October 19, 2015
Once again the Jews assert their position as the chosen ones of God, as only their alleged genocide cannot be questioned.
Even while there exists no physical evidence whatsoever that even a single Jew was ever gassed in Hitler’s Germany, and there are most assuredly mass graves from the Armenian genocide.
Reality doesn’t matter though. What matters is protecting Jews. That’s what the word “democracy” means.
The European Court of Human Rights ruled on Thursday that a Turkish politician should not have been prosecuted for denying that the mass killing of Armenians by Ottoman Turkey in 1915 was a genocide.
In a landmark free speech ruling, the ECHR judges ruled by 10 votes to seven that Dogu Perincek, chairman of Turkey’s Patriotic Party, should never have been convicted of racial discrimination by a Swiss court for saying that the “Armenian genocide is a great international lie”.
The ECHR ruled Perincek’s 2007 conviction and fining over the remark was an infringement on his right to free speech.
In its judgement, the court said Perincek’s statements related to an issue of “public interest and did not amount to a call for hatred or intolerance… and could not be regarded as affecting the dignity of the members of the Armenian community to the point of requiring a criminal law response”.
The court made a clear distinction with Holocaust denial, whose specific history meant it could always be “seen as a form of incitement to racial hatred” in certain countries.
Its judges had earlier that the historical facts of the Holocaust,“such as the existence of gas chambers” were “considered clearly established by an international jurisdiction”.
Yeah okay. Where’s the evidence? No autopsy of a gassed Jew, no documented orders of Jews to be gassed, no physical evidence of a homicidal gas chamber having existed at any of the camps, no mass graves of gassed Jews – zero evidence, at all.
But the Armenian genocide definitely happened. Mass graves existed, and have been dug up, and they were all murdered – they didn’t die of disease and starvation like the Jews in the camps (who the Nazis did their best to keep alive after the allies bombed the supply lines).
The Collapse of the Hoax
It is extremely important we crush this idiot Jew hoax. We must push the issue every chance we get.
It is 100% fact that there is no physical evidence of anyone getting gassed. The entire Holocaust fable is based on massively conflicting “eye-witness testimony” from lying Jews.
I tell everyone that when you debate this topic on the internet, do not over complicate it. The believers are the one making the outrageous claim of six million gassed Jews magically disappearing, so the burden of proof is on them.
Whenever anyone confirms the Holocaust, just ask them for physical evidence that it happened. Say you want a link to some for of recorded documentation based on something other than eye-witness testimony. They will, inevitably, post pictures of starved bodies being bulldozed by the allies.
Point out that people starving to death has no relationship to the alleged existence of gas chambers. Then watch them squirm.
Repeat, repeat, repeat. Flood the tubes with Holo denialism, make sure everyone is exposed to it. Our numbers are growing, rapidly. Once the hoax collapses, we’ve got a straight shot to stopping these kikes.
Holocaust Blackmail Over Second and Third Generation Trauma
Lasha Darkmoon – October 31, 2015
It all boils down to this: Jews are demanding never-ending financial reparations from Germany for inherited “Holocaust trauma”. How much longer will Germany be a cash cow for the Jews? Will the remote descendants of today’s “Holocaust survivors” still be demanding money from Germany 100 years from now? How much longer is this racket going to go on?
“Jewish activists in Scotland,” the Guardian reports, “have started a campaign to support the grandchildren of Holocaust survivors across the world, saying the trauma of the extermination camps continues to haunt the descendants of those who suffered there.”
Dan Glass, 29, from London, said he heard constant tales of the Holocaust as he grew up, which have deeply affected him into adulthood:
“All four of my grandparents narrowly avoided the gas chambers in Auschwitz and countless of their friends met with this fate. For my father it was a daily conversation in my teens and early 20s and even though I very profoundly understood his pain, one day I had to say to him, ‘Dad, I can’t talk about this anymore.’ My father had a whole wall of books on the subject of the Holocaust – it was all he wanted to talk about, but it was so harrowing for me.”
Let’s scrutinize Mr Glass’s first point and see if it makes any sense. Note his claim that all four of his grandparents “narrowly avoided the gas chambers.” Let’s give Mr Glass the benefit of the doubt. Let’s not ask him any embarrassing questions, such as: (1) “Can you show me a single authentic gas chamber anywhere in the world?” Or (2): “Can you explain how the Pyramids, built more than 2000 years before the birth of Christ, are still standing as proof that they were once built, whereas there is not a single authentic Holocaust gas chamber in existence today as proof that gas chambers ever existed?” Or (3): “Are you aware that the gas chamber at Auschwitz, which you claim your grandparents narrowly escaped, is a fake copy built after the war?”
We will spare Mr Glass these acutely embarrassing questions.
Instead, we will concentrate on another important point which appears to have escaped Mr Glass’s attention completely. It is not clear how Mr Glass can claim to have been traumatized by an event that ALMOST occurred to his four grandparents over 70 years ago. He needs to explain this, just as you and I would need to explain how we had been traumatized by an automobile accident that never took place in which our grandparents were ALMOST killed by a car as they were crossing the road.
If you happen to be a young woman anxious to make a bit of easy money, I don’t think you would have a leg to stand on if you were to claim that you were seriously traumatized by reading your grandmother’s diary in which she writes: “I was almost raped at a party in 1943.” Even if your granny had been actually raped, you wouldn’t stand a chance of receiving a penny in compensation for this historical tragedy. So what chance do you have of cashing in on your granny’s troubles if all you can claim is that the was ALMOST raped?
Not much, in my honest opinion.
Still, Mr Glass has that quality we call “chutzpah”, and he is hoping that Germany will buy his story and award him a handsome allowance for life on the strength of his grandparents’ alleged near-death experiences over 70 years ago.
Don Glass, a British Jew—pictured here—began interviewing the children and grandchildren of other Holocaust survivors, initially for an academic thesis. He began with the hypothesis that the world was swarming with people just like himself, all traumatized by events that almost took place to remote ancestors 70 years ago. Sure enough, his suspicions were confirmed. Almost every Jew he spoke to claimed to be pretty traumatized, and none of them were at all averse to receiving financial compensation from Germany for their dreadful sufferings. He soon realized, theGuardian tells us, that “he was not alone in being scarred by the traumatic pasts of his relatives.”
“I have been privileged to hear so many stories from young people who should now be able to live with joy – but their lives are damaged and they weren’t even there,” Glass points out gloomily.
Glass adds that other grandchildren of survivors have experienced clinical depression, anxiety, addiction and eating disorders, which they blame on the impact of their families constantly retelling stories of the horrific events their relatives endured.
A young woman from London told Glass of how her grandmother, who was in the Dutch resistance, avoided starvation at times by digging up flower bulbs and sucking out the nutrients. The woman later developed anorexia and believes it was related to the war stories that had been passed down the line and never processed.
According to all these accounts, gathered almost exclusively by Jews claiming to be traumatized and transmitted to the Guardian newspaper:
“Trauma research about the impact of the Holocaust on subsequent generations varies; some studies conclude there is no effect of trauma two generations on, while others claim that breast milk of survivors was affected by stress hormones that impacted on the physiology of the next generation.”
‘Our babies are being poisoned by our breast milk because of stress hormones due to the Holocaust! We demand compensation from Germany for inherited trauma!’
How strange. Their babies are being poisoned by their breast milk. The obvious solution to that problem is to give up breastfeeding, right? But no, they refuse to do that, apparently determined to transmit stress hormones to their children in perpetuity. It really does defy comprehension.
Jewish (and non-Jewish?) workers in the field of epigenetics are now claiming that “the intergenerational effects of the Holocaust are very pronounced and that the atrocities altered the DNA of victims’ descendants, so that they have different stress hormone profiles to their peers.”
Psychologist Ruth Barnett, whose Jewish father fled Germany for Shanghai, narrowly escaping the Holocaust, says she has witnessed inherited trauma in some of her clients. “Constantly talking about events like the gas chambers to grandchildren is a way that traumatised people try to get rid of it – by sicking it up. But unless it is processed properly, they make even more anxiety for themselves and other generations.”
Mr Glass adds grimly:
“We should be releasing these old wounds to something beautiful rather than staying paralysed in memory and fear. Until then we cannot properly celebrate their lives or any kind of victory.”
“What would our grandparents have felt,” Don Glass added, “if they had known we have had to carry their torment through generations? Wouldn’t they have wanted us to find the peace that was robbed from them? Wouldn’t they want us whole and living lives that they lost? I realised that if they could speak to us beyond the grave many would have agreed the mourning has to stop and be replaced with something more constructive.” (See here)
Let’s cut to the chase. It all boils down to this: Jews are demanding never-ending financial reparations from Germany for inherited “Holocaust trauma”. How much longer will Germany be a cash cow for the Jews? Will the remote descendants of today’s “Holocaust survivors” still be demanding money from Germany 100 years from now? How much longer is this racket going to go on?
Here is Holocaust revisionist scholar Carlos W. Porter :
“We call it the ‘Hoaxoco$t’ because it is a hoax, and it costs plenty. In addition to the jillions of dollars already paid out, directly or indirectly, in cash, goods, and services to Hoaxoco$t “survivors” and the racketeer state of Israel—with new, improved Hoaxoco$t survivor rip-offs, shake-downs, protection rackets, extortion rackets, blackmail schemes, and related swindles being invented and refined almost every week—one would need a computer to calculate the number of unprovoked air strikes, invasions, bombings, burnings, sinkings, shellings, confiscations, expulsions, tortures, book-burnings, beatings, arrests and detentions, both with and without trial, all caused by the insane delusion that we are fighting Hitler every five seconds, in the need to prevent yet another Hoaxoco$t from occurring for the umpteenth time.”
Needless to say, Carlos Porter could end up in prison for saying this; or, if things get any worse, he could one day face a firing squad for daring to speak out in this candid way against Holocaust blackmail.
Fluent in German, French, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese, the erudite Porter renounced his American citizenship in 1984 and relocated to Belgium with his wife and children. There he was to write “Not Guilty at Nuremberg.” (See also here). This should be required reading for anyone interested in Holocaust studies. Porter demonstrates with meticulous scholarship in this book that most of the American interrogators at Nuremberg had been Jews, and that they had extracted forced confessions from their German prisoners of war by the most horrendous tortures, including the crushing of their testicles. (See my notes on this topic in Torture and Testicle Crushing at Nuremberg).
In a private email to me (July 28, 2015 at 9:55 pm), Porter confirmed that much of the evidence for the alleged genocide of 6 million Jews at the hands of the Third Reich had been gathered by torture and that the torturers were mostly Jewish:
“You can be absolutely CERTAIN,” Carlos Porter said, “that nearly ALL the interrogators and interpreters in ALL the trials were Jewish, because the Americans stamped out the German language from all American schools during WWI, so German Jewish refugees were almost the only competent people they had. Of course, other “German-Americans” could not be trusted not to be “Nazis”, so they were stuck with the German Jews.
That there was a great deal of mistreatment and torture in the minor trials is absolutely certain. I reproduced a couple of accounts of torture at the Dachau trials in “War Crimes Trials and Other Essays”. But I’m sure it’s only the tip of the iceberg. Minor personnel could be tortured with impunity, and 99% of them would be afraid even to mention it. It would be hard to get away with torturing somebody like Goering though.
There’s a lot of literature on the subject, more all the time. The Brits appear to have been surprisingly enthusiastic torturers, whether Jewish or not.”
Porter is not alone in his claim that Jews featured prominently in the ranks of the torturers in post-war Germany. On Sept. 25, 1945, Thomas Dodd, who was the second in command on the American prosecution team at Nuremberg, made the following observation in which he claimed that three out of four interrogators at Nuremberg were Jewish:
“You know how I have despised anti-Semitism,” he said. “You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge, you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish.”
The Presiding Judge at Nuremberg was also, coincidently, a Jew. His name was A.H. Rosenfeld and he was a colonel in the American army. Col. Rosenfeld cheerfully admitted to torturing German prisoners of war as a matter of policy. “We couldn’t have made those birds talk otherwise,” he remarked cynically. “It was a trick, and it worked like a charm.”
According to American Judge Edward L. Van Roden, testifying in American Atrocities in Germany, out of 139 cases of alleged German “war criminals” investigated by his commission for war crimes, ”137 of these Germans were tortured by having their testicles crushed.”
In a recent private email to me, in response to some of my queries about torture at Nuremberg, Thomas Goodrich, acclaimed author of Hellstorm : The Death of Nazi Germany (1944-1947), mentioned the names of four well-known Jews in the American zone whom he identified as torturer-inquisitors: Harry Thon, William Perl, AH Rosenfeld, and Shlomo Morel.
This last-named individual, Shlomo Morel, was a particularly nasty piece of work whom Goodrich describes as follows:
“a vicious monster who drowned men and women in outdoor latrines, who made them eat excrement, who personally beat captives to death, and who forced women to kiss and make love with disinterred corpses.”
The next time you are inclined to shed tears for contemporary Holocaust survivors allegedly traumatized by drinking the poisoned breast milk of their Jewish mothers, spare a tear for the German prisoners of war who were drowned in outdoor latrines and forced to have sex with dug-up corpses.
Jew Mad? Times of Israel Complains About American Neo-Nazis Supporting Bibi’s Pro-Hitler Stance
October 25, 2015
Recently, Bibi Netanyahu came out and endorse Holocaust revisionism, claiming that Hitler had no plan to kill Jews, and that Arabs directed him to do so. Granted, he still claims that the hoax is real, but this is revisionism nonetheless, as he blames the Grand Mufti, which is not the position of any mainstream holo-historian.
Actually, I have no idea where he is claiming to have gotten this theory from. He did not cite a source regarding his claim that the Mufti was the puppeteer of Hitler. I think he just made it up. But this was not off the cuff, it was in a written speech he delivered to a major Zionist group.
Here on DS, I noted that the idea of Hitler being a puppet of Moslems is goofy and dumb, Bibi was correct in his statement that Hitler had no plan to kill Jews, and did cite sources, including the Transfer Agreement and the Madagascar Plan.
The Times of Israel got mad:
An American neo-Nazi website has backed comments made by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu earlier this week that Adolf Hitler had never planned to systematically murder the Jews of Europe until it was suggested by the leading Muslim cleric in Jerusalem, open Nazi sympathizer Grand Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini.
“Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time. He wanted to expel the Jews,” Netanyahu told the World Zionist Congress on Tuesday. “And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said: ‘If you expel them, they’ll all come here.’ ‘So what should I do with them?’ he asked. He said: ‘Burn them.’”
Netanyahu was trying to illustrate his claim that Palestinian incitement goes back decades, and is not related to any Israeli policies.
But in doing so, the prime minister won the support of neo-Nazis.
“His [Netanyahu’s] statement is completely factual. Hitler never had any plan to exterminate Jews,” writes Andrew Anglin in an article on The Daily Stormer website entitled Netanyahu Comes Out in Defense of Hitler. “He lobbied continually before and during the war to have them shipped out peacefully, giving them fair payment for their properties and so on.”
This is “historical fact,” says Anglin, adding that Hitler “helped Jews get to Palestine.”
They don’t bother to link my article or mention my reasons for claiming this is “historical fact.” Unless they are denying that the Transfer Agreement and Madagascar Plan existed, they would also have to admit that it is a fact Hitler spent a great deal of energy trying to deport Jews, and was even supported by Zionist organizations – even after the war started.
Is The Times of Israel denying this? Why is “historical fact” in quotes?
Jews Cry 6 Million Tears Over Anne Frank Bobblehead Figure
August 23, 2014
A company that makes Bobblehead figures of different historical figures has now caught the wrath of Jews because of a “Holocaust Anne Frank Bobblehead” that is currently being sold on Amazon.
Anne Frank is a figure that Jews have used to help promote their ridiculous Holohoax. She is said to have died during World War II leaving behind a diary that many historians believe was forged either by her father Otto Frank or novelist Meyer Levin. Despite its questionable authenticity, the Jews have used it along with Elie Weisel’s Night as two of their most prominent pieces of Holohoax propaganda.
So with this said, it is comical that the Jews are so outraged over an Anne Frank Bobblehead figure. There didn’t appear to be any malicious intent by the manufacturers as it seems clear that they fully accept the official version of their ridiculous Holohoax.
The Jews did say that they would be troubled if somebody made an Adolf Hitler Bobblehead figure, so perhaps that’s something someone should create and sell. Just think how many tears Jews would shed if somebody did that.
For some, the young Jewish martyr Anne Frank personifies the Holocaust.
For others, she is a plastic toy that bobs along on your dashboard.
Recently, I bought an Edgar Allan Poe bobblehead at The News Journal’s charity sale. Smitten, I began searching the Internet for other literary figures to amass a collection.
So, I was a bit shocked to discover a “Holocaust Anne Frank Bobblehead” being sold on Amazon.com for $19.95.
Four reviewers wrote in, appalled.
“This is the most degrading thing I’ve ever seen,” one wrote. “What is wrong with people?” said another.
So far, the doll has not garnered national attention
Wendy Berger, the Jewish Federation of Delaware’s development director, said she had neither seen nor heard of the doll before The News Journal sent her a product link.
The Federation issued the following statement:
“The Jewish Federation of Delaware finds it disturbing and in poor taste that any company would produce a product that appears to make light of any historical tragedy.”
Berger declined further comment.
It’s unclear how long the doll has been on the market, since the Seattle, WA company that produces it, Off the Wall Toys, did not respond to a request for comment.
The company, known for producing funny toys and gag gifts, also sells bobbleheads that resemble former Pres. George W. Bush, Pres. Barack Obama, Elvis, Mother Teresa, Helen Keller, Moses and former North Korean dictator Kim II-sung. Other Amazon sellers market bobbleheads of Jesus and Pope Francis.
Which begs the question: Should certain historical figures be considered off-limits for kitschy toys?
The national Anti-Defamation League weighed in.
Deborah Lauter, the ADL’s director of civil rights, said she had never seen the toy before.
“When I heard about it, it just seemed crass and insensitive,” she said.
But then she took a closer look. The manufacturer’s description notes Anne Frank as a “beloved victim of the Holocaust.”
“The way they promoted it, there appears to be no malicious intent,” Lauter concluded. “I could see it resonating as a heroine figure for young people.”
“We would obviously be troubled by a bobblehead of Hitler being sold,” she added.