“God Has No Religion”- Gandhi. Question: Why Should We?



 Gandhi probably meant God does not  favor or follow any organized religion.


Why should WE favor or follow any organized religion?

THINK, if we didn’t  have religion, we would not have had:

**  The Crusades , where Christians burned alive Jews and Muslims together in Jerusalem.

**  The Inquisition, which lasted over 400 years.

**  The Salem witch hangings.

**  The “30 year War” between Protestants and Catholics

**  The violence and killings in Ireland between Catholics and Protestants.

**  The conflict between Hindus and Moslems, in India, including the formation of two states, India and Pakistan.

**  The assassination of the source of the above quote “God has no Religion”, Mahatma Ghandi.

**  The killings in Iraq between Sunnis and Shias.

**  The killings in Afghanistan between Sunnis and Shias.

**  The Holocaust.

**  The turmoil presently in the Mid-East between Israel and Palestine.

**  The possible war between Israel, the United States, and Iran.


If there were no organized religion, none of the above would have happened.

Think of it. None of the above.

“This is my simple religion. There is no need for temples; no need for complicated philosophy. Our own brain, our own heart is our temple; the philosophy is kindness.”   Dalai Lama

More violence has occurred in the name of religion than for any other reason.”  Deepak Chopra in New York Times Bestseller “The Book of Secrets”

Religion is something we can perhaps do without.” – Dalai Lama From his book   Ethics for the New Millennium

The Dalai Lama and Deepak Chopra quotes are contained in the new book by Samuel Butler, “Beyond All Religion”. 

 “The liberty of man is not safe in the hands of any church. Wherever the Bible and sword are in partnership, man is a slave.”  Robert Green Ingersoll, in Some Mistakes of Moses:III: The Politicians


Welcome All Free Thinkers

Instead of Violence, Intolerance, Hate, and even War Against Those Who Don’t Believe as We Do, Let’s all be friends!

I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend.
Thomas Jefferson quotes (American 3rd US President (1801-09). Author of the Declaration of Independence.17621826)

“Religion is something we can perhaps do without.”–Dalai Lama from his book Ethics for the New Millennium

(Cosmic Secular) Blessings to Everybody!!

Voltaire Quotes: “It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities are wrong””I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”  –Voltaire (French Philosopher and Writer.   One of the greatest of all French authors, 16941778)“Historically, it is quite doubtful whether Christ ever existed at all, and if He did we do not know anything about Him.” Bertrand Russell, “Why I am not a Christian.

David Jenkins, a former Anglican Bishop of Durham and university professor, has stated that “There is absolutely no certainty in the New Testament about anything of importance.”

“A SPELL on All Their Houses, How Religious SCRIPTURE  and Practices Support Intolerance, Violence and Even War. Includes Mythical and Outrageously FORGED Religious Origins”

Available on Amazon:  http://tinyurl.com/3jln7b2 

E-Book available $2.99:  http://tinyurl.com/4xh38xh

Spanish version on Amazon:  http://tinyurl.com/3sgy4kb 


“More violence has occurred in the name of religion than for any other reason.” –Deepak Chopra in New York Times Bestseller “The Book of Secrets.”

“I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians, they are not Christlike.”– Mahatma Gandhi

Blessed humor of the Dalai Lama

The Dalai Lama also said: “This is my simple religion. There is no need for temples; no need for complicated philosophy. Our own brain, our own heart is our temple; the philosophy is kindness.”– Dalai Lama

Many of The United States Founding Fathers Were Not Christians.  America not founded on the Christian religion.

It’s in a treaty.

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tripoli

…”receiving ratification unanimously from the U.S. Senate on June 7, 1797 and signed by Adams, taking effect as the law of the land on June 10, 1797.

The Treaty is much discussed in the 21st century because of the text of article 11, as ratified by the Senate:

As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.”

Quotations from Founders of the United States:

 “The fable of Christ and his twelve apostles…is a parody of the sun and the twelve signs of the Zodiac, copied from the ancient religions of the Eastern world…. Every thing told of Christ has reference to the sun. His reported resurrection is at sunrise, and that on the first day of the week; that is, on the day anciently dedicated to the sun, and from thence called Sunday…”  

–Thomas PaineThe Complete Religious and Theological Works of Thomas Paine (382) 
“…the day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter.”
–Thomas JeffersonThe Adams-Jefferson Letters (594)
“I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish Church, by the Roman Church, by the Greek Church, by the Turkish Church, by the Protestant Church, nor by any church that I know of.  My own mind is my own Church” —Thomas Paine

More founders’  Quotes:

John Adams:

Late in life he wrote: “Twenty times in the course of my late reading, have I been upon the point of breaking out, “This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it!”

James Madison:  

Fourth president and father of the Constitution, was not religious in any conventional sense. “Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise.” 

Benjamin Franklin:

As to Jesus of Nazareth…. I have, with most of the present dissenters in England, some doubts as to his Divinity

Ethan Allen, whose capture of Fort Ticonderoga while commanding the Green Mountain Boys helped inspire Congress and the country to pursue the War of Independence, said, “That Jesus Christ was not God is evidence from his own words.” In the same book, Allen noted that he was generally “denominated a Deist, the reality of which I never disputed, being conscious that I am no Christian.” When Allen married Fanny Buchanan, he stopped his own wedding ceremony when the judge asked him if he promised “to live with Fanny Buchanan agreeable to the laws of God.” Allen refused to answer until the judge agreed that the God referred to was the God of Nature, and the laws those “written in the great book of nature.”

From:  Religion of the American Enlightenment by G. Adolph Koch, p. 40 (1968

There’s a Bible on the shelf there. But I keep it next to Voltaire-poison and antidote.
 Bertrand Russell quotes (English Logician and Philosopher 18721970)

(Much of below is from an important expanded version of the ”CURSE” and “SPELL”books,  called “ BEYOND ALL RELIGION” available besides the “CURSE” and “SPELL” books on Amazon.com   here: http://tinyurl.com/7cz2cwv  (152 pages, $9.95) Also an ebook on Smashwords ($3.49), OR send $9.95 to Sam Butler, SB 197, PO BOX 25292, Miami, FL 33102.

$8.95 for either the Curse or the Spell book .   


For balance purposes:  

The Old Testament Bible is not peaceful. The Koran is not peaceful. The Buddhists in Tibet were not peaceful. The Mormons: “Cut their Throats”-said Brigham Young… A rabbi said that .”One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.”


Christianity is based upon a myth (The Persian saviour god Mithra), which was based on other similar myths, all the way back to Chrishna of India (a mythical god that was “crucified” around 1200 B.C.). There were 16 mythical crucifixions before Christ. The belief in the crucifixion of Gods was prevalent in various oriental or heathen countries long prior to the reported crucifixion of Christ.  Of the 16 crucifixions, most were born of a virgin, and about half were born on December 25th.

What follows was extracted from:http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biblianazar/esp_biblianazar_40.htm :

“What the Church doesn’t want you to know

It has often been emphasized that Christianity is unlike any other religion, for it stands or falls by certain events which are alleged to have occurred during a short period of time some 20 centuries ago. Those stories are presented in the New Testament, and as new evidence is revealed it will become clear that they do not represent historical realities.

The Church agrees, saying:

“Our documentary sources of knowledge about the origins of Christianity and its earliest development are chiefly the New Testament Scriptures, the authenticity of which we must, to a great extent, take for granted.”

(Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. iii, p. 712)

The Church makes extraordinary admissions about its New Testament. For example, when discussing the origin of those writings,  “the most distinguished body of academic opinion ever assembled” (Catholic Encyclopedias, Preface) admits that the Gospels “do not go back to the first century of the Christian era”

(Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. vi, p. 137, pp. 655-6).

This statement conflicts with priesthood assertions that the earliest Gospels were progressively written during the decades following the death of the Gospel (sic) Jesus Christ.  In a remarkable aside, the Church further admits that, “the earliest of the extant manuscripts [of the New Testament], it is true, do not date back beyond the middle of the fourth century AD” — (Catholic Encyclopedia, op. cit., pp. 656-7).

That is some 350 years after the time the Church claims that a Jesus Christ walked the sands of Palestine, and here the true story of Christian origins slips into one of the biggest black holes in history. There is, however, a reason why there were no New Testaments until the fourth century: they were not written until then, and here we find evidence of the greatest misrepresentation of all time.

It was British-born Flavius Constantinus (Constantine, originally Custennyn or Custennin) (272-337) who authorized the compilation of the writings now called the New Testament. After the death of his father in 306, Constantine became King of Britain, Gaul and Spain, and then, after a series of victorious battles, Emperor of the Roman Empire. Christian historians give little or no hint of the turmoil of the times and suspend Constantine in the air, free of all human events happening around him. In truth, one of Constantine’s main problems was the uncontrollable disorder amongst presbyters and their belief in numerous gods.

The majority of modern-day Christian writers suppress the truth about the development of their religion and conceal Constantine’s efforts to curb the disreputable character of the presbyters who are now called “Church Fathers” (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. xiv, pp. 370-1).

Originally Christianity is an adaptation of Mithraism welded with the Druidic principles of the Culdees, Egyptian sun worship (the pre-Christian Book of Revelation was originally called The Mysteries of Osiris and Isis ), Greek philosophy and various aspects of Hinduism(via Alexander the Great).


(Note: Eusebius –Bishop of Caesarea in Palestine “Father of Church History“- , attended the Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D. and was a friend of Emperor Constantine, who also attended and made the keynote speech– Samuel Butler,  Author).

Constantine instructed Eusebius to organize the compilation of a uniform collection of new writings developed from primary aspects of the religious texts submitted at the council.  Eusebius has been described as  follows:  Jacob Burckhardt (19th century cultural historian) dismissed Eusebius as “the first thoroughly dishonest historian of antiquity”. He has been also described as ” a political theologian”. He favored doctoring his history in his own words to “be useful first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity”. Edward Gibbon (18th century historian-“The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire”) dismissed his testimony on the number of martyrs and impugned his honesty (To be clear on this matter, I say don’t trust Eusebius’s reports of the Apostles or how the Apostles died, and be suspicious of all of his writings.)
– Author Samuel Butler

Eusebius then arranged for scribes to produce fifty sumptuous copies to be written on parchment in a legible manner, and in a convenient portable form, by professional scribes thoroughly accomplished in their art (ibid.). These orders, said Eusebius, were followed by the immediate execution of the work itself we sent him [Constantine] magnificently and elaborately bound volumes of three-fold and four-fold forms (Life of Constantine, vol. iv, p.36). They were the New Testimonies, and this is the first mention (c. 331) of the New Testament in the historical record. With his instructions fulfilled, Constantine then decreed that the New Testimonies would thereafter be called the word of the Roman Saviour God (Life of Constantine, vol. iii, p. 29) and official to all presbyters sermonising in the Roman Empire. He then ordered earlier presbyterial manuscripts and the records of the council burnt and declared that any man found concealing writings should be stricken off from his shoulders (beheaded)



In 391AD, Christian Emperor Theodosius I ordered the destruction of all pagan (“heathen” they were called) temples. The Christian Patriarch Theophilus of Alexandria (Egypt) complied with this request. Seizing this opportunity, Theophilus exerted himself to the utmost to expose the pagan mysteries to contempt, the Serapeum also he showed full of extravagant superstitions, the commander-in-chief of the troops in Egypt, assisted Theophilus in demolishing the heathen temples then he destroyed the Serapeum. -Historia Ecclesiastica

The Serapeum housed the Great Library of Alexandria  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_alexandria

Why there are no records of Jesus Christ

It is not possible to find in any legitimate religious or historical writings compiled between the beginning of the first century and well into the fourth century any reference to Jesus Christ and the spectacular events that the Church says accompanied his life.

This confirmation comes from Frederic Farrar (1831-1903) of Trinity College, Cambridge:

“It is amazing that history has not embalmed for us even one certain or definite saying or circumstance in the life of the Saviour of mankind … there is no statement in all history that says anyone saw Jesus or talked with him. Nothing in history is more astonishing than the silence of contemporary writers about events relayed in the four Gospels.” (The Life of Christ, Frederic W. Farrar, Cassell, London, 1874)

This situation arises from a conflict between history and New Testament narratives. Dr Tischendorf made this comment: “We must frankly admit that we have no source of information with respect to the life of Jesus Christ other than ecclesiastic writings assembled during the fourth century.” (Codex Sinaiticus, Dr Constantin von Tischendorf, British Library, London)

There is an explanation for those hundreds of years of silence: the construct of Christianity did not begin until after the first quarter of the fourth century, and that is why Pope Leo X (d. 1521)  called Christ a “fable” (Cardinal Bembo: His Letters…, op. cit.),  and later Pope Paul III expressed similar sentiments, saying that there  was no valid document to demonstrate the existence of Christ.  He confessed that Jesus never existed, adding that he was no other than the sun, adored in its Mithraic sect ..”

Yes, but what about Tacitus,  Roman Historian,  who wrote about the persecutions of the early “Christians”?

Regarding Tacitus, (Senator and Historian of the Roman Empire) these writings supporting the persecution were mysteriously found in the 15th century in the forests of Germany, following a reward offered by Leo X for old writings,  and following a history of forgeries in Catholicism:

In any case, there has been serious questions about the integrity of the famous passage about Christians.

From: http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/tacitus.html

Gordon Stein denied the authenticity of this passage, arguing:

(1) there is no corroborating evidence that Nero persecuted the Christians
(2) there was not a multitude of Christians in Rome at that date (3) Christian was not a common term in the first century
(4) Nero was indifferent to various religions in his city
(5) Nero did not start the fire in Rome
(6) Tacitus does not use the name Jesus
(7) Tacitus assumes his readers know Pontius Pilate

Yes, but what about Josephus?

His reference to Jesus in Testimonium Flavianum has been claimed as a later addition, not questioning the authenticity of the main work.

See: http://www.truthbeknown.com/josephus.htm

Yes, but what about Pliny the Younger’s letter to Emperor Trajan 112 AD (Pliny not a contemporary of Jesus, and he never mentions “Jesus”)?  Pliny the Younger (c. 61 – c. 112), the provincial governor of Pontus and Bithynia, wrote to Emperor Trajan c. 112 concerning how to deal with Christians, who refused to  worship the emperor, and instead worshiped “Christus”.  What about that?

Charles Guignebert, who does not doubt that Jesus of the Gospels lived in Gallilee in the 1st century, nevertheless dismisses this letter as acceptable historical evidence:  “Only the most robust credulity could reckon this assertion as admissible evidence for the historicity of Jesus” – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

Why did Paul say that women should not speak in Church?

Why did St. Paul say women should not speak in church and be submissive?

King James Bible 1 Corinthians 14:34

“Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but [they are commanded] to be under obedience, as also saith the law. “

“As in all the congregations of the saints, women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church. Did the word of God originate with you? Or are you the only people it has reached?” (1 Cor. 14:33b-36 NIV).

Why did St Paul say that? Why?

The short answer: HE DIDN’T. Someone pretending  to be Paul said that, lying. From March 27, 2011 Daily Mail (UK) See http://tinyurl.com/4fumoaj

They Murdered the Pope!

by Samuel Butler on Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 9:25am


By Samuel Butler 3/31/11

When I was a commercial real estate broker, I was involved in a large land transaction, later completed on a property in Marin County, California.

My interested party in the purchase was Bruce Connor, associated with the Howard S. Wright Corporation of Seattle, a huge and important developer. They built the Space Needle in Seattle.

Bruce told me the following story. He went to Rome with a friend, and while he was there, his friend went to the Vatican, where his friend had a personal friend in the Holy See, which acts and speaks for the whole Catholic Church.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See .

When Connor’s friend came back from the Holy See, he told my client Connor, “THEY MURDERED THE POPE!”. Connor was told that there was no autopsy, no time of death, and a deep mystery.

His friend told Connor that the Pope couldn’t handle the job, and there is only one way to go if you are Pope and can’t handle the job. The Pope only served as Pope for 33 days.  It was that simple. He couldn’t handle the job, and he couldn’t resign. At that time, 1978, the Pope was supposedly infallible on dogmatic statements. It would be strange to have an “infallible” Pope resign.

The Pope was John Paul I. He lasted only 33 days. He chose the first double name in the history of the papacy, the first double name in the history of the papacy,

I later did research on this and found that this “humble” and “smiling” Pope , as he was known from Venice, far from being a pushover for the hierarchy of the Church, wanted to:

  1. Fire the Cardinal of Chicago
  2. Re-open birth control
  3. Personally investigate the Vatican Bank.

It was not to be.

He was poisoned.
1. There was no time of death stated.
2. There was no autopsy.
3. There still is no death certificate to this day.

There were 6 suspects to the murder.

One was Roberto Calvi,  Chairman of the “Vatican Bank”, and known as “God’s Banker”, and one was Paul Marcinkus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Marcinkus , who was President of the ” Vatican Bank” at the time of the Pope’s mysterious death. (Another case of “don’t mess with banksters”). It turned up later that 1.3 billion dollars vanished in the later collapse of  that bank.  It ended up that five of the 6 suspects died under mysterious circumstances.  For example, Roberto Calvi committed suicide in London, after missing from Milan, Italy for 9 days, by going to the Blackfiars Bridge in London, climbing to the underneath of it and putting a rope around his neck to hang himself!

The sole survivor of the six suspects after a period of time turned out to be coincidentally enough, the head of the Vatican bank, Paul Marcinkus, who died in Sun City, Arizona  on February 20, 2006.

There is a book about this, the murder of this Pope, John Paul I, I found in my research. It’s called “In God’s Name”, by David Yallop, a world-wide best seller.


The Godfather series is disguised history. “Godfather I” delved into Frank Sinatra being pushed by threats (offer that couldn’t be refused) (remember the dead horse in the bed of the movie kingpin?),  to the maker of “From Here to Eternity” to allow a singer a part in the movie to be played by Sinatra (a part “he was made for”, Maggio).

Godfather III, shows the Pope (played by a character even taking the correct name, John Paul I) being poisoned, and the Mafia boss, played by Al Pacino,  failing to prevent it.) Not too “disguised” history, even going into the banking corruption, which was real, and that is what the real John Paul I wanted to personally investigate.



(Continuing Vatican Bank problems.)

Having written a book about all four of the main religions supporting Violence, Intolerance, and Even War, this article shows one of the religions had MURDERwithin its own structure, AT THE TOP, including even within the last 33 years.

There’s more: Other Popes who have been murdered.

From wikipedia :

List of 10 Popes who allegedly have been murdered. Five by poisoninghttp://tinyurl.com/3mu33zd

Also, according to this, http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/mo-death.htm ,

Muhammad also died of being poisoned (by a Jewish woman).  Intrigue and politics and power plays are not so unusual in the Church.  One time there were 3 popes! Yes, three at the same time (sometimes the “other Popes” were called “Anti-Popes”.)  If you want to get confused and amazed, read here:


My “A Curse on All Their Houses” book is available on Amazon: http://tinyurl.com/4bcvmem


“A TOP NOTCH EXPOSE FOR THE AGES. ABSOLUTELY REVEALING.  LONG OVERDUE”.  Warren Fairbanks, M.F.A, international Art Educator (France, Germany and U.S.).


Writer utters what hitherto was considered UNSPEAKABLE. Five stars for this heroic author. Ivar Zapp, Professor of Architecture, Author, Lecturer, Owner of Biofuel Corporation.  Islam, Christianity, Mormonism, and Judaism are all covered. Includes Mythical and Forged Religious Origins.  Includes shocking permissive sex practices in all of them. (Example: Muhammad married a girl who was six years old.)


“More violence has occurred in the name of religion than for any other reason.”  Deepak Chopra in New York Times Bestseller “The Book of Secrets”

I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians, they are not Christlike ..Ghandi

Site edited June 25th, 2011

Quiz:  Who said this?: “But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them–bring them here and kill them in front of me.”

Who? Answer: Jesus, in a parable he told about a mean King : Luke 19.27

Religion is seen by normal people as true, by wise people as false,  and by rulers as useful. Hitler and Mussolini were Catholics, as were Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain under whose reign we had TorquemadaGrand Inquisitor, 1483-1498, and Ferdinand and Isabella’s royal Edict of Expulsionagainst the Jews of Spain  (March 31, 1492). It ordered all Jews of whatever age to leave the kingdom by the last day of July.

” religion is something we can perhaps do without. ” – Dalai Lama From his book   Ethics for the New Millennium

He also said:

~ This is my simple religion. There is no need for temples; no need for complicated philosophy. Our own brain, our own heart is our temple; the philosophy is kindness.   Dalai Lama~

Pasted from <http://www.finestquotes.com/author_quotes-author-Dalai%20Lama-page-0.htm>


News Item: 3/4/11 : : Brigham Young University’s star basketball player, Brandon Davies, is dismissed from the team for having premarital sex, but Brigham Young , who the University is named after, and who was President of the Church for 30 years, “had 55 wives. One was 15 years old. Young had 57 children by 16 of his wives”. Quote is from my book: http://tinyurl.com/4bcvmem .A list of his 55 wives is in Wikipedia (from Church Records) here: http://tinyurl.com/25ea22e -Samuel Butler, Author.

One more thing, also from the book.  Joseph Smith, the founder of the Mormon movement,  had at least 24 wives. One was 14 years old, and after the marriage considered herself as an abused child. Here is a list of his wives from official church records:

Sam, Searcher for truth, regardless of wherever the chips may fall. 

Holes pierced in his feet … a hole in the top of one foot, just above the toes, where the nail was inserted in the act of crucifixion.  Savior __________ atoned for the sins of a grief-stricken world by “pouring out his blood as a propitiatory offering” while stretched upon the cross.But Before the crucifixion :  “he soon became surrounded by many earnest followers, and the people in vast multitudes followed him, crying aloud, ‘This is indeed the Redeemer promised to our fathers.’” His pathway was thickly strewn with miracles, which consisted in healing the sick, curing lepers, restoring the dumb, deaf and the blind, raising the dead, aiding the weak, comforting the sorrow-stricken, relieving the oppressed, casting out devils, etc. He come not ostensibly to destroy the previous religion, but to purify it of its impurities, and to preach a better doctrine. He came, as he declared, “to reject evil and restore the reign of good, and redeem man from the consequences of the fall, and deliver the oppressed earth from its load of sin and suffering.” His disciples believed him to be God himself, and millions worshiped him  ….  There is more:
1. His miraculous birth by a virgin. 2. The mother and child being visited by shepherds, wise men and the angelic host, who joyously sang, “In thy delivery, O favored among women, all nations shall have cause to exult.” 3. The edict of the tyrant ruler ______, ordering all the first born to be put to death. 4. The miraculous escape of the mother and child from his bloody decree by the parting of the waves of the River ________ to permit them to pass through on dry ground. 5. The early retirement of ________ to a desert. 6. His baptism or ablution in the River _________…. 7. His transfiguration at ________, where he assured his disciples that “present or absent, I will always be with you.”  9. He was anointed with oil by women. 10. …fish story is told of him — his disciples being enabled by him to catch large draughts of the finny prey in their nets. Many of the precepts uttered by ___________display a profound wisdom and depth of thought.  For a list of them Click on the Christianity page above and slide to the end. Here is one of the final ones: Above all things, cultivate love for your neighbor.WHO WAS THIS? This was Chrishna (Krishna) of India, who according to tradition was crucified approximately 1200 B.C. Incidentally, he had a “virgin” birth, either by a hair of the Hindu God Vishnu entering his mother’s womb, or in another version of the myth, God Vishnu himself entering her womb.How is this for religious intolerance? Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said, “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” Muhammad married a 6 year old girl. Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonism had 24 wives, one was 14 years old. Christ story is based on other myths (Chrishna of India and Mithra of Persia). The story of Moses is patterned after the story of Sargon the Great. Major religions have SCRIPTURES that support intolerance, violence and even war.At Amazon.com, take a look at my book “A Curse on All Their Houses, How Religious SCRIPTURE and Practices Support Intolerance, Violence, and Even War”  Includes Mythical and Forged Religious Origins. CLICK HERE

Look Inside and/or get the book at Amazon.com HERE

or  send your mailing address to my email samjcr@pobox.com and pay by PayPal ($8.95)  using same email as my PayPal address

Or send $8.95 and your address to Samuel Butler SB 197, PO BOX 25292, Miami, Fl 33102.

Or get it as an ebook (English) for $3.99 HERE

A just approved Spanish version is NOW available on Amazon.com (“Una Maldicion Sobre Todas Sus Casas, Como las ESCRITURAS y las practicas religiosas apoyan la intolerancia, la violencia y aun la guerra”) HERE

Or get it as a Spanish  ebook for $2.99 HERE

These books will show we have been hoodwinked (tricked) with false beliefs regarding the origins of Christianity (1600 years of being hoodwinked by forgery) and about Muhammad  and the Koran-he didn’t write it –  and the Old Testament- Moses never existed, and his story was patterned after the story of Sargon the Great.


How about this for intolerance from a religious person?: Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said, “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” (NY Daily News, Feb. 28, 1994, p.6).

Mormons kill 120 innocent Men, Women and Children :

These unfortunates were emigrants from Arkansas going to California.

“If any miserable scoundrels come here, cut their throats.” Brigham Young

“The Mountain Meadows Massacre stands without a parallel amongst the crimes that stain the pages of American history.

Mountain Meadows Massacre stands without a parallel amongst the crimes that stain the pages of American history.

Before founding Mormonism,  Joseph Smith was convicted of being an imposter-convicted of fraud in a court of law.  (March 20, 1826): http://www.ils.unc.edu/~unsworth/mormon/jsconviction.html

Joseph Smith, the founder of the Mormon movement,  had at least 24 wives. One was 14 years old, and after the marriage considered herself as an abused child. Here is a list of his wives from official church records:


Brigham Young  was the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church “Mormon” Church) from 1847 for 30 years, until his death.

Young had 55 wives.  One was 15 years old. Young had 57 children by 16 of his wives. Here is a list of his 55 wives: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Brigham_Young’s_wives


What do the Dead Sea Scrolls say about Jesus? The short answer: Nothing, and the last of the scrolls have been dated to approximately 68 AD.
The scrolls were discovered in 1948, and the Vatican, after a Church Father was put in charge of the translation, suppressed the publication of the Scrolls for many years.
” There was no mention of Jesus in the Dead Sea Scrolls because Jesus as a living historical figure, in their theory, did not exist. They could not state that publicly because of the fear of an outcry, but that was the situation. ” (above from:http://www.biblemysteries.com/library/james.htm).
Pope Leo X (1513-1521): Some believe that he considered Jesus to be a mere legend.
The Catholic Encyclopedia refers to a widely circulated remark:

How much we and our family have profited by the legend of Christ, is sufficiently evident to all ages.”
From:  http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_jcno.htm

Historically, it is quite doubtful whether Christ ever existed at all, and if He did we do not know anything about Him.“  –Bertrand Russell


The above confirms the statements in my book “A Curse on All Their Houses”  page 62, “The Forged Origins of the New Testament”.  The book also covers astonishing irregularities in all four main religions, plus there is  a chapter on violence in Buddhism, which is normally viewed as very peaceful and is actually the most peaceful of the 5 religions, by far, although in practice there have been exceptions to the peaceful image.


1. DIGNITY. Proclaim the natural dignity and inherent worth of all human beings.

2. RESPECT: Respect the life and property of others.

3. TOLERANCE: Be tolerant of others’ beliefs and lifestyles.

4. SHARING: Share with those who are less fortunate and assist those who are in need of help.

5. NO DOMINATION: Do not dominate through lies or otherwise.

6. NO SUPERSTITION: Rely on reason, logic, and science to understand the Universe and to solve life’s problems.

7. CONSERVATION: Conserve and improve the Earth’s natural environment.

8. NO WAR: Resolve differences and conflicts without resorting to war or violence.

9. DEMOCRACY Rely on political and economic democracy to organize human affairs.

10. EDUCATION: Develop one’s intelligence and talents through education and effort.

From “The Code for Global Ethics, Ten Humanist Principles” by Rodrigue Tremblay, with Preface by Paul Kurtz. Published  2010 by Prometheus Books.


May the white dove of  Peace, Spirituality, and Tranquility Alight Gracefully on Your Shoulder


Not in my book, but interesting:

The United States was not, in any sense,  founded on the Christian religion:

It’s in a treaty.

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tripoli

…”receiving ratification unanimously from the U.S. Senate on June 7, 1797 and signed by Adams, taking effect as the law of the land on June 10, 1797.

The Treaty is much discussed in the 21st century because of the text of article 11, as ratified by the Senate:

As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.”

Samuel Butler, researcher for truth and seeker of truth, regardless where the chips may fall.


Gandhi On Jews And Hitler


The Jews In Palestine

By Mahatma Gandhi

Published in the Harijan

Several letters have been received by me, asking me to declare my views about the Arab-Jew question in Palestine and the persecution of the Jews in Germany. It is not without hesitation that I venture to offer my views on this very difficult question.

My sympathies are all with the Jews. I have known them intimately in South Africa. Some of them became lifelong companions. Through these friends I came to learn much of their age long persecution. They have been the untouchables of Christianity. The parallel between their treatment by Christians and the treatment of untouchables by Hindus is very close.

Religious sanction has been invoked in both cases for the justification of the inhuman treatment meted out to them. Apart from the friendships, therefore, there is the more common universal reason for my sympathy for the Jews. But my sympathy does not blind me to the requirements of justice.

The cry for the national home for the Jews does not make much appeal to me. The sanction for it is sought in the Bible and the tenacity with which the Jews have hankered after return to Palestine.

Why should they not, like other peoples of the earth, make that country their home where they are born and where they earn their livelihood? Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs. What is going on in Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct. The mandates have no sanction but that of the last war. Surely it would be a crime against humanity to reduce the proud Arabs so that Palestine can be restored to the Jews partly or wholly as their national home. The nobler course would be to insist on a just treatment of the Jews wherever they are born and bred. The Jews born in France are French in precisely the same sense that Christians born in France are French.

If the Jews have no home but Palestine, will they relish the idea of being forced to leave the other parts of the world in which they are settled? Or do they want a double home where they can remain at will? This cry for the national home affords a colorable justification for the German expulsion of the Jews. But the German persecution of the Jews seems to have no parallel in history. The tyrants of old never went so mad as Hitler seems to have gone. And he is doing it with religious zeal. For, he is propounding a new religion of exclusive and militant nationalism in the name of which any inhumanity becomes an act of humanity to be rewarded here and hereafter.

The crime of an obviously mad but intrepid youth is being visited upon his wholerace with unbelievable ferocity. If there ever could be a justifiable war in the name of and for humanity, a war against Germany to prevent the wanton persecution of a whole race, would be completely justified. But I do not believe in any war. A discussion of the pros and cons of such a war is, therefore, outside my horizon or province.

But if there can be no war against Germany, even for such a crime as is being committed against the Jews, surely there can be no alliance with Germany. How can there be alliance between a nation, which claims to stand for justice and democracy and one, which is the declared enemy of both? Or is England drifting towards armed dictatorship and all it means?

Germany is showing to the world how efficiently violence can be worked when it is not hampered by any hypocrisy or weakness masquerading as humanitarianism.It is also showing how hideous, terrible and terrifying it looks in its nakedness.Can the Jews resist this organized and shameless persecution? Is there a way to preserve their self-respect, and not to feel helpless, neglected and forlorn? I submit there is. No person who has faith in a living God need feel helpless or forlorn. Jehovah of the Jews is a God more personal than the God of the Christians, the Mussalmans or the Hindus, though as a matter of fact, in essence, He is common to all and one without a second and beyond description. But as the Jews attribute personality to God and believe that He rules every action of theirs, they ought not to feel helpless.

If I were a Jew and were born in Germany and earned my livelihood there, I would claim Germany as my home even as the tallest gentile German might, and challenge him to shoot me or cast me in the dungeon; I would refuse to be expelled or to submit to discriminating treatment. And for doing this I should not wait for! the fellow Jews to join me in civil resistance, but would have confidence that in the end the rest were bound to follow my example…. …

And now a word to the Jews in Palestine. I have no doubt that they are going about it in the wrong way. The Palestine of the Biblical conception is not a geographical tract. It is in their hearts. But if they must look to the Palestine of geography as their national home, it is wrong to enter it under the shadow of the British gun. A religious act cannot be performed with the aid of the bayonet or the bomb. They can settle in Palestine only by the goodwill of the Arabs. They should seek to convert the Arab heart.

The same God rules the Arab heart who rules the Jewish heart… They will find the world opinion in their favor in their religious aspiration. There are hundreds of ways of reasoning with the Arabs, if they will only discard the help of the British bayonet. As it is, they are co-sharers with the British in despoiling a people who have done no wrong to them. I am not defending the Arab excesses. I wish they had chosen the way of non-violence in resisting what they rightly regarded as an unwarrantable encroachment upon their country. But according to the accepted canons of right and wrong, nothing can be said against the Arab resistance in the face of overwhelming odds.

Let the Jews who claim to be the chosen race prove their title by choosing the way of non-violence for vindicating their position on earth. Every country is their home, including Palestine, not by aggression but by loving service. A Jewish friend has sent me a book called The Jewish Contribution to Civilization by Cecil Roth. It gives a record of what the Jews have done to enrich the world’s literature, art, music, drama, science, medicine, agriculture, etc. Given the will, the Jew can refuse to be treated as the outcast of the West, to be despised or patronized. He can command the attention and respect of the world by being the chosen creation of God, instead of sinking to the brute who is forsaken by God. They can add to their many contributions the surpassing contribution of non-violent action.


The myth of Gandhi and Palestinian reality

The recent visit of Mohandas K. Gandhi’s grandson, Arun Gandhi, to Palestine has sparked new discussion about the role of nonviolence in the Palestinian struggle for freedom. In a speech before the Palestinian Legislative Council, Gandhi called upon 50,000 Palestinian refugees to march back home en masse from their exile in Jordan, forcing the Israelis to choose between relenting to a wave of people power, or gunning the marchers down in cold blood.In an editorial, the English-language Jordan Times gently endorsed the idea, arguing: “Perhaps it’s time for the world to accept that the refugees need to have a say in their own fate. Perhaps it’s time for them to make their voices heard. Perhaps they should march.” However, the newspaper also warned that such tactics could lead to “losses to the Kingdom,” and recalled Israel’s harsh military retaliation against Jordan and Lebanon when the Palestinian Liberation Organization used those countries as bases.

While one can admire Mohandas Gandhi’s nonviolent principles, one can hardly point to the Indian experience as a demonstration of their usefulness in overthrowing a colonial regime. Indeed, Gandhi’s concepts of satyagraha, or soul power, and ahimsa, or nonviolent struggle, played an important role during the Indian independence struggle, however the anti-colonial period in India was also marked by extreme violence, both between the British and Indians and between different Indian communal groups. Anti-colonial Indians committed a wide variety of terrorist acts; the British government was responsible for numerous massacres and other atrocities; and communal violence before, during and after independence claimed the lives of millions of people. One simply cannot argue that Indian independence was achieved in a nonviolent context.

Nevertheless, the fact that the Palestinian leadership has never seriously sought to use mass, organized nonviolence is yet another example of its monumental lack of creativity. Imagine, for example, if the Palestinian president, Yasser Arafat, instead of abjectly and unsuccessfully begging his Israeli captors to allow him to attend the Christmas services at Bethlehem’s Church of the Nativity last year, had simply announced he would walk there without their permission, and invited all the people of Ramallah, international figures, clergymen, and the world’s press, to walk with him? What if Palestinian ministers slept in and defended with their bodies the houses and farms of their people, slated for demolition or seizure by Israel?

We had a tantalizing glimpse of the potential power of such action on the bittersweet day the late minister Faisal Husseini was buried in June 2001, when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians flooded into occupied Jerusalem, and Israel was powerless to stop them. For those brief hours the people made Jerusalem free and whole.

The call for nonviolent resistance by Palestinians has also been taken up in Israel, although more disingenuously. Yoel Esteron, a columnist and former managing editor at Ha’aretz, lauded Arun Gandhi in a recent column, and wondered, “what would have happened if four years ago the Palestinians had chosen passive resistance?” Esteron lectured the Palestinians: “It is worth it to them to choose Gandhi’s way. And it is worth it to us. If the Palestinians stop committing suicide on our buses, this will be a more effective weapon than explosive belts … Ostensibly, the key rests in the hands of the stronger side. Wrong. If Israel were to lay down its weapons, it would be forced to pick them up again after a few murderous terror attacks … The key is in the Palestinians’ hands.”

On October 14, 2003, over 100 Birzeit University students and faculty members held a makeshift class at the checkpoint on the Ramallah-Birzeit Road which remained closed by Israeli troops for the 7th consecutive day. Students, frustrated at their inability to reach the University, and at the loss of yet another day of classes, came together carrying placards with statements such as Yes to Education, No to Occupation and Open Minds: Open the Way to Education. The students sat on the ground to listen to a 45 minute lecture given by Dr. Abdalkarim Abukhashan, a professor in the Arabic Language Department at the University. (Dan Richards/FoBZU)

While apparently embracing Arun Gandhi’s call for nonviolent actions, Esteron would not actually want Palestinians to act on Gandhi’s suggestion that refugees return home in force. Esteron has argued forcefully that the refugees must give up their right of return. Nor is it necessary to wonder, as Esteron does, what would have happened had the Palestinians opted to engage in nonviolent resistance. From 1987 to 1993, during the first intifada, they did exactly that. And despite it all, their mass protests and strikes were met with brutal repression. Israel did not have bus bombings to use as an excuse for its retaliation, since the first bus attack occurred in 1994.

While the first uprising that began in 1987 shifted international public opinion toward the Palestinians, it did not result in gains on the ground. According to the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem, from the beginning of the first intifada in 1987 until the signing of the Oslo Accords in September 1993, Palestinians killed a total of 100 Israeli civilians, half of them inside the Occupied Territories. During the same period, Israeli occupation forces and settlers killed more than 1,160 Palestinian civilians. The Israeli answer to what was then a largely peaceful mass uprising was what is commonly referred to in Israel as “the appropriate and Zionist response” – the violent confiscation of more land and the building of ever more settlements.

The present conflict preserves this gross imbalance, where the victims of violence are overwhelmingly Palestinian, but at far higher levels of violence all around. The conflict is also increasingly characterized by nonviolence, even if this remains invisible to most Israelis and to the world’s media. For Palestinians, circumventing barriers and checkpoints in order to get to school, to work, or simply to visit family or worship, is a daily act of resistance. The recent hunger strike by thousands of Palestinian prisoners and their families was another example that was largely ignored internationally. The wire services carried dozens of photographs of silent vigils and protests by prisoners’ families, but few of those made it into newspapers.

On 30 August, China’s Xinhua news agency reported the death of 55-year-old Aisha al-Zaban. She had been on hunger strike for 12 days in solidarity with her imprisoned son and his comrades. Doctors had advised her to end her fast, but she refused and died of a heart attack. I was unable to find her name in any of the dozens of American newspapers that routinely echo the calls for Palestinians to follow the way of Gandhi.

It is important to distinguish between those like Arun Gandhi and the Palestinians with whom he is in dialogue, who are genuinely seeking new and creative ways to energize the freedom struggle; and those like Esteron, whose calls for nonviolence are simply another bankrupt exercise in shifting the blame from the occupier to the occupied, while still posing as advocates for peace.

Ali Abunimah is a co-founder of The Electronic Intifada. This article first appeared in The Daily Star

George Bush Cancels Europe Trip Amid Calls for His Arrest


,  – Humans are Free

by Justin Elliott

Will George W. Bush set foot in Europe again in his lifetime?

A planned trip by Bush to speak at the Switzerland-based United Israel Appeal later this week has been canceled after several human rights groups called for Swiss authorities to arrest Bush and investigate him for authorizing torture.

Bush has traveled widely since leaving office, but not to Europe, where there is a strong tradition of international prosecutions.

The Swiss group and Bush’s spokesman claim that it was threats of protest, not of legal action, that prompted the cancellation. But facing protests is nothing new for Bush.

What was different about this trip was that groups including Amnesty International and the Center for Constitutional Rights argued that Switzerland, as a party to the UN Convention against Torture, is obligated to investigate Bush for potential prosecution.

Amnesty’s memo to Swiss authorities cites, among other things, Bush’s admission in his own memoir that he approved the use of waterboarding.

From Amnesty’s press release:

“To date, we’ve seen a handful of military investigations into detentions and interrogations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantánamo. But none of these has had the independence and reach necessary to investigate high-level officials such as President Bush,” said Salil Shetty, Secretary General of Amnesty International.

“Meanwhile, there has been virtually zero accountability for crimes committed in the CIA’s secret detention program, which was authorized by then-President Bush.”

Anywhere in the world that he travels, President Bush could face investigation and potential prosecution for his responsibility for torture and other crimes in international law, particularly in any of the 147 countries that are party to the UN Convention against Torture.

“As the US authorities have, so far, failed to bring President Bush to justice, the international community must step in,” said Salil Shetty.——————————————————————————————–

After Saudis Beheaded 47 People, Belgium Now Refusing to Sell them Arms, Germany May Follow

by Matt Agorist

On Saturday, the Saudi Arabian government beheaded 47 people, one of whom was prominent Shia cleric Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr, a senior opposition figure. He and the others were all killed for their charges of “undermining the national security” of the kingdom.

Immediately following the beheadings, countries across the globe – except for the United States – denounced the barbaric move.

Rightfully outraged with the beheadings, Shiite Muslims in Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon and Bahrain angrily condemned the executions, and Iranian protesters stormed the Saudi embassy in Tehran.

These inhumane acts of murder on the part of the Saudis have forced the hands of those who sell them weapons and on Monday, Germany became the first country to question their arms trade deal.

“We must now review whether in the future we should take a more critical stance” on selling arms to Saudi Arabia, German Vice Chancellor, Sigmar Gabriel said Monday.

While Germany has said they will review their decision, Belgium just took it a step further on Tuesday, by immediately declining Saudi Arabia’s request for military equipment supplies.

“We have rejected the request [for military equipment supplies to Saudi Arabia],” Geert Bourgeois told the Flemish Parliament, as quoted by the RTBF broadcaster. “If there is a possibility that the weapons may be used for internal repression, I refuse.”

The moves by Germany to advocate for a review, and Belgium to renounce the selling of weapons to such a repressive regime are heartening and should be a model for all those involved in arming a country who beheads more people than ISIS.

Of course, the US is not about to give up their largest weapons export contract, even if the weapons are used to oppress entire nations and murder their children.

Immediately after the beheadings, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce took to CNN to blame the Saudi’s executions on Iranians.

As Daniel McAdams reports for the Ron Paul Institute, Royce falsely claimed that the Iranian military invaded Yemen. But that is demonstrably untrue. It was the Saudis who invaded Yemen.

It seems that the Saudi influence over the United States is far and wide, even spreading to the presidential candidates, who all curtsey to “our Saudi ally” by pledging their blind support of the terrorist regime.

It’s no coincidence that President Obama was showered with $1.3 million in gifts from the Saudi King last year. Obama is responsible for forging the largest weapons sale in American history, all of which went to Saudi Arabia.


Spain ‘issues arrest warrant’ for Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu over 2010 Gaza flotilla attack

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and seven other former and current government officials are at risk of arrest if they set foot in Spain, after a Spanish judge effectively issued an arrest warrant for the group, it has been reported.

According to the Latin American Herald Tribune, Spanish national court judge Jose de la Mata ordered the police and civil guard to notify him if Mr Netanyahu and the six other individuals enter the country, as their actions could see a case against them regarding the Freedom Flotilla attack of 2010 reopened.

Palestinians wave their national flag as they ride boats during a rally in support of activists aboard a Pro-Gaza flotilla made up of four boats aimed at defying Israel’s blockade of Gaza, at the seaport of Gaza City

The other men named in the issue are former defence minister Ehud Barak, former foreign minister Avigdor Leiberman, former minister of strategic affairs Moshe Yaalon, former interior minister Eli Yishai, minister without portfolio Benny Begin and vice admiral maron Eliezer, who was in charge of the operation.

The case – which was put on hold by Judge de la Mata last year – was brought against the men following an attack by Israeli security forces against the Freedom Flotilla aid ships in 2010, which was trying to reach Gaza.

It concerns the Mavi Marmara ship, the main civilian vessel in a fleet of six that were attempting to break an Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip. The six ships were carrying around 500 passengers, humanitarian aid and construction materials. The Israeli Defence Force stormed the ship in a raid that left nine human rights activists dead. A tenth activist died later that month due to wounds sustained in the raid.

Palestinian shot dead in Gaza

The Israeli Prime Minister and other officials now face charges in the case, should it be reopened.

An Israeli foreign ministry spokesperson Emmanuel Nachshontold the Jerusalem Post: “We consider it to be a provocation. We are working with the Spanish authorities to get it cancelled. We hope it will be over soon.”


Israel Confirms U.K. Arrest Warrant Against Livni
Miliband voices shock over arrest warrant in call to Livni; Israel summons U.K. envoy over warrant.

Barak Ravid and Agencies Dec 15, 2009 12:00 AM Updated: 2:11 PM
259comments   Zen Subscribe now
56  Tweet
Britain pledged Tuesday to reform the peculiar legal power that lets judges order the arrest of visiting politicians and generals – a threat currently focused on Israeli visitors that, one day, might be invoked against Barack Obama or Vladimir Putin.
Lawyers working with Palestinian activists in recent years have sought the arrest of senior Israeli civilian and military figures under terms of universal jurisdiction. This ill-defined legal concept empowers judges to issue arrest warrants for visiting officials accused of war crimes in a foreign conflict.
Their latest target is Tzipi Livni, Israel’s former foreign minister and current opposition leader, who staunchly defends Israel’s offensive against Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
Israel’s government confirmed on Tuesday that Livni canceled a planned London trip this month after her office received news of a secretly issued arrest warrant awaiting her arrival.
Foreign Secretary David Miliband later announced that Britain would no longer tolerate legal harassment of Israeli officials in this fashion.
Speaking after meeting Israel’s London ambassador Tuesday night, Miliband said the British law permitting judges to issue arrest warrants against foreign dignitaries without any prior knowledge or advice by a prosecutor must be reviewed and reformed.
Miliband said the British government was determined that arrest threats against visitors of Livni’s stature would not happen again.
“Israel is a strategic partner and a close friend of the United Kingdom. We are determined to protect and develop these ties,” Miliband said. “Israeli leaders – like leaders from other countries – must be able to visit and have a proper dialogue with the British government.”
Miliband voices shock over arrest warrant in call to Livni
Earlier Tuesday, Miliband called Livni to express his shock over the arrest warrant and pledged to address the matter immediately.
Livni clarified that she doesn’t view the arrest warrant as a personal offense, but rather one that affects Israel as a whole. She added that it also harms efforts to operate jointly against threatening elements.
Livni stressed that Israel and Britain must work to solve the problem according to agreements outlined when she was foreign minister.
Miliband earlier in the day denounced the arrest warrant as insufferable, after Israel warned that the matter could harm bilateral ties.
Miliband made the comments during a meeting with Israel’s ambassador to Court of St. James, Ron Prosor. The Israeli envoy asked to discuss the matter with Miliband on Monday, following news that Livni had canceled her trip to Britain after a warrant was issued for her arrest.
Prosor told Miliband that the British government must work immediately to combat the grave phenomenon of arrest warrants being issued against senior Israeli officials.
The foreign secretary said he had spoken with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and with Secretary of State for Justice Jack Straw in order to try to resolve the problem.
Miliband called Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman on Tuesday and expressed concern over the arrest warrant, saying he and other British parliamentarians found it unacceptable. Miliband also planned to call Livni.
He told Lieberman that solutions must be found in order to prevent this situation from repeating itself in the future.
Lieberman expressed disappointment over Britain’s abstention during the United Nations vote on the Goldstone report, which accuses Israel and Hamas of committing war crimes in Gaza, and the Swedish proposal to recognize Jerusalem as a shared Israeli and Palestinian capital.
Also Tuesday, the Foreign Ministry summoned the British envoy to Israel to rebuke him over the warrant.
Israel views the arrest warrant with utmost gravity, Naor Gilon, deputy director at the Foreign Ministry in charge of Western Europe, told British ambassador Tom Phillips.
Gilon also called on Phillips to urge his government to change the law that allows for arrest warrants to be issued against senior Israeli officials over alleged war crimes perpetrated in Gaza during the winter conflict between Israel and Hamas.
Netanyahu: We won’t allow our leaders to be tried for war crimes
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday issued a statement saying that Israel will not agree to have its leaders be recognized as war criminals.
“We will not agree to a situation in which Ehud Olmert, Ehud Barak and Tzipi Livni will be summoned to the defendant’s bench,” Netanyahu said.
“We will not agree that IDF commanders and soldiers, who – heroically and in a moral fashion – defended our citizens against a brutal and criminal enemy, will be condemned as war criminals. We reject this absurdity outright.”
Netanyahu instructed National Security Adviser Prof. Uzi Arad to deliver a clear message on this issue to British envoy Phillips.
Dr. Arad spoke with Ambassador Phillips and made it clear to him that Israel expects the British government to act against this immoral phenomenon, which is trying to impair Israel’s right to self-defense.
A statement from the British embassy in Israel said the U.K. is determined to work for peace in the Middle East and to be a strategic partner to Israel.
“To do this, Israel’s leaders need to be able to come to the U.K. for talks with the British government. We are looking urgently at the implications of this case.” The embassy statement said.
Israel’s Foreign Ministry earlier Tuesday called on the British government to end the “absurd situation” in which arrest warrants were being issued to Israeli officials over alleged war crimes in Gaza, warning that ties between the two countries could suffer as a result.
“Only actions can put an end to this absurd situation, which would have seemed a comedy of errors were it not so serious,” said the Foreign Ministry.
The ministry warned that in indulging the arrest warrant, the British government was hampering its own efforts at playing a role in Middle East peace negotiations.
“We appreciate the British government’s desire to play a central role in the Middle East peace process, and thus we expected it to translate the importance it gives its relations with Israel into actions,” said the ministry.
“Israel urges the British government to once and for all honor its promises to take action to prevent anti-Israel forces from exploiting the British legal system to act against Israel and its citizens, the ministry said. The absence of resolute and immediate action to redress this distortion harms relations between the two countries,” it added.
Vice Premier Silvan Shalom urged the ministry to make “real diplomatic” efforts to make it clear that Israel would not accept such behavior.
“We are all Tzipi Livni,” he said. “The time has come for us to move from the defensive to the offensive. We must use real diplomacy here, to tell Britain, Spain and all those other states that we will not stand for this anymore.”
Livni: World can judge us, but don’t equate IDF with terrorist
In response to the warrant, Livni said Tuesday that she would not accept any accusation that compared Israel Defense Forces soldiers to terrorists.
“I have no problem with the fact that the world wants to judge Israel,” said Livni. “We are part of the free world. The problem starts when they equate terrorists and Israeli soldiers.”
Senior officials in Israel confirmed reports on Monday that a British court issued the warrant against Livni for her role in orchestrating Israel’s military offensive against Hamas in the Gaza Strip nearly a year ago. The request for the warrant was submitted by a pro-Palestinian organization.
British sources reported late Monday that though a British court had issued an arrest warrant for Livni over war crimes allegedly committed in Gaza while she served as foreign minister, it annulled it upon discovering she was not in the U.K.
The incident was the latest in a string of attempts by pro-Palestinian activists to have Israeli officials arrested.
Pro-Palestinian lawyers attempted earlier this year to invoke the universal jurisdiction law to arrest Gaza war mastermind Ehud Barak, Israel’s defense minister, but his status as a Cabinet minister gave him diplomatic immunity.
In 2005, a retired Israeli general, Doron Almog, returned to Israel immediately after landing in London because he was tipped off that British police planned to arrest him. The warrant against Almog – who oversaw the bombing of a Gaza home in which 14 people were killed – was later canceled.
Other Israeli leaders, including former military chief Moshe Ya’alon and ex-internal security chief Avi Dichter, have also canceled trips to Britain in recent years for the same reason
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-confirms-u-k-arrest-warrant-against-livni-1.2133


Queen Elizabeth Found Guilty in Missing Children Case — Whistle Blowers Incarcerated, While She is Free

In the second week of May 2014, British soldier Vivian Cunningham was drugged and institutionalized against his will. Apparently, his “crime” on May 6 was daring to ask superiors about Queen Elizabeth’s outstanding arrest warrant.

The order to arrest Queen Elizabeth was issued in 2013 by six judges of the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels.

After nearly a year of litigation, Queen Elizabeth and her husband, Prince Phillip, were found guilty in the disappearance of ten native children from the Catholic-run Kamloops residential school in British Columbia. Grieving parents haven’t seen their children since they left for a picnic with the Royal couple on Oct. 10 1964.

On May 10th, the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State was asking concerned citizens to demand Cunningham’s immediate release. The ITCCS successfully prosecuted Queen Elizabeth’s kidnapping, along with 50,000 cases of other missing children.

People could voice their concerns to the St. George’s Hospital in Stafford England (ph: 44 01785 257888). Complaints could also be made to Cunningham’s superior, Captain Murrell (ph: 44 07909 686198).

Regiment soldier Cunningham had innocently questioned a senior officer about Queen Elizabeth’s arrest warrant, only to be committed to a mental care unit in Stafford England.

He was injected with an atypical anti-psychotic drug olanzapine under orders of Captain Murrell and Doctors Khan and Sema. The soldier was committed for six months to the St. George Hospital Psychiatric Unit with a “diagnosis” of suffering from an acute psychotic episode.

“Queen Elizabeth had direct involvement in the kidnapping and death of aboriginal children” it was reported on the ITCCS website. “Royal Family members also appeared to regularly participate in Ninth Circle Satanic Cult rituals at the Mohawk Indian School in Brantford, Ontario, Canada.”

In April, a second international trial began in Brussels on global elite members of the Ninth Circle Satanic Cult.

A court document had been filed indicating that in Jan. 2012 UK Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby acted under the direction of Queen Elizabeth to destroy forensic remains of a Ninth Circle Satanic Cult child homicide. Two eyewitnesses have testified that as children they were present during this same murder of a native child.

The satanic rite evidently occurred in a sub basement catacomb under the west wing of the Canadian Branton Ontario Mohawk Indian residential school. The two eyewitnesses alleged that they saw a young girl being bound to an altar.

The five or six year-old child was gagged, repeatedly raped, killed, disemboweled and dismembered. Her blood was consumed by nine red-robed figures that included a member of the British Royal Family.

Unfortunately Cunningham was not alone in his victimization after exposing these Ninth Circle Satanic Cult activities. Several incarcerations and even a death appeared to surround exposures of Queen Elizabeth’s kidnapping case.

Former Kamloops School resident William Combes died after a 2010 radio interview where he discussed witnessing Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip leave the school with his ten friends and fellow Kamloops residents.

Directly after the interview the healthy Combes was ordered to report for tests at the Vancouver St. Paul’s Catholic hospital. There he was given an injection that put him into a coma. Within hours and without consent of his family members, Combes was permanently pulled off life support.

British citizen David Compan was another victim of whistleblowing against Queen Elizabeth. In 2013 he was twice arrested, as was his wife. Compan’s “crime” was daring to post Queen Elizabeth’s arrest warrant on a Catholic Church.

Compan was never charged, but accosted, drugged and incarcerated in the London Park Royal Mental Health Center. After several days of protests irate citizens secured the couple’s release. Compan discussed the incarceration in this video.

Last October in Kitchener Ontario Canada Steve Finney was trying to expose this same Ninth Circle Satanic Cult case on 50,000 missing native children that included Queen Elizabeth’s kidnapping charges-conviction. Finney was arrested without cause and held in prison for three days. Protests around the globe organized by the ITCCS appeared effective in Finney’s release.

“Like my friends Combes, Compan and Finney, Cunningham is being cruelly drugged and imprisoned against his will because he simply mentioned the existence of a citizens arrest warrant against Queen Elizabeth” stated Kevin Annett of the ITCCS.

“As a British soldier and citizen, Cunningham has now become a Prisoner of Conscience at the hands of the British Crown in an effort to hide proven crimes of the Royal Family.”

Annett himself has felt the wrath of Queen Elizabeth. In 2013 when Annett was in London attending a rally for the 50,000 missing children, he was detained, held in jail overnight, then deported – all done without being charged.

In March the ITCCS began a second prosecution on global elite members of the Ninth Circle Satanic Cult. Five international judges and 27 jury members were scheduled to hear the testimony of at least 16 adult survivors who have come forward to expose their witness to child kidnapping and murder.

The first prosecution in the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels concerned 50,000 missing native Canadian children and included Queen Elizabeth’s kidnapping case.

The court’s Feb 2013 guilty verdict by six international judges on 40 global elites appeared to influence the resignation that same week, of Pope Joseph Ratizinger.

USA a British Crown Colony – The City of London (Crown) and the NWO


City of London’s Ownership of American Colonies

The misplaced reverence to the ill formulated U.S Constitution and hidden subjugation back to the City of London is one aspect of history that is not taught in government schools or discussed in institutes of higher education. This subject is probably new to most observers of the legacy from the Founding Father’s biggest mistake. Regular readers of BREAKING ALL THE RULES are familiar with the arguments made in the essays, In the beginning: Let there be the Articles of Confederation and Articles of Confederation was Preferable. Now the case for the betrayal of the purpose of the American Revolution needs to be explored.

Cited on the US Constitution Gave Legal Ownership and Control of the United States to London site is an assessment by Michael Edward.

“Neither the American people nor the Queen of Britain own America. The Crown Temple owns America through the deception of those who have worn their allegiance by oath to the Middle Templar Bar. The Crown Bankers and their Middle Templar Attorneys rule America through unlawful contracts, unlawful taxes, and, contract documents of false equity through debt deceit, all strictly enforced by their completely unlawful, but ‘legal,’ Orders, Rules and Codes of the Crown Temple Courts Our so-called ‘judiciary’ in America. This is because the Crown Temple holds the land titles and estate deeds to all of North America.”

An examination of The Templars of the Crown provides elaboration on this appraisal. For an even more in-depth analysis, review the material that probes AMERICAN LAND OWNERSHIP, A TRUE OXYMORON, which deals with the work of James Montgomery.

“Many of you are aware that the laws of this nation and it’s states, were made to be in compliance and submission to the laws of England, only modified by state and federal law. You will see in this last Chapter state statutes from just a few of the original colonies, that this is the case. Are these what are called ancient statutes? Yes. However, since the king’s Corporation is alive and well as are his heirs, so is his Trust and the law used to create and govern it. The law that governs his Trust can only be amended, no law could be enacted contrary to the king’s will and cestui que trust, the main corporate sole where office is always found, the Crown. The king’s practice of granting lands in this country to those loyal to him continues, along with their land grants being protected by state ancient statutes which are still on the books. We are governed by the king’s nobles just as in times of old England, self proclaimed nobles, and corporate trusts. They rule this country and the world. The huge corporations have been granted power and liberty not known by the common man. The nobles, real and the created, occupy their possessions as fiduciaries and trustees of the king’s grants; only if they remain loyal to the system, their privilege and life style are their reward.”

Invest the time in discovering all the historic accounts, legal rulings and linkages that go back to the Crown, AKA, the City of London.

If you are unfamiliar with The (British) Crown Empire and the City of London Corporation take a quick refresher course on the actual nature of the financial foundation and codified sanction that purports to be lawful. Jurisprudence may be legal by the definition and formulations of the judicious barrister class, but it certainly is not founded on the basic principles of natural law.

Julian Websdale concludes: “The whole Earth is governed by The Crown, through Crown Colonies which belong to The City – The Crown Empire. It governs Africa and still governs China and India. The colonies of the Earth are really just Crown Colonies – The United States of America are states of The Crown.”

Now this interpretation may seem bizarre to most and the plot thickens in the The construe Powers – Behind the Global Empire piecing together a long account of legalized equity mandates.

“The signed treaties and charters between Britain and the United States reveals that King James the 1st was not only famous for translating the Bible, but for signing the first charter of Virginia in 1606. That charter granted America’s British forefathers a license to settle and colonize America and guaranteed future kings and queens of England to have sovereign authority over citizens and colonized land in America. The treaty of 1783 identifies the king of England as the prince of the United States. King George the 3rd gave up most of his claims over American colonies, but he kept his right to continue receiving payment for his business venture of colonizing America.”

The next element to consider has The Top of the Pyramid: The Rothschilds, the British Crown and the Vatican Rule the World. Read this account and trace back the historic lineage of  some of the Englishmen who founded America.

“To have the Declaration of Independence recognized internationally, Middle Templar King George III agreed in the Treaty of Paris of 1783 to establish the legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, referred to internally as the Crown Temple States (Colonies). States spelled with a capital letter ‘S,’ denotes a legal entity of the Crown.

At least five Templar Bar Attorneys under solemn oath to the Crown, signed the American Declaration of Independence. This means that both parties were agents of the Crown.”

As time proceeds, the sell out of the “shot heard around the world” revolution deepens. Two Constitutions in the United States. 1st was illegally suspended in favor of a Vatican “Crown” corporation in 1871. This approving assessment of the Federal Constitution views a Shadow Government in place since 1871.

“Since 1871 the United States president and the United States Congress has been playing politics under a different set of rules and policies.  The American people do not know that there are two Constitutions in the United States.  The first penned by the leaders of the newly independent states of the United States in 1776.  On July 4, 1776, the people claimed their independence from the Crown (temporal authority of the Roman Catholic Pope) and Democracy was born.  And for 95 years the United States people were free and independent.  That freedom ended in 1871 when the original “Constitution for the United States for America” was changed to the “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”.

The Congress realized that the country was in dire financial straits, so they made  a financial deal with the devil –  the Crown (a.k.a. City of London Corporation – est. by the Catholic Church on Jan 1, 1855 ) thereby incurring a DEBT to the Pope.  The conniving Pope and his bankers were not about to lend the floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a way of taking back control of the United States and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed.  With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia.

With the passage of  “the Act of 1871” a city state (a state within a state) called the District of Columbia located on 10 sq miles of land in the heart of Washington was formed with its own flag and its own independent constitution – the United States’ secret second constitution.”

Lastly, Three Corporations run the world: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City list the City of London houses as including:

Rothschild controlled ‘Bank of England’

Lloyds of London

The London Stock Exchange

All British Banks

The Branch offices of 384 Foreign Banks

70 USA Banks

Fleet Streets Newspaper and Publishing Monopolies

Headquarters for Worldwide Freemasonry

Headquarters for the worldwide money cartel known as ’THE CROWN’

Conclusion: “City of London directly and indirectly controls all mayors, councils, regional councils, multi-national and trans-national banks, corporations, judicial systems (through Old Bailey, Temple Bar and the Royal Courts of Justice in London), the IMF, World Bank, Vatican Bank (through N. M. Rothschild & Sons London Italian subsidiary Torlonia), European Central Bank, United States Federal Reserve (which is privately owned and secretly controlled by eight British-controlled shareholding banks), the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland (which is also British-controlled and oversees all of the Reserve Banks around the world including our own) and the European Union and the United Nations Organization.”

This introduction to the actual influence and pompous legal authority that underpins the financial hierarchy is based upon a historic explanation that is foreign to most Americans. The implications are staggering and for this reason alone, most are not willing to do their own research. Do not get caught up in the uncanny departure from the usual rendering of reality. Remember that the City of London’s coat-of-arms reads in Latin – Domine Dirige Nos – which translates, Lord, direct us. The true question, asks just which deity do the soldiers of the Crown adore?

SARTRE – March 24, 2015


The NWO is the British Empire – the Whole World to Belong to the Rothshild/Jesuit City of London.

“I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire and I control the British money supply.” (Nathan Rothschild said (1777-1836)).

“The truth is that the United States, under its present administration, is the tool of the British Empire – the monetary financial empire which sits like a parasite, sucking the life out of Britain from the City of London and which has never gone away. (John Yoo in an article for the National Review – quoted by The UKColumn 4 Jan 2012″.


The  League of Nations after WWI was seen as a failure. Nevertheless, It was the beginning of the final attempt of achieving total world domination by the “British Empire” and the “British Crown”, the NWO,  –  cover names for the rule of the world through the City of London by its masters, the Jesuits/ Rothschild dynasty.

great-seal-hexagram-of-pentagramsThe Great Seal of the USA was  a gift from Mayer Amschel Rothschild to his Masonic/Illuminati brethren in “The New World” to remind them of his and Weishaupt´s New Order – brought byRothschild´s agent, Haym Salomon, who raised the money for the American Revolution.illuminati-horus-osiris-eye-200

The following Report is nearly 100 years old – and the British empire has apparently vanished in the meantime – and the USA has not returned to the British “Crown” – or has it? The Telegraph 18 Aug 2014: “The United Kingdom may now be a second-rate power, but the City’s unparalleled legacy as a global financial capital still underpins its pre-eminence.” Forbes found London and New York held a “hegemony” over the rest of the world.”

Henry Makow 4 oct. 2014:The New World Order is an extension of the imperialism of the “Crown”, a clique of Jewish bankers and their Gentile accomplices devoted to “absorbing the wealth of the world” (in Cecil Rhodes words) and enslaving the human race. The first step was Wilson’s plan for the League of Nations “which we prepared for him.”

We are being colonized by this financial invisible invader. The bogus “War of Terror” obviously is directed against us.  Our jobs and resources are exported. Illegal aliens are imported. The education system is used for mass indoctrination. News is controlled. Entertainment is filled with trivia, the occult, violence and pornography.”

The London City rules the US FED and Wall Street, The rulers of the USA, the Council on Foreign Relations, the AIPAC, the ADL, the whole Jewish Lobby are servants of the the Jesuits/Rothschild. The US was founded by Masons and Illuminati – who work for a united world under the British “Crown” – i.e. the Jesuit/Rothschild dynasty.

Edward_Grey_1914The UN is the continuation of the League of Nations woven into the PeaceTreaty of Versailles after WWI. It was conceived by the British Foreign Minister, Edward Grey (1905–1916), until 1910 under King Edward VII, the Rothschild puppet, who was the son of Lionel Rothschild, and closelycollaborating with Col. Edward Mandell House, Pres. Woodrow Wilson´s Rasputin. Grey´s next master, King George Vhimself thus City-of-london-tower-of-babela grandson of Lione
was also surrounded by Jewish–intermarried nobility.

The immensely wealthy private bank of N. M. Rothschild & Son controlled the British Empire then as well as now – took over the Bank of England in 1815.Then it controlled the press, the railroads and the industries with minor exceptions. It is building the Tower of Babel in defiance of God –  since their God is Lucifer.

mandell-houseJesuit and Jewish Rothschild agent Colonel Edward Mandell House was the driving force behind the Federal Reserve coup d´Etat in 1913, behind the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 –  and behind Pres. Woodrow Wilson´s decision to enter WWI –  as well as Wilson´s chief negotiator at the Versailles Peace Negotiations. More about Mandell House.

“The Colonel House Report (1919)” aka the “Col. E. M. House letter”: This report, or letter, was presented to the House of Representatives by Congressman Thorkelson of Montana, and is published in the Congressional Record of October 13, 1919, p. 598-604 inclusive. Its authenticity was discussed by members of the House and an effort was made to strike it from the Record, which failed.
No minor official would dare write such a letter to the British Prime Minister (Lloyd George), or dare discuss the important subjects contained in it; except in the line of duty. It was not written by Col. E. M. House – a nom de plume. It discloses that it wasprobably written by Lord Northcliffe, who was at that time the head of the British Propaganda Department in enemy countries. He sustained toward Lloyd George the same intimate relationship that once existed between Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House, and this fact may explain the name he assumed.

NorthcliffeLord Northcliffe aka Viscount Alfred Charles William Harmsworth was a famous journalist and publisher of the Daily Mail, The Daily Mirror, and The Times. He was Prime Minister Lloyd George´s director of propaganda – and exercised vast influence over British popular opinion. Lord Northcliffe helped Lloyd George into power –  but later turned against him, when Lloyd George would not punish the defeated Germans as hard as Northcliffe wanted. Lord Northcliffe was a founder of the notorious Tavistock Institute to manipulate the British public opinion to accept war with Germany (WWI). This brainwashing octopus was funded by the British Royal family and the Rothschilds (to whom Northcliffe was said to be related by marriage) – and spread to the US –  where no one gets a high public office without a Tavistock brainwashing.

This is the plan of the British Illuminati elite for their one-world government, the “British Empire”. The British Royal family is Jewish (see above and here in comment 2) and Masonic, servants of the Jesuits/Rothschilds.

The Colonel House Report (1919)” aka the “Col. E. M. House letter
“The World’s Peace Foundation has issued for us a series of League of Nations pamphlets, which, with our other literature, tax the mails to the limit of their capacity. Our film concerns are preparing an epoch-making picture entitled “The League of Nations.” In brief, our entire system of thought control is working ceaselessly,tirelessly, ruthlessly, to insure the adoption of the League. And it will be adopted, for business wants peace, the righteous cannot resist a covenant, and the politicians, after shadow-boxing for patronage purposes, will yield valiantly lest the fate of the wanton and wilful pursue them.

By these means we hope smoothly to overcome all effective opposition on the part of our colony America to entering the League — that is, the Empire. As soon as the League is functioning properly, His Majesty in response to loyal and repeated solicitation, might graciously be pleased to consent to restore to this (American) people their ancient right to petition at the foot of the throne; to confer the ancient rank and style of governor general upon our Ambassador, that this colony may enjoy a status inferior to no other colony’s.

Round-tableCecil-rhodesSince that memorable day, September 19, 1877, on which the late Cecil Rhodes devised by will a fund “to and for the establishment, promotion, and development of a secret society (The Round Table)– the true aim of which and object of which shall be the extension ofBritish rule throughout the world, and especially the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire” — the energy and intelligence of England has not been spent in vain. It would perhaps be presumptuous of me to refer here to the admirable services rendered not only by LORD NORTHCLlFFE (the probable author of the report).

The Carnegie League to Enforce Peace and its affiliate League of Small Nations are even now leading the van in our fight. Only the last great battle remains to be fought — the battle to compel America´s acceptance of the terms of the League of Nations.”

City-of-london-british-empireLeague-of-nationsFrom the moment of my arrival here, it was evident to me that such an Anglo-American alliance as would ultimately result in thepeaceful return of the American Colonies to the dominion of the Crown could be brought about only with the consent of the dominant group of the controlling clans.

For those who can afford the universities, we are, as I have already mentioned, plentifully supplying British-born or trained professors, lecturers, and presidents.  British-born editors and reporters now create imperial sentiment in most American newspapers. A Canadian-born admiral now heads the United States Naval College.

Through the Red Cross, the Scout movement, the YMCA, the church, and other humane, religious, and quasi-religious organizations, we have created an atmosphere ofinternational effort which strengthens the idea of unity of the English-speaking world. In the co-ordination of this work, Mr. Raymond Fosdick, formerly of theRockefeller Foundation, has been especially conspicuous.

As the consortium for China, and the security company for Mexico show, our brokers and their aids have become the unchallenged financiers of the world. We have been particularly fortunate in our fiscal agents here, Messrs Pierpont Morgan & Company.Lamont and Davidson gave you valuable aid at the peace conference. They loaned $200,000,000 to Japan that our ally might build a fleet to compete with America on the Pacific carrying routes. Their attempts to retain for us control of the international mercantile marine are well known to you.

City-of-londonThrough our fiscal agents we have become the world’s purchasers. Moreover, the war has made us the custodian of the greater part of the world’s raw materials and we now largely control the oil fields of the world and thereby the world’s transportation and industry. This control would enable us to exert such pressure as would make American industrial interests amenable to His Majesty’s pleasure.
In the financial world the Anglo-American alliance is a well-established fact.

City-of-london2The City of London is an independent state marking its limits by the symbol of the Devil: dragons. The world economy is ruled from here.

We must quickly act to transfer its (US) dangerous sovereignty  to the custody of the Crown (City of London). We must, in short, now bring America within the Empire. The first visible step in this direction has been taken; President Wilson has accepted and sponsored the plan for a League of Nations which we prepared for him(Rothschild puppet Edward Grey – see above). We have wrapped this plan in the peace treaty so that the world must accept from us the League or a continuance of the war. The League is in substance (the Jesuit/Rothschild) Empire with America admitted on the same basis as our other colonies.

The Americans must see that far from surrendering their independence to the League they are actually extending their sovereignty by it. Pres. Wilson alone can satisfy them on this. He alone can father an anti-Bolshevik act which judicially interpreted — will enable appropriate punitive measures to be applied to any American who may be unwise enough to assert that America must again declare her independence. And he alone, therefore, is qualified to act for us as first president of the League.”

Jesuit Pope Francis I has a coats of arms full of pagan symbols –  turned upside down it shows the satanic pentagram (left). On 28/29 June 1963, The Vatican  alongside with Albert Pike’s Southern division of the Scottish Rite Freemasonry celebrated a black mass in the Cappella Paolina in the Vatican –  making Satan the head of the Church. Right: Detail from the  Jesuit College.


This entry was posted in english, euromed. Bookmark the permalink.

3 ‘City States’ Rule the World


Maps of Palestine, and the atrocities by Israel.

Where is Palestine, and why are Palestinians unhappy with their lot?

Once upon a time there was a place called Palestine, a land of milk & honey written about in a book called The Bible. This ended in 1948 when Ben-Gurion declared the creation of the State of Israel. Palestine was then flooded with Jews from Europe, later USA and other countries. These immigrants kicked the Palestinians out of their homes, off their farms and out of Palestine. Now the Palestinians are imprisoned in The Gaza Strip, a foul strip of desert between Israel & Egypt, or have been forced out to the west of The River Jordan. However even that is not enough for the Israelis, they keep expanding into the West Bank territory and creating settlements there and every couple of years the Israelis have a turkey shoot, except it’s not turkeys they’re shooting.

I started this webpage in 2002, and have added to it, so, where incomplete, some of my dates might seem confusing.

Palestine 1851 Palestine 1851
Lapie, Pierre (1779-1851) Paris
MODERN PALESTINE, 1851. Rapkin, John (1815-1876)
Drawn & Engraved by J. Rapkin,
London & New York J. & F. Tallis


Palestine 1886 Palestine 1886
[Cram, George Franklin] (1841-1928)
Engraver & Publisher, Chicago


Israel 1988 PALESTINE, 1988.


* What happened to Palestine?
* Who’s occupied Palestine?
* What’s happened to all those Palestinians?

Here follow some reports of what has happened to the Palestinians.


Israel encroachment into Palestine

First updates for ages. May/June 2015

I have not been updating the atrocities of Israel as often as needed, but here are a couple of articles from
The Independent, May/June 2015, that are worth reading.

UN Gaza report:
Five Palestinians’ harrowing stories from the horror of the IDF bombardment of 2014

‘Fire at every person you see’.


July 2014 – The same old story, Israeli atrocities against Palestinians

The terrible murder of three Israeli youths has given the Israelis an excuse to continue their slaughter of Palestinians. They have neither produced nor cited evidence that Hamas was involved. (Now, 1st Aug., the Israelis admit they weren’t killed by Hamas.) Following this, Israelis seized a Palestinian youth and killed him by burning him alive.

Although Israel, US and a few other countries readily say Hamas is a terrorist organisation, it must be remembered that Hamas was the democratically elected government of Gaza, after Israel destabilised the government of Yasser Arafat.

Around New Year 2009 Israel killed 400 children and 900 adults in Gaza. This was because some people in Gaza had fired simple rockets into Israel. Throughout 2008, prior to the Israeli atrocities, those rockets had not killed anyone in Israel.

How many children and how many adult Palestinians have the Israelis killed this time?

Up to 22nd Aug. 2014

The Israelis are killing Palestinians faster than the killings can be reported, so I have not been able to update the deaths.
2,070+ Palestinians killed
315, Children, two thirds under 12 years, (Old data) Including these 4 children killed 16 July.
Read this bit too, . . . carrying the remains of his dead son in a plastic bag.
166 Women, and 35+ Elderly people killed. (Old data)
9,000 injured, of whom 80% are civilians. (Old data)
At least 2,655+ homes in Gaza have been totally or severely damaged (Very old data)

64 Israeli soldiers and 3 civilians killed.

Which is the terrorist state, Israel or Gaza?




2012 – The Same Old Story,
Israelis Slaughter Palestinians

In 22 days over New Year 2009 Israeli snipers and tanks killed 400 Palestinian children, (and 900 adults). What sort of people are these Israelis, snipers deliberately kill children and tank commanders fire shells into family apartments when they see people living there? It reminds me of the Nazis in Warsaw, 1939. They are as bad as Hitler’s SS.
Up to 00:30hrs, 21 Nov. 2012 – Israelis have killed 139 Palestinians, including, at least, 24 children. 5 Israelis have been killed.

The Israeli elections are two months away so Mr Netanyahu is buying votes with Palestinian lives.

Information for people in Britain.
If I were to tell you that top British politicians were members of an Israeli lobbying group, you would probably not believe me. Check it out for yourself on Wikipedia,
Conservative Friends Israel
Labour Friends of Israel,
and you will see that David Cameron, William Hague, Tony Blair & Gordon Brown all are/were “Friends of Israel”. Britain’s foreign policy is determined by Israel.


2008/9 – The Same Old Story,
Israelis Slaughter Palestinians

Summary of the Israeli atrocities in Palestine.

In 2008, up to 27th Dec., the home-made rockets that Hamas fired into Israel killed no-one. In return the Israelis killed 400 children and 900 adults in Gaza. After the Israeli attacks, Hamas rockets killed 3 Israeli civilians. The Israelis shelled clearly designated UN schools sheltering civilians and used white phosphorus against civilians, both of these actions are war crimes. USA supplied, free, the aircraft, helicopter gunships, missiles, bombs and bullets for these attacks and block any international condemnation of Israel in UN.

BBC – “I rushed back to find their dead bodies – or rather parts of their bodies – strewn all over the room. . .
BBC – Amnesty Finds Evidence of War Crimes
TIMESONLINE – Amnesty International: Gaza white phosphorus shells were US made
BBC – Israel troops admit Gaza abuses

5th Jan. 2009

People who are really evil are few and far between, and so it is with nations. By being evil I mean people or states who choose to indiscriminately kill, imprison, torture and inflict severe physical and mental pressures on others. Examples are Nazi Germany in the 1940’s and the Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia in the 1970’s. There are states and organisations in Africa and one or two other places that are evil, they slaughter anyone that comes in their way as they try to gain their desires.

And so it is with Israel and U.S.A. In order to gain land for themselves the Israelis have driven the Palestinians from Palestine, from their farms, from their homes and they kill the Palestinians who object. What sort of people are these Israelis, who, when seeing a child’s face look out of a window, instead of raising their hand and giving it a friendly wave they raised their gun and blew the child’s brains out. Or, if there was a family in the room a tank commander would swing around the tank’s gun and blast the whole family, father, mother and children, into tattered body parts. This is not exaggeration, 400 children in Gaza were killed by the Israelis in a two week campaign.

The U.S.A., whose presidents depend upon the votes and influence of Jews in New York who support Israel, have always been ready to give the Israelis the weapons to enable them pursue this evil. In effect US foreign policy is determined by Israel. To support the Israelis the US blocks any attempt in U.N. by other nations to stop or condemn this evil.

The U.S.A. is evil in its own right. Its invasion of Iraq, which brought about the death of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis was nothing more than an attempt to gain control of Iraqi oil. The US government distorted its laws and ignored international laws to allow it to imprison and torture any Iraqi, anyone, they wished. It was the same in Vietnam, only then over 2 million Vietnamese died.

Quite simply Israel and U.S.A. are evil just as Nazi Germany and the Khmer Rouge were before them.

Yesterday, as I wrote that, the Israelis were firing tank shells into a U.N. school in which civilians were sheltering. At least 40 were killed and another 55 wounded. As I said, Israel and America who provided them with the weapons are evil terrorist states.
* The Guardian – Gaza’s day of carnage – 40 dead as Israelis bomb two UN schools
* The Independent – Robert Fisk: Why do they hate the West so much, we will askThis is essential reading
* The Guardian – Israel accused of delaying medical access to injured
* The Guardian – Israel shelled Palestinians after evacuating them, UN says

28th Dec. 2008

Once again I am ashamed to be British. As the world is horrified by the slaughter of hundreds of Palestinians in Gaza by the Israelis the British Government refuses to condemn the slaughter, or even ask the Israelis to stop the slaughter. Where is Tony Blair, George Bush’s tame Peace Envoy? Perhaps he’s too busy making money to buy one more fancy house, or in the confessional at his church.

In Britain, on Guy Fawkes Night, (Nov. 5th), there were more casualties from fireworks than there has been all year in Israel from Hamas rockets. In 2008 not one Israeli was killed by these Hamas rockets before the Israelis started killing the Palestinians. (If any Zionist wishes to correct that please send me a list of the deaths of Israelis due to these rockets.) This destruction and killing is nothing to do with Hamas fireworks, it is an attempt to destroy the civil infrastructure of Gaza. Look at the buildings destroyed, the interior ministry, police headquarters, mosques and a university. Several years ago they did the same with Fatah and in doing so created public support for Hamas which brought about the democratically elected Hamas government.

Gaza is the worlds biggest prison camp. Israel controls the borders and all that is allowed in and out of this foul, barren desert strip. Recently they have been restricting food, medicine and fuel such that there is extensive hardship and malnutrition in Gaza. Now The Israelis seem to have decided it is simpler to kill the Palestinians with bombs & missiles provided for that purpose by USA. For the Israelis it is like shooting fish in a barrel. The Israelis seem to accept that Hitler knew how to deal with unwanted people, perhaps Gaza should be re-named Auschwitz.
Here are two reports from the British media. The Guardian and The Independent are newspapers of the highest quality, their reports will be 100% accurate.

* Five sisters killed while they slept
* Gaza Diary

What sort of moral code justifies this slaughter by the Israelis and its approval by the US and UK governments?

July 2006

I feel I should be updating my website with details of the latest incidents in Palestine and Lebanon, but it’s just the same as before. The Israelis destroying and killing while America supplies them with billions of $$ worth of bombs, missiles and aircraft. Israel has devastated Gaza and Lebanon, destroying the infrastructure and killing many hundreds of people, most of who are women and children. They are also targeting UN observers and Red Cross ambulances as well as convoys of civilian refugees trying to escape the bombing. These actions are undoubtedly war crimes. War crimes, does it matter, the USA will veto any criticism of Israel made in UN. Check out this BBC websiteto see what the Israelis have destroyed. Don’t be misled by the Israeli talk of the rockets, home-made fireworks, fired by Hizbollah, they have killed less than 20 civilians compared to the several hundred Palestinians and Lebanese killed by the Israelis in the past few days.

What started this? The Israelis, who have over 10,000 Palestinians & Lebanese held in prison camps, feel that it OK for them to devastate Gaza and Lebanon because Hamas has one Israeli prisoner and Hizbollah has two. I wondered if this was to be a smokescreen allowing the Israelis to bomb Iran, so far it hasn’t been. I’m not much into countries having nuclear bombs but with such a belligerent Israel and USA who can blame Iran for wanting nuclear weapons to protect it’s people.

America is flying in more laser guided bombs, missiles and other weaponry as fast as Israel can use them. Sadly the USA/Israel Axis of Evil has been supported by the British Government which has allowed the aircraft carrying these shipments of bombs and missiles to refuel in UK. Even Bush’s poodle Tony Blair has become a supporter of America’s far right neo-cons. I see that Blair doesn’t want a cease-fire, he wants the Israelis to have a more time to kill more Palestinians & Lebanese and to destroy more of the infrastructure before there is a cease-fire. I can not understand how British Members of Parliament who had humanitarian political attitudes in the 1980’s have been so ready to support Bush’s destruction and killings in the Middle East. I am ashamed of the British Government.


Update, 31st July 2006

When I added the section above about the killings by Israel being the same old story I didn’t realise how right I was. In 1996 The Israelis massacred 105 Lebanese civilians who were sheltering in a UN compound in Qana. Yesterday the Israelis used a laser precision-guided bomb to kill approximately 60 civilians, including 34 children who were sheltering in a building in Qana.

Bush and his lap-dog Blair have repeatedly made it clear that they didn’t want a ceasefire, they wanted the Israelis to have more time to continue their killing.

Well, Tony, you got what you wanted. Are you happy now? And you British Labour MP’s, you supported Blair throughout his lies and killing in Iraq, you let this evil genie out of the bottle, how much longer will you support his far-right, neo-con, murderous policies?



Terrorism in Palestine

  • In the 18 months, up to 1st May, 2002, Israeli terrorists have killed approximately 1,200, Palestinians, (now probably 1,600 – 1,800, up to 12th May 2002). They have used American tanks, American helicopter gunships, American warplanes, and American missiles against civilians.

    In the same period, in response to the Israeli killings, Palestinian suicide bombers have killed approximately 200 Israelis.

  • Ariel Sharon oversaw the slaughter of over 800 Palestinian civilians, mostly women & children, in the Sabra and Chatilla refugee camps in South Beirut in 1982.
  • In Jenin the Israeli army used bulldozers to crush house in which civilians sheltered, the Israelis used civilians as human shields when they attacked Palestinians and checked for booby traps. These acts fall within the definition of war crimes.
  • Israel has developed weapons of mass destruction and has over 200 nuclear weapons, and the USA has done nothing about it.
  • The government of U.S.A. has funded and still funds and arms the Israeli terrorists. This year, 2002, USA government is giving Israel $2,000,000,000 in military aid, that’s an awful lot of tanks, helicopter gunships, warplanes, missiles etc.etc. that’s an awful lot of dead Palestinians, and that’s nothing compared the previous years.

These sources of information are not Palestinian propaganda websites, most reports are from reliable Western agencies, e.g. BBC, CNN, The Times & The Guardian.

A Conservative Total for U.S. Aid to Israel: $91 Billion and Counting

I have not added any information on the amount of military aid that USA gives to Israel for several years, but today but today, (21st July 2014), I came across a link in The Gruardian to some current military aid data that is in in Washington Report. Now the aid to Israel has mounted to $130 billion.

Since 1973, Israel has cost the United States about $1.6 trillion. If divided by today’s population, that is more than $5,700 per person
October 26

A schoolgirl riddled with bullets. And no one is to blame , – October 21 2004

Questions remain after Israeli unit commander is cleared of Palestinian pupil’s death .

Inside Hell, – April 4, 2002

Muna Khleifi lives in Ramallah, one of the Palestinian towns besieged by Israeli soldiers. Here she describes a week of deprivation and terror.

Israeli Army uses tank and heavy machine gun to kill 6 year old Palestinian children. – 21 June 2002
A Brief History of the Arab-Israeli Conflict.
Israelis attack and kill UN relief workers. – Dec. 7 2002

About 10 days after killing the British Head of the UN Relief Opperation in Jenin, the Israelis killed two more UN relief workers in Gaza.

I now see that the US has vetoed a UN resolution criticising Israel for killing the UN relief workers. What sort of morality does the US have when it thinks it is acceptable for Israel to kill unarmed United Nations relief workers?

Death of town, – Oct 27, 2003

. . . Palestinians in Rafah have killed three soldiers and one Jewish settler during the intifada. The Israelis have killed about 280 people in Rafah . . .

Ten die as Israeli tanks fire on peaceful protest, – May 20th, 2004
Palestinian doctors despair at rising toll of children shot dead by army snipers, – May 20th, 2004

. . . Will these Israelis ever stop slaughtering Palestinian civilians ?

Petition to investigate and clear/condemn Ariel Sharon

If you feel that Ariel Sharon activities needs further investigation you might wish to sign:
“A Petition for International Investigation Committee on Ariel Sharon’s crimes against humanity”
If he is innocent of the crimes against humanity he will be shown to be innocent, conversely if he is guilty the world should know and he should be condemned.

U.S. military equipment supplied to Israel
(I wrote the section below in about 2002, so this would have been arms supplied in the 1990’s. I can not check this as the webpage from which I copied the data, atFederation of American Scientists, has been removed. More recently, up to 2012, the US has been supplying Israel with between $2bn – $3bn in armaments each year.)

In the past 10 years the US has provided Israel with $7.2bn worth of weaponry and military equipment, including:

Equipment, Cost (per unit)

Fighter planes

  • 237 F-16 Fighting Falcons, $34.3m (each!)
  • 98 F-15 Eagles, $38m
  • 50 F-4E Phantoms, $18.4m


  • 42 AH-64 Apache Attacks, $14.5m
  • 57 Cobra Attacks, $10.7m
  • 25 Blackhawks, $11m


  • AGM 65 Mavericks, $17,000-$110,000
  • AGM 114 Hellfires, $40,000
  • Aim 7 Sparrows, $125,000
  • Aim 9 Sidewinders, $84,000
  • Aim 120B Amraams, $386,000
  • Harpoon anti-ship missiles, $720,000
. . And a few Freebies
The US also gives weapons and ammunition free of charge.
Between 1994 and 2001 this included:

  • 64,744 M-16A1 rifles,
  • 2,469 M-204 grenade launchers,
  • 1,500 M-2 .50 calibre machine guns
  • .30 calibre,
  • .50 calibre,
  • 20mm

Source: World Policy Institute. Research department: Linda MacDonald

For more detailed information on the supply of military equipment to Israel up to 2001 check out,
World Policy Institute.

Search for the facts yourself

It would be possible to list hundreds of reports of killings by Israelis and how this has been supported by U.S.A. If you don’t want to believe me you might be more convinced if you did the searches yourself, go to Google and simply search for:

Sharon Sabra Chatilla Shatila

or try:

“Foreign Aid” USA Israel


Israel nuclear weapons

Don’t just try these, try anything which will give you more information about what is happening out there, and who is responsible for it.

U.S.A. Attitude to Democracy and Chemical Weapons

If you get bored seeing the Israelis using American helicopter gunships, American warplanes and American tanks to kill civilians in Palestine you could check out the US attitude to democracy, try Google and search for:

[“declassified documents” xxx yyy]

where ‘xxx’ & ‘yyy’ are anything that interests you, try, Chile, Indonesia, Timor, Nicaragua etc. etc. In the past 50 years the government of USA has deliberately de-stabilised democratically elected governments, has funded and armed terrorists in many countries, etc. etc. I could go on and list lots of appalling acts perpertrated by USA. You will be more convinced if you do the search and find the facts yourself.
Do you think the current government is any different? What will the declassified documents say in decades to come?
Another interesting exercise with Google is to try and find out how many people were killed due to the USA intervention in Vietnam, and why USA thought that their deaths were appropriate.
I came up with 2,100,000 Vietnamese and 58,200 Americans being killed. I couldn’t find any acceptable reason why they should have been butchered, perhaps you are better with Google than I am.

If you would like an extensive list of US intervention in world affairs check out, http://whatreallyhappened.com/usinterventionism.html.

Or if you think that the US government is not developing chemical weapons check out:
US Military Operating a Secret Chemical Weapons Program
Don’t get angry with me because the Department of Defense’s Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate is operating an illegal and classified chemical weapons program, I’m just pointing you to the facts.

Please bear in mind that in most of this webpage I am just trying to lay out some facts which many people don’t realise and many prefer not to consider. The newspapers I refer to are are of high standard and their reports are factual.If you have some facts to show that Sharon wasn’t The Butcher of Beirut, that America isn’t funding and supplying the weapons to Israel, if you can show that the U.S.A. has a consistent policy on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and Democracy, please tell me, I’d much prefer to believe that.

O.K. – My Personal View

If I was Jewish or American I would be greatly ashamed of Israeli terrorism and America facilitating it. It’s not about racial or national solidarity, it’s about morality, and the Israeli actions, and American support are immoral by any standard, just like the Nazis, and more recently the Serbs, before them. If someone handed a knife to a known murderer, then stood by and watched him kill someone, he too would be guilty of murder, and so it is with U.S.A. and Israel.How have the Israelis have managed to hijack the government of U.S.A.’s foreign policy and foreign aid?
Even though I did not support the destruction of the WTC, in any way, and I still do not, I can now understand why some Palestinians, Arabs, and Moslems feel such action is justifiable.I am disappointed with Britain, Europe and UN’s ineffectiveness on these key issues. As the butchery continues my views are slowly becoming less pacifist. Surely it is time for Europe, Middle Eastern countries and the rest of the world to supply anti-tank and anti-helicopter weapons to the Palestinians so that they can defend themselves from these land-grabbing Israeli terrorists.

By the way,
I am not a Palestinian,
I am not an Arab,
I am not a Moslem,
I am not anti-semitic, (I differentiate between being Anti-Israel and Anti-semitic).
I’m just an insignificant English guy who is apalled by this Israeli terrorism which is sponsored by the Americans.

Palestine for the Palestinians.


Threats from Jewish Defense League – 19 August 2012

Here is an email that I have just received from the Jewish Defense League.

Dear Mr Loud

We are fully aware of your continuous attempts to vilify the State of Israel via your own websites and the comments that you post on third party forums. We respect your right to express your views – however offensive and factually incorrect (the lies that you promote as ‘fact’ are typical of your kind), and we accept that you have that prerogative.

However, your dishonest, disingenuous claims that you are not anti-semitic do not ring true when viewed in the context of one of the images that appears on several of your web pages. You have ‘doctored’ the Star of David (a symbol that has great significance and resonance for ALL Jews, not just Israelis) so that it appears with a nazi Swastika as it’s central motif. This is a clear and blatant attempt to not only cause offense to the entire Jewish race, but to also incite anti-semitism. As such, you are committing a very serious criminal offense. The last person in the UK to display similar imagery on line received a long prison sentence.

If that image remains in place on your website(s) 48-hours from now, then we intend to make a formal complaint about you to the police. And if they cannot force you to remove it, then we will. In the middle of the last century, Jews had no right of response when we were vilified and attacked by your ideological soulmates, but those days are long gone. Jews are now a strong and resourceful people, and when we are attacked and/or demonised, we respond with all the resources at our disposal and with extreme prejudice.

There are three things that you should remember: the saying that we live by is ‘never again’; our hatred of scum like you is even stronger than your hatred of us; we didn’t choose you as an enemy, you chose us.

Danny Levi
The Jewish Defense League

On Friday 17th May, 2002 I received a group of emails about my website here are the key extracts:
(Do these people react like this to the BBC, CNN and The Times everytime they report the facts)


Ancient Jewish History:
The Bar-Kokhba Revolt

(132 – 135 CE)

Ancient Jewish History: Table of Contents | The Two Kingdoms | The Temple

Print Friendly and PDF

The Bar Kokhba revolt marked a time of high hopes followed by violent despair. The Jews were handed expectations of a homeland and a Holy Temple, but in the end were persecuted and sold into slavery. During the revolt itself, the Jews gained enormous amounts of land, only to be pushed back and crushed in the final battle of Bethar.

When Hadrian first became the Roman emperor in 118 C.E., he was sympathetic to the Jews. He allowed them to return to Jerusalem and granted permission for the rebuilding of their Holy Temple. The Jews’ expectations rose as they made organizational and financial preparations to rebuild the temple. Hadrian quickly went back on his word, however, and requested that the site of the Temple be moved from its original location. He also began deporting Jews to North Africa.

The Jews prepared to rebel until Rabbi Joshua ben Hananiah calmed them. The Jews then satisfied themselves with preparing secretly in case a rebellion would later become necessary. They built hideouts in caves and did shoddy work building weapons so that the Romans would reject the weapons and return them to the Jews.

The Jews organized guerilla forces and, in 123 C.E., began launching surprise attacks against the Romans. From that point on, life only got worse for the Jews. Hadrian brought an extra army legion, the “Sixth Ferrata,” into Judea to deal with the terrorism. Hadrian hated “foreign” religions and forbade the Jews to perform circumcisions. He appointed Tinneius Rufus governor of Judea. Rufus was a harsh ruler who took advantage of Jewish women. In approximately 132 C.E., Hadrian began to establish a city in Jerusalem called Aelia Capitolina, the name being a combination of his own name and that of the Roman god Jupiter Capitolinus. He started to build a temple to Jupiter in place of the Jewish Holy Temple.

As long as Hadrian remained near Judea, the Jews stayed relatively quiet. When he left in 132, the Jews began their rebellion on a large scale. They seized towns and fortified them with walls and subterranean passages. Under the strong leadership of Shimon Bar-Kokhba, the Jews captured approximately 50 strongholds in Judea and 985 undefended towns and villages, including Jerusalem. Jews from other countries, and even some gentiles, volunteered to join their crusade. The Jews minted coins with slogans such as “The freedom of Israel” written in Hebrew. Hadrian dispatched General Publus Marcellus, governor of Syria, to help Rufus, but the Jews defeated both Roman leaders. The Jews then invaded the coastal region and the Romans began sea battles against them.

The turning point of the war came when Hadrian sent into Judea one of his best generals from Britain, Julius Severus, along with former governor of Germania, Hadrianus Quintus Lollius Urbicus. By that time, there were 12 army legions from Egypt, Britain, Syria and other areas in Judea. Due to the large number of Jewish rebels, instead of waging open war, Severus besieged Jewish fortresses and held back food until the Jews grew weak. Only then did his attack escalate into outright war. The Romans demolished all 50 Jewish fortresses and 985 villages. The main conflicts took place in Judea, the Shephela, the mountains and the Judean desert, though fighting also spread to Northern Israel. The Romans suffered heavy casualties as well and Hadrian did not send his usual message to the Senate that “I and my army are well.”

The final battle of the war took place in Bethar, Bar-Kokhba’s headquarters, which housed both the Sanhedrin (Jewish High Court) and the home of the Nasi (leader). Bethar was a vital military stronghold because of its strategic location on a mountain ridge overlooking both the Valley of Sorek and the important Jerusalem-Bet Guvrin Road. Thousands of Jewish refugees fled to Bethar during the war. In 135 C.E., Hadrian’s army besieged Bethar and on the 9th of Av, the Jewish fast day commemorating the destruction of the first and second Holy Temples, the walls of Bethar fell. After a fierce battle, every Jew in Bethar was killed. Six days passed before the Romans allowed the Jews to bury their dead.

Following the battle of Bethar, there were a few small skirmishes in the Judean Desert Caves, but the war was essentially over and Judean independence was lost. The Romans plowed Jerusalem with a yoke of oxen. Jews were sold into slavery and many were transported to Egypt. Judean settlements were not rebuilt. Jerusalem was turned into a pagan city called Aelia Capitolina and the Jews were forbidden to live there. They were permitted to enter only on the 9th of Av to mourn their losses in the revolt. Hadrian changed the country’s name from Judea to Syria Palestina.

In the years following the revolt, Hadrian discriminated against all Judeo-Christian sects, but the worst persecution was directed against religious Jews. He made anti-religious decrees forbiddingTorah study, Sabbath observance, circumcision, Jewish courts, meeting in synagogues and other ritual practices. Many Jews assimilated and many sages and prominent men were martyred including Rabbi Akiva and the rest of the Asara Harugei Malchut (ten martyrs). This age of persecution lasted throughout the remainder of Hadrian’s reign, until 138 C.E.

Sources: Encyclopedia Judaica. “Bar Kokhba”. Keter Publishing House, Jerusalem.
H.H. Ben Sasson, Editor. A History of the Jewish People. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1969.
History Until 1880: Israel Pocket Library. Keter Publishing House Ltd., Jerusalem, 1973.
The Jewish Encyclopedia. “Bar Kokba and Bar Kokba War.” Funk and Wagnalls Co. London, 1902.
Kantor, Morris. The Jewish Time Line Encyclopedia. Jason Aronson Inc., New Jersey, 1989.


Palestine Hoped For Hitler Victory


Palestine is NOT the Jews’ Promised Land (new book)

Greek Ptolemies with Jewish clergy pulled one of the first false flag operations in history

“Egypt knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites” … this is not a hypothesis nor a claim. It is the naked truth we have been blind to for two thousand years”

… by Dr. Ashraf Ezzat / VT – Egypt


'Egypt knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites' book's cover

Having finished my first ebook, a lengthy process that has taken two years of scholarly research and field work, I have the pleasure to resume my contribution to VT as a staff writer and reporter from the Middle East based in Egypt.

The book’s title is (Egypt knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites). It is a kind of investigative research that digs deep into the ancient history of Egypt and Israel.

I know that the mere mention of ‘ancient history’ will be a turn off for many of you. But bear with here, for what is about to be revealed in my ebook is the ugly truth about the Israelites’ and their ancient deception.

You will find the revelations unfolded in the book so relevant to today’s Israel and Zionism they are bound to change not only your perspective but the whole Zionist paradigm upon which modern day Israel has been established as a state for almost 70 years now.

As you well know I’m pretty much into ancient history, especially ancient Near Eastern history. And why ancient Near East in particular; well because of the following reasons:

  • It is not only the place historians see as the cradle of civilization (ancient Sumer & Egypt) but also, as I see it, the birthplace of organized dogma (Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam)
  • It is the place that witnessed the inception of the Israelite tales of God’s chosen people and their Promised Land (the very seeds of fanaticism and later on Zionism and modern day Israel)
  • It is also the land that witnessed the demise of ancient knowledge and wisdom (heralding man’s long dark ages and obscurantism)
  • And last but not least the land upon which one of humanity’s hugest deception happened, I mean the Moses and Pharaoh of Egypt duplicity (Yes, Egypt was never ruled by Pharaohs, and Moses never set foot in Egypt

In other words, neither Egypt was the land of the Israelite Exodus nor Palestine is their Promised Land (so much for the Arab/Israeli conflict and millions of Palestinian victims and refugees)

Now, pause her for a while and let the echo of that revelation recur in the back of your mind- Palestine is not the Jewish Promised land – shocking revelation eh!

Behind the story/myth of Egyptian Pharaoh is a staggering two-thousand- year deception/conspiracy (exposed by academic research that has yielded amazing evidence-based findings –amazing is actually an understatement).

The truth that will be revealed in the book is that the land which witnessed the Israelite stories of Abraham, Joseph and Moses is actually named “Mizraim/Misrim” and not Egypt of the River Nile we all know (never let any fool/ conniver convince you that Mizraim/Misrim is the name (Hebrew/Arabic) for Egypt, for that is simply not the historical truth (twisted/distorted by an ancient Jewish deception)

Egypt’s native name during the alleged timeline of the Israelite stories was Gopt/Copt and not Mizraim/Misrim (as expounded in the book)

The truth could still be gleaned from the Hebrew Version of the Old Bible. In the following chapter from Genesis that describes selling Joseph as a slave in Egypt (the very beginning of the Israelites’ alleged story in Egypt) you will notice that the English translation explicitly mentions Egypt as the place of selling Joseph.

“And there passed by Midianites, merchantmen; and they drew and lifted up Joseph out of the pit, and sold Joseph to the Ishmaelites for twenty shekels of silver. And they brought Joseph into Egypt” Genesis 37-28

But in the Hebrew Version Egypt is nowhere to be found, and instead we read “Mizraim/Mizrima” .
כח וַיַּעַבְרוּ אֲנָשִׁים מִדְיָנִים סֹחֲרִים, וַיִּמְשְׁכוּ וַיַּעֲלוּ אֶת-יוֹסֵף מִן-הַבּוֹר, וַיִּמְכְּרוּ אֶת-יוֹסֵף לַיִּשְׁמְעֵאלִים, בְּעֶשְׂרִים כָּסֶף; וַיָּבִיאוּ אֶת-יוֹסֵף, מִצְרָיְמָה”

The true Faraon/Pharaoh came from Arabia and could have looked like this photo.

Mizraim is a small and obscure tribal village in the south of ancient Arabia. The Arabic chieftain who ruled over this obscure village was referred to as Faraon (genuinely ancient Arabic title for chieftain)

In the second century BC, the Hebrew Bible was translated to Greek at the legendary library of Alexandria. Seventy Jewish scribes, hence the designation Septuagint, were assigned this task in which they cunningly (and premeditatedly) replaced this obscure Mizraim and its Faraon with Egypt and its mighty king.

The Greek forged version has been the source for all translations of the Bible worldwide ever since (could you imagine the scale and durability of the deception)

The Greek Ptolemies in complicity with the Jewish clergy had pulled out one of the first false flag operations in history.

The goal behind this false flag deception was to create a rift between the people of the Nile Valley and their older Egyptian monarchy (an old rival to the Greeks) by demonizing the Kings of Egypt as Pharaohs defiant to God. In that way, the land and wealth of ancient Egypt had been appropriated by the Greeks while allowing the Hebrews to do the same to the Egyptian culture and history.

The scale of the deception is enormous; tampering with the place names of the original Israelite stories

  • changing the location where those stories happened to a completely different geography
  • hijacking the landscape of the world’s most ancient civilizations and turning it into a backdrop for the patriarchal stories
  • tainting the grand stature and culture of ancient Egypt and demonizing their kings (as heathens and hard-hearted Pharaohs)
  • expanding the size and shifting the borders of the Israelite alleged promised land (from a tiny and arid terrain in south Arabia to the fertile crescent bordered by ancient Egypt in the west and Mesopotamia/Iraq to the east
  •  making use of the grandeur of ancient Egypt had helped transform the structure and the milieu of the Israelite stories from an extremely primitive and local tribal tales into globally disseminated stories.

All that with the Greeks/Ptolemies’ blessings.

Actually the Greek/Jewish complicity is almost like the so called strategic and unbreakable bond between the nowadays US and Israel.

Obviously the Jews have an ancient and inherent proficiency of affiliating with and then controlling world superpowers. They did that in ancient times with the Persians (before the release from Captivity 539 BC) then with the Greeks in 2nd century BC (a complicity that led to forging their fake Septuagint Bible) and the same complicity was repeated centuries later between the Roman monarchy and the Jewish elite (a duplicity that led to the tailoring of Christianity- an absolutely pro-Roman new faith 1st century AD)

And currently that same duplicity and complicity has long been in progress for almost a century now between the US/EU and Zionism.

Supported by a body of academic researches carried out by serious scholars, the author of (Egypt knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites) is not only revisiting the ancient Near East and exposing the deceptions of the ancient Jewish clergy and illuminati but in the process is also demolishing the very basis upon which modern Zionism and the state of Israel has been established.

Get ready to think the unthinkable and imagine the never thought imaginable, for if Egypt knew no Pharaohs then it goes without saying that Egypt never Knew Moses either. And if Moses never set foot in Egypt, then The Exodus’ road map into the Promised Land has to be redrawn.

Not only is the author going to stop this far but he is going to hit the readers with more explosive revelations such as neither Abraham nor Joseph ever set foot in Egypt or even dreamed about it.

And if that’s not enough the readers will be in for a stunning surprise when they will find out that the true Pharaoh is not Egyptian and that he actually came from the arid and tribal land of Arabian desert.

And that’s not all, brace yourselves for more astonishing revelations uncovering the Arabic roots of Judaism (and its relation to modern day Wahhabism) and where exactly the Jewish Patriarchs Abraham, Joseph and Moses lived and died.

Still the biggest surprises this book will reveal is that ancient Egypt never witnessed any of the stories of the Jewish patriarchs and that the land of the Nile valley knew neither Pharaohs nor any Israelites.

Neither Egypt is the land of the Israelites’ Exodus nor Palestine their promised land.

End of WW II – The Mass Rape of German Women by the Red Army and its Allies

Hellstorm: The Devil’s Cauldron

. . . by JA Sexton and Lasha Darkmoon

Two million German women were savagely raped and tortured at the tail end of WWII. No one has yet apologized for these horrific war crimes. Why not?

about to die“In the German race there is nothing but evil. Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill!” 

— Ilya Ehrenberg, Jewish propagandist for the Stalin regime

This 6000-word article consists of two parts. Part 1, by Lasha Darkmoon, sets the scene and provides many factual details about rape atrocities against German women by Allied soldiers in the 1944-1947 period. Part 2, by JA Sexton, is a review of Thomas Goodrich’s Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany (1944-1947). This brings to life in vivid detail all the horrors defeated Germany had to go through at the hands of the victorious Allies.

If you have a delicate constitution and want to protect your mind from images of extreme terror, images bordering on the grotesquely obscene, please read no further. If, on the other hand, you have an appetite for the gruesome truth and wish to take a peek into the Devil’s cauldron, then by all means read on.

Part 1: The Devil’s Cauldron
by Lasha Darkmoon

RED ARMY RAPISTS (Artist unknown)
(German artist Herbert Smagon)

One German woman came to her priest and broke down in tears. “Father, I can’t go on living! Thirty of them raped me last night.” (Goodrich, p.158).The German clergy were only too aware of the rape and mass murder of Catholic nuns, many of them bedridden geriatric women. One of these priests writes in his diary:

“The girls, women and nuns were raped incessantly for hours on end, the soldiers standing in queues, the officers at the head of the queues, in front of their victims.

During the first night many of the nuns and women were raped as many as fifty times.The Russians knocked them down, kicked them, beat them on the head and in the face with the butt-end of their revolvers and rifles.

The same dreadful scenes were enacted in the hospitals, homes for the aged, and other such institutions. Even nuns who were seventy and eighty years old and were ill and bedridden were raped and ill-treated by these barbarians. (Ibid. p.84)

The Americans and the Brits knew all these atrocities were going on but did nothing to stop them. They stood by and saw it all happening, cruel accomplices to crime. Indeed, many of them joined in the bloodbath of sadistic sexuality: Americans, Brits, French, and French Moroccans in particular.

“Staggered by what he had seen and heard, a German officer tried desperately to make sense of the disaster; to understand the minds of men ‘who find . . . pleasure in raping the same woman over and over, dozens of times, even while other women are standing near.’” (Ibid. p.93)

Inflicting savage sex wounds on German women, including their children in the presence of their parents, was one the perks of war for these coldhearted killers. “Our fellows were so sex-starved,” a Soviet major told a British journalist at the time, “that they often raped old women of sixty, seventy or even eighty — much to these grandmothers’ surprise, if not downright delight.”

This cynical throwaway comment is indicative of the surreal atmosphere of war fever that possessed so many otherwise sane and well-balanced people at that time: the bizarre idea that an 80-year-old German grandmother should actually be flattered and pleased to be raped.

Several German women recorded how even Soviet servicewomen watched and laughed while they were being gang-raped.

While the idea that the Russians were largely to blame for this orgy of mass rape cannot be denied, the overall picture is more nuanced. “There were Russian freebooters who drank and raped quite shamelessly,” British historian Anthony Beevor tells us, “but there were also idealistic, austere communists and members of the Russian intelligentsia who were appalled by such behaviour.”

Beria and Stalin, back in Moscow, knew perfectly well what was going on from a number of detailed reports….Marshal Rokossovsky issued order No 006 in an attempt to direct “the feelings of hatred at fighting the enemy on the battlefield.” It appears to have had little effect. The commander of one rifle division is said to have “personally shot a lieutenant who was lining up a group of his men before a German woman spreadeagled on the ground”. But either officers were involved themselves, or the lack of discipline made it too dangerous to restore order over drunken soldiers armed with submachine guns.”  — Historian Anthony Beevor, acclaimed author of “Berlin: The Downfall 1945.”

Drink of every variety, Beevor discloses, including dangerous chemicals seized from laboratories and workshops, was a major factor in the violence.

“It seems as if Soviet soldiers needed alcoholic courage to attack a woman. But then, all too often, they drank too much and, unable to complete the act, used the bottle instead with appalling effect. A number of victims were mutilated obscenely.”

According to Beevor, estimates of rape victims from Berlin’s two main hospitals ranged from 95,000 to 130,000. One doctor calculated that out of approximately 100,000 women raped in Berlin, roughly 10,000 died as a result. Mostly from suicide. The death rate was thought to have been much higher among the 1.4 million estimated victims in East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia. “Altogether at least two million German women are thought to have been raped,” Beevor concludes, “and a substantial minority, if not a majority, appear to have suffered multiple rape.” (See here)

Note that we are talking about 2 million different women being raped, not about two million rapes. Given that women were often raped several times a day—sometimes 60-70 times according to one authority—the total number of rapes could well have numbered over 20 million.

Since the Red Army included a substantial number of Jews in it, many in supervisory positions, there appears to have been an unwritten rule that Jewish women should be exempt from rape. After all, the Bolshevik regime whose forces were carrying out most of these rapes was known to be an essentially Jewish regime, with the cheka or secret police and other top government functionaries being predominantly Jewish. There is a curious account, however, of one German Jewess being raped by Soviet troops. When this was pointed out to the rapists as some kind of anomaly — “Hey, don’t rape her, she’s Jewish!” — the brutalized soldiers are reported to have sneered, “So what? A woman is a woman. Frau ist Frau.”

Here are some relevant facts which the reader might wish to bear in mind when reading JA Sexton’s chilling review of Goodrich’s Hellstorm that follows in Part 2 of this article:

These acts of sexual violence against German women, described by Beevor as “the greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history,” took place mostly in 1944-1945 as the Western Allies and the Red Army fought their way into the Third Reich. They began in October 1944 and reached their climax in 1945, continuing until the winter of 1947-1948.

Of the 2 million German women who were raped, an estimated 240,000 died in the process after sustaining multiple wounds and being gang-raped several times—sometimes as many as 100 times in a single day. A large number of these women are said to have committed suicide.

Stalin knew that these rapes were going on and that the reputation of the Red Army and the Soviet Union was suffering as a consequence. There was a notable difference between the official Soviet attitude to these rapes—one of severe disapproval and condemnation—and Stalin’s own laissez-faire attitude which reflected the view of many around him, especially the Jews in his entourage who hated the Germans with an unquenchable hatred.

Remember that it was Ilya Ehrenberg, Stalin’s Jewish Red Army propagandist, who had authored and signed several leaflets urging Soviet  troops to kill the Germans without mercy and to take German women as their “lawful booty.”

In January 1945 Stalin signed an order criminalizing Red Army misconduct. It stated that civilians “should not be subjected to violence. The perpetrators will be punished. In liberated territories, sexual relations with females are not allowed. Perpetrators of violence will be shot.”

These regulations however were seldom applied with any degree of stringency. Leniency, laissez-faire and connivance were the rule rather than the exception—exactly as in Israel today where the IDF and Jewish settlers break Israeli law with impunity and are seldom punished for their crimes of violence against the Palestinians.

Nothing changes in this respect. The law says, Thou Shalt Not. But the state-backed criminal does what he pleases.

Stalin’s easygoing attitude to the mass rape and murder of German women was revealed in an unofficial, off-the-cuff comment he made to Yugoslav politician Milovan Djilas who had complained to him about Red Army rapes in Yugoslavia.

“Understand it ,” Stalin is reported to have said cynically, “that if a soldier who has crossed thousands of kilometres through blood and fire and death has fun with a woman or takes some trifle.” On another occasion, when told that Red Army soldiers had sexually maltreated some German women, he said dismissively: “We lecture our soldiers too much; let them have their initiative.”

Boys will be boys. Let the lads have their fun.

According to Oleg Rzheshevsky, a professor and President of the Russian Association of World War II Historians, 4,148 Red Army officers and soldiers had been convicted of atrocities. He explained that plunder and rapine were  an inevitable part of war and that other Allied forces committed such crimes too, not just the Soviets. On the whole, he believed Soviet servicemen had been well-behaved and treated the German enemy in a humane and civilized manner.

The German woman who had been raped sixty times in a single day clearly would not have agreed with this rosy picture of Russian civility.

This claim of exemplary behavior by “most” Soviets soldiers later became the refrain among Soviet commentators, too traumatized with guilt and shame to be able to admit what their own people had done. Russian soldiers were credited with “feeding the German population, rescuing children, and helping to restore normal life in the country.” In many cases this was true. Not all Russians were brutes. Many were indeed kind and decent, noble and self-restrained, deeply impregnated with the Christian values of the great race that had given the world Tolstoy and Dostoevsky.

Indeed one Russian official, Makhmut Gareev, said that “he had not even heard about any sexual violence.” (Seehere)

The number of rapes committed by US servicemen in Germany are officially estimated at 11,040. Many of these were gang rapes committed by armed American soldiers at gunpoint. The journalist Osmar White, a war correspondent from Australia who served with American troops during the war, writes:

“I know for a fact that many women were raped by White Americans. No action was taken against the culprits. A typical victimization with sexual assault by drunken American personnel marching through occupied territory involved threatening a German family with weapons, forcing one or more women to engage in sex, and putting the entire family out on the street afterward.”

In May-June 1946, no fewer than five dead German women were found in American barracks. Maybe they were being kept as trophies or for continued use after death. Blood-spattered sex dolls. We’ll never know. Punishment was sporadically meted out to American rapists, the maximum severity being reserved for black American soldiers by their white racist officers. Some one had to be singled out for punishment, after all, so why not Jim Crow?  (See here)

British troops were also guilty of raping German women. On a single day in mid-April 1945, three German women were raped by British soldiers in Neustadt. A senior British army chaplain was quite matter-of-fact about British participation in rape. “A good deal of rape is going on,” he admitted, adding somewhat callously: “The women probably deserved it.”

Let us see what these German women “deserved”.  Here are a few grisly quotes from Hellstorm which you will not find in Sexton’s book review below, though you will find other quotes there that are equally horrifying.

“Of all the methods used to express its anger, the Red Army said it best with rape. From eight to eighty, healthy or ill, indoors or out, in fields, on sidewalks, against walls, the spiritual massacre of German women continued unabated. (p.155)

The mothers had had to witness how their ten and twelve-year-old daughters were raped by some 20 men; the daughters in turn saw their mothers being raped, even their grandmothers. Women who tried to resist were brutally tortured to death. There was no mercy. (p. 159)

When even violated corpses could no longer be of use, sticks, iron bars and telephone receivers were rammed up their vaginas. (p. 155)

The women were raped, not once or twice but ten, twenty, thirty and a hundred times, and it was all the same to the Russians whether they raped mere children or old women. (p.79)

“Those women who were pregnant, on their menstrual cycle, or enduring diarrhea, suffered like all the rest. Nothing, it seemed—not age, ailment or ugliness—could repel the Red rapist.

Even death was no defense.

‘I saw some twenty Red Army men standing in line before the corpse of a woman certainly beyond sixty years of age who had been raped to death,’ one sickened witness recorded. ‘They were shouting and laughing and WAITING FOR THEIR SATISFACTION OVER HER DEAD BODY.’” (Emphasis added, p.84)

The haunting book review that follows in Part 2 will take you to hell and back. Prepare for a roller coaster ride into a landscape of terror that neither Dante in his Inferno nor Hieronymus Bosch in his maddest paintings could ever have imagined.

Part 2: Into the Inferno,
by JA Sexton

 A review of Thomas Goodrich’s Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany (1944-1947),

1What is hell?

I’ve often pondered what the concept “hell” entailed; what it means to be living in the absence of “God,” the supreme creative force behind all life. After reading Thomas Goodrich’s breathtaking and physically nauseating analytical narrative of the burnt offering – Holocaust – of Germany I now know what hell looks like and how its inhabitants live and behave.

Relentless, reckless, and senseless hate of a magnitude so profound, so immense, that I am still unable to understand it. And then the irony of it all: that former inhabitants of Europe – Europeans – were responsible for inculcating hell in their own Heimat(homeland).

Who but the Devil itself could make a family turn on itself, causing it to tear itself apart in such a murderous, inhuman fashion that the victims are left unrecognizable after all the torture, abuse, burning, systematic rape, and beatings subsides?

Who or what could inspire such madness? Thomas Goodrich answers this question silently, subtly, but matter-of-factly :  the Jews in Communist Russia (the former USSR) were to blame — and so, too, were the Jews of Capitalist America and Britain.

Hellstorm is the type of book that changes lives. Goodrich is the type of author who literally puts you, the reader, there in the midst of hell. And what is this hell that he forces you to experience page after page, torture after torture, and rape after rape? One that has been all but forgotten; the only hell the modern age really knows.

The Allied Holocaust of National Socialist Germany

Goodrich describes the Allied-induced inferno in more detail than most need to know to gain an understanding of the depths of Allied criminality and hatred, but the detail is necessary. Without the detail no one will really know what hell is like. Here’s a taste of it.

A German woman has her jaws forced open by the filthy brutish hands of a Soviet serial rapist. He literally spits into her mouth and forces her to swallow his salivary filth as he rams her body again . . . and again . . . and again – until he’s satisfied fulfilling his oath to Stalin and his chief Holocaust propagandist, Ilya Ehrenburg.

Stalin officially sanctioned the systematic rape of German women. Ilya Ehrenburg, for his part as the lascivious advocator of rape of German women, helped the Red Army perpetrate the largest gynocide and mass rape in recorded history.

Commissar Ehrenburg’s pamphlet urged Soviet troops to plunder, rape and KILL. This pamphlet was distributed in the millions among Red Army troops on the front lines of battle — men who were already intoxicated with hate and vengefulness as a result of over two decades of Bolshevik oppression: the collectivization of their farms, the confiscation of their grain and property, and the mass murder of their families.

Here are the final paragraphs of Ilya Ehrenberg’s pamphlet entitled “Kill”:

“The Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word ‘German’ is the most horrible curse. From now on, the word ‘German’ strikes us to the quick. We have nothing to discuss. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day.

If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime. If you have already killed a German, then kill another one — there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses.

Don’t count the days, don’t count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed.

Kill the Germans!… Kill the Germans!…Kill!”

And in another leaflet, this is what the same psychopath has to say:

“The Germans must be killed. One must kill them….Do you feel sick? Do you feel a nightmare in your breast?…Kill a German! If you are a righteous and conscientious man, kill a German!. . . Kill!”

Ehrenburg, like any skilled propagandist with a penchant for revenge and training in human psychology, appealed to the basest instincts of his men, urging them to rape and wantonly slaughter other human beings at will. There would be no penalties for this injustice. It was all officially sanctioned.

Here is Ehrenburg again, rising to new heights of mental derangement, this time giving Soviet troops the green light to rape and kill as many German women as they wanted:

“Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, not one among the yet unborn but is evil! Follow the precepts of Comrade Stalin. Stamp out the fascist beast once and for all in its lair! Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, KILL, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army!”


There is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses.”
—  Ilya Ehrenberg

LASHA DARKMOON: Ilya Ehrenberg’s attitude to German women—that they should be treated as”lawful booty” by Soviet troops—is strikingly similar to the attitude attributed by Russian history professor Alexander Statiev to the average Soviet soldier: “Avenge! You are a soldier-Avenger! Kill the German, and then jump the German woman! This is how a soldier celebrates victory!”  (See here

Ilya Ehrenberg, directly responsible for the rape, torture and mass murder of 2 million German women after WWII, is now honored in Israel, his papers being lovingly preserved by the Yad Vashem Holocaust museum.

In his 6-volume memoirs, Ehrenberg openly boasts about being aware of the crimes of the Stalin regime, his own included, and actually admits that a veil of silence has been drawn over these matters.

He is buried in Moscow at the Novodevichy Cemetery where his tomb is graced with a crude, cartoonish portrait by his close friend Picasso. One cannot help wondering if the great Spanish painter was aware that his Jewish pal, who won the absurdly named “Stalin Peace Prize” in 1952,  was a psychopath with a lot of blood on his hands.. (See here).

JA SEXTON (continues) : The thought of being burned alive is horrific, but the thought of being burned alive because you are trapped in melted asphalt and literally stuck by your own disfigured hands and knees and screaming is worse.

What did you do to be burned or boiled alive? What was your crime?

You supported Adolf Hitler, the man who dared to stand up to international finance and the Jewish system of systematic international monetary and spiritual enslavement.

THAT was your “crime” and the crime of millions of others in Germany and Europe who were incinerated, melted, tortured, strafed, raped or blown into body parts by their own racial and cultural kindred in the USSR, Britain and America.

The core of the firestorms often reached 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit; the flames 1,300 to 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit. A Holocaust in the truest sense of the word: a burnt offering of the Germanic race – women, children, refugees, POWs, the elderly, and even animals at the Berlin Zoo – to the Christian-Jewish “god” Jahve. The truth is that this was the single largest burnt offering of human flesh to the Devil in recorded history. And for what? For what did hundreds of thousands of German victims suffer: international finance Capitalism.

And WHY? This is why: So that a few people, mostly ethnic Jews, could continue to make money from money and enslave millions of people in the process.


Eisenhower’s camps were designed with one purpose in mind: mass death. They were, quite literally, death camps.

Millions of German men and boys died from starvation, disease, exposure, heat exhaustion, thirst, and of course torture, slave labor, random massacre, and systematic execution.

After having served in the worst war in Western history, and one of the worst in world history, German men came “home” to nothing more than rubble. Their wives, girlfriends, and children were dead, enslaved, mutilated, driven to madness, missing, lost, or had gone with the enemy to survive and prevent further systematic rape by Polish, Russian, and Mongolian soldiers.

There were very few “homes” to return to, so thousands of men ended their lives in despair. They had survived six years of horror and warfare only to end it all in the rubble-strewn wasteland once called “Germany.”


Because their own blood kindred in America and Britain — and even in much of Europe — had betrayed them: had turned on them to appease their Jewish overlords.

An older German woman is approached by filthy Soviet soldiers. She knows what awaits her because Goebbels did not lie. She tries to talk them out it. She has children with her. They dispose of the children rapidly, viciously: their heads are rammed into the side of the building. The woman is gang-raped. What does she recall . . . the rape? No. The sound of a child’s skull when it is crushed against a wall. She’ll never forget that sound.

Nor will I because I too can hear it. I too witnessed it. I witnessed it through Goodrich.

PRESIDENT EISENHOWER: “God, how I hate the Germans!”
“God, how I hate the Germans!”

And then there were the death camps where over a million German men perished because Eisenhower (pictured) hated Germans: “God, how I hate the Germans,” he confided in a letter to his wife.

His racism and hate became official policy, a policy of genocide—an American orchestrated Holodomor. Countless thousands of German men were shipped off to Britain and Siberia to serve as slave laborers for the “victors”.

Victors of what? Total destruction.

While this horror is unfolding, Roosevelt (and later Truman) and Churchill cheerfully offer Stalin half of Europe. They are more than happy to accommodate nearly every demand drafted up by this “Man of Steel.” The result of these Anglo-Soviet arrangements  nearly defies description:

The greatest mass expulsion and deportation in history (upwards of 13 million); the mass murder of millions of Germans and their allies in Russian, French, Jewish, and Polish retribution camps and prisons dotted all throughout Europe and the USSR; the systematic mass rape and murder of German and collaborator women (an estimated two million); and the deliberate secret starvation of the Germanic race as spelled out by the Jewish adviser to Roosevelt and Truman, Henry Morgenthau.

Between 20 and 25 million Germans and collaborators perished in the years AFTER the war had officially ended. It is a crime that will never be forgotten, and it is a crime that will forever stain the hands and national consciences of the former USSR, the United States of America, Great Britain and her Commonwealth nations, and perhaps more pointedly the Anglo and Slavic races of the White race.

A little German boy holds a lantern as he sits in a wagon en route to the Allied lines in the bitter winter snow. He’s with his mother. She’s bleeding profusely; she’s dying. The German doctor who the little boy was lucky enough to hunt down is doing his best to perform a tamponade (a blockage) of her uterus. She was brutally, viciously raped. Did she survive? Goodrich doesn’t say, but the prognosis and tone suggests she didn’t make it. She was a German. She supported Hitler. She was a Nazi. She deserved it.

She deserved it.

So said the Allies in the years following the war: Germany merely got what she deserved. The ‘morally superior’ White nations of the globe had smashed ultimate evil: the Nazis; the German race.



“She deserved it . . . because she was a Nazi!”

Never has a greater lie been told. Never has so much hatred and vengeance been poured forth onto one people and one nation that had chosen not to abide by the laws of international bankers and financiers who wish only to enslave, plunder, steal and when necessary, kill.

And most of the White races of the world were more than willing and eager to take up the flag of international Jewish money power and to smash the one White race that opposed it with such honor, valor and sheer might — so much so that it took all the best brain-power and material wealth of the entire White race, and all the monetary power of its Jewish financiers and overlords, to break its back.

I went into Goodrich’s book expecting to read little more than I already knew about the worst gynocide and mass rape of womankind in recorded history, but I was in for a shock. As an individual who looks out for women’s interests, I was repeatedly overcome with emotion while reading of the indescribable genital mutilations, deliberate and systematic terrorism, gang-rape and wanton mass murder of women.

Here is Brazilian German Leonora Cavoa who was an eyewitness to these sexual atrocities:

“Suddenly I heard loud screams, and immediately two Red Army soldiers brought in five girls.

The Commissar ordered them to undress. When they refused out of modesty, he ordered me to do it to them, and for all of us to follow him.

We crossed the yard to the former works kitchen, which had been completely cleared out except for a few tables on the window side. It was terribly cold, and the poor girls shivered. In the large, tiled room some Russians were waiting for us, making remarks that must have been very obscene, judging from how everything they said drew gales of laughter.

The Commissar told me to watch and learn how to turn the Master Race into whimpering bits of misery.

The horror that ensued nearly defies written description, as no written description can actually make a reader of either sex feel and genuinely know the pain and suffering inflicted in this never-ending horror show. The victims’ pain and suffering must have seemed like hours and hours . . . an entire lifetime . . . I can’t imagine. I try not to imagine it because about 2,000 women in the Nemmersdorf area alone suffered a similar fate.

Now two Poles came in, dressed only in their trousers, and the girls cried out at their sight. They quickly grabbed the first of the girls, and bent her backwards over the edge of the table until her joints cracked.

I was close to passing out as one of them took his knife and, before the very eyes of the other girls, cut off her right breast.

He paused for a moment, then cut off the other side.

I have never heard anyone scream as desperately as that girl. After this operation he drove his knife into her abdomen several times, which again was accompanied by the cheers of the Russians.”


Picture it.

Imagine it.

Live it!

— Josef Stalin

Force yourself to see your own body mutilated in similar fashion; force yourself to picture a knife plunging into your abdomen again . . . and again . . . your short lifetime come to this end: you know you are about to die. You are being murdered; your body brutally tortured by a mob of brutal sadists. Try to imagine the horror and the helplessness you would feel as your person was mutilated and your very life bleeding away on a table.

Can a human being really suffer a worse injustice than this?

Now . . . step back out of the scene and analyze this needless, inhuman horror with the gift of hindsight. This victim was not just the victim of these Red Army men, reduced to base animal instinct and mentality, but she was also the victim of an ideology inspired by Judaism and a Jewish propagandist named Ilya Ehrenburg.

Brazilian eyewitness Leonora Cavoa again :

“The next girl cried for mercy, but in vain—it even seemed that the gruesome deed was done particularly slowly because she was especially pretty.

The other three had collapsed, they cried for their mothers and begged for a quick death, but the same fate awaited them as well.

The last of them was still almost a child, with barely developed breasts. They literally tore the flesh off her ribs until the white bones showed.

Loud howls of approval began when someone brought a saw from a tool chest. This was used to tear up the breasts of the other girls, which soon caused the floor to be awash in blood. The Russians were in a blood frenzy. More girls were being brought in continually.

I saw these grisly proceedings as through a red haze.

. . . Over and over again I heard the terrible screams when the breasts were tortured, and the loud groans at the mutilation of the genitals. . . . It was always the same, the begging for mercy, the high-pitched scream when the breasts were cut and the groans when the genitals were mutilated.

The slaughter was interrupted several times to sweep the blood out of the room and clear away the bodies. . . . When my knees buckled I was forced onto a chair. The Commissar always made sure that I was watching, and when I had to throw up they even paused in their tortures.

One girl had not undressed completely, she may also have been a little older than the others, who were around seventeen years of age. They soaked her bra with oil and set it on fire, and while she screamed, a thin iron rod was shoved into her vagina . . .

. . . until it came out of her navel.

In the yard entire groups of girls were clubbed to death after the prettiest of them had been selected for this torture. The air was filled with the death cries of many hundred girls” (pp. 156–57).

And this is where I have to stop transcribing . . .

“The Commissar told me to watch and learn how to turn the Master Race into whimpering bits of misery.”
“The Commissar told me to watch and learn
how to turn the Master Race into whimpering bits of misery.”

LASHA DARKMOON:  It is a closely documented fact that most of the supervisory jobs among the Red Army Bolsheviks were held by Jews. The sadistic commissar mentioned above is therefore likely to have been Jewish.

As for the Red army rapists, we have a great deal of  circumstantial evidence that the bulk of these may have belonged to three ethnic groups with an ancient animosity toward the White race: Mongols, Tatars, and Asiatic Russian Jews. Remember there were no fewer than 500,000 Jews in the Red Army, many of them primed for “revenge sex” against white women.

Don’t forget also that these mentally deranged degenerates, some of them just let out of prison, had been  given the green light to rape and kill with impunity by Stalin’s psychotic Jewish propagandist, Ilya Ehrenberg: “Use force and break the racial pride of these German women,” Ehrenberg had instructed. “Take them as your LAWFUL BOOTY! Kill!”


Since publishing this article two days ago, I have received further information from a trusted correspondent that furthers my thesis—and it is only a thesis at this stage—that Russian Jews were among the most likely rape perpetrators. Not only were there 500,000 Jews in the Red Army, there were also regiments in the Red Army consisting entirely of Jews led by Jewish commanders.

Here is a quote from Solzhenitsyn on the Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution and later:

“In 1918 Trotsky . . .  created the Red Army. Jewish soldiers were numerous in its ranks. Several units of the Red Army were composed entirely of Jews, as, for example, the brigade commanded by Joseph Forman. Among the officers of the Red Army, the share of Jews grew in number and importance…”

It is my contention that Jewish units such as the one mentioned above were largely responsible for the majority of rapes that took place in Germany at this time.

Covering up this fact would have been of vital importance to the Stalin regime with its heavy Jewish component.

Note that the execution of 22,000 Polish officers at Katyn in 1943, known as the Katyn Massacre, was a war crime for which the Nazis were blamed for several decades, before the shocking truth finally emerged only as late as 2010: that Stalin had ordered the massacre and that his loyal henchman, the Jew Lazar Kaganovich, had been the evil genius who had helped to carry it out — the same man, incidentally, who had been behind the starvation of 7-10 million Ukrainians in 1933, known as the Holodomor Famine.

(See “Russian Lawmakers Say Stalin Ordered Massacre of Polish Soldiers.” CNN, November 27, 2010)

That the rape of 2 million German women was carried out largely by Jews within the Red Army is, I believe, another of those grisly facts that have been carefully concealed by the hyper-secretive Stalin regime. This truth will only emerge into the light of day when Soviet archives are finally thrown open to public scrutiny.

Never in the history of the world has such an orgy of rape and mass murder taken place, all of it against the helpless women and children of a great defeated nation, and all with the full connivance of the three great leaders of the victor countries: the blood-bespattered Franklin D. Roosevelt, the coldhearted war criminal Winston Churchill, and that ultimate psychopath and monster in human form, Josef Stalin.

“We must never forget,” Jewish writer Sever Plocker tells us, “that some of the greatest murderers of modern times have been Jewish.”

It is sobering to reflect that the three statesmen pictured below—Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin—may have been little more than helpless puppets in the hands of the shadowy puppet masters standing behind them. 




And yet . . . and yet Germany’s back was not broken . . . Goodrich ends his book on a note of hope.

When all had been destroyed, when all seemed to have been lost forever in Year Zero, the Germans proved once again that such was just not the case.

Brick by brick, and hour by hour, they rebuilt upon the ruins of God’s Empire a new Germany. No Holocaust by fire, no gynocide, no viricide, no famine, no other inhuman atrocities, could subdue or quench the noble Germanic spirit — which is the essence of the White race of humankind.

Even though Germany today is still an occupied nation with a hurting people, she still possesses that flicker of life and spirituality that the other White races and nations lost long ago when they sold their souls to Judaism and the Jewish “god” of hatred and revenge.

“Unbowed, unbent, unbroken.”

Such are the words of an album released by a European band named Hammerfall. And such are the words that describe the German people, the German folk, the German race.

The only ones who bear the burden of bloodstain and guilt are the Allies. No crimes in recorded history surpass those inflicted against Germany and Europe by the United States, Great Britain and the former Soviet Union—all with the ideological and financial backing of international Jewry.

The death of National Socialist Germany was the death of Western man and everything he once stood for.

I must thank Thomas Goodrich. Hellstorm has changed my life.


Sexual and Predatory Magnitude of the Allied Forces After WWII (Part II)

…And Trajectory Implications

“A Russian lieutenant walked into a barber’s shop and proceeded to rape the [German] cashier in front of the customers.” Giles MacDonogh


…by Jonas E. Alexis


After-the-Reich-GILESMACDONOGHThe evidence is quite clear that raping women and children was a form of revenge for the Allied forces. “One of the French officers is supposed to have said, ‘We are the avengers, the SS of the French Army.’”[1]

The French units “were made up of French soldiers from the 5th Armoured Division, Foreign Legionaries, and Moroccan and Algerian troops from the 2nd Moroccan and the 3rd Algerian Infantry Divisions. From the first the French made it clear that the people were going to be properly punished.

“There would be three days of plunder. A sergeant said that the troops would be released from discipline, and a quartermaster added, ‘In the next few nights no woman will go untouched’…

“The surviving houses were systematically destroyed with benzene: 649 were burned down in this way. It was now open season for any women aged between sixteen and eighty. It is generally said that the Moroccans behaved the worst.”[2]

The French soldiers moved to Stuttgart, where “3,000 women and eight men were raped,” a behavior which infuriated the Americans.[3] In another place called Vaihingen, “A further 500 women were raped…”[4]

Yet revenge was one of their plans, and they were

“anxious to weed out the major Nazis of Breslau. On 7 May the Red Army deliberately started fires in the ruins. What was left of the city was looted.

“On 10 May the library of the university or Leopoldina for which Brahms had written his famous Academic Festival Overture went up in flames; on the 15th it was the turn of the city museum. On the same day the twin towers of one of the city’s great Backsteingotik churches—St. Mary Magdalene—were blown up.”[5]

Acts of revenge reached their fulfillment when the Jews plotted to exterminate the Germans through poisoning:

“The greatest act of lawlessness committed by the Jews in post-war Germany was the attempt to kill a large number of POWs in Nuremberg. Abba Kovner, who had led an armed revolt in the Vilna Ghetto, founded the Nakom (Revenge’) Group and conceived the idea of poisoning the drinking water in the city.

“One member of the group found a job in the waterworks, but David Ben-Gurion refused to allow him to go ahead with the scheme. They turned instead to the camp, where 12,000 POWs were kept, many of them ex-SS or Nazis, and succeeded in poisoning the bread.

“The prisoners suffered terrible pains, but none died. The perpetrators fled to Palestine and resisted all attempts to make them face justice in Germany.”[6]

The Americans were generally considered to be kind, and many blacks in the army (there were 42,000 of them), as Princess Victoria Louise put it, “were friendly and cheerful.”[7] But many others followed in the footsteps of the Red Army, and “were accused of perpetrating several rapes, in one instance of a fourteen-year-old girl in the village of Altwarmbuch.”[8]

In April 28, when the Allies “were doing little to restore” order, “the villages were full of drunken American blacks with women on their arms, looking for beds.”[9]

Between the months of January and February in 1945, there were 402 rape charges reported in the U.S. army; in April, that number rose to 501.[10] Unlike the Red Army, many of those who were convicted of such crimes were executed.[11]

jamesOther atrocities were committed as well. After the war, the Americans joined the Russians in looting German towns and villages. The Soviet forces, of course, started “all sorts of theft.”

During the first two days of August, it is estimated that they stole “1,280,000 tons of materiel and 3,6000,000 tons of equipment.”[12] U.S. soldiers were accused of stealing paintings, and two U.S. officers “of the Women’s Army Corps were tried for stealing $1,500,000 worth of jewelry.”[13]

In some Allied camps, “the prisoners discussed the merits of the different Allies: ‘In general it was best to be with the English.’ That guaranteed ‘decent treatment.’”[14] At a British camp—Scotland Camp 21—one prisoner “was hung up in the latrines.”[15]

Treatment is “decent” only when compared to the other options:

“At one point the British were handing out between thirty and fifty death sentences a month, although a third of them were quashed on appeal…At Bad Nenndorf near Hanover, CSDIC 74 also possessed an interrogation centre where men were tortured…

“The torturechamber was the old pumproom. Here they were beaten, deprived of sleep, threatened with execution or unnecessary surgery. As many as 372 men and 44 women passed through Bad Nenndorf before it closed in July 1947.”[16]

It was so bad at Bad Nenndorf that German-born Jew Lieutenant Richard Langam, along with many others, was accused of abusing the prisoners.

“Lord Pakenham expressed his concern about the accusation that the British were treating prisoners in a manner ‘reminiscent of the German concentration camps.’ Following the court martial Bad Nenndorf was closed down.”[17]

German prisoners suffered similar brutalities in the French camps, whose revenge reached its zenith by starving the prisoners.

“Very soon after the end of the war the Red Cross reported that there were 200,000 prisoners on the brink of famine in France…officially 21,886 German POWs died in France…

“Salomon cites one case of an elderly Alsatian German historian who starved to death in a French ‘dungeon.’ In another camp in the Sarthe, prisoners had to survive on 900 calories a day. In the prison hospital an average of twelve POWs died daily.”[18]

The Russian camps were the worse. At least 1,094,250 “soldiers perished, half of them before April 1945. Sometimes it was the majority: of the 90,000 soldiers taken prisoner at Stalingrad, only 5,000 returned home.”[19]

Berlin suffered more damage than any other city. Anything the Russians did not steal there, “they destroyed.”[20] But property damages were nothing compared to the women who were raped. Richard J. Evans himself admits,

“Rape was accompanied by torture and mutilation and frequently ended in the victim being shot or bludgeoned to death. The raving violence was undiscriminating. Often, especially in Berlin, women were deliberately raped in the presence of their menfolk, to underline the humiliation.”[21]

A Victim of Allied Forces

It is estimated that 100,000 women were raped in Berlin alone.[22] MacDonogh says that a conservative number of women who were raped there was 20,000.

“The worst cases involved very young children or elderly ladies, and the victims were often killed afterwards. Sometimes they took their own lives. In one instance soldiers raped the sisters who worked as nurses in the military hospital, infecting them with syphilis at the same time.”[23]

One woman, Ruth Friedrich,

“was spared, largely because her lover, the conductor Leo Borchard, spoke fluent Russian. She visited a friend who had been raped by seven soldiers, ‘once after the other, like beasts.’

“‘We need to commit suicide…we certainly can’t live like this,’ the friend said…The Russians took bodily possession of German soil, bit by bit; and bodily they consumed German flesh, night by night.”[24]

The only escape for the women was suicide by poisoning, “and there was much discussion of the best and most painless way to quit life. The discussions had started before the Russians arrived…There were instances of mass suicide by poison.”[25]

There were other widespread instances of women hanging themselves in attics.[26] As rape became routine, it became clear that “it could eventually be laughed off.” One woman, a widow,

“was over fifty when she was raped by an unbearded boy. He later paid her a compliment, saying she was considerably tighter than the women of the Ukraine.”[27]

Another woman, “a victim of a savage rapist who had not only cracked her skull but knocked out most of her teeth, lost her middle-class prudishness with the experience.”[28] One eighteen-year-old “had been raped sixty times.”[29]

Most of the German men could do nothing, and those who tried found themselves bleeding to death while their wives were raped in front of them.[30] Following the rapes were countless unwanted babies. Ruth Friedrich observed that “there would be an epidemic of babies in six month’s time ‘who don’t know who their fathers are, are the products of violence; conceived in fear; and delivered in horror.” She then asked the question, “Should they be allowed to live?”

But that was only the tip of the iceberg: women had to cope with syphilis and gonorrhea without antibiotics.[31] Those who decided that they would not commit suicide and found themselves pregnant came to one conclusion: abortion.

But that again was troublesome: “Abortion was a crude business, normally carried out without anesthetic,” and the cost for performing one was quite costly.

“Many women performed the act on themselves, with inevitable consequences. Despite the massive incidence of abortion, it is estimated that between 150,000 and 200,000 ‘Russian babies’ survived to see the light of day.”[32]

MacDonogh writes that “the daily threat of rape petered out only when the Western Allies arrived in July, and when the Soviet authorities realized that it was damaging their chances of political success among the civilian population.”[33]

But the damage was already done, and by this time Berlin was already referred to as a “‘city without Eros.’”[34] When other groups came in, they described Berlin as “a picture of hell.”[35]

Yet there were instances where the American Allies were involved in rape as well. Margret Boveri, a journalist who worked in the United States,

“recounts the case of an estate-owning family on the edge of Berlin who were out walking when the Russians arrived and so ran back to the house petrified with fear as to what the soldiers would do to their daughters and their friends.

“They found to their surprise that the Russians had touched nothing and had been exceptionally polite. When the Americans arrived, however, one of the girls was so brutally raped that it took her years to recover from the shock.”[36]

Even when the instances of rape slowed down for a time, the Allies treated the Berliners as “former Nazis. No distinction was to be made between good Germans and bad Germans, so the good Germans began to muck in with the bad.”[37]

rape-german-women-ww2-1945Starvation was rampant.[38] In Breslau, for instance, “The Russians and the Poles had made it clear they were not in a position to feed the Germans.”[39]

There were about 42,000 Germans living in Prague in 1945. On May 5th, at 11 in the morning, the Revolution began.

“The insurgents captured the radio station and began broadcasting the slogan (Death to the Germans! Death to all Germans! Death to all occupiers!). There was no mercy for old men, women or children—even for German dogs.”[40]

No one was spared, and

“many of the city’s most notable Germans were put to death during this bloodletting. Professor Albrecht, the last rector of the German university, was arrested at the Institute for Neurology and Psychiatry. He was beaten up and hanged outside the lunatic asylum. The director of the Institute for Dermatology suffered a similar fate.”[41]

Concentration camps closed for Jews, Catholics, and homosexuals were being reopened for the Germans. In Brux, a small town in Czechoslovakia, which had about 30,000 inhabitants, “of whom two-thirds were Germans,” it is estimated that there were thirty camps.[42] Many of the prisoners, who suffered from diseases such as tuberculosis, in those camps were shot.[43] Some “hanged or poisoned themselves, others vanished.”[44]

At many of those camps, Germans “had to strip. Any good clothing was carted off and they were given rags that had belonged to those who had already perished; very often they were covered in blood.”[45]

The longer the Red Army stayed in Eastern Europe, the more dreadful they became to the Germans.

“Anyone found to have [an SS tattoo] was stripped naked and beaten to a pulp. One young, blond boy put up a fight. They prized open his legs and destroyed his genitals before beating him to death.”[46]

Another SS man “was so badly beaten that he had to be taken away to hospital where he died without regaining consciousness.”[47] At one point the occupying army had one man’s face “pushed in his own excrement until he died from that and other beatings.”[48]

On another occasion, eighty Germans, who had nothing to do with the Nazis, were killed in the Jewish cemetery.[49]

“Beatings were a matter of course and the work was grueling enough: eighteen hours a day at the hydrogenation works with six hours’ sleep. Work was a two-hour march away, and a two-hour slog home. The march was all part of the planned humiliation.”[50]

One German nobleman Alexander Thurn und Taxis “was thrown into a wild concentration camp with his family. He and his two sons had to watch while his wife, her mother, and the governess were repeatedly raped. When the sport was over he was marched off to a Russo-Polish run Auschwitz.”[51]

Four days later, the Red Army arrived in Prague, and “Germans were told to bow when they saw a Soviet car.”[52] Then real concentration camps began. “Germans were beaten bloody with iron bars and lead pipes by a civilian mob and made to remove their shoes and run over broken glass.”[53]

Men and women were forced to clear the barricades, which were made of iron bars and barbed wire. Women’s hair

“was cut with bayonets and they were stripped of shoes and stockings. Both men and women died from the beatings.

“A large crowd of Czechs stood by and cheered whenever a woman was struck or fell…As [the women] were driven off, one woman heard a Czech tell another, ‘Don’t hit them on the head, they might die at once. They must suffer longer and a lot more.’”[54]

alliedOne woman, Helene Bugner,“was unrecognizable to her children” at the end of a day.[55] Another, Marianne Klaus,

“saw her husband alive for the last time on the 9th. She received his body the next day—the sixty-six-year-old had been beaten to death by the police.

“On the same day she saw two SS men suffer a similar fate, kicked in the stomach until blood spurted out; a woman Wehrmacht auxiliary stoned and hanged; and another SS man hung up by his feet from a lamppost and set alight.

“Many witnesses attested to the stringing up and burning of Germans as ‘living torches,’ not just soldiers but also young boys and girls…Germans were torched in rows on lampposts.”[56]

German prisoners were placed in locations such as the Ministry of Education, the Military Prison, the Riding School, the Sports Stadium, and the Labour Exchange. German men, women, children, and babies were shot on the 5th in the courtyard.[57]

“Alfred Gebauer saw female SS employees forced to roll naked in a pool of water before they were beaten senseless with rifle butts.”[58]

Ruth Schumacher

For the Red Army, revenge on the Germans was a central issue, and nothing would stop them from their hatred towards all Germans—wherever they could be found. As one Red Army soldier wrote to his parents in 1945,

“Happy is the heart, as you drive through a burning German town. We are taking revenge for everything, and our revenge is just. Fire for fire, blood for blood, and death for death.”[59]

MacDonogh writes,

“Once it had been decided that all Germans were guilty, the next job was to punish them. Despite the propaganda rations meted out by the Russians in Berlin, the Potsdam Conference decided that the Germans were not to be over-fed.

“Requests by the Red Cross to bring in provisions were waved aside, and in the winter of 1945 donations were returned with the recommendation that they be used in other war-torn parts of Europe—although the Irish and Swiss contributions had been specifically raised with Germany in mind.

“The first donations to be permitted reached the American Zone in March 1946, to some degree thanks to the intervention of British intellectuals such as Bertrand Russell and Victor Gollancz.”[60]

Nearly every German was depicted as a Nazi and

“soldiers were told not to be moved by the hunger of a ‘yellow-haired German child…there lurked the Nazi.’ In the American army paper Stars and Stripes, servicemen rehearsed useful slogans: ‘Soldiers wise don’t fraternize.’

“A picture showed a comely German girl: ‘Don’t play Samson to her Delilah—She’d like to cut your hair off—at the neck.’ Or quite simply: ‘In heart, body and spirit every German is a Hitler!’”[61]

Gollancz was a Jew and due to what was happening after the Reich, he wrote his book The Ethics of Starvation, in which he challenged the premise of Jewish revenge:

“It is indeed a fact that I feel called upon to help suffering Germans precisely because I am a Jew: but not at all for the reason imagined…It is a question…of plain, straight common sense, undeflected by that very sentimentality that deflects the judgment and corrupts the spirit of so many.

“To me three propositions seem self-evident. The first is that nothing can save the world but a general act of repentance in place of the present self-righteous insistence on the wickedness of others, for all have sinned, and continue to sin most horribly.

“The second is that good treatment and not bad treatment makes them good. And the third is—to drop into the hideous collective language which is now much the mode—that unless you treat a man well when he has treated you ill you just get nowhere, or rather it will give further impetus to evil and head straight for human annihilation…

“The plain fact is…we are starving the Germans. And we are starving them, not deliberately in the sense that we definitely want them to die, but willfully in the sense that we prefer their death to our own inconvenience.”[62]

MacDonogh notes that “over and over again in his letters to his wife, [Gollancz] is struck by the fact that these suffering infants might have been his own children.”[63]

Gollancz was a man of honor who saw that gratuitous evil cannot be defeated by another equally gratuitous form of evil. To his surprise, the Red Army ended up mimicking to a much greater degree what he perceived Nazi Germany had done.

He noted that “the Germans have been driven out” to “the highest degree of brutality.” He expanded on this theme in his 1946 Our Threatened Values:

“They live crammed together in shacks without consideration for gender and age…They ranged in age from 4 to 80. Everyone looked emaciated…the most shocking sights were the babies…nearby stood another mother with a shrivelled bundle of skin and bones in her arms…

“Two old women lay as if dead on two cots. Only upon closer inspection, did one discover that they were still lightly breathing. They were, like those babies, nearly dead from hunger.”[64]

In order to have a better grasp of what was happening, “Gollancz had gone to Germany with the ‘attitude of a sceptic.’” In other words, he admitted that he might have been wrong in depicting the occupying forces as brutal. He took with him a photographer in order to back up his claims. Among other things, he saw

“boys suffering from malnutrition…He saw some telling cases in the hospital, with the usual waterlogged legs. His photographer took a picture of a dying man. The death-rattle had already started.

“Another had a scrotum that stretched a third of the way down to the ground…Tuberculosis was at four to five times its 1939 level. There was no penicillin available for the hospitals, because the Germans did not have the money to pay for it.”[65]

Gollancz should be considered as a hero in the midst of a world gone mad, but the Red Army paid no heed to his warnings. They imagined the most atrocious methods of torture—and proceed to put them into action. At one point,

“A Waffen-SS man’s penis and testicles had been so worked over that the former had swollen to 8-9 cm thick and the latter were septic. The whole area round to his anus was filled with pus and stank. In Theresienstadt one woman observed a female SS member being forced to sit astride an SA dagger: ‘I can still hear her scream.’”[66]

491224_General-Dwight-D-EisenhowerEven after the summer of 1945, many colonies within the Red Army continued to rape women wherever they could be found. When the Russians flooded into parts of Saxony and Thuringia, they performed a hundred rapes.

At one point, “a Russian lieutenant walked into a barber’s shop and proceeded to rape the cashier in front of the customers.”[67] And how did some of the medical staff react to the situation?

One individual declared, “Our soldiers’ behaviour towards Germans, particularly German women, is absolutely correct!”[68] One leader of the tank company added, “They all lifted their skirts for us and lay on the bed. Two million of our children were born” in Germany.[69]

Politicians in the United States also had no pity for the poor Germans who were being raped and massacred by the millions. President Herbert Hoover, who visited Hitler on several occasions, noted around the same time, “Having seen the results of Hitler’s vengeance on the Poles and remembering the millions who had died in his rape of Europe…I had no pity for his ending.”[70] Historian James Bacque meticulously documents that

“As soon as Germany surrendered on 8 May 1945, the American Military Governor, General Eisenhower, sent out an ‘urgent courier’ throughout the huge area that he commanded, making it a crime punishable by death for German civilians to feed prisoners. It was even death-penalty crime to gather food together in one place to take it to prisoners.”[71]

Antony Beevor wrote,

“Several German women recorded how Soviet servicewomen watched and laughed when they were raped. But some women were deeply shaken by what they witnessed in Germany.

“Natalya Gesse, a close friend of the scientist Andrei Sakharov, had observed the Red Army in action in 1945 as a Soviet war correspondent. ‘The Russian soldiers were raping every German female from eight to eighty,’ she recounted later. ‘It was an army of rapists.”[72]

In 2009, one victim, Ruth Schumacher, told the National Public Radio in 2009,

“I was immediately gang raped by five Russians. The memories come back to you over and over again; you can never forget something like that. Sometimes after I talk about it, I sleep for a few hours and then wake up crying, screaming. You can never ever forget… Nobody talked about that; the danger was too great.

“I didn’t want to know about anybody else’s experiences, and they didn’t want to know about mine. My conscience was heavy enough. And I didn’t want to make it worse. Of course we felt ashamed about what the Nazis had done. But one should never pay back in the same currency, right?”[73]

It is also reported that

“Dr. Phillip Kuwert, a senior physician at the University of Greifswald’s department of psychotherapy and psychiatry, estimates that about 200,000 children were conceived by native German women raped by Russian soldiers.”[74]

Elie Wiesel

Here again we see the hypocrisy of people like Simon Wiesenthal. Why aren’t they chasing those who committed crimes against Germans, particularly ones who had nothing to do with the war, after the Third Reich?

Is one life more important than another? Are Jews more important than the rest of mankind? Well, according to Talmudic reasoning, the answer is yes. According to Rabbi Eli Ben Dahan, even “Homosexual Jews have ‘higher souls’ than gentiles, gay or traight…”[75]

Blinded by this Talmudic mumbo jumbo, the late Rabbi Ovadia Yosef propounded in 2010:

“The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews. Why are the Gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why Gentiles were created.”[76]

Yet when the Rabbi passed away last October, Benjamin Netanyahu unapologetically declared, “The Jewish people have lost one of the wisest men of this generation.”[77]

Shimon Peres added, “When I pressed his hand, I felt I was touching history, and when I kissed his head, it was as though I kissed the very greatness of Israel.”[78]

Hence, one should not be surprised at all when Talmudic extrapolation is being applied to the Gentile world. Elie Wiesel writes in Legends of our Time,

“Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone for hate—healthy, virile hate—for what the German personifies and or what persists in the German. To do otherwise would be a betrayal of the dead.”[79]

Good title for the book. But even if we take Wiesel’s thesis here with a grain of salt, we won’t have to go very far to see that it is fraught with blatant hypocrisy.

What about what the Red Army personifies and or what persists in the Red Army, the brutal raping of at least two million German women, not to mention the overall damage to goods and property?

Are people like Wiesel betraying the dead by ignoring the millions who lost their lives at the hands of the Bolshevik regime? If Hitler’s willing executioners were ordinary Germans, as Daniel Jonah Goldhagen preposterously propounded, then Stalin’s willing executioners were largely Jewish revolutionaries, a historical fact which can hardly be disputed among serious historians.

“There were as many as 10,000—15,000 Germans in the football stadium in Strahov. Here the Czechs organized a game where 5,000 prisoners had to run for their lives as guards fired on them with machine guns. Some were shot in the latrines.

“The bodies were not cleared away and those who used the latrines later had to defecate on their dead countrymen. As a rule all SS men were killed, generally by a shot in the back of the head or the stomach.

“Even after 16 May when order was meant to be restored, twelve to twenty people died daily and were taken away from the stadium on a dung wagon. Most had been tortured first.”[80]

One particular prison cell, which used to be a brothel, was located on a hill.

“Germans were locked up in the cellar, and the whores and their pimps indulged in a new orgy of sadism and perversity. German men and women had to strip naked for their treatment.

“One of them was Professor Walter Dick, head of a department at the Bulovka Hospital. He was driven insane by his torturers and hanged himself on a chain.”[81]

Some women were raped “as many as forty-five times in a night.”[82] In some prison camps, Germans were forced to fight against each other

“until they were bloody and then lick up the blood. When that resulted in vomiting, that too had to be licked up.

“When they had cleaned up the mess they were stripped and beaten with whips until the skin hung from their bodies. Then they were tossed into a cellar. Those who did not die from their wounds were later hanged.”[83]

In March 1945, the Waffen-SS made the mistake of torching the Czech village of Javoricka, probably as a result of what was happening or what they presumed would happen to Germans after the war. Immediate consequences followed:

“The partisans responded by driving the Germans into a forester’s house and the Schloss and murdering them….All the male German inhabitants were hunted into the main square. By the early afternoon there were as many as a thousand.

“The Czechs amused themselves by drilling them, forcing them to lie down and get up, all the while walking among them, spitting and kicking them in the groin and shins. Those who fell during the humiliation were taken to a water tank and drowned. Any who bobbed up were shot.”[84]

With one atrocious event after another, a great number of Germans took the easy way out by committing suicide.[85]The same thing happened in Iglau and Kladno. It is estimated that 1,200 Germans

“took their lives, and perhaps 2,000 were dead by Christmas. Between six and seven thousand Germans were driven into the camps Helenental and Altenberg. When the Helenental was closed, the inhabitants were plundered and herded south towards the Austrian border.

Some 350 people are said to have lost their lives on the way. They were detained in another camp in Stannern where hundreds more perished.”[86]

On another occasion, the Czechs threatened to shoot all the Germans, and took them

“to Masshaupt where they had to stand in a ditch while a crowd spat on them and pelted them with stones…On the 10th [of May] [the Czech] prepared to march. Before the gates of the barracks a jeering crowd had assembled a Czech read a speech: all Germans were criminals. Hand grenades once again tossed among the refugees, producing another bloodbath.”[87]

The Red Army acted cautiously when the Americans were around. For example,

“the torture stopped when the Americans came to inspect, and started the next day…Franz Weinhand was picked up by the militia in Gfell and taken to the castle in Elbogen. He and his fellow Germans screamed so loudly during their whippings that they began to annoy the American sentries a hundred metres away.

“One of them fired his machine gun at their window. Two days later members of the American Commission arrived at the castle and took photographs of the Germans’ naked bodies. Weinhand and the others dared not say a word for fear of reprisals.”[88]

The Czechs, particularly the women, were more than happy to see the Germans being beaten to death. One priest, Joseph Seidl, “had apparently committed no other crime than being German.”[89]

One commander, Wiesner, after smashing the heads and limbs of some German youth, greeted the new arrivals with the words, “German blood is no blood, it is pig’s shit.”[90] At one point,

“twenty men had to dig their own grave and then climb in. They were shot in the back of the head. One man had to be shot three times, yet he was still alive when the prisoners filled in the grave.”[91]

When the Red Army reached Brno, a German enclave, they once again followed

“the usual scenes of rape and violence…Czech partisans established their HQ in Kaunitz College, where the city’s leading Germans were beaten and tortured. Sometimes they were forced to go on all fours and bark like dogs.

“When the Czechs had finished with them they were delivered to the hospital, where they were thrown into a cellar. A Red Cross nurse examined a German who had indescribable wounds to his genitals. Before he died he was able to explain his crime: he had sold vegetables to the Gestapo.”[92]

Usual beatings with truncheons and whips were quite common, and “survivors were strip-searched before being driven on to a camp at Pohrlitz…The Red Cross nurse claimed that a thousand had already died. Another said that the camp claimed a further 1,700…the younger women were raped by the guards.”[93]

At the camp at Pohrlitz, “Sixty to seventy people had been dying daily, largely from typhus…When the Red Cross nurse tried to protect a tender eleven-year-old, she herself was taken away to ‘suffer the consequences’ and was raped by five soldiers. Another witness said that the youngest raped was seven years old, the oldest eighty.”[94]

"Man, I love the Soviet Red Army!"

The irony in all this is that in 2010, sixty-five years after these atrocious and brutal events, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promised Vladimir Putin that he would erect a monument to the Soviet Army.[95]

Keep in mind that even some of the most liberal figures admit that at least 2 million women were raped in Germany alone by the Red Army.[96] The estimate for Vienna is between 70,000 and 100,000, with another 50,000 to 200,000 in Hungary, not counting other countries such as Romania and Bulgaria.[97]

How did Netanyahu, a public figure, get away with his statement? Let us do some thought experiment here. Suppose Angela Merkel comes out and declares that she would like to build a monument to Nazi Germany.

How would the entire world respond? Wouldn’t the Holocaust establishment and the Zionist world universally ask for Merkel’s head on a silver platter? Wouldn’t the Zionist media brainwash America and much of the world until Germany dethrones Merkel from her post? Wouldn’t they whine that Merkel is seeking to exterminate Jews?

Yet Netanyahu can say some of the most disgusting and politically promiscuous statements and manage to get away with it. If that is not power, nothing is.

As if to prove that the Israeli regime seeks to control much of the world through deceptive means,

“Israeli forces demolished several structures, including a mosque, in a Palestinian village on Tuesday, the day a deadline for a deal in now-frozen peace talks expired….

“Other razed buildings included three one-storey family houses, animal shelters and a communal well. Locals said around 30 people were made homeless.”


the King David Hotel after the bombing

There is more: “Israel has approved a total of 13,851 housing units in the West Bank and East Jerusalem during the past nine months of negotiations with the Palestinians.”

What we are seeing here is that whenever the dreadful few are in charge, the moral and political law will be suspended and replaced Talmudic mores.

A classic example would be the first one hundred days at Guantanamo. The Pentagon deliberately and deceptively bypassed the Geneva Conventions in order to brutally torture prisoners and treat them like animals.[98]

This did not happened in just Guantanamo—it was the same thing in Afghanistan and Iraq. And what happened to those who were responsible for torturing those prisoners? Well, they lived happily ever after.

For example, Haji Gulalai, “torturer in chief” in Afghanistan, was “a big wheel in a machine that ground up a lot of people” and was “funded, trained, and equipped by the CIA.” Where does Gulalai live now?

He lives in the LA suburbs with his “extended family,” breathing fresh air and enjoying the goodness of the Zionist life. And get this from Fox News itself:

About 500,000 Jews served in the Soviet Red Army during World War II. Most of those still alive today — about 7,000 — are said to live in Israel. Every year on Victory Day, which falls on Thursday this year, they parade in uniform throughout Israel to celebrate Nazi Germany’s surrender to the Soviet Union. Afterward, they return home to their modest apartments, where some tick off the days in solitude — and poverty.”

Do not forget the Jewish “Holocaust” principle: only Nazis can commit crimes; Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo were lawful.  Supporting terrorist regimes such as Kuwait and Saudi Arabia is rational. Here we are seeing again and again that Yuri Slezkine’s thesis was right:

“The modern age is the Jewish Century, and the twentieth century, in particular, is the Jewish Century…Modernization is about everyone becoming Jewish.”[99]

Slezkine, however, sees this as a good thing, but the evidence indicates something different. In the Jewish Century, what is morally and politically repugnant becomes acceptable, and what should be disgusting progressively becomes the norm. For example, it is now politically correct for Israel to put Palestinian children in cages during winter season.[100]

It is now politically correct for the U.S. government to create “an environment that fostered corruption” in places like Afghanistan “by supporting warlords”[101] at the expense of the taxpayers.

Jaji Gulalai

It is also morally permissible to destroy an entire population in Gaza. TheAssociated Press itself declared back in 2012:

“Gaza will no longer be ‘liveable’ by 2020 unless urgent action is taken to improve water supply, power, health, and schooling, the United Nations’ most comprehensive report on the Palestinian enclave said on Monday.”[102]

People like Ben Cohen of Commentary and Deborah E. Lipstadt are too busy doing “scholarly work” and chasing after anti-Semites that they cannot find time to deal with serious issues such as this.[103]

In short, virtually nothing is too great a risk in the Jewish Century. Hundreds upon hundreds of Palestinians and Arab and Syrians have to die every single day fortikkum olam to take place.

Just last month alone, it was reported that “global terrorism” rose by 43%; we were also told that 750 Iraqis lost their lives in a violent attack.

Do you think the vast majority of Americans know about this? And do you think that the dreadful few want them to know? And why should Americans know anyway? Don’t we all know by now that we Goyim are just donkeys and beasts?

Weren’t we created to serve the dreadful few? Aren’t we supposed to support whatever madness they inflict upon us, despite the fact that Americans oppose the interventionist position[104] which the neoconservatives have unleashed upon the Middle East?

Take a look at Sarah Palin in action. If there is a female politician who will probably move heaven and earth to do whatever the dreadful few demand, it is almost certainly Sarah Palin. She recently declared that “waterboarding is how we baptize terrorists”!

Honestly, where did they get this woman? Doesn’t she know that Bush supported terrorist organizations like the MEK? And should we “baptize” Bush for doing so? Doesn’t she know that the Syrian rebels are terrorists and that America has relentlessly supported them? Doesn’t she know that Israel has been a terrorist state from its inception?[105] Doesn’t she know about the Levon Affair, the King David Hotel bombing, etc.?

Which country literally split Iranian scientists’ bodies into different particles in 2010? Iraq? Syria? Afghanistan? Pakistan?

The answer is the Israeli regime.[106] Even the Jerusalem Post itself acknowledged that Israel aided “terror group to kill Iran scientists.”[107]

More recently, Foreign Policy has reported that “the CIA wants to use fingerprint scanners and GPS devices to make sure Syria’s rebels [jihadists] target Assad—not the West.”[108]

If Palin is right, then one must ask a preliminary question: has the intellectual fabric of the WASP ruling class sunk that low? At this present moment, “A campaign to allow Israelis to enter the United States without a visa is gaining steam in Congress,”[109] but Israelis do not want to return this favor.[110]

That is an example of double standard, and surely Palin has a small dose of common sense to understand this. If she refuses to see it, she needs to get a decent job and get out of politics for good.

YouTube – Veterans Today –

[1] MacDonogh, After the Reich, 78.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Ibid., 79.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Ibid., 56-57.

[6] Ibid., 334-335.

[7] Ibid., 75.

[8] Ibid., 73.

[9] Ibid., 74.

[10] Ibid., 240.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Ibid., 388.

[13] Ibid., 389.

[14] Ibid., 399.

[15] Ibid., 409.

[16] Ibid., 414.

[17] Ibid., 415.

[18] Ibid, 417.

[19] Ibid., 421.

[20] Ibid., 98.

[21] Evans, The Third Reich at War, 710.

[22] Ibid., 711.

[23] MacDonogh, After the Reich, 98.

[24] Ibid., 99.

[25] Ibid.

[26] Beever, Berlin: The Downfall, 107.

[27] MacDonogh, After the Reich, 99.

[28] Ibid., 100.

[29] Ibid., 101.

[30] Ibid., 100; also Evans, The Third Reich at War, 710.

[31] MacDonogh, After the Reich, 102.

[32] Ibid.

[33] Ibid.

[34] Ibid., 103.

[35] Ibid., 104.

[36] Ibid., 115.

[37] Ibid., 117.

[38] Ibid., 116.

[39] Ibid., 178.

[40] Ibid., 132.

[41] Ibid., 132-133.

[42] Ibid., 146-147.

[43] Ibid., 147.

[44] Ibid., 148.

[45] Ibid., 150.

[46] Ibid., 151.

[47] Ibid., 152.

[48] Ibid., 153.

[49] Ibid., 151.

[50] Ibid., 147.

[51] Ibid., 133.

[52] Ibid.

[53] Ibid.

[54] Ibid.

[55] Ibid.

[56] Ibid., 134.

[57] Ibid.

[58] Ibid.

[59] Evans, The Third Reich at War, 710.

[60] MacDonogh, After the Reich, 362.

[61] Ibid., 370.

[62] Ibid., 362-363.

[63] Ibid., 363.

[64] Wikipedia.

[65] MacDonogh, After the Reich, 364.

[66] Ibid., 157.

[67] Ibid., 210.

[68] Quoted in Antony Beevor, “‘They Raped Every German Female from Eight to 80,’” Guardian, May 1, 2002.

[69] Ibid.

[70] Quoted in James Bacque, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950(Vancouver: Talonbooks, 2007), 159.

[71] Ibid., 40.

[72] Beevor, “‘They Raped Every German Female from Eight to 80,’” Guardian, May 1, 2002.

[73] Quoted in Eric Westervelt, “Silence Broken on Red Army Rapes in Germany,” National Public Radio, July 17, 2009.

[74] Ibid.

[75] “Gay Jews Have ‘Higher Souls’ Than Gentiles, Says Deputy Minister,” Haaretz, December 29, 2013.

[76] Quoted in Jonah Mandel, “Yosef: Gentiles Exist Only to Serve Jews,” Jerusalem Post, October 18, 2010.

[77] Quoted in Gwen Ackerman, “Ovadia Yosef, Rabbi Who Led Followers into Politics, Dies,” Bloomberg, October 7, 2013.

[78] Quoted in Israel Kershner, “Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, Spiritual Leader of israel’s Sephardic Jews, Dies at 93,” NY Times, October 7, 2013.

[79] Elie Wiesel, Legends of our Time (New York: Schocken Books, 1982), 142.

[80] MacDonogh, After the Reich, 134.

[81] Ibid., 134.

[82] Ibid., 136.

[83] Ibid., 137.

[84] Ibid., 138.

[85] Ibid., 139.

[86] Ibid., 140.

[87] Ibid., 141.

[88] Ibid., 142.

[89] Ibid., 143.

[90] Ibid., 145.

[91] Ibid., 143.

[92] Ibid., 139.

[93] Ibid.

[94] Ibid., 140.

[95] Herb Keinon, “PM: Israel to Erect Red Army Memorial,” Jerusalem Post, Feb 17, 2010; “Netanyahu in Moscow: Israel Not Planning War,” Haaretz, Feb 16, 2010.

[96] Andrew Roberts, “Stalin’s Army of Rapists: The Brutal War Crime that Russia and Germany Tried to Ignore,” Daily Mail, October 24, 2008.

[97] Ibid.

[98] See for example Karen Greenberg, The Least Worst Place: Guantanamo’s First 100 Days (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).

[99] Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), 1.

[100]Adam Withnal, “Israel government ‘tortures’ Palestinian children by keeping them in cages, human rights group says,” The Independent, January 1, 2014.

[101] Tony Capaccio, “Afghanistan Corruption Fostered by U.S., Pentagon Finds,” Bloomberg, April 30, 2014.

[103] Ben Cohen, “Global Anti-Semitism Continues to Surge,” Commentary, April 29, 2014; Deborah E. Lipstadt, “In Europe, Elites Create the Atmosphere That Allows Popular Anti-Semitism to Grow,” Tablet Magazine, January 2, 2014.

[104] Janet Hook, “Americans Want to Pull Back From World Stage, Poll Finds,” Wall Street Journal, April 30, 2014.

[105] See for example Ami Pedahzur and Arie Perliger, Jewish Terrorism in Israel (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009).

[106] See for example Dan Raviv and Yossi Melman, Spies Against Armageddon: Inside Israel’s Secret Wars (Sea Cliff, NY: Levant Books, 2012).

[107] “‘Israel Aiding Terror Group to Kill Iran Scientists,’” Jerusalem Post, February 9, 2012.

[108] Yochi Dreazen, Shane Harris, and Dan Lamothe, “How Do You Teach and Old Gun New Tricks?,” Foreign Policy, April 29, 2014.

[109] Bradley Klapper and Matthew Lee, “Israeli Push for Visa-Free Travel to US Faces Test,” Business Week, April 25, 2014.

[110] Glenn Greenwald, “Barbara Boxer, AIPAC Seek to Codify Israel’s Right to Discriminate Against Americans,”Guardian, April 13, 2013.


Fugitive Rabbi Accused of Sex Crimes Issues Death Threat Against South Africa’s Chief Rabbi


He is not on the run: they simply do not want to arrest him. They know where he is, they know where he stays, they know all his whereabouts, he even allows himself to issue death threats, with impunity. They do not want to arrest him because he is a jew and a rabbi. That’s all.


A fugitive rabbi on the run from Interpol has issued a death threat against the chief rabbi of South Africa, Warren Goldstein.
The threat, made by followers of the Jewish sect’s leader in his name and on his website, has rattled the South African Jewish community.
South African Police Service officers, acting on a request from Interpol, 10 days ago raided a hotel in Samrand, north of Johannesburg, where 78-year-old Rabbi Eliezer Berland has been staying on and off for five months with a number of his disciples.

Berland, one of the leaders of the Bratslav Hasidic movement in Israel and head of Yeshivat Shuvu Bonim in Jerusalem —and considered a holy man by his followers — has been on the run since 2012 when allegations were made by female followers in Israel that he had sexually harassed or raped them.

He has managed to live under the noses of authorities from Morocco to the Netherlands and Zimbabwe.

In South Africa he has been staying at hotels and golf estates. He is followed by about 40 families, to whom he is a spiritual guru.

The men study with him all day and teach the younger boys while their wives take care of the many children and cook. They may not eat the food or use the crockery and cutlery at any of these establishments since the hotels are not kosher. They cook in their rooms.
Sect members — most of whom speak Hebrew only — were this week adamant that the rabbi would return in two weeks’ time or so when things were “calmer.” They said they were upset about the police raid on the hotel on Friday night last week and said their children had been “traumatized.”

Hila Nakesh, whose mother was born in Greenside, Johannesburg, said she saw a policeman pull an oxygen mask off her 8-year-old son, Nathan, who has Down’s syndrome, and who was “traumatized” by the “assault” and had to be taken to hospital in Pretoria.
Brig. Hangwani Mulaudzi, national spokesman for the police, denied that the boy had been touched.

Berland, who has eluded South African police on at least two other occasions, apparently escaped from the hotel just before the raid. He is now in hiding.

His followers, especially those in Israel, have blamed Goldstein for setting the police on Berland.

They went further this week and claimed that Goldstein should be subjected to din rodef (“law of the pursuer ”), one of the few provisions in Jewish religious law that permits extrajudicial killing.
Taken from the Babylonian Talmud, the relevant passage speaks of “one who pursues his fellow to kill him” — this would include informing on “his fellow” to the police — and says that such a pursuer or informer may legitimately be killed.

Using the religious legal opinion of a well-known Johannesburg rabbi, the group’s spokesman posted on the group’s website: “The police were sent in an attempt to arrest Rabbi Berland on Shabbat [sabbath] night.
This is a very serious crime. [Jewish law] speaks extensively on the rodef, a person who goes and tries to imprison his fellow in the hands of non-Jews.
There is a commandment to stop him at all costs. And the law refers to a simple Jew … whereas we are dealing with a great Rabbi, a great Torah Sage [Berland].” Much controversy was generated in Israel in 1995 when Yigal Amir, the murderer of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, defended his actions partly on the basis of din rodef.

Amir argued that Rabin’s offer of concessions to the Palestinian Authority would endanger Jewish lives.

Goldstein has not commented on the matter but the South African Jewish community issued an official statement “representing the full spectrum of South African Jewry.

“The South African Jewish community calls on Rabbi Eliezer Berland to return to Israel immediately to face the serious criminal charges laid against him and for which there is an international warrant of arrest against him,” it said.

“We further condemn the baseless malicious lies and incitement to violence aimed at our Chief Rabbi, including the libellous accusation that the Chief Rabbi was responsible for the police raid on Berland’s compound.” Asked why Berland’s followers had accused Goldstein of “a merciless blood libel campaign,” a spokesman in Israel, identifying himself as “Yossi,” said: “This is what we feel is being done to us. Only by us we don’t have the SAPS … or the government protecting us, and sending after us the Hawks or the police and spreading lies about us in the media — which is literally spilling innocent blood.” Mulaudzi confirmed that Berland was a fugitive wanted in Israel for indecent assault and that his arrest had been requested by Interpol.

Mulaudzi said the South African police suspected Berland had an informant who let him know about police movements, and that this was why the rabbi left the hotel before the police arrived.
But Yossi said: “It was nothing short of a miracle. We’ve seen this kind of thing many times, and each time there is absolutely no other explanation for it. Two years ago when the Hawks busted into a wedding and the rabbi was in the center [of the ceremony], they literally had their hands on him and mistakenly took someone else.

“This Shabbat they went into every room at least once and interrogated every person at gunpoint. The rabbi had the door open to his room and he was studying Torah peacefully.

“God blinded the eyes of the officers and they didn’t notice his room.”

This article first appeared in Sunday’s edition of the Johannesburg Sunday Times.




Published On 01/30/2016 | By infostormer | Jewish Problem, News

A fugitive Jew rabbi who is on the run for raping his female followers has issued a death threat against the chief Jew rabbi of South Africa.

These Jews are something else.  If they don’t have a culture or society to leech off of, they will end up destroying themselves.  This is just proof of it.  Jews have no problem Jewing other Jews.  Honor and justice are traits that are not present in their DNA.

From Haaretz:

A fugitive rabbi on the run from Interpol has issued a death threat against the chief rabbi of South Africa, Warren Goldstein.

The threat, made by followers of the Jewish sect’s leader in his name and on his website, has rattled the South African Jewish community.

South African Police Service officers, acting on a request from Interpol, 10 days ago raided a hotel in Samrand, north of Johannesburg, where 78-year-old Rabbi Eliezer Berland has been staying on and off for five months with a number of his disciples.

Berland, one of the leaders of the Bratslav Hasidic movement in Israel and head of Yeshivat Shuvu Bonim in Jerusalem —and considered a holy man by his followers — has been on the run since 2012 when allegations were made by female followers in Israel that he had sexually harassed or raped them.

He has managed to live under the noses of authorities from Morocco to the Netherlands and Zimbabwe.

In South Africa he has been staying at hotels and golf estates. He is followed by about 40 families, to whom he is a spiritual guru.


Grant Smith: A brief history of Israeli foreign agent, smuggling & spy cases

Interesting history of Israeli spying and smuggling in the US, and how Zionist agents escaped prosecution for their criminal activities.

How — and Why — Jews Gave China the Bomb

1035bEven the highest officials in the US government didn’t know of the frantic Jewish activity to checkmate Germany.

ON JANUARY 30, 1933 a Certain Person took power in Europe. The U.S., which had no diplomatic relations with Communist Russia, was then visited in June 1933 by one Maxim Litvinov. Roosevelt had consented to recognize the Soviet Union. The visit by Litvinov would formalize things and get the show on the road. (ILLUSTRATION: Tsien Hsue-shen)

The First World War, if it did nothing else, proved that no European military combination would be able to defeat Germany. It took U.S. power to tip the scales. But in 1933 the U.S. did not recognize Russia and a military alliance between these two powers was the only means the liberal-minority coalition could depend on for victory over Germany. Therefore, there was a lively communication, not for the first time, across the capitalist-communist frontier. We know that Napoleon’s Continental System was penetrated daily by enemies. So was, and is, the Iron Curtain.

The mood in 1933 among the Jews and their political allies was desperate. Could the U.S. be armed in time? The question of timing was paramount, for if France and England went down in a fast blow, and the Germans turned eastward, and Russia went down, the United States would be paralyzed, repeat, paralyzed. National Socialist Germany would be in control of the resources and manpower of all Europe — and allied with Japan! Something was needed besides a tenuous Russo-American alliance.

Now we all have learned about the frantic international cooperation by physicist after physicist, Jews nearly to a man, in the intense search for a practicable nuclear weapon to use on the Germans, a search inspired by the doubt that America could be geared for World War II in time. If such bombs could be developed and produced, Germany could be destroyed even with France, England and Russia prostrate. The feverish nature of the research is evident to anyone who has studied the individuals involved. Einstein was the key go-between in delivering the data from the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute to the U.S. and the affair was considered so crucial that only Jews were deemed trustworthy to carry it out. The trio in charge was Morgenthau, Lilienthal and Oppenheimer. In the Soviet Union, Landau and a whole string of Jewish scientists were receiving all the “secret” bomb plans.

Harry Truman: utterly clueless

Harry S. Truman stated that as vice president he did not know of the existence of the Manhattan Project, the U.S. atomic bomb assembly line. If he, the #2 man in Washington did not know of the project, imagine what he knew about what was going on earlier in the 1930s — that is, from January 30, 1933 on.

What nobody knew, or even knows now, was that the Jews and their allies were setting up a second nuclear bomb project for China. All that one can deduce logically is that if France, England and Russia collapsed and America finked out in one of its Congressional fits, the Chinese, preferably the Chinese Communists, would have a nuclear weapon for use on a Certain Person.

The source for this deduction is The China Cloud, America’s Tragic Blunder and China’s Rise to Nuclear Power by William L. Ryan and Sam Summerlin (Little, Brown, 1968).

The top eighty Chinese nuclear physicists received their training in America, primarily at the California Institute of Technology, but also at M.I.T., Harvard, Yale and the universities of Chicago, Michigan, California and Columbia. These eighty men are the ones responsible for setting off the first Communist Chinese hydrogen bomb on June 17, 1967, over the Takla Mahan desert in Sinkiang. Tsien Hsue-shen, the chief missileman in this successful test, received his education at Cal Tech’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Like most of the rest, Tsien got his training free from funds contributed by the U.S. from its share of Boxer Rebellion indemnities.

Theodore von Karman

Oddly enough, reading between the lines of The China Cloud, which is necessary in order to understand the factual information presented, one observes that the people working in the federal government and in the state government of California had no comprehension of the forces at work about them. But two Los Angeles detectives did. Their names were Bill Hynes and William Ward Kimple. Hynes was head of a “Red Squad” office (his idea) and Kimple was an undercover man who at first failed to get into the Communist apparatus. “Most were New York Jews,” he would say in later years, “and I couldn’t get into the Party.”

Nevertheless, Hynes and Kimple penetrated into a most complex net centering on the training of the Chinese at Cal Tech as early as 1933. On page 44 of The China Cloud we learn that the Chinese, ostensibly not Communists, were placed in Cal Tech specifically for nuclear physics research. Theodore von Karman had assigned Tsien, mentioned above, to Cal Tech’s JPL. Von Karman, a Hungarian Jew, was the great gathering point for data on possible missile delivery systems. He and Tsien were cooperating closely as early as 1935. A typical bit of chitchat by Von Karman, “I remember that Professor Paul S. Epstein of the Physics Department, a great theoretician, once said to me: ‘Your student, H.S. Tsien, is in one of my classes.’ ‘Ja, he is good, I replied: ‘Tell me,’ Epstein said with a twinkle in his eye, ‘do you think he has Jewish blood?’”

Paul S. Epstein

What Hynes and Kimple apparently ran across was Dr. Sidney Weinbaum’s Communist Party Professional Unit 122, Pasadena Section, which was formed in 1936 or 1937. Tsien was in contact with Weinbaum. Coming in and out of the homes where Professional Unit 122 met was the brother of J. Robert Oppenheimer.

The authors of The China Cloud at no time provide evidence that they quite understand what their assembly of facts indicate. One could never prove before a Congressional committee that the Red Chinese were placed in American schools of physics and rocket propulsion so that when the Chinese Communists overran China (1948) they would have a ready-made team to create a nuclear stockpile and delivery system. Neither could it be proved that the movement of each Chinese into a key college course was greased by Jews. But rest assured, it was. The pattern of coincidence, if it were argued to be a coincidence, would have arrayed against it the most astronomical odds imaginable.

Dr. Sidney Weinbaum

The prevalence of Jewish physicists (and agents, organizers, technical directors, and espionage operators) in wartime atomic research around the planet has never been properly evaluated. When noticed at all, the phenomenon is attributed to some sort of “genius” absent in other physicists. The peculiar circumstance of Jews all along the path of nuclear development — even to the proprietors of rooming houses used by various conspirators — is not understood. For such a dense mass of Jews — almost no end to them — to appear in cooperation at a given time and in a given place would presuppose a powerful motive. The motive was a Certain Person, who had them literally desperate, working on a time schedule that was giving practically all of them a nervous disorder. The number of them who knew about what was going on in the U.S. probably included even the inmates of Miami Beach homes for the elderly. However, Truman says he didn’t know.

Something of a similar nature is probably taking place now in regard to other technical developments. We may wake up one day and find out that not only the vice president knew nothing about it, but that the president was equally ignorant. This time the data will not be dispatched to Moscow — there’s some sort of Russian revivalism going on in the Socialist motherland — but to a computer near Mount Zion.

* * *

Source: based on an article in Instauration magazine, May 1978


Review: Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem, Part One

Andrew Joyce
Occidental Observer
January 31, 2016


‘Wagner himself asserts about Nietzsche that a flower could have come from this bulb. Now only the bulb remains, really a loathsome thing.’
Cosima Wagner, 1878.

Friedrich Nietzsche’s puzzling stance on Jews and Judaism has perplexed me for the better part of a decade, so I was intrigued and optimistic about Princeton University Press’s 2015 publication of Robert Holub’s Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism. Broadly speaking, I’m sympathetic to certain elements of Nietzsche’s philosophy, particularly its rejection of equality and the concept of the ‘will to power.’ However, I can’t say I ever came close to describing myself as a ‘Nietzschean’ in the same way that the late Jonathan Bowden was fond of doing. One of the reasons for my hesitation in claiming affinity with Nietzsche’s worldview was that I couldn’t escape the impression that its nihilism was often destructive ‘for the sake of it,’ a quality that has endeared it to the Left, past and present. Then there was Nietzsche’s, to my mind unforgivable, habit of lauding the Hebrew over the German. More importantly though, I couldn’t perceive any true coherence or solidity in Nietzsche’s writing beyond his celebrated aphorisms. Taken as a whole, the philosophy of Nietzsche was apt to strike me as too intentionally fluid; too deliberately open to interpretation. Nowhere was this non-committal stance more apparent than in Nietzsche’s sparse, vague, contradictory and often quite opportunistic references to Jews and Judaism.

As one might expect of a philosopher as enigmatic as Nietzsche, his work has been approached awkwardly and suspiciously by scholars and ideologues alike. His attitudes towards Jews, in particular, have been debated, discussed and fought over from the very beginning of his public career. Nowhere, and at no time, was a consensus ever reached. During the Third Reich he was both ‘recruited for the cause’ by some, and rejected outright by others. His foundational place in the National Socialist philosophical canon was thus never assured, primarily because of his nihilism, his hostility towards Nationalism, and his ambivalence regarding Jews. Confusion still reigns. Modern scholarship has been divided between those who condemn Nietzsche outright as a ‘racist’ reactionary and a proto-Fascist, and those who highlight his vocal opposition to political anti-Semitism as thus seek his social exoneration and academic rehabilitation. As noted above, elements of Nietzsche remain strongly attractive to the Left. Therefore, where total exoneration of anti-Semitism has been found difficult, blame for ‘corrupting’ Nietzsche and shaping him as an ‘anti-Semite’ has been attributed variously to his one-time guru, Richard Wagner, or his sister Elisabeth, who married Bernhard Förster, perhaps the leading figure in nineteenth-century political anti-Semitism. The result of these battles has not been a clarification of the historical record, but an ever-thickening web of biased interpretations, white-washing, and pseudo-history.

Holub’s book postures as an attempt to disentangle Nietzsche from the tug-of-war waged on all sides by those who have wished to claim or condemn him, and who have represented his position on Jews and Judaism with biased motives. The book essentially claims to offer the clearerst picture yet on what exactly Nietzsche thought and felt about Jews and Judaism. The first chapter, ‘The Rise and Fall of Nietzschean anti-Semitism,’ returns to the primary problem facing such a project by dealing exclusively with how others, over historical time, have interpreted Nietzsche’s attitudes towards Jews. I found this one of the more interesting chapters of the book. The story begins in Nietzsche’s own lifetime when he was initially suspected of anti-Jewish leanings not because of the content of his writings but because of his brother-in-law and also his publisher, Ernst Schmeitzner, who published anti-Jewish content and was a well-known supporter of political anti-Semitism. More crucial however was the fact that Nietzsche was considered an acolyte of Richard Wagner’s cultural mission, at least until the early 1880s. Since Wagner’s circle was widely associated with anti-modernist, anti-Enlightenment, and anti-Jewish tendencies, these naturally came to be associated with Nietzsche also. Quite apart from the fact Nietzsche’s public remarks on Jews “were infrequent and ambiguous,” based purely on such associational links, many of the leading political and social agitators against Jews in Germany prematurely assumed that Nietzsche was firmly among their number.

k10635Nietzsche’s general reception during his lifetime was mixed to say the least. His oppositional attitude, his polemics against the status quo, and his vaguely defined (yet epic-sounding) vision of the future attracted praise from an assorted collection of writers. There was, it seemed, something for almost everyone in his philosophy. He drew commendation from Greek scholars for his treatment of tragedy; plaudits from those who agreed with his stance on morality; and admiration from those who delighted in his cutting critique of the hypocrisy of middle-class norms. Those who resented Christianity could find what they wanted in his “ruthless criticism of the Church and its oppressive restriction on human development.” Although he heaped scorn on anarchists and socialists, it is a telling feature of Nietzsche’s abstractions that his writing nevertheless appealed strongly to both. Germany’s conservative nature at that time made Nietzsche’s adversarial quality infinitely more attractive to the Left, and even in the United States he was received primarily as sympathetic to the ‘working-class struggle’ and a champion of individual liberties. Leftist intellectuals chose to ignore Nietzsche’s disparaging comments on socialism, anarchism and feminism because they were so enraptured with his critique of the institutions of middle-class society, which they also hated. Since Jews also hated the culture and institutions of Christian middle-class German society, it should come as no surprise that we also find Jews among his earliest supporters. Like the anarchists, socialists and feminists, some Jews simply chose to block out less appealing aspects of Nietzsche’s philosophy, and it is interesting that most of the earliest Jewish comment on his work studiously avoided discussion of its alleged anti-Jewishness.

However, there were some murmurs from wary Jews. Max Nordau, cofounder with Theodor Herzl of the World Zionist Organization, was a searing critic of Nietzsche but tended to avoid directly confronting any anti-Jewish qualities he may have perceived in the philosopher’s work. Nordau instead labelled Nietzsche an “egomaniac” and specifically cited his condemnation of Jews, ‘Israel,’ and Christianity for overthrowing earlier moral systems with a ‘slave morality’ as “insane gibberish,” “delirious sallies,” and “fabulous stupidity.” The French Jewish intellectual Bernard Lazare more openly accused Nietzsche of anti-Semitism in his L’Antisemitisme: Son Histoire et ses causes (1894) for practically the same reason, writing:

After [Eugen] Dühring, Nietzsche, in his turn, combatted Jewish and Christian ethics, which according to him are the ethics of slaves as contrast with the ethics of masters. Through the prophets and Jesus, the Jews and Christians have set up low and noxious conceptions which consist in the deification of the weak, the humble, the wretched, and sacrificing it to the strong, the proud, the mighty.

Negative attention from Jews was rare however. More vocal contemporary opinion on Nietzsche’s attitudes towards Jews came from the anti-Jewish ideologists themselves. These opinions were often shaped as much by personal relationships as by considered philosophical or ideological evaluation. Theodor Fritsch, author of The Anti-Semitic Ten Commandments, made numerous failed attempts to solicit support from Nietzsche before publishing a series of frustrated criticisms of his philosophy. Similar treatment followed from Eugen Dühring and his disciple Ernst Jünemann. Jünemann was particularly worried by the fact that Nietzsche appeared to be enjoying Jewish promotion: a sure sign to the former that there was something rotten in the writings of the latter. He would write in 1897:

The writings of Friedrich Nietzsche, who several years ago fell into a state of deep derangement, are currently being purchased and read with great enthusiasm by the public since Hebrew advertisements in particular have propped him up, and Jewish opinion, as is well known, is unfortunately fashionable, which is evidence of how low the intellectual and moral level of today’s dominating social powers have sunken.

Jünemann represented Nietzsche’s philosophical trajectory as a “steady decline into insanity and Judeophilia.” Jünemann outlined “a promising beginning when [Nietzsche] engaged productively with Richard Wagner and Arthur Schopenauer, [but] he strayed from the nationalist and anti-Semitic path in his aphoristic period and descended into irrational argumentation and pandering to Jewish interests in his last writings.” Jünemann attacked Nietzsche for arguing that Jews “are the true bearers of culture and the creator of values,” and raised suspicion over the fact Nietzsche’s fame and financial fortunes improved significantly following his public repudiation of Wagner. Faced with a philosophy that amounted to a “Jewish junk shop” of ideas, the German public would have to decide whether Nietzsche was a master psychologist and Nature a “comedian,” or rather that Nature was true and honest and Nietzsche was “spiritually and morally defective.” Jünemann was clear in his opinion that Nietzsche had no place in the movement.

But Jünemann’s rejection was not entirely representative of contemporary nationalist opinion. There were substantial numbers of völkisch figures who found Nietzsche’s statements about Jews and race difficult to reconcile with their own worldview, but who nonetheless found value in the same oppositional aspect of his work that appealed to the Left. One of them, Adolf Bartels, argued in his 1902 essay “Friedrich Nietzsche and Germanness” that the latter’s attacks on German society were fundamentally different from similar pejorative statements by Jewish writers like Heinrich Heine whose arguments sprang from racial animus. Instead, argued Bartels, Nietzsche had gotten carried away in the heat of a “highly spiritual and ideal temperament.” The philosopher had become “ensnared” in Europeanism and the Enlightenment and had mistakenly turned away from nationalism. Although rejecting the anti-Semitic movement, Nietzsche was merely acting against his brother-in-law, and in truth he was well aware of the ability of Jews to “easily obtain power over Europe and its nations.”

But Bartels’ apologetics for Nietzsche’s work were weak and unconvincing for most nationalists, and Nietzsche’s first great adoption by völkisch elements only occurred during World War I. It was during this great European conflagration that his ruminations on war, battle, struggle and related notions found an urgent resonance. Again, quite apart from specific content, the context of the times allowed for the flexibility of his vague works to lend themselves to militaristic and ethnocentric interpretations. Seizing on the new trend, the Germany Army circulated 150,000 of the cryptic Thus Spoke Zarathustra to the troops, and forty thousand copies of the tome were sold in 1917 alone. Mussolini soon announced his enthusiasm for Nietzsche and asserted that the Fascist movement was the concretization of a national “will to power.” Oswald Spengler, author of Decline of the West (1918) declared Nietzsche, along with Goethe, one of his greatest inspirations. Nietzsche had been transformed, by context more than content, into a Nationalist.

During the Weimar period nationalists displayed a desire to ‘keep’ Nietzsche. Franz Haiser admitted in The Jewish Question from the Standpoint of Master Morality(1926) that Nietzsche was “culturally leftist and contradictory” but argued without further elucidation that he “is irreplaceable for us.” One of the most important texts incorporating Nietzsche into the Right was Alfred Baeumler’s Nietzsche the Philosopher and Politician (1931). Baeumler was a close associate of Third Reich intellectual Alfred Rosenberg, and his monograph was by some degree the most important National Socialist work on the philosopher, running into several editions. Baeumler lauded Nietzsche’s opposition to Wilhelmine Germany, but, in relation to the philosopher’s position on Jews, he was forced to “employ strained arguments that are never entirely convincing.” In the end Baeumler resorted to arguing that Nietzsche only praised the Jews in order to goad the Germans to greatness. The gulf between Jünemann and Baeumler starkly illustrates how literally anything could be read into Nietzsche’s work. Even more stark is the fact that while he was lauded by many in the Third Reich, Nietzsche continued to be admired by the Frankfurt School in exile in the United States.

The post-war period would witness yet another radical re-interpretation of Nietzsche’s work. Liberals had by this time started believing the awkward völkisch reading of Nietzsche and were now confronted with the task of either condemning or somehow absolving the newly discovered ‘racist’ philosopher. Many settled on blaming his sister, Elisabeth, who, as noted, had married a well-known anti-Jewish activist and had forged a relationship with Hitler himself. Writers like Henning Ottmann and R.J. Hollingdale hastened to argue that Elisabeth (a “virulent Christian anti-Semite”) had produced editions of Nietzsche’s work that emphasized themes “friendly to the ideas of National Socialism.”  Elisabeth’s ‘influence’ was of course a lie built on top of another lie — that Nietzsche was a bona fide ‘anti-Semite.’ In a post-war West obsessed with its ‘racist’ past, using Elisabeth as a scapegoat provided the means for Leftist Nietzsche enthusiasts to absolve the object of their admiration from the most grievous accusation that could possibly have become attached to him.

Holub’s analysis of these arguments is quite excellent. Using archival correspondence, he deconstructs entirely the notion that Elisabeth in any way doctored her brother’s work after his death, and throws significant doubt over the stereotype of Elisabeth as a violent, fulminating fanatic. Holub’s portrait of Elisabeth is balanced and often sympathetic. This interesting first chapter ends by pointing out that Nietzsche has been claimed by so many, so often, and with so many differing motives, that any sense of clarity on his position regarding Jews has been lost. The only way to regain this clarity, Holub argues, is to return to a close analysis of primary texts and contextual factors, and the rejection of all received wisdoms, including the conventional understanding of terms like ‘anti-Semitism.’ With the slate now ostensibly cleared, we move forward to Holub’s history of Nietzsche’s true view of Jews and Judaism.

Holub surveys an unprecedented amount of Nietzsche’s private and public correspondence as well as his published writings to write what amounts to a biography of Nietzsche’s attitudes towards Jews. Chapter Two, ‘Youthful Remarks and Encounters,’ is an enjoyable stroll through Nietzsche’s childhood and very earliest writings. A survey of his family tree debunks the accusation, made by Jünemann, that he had Jewish ancestry. His childhood town of Röcken had no Jewish inhabitants, and in the whole of Prussian Saxony Jews constituted just 0.3% of the population. It is perhaps not surprising then that Jews are entirely absent from Nietzsche’s writings and correspondence right up until he moved to Leipzig to enrol at the University, at the age of 25, having first completed a degree at the University in Bonn.

Leipzig was a city famous for its trade fairs, which attracted a large influx of Jewish traders and merchants. For the first time, Nietzsche was exposed to a significant number of Jews in one place. Coming from a ‘Jew-free’ environment, Nietzsche is actually the perfect case study for the rational development of negative attitudes towards Jews. A handful of letters to his mother and sister dating from this time reveal that he regularly emphasized the unsavory impact of the Jewish tradespeople on the city. Importantly, he does so without referencing ‘stereotypes’ or appealing to Christian traditions about Jews. Nietzsche’s commentary is much more journalistic. His attempts to finish a book are hindered by the disruption of the trade fair, and “everywhere you look there are Jews and associates of Jews.” Writing on the final day of the fair in October 1868 Nietzsche expresses relief that the city will soon be free of “the smell of fat and the numerous Jews.” Remarks like these are fairly self-explanatory. To Nietzsche, the crowds, the exchange of money, and the influx of a foreign people among the citizens of Leipzig were simply unhealthy and unwanted distortions of the city’s normal, healthier life.

Holub’s analysis, however, follows the standard Jewish-academic line. He can’t accept that anti-Jewish feeling can be this logical or natural, and so he argues instead that Nietzsche’s remarks “must have emanated from personal contact with friends and acquaintances.” No evidence is presented in support of this argument. Holub is left perplexed about where the remarks could have come from because “during his student years there is no evidence that Nietzsche read or pursued authors who exhibited Judeophobia or texts that contained Judeophobic themes.” The simple fact that Nietzsche, like many Leipzig citizens, found this mass orgy of Jewish trading distasteful is overlooked in favor of theoretical abstractions about ‘anti-Semitism.’ Disappointingly then, very early in the book Holub reveals that a primary thesis underpinning the study is that anti-Semitism is simply an ideological, psychological, and prejudicial virus that is contracted from others rather than a natural reaction to direct experience with Jews. My initial enthusiasm for the book began to evaporate at this point.

Chapter Three, ‘The Wagnerian Vanguard,’ covers Nietzsche’s early relationship with Richard Wagner. By the time Nietzsche had been introduced to Wagner, the latter had already become well known for his animus towards Jewish influence on German society. Many Leftist apologists for Nietzsche have found easy prey in Wagner. The maestro, more than anyone, is held responsible for an increase in Nietzsche’s alleged hostility towards Jews. Although Holub postures his book as a retort to scholars like these, he actually makes essentially the same argument. Referencing the innocent college letters from Leipzig, Holub writes that as a young man “Judeophobia was not well developed in [Nietzsche’s] writing or thought, but it formed an unstated background for his intellectual endeavors, ready to be activated by the right person. Wagner was that person.”

Nietzsche first met Wagner, via mutual friends, following an invitation from the composer in 1868. Wagner played from the Meistersinger and the small group discussed Schopenhauer until late evening. The pair instantly hit it off, and when Nietzsche received his professorship at Basel in 1869, he became a frequent visitor at Tribschen, where Wagner and his family lived until 1872. While 1869 was a pivotal year for Nietzsche’s career, it was also a memorable one for Wagner. In 1850 Wagner had published the essay Jewry in Music under the pseudonym K. Freigedank (K. Freethought). In 1869, despite advice from his friends and even his wife, Wagner re-published the piece as a pamphlet, divulging his authorship of the original and adding further thoughts and reflections. The move provoked a predictable storm, as influential Jews moved quickly to destroy the composer. His operas were disrupted, and the every organ of the Jewish media was used to annihalate his reputation.

Nietzsche never personally commented on ‘Jewry in Music,’ but his correspondence reveals that he did read it in its entirety and that he claimed to agree with its message. When a friend wrote to him admiringly of the pamphlet in 1870, Nietzsche replied: “That we are now also in agreement with regard to Richard Wagner is for me completely reliable evidence of how we belong together. Because it isn’t easy and demands a vigorous, manly courage not to be led astray by the alarming racket. … Our ‘Jews’ — and you know how widely this concept extends in particular despise Wagner’s idealistic manner.” Although overlooked by Holub, the last sentence prefigures an ambivalence in Nietzsche’s attitudes to Jews that would last throughout his life. True, Jews were an oppositional element of society, but they were difficult to define. A German, to Nietzsche, could be just as ‘Jewish’ as a Rothschild if he or she displayed enough ‘Jewish’ traits. This certainly opened the door to a justified critique of those non-Jews serving Jewish interests, but by blurring the boundaries and obfuscating the role of race and ethnicity, Nietzsche also moved dangerously close to an erroneous worldview.

Though perhaps ambivalent towards the Jewish Question, Nietzsche was undeniably in tune with Wagner when it came to animosity towards those aspects of modernity most closely linked with the rise of the Jews in Germany: the hegemony of journalists, the press, newspapers, new ‘trends’ in art, and the stock market. He was a critic of both Berthold Auerbach and Felix Mendelssohn, whom he argued produced works typified by foreignness, jargon, mawkishness and internationalism. Even if we accept that Wagner had some influence on Nietzsche in adopting certain positions in the ‘culture war,’ we can by no means place too much weight on the composer’s influence. At Basel one of Nietzsche’s closest colleagues was the historian Jacob Burckhardt, described in one dedication as “my honored friend.” Burckhardt was unequivocally opposed to Jewish emancipation, and believed that everything of worth in European culture was due to its Greek and Roman heritage rather than the Jewish tradition. He would have baulked at the idea of Europe as a ‘Judeo-Christian’ cultural entity, and he was firmly convinced that Jews were responsible for the worst manifestations of modernity. Early in his career Burckhardt wrote to a friend that the presence of Jews in a theatre would be sufficient to entirely destroy his enjoyment of the event.

Although Holub makes the argument that Nietzsche was awed by the likes of Wagner and Burckhardt and adopted their views out of star-struck mimicry, I read a quite different history in the evidence provided. I do not believe that Nietzsche ever became as fully versed in the Jewish Question as many of his contemporaries, but I do see a gradual learning process between 1868 and 1873 where he gains a grasp of the fundamentals. In addition to this, he continually articulates a natural and impulsive distaste for aspects of Jewish culture and behavior. His letters to his mother show that he associated Jews with unsavory business practices, tastelessness, and low cultural attributes. Writing to his mother about a tour around Switzerland in 1872, he describes his fellow travelers before commenting “unfortunately there was a Jew among them.”

In 1872 these feelings and ideas came closest to intellectual expression. In January and February of that year Nietzsche delivered two lectures, ‘The Greek Music Drama’ and ‘Socrates and Tragedy.’ Despite their fairly innocuous titles, the lectures dealt with key aspects of the Wagnerian cultural program: that modern opera had become greatly distanced from its ancient cultural roots, and that Jews were having a deleterious impact on contemporary art and culture. Nietzsche, taking his cue from Wagner, argued that genuine tragedy was mysterious, instinctive and profound. It was also able to be conceived and appreciated only by Europeans. By contrast, ‘Socratism,’ identified with rationalism and dialectic, eradicates instinct and with it art. ‘Socratism’ had also become a historical force in its own right, in the form of this-worldly Judaism. Nietzsche would conclude his second lecture by stating:

Should the Teuton have nothing else to place at the side of that vanished artwork of the past except the ‘grand opera,’ something akin to the ape appearing next to Hercules? This is the most serious question of our art: and anyone who, as a Teuton, does not understand the seriousness of this question, has fallen into the Socratism of our times, which, to be sure, is neither capable of producing martyrs, nor speaks the language of the wisest Hellene. This Socratism is the Jewish press: I’ll say no more.


Trailblazing Connecticut course is blueprint for future Holocaust education

UNITED NATIONS – As the Holocaust recedes further into history and as the era of the living witness closes, educators and researchers are grappling with how best to teach it to future generations.

“We need to create a real bond with history, to give it a human story rather than just present a series of frightening pictures of piles of bodies. We must make it relevant. We must constantly engage students, delivering the subject in bite-sized bursts,” said Jane Jacobs-Kimmelman, director of the International Relations Department at the International School for Holocaust Studies at Yad Vashem.

Jacobs-Kimmelman was one of several researchers and educators to participate in a discussion at the United Nations on Thursday about the future of Holocaust research and education. Of concern is how to make the Holocaust, which occurred more than 70 years ago, relevant to today’s students, particularly in places where there are few Jewish students or where perhaps students aren’t aware of their grandparents or great-grandparents’ stories.

Since 2013, laws mandating the inclusion of the Holocaust in curricula have been on the books in Austria, France, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands, Poland, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. In the US, individual states decide on curriculum content. To date Holocaust education is mandatory in California, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania.

Left to right: Zehavit Gross, Professor, Bar-Illan University and UNESCO Chair in Education for Human Values, Tolerance Democracy and Peace; Deborah Dwork, Rose Professor of Holocaust History at Clark University and Jane Jacobs-Kimmelman, Director of the International Relations Department, International School for Holocaust Studies at Yad Vashem. (Cathryn J. Prince)

While Connecticut doesn’t mandate Holocaust education, schools include the Holocaust as part of the unit on World War II. Beyond that, many schools offer a variety of history electives on the subject.

At Weston High School in Connecticut, the course “Facing History and Ourselves” provides a blueprint for the future of Holocaust education. The semester-long history course, for juniors and seniors, uses current events to link students to the past, said Weston Public Schools social studies teacher Jennifer B. Klein.

Although Klein didn’t attend the UN meeting, her class is an example of the future of Holocaust education.

To prepare for the course, Klein trained with FacingHistory.org in New York City. The organization now has educational partnerships in 150 countries including China, Israel and South America.

In Weston, Klein opened the course by asking students to think about what influences their decision making. Next they consider “We and They” — how different social groups perceive each other, and how people consider the “other.” The students then examine how societal decisions and divisions can combine to allow atrocities to occur. Lastly, the students explore the aftermath of an atrocity and think about justice and remembrance.

“So by the time the students get to the Holocaust we’ve made a whole framework,” Klein said. “The students learn that anti-Semitism wasn’t something Hitler created. They learn he was bringing up ideas that were simmering below the surface. They learn that he was voted in and they look at the conditions that made that possible.”

As part of the course, students learn about Judaism and how they might find common ground with different elements of the religion – such as its emphasis on family, food, or study.

Students also relate to the many photos they see of Jewish life before the Holocaust, from Orthodox men walking to synagogue in rural Poland to Reform Jews enjoying a day at the beach.

“I ask the students to think about what’s familiar to them. I ask them to see that these were people just like you and me,” Klein said.

If the class “Facing History and Ourselves” shows what can be accomplished with access to teacher education and dedication on the part of a school district, a recent report out of the United Kingdom shows how much more needs to be done.

As if to echo the UN panel’s call for expanded teacher training and Holocaust education worldwide, a committee of parliament members recently cautioned the government that not enough teachers receive adequate training to teach the Holocaust.

According to Paul Salmons, program director at the University College London Centre for Holocaust Education, about 80 percent of those teaching the Holocaust said more professional development in this area is needed and priority must be given to this curriculum.

Expanding teacher training will naturally lead to an expansion of Holocaust studies in the classroom, Yad Vashem’s Kimmelman said.

“In Europe you can understand there is interest where the Holocaust took place, but there is interest in other countries to study the Holocaust as a way of looking at their own conflicts. Argentina is a very good example of this,” Jacobs-Kimmelman said. “Still, we work very hard to make sure facile and incorrect comparisons to current conflicts are avoided. We emphasize the uniqueness of the Holocaust.”

Left to right: Kimberly Mann, Chief Education Outreach Section, United Nations; Szabolcs Takacs, Chair of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance; and Cecillie Felicia Stokholm Banke, Senior Researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies. (Cathryn J. Prince)

That’s especially important in Central and Eastern Europe, said Szabolcs Takács, chair of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, an intergovernmental body that works to expand Holocaust education around the world.

“The trauma of the Holocaust was distorted by communist regimes because it was ignored. It’s only 25 years since we can openly talk about the Holocaust, which is of course a national tragedy in Hungary,” said Takács who is Hungarian.

Although many teachers use the Holocaust as a means of combating racism, anti-Semitism and even bullying, a recent study released by the University College of London Centre for Holocaust Education indicates that might not be effective.

‘The real take away was they learn there is a step-by-step move to evil and a step-by-step move to rescue’

According to the report, 93 percent of the students said they felt learning about the Holocaust to change racist attitudes missed the mark, said Dr. Deborah Dwork, the Rose Professor of Holocaust History and Founding Director of the Strassler Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies at Clark University.

“An overwhelming majority of students felt it was important to learn about the Holocaust because it was an important part of European history,” Dwork said. “But the real take away was they learn there is a step-by-step move to evil and a step-by-step move to rescue. They learn you are not born a hero but step-by-step you can become one.”

Some educators worry recorded testimonies and DVDs aren’t as powerful as having actual survivors or other eyewitnesses, such as camp liberators, speak to students. Oral histories, such as those archived at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, can help fill that void. Second and third generation survivors are another untapped resource for the classroom.

“It is quite clear that the world is not finished learning about the Holocaust, despite the fact that the survivor population is diminishing,” Jacobs-Kimmelman said.


Poll: 25% Of Israelis Believe Another “ Holocaust®” Is Possible

According to a recent report published by The Times of Israel, a new poll has found that roughly 25% of Israelis fear a “second Holocaust” is possible. How delusional are these people?

Screenshot (105)

Israelis are worried for the future of world Jewry, a new poll has found, with a quarter of respondents believing another Holocaust could take place and almost a third agreeing that European Jews should move to Israel.

The complete findings of the survey by the World Zionist Organization will be presented on Sunday at a conference in Jerusalem devoted to new forms of anti-Semitism and the international boycott movement against Israel.

“This new data is sad and surprising,” the Hebrew-language website NRG quoted WZO Vice Chairman Yaakov Hagoel as saying. “It is inconceivable that Jews, having a country of their own, still believe the Holocaust could happen again.”

“I am not in the 25 percent that think another Holocaust may take place, but in the 75% who believe that so long as the State of Israel exists – and it will exist forever – there will not be another Holocaust. In my eyes, there was a Holocaust because we didn’t have a state. Today this would not happen,” Hagoel told Israeli newspaper Makor Rishon. […]

In other “Holocaust” related news, a U.S. appeals court recently “gave new life to a lawsuit by a group of Holocaust survivors seeking damages from Hungary for its role in the deaths of more than 500,000 Jews during World War II,” The Times of Israel reports.

Could it be any more obvious that the fake Jewish “Holocaust” narrative is simply a weapon utilized by the organized Jewish community to extort massive amounts of money and endless sympathy from (formerly) White nations, demonizing any form of White racial consciousness and nationalism as “hateful” and fundamentally illegitimate in the process? It has also served as a useful tool in promoting Jewish ethnic interests and identity, as this article (and many, many others) demonstrate.

This has to be understood, especially by those of us concerned about the future of the White race. The fake “Holocaust” narrative is the number one weapon being used to demonize and slander our race and any form of White racial identity. As Eric Striker (listen to him on The Realist Report), a very talented and insightful young writer associated with Matthew Heimbach’s Traditionalist Youth Network, recently argued in a brilliant article:

Exposing the Holocaust as what it is must be one of the main tenets of any emerging Western nationalist movement. Don’t settle for anything less because this is the first – not the last – problem we need to deal with before any real work gets done.

I couldn’t agree more – Striker is spot on. The fake “Holocaust” must be directly confronted and exposed, especially considering how central it is to not only Jewish identity, but the Jewish agenda to genocide the White race. The fake “Holocaust” narrative is a weaponized, entirely false version of history that has and continues to be used against the White race and White racial consciousness.




Published On 01/30/2016 | By infostormer | Featured Articles, Jewish Problem, News

A new poll by the World Zionist Organization has found that 25% of Israeli Jews fear another Holocaust of 60 trillion could take place.  1/3 of Israeli Jews believe that European Jews should move to Israel.

First off, there was never a Holocaust because that is a stupid Jew hoax designed to make people believe that Jews are perpetual victims who never do any wrong.

Secondly, Jews should be scared.  They are not hated because they are Jews, they are hated for what they do.  These Jews just can’t wrap their minds around this concept.

Jews through their usury scam have gained control over powerful media, financial and political institutions.  They have used this power to subvert Western civilization and have been pushing for policies that will destroy it if it is not reversed.

And take a look at the retarded Holocaust hoaxing Jews in the above picture.  What a bunch of demonic looking pigs.  How come there are so many of these 100 year old Jews still wandering around if trillions of them were gassed and turned into soap?  It is all a big Jewish lie.  The Germans simply wanted them expelled from Europe during World War II.  The Jews declared war on them in 1933, so they deserved expulsion on that basis alone.

From Times of Israhell:

Israelis are worried for the future of world Jewry, a new poll has found, with a quarter of respondents believing another Holocaust could take place and almost a third agreeing that European Jews should move to Israel.

The complete findings of the survey by the World Zionist Organization will be presented on Sunday at a conference in Jerusalem devoted to new forms of anti-Semitism and the international boycott movement against Israel.

“This new data is sad and surprising,” the Hebrew-language website NRG quoted WZO Vice Chairman Yaakov Hagoel as saying. “It is inconceivable that Jews, having a country of their own, still believe the Holocaust could happen again.”

“I am not in the 25 percent that think another Holocaust may take place, but in the 75% who believe that so long as the State of Israel exists – and it will exist forever – there will not be another Holocaust. In my eyes, there was a Holocaust because we didn’t have a state. Today this would not happen,” Hagoel told Israeli newspaper Makor Rishon.


EP President Martin Schulz: Germany exists only in order to ensure the existence of the Jewish people.

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Sunday, 31 January 2016 03:00.

European Parliament Schulz and Merkel composite.
Martin Schulz and Angela Merkel.

Martin Schulz has been active in European politics for almost thirty years, and so he is a person who does not need an introduction. His position however is not one that is understood very well by normal people, because a lot of people don’t know what the roles of the institutions of the European Union in the post-Lisbon Treaty environment are.

In his role as President of the European Parliament, Schulz would be responsible for the overall direction of international relations, and also is the custodian of the fundamental values of the European Union. The European Parliament is the first institution in the European Union, which prior to the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty had been seen as a mere talking shop, but subsequently developed into becoming one of the most powerful legislatures in the world in terms of both its legislative powers and executive oversight powers.

Of course, informally, the political history which the individual was acculturated with along with that person’s connection to the national political power, means that it can usually be considered advantageous to a member state if one of their citizens is holding such an EU position.

Schulz hails from Germany, but what does Schulz think Germany’s raison d’etre is? A look at his ownwords in Haaretz as reported by his friend Avraham Burg, reveals something interesting:

Haaretz, ‘Say a big ‘thank you’ to Martin Schulz’, Avraham Burg, 14 Feb 2014 (emphasis added):

[…] Martin Schulz, the president of the European Parliament, is a close friend of mine. On most issues connected to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict we disagree. He is closer to the Israeli mainstream, and his positions resemble those of Labor Party chairman Isaac Herzog. He once told me, during a frank and stern conversation, “For me, the new Germany exists only in order to ensure the existence of the State of Israel and the Jewish people.” […]

Schulz is of course, Jewish.


Alex Salmond rebukes Israelis over Holocaust speech

The former First Minister tells the Council of Europe it was “inappropriate” for a senior Israeli representative at a Holocaust commemoration service to criticise the Iranians, who have questioned whether the atrocity took place.

Alex Salmond has criticised the Israelis over a Holocaust commemoration speech

Alex Salmond has criticised the Israelis over a Holocaust commemoration speech Photo: Getty Images

Alex Salmond has come under attack for using his new role representing the UK in Europe to issue a rebuke to the Israeli parliament on Holocaust Memorial Day.

The former First Minister told the Council of Europe that it was “inappropriate” for a senior Israeli representative at a Holocaust commemoration service to criticise the presence of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani in France.

But his dressing down came the same day as Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran, published a video questioning whether the Holocaust “is a reality or not”.

The Ayatollah’s website promoted the video with a banner across its home page, featuring a montage of images, including one of Adolf Hitler.

Mr Salmond, who recently returned from a trip to Iran, told the Strasbourg meeting that there was a “time and place for international politics” and the Israeli government should not have issued the criticism “during a solemn commemoration service.”

He last night defended his actions, telling the Telegraph that everyone he had spoken to who also attended the council’s commemoration service on Wednesday morning agreed that the “political” attack in the Israeli speech was wrong.

However, experienced figures from other parties questioned his judgment on the international stage and claimed his comments created the impression of him being an unofficial spokesman for the Iranian regime.

Mr Salmond was criticised for grandstanding during his Iran visit last month during which it was reported he told a Tehran-based news agency that Scotland’s “ruling party has always been against the decisions Westerners make against Iran.”

A still from Khamenei’s video, Are The Dark Ages Over?  Photo: Khamenei.ir

Lord Campbell of Pittenweem, the former Liberal Democrat leader, who has specialised in foreign affairs, said: “Judgements in these matters are extremely important and often the less said the better.

“It was after all Mr Salmond who accused Tony Blair of committing an ‘unpardonable folly’ when the Prime Minister successfully set out to protect the people of Kosovo for the genocide being inflicted upon them.”

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock, a Labour peer who has also attended the Council of Europe, added: “He does appear to be a spokesman for Iran.”

The Prime Minister appointed the former SNP leader and fellow Nationalist MP Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh to the British group to represent UK voters in the council’s parliamentary assembly.

It spends four weeks of the year in Strasbourg and recommends policies that are submitted to national governments for action. Michael Oren, a historian and former ambassador to the US, led this week’s Israeli parliament delegation.

Before Wednesday morning’s Holocaust ceremony, he criticised President Rouhani’s four-day visit to Italy and France, asking: “How can Europe honour the memory of the Holocaust, and on the exact same day host the leader of the Iranian regime, which denies that the Holocaust actually happened?”

Mr Salmond told this newspaper that the Israelis were free to repeat their criticism at other times, only not during the commemoration service.

“No one else is impressed by that sort of behaviour. It was a formal event to commemorate the greatest disaster in European history,” the former SNP leader said.

“Someone had to say what a lot of people who attended that service were thinking.” He said the appropriate method to make his feelings known was raising a point of order in the council’s parliamentary assembly as it had hosted the commemoration service.

Mr Salmond intervened in a debate on Wednesday morning, declaring an interest as a member of the Holocaust Commission of the United Kingdom and praising those who organised Wednesday morning’s ceremony.

“I found it inappropriate that the Israeli ambassador launched attacks on the Republic of Iran and its President, who is a guest of this republic,” he said.

“We cannot vet what people say, but we have the right to state that there is a time and a place for international politics. Such attacks should not take place during a solemn commemoration service.”

President Rouhani, who studied law at Glasgow Caledonian University, embarked on his tour of Europe to drum up trade and diplomatic links after Iran signed a historic deal to limit its nuclear ambitions.

In contrast to his predecessor Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, he has publicly acknowledged and condemned the Holocaust as “reprehensible.” The Israeli government was last night unavailable for comment.

The Telegraph


  • View image on Twitter

Belgian Jewish newspaper claims “gas chambers” are “the Holocaust”

Published by carolyn on Sat, 2016-01-30 00:35

On January 19, an Antwerp-based Jewish monthly, Joods Actueel,filed a complaint with the country’s watchdog on journalism over an interview in a daily newspaper, De Morgen. The interviewee was well-known revisionist Siegfried Verbeke (shown at right in 2010). In the course of the interview, Verbeke said:

“Of course gas chambers existed, hundreds of them. To disinfect the clothes of people who went through them. But gas chambers designed to kill people never existed, no.”

In its complaint against De Morgen, Joods Actueel citedlegislation from 1995 that forbids claiming the Holocaust did not happen – a law which the Jewish monthly’s editor-in-chief Michael Freilich claims was broken both by De Morgen and by Verbeke.

So let’s see—it’s against the law in Belgium to say the Holocaust didn’t happen.

Verbeke didn’t say that—he said homicidal gas chambers didn’t exist.

So is the existence of homicidal gas chambers equal to the Holocaust? Or, put another way, does the Holocaust consist of there being homicidal gas chambers in which millions of Jews were “gassed to death?” [This has been thoroughly disproven since the 1980’s.]

This is a very important question. Will Belgium have to change it’s law to make it illegal to say homicidal gas chambers didn’t exist? My guess is this case will never be prosecuted once they realize they’re opening a can of worms, even though Antwerp Mayor Bart De Wever expressed support for Verbeke’s prosecution.



Canadian PM and Holocaust without Jews

justintrudeau2[1]Justin Trudeau’s first statement as Canada’s new prime minister on Holocaust Day (January 27) has shocked country’s Jewish Lobby (CIJA), and the Christian Zionist groups. The 111-word statement did not mention Jews or antisemitism or the Holy Six Million even for once.

On this day, we pay tribute to the memory of the millions of victims murdered during the Holocaust. We honour those who survived atrocities at the hands of the Nazi regime, and welcome their courageous stories of hope and perseverance. The Holocaust is a stark reminder of the dangers and risks of allowing hate, prejudice, and discrimination to spread unchallenged. It also reminds us that silence must never be an option when humanity is threatened. As we pause to educate ourselves and our families on the bitter lessons of the Holocaust, we also strengthen our resolve to work with domestic and international partners to continue defending human rights and condemning intolerance,” Justin Trudeau said.

Does that make Justin Trudeau a ‘Holocaust denier’ as former Iranian president Dr. Ahmadinejad became one after making a similar statement in Persian in 2006? I doubt very much because Justin supports Israel which is one of world’s top human rights abuser. In 2009, American Jewish academic and author, Norman Finkelstein, accused Israel of committing Holocaust in Gaza. Why? Because the Trudeau family is very much connected to the Organized Jewry.

I did hear some anti-Justin whining coming from Tablet magazine, Algemeiner.Christian United for Israel, and BBC’s Jewish “political analyst” Jonathan Sacerdoti (here) to name a few. One Zionist idiot even compared Justin Trudeau with Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatullah Ali Khamenei for not mentioning Jews in his speech.

Earlier this month, both Justin Trudeau and his foreign minister Stephane Dion said that Ottawa is interested in re-establishing diplomatic relation with Tehran. However, Iranian leaders don’t consider Canada of strategic importance to Iran. Canada is home to a large Iranian community (80,000), mostly royalists, that suffered lot under former Harper’s pro-Israel government (here). Iranian have not forgotten Canada’s last ambassador Kenneth Taylor (d. 2015), who spied for CIA under his diplomatic immunity (here).

Justin Trudeau, a 1971 Christmas Eve baby has inherited media spotlight and $1.2 million estate from his late father Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Canada’s longest serving prime minister.


The Holocaust Shakedown


by Dr. William L. Pierce

IMAGINE that a robber walks into a bank, points a pistol at a teller, hands her a bag, and demands that she put all the money from her cash drawer in it. At first she protests, but then, after he threatens to shoot, she fills the robber’s bag with cash. And then imagine that, as the robber walks out of the bank with his bag of loot, the bank guard opens the door for him, smiles at him, offers to hail a cab for him, and tells him to come again soon. After that it’s not difficult to imagine that he probably will.

That’s about the way it’s been with the Jews recently. Two years ago they put a gun to the head of the Swiss people collectively and demanded billions of dollars in reparations for Swiss bank accounts they claimed had been owned by Jews who disappeared during the Second World War. The Swiss initially protested that unclaimed Jewish bank accounts from the 1930s and 1940s amounted at most to a few million dollars, not to billions, and besides the war ended more than 50 years ago and claims should have been filed long ago. The Jews threatened to shoot, figuratively speaking, by having their bought politicians in the United States prevent Swiss banks from doing business in America. Eventually they walked away with $1.25 billion in loot, with the Swiss apologizing for not having coughed it up sooner.

After that sort of success with the Swiss one could hardly expect the Jews to give up extortion and go straight. So anyway, they were back again soon, with demands against the Volkswagen Company for having used Jewish workers during the Second World War and providing them only with room and board but not paying them union-scale wages. One might think that these Jewish workers would be grateful to Volkswagen for keeping them alive during the war, feeding them, and giving them a roof over their heads, when so many German civilians had only bombed-out ruins to live in. Well, if you thought that, you just don’t understand Jews. The Jews told the Volkswagen Company that if it ever wanted to sell any more cars in America, it had better cough up — soon. And the bought politicians and the media bosses in America began rattling their sabres and talking loudly about sanctions of various sorts against Volkswagen. And so, like the Swiss banks, Volkswagen coughed up the money.

Then the feeding frenzy started, just as I told you it would two years ago, when I predicted that after the Jews had cleaned out the Swiss they would go after other victims in a long list. Volkswagen wasn’t the only company which had used involuntary labor during the war. The Jews went after Daimler-Benz and BMW and Siemens.

And Switzerland wasn’t the only country where Jews could claim that Uncle Abe had stashed some of his loot sixty years ago, before the war. So they sued banks in France and in Britain and began moaning and whining in the media that the banks were being “insensitive” to poor, deserving “Holocaust survivors,” who suddenly had remembered Uncle Abe’s millions and needed it — now! And then they remembered the insurance companies in Italy and Switzerland and Britain and elsewhere from whom they could claim that Uncle Abe once had had a life-insurance policy. Then they remembered that the Swedes owed them gold, and the Danes and the Norwegians. Even the Poles, whom the Jews had ruled as Bolshevik commissars for nearly 50 years after the war, owed them, they claimed.

The racket has worked the same in every case: pay us, or we will have our bought Gentile politicians pass laws making it impossible for you to continue doing business, and our people in the media will paint you as monsters who want to hang onto the profit you made when poor Uncle Abe and Aunt Sara were crammed into gas chambers, and then the gullible Gentile lemmings won’t buy your products. If you give us any trouble or resist our demands we’ll make an example of you, the way we did with the Swiss banks. Just pay us the few hundred million dollars we’re demanding now, and we’ll leave you alone. Otherwise, it’ll end up costing you a lot more.

And it has worked every time. Not one banker or businessman has stood up to them and flatly refused to pay. Not one president or prime minister has said to them, “All right, Jew boys! You try a boycott against my country, and we’ll organize a boycott against Israel. We’ll round up all the Jews in our country and send them packing.” Not one has called the Jews’ bluff. They’ve all calculated that it is cheaper to pay the gangsters than to fight them, and so they pay. Honor means nothing to these businessmen and politicians. Principles mean nothing to them. All they care about is continuing to make money, continuing to stay in office.

With this sort of attitude predominant among the Gentiles, one can hardly blame the Jews for turning to extortion on a larger scale than ever before. They are successful at it; therefore they continue to do it. And they don’t limit themselves to Europe or to those who allegedly cooperated with the Germans in their demand for reparations. A few months ago they filed a claim against Britain for $600 million they claim the British government confiscated from Jews between 1940 and 1942 when the British governed Palestine. Remember, the Jews were waging a guerrilla war against the British prior to 1948, when the British finally gave up and pulled out, letting the Jews slaughter the Palestinians and establish the Jewish state of Israel on Palestinian land. The Jews were kidnapping and murdering British soldiers in Palestine and assassinating diplomats. In 1946 the Jews used a terrorist bomb to blow up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, which was the British government headquarters. This Jewish forerunner of the Oklahoma City bombing killed a large number of British civilians and military people. And now the Jews are demanding $600 million in reparations from the British!

And of course, the Jews also are expecting payoffs from American companies. Both Ford and General Motors had subsidiaries working in Germany when the Second World War began. The Ford plant in Germany made military vehicles for the Germans throughout the war, and the General Motors subsidiary, Opel, did the same. And so now the Jews are claiming that both Ford and General Motors owe them a great deal of money because of that. The Jews already have filed a class-action suit against Ford in a Federal court in New Jersey, seeking hundreds of millions of dollars in wages plus interest for Jews who worked in Ford’s German plant during the war. And because the businessmen who run Ford and General Motors today are the same sort as those who run the Volkswagen Company, they undoubtedly will pay off the Jews rather than risk having the media portray them as “insensitive” types who profited from the so-called “Holocaust” and now refuse to share their loot with the poor, deserving Jewish “survivors.” Two hundred years ago the American motto was, “Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.” But in those days Americans were made of sterner stuff — and I assume that our people in Europe were too.

Cash isn’t the only thing the Jews are going after. They have decided that a substantial portion of the art treasures of Europe really belonged to Uncle Abe too 60 years ago and ought to be returned to the Jews now. It is true, of course, that during the war the German government had a keen interest in bringing as much Germanic art as possible back under German protection. They bought all the Vermeers and Rembrandts and Holbeins and Dürers and Halses and other Germanic art works as they could from owners in the conquered countries and brought them back to Germany. And when the works the Germans were interested in were in the hands of Jews, they often brought pressure to bear and obtained the works at low prices. The Germans, however, generally weren’t interested in modern art — certainly not in Jewish paintings by Chagall or Modigliani, for example — and a great many such modern paintings ended up in the hands of Jewish art dealers. In fact, the Germans often had agreements with Jewish art dealers, swapping the modern paintings they weren’t interested in for the Germanic paintings they were interested in. The biggest of these Jewish dealers, Georges Wildenstein, was in Paris, and he acquired an enormous number of modern paintings during the war. After the war he brought them to New York and later sold hundreds of them to museums and private collectors around the world. The Jews currently are engaged in a huge treasure hunt for those paintings now in Gentile hands which formerly belonged to Jews. The fact that most of these paintings were acquired by their present owners from Jewish dealers such as the Wildensteins and that many of them were legally purchased from their Jewish owners during the war are glossed over. All of these paintings are characterized by the Jews as “art stolen from victims of the Holocaust by the Nazis,” and they want it all back now.

There’s an interesting double standard here. A messy divorce in the Wildenstein family attracted public attention last year to the Jewish family’s business dealings in Paris during the war, and another Jewish family claimed that the Wildensteins have artworks that actually should be returned to them, because they were forced to sell them at fire-sale prices during the war. The Wildensteins told them to buzz off: the statute of limitations for such claims expired long ago, the Wildensteins asserted. Of course, no Gentile owner dares make such an assertion. But in fact, there are statutes of limitations for most claims. Dormant bank accounts typically become the property of the government after being unclaimed for 20 years or so, but when the Swiss brought up that legality two years ago, the Jews went into their “persecuted victim” act, feigning outrage that the Swiss should try to let a mere law stand between the Jews and what they were claiming in reparations.

Whenever the Jews, in order to remind the world for the six-millionth time of their “victim” status, have accused some elderly German or Pole or Ukrainian or Lithuanian of having mistreated Jews 55 years ago during the war, there is no question of a statute of limitations. If anyone mentions that legality, Jewish shrieking in all of their media quickly drowns him out. For an injury, real or imaginary, done to a Jew by a Gentile there is no statute of limitations, no matter how much time has passed. The Jews still celebrate every year in their Purim festival the revenge their ancestors took on the ancient Persians 2,500 years ago through their control of a corrupt king.

Yet when the Polish government asked the government of Israel a few months ago to extradite a Jewish mass murderer, Solomon Morel, so that he could be tried in Poland for genocide, the Jews refused. “There’s a statute of limitations for extradition,” the Israelis told the Poles, “and you’re too late.” Morel was the Jew-communist commissar of a concentration camp in Poland after the war, and he had tortured hundreds of Poles and Germans to death. When he saw the possibility of retribution looming, Morel, like thousands of other Jewish criminals before him, fled to Israel. The horrifying atrocities committed by Solomon Morel have been described in the 1993 book An Eye for an Eye by John Sack.

This same double standard applies to every sort of interaction between Jews and non-Jews. It is a fact that in wars people suffer losses. Usually, within a few years after the wars are over, people try to get on with their lives, and they consider what is past to be past. If other people behaved the way the Jews behave, then every Englishman whose family residence got hit by a bomb during the “blitz” of the Second World War would be clamoring now for the German government to reimburse him for the repairs that his grandparents had to make 55 years ago — plus interest, of course. And if it’s all right to go back 55 years for claims, why not go back 135 years and let all of the Americans whose ancestors’ homes and farms in Georgia were burned by General Sherman collect damages from the U.S. government now — plus interest, of course? Or why not go back 220 years and demand that Tony Blair’s government pay reparations to all of those Americans whose ancestors suffered property loss from the Redcoats during the First American Revolution — plus interest, of course? I mean, if the Jews are allowed to keep score, without regard for time, why shouldn’t everyone else? Why not set up some sort of World Court for Reparations? I imagine that there are a lot of Palestinians who would like to file claims against the state of Israel.

The fact is that we would have international chaos if everybody behaved the way the Jews do. So this raises two interesting questions: Why do the Jews behave the way they do? And why do we let them get away with it?

Well, I’ve already given an answer of a sort to the first question: the Jews behave the way they do because we let them behave that way; it’s just like the case of the bank robber, who will keep coming back until the bank guard stops being nice and shoots the robber. But there’s really more to it than that. No one else is even inclined to make the sort of demands on the rest of the world that the Jews do. The Jews really are different. Their religion provides a few clues in this regard. It is a religion which tells them that all the property of the Gentiles really should belong to Jews, that the Jews are entitled to it. It’s as blatant as anywhere in the 60th chapter of the book attributed to their prophet Isaiah, where they are told to keep their gates open all the time, so that all the wealth of the Gentiles can be brought to them. “Thou shalt suck the milk of the Gentiles,” the Jews are told. And if you think that doesn’t really mean what it sounds like it means, you should look into the Talmud, where the Jewish sages, the Jewish interpreters of the Bible, explain to the rest of the Jews what it means. The Talmud tells the Jews that only Jews are human beings, that the Gentiles are just animals created by the Jewish tribal god Yahweh to be used by the Jews, like other animals are used. Because Gentiles are merely animals, they can’t really own anything, and it is the duty of the Jews to make sure they don’t.

Now all of this Biblical stuff and Talmudic stuff is very old and quaint and might seem irrelevant to a lawsuit against the Ford Motor Company by the Jews today. But this old and quaint stuff is the basis of the Jews’ religion today. The religious Jews really believe it. And the non-religious Jews, the atheist Jews, behave as if they believe it. And I think that in a certain sense they do. I think this belief is in their blood. I think that this is what accounts for their almost incredible arrogance in their dealings with non-Jews.

And of course, there’s not just belief: there’s also calculation. They understand that the success of their current effort to swindle the rest of the world out of every cent they can depends on three factors: it depends on their control of the mass media; it depends on the unprecedented degree of political corruption which exists almost everywhere in the Western world, on the unprecedented degree of democracy; and it depends on the confused and demoralized state of Gentiles everywhere.

There never before has been a time when the Jews have wielded as much open power as they do today. No previous government in the United States has had as many Jews in positions of power as the present Clinton government. And that’s pretty much the way it is everywhere in Europe too. The Jews around Clinton are mirrored by high-ranking Jews around Tony Blair in Britain. In Russia, the Jews not only hold most of the key posts around the alcoholic and ailing Boris Yeltsin, they have one of their own as prime minister. And nearly everywhere except in the United States the Jews have succeeded in having laws passed making it illegal for a patriot to tell his countrymen what the Jews are up to. In Britain, in France, and in Germany hundreds of patriots are rotting in prisons today because they dared to speak the truth about the Jews. In Switzerland the Jews succeeded in having similar laws passed before they began extorting money from the Swiss. Only in Russia today are any significant number of patriots speaking out against the Jews and daring the government to try to silence them.

And I suppose it seems reasonable to the Jews that when they have so much power they should use it to their advantage. They should go for everything they can get. The opportunity may pass. And they are going for it, everywhere and in every way. It’s interesting to note that this display of unbridled greed and arrogance has made even some of their fellow Jews a little nervous. Charles Krauthammer, a Jewish writer for the Washington Post, the second most powerful Jewish newspaper in the United States, wrote a column last month which begins with the words, and I quote: “The pursuit of billions in Holocaust guilt money has gone from the unseemly to the disgraceful.” Krauthammer refers to the whole racket as a “Holocaust shakedown.” It’s not that Krauthammer doesn’t think the Jews should have all the money they can get from the Gentiles. It’s just that he’s appalled by the reckless display of naked, unprincipled greed as more and more Jewish shysters — that’s what Krauthammer calls them — trample each other in their current feeding frenzy. What if the Gentiles notice? What will the Gentiles think?

Now, the unfortunate fact is that no non-Jewish writer for a major newspaper would dare to write what Krauthammer wrote. Not even in the United States, where it’s still legal to write such things. They’re all afraid. For two generations the Jewish media have conditioned them by instantly and loudly accusing anyone who opens his mouth of being a “racist” or a “hater” or an “anti-Semite.” They’ve been conditioned to run for cover whenever they hear one of those accusations. And that is the answer to our second question, why do we let them get away with it?

Their media control keeps the couch potatoes confused and unaware; the corrupt politicians who have come to characterize our democracy are always ready to front for them and betray the people whose interests they are supposed to be representing; and those among us who are perceptive enough and independent-minded enough to understand what is happening are nearly all too cowardly to speak out. So it is easy enough for me to predict that the Jews will keep coming back for more — and more — and more — until they either have it all, as in Russia today, or what Charles Krauthammer is concerned about happens, and the Gentiles notice. But really, the former outcome is much more likely.

* * *

Source: American Dissident Voices broadcast of January 2nd, 1999



Merkel is squirming, says refugees are in Germany only temporarily

Posted by Ann Corcoran on January 31, 2016

Invasion of Europe news….

Germany is a disaster and Chancellor Angela Merkel is like a worm on a hook trying to figure out how to release herself.  Now, she is trying to tell the German people that, WHEN things calm down in the Middle East, the Syrians and Iraqis will leave. Even if that were true (it isn’t!), it isn’t true of the hundreds of thousands from all over the globe who have invaded Germany at Merkel’s invitation.

Merkel pensive

Note to Americans: Our refugee program is permanent.  I think there is still some misconception that asylum seekers and refugees are only here for a little while until things change back home.  That isn’t so, when we accept refugees and asylees they WILL become US citizens and never leave.

When you hear someone say we need to share the burden of Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey which are getting the brunt of the refugee flow, remember most of those ‘refugees’ are living in camps in those countries and will be forced to return home when the conflict ends.

If Merkel believes what she is saying, the migrants arriving in Germany should have been placed in camps and sorted out from there not planted in every town in Germany.

Back to the latest news from Deutsche Welle:

Chancellor Angela Merkel has said she expects most Syrian and Iraqi refugees to return home once the conflict in their home countries has ended. She urged other European countries to offer more help.

Speaking at a regional party meeting, Chancellor Angela Merkel sought to moderate the criticism which has grown over her open-door policy towards refugees from conflict areas in Syria and Iraq.

“We need … to say to people that this is a temporary residential status and we expect that, once there is peace in Syria again, once IS has been defeated in Iraq, that you go back to your home country with the knowledge that you have gained,” she told members of her Christian Democratic Union (CDU) in the state of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania on Saturday.


The leader of Merkel’s coalition partners, the Christian Social Union (CSU), Horst Seehofer, has threatened to take the government to court if the flow of asylum seekers is not reduced.

Get ready for the spring tidal wave of migrants! (My recommendation, turn back boats and build camps to contain them!):

Merkel urged other European countries to offer more help by taking in refugees: “because the numbers need to be reduced even further and must not start to rise again, especially in spring.”

Head of the European Union’s border agency Frontex, Fabrice Leggeri said that the UN estimated up to a million migrants may try to enter Europe across the eastern Mediterranean and Western Balkans over the next year.

As we have previously reported a trickle of so-called refugees supposedly fearing persecution have begun to leave Germany as their welfare goodies aren’t fast enough in coming.  So, make sure their welfare is meager, housing is difficult and jobs not available and they might go home.

Every one from every country should be watching what happens in Germany and Europe generally as the invasion continues unabated because you are watching a major shift in the history of the world and possibly witnessing the end of the European font of western civilization.  See our complete ‘Invasion of Europe’ archive here.

Be sure to see this post about the European Nationalist parties who do offer some hope for the continent.


Sweden 2016: Gothenburg suburb Mölndal destroyed by migration, armed gangs patrol the streets, crime explosion
2016-01-29 21:01

From: dailymail.co.uk

Standing on a street corner in the pitch black night, a youth brandishes a broken walking stick like a weapon.

Wrapped up warm in a thick parka coat Mohammed jokes with his friends as passers-by watch the gang of unruly youths hanging around one of the few shops still open with suspicion.

As I approach, the 16-year-old drops the baton, his friend kicks it away, trying to hide it.

Ruined: The Gothenburg suburb of Mölndal is in the spotlight this week after the young, beautiful social worker Alexandra Mezher, 22, was stabbed to death in a frenzied attack at the child migrant centre where she worked

‘Mölndal is the best place in the world,’ Mohammed claims. ‘I have lived here my whole life. I wouldn’t want to live anywhere else.’

His family arrived in Sweden as refugees in the 1980s. Iraqi Kurds they were forced to flee Saddam Hussein merciless vendetta against this persecuted people.

His father stayed on to fight the regime – a volunteer to the fearless Peshmerga fighters, Mohammed announces proudly.

‘Sweden is very good for people who want to live a peaceful life,’ the youngster explains in flawless English.

‘Everyone is treated with respect. And Swedish people are kind.’

Mohammed’s friends have similar stories. Many were born in Sweden, others arrived as children – all of their families are from other countries – the Middle East, Africa or Eastern Europe.

‘At my school there are people from 25 different countries,’ he tells me.

‘And there are lots of new kids at school who have just arrived as refugees.’

Landscape: But others in the town disagree and blame Sweden’s politicians for Sweden’s open door policy. ‘Our f***ing politicians should be shot,’ one outspoken Swede told MailOnline. ‘What the f*** were they thinking opening our doors to everyone?’

A 20-minute tram ride from the glittering water-fronted centre of Sweden’s second city, Gothenburg, Mölndal is already one of the country’s most diverse communities. And when Europe’s migration crisis erupted last year city leaders stepped forward with open arms to help.

The Gothenburg suburb accepted more unaccompanied refugee children than anywhere else in the country – 4,041 added to a population of 63,000. In the autumn 400 refugee kids were taken in every week.

In 2014, Mölndal received £22.6million to provide housing for unaccompanied minors – the most state funding per capita than any town or city in Sweden.

Mölndal is home to the huge Sagasen refugee centre that houses up to 1,000 new arrivals.

Last year, Sweden, with a population of 9.8 million, took in more than 160,000 asylum seekers. Just over three out of every 2,000 citizens are now refugees.

‘Most of the new kids have special lessons at the moment,’ Mohammed explains. ‘They need to learn Swedish before they can join us in class.’

Exploiting the warmth and lighting of Mölndal’s bus station to chat and play on their smart phones are two such recent arrivals. Abdasis and his friend left Somalia just over a year ago.

The pair have only praise for Sweden – despite the long, cold dark nights of winter – because it has offered them sanctuary.

‘Sweden is good place,’ Abdasis, 16, said in broken English. ‘Somalia is war, always war, no peace. Sweden is peace, happiness, life.’

Not everyone in Mölndal or Gothenburg agrees.

Weapons: As our reporter approached Mohamed the 16-year-old dropped his wooden baton and one of his gang kicked it away
‘Our f***ing politician should be shot,’ one out-spoken Swede told MailOnline this week.

‘What the f*** were they thinking opening our doors to everyone?’

The pedestrian bridge over the main road through Mölndal has become a meeting place for young refugees, residents claim.

One said: ‘The refugee children gather on the bridge at night. There are lights and it is warm do it us somewhere to go for them.

‘But people become worried when they see gangs of youths hanging around at night.’

Others gather outside the cut-price supermarket Netto in s housing estate a short walk from the station.

A playground and a basketball court are also popular meeting points.

Another resident said: ‘this used to be a good area. Now look at it.’

The murder of social worker Alexandra Mezher at a home for unaccompanied refugees this week has shone the spotlight on the country’s controversial open-door immigration policy.

The 22-year-old’s mother Chimene, who arrived in Sweden as a refugee, claims the country is no longer safe.

Heartbroken Mrs Mezher said: ‘We left Lebanon to escape the civil war, the violence and the danger. We came to Sweden where it was safe, to start a family. But it is not safe anymore.’

Her husband Bourous, 45, moved to Sweden from Beirut in 1989 and built up a pizza business. Mrs Mezher, who has three sons, said: ‘She was not just my daughter, she was my angel. She was a just and fair human being. There were so many who loved her. She was my daughter, my friend.’

She blamed Swedish politicians for a dramatic rise in immigration in Molndal – particularly of unaccompanied children.

Officers in Mölndal say they have had to ignore lesser offences such as drug-dealing because they are so overrun by migrant crime, with gang fights and violent assaults.

And in capital Stockholm police this week warned that the capital’s main train station was ‘overrun’ by gangs of Moroccan street children ‘stealing and groping girls’.

Swedish police revealed they have sent plain-clothes officers to monitor swimming baths in Stockholm after increased reports of sexual harassment of girls and women.

It was also claimed this week police had been forced to flee after being attacked by a mob of asylum seekers as they tried to relocate a ten-year-old boy amid allegations he had been ‘raped repeatedly’ at a refugee centre.

And staff at a migrant centre in Sweden had to flee where 19 asylum seekers ran riot with weapons.

Crime statistics in Mölndal also contradict Abdasis’s assessment of ‘peace, happiness, life’ in the town.

Police say they have responded to four or five emergency calls from refugee centres in the Gothenburg area – which includes Mölndal – every day since late October.

The city’s most up-to-date crime figures reveal there were 372 incidents reported which led to 222 criminal complaints linked to migrant centres – between 20 October 2015 and 8 January this year.

Mölndal’s politicians have refused to explain their open-door immigration policy.

Marie Östh Karlsson, leader of Mölndal district council, thanked MailOnline for a request to discuss immigration, Sweden’s most pressing issue.

But she added: ‘At the moment I choose not to give any interview on this topic [immigration].’

Police complain they are stretched to breaking point in having to deal with the rising migrant crime wave.

‘We have become completely overwhelmed,’ one policeman with over 30-years-service with Gothenburg Police told MailOnline.

‘We have given up with narcotic crime. We just don’t have the resources.’

Instead officers are trying to fight back the explosion of violent street crime that has erupted in recent months.

There are 20 robberies in Gothenburg every day – usually with violence. This week an 83-year-old lady had a gun put in her face when she was mugged on her way to play bingo. They got away with just 50 Kroner [about £4].

‘I have worked in Gothenburg for over 30 years and I have never known anything like it,’ the officer told MailOnline.

‘I will not let my children go into the city after 2pm and especially not at night.

‘There are violent gangs roaming around the streets and the use of knives and other weapons have become normal, rather than a rarity as it used to be,’

‘There are 20 robberies in Gothenburg every day – usually with violence or the threat of violence.

‘This week an 83-year-old lady had a gun put in her face when she was mugged on her way to play bingo. They got away with just 50 Kroner [about £4].

‘In the summer there were mass shootings with lots of people killed, including a little girl.’

He added the city streets were now at the mercy of gangs of young men mainly from North Africa.

The police source revealed: ‘In the past couple of months we have noticed a dramatic increase in street robbery. This is a new phenomenon.

‘They will do anything to get money – steal a person’s wallet, iPhone, jewellery. And then they will attack their victim and kick them half to death.

‘Drug crime has gone through the roof. Every drug is available on the street nowadays, even in broad daylight.

‘And when the police arrest someone nowadays the suspect often fights back – with a knife or a screwdriver. This is not something we have seen before.’

Source: dailymail.co.uk



European Commission denies link between migration crisis and attacks on women in Germany

The sex attacks that took place in Cologne on New Year’s Eve were simply a “matter of public order” and had nothing to do with the refugee crisis, Jean-Claude Juncker’s inner circle believe.

The European Commission will be the “voice of reason” and tell the public that there is no link between the migration crisis affecting the continent and attacks on women in Germany, internal minutes disclose, amid growing fears of a “xenophobic” backlash.

The minutes of the European Commission’s weekly cabinet meeting from January 13 hint at officials’ fears that the events in Cologne could turn public opinion sharply against the million migrants who have entered Europe.

They spell out Mr Juncker’s frustration at the inaction of national governments under pressure from voters, and hint at panic that the inability to halt a growing volume of economic migrants could undermine the “credibility” of the European project. Dimitris Avramopoulos, the migration commissioner, said the EU is facing its “moment of truth”.


Renowned German psychiatrist warns: Merkel’s “narcissistic problem” dangerous for Germany

Published by carolyn on Sat, 2016-01-30 11:32

Hans-Joachim Maaz,(right) well-known psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, sees Merkel as a threat to the country. Her behavior shows a “basic narcissistic problem”, which will become a growing danger to the nation.

Maaz has attested to Chancellor Angela Merkel’s questionable traits in an interview with the “Huffington Post”. He called her behavior “completely irrational”.

The expert fears that Merkel has lost touch with reality. Merkel is not acknowledging “the real difficulties in connection with the refugee crisis” and shows a stubborn attitude toward criticism.

Maaz sees no leadership in Merkel. He says: “She was never a leader, she always reacts and does not act.” The psychiatrist observed in Merkel even a “basic narcissistic problem”. Narcissists can not say that they were wrong.

This behavior is dangerous because it will contribute to ensuring splits in society. Merkel insists on positions that are no longer accepted by an increasing number of citizens. If Merkel continues to maintain a power struggle, then a psychological or psychosomatic breakdown will occur, said Maaz.



The Texts of the White Yajurveda, tr. Ralph T.H. Griffith, [1899], at sacred-texts.com


Aum: Copyright J.B. Hare 1999, All Rights Reserved


THE YAJURVEDA—derived from the roots yaj, to sacrifice or, worship, and vid, to know,—is the Knowledge of Sacrifice or Sacrificial Texts and Formulas as distinguished from the Rigveda or Knowledge of Recited Praise, the Sâmaveda or Knowledge of Chanted Hymns, and the Atharva or Brahmaveda which is the Knowledge of Prayer, Charm, and Spells. Though ranking second in the Indian enumeration of the Vedas and containing much that is of very ancient origin, its compilation in its present form, exhibiting as it does the almost complete development of castes and mixt castes and considerable advance in arts and sciences, trades, handicrafts and occupations, is evidently of later date than that even of the Atharva. The Samhitâ or Collection of its hymns, texts, and formulas, constituting the hymn-book and prayer-book of the Adhvaryu priests as distinguished from the Hotar, the Udgâtar, and the Brahman, the special priests, respectively, of the three other Vedas, owes its origin to the increasing multiformity and complication of the Indian ritual and the recognized insufficiency of the simple and unsystematically arranged Collection of Rigveda Hymns to meet the requirements of the performers of various essentially important rites and ceremonies.

The Yajurveda, owing to a schism among its earliest teachers and their followers, was divided into two distinct Samhitâs or Collections called—probably from the names of the Rishis or inspired Seers who, ate respectively their reputed compilers—the Taittirîya and the Vâjasaneya or Vâjasaneyi; the former and older being known also by the title Krishna or Black—probably from its dark or obscure appearance, the collection of sacrificial texts and formulas being perplexingly

p. xviii

intermingled with the Brâhmana or exegetical portion which explains them and teaches their ritual application—, and the latter being called Sukla or White, the revised, systematic and clear collection, containing the texts and formulas by themselves with a totally distinct Brâhmana, the Satapatha, as an appendix. In the two divisions, besides these essential points of difference, are found occasional verbal and orthoepic variations which are generally of little importance. The order of rites and ceremonies is substantially identical, but the White contains a few more texts than the Black.

The Samhitâ of the White Yajurveda consists of forty Adhyâyas or Books containing, with frequent repetitions of the same text, about two thousand verses. A large portion of these are Richas or Strophes borrowed—frequently with variations—from the Rigveda, and sometimes from the Atharva these, of course, are metrical. Nearly equal in quantity are the Yajus texts or sacrificial formulas—the most characteristic portion, from which the Veda derives its name—composed in measured prose ‘which rises now and then,’ as Professor Weber observes, ‘to a true rhythmical swing,’ and long passages, such as the lists of victims to be tied up and dedicated at the Asvamedha and the Purushamedha, which are necessarily in the simplest prose.

For further information with regard to this Veda the reader should consult Professor Weber’s History of Indian Literature (English Translation by John Mann and Theodor Zachariae: Trübner’s Oriental Series); Professor Max Müller’s History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature; Professor J. Eggeling’s Introduction, Vol. XII. of the Sacred Books of the East, or, for a briefer account, Mrs. Manning’s Ancient and Mediaeval India, Vol. I. pp. 107-109.

My translation follows the fine edition of the White Yajurveda or Vâjasaneyi-Sanhitâ, in the two recensions—the Mâdhyandina

p. xix

and the Kânva—, with Mahîdhara’s Commentary, the Vedadîpa, or Lamp of Knowledge, written towards the close of the sixteenth century, published under the patronage of the Honourable Court of Directors of the East India Company in 1849 at Berlin by Dr. Albrecht Weber, at that time Docent of the Sanskrit language at that University. This excellent edition consisting of three Parts the latter two of which contain the Satapatha-Brâhmana in the Mâdhyandina recension with extracts from the Commentaries of Sâyana, Harisvâmin, and Dvivedaganga, and the Srautra-Sûtra of Kâtyâyana with extracts from the Commentaries of Karka and Yâjñikadeva, has not been reprinted and is now practically unobtainable. In India the text of the Mâdhyandina recension with Mahîdhara’s Commentary has been issued in a cheap form at Calcutta by Pandit Jîbânanda Vidyâsâgara, B. A., Superintendent of the Free Sanskrit College, of which a second edition appeared in 1892; and a lithographed edition of the text with a Hindi translation of Mahîdhara’s Commentary was published in 1874, at Besma in the North-Western Provinces, by Râjâ Giriprasâdavarman of that place. A cheap edition of the text, in unbound MS. form, has been published at Bombay.

No separate translation of the whole Samhitâ or Collection of Texts and Formulas has appeared in any European language. It was Professor Weber’s intention, as signified in his History of Indian Literature, to bring out a translation giving the ceremonial belonging to each verse, together with a full glossary, but ‘this promise has not been fulfilled, owing to the pressure of other labours.’ This scholar had previously published a Latin translation, with annotations in the same language, of Books IX. and X. in his Vâjasaneya-Sanhitae Specimen (Breslau, 1846), and more recently a German version of Book XVI. in Indische Studien II. pp. 14 ff., and of the list of men and women to be dedicated at the Purushamedha in his treatise on Human Sacrifice among Indians of the Vedic Age reprinted

p. xx

in his Indische Streifen I. pp. 76-84. Of Book XL. as an Upanishad there are several translations into English.

Moreover, nearly the whole of the first eighteen Books has been incorporated—dissected and explained clause by clause—in the first nine Books of the Satapatha-Brâhmana; and an admirable translation of this vast work by Professor Julius Eggeling is now nearly completed in the Sacred Books of the East, four volumes (XII, XXVI., XLI., XLIII. of that series) having already appeared, and the concluding volume (XLV) being in the press. From this translation—which, but for its bulk and costliness would make half of my work superfluous—and from Professor Eggeling’s annotations, I have derived the greatest assistance, and most gratefully record my obligations.

All that I have attempted to do is to give a faithful translation, to the best of my ability, of the texts and sacrificial formulas of the Veda, with just sufficient commentary, chiefly from Mahîdhara, to make them intelligible. Much additional information way be found in Professor A. Hillebrandt’s Ritual-Litteratur, Vedische Opfer and Zauber (Grundriss der Indo-Arischen Philologie and Altertumskunde), Strassburg: 1897; and further minute details of the various sacrifices, rites and ceremonies are given in the Satapatha-Brâhmana as already mentioned, and in various articles, referred to in my notes, by Professor A. Weber, the great authority on the Yajurveda and all that is connected with it.


Deep State: Inside Washington’s Shadowy Power Elite

Tyler Durden's picture

This “state within a state” hides “mostly in plain sight, and its operators mainly act in the light of day,” says Lofgren, and yet the “Deep State does not consist of the entire government.”

Our plutocracy, whether the hedge fund managers in Greenwich, Connecticut, or the Internet moguls in Palo Alto, now lives like the British did in colonial India: ruling the place but not of it. If one can afford private security, public safety is of no concern; to the person fortunate enough to own a Gulfstream jet, crumbling bridges cause less apprehension, and viable public transportation doesn’t even compute. With private doctors on call and a chartered plane to get to the Mayo Clinic, why worry about Medicare?”


? Mike Lofgren, The Deep State: The Fall of the Constitution and the Rise of a Shadow Government


“Our analyses suggest that majorities of the American public actually have little influence over the policies our government adopts. Americans do enjoy many features central to democratic governance, such as regular elections, freedom of speech and association, and a widespread (if still contested) franchise.


But we believe that if policymaking is dominated by powerful business organizations and a small number of affluent Americans, then America’s claims to being a democratic society are seriously threatened.”


Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page, Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens, Princeton 2014

“As a congressional staff member for 28 years specializing in national security and possessing a top secret security clearance, I was at least on the fringes of the world I am describing, if neither totally in it by virtue of full membership nor of it by psychological disposition.


But, like virtually every employed person, I became, to some extent, assimilated into the culture of the institution I worked for, and only by slow degrees, starting before the invasion of Iraq, did I begin fundamentally to question the reasons of state that motivate the people who are, to quote George W. Bush,  ‘the deciders.’


Cultural assimilation is partly a matter of what psychologist Irving L. Janis called groupthink,  the chameleon-like ability of people to adopt the views of their superiors and peers. This syndrome is endemic to Washington: The town is characterized by sudden fads, be it negotiating biennial budgeting, making grand bargains or invading countries. Then, after a while, all the town’s cool kids drop those ideas as if they were radioactive.


As in the military, everybody has to get on board with the mission, and questioning it is not a career-enhancing move. The universe of people who will critically examine the goings-on at the institutions they work for is always going to be a small one. As Upton Sinclair said,  ‘It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.’

Mike Lofgren

h/t Jesse’s Cafe Americain blog

*  *  *

As we previously concluded, for all intents and purposes, the nation is one national “emergency” away from having a full-fledged, unelected, authoritarian state emerge from the shadows. All it will take is the right event—another terrorist attack, perhaps, or a natural disaster—for such a regime to emerge from the shadows.

As unnerving as that prospect may be, however, it is the second shadow government, what former congressional staffer Mike Lofgren refers to as “the Deep State, which operates according to its own compass heading regardless of who is formally in power,” that poses the greater threat right now.

Consider this: how is it that partisan gridlock has seemingly jammed up the gears (and funding sources) in Washington, yet the government has been unhindered in its ability to wage endless wars abroad, in the process turning America into a battlefield and its citizens into enemy combatants?

The credit for such relentless, entrenched, profit-driven governance, according to Lofgren, goes to “another government concealed behind the one that is visible at either end of Pennsylvania Avenue, a hybrid entity of public and private institutions ruling the country according to consistent patterns in season and out, connected to, but only intermittently controlled by, the visible state whose leaders we choose.”

This “state within a state” hides “mostly in plain sight, and its operators mainly act in the light of day,” says Lofgren, and yet the “Deep State does not consist of the entire government.”

Rather, Lofgren continues:

It is a hybrid of national security and law enforcement agencies: the Department of Defense, the Department of State, the Department of Homeland Security, the Central Intelligence Agency and the Justice Department. I also include the Department of the Treasury because of its jurisdiction over financial flows, its enforcement of international sanctions and its organic symbiosis with Wall Street.


All these agencies are coordinated by the Executive Office of the President via the National Security Council. Certain key areas of the judiciary belong to the Deep State, such as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, whose actions are mysterious even to most members of Congress. Also included are a handful of vital federal trial courts, such as the Eastern District of Virginia and the Southern District of Manhattan, where sensitive proceedings in national security cases are conducted.


The final government component (and possibly last in precedence among the formal branches of government established by the Constitution) is a kind of rump Congress consisting of the congressional leadership and some (but not all) of the members of the defense and intelligence committees. The rest of Congress, normally so fractious and partisan, is mostly only intermittently aware of the Deep State and when required usually submits to a few well-chosen words from the State’s emissaries.

In an expose titled “Top Secret America,” The Washington Post revealed the private side of this shadow government, made up of 854,000 contract personnel with top-secret clearances, “a number greater than that of top-secret-cleared civilian employees of the government.”

Reporting on the Post’s findings, Lofgren points out:

These contractors now set the political and social tone of Washington, just as they are increasingly setting the direction of the country, but they are doing it quietly, their doings unrecorded in the Congressional Record or the Federal Register, and are rarely subject to congressional hearings…

The Deep State not only holds the nation’s capital in thrall, but it also controls Wall Street (“which supplies the cash that keeps the political machine quiescent and operating as a diversionary marionette theater”) and Silicon Valley.

As Lofgren concludes:

[T]he Deep State is so heavily entrenched, so well protected by surveillance, firepower, money and its ability to co-opt resistance that it is almost impervious to change… If there is anything the Deep State requires it is silent, uninterrupted cash flow and the confidence that things will go on as they have in the past. It is even willing to tolerate a degree of gridlock: Partisan mud wrestling over cultural issues may be a useful distraction from its agenda.

Remember this the next time you find yourselves mesmerized by the antics of the 2016 presidential candidates or drawn into a politicized debate over the machinations of Congress, the president or the judiciary: it’s all intended to distract you from the fact that you have no authority and no rights in the face of the shadow governments.


The Bank Of Japan – Ringing In The Keynesian Endgame

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Pater Tenebrarum via Acting-Man.com,

Let’s Do More of What Doesn’t Work

It is the Keynesian mantra: the fact that the policies recommended by Keynesians and monetarists, i.e., deficit spending and money printing, routinely fail to bring about the desired results is not seen as proof that they simply don’t work. It is regarded as evidence that there hasn’t been enough spending and printing yet.


Bank of Japan (BOJ) Governor Haruhiko Kuroda speaks at a news conference at the BOJ headquarters in Tokyo June 11, 2013. REUTERS/Yuya Shino

BoJ governor Haruhiko “Fly” Kuroda: is that a windshield I’m seeing?


At the Bank of Japan this mantra has been gospel for as long as we can remember. Japan has always exhibited an especially strong penchant for central planning. We still recall that many Western observers were beginning to wonder in the late 1980s whether the Japanese form of state capitalism administered by the powerful Ministry of Trade and Industry and the BoJ wasn’t a superior economic system after all. Then this happened:



The Nikkei Index from 1989 to 2003. Japan’s seemingly never-ending boom coupled with forever rising stock prices, carefully administered by Tokyo’s powerful bureaucrats, suddenly became an intractable bust – click to enlarge.


This sudden change in fortunes should perhaps have been taken as a hint that central planning of the economy wasn’t such a good idea after all. That was not the conclusion of Japan’s movers and shakers though (or anyone else’s, for that matter). Instead it was decided that what was required were better planners, or at least a better plan.

For decades Japanese policymakers have been inundated with well-meaning advice by prominent Western economists. Even Ben Bernanke famously admonished them to just print more. According to Bernanke, holding interest rates at zero and implementing several iterations of QE were indicative of “policy paralysis” – after all, these efforts were obviously just not big and bold enough!


Going Big and Failing Again

After the reelection of Shinzo Abe and the installation of Haruhiko Kuroda as BoJ governor, the BoJ decided to simply continue doing what it has always done – more than 20 years of utter failure notwithstanding. However, in deference to the admonitions of the Bernankes and Krugmans of this world, it increased the size of its meddling by an order of magnitude:


2-BoJ assets

Assets held by the Bank of Japan: since Kuroda has started this “QE on steroids” program in 2012, the central bank’s balance sheet has grown in parabolic fashion – click to enlarge.


In short, over the past four years the BoJ has thrown all remaining caution to the wind, with the declared goal of reviving Japan’s economy and creating an annual “inflation” rate of 2%. However, it seems now that even that was not enough just yet!

As an aside to this: no-one knows or can sensibly explain what lowering the purchasing power of one’s currency by exactly 2% p.a. is supposed to achieve. There exists neither theoretical nor empirical evidence that could possibly support the notion that it is a desirable goal. It is just another Keynesian mantra. Central bankers have basically pulled the 2% figure out of their hats.

The BoJ has certainly succeeded in devaluing the yen’s external value and impoverishing Japan’s citizens accordingly. It has also created a short term windfall for people buying Japanese stocks. To give you a rough idea how its “success” has manifested itself otherwise, here are a few charts illustrating the situation. The first one shows the quarterly annualized growth rate of Japan’s machinery orders (note the most recent figure, which has been released only last week):



The most recent data point of the BoJ-engineered “recovery”: machinery orders plunge by 14.4% – click to enlarge.


And here is the monthly growth rate in manufacturing production – a sector that due to its export prowess was supposed to be an especially great beneficiary of Kuroda’s destruction of the yen:



Japan’s manufacturing production, monthly annualized growth rate – the December data haven’t been released yet, but in light of last quarter’s machinery orders, production growth will likely be back in negative territory – click to enlarge.


In light of the enormous decline of the yen’s exchange rate since 2012, one would normally expect that the BoJ has at leastsucceeded in achieving its bizarre goal of raising the consumer price inflation rate to 2%. Well, it did – for exactly one month. However, that was mainly due to a hike in the sales tax, so it can actually not be attributed to the BoJ. Japan’s consumers have been very lucky so far – the planned assault on their wallets has turned out to be a complete dud as well:



Japan’s consumer price inflation rate, month-on-month. No dice, so far – click to enlarge.


The Time for More Insanity has Come

Stock markets around the world have recently swooned, with the Nikkei delivering an especially weak performance. After assuring everyone that the BoJ saw no need to add to its already enormous debt monetization program, Mr. Kuroda seems to have been convinced by recent market volatility that is was time to move on from an insane monetary policy to even more insane monetary policy. As Reuters reports:

“The Bank of Japan unexpectedly cut a benchmark interest rate below zero on Friday, stunning investors with another bold move to stimulate the economy as volatile markets and slowing global growth threaten its efforts to overcome deflation.


Global equities jumped, the yen tumbled and sovereign bonds rallied after the BOJ said it would charge for a portion of bank reserves parked with the institution, an aggressive policy pioneered by the European Central Bank (ECB).


“What’s important is to show people that the BOJ is strongly committed to achieving 2 percent inflation and that it will do whatever it takes to achieve it,” BOJ Governor Haruhiko Kuroda told a news conference after the decision.

(emphasis added)

Obviously, the BoJ cannot allow Draghi to get away with imposing policies that are even more crazy than its own. So it has now caught up with the lunatics running the monetary asylum in Europe. It is actually quite amusing that this admission of the complete failure of the policies implemented to date apparently caused stock markets to rally. JGB yields declined by more than 56% (!) on the day to a mere 10 basis points, and the yen got kneecapped, surrendering much of the gains it has achieved in recent weeks.


6-JGB, one day chart

JGB yields plunge by 13 basis points to just 10 basis points – a loss of 56% in just one trading day – click to enlarge.




The yen is murdered, surrendering a large part of the gains it has made since early December – click to enlarge.


As to the BoJ’s commitment to “achieve inflation”, it may well end one day with price inflation going from zero to infinity in the space of a few months. Kuroda should be thankful that Japan’s citizens haven’t lost confidence in the currency yet in spite of his efforts; one of these days they will, and then it will probably be “game over” in a flash.

We should also point out that there is actually no deflation in Japan. There never has been and very likely, there never will be. Here is a chart of Japan’s narrow money supply M1, which consists of currency and demand deposits:



Japan’s narrow money supply M1 since the 1950s. What terrible, terrible deflation! – click to enlarge.


Reuters then unquestioningly parrots the official “reasoning” for why falling prices are allegedly “dangerous” (never mind that prices haven’t really fallen in Japan anyway – at best they were stable for a number of years) – readers are evidently supposed to just accept these unproven assertions as if it were perfectly obvious that they are true:

“In adopting negative interest rates Japan is reaching for a new weapon in its long battle against deflation, which since the 1990s have discouraged consumers from buying big because they expect prices to fall further. Deflation is seen as the root of two decades of economic malaise.”

This shows how utterly divorced from reality today’s mainstream economists and central bankers are – not to mention how lazy financial journalists are, who never seem to question this nonsense. The above assertion even flies into the face of economics 101. People buy less when prices decline? Since when? In what universe? Japanese consumers are allegedly waiting since the 1990s for “prices to fall further”? To call this utter bullsh*t feels almost like an insult to bullsh*t.

We guess the billions of people in the world who keep buying smart phones, computers, TV sets and all the other things that are continually falling in price in spite of the ministrations of central bankers must represent the “exception from the rule”.



Japan’s consumer price index has recently reached a new multi-decade high. Shouldn’t the central bank be glad that prices have actually been stable for so long? – click to enlarge.


In his press conference Kuroda uttered the following:

“Kuroda said the world’s third-biggest economy was recovering moderately and the underlying price trend was rising steadily.


“But there’s a risk recent further falls in oil prices, uncertainty over emerging economies, including China, and global market instability could hurt business confidence and delay the eradication of people’s deflationary mindset,” he said.


“The BOJ decided to adopt negative interest rates…to forestall such risks from materializing.”

Perhaps Kuroda should instead have pondered what risks are likely to materialize on account of the imposition of negative interest rates. We have already discussed this topic extensively in the context of the ECB’s decision to introduce negative rates, but here is a brief reminder:

Neither zero nor negative originary interest could possibly exist in an unhampered free market economy. Time preference cannot become zero or negative. Conceivably it could become zero if one were to fall into a black hole (it is theorized that no time passes there), or if scarcity were completely eliminated one day and no economic or technological progress would be seen as possible anymore. Neither of these hypothetical cases will ever be of practical importance.

Other than that, the only thing artificially imposed negative rates will achieve is to destroy what is left of the economy – they will slowly but surely transform prosperity into poverty. As Ludwig von Mises has warned:

“Not the impossible disappearance of originary interest, but the abolition of payment of interest to the owners of capital, would result in capital consumption. The capitalists would consume their capital goods and their capital precisely because there is originary interest and present want-satisfaction is preferred to later satisfaction.


Therefore there cannot be any question of abolishing interest by any institutions, laws, and devices of bank manipulation. He who wants to “abolish” interest will have to induce people to value an apple available in a hundred years no less than a present apple.


What can be abolished by laws and decrees is merely the right of the capitalists to receive interest. But such laws would bring about capital consumption and would very soon throw mankind back into the original state of natural poverty.”

As we have always said in these pages, the cunning plan of the mad hatters running the world’s central banks seems to consist of making people richer by making them poorer. One can safely assume that they haven’t really thought this one through.



It appears to us that the ever more desperate monetary policy measures adopted by the BoJ are coming closer and closer to crossing a point of no return. In other words, the BoJ seems to be entering what is popularly known as the “Keynesian endgame”. Once the threshold beyond which confidence is finally lost is crossed, the long maintained sophisticated fiat money Ponzi scheme and the associated three card Monte played between central banks, commercial banks and government treasuries will come to a screeching halt.

Naturally, we cannot tell you where this threshold precisely lies or how quickly said “endgame” will be playing out.Nor do we know with any precision what gyrations we may yet see as the situation evolves. We do however know that Kuroda’s decision has brought the world another step closer to the end. It would be a dangerous error to believe that such policies can be adopted without inviting severe consequences.

Kuroda is a member of a small coterie of central planners running the worlds currency systems, who are completely divorced from reality and are playing with the savings and lives of millions. They are implementing extremely risky experiments and evidently haven’t even the faintest inkling of what the ultimate outcome will be.

Unfortunately, none of us can do anything to stop them. It is therefore vitally important that one make a plan for oneself. It is quite ironic actually: the very people the economy depends on the most with respect to wealth creation are also most likely to be terrified by these developments. Consequently they are likely to withdraw more and more from genuine wealth creation activities. They will simply be far too busy trying to save themselves while it’s still possible.



Syria opposition threatens to walk out of Geneva talks


Opposition delegates say they will leave if government does not lift sieges on rebel-held areas and stop rocket attacks.

31 Jan 2016 07:49 GMT | War & Conflict, Middle East, Syria, Syrian crisis

  •  Salem al-Meslet, spokesman of the Higher Negotiations Committee, talked to the press in Geneva [Basma Atassi/Al Jazeera]
Salem al-Meslet, spokesman of the Higher Negotiations Committee, talked to the press in Geneva [Basma Atassi/Al Jazeera]

More to this story

Syria’s main opposition bloc has threatened to pull out of United Nations-sponsored peace talks in Geneva if what it called the “crimes” of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government persisted.

Representatives of the Saudi Arabia-based group, known as the High Negotiations Committee (HNC), landed in the Swiss capital late on Saturday, a day after a delegation representing the Assad regime arrived and held preliminary talks with the UN’s Syria envoy Staffan de Mistura.

Speaking to Al Jazeera in Geneva late on Saturday, HNC spokesman Salem al-Meslet said: “We want the peace talks to work, but there is no seriousness on the part of the regime.”

Meslet said that the HNC would discuss with de Mistura on Sunday its conditions for joining the negotiations, which include the government agreeing to lift sieges on opposition-held areas and stop shelling them and agreeing to release prisoners.

Opposition spokesperson Salem al-Meslet said the opposition would leave Geneva if its demands were not met [Basma Atassi/Al Jazeera]

“The priority is to lift the suffering of the Syrian people,” he said. “If we see an implementation of these demands, including allowing trucks of aid into besieged areas, we will consider this as a sign of good will.”

HNC coordinator Riad Hijab, who did not travel to Geneva, said in an Arabic statement posted online that “if the regime insists on continuing to commit these crimes, then the HNC delegation’s presence in Geneva will not be justified.”

“The delegation will inform de Mistura of its intentions to withdraw its negotiating team if the UN and world powers are unable to stop these violations,” Hijab wrote.

Monzer Makhous, a member of the Syrian opposition delegation, said: “We are here to test the intentions of the regime … We do not have assurances, we have promises”.

The proposed intra-Syrian talks are part of a peace plan set out in November by external powers embroiled in the five-year-old conflict, some on different sides.

The process envisions elections within 18 months but leaves unresolved the future of Assad, whose government has been making gains on the ground since Russia began supporting it with air strikes since last September.

Another thorny issue is which rebel groups will be involved in the talks, though all sides agree on the exclusion of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and the al-Nusra Front, which is seen as allied with al-Qaeda.

Syrian chief negotiator Bashar Jaafari [R] held talks with UN envoy de Mistura on Friday [Martial Trezzini/EPA]

Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov was quoted by the country’s Interfax news agency as saying that there would be no face-to-face negotiations, only so-called “proximity talks” in which the sides gather in separate rooms at the same venue with mediators shuttling between them.

The talks are the first since two rounds of negotiations collapsed in 2014. Syria’s conflict has killed more than 250,000 people, displaced millions and sent hundreds of thousands fleeing as refugees to Europe.

Air strikes and starvation

As the delicate process unfolded in Switzerland, there was no let-up in fighting in Syria. On Saturday, at least 15 people were killed and dozens wounded in suspected Russian air strikes targeting rebels near the northern city of Aleppo.

In the west of the country, opposition fighters said they had taken control of several checkpoints around the city of Hama, which is in a region where control is divided between government and opposition fighters.

Further south, residents of the besieged town of Madaya continued to die of starvation and a lack of medical supplies, despite the delivery of aid earlier this month, according to the Doctors without Borders (MSF) aid group.

READ MORE: Syrians are still starving to death

MSF said on Saturday that at least 16 people – close to one person per day – have died since three aid convoys entered the town, near the Lebanese border 40km northwest of the capital Damascus, on January 11.

The group said that an estimated 320 people in Madaya were suffering from malnutrition, 33 of whom were “in danger of death if they do not receive prompt and effective treatment”.

Additional reporting by Al Jazeera’s Basma Atassi in Geneva

Source: Al Jazeera And Agencies


Breaking: ISIS/Turkey Advanced Missile Downs Russian Bomber Over Syria

Pilots bailed out, unaccounted for at this publishing


[ Editor’s note:  Yesterday, Turkey complained to Russia that an SU 34 violated its air space.  Today a Russian jet well inside Syria is downed by a missile that shouldn’t exist.  Is this a coincidence?Gordon ]


Russian Su-24 Jet Downed Over Syria

Sputnik, Moscow: The Russian jet crashed in Syria earlier on Tuesday with two people aboard. The plane was most likely downed by a ground missile, according to the Russian Defense Ministry.

According to initial ministry information, both pilots were able to eject from the airplane. Their current condition and whereabouts have not been released.

Turkey summons Russian envoy, claims Su-34 fighter jet violated air space

Turkey has summoned the Russian envoy, claiming a Russian fighter jet has violated its airspace, Dogan news agency reports. According to Ankara, the incident involving a Russian Su-34 took place Friday. Several warnings in Russian and in English were allegedly sent to the jet.

We are making a clear call to the Russian Federation not to violate Turkish airspace, which is also NATO airspace,” the Turkish Foreign Ministry said in a statement Saturday.

We are emphasizing once again that the unwanted consequences of such irresponsible behavior will belong fully to the Russian Federation,” it added.

The ministry also said it views the alleged violation as a clear sign that Russia is seeking to escalate the already existing tensions. The Russian embassy in Ankara confirms the envoy has been summoned.

We confirm that the ambassador, Andrey Karlov, has had a meeting in the Turkish Foreign Ministry,” Igor Mityakov, the press secretary of the Russian embassy in Ankara, told RIA Novosti following Turkey’s statement. He did not confirm the incident itself and provided no further comment.

Turkey's Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu © Marko Djurica

In November, Turkey downed a Russian bomber, a Su-24, after it briefly violated the country’s airspace. The plane went down in Syria with Moscow saying that it only spent 17 seconds over Turkish territory.

The incident provoked a deep political crisis between Ankara and Moscow. Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has so far refused to apologize for the incident and blamed the downing of the Russian bomber on the pilots. One of the two pilots was killed in the incident.

Following the downing, Moscow introduced multiple sanctions against Ankara, banning agricultural trade with Turkey, reintroducing a visa regime and suspending most bilateral economic projects, including the Turkish Stream gas pipeline construction project.

Moscow has been carrying out an anti-terrorist operation in neighboring Syria since September 2015. Russia’s Su-27 and Su-30 fighter jets, Su-34 and Su-24 tactical bombers and Su-25 attack aircrafts are taking part in airstrikes on Islamic State (IS, former ISIS, ISIL) and other Syrian terrorist groups.

200 Swedes Storm Occupied Stockholm Train Station, Beat Migrant Children

Tyler Durden's picture

Sweden is losing its patience with refugees.

In the wake of the sexual assaults allegedly perpetrated by men of “Arab origin” in Cologne, Germany on New Year’s Eve, the Swedish press revealed what certainly appeared to be a coverup related to a wave of similar incidents that apparently occurred at a youth festival and concert in central Stockholm’s Kungsträdgården last August.

That ruffled the feathers of quite a few Swedes and then, earlier this week, we learned that a 22-year-old asylum center workerwas murdered in a knife attack carried out by a 15-year-old Somali migrant named Youssaf Khalif Nuur, shown below.

Alexandra Mezher (the victim) had been working at the shelter in Molndal for “a few months” when she was killed while working a night shift.

And speaking of unaccompanied refugees, Stockholm’s central train station has apparently been overrun by Moroccan migrant children who, according to reports, spend their days drinking, stealing, and accosting women.

On Thursday, Interior Minister Anders Ygeman said the country is set to deport some 80,000 of the 163,000 people who entered the country seeking shelter last year, but that wasn’t good enough for the “football hooligan scene”, who on Friday night “went on a rampage” at the train station in Stockholm where “hundreds” of masked men beat migrant children. 

“A mob of black-clad masked men went on a rampage in and around Stockholm’s main train station last night beating up refugees and anyone who did not look like they were ethnically Swedish,” The Daily Mail reports. “Before the attack, the group of 200 people handed out xenophobic leaflets with the message ‘Enough now’.”

The “thugs” were “allegedly linked to Sweden’s football hooligan scene” – whatever that is.

“I was passing by and saw a masked group dressed in black … start hitting foreigners,” one witness said. “I saw three people molested.”

Here are the visuals:


And here’s the text of the flyer the “football hooligans” distributed ahead of the assault to wrest control of the train station from the iron grip of preteen Moroccan migrant children:

All over the country, reports are pouring in that the police can no longer cope with preventing and investigating the crimes which strike the Swedish people.’

‘In some cases, for example, in the latest murder of a woman employed at a home for so called ‘unaccompanied minor refugees’ in Molndal, it goes as far as the National Police Commissioner choosing to show more sympathy for the perpetrator than the victim,’ it continues.

‘But we refuse to accept the repeated assaults and harrassment against Swedish women.’

‘We refuse to accept the destruction of our once to safe society. When our political leadership and police show more sympathy for murderers than for their victims, there are no longer any excuses to let it happen without protest.’

‘When Swedish streets are no longer safe to walk on for normal Swedes, it is our DUTY to fix the problem,’ the leaflet reads.

‘This is why, today, 200 Swedish men gathered to take a stand against the north African ‘street children’ who are running rampage in and around the capital’s central station.’

‘Police have clearly showed that they lack the means to stop their progress and we se no other way than to hand down the punishment they deserve ourselves.’

‘The justice system has walked out and the contract of society is therefore broken – it is now every Swedish man’s duty to defend out public spaced against the imported criminality.’


‘Those who gathered today are neither your politician, your journalist or your policeman. We are your father, your brother, your husband, your colleague, your friend and your neighbour.

You’ll recall what we said in the wake of Mezher’s murder: “Yes PM Löfven, we believe that you are correct to say that ‘there are quite many people in Sweden who feel a lot of concern’ and make no mistake, if European politicans do not find an effective way to get the situation under control, the public will remove them – either with the ballot or with the torches and pitchforks.”

The text of the leaflet distributed ahead of the train station “rampage” is proof positive that at least some Swedes are prepared to stage an open revolt against a government they now view as standing in violation of the social contract.

When social contract theory breaks down, you’re left with a Hobbesian state of nature and as you can see from the video shown above, it is indeed “nasty and brutish” and may well end up being quite “short” for the hundreds of unaccompanied North African migrants who fled their countries for the “safety” of Sweden.

There was no word on whether the “football hooligan” crowd managed to retake the station or whether the Moroccan migrant children remain dug in.



Is the German city of Cologne shifting to the right?

As the city’s traditionally liberal identity is challenged, we meet those on the right who stand to gain.

Kait Bolongaro | 30 Jan 2016 17:32 GMT | Politics, Europe, Germany

Cologne has traditionally been considered an unwelcoming place for the far right, but has something changed? [Melanie Dittmer/Al Jazeera]

Cologne, Germany – Famous for its fun-loving carnival and vibrant artistic scene, Cologne has long been considered a left-wing city. But the events of New Year’s Eve, when hundreds of women reported being robbed and assaulted, may be challenging that tradition and allowing the right to gain more of a foothold here

Police had registered 516 complaints, and, according to officials, many of those accused were of North African origin, which has led some to demand that the government re-evaluate its asylum policy.

More than 1.1 million asylum seekers arrived in Germany in 2015, but experts suggest that Germanys once-welcoming culture is shifting and falling more in line with the position promoted by anti-immigration parties.

Now, the city’s leftist identity is seemingly being challenged. On January 9, more than 1,700 protesters attended a demonstration led by a coalition of right-wing groups in Cologne.

So, if attitudes are changing here, who stands to gain?

Putting ‘fingers in wounds’

In the October 2015 municipal elections, Henriette Reker, who represents a coalition between the leftist Greens and centre-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), was elected mayor. That came a day after she survived an assassination attempt by an assailant who expressed anti-refugee sentiments. The Alternative for Germany (AfD) won only 4.01 percent of the vote.

Founded in 2013 as a response to the euro crisis, the AfD is seen as likely to inherit disenchanted conservative CDU voters who disagree with some of the policies of CDU president and the country’s chancellor, Angela Merkel.

“We ask the tough questions and put our ‘finger in the wound’ wherever possible,” Hendrik Rottmann, the AfD chairman in Cologne, told Al Jazeera via email.

‘We are standing for a politics that is more patriotic so that [Germans] have a normal way of thinking about [their] own identity,’ Carlo Clemens, the president of the Cologne chapter of the Young Alternative, explains [Adrien le Coarer/Al Jazeera]

Carlo Clemens is the president and cofounder of the Cologne chapter of Young Alternative, the AfD’s youth faction, which has 70 members.

Born in Bavaria to a Filipina mother and German father, the 26-year-old history student describes the political group as Germany’s “most rebellious youth organisation”.

“We are standing for a politics that is more patriotic so that [Germans] have a normal way of thinking about [their] own identity,” he says, standing beside the imposing Cologne Cathedral.

For Michael Gautsch, the vice president of Young Alternative in Cologne, the AfD is the political party most closely aligned with his beliefs. The 26-year-old, who has one German parent and one Russian parent, says that he thinks it is important to question government policy – even on sensitive issues such as immigration and further European integration.

“The [AfD’s] biggest challenge is to sensitise people to the fact that it’s not bad when you’re critical,” he says.

Despite their multicultural origins, both men say that they have been made to feel welcome in the Young Alternative and the AfD, which runs on an anti-immigration platform. According to the government, one in every five Germans has a parent or grandparent from another country.

The Young Alternative says that it supports accepting those refugees it considers to be fleeing for their lives, but Clemens and Gautsch say that only three percent of asylum seekers in Germany qualify for such protection according to the Dublin Regulations, a European Union law that aims to determine the EU member state responsible for processing an asylum claim (often the point of entry into the EU), and ‘safe country of origin’ cases, which are claims of people from “safe” countries in instances where it’s proven that a threat of persecution exists if they were to return.

The group also calls for swift deportation measures for failed asylum requests and refugees who commit crimes.

The local right

Michael Gabel, the chairman of Pro Koln Pro Koln, a group that wants to place limits on the number of asylum seekers Germany takes in [Adrien le Coarer/Al Jazeera]

As far as far-right political parties are concerned, Pro Koln is as local as it gets. The populist movement was founded in Cologne in 1996 as an anti-immigration and anti-“Islamisation” party.

It would be hard to imagine a more quintessential Cologner than Michael Gabel, Pro Koln’s chairman. The 55-year-old is openly gay and has enjoyed a long career as a theatre actor in the city’s vibrant arts scene. But, he says, he has lost some professional opportunities as a result of his political affiliation.

Gabel says that he decided to join the party after a physical confrontation with a group of Turkish men in 2008.

“I had it up to here. I had never experienced such an attack in Germany,” he explains from his office.

He has since become an active protester against mosques in Cologne, organising demonstrations whenever plans for a new one are announced.

Pro Koln wants to place limits on the number of asylum seekers Germany takes in and believes that any asylum seeker who has arrived in Germany via a safe third country, such as Turkey, Italy or Greece, should be swiftly returned.

“We are just asking that laws [such as the Dublin Regulation] be applied,” explains Gabel.

At Pro Koln’s weekly citizens’ meetings, about 30 dedicated supporters cram into a small room to discuss their concerns. The mostly greying members express their fear of young, male, Muslim refugees and say that they are worried about the safety of women in the city.

An attendee suggests that women should demand the right to carry weapons to protect themselves. Another shouts that all refugees – regardless of their country of origin – should be sent back to their homelands. Another attendee expresses her support for non-Muslim refugees who face religious persecution.

Just a ‘patriotic girl’

‘I am a patriotic girl and identitarian because I fight for a Central and Northern European identity,’ says Melanie Dittmer [Adrien le Coarer/Al Jazeera]

Melanie Dittmer is a key player in Cologne’s far-right scene. Since arriving from nearby Essen three years ago, she has cofounded three branches of Pegida, the German acronym for “Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of the West” in the area, including Kogida – the Cologne version of the movement that started in Dresden – before launching her own initiative, Identity Action, in 2014.

But the 37-year-old rejects the two adjectives commonly used to define her: right-wing and Nazi.

“I am a patriotic girl and identitarian because I fight for a Central and Northern European identity,” she says from her home in Bornheim, a village near Cologne.

Dittmer was 15 when she joined the Young National Democrats, the youth wing of the National Democratic Party (NPD), which is often described as a neo-Nazi organisation.

Of the assaults on New Year’s Eve, she says: “Women cannot feel safe because some [Muslims] think differently about women than people [in Germany] do.”

If she had her way, Germany would halt all asylum applications while reinforcing its borders with fences and extra security personnel.

“I would buy buses and planes to take [asylum seekers] out of Europe in a humane and nonviolent way,” she explains.

Dittmer says members of the left-wing Antifa movement have physically attacked her, including one altercation that left her needing hospital treatment, and that she now always takes her dog, some pepper spray and a Kubotan key chain weapon with her when she walks around Cologne.

She says that she intends to run for office in the next municipal elections in 2020, but has not yet decided which party she would like to stand for.

The persistent comparison

The spectre of Germany’s Nazi past seems to loom over so much of the discussion on refugees and immigration, but many on the right insist it is time for the German political discussion to evolve beyond the Nazi paradigm.

“It is mea culpa from morning to the evening,” says Dittmer.

READ MORE: Berlin’s refugee youth

The relationship between the right-wing parties and the German press is also fraught with distrust. Many on the right dislike the way sections of the press refer to any party right of the CDU as neo-Nazis, while they refer to most media outlets as the “lying press”.

Clemens says labelling political parties as ‘Nazi’ is a strategy to push their ideas out of the acceptable range for political debate.

“If you push [the AfD] outside of the legitimate range of public discussion, then people have social pressure to stay away from us,” he adds.

Werner Patzelt, a professor of Comparative Government and Political Communication at the Dresden University of Technology and a commentator on the right in Germany, argues that a “gap of representation” has emerged as a result.

Cologne’s shifting public opinion

Over recent years, the perceived failings of German immigration policies have become the rallying point for far-right groups. But public opinion has not been on their side.

However, the tide may just be beginning to turn. A poll recently published by public broadcaster ARD revealed that 51 percent of those questioned were sceptical of Angela Merkel’s plan for refugees. It is the first time more than half of all respondents have disagreed with their chancellor.

“After the New Year’s Eve attacks, people in Cologne are very frustrated. They have been very welcoming and this is the thanks they get,” says Michael Gautsch.

Right-wing leaders say that interest in their political parties has rocketed. They have all reported an increase in social media “likes” and followers, supportive emails and increased turnout at events.

Patzelt expects the Eurosceptic AfD to gain the most public support of all right-wing parties in future elections.

“The Cologne events have significantly increased support for the AfD as a new party between the Christian Democrats (CDU) and the far right,” he told Al Jazeera via email.

But the left does not necessarily agree. Guldane Tokyurek, a member of Cologne’s city council from the left-wing Die Linke, said: “The far right tries to exploit the fears many people have after the sexual attacks on New Year’s Eve. But the community of Cologne stood up against those attempts in the past and will continue to do so in order to defend the city’s liberal and tolerant character.”

“We have to make sure that women in Cologne are safe and feel safe,” Tokyurek continued. “For this purpose, we are developing an action programme against sexism. The far right does not have any solutions. They are causing even more trouble and distrust because they thrive on it.”

With the next municipal elections due in 2020, it is yet to be seen how far politics in the city will swing to the right and if Cologne’s liberal identity will recover. Refugees and those who work with them in the city worry that if it does not, they are the ones who will pay the greatest price.

“After New Year’s Eve, we have noticed an increase in racially motivated hostility and crime,” said Marianne Jurgens, a spokeswoman for Caritas, a Catholic charity working with refugees in Cologne.

“There is a changing mood in an otherwise very tolerant city. It gives the impression that an entire group is blamed for the events. So we have concerns that our visitors and residents are the new victims.”

Source: Al Jazeera

Hillary Emails: NATO Destroyed Libya To Prevent Gold-Backed Dinar


SupportJanuary 29th, 2016 | by CoNN … Adapted for The AEGIS Alliance by Kyle James Lee



Hillary’s emails truly are the gifts that keep on giving. While France led the proponents of the UN Security Council Resolution that would create a no-fly zone in Libya, it claimed that its primary concern was the protection of Libyan civilians (considering the current state of affairs alone, one must rethink the authenticity of this concern). As many “conspiracy theorists” will claim, one of the real reasons to go to Libya was Gaddafi’s planned gold dinar.
One of the 3,000 Hillary Clinton emails released by the State Department on New Year’s Eve (where realnews is sent to die quietly) has revealed evidence that NATO’s plot to overthrow Gaddafi was fueled by first their desire to quash the gold-backed African currency, and second the Libyan oil reserves.
The email in question was sent to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by her unofficial adviser Sydney Blumenthal titled “France’s client and Qaddafi’s gold”.


SummonFrom Foreign Policy Journal:


Most astounding is the lengthy section delineating the huge threat that Gaddafi’s gold and silver reserves, estimated at “143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver,” posed to the French franc (CFA) circulating as a prime African currency.

SupportAnd here is the section of the email proving that NATO had ulterior motives for destroying Libya:




(Source Comment: According to knowledgeable individuals this quantity of gold and silver is valued at more than $7 billion. French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was one of the factors that influenced President Nicolas Sarkozy’s decision to commit France to the attack on Libya. According to these individuals Sarkozy’s plans are driven by the following issues:


a. A desire to gain a greater share of Libya oil production,
b. Increase French influence in North Africa,
c. Improve his internal political situation in France,
d. Provide the French military with an opportunity to reassert its position in the world,
e. Address the concern of his advisors over Qaddafi’s long term plans to supplant France as the dominant power in Francophone Africa)
Ergo as soon as French intel discovered Gaddafi’s dinar plans, they decided to spearhead the campaign against him- having accumulated enough good reasons to take over.
Sadly, Gaddafi had earlier warned Europe (in a “prophetic” phone conversations with Blair) that his fall would prompt the rise of Islamic extremism in the West. A warning that would go unheeded; what’s a few lives in France and Libya, if the larger goal lines the pockets of politicians and the elite so much better after all?


SupportSource: AnonHQ.com

SummonSources: Free Thought Project, NY Post, FOIA, Daily Telegraph


SupportThis Article (Hillary Emails: NATO Destroyed Libya To Prevent Gold-Backed Dinar) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author(CoNN) and AnonHQ.com.


Gaddafi Planned Gold Dinar, Now Under Attack
By Anthony Wile – May 05, 2011

Plans for attacking Muammar Gaddafi apparently go back some 20 years, and even US President Ronald Reagan tried to kill him, deeming him a threat to America power. The latest attacks are in keeping with the larger wave of aggression initiated by the Anglo-American power elite that is on to the next stage of its implementation of the “new world order.”

This power elite, based mostly in the one-square mile City of London, is said to seek world domination if it can get it – and sooner rather than later in the face of a growing Internet Reformation.

But there may be another reason for the Libyan attacks that explain their timing. According to a Russia Today news story, for which I was interviewed, Gaddafi was planning to introduce a gold dinar – “a single African currency made from gold, a true sharing of the wealth.”

The idea, according to Gaddafi, was that African and Muslim nations would join together to create this new currency and would use it to purchase oil and other resources in exclusion of the dollar and other currencies. RT calls it “an idea that would shift the economic balance of the world.”

It was not a democratic perspective in the sense that a country’s wealth would revolve around gold and its population. But that’s how modern money works. The current dollar reserve system benefits the US. In Gaddafi’s case, as he held some 144 tons of gold against a fairly small population, a gold dinar would prove a most powerful currency.

When I was interviewed by RT, I said the following: “If Gaddafi had an intent to try to re-price his oil or whatever else the country was selling on the global market and accept something else as a currency or maybe launch a gold dinar currency, any move such as that would certainly not be welcomed by the power elite today, who are responsible for controlling the world’s central banks. … So yes, that would certainly be something that would cause his immediate dismissal and the need for other reasons to be brought forward from moving him from power.”

There are many who believe Iraq’s Saddam Hussein’s overthrow by the US was sealed when he announced Iraqi oil would be traded in euros, not dollars. Sanctions and then a US invasion followed. Coincidence? Hussein’s idea would have strengthened the euro, but Gaddafi’s idea would have strengthened all of Africa in the opinion of hard-money economists. Gold is the ultimate honest money and the peg against which all other fiat currencies are ultimately devalued.

Pricing oil in something other than the dollar would attack the basis of US power in the world. The dollar is the reserve currency based on a deal made with the Saudis back in 1971 in which the Saudis as the world’s largest oil producer agreed to accept only dollars for oil. RT concludes: “A change in this policy its NATO allies literally could not afford to let that happen.”

The central banking Ponzi scheme requires an ever-increasing base of demand and the immediate silencing of those who would threaten its existence. Perhaps that is what the hurry is in removing Gaddafi in particular and those who might have been sympathetic to his monetary idea.


Hillary Clinton’s Iraq War Albatross

George W. Bush’s Iraq invasion may rank as the worst foreign policy disaster in U.S. history – spreading chaos across the Mideast and now into Europe, yet polls show Democrats nationwide favor nominating Hillary Clinton, who voted for the war and backed it even after Bush’s WMD claims were debunked, recalls Stephen Zunes.

By Stephen Zunes

Former Sen. and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is the only candidate for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination who supported the invasion of Iraq. That war not only resulted in 4,500 American soldiers being killed and thousands more permanently disabled, but also hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths, the destabilization of the region with the rise of the Islamic State and other extremists, and a dramatic increase in the federal deficit, resulting in major cutbacks to important social programs.

Moreover, the primary reasons Clinton gave for supporting President George W. Bush’s request for authorizing that illegal and unnecessary war have long been proven false.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testifies before Congress on Jan. 23, 2013, about the fatal attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11. 2012. (Photo from C-SPAN coverage)

As a result, many Democratic voters are questioning — despite her years of foreign policy experience — whether Clinton has the judgment and integrity to lead the United States on the world stage. It was just such concerns that resulted in her losing the 2008 nomination to then-Sen. Barack Obama, an outspoken Iraq War opponent.

This time around, Clinton supporters have been hoping that enough Democratic voters — the overwhelming majority of whom opposed the war — will forget about her strong endorsement of the Bush administration’s most disastrous foreign policy. Failing that, they’ve come up with a number of excuses to justify her October 2002 vote for the authorization of military force. Here they are, in no particular order:

–“Hillary Clinton’s vote wasn’t for war, but simply to pressure Saddam Hussein to allow UN weapons inspectors back into Iraq.”

At the time of vote, Saddam Hussein had already agreed in principle to a return of the weapons inspectors. His government was negotiating with the United Nations Monitoring and Verification Commission on the details, which were formally institutionalized a few weeks later. (Indeed, it would have been resolved earlier had the United States not repeatedly postponed a UN Security Council resolution in the hopes of inserting language that would have allowed Washington to unilaterally interpret the level of compliance.)

Furthermore, if then-Sen. Clinton’s desire was simply to push Saddam into complying with the inspection process, she wouldn’t have voted against the substitute Levin amendment, which would have also granted President Bush authority to use force, but only if Iraq defied subsequent UN demands regarding the inspections process. Instead, Clinton voted for a Republican-sponsored resolution to give Bush the authority to invade Iraq at the time and circumstances of his own choosing.

In fact, unfettered large-scale weapons inspections had been going on in Iraq for nearly four months at the time the Bush administration launched the March 2003 invasion. Despite the UN weapons inspectors having not found any evidence of WMDs or active WMD programs after months of searching, Clinton made clear that the United States should invade Iraq anyway.

Indeed, she asserted that even though Saddam was in full compliance with the UN Security Council, he nevertheless needed to resign as president, leave the country, and allow U.S. troops to occupy the country.

“The president gave Saddam Hussein one last chance to avoid war,” Clinton said in a statement, “and the world hopes that Saddam Hussein will finally hear this ultimatum, understand the severity of those words, and act accordingly.”

When Saddam refused to resign and the Bush administration launched the invasion, Clintonwent on record calling for “unequivocal support” for Bush’s “firm leadership and decisive action” as “part of the ongoing Global War on Terrorism.” She insisted that Iraq was somehow still “in material breach of the relevant United Nations resolutions” and, despite the fact that weapons inspectors had produced evidence to the contrary, claimed the invasion was necessary to “neutralize Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.”

–“Nearly everyone in Congress supported the invasion of Iraq, including most Democrats.”

While all but one congressional Democrat — Representative Barbara Lee of California — supported the authorization of force to fight Al Qaeda in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks in 2001, a sizable majority of Democrats in Congress voted against the authorization to invade Iraq the following year.

There were 21 Senate Democrats — along with one Republican, Lincoln Chafee, and one independent, Jim Jeffords — who voted against the war resolution, while 126 of 209 House Democrats also voted against it.

Bernie Sanders, then an independent House member who caucused with the Democrats, voted with the opposition. At the time, Sanders gave a floor speech disputing the administration’s claims about Saddam’s arsenal. He not only cautioned that both American and Iraqi casualties could rise unacceptably high, but also warned “about the precedent that a unilateral invasion of Iraq could establish in terms of international law and the role of the United Nations.”

Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, stood among the right-wing minority of Democrats in Washington.

The Democrats controlled the Senate at the time of the war authorization. Had they closed ranks and voted in opposition, the Bush administration would have been unable to launch the tragic invasion — at least not legally. Instead, Clinton and other pro-war Democrats chose to cross the aisle to side with the Republicans.

–“Her vote was simply a mistake.”

While few Clinton supporters are still willing to argue her support for the war was a good thing, many try to minimize its significance by referring to it as simply a “mistake.” But while it may have been a terrible decision, it was neither an accident nor an aberration from Clinton’s generally hawkish worldview.

It would have been a “mistake” if Hillary Clinton had pushed the “aye” button when she meant to push the “nay” button. In fact, her decision — by her own admission — was quite conscious.

The October 2002 war resolution on Iraq wasn’t like the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin resolution authorizing military force in Vietnam, which was quickly passed as an emergency request by President Lyndon Johnson when there was no time for reflection and debate. By contrast, at the time of the Iraq War authorization, there had been months of public debate on the matter. Clinton had plenty of time to investigate the administration’s claims that Iraq was a threat, as well as to consider the likely consequences of a U.S. invasion.

Also unlike the Gulf of Tonkin resolution, which was disingenuously presented as an authorization to retaliate for an alleged attack on U.S. ships, members of Congress recognized that the Iraq resolution authorized a full-scale invasion of a sovereign nation and a subsequent military occupation. Clinton had met with scores of constituents, arms control analysts, and Middle East scholars who informed her that the war was unnecessary, illegal, and would likely end in disaster.

But she decided to support going to war anyway. She even rejected the advice of fellow Democratic Sen. Bob Graham that she read the full National Intelligence Estimate, which would have further challenged some of the Bush administration’s claims justifying the war. It was not, therefore, simply a “mistake,” or a momentary lapse of judgment. Indeed, in her own words, she cast her vote “with conviction.”

As late as February 2007, Clinton herself refused to admit that her vote for the war resolution was a mistake. “If the most important thing to any of you is choosing someone who did not cast that vote or has said his vote was a mistake,” she said while campaigning for president, “then there are others to choose from.” She only began to acknowledge her regrets when she saw the polling numbers showing that a sizable majority of Democrats opposed the decision to go to war.

–“She voted for the war because she felt it was politically necessary.”

First of all, voting for a devastating war in order to advance one’s political career isn’t a particularly strong rationale for why one shouldn’t share responsibility for the consequences — especially when that calculation proved disastrously wrong. Clinton’s vote to authorize the invasion was the single most important factor in convincing former supporters to back Barack Obama in the 2008 Democratic primary, thereby costing her the nomination. Nevertheless, it still raises questions regarding Hillary Clinton’s competence to become president.

To have believed that supporting the invasion would somehow be seen as a good thing would have meant that Clinton believed that the broad consensus of Middle East scholars who warned of a costly counterinsurgency war were wrong — and that the Bush administration’s insistence that U.S. occupation forces would be “treated as liberators” was credible.

After all, for the war to have been popular, there would have had to be few American casualties, and the administration’s claims about WMDs and Iraq’s ties to Al Qaeda would have had to be vindicated. Moreover, some sort of stable pro-Western democracy would have emerged in Iraq, and the invasion would have contributed to greater stability and democracy in the region.

If Clinton believed any of those things were possible, she wasn’t paying attention. Among the scores of reputable Middle East scholars with whom I discussed the prospects of a U.S. invasion in the months leading up to the vote, none of them believed that any of these things would come to pass. They were right.

Nor was pressure likely coming from Clinton’s own constituents. Only a minority of Democrats nationwide supported the invasion, and given that New York Democrats are more liberal than the national average, opposition was possibly even stronger in the state she purported to represent. Additionally, a majority of Americans polled said they would oppose going to war if Saddam allowed for “full and complete” weapons inspectors, which he in fact did.

Finally, the idea that Clinton felt obliged to support the war as a woman in order not to appear “weak” also appears groundless. Indeed, every female senator who voted against the war authorization was easily re-elected.

–“She thought Iraq had ‘weapons of mass destruction’ and was supporting Al Qaeda.”

This is excuse is problematic on a number levels. Before the vote, UN inspectors, independent strategic analysts, and reputable arms control journals all challenged the Bush administration’s claims that Iraq had somehow rebuilt its chemical and biological weapons programs, had a nuclear weapons program, or was supporting Al Qaeda terrorists.

Virtually all of Iraq’s known stockpiles of chemical and biological agents had been accounted for, and the shelf life of the small amount of materiel that hadn’t been accounted for had long since expired. (Some discarded canisters from the 1980s were eventually found, but these weren’t operational.)

There was no evidence that Iraq had any delivery systems for such weapons either, or could build them without being detected. In addition, a strict embargo against imports of any additional materials needed for the manufacture of WMDs — which had been in effect since 1990 — made any claims that Iraq had offensive capability transparently false to anyone who cared to investigate the matter at that time.

Most of the alleged intelligence data made available to Congress prior to the war authorization vote has since been declassified. Most strategic analysts have found it transparently weak, based primarily on hearsay by Iraqi exiles of dubious credibility and conjecture by ideologically driven Bush administration officials.

Similarly, a detailed 1998 report by the International Atomic Energy Agency indicated that Iraq’s nuclear program appeared to have been completely dismantled by the mid-1990s, and a 2002 U.S. National Intelligence Estimate made no mention of any reconstituted nuclear development effort. So it’s doubtful Clinton actually had reason to believe her own claims that Iraq had a nuclear weapons program.

Additionally, there was no credible evidence whatsoever that the secular Baathist Iraqi regime had any ties to the hardline Islamist group Al Qaeda, yet Clinton distinguished herself as the only Senate Democrat to make such a claim. Indeed, a definitive report by the Department of Defense noted that not only did no such link exist, but that none could have even been reasonably suggested based on the evidence available at that time.

Moreover, even if Iraq really did have “weapons of mass destruction,” the war would have still been illegal, unnecessary, and catastrophic.

Roughly 30 countries (including the United States) have chemical, biological, or nuclear programs with weapons potential. The mere possession of these programs is not legitimate grounds for invasion, unless one is authorized by the United Nations Security Council — which the invasion of Iraq, pointedly, was not. If Clinton really thought Iraq’s alleged possession of those weapons justified her support for invading the country, then she was effectively saying the United States somehow has the right to invade dozens of other countries as well.

Similarly, even if Iraq had been one of those 30 countries — and remember, it was not — the threat of massive retaliation by Iraq’s neighbors and U.S. forces permanently stationed in the region provided a more than sufficient deterrent to Iraq using the weapons beyond its borders. A costly invasion and extended occupation were completely unnecessary.

Finally, the subsequent war and the rise of sectarianism, terrorism, Islamist extremism, and the other negative consequences of the invasion would have been just as bad even if the rationale weren’t bogus. American casualties could have actually been much higher, since WMDs would have likely been used against invading U.S. forces.

But here’s the kicker: Clinton stood by the war even after these claims were definitively debunked.

Even many months after the Bush administration itself acknowledged that Iraq had neither WMDs nor ties to Al Qaeda, Clinton declared in a speech at George Washington University that her support for the authorization was still “the right vote” and one that “I stand by.” Similarly, in an interview on Larry King Live in April 2004, when asked about her vote despite the absence of WMDs or Al Qaeda ties, she acknowledged, “I don’t regret giving the president authority.”

No Excuses

The 2016 Democratic presidential campaign is coming down to a race between Hillary Clinton, who supported the Bush Doctrine and its call for invading countries that are no threat to us regardless of the consequences, and Bernie Sanders, who supported the broad consensus of Middle East scholars and others familiar with the region who recognized that such an invasion would be disastrous.

There’s no question that the United States is long overdue to elect a woman head of state. But electing Hillary Clinton — or anyone else who supported the invasion of Iraq — would be sending a dangerous message that reckless global militarism needn’t prevent someone from becoming president, even as the nominee of the more liberal of the two major parties.

It also raises this ominous scenario: If Clinton were elected president despite having voted to give President Bush the authority, based on false pretenses, to launch a war of aggression — in violation of the UN Charter, the Nuremberg Principles, and common sense — what would stop her from demanding that Congress give her the same authority?


The Dirty War on Syria: Washington, Regime Change and Resistance


Image left: Professor Tim Anderson, distinguished author and senior lecturer of political economy at the University of Sydney, Australia

Global Research Publishers is launching Professor Tim Anderson’s timely and important book on Syria

The E-book is available for purchase from Global Research 

Tim Anderson  has written the best systematic critique of western fabrications justifying the war against the Assad government. 

No other text brings together all the major accusations and their effective refutation.

This text is essential reading for all peace and justice activists.  -James Petras, Author and Bartle Professor (Emeritus) of Sociology at Binghamton University, New York, Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.

Tim Anderson’s important new book, titled “The Dirty War on Syria” discusses US naked aggression – “rely(ing) on a level of mass disinformation not seen in living memory,” he explains.

ISIS is the pretext for endless war without mercy, Assad the target, regime change the objective, wanting pro-Western puppet governance replacing Syrian sovereign independence.

There’s nothing civil about war in Syria, raped by US imperialism, partnered with rogue allies. Anderson’s book is essential reading to understand what’s going on. Stephen Lendman, Distinguished Author and Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Host of the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

Professor Anderson demonstrates unequivocally through carefully documented research that America’s “Moderate Opposition” are bona fide Al Qaeda affiliated terrorists created and protected by the US and its allies, recruited  and trained by Saudi Arabia, Turkey, in liaison with Washington and Brussels.

Through careful analysis, professor Anderson reveals the “unspoken truth”: the “war on terrorism” is fake, the United States is a “State sponsor of terrorism” involved in a criminal undertaking. Michel Chossudovsky, Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization, Professor of Economics (Emeritus), University of Ottawa.

Click here to purchase Tim Anderson’s Book (pdf) 

Excerpts from the Preface of Professor Anderson’s book

Although every war makes ample use of lies and deception, the dirty war on Syria has relied on a level of mass disinformation not seen in living memory. The British-Australian journalist Philip Knightley pointed out that war propaganda typically involves ‘a depressingly predictable pattern’ of demonising the enemy leader, then demonising the enemy people through atrocity stories, real or imagined (Knightley 2001). Accordingly, a mild-mannered eye doctor called Bashar al Assad became the “new evil” in the world and, according to consistent western media reports, the Syrian Army did nothing but kill civilians for more than four years. To this day, many imagine the Syrian conflict is a ‘civil war’, a ‘popular revolt’ or some sort of internal sectarian conflict. These myths are, in many respects, a substantial achievement for the big powers which have driven a series of ‘regime change’ operations in the Middle East region, all on false pretexts, over the past fifteen years.

Click image to purchase Tim Anderson’s Book (pdf) 

This book is a careful academic work, but also a strong defence of the right of the Syrian people to determine their own society and political system. That position is consistent with international law and human rights principles, but may irritate western sensibilities, accustomed as we are to an assumed prerogative to intervene. At times I have to be blunt, to cut through the double-speak. In Syria the big powers have sought to hide their hand, using proxy armies while demonising the Syrian Government and Army, accusing them of constant atrocities; then pretending to rescue the Syrian people from their own government. Far fewer western people opposed the war on Syria than opposed the invasion of Iraq, because they were deceived about its true nature.

In 2011 I had only a basic understanding of Syria and its history. However, I was deeply suspicious when reading of the violence that erupted in the southern border town of Daraa. I knew that such violence (sniping at police and civilians, the use of semi-automatic weapons) does not spring spontaneously from street demonstrations. And I was deeply suspicious of the big powers. All my life I had been told lies about the pretexts for war. I decided to research the Syrian conflict, reading hundreds of books and articles, watching many videos and speaking to as many Syrians as I could. I wrote dozens of articles and visited Syria twice, during the conflict. This book is a result of that research.

I would go so far as to say that, in waging the Dirty War on Syria, western culture in general abandoned its better traditions: of reason, the maintenance of ethical principle and the search for independent evidence at times of conflict; in favour of its worst traditions: the ‘imperial prerogative’ for intervention, backed by deep racial prejudice and poor reflection on the histories of their own cultures. That weakness was reinforced by a ferocious campaign of war propaganda. After the demonisation of Syrian leader Bashar al Assad began, a virtual information blockade was constructed against anything which might undermine the wartime storyline. Very few sensible western perspectives on Syria emerged after 2011, as critical voices were effectively blacklisted.

In that context I came to write this book. It is a defence of Syria. This is a resource book and a contribution to the history of the Syrian conflict. The western stories have become self-indulgent and I believe it is wasteful to indulge them too much. Best, I think, to speak of current events as they are, then address the smokescreens later. I do not ignore the western myths, in fact this book documents many of them. But I lead with the reality of the war.

Click here to purchase Tim Andersons’s Book (pdf) 

Chapter Overview:

Chapter 1, ‘Syria and Washington’s ‘New Middle East’’ puts Syria in context of the US plans for a ‘New Middle East’, the latest chapter in a longer history of US attempts to dominate the region.

Chapter 2, ‘Barrel Bombs, Partisan Sources and War Propaganda’ addresses the problem of reporting and reading the Syrian crisis. Media channels have shown a hyperreliance on partisan sources, committed to the war and denigrating the Syrian Army. This is the key barrier to understanding the controversies around chemical weapons, civilian massacres and the levels of support for or opposition to President Assad.

Chapter 3, ‘Daraa 2011: Another Islamist Insurrection’ reconstructs, from a range of sources, the Saudi-backed Islamist insurrection in Daraa in March 2011. Those armed attacks were quite distinct from the political reform rallies, which the Islamists soon drove off the streets.

Chapter 4, ‘Bashar al Assad and Political Reform’ explains the political reform movement from the time Bashar assumed the presidency in the year 2000 to the beginning of the crisis in 2011. From this we can see that most opposition groups were committed to reform within a Syrian context, with virtually all opposing attacks on the Syrian state. The chapter then reviews the role of Bashar as a reformer, and the evidence on his popularity.

Chapter 5, ‘The Empire’s Jihadis’ looks at the collaboration between Salafist political Islam and the imperial powers in the Middle East. Distinct from the anti-imperial Islamic currents in Iran and south Lebanon, Salafist political Islam has become a sectarian force competing with Arab nationalism across Egypt, Palestine and Syria, and drawing on long standing collaborative relations with the big powers. This history provides important background to the character of Syria’s Islamist ‘revolution’, and its various slogans.

Chapter 6, ‘Embedded Media, Embedded Watchdogs’ identifies the propaganda techniques of media channels and the network of ‘human rights’ bodies (Human Rights Watch, Avaaz, etc) which function as megaphones and ‘moderators’ for the Washington agenda. Many have become fierce advocates for ‘humanitarian war’. A number of newer western NGOs (e.g. The Syria Campaign, The White Helmets) have been created by Wall Street agencies specifically for the dirty war on Syria. A number of their fabrications are documented here.

Chapter 7, ‘The Houla Massacre Revisited’ considers in detail the evidence from the first major massacre designed (following success of the technique over Libya) to influence UN Security Council consideration of military intervention. While the first UN inquiry group, actually in Syria, found contradictory evidence on this massacre, a second UN group outside Syria and co-chaired by a US diplomat, tried to blame the Syrian Government. Yet more than a dozen witnesses blamed Farouq FSA Islamists, who killed pro-government villagers and took over the area, holding it for some months. Several other ‘false flag’ massacres are noted.

Chapter 8, ‘Chemical Fabrications: the East Ghouta Incident’ details the second major ‘false flag’ incident of international significance. This incident in August 2013, which nearly sparked a major escalation involving US missile attacks on Syria, was used to accuse the Syrian Government of killing hundreds of civilians, including children, with chemical weapons. Within a fairly short time multiple sources of independent evidence (including North American evidence) disproved these accusations. Nevertheless, Syria’s opponents have repeated the false accusations, to this day, as though they were fact.

Chapter 9 , ‘A Responsibility to Protect and the Double Game’ addresses a recent political doctrine, a subset of ‘humanitarian intervention’ popularised to add to the imperial toolkit. The application of this doctrine in Libya was disastrous for that little country. Fortunately the attempts to use it in Syria failed.

Chapter 10, ‘Health and Sanctions’ documents the NATO-backed Islamist attacks on Syria’s health system, linked to the impact of western economic sanctions. These twin currents have caused great damage to Syrian public health. Such attacks carry no plausible motive of seeking local popular support, so we must interpret them as part of an overall strategy to degrade the Syrian state, rendering it more vulnerable to outside intervention.

Chapter 11 ‘Washington, Terrorism and ISIS: the evidence’, documents the links between the big powers and the latest peak terrorist group they claim to be fighting. Only evidence can help develop informed opinion on this contentious matter, but the evidence is overwhelming. There is little ideological difference between the various Salafi-Islamist groups, and Washington and its allies have financed and armed every one of them.

Chapter 12, ‘Western Intervention and the Colonial Mind’ discusses the western cultural mindset that underlies persistent violations of the rights of other peoples.

Chapter 13 ‘Towards an Independent Middle East’, considers the end-game in the Syrian crisis, and its implications for the Middle East region. At tremendous cost the Syrian Arab Republic, its army and its people, have successfully resisted aggression from a variety of powerful enemies. Syria’s survival is due to its resilience and internal unity, bolstered by support from some strong allies. The introduction of Russian air power in late September 2015 was important. So too were the coordinated ground forces from Iran, Iraq and Lebanon, in support of an independent Syria.

When the attacks on Syria abate the Middle East seems set to be transformed, with greater political will and military preparedness on the part of an expanded Axis of Resistance. That will signal the beginning of the end for Washington’s 15 year spree of bloodshed and ‘regime change’ across the entire region.

Click here to purchase Tim Anderson’s Book PDF

UN Resolutions Targeting Israel and the Palestinians

Israel is the target of at least 77 UN Resolutions
and the Palestinians are the target of 1.

Number of UN Resolutions Passed in CondemnationIsraelPalestinians0255075100

Category Israelis Palestinians
Israel 77
Palestinians 1

Aside from the core issues—refugees, Jerusalem, borders—the major themes reflected in the U.N. resolutions against Israel over the years are its unlawful attacks on its neighbors; its violations of the human rights of the Palestinians, including deportations, demolitions of homes and other collective punishments; its confiscation of Palestinian land; its establishment of illegal settlements; and its refusal to abide by the U.N. Charter and the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War.

Donald Neff

Source: United Nations Security Council resolutions passed from 1955 through 1992 were detailed in Paul Findley’s book Deliberate Deceptions (1998, pages 192-4). Resolutions passed from 1993-2013 were accessed at UN.org.

UN Resolutions Against Israel, 1955-2013

  1. Resolution 106: “…‘condemns’ Israel for Gaza raid”
  2. Resolution 111: “…‘condemns’ Israel for raid on Syria that killed fifty-six people”
  3. Resolution 127: “…‘recommends’ Israel suspend its ‘no-man’s zone’ in Jerusalem”
  4. Resolution 162: “…‘urges’ Israel to comply with UN decisions”
  5. Resolution 171: “…determines flagrant violations’ by Israel in its attack on Syria”
  6. Resolution 228: “…‘censures’ Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control”
  7. Resolution 237: “…‘urges’ Israel to allow return of new 1967 Palestinian refugees”
  8. Resolution 248: “…‘condemns’ Israel for its massive attack on Karameh in Jordan”
  9. Resolution 250: “…‘calls on’ Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem”
  10. Resolution 251: “…‘deeply deplores’ Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250”
  11. Resolution 252: “…‘declares invalid’ Israel’s acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital”
  12. Resolution 256: “…‘condemns’ Israeli raids on Jordan as ‘flagrant violation”
  13. Resolution 259: “…‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to accept UN mission to probe occupation”
  14. Resolution 262: “…‘condemns’ Israel for attack on Beirut airport”
  15. Resolution 265: “…‘condemns’ Israel for air attacks for Salt in Jordan”
  16. Resolution 267: “…‘censures’ Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem”
  17. Resolution 270: “…‘condemns’ Israel for air attacks on villages in southern Lebanon”
  18. Resolution 271: “…‘condemns’ Israel’s failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem”
  19. Resolution 279: “…‘demands’ withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon”
  20. Resolution 280: “….‘condemns’ Israeli’s attacks against Lebanon”
  21. Resolution 285: “…‘demands’ immediate Israeli withdrawal form Lebanon”
  22. Resolution 298: “…‘deplores’ Israel’s changing of the status of Jerusalem”
  23. Resolution 313: “…‘demands’ that Israel stop attacks against Lebanon”
  24. Resolution 316: “…‘condemns’ Israel for repeated attacks on Lebanon”
  25. Resolution 317: “…‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to release Arabs abducted in Lebanon”
  26. Resolution 332: “…‘condemns’ Israel’s repeated attacks against Lebanon”
  27. Resolution 337: “…‘condemns’ Israel for violating Lebanon’s sovereignty”
  28. Resolution 347: “…‘condemns’ Israeli attacks on Lebanon”
  29. Resolution 425: “…‘calls on’ Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon”
  30. Resolution 427: “…‘calls on’ Israel to complete its withdrawal from Lebanon’
  31. Resolution 444: “…‘deplores’ Israel’s lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces”
  32. Resolution 446: “…‘determines’ that Israeli settlements are a ‘serious obstruction’ to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention”
  33. Resolution 450: “…‘calls on’ Israel to stop attacking Lebanon”
  34. Resolution 452: “…‘calls on’ Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories”
  35. Resolution 465: “…‘deplores’ Israel’s settlements and asks all member states not to assist Israel’s settlements program”
  36. Resolution 467: “…‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s military intervention in Lebanon”
  37. Resolution 468: “…‘calls on’ Israel to rescind illegal expulsions of two Palestinian mayors and a judge and to facilitate their return”
  38. Resolution 469: “…‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s failure to observe the council’s order not to deport Palestinians”
  39. Resolution 471: “…‘expresses deep concern’ at Israel’s failure to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention”
  40. Resolution 476: “…‘reiterates’ that Israel’s claims to Jerusalem are ‘null and void’
  41. Resolution 478: “…‘censures (Israel) in the strongest terms’ for its claim to Jerusalem in its ‘Basic Law’
  42. Resolution 484: “…‘declares it imperative’ that Israel re-admit two deported Palestinian mayors”
  43. Resolution 487: “…‘strongly condemns’ Israel for its attack on Iraq’s nuclear facility”
  44. Resolution 497: “…‘decides’ that Israel’s annexation of Syria’s Golan Heights is ‘null and void’ and demands that Israel rescind its decision forthwith”
  45. Resolution 498: “…‘calls on’ Israel to withdraw from Lebanon”
  46. Resolution 501: “…‘calls on’ Israel to stop attacks against Lebanon and withdraw its troops”
  47. Resolution 509: “…‘demands’ that Israel withdraw its forces forthwith and unconditionally from Lebanon”
  48. Resolution 515: “…‘demands’ that Israel lift its siege of Beirut and allow food supplies to be brought in”
  49. Resolution 517: “…‘censures’ Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon”
  50. Resolution 518: “…‘demands’ that Israel cooperate fully with UN forces in Lebanon”
  51. Resolution 520: “…‘condemns’ Israel’s attack into West Beirut”
  52. Resolution 573: “…‘condemns’ Israel ‘vigorously’ for bombing Tunisia in attack on PLO headquarters
  53. Resolution 587: “…‘takes note’ of previous calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon and urges all parties to withdraw”
  54. Resolution 592: “…‘strongly deplores’ the killing of Palestinian students at Bir Zeit University by Israeli troops”
  55. Resolution 605: “…‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s policies and practices denying the human rights of Palestinians
  56. Resolution 607: “…‘calls on’ Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention
  57. Resolution 608: “…‘deeply regrets’ that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians”
  58. Resolution 636: “…‘deeply regrets’ Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians
  59. Resolution 641: “…‘deplores’ Israel’s continuing deportation of Palestinians
  60. Resolution 672: “…‘condemns’ Israel for violence against Palestinians at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount
  61. Resolution 673: “…‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to cooperate with the United Nations
  62. Resolution 681: “…‘deplores’ Israel’s resumption of the deportation of Palestinians
  63. Resolution 694: “…‘deplores’ Israel’s deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return
  64. Resolution 726: “…‘strongly condemns’ Israel’s deportation of Palestinians
  65. Resolution 799: “…‘strongly condemns’ Israel’s deportation of 413 Palestinians and calls for their immediate return
  66. Resolution 904: “…‘strongly condemns’ the massacre in Hebron and its aftermath which took the lives of more than 50 Palestinian civilians and injured several hundred others”
  67. Resolution 1073: “…‘calls for’ the immediate cessation and reversal of all acts which have resulted in the aggravation of the situation, ‘calls for‘ the safety and protection of Palestinian civilians to be ensured”
  68. Resolution 1322: “…‘condemns’ acts of violence, especially the excessive use of force against Palestinians, resulting in injury and loss of human life”
  69. Resolution 1402: “…‘calls upon’ both parties to move immediately to a meaningful ceasefire; calls for the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Palestinian cities, including Ramallah”
  70. Resolution 1403: “…‘demands’ the implementation of its resolution 1402 (2002) without delay”
  71. Resolution 1405: “…‘emphasizes’ the urgency of access of medical and humanitarian organizations to the Palestinian civilian population”
  72. Resolution 1435: “…‘demands’ that Israel immediately cease measures in and around Ramallah including the destruction of Palestinian civilian and security infrastructure”
  73. Resolution 1544: “…‘calls on’ Israel to respect its obligations under international humanitarian law, and insists, in particular, on its obligation not to undertake demolition of homes contrary to that law”
  74. Resolution 1860: “…‘calls for’ an immediate, durable and fully respected ceasefire, leading to the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza; ‘calls for‘ the unimpeded provision and distribution throughout Gaza of humanitarian assistance, including of food, fuel and medical treatment”
  75. Resolution 1937: “…‘urges’ the Government of Israel to expedite the withdrawal of its army from northern Ghajar without further delay”
  76. Resolution 2004: “…‘urges’ the Government of Israel to expedite the withdrawal of its army from northern Ghajar without further delay”
  77. Resolution 2064: “…‘urges’ the Government of Israel to expedite the withdrawal of its army from northern Ghajar without further delay”

UN Resolutions Against the Palestinians, 1955-2013

  1. Resolution 1435: “…‘calls on’ the Palestinian Authority to meet its expressed commitment to ensure that those responsible for terrorist acts are brought to justice by it”



“Prodigiously documented… Alison Weir must be highly commended for throwing such a brilliantly hard light on the relationship between the United States and Israel. I hope this marvelous book gets all the attention it deserves.” – Ambassador Andrew Killgore, Publisher, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.

Soon after WWII, US statesman Dean Acheson warned that creating Israel on land already inhabited by Palestinians would “imperil” both American and all Western interests in the region. Despite warnings such as this one, President Truman supported establishing a Jewish state on land primarily inhabited by Muslims and Christians.

Few Americans today are aware that US support enabled the creation of modern Israel. Even fewer know that US politicians pushed this policy over the forceful objections of top diplomatic and military experts.

As this work demonstrates, these politicians were bombarded by a massive pro-Israel lobbying effort that ranged from well-funded and very public Zionist organizations to an “elitist secret society” whose members included Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis.

AGAINST OUR BETTER JUDGMENT brings together meticulously sourced evidence to illuminate a reality that differs starkly from the prevailing narrative. It provides a clear view of the history that is key to understanding one of the most critically important political issues of our day.


Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel Paperback – February 21, 2014


Dana Antiochus Calls NPR About Parasitic Israel

Listen to Dana live every Friday night and check out his archives:


JEWS: Celebrating Centuries of Control


I almost never take the time to respond to shills, trolls, and other detractors, but I shall make an exception for Miss Veronika Clark. This “historian” has written a number of books, with some valid information, wherein she portrays National Socialists as anti-racists. While not working on her books, Veronika likes to ridicule and troll White Nationalists for being bigoted, sexist, and hateful. She even admitted that she was a member of the SPLC, but the evidence of this has been effectively scrubbed from the internet, much like the videos of Veronica doing some ridiculous World War II costume play. She was even able to get Youtube to remove a video that contained audio from an interview she did with me, Kyle Hunt, back in 2012. This content in no way belongs to Veronica, as it was originally broadcast on my Star Theory Radio show, and I have decided to release it, as Veronica has been viciously attacking the good people of Renegade Broadcasting for some time now. Listen as she suggests that the only way for Europeans to save themselves and beat the jews is to mass convert to Islam.

Veronica Clark Says Europeans Need to Mass Convert to Islam


Gas Chambers? Jim Rizoli Interviews Fred Leuchter: His Story, His Way — TRANSCRIPT

Fred Leuchter - 01 - COVER Ver 1

[Very informative and entertaining interview by Jim Rizoli with Fred Leuchter and the story about his experiences as he became a “reluctant Revisionist“, due to his expertise in designing execution equipment for US prison systems. Called in by Ernst Zundel’s legal team as an expert witness Fred went to Europe to conduct tests and gather evidence on the feasibility of the alleged German gas chambers in Poland and elsewhere. As a result he wrote up a document that became known as the “Leuchter Report” that concluded that the alleged gas chambers could not have been used as gas chambers. This eventually led to Fred being hounded and persecuted by Jews that ruined his career as an engineer — KATANA.]


Fred Leuchter - 02 - Video Intro



Click on the above link to watch the video.



NOTE: Transcript kindly provided by Diane King.


Fred Leuchter


His Story, His Way


Interviewed by


Jim Rizoli



September 29, 2015.

Fred Leuchter, who wrote The Leuchter Report, is interviewed byLeague of Extraordinary Revisionists Co-FounderJim Rizoli.




 (103:30 minutes)




Jim Rizoli (JR): Hi everyone, this is Jim Rizoli.

This is part of RizoliTV and we have a special feature of our show tonight with Dr. Fred Leuchter. He is going to talk a little bit about where he has been since his days back in the 1980s with Ernst Zundel and all those type of things there. We are going to learn a lot about him. Should be very informative for you. So, I want to welcome Fred to the show here.


Fred Leuchter - 03 - Fred and Jim at the start

[Image] Fred Leuchter being interviewed by Jim Rizoli.


Fred Leuchter (FL): Thank you.


JR: Nice to have you here. This is a real special occasion for me anyway, because when I think of all these revisionists, … Well, first of all, would you call yourself a revisionist?


FL: I do now. I didn’t 25 years ago.


JR: Okay. But when you think about all the revisionists that are out there, especially the ones publishing and writing, you probably are one of the most famous ones.


FL: I think that’s probably true and in those days after I had been to Auschwitz, after I had testified in court, I considered myself a reluctant revisionist. Now after the Jews beating on my head for 20 years, I’m not reluctant any more. [laughing]


JR: [laughing] Well, we’re going to get into all that, so don’t worry. But what I want to get an understanding of you is, … I remember watching the video, “Mr. Death”.


FL: Right.


JR: And in that video, … I might even play the last clip of the video, … But, in that video it shows you at the end, walking down the street.


FL: Yes.


JR: Now, that always interested me, because now I know you, and I met you. I always wondered, what happened to that man walking down the street in that video. [chuckling] See what I’m saying?


Fred Leuchter - 04 - Mr Death 01

[Image] Closing scene from the video, “Mr. Death”.

And again, that video was done, … What year was that done, do you remember?


FL: Ninety six …?


JR: Okay, say in the middle 1990s. So that’s 20 years ago.


FL: Yes.


Fred Leuchter - 05 - Mr Death 02

[Image] Closing scene from the video, “Mr. Death”.

JR: So from that time period, you’re walking down the street, … We knew nothing about you. No one knew anything, what happened to you, where have you been, where have you lived? I didn’t even know that you were even living in Massachusetts.

So, basically, I would like to get into that. What happened since then to you and all the things that have transpired from that? So, that’s what I want to get into. So, maybe you can give us a little background of what happened from that time onward.

Fred Leuchter - 06 - Fred and Jim, getting into the interview

[Image] Fred and Jim, getting into the interview.

FL: Before I do that, I’d like to comment on something. I was at a revisionist meeting a number of years ago, … Well after everything had happened. I didn’t speak that time, but I got up on the podium because Willis Carto introduced me. And I got up and a number of people had told me that they thought I had died.


JR: Oh, wow!


FL: They had read some place, or what have you, and I quoted Mark Twain at that time from the podium. And I told them that — how was it that he worded it:

Reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated.


Fred Leuchter - 07 - Fred and Jim, having a laugh Mark Twain

[Image] Fred and Jim, having a laugh over the Mark Twain reference.


JR: You said that at the meeting!


FL: Yes! Anyway, after I testified in court, my life essentially was turned upside down. I was put through hell. I was prosecuted in court on a spurious charge as practicing as an engineer without a license. And one doesn’t need a license, I don’t believe in any single state, to be an engineer. You only have to have a license if you certify blueprints! I didn’t do that.

I was persecuted. My friends threatened. I lost job offers. I was effectively put out of business in my execution equipment, because the Department of Corrections was afraid to deal with me.


Fred Leuchter - 08 - Fred describing his ordeal.

[Image] Fred describing his ordeal.

People that worked for the state, particularly the Department of Corrections, … They were political animals and they were afraid. I had one warden, … I was at a convention in the Midwest. It was actually in Missouri, and I walked into the coffee shop at the hotel and there was a big curved coffee bar in the center. And I sat down opposite him and I looked at him and I waved. He looked at me. He got up and he walked out of the room!


When I got back to my room, I had a phone call and his secretary had called me, so I called him back and she said:

Warden so-and-so wanted me to apologize.

She says:

But there’s been so much political pressure.

That she said he was afraid to be in the same room with you.


JR: Oh, wow!


FL: It was terrible! I had my house fire bombed. I had my friends threatened.

I was even followed by two Mossad agents, who came over from Israel specifically to follow me around during the time of my trial. I was informed by my cousin, who had been informed by the gentleman, who was the head of the Massachusetts State Police, … And when we were younger, we grew up and we played with the gentleman who was the head of the state police. At any rate, he called my cousin. He says:

Because of the fact that Freddy is facing the court now, I can’t communicate with him. He says, but I would like you to get a message to him. We have been advised by the State Department and by the CIA and by the FBI, that there were two Mossad agents in Malden. We don’t know what they’re doing, but they’re being watched.

Well, I was unaware of this until she told me, … And for about 3 or 4 days, I was being followed and I didn’t know why I was being followed.

Well, at any rate, after I found out the day following that, I was being followed again by a vehicle with tinted windows. I think it was a Cadillac or some such thing. and I got into a semi-rural part of Malden and they followed me up the hill and I spun my car out and blocked the road!

At that point, I got out of the car and I went up to the window and I pounded on the window of the driver’s side. The gentleman rolled the window down. There were two very dark-complected, I guess they were Jews from Israel. They could have been Arabs. They were middle eastern types. At that point, I reached inside my jacket and I pulled out a 45-caliber pistol and I touched his nose with it and I asked him what he wanted!

Well, the two gentlemen in the car, as dark-complected as they were, turned white! [Jim chuckling] And the next thing I know, they put the car into reverse, floored it, went up over the curb, hit somebody’s fence, spun around and took off down the street from whence they came.

And, I guess, they didn’t want some kind of an incident because I was legally carrying a firearm. I was legally protecting myself. They wouldn’t have looked too good in the news media and the police.


JR: Oh, absolutely!


FL: And if they are foreign agents of a foreign government, following somebody around, …


JR: Yes, yes!


FL: So that was the last I saw of them. I think they finally figured that I was a little too crazy to deal with.


JR: What year was that, about?


FL: About 1993, 1994. It was before I went to California.


JR: Okay.


FL: At any rate, I decided, because I had a job offer in California, … So I decided to go to California.

My ex-wife didn’t want to go, and she stayed behind; and subsequently, I went out there on my own, and that’s where I met my current wife.


JR: What did you do for work out there?


FL: Well, I went out to a company, … A man who ran a computer company, and he asked me to do some design work for him. While I was working for him, doing design work, … He was a Jewish gentleman, and he didn’t care about my background, or so he said. But the fellow who was funding him owned the building found out I was down there and I think he kind of pulled the plug on everything. They locked me out of my office and I was essentially standing on the street with no place to go.

I was only there for 3 or 4 months. So, at that point, I had already met my wife, Terri, and I stayed with her, and we got an apartment. I came back before Christmas. I went back to Pennsylvania because a fellow whom I had worked for before had offered me a job. He needed some design work done on a communications device. Which I did.




JR: Okay.


FL: Then we moved from there. I brought Terri and the kids to Pennsylvania and then from Pennsylvania, we moved back to Boston.


JR: Okay.


FL: I’m unemployable as an engineer. Nobody wants me because they’re afraid of me. And I was never able to be employed again as an engineer. I went to work as a driver in a homeless women’s shelter, … After I finished there, … Most of these places don’t keep you very long, because they don’t want to give you a raise. You work 2 years and then they find some reason to let you go. Generally, it’s; “we don’t have any more work”.

So, I went from there. I went to a company that took former drug and alcohol abusers to halfway houses and I was there for a couple of years and then from there, they let me go again because it was time for a raise And I went from there, I worked for a company that was an adjunct to the transportation system in the greater Boston area, called The Ride, and was taking older people and handicapped to doctor’s appointments, etc. After I was there for 6 years, it was time for another raise and they determined that I shouldn’t be there, so they let me go.


JR: What I’d like to ask you now is — that happened since then — but maybe you can tell the people watching this, … Your tie-in with the revisionist movement, with the Zundel case. And maybe you can explain to how all that happened to you. That’s how you really got drawn into all this.


FL: Yes. I had been working as an engineer for some 35 years or so. I had basically been designing navigational equipment. I have several patents for surveying equipment. Many of the people watching have probably seen the surveyors out on the street with what they call a “Total Station”; it’s that big yellow or orange transit that they now use, which digitizes all the information and essentially it does all the drawings and everything, so it took a great deal of work off the surveyor. I designed the device that transmits the motions of the telescope both horizontally and vertically into digital information so it can be utilized by a computer.


Fred Leuchter - 09 - Total Station Instrument

[Image] An example of a Total Station used by surveyors and builders.

I never was able to do anything with that because the Swiss and the Japanese came over here. They paid $5 for a copy of my patent and they proceeded to make instruments, based on my patent.


JR: Wow!


FL: My pockets essentially weren’t deep enough to engage in litigation.


JR: So that’s basically what they do. They will just buy a patent and then they’ll make it and they have millions of dollars. You have no money. They have the device.


FL: My patent attorney told me that if I didn’t have a half a million dollars to throw down the tube initially, don’t even start. I didn’t have that kind of money. The patents were expensive. My last patent cost me $89,000.


JR: Your name wouldn’t be associated with that patent at all.


FL: Well, it’s on the patent but not on the instruments. My father worked in the Massachusetts Correctional System for over 40 years. And they passed a law in Massachusetts reinstating the electric chair.

One of the officials at the state prison asked my father if I would come down and meet with them because he knew I was an electrical engineer, and quite frankly, they needed help in making their equipment functional. I met with them and I talked with them and like everything else, the job kind of stalled because things always occur 3 or 4 or 5 years after the legislation is passed, but at least they knew what they were doing.



A year afterwards, they passed legislation, eliminating the death penalty in Massachusetts, so we have none and we had none the year following that. However, because I had talked with the Massachusetts system, my name was passed around the other states that utilized capital punishment. And they began contacting me and I began supplying bits and pieces of hardware until I was asked by the state of New Jersey to design a lethal injection machine, and I designed the machine, supplied the machine not only to New Jersey but to several other states. I supplied an electric chair to the state of Tennessee.


JR: Do you have a patent on that?


FL: No. There’s not a big enough market to warrant that.


JR: Okay.


FL: Because of that, I also consulted with a number of states on their gas chamber. I consulted with Mississippi, I consulted with California; but at any rate, I consulted with Missouri. Zundel’s first trial had been set aside, and they were retrying him again and they were getting ready to go to trial and Dr. Robert Faurisson, who was an expert on WWII literature — when I say literature — I’m talking about documentation that was generated during the war by the powers that were fighting. He had been in touch with Ernst Zundel, and he told Zundel that the only way you are going to be able to do anything is you’re going to have to get an expert on gas chambers to come in and talk about the alleged gas chambers (and I say alleged because that’s important) that were in Auschwitz and then Birkenau and in any of the other facilities.

And since this was the case, they spoke with the court. The judge tentatively authorized them to find an expert. Dr. Faurisson’s next contact was with the United States to find out who made execution equipment. Everybody sent them to me. Well before they contacted me, he had a very long conversation with Bill Armontrout, who was the warden and later became the Commissioner of Correction in Missouri. And he was then directed to contact me.


Fred Leuchter - 10 - Bill Armontrout

[Image] Bill Armontrout.

I was contacted, a little surreptitiously at first because he asked me questions about my background and then he asked what I thought of the holocaust and the gas chambers that we used to kill all the jews during WWII. I said:

Well, I don’t anything about it.

He said:

Well do you believe that they existed?

And I said:

Well, yeah, I guess so. They taught me that in school.

At any rate, the court approved me as an expert, tentatively. I was brought to Toronto. I met with Doug Christie and Zundel and his legal team in 1988. I was given a lot of documentation. I had to do a lot of studying on the alleged concentration camps because I came in really “wet behind the ears”. I didn’t know what was going on.


Fred Leuchter - 11 - Zundel and team

[Image] Zundel (front right) solving the 6 million riddle with Fred Leuchter (second from left), Dr. Faurisson (left), Ditlieb Felderer and one other person, 1988]

After I got all of this information absorbed, I did a lot of studying on it. I also had a study on crematoria. I had to find out how long it took to cremate a body with coal, how long it took to cremate a body with oil today. And there was a lot of material that I had to study as would any engineer that was doing a job.

They then cleared me to go to Poland. I told Ernst Zundel that if I found the facilities could have been execution facilities, I would report that as such in my report. I told him that whether or not I found evidence, if I found that they could have done it, I would also report that. And Zundel said:

I’m satisfied that you’re going to come back and going to believe that there were no gas chambers.


So, I went to Poland. When I got to Poland, I was just totally amazed. I mean the whole thing was a joke! There were no gas chambers! The facilities that were supposed to have been gas chambers were no more than rooms with leaky windows and leaking doors. If you ever tried to use one for a gas chamber, you would have killed yourself while you were killing whoever was in the chamber. They said that there was equipment removed. There was nothing removed, because from the design standpoint, there’d have to be holes in the walls, holes in the ceiling, holes in the floors. You have to have places where you had fans, ducts. None of that was removed and none of that was patched up. The stuff just didn’t exist.


Fred Leuchter - 12 - Fred taking samples from a wall

[Image] Samples being taken from a wall at Auschwitz.

So, I wrote a report and I stated that I felt the facilities there in Poland not only were not gas execution facilities, but could not have been made into gas execution facilities, and I returned. I wrote the report. I testified in court. Now, when we got into court, it was really an interesting situation because the judge didn’t want to admit the report, and this is the copy of the report — this is the original report.


Fred Leuchter - 13 - Fred holding Report

[Image] A copy of the original report submitted to the court.

There were three of them. I had one and Zundel had one and the court has the other one. At any rate, the judge refused to accept it as a report, even though he accepted the fact that I was qualified to do the report.


Fred Leuchter - 14 - The Leuchter Report booklet

[Image] The first “Leuchter Report” with a forward by Dr. Robert Faurrisson.

So, what we had to do, I had to take the stand and for over 3 days, I was questioned by Doug Christie and everything in the report was entered into the record verbally. I read it from the report and I qualified it by explaining what everything meant.


JR: Did you read the whole thing, or just part of it.


FL: No, I was only allowed to read the parts relevant to the gas chamber. That’s where the interesting part comes. The court found that I was an expert on execution equipment. It couldn’t deny that because I was certified by the federal court system in the United States. But, I wasn’t an expert on crematoria, so therefore, none of my numbers on the crematoria could be entered into the record by me. Doug Christie then sought out and got the top expert in Canada on crematories. That gentleman was given a copy of the report, and he read it.


JR: Do you remember his name?


FL: No I don’t. His name is available, but I don’t remember it, …


JR: Isn’t his name Ivan Lagace?


Fred Leuchter - 14 - Ivan Lagace

[Image] Ivan Lagace, a crematory expert from Calgary, Alberta. Ivan Lagacé was the fourteenth witness called by the defence. He testified on Tuesday, April 5 and Wednesday, April 6, 1988. He resigned from his job as crematory director after receiving endless threats by anonymous callers and from thugs claiming to be the Jewish Defense League.


FL: I think so. Yes.


JR: Ivan Lagace?


FL: Yes, I think so. And he did what I couldn’t do or what the court wouldn’t allow me to do — he read my report into the court record, verbatim! So no matter how you slice it, the judge didn’t want it, but he got it all!


JR: Okay.


FL: And unfortunately, he choked on it. He found Ernst guilty and, subsequently, the Supreme Court in Canada overturned the verdict of the second trial.


JR: So, he really didn’t go to jail. He more or less was out waiting for the last verdict.


FL: Yes. But fortunately, they eventually got him.


JR: Well, yes, that’s another thing.


FL: Subsequent to my going to Poland and then to Canada, Ernst Zundel’s defense team sent me back to Europe again to examine other facilities: Dachau, Hartheim Castle, Mauthausen. While I was on that trip and the prime reason for my going on that trip, so I would be available in Germany to be “voir dired”. That’s a legal term, Latin. It means that they question you and your background to determine whether you’re competent, and I was questioned by two judges on the Superior Court of Bavaria, and they determined after 3 days of questioning, that I was competent to testify in a German court on the existence of gas chambers. And that was important because that was something that they were never able to do before. Get the question of the gas chambers before the court. And after I was qualified, I then left and I went to look at the other facilities and I, subsequently, wrote reports on them for Ernst. And the reports were available through the Zundel website.


But, after doing that, while I was in Germany, I spoke at a number of locations — spoke only about what I did in terms of my investigation for the court — only spoke about how I was persecuted by the jews afterwards, how they fire bombed my house, how the Mossad chased me and all of the information that we’ve already talked about.


Fred Leuchter - 15 - Fred in the ruins

[Images] Fred Leuchter taking samples the the ruins of the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz for later chemical analysis in the U.S.

After I had returned to the United States, I didn’t realize it and unbeknownst to me, they were plotting in Germany, certain parties were plotting in Germany to bring me back and charge me with breaking the law. And the law that I broke was called, “defaming the dead”.  And you defamed the dead by saying that the gas chambers didn’t exist. Now, I was very careful about everything I said in Germany, so I never said that the gas chambers didn’t exist. I said my testimony in Canada was that the gas chambers didn’t exist and how I was persecuted. But I was very careful never to violate German law.


JR: Wouldn’t they have arrested you there if you said something.


FL: Probably. But, you see the problem was I was never arrested. I was contacted by a television show called the Schreinemacher Show. It’s a woman TV personality. Her name is Frau Schreinemacher. She has a show in Cologne, Koln, as the Germans call it, television show. And the Germans are crazy for information about the elektrischer Stuhl, which was the electric chair. I was asked to come over and talk about the electric chair. I made it very clear to the people that contacted me, her writers and her producers that I would not discuss the “holocaust”. I would not discuss the gas chambers at Auschwitz or what have you. I would only discuss the electric chair and its application in the United States. That’s what she wanted.

But unbeknownst to me again, she made a deal with the police in Mannheim, Germany. I didn’t know this. I arrived and just before I went on camera, I was approached by three German police officers from Mannheim. One of them spoke English — not well, but his English was better than my German. The other two gentlemen didn’t speak any English at all. And I was told that I was going to have to go back to Mannheim with them and face trial in Mannheim because of what I said about the gas chambers.  And I said:

What have I said and where have I said it?

Well, I said it in Canada. I said:

How do you get jurisdiction in Canada.

I said:

I’m an official of the court. How do you interfere with the legal system in Canada?

Well, it didn’t seem to make any difference. I said:

All right, I assume you have a warrant. Let me see your warrant.

Well, we don’t have a warrant.

I said:

What do you mean, you don’t have a warrant!

I said:

How do you expect to make an arrest?

He said:

Well, we’re not making an arrest.

I said:

Then what are you doing?

He said:

We’re going to take you back to see a judge in Mannheim.

I said:

Like hell, you’re going to take me back to see a judge in Mannheim.

[Jim laughing]

I said:

I came over here to be on a television show.

At which point, he pulled his Walther 380 out and stuck it in front of my face and told me that I would be required to go back. I said:


If that’s the case, I not going to argue. I can stop a 380 like anybody else could. I didn’t feel like being dead.


Fred Leuchter - 16 - Fred PK380 sights

[Image] A Walther PK380, is a semi-automatic pistol manufactured byCarl Walther GmbH Sportwaffen.

So I was handcuffed at that point and I was taken across three states by police officers that were violating their own laws; I was essentially kidnapped, not arrested.

And Schreinemacher threw a fit! Because she told the cops:

You promised he could be on television, and now you’re taking him before he is.

I said:

Sure, let me on television.

I was about to tell the world on her national hookup that I was being kidnapped at gunpoint and they weren’t about to let that happen.


So, at any rate, we drove through half the night and I wound up getting fingerprinted, mug shots taken — first time that ever happened to me and probably the last time it would ever happen to me, and I was thrown in a cell. The following morning, I was taken from there to the courthouse and the information of my being taken, and I don’t want to say arrest, but nobody knew I wasn’t arrested except me and my ex-wife, because she was there.

And, at any rate, I was taken to the court and Zundel had made arrangements for an attorney to come, and the attorney made an argument, but it didn’t do any good. The judge just threw me into a cell at the Mannheim Prison. They have a wing of unconvicted, that are awaiting trial and that’s where I wound up. Judge Bauer, incidentally, was Jewish. I explained to him and I complained to him that I was taken without a warrant. He said:

It doesn’t matter.

He says:

I got you here now.

So, at any rate, I was thrown into a cell and I spent some 3-1/2 months. The attorney that I first had was Zundel’s attorney, and I subsequently, was put in touch with another attorney, who handled my case from thereon out — Hajo Hermann, whom I believe has subsequently passed away [in 2010]. Hajo Hermann had very strong feelings about people that were held and put in prison for “thought crimes”, which essentially was what happened to me.


Fred Leuchter - 17 - Zundel drawing Mannhiem cell

[Image] The inside of a Mannheim Prison cell, as drawn by Ernst Zundel while serving many years there.

Hajo was a German soldier during WW II on the Eastern Front, and he spent 11 years in a communist prison before he was released after the war. So, he became a lawyer, so he could prevent that from happening again. It took him 2-1/2 months, almost 3 months after that, but he finally got me a bail hearing. And I was, subsequently, handcuffed, taken out in a prison bus. The bus was very interesting because it had little rooms half the size of a telephone booth and I was squeezed into it and then the door was closed — individual rooms.


Fred Leuchter - 18 - Hajo Hermann - lawyer

[Image] Leuchter’s lawyer, Hajo Hermann, pictured here in Jan 1944. He was a high ranking and influential member of the Luftwaffe, and a recipient of the Knight’s Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves and Swords (German: Ritterkreuz des Eisernen Kreuzes mit Eichenlaub und Schwertern).

After I arrived there, I went before a 3-judge panel that was going to decide on whether or not I would get bail. Hajo Hermann made all his arguments, and I hadn’t said anything. I was then given the opportunity to speak. I spoke briefly and the judges said:

Well, we don’t have to go any further. We are going to remand you without bail.

This was all going on in German, … So, and my German is not good, but I obviously figured out, at this point, that I’m going back to the slammer. So, I turned around to Hajo Hermann:

What the hell kind of kangaroo court is this.

I said:

They haven’t given me an opportunity to speak.

I said:

I’m a responsible individual.

Well, the judge, at that point, stopped the proceedings. He said to Hajo Hermann, in German:

What’s your client’s problem?

And then he said:

Never mind.

He turned around and said to me in perfect English. They all understood perfect English, and he said to me:

Do you have a problem with what we’re doing here?

And I looked at him, and I said:

You damn well know I’ve got a problem with what you’re doing here.

I said:

I’m a responsible business person.

I said:

I came over to your country for a television show.

I said:

I was seized at gunpoint, illegally transported across a half dozen states against your own laws, and now I’m waiting bail, so I could go home.

And the judge says:

Well, if we gave you bail, would you come back?

And I said:

Of course, I’d come back.

So, they said:

Give us a few minutes to deliberate.

They went in back. They came out 10 minutes later and they said they were giving me bail. Now they had to do something with me while they’re waiting for the bail, because Hajo Hermann contacted his contacts with Zundel, and Zundel had to post bail. I was effectively bailed for something in the vicinity of $22,000. Oh yeah, I was a master criminal!


JR: Wow, what a criminal!



FL: At that point, the judges called us into chambers. Now we’re in chambers. They ordered coffee and cakes. In our meeting, I’m eating cakes and drinking coffee with the judges. [Jim laughing] You can see where their sympathies lay, okay.


Fred Leuchter - 19 - Coffee and Cake

[Image] Coffee and cake with the judges.

Afterward, I went back to the prison. I got my belongings. I got my passport, everything. And I told Hajo Hermann. I said:

I want the next plane out of here.

He said:

I would like you to stay a couple more days because there are some people who would like to hear you speak.

I said:

I’m not staying. I want to be on the next plane.

So I did get on the next plane. I came home and that was fine, after I got home. Then I was in touch with Hajo Hermann and I had plans to go back and face trial, something along a year, which I believe was going to be the following February. As the time went by, he had been in touch with me. About a week before, he called and I said:

Yes, I’ll make arrangements, I’ll get a ticket, and I’ll see you on such and such a date.

Well, while I was in prison, and prisoners, as most people know stick together. I had a prisoner who used to feed me. He was called aschantzer and he brought the food to all the cells. He used to talk to me sometimes because I was effectively held in solitary confinement the whole time I was there because I was what, in this country, they called “Protective Custody” (PC) because they were afraid somebody might try to kill me.

I got a call from an attorney, who told me that this call never took place. He said:

I was asked to call you by (and he told me the person, whose name I won’t mention) who was the schantzer and he said he wanted me to tell you, ‘Don’t come back!’

He said:

The day after you left, your bail was revoked. There is an arrest on sight warrant out on you. The judges were fired and the Jewish mafia has a contract out on you. You won’t last several days in the prison.

He said:

I told you what I was asked to tell you. This conversation never took place.

I told my attorney. I said:

I’m not coming back.

He said:

Fred, you’ve gotta come back.

I said:


He said:

That couldn’t possibly happen. They can’t revoke your bail without telling me.

He said:

They couldn’t fire the judges. I would have to be served with the arrest warrant.

I said:

Well, I’m not coming back.

I got a call back later the following day after he had been to court. He said:

Fred, I don’t know what to say. He says everything happened exactly the way you said. The judges were fired. There was an arrest warrant out on you, arrest on sight. The court apologized for not sending any paperwork. It must have slipped through the cracks.

See, they wanted to get their hands on me, wanted me to come back.


JR: What would have happened if you went back and you obviously would have been convicted.


FL: I would have done 7-10 years in prison.


JR: Oh my goodness! And it would have been for defaming the dead.


FL: Several of the interesting things that happened to me, most of the guards liked me and talked to me. They didn’t treat me like a criminal. I may have been incarcerated in their prison wing. They didn’t treat me like another criminal. Obviously I wasn’t. Most of them were Germans and they probably didn’t like what was going on anyway.

When I first got in there, they issued me prison clothes: Dungarees and a denim shirt, and I was supposed to put it on. And I told the guard that I absolutely refused to wear their clothes. I had my clothes. I had two pairs of pants. I had 2 shirts and I had 2 changes of socks and that’s what I was going to be using. So the deputy warden came down and he told me:

You have to wear prison clothes.

And I told him:

I am not going to wear your lousy clothes.

I said:

Let me explain something to you. These clothes,” and I took my shirt, and I said, “these are my only connection with the outside. As far as I’m concerned, I don’t belong in here. I’m not taking these clothes off and putting your prison clothes on. You may get them off me, but I’m going to tell you right now, that you and the rest of your people are going to know you have been in one helluva fight.


So, he looked at me like he didn’t quite know how to deal with that. He turned around to the guard, and he says:

Does he keep himself clean?

And the guard says:

He washes his underwear and his socks every day and he changes his clothes every day.

He said:

Let him wear what he’s wearing.

I won round one anyway.

Then at another point, I had people pounding on my door at 3:00 in the morning. The security in the prisons was terrible. People from the convicted wing used to come through. They all had keys. I don’t know how they could do this. They’d be pounding on my door 3:00 in the morning, telling me that they’re going to kill me. I said obviously, they were Jews.

So, I had an extra broom pole that I had because they changed cells on me when I first got there, and I whittled down the end of the broom pole and I made myself a spear. And every time they opened the door, I was waiting with the spear and the guards would look at it.


Fred Leuchter - 20 - Making a broom spear

[Image] A reenactment of Fred working on his “broom spear”.

They knew what was going on. Nobody was worried I was going to stab anybody. They knew I was going to stab someone if they came in after me. So, I went on that way for over a month. Every time they opened the door, I stood there with a spear waiting to lunge.

At any rate, there was a shakedown in the prison, just like they do in the United States. Periodically, they came through and they tossed everybody’s cell, looking for drugs, weapons, whatever. The lieutenant came down and that was the first time I ever met the lieutenant. He introduced himself. They threw everybody’s clothes, furniture, everything out onto the tier. He just put his hands under my clothes, didn’t disturb anything, apologized for the inconvenience and thanked me. Again, he didn’t consider me a criminal. Just on the way out, he looked down and saw under the sink, my spear, and he turned around to the guard and he said:

What’s that?” in German.

The guard looked at it and got a little red faced, but he didn’t know quite what to say and in German, he said:

It’s Leuchter’s weapon.

[laughing] The guard looked at him and he looked at me, he says:

I don’t want to know”, in German, and he turned and walked out.

Obviously, they weren’t afraid that I was going to use it on them. They understood what was going on. So, they understood why I had a weapon.

I spent most of my time in solitary except on Sunday night late around 10:00, an hour before they locked us up. They let me go down and sit in a room with the fellow that fed us, schantzer and he used to make coffee and I’d sit and have a cup of coffee and talk with him.

The total 3-1/2 months I was there, I got exactly 2 showers — that’s because they were afraid to let me out of the cell. When they did send me down to get the shower, they sent me down with a couple of Right-wing skinheads, who happened to like me. So nobody was going to hurt me when I went down.

The security in the place was crazy. In one respect, they sent me down to the shower with these Right-wing skinheads, but yet when I went to see my lawyer or went to the doctor, they just turned me loose. We’d be walking across the prison yard with everybody in there. So it was a crazy place, one of those places, that old joke, … Who’s running the mental institution? The inmates! Crazy people were running their stupid prison.


JR: Did you stop in England before you came to the United States? Did something happen in England?


FL: Yes. When I went over there, the time I went over there to be qualified by the court, and I viewed Dachau and Mauthausen andHartheim Castle.


Fred Leuchter - 21 - Hartheim Castle

[Image] Hartheim Castle, Germany.

I stopped in England and I was supposed to speak at a history club of which David Irving was a member. He was the one who set it up. And unbeknownst to me, I had received a letter from somebody saying that I was persona non grata in England and if I went there, I would be deported But I gave it to my attorney and my attorney spoke with the consul and also the ambassador, and they said there was no such information on it. Well, apparently there was and it was the case of the right hand not knowing what the left hand was doing.


We drove and took the ferry. And when we got to England, fortunately we got there a day early, and I was able to get down. The only thing we were able to do that was enjoyable was I saw Stonehenge.


Fred Leuchter - 22 - Fred Stonehege montage

[Image] Fred’s handiwork with hammer and chisel at Stonehenge.

Then when I got back the following night, my wife was in the audience and I got up to speak at the meeting of the historical group. We were in a hall in Chelsea. David Irving came up just as I started speaking, saying there was some gentlemen waiting to talk to you off to the side. And I looked off the side, and there’s a bunch of cops out there. What’s this? So I said:

Well, what’s going to happen?

He said:

Well, maybe you better talk to them.

So David Irving stood up and he said that the police are asking to see Fred Leuchter. So I went out to the hall and I had the Chief Inspector or the Commissioner, like a captain in this country, who was in charge of the Chelsea Station. He told me, he said that they got a complaint. He said:

We’re a little unclear with the paperwork. We don’t know where it came from, but he said I have a call from the Home Office, which they give us direction and I was told to detain you. So he says, I’m going to have to take you to the station.

So I said:

What about my wife out there.

He said:

Don’t worry about her; I’ll get her.

He drove her to the station personally. They were being very amicable.

I got out and there must have been 8 or 10 bobbies [British term for police] inside this prison van that they got me in and I’m sitting in the van. They didn’t handcuff me. They didn’t do anything. As soon as they closed the doors and we drove off and the chief inspector was out of the way, all the cops jumped up and shook hands with me because I made execution equipment! They were all fans! [laughter]


Fred Leuchter - 22 - Fred having a laugh about “bobbies”

[Image] Fred having a laugh while recounting his experience with the English “bobbies”.

I got to the station and I was allowed to stay in the lobby with my wife, out in front of the police station until the guard changed at 1:00 in the morning. At 1:00 in the morning, a new captain came on, and he decided that I shouldn’t be out there because he said:

Criminals, people who are supposed to be detained are supposed to be in cells.

He didn’t know who I was, didn’t care. So they threw me in a cell with a psychopath, who was in there for assault with a deadly weapon. He had already hurt a number of people. So, I’m in there with him and he asked me what I was in there for, so I told them. Well, he said:

What the hell are these people doing.

He said:

We have freedom of speech in England, what are they thinking of doing to you?

So I’m not going to get hurt with him. Obviously, he likes me.

They pulled me out again, put me in another cell. Fhis time with somebody that wasn’t as dangerous. This poor kid that they put me in with, he was a snatch and grab crook. He was crying to me. He said:

It shouldn’t have happened.

He used to go into department stores. He’d grab a television and run. It was Christmastime, just before Christmas and they had this beautiful gold Buddha that they had on display. He thought it was just a display. He thought it was nice. He decided to get it for his girlfriend. He grabbed it and they caught him at the door.

An he says:

I never took anything in my life that was expensive.

It was worth 120,000 pounds, and they had special guards guarding them; although, you couldn’t see them. He just grabbed it and ran. He said [laughing]:

They should never put out something that is that expensive in front of me.

I was then pulled out of my cell at 2:00 in the morning by a couple of idiot immigration officers, and they took me in a little room. Turned a tape recorder on, proceeded to give me the third degree.

I said:

What, are you people crazy?

I said:

I came over here to speak. What do you think, I’m some kind of a subversive? You’re being ridiculous.


They questioned me until 4:00 in the morning, with the typical good cop, bad cop technique, that didn’t get them anything. So finally they left and I was put back in my cell.


Fred Leuchter - 23 - Fred's interrogation

[Image] Fred Leuchter holding up while getting the third degree with the old, good cop, bad cop routine.

Well, I’m in the cell. They fed everybody in the cell that was going out to court, but I’m not going out to court. I don’t even get a cup of coffee. The snatch-and-grab kid, he starts pounding on the bars, screaming his head off and the guard cops come over and they say:

What do you want.

He points at me and he says:

Give my mate coffee!

So I got coffee and a banger for breakfast. But they were going to leave me there because they didn’t know what to do with me. I didn’t exist on paper.


Fred Leuchter - 24 - British banger

[Image] A British banger.

Well, at 7:00 in the morning, another agent shows up from Her Majesty’s Immigration Service and he takes me in the room and starts to talk to me. He said;

You know why I’m here?

I said:

No, why are you here? I have just been questioned for the last 4 hours.

He says:

Yeah, I know. Unfortunately, I saw the tapes. That’s why I’m here. You made a formal request to be sent home.

I said:

You’re damn right I did.

He said:

Well, I’m going to send you home at her majesty’s expense. They never should have done what they did to you. They are violating our laws. Get something straight. I don’t know who you are. I don’t like you. I don’t dislike you.”

He said:

“I couldn’t care less! But I’ll be damned if I’m going to let these people violate our laws for whatever reason. That shouldn’t have happened. You know what was planned for you?”

I said:

No, what was planned for me?

He said:

Under international law, you requested to go home and we should have sent you home, but they were going under a different section of the law that if you hadn’t asked, they were going to deport you back to where you came from.

Well, you came from France. You would have been given to France. We have 3 days to a week for France to refuse you. France would have refused you, because you don’t belong in France. Prior to that, you went into Belgium to get to France. He said you would have been given to Belgium. Belgium would have refused you. Then you would have been offered to Germany. Germany would have refused you.

By the time this was done, he said, you would have been in a cell for about 25 days. But you’re going home today.

JR: So basically, would you say that that was the Jews harassing you? Just trying to get back at you.


FL: Yes, yes! Very definitely. Of course, it didn’t do them any good.

They finally put me on an airplane and they sent my wife and I home at her majesty’s expense. We didn’t even get to use our tickets.


JR: Now if you went to Germany today, would you be arrested?


FL: Yes!


JR: So, you really can’t go out of the country, right?


FL: No, I can’t even go to Canada.


JR: You probably can’t go to any of the 18 countries where “Holocaust” denial is banned?


Fred Leuchter - 25 - Map of ountries with Holo Denial Laws

[Image] Eighteen, mostly European countries that ban telling the truth about the so-called “Holocaust”.

FL: I can’t go to any of the countries that are affiliated with the European Common Market. What a lot of people don’t realize is that the Common Market is more than just an economic alliance. There is a criminal alliance that goes with it.

The fellow who sent the message to me not to come back, his brother lived in Portugal. He was a German. He went to Portugal to visit his brother. Seven people were murdered within his brother’s apartment. He was arrested in Portugal in an investigation and charged with murder. After they investigated, they determined that he had nothing to do with the murder, so they let him go and he went back to Germany.

When he got back to Germany, the German officials arrested him and threw him into jail and they’re trying him for murder and he said:

But I was exonerated by the Portuguese police.

It doesn’t make any difference. The Portuguese police aren’t going to come to Germany to testify for him because somebody has to pay them to that. He didn’t have any money to pay them to do that, but he is being prosecuted in Germany because Portugal is part of the Common Market.


JR: Wow! That is something. Are you on a no-fly list? You haven’t been flying?


FL: I don’t know.


JR: So you haven’t been flying.

Okay, Fred I do have some questions I would like to ask you about yourLeuchter Report. Is this two reports or one report?




Fred Leuchter - 26 - Map - Auschwitz Complex

[Image] Map of the Auschwitz Camp Complex showing the 3 main camps.

Fred Leuchter - 27 - Auschwitz I Camp Layout - Ver 2

[Image] Auschwitz I (Main Camp) Layout.

FL: This is one report. This is the original report. It was done for the court in Toronto. It’s entitled, “An Engineering Report on the Alleged Execution Gas Chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek Poland,” dated April 5, 1988.

Fred Leuchter - 28 - Fred reading his report

[Image] Fred reading his report.

JR: Now the questions I have are about Krema I in Auschwitz. You went into that building in there, right?


FL: Right.


JR: Maybe you can explain to me how they would have said it worked. They claim they have these Zyklon pellets. They throw them into the hole. It goes on the ground. How does it work they way they described it?


Fred Leuchter - 29 - Krema I roof and closeup

[Image] Krema I in the main Auschwitz I camp showing the flat roof. This is the where the alleged gassings took place and is the one tourists get a tour of.


FL: The trouble is, they don’t know how Zyklon B works and the people that came up with the procedure to supposedly work, couldn’t possibly work. Let’s talk about Zyklon B for a moment, so we know what it is.

Prior to WWII, in the 1930s and in the 1920s, they used to fumigate with hydrogen cyanide gas. The Germans improved things and they have been well known for their scientific advances, etc. They wanted to come up with a better way to handle hydrogen cyanide gas, so you wouldn’t kill yourself. Normally what happened was you generated the gas on site. The gas fumigated where you were, then you vented it or opened it up. They did it with houses. They did it with factories, etc. They would simply throw sodium cyanide into a dilute sulphuric acid and water mixture. They covered the building with a tent. They let the gas degenerate, then a day later they took the tent down. They wore masks so they didn’t hurt themselves. Then they’d air the place out.


Fred Leuchter - 30 - Zyklon B cans

[Images] Cans of the insecticide Zyklon B

Well, what the Germans did was they took the gas after they made it. They made it at the factory instead of making it on site and they allowed the gas to be absorbed in chalk pellets — it was either mine chalk, or sometimes they used crushed up sea shells.


JR: Could it have been gypsum?


FL: Yes, they used gypsum. It got absorbed in that. In order to get it out of the pellets, you had to blow hot air through the pellets. They designed it for use in the chambers that they used for fumigating, for which they had a furnace, which ran by oil or coal or some other method. They put the Zyklon B pellets in like a big strainer. It held the pellets. They forced hot air with a blower up through the pellets. The absorbed gas that was in the pellets now becomes gas again. It’s a procedure that chemists call, ‘sublimation’.


JR: Can you see the gas, or is it invisible?


FL: No, you can see it.


JR: So, in other words, it becomes like a mist, a white mist?

Fred Leuchter - 31 - Room being fumigated

[Image] A room being fumigated with some kind of white gas.


FL: It becomes like a cloud. If you don’t blow it, which is what they do in the fumigation chambers, they had the stove at one end. They sublimated the gas in the stove and they had blowers that blew it through all the clothes that were hanging and there was a door at one end, a door at the other end. The same thing they did in the U.S. Space program when the people came back from the moon. They went in one door. They were decontaminated and they came out the other door. That’s what they did. They put the clothes in one end. They fumigated them and they took the clothes out the other end. It was an easy way to handle hydrogen cyanide. They have a tall stack on the thing and they fumigated it; they exhausted the gas, blew fresh air in for several hours.


JR: With the Zyklon B pellets that they had, they said they put them on the ground. I don’t know how that would work on the ground. If you put these pellets on the ground, how would it give off gas. You have to blow the hot air over it.



FL: That’s correct! And presumably what happened at Krema I — that’s at Auschwitz [I] — they had this long room, which was actually a morgue.


Fred Leuchter - 32 - Krema I - inside

[Image] Krema I, the so-called “gas chamber” at Auschwitz I (main camp).

It was a Leichenkeller [morgue]. They had these holes in the roof. They were like vents, and they took the covers off of them and the SS officers — now remember, you can’t touch Zyklon B — they were taking handfuls of it and throwing it down through these holes, went down on the floor, then presumably the gas went up and killed them.


Fred Leuchter - 33 - Flat roof of Krema i

[Image] The four holes in the roof of the Leichenkeller [morgue].

Fred Leuchter - 34 - Jews in gas chamber

[Image] A scene from a jewish horror movie where naked and incredibly naive jews wait jam-packed together for the showers to be turned on. Some have puzzled expressions as they try to figure out what the guard meant, when in response to their questions about there being no soap, he replied cryptically, “Don’t worry. You are the soap!

Fred Leuchter - 35 - evil Nazi pouring Zyklon B

[Image] Another scene from a jewish horror movie showing an “evil Nazi” in a sinister looking gas mask about to drop Zyklon B onto innocent jews. Note the round well-made porthole style construction versus the Krema I roughly-made square holes.

Well, in the first place, this was out in the middle of the Polish countryside. When these [alleged] executions all took place, it was in the winter time, so it was cold. The gas chamber itself, or the room that they call the gas chamber, which was actually the morgue, … It was probably below zero. So, you’re not going to sublimate any gas.

Plus the fact, let’s assume you could sublimate the gas, … These people who were presumably put into the chamber were put in unrestrained.


JR: Right.


FL: Which means that they could cause a spark. They had hobnails in their boots. [see JR’s comment below] There were any one of a number of ways they could make a spark. The gas is extremely explosive! So if they made a spark, … and I’ll tell you something, that if I was going to be gassed with 500 other people, I’d make a spark to blow the room up. I’m sure they would have done the same thing.


JR: They are going to say, though, the people had no clothes on, right? So they’re not going to have any metal on them without clothes. But they do have lights in there. Lights and a spark.

FL: They weren’t explosion proof. They didn’t have explosion-proof lights. None of the doors were pressurized doors. It was just a joke.

Fred Leuchter - 36 - gas chamber wooden door

[Image] A wooden door with a glass pane in Krema I (Auschwitz I).

Now there was a little difference in the [alleged] procedure that was used in Krema II and III at Birkenau  (Auschwitz II).

Fred Leuchter - 37 - Auschwitz II map showing Krema II & III NEW

[Image] Layout of Auschwits II (Birkenau) showing location of  Kremas II, III, IV and V.

They allegedly had a metal cage that came down inside, and they filled the cage with Zyklon B. Another brilliant idea! [sarcasm alert] Because if you pack the cage with Zyklon B, with everything compressed together, you’d never get anything out. So, I mean, the whole thing is a joke! These facilities could not have been used for gas execution.


JR: That was Krema I [actually II and III]. Then you had the other Krema IV and V. Of course, they blew those up.

Fred Leuchter - 38 - Remains of Krema II NEW

[Image] Ruins of Krema II with women’s kitchen in the background.

Fred Leuchter - 39 - Remains of Krema III NEW

[Image] Remains of Krema III


FL: Krema II and Krema III were full-fledged buildings with crematoria. They had basements. They even had a conveyor belt for moving bodies around. They weren’t execution facilities.


Fred Leuchter - 40 - Krema IV, in the summer of 1943

[Image] Krema IV, in the summer of 1943 after it became operational.

Krema III and Krema IV [FL says he misspoke here and actually meant Krema IV and Krema V] were brick buildings that were on one level. They had normal windows in them. They certainly couldn’t have been used for gas chambers either. Those buildings, the only thing left is the floors, which was a poured concrete slab and few bricks on the corners because the local Poles robbed all the bricks after the war.

Now, if we come back to Krema II and Krema III, they were allegedly destroyed by the SS before the evacuated the camp. They may well have been destroyed by the SS before they evacuated the camp because, quite frankly, if I was evacuating some place and the enemy was coming, I didn’t want the Russians to get what I had. I’m going to blow the buildings up anyway. Those facilities were made. They were full crematoria with morgues. You must remember that all hospitals, all public buildings where people lived, all had crematoria in Europe. Long before they ran out of cemetery room. So it was standard procedure to cremate. That’s why they had them. They pointed to these things. I said:

These people have these things because they didn’t have any cemeteries.


JR: Now, you didn’t go to Treblinka, right? Any of those, did you? So you only went to the camps that you mentioned.


FL: There’s nothing there.


JR: That’s true. Have you seen the last video by David Irving? He actually was talking about Treblinka, and he was thinking that millions of people were killed there. I just don’t understand how he came to that conclusion!




FL: He’s done the same thing that Mark Weber has done. They are talking about limited gassings. Absolutely impossible! With the technology that the SS had, they did not, were not capable. They couldn’t do a competent gas execution. They couldn’t execute one person, let alone thousands. With all the stuff that they’ve done at these camps, they brought in ground-penetrating radar. They’ve done all kinds of things. They cannot even find any bone. They haven’t found ANYTHING!!!!


Fred Leuchter - 41 - Ground penetrating radar at Treblinka

[Image] Ground penetrating radar being used at Treblinka. Being conducted to a depth of eighteen feet by an expert in November 1999 and showing no ground disturbance.

JR: Well, the biggest problem is not really the people that you can kill, but it is to get rid of the bodies. What do you do with the bodies? Now they say at Auschwitz, a million people went through it, were killed there. Fine, if you believe that, where are all the bodies?

FL: As I pointed out several times when I spoke, they would have been cremating bodies up into the 1990s.


JR: If you are dealing with 6 million, right? It makes no sense. In my investigation, what I’ve come to learn, especially the camps like Treblinka now. There’s nothing there. There is absolutely no bodies.


Fred Leuchter - 42 - Treblinka, with a stone monument in the background

[Image] Treblinka, with a stone monument in the background.

Fred Leuchter - 43 - Treblinka Memorial

[Image] Treblinka Memorial. Includes 17,000 stones set in concrete in a circle to form an ugly looking symbolic cemetery.

FL: Those were transit camps, shipped in by rail. They brought people into it that were sent to the other camps.


Fred Leuchter - 44 - Treblinka railway branch line

[Image] Treblinka railway branch line.

What they can’t seem to get through their heads is that the Germans needed laborers in the factories. You don’t kill your laborers.


Fred Leuchter - 45 - Prison labor working on metal parts

[Image] Prison labor working on metal parts.


If it wasn’t for Auschwitz and Birkenau, the German Army and Air Corp would have stopped functioning because that was the I.G. Farben Buna Rubber facility.

Fred Leuchter - 46 - I. G. Farben factory at Auschwitz III (Monowitz)

[Image] I. G. Farben factory at Auschwitz III (Monowitz).

Fred Leuchter - 47 - Prison labor at work at one of the many Auschwitz factories

[Image] Prison labor at work at one of the many Auschwitz factories.


They were making artificial rubber. They couldn’t get any real rubber because we cut them off. So without that, you wouldn’t have any airplanes, you wouldn’t have any gaskets. You wouldn’t have any tires. You wouldn’t have had any bushings for the tanks, nothing would have rolled. So you have to keep all these people working.


Fred Leuchter - 48 - Prison labor at work at one of the many Auschwitz factories

[Image] Prison labor at work at one of the many Auschwitz factories.

Nobody said that the Nazis were nice people. They put all these people in prison camps to make them work.

Fred Leuchter - 49 - Prison labor at work at a construction site

[Image] Prison labor at work at a construction site.

But also in the camps, they treated them decently. They kept them well. They were given medical care. Auschwitz had a symphony orchestra. Auschwitz had a swimming pool. All these things.

Fred Leuchter - 50 - Auschwitz orchestra

[Image] Auschwitz orchestra.

Fred Leuchter - 51 - Auschwitz I swimming pool

[Image] Auschwitz I swimming pool (see map above).

JR: All the amenities.


FL: Did they execute anybody? Yes. They executed the people that the Jews tried themselves. If I was a Jew and I was in the camp and I killed another Jew, they tried me and like Pontius Pilate, they conducted the execution.


JR: We aren’t denying that Jews were killed. But any Jew that was killed, I would think would have been subversive,. An enemy of the state or they did something criminal or whatever, but of course, you’re not dealing in the millions, that’s for sure.


FL: They also used some of these prisoners in the concentration camps for medical experiments. They used them for high altitude tests. They pumped air out of the chambers. We got a wealth of medical information after the war. Nobody raised the question that maybe we should be all nice people and maybe we should say:

We shouldn’t use this information that wasn’t gotten properly.

They murdered people to get this information. So, maybe this medical information should be thrown away — NO! You get the information, you use it and we took it after the war. Everything they did, they had a purpose to.


JR: Why do you think the Jews were so adamant against guys like you. that you’re trying to just tell the truth? I know the answer because I’ve studied it. What do you think the game is there?


FL: Because we’re rocking their boat and since WWII, Israel has been making a fortune on it. It’s an industry. They’re making thousands [billions] of dollars. Germany gives [hundreds of] millions of dollars every year to Israel.

You know, the average Jew believes it.

JR: Right.




FL: I think I may have told you one time in the past, when I was on trial for practicing as an engineer without a license, I got a call from a Jewish gentleman, within the Los Angeles area. And he called me up to tell me, he said:

I wanted to express my opinion on this. I don’t think what they’re doing to you is right. The Jews in your area and the Jewish organizations are persecuting you. The same way that we were persecuted by the Nazis, and that’s wrong. You are still a despicable person.

And I asked:

Why am I despicable?”

He says:

Because you made the gas chambers that they used at Auschwitz and Birkenau.

I said:

Wait a minute, let’s back up a minute. What are you talking about? You know how old I am? I was born in 1943.

He said:

Oh, my God. I’m 10 years older than you are.

He was in the concentration camps. He said:

I have a white paper that was sent out by the B’nai B’rith saying that I built the gas chambers.


JR: So that’s why they’re after you.


FL: I said, would you please send me a copy of it. He said:

Oh no, I couldn’t do that. I might get in trouble.

He hung up the phone.


JR: So what they did is they just got a lot of propaganda against you to make it look like you’re a demon, that you were killing all these people, that you made the equipment to kill them.


FL: Lord knows what they said about me.


JR: I didn’t really catch that one. I can see why they’d get mad, if someone told them that.


FL: Everything that I said in my report has been confirmed by Yad Vashem in Jerusalem. They have a copy of a report, and they’ve said:

Everything that Fred Leuchter said in his report at the Zundel trial is essentially correct; however, it doesn’t really matter because the Nazis were despicable people.


Fred Leuchter - 52 - Anti-German propaganda illustration

[Image] Anti-German propaganda illustration.

Fred Leuchter - 52 - Aerial view of Yad Vashem

[Image] Aerial view of Yad Vashem.


Let’s punish them for what they did. Let’s not punish them for what they didn’t do, which was what they were/are doing. Germany has been abused for the last 70 years, since the war. They’ve been abused. The people in Germany, most of them believe that they murdered all these Jews. The world should be ashamed of itself for what it did.


JR: I think more Germans died [20 million] than Jews, in regards to people dying. They said that at the end of the war, a lot of the German soldiers were killed because they didn’t feed them and all the bombings that happened. Within the cities of Germany, they were bombing at the end of the war and killing innocent people.

Fred Leuchter - 53 - Dresden after being fire-bombed

[Image] Dresden after being fire-bombed.

Fred Leuchter - 54 - Dead Germans being stacked up on steel girders, ready to be burnt

[Image] Dead Germans being stacked up on steel girders, ready to be burnt.


FL: The real holocaust was Dresden and there were two holocausts in Japan. Not that I have a problem with the dropping of the bombs in Japan. I believe that they shortened the war. I don’t think it was a good idea to drop the bombs.

Fred Leuchter - 55 - Curtis Emerson LeMay (1906 – 1990)

[Image] Curtis Emerson LeMay (1906 – 1990) was a General in the United States Air Force. During the war, he was known for planning and executing a massive bombing campaign against cities in Japan.


Because a man who was in charge of the Air Force, Curtis LeMay. He said:

I can do the same thing in less than a month with fire bombs.

He told Truman. He said:

Let’s not open the atomic can” and Truman ignored him.

Because it was already determined by FDR what was going to be done. All he was doing was carrying out the work of the Jewish Brain Trust that FDR had. No, I don’t think we should have dropped the bombs because we forever have a black eye for doing that when we didn’t need to.

We could have done it by conventional weapons. And yes, the Japanese needed a lesson because they would have fought us with anything they could have, when they landed. The same thing would have happened if someone invaded this country. Admiral Yamamoto said that before the war started, before Pearl Harbor, because he advised against Pearl Harbor, he said:

There’s a rifle behind every blade of grass in the United States. If we defeat the military, then we have to deal with the people and we ain’t gonna win.

The same thing would have happened in Japan. We would have been fighting the populace with stones and rocks, everything.


JR: They wouldn’t have gone down easily.


FL: No! I think LeMay could have done the same thing with some fire bombs without irradiating the planet.


JR: So in regards to your report, you said there is only three of them, original Leuchter Reports. You would think they’d put that in the Washington archives, Library of Congress .…


Fred Leuchter - 56 - Jim Rizoli holding up one of the three original Leuchter Reports

[Image] Jim Rizoli holding up one of the three original Leuchter Reports.




FL: Probably not in my lifetime.


JR: Well, it is something that really has turned the tide in regards to revisionism, with what’s going on there.


FL: Zundel’s copy was lost when they fire bombed his house.

Fred Leuchter - 57 - Ernst Zundel’s Toronto house after being firebombed

[Image] Ernst Zundel’s Toronto house after being firebombed in the early morning on Sunday, May 7, 1995. An offshoot of the New York based Jewish Defense League (JDL) claimed responsibility.


The one in the court, Lord knows what happened to it. The one in the court was copied by, strangely enough, the Aryan Nations. They printed a copy with their name on it. I have had a lot of people call me and ask me about that. I said:

I had nothing to do with it. It’s a public record.

It’s a court transcript.


JR: I think I might have seen it on the Internet, too.


FL: Zundel has copies of it, well his wife, Ingrid has copies.


JR: Germar Rudolf kind of gave some information on it. How do you feel about what he wrote about it? Did you read his book about it?


Fred Leuchter - 58 - Germar Rudolf, author of the The Rudolf Report

[Image] Germar Rudolf, author of the The Rudolf Report.


FL: I did read the whole thing but unfortunately, what we’ve got here is we’ve got a bit of a tempest in a teapot. People have said that Germar Rudolf was critical of the report. He really wasn’t critical and the problem is that I’m an engineer. I build things. I approached it totally differently than he does. He is an “egghead”. He’s a scientist. He’s a Ph. D. and a chemist. He approaches everything from a theoretical standpoint. I approach everything from a physical standpoint. Some of his stuff has been misunderstood.


Fred Leuchter - 59 - The Rudolf Report 2nd Edition

[Image] Germar Rudolf, Wolfgang Lambrecht: The Rudolf Report—Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the “Gas Chambers” of Auschwitz — 2nd, revised edition

In 1988, Fred Leuchter, American expert for execution technologies, investigated the alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz and Majdanek and concluded that they could not have functioned as claimed. Ever since, Leuchter’s claims have been attacked. In 1993, Rudolf, a researcher from the prestigious Max Planck Institute, published a thorough forensic study about the “gas chambers” of Auschwitz. His report irons out the deficiencies and discrepancies of “The Leuchter Report.The Rudolf Report was the first English edition of this sensational scientific work. This new edition analyzes all existing evidence on the Auschwitz gas chambers and offers even more evidence. The conclusions are startling. Appendix describes Rudolf’s unique persecution—this brilliant scientist was so feared by the mainstream holocaust establishment that they banned him from writing about or researching the subject as terms of his release from prison!

Source: http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=2

NOTE: The book can be downloaded as a PDF here:http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/02-trr.pdf


I don’t know if you saw recently in the dispute with Fritz Berg. Fritz Berg was critical of me because he said that Germar Rudolf said I was wrong, it isn’t explosive. Germar Rudolf responded by saying:

I didn’t say it wasn’t explosive. What I said was both you are right and Fred is right.

Fred Leuchter - 60 - Fritz Berg

[Image] Fritz Berg. His website is: http://www.nazigassings.com/


Germar realizes that we have two different approaches and he approached it differently than I did, and that’s the only difference. Everything I said was substantially correct. I’m not a chemist. I was briefed by a chemist, who was the chief chemist for Dupont in their facility for making hydrogen cyanide gas. He was the one that told me how to deal with it, how it works and how the blue residue that’s left is ferric cyanide.


Fred Leuchter - 61 - Germar Rudolf in delousing chamber, Birkenau

[Image] Germar Rudolf in the interior northwest room in the Zyklon B disinfestation wing of BW 5a in the Birkenau camp.


Fred Leuchter - 62 - Germar Rudolf outside delousing chamber, Birkenau

[Image] Germar Rudolf next to the exterior southwest wall of the Zyklon B disinfestation wing of BW 5b in the Birkenau camp. Blue staining remains despite 50 years of weathering.


Now my explanation of it probably wasn’t as intense as Germar Rudolf would have done. He was very much stronger; but essentially, he said the same thing.


JR: I didn’t really see that Germar was against it, but I do see that because he’s a chemist, so it’s a whole different frame of thought and how that is.

Concluding here, Fred, is there anything you would have done differently when you think about what happened. You look at your life and what happened. What do you think you could have done differently that would have made it easier on yourself, … Probably not do it, right? [half jokingly] Not to go over to Poland and get in there and do your investigation?


FL: The long and the short of it is that I guess I couldn’t have done anything any different.


JR: Yes.


FL: I became involved in executions to stop torturing and punishment. I was the only one who could have dealt with the problem that Zundel had.

I thought about this a number of times. First, as an American, I believe in freedom of speech, freedom of thought. Second, I believe that anyone, whoever he is, has a right to a proper legal defense, no matter what his charges are. Those two things lead me to say, that I would have done the same thing over again, even if I knew what was going to happen. Because Zundel had a right to defend himself!




And he also has a right to believe what he wants and nobody has any right to interfere with that.

Fred Leuchter - 63 - Ernst Zundel, a persecuted revisionist

[Image] Ernst Zundel, a persecuted revisionist.

Canada doesn’t have a bill of rights like we do. They had something that was kind of watered down, but even so, it was enough for the Supreme Court to strike down what they did to Ernst.


JR: Of course, his life hasn’t turned out too well. He’s in Germany now. I don’t even know if he’s going to be coming back to this country, right?


FL: He probably won’t. He’s probably going to die in the Black Forest where he is. He lives where he used to live when he was a youngster. I think he should be brought back to the United States, and I think he should be given citizenship. He shouldn’t be separated from Ingrid.


JR: I know, I know. Do you get the chance to talk to her yourself?


FL: Once in a great while I talk to her on the Internet. I talked to her on the phone a couple of times. I don’t really know Ingrid and she really doesn’t know me. It’s unfortunate, because had Zundel stayed in this country, I’m sure she would have. But I keep a low profile where Ernst is concerned. Because part of the terms of Ernst’s release from prison is based on the fact that he doesn’t associate with any of the former “criminals” that he associated with — and I’m one of those criminals!


JR: You haven’t been formally arrested, have you?


FL: There was a warrant out for me. I was in prison.


JR: I know that but technically, you haven’t been arrested.


FL: What they did by doing that, they sullied “my skirt” so that if I were to testify in a German court, I don’t come off clean. That’s what they wanted to do and that’s what they succeeded doing. It was a political move. The fact that even if I was convicted of a crime, it wouldn’t change my ability to make a determination of what the gas chambers were.

If I was a Nazi and I was defaming the dead, it wouldn’t change anything! That didn’t happen, but nevertheless, that’s where it’s at. I stay away from Ernst because I don’t want to cause Ernst any problems. And if I send him letters, I’m sure it would cause him problems, because I’m sure they watch his mail.

JR: So basically now, now and then you go to a revisionist meeting or some meeting every now and then?


FL: Yeah.


JR: You kind of stay low key.


FL: I’ve been more active since I’ve been on Facebook than I have in the last 15 years before that. And it’s funny. I’m not careful what I say on Facebook, but what I say is the same thing I’ve said for the last 25 years.

I speak as the Pope does — ex cathedra — I’m an expert. There are no other experts. There has been nobody else certified by any court on this planet. The only one that exists is ME. It sounds pompous, then it’s pompous, but the point is when I speak as an expert and I speak of the things that I requested to investigate by the court, nobody can question what I said.

I say a lot of things on Facebook that somebody else probably would get shut down for. I don’t get shut down because I don’t think they know how to do it. They could arbitrarily do that but I think it’d cause an uproar and people would be upset. I’m not a neo-Nazi. I haven’t said anything that’s right wing.


JR: You just tell what the truth is about the topic you’re talking about.


FL: Right. The only thing that I’m careful about is I have people that ask me to “like” web pages, and I told them before, I, like Caesar’s wife, must be above reproach and I’m going to maintain that position. As an expert, I’ll state an opinion. My personal opinions, I keep to myself.




JR: Right.

Well, Fred, we’ve covered quite a bit here in regards to your involvement with the revisionist movement anyway and your expertise on the gas chamber situation. The only other thing we didn’t cover was, I wanted to just touch briefly on your family and your family coming here related to the Revolutionary War. We haven’t really touched on that. I just wanted to get a little background about you and your family with Bunker Hill. Remember, we talked about that.


FL: Before we do that, there is something else I’d like to comment on.

We talked briefly how the Jews and Jewish organizations destroyed my business as a manufacturer of execution equipment. Some of the states threatened to pass laws to prohibit the Department of Corrections in these states from dealing with me. These people that are doing this, have no consideration at all and what they’re doing is actually criminal because they are fostering torture.

All these people that are waiting to be executed have a right to be executed humanely and by pushing me out of the picture, they’re making it so that these people are being executed, are being tortured to death. Probably the last 20 executions, almost all of them, resulted in torture and problem execution. There’s nobody there to help the states any longer.


JR: You mean, right now that’s it, nobody at all.


FL: That’s right. The states are operating blindly. They are having problems with the chemicals because the Europeans, and they are the only ones that make sodium Pentothal, they’re not supplying it to the states. We use sodium Pentothal for operations and they’ve refused to supply sodium Pentothal to the United States for needed operations, if the Department of Corrections continued to use it for lethal injections.

So, as a result, the states have tried to find other means of doing it and they’ve had all kinds of problems.

These people that have come after me, they’re no more than criminals, and there is certainly no humanity in their souls at all, because they don’t care if people are tortured. The only thing they care about is silencing me. They failed to do that.

There’s one other thing that I would like to comment on, which is in the same vein. I built an electric chair for the state of Tennessee. The state of Tennessee has used it once.


Fred Leuchter - 64 - An electric chair built be Fred Leuchter

[Image] An electric chair built be Fred Leuchter.


The Jewish element in Tennessee pressured the Department of Corrections to have the chair modified. They brought in a gentleman by the name of Jay Weichert, who should be ashamed of himself.

Fred Leuchter - 65 - The electric chair and its control panel

[Image] The electric chair and its control panel are shown in Riverbend Maximum Security Institution in Nashville, Tenn. 2014.


He is an electrical engineer that comes from the state of Arkansas. He is responsible for the electric chair in Florida, the one that tortures everybody. He deliberately, and I say deliberately, because he must know as much about the execution procedure as I do. He must have read all the material that happened in New York or he should have. If he didn’t read it, he shouldn’t be building electric chairs.

He deliberately uses low voltage, so it hurts. He modified my chair at the behest of the Jews in Tennessee and he changed the voltage. They reduced the voltage and they increased the current so now it will hurt and it will cook the tissue. One person was executed with it since it has been modified. We don’t know if it hurt him. It looked like it was an acceptable execution, but even all of the executions with Florida’s chair didn’t turn out to a fiasco, but there are enough of them that have to show that the voltages that he chooses shouldn’t be used. These people that did that, they did that full well knowing that the people that are going to be electrocuted in that chair are going to be tortured to death and they don’t care! But, they have a lot of power and they have a lot of force.




I consulted with the Commissioner of Corrections in the state of Mississippi, relative to their gas chamber. I was asked to write a report on it. Before I had the report finished, because the Jewish organizations found out that he did that, they fired him and the state notified me that they do not want to accept the report. Of course, I wasn’t paid for it. I haven’t been paid for a lot of things that I did because of these problems.

But the interesting thing about it is that the man who lost his job, his name was Commissioner Thigpen. He was a black gentleman and a black man in the state of Mississippi, in the Department of Corrections has to be an exceptional person to get the job of commissioner, because most of those southern facilities are all run by southern rednecks. Here was a man, who was good enough to get promoted to be head of the Department of Corrections, a commissioner and he was fired by the Jews because he asked me to see if the gas chamber was safe, and he didn’t kill any of his guards. It shows you the amount of pressure that’s been applied all over the country. To get at me, they would torture.


JR: It’s very mean spirited.











Image captions were not part of the interview.



Click to download a PDF of this post (x.0 MB): (in progress)


Version History


Version 4: Jan 30, 2016 — Added 15 more minutes. Total = 90 minutes.

Version 3: Jan 28, 2016 — Added 7 more minutes. Total = 75 minutes.

Version 2: Jan 27, 2016 — Added more images.

Version 1: Posted  68 minutes — Jan 25, 2016  

Ben Bradberry - COVER Ver 1


[Very informative interview by Jim Rizoli with Benton Bradberry and the story behind his excellent book that exposes the lies behind our “official” understanding of the events of the 20th century whereby Germany is most wrongly portrayed as the “evil villain“. The truth is the very opposite — KATANA.]



Ben Bradberry - Video



Barnes Books: Get Your “Un-annotated” Mein Kampf Here!

The “critical” edition of Adolf Hitler’s book Mein Kampf has sold out after being published legally in Germany for the first time in 70 years. The new German edition hit the bookstores on January 8, and the 4,000-copy print run sold out in less than a week.


broszat-dachau-02The publisher says it has orders for another 15,000 copies and is now working on a second print run. The book also made Der Spiegel’s best-seller list, winning 20th place on the nonfiction list.

This demand is despite copious leftist “additions” having turned the original 600 page work into a 2,000 page monster. The “criticism and analysis” consists of page for page notes on almost every single point Hitler makes, from the petty to the weighty, and everything in-between.

The new edition was published by the infamous Institute of Contemporary History in Munich, which was founded in founded in 1949 specifically to “study the phenomenon of National Socialism”—from a far left perspective of course.

In spite of this political positon, it was one of the Institute’s historians, Martin Broszat, who in 1960 became the first establishment historian to admit in public that there had been no gas chambers in Germany.

This was a major concession in an era which had seen Germans hanged after “confessing” to such having committed such “crimes” just 15 years previously.

Titled “Keine Vergasung in Dachau” (No Gassing in Dachau), the letter corrected an earlier article in Die Zeit which had made all manner of wild claims about “gas chambers” in Dachau and elsewhere.


Weder in Dachau noch in Bergen-Belsen noch in Buchenwald sind Juden oder andere Häftlinge vergast worden. Die Gaskammer in Dachau wurde nie ganz fertiggestellt und ‘in Betrieb’ genommen. Hunderttausende von Häftlingen, die in Dachau oder anderen Konzeentrationslagern im Altreichsgebiet umkamen, waren Opfer vor allem der katastrofen hygienischen und Versorgungszustände... (“No Gassing in Dachau, Dr. Martin Broszat, Institute of Contemporary History in Munich, Letter in Die Zeit, 19 August 1960, p. 16. English translation: “Neither in Dachau, nor in Bergen-Belsen, nor in Buchenwald, were Jews or other inmates gassed. The gas chamber in Dachau was never completed and put ‘into operation.’ Hundreds of thousands of prisoners who perished in Dachau or other concentration camps in the old Reich area were primarily victims of the catastrophic hygiene and logistics situations.”)

The Institute of Contemporary History in Munich lists its new version of Mein Kampf at 59 euros ($64) per copy, but it is already being offered for hundreds of euros on Amazon and eBay for anyone who can’t wait for the next print run.

Mein-Kampf-StalagThe good news for TBR readers is of course, that the only officially-authorized—by Hitler personally—English translation is already available.

Translated by a now-unknown English-speaking Nazi Party member, it was printed by the Franz Eher Verlag in Berlin for the Central Press of the NSDAP in limited numbers during the years 1937 to 1944.

Most copies were distributed to the camp libraries of English-speaking prisoner of war camps, and became known as the “Stalag” edition (Stalag being a contraction of the German word Stammlager or “POW camp”) because they all carried a camp library rubber stamp on the title page.

Only a handful of copies survived the war, and the text contained in this edition has been taken directly, without amendment, from one of these extremely rare editions.

This official translation is not to be confused with the “James Murphy” or “Ralph Mannheim” translations, both of which were edited and abridged and are unauthorized.

The Murphy and Mannheim editions both left out major sections of text, and contained long, clunky, badly translated and almost unintelligibly long sentences.

In sharp contrast, the only authorized “Stalag” edition contains none of these complicated and unnecessarily confused constructions, and is extremely easy to read, as anyone familiar with the other versions will immediately notice.

Most importantly, this only authorized edition contains the full text of the original German—and none of the deliberately-inserted racial pejoratives used in the Murphy and Mannheim versions (words that Hitler never used in the original).

You can get your copy of this only officially authorized English translation of Mein Kampf ever issued for just $35 (less 10% for Barnes Review subscribers) by clicking here.


Hitler as Popular as Ever in Germany, New Film Accidentally Reveals

Adolf Hitler appears to be as popular as ever in Germany, a new leftist film based on the best-selling book Er ist wieder da (“He is Back”) has inadvertently revealed.

The film, meant to mock the German leader, is based on a comedy book of the same name by Timur Vermes. In the book, published a few years ago, Hitler wakes up in a vacant lot in Berlin in the year 2011, with no memory of anything that happened after 1945.


Homeless and destitute, he interprets everything he sees in Germany from a Nazi perspective (for instance, he assumes that Turks in Germany are an indicator of Karl Dönitz having persuaded Turkey to join the Axis), and although everyone recognizes him, nobody believes that he is Hitler; instead, they think he is either a comedian, or an actor.

As a result, videos of his speeches become highly popular on YouTube, and he achieves celebrity status as a performer. In the end, he uses his popularity to go back to politics.

The film version, however, went a step further and interlaced the book’s storyline with documentary-style scenes, last seen in the “Borat” films made by Sacha Baron Cohen, where unwitting members of the public interact with the film without first realizing that it was all a set up.

According to an AFP report on the film’s opening week in Germany, lead actor Oliver Masucci, complete with Hitler moustache and uniform, is seen getting rousing receptions from ordinary people, many of whom pose for “selfies” with him.

Tourists and football fans cheer the fake Hitler at Berlin’s Brandenburg Gate, in a Bavarian village and elsewhere, and elderly people pour their hearts out to him.

“Yes, bring back labor camps,” says one citizen to the actor.

“There is a smoldering anger among the people, like in the 1930s,” says the Hitler character, with visible satisfaction.

Masucci, best known as a stage actor, told Bild daily about his mixed feelings while shooting the unscripted scenes with people on the street.

“During shooting, I realized: I didn’t really have to perform—people felt a need to talk, they wanted to pour their hearts out to a fatherly Hitler who was listening to them,” he said.

“I found it disturbing how quickly I could win people over. I mean, they were talking to Hitler.”

“A fake Hitler, a small moustache clearly helped people lose their inhibitions and… allowed insights into Germany’s dark side,” the far leftist daily Berliner Morgenpost wrote in its review.

“After all, it said,” Hitler, “in a figurative sense, “never really left.”


Hitler’s Revolution: A Review

Hitler’s RevolutionBy John Tiffany. The famous reign of Adolf Hitler occurred over a half-century ago, but he remains as popular as ever. And new books on the great leader keep coming out. Like Jesus, thousands of books have been written about Hitler. Biographies have been written by everyone from Alan Bullock to John Toland to Kevin Williams, in every significant language. Most of them are hostile to the man—a testimony to the power of Jewish propaganda.

The best new volume manages to be “politically incorrect” but historically correct. It is by Richard Tedor, an Illinois native who has contributed to TBR. The title is Hitler’s Revolution: Ideology, Social Programs, Foreign Affairs (HR), available from TBR Books. A translator and researcher, Tedor specializes in German foreign policy and war propaganda during the National Socialist era.

The goal of HR is a modest one: to contribute to understanding the axioms of the German people under National Socialism by exploring the spirit of the epoch in which they lived. Tedor was fortunate in being able to draw on previously classified Russian archives, recently released British secret papers and sources in the German language not available in English.

While we might think of Hitler and his movement as “right wing,” in fact National Socialism owes much to liberalism—paleoliberalism, that is. Until it became corrupted, liberalism fought for the rights of the common man—a philosophy carried over into National Socialism. However, as Hitler declared in an April 1939 address: “This state came into being, and all states come into being, through overcoming interests of pure personal will and individual selfishness. Democracy steers recklessly toward placing the individual in the center of everything. In the long run it is impossible to escape the crisis such a conflict will produce.”

As for a congressional or parliamentary form of government, the damaging influence of it soon becomes apparent. The participation of the people exists only on paper. Politicians make a career out of getting re-elected, and focus not on the welfare of the people and of the state but on certain financial circles standing behind them. (HR 14)

Hitler, an uneducated “ordinary” man, out of natural intuition and despite the opposition of experts, cut out high finance. Since the only available collateral for his money was the technical aptitude and great industriousness of the German people, technology and labor became his “gold,” and like magic this system eliminated all unemployment, as Tedor notes Soviet diplomat Kristyan Rakovsky commenting in 1938.

Hitler was the opposite of warlike. In 1936, although Germany was in a position to implement a massive rearmament program, Hitler did not assign priority to the manufacturing of military hardware. Instead, he focused on things like housing construction and improving conditions for the working man.

But Hitler was forced by Polish hostility (and Poland’s allies) to go to war. On September 1, 1939, the German invasion of Poland began. By the next day, Hitler arranged through his foreign minister to England an offer to withdraw his army from Poland and to compensate the Poles for damages, if London would mediate the Danzig Corridor dispute. Prime Minister Chamberlain’s response belies the claim he was a peacenik: He declared war on Germany the next day.

Lord Halifax (Edward Wood) stated, “Now we have forced Hitler to war.”

Had England been willing to cooperate with Germany, Europe’s supremacy in the world would have been undisputed. Instead, the continent’s role as pioneer and steward of civilization was thrown away by Britain’s rulers, controlled by Jews.

Meanwhile things were not going well in Russia, to say the least, with the Jewish Bolsheviks running wild. As many as 8 million people were arrested in 1937 and 1938 alone, of whom less than 15 percent ever went home. The rest, we can be sure, were tortured and/or worked and starved to death. This was a real holocaust, and deserves far more attention than the phony “holocaust” of the “6 million Jews.” Genocide was planned and executed not only for Russia but also for Germany.

While external enemies were bad enough, what really undermined Hitler’s efforts to achieve a better world for us all were the internal turncoats—especially the reactionary German/Prussian nobility, who did not care that their plots would destroy the fatherland and stab in the back the patriotic men fighting at the front.

Major subverters included Carl Goerdeler, baron von Weizsaecker, Ewald von Kleist-Schmenzin, Erich Kordt and chief of military intelligence Adm. Wilhelm Canaris. (220) We might add that all the leading generals were in on the plotting or connived at it: Walter von Brauchitsch, the commander-in-chief, Gerd von Rundstedt, Ludwig Beck, Carl-Heinrich von Stuelpnagel, Erwin von Witzleben, commander of the Berlin garrison, and Graf Helldorf, chief of Berlin police, among others. (219)

Nor did they scruple to kill Hitler with a bomb, though these Keystone Kop-like conspirators had no idea what they would do next or what government they might put in place once Hitler was gone; nor did the Allies offer them anything other than unconditional surrender, the same crummy deal they offered Hitler.

In analyzing why Germany lost the war, we must weigh the flagrant disregard of Hitler’s orders, misleading intelligence he received and true intelligence withheld from him, and the militarily useless troop movements carried out without his knowledge, as Tedor notes. Yet establishment historians blame Hitler for the catastrophe.

The much-maligned leader of National Socialist Germany saw the duty of government as to foster, never restrict, the creative energy of the nation and expedite its progress.


Adolf Hitler 4/20/1889-12/24/1945 Impossible Dream


✠German victory march through Paris june 1940 Parade deutscher Truppen (Pariser Einzugsmarsch)


Did Hitler Want War?

This post was viewed 138,761 times.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Votes: 4.28 Stars!

by Patrick J. Buchanan

On Sept. 1, 1939, 70 years ago, the German Army crossed the Polish frontier. On Sept. 3, Britain declared war.

Six years later, 50 million Christians and Jews had perished. Britain was broken and bankrupt, Germany a smoldering ruin. Europe had served as the site of the most murderous combat known to man, and civilians had suffered worse horrors than the soldiers.

By May 1945, Red Army hordes occupied all the great capitals of Central Europe: Vienna, Prague, Budapest, Berlin. A hundred million Christians were under the heel of the most barbarous tyranny in history: the Bolshevik regime of the greatest terrorist of them all, Joseph Stalin.

What cause could justify such sacrifices?

The German-Polish war had come out of a quarrel over a town the size of Ocean City, Md., in summer. Danzig, 95 percent German, had been severed from Germany at Versailles in violation of Woodrow Wilson’s principle of self-determination. Even British leaders thought Danzig should be returned.

Why did Warsaw not negotiate with Berlin, which was hinting at an offer of compensatory territory in Slovakia? Because the Poles had a war guarantee from Britain that, should Germany attack, Britain and her empire would come to Poland’s rescue.

But why would Britain hand an unsolicited war guarantee to a junta of Polish colonels, giving them the power to drag Britain into a second war with the most powerful nation in Europe?

Was Danzig worth a war? Unlike the 7 million Hong Kongese whom the British surrendered to Beijing, who didn’t want to go, the Danzigers were clamoring to return to Germany.

Comes the response: The war guarantee was not about Danzig, or even about Poland. It was about the moral and strategic imperative “to stop Hitler” after he showed, by tearing up the Munich pact and Czechoslovakia with it, that he was out to conquer the world. And this Nazi beast could not be allowed to do that.

If true, a fair point. Americans, after all, were prepared to use atom bombs to keep the Red Army from the Channel. But where is the evidence that Adolf Hitler, whose victims as of March 1939 were a fraction of Gen. Pinochet’s, or Fidel Castro’s, was out to conquer the world?

After Munich in 1938, Czechoslovakia did indeed crumble and come apart. Yet consider what became of its parts.

The Sudeten Germans were returned to German rule, as they wished. Poland had annexed the tiny disputed region of Teschen, where thousands of Poles lived. Hungary’s ancestral lands in the south of Slovakia had been returned to her. The Slovaks had their full independence guaranteed by Germany. As for the Czechs, they came to Berlin for the same deal as the Slovaks, but Hitler insisted they accept a protectorate.

Now one may despise what was done, but how did this partition of Czechoslovakia manifest a Hitlerian drive for world conquest?

Comes the reply: If Britain had not given the war guarantee and gone to war, after Czechoslovakia would have come Poland’s turn, then Russia’s, then France’s, then Britain’s, then the United States.

We would all be speaking German now.

But if Hitler was out to conquer the world — Britain, Africa, the Middle East, the United States, Canada, South America, India, Asia, Australia — why did he spend three years building that hugely expensive Siegfried Line to protect Germany from France? Why did he start the war with no surface fleet, no troop transports and only 29 oceangoing submarines? How do you conquer the world with a navy that can’t get out of the Baltic Sea?

If Hitler wanted the world, why did he not build strategic bombers, instead of two-engine Dorniers and Heinkels that could not even reach Britain from Germany?

Why did he let the British army go at Dunkirk?

Why did he offer the British peace, twice, after Poland fell, and again after France fell?

Why, when Paris fell, did Hitler not demand the French fleet, as the Allies demanded and got the Kaiser’s fleet? Why did he not demand bases in French-controlled Syria to attack Suez? Why did he beg Benito Mussolini not to attack Greece?

Because Hitler wanted to end the war in 1940, almost two years before the trains began to roll to the camps.

Hitler had never wanted war with Poland, but an alliance with Poland such as he had with Francisco Franco’s Spain, Mussolini’s Italy, Miklos Horthy’s Hungary and Father Jozef Tiso’s Slovakia.

Indeed, why would he want war when, by 1939, he was surrounded by allied, friendly or neutral neighbors, save France. And he had written off Alsace, because reconquering Alsace meant war with France, and that meant war with Britain, whose empire he admired and whom he had always sought as an ally.

As of March 1939, Hitler did not even have a border with Russia. How then could he invade Russia?

Winston Churchill was right when he called it “The Unnecessary War” — the war that may yet prove the mortal blow to our civilization.

The ethnic cleansing of Germans from Czechoslovakia after the Second World War. Contains copyright material but is posted for educational purposes as it is impossible to obtain commercially.

Time Shift A Shadow Over Europe


Was World War Two just as pointless and self-defeating as Iraq, asks Peter Hitchens


Last updated at 21:01 19 April 2008


It makes me feel like a traitor to write this. The Second World War was my religion for most of my life.Brave, alone, bombed, defiant, we, the British, had won it on our own against the most evil and powerful enemy imaginable.

Born six years after it was over, I felt almost as if I had lived through it, as my parents most emphatically had, with some bravery and much hardship in both cases.

What do you think? Tell in the comments section at the bottom of the page

Scroll down for more…

British troops Caen 1944Heroism: Tommies commandeer a German machine gun during battle for Caen in 1944

With my toy soldiers, tanks and field-guns, I defeated the Nazis daily on my bedroom floor.

I lost myself in books with unembarrassed titles like Men Of Glory, with their crisp, moving accounts of acts of incredible bravery by otherwise ordinary people who might have been my next-door neighbours.

I read the fictional adventures of RAF bomber ace Matt Braddock in the belief that the stories were true, and not caring in the slightest about what happened when his bombs hit the ground. I do now.

After this came all those patriotic films that enriched the picture of decency, quiet courage and self-mocking humour that I came to think of as being the essence of Britishness. To this day I can’t watch them without a catch in the throat.

This was our finest hour. It was the measure against which everything else must be set.

So it has been very hard for me since the doubts set in. I didn’t really want to know if it wasn’t exactly like that. But it has rather forced itself on me.

When I lived in Russia at the end of the Soviet era, I found a country that made even more of the war than we did.

I even employed a splendid old Red Army war veteran to help me set up my office there: an upright, totally reliable old gentleman just like my father’s generation, except that he was Russian and a convinced Stalinist who did odd jobs for the KGB.

They had their war films, too. And their honourable scars.

And they were just as convinced they had won the war single-handed as we were.

They regarded D-Day as a minor event and had never heard of El Alamein.

Once I caught myself thinking: “They’re using the war as a way of comforting themselves over their national decline, and over the way they’re clearly losing in their contest with America.”

And then it came to me that this could be a description of my own country.

When I lived in America itself, where I discovered that the Second World War, in their view, took place mainly in the Pacific, and in any case didn’t matter half as much as the Civil War and the Vietnam War, I got a second harsh, unwanted history lesson.

Now here comes another. On a recent visit to the USA I picked up two new books that are going to make a lot of people in Britain very angry.

I read them, unable to look away, much as it is hard to look away from a scene of disaster, in a sort of cloud of dispirited darkness.

They are a reaction to the use – in my view, abuse – of the Second World War to justify the Iraq War.

We were told that the 1939-45 war was a good war, fought to overthrow a wicked tyrant, that the war in Iraq would be the same, and that those who opposed it were like the discredited appeasers of 1938.

Well, I didn’t feel much like Neville Chamberlain (a man I still despise) when I argued against the Iraq War. And I still don’t.

Some of those who opposed the Iraq War ask a very disturbing question.

The people who sold us Iraq did so as if they were today’s Churchills. They were wrong.

In that case, how can we be sure that Churchill’s war was a good war?

What if the Men of Glory didn’t need to die or risk their lives? What if the whole thing was a miscalculated waste of life and wealth that destroyed Britain as a major power and turned her into a bankrupt pensioner of the USA?

Funnily enough, these questions echo equally uncomfortable ones I’m often asked by readers here.

The milder version is: “Who really won the war, since Britain is now subject to a German-run European Union?”

The other is one I hear from an ever-growing number of war veterans contemplating modern Britain’s landscape of loutishness and disorder and recalling the sacrifices they made for it: “Why did we bother?”

Don’t read on if these questions rock your universe.

The two books, out in this country very soon, are Patrick Buchanan’s Churchill, Hitler And The Unnecessary War and Nicholson Baker’s Human Smoke.

I know Pat Buchanan and respect him, but I have never liked his sympathy for “America First”, the movement that tried to keep the USA out of the Second World War.

As for Nicholson Baker, he has become famous only because his phone-sex novel, Vox, was given as a present to Bill Clinton by Monica Lewinsky.

Human Smoke is not a novel but a series of brief factual items deliberately arranged to undermine the accepted story of the war, and it has received generous treatment from the American mainstream, especially the New York Times.

Baker is a pacifist, a silly position open only to citizens of free countries with large navies.

He has selected with care to suit his position, but many of the facts here, especially about Winston Churchill and Britain’s early enthusiasm for bombing civilian targets, badly upset the standard view.

ChurchillIn his element: Churchill preferred war to peace. claims U.S. author Patrick Buchanan

Here is Churchill, in a 1920 newspaper article, allegedly railing against the “sinister confederacy” of international Jewry.

I say “allegedly” because I have not seen the original. I also say it because I am reluctant to believe it, as I am reluctant to believe another Baker snippet which suggests that Franklin Roosevelt was involved in a scheme to limit the number of Jews at Harvard University.

Such things today would end a political career in an instant.

Many believe the 1939-45 war was fought to save the Jews from Hitler. No facts support this fond belief.

If the war saved any Jews, it was by accident.

Its outbreak halted the “Kindertransport” trains rescuing Jewish children from the Third Reich. We ignored credible reports from Auschwitz and refused to bomb the railway tracks leading to it.

Baker is also keen to show that Hitler’s decision to exterminate the Jews of Europe came only after the war was fully launched, and that before then, although his treatment of the Jews was disgusting and homicidal, it stopped well short of industrialised mass murder.

The implication of this, that the Holocaust was a result of the war, not a cause of it, is specially disturbing.

A lot of people will have trouble, also, with the knowledge that Churchill said of Hitler in 1937, when the nature of his regime was well known: “A highly competent, cool, well informed functionary with an agreeable manner, a disarming smile, and few have been unaffected by a subtle personal magnetism.”

Three years later, the semi-official view, still pretty much believed, was that Hitler was the devil in human form and more or less insane.

Buchanan is, in a way, more damaging. He portrays Churchill as a man who loved war for its own sake, and preferred it to peace.

As the First World War began in 1914, two observers, Margot Asquith and David Lloyd George, described Churchill as “radiant, his face bright, his manner keen … you could see he was a really happy man”.

Churchill also (rightly) gets it in the neck from Buchanan for running down British armed forces between the wars.

It was Churchill who, as Chancellor of the Exchequer, demanded deep cuts in the Royal Navy in 1925, so when he adopted rearmament as his cause ten years later, it was his own folly he was railing against.

Well, every country needs men who like war, if it is to stand and fight when it has to. And we all make mistakes, which are forgotten if we then get one thing spectacularly right, as Churchill did.

Americans may take or leave Mr Buchanan’s views about whether they should have stayed out, but the USA did very well out of a war in which Britain and Russia did most of the fighting, while Washington pocketed (and still keeps) most of the benefits.

Surveying Buchanan’s chilly summary, I found myself distressed by several questions.

The First and Second World Wars, as Buchanan says, are really one conflict.

We went to war with the Kaiser in 1914 mainly because we feared being overtaken by Germany as the world’s greatest naval power. Yet one of the main results of the war was that we were so weakened we were overtaken instead by the USA.

We were also forced, by American pressure, to end our naval alliance with Japan, which had protected our Far Eastern Empire throughout the 1914-18 war.

This decision, more than any other, cost us that Empire. By turning Japan from an ally into an enemy, but without the military or naval strength to guard our possessions, we ensured that we would be easy meat in 1941.

After the fall of Singapore in 1942, our strength and reputation in Asia were finished for good and our hurried scuttle from India unavoidable.

Worse still is Buchanan’s analysis of how we went to war.

I had always thought the moment we might have stopped Hitler was when he reoccupied the Rhineland on March 7, 1936. But Buchanan records that nobody was interested in such action at the time. Nobody? Yes.

That includes Churchill, who said fatuously on March 13: “Instead of retaliating by armed force, as would have been done in a previous generation, France has taken the proper and prescribed course of appealing to the League of Nations.”

He then even more wetly urged “Herr Hitler” to do the decent thing and withdraw.

Buchanan doesn’t think that Britain and France could have saved Czechoslovakia in 1938, and I suspect he is right.

But this is a minor issue beside his surgical examination of Britain’s guarantee to help Poland in March 1939. Hitler saw our “stand” as an empty bluff, and called it.

The Poles were crushed and murdered, and their country erased from the map. Hitler’s eventual defeat left Poland under the Soviet heel for two generations.

We then embarked on a war which cost us our Empire, many of our best export markets, what was left of our naval supremacy, and most of our national wealth – gleefully stripped from us by Roosevelt in return for Lend-Lease supplies.

As a direct result we sought membership of a Common Market that has since bled away our national independence.

Would we not have been wiser to behave as the USA did, staying out of it and waiting for Hitler and Stalin to rip out each other’s bowels?

Was Hitler really set on a war with Britain or on smashing the British Empire?

The country most interested in dismantling our Empire was the USA. Hitler never built a surface navy truly capable of challenging ours and, luckily for us, he left it too late to build enough submarines to starve us out.

He was very narrowly defeated in the Battle of Britain, but how would we have fared if, a year later, he had used the forces he flung at Russia to attack us instead?

But he didn’t. His “plan” to invade Britain, the famous Operation Sealion, was only a sketchy afterthought, quickly abandoned.

Can it be true that he wasn’t very interested in fighting or invading us? His aides were always baffled by his admiration for the British Empire, about which he would drone for hours.

Of course he was an evil dictator. But so was Joseph Stalin, who would later become our honoured ally, supplied with British weapons, fawned on by our Press and politicians, including Churchill himself.

By Christmas 1940, Stalin had in fact murdered many more people than Hitler and had invaded nearly as many countries.

We almost declared war on him in 1940 and he ordered British communists to subvert our war effort against the Nazis during the Battle of Britain.

And, in alliance with Hitler, he was supplying the Luftwaffe with much of the fuel and resources it needed to bomb London.

Not so simple, is it? Survey the 20th Century and you see Britain repeatedly fighting Germany, at colossal expense.

No one can doubt the valour and sacrifice involved.

But at the end of it all, Germany dominates Europe behind the smokescreen of the EU; our Empire and our rule of the seas have gone, we struggle with all the problems of a great civilisation in decline, and our special friend, the USA, has smilingly supplanted us for ever. But we won the war.

Human Smoke, by Nicholson Baker, is published on May 6 by Simon and Schuster. Churchill, Hitler And The Unnecessary War, by Patrick Buchanan, is published on May 13 by Crown Publishing.

Mail online


NWO – Historian Says Rothschilds Are Puppets of the Hasidim Jewish Sect, Chabad Lubavitch

Historian Says Rothschilds Are Puppets of the Hasidim Jewish Sect, Chabad Lubavitch

Germany Spain Netherlands France FussiaFedFlag23h35w Estonia Flag CzechRepublicFlag23h35w Poland Flag Serbia flag 23h Serbia flag 23h Croatia Flag 23h India Flag 23h Greece Flag Portugal Flag Italy Flag Finland Flag Sweden Flag Romania Flag Norway Flag Turkey Flag Hungary Flag Bulgaria Flag Thailand flab23h35w

by Henry Makow Ph.D.
November 8, 2015, Updated from Sept 4, 2008

Historian Says Rothschilds Are Puppets of the Hasidim Jewish Sect, Chabad Lubavitch (Nov. 8, 2015)


Is this the real face of the Illuminati?schneerson.jpg

Speaking in euphemism, Lubavitcher prophet Menachem Mendel Schneerson (1902-1994) said Cabalist Jews will rule the world after an apocalypse that they intend to initiate.
A Munich-based historian Wolfgang Eggert, 54, believes orthodox Jews called Chasidim want to instigate a nuclear holocaust to fulfill Biblical prophesy. (Chasidim is plural of Chasid.) He thinks these religious fanatics must be exposed. The largest Hasidim group, the Chabad Lubavitch sect want to hasten Armageddon to facilitate the intervention of the Messiah. Eggert quotes a Lubavitch rabbi who says:”the world is waiting for us to fulfill our role in preparing the world to greet Moshiach” (i.e. Messiah.)
(Wolfgang Eggert, left) 
“All human history is about Messianicsatanic Judaism (“Chassidim”); they´re “making” it. History and politics are a big movie, and they are the directors, bringing old-testament-prophecy into reality. They captured freemasonry by building up the illuminati (through Rothschild/Jacob Frank/Weishaupt); they made a pact with the British monarchy when they financed William III to become king; they placed the British royals at the head of the Freemasons; they made the modern banking system and the Fed (through Rothschild); they made Zionism, the world wars, the European union and so on. They reign through their puppets Rothschild (whose ancestors had been part of the chassidic cult) and Rockefeller, who were the guiding force behind Bilderberg, the trilaterals etc. We are now in the “End Times”; they are trying to foment a “prophesied” Third World War.
Eggert believes both Germany and Israel are in the Hasid cross-hairs. “Germany, because the Hassidim are reading from the bible/talmud, that this country is foe to the Jews and must be killed. Israel has to burn for bringing the prophecy of armageddon into reality. In addition, they are repeating a Machiavellian, strategic “trick”: the sacrifice of the European jews in the Second World War (“shoah”) which brought them their own country- Israel. The sacrifice of the Israeli Jews shall bring them the international approval to be masters of a united word”republic”, that will be governed from Jerusalem, which, again, is being “prophesied” by Jahwe.”
While the Chabad Lubavitchers are his focus, Eggert is also concerned about [British Israel] Christian Evangelists like Jack Van Impe, left, and Timothy LaHayewho believe war is the will of God. The Books of Ezekiel and Daniel and Revelation in the New Testament prophesied Armageddon. Their desired scenario includes the destruction of the al-Aqsa mosque [the Dome of the Rock mosque], the restoration of the Third Temple on its site; the rising to heaven of the 144,000 Chosen Ones; the battle of Armageddon; mass death among Israeli Jews and the Final Coming of Jesus Christ.
According to Alison Weir, there are approximately 3,600 Chabad institutions in over 1,000 cities in 70 countries, and 200,000 adherents. Up to a million people attend Chabad services at least once a year. Numerous campuses have such centers and the Chabad website states that hundreds of thousands of children attend Chabad summer camps.
(l. Schneerson in later life.) 
According to the NY Times, Schneerson “presided over a religious empire that reached from the back streets of Brooklyn to the main streets of Israel and by 1990 was taking in an estimated $100 million a year in contributions.
Schneerson believes Jews are the acme of Creation: “The general difference between Jews and non-Jews: A Jew was not created as a means for some [other] purpose; he himself is the purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to serve the Jews.”
“The important things are the Jews, because they do not exist for any [other] aim; they themselves are [the divine] aim.”
“The entire creation [of a non-Jew] exists only for the sake of the Jews.”
When Schneerson died in 1994, he was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal for his contribution to “global morals.” According to Schneerson, Jews are the Priests while the Noahide Laws provide “a religion for the rank and file.” Eggert quotes another Lubavitcher rabbi: “When examining the chain of frightening events [since 9-11] with a Chassidic eye, we see that the US is being pushed toward fulfilling its historic role of teaching the Sheva Mitzvos [i.e. Noahide laws] to the world.”
According to Eggert, Freemasons have always called themselves “Noachids” and incorporated the statutes into their Constitution as early as 1723.obamachabd.jpgHere is a 2004 picture of Barack Obama meeting with Rabbi Yossi Brackman, Director of the Chabad Jewish Center in Chicago. If you look, you can find pictures of many major politicians in the West posing with this sect. This website features more than a dozen of them.  In this You Tube  the Chief Rabbi of the Chabad boasted of his rapport with Vladimir Putin. Eggert says Putin’s mother is Jewish, which makes him Jewish, and that President Medvedev is Jewish on both sides.  It’s hard to say if they are beholden to the Chabadniks.

Eggert, who studied History and Politics at universities in Berlin and Munich, is the author of eight books on hidden history. While he believes that modern history is dominated by the Cabalistic plot to fulfill Biblical Prophesy, he is careful to distinguish between the Lubavitchers and other Hasidim called “Satmar” who think it is a crime to “force God’s hand” and “hasten the redemption.”

However, the Lubavitchers seem to be in control.

“Every part of modern history is linked to another and in itself to Zionism, state intelligence, lodges and alike. Without the Balfour declaration, there would have been no revolution in Russia and no America into World War One … We may start at any historical point (even with the American revolution or more far back Oliver Cromwell) [and] we´ll see, that the maker (or profiteer) of all this isCabalistic Judaism. All serves their plan, to implement biblical prophecy.”

bushchabad.jpgEggert cites World Zionist VP Max Nordau’s speech at the 1903 Zionist Convention predicting “a future World War [and] peace conference where with the help of England a free and Jewish Palestine will be created.”

( Eggert, “Israel’s Geheimvatikan” Vol.2, pp.21-22)

He says the Zionists sabotaged Germany in WWI (strikes, revolts) because it wouldn’t play ball on Israel. He cites a book in Hebrew, “The Historical Moment” by M. Gonzer: “We even find nations who are slow on the uptake and who find it difficult to understand certain relations unless the rebbe–that is world history–gives them some sensible bashes which makes them open their eyes.” (Israels Geheimvatikan, vol. 1, p.47.)

If you look at the people behind the conflicts in Ukraine and Syria, you will find Jews like Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland who may very well be advancing this demented agenda.


US Defence Secretary says Russia and China are “Challenging the World Order”
Apocalypse No! 
“The Jewish Crew Behind John McCain”
and my “What Every Jew (and Non-Jew) Should Know”

Wolfgang Eggert adds today:
French Revolutionary Jean-Paul Marat warned, before being murdered:

“Don’t ..be deceived when they tell you things are better now. …Watch out, for as soon as it pleases them they’ll send you out to protect their gold in wars whose weapons, rapidly developed by servile scientists, will become more and more deadly until they can with a flick of the finger tear a million of you to pieces.” 

Some thrilling press-headlines fit into this warning.

Oct. 5, 2015 (Politico) Brzezinski: Obama should retaliate if Russia doesn’t stop attacking U.S. assets in Syria

Oct. 8, 21015 (The Daily Express) US vs Russia military showdown is INEVITABLE top MI6 chief warns

Oct. 11, 2015 (International Business Times/SundayTimes) British Pilots Authorized to Shoot Down Russian Planes over Syria

Oct. 12, 2015 (Reuters) NATO says will help Turkey against Russia if needed

Not only some of the most efficient doomsday-networks are working for a Third World War, the money powers pursue for the same end. Humanity is caught in a deadly trap. We have to act so save us.…There are a lot of people here in north/central europa, who want to get rid of the globalist-militaristic elites/lobbies right now, the political atmosphere is getting partiotic/anti government and is at a very critical point.

First Comment from Dan:

The Chabad Lubavitch sect was a spinoff of Baal Shem Tov’s (c1700-1760) Hassidic movement.  Non-Jewish Americans think its a minor ‘denomination’ of Judaism.  In fact it’s the largest Jewish religious organization in the world. It has centers in every important city on Earth.  They’re as active at recruiting as Scientology or Krishna Consciousness, and employ similar inducements.  Consequently they’re the fastest growing Jewish religious group as well.

As with the other theocratic juggernauts that move lots of people and money under the cloak of religion, they interlock with the world’s consortium of organized crime. There have been many spectacular arrests for such charges as international narcotics, weapons and human trafficking, and of course money laundering.  As with the Vatican’s international money laundering and pedophile network, nothing sticks.


Netanyahu and the Rebbe Schneerson, 1990.   After exchanging amenities Netanyahu said; “I come to ask your blessing and your help.  In all areas, political and personal.”   The Rebbe replied, “Since last time we met many things have progressed.  What hasn’t changed however is Moshiach [Messiah] still hasn’t come.  So do something to hasten his coming.”  Netanyahu; “We’re doing. We’re doing.”

The Rebbe and Bibi Netanyahu: Politicians For Redemption 

Reminds me of scenes from the Godfather. They weren’t making small talk.  The Rebbe was anxious.  It’s a Hasidic belief that every generation of Jews has a potential Moshiach who will become THE Moshiach if that generation becomes worthy.  That man is known as the Tzadik Ha-Dor, meaning Tzaddik of the Generation.  Lubavitchers believed it was “the Rebbe” Menachem Mendel Schneerson.   Since he died in 1998, they’re waiting for the new generation’s Tzadik Ha-Dor to appear and bring on the Messianic Age.

What is the Messianic Age?

Yossi Gurvitz [former yeshiva student] explains what it means from the Talmud, here: When Israel Is Mighty

Transcript of video:

We all know what rabbis say is the origin of Judaism. Moshe [Moses] passed the Torah down to the elders, the elders passed the Torah down to the prophets, etc. All the way down to the Talmud, and there were no changes. The central motif of the Jewish understanding of history is that there were no changes [in the religion]. In other words, what the rabbis are saying now are merely minor refinements of what the rabbis had said during the time of the ‘Elders’ – the time of the Mishnah and the Talmud.

Now first of all, the problem with this version of history is that it is completely baseless. And second of all, that it has a few historical problems, and these historical problems continue to this day due to the fact that Judaism as a religion has been frozen in time for the last 1800 years. Generally speaking, Rabbinical Judaism, as it apperas in the Talmud – unlike what is generally taught in secular schools – the source of Judaism is not the Bible. The source of Judaism is the Talmud.

The people who wrote the Talmud are the ones who decided what books would be included in the Biblical canon. What they decided wouldn’t go in – didn’t go in. So for example, while the Catholic Church included the Books of Macabees in its version of the canon, Judaism did not preserve them, and in fact only the Greek version of them was preserved. Whether there were ever Hebrew or Aramaic versions of them is an interesting question, but only Christianity preserved them. The Book of Judith. The Book of Tobias.

Many other books, mostly dealing with the Jews of the Diaspora, didn’t make it into the Jewish Biblical canon, and were only preserved by Christianity. Now, the Judaism that preceded Rabbinical Judaism was pretty much erased from history. In other words, there’s not enough information to know what happened then. We know there were Sadducees, there were Pharisees – the Pharisees are the Rabbinical Jews – there were the Essenes – we don’t know anything about them for certain, and the reason we don’t know anything about them for certain is that when their enemies were victorious, the Pharisees established more than 10 religious holidays to celebrate their victories over the Sadducees, they simply erased them from history.

So you have to eke a fragment [of information] out of a fragment [of informaiton], so you can say “Maybe it was like this” or “Maybe it was like that” – it’s impossible to know what really happened. What we do know is this: from very early on, Rabbinical Judaism is a Judaism that hates humans [humanity]. It defines only Jews as humans – only Jews who believe in the religion as humans.

Okay, let’s get this exactly right: it defines only Jews who believe in the religion and are men – as full humans. And everyone else is some level of ‘other’, that must be pushed aside or, in extreme cases, destroyed. Rabbinical Jewish law does not prohibit – okay, that’s not accurate. Rabbinical Jewish law prohibits the killing of a non-Jew, but it does not punish a person for doing so. In other words, if you kill a Jew, even a Jewish woman, even the slave of a Jew – and here it’s important to note that Orthodox Judaism has never abolished slavery – then there’s a penalty you have to pay. It could come to execution or it could be a fine. They didn’t have jails.

But if you kill a non-Jew then you’re guilty, but there is no penalty. God will punish you. And that is – how shall I put it? – a bit problematic. When you say something is a crime, but there’s no punishment for committing it, then it’s not really a crime. That’s the Talmud. When you come to the writers of later exegesis, especially the Shulhan Aruch, by that poiint, he is already saying that there are situations where you can kill a non-Jew with impunity. Of course, it’s written in the 16th century, after the expulsion [of all Jews] from Spain [in 1492]. So he has to write what he wants ot say in coded language. So he calls them”idolaters”. But just so you know, there weren’t any [pagans] left in that part of the world [by that point] – not in Europe, and not in the Muslim world. So he calls them “idolaters” or other such terms, but everyone knows who he’s talking about [non-Jews, Goy, or Goyim].

The worst case, in my opinion, is the case of Maimonides, who decrees – first of all, he decrees that it is permissible to have sexual interocurse with a 3-year old girl. That age of consent is – problematic. And second of all, he decrees that if a Jew rapes a three-year-old non-Jewish girl, then she must be executed. Her, not him – because she tempted him to sin. And for this reason, you have to treat her like an animal that puts obstacles in a person’s way. And he quotes some verse about a bull or something like that. And the rabbis know that these parts of the religion that are misanthropic, that are discriminatory to non-Jeews, pose a problem for them. Because if they try to implement them – there are some rules that are very unpleasant, like that three-year-old-girl we were just talking about – if they try to implement them, there will be a pogrom.

So to avoid that situation, the Talmud defines two different states of reality. There’s one called “Darkei Shalom” [Peaceful Ways]. In other words, “This is the actual religious law, this is how you are supposed to act.” “However, since it would cause a huge mess, and people will die. So due to ‘peaceful ways’, you don’t act that way.” Now, until what point does the “peaceful ways” rule still apply? Just as long as the other situation does not exist, which is “When Israel is Mighty”. That’s when there is a Jewish regime. It is independent, and it is merciless, it can do what it likes. Under those circumstances – it’s all over, you go back to the letter of the law.

No more “peaceful ways”, no more nothng. Now when you think about Jewish history, lots of people talk about the Hasmonean Wars which was pretty much one of the only times that Jews wielded weapons and they think about what the Hasmoneans did to the Hellenized Jews [who assimilated Greek culture]. Which was to make them extinct, to destroy them. A small genocide. And I remind people of this frequently, every time Hanukah rolls around. But they didn’t stop there.

They embarked on campaigns of looting and conquest and at the beginning, during their first 20 years, wherever they arrived, they would destroy the local temples. It was prohibited for a place that was under Jewish rule to have a pagan temple. That’s what we’re talking about. They also forced the Edomites to convert to Judaism on pain of death. It was a forced conversion. Something we learn the [Spanish] Inquisition did later on. They took people and told them: ;”Either you’re dead, or you’re converting to Judaism”. And things only got worse from there.

Now, when religious zionists look at reality, they say: “We’ve got a state. We’ve got weapons. We’ve got a Jewish army. This hasn’t happened for 2, 000 years.” What this means is that God wants us to bring about the Messiah, that God wants us to build the Temple.” They skip over all of the conditions that are imposed by the Talmud on what a Messiah must be. And they go back to Maimonides. And Maimonides says, “There is no difference between our time and the time of the Messiah, other than the subordination to kingdoms.”

In other words, the only difference between the time of Maimonides – he died in 1204 – and the time of the Messiah, is who is subordinate to whom. Are the Jews subordinate to “kingdoms”, to other nations? Or can they subordinate other nations? And that is how Maimonides begins his Book of Kings. He explains what the rules are for a king, what a king can do. It emeres from the belief that, yes, there can be a king. You don’t have to first have a temple. You don’t need God to come down fromt he sky and point at someone and say, “That’s the Messiah”. You can have a king, and if he is victorious, then he’ll also be the Messian. And then you look at what religious zionists are doing about this. They want a Messiah. They want him now.

There must be cleansings. Religious law prohibits contact with non-Jews. Of course, the Kosher laws prohibit you from eating with them. Other laws forbid you from treating them fairly. You are forbidden to return a lost item to a non-Jew – except in order to “keep the peace”. There is no prohibition on stealing from a non-Jew – except in order to “keep the peace”. You can’;t say “hello” to them – unless there is no alternative. And so on and so forth.

There are all kinds of prohibitions that are entirely psychotic that are based on a religion of vengeance. Religious zionists hae a serious problem with the fact that there are any non-Jews here. The Land of Israel is suppossed to be only for Jews. So, ironically, they would manage to get along with the Muslims more or less if we weren’t involved in a military conflict with them. Because according to Judaism, Muslims are not idolaters. Muslims believe in one God. They don’t have idols, they don’t have statues, they don’t have anything like that. So ironically, during the Medieval Era, Jews got along better with Muslims than with Christians. But what can you do?

We conquered a territory populated mainly by Muslims. and the Muslims are fighting us – so those defenses fall away. And look, now they are starting to talk about genocide. You have the [book] “Torah Hamelech” [King’s Torah]. which tells you that you can kill children if there is a reason to believe that one day they could cause harm. Now, if you killed someone’s entire family and left only him alive, he will indeed have a reason to cause harm. If you stole his lands, turned him into a refugee, tossed him to Jordan or Lebanon – he will indeed have a reason to cause harm. Many people said that the book’s arguments are not sound according to religious law, and so on and so forth, but no one really tackled it head-on. And it’s no wonder that it became a best seller. Because in general, what religious zionists actually want is for the Land of Israel to be for Jews only.

Now the situation for the Christians, on the other hand, will be really bad. [According to Judaism], they are idolaters, and you have to kill them even if they do not resist Jewish rule. In Jerusalem, religious seminary students have a despicable habit: they urinate or defecate on churches. If you go there and talk to the church staff, you’ll hear it from every church. Spitting on clergymen on the street is something that happens regularly. If the priest has the gall to hit the person back, to slap him or something similar, then he is deported quietly. They cancel his residence permit in the country. If you want to justify a pogrom, all you hae to do is say the words “missionary threat”.

And from that perspective, Christianity, which is the historical arch enemy of Judaism is going to get a serious beating once the religious zionists are in power. The Christian Fundamentalists who send them money apparently don’t understand what they’re dealing with. But you know, it’s really a case of “a pox on both your houses”.

End transcript

‘Christian’ fundamentalism originated from a subversive corruption of Anglicanism called ‘Dispensationalism’.

“Just say No” to conversations about ‘Blood Moons’ and Red Heifers.

Comments for “Historian Says Rothschilds are Chasid Puppets “

Wade said (November 8, 2015):


Pseudo Christian ministers, who are Zionists, put forward all manner of false doctrine to congregations and followers who do not know their Bible.

The claim that 144,000 will be taken to heaven is preposterous. The 144,000 are “SEALED IN THEIR FOREHEADS” in Revelation chapter 7. They are sealed specifically because they are not taken to heaven. They are left here on earth and the seal protects them from the wrath of God which begins at Revelation chapter 8 verse 1.

The claim from Jehovah witnesses that these 144,000 are from the gentile Christian population is equally preposterous. In the same chapter (Revelation chapter 7) we see a vast amount of people clothed in white robes standing before God. They are described as a number no man can count from every tribe, kindred, and race. They are also described as those who came out of great tribulation. The 144,000 are described (In Revelation chapter 7) as Sephardi Jews, 12,000 from each of the original 12 tribes. Their will be no gentiles in the 144,000. On the other hand their will be Jews in the number no man can count who stand before God in white robes.

People are too lazy to read their own Bible. And they are too gutless to challenge the false doctrines of their so called Christian leaders. As long as this phenomenon remains the masses will be fodder for Satan’s false prophets.

Tony B said (November 8, 2015):

Jews think they are God. This is the essence of their satanism.—-

“Schneerson believes Jews are the acme of Creation: “The general difference between Jews and non-Jews: A Jew was not created as a means for some [other] purpose; he himself is the purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to serve the Jews.”

“The important things are the Jews, because they do not exist for any [other] aim; they themselves are [the divine] aim.”

“The entire creation [of a non-Jew] exists only for the sake of the Jews.”
– end quotes.

This ludicrous summation of the “chosen people” actually goes further than just “chosen.” What this man is promoting is that these Jews are themselves God, not a creation of God. You will note that the word “creation” is completely absent from the statements about Jews except to say, in a very cunningly constructed sentence, not easily noticed by outsiders (whom they know will assume a different meaning), that Jews were “not created.”

But those non-Jews whom he says ARE created he claims they are created for any use for which this godhead style of Jews decide. This is self-love blasphemy beyond belief. It explains much of the world-wide mass murder of human beings in the last centuries and will be a swift ride to a very great fall along with the satanism which is behind it.

Tom said (November 8, 2015):

Your article ‘Historian Says Rothschilds are Chasid Puppets’ is very revealing.

What the Chabad Lubavitcher (talmudic) sect wants to ignore is, from the Old Testament:

Psalm 1.1

“Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful.”
and, Psalm 10.5

“He that putteth not out his money to usury, nor taketh reward against the innocent. He that doeth these things shall never be moved .” and from the New Testament,
Revelations 2.9

“I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”

Glen said (November 8, 2015):

If people would take the time to research, they would find Eggert is pretty much dead on with his analysis. I don’t know how many times so called “Christian” friends or co-workers have told me no matter what path we as humans take it will make no difference in the end.

The world must be destroyed as written in the books of Daniel (Old Testament) and Revelation (New Testament). Try as I may to argue the point that we as humans were given the gift of logic, and with that gift alone we should be able to guide our own destiny it inevitably falls on deaf ears. ‘It is written therefore it must be’ I am told. Funny these so called “Christ-Like” followers will do anything but follow his teachings.

We as humans should be in charge of our own destiny. We have the gift of thought and memory. Those two abilities alone should enable us to see through the fog of deception that is organized religion, whether it be Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Satanism, or Luciferianism. Until we learn the major religions were nothing more systems of control we will never be enlightened to the true meanings of the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth.

BN said (November 8, 2015):

Eggert is correct, and the Truth by the way, is in the BIBLE. since Adam’s fault, human kind DOES NOT live in a world OF GOD, therefore we are definitely in a satanic world, the current events on whatever scale actually emphasizes this fact, the good side of things is that a lot of people are awakening…the bad side is that there will be God’s Anger in the end, after humankind will have undergone a great deal of hardship during the antichrist period.

James C said (November 8, 2015):

Either it’s happening because biblical prophecy is 100% accurate, or it’s happening because “they are making it happen.” Either way it’s happening. My opinion is that the former alternative is correct: biblical prophecy is 100% accurate. All the forces involved in bringing about its fulfillment are merely bringing about their own destruction. Zionism is Antichrist; Zionism is a human attempt to accomplish everything the Messiah will do. Zionism is rejected by Torah-true Jews.

Fr. John said (September 7, 2008):

While much of what this gentleman says is spot on, his clearly antagonistic approach to ALL religion is also very much apparent. Therefore, I would not sign his petition, on the grounds that such vehement bigotry hides an ‘agenda’ all of his own.

Secondly, the accusations that Putin and Medvetev are not what they seem, are refuted by Orthodox Christians in Russia, who know better than the UTTERLY IGNORANT West, on this matter. Your one poster noted that Putin’s forebears were both named Spiridon; this is in honor of a GREEK Orthodox saint’s name, and is one that would NOT have been passed on in an atheist household, and that the female members of his family were named Mary in honor of the Theotokos. Hardly ‘party approved,’ wouldn’t you say?

Others have commented on this renaissance of ‘faith’ in Russia’s leaders, from sources much more trustworthy than ‘advice from psychics,’ etc.

Finally, the lumping together of what is spuriously called ‘Dominion Theology’ (in the body of this German Eggert’s petition) with the Dispensationalist heretics; such as van Impe, Hagee, et al. is as moronic as it could be. The Calvinist wing that created and brought to the forefront of Christian discourse the ‘Puritan theology of postmillenialism’ and its’ attendant “Christian Reconstruction” element, has LONG been utterly, diametrically opposed to the ‘two ways of salvation’ that lie behind all Zionist-friendly schemes of the Falwells, the Swaggarts, the Robertsons – in their assumption that ‘salvation is different for the Jews’. The “Dominion theology” folks utterly deny that.

A quick perusal of CR writers such as Gary North, Rousas Rushdoony, David Chilton, etc. show that they believe it is the VOLUNTARY coming to faith in Jesus Christ (of all men) that will affect personal change, that will bring about SOCIETAL change in short, the older progression of the Gospel in a nation’s culture is what will bring about ‘change,’ not some ‘top down’ forced conversion scenario!
(Shades of Obama!)

Please, Henry, when you write of religious matters, at least delineate the players and their attendant theological varieties, rather than lump them all together in an ‘us vs. them’ mindset!

Finally, as far as the Church’s view of the Antichrist, (and by “Church” I do NOT mean the Fallwells’ etc. school) I am sure you know this, but do your readers?

“The holy Fathers Irenaeus of Lyons (Against Heresies, Bk.V, Ch.30) and Hippolytus of Rome (Discourse on Christ and Antichrist), as well as Sts. Hilary of Poitiers, Ambrose of Milan, Blessed Jerome and Augustine of Hippo, maintain that Antichrist will be of Jewish Lineage, of the tribe of Dan. In the Synaxarion for Meatfare Sunday, we read: “Antichrist shall come and shall be born, as St. Hippolytus of Rome says, of a polluted woman, a supposed virgin, a Jewess of the tribe of Dan.” (Lenten Triodion, Moscow, Synodal Press, 1897, pp.30b-31a). (p.2-3)

“As the Lord was pleased to reveal Himself to all men as the Messiah in his triumphal entry into Jerusalem and its temple, so also will the Antichrist reveal himself as the false messiah of the Jews, the monarch of the whole world, in the Triumphal ceremony of his entrance into Jerusalem and his enthronement in the temple, which, by that time, will have been restored.” (p.3)

So, of all the races on the planet that are ‘guilty’ of fostering a desire for the Antichrist, should not ONE race alone take all the blame, especially when they created a ‘false flag’ nation in 1948, after having been divinely dispossessed of it for all time? And, if one people are assuming such heretical stances, do they truly, honestly have a ‘right to exist’ for their ‘crimes against humanity’, starting with Calvary? How deeply does one’s repudiation of a spurious race and religion allow one to admit wrongdoing? For that is the key to this whole apocalypticism of the modern apostate age……


Fr John +
Orthodox Priest

Andrew said (September 7, 2008):

I have first hand experience having spent time with Lubavitchers at the Chabad house at my college. It seems they have a network not unlike the Masons around the world. They are very well connected. It does appear that they have extraordinary funding for campus buildings and food to bribe students to attend their brainwashing Shabbos meetings. I once peaked in on a founders/organizers meeting and they were serving them primo food and can you believe it, Baron De Rothschild wine from the french vineyard (Very expensive wine I am told).

They bribe college kids on shabbos by offering free many course meals and alcohol (to underage students…red wine mostly and the Rabbi’s fruity mixed cocktails(vodka based I think). When everyone is eating and drinking like pigs at the trough, the rabbi goes into his schpiel that everyone (all jews) must return to Israel to await the return of Mosiach. I think that when some charasmatic leader of this sort comes, jews and christians will fight over him with Jews calling him Messiah and Fundamentalist Christians calling him Jesus.

Barack Obama could be like the next Martyr (Martin Luther King) in a good sense or Hitler in a bad sense if he breaks from his Illuminati programming. David Icke says that as people get older the may break from their programming like Kathy O’Brien. Compartmentalisation breaks down and these schizoid alters start to communicate back into one personality. Obama is still young so it is doubtful unless he is playing a game with his handlers like he is pretending to be a brainwashed sycophant when he really isn’t just to get to the top where he can carry out his own plans.

Food for thought…

S said (September 5, 2008):

Hi Henry,

Wolgang Eggert may not be correct about Putin’s background. It is true that on his father and grandfather were hard core Bolsheviks. In fact Putin’s father, Vladimir Spiridonovich Putin, was conscripted into the Soviet Navy, where he served in the submarine fleet in the early 1930s. His father subsequently served with the NKVD in a sabotage group during the Second World War …. His paternal grandfather, Spiridon Putin, had been Vladimir Lenin’s and Joseph Stalin’s personal cook.” (Wikipedia)

The position of a cook is no menial position – it shows that Putin’s grandfather was a highly trusted member of the inner circle. People like Lenin and Stalin have generally been paranoid about being poisoned.

However, his mother may be a different story. In fact, “Putin’s mother, Maria Ivanovna Putin, was from the Tver Region and also lived through the siege of Leningrad during World War II. Putin’s two elder brothers died young and his mother gave birth to him when she was 41. She was a deeply religious woman and had Putin secretly baptized by a Russian Orthodox priest” (source Xinhuahttp://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-10/14/content_2089835_3.htm)

It is interesting that Putin’s first child, a daughter, is also named Maria.

Putin was indeed hand picked by the oligarchs to lead Russia, but it appears that his symapthies are mixed. His conduct in jailing the Rothschild man Khodorovsky seems to bear this view out.

R said (September 5, 2008):

Henry, your latest cross-references with Albert Pike ‘prediction’ of three world wars.

It also ties in with recent predictions from my psychic friend.

I’ll briefly outline a few points for your consideration:

First, the book of Revelations talks of the anti-Christ initially being seen as peacemaker (at least I think it does, I’m no biblical scholar).

Well, now my psychic friend says a clash will begin in April next year [April 2009] It will start-off as a limited regional conflict, between Iran and Israel I suspect, however within 12-18 months it will escalate into a global clash, WWIII.

As my psychic friend puts it, it will start “slowly, slowly”.

He also says the Anti-Christ (Ahriman or satan incarnate as a man) will rise to prominence in the next 12 months or so.

Moreover, I suspect, this character may well emerge as some kind of negotiator after the initial clashes with Iran – a “peace-maker”. However his ‘peace’ deal, if any, will fail utterly with Russia and China entering the fray.

From that point on all hell will break loose.

My friend also says Putin is not what he seems. Although he does say that Ahmadinejad is “sincere”,which implies he’s being used to trigger this confrontation.

In other words Putin, the Chabad Lubavitcher sect and so-called Christians like Jack Van Impe and Timothy LaHaye are preparing for the entrance of this character. His debut on the world stage will be sanctified with the blood of millions of innocents who will die in this conflagration.

Truly diabolical.

Michael said (September 5, 2008):

Once again, thank you for the timely article and excellent insight into the agenda of our criminal banking masters.

I just wanted to add that, on a side note, I remember very well the Rebbe Menachem Schneerson both in the news, and the day of his funeral procession. I was living in Queens, NY at the time. My best friend was driving me along the Belt Parkway, from Brooklyn back to Queens, when the traffic came to a dead stop. After about 20 minutes of trying to figure out what’s going on, we finally tuned in to the news, and there was the announcement of traffic problems due to the Rebbe’s funeral procession. Even as the announcer was talking, we finally saw, along the service roads NEXT to the highway, first the arrival of hundreds and hundreds of police cars, ambulance, and fire trucks, followed but what seemed like an endless stream of cars! This funeral procession took over three hours to pass by. It was then followed up yet by MORE police cars and other emergency vehicles. The whole time my friend and I were wondering what would happen in case a real emergency came up, and all of our “protectors” were too busy protecting the corpse of this dead guy. Anyway, it was a real pain in the butt. All of us that were stuck in the PARKING LOT that was supposed to be a highway had nothing nice to say.

If I NEVER have to sit through such nonsense again it will be TOO SOON!

Thanks Michael

This illustrates the power these people have. -h

Tina said (September 5, 2008):

I will also sign Wolfgang Eggert’s petition because it is important that we don’t fall in the trap of the evangelists and many other cults out there. On one hand these cults claim that our lives are not pre-destined and on the other hand they live by the book of revelation.

I say that Armageddon is inevitable however it is obvious to any reasonable person that some in power, are trying to instigate it sooner. I believe that we have the capacity to hang in and change our destructive behaviour in the positive by following God’s Law, as we have the capacity to change our DNA by changing our bad habits.

I was told recently by someone belonging to a religious group that my fighting for justice and exposing those who are damaging us and damaging our country is harmful because, I am, in the eyes of some religious group, sinning for speaking out when I see things that affects all of us. Thus basically many cults including Buddhism, who is trying to persuade people to get rid of anger all together because it is claimed to be a negative emotion– wants us to put our head in the sand and be willfully blind to any of the injustice that we see occurring. — This would include yourself Henry, since your website is all about exposing and educating people.

Obviously I do not agree with the position that some religious group have taken however I do share the same belief as them., which is, I believe in God and I want this earth to be ruled by Him, however I am not prepared to go along with some of them who appear to be inducing a third world war.

Christine said (September 5, 2008):

Good Morning Henry,

It is ironic that Wolfgang Eggert feels threatened by Christian groups when they have no power whatsoever. He should read David Kuo’s book “Tempting Faith,” about his experience in the Bush White House. Here is an extract from an interview with Kuo:

“‘correspondent Lesley Stahl reports, he also says the White House was a place that cynically used religion for political ends and that White House aides ridiculed the very Christian leaders who helped bring Mr. Bush to office.

In his book, Kuo wrote that White House staffers would roll their eyes at evangelicals, calling them “nuts” and “goofy.”

Asked if that was really the attitude, Kuo tells Stahl, “Oh, absolutely. You name the important Christian leader and I have heard them mocked by serious people in serious places.”‘http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/14/60minutes/main2089778.shtml

Take care,

Anthony said (September 5, 2008):

Hello Henry,

An hour ago I was telling somebody about a newspaper article I read in the 70’s which described how “Christian” Armageddonists were trying to infiltrate the highest positions of US politics. When I read your article about Wolfgang Eggert and the Lubavitchers I could feel another penny dropping.

This high-level theatre is so well choreographed and predictable that it would be almost embarrassing to use as a plot for a fictional novel. I agree with you completely that Putin, Ahmadinejad, Chavez and others are simply stooges for the real powers behind the scenes.

The spiritual aspect of this becomes clearer with every move the bad guys make. It must be an evil, very powerful force that can corrupt so many influential men and women over centuries to betray their fellow man and even their own souls.

At the same time, I believe very strongly that their is a far greater force for good that will guide and protect us through whatever storms lie ahead. I also believe strongly that God has given each one of us the gift of free will to decide our own personal destiny. This gift is hard for many to comprehend, but I liken it to a loving parent who allows their child to go its own way in life.

These dark days are bringing out the best in many people. We’re seeing through the lies that have divided us for generations. Sex, race, religion, etc. are all secondary to our “heart condition”. I hope that the Muslims, Jews, Christians, Pagans, feminists, homosexuals who read your words will understand that they have all been duped by evil deceitful liars. We have a wonderful opportunity to redefine our priorities and reject the selfish, hateful materialistic path that much of mankind has been following. Let’s continue to expose the lies of the elite and their stooges.

Thank you Henry (and Wofgang!)

Troubled said (September 5, 2008):

I gotta say I like to read your writings.. However, a lot of this stuff is very depressing and hard to take in.. As an American Individual/Family Guy I can’t even think of a solution to these problems.. what is one to do in any of these crazy situations where I’m in the lower class living paycheck to paycheck 8-5. Guess that’s what the american dream is all about.. lot’s of work no vaca. sucking up to your boss, etc etc. .. Then I keep reading about the NWO and all that crap which all seems apparent due to recent events, ie. georgia (caspian basin pipeline) Dutch spies being pulled from Iran due to “imminent” attack. ….All the stuff about who “controls” the world (bankers) + descendents. What does it all add up to? I’m getting paranoid over here, and have no clue and I don’t want to be like the “sheeple” that I hear about. Stock up on non-perishable food, water & ammo and dig a bunker that I most likely won’t need? I’d like to live my life out & be succesful without all this paranoia so if you have any words of wisdom I would love to hear it. Thanks
Troubled American—

Dear TA,

Remember that things have always been this way and people have muddled through and had fulfilling lives. Take a few precautions and keep informed, but take breaks from the ‘net as well. This info should empower and liberate you, not spoil the good you have.



It’s Time to Strike At the Root

by Preston James


Yes, it’s time to strike at the Root Cause of all the Evil that has engulfed the United States of America Our Republic and most of the World.



The City of London Banksters have used their main Cutout the Federal Reserve System to engulf the whole World in a sinister Web-of-Debt of US Petro Dollars that has led to numerous continuing wars accompanied by mass-death, maimings and unimaginable human sufferings.

This Web-of-Debt and its related pernicious usury now threatens the well-being and economic survival of the whole World including America and “We The People”.

“There are a thousand people hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root.” —Famous quotation by Henry David Thoreau.

A very crafty Counterfeiting Scam run out of the City of London.

The counterfeiting scam is based on printing debt-notes presented as real currency, which must be repaid with pernicious accruing interest, that is, Americans pay huge amounts of their wealth for nothing, “for using what should be their own money” according to the US Constitution.

America has been asset stripped beyond imagination by a very crafty Counterfeiting Scam which is based on a very small and powerful group of Rothschild Banksters from the City of London Financial District hijacking the American Monetary Production and distribution System and pretending they are representing We The People when they are only scamming all Americans.

To give the reader and example of how vicious this asset stripping of the the American people has been, the Official figures of the General Accounting Office which reports to Congress but has no prosecutorial ability.

In 1981 the GAO reported that top 1% controlled 20% of the US economy, and the lower 99% controlled 80% of the economy. In June of 2012 the GAO reported that the top 400 men (which is far less than 1% of the population now controlled 95% of the economy which they accomplished in 31 years). Most of these 400 were either Banksters or associated with them. For specific names of the top twelve known as the “Commission” refer to Stew Webb’s website.

Thanks to the Internet, for the very first time Folks all over the World are now understanding how any Entity that controls the Manufacture and Distribution of Money is able to control the Top Policy-Makers in many nations and orchestrate History step by step.

And if this Entity that has control over most of the World’s monetary production and distribution systems  is notably Evil, it can do maximum damage to humanity because it has the money and accrued power to appoint and coerce Top Policy-Makers to enact a notably Evil Agenda on the World.

And if they have all the money they choose to issue at will, they can buy up and control the Major Mass Media and use it to dispense false narratives which effectively keep their crimes of State and incredible Evil hidden in plain sight.

Now for the first time in the last hundred years, the Worldwide Internet is creating a worldwide Consciousness and complete awareness of the Evil Power that the Rothschild private Zionist Banksters from the City of London and their main Cutout the Federal Reserve System have wrought against the World.


Thanks to the Worldwide Internet, the New Gutenberg Press, the Banksters Evil World Agenda has now been completely uncovered and is now in the Public Domain for all to study and know for the first time ever.

And it turns out this has happened and the Banksters Evil World Agenda is to asset strip the fruits of the labors of most humans, create continual wars in order to foment mass their deaths by the millions accompanied by incredible human pain, loss and suffering.

It is now known beyond any shadow of a reasonable doubt that this is all part of their Evil Agenda for the whole World.

And what is the Evil Agenda of the Rothschild City of London World Zionist Banksters, Insiders call the New Crusaders for their creation of Israel as their slave state, main action agent used to further their agenda and as their personal Masonic haven.

Without the support of naive Freemasons who want the fellowship, protection and jobs, the Rothschild Banksters could not have survived and held power this long.

And now these same Evil Banksters have deployed sophisticated means of Eugenics, soft-kill and hard kill against humanity designed to reduce the population of America and the World by 90%.

And now it is certain beyond any shadow of a reasonable doubt, that this Entity which has been in control of the Money Production and Distribution of most of the World since the 1800’s has either failed miserably in acting responsibly, or been the most evil, sinister group of men that ever walked the face of the Earth.

Major substantial evidence has been emerging for the last 100 years years now, especially the last ten that the latter is the case, that these Men who have been in control of most of the World’s production and distribution of FIAT money made from nothing have done so to gain more and more control over mankind so that they can attain their most Evil Agenda, an Agenda so Evil that it is unimaginable to most normal humans.

It is very difficult for this kind of truth to fit into a normal person’s consciousness because it is so bizarre, so inextricably Evil that only inhuman monsters would ever hold such an Agenda of Evil.

clip_image00120These World Banksters aka “the Moneychangers” have gained this control by their prolific use of pernicious usury and their imposition of debt-slavery on almost the whole World.

Rather than harness such incredible power over the People of the World for good, they have harnesses it and used it for grotesque, unimaginable Evil that is so deviant the average person just cannot fit it in to their head and has tended to reject such truth when Insiders have leaked it.

They have created the money which was supposed to owned by the nations using it, illegally lent it to them, and then charged them onerous illegal interest for folks using what should have been their own money in the first place.

Inside America these Rothschild controlled Banksters AKA the private Federal Reserve System, have hoodwinked the masses and had an easy time controlling Congress through an unlimited elastic checkbook filled with unlimited issuing of money with no real backing, that is no Gold, no Silver nothing but more Debt-notes and promises to pay with more debt-notes, each of which must be paid back with accrued pernicious interest.

In the United States of America these crimes of the Banksters are easily discernible because they are crystal clear violations of the US Constitution, Common Law and now RICO law which provides some real teeth necessary to take down these greatest financial fraudsters in history.

All we need is an honest US Department of Justice which has been compromised ever since 1913 when these City of London Banksters took over the American Monetary Production and distribution system and set up illegal practices including pernicious usury charged to We The People for using what was still actually our own money.

All this is covered in the article PuppetGate from which the following descriptive drawing is taken from:


These City of London Banksters aka the Rothschild World Zionists have been a very crafty bunch.


US Dollars are no longer backed by Gold or Silver or anything but lots  more Debt-notes and “house-of-cards” derivative systems.

The US Dollar is a Debt-Note which you promise to pay back in principal and accrued interest, yes the Federal Reserve System fraudulently issues our money to us and charges we must pay back the principal and the interest to them.

This is the biggest fraud in history.

The private Federal Reserve System started out in America using US Currency backed by Gold and Silver. In progressive steps they removed the backing and converted the US Money to strictly paper debt-notes backed by nothing but access to future tax collections from We The People which have not become incredibly limited compared to the phony kited-up so-called deficit.

Technically, We The People cannot legally be charged to use our own money, for such to occur is massive Financial Fraud to which there is no statute of limitations.

And if the Federal Reserve System issues Our Own Money then we can take it back anytime we want and seize all their accrued assets which were taken by fraud in the first place.

The US Federal Reserve System is a private bank franchised from the City of London Rothschild Banksters.

297348_2536384613812_1390184655_n2And of course as many realize the Federal Reserve System, little more than the largest franchisee and Cutout of the City of London Private Rothschild Banksters, has issued so many debt-notes that the whole world is now engulfed in their Web-of-Debt which has actually diluted the value of the US Dollar (USD) to the point when all the USDs go into play they are essentially going to be worthless.

The US Dollar loses Gold and Silver backing and becomes the US Petro Dollar and the World’s Reserve Currency, but that is all coming to a sudden catastrophic end.

End of the hegemony of the Petrodollar system?At the time the USD was taken off of the Gold standard completely in 1971, President Nixon at the urging of Heinz Kissinger was able to negotiate that all Mideast oil Sales (and all world Oil sales) be made using the USD.

This established the US Petro Dollar as the World’s exchange currency and then all the Banksters had to do to create their worldwide Web-of-Debt was to radically increase the amount of USD in circulation.

Once the most of the World was caught up in this Web-of-Debt from their massive holdings of US Petro Dollars, many felt trapped. The Mideast nations had made an agreement to spend many of their massive oil earning buying American products, especially expensive defense related armaments.

What they got in exchange for supporting the US Petro Dollar System was a promise to be protected along with Israel which is the personal action-agent nation state established by the Rothschild family for their own World Zionist haven and location of the World Ruler they have planned to appoint for centuries.

Most of the World now wants out of the Rothschild/Federal Reserve System Web-of-Debt and the BRICS Development has arisen as a suitable counter-measure.

brics-logo-320x116Now that so many nations realize that they have been caught up in this pernicious worldwide Web-of-Debt of the Rothschilds, they have have been working hard to find solutions to free themselves from this debt-slavery without completely crashing out their economies forever, which has been the Rothschild’s built in system protection.

This rejection of the US Petro Dollar has already happened in some nations who have started the BRICS Development Bank. Unless Americans wake up and deliver justice to put the Federal Reserve System out of Business and fully prosecute its owners and chief officers the whole World will eventually turn against We The People and blame us for the massive Evil the Federal Reserve System has unleashed on the World as agents of the Rothschild City of London Banksters.

indexAnd when the financial bubble created by the Rothschild Banksters popped in Iceland in 2008 like it did in America,  the Icelandic Legislators prosecuted and jailed some of the top Banksters and granted mortgage forgiveness to almost every homeowner with a mortgage in Iceland because of fraudulent banking practices.

This action to enforce the financial fraud and counterfeiting laws in Iceland were the opposite of what was done in America because the American US Department of Justice was completely compromised and corrupted with all honest Federal Prosecutors either driven out or dis-empowered by the Banksters and their Cutout and kingpins.

And it was announced that even in England, home of the City of London Financial District where the Rothschild’s Banksters run their system out of, has now organized talks on how money is manufactured and distributed and if it is being done effectively.

This is an historical first and shows that everybody around the whole World has had enough of the Rothschild’s unimaginable evil imposed on them. Some believe that a few of the more sensitive Bankers in the UK who are shareholders of the Bank of England are getting afraid of the coming pitchforks and are attempting to come clean and be part of an equitable solution.

YouTube – Veterans Today –

The solution that 137 nations have selected, many more coming all the time is to establish their own Development Bank called the BRICS Development Bank (which will eventually operated without the use of any Rothschild produced money especially the US Petro Dollar). Some of the nations which have joined the BRICS have already started direct trading of oil, natural gas and other commodities without the use of any Rothschild manufactured money or use of the US Petro Dollar.

Numerous economists have claimed that this shift to BRICS will eventually doom the US Petro Dollar and probably bring the Rothschild Central FIAT Banks and Federal Reserve System into complete collapse. The purpose of the BRICS is to decouple now before this collapse takes them with it. Once this Rothschild Debt Bomb is detonated it could easily take America back into the stone age the collapse would be so total and so devastating.

The clear solution is to strike at the Rothschild/Federal Reserve System root now and enforce ALL the valid laws and the Constitution of United States of America our Republic.


This means we need to reconstitute the US Department of Justice. The most corrupt Attorney general in the history of America has resigned but hasn’t left office yet. He should be hauled off in leg shackles and cuffs for his Treason, Sedition and RICO crimes running protection for the Banksters and all their PuppetMasters, like the two that tried to shake down Lee Wanta for 30 Billions Dollars and then conspired to murder him.

There has been substantial evidence provided to Eric Holder of all the fraud of the Banksters related to the Mortgage Bubble and all he did was extract minimal “normal cost of doing business” proportionally small fines from these major Wall Street banks who defrauded millions of homeowners and sucked USG mortgage insurance programs dry. And now the evidence of his part in the criminal coverup is his new job at Morgan Banks for an annual salary of 77 million USD. This is a slap in every American’s face and must be mitigated by his prosecution and arrest under RICO and numerous other valid US Statutes.

What exactly is the unimaginably Evil Agenda of the Rothschild Banksters and their Kingpins, Cutouts andPuppetMasters?

imagesWhat is the incredible Evil that these Banksters have created and unleashed on the world to further their Agenda which is now known to be a completely Anti-human Agenda?

Their Agenda is now known because Insiders have leaked accurate information that the Agenda of these World Banksters is to minister mass painful death and destruction, repeated major wars and now perpetual wars, and a program of sinister practices of programmed Eugenics, mass Mind-Kontrol by ultra high-tech Psychotronics, accompanied by massive soft-kill and hard-kill programs.

Many now wonder how such a few Men were able to get control over the most of the World’s Monetary Production and Distribution and have been able to hijack History. But an even more difficult matter to understand is why such men just happen to be the most Evil creatures that ever walked the face of the earth caring only for themselves and their anti-human mass Death and Human suffering Agenda.


If an entity or person is so evil they will pay to murder any dissenter or whistle-blower that tries to make the Public aware of their immense evil, these perps can amass tremendous wealth with which they can buy almost every single Politicians and Federal judge.


The answer that has emerged from insiders at the periphery of this group is that it is their absolute evil and complete criminal psychopathology that has enabled them to kill anyone who got in their way, if they couldn’t buy them off first. It is their absolute evil and complete lack of feeling for any other persons that has enabled them to be absolutely ruthless in their lust for more and more Gold, Silver, and precious metals and complete control over mankind and all his institutions of government.

These are the most powerful, richest men in the World and undoubtedly by far the most evil that ever lived. It is their absolute Evil, lack of any workable conscience and complete lust for wealth and power that drives these men and makes it possible for them to create all the wars, mass painful deaths and maimings of war, starvations and endemic corruption that plagues most nations caught in their worldwide Web-of-Debt.

Once the World’s top Military Commanders and soldiers who are not part of their Occult Circles understand this, they will of course began to make plans to strike at the root of all this Hell on Earth.

Because the Rothschild run occult circles and this provides legions of those who protect them, many innocently naive about what these masonic organization really represent.

Once the lower ranked Freemasons find out that the very top Freemason refer to them as the “unwashed”, and “porch monkeys” and claim that they are all told inaccuracies to protect the real Secrets of their Craft and that these very top Masonic leaders have a completely evil agenda to destroy almost all of the human race, they will abandon Freemasonry in droves. It has been known for years that Freemasonry has been used for cover and for a means to exert control by the Rothschilds and their Federal Reserve System.

Once they realize they have been duped by those that intend to  mass murder them and their families and take everything they have worked for they will wake up and get free.

What needs to be done for We The People to take back control over what should be their own Monetary Production and Distribution System?

1-Eric Holder needs to be indicted and arrested under RICO and hauled off in leg shackles and chains. He needs to be made an example of never to use the US Department of Justice to cover up the crimes against We The People by the Banksters.

Capture2-The Rats Nest of corruption at US Department of Justice and the FBI needs to be completely cleaned out and numerous top officials and agents fired, many must be arrested under RICO for numerous prior crimes including coverups, cointelpro crimes, harassments and even murders of whistle-blowers, and some must be arrested for Treason for serving an foreign power such as Israel instead of honoring their Oath of Office to We The People and the Constitution.

3-The PuppetMasters, that is folks like the Two that tried to shake Ambassador Lee Wanta down for 30 Billion Dollars must be arrested under Rico, some for Treason for serving an foreign power such as Israel instead of honoring their Oath of Office to We The People and the Constitution.

4-If the US Department of Justice and the notably corrupt FBI cannot be cleaned up and immediately start doing their job, indicting Banksters for massive counterfeiting and financial fraud, then the US Military must step in because over 90% of Congress and five Supreme Court Judges have been bribed and/or completely compromised.

5-Many in Congress need to be arrested under RICO and espionage laws for aiding foreign entities in their espionage against America (Rothschild Banksters and their Federal Reserve System). Do not expect Congress to do anything because they are almost completely bought, owned, bribed and compromised (with between 39and 42% pedophiles according to prior investigations).

6-Give the Banksters 48 hours to reports to their nearest US Magistrate to surrender after a quick indictment, otherwise go after them with the US Marshals, the Provost Marshals assisted by the First and Fifth US Armies and navy Seal Teams.

7-Indict the Rothschilds and order them to return all the Gold, Silver and other assets they defrauded and stole from America. Given them 48 hours to make arrangements to surrender themselves and it. Then if they don’t comply, attack and subdue them with the full force of the US Military.

8-Using RICO and espionage laws, arrest all members and assets of the Bush Crime Cabal (BCC) and the International Zionist Crime Syndicate (IZCS) and all AIPAC officers and any other related groups members who have been buying, bribing, coercing and blackmailing Members of the US Congress and the USG and Federal Judges. Force all Israeli espionage fronts like AIPAC, the ADL, Bnai Brith to register as agents of foreign influence and espionage against America.

9-Fire and arrest all Federal Judges who have been corrupted by either the BCC or the IZCS using seized NSA raw Intel data including all phone tap evidence which clearly shows such corruption.

10-Arrest the secret CIA which is the center of the Bush Crime Cabal and which has been running massive private armies and terrorists to start wars (as under ISIS/ISIL cover in Iraq and Syria now) and which trafficks in massive amounts of illegal narcotics and illegal weapons.

11-Outlaw any Dual, triple or multiple Citizenship and deport any who have served another nation first, no exceptions. Make the rest take a loyalty oath  to the US Constitution and our Republic the USA and forbid them from ever holding any American public office ever.

12-Immediately declare the Federal Reserve System a RICO criminal enterprise specializing in financial fraud, theft of taxpayers assets, and is the largest Counterfeiting operation in History and the source of all wars and the mass suffering of many Americans, especially American Soldiers who they betrayed and used as mere cannon fodder. Their blood cries out from the ground for revenge and may it be granted asap.

13-Seize and federalize the Federal Reserve System, make it an asset of the USA and claw back all it profits, assets and all assets of those owners who gained from it. If they are foreigners go after them where ever they are and bring them back one way or another.

14-Immediately cancel all fraudulent elections such as any Bush because of the Preston Bush (Scherf) immunity agreement and immediately rescind all laws which Congress passed or any court concocted which are clearly Unconstitutional and Illegal. Congress cannot pass a law to break another pre-existing valid law.


15-Immediately rescind the Federal Income Tax which was never properly ratified and immediately re-install Glass-Stegall. there will be so much money, gold and assets clawed back from the Banksters that there will be plenty of money for a long time.

16-Immediately enforce all Antitrust Laws and break up the Controlled Major Mass media comprised of six major international news corporations. Prosecute their key officers and owners under US espionage laws since they are either owned or controlled by agents of the Rothschilds.

17-Provide Ambassador Wanta his money and allow him to complete his Agenda to rebuild,revitalize and re-industrialize America and build his inter-coastal High Speed Maglev Railroad System which will produce an immediate 2 million good paying job opportunities. Offer him job as a top USG economic adviser.

18-Set up a new Congress made up of We The People and restrict terms to one term only and set up rigid rules preventing revolving door jobs used for bribery. Until a new honest Congress can be elected, the US Military High Command will be responsible for running all governmental matters.

19-Immediately prosecute all major Defense Contractor CEOs and Officers under RICO who have bribed Congress or offered extremely lucrative revolving door jobs promised to Members of Congress to induce cooperation.


20-Immediately cut off all US foreign aid and any US Dollars flowing to Israel which is a purely Freemasonic state set up by the Rothschilds as their own personal haven, main action-agent, and means to start wars and destabilize the Mideast and foment false-flag terror. Any American financial support of Israel is an international crime against the Palestinians to support the Israeli Apartheid and mass-murder/genocide against Palestinians. Europe and most of the World is now divesting and turning against Israel for this Apartheid, mass-murder and genocide against Palestinians and massive theft of their land in complete violation of numerous UN Rulings. And every day, more and more Americans are finding out Israel with the help of the BCC, IZCS and Traitors in the JCS, USAF, NORAD and the FCC attacked America on 9/11/01 by deploying “decommissioned” nukes stolen from the US nuclear arsenal.

21-Set up Peoples Grand Juries all over the USA run by We The People and not sidetracked by compromised, crooked prosecutors. Make sure that every single Jury is instructed of their right to nullify any charges they think are wrong and any judge who ever tries to stop this right of any juror or refuses to inform them of jury nullification shall be immediately arrested for obstruction of justice.

Note: Readers can create their own list, perhaps taking this list as a starter and adding to it. Hundreds of creative things can be done to “Strike at the Root” including sharing this story will all your family, your trusted friends and associates and numerous other constructive and legal actions such as mass campaigns with calls to the Whitehouse, Congress and the US Department of Justice. It’s a fact that the current Internet users that read articles like this are the brightest and the best students of USG corruption in history. If the public wakes up in mass, a firestorm of dissent can be imposed on this criminal system and they can be brought down.



Right now the USA is on the brink of total financial collapse and like most of the World has been caught up in a massive Web-of-Debt created by the US Congress and the elastic checkbook of phony FIAT dollars provided to them by  the Federal Reserve System, the greatest fraud in history. Unless this shell game is stopped soon this worldwide Debt-Bomb will detonate and could take the USA back to the stone-age.

And America is now fighting a secret Civil War in Iraq and Syria against ISIS/ISIL, which is a BCC/IZCS controlled CIA paramilitary group being supplied by a criminal portion of the US Military. This secret army is army made up of American purchased Mercenaries with support from Israel, the Saudis and others and is called Al Qaeda 2 aka “Al CIA Duh” version 2 by insiders who know all the details.

The rest of the World has already figured this out, that the Rothschild System and their chief Cutout the Federal Reserve System has generated a phony money Debt-Bomb comprised of a worldwide Web-of-Debt and is now working to de-couple from the Rothschilds and their Federal Reserve System. The Banksters are attempting to counteract this by goading President Putin and Russia into a nuclear WW3 which would provide suitable cover and advance their plan to mass-murder up to 90% of the World Populace and aid their installation of their NWO Ruler in Jerusalem, which was the same dream of the Teutonic Zionists aka the First Crusaders. The Rothschilds are viewed as the New Crusaders by Intel Insiders for their obsession with acquiring control over Jerusalem and all of Palestine and the setting up of their own private nation state called Israel in 1947.

If the Federal Reserve System and all the USG Officials and elected Officials it has corrupted are not stopped with many arrested under RICO and US espionage laws, the rest of the World has started de-coupling enough to probably survive any Debt-Bomb detonation. But unless these Banksters are stopped cold now, it is America and Americans that will suffer complete economic and financial collapse, accompanied by mass-starvation, internal civil war and mass death, all for nothing. For years starvation was the secret and official policy of the Banksters and their Kingpins, Cutouts and Top Policy-Makers. Now Population Reduction of Americans by 90% is the new goal of the Banksters.


Rather than allow our American families and children and countrymen to be destroyed as pawn in the Rothschild’s system of hatred for all Mankind, why not all work together to publicize what they have done to defraud America since 1913 and work together to route them out and bring them to justice? You can bet the rest of the World is going to do so some day, but why should be allow them to destroy America and Our people first?

1195437989469106298liftarn_Police_brutality_svg_hiAnd here is a suggestion for all Police Officers and their superiors. Be very careful to make sure you are known in your communities as being there to Protect and Serve the Community, rather than acting like Agents of a Criminal State or being there only to protect the Banksters and their criminal establishment.

If your citizens see you as an Agent of the State, part of a militarized machine built up by the same traitors that started DHS who work for a foreign power, you and your officers will likely be attacked as agents of the State when and if TSHTF.

If you act like you only work for DHS and are willing to oppress your citizenry with the enforcement of Unconstitutional laws and continue to misuse Swat Teams as many departments have, many will see you as the enemy and will act accordingly when TSHTF which in practical means many will target and fight your Officers who will be greatly outgunned and outnumbered, if everything collapses from the Debt Bomb becoming detonated. Start now and work hard to establish friendly, positive relationships with your citizens and let them know you work for them to Protect and Serve them, and then act like it.

It’s time for We The People at all levels to rise up and support our new High Militarily Command and demand that they strike at the root of the greatest financial fraud in History that has been parasitizing the United States of America since 1913. yes, it time for the Rothschilds and their Federal Reserve System to be taken down and for America to reabsorb all Federal Reserve System functions back into our own Government, where it should have always remained in the first place ass was the core belief of President Andrew Jackson.


For those who have time and want some soul healing entertainment, here is a performance by Beth Hart and primo guitarist Joe Bonamassa that is pretty amazing and about as powerful as you will ever hear. It is suggested you use a good headset or headphones if you have them and set your video to HD 1080 if you have that capability.

YouTube – Veterans Today –

Judaism – The Truth about the Talmud

A Documented Exposé of Jewish racist Hate Literature

By Michael Hoffman, foremost scholar of Judaism in the English-speaking world


Copyright ©2000-2006 by Michael A. Hoffman II All Rights Reserved


Jewish soldiers read their holy scriptures

Israeli soldiers reading from the Jewish Holy Scriptures.
What is it they contain that inspires them to such atrocities?




The Talmud is Judaism’s holiest book (actually a collection of books). Its authority takes precedence over the Old Testament in Judaism. Evidence of this may be found in the Talmud itself, Erubin 21b (Soncino edition): “My son, be more careful in the observance of the words of the Scribes than in the words of the Torah (Old Testament).”

The supremacy of the Talmud over the Bible in the Israeli state may also be seen in the case of the black Ethiopian Jews. Ethiopians are very knowledgeable of the Old Testament. However, their religion is so ancient it pre-dates the Scribes’ Talmud, of which the Ethiopians have no knowledge. According to the N.Y. Times of Sept. 29, 1992, p.4:

“The problem is that Ethiopian Jewish tradition goes no further than the Bible or Torah; the later Talmud and other commentaries that form the basis of modern traditions never came their way.”

Because they are not traffickers in Talmudic tradition, the black Ethiopian Jews are discriminated against and have been forbidden by the Zionists to perform marriages, funerals and other services in the Israeli state.

Rabbi Joseph D. Soloveitchik is regarded as one of the most influential rabbis of the 20th century, the “unchallenged leader” of Orthodox Judaism and the top international authority on halakha (Jewish religious law). Soloveitchik was responsible for instructing and ordaining more than 2,000 rabbis, “an entire generation” of Jewish leadership.

N.Y. Times religion reporter Ari Goldman described the basis of the rabbi’s authority:

“Soloveitchik came from a long line of distinguished Talmudic scholars…Until his early 20s, he devoted himself almost exclusively to the study of the Talmud…He came to Yeshiva University’s Elchanan Theological Seminary where he remained the pre-eminent teacher in the Talmud…He held the title of Leib Merkin professor of Talmud…sitting with his feet crossed in front of a table bearing an open volume of the Talmud.” (N.Y. Times, April 10, 1993, p. 38).

Nowhere does Goldman refer to Soloveitchik’s knowledge of the Bible as the basis for being one of the leading authorities on Jewish law.

The rabbi’s credentials are all predicated upon his mastery of the Talmud. Other studies are clearly secondary. Britain’s Jewish Chronicle of March 26, 1993 states that in religious school (yeshiva), Jews are “devoted to the Talmud to the exclusion of everything else.”

The Talmud Nullifies the Bible

The Jewish Scribes claim the Talmud is partly a collection of traditions Moses gave them in oral form. These had not yet been written down in Jesus’ time. Christ condemned the traditions of the Mishnah (early Talmud) and those who taught it (Scribes and Pharisees), because the Talmud nullifies the teachings of the Holy Bible.

Shmuel Safrai in The Literature of the Sages Part One (p.164), points out that in chapters 4 and 5 of the Talmud’s Gittin Tractate, the Talmud nullifies the Biblical teaching concerning money-lending: “Hillel decreed the prozbul for the betterment of the world. The prozbul is a legal fiction which allows debts to be collected after the Sabbatical year and it was Hillel’s intention thereby to overcome the fear that money-lenders had of losing their money.”

The famous warning of Jesus Christ about the tradition of men that voids Scripture (Mark 7:1-13), is in fact, a direct reference to the Talmud, or more specifically, the forerunner of the first part of it, the Mishnah, which existed in oral form during Christ’s lifetime, before being committed to writing. Mark chapter 7, from verse one through thirteen, represents Our Lord’s pointed condemnation of the Mishnah.

Unfortunately, due to the abysmal ignorance of our day, the widespread “Judeo-Christian” notion is that the Old Testament is the supreme book of Judaism. But this is not so. The Pharisees teach for doctrine the commandments of rabbis, not God.

The Talmudic commentary on the Bible is their supreme law, and not the Bible itself. That commentary does indeed, as Jesus said, void the laws of God, not uphold them. As students of the Talmud, we know this to be true.

Jewish scholar Hyam Maccoby, in Judaism on Trial, quotes Rabbi Yehiel ben Joseph: “Further, without the Talmud, we would not be able to understand passages in the Bible…God has handed this authority to the sages and tradition is a necessity as well as scripture. The Sages also made enactments of their own…anyone who does not study the Talmud cannot understand Scripture.”

There is a tiny Jewish sect which makes considerable effort to eschew Talmud and adhere to the Old Testament alone. These are the Karaites, a group which, historically, has been most hated and severely persecuted by orthodox Jewish rabbinate.

To the Mishnah the rabbis later added the Gemara (rabbinical commentaries). Together these comprise the Talmud. There are two versions, the Jerusalem Talmud and the Babylonian Talmud.

The Babylonian Talmud is regarded as the authoritative version: “The authority of the Babylonian Talmud is also greater than that of the Jerusalem Talmud. In cases of doubt the former is decisive.” (R.C. Musaph-Andriesse, From Torah to Kabbalah: A Basic Introduction to the Writings of Judaism, p. 40).

This study is based on the Jewish-authorized Babylonian Talmud. We have published herein the authenticated sayings of the Jewish Talmud. Look them up for yourself.

We publish the following irrefutable documentation in the hope of liberating all people, including Jewish people, from the corrosive delusions and racism of this Talmudic hate literature, which is the manual of Orthodox and Hasidic Jews the world over.

The implementation by Jewish supremacists of Talmudic hate literature has caused untold suffering throughout history and now, in occupied Palestine, it is used as a justification for the mass murder of Palestinian civilians. The Talmud specifically defines all who are not Jews as non-human animals.


Some Teachings of the Jewish Talmud

Where a Jew Should Do Evil

Moed Kattan 17a: If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.

Penalty for Disobeying Rabbis

Erubin 21b. Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.

Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God

Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (gentile) hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.

O.K. to Cheat Non-Jews

Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile (“Cuthean”) the wages owed him for work.

Jews Have Superior Legal Status

Baba Kamma 37b. “If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite…the payment is to be in full.”

Jews May Steal from Non-Jews

Baba Mezia 24a . If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile (“heathen”) it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b). Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who “marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean…”

Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews

Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a gentile (“Cuthean”), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.

Baba Kamma 37b. The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has “exposed their money to Israel.”

Jews May Lie to Non-Jews

Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies (“subterfuges”) to circumvent a Gentile.

Non-Jewish Children are Sub-Human

Yebamoth 98a. All gentile children are animals.

Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.

Abodah Zarah 22a-22b . Gentiles prefer sex with cows.

Insults Against Blessed Mary

Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus’ mother was a whore: “She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.” Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the “uncensored” text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother, “Miriam the hairdresser,” had sex with many men.


Gloats over Christ Dying Young

A passage from Sanhedrin 106 gloats over the early age at which Jesus died: “Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was?–He replied: It is not actually stated but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old.”


Jesus in the Talmud:

Horrible Blasphemies Against Jesus Christ

While it is the standard disinformation practice of apologists for the Talmud to deny that it contains any scurrilous references to Jesus Christ, certain Orthodox Jewish organizations are more forthcoming and admit that the Talmud not only mentions Jesus but disparages him (as a sorcerer and a demented sex freak). These orthodox Jewish organizations make this admission perhaps out of the belief that Jewish supremacy is so well-established in the modern world that they need not concern themselves with adverse reactions.

For example, on the website of the Orthodox Jewish Hasidic Lubavitch group–one of the largest in the world–we find the following statement, complete with Talmudic citations:

“The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of ‘Jesus the Nazarene’:

1) He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).

2) He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).

3) He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform miracles, used procedures that involved cutting his flesh, which is also explicitly banned in the Bible (Shabbos 104b).

End quote from http://www.noahide.com/yeshu.htm (Lubavitch website) June 20, 2000.

[Note: we have printed and preserved in our files a hard copy of this statement from the Lubavitch”Noah’s Covenant Website,” as it appeared on their website at http://www.noahide.com on June 20, 2000, in the event that denials are later issued and the statement itself suppressed].

Let us examine further some of these anti-Christ Talmud passages:

Gittin 57a. Says Jesus is in hell, being boiled in “hot excrement.”

Sanhedrin 43a. Says Jesus (“Yeshu” and in Soncino footnote #6, Yeshu “the Nazarene”) was executed because he practiced sorcery: “It is taught that on the eve of Passover Jesus was hung, and forty days before this the proclamation was made: Jesus is to be stoned to death because he has practiced sorcery and has lured the people to idolatry…He was an enticer and of such thou shalt not pity or condone.”

Kallah 51a.”The elders were once sitting in the gate when two young lads passed by; one covered his head and the other uncovered his head. Of him who uncovered his head Rabbi Eliezer remarked that he is a bastard. Rabbi Joshua remarked that he is the son of a niddah (a child conceived during a woman’s menstrual period). Rabbi Akiba said that he is both a bastard and a son of a niddah.

“They said, ‘What induced you to contradict the opinion of your colleagues?’ He replied, “I will prove it concerning him.” He went to the lad’s mother and found her sitting in the market selling beans.

“He said to her, ‘My daughter, if you will answer the question I will put to you, I will bring you to the world to come.’ (eternal life). She said to him, ‘Swear it to me.’

“Rabbi Akiba, taking the oath with his lips but annulling it in his heart, said to her, ‘What is the status of your son?’ She replied, ‘When I entered the bridal chamber I was niddah (menstruating) and my husband kept away from me; but my best man had intercourse with me and this son was born to me.’ Consequently the child was both a bastard and the son of a niddah.

“It was declared, ‘..Blessed be the God of Israel Who Revealed His Secret to Rabbi Akiba…”

In addition to the theme that God rewards clever liars, the preceding Talmud discussion is actually about Jesus Christ (the bastard boy who “uncovered his head” and was conceived in the filth of menstruation). The boy’s adulterous mother in this Talmud story is the mother of Christ, Blessed Mary (called Miriam and sometimes, Miriam the hairdresser, in the Talmud).

“The Editio Princeps of the complete Code of Talmudic Law, Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah — replete not only with the most offensive precepts against all Gentiles but also with explicit attacks on Christianity and on Jesus (after whose name the author adds piously, ‘May the name of the wicked perish’)… –Dr. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 21.

“The Talmud contains a few explicit references to Jesus…These references are certainly not complimentary…There seems little doubt that the account of the execution of Jesus on the eve of Passover does refer to the Christian Jesus…The passage in which Jesus’ punishment in hell is described also seems to refer to the Christian Jesus. It is a piece of anti-Christian polemic dating from the post-70 CE period…” –Hyam Maccoby, Judaism on Trial,pp. 26-27.

“According to the Talmud, Jesus was executed by a proper rabbinical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to idolatry, and contempt of rabbinical authority. All classical Jewish sources which mention his execution are quite happy to take responsibility for it; in the talmudic account the Romans are not even mentioned.

“The more popular accounts–which were nevertheless taken quite seriously–such as the notorious Toldot Yeshu are even worse, for in addition to the above crimes they accuse him of witchcraft. The very name ‘Jesus’ was for Jews a symbol of all that is abominable and this popular tradition still persists…

“The Hebrew form of the name Jesus–Yeshu–was interpreted as an acronym for the curse, ‘may his name and memory be wiped out,’ which is used as an extreme form of abuse. In fact, anti-zionist Orthodox Jews (such as Neturey Qarta) sometimes refer to Herzl as ‘Herzl Jesus’ and I have found in religious zionist writings expressions such as “Nasser Jesus” and more recently ‘Arafat Jesus.” –Dr. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, pp. 97- 98, 118.

Talmud Attacks Christians and Christian Books

Rosh Hashanah 17a. Christians (minnim) and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.

Sanhedrin 90a. Those who read the New Testament (“uncanonical books”) will have no portion in the world to come.

Shabbath 116a. Jews must destroy the books of the Christians, i.e. the New Testament.

Dr. Israel Shahak of Hebrew University reports that the Israelis burned hundreds of New Testament Bibles in occupied Palestine on March 23, 1980 (cf.Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 21).


Sick and Insane Teachings of the Talmud

Gittin 69a . To heal his flesh a Jew should take dust that lies within the shadow of an outdoor toilet, mix with honey and eat it.

Shabbath 41a. The law regulating the rule for how to urinate in a holy way is given.

Yebamoth 63a. States that Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals in the Garden of Eden.

Yebamoth 63a. Declares that agriculture is the lowest of occupations.

Sanhedrin 55b. A Jew may marry a three year old girl (specifically, three years “and a day” old).

Sanhedrin 54b. A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old.

Kethuboth 11b. “When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.”

Yebamoth 59b. A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a Jewish priest. A woman who has sex with a demon is also eligible to marry a Jewish priest.

Abodah Zarah 17a. States that there is not a whore in the world that the Talmudic sage Rabbi Eleazar has not had sex with. On one of his whorehouse romps, Rabbi Eleazar leanred that there was one particular prostitute residing in a whorehouse near the sea, who would receive a bag of money for her services. He took a bag of money and went to her, crossing seven rivers to do so. During their intercourse the prostitute farted. After this the whore told Rabbi Eleazar: “Just as this gas will never return to my anus, Rabbi Eleazar will never get to heaven.”

Hagigah 27a. States that no rabbi can ever go to hell.

Baba Mezia 59b. A rabbi debates God and defeats Him. God admits the rabbi won the debate.

Gittin 70a. The Rabbis taught: “On coming from a privy (outdoor toilet) a man should not have sexual intercourse till he has waited long enough to walk half a mile, because the demon of the privy is with him for that time; if he does, his children will be epileptic.”

Gittin 69b. To heal the disease of pleurisy (“catarrh”) a Jew should “take the excrement of a white dog and knead it with balsam, but if he can possibly avoid it he should not eat the dog’s excrement as it loosens the limbs.”

Pesahim 111a. It is forbidden for dogs, women or palm trees to pass between two men, nor may others walk between dogs, women or palm trees. Special dangers are involved if the women are menstruating or sitting at a crossroads.

Menahoth 43b-44a. A Jewish man is obligated to say the following prayer every day: Thank you God for not making me a gentile, a woman or a slave.


Tall Tales of a Roman Holocaust

Here are two early “Holocaust” tales from the Talmud: Gittin 57b. Claims that four billion Jews were killed by the Romans in the city of Bethar. Gittin 58a claims that 16 million Jewish children were wrapped in scrolls and burned alive by the Romans. (Ancient demography indicates that there were not 16 million Jews in the entire world at that time, much less 16 million Jewish children or four billion Jews).


A Revealing Admission

Abodah Zarah 70a. The question was asked of the rabbi whether wine stolen in Pumbeditha might be used or if it was defiled, due to the fact that the thieves might have been gentiles (a gentile touching wine would make the wine unclean). The rabbi says not to worry, that the wine is permissible for Jewish use because the majority of the thieves in Pumbeditha, the place where the wine was stolen, are Jews. (Also cf. Gemara Rosh Hashanah 25b).


Pharisaic Rituals

Erubin 21b. “Rabbi Akiba said to him, “Give me some water to wash my hands.”

“It will not suffice for drinking,” the other complained, “will it suffice for washing your hands?”

“What can I do?’ the former replied, “when for neglecting the words of the Rabbis one deserves death? It is better that I myself should die than that I transgress against the opinion of my colleagues.” [This is the ritual hand washing condemned by Jesus in Matthew 15: 1-9].

Genocide Advocated by the Talmud

Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai: Tob shebe goyyim harog (“Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed”).

This passage is from the original Hebrew of the Babylonian Talmud as quoted by the 1907 Jewish Encyclopedia, published by Funk and Wagnalls and compiled by Isidore Singer, under the entry, “Gentile,” (p. 617).

This original Talmud passage has been concealed in translation. The Jewish Encyclopedia states that, “…in the various versions the reading has been altered, ‘The best among the Egyptians’ being generally substituted.” In the Soncino version: “the best of the heathens” (Minor Tractates, Soferim 41a-b].

Israelis annually take part in a national pilgrimage to the grave of Simon ben Yohai, to honor this rabbi who advocated the extermination of non-Jews. (Jewish Press, June 9, 1989, p. 56B).

On Purim, Feb. 25, 1994, Israeli army officer Baruch Goldstein, an orthodox Jew from Brooklyn, massacred 40 Palestinian civilians, including children, while they knelt in prayer in a mosque. Goldstein was a disciple of the late Brooklyn Rabbi Meir Kahane, who told CBS News that his teaching that Arabs are “dogs” is derived “from the Talmud.” (CBS 60 Minutes, “Kahane”).

University of Jerusalem Prof. Ehud Sprinzak described Kahane and Goldstein’s philosophy: “They believe it’s God’s will that they commit violence against goyim, a Hebrew term for non-Jews.” (NY Daily News, Feb. 26, 1994, p. 5).

Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg declared, “We have to recognize that Jewish blood and the blood of a goy are not the same thing.” (NY Times, June 6, 1989, p.5).

Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said, “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” (NY Daily News, Feb. 28, 1994, p.6).


Talmudic Doctrine: Non-Jews are not Human

The Talmud specifically defines all who are not Jews as non-human animals, and specifically dehumanizes Gentiles as not being descendants of Adam. Here are some of the Talmud passages which relate to this topic.

Kerithoth 6b: Uses of Oil of Anointing. “Our Rabbis have taught: He who pours the oil of anointing over cattle or vessels is not guilty; if over gentiles (goyim) or the dead, he is not guilty. The law relating to cattle and vessels is right, for it is written: “Upon the flesh of man (Adam), shall it not be poured (Exodus 30:32]); and cattle and vessels are not man (Adam).

“Also with regard to the dead, [it is plausible] that he is exempt, since after death one is called corpse and not a man (Adam). But why is one exempt in the case of gentiles (goyim); are they not in the category of man (Adam)? No, it is written: ‘And ye my sheep, the sheep of my pasture, are man” (Adam); [Ezekiel 34:31]: Ye are called man (Adam) but gentiles (goyim) are not called man (Adam).”

In the preceding passage, the rabbis are discussing the portion of the Mosaic law which forbids applying the holy oil to men.

The Talmud states that it is not a sin to apply the holy oil to Gentiles, because Gentiles are not human beings (i.e. are not of Adam).

Another example from tractate Yebamoth 61a: “It was taught: And so did R. Simeon ben Yohai state (61a) that the graves of gentiles (goyim) do not impart levitical uncleanness by an ohel [standing or bending over a grave], for it is said, ‘And ye my sheep the sheep of my pasture, are men (Adam), [Ezekiel 34:31]; you are called men (Adam) but the idolaters are not called men (Adam).”

The Old Testament Mosaic law states that touching a human corpse or the grave of a human imparts uncleanness to those who touch it. But the Talmud teaches that if a Jew touches the grave of a Gentile, the Jew is not rendered unclean, since Gentiles are not human (not of Adam).

From Baba Mezia 114b: “”A Jewish priest was standing in a graveyard. When asked why he was standing there in apparent violation of the Mosaic law, he replied that it was permissible, since the law only prohibits Jews from coming into contact with the graves of humans (Adamites), and he was standing in a gentile graveyard. For it has been taught by Rabbi Simon ben Yohai: ‘The graves of gentiles [goyim] do not defile. For it is written, ‘And ye my flock, the flock of my pastures, are men (Adam)’ (Ezekiel 34:31); only ye are designated men (Adam).”

Ezekiel 34:31 is the alleged Biblical proof text repeatedly cited in the preceding three Talmud passages. But Ezekiel 34:31 does not in fact support the Talmudic notion that only Israelites are human. What these rabbinical, anti-Gentile racists and ideologues have done in asserting the preceding absurdities about Gentiles is distort an Old Testament passage in order to justify their bigotry.

In Berakoth 58a the Talmud uses Ezekiel 23:20 as proof of the sub-human status of gentiles. It also teaches that anyone (even a Jewish man) who reveals this Talmudic teaching about non-Jews deserves death, since revealing it makes Gentiles wrathful and causes the repression of Judaism.

The Talmudic citation of this scripture from Ezekiel as a “proof-text” is specious, since the passage does not prove that Gentiles are animals. The passage from Ezekiel only says that some Egyptians had large genital organs and copious emissions. This does not in any way prove or even connote that the Egyptians being referred to in the Bible were considered animals. Once again, the Talmud has falsified the Bible by means of distorted interpretation.

Other Talmud passages which expound on Ezekiel 23:20 in this racist fashion are: Arakin 19b, Berakoth 25b, Niddah 45a, Shabbath 150a, Yebamoth 98a. Moreover, the original text of Sanhedrin 37a applies God’s approval only to the saving of Jewish lives (cf. the Hesronot Ha-shas, Cracow, 1894).


Moses Maimonides: Advocate of Extermination

We will now examine the post-Talmudic commentator Rambam (Moses Maimonides). This revered “sage” taught that Christians should be exterminated. He has the highest stature in Judaism:

“Moses Maimonides is considered the greatest codifier and philosopher in Jewish history. He is often affectionately referred to as the Rambam, after the initials of his name and title, Rabenu Moshe Ben Maimon, “Our Rabbi, Moses son of Maimon.” [Maimonides’ Principles, edited by Aryeh Kaplan, Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America,, p. 3].

Here is what Maimonides (Rambam) taught concerning saving people’s lives, especially concerning saving the lives of gentiles and Christians, or even Jews who dared to deny the “divine inspiration” of the Talmud:

Maimonides, Mishnah Torah, (Moznaim Publishing Corporation, Brooklyn, New York, 1990, Chapter 10, English Translation), p. 184: “Accordingly, if we see an idolater (gentile) being swept away or drowning in the river, we should not help him. If we see that his life is in danger, we should not save him.” The Hebrew text of the Feldheim 1981 edition of Mishnah Torah states this as well.

Immediately after Maimonides’ admonition that it is a duty for Jews not to save a drowning or perishing gentile, he informs us of the Talmudic duty of Jews towards Christians, and also towards Jews who deny the Talmud. Maimonides, Mishnah Torah, (Chapter 10), p. 184:

“It is a mitzvah [religious duty], however, to eradicate Jewish traitors, minnim, and apikorsim, and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jews and sway the people away from God, as did Jesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students. May the name of the wicked rot.”

The Jewish publisher’s commentary accompanying the preceding statement of Maimonides states that Jesus was an example of a min (plural: minnim).

The commentary also states that the students of Tzadok were defined as those Jews who deny the truth of the Talmud and who uphold only the written law (i.e. the Old Testament).

According to Maimonides’ Principles, p. 5, Maimonides “spent twelve years extracting every decision and law from the Talmud, and arranging them all into 14 systematic volumes. The work was finally completed in 1180, and was called Mishnah Torah, or “Code of the Torah.”

Maimonides taught in another part of the Mishnah Torah that gentiles are not human: “Man alone, and not vessels, can contract uncleanness by carriage. …The corpse of a gentile, however, does not convey uncleanness by overshadowing. …a gentile does not contract corpse uncleanness; and if a gentile touches, carries, or overshadows a corpse he is as one who did not touch it.

“To what is this like? It is like a beast which touches a corpse or overshadows it. And this applies not to corpse uncleanness only but to any other kind of uncleanness: neither gentiles nor cattle are susceptible to any uncleanness.” (The Code of Maimonides, vol. 10, translated by Herbert Danby, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1954, pp. 8-9).

Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Rotze’ach 2:11: “A Jew who killed a righteous gentile is not executed in a court of law. It says in Exodus 21:14, ‘If a man schemes against his fellow man and kills the man deliberately, take him away from the altar and put him to death.’ But a gentile is not considered a man, and even more so, a Jew is not executed for killing an unrighteous gentile.”


The Schindler’s List Quote

The Talmud (i.e., the Babylonian Talmud) text of Sanhedrin 37a restricts the duty to save life to saving only Jewish lives.

The book on Hebrew censorship, written by Jews themselves (Hesronot Ha-shas), notes that some Talmud texts use the universalist phrase:

“Whoever destroys the life of a single human being…it is as if he had destroyed an entire world; and whoever preserves the life of a single human being …it is as if he had preserved an entire world.”

However, Hesronot Ha-shas points out that these are not the authentic words of the original Talmud.

In other words, the preceding universalist rendering is not the authentic text of the Talmud and thus, for example, this universalist version which Steven Spielberg in his famous movie, Schindler’s List attributed to the Talmud (and which became the motto of the movie on posters and in advertisements), is a hoax and constitutes propaganda intended to give a humanistic gloss to a Talmud which is, in its essence, racist and chauvinist hate literature.

In the authentic, original Talmud text it states that “whoever preserves a single soul of Israel, it is as if he had preserved an entire world” (emphasis supplied). The authentic Talmud text sanctions only the saving of Jewish lives.


Jewish Deception and Dissimulation

The response of the orthodox rabbis to documentation regarding the racism and hatred in their sacred texts is simply to brazenly lie, in keeping with the Talmud’s Baba Kamma 113a which states that Jews may use lies (“subterfuge”) to circumvent a Gentile.

The Simon Wiesenthal Center, a multi-million dollar rabbinical propaganda center dispatched Rabbi Daniel Landes in 1995 to deny that the Talmud dehumanizes non-Jews. “This is utter rot,” he said. His proof? Why, his word, of course.

Lying to “circumvent a Gentile” has a long patrimony in Judaism. Take for example the 13th century Talmud debate in Paris between Nicholas of Donin, a Jewish convert to Christianity, whom Hyam Maccoby admits had “a good knowledge of the Talmud” (“The Jews on Trial,” p. 26) and Rabbi Yehiel. Yehiel was not under threat of death, bodily injury, imprisonment or fine. Yet he brazenly lied during the course of the debate.

When asked by Donin whether there were attacks on Jesus in the Talmud, Yehiel denied that there were any. Donin, a Hebrew and Aramaic scholar, knew this to be false. Hyam Maccoby, a 20th century Jewish commentator on the debate, defends Rabbi Yehiel’s lying in this way:

“The question may be asked, however, whether Yehiel really believed that Jesus was not mentioned in the Talmud, or whether he put this forward as an ingenious ploy in the desperate situation in which he found himself…It would certainly have been pardonable of the rabbi to attempt some condonation in which he did not fully believe, to prevent such tyrannical proceedings by one religious culture against another.” (Maccoby, “The Jews on Trial,” p. 28).

This is how Jewish denial of the existence of hateful Talmud texts is justified to this day. A fanciful word for Jewish lying is conjured (“condonation”) and deemed “pardonable,” while any scrutiny of Jewish holy books by Christian investigators is characterized as a “tyrannical proceeding.”

In 1994, Rabbi Tzvi Marx, director of Applied Education at the Shalom Hartman Institute in Jerusalem, made a remarkable admission concerning how Jewish rabbis in the past have issued two sets of texts: the authentic Talmudic texts with which they instruct their own youth in the Talmud schools (yeshiviot) and “censured and amended” versions which they disseminate to gullible non-Jews for public consumption.

Rabbi Marx states that in the version of Maimonides’ teachings published for public consumption, Maimonides is made to say that whoever kills a human being transgresses the law.

But, Rabbi Marx points out “…this only reflects the censured and amended printed text, whereas the original manuscripts have it only as ‘whoever kills an Israelite.”(Tikkun: A Bi-Monthly Jewish Critique May-June, 1994).

The Jewish book, Hesronot Ha-shas (“that which is removed from the Talmud”), is important in this regard. (Cf. William Popper, The Censorship of Hebrew Books p. 59).

Hesronot Ha-shas was reprinted in 1989 by Sinai Publishing of Tel-Aviv. Hesronot Ha-shas is valuable because it lists both the original Talmud texts that were later changed or omitted, and the falsified texts cited for Gentile consumption as authentic.

Historian William Popper states: “It was not always that long passages…were censored…but often single words alone were omitted…Often, in these cases, another method of correction was used in place of omission–substitution.” (Cf. William Popper, The Censorship of Hebrew Books pp. 58-59).

For example, the translators of the English Soncino version of the Talmud sometimes render the Hebrew word goyim (Gentiles) under any number of disguise words such as “heathen, Cuthean, Kushite, Egyptian, idolater” etc. But these are actually references to Gentiles (all non-Jews). Footnotes for certain passages in the Soncino Talmud translation state: “Cuthean (Samaritan) was here substituted for the original goy…”

The heirs of the Pharisees often deny the existence of the Talmud passages here cited, in order to brazenly claim that such passages are the “fabrications of anti-Semites.”

In 1994, the 80 year old Lady Jane Birdwood was arrested and prosecuted in a criminal court in London, England for the “crime” of publishing in her pamphlet, The Longest Hatred, the truthful statement that the Talmud contains anti-Gentile and anti-Christian passages. (She was accused of violating the Public Order Act of 1986).

In the course of her Orwellian thought-crime trial, which was ignored by the U.S. media, a rabbi was called as a prosecution witness. The rabbi proceeded to flatly deny that the Talmud contained anti-Gentile or anti-Christian passages and on the basis of the rabbi’s “prestige,” this elderly and ailing woman was sentenced to three months in jail and fined the equivalent of $1,000.


Judeo-Christian” Response to the Talmud

Neither the modern popes or the modern heads of Protestantism, have ever insisted that the rabbis of Judaism repudiate or condemn the racism in the Talmud or the murderous hate for Christians and gentiles expressed within it. On the contrary, the heads of Churchianity have urged the followers of Christ to obey, honor and support the followers of the Talmud. Therefore, it should be obvious that these Catholic and Protestant leaders are the worst betrayers of Jesus Christ on earth today. (Cf. Matthew 23:13-15; I Thess. 2:14-16; Titus 1:14; Luke 3:8-9; Rev. 3:9).


Non-Jews are “Supernal Refuse”

Moreover, not only Christians but non-Christians of all races are regarded as “supernal refuse” (garbage) by Talmud teachers such as the founder of Habad-Lubavitch, Rabbi Shneur Zalman.

This was analyzed in the Jewish magazine, New Republic: “…there are some powerful ironies in Habad’s new messianic universalism, in its mission to the gentiles; and surely the most unpleasant of them concerns Habad’s otherwise undisguised and even racial contempt for the goyim.

“…medieval Jewish theologians–most notably the poet and philosopher Judah Ha-Levi in twelfth-century Spain and the mystic Judah Loewe in sixteenth-century Prague–sought to define the Jewish distinction racially rather than spiritually…this…view, according to which there is something innately superior about the Jews, was rehabilitated in its most extreme form by Shneur Zalman of Lyady. The founder of Lubavitcher Hasidism taught that there is a difference of essence between the souls of Jews and the souls of gentiles, that only in the Jewish soul does there reside a spark of divine vitality.

“As for the goyim…Zalman’s attitude (was): ‘Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.’

“Consequently, references to gentiles in Rabbi Shneur Zalman’s teachings are invariably invidious. Their (non-Jews) material abundance derives from supernal refuse. Indeed, they themselves derive from refuse, which is why they are more numerous than the Jews, as the pieces of chaff outnumber the kernels…All Jews were innately good, all gentiles innately evil.

“…Moreover, this characterization of gentiles as being inherently evil, as being spiritually as well as biologically inferior to Jews, has not in any way been revised in later Habad writing.” —The New Republic, May 4, 1992. Also cf. Roman A. Foxbrunner, Habad: The Hasidism of Shneur Zalman of Lyady (Northvale, New Jersey, Jason Aronson, Inc., 1993) pp. 108-109.


U.S. Government Lays Groundwork for Talmudic Courts

“Our” government under Presidents Reagan, Bush and Clinton, has provided, under the euphemism of education (for example, House Joint Resolution 173 and Public Law 102-14), a groundwork for the establishment of Talmudic “courts of justice” to be administered by disciples of Shneur Zalman’s Chabad successor, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson.

Maimonides ruled that it is a Jewish court — or a court appointed by Jewish authority –that enforces obedience and passes judgment on Gentiles, as well as promulgating legislation by court order for that purpose. Maimonides further decreed that any non-Jewish nation “not subject to our jurisdiction” (tahaht yadeinu) will be the target of Jewish holy war. (Cf. Hilkhot Melakhim 8:9-10; 10:11. Also cf. Gerald J. Blidstein, “Holy War in Maimonidean Law,” in Perspectives on Maimonides [Oxford, England: Oxford Univ. Press, 1991].

These courts are to be convened allegedly under the “Noahide Laws” (proscriptions against idolatry supposedly based on the covenant with Noah). The U.S. presidents and Congress urged the adoption of the “Noahide” Laws as interpreted by Chabad-Lubavitch Grand Rabbi Schneerson.

Prof. Easterly of the Southern University Law Center, a Jewish legal expert, has compared this Public law 102-14 to the “first rays of dawn” which “evidence the rising of a still unseen sun.”

The Jewish Encyclopedia envisages a Noahide regime as a possible world order immediately preceding the universal reign of the Talmud.

It has to be understood that we are not dealing with the Noah of the Bible when the religion of Judaism refers to “Noahide law,” but the Noahide law as understood and interpreted by the absolute system of falsification that constitutes the Talmud.

Under the Talmud’s counterfeit Noahide Laws, the worship of Jesus is forbidden under penalty of death, since such worship of Christ is condemned by Judaism as idolatry. Meanwhile various forms of incest are permitted under the Talmudic understanding of the Noahide code. (Enziklopediya Talmudit,note 1, pp. 351-352).

Furthermore, all non-Jews would have the legal status of ger toshav (“resident alien,” cf. Alan Unterman, Dictionary of Jewish Lore and Legend[London: Thames and Hudson, 1991], p. 148), even in their own land; as for example in occupied Palestine where newly arrived Khazars from Russia have an automatic right to housing and citizenship, while two million Palestinian refugees who either fled or were expelled by the Israelis, are forbidden the right of return.

Resident alien status has been clearly delineated in scholarly articles in leading Jewish publications. For example, Hebrew University Professor Mordechai Nisan, basing his exposition on Maimonides, stated that a non-Jew permitted to reside in a land ruled by Jewish law “must accept paying a tax and suffering the humiliation of servitude.”

If Gentiles refuse to live a life of inferiority, then this signals their rebellion and the unavoidable necessity of Jewish warfare against their very presence. [Cf. Mordechai Nisan, Kivunim (official publication of the World Zionist Organization), August, 1984, pp. 151-156].

At a symposium (“Is Autonomy for Resident Aliens Feasible?”) organized by Israeli Minister of Education Shulamit Aloni, the Israeli Chief Rabbi Shlomo Goren repeated the Talmudic teaching on resident aliens: that Judaism forbids “granting any national rights” to them. He ruled that such “Autonomy is tantamount to a denial of the Jewish religion.” (Nadav Shraggai, Ha’aretz, Oct. 14, 1992).

American taxpayers’ subsidy of the so-called “U.S. Holocaust Museum” in Washington, D.C., is yet another indicator of the gradual establishment of a Jewish state religion in the U.S. This “Holocaust museum” excludes any reference to holocausts perpetrated by Jewish Communists against Christians in Russia and Eastern Europe, from 1917 onward.

The focus of the museum is almost entirely on Jewish suffering. Holocausts perpetrated by Israelis against Arabs in Lebanon and Palestine since 1948 are nowhere to be found in the exhibits of the U.S. “Holocaust Museum,” which functions more like a synagogue than a repository of objective historical information.

It is through the rapid emergence of this ostensibly secular but all-pervasive “Holocaustianity” — whereby the religion of Judaism is gaining enormous power and influence as mankind’s supreme ethos and the creed of God’s Holy People.


Jewish Law Requires Christians be Executed

Israeli “Torah scholars” have ruled that:

“The Torah maintains that the righteous of all nations have a place in the World to Come. But not all religious Gentiles earn eternal life by virtue of observing their religion…And while the Christians do generally accept the Hebrew Bible as truly from God, many of them (those who accept the so-called divinity of Jesus) are idolaters according to the Torah, punishable by death, and certainly will not enjoy the World to Come.”

Israeli Mechon-Mamre website, June 26, 2000; 12 Hayyim Vital St., Jerusalem, Occupied Palestine. (“Mechon Mamre is a small group of Torah scholars in Israel…”).

[Note: we have printed and preserved in our files a hard copy of this statement from the Israeli “Mechon-Mamre Torah Scholars,” as it appeared on their website at http://www.mechon-mamre.org/jewfaq/gentiles.htm on June 26, 2000, in the event that denials are later issued and the statement itself suppressed].

Jewish Superstitions

It is not for nothing that the authoritative edition of the Talmud is known as the Babylonian Talmud. As Christians misled by their Judaizing preachers and popes are increasingly consulting Jewish rabbinical sources for a “pure” understanding of the Old Testament, they are unknowingly consulting the occult.

Judaism is the religion of the Pharisees and the patrimony of Babylon, from whence the Talmudic and Kabbalistic traditions of Judaism ultimately derive. Orthodox Judaism’s other sacred book, the Kabbalah, is filled with astrological teachings, fortune-telling, gematria, necromancy and demonology.

The photograph on the cover of this publication’s hard copy version shows an orthodox Jew performing a ritual to transfer his sins to the chicken he is waving over his head. This is pernicious superstition.

Furthermore, the Israeli “Star of David,” is actually nothing of the kind, but rather an occult hexagram, a yantra of the androgyne, which became associated with the Khazars in 14th century Bohemia. (The misnamed “state of Israel” was founded in 1948 in an alliance between Jewish Communists and atheistic Zionists, with crucial U.N. recognition provided by Soviet Communist dictator Joseph Stalin).

Christians might find it eye-opening to visit a Hasidic Jewish area during “Purim” and observe the grotesque, Halloween-like cavorting. Though the Purim festival uses the Book of Esther as its supposed proof-text, in practice the Jewish celebration of Purim is little more than a Bacchanal (cf. “Superstitions said legacy from Jewish ancestors,” Canadian Jewish News, Nov. 16, 1989, p. 58).

Orthodox rabbis place curses, cast spells and imagine they have powers greater than God, derived from their study of the Sefer Yezriah, (a book of Kabbalistic magic). Christians are trafficking in Babylonian paganism when they defer to the rabbis of Judaism.

Sodomy in the synagogue

From a report published in the Hebrew language Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz

“…for many years, (Talmud scribe) Yaakov Yitzhak Brizel…sodomized ultra-Orthodox boys. The greatest rabbis knew – and did nothing…”At the age of 11, Moisheleh, the strongest fellow in the talmud torah (school for ultra-Orthodox boys), went up to Shaiya Brizel and said to him: ‘Kid, I want you know that your father is not the holy man you think he is. He is a homo.’ …Brizel was a scion of the Brizel family, which founded …the mysterious organization that imposes moral order on the ultra-Orthodox ghetto…

“Had the father, Yaakov Yitzhak Brizel …contented himself with homosexual relations with adults, it is reasonable to suppose that we would never have heard his son’s story.

“However, in his book, The Silence of the Ultra-Orthodox, published a few weeks ago, the son claims that for decades his father …sodomized yeshiva students. He committed the act in empty synagogues during the hours between prayers and in other places.

“The greatest of the ultra-Orthodox rabbis…like Rabbi Landau and the halachic sage Shmuel Halevi Hausner of Bnei Brak, knew and kept silent. The father was a Hasid heart and soul, and went to a number of rebbes…. the twin brother of the rebbe from Rehovot, the Rebbe of Kretschnif in Kiryat Gat, was happy to accept the father among his followers. Ultimately, claims Brizel, it was not easy for the Rebbe from Kiryat Gat to be picky when he could win such a respected adherent.

“…The proud father with the look of an honored rebbe, who observed all the commandments from the slightest to the most important, used to pray at a certain yeshiva with the young boys. There, claims Shaiya Brizel, he hunted his victims. When the head of the yeshiva discovered the true reason that the respected Torah scribe was praying fervently at his yeshiva, he did not contact the police…

“Before the publication of his book, Shaiya Brizel met with the yeshiva head. ‘You are right that we covered up for him,’ admitted the man. ‘I and a few other rabbis…I was busy trying to calm things down and hushing up the affair so that it would not get publicized.’

“(The son) published the book using real names. His entire family and almost all the rabbis appear under their own names. Only the names of some of the localities and the head of the yeshiva are disguised. To protect himself from a legal point of view, Brizel held a series of conversations with members of his family and rabbis, in which he demanded explanations of why they had covered up for his father’s misbehavior. He secretly recorded all these conversations, even with his mother.

“If I had written without the names it would have been fiction and this certainly did not suit me,” he explained. ‘I wanted things to change, for ultra-Orthodox society to know that it can attempt to hide things and be hidden, but even if it takes 30 years, a Golem will always rise up against its creator and reveal everything. In this case, I was the Golem.’

“When Rachel Brizel, the daughter of a good Bnei Brak family, married an arranged match from the glorious Brizel family, she had no idea that she was destroying her own life. After six months, she caught her husband having sex with another man. In that case, at least it was with an adult.

“Shaiya Brizel relates that some of the boys with whom his father had relations sent letters of complaint to their own fathers; in the discreet ultra-Orthodox society they had no one else to whom they could complain.

Shaiya Brizel: author of a book telling of sodomy in the synagogue“When she read these letters, my mother went out of her mind,’ writes Brizel. ‘Every such letter made her want to demand a divorce. Again and again batteries of mediators, the Brizel rabbis, would show up, whose job it was to calm her down so that, heaven forbid, she would not destroy the good name of the Brizel family.

“They could live with the fact that one of their own had raped minors, but for them divorce was an impossible situation.’

“…Twice, once during prayers in a synagogue, and once during a Gemara (Talmud) study hour at Rabbi Eliezer Shach’s Ponevezh Yeshiva, ultra-Orthodox men who were strangers to him touched his sexual organ, presumably on the assumption that he followed in his father’s footsteps. The first time, he made a fuss, only to discover that the only thing that interested the people there was to hush the whole thing up. The second time, he made do with a whispered warning to the man.

“Shaiya Brizel is now 36 and the father of three; he works as an accountant.

“His father, 65, was forced to leave home several years ago and return to his elderly parents’ apartment. Shaiya wrote this book after a suicide attempt in June.

‘For all those years I was half dead. For the past five years I have been getting psychological treatment. During my talks with the psychologist I decided that I was going to spew out all this ugliness in the form of a book.’

“He took into account that there would be violent reactions to the book…which only came out a few weeks ago…Brizel suffers from a serious heart defect, which could cause his death. As a way of protecting himself, he has deposited a letter with three lawyers that contains serious allegations about the Eda Haredit, and he has informed the relevant people.

“Recently, he has moved to a new apartment, and he lives in the National Religious sector of a mixed community of National Religious and ultra-Orthodox families. Naturally, he started praying at the only Hasidic synagogue in the settlement. After the book came out, associates of the local rebbe (rabbi) informed him that he was persona non grata.

“Ironically, this same rebbe had come to the area after being compelled to leave several other communities on suspicion of having sodomized his pupils. In ultra-Orthodox society, revealing that acts of sodomy have been committed is a far graver offense than committing them.

“On the day the book was published, Brizel met with the head of the Hachemei Lublin Yeshiva, Rabbi Avraham Vazner. ‘He told me that publishing the book was a million times worse than what my father had done…’

Ha’aretz has been unable to obtain a response from Rabbi Yaakov Yitzhak Brizel. At his parents’ home, a woman replied: “We don’t care. Shaiya is a liar and there is nothing more to be said.”

Ha’aretz also requested the Brizels’ response through the Eda Haredit activist Yehuda Meshi- Zahav. By the time the article went to press, there was no response through this channel either.

“Several weeks ago the father responded to the women’s magazine La’isha, saying that he would sue the publishers, which has not yet happened. It is unlikely that it will happen.

“Shaiya Brizel was ready to put off publication of the book, on condition that the family sue him in a rabbinical court, in which the affair would be aired. He has said that no one in the family was prepared to take up the challenge.

“In the conversation with La’isha, the father said that he was indeed a homosexual, ‘But I have had treatment and today I am no longer like that. All this is behind me.’

“In reply to a question as to whether he had sexual relations with minors, he replied: ‘Perhaps I will talk about that some other time.’ He accused his son Shaiya of being ‘the only one who is after me. He has destroyed my life…He wrote this only for the money. He wanted money from me…Because of him I separated from my wife.’

“Shaiya’s sister, Rivka Hubert, spoke with great anger to the La’isha reporter about the fact that her brother had revealed the names of the persons involved, and declared: ‘We deny everything it says in the book.”

[End quote]

Source: Ha’aretz, “Israel’s Leading Daily Newspaper,” Shevat 25, 5760 (Feb. 1, 2000).



Copyright ©2000-2006 by Michael A. Hoffman II All Rights Reserved.


Jewish Racism towards Non-Jews as expressed in the Talmud


“The modern Jew is the product of the Talmud…”– “Babylonian Talmud”, published by the Boston Talmud Society, p. XII

The Jews refer to the remainder of Earths inhabitants, the non-Jewish peoples, as “Gentiles”, “Goyim”.

Let’s see what the Jewish Talmud teaches the Jews concerning the non-Jewish majority, i.e. those who are not part of Jahve’s “Chosen People”:

“The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts.”

– Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b


“The Akum (non-Jew) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture teaches to honor the the dog more than the non-Jew.”

– Ereget Raschi Erod. 22 30


“Even though God created the non-Jew they are still animals in human form. It is not becoming for a Jew to be served by an animal. Therfore he will be served by animals in human form.”

– Midrasch Talpioth, p. 255, Warsaw 1855


“A pregnant non-Jew is no better than a pregnant animal.”

– Coschen hamischpat 405


“The souls of non-Jews come from impure sprits and are called pigs.”

– Jalkut Rubeni gadol 12b


“Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human.”

– Schene luchoth haberith, p. 250 b


“If you eat with a Gentile, it is the same as eating with a dog.”

– Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b


“If a Jew has a non-Jewish servant or maid who dies, one should not express sympathy to the Jew. You should tell the Jew: “God will replace ‘your loss’, just as if one of his oxen or asses had died”.”

– Jore dea 377, 1


“Sexual intercourse between Gentiles is like intercourse between animals.”

– Talmud Sanhedrin 74b


“It is permitted to take the body and the life of a Gentile.”

– Sepher ikkarim III c 25


“It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.”

– Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5


“A heretic Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands.”

– Talmud, Abodah Zara, 4b


“Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.”

– Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772


The Jewish Talmud Exposed


Talmud and its darkside of secrets


International Usury Talmudic Banking

Exposing our Government’s run by kosher Nostra Money Grubbing, Power Hungry Jews. Education is key to understanding the problems WE face today. This channel is a nonprofit channel!

1913 Federal Reserve Act: Epitomizing Moment of the Modern Era For the Ultimate destruction of Europeans (Whiteness)

I. Introduction: Money and Banking in General, Usury


17 U.S. Code § 107 – Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;

(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.