“Demographic theory, and numerous simulations, have already shown that immigration cannot compensate for population ageing except with flows so large as to hugely increase population growth and rapidly replace the existing population with a foreign one—‘replacement migration’ indeed.” David Coleman, Professor of Demography, University of Oxford
The white population worldwide is experiencing massive demographic collapse, a fact perfectly comprehended—and applauded—by its enemies, who call Aryans “the cancer of human history” and promote genocide as morally “good.” (They have a long habit ofcalling evil good and good evil, of putting darkness for light and light for darkness.) Genocide directed at whites is now de facto public policy.
It is implemented by numerous methods, including genetic swamping via Third World immigration, curtailment of white births, and the imposition of dictatorial laws suppressing protective reactions (including free speech and political parties) against physical annihilation. Fundamentally, “replacement migration” is the inviting idea—inviting to our overlords—of substituting non-white immigrants for “missing” white babies never born due to culturally-induced low fertility.
With the abrupt onset of sub-replacement fertility in the (then still-white) West after 1970, falling to levels way below any historically experienced or thought feasible, a major problem with the final stage (three) of the prevailing demographic transition model became apparent. (For a discussion and critique of the model see Andrew Hamilton, “Holes in the Demographic Transition Model?”)
That theory had predicted stable replacement fertility (just over 2 children on average) for European peoples, zero population growth, and life expectancies higher than 70 years of age. Household, marriage, and child-bearing patterns would continue to be typified by heterosexual couples in stable, long-term marriages with children.
Today, however, sub-replacement fertility is regarded as a permanent (structural, long-term) feature of white populations. A multitude of living arrangements has replaced matrimony, marriage has been decoupled from procreation, and white children are often viewed as undesirable.
Like many of their colleagues, two Dutch-speaking demographers, Ron Lesthaeghe and Dirk van de Kaa, see white sub-replacement fertility as causing a “demographic need” for “sustained immigration,” a “compensatory trend” that will fuel the growth of multiracial societies far into the future. Lesthaeghe explicitly refers to this as “replacement migration,” though van de Kaa avoids the term.
Should this pattern persist within the existing dictatorial, anti-white, multiracial environment, whites will cease to be a major race in the not too distant future.
The UN’s Replacement Migration Report
Thirteen years ago the United Nations published a report, Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations? (United Nations Population Division, 2001). “As part of its regular work programme, the United Nations Population Division continuously monitors fertility, mortality and migration trends for all countries of the world,” said the report, which was overseen and possibly written by then-UN Population Division director Joseph Chamie. (p. 7)
Judging from the report and other things he’s written, Chamie appears to favor large-scale immigration and amnesty in the West, although he carefully camouflages his views by the ample use of Communist-style bureaucratese.
In 2000 he condescendingly noted that Jean-Marie Le Pen’s National Front party in France viewed his report “as a recipe for cultural genocide.” Unsurprisingly, in an enumeration of arguments against amnesty in a different paper (counterbalanced with a long list of pro-amnesty arguments), he makes no mention of the most important one of all: the survival of a people and civilization.
In light of the circumstances, it is of interest whether Chamie is a Jew. His photos do not rule it out. He maintains that emigration is a universal human right, but immigrationis not, and therefore up to the receiving country to determine. (Reminds me of a politician I once knew.) He has written articles about Israeli population issues. Despite his mealy-mouthed style, they seem essentially pro-Jewish: the Palestinian refugees of 1948 have no right of return to their homeland; the United States or NATO must provide both Israelis and Palestinians with security guarantees (why, for Christ’s sake?). There is, of course, the cosmopolitan profile. And the kind of influence he wields over the life and death of our people suggests Jewishness as well. Lastly, because Google conceals Jewish identity in searches (except for flaming Jews), I’llassume Chamie is Jewish until I definitively know otherwise.
The report analyzed eight countries and two regions, all relatively large, which had below replacement fertility in 2000: France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the US, Europe, and the European Union. Though not mentioned, the baseline figures included large numbers of non-whites due to many years of high fertility Third World immigration and extensive hybridization between whites and non-whites.
The time period covered is roughly half a century, from 1995 to 2050. Omitted from the report are Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, whose trends, however, were the same.
“Replacement migration” means “the international migration that would be needed to offset declines in the size of population, the declines in the population of working age, as well as to offset the overall ageing of a population.” (Executive Summary, p. 1)
Keep in mind that whenever you read statements such as the following, anywhere, in any source, hybrid fertility (race mixture) and the much higher fertility of endlessly arriving non-whites and their descendants are included in the raw numbers, meaning that white fertility must be incomprehensibly low: “Fertility is presently at record low levels in many countries where total fertility rates (TFR) as low as 1.2 children per woman have been recorded in recent years—well below the level of 2.1 children per woman that would ensure the replacement of the parents’ generation.” (Overview of the Issues, p. 8)
The report distinguishes three distinct “migration streams,” each with rising numbers, necessary to offset:
- total population decline
- working-age population decline
- prevent countries from ageing
The size of migration flows needed to maintain a support ratio of working to retired age groups (the third option, “prevent countries from aging”) would require immigration levels so high that the percent of the population by 2050 traceable to post-1995 immigrants and their descendants would range between 59% and 99% of the total. (Chapter 5: Conclusions and Implications, p. 98)
“Such high levels of migration,” the study continues, “have not been observed in the past for any of these countries or regions.” It seems “extremely unlikely” that flows of such magnitude will happen “in the foreseeable future.” (p. 98) Unhappily, we’ve been subjected to thirteen additional years of unchecked, ever-accelerating immigration since those words were written.
The report uses 1995 as the baseline, a period when Western nations already had historically unprecedented numbers of non-whites within their borders. As the report itself states, “For example, in 1990 [emphasis added], 16 per cent of the population of Canada and Switzerland and 23 per cent of the population of Australia were foreign-born” (p. 98; yes, that’s what it says). Therefore, the numbers, no matter how you slice them, seem radically different from whites “merely” falling below 50 percent of the population by 2050, as the media and government ordinarily state.
Absent very high migration, projected declines in some nations during the first half of the 21st century will be “as high as one quarter or one third of the entire population of the country.” (p. 97)
The report grumbles particularly about supporting people aged 65 and older (i.e., predominantly whites). One option would be to require them to work until age 75. By that time, of course, many would have conveniently dropped dead slaving for their Jewish and plutocratic overlords and brown, black, and yellow “replacements.” Also appealing is a substantial reduction in retirement and health-care benefits for the elderly (pp. 97, 98, 99).
During the second half of the twentieth century, the industrialized countries have benefited from population sizes and population age-structures that were the result of a history of moderate levels of fertility and low mortality. These favourable demographic circumstances made possible, to a large extent, the provision of relatively generous benefits to retirees at comparatively low costs to workers and employers. (p. 98)
But those days are over.
The gist of the report may be summarized as follows (Executive Summary, pp. 3, 5):
During the first half of the 21st century, the populations of most developed countries are projected to become smaller and older as a result of below-replacement fertility and increased longevity.
In the absence of migration, the declines in population size will be even greater than those projected, and population aging will be more rapid.
Although fertility (the fertility of racially mixed populations) may rebound in the coming decades, few believe that fertility in most developed countries will recover sufficiently to reach replacement level in the foreseeable future, thus making population decline inevitable in the absence of replacement migration.
Radical reassessments of, and sweeping changes to, economic, social and political programs and policies will be made.
It is odd that the Republican Party, viewed as America’s de facto white party, is pioneering proposed cuts to Medicare, Social Security, farm subsidies, and other programs aimed (by now, accidentally) at its core constituency while simultaneously promoting amnesty and huge welfare programs like Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney’s Romneycare, the prototype for Obamacare, which vastly expanded Medicaid expenditures for young non-whites, including illegals. Such Republican initiatives amount to massive racial wealth transfers favored by Democrats, whose anti-white racism is overt. Why not let them do the dirty work? But no.
Because it is such a spectacularly bad idea, replacement migration has had one or two critics.
University of Oxford demographer David Coleman called the UN report an exercise in “demographism,” which he defined, in the words of the Population Reference Bureau, “as an excessive reliance on narrow demographic statistics relating to the numbers of people, without regard to their characteristics and without regard to the consequences of such population change on social and political structures, community relations, or social cohesion.”
Will the ageing populations of the Western world need even more immigrants to avert imminent population decline and to support the unsustainable burden of the elderly? Or is migration on that scale just a simple-minded short-term solution which ignores domestic demographic reserves and which would rapidly transform, in unwelcome ways, the receiving countries into a radically different kind of society. . . ?
Europe already receives many more immigrants than it knows what to do with (up to 1 million a year net for much of the 1990s). Regular labour migration is managed by work permit and by free movement in the EU [European Union]. But most migration is unrelated to economic needs: asylum claimants, spouses and dependents. European public opinion does not on the whole welcome large-scale migration. Europeans think they know who they are and unlike (say) Australians, do not want to become something different. Post-war immigration has already turned large sections of European cities into foreign enclaves. About 10% of Continental Europe’s workforce is out of a job. Europe’s immigrants (especially women) are already less likely than natives to be in the workforce and are much more likely to be unemployed. Compared with its industrial competitors, the EU makes poor use of its own demographic resources. If people of working age throughout the EU had the same work patterns as Denmark, then over 30 million people would be added to the EU workforce.
In 2002 Frank Salter, an Australian researcher in Human Ethology at the Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Physiology in Germany, likewise addressed the question of replacement migration, though not directly in response to the UN report. (In a footnote he mentioned a special issue of Population and Environment [March 2001] devoted to replacement migration, in which many articles did discuss the UN findings.)
Instead of replacement migration, Salter advocates “universal nationalism,” essentially the same concept articulated in different ways by Greg Johnson, and Richard McCulloch in his book The Racial Compact (1994) (physical version here). In Salter’s words:
Universal nationalism means thinking again about ethnic states where the state unambiguously serves the ethnic interests of the majority. By ethnic state I mean something closer to the traditional German than the French model of the nation. The German model adopts ethnicity as shared descent as a criterion of citizenship and thus offers a constitutional barrier to replacement migration. In the second half of the twentieth century this barrier collapsed in wealthy states that adopted the French model. (“Estimating Ethnic Genetic Interests: Is It Adaptive to Resist Replacement Migration?” Population and Environment 24 (November 2002): 111-140 at 134)
Salter sardonically observes that “From the majority perspective, it would seem that the only thing more maladaptive than multiculturalism that does not ‘work’ is multiculturalism that does ‘work.’” (p. 133)
To Hell With This
It was consciously decided by elites in direct opposition to the will of the people as expressed by popular vote and in extensive surveys over many decades that collapsing populations in formerly white nations were to be supplemented, and ultimately replaced, by Third World migrants. There was nothing inevitable about this process, as the examples of Israel and Japan, not to mention common sense, prove.
Indeed, Jewish populations everywhere are permitted to retain their own segregated laws, institutions, and communities free of ubiquitous charges of racism or legal prohibitions against discrimination. This includes not only dual/multiple citizenship, Jewish courts, autonomous institutions of self-government (federations, congresses, committees), tax exempt racist organizations such as the ADL, SPLC, and AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), but even domestic terrorist groups (JDL, JDO, JTF) and community vigilante organizations resembling police forces. To the extent that Jews integrate with other races (including, unfortunately, whites), they do so at their own volition, not because they are compelled to by the state.
As an aside, an enigmatic statement in a brief paper by Charles B. Keely, Professor of International Migration at the Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University in Washington, DC, is attention-grabbing, though not further explained:
[T]here was good evidence, since strengthened, that Soviet authorities [in the mid-20th century] were facilitating movement of asylum seekers into Europe to discomfort the West in return for the West’s attempts to embarrass the East by its open asylum policy for those from Communist countries.
The effect of these Cold War policies was an attempt in the mid 1980s for European countries to change asylum practice. This set up political controversy within European democracies about whether narrowing asylum practice to adhere only to what was required by international conventions was acceptable. Opponents charged that a fortress Europe was evolving based on racist motives toward Third World asylum seekers. (p. 3)
Whether Keely is referring to Communist Jews, Third World colored immigrants, or both, is unclear. Although tens of thousands of Jews were permitted to leave the Soviet bloc without hindrance, Aryans were never free to leave en masse.
Replacement migration blandly treats all races as fungible. The only thing that matters is age of the migrants: they should be young and highly fertile. Even education, language, and basic skills, never mind IQ, do not matter.
Mass immigration was not a policy response to white fertility decline. Immigration throughout the West was imposed before white fertility dropped below replacement level. Replacement migration as an excuse for countering white population collapse surfaced only decades later.
At the middle of the twentieth century—when Europe and North America were still white—the average fertility level stood at 2.6 children per woman in Europe and 2.4 children for the countries of the European Union. For the countries in the UN study, the range was from 2.2 children per woman in Germany and the United Kingdom to 2.7 children in France. Fertility was markedly higher in the US at 3.4 children. By 1965-1970 (nations still white), fertility had increased a little on average for the countries of the European Union, to 2.5 children per woman, but fallen below replacement in Japan and the Russian Federation at 2.0 children. Fertility had decreased to 2.5 children in the United States (still above replacement). By 1995-2000, however, fertility was below replacement level in all countries and regions analyzed by the UN, ranging from a high of 2.0 children in the United States to 1.2 children in Italy. The average for Europe and the European Union was 1.4 children per woman. But by that time high fertility non-whites were a major factor, demonstrating how suddenly and precipitously white fertility, which is lower than the racially mixed averages, collapsed. (Data from UN,Replacement Migration, Chapter 4, “Results: Overview,” p. 21)
The new migration undoubtedly accelerated white numerical decline through genetic swamping, hybridization, immense compulsory interracial wealth transfers, the movement of white women en masse from the home into the labor force, racially discriminatory laws, and job displacement—not excluding lucrative, powerful, and socially elite positions.
While white immigration is everywhere flagrantly blocked in discriminatory ways, Jewish and non-white migration has consistently been pushed far beyond legal limits—even as laws were continuously expanded to promote higher and higher levels of non-white entrants from the most backward regions of the globe.
“The whole of Europe now became an area of destination for would-be immigrants from other parts of the world. . . . seeking entry by whatever means feasible,” Dutch demographer Dirk van de Kaa wrote.
Open borders for non-whites were achieved by ceaselessly ratcheting up “legal” immigration quotas, governments’ refusal to enforce existing laws, public subsidies to illegal residents, admitting “guest” and “migrant” workers who never left, providing an open door for anyone born in former colonies long since independent, using restricted categories such as “displaced persons,” “refugees,” and “asylum seekers” as de factoopen portals, and chain migration (“family reunification”), a technique by which everyone who arrives is allowed to invite family members as new residents, who in turn invite more family members, and so on in an endless sequence. To top it off, every successive wave of illegal arrivals, numbering in the millions, is ultimately granted “amnesty” (citizenship).
Projections are merely projections. The UN’sReplacement Migration report is important primarily for what it tells us about the anti-white, illiberal elites who promulgate and selectively enforce our racial laws. The report should be viewed in conjunction with “street-level” awareness of political, media, academic, and governmental hatred and rage against whites, a burning desire to eliminate us physically, as a people, through government and cultural fiat. This attitude, this fixation, this anti-white fury is far more important than any specific, dry projections contained in a globalist policy report promoting the genocidal agenda.
As the Left-wing Guardian (UK) newspaper sneers: “They cry free speech, as if that principle overrode issues of human rights [sic] and morality [sic]. . . . [M]any of us believe that immigration controls are inherently racist, and explicable only by racism.”
Replacement migration, in one form another, is happening now. It is enforced by states everywhere. How about this instead? Stop immigration, and start deportation.
*UN Replacement Migration Program:*
2013 – 043 The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan – The Genocide Of The People Of Europe and Agenda 21
2013 – 043 The EU Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan – The Genocide Of The People Of Europe, Agenda 21 and the EU Charlemagne Prize
Exterminate white people youtu.be/h-NWOSOi1O4
see also 2012 – 021 The Toxic Origins of the EU
If you think this post important please forward on to all your email contacts. It is the driving force for mass migration into the UK and the manifestation of Cultural Marxism. (2015 – 028 We are controlled by Cultural Marxists, What is that all about?) and to eliminate the White tribes.
“To achieve One World Government it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, their loyalty to family traditions and national identification.” Brock Chisholm, when director of the UN World Health Organization.
Perhaps this is also necessary to achieve the EU Project in the UK.
These are the words of the EU and UN.
When Tony Blair made the UK ‘open borders’ he did it for two reasons. The first because it was an EU requirement and he had to do it. Secondly because he calculated that the vast majority of the immigrants would vote Labour and outvote the indigenous British.
It essentially a stepping stone towards the UN Wildlands project 2014 – 014 The Wildlands Project to control all humans and Agenda 21. it is the ultimate in Politrickery.
Two of the most important things that a Human Being requires is sufficient land (that contains all the resources for you and your family to survive) and to know their ancestry. This an EU plan is to destroy your ancestry, family loyalty , nationality and Englishness. It is part of the plan to dumb down the open education of the young and only teach ‘revised’ and politically approved material.
As Mandelson said ‘The democratic experiment in Europe has failed. We must now move on to the post democratic society’
This article is a translation of an Italian article, originally posted on Identità. Also http://blog.balder.org/?p=404
The aim of this plan is to destroy the White Tribes of Europe by what they call ‘ethnic dilution’. Is this a conspiracy theory? It reads like a James Bond film. If you think so then you must explain why Merkel and Van Rompuy have both been awarded the EU Charlemagne prize for their efforts in moving the Coudenhove Kalergi plan forward.
Richard Coudenhove Kalergi was the first recipient in 1950 for his Pan European Plan for the elimination of the White Tribes of Europe.
For a list of the rest of recipients others scroll down
“The very essence of Cultural Marxism is the support of mass immigration / open borders.”
“The end goal of Cultural Marxists is white genocide.”
“Political correctness is Cultural Marxism.” see 2015 – 028
“Cultural Marxists have taken over the institutions of the media, education, mainstream Christianity (conservative and liberal), law, and finance often via Common Purpose 2015 – 013 The Rotherham Common Purpose Effect. Their goal is the annihilation of Western Civilization in general and white people in particular.”
It is a plan to re-establish a world society of Lords and serfs.
It would have been polite, surely, to ask the White Tribes of Europe whether or not they wanted to be eliminated.
Whether this plan is good or bad is not the point. In a free society you should be free to marry whoever you wish (with their agreement of course). This plan, however, is being engineered, orchestrated and implemented by a faceless, unaccountable, arrogant, self centered political elite without consulting the public are even telling them. It gives the Plan a very sinister edge indeed. eg Tony Blair’s opening of the UK borders to all and sundry without it being discussed openly in parliament. However it is being used by the EU to what they call the ethnic dilution the British people and culture and that of the other European nations. Their ultimate aim is for the EU to be governed by an obscenely wealthy elite, run by a pampered bureaucracy. The rest of us to be molded into a amalgamated serf-like herd of cattle to be told what we can do, when we can do it, how we can do it and where we can do it.
This Plan is being implemented in the UK by giving migrants preferential treatment in houses and jobs over native Brits.
You probably couldn’t get more racist than that.
There is also the nightmarish possibility that if the great majority of people wish to marry their own kind then the mind set of the New World Order elite may decide that they have to have complete control of who you can marry??? to achieve their goal. Quite possible.
As Cassius Clay said ‘pigeons don’t fly with sparrows’.
This should, of course, be headlines in the British media and BBC. The fact it is not says that either the media is unaware of it, which seriously reflects on their competence, or deliberate choice not to publish.
The CK Plan is the reason behind migrants being given homes and jobs in the public sector ahead of native Brits.
However for the UK the sudden influx of 4 million uninvited immigrants (by the public) has overwhelmed British society with demands for housing, schools, the Health Service, water supply, city transport etc. Facilities that were carefully set up over many years for 55 million and at breaking point with 4 million extra. British society is being reduced to a shambles – much to the amusement of many in the European Commission.
‘Too many White Christian faces in Britain’ says David Cameron: http://youtu.be/mHqRtLeI_pE (for some reason you will have to copy into Word then control click) via @youtube Too many white Christian faces! That may be his opinion but in a democratic society it should be put openly to the citizens and not be implemented covertly.
Cameron has also said that he wants to see far more Muslims in positions of authority and eventually a Muslim Prime Minister
The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan – The Genocide Of The People Of Europe
The sounds like the plot of a James Bond movie. However every year the EU awards ‘The EU Coudenhove Kalergi Prize also known as the Charlemagne Prize’. This prize is for work to destroy the different tribes and nationalities of Europe (and eventually the world) and integrate independent peoples (Plebs only) into a common, undifferentiated homogeneous people. Their aim is for a serf like common people dominated by an obscenely wealthy self electing elite. The CK plan is not just to ‘dilute’ the White Races but the Black and Brown as well. (Not dissimilar from the Roman Empire)
The fact that this is no made up story is confirmed by Vaira Vike-Freberg in 2006, Merkel being awarded the EU Coudenhove Kalergi prize in 2010 and Van Rumpoy in 2012 for their efforts to ensure the mass migration of European people – particularly into the UK. scroll down for full list (There is within the EU hierarchy an element that wishes the UK and particularly the English serious harm)
Posted on October 27, 2013 by cigpapers
Mass immigration is a phenomenon, the causes of which are still cleverly concealed by the system, and the multicultural propaganda is trying to falsely portray it as inevitable. With this article we intend to prove once and for all, that this is not a spontaneous phenomenon. What they want to present as an inevitable outcome of modern life, is actually a plan conceived around a table and prepared for decades, to completely destroy the face of the continent.
You may think that Blair’s opening the UK borders to mass immigration without openly putting it before parliament was an act of Treason against the British citizens. Not so – he took care to remove the Treason Act by repealing it hidden in the 1998 Crime & Disorder Act. It was mentioned in parliament but not clearly and openly explained what its object is.
Few people know that one of the main initiators of the process of European integration, was also the man who designed the genocide plan of the Peoples of Europe. He is a dark, sinister person, whose existence is unknown to the masses, but the elite considers him as the founder of the European Union. His name is Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi. His father was an Austrian diplomat named Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi (with connections to the Byzantine family of the Kallergis) and his mother the Japanese Mitsu Aoyama. Kalergi, thanks to his close contacts with all European aristocrats and politicians, due to the relationships of his nobleman-diplomat father, and by moving behind the scenes, away from the glare of publicity, he managed to attract the most important heads of state to his plan, making them supporters and collaborators for the “project of European integration”.
The man behind White European genocide Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi.
In 1922 he founded the “Pan-European” movement in Vienna, which aimed to create a New World Order, based on a federation of nations led by the United States. European integration would be the first step in creating a world government. Among the first supporters, including Czech politicians Tomáš Masaryk and Edvard Beneš and the banker Max Warburg, who invested the first 60,000 marks. The Austrian Chancellor Ignaz Seipel and the next president of Austria, Karl Renner, took the responsibility for leading the “Pan-European” movement. Later, French politicians, such as Léon Bloum, Aristide Briand, Alcide De Gasperi, etc will offer their help.
With the rise of Fascism in Europe, the project was abandoned and the “Pan-European” movement was forced to dissolve, but after the Second World War, Kalergi, thanks to frantic and tireless activity and the alleged support of Winston Churchill(doesn’t sound like Churchill?? ed), the Jewish Masonic Lodge B’nai B’rith and major newspapers like the New York Times, the plan managed to be accepted by the United States Government. The CIA later undertakes the completion of the project.
The Essence Of The Coudenhove Kalergi Plan:
In his book Practical Idealism, Kalergi indicates that the residents of the future “United States of Europe” will not be the People of the Old Continent, but a kind of sub-humans, products of miscegenation. He clearly states that the peoples of Europe should interbreed with Asians and colored races, thus creating something akin to a multinational herd of livestock with no quality and easily controlled by the ruling elite.
The only way ensure this is for the governing elite to have complete control of who has children with whom. Rather like the way Hitler wanted to produce his ‘Master Race’. If you wish to wed a person from a different ‘race’ that is entirely your decision. Not to be told with whom you can have children by an unknown bureaucrat.
Kalergi proclaims the abolition of the right of self-determination and then the elimination of nations with the use of ethnic separatist movements and mass migration. In order for Europe to be controlled by an elite, he wants to turn people into one homogeneous mixed breed of Blacks, Whites and Asians. Who is this elite however? Kalergi is particularly illuminating on this:
“The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals. Instead of destroying European Judaism against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It’s not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews [due to the actions taken by the French Revolution]”
Although no textbook mentions Kalergi, his ideas are the guiding principles of the European Union. The belief that the peoples of Europe should be mixed with Africans and Asians, to destroy our identity and create a single mestizo race, is the basis of all community policies that aim to protect minorities. Not for humanitarian reasons, but because of the directives issued by the ruthless Regime that machinates the greatest genocide in history. The Coudenhove-Kalergi European Prize is awarded nearly every year to Europeans who have excelled in promoting this plan of ever further integration. Among those awarded with such a prize are Angela Merkel and Herman Van Rompuy.
The incitement to genocide, is also the basis of the constant appeals of the United Nations, that demands we accept millions of immigrants to help with the low birth rates of the EU. According to a report published on January 2000 in «Population division» Review of the United Nations in New York, under the title “Immigration replacement: A solution to declining and aging population,” Europe will need by 2025 159,000,000 migrants.
One could wonder how there can be such accuracy on the estimates of immigration, although it was not a premeditated plan. It is certain that the low birth rate could easily be reversed with appropriate measures to support families. It is just as clear that it is the contribution of foreign genes do not protect our genetic heritage, but that it enables their disappearance. The sole purpose of these measures is to completely distort our people, to turn them into a group of people without national, historical, family or cultural cohesion. In short, the policies of the Kalergi plan was and still is, the basis of official government policies aimed at genocide of the Peoples of Europe, through mass immigration. G. Brock Chisholm, former director of the World Health Organization (OMS), proves that he has learned the lesson of Kalergi well when he says: “What people in all places have to do is to limit of birthrates and promote mixed marriages (between different races), this aims to create a single race in a world which will be directed by a central authority. ”
It would seem that their aim is for a remote and unknown, un-elected bureaucrat to decide who you can have children with.The children will then be taken away to be brought up by the state and indoctrinated. Rather like the puppies of Bluebell and Jesse in Animal Farm or Hitler’s Children. A far sighted visionary was George Orwell.
If we look around us, the Coudenhove Kalergi plan seems to be in full flow. We face Europe’s fusion with the Third World. The plague of interracial marriage produces each year thousands of young people of mixed race: “The children of Kalergi”. Under the dual pressures of misinformation and humanitarian stupefaction, promoted by the MSM (main stream media), the Europeans are being taught to renounce their origin, family and renounce their national identity.
The servants of globalization are trying to convince us that to deny our identity, is a progressive and humanitarian act, that “racism” is wrong, because they want us all to be blind consumers. It is necessary, now more than ever, to counter the lies of the System, to awaken the revolutionary spirit Europeans. Every one must see this truth, that European Integration amounts to genocide. We have no other option, the alternative is national suicide.
Translator’s note: Although the reasons due to which Kalergi made the choices he made are of no particular interest to us, we will try to answer a question that will surely our readers have already asked: Why a European aristocrat with Flemish, Polish, Greek-Byzantine roots and even with some samurai blood in his veins (from his mother) was such a body planed and organised in the hands of dark forces? The reasons, in our opinion, are multiple, idiosyncratic, psychological and … women.
We therefore observe a personality with strong snobbish attitudes, arrogance, and, allow me the term, “degenerate elitism.” Also, the fact that his mother was Asian, perhaps created internal conflicts and frustrations, something that can happen to people with such temperament. But the most decisive factor must have been the “proper teenager”, which incidentally of course, was beside him, and became his first woman (at age 13): The Jewess Ida Roland, who would later become a famous actress.
Van Rompuy won the Coudenhove-Kalergi prize (also known as the Charlemagne Prize)for the biggest contribution to White European genocide and enslavement..
The Award Of The Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize To President Van Rompuy
On November 16th 2012, the President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, was awarded the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize, during a special conference in Vienna, to celebrate 90 years of pan-European movement. The prize is awarded every year to leading personalities for their outstanding contribution to the process of European integration.
A decisive factor that helped him win the prize was the balanced way in which President Van Rompuy executed his duties in the new position of President of the European Council, which was established by the Treaty of Lisbon. He handled this particularly sensitive leading and coordinating role with a spirit of determination and reconciliation, while emphasis was also given to his skillful arbitration on European affairs and unfailing commitment to European moral values.
During his speech, Mr Van Rompuy described the unification of Europe as a peace project. This idea, which was also the objective of the work of Coudenhove-Kalergi, after 90 years is still important. The award bears the name of Count Richard Nicolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), philosopher, diplomat, publisher and founder of the Pan-European Movement (1923). Coudenhove-Kalergi was the pioneer of European integration and popularized the idea of a federal Europe with his work.
Among the winners of the award, the Federal Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel (2010) and the President of Latvia Vaira Vike-Freiberga (2006), are included.
Agenda 21 Revealed – You Need to Know This
Added by Lucille Femine on September 21, 2013. Saved under Lucille Femine, Op-ed, Political Right, Politics
This is neither the website of, nor affiliated in any way with, Guardian News and Media.
Agenda 21 is a major tool of the New World order, conceived in 1992 in Rio DeJaniero at the “Earth Summit.” Its original name, “Sustainable Development”, began in 1987 with Gro Harlem Brundtland, VP of the World Socialist Party. Heavily promoted to the public as the salvation for this planet and every human being, it is anything but that. It needs to be revealed in no uncertain terms so you know what it truly is.
By putting this data out here, I might be labeled a prominent member of the lunatic fringe but I believe we have an ethical obligation to present truth, as we see it. If I’m wrong – well, I’ll be embarrassed but then I’ll be relieved because maybe this insanity won’t happen after all.
However, there is growing evidence this rotten egg called Agenda 21 has been hatching for quite some time, under our very noses. And it stinks.
At that momentous meeting, 178 nations signed the document; President Bush signed for the U.S. Later President Clinton signed an executive order, basically demanding compliance from every state and community with the goals and plans of Agenda 21 which is fast coming about as official policy in every town, city and state
Compassionate-sounding terms like “Population Stabilization” and “Sustainable Development” are simply masks for the true purpose of this United Nations plan – a world domination of your life and liberty, basically an insidious plot to control any and all parts of existence.
According to its authors, sustainability focuses on three things: “global land use, global education and global population control and reduction”. Doesn’t sound too bad, does it? However, in actual practice, these concepts pan out far below their lofty rhetoric. see 2014 – 021 The UN Wildlands Project Unleashes its War on Mankind
The true objectives of Agenda 21, revealed, include an end to national sovereignty; restructure of the family unit which means basically the state will take care of your children, with a keen eye toward indoctrinating them into state control over family allegiance; abolition of private property with citizens crammed into “stack and pack”, hi-rise apartment buildings, close to railroad tracks while cars will not be allowed.
It is also their intention to breakup family life by Tax incentives and removing children from families and banning fathers from seeing their kids.
“To achieve One World Government it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, their loyalty to family traditions and national identification.” Brock Chisholm, when director of the UN World Health Organization.
July 17, 2015
American Genocide Obama Style – Diversity, Immigration, Feminization And Emasculation – 4 Dead Marines Is Just The Tip Of The Iceberg As The Endgame Plan Accelerates
By Susan Duclos – All News PipeLine
Through “diversity,” immigration, feminization and emasculation of the American male, we are watching a four-pronged attack against America which will fulfill the predictions made by the Deagel website which shows that the total number of Americans who are here now but not expected to be here in 10 years to 254 million people.
What we are watching is an American genocide, Obama-style.
White Genocide is described by the White Genocide Project in the following manner:
Moving millions of non-White immigrants into traditionally White countries over a period of years. This alone is not genocide, but the next step makes it a part of genocide.
A combination of mass immigration (of different groups of people) plus forced assimilation would qualify as genocide, as defined by Article II, part (C) of the United Nations Genocide Conventions.
FIRST PRONG – DIVERSITY – CODEWORD FOR WHITE GENOCIDE
We have heard quote a bit from the Obama administration and Obama himself on “diversity” recently with Breitbart reporting that “that Obama is moving forward with threatened plans to force “diversity” on wealthier neighborhoods by using the federal government’s influence to build housing for lower income families.”
In the video below we see Obama himself discussing his “deranged fair housing” plot.
(Article continues after the video below)
SECOND PRONG – IMMIGRATION
By now most people have heard that a 24 year old Kuwaiti-born man by the name of Mohammod Youssuf Abdulazeez opened fire at two military facilities in Chattanooga, Tennessee on Thursday, killing four Marines and injuring three others before dying from a gunshot wound. According to an ex-CIA agent, the gunman was tied to ISIS.
Those attacks and deaths are just the tip of the iceberg.
In 2011 Pew Research reported that in the U.S. “the population projections show the number of Muslims more than doubling over the next two decades, rising from 2.6 million in 2010 to 6.2 million in 2030, in large part because of immigration and higher-than-average fertility among Muslims. The Muslim share of the U.S. population (adults and children) is projected to grow from 0.8% in 2010 to 1.7% in 2030, making Muslims roughly as numerous as Jews or Episcopalians are in the United States today. Although several European countries will have substantially higher percentages of Muslims, the United States is projected to have a larger number of Muslims by 2030 than any European countries other than Russia and France.”
Emphasis on the fertility average among Muslims mine because we are going to come back to that later in the article.
In April 2015 Stefan Stanford reported on “190 US cities have been ‘secretly selected‘ to receive a massive influx of Muslim immigrants via the US State Department in their bid to ‘destroy America from within‘ by creating a ‘nation within a nation‘ within the United States.(See embedded list of those cities in the ANP article from April)
USA Today reported in May 2015 that FBI Director James Comey said there are “hundreds, maybe thousands” of people across the country who are receiving recruitment overtures from the terrorist group [ISIS] or directives to attack the U.S.
Comey said the Islamic State, also known as ISIL, is leveraging social media in unprecedented ways through Twitter and other platforms, directing messages to the smartphones of “disturbed people” who could be pushed to launch assaults on U.S. targets.
“It’s like the devil sitting on their shoulders, saying ‘kill, kill, kill,”’ Comey said in a meeting with reporters.
Despite all of that, we find out that the Census Bureau is predicting another 1.24 million more immigrants to enter the U.S. in 2015.
PRONGS 3 & 4 – FEMINIZATION AND EMASCULATION OF THE AMERICAN MALE
In January 2015, in an ANP article titled “Wiping Out America….. Study Shows Depopulation Agenda Moving Full Speed Ahead,” we discussed “the feminization and emasculation of the American male and the effects it will have on future generations and the American male being effectively neutered out of existence.”
In that article we covered a study showing that there has been a descrease and falling sperm count and a variety of chemicals used in Industrial products and Plastics, foods, insecticides and other products causing this.
Which brings us back to the pew Research assertion on the higher-than-average fertility among Muslims.
They are systematically wiping out the American male.
Furthermore, we are seeing the total emasculation of the men with the most recent example explained by the Washington Post who declares in their first sentence of this article, “The end of gender is near.”
They say a picture is worth more than a thousand words, well the one below from that WAPO article, says it all!
Last but not least, we see a direct attack on procreation with the recent Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriages, where in order to procreate, gay couples must use artifical means or surrogates and this agenda was pushed hard by none other than Barack Hussein Obama.
Diversity, immigration, feminization and emasculation is a 4-pronged attack on America where we see the American genocide Obama-style happening right before our very eyes.
In the video below we see that this very agenda has been pushed successfully elsewhere and America is just latest example of the acceleration of White Genocide playing out right before our very eyes.