Jewish ADL Violated US Law By Attacking Trump

ADL VIOLATES LAWBy Attacking Trump, The ADL is Violating Their 501c3 Status


The Jew ADL has come out and attacked Donald Trump for not denouncing the support of David Duke, the alt-right and Anime Nazis.

Here are their demands, from a press release:

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today called on presidential candidate Donald Trump to distance himself from white nationalist and former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke, as well as other white supremacists, and publicly condemn their racism.

Although he did not explicitly endorse Mr. Trump, David Duke recently said on his radio program, “Voting against Donald Trump at this point is really treason to your heritage.” He encouraged listeners to volunteer for the campaign, saying that at Trump campaign offices, “you’re going to meet people that have the same kind of mindset that you have.”

Mr. Trump may have distanced himself from white supremacists, but he must do so unequivocally,” said Marvin D. Nathan, ADL National Chair, and Jonathan A. Greenblatt, ADL CEO. “It is time for him to come out firmly against these bigoted views and the people that espouse them.”

Look at that.

The Jews say Trump “must” do something. It’s an order.

The ADL is a non-profit with 501c3 status, and this attack on Our Leader clearly violates the legal limitations associated with this tax group.

From the IRS website:

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds orpublic statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity. Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes.

Can’t really get any more clearcut than that.

Trying to stump someone is obviously “intervening.” As is making demands that a politician endorse a certain position or be subject to abuse. By condemning the candidate Trump, they are attempting to influence the election by portraying him negatively.

This violation is very, very clear.

These Jews are lawyers. You’d think they’d know better.

I hope Trump sues them.

Jew Jake Tapper Invokes David Duke And KKK To Try And Stump The Trump


No one seemed to care when Sen. Robert Byrd endorsed Obama, even though he had been in the KKK for years! (INCOG)

The CNN Jew Jake Tapper has invoked David Duke and the KKK as part of an underhanded effort to stump the Trump. Tapper asked Trump if he would disavow Duke’s support of his campaign while associating Duke with the KKK. As if, Trump has any control who supports him.

First off, it has been over 40 years since Duke was in the KKK and Duke doesn’t consider himself any sort of “supremacist.”

Secondly, where were these Jews back in 2008 demanding Barack Obama to disavow support from “Black power” groups?

These talking points are mainly coming from the subversive Jews at the Anti-Defamation League. If the ADL is trying to kill Trump’s campaign with this nonsense, than it is clear that Trump’s campaign is on the right track. There are few organizations in the United States more vile than the ADL.

The good news is that everyone is seeing how desperate and ridiculous these tactics are. They are doomed to fail.


Print Friendly
Download PDF

Wake up or die, White people!

I’m sick and tired of all the BS out there.

Got that?

Government traitors blatantly lying to us about 9/11, the New World Order, Iraq and Afghanistan; the devious, trouble-making country of Israel sucking on the good graces of America; the private monopoly parasite called the Federal Reserve ripping us off; Wall Street elites solely out to enrich themselves in any way they can; anti-White Mestizos illegally flooding our lands; the criminally violent and Affirmative Action-spoiled Blacks howling “racism” every 5 minutes; Corporate Globalist whores uprooting the country’s manufacturing to increase profits; the media controlled by Zionist Global Elites; Neo-CONS and Israel-Firsters leading us into Mideast wars over the precious State of Israel and Pax Americana; The Globalist Jew Bankers and ever-profit hungry Military-Industrial Complex bilking world-wide conflict; Politicians corrupted by the Globalists, traitorous “American” Zionists and selfish corporate lobbyists; Illegal immigrants spitting on our sovereignty while taking full advantage of the US taxpayer; Israeli MOSSAD spies stealing US secrets and selling our technology to China or anywhere to make a buck; Israel-Firsters and AIPAC manipulating our politicians and this country’s elections for Israel; Sicko Homos and bizarre Transgenders openly parading their filth; greedy pornographers freely addicting people to smut; Jews and liberals attacking the White race and White men in the media and education; subversive Jew Multicults openly promoting interracial and homosexual sex for us “Goyim;” foolish Christian-Zionists supporting Israel even though devious Jews actively work everywhere towards Christianity’s demise; braindead White sheeple who believe all the BS fed to them by the “talking heads” on mainstream TV and last, but certainly not least — those lily-white, deluded Liberals, who work so hard as enablers for the above — all trying to prove how sensitive and caring they think they are.

What a joke. What a big, fat lying joke on America, anymore.

I’ve had it with all of this BS,
How about you?

And this is where I’ll say whatever the HELL I want to about it all, regardless of whether you like it or not.

And I know that a lot of it might tick some of you off  — GOOD!

>>>Then you must belong to one of the aforementioned groups. <<<

If you can’t see or understand where all of this is really going  what the White race is allowing to happen to ourselves  then you’re a part of the problem. We may very well, one day soon, find ourselves and our children as minorities in some nightmarish, Third World cesspool, ruled over by a Police State and what was once America, will be a long, distant memory…

— INCOG MAN, 2007

Wake up or die, White people!

“To see what is in front of one’s nose requires constant struggle.”

— George Orwell, 1946

NOTE! All the Jewish Extremists and Zionists spoken about here are mostly from the Turkish/Hunnish Khazar kingdom originating in southern Russia (usually called the Ashkenazi), who converted in the 8th-9th century, AD. These are NOT the true Israelites of the Bible. These are semi-Asiatic KHAZAR interlopers, who donned the cloak of Judaism in the misty past, yet retained ancient criminal and parasitic functions while living among Gentile host nations. Unfortunately, they now look much like Whites. Over the centuries, their subversive and immoral behavior has caused the surrounding Gentile populations to eventually rise up and throw them bodily out, or worse. This has happened at least 79 times (some say 109). Now, a semi-hidden Globalist oligarchy has almost total financial and media control of America and other White, European nations (the NWO), as well as having their own stolen country in the Mideast that we are brainwashed and coerced into supporting — no matter what they do to us or what they make us do to the world for them. According to their books of the Talmud (never, ever talked about by the US mainstream press), we are nothing but “Goyim” or cattle to them.

“Behold, I will make them of the Synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.”

Revelation 3:9

“Mundus vult decipi!”

You got a problem about it? Then Click Here and tell me all about it.

Here, I’ll let all these people tell you what I think:

“So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation), facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation…

…Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy to be useful must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests.”

— George Washington’s Farewell Address, 1796


“…to permit AIPAC to operate as an undeclared agent of a foreign nation… we should acknowledge our true status as nothing more than a colony of Israel, pull down the Stars and Stripes and raise the Star of David over our nation’s capitol.

While representing the final act of submission, it would also be the first truly honest act that occurred in Washington DC, in many years”

— Scott Ritter UN weapons inspector in Iraq, 1991-1998, and author of “Iraq Confidential: The Untold Story of America’s Intelligence Conspiracy.”

AIPAC: American Israeli Public Affairs Committee


“Every time anyone says that Israel is our only friend in the Middle East, I can’t help but think that before Israel, we had no enemies in the Middle East.”

— Fr. John Sheehan, S. J.


“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse…

More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history.

It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time.

The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of its perpetrators.”

— Famous Russian author, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, in his last book, “200 Years Together,” carefully not published or talked about in America.


The cry of “persecution,” has always been used to cover the crimes of the only people on earth whose very religion teaches them that murder and enslavement and cheating of all other peoples is a sacred right.

— Elizabeth Dilling, “The Jewish Religion and it’s Influence Today


“We can no longer continue worrying about offending ‘the nice Jewish man next door whose sister lives in Israel’… If the nice Jewish man resents the fact that grassroots Americans don’t like the way the Israeli lobby is dictating U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of America’s interests, that’s his problem.”

— Michael Collins Piper


“Be a Proud American. Swagger and strut. Pretend that you are not besmirched by the shame that your government has heaped upon you. Take refuge in your ignorance, fostered by 60 years of Israeli lies, that the murder of Palestinians and the theft of their lands is “Israel’s right of self-defense.”

— Paul Craig Roberts, “America’s Shame


“…I wish to directly refute Mr. Schoenfeld’s claim that I “cast aspersions on American Jews.” I do not cast aspersions, I forthrightly damn, and pray that God damns, any American – Jew, Catholic, Evangelical, Irish, German, Hindu, hermaphrodite, thespian, or otherwise – who flogs the insane idea that American and Israeli interests are one and the same. The nation-state of Israel is an intolerable burden to the treasury and security of the United States, and Washington’s current relationship with Israel – sanctioned by the AIPAC-funded political leaders of both parties – is one of several factors that are leading to full-scale American participation in other peoples’ religious wars…”

— Dr. Michael Scheuer, “The Anti-Americanism of the Israel-Firsters,” November 8, 2007Anti War.Com. Scheuer is the former Chief of the CIA’s Osama Bin Laden unit.


“Mr. Forrestal next tried to strengthen the hand of the State Department, in its resistance to the President [Truman], by a memorandum (January 21, 1948) in which he analyzed the dangers to American national security flowing from this entanglement: ‘It is doubtful if there is any segment of our foreign relations of greater importance or of greater danger…to the security of the United States than our relations in the Middle East.’…The Zionists demanded the submission of American state policy and offered in return a four year tenure of the presidency to the highest bidder…”

Douglass Reed in “Controversy of Zion,” p 299


“The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society, and we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, secret oaths, and secret proceedings. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence. It depends on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published, its mistakes are buried, not headlined, its dissenters are silenced, not praised, no expenditure is questioned, no secret is revealed… I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people.”

— President John F. Kennedy, 1961, assassinated 1963.


“I’ve never seen a President — I don’t care who he is — stand up to them. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn’t writing anything down. If the American people understood what a grip these people have got on our government, they would RISE UP IN ARMS. Our citizens certainly don’t have any idea what goes on.”

— Thomas H. Moorer (1912 – 2004) Admiral US Navy & Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff during a interview on August 24, 1983. From Andrew Hurley’s book “One Nation Under Israel” p.124.


“I fear the Jewish banks with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America. And use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization. The Jews will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos that the earth should become their inheritance.”

— Otto von Bismarck

[“Jewish banks” is usually replaced with “foreign bankers” for PC purposes]


“Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce, and when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate.”

— James A. Garfield, 20th U.S. president, two weeks before he was assassinated in 1881.


“It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”


“I am convinced that nearly all wars are caused so that someone will profit and those who profited and those who are profiting now are the International Financiers, the Jews. Gather together the fifty most wealthy Jewish Financiers, the men who create wars for their own profits, control them and you will put an end to it all.”

— Henry Ford


“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them, will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

 — Thomas Jefferson

“I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.”

“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.”

— James Madison (attributed)

It doesn’t require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires to people’s minds.

Sam Adams (1722 – 1803)  


“The consolidation of the states into one vast republic, sure to be aggressive abroad and despotic at home, will be the certain precursor of the ruin of all that has proceeded it.”

— Robert E. Lee


“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”


“There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance.”

— Goethe


“If you make people think they’re thinking, they’ll love you; but if you really make them think, they’ll hate you.”

— Don Marquis


“The great majority of mankind are satisfied with appearances, as though they are realities, and are often even more influenced by the things that seem than by those that are.”

— Niccoló Machiavelli, “The Discourses.” 1517.


… No, instead of wishing, like the young man, to tear away the veil from divinity, I wish to tear the veil from human twaddle and from the conceited self-complacency with which men try to convince themselves and others that man really wants to know the truth.

— Søren Kierkegaard


“A slave is one who waits for someone to come and free him.”

— Ezra Pound


“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out… without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.”

— H. L. Mencken, “The Sage of Baltimore.”


“A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable for he is known and carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself… for the traitor appears no traitor: He speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their faces and their garments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the souls of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is to be less feared.”

 — Cicero (Roman orator)


“They are the boastful, arrogant rascals who to the present day can do no more than boast of their race and lineage, praise only themselves, and disdain and curse all the world in their synagogues, prayers, and doctrines. Despite this, they imagine that in God’s eyes they rank as his dearest children.”


“The sun has never shone on a more bloodthirsty and vengeful people than they are who imagine that they are God’s people who have been commissioned and commanded to murder and to slay the Gentiles. In fact, the most important thing that they expect of their Messiah is that he will murder and kill the entire world with their sword.”

— Martin Luther, “On the Jews and Their Lies,” 1543


The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous — cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity.

— Voltaire, Essai sur les Moeurs et l’Esprit des Nations (1753), Introduction, XLII: Des Juifs depuis Saul


… [Jews] are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.

— Voltaire, Lettres de Memmius a Ciceron (1771)


“The Jew alone regards his race as superior to humanity, and looks forward not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them all and to its final ascendancy under the leadership of a tribal Messiah.”

— Goldwin Smith, Oxford University, 1881


There is no such thing in America as an independent press, unless it is in the country towns. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write his honest opinions, and if you did you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid $150.00 a week for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with—others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things—and any of you who would be so foolish as to write his honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. The business of the New York journalist is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell his race and his country for his daily bread. You know this and I know it, and what folly is this to be toasting an “Independent Press.” We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping-jacks; they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.

— John Swinton, a once famous New York journalist and editor, is supposed to have said at a banquet in 1880.


“i’ll be witness for my mother who’s worked as a producer for abcnews for 3 decades now. she’s always said that if herself or any1 else employed by her company dared to question the terrorist state of israel & more recently the obama bin biden deity, they’re to be fired immediately . so there’s got to be some truth to this video, we cant deny it…”

– Comment left on one of my videos at Youtube before they deleted my account (SymAmineC8H11N).


“All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

— Edmund Burke (attributed)


“Tolerance is the virtue of men who no longer believe in anything.”

— G. K. Chesterton


“There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root…”

Henry David Thoreau


“What is coming is the complete triumph of Jewish ideas, before which, sentiments of humanity, the thirst for truth, Christian feelings, and the national and popular pride of Europe must bow. And what will be in the future is known also to the Jews themselves: Their reign is approaching, their complete reign!”


“The Jews look forward to world domination. This requires them to maintain their own close-knit identity. If the Jews are given equal legal rights in Russia, but are allowed to keep their ‘State within a State,’ they would be more privileged than the Russians. The consequences of this situation are already clear in Europe.”

— Fyodor Dostoyevsky, “Diary Of A Writer,” 1877.


“In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. …this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing… It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”

— Winston Churchill writing the early 1920’s, soon after the Bolshevik revolution in Russia. Churchill was later corrupted by Big Jew money in the 1930’s and helped Roosevelt get America into WWII to destroy Jew-aware Nazi Germany.


“These hopes were frustrated by the gradual gains in power of the more irresponsible and socialistic elements of the population, guided by the Jews and other anti-Russian races. A table made in April 1918 by Robert Wilton, the correspondent of the London Times in Russia, shows that at that time there were 384 “commissars” including 2 Negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22 Armenians and more than 300 Jews. Of the latter number, 264 had come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial government.”


“It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States, but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type, who have been in the United States and there absorbed every one of the worst phases of our civilization without having the least understanding of what we really mean by liberty.”

— Captain Montgomery Schyler, speaking of events following the decline of the First Provisional Government (the Bolshevik Jew revolution in Russia) in a Report of the American Expeditionary forces to Siberia, on March 1, 1919.


“Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible. It’s Western exploration, science, and conquest that have revealed the world to itself. Other races feel like subjects of Western power long after colonialism, imperialism, and slavery have disappeared. The charge of racism puzzles whites who feel not hostility, but only baffled good will, because they don’t grasp what it really means: humiliation. The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn’t conscious of it. And superiority excites envy. Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call ‘minorities.’”

— Joe Sobran (well-respected conservative writer who suffered constant attacks on his character because of what he dared say about Israel)


“The inferior races hate the white race precisely because of its superiority. It is galling to the lower races to be reminded of their inferiority, and white superiority instills in them a burning desire to tear down whites and their creations in order to make themselves whites’ ‘equal’. This is not all, however, for tearing down whites removes a burr from their consciousness — that of being reminded of their inferiority — and indeed is an act of revenge for such reminding. Accordingly, when whites are so stupid as to treat the lower races as equals, this but whets the appetite of those races to see whites destroyed, for they see vulnerability in this stupidity, and thus an opportunity for inserting their grappling hooks into the edifice of white civilization.”

— JBR Yant, Mortal Words v 11


“I have given my life to try to alleviate the sufferings of Africa. There is something that all white men who have lived here like I must learn and know: that these individuals are a sub-race. They have neither the intellectual, mental, or emotional abilities to equate or to share equally with white men in any function of our civilization. I have given my life to try to bring them the advantages which our civilization must offer, but I have become well aware that we must retain this status: the superior and they the inferior. For whenever a white man seeks to live among them as their equals they will either destroy him or devour him. And they will destroy all of his work. Let white men from anywhere in the world, who would come to Africa, remember that you must continually retain this status; you the master and they the inferior like children that you would help or teach. Never fraternize with them as equals. Never accept them as your social equals or they will devour you. They will destroy you.”

— Dr. Albert Schweitzer in “Afrikanische Geschichten” (African Notebook), original German edition, 1938, deleted from American reprints.


“I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races—that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this, that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”

 Abraham Lincoln, speech in Charleston, Illinois, 1858


“Homosexuality is not a civil right. Its rise almost always is accompanied, as in the Weimar Republic, with a decay of society and a collapse of its basic cinder block, the family.”


“Homosexuality involves sexual acts most men consider not only immoral, but filthy. The reason public men rarely say aloud what most say privately is they are fearful of being branded “bigots” by an intolerant liberal orthodoxy that holds, against all evidence and experience, that homosexuality is a normal, healthy lifestyle.”

— Pat Buchanan, September 3, 1989


“Capitol Hill is Israeli-occupied territory”


“Congress has become “a Parliament of Whores incapable of standing up for U.S. national interests if AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee) is on the other end of the line.”

— Pat Buchanan, St. Louis Dispatch 10/20/90


“Global elites view the West as the main obstacle to a future world government. Multiculturalism is a tool used by such elites to dismantle White Western civilization.”

— Pat Buchanan, in a speech in Falls Church, Va. 2004


“America was founded by men who understood that the threat of domestic tyranny is as great as any threat from abroad. If we want to be worthy of their legacy, we must resist the rush toward ever-increasing state control of our society. Otherwise, our own government will become a greater threat to our freedoms than any foreign terrorist.”

Texas Congressman Ron Paul in “Freedom vs Security: A False Choice,” May 31, 2004


“The politician who betrays his country as a whole by pandering to a minority group because it appears to hold the balance of power is of all creatures the most pitiful.”

— Carleton Putnam


“I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We are against the [U.S. Government] system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic freedom. This system is totally in control of the American-Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is clear that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the U.S. is not uttering a single word.”

— Osama Bin Laden (the real one) in an interview published on September 28, 2001 by the Karachi-based Pakistani daily newspaper, “Ummat.” This interview was completely kept from the American public at the time by our Zionist Jew-controlled media, telling us that it might contain “embedded secret codes to terrorists.” Public action site


“So don’t be shocked when our grandkids bury much of this generation as traitors to the nation, … , leaving the country vulnerable to unchecked, unchallenged parasites.”

— Kevin Tillman (brother of NFL player turned soldier, Pat Tillman, killed in Afghanistan by “friendly fire”) in his powerful essay, “After Pat’s Birthday.”


“A healthy body will destroy harmful germs. Only a fool would willingly sabotage the natural function of his body and call it ‘anti-germism.’ A wise person will do everything he can to support the fight against dangerous parasites.”

— W. F. Hermans


“People may dismiss what I say as the rantings of an angry old man, but given what is taking place today regarding the war in the Middle East and everything that may happen, my suggestion is that–while there is time–people turn off the Britney Spears, the Desperate Housewives and the football games and listen, listen carefully to what happened, as it is likely to happen again, because, as the old saying goes, ‘a leopard does not change its spots.’”

— Phil Tourney, Survivor of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty


“I’ve checked out the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct – not a single mention of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ’six million’ Jewish victims of the war.
Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; Churchill’s Second World War totals 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.
In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ’six million’ Jewish victims of the war.”

 Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus
University of Ulster, December 5, 2005


“Do I “deny the Holocaust”? No! No indeed. I hope the holocaust is not denied and never forgotten. I hope the holocaust is remembered as the greatest propaganda effort and hate campaign ever waged against a civilized people. We must never forget. We must look at the despoliation of our people and our culture and ask: Why do the heavens not darken? We have lost the will and courage to defend ourselves. The time has come to commit the new blasphemy. It is time to deny the gods of the New World Order.”

— Tom Blair, ‘The New Blasphemy’


“The alleged Hitlerite gas chamber and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which opened the way to a gigantic political, financial fraud, whose principal beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism, and whose principal victims are the people of Germany – but not their rulers – and the entire Palestinian people.”

— Robert Faurisson


“Why should we worry about Islamists commandeering airplanes when we have Israelis commandeering our entire government?”

— Mary O’Brien, American citizen, NY


“‘Conspiracy stuff’ is now shorthand for unspeakable truth.”

— Gore Vidal


“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”

— George Orwell


“When Jews step forward as innocence itself then the danger is great.”

— Friedrich Nietzsche, “The Will to Power,” section 199.


“All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; second, it is violently opposed; and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”

— Arthur Schopenhauer


“Every time new and promising opportunities for meddling have arisen,” he brought out, “the Jew has been immediately involved. He has demonstrated an uncanny ability to sniff out like a bloodhound anything which was dangerous to him. Having found it, he uses all his cunning to get at it, to divert it, to change its nature, or, at least, to deflect its point from its goal.

Schopenhauer called the Jew ‘the dregs of mankind,’ ‘a beast,’ ‘the great master of the lie.’ How does the Jew respond? He establishes a Schopenhauer Society.”

— Dietrich Eckart


We’re on to you, now — the Jig is up.

— INCOG MAN, 2007

More here, about my White old self…


Print Friendly
Download PDF

FOX New’s Rupert Murdoch is a CRYPTO-JEW


Murdoch’s Deeply Hidden Jewish Roots — A Biography

By Christopher Bollyn – American Free Press

Christopher Bollyn is an investigative journalist who has written extensively  on the events of September 11, 2001 in the Washington-based American Free Press. He has researched different aspects of the 9/11 attacks and uncovered facts and  evidence that challenge the official version of events. tried to smear Bollyn as an “anti-Semite” in order to discredit him and diminish the significance of his  work. At the helm of both organizations, the ADL and Fox News, is an Australian-born Zionist named Keith Rupert Murdoch.

Murdoch’s Jewish Roots

Murdoch “became an American citizen for business reasons,” according to Richard H. Curtiss, editor of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Keith Rupert was born in Melbourne, Australia, on March 11, 1931. “Rupert’s father, Sir Keith Murdoch, was a newspaper publisher, and his mother an Orthodox Jew,” Curtiss  wrote, “although Murdoch never offers that information in his biographies.”

Murdoch’s father married Elisabeth Joy Greene, daughter of Rupert Greene in 1928. They had one son, Keith Rupert and three daughters. Later in life, Keith Rupert chose to use Rupert, the first name of his Jewish maternal grandfather.

The young Keith Rupert was educated at Australia’s fashionable Geelong private school, and went on to the elitist and aristocratic Oxford University in England, according to Candour (UK) magazine.

“Rupert’s father Sir Keith Murdoch attained his prominent position in Australian  society through a fortuitous marriage to the daughter of a wealthy Jewish family, née Elisabeth Joy Greene. Through his wife’s connections, Keith Murdoch was subsequently promoted from reporter to chairman of the British-owned newspaper where he worked. There was enough money to buy himself a knighthood of the British realm, two newspapers in Adelaide, South Australia, and a radio  station in a faraway mining town,” Candour wrote in 1984. “For some reason, Murdoch has always tried to hide the fact that his pious mother brought him up as a Jew.”

While Murdoch may have “tried to hide” his Jewish roots, he has been quite forthright about his support for extreme right-wing Zionists, such as Benjamin Netanyahu and Ariel Sharon.

Netanyahu, who wrote a book entitled The War on Terror: How the West Can Win in  1986, is a frequent commentator on Murdoch’s Fox News.

Murdoch’s support for Zionism extremists is well known and a matter of record. As New York Governor George Pataki said, “There is no newspaper in the U.S. more supportive of Israel than the [Murdoch’s] New York Post.”

It is through a network of Zionist organizations, in which Murdoch plays a central role, that Murdoch is connected to the individuals who arranged the  privatization – and obtained control of the World Trade Center – shortly before  its destruction.

These key individuals are: Larry Silverstein and the former Israeli commando Frank Lowy, the lease holders of dubious repute who gained control of the WTC property six weeks before 9/11, and Port Authority Chairman Lewis M. Eisenberg, who authorized the transfer of the leases.

Murdoch belongs to, and has been honored by, a number of leading Zionist  organizations in which Silverstein, Lowy, and Eisenberg all hold senior positions. These organizations include the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), and the New York-based Museum of Jewish Heritage – A  Living Memorial to the Holocaust.

Fifty days before 9/11, Silverstein Properties and Lowy’s Westfield America  secured 99-year leases on the WTC. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey turned control of the World Trade Center over to the private hands of Silverstein and Lowy on July 24, 2001.

Silverstein and Lowy then took control of the 10.6 million-square-foot complex, which included the twin towers office buildings and two nine-story office  buildings. Silverstein and the former Israeli commando Lowy then controlled all access to the World Trade Center.

Lowy leased the shopping concourse called the Mall at the World Trade Center, which comprised about 427,000 square feet of retail space.

“Six weeks before the WTC towers were destroyed, the Port Authority completed the process of leasing them for 99 years to Larry Silverstein, the developer who had built 7 World Trade Center [which mysteriously self-demolished at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11].

“Simultaneously, the retail space underneath the complex was leased to Westfield  America, the US division of an Australian company that is one of the world’s largest operators of shopping malls.” Paul Goldberger wrote in New Yorker, May  20, 2002.

“Silverstein and Westfield were given the right to rebuild the structures if they were destroyed, and Westfield has the right to expand the retail space by  30 percent,” Goldberger wrote.

Silverstein is suing for some $7.2 billion in insurance money for the loss of  the destroyed World Trade Center – and his expected earnings – for property he had leased with a down payment of $100 million – of borrowed funds.

Murdoch the Zionist

“Murdoch is a close friend of Ariel Sharon,” Sam Kiley, The Times (UK) veteran  journalist on the Middle East wrote about the man who took over the once famous British paper. Kiley said Murdoch’s friendship with the Israeli prime minister had caused senior staff at the paper to rewrite important copy.

Mohammed-Al-Dura and father shot dead by IDF.

“Murdoch’s executives were so afraid of irritating him that, when I pulled off a little scoop of tracking down and photographing the unit in the Israeli army which killed Mohammed al-Durrah, the 12-year-old boy whose death was captured on film and became the iconic image of the conflict, I was asked to file the piece ‘without mentioning the dead kid.’” Kiley wrote. “After that conversation, I was left wordless, so I quit.”

Sharon and Murdoch are old friends. On Oct. 15, 1982, a month after the massacres of thousands of Palestinian refugees in the Sabra and Shatila camps of Beirut, war crimes which occurred under Sharon’s direct command, the Israeli defense minister held meetings with Rupert Murdoch and others, reportedly in order to advance his “West Bank real estate grab.”

The visit with Sharon included a trip for Murdoch and his editors from New York  and London that “took them on a bird’s-eye tour of Israel aboard a helicopter  gunship, flying over the Golan Heights, West Bank and settlements.”

“I have always believed in the future of Israel and the goals of the  international Jewish community,” Murdoch said at a spring fund-raiser for the Museum of Jewish Heritage – A Living Memorial to the Holocaust on April 29,  2001.

From the beginning, News Corp., his global media company, “has been supportive  of the Jewish national cause,” Murdoch said.

Larry Silverstein, who had not yet acquired the lease on the World Trade Center, attended the fund-raiser with Murdoch and reportedly said about museum chairman Robert Morgenthau’s plans to expand the museum: “I’ll support you…as long as you keep it under 110 stories.”

Murdoch and the ADL

“Henry Kissinger, Rupert Murdoch and Mortimer Zuckerman are on the [ADL] dinner  committee,” according to a recent New York Times report on the ADL’s recent fund-raiser in which the controversial Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi received the ADL’s Distinguished Statesman Award.

Silverstein and Eisenberg have both held senior leadership positions with the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), a billion dollar Zionist “charity” organization, to which Murdoch and Lowy generously contribute. In 1997, Henry Kissinger presented Murdoch with the UJA’s award for “Humanitarian of the Year.”

Silverstein is a former chairman of UJA. This organization raises hundreds of millions of dollars every year for a network of Zionist agencies in the United States and Israel. Eisenberg, who was instrumental in obtaining the lease for Silverstein, is on the Planning Board of UJA.

Eisenberg in his role with the Port Authority was the key person who negotiated the 99-year leases for Silverstein and Frank Lowy’s Westfield America, who were in fact the low-bidders for the lease on the 110-story towers and the retail mall.

Murdoch and the Czechoslovakian-born Israeli commando Frank Lowy, a former fighter in Israel’s Golani Brigade, who emigrated to Australia in the 1950s, have had a long friendship, which Murdoch recounted during an American Australian Association fund-raising dinner in honor of Frank’s son, Peter S. Lowy, in New York on November 20, 2002. Larry Silverstein and his wife also attended the American Australian event.

Some reporters refer to the American Australian Association, whose membership includes James Wolfensohn, the president of the World Bank, who raised cash for Rupert Murdoch when he first expanded into the United States, as “the kangaroo mafia.”

“Frank was a brave and determined fighter,” Rafi Kocer, Lowy’s former commander, said. Lowy has donated some $350,000 to build a memorial museum in Israel for his former brigade.

Today, Lowy and his three sons control Westfield Corporation, one of the largest operators of shopping centers in the United States – and the world.

Insured Against Terrorist Attacks

On September 12, 2001, The Jerusalem Post reported: “Frank Lowy, who emigrated  to Australia from Israel in 1952, owns the 99-year lease for the 425,000 square  foot retail portion of the destroyed World Trade Center…Westfield said today  that it has insurance cover against terrorist attacks and its earnings will not  be materially affected.”

Lowy, is described by the Sydney Morning Herald as “a self-made man with a  strong interest in the Holocaust and Israeli politics.”


INCOG NOTE: If your mother is a Jew, then you are considered a full Jew and qualify for citizenship in Israel.

Print Friendly
Download PDF


The US are using Volkswagen (VW) to test their TTIP power


JPEG - 18 kb

What the United States and their global corporations call “Free Trade Agreement” (TTIP) has been compared to NATO by former US-vice president Biden. It is meant to subject Europe to American economic domination and their interests. This has an inner and an outer goal :

• For a long time, the Juncker clique in Brussels has been working on dismantling the nation states in Europe and on disempowering their parliaments in order to gain central power for the EU Commission. This is why the politburo in Brussels is negotiating in secret with only the US, excluding the nation states and even keeping things secret from them. This is in contradiction to the EU clause of subsidiarity and sovereignty. But centralisation is Juncker’s main programme as has been demonstrated in the financial crisis (from a competitive union to a union of liability and debt and from there to a financial union) and now in Poland in the EU intervention against the disempowerment of US agents in the Polish national broadcasting corporation. Brussels does not tolerate divergent opinions in governments or parliaments nor does it allow any restrictions of US influence in Europe on their part.

• Outwardly, TTIP is meant to start an economic war (just like NATO) of the US economy against Russia (sanctions, oil embargo, currency war). According to the Brzezinski doctrine, the US can only maintain their status as a superpower if they keep their grip on Europe while Europe can only be controlled if the central power Germany is kept under control. This is not only politically true (Atlanticists), but also economically (the majority of DAX companies is controlled by the US). The plan is now that by means of TTIP the whole region be welded into a common Euro-Atlantic economic region, directed against Russia.

This seizure of power over Europe by means of economy politics and commercial law with the help of TTIP is accompanied with attacks on economic strongholds, mainly in Germany, which are not yet controlled by the US. The main target is currently Volkswagen.

Twice General Motors has attempted to take over “the fat VW” by means of unlimited Fed credits. The first time they were beaten by the Porsche family, the second time their lawsuit against Lower Saxony Law at VW (stipulating a vetoing power) was rejected. Now they are trying to bleed VW for a third time, through US lawyers and administrations commissioned by them. The goal is to weaken VW, to make it cheap, in order to be able to take it over for a lower price.

Were VW to try a reciprocal coup in the US, the US government would immediately intervene and declare the transaction a violation of national security. The real current VW scandal is that the German government is not backing VW, that it is obviously more loyal to the US power than to the over a hundred thousand VW employees.

If we allow the Americans to destroy VW in favour of the two American competitors Ford and Opel (General Motors), Germany will lose one of its economic beacons, not only on the national but also on the international level. This illustrates what the US will undertake also against the others of our corporations and know-how monopolists, with the help of US law installed in Germany through TTIP.

And thus it is not surprising that a government that keeps silent about the destruction of VW also tolerates and even supports the seizure of power of the German economy by US corporations. A destruction campaign like the one the US has launched against VW would be inconceivable conversely for Germans in America – and it would not be tolerated by any US government or any Congress. This demonstrates again the worth of a contract between a powerful (the US) and a powerless partner (EU) if it is negotiated between a global power on the one side and its puppet officials on the other (EU Commission) and if the officials of the employers’ association pursue their corporations’ interests, against the majority of their medium- sized member companies.

The importance of the US economic seizure of power over Europe for the US president is demonstrated by Obama’s plan to visit the Hanover Fair in order to “align politics and economy in favour of TTIP.”

Currrent Concerns (Switzerland)


The Destabilization and Fracture of the EU: Will the European Union Share the Same Fate as the Soviet Union?

Financial Chaos and Debt Default in the European Union

EU politicians and European heads of state are desperately looking for ways to save the European project, but a series of powerful anti-EU shocks, and growing public distrust makes a Soviet-style collapse seem almost inevitable, French economist Charles Gave suggests.

Beset by crises from all sides, from the prospects of a Brexit to the ongoing migrant crisis to a negative economic outlook, cracks have appeared in the EU project, France’s Atlantico newspaper recalls.Speaking to the newspaper, Charles Gave, an economist and president of the liberal think tank Institut des Libertes, was asked why he believes the European Union project may eventually face the same fate as the old Soviet Union.

Members of left wing parties shout slogans behind a burning European Union flag during an anti-EU protest in the northern Greek port city of Thessaloniki, Sunday, June 28, 2015

© AP Photo/ Giannis Papanikos

“The disaster of the quotations of European banks shows that something has gone terribly wrong,” the economist warned. “I have never seen a scenario where the collapse of major European banks was not followed by a recession in Europe. So the answer to your question is simple: if a recession happens in Europe in 2016, the euro will not survive.”

For example,” Gave recalled, “in Italy, bank debts already constitute 20% of GDP, and might cross the 30% or even 40% threshold, which is obviously not tenable. For years now, the euro has served as a financial Frankenstein: it is impossible to maintain a fixed exchange rate for countries that have such differing production capacities.

I wrote back in 2002 that the euro would lead to too many houses in Spain, too many officials in France and too many factories in Germany, and that Europe would fall under German influence, with Germany remaining the only country with a positive net balance.

“As for the formation of a [single] European state,” Gave noted,

“France, Germany and Italy are real states – Europe is not. Europe is a civilization, not a state. The supporters of the euro have, for 15 years now, been killing the continent’s economies, and if a recession begins in 2016, the European people will take the wheel away from those whom they did not elect – from [European Council President] Donald Tusk and [European Commission President] Jean-Claude Juncker. A union [in itself] does not necessarily indicate strength, because if that was the case, the Soviet Union would be the main world power…

Ultimately, Gave suggests,

“strength lies in a competitive economy, and not in a bloated organization which no one wants – one which destroyed the fruits of the labors of the founding fathers of Europe. Schumann, Adenauer and Piux XII desired to establish a Europe based on diversity. The malefactors who created the euro want instead to create a European nation…and are responsible for the looming catastrophe on the horizon.”

Moscow, rampart against the jihadists

Since 2012, Moscow has been trying to rally the Western powers to its cause – to defend civilisation against jihadism, as the world was once united against Nazism. In order to do so, it first of all dissociated the White House from the combatants that the United States call « rebels », and whom Moscow regards as « jihadists ». Today, it is trying to isolate Turkey. Far from being a diplomatic epiphenomenon, the cessation of hostilities in Syria marks an about-face. Washington has just admitted that there are no « moderate » armed groups, or none left.


JPEG - 54.1 kb
Demonstration at the Russian embassy in Damascus.

We are wrong to analyse Russian politics from the Arab or Western point of view. Russia has its own view of jihadists, with whom it is familiar since 1978, when they came to lend a helping hand to the Afghan Pashtuns against the Communist government in Kabul.

Vladimir Putin personally fought the jihadists from the Caucasus, in particular the Islamic Emirate of Itchkeria (the second Chechen war 1999-2000), and beat them. At the time, the Arabs claimed to support tbe Russian Muslims, although they did not understand what was happening there, while the West, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, applauded any group who attempted to pursue the movement of the dislocation of Russia. However, on the ground, there was no difference between yesterday’s Emirate and today’s Caliphate. The charia was still applied, and heads were chopped off in Grozny just as they are today in Rakka.

Atrocities by the jihadists of the Caucasus. Here in Dagestan, 1999.

Today, despite propaganda claiming that the war in Syria is a war against Islam, or that the Syrian Arab Republic is an « Alawite (sic) dictatorship (re-sic) » which massacres Sunnis, the facts remain – the Syrian Arab Army currently fighting the jihadists is composed of 70 % Sunnis.

In 2012, which is to say almost at the beginning of the war, at the moment when the United States DIA warned the White House against the force that was to become Daesh, Vladimir Putin declared that Syria had become a « Russian interior question ». Since then, he has been trying to create an international Coalition with the West against the jihadists.

Russia remembers how the world changed in the 1930’s. At that time, the King of England, Edward VIII, was a public supporter of Nazism. Montagu Norman, the governor of the Bank of England, financed Adolf Hitler’s accession to power with the Crown’s money [1]. The British thought that in this way, they were supporting a state capable of overthrowing the Soviet Union, which had eliminated Tsar Nicolas II, and was a threat to their capitalist interests. However, during the Second World War, they allied with Stalin and Mao against Hitler.

In these archive documents, revealed by the Sun, the future King of England, Edward VIII, teaches the future Queen Elizabeth II — then aged 6 — to make the Nazi salute.

Vladimir Putin hopes to be able to overturn today’s alliances, as was the case in the period 1936-39. This is why, over the last few years, he has been working to treat the United States as « partners », even while Washington was stabbing him in the back, organising demonstrations in Moscow against his governement (2011-12) and mounting a coup d’État in Ukraine (2013-14).

On the 10th February, Russian ambassador Vitali Tchourkine distributed to all the members of the Security Council an intelligence report concerning the activities of Turkey in support of the jihadists [2]. This two-page document presents ten indisputable facts. It attests to the fact that Turkey is a gangster-state which for many years has been deliberately violating a quantity of UN Resolutions. Each of these facts connects to networks and agents who once supported the Chechen jihadists. In those days, the Turkish state as such was not implicated, but the Welfare Party (Refah). Today, Refah has been disbanded and replaced by the AKP. Since the AKP is now in power, the Turkish state is now implicated [3].

Today, the resolute Russian bear is attempting to separate Turkey from NATO. The future of humanity depends on this operation. Either Turkey stays in the Atlantist Alliance, thus able to support the jihadists, not only in Syria, but also in Iraq and Libya, and, finally, all over the world. Or else NATO distances itself from Turkey, in which case the United States and Russia would effectively be allied to fight the jihadists efficiently, wherever they may be.

It seems that on the 12th February, the Russians were able to separate the White House from the neo-conservatives and liberal hawks who support Turkey and the jihadists. Sergey Lavrov and John Kerry agreed to create two work groups, which they co-preside, which relegates the UNO to the role of simple clerk [4]. In other terms, Jeffrey Feltman, who has been using his functions as United Nations number 2 to sabotage all efforts for peace over the last three and a half years, has now been benched [5]. The result ? In only 10 days, Russia and the United States have been able to conclude the conditions for a cessation of hostilities which has been awaiting finalisation since 2012 [6].

President Putin decided to announce personally on TV the conclusion of the agreement with the United States for the cessation of hostilities.

This cessation of hostilities was firmly rejected by the « National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces », whose President, the Turco-Syrian Khaled Khoja, commented in a letter to the Security Council – « It is absolutely scandalous to conclude bilateral agreements with Russia on a “cessation of hostilities”, when these agreements do not concern one of the main killers of civilians in Syria, the Russian Federation. It is high time for Russia to leave Syria and end the brutal war that it is waging against our fellow country-men » [7].

This agreement is in reality a trap aimed at destroying the whole system created by the neo-conservatives and the liberal hawks. Already, during the Genève 3 negotiations, Russia had patiently revealed the bad faith of the « opposition » supported by Saudi Arabia and Turkey. This opposition had already discredited itself without any help by its procrastination. The question is not so much the representativity of the opposition, but to show that it has no desire to improve the living conditions of the Syrian people, only to overthrow the Syrian Arab Republic. The comment quoted above is convincing enough, since, contrary to M. Khoja’s allegations, the cessation of hostilities does in fact concern Russia, but not the groups listed as terrorists by the United Nations.

The cessation of hostilities is aimed at facing the armed groups with their responsibilities. All they had to do was sign up with Washington or Moscow to avoid being bombed by the Russians or the Syrians, but in this case, they would have been obliged to renounce their project for the overthrow of the Syrian Arab Republic, and join a political process in favour of a secular, democratic Syria, in other words, to abandon the dream of an Islamic state. Only 97 Katibas of the thousand in existence would have dared to engage in a process which makes them « traitors » to the Turkish cause, and marks them as the next victims of their jihadist ex-comrades.

Moreover, the Western powers could not have dreamed of a better outcome. On the 15th December 2015, during a Senate hearing, General Didier Castres, responsible for French external operations assured that the total number of combatants susceptible of being moderates did not exceed 20,000 [8]. While in January 2016, a German intelligence report affirmed that the proportion of Syrian combatants participating in all the armed groups in Syria would not exceed 5 % [9].

This is exactly the result that Kerry and Lavrov were looking for when they spoke of a cessation of hostilities and not a cease-fire – the second expression being the only one with legal consequences.

This enables us to understand John Kerry’s answer to the question posed by a senator during a parliamentary hearing concerning an eventual « plan B » for use, if necessary, as a get-out clause. If the cessation of hostilities fails to work, there could be no partition of Syria, simply because the plan for the cessation of hostilities will have shown that the choice is not between Damascus and the « rebels », but between Damascus and the « jihadists ».

For President el-Assad’s advisor, Kerry’s « plan B » should be aimed at fighting the jihadists.

By the same logic, the Luxembourg Minister for Foreign Affairs, Jean Asselborn, declared to Der Spiegelthat NATO would not allow itself to get dragged into a war started by Turkey against Russia [10]. Article 5 of the NATO Alliance provides for the support of a member state only when it is directly attacked, not when it initiates a conflict [11]. Comments confirmed by Germany to the Daily Mail [12].

As from now, the White House is preparing to sacrifice Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who will probably be held responsible for everything that has gone wrong in the region. The Turkish President may be assassinated, like his predecessor Turgut Özal, in 1993, or else be overthrown by those close to him. Failing that, the war will be displaced from Syria to Turkey, and Vladimir Putin will have won his bet – to shift the front lines in such a way as to cause the Western powers to fight alongside him against the jihadists that they themselves created.

Keep in mind :
- Russia did not go to war in Syria to defend economic interests or resuscitate a Cold War alliance, but to fight the jihadists.
- Since 2012, Russia has been trying to split the Western powers from the jihadists, whom they created and have supported since 1978.
- By conluding the Munich agreement, John Kerry has accepted to relegate Jeffrey Feltman, the leader of the neo-conservatives in the UNO, to a subordinate role. By proposing a cessation of hostilities, he has made it possible to separate the reasonable Syrian combatants from the jihadists.

Pete Kimberley


How Turkey supports the jihadists

Russia questioned the future of Turkey when it delivered to the Security Council an intelligence report concerning Turkey’s activities in support of jihadists. The document includes about ten revelations which implicate the activities of the MIT. The problem is that each of the operations listed refers back to operations in which the same actors worked with the United States or their allies against Russia. This information adds to that which is already available concerning the personal connections between President Erdoğan and the Al-Qaïda banker, and the information about Erdoğan’s son and the illegal use of the oil stolen by Daesh.


JPEG - 38 kb

Russia delivered to the members of the UN Security Council an intelligence report concerning the activities of Turkey which support the jihadists operating in Syria [1]. The document lists about ten facts, each one of which violates one or several Council Resolutions.

By doing so, Russia puts the Council, and, by extension, several other inter-governmental organisations, face to face with their responsibilities. By law, the Council should ask for corresponding proof of these assertions and pressure Turkey for explanations. In the event that Turkey should be found guilty, the Council would have to decide which sanctions should be adopted under chapter VII of the Charter, in other words, by resorting to force. From their side, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation would have to exclude this gangster-state from their ranks, while the European Union would have to halt Turkey’s negotiations for membership.

However, a close examination of the Russian intelligence report reveals that the alleged infringements are susceptible to open a number of other case files implicating other powers. Consequently it is unlikely that this report will be discussed publicly, but that the future of Turkey will be negotiated behind closed doors.

The case of Mahdi Al-Harati

Born in Libya in 1973, Mahdi al-Harati emigrated to Ireland and founded a family there.

In May 2010, he was aboard the Mavi Marmara, the flagship for the « Freedom Flotilla », organised by the Turkish non-governmental organisation IHH to deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza. The ships were attacked on the high seas by the Israëli army, provoking an international scandal. The passengers were kidnapped by Tsahal, imprisoned in Israël, and then finally liberated [2]. Then Turkish Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, paid a visit to a hospital to comfort the wounded militants. His cabinet issued a photograph showing one of the militants kissing him as if Erdoğan was his father. He was described as being Turko-Irish, and named El Mehdi El Hamid El Hamdi – but in reality, he was the Libyo-Irish Mahdi al-Harati.

JPEG - 21.9 kb

In July 2011, al-Harati’s house in Rathkeale (Ireland) was burgled. His companion, Eftaima al-Najar, alerted the police and told them that the thieves had taken costly Egyptian and Libyan jewellery and 200,000 Euros in 500-Euro notes. Contacted by telephone, Mahdi al-Harati confirmed to the police that he had recently met with authorities from Qatar, France and the USA, and claimed that he had received this sum from the CIA to help in the overthrow of Mouamar el-Kadhafi [3]. However, he recanted these original declarations when the Libyan Resistance took control of the affair [4].

In July and August 2011, he commanded the Tripoli Brigade – of which his brother-in-law, Hosam al-Najjair, was also a member. The Tripoli Brigade was a unit of Al-Qaïda supervised by French legionnaires and tasked by NATO with taking the Hotel Rixos [5]. Officially, the hotel was the international Press centre, but NATO had been informed by the hotel’s Turkish builder that it included a furnished basement accessible to the exterior, where several members of the Kadhafi family and the leaders of the Jamahiriya were hiding. For several days, al-Harati fought with the French against the soldiers of Khamis Kadhafi [6]

In September 2011, NATO named him as the assistant to Abdelhakim Belhaj, the historical chief of Al-Qaïda, who had become the « military governor of Tripoli ». He resigned this post on the 11th October, allegedly due to a difference with Belhaj [7]

Nonetheless, in November 2011, at Abdelhakim Belhaj’s side, he commanded a group of between 600 and 1,500 Al-Qaïda jihadists in Libya – formerly known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) – who were registered as refugees and transported by sea to Turkey under the responsibiliy of Ian Martin, the ex-General Secretary of the Fabian Society and Amnesty International, who had become Ban Ki-moon’s special representative.

Once arrived in Turkey, the jihadists were transferred by bus into Syria, under MIT escort (Turkish secret services). They settled in Jabal al-Zouia where, on behalf of France, they created the Free Syrian Army (FSA). For almost two months, Abdelhakim Belhaj and Mahdi al-Harati received all the Western journalists who passed through Turkey in order to cover the event, in what they transformed into a « Potemkin village » [8]. The cabinet of Prime Minister Erdoğan put them in contact with “passers” who transported them by motor-bike to Jabal al-Zouia. There they saw with their own eyes thousands of people demonstrating « against the dictatorship of Bachar el-Assad and for democracy ». Bedazzled, the Western Press concluded that a revolution was under way, at least until a journalist from the Spanish daily ABC, Daniel Iriarte, noticed that the majority of the demonstrators were not Syrian, and only obeyed their Libyan commanders, Abdelhakim Belhaj and Mahdi al-Harati [9]. However, the spectacle of the Falcons of the Levant Brigade (Suqour al-Sham Brigade) had its effect. The myth of a Free Syrian Army composed of « deserters from the Syrian Arab Army » was born, and the journalists who fed the fire will never admit that they had been tricked.

In September 2012, Mahdi al-Harati returned to Libya for medical reasons, after having formed, with his brother-in-law, a new jihadist group – Liwa al-Umma (the Ummah Brigade) [10].

In March 2014, Mahdi al-Harati escorted a new group of Libyan jihadists who travelled to Turkey by sea. According to the Russian intelligence report, the group was taken over by the régime’s number 2, Hakan Fidan, the head of the MIT (secret services), who had just re-assimilated his functions. The group joined Daesh via the frontier post at Barsai. This decision was consecutive to the meeting organised in Washington by the US National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, with the heads of the secret services from the Gulf states and Turkey, with a view to handing over the continuation of the war against Syria, in order to maintain the pretence of not using Al-Qaïda and Daesh [11].

In August 2014, Mahdi al-Harati was « elected » Mayor of Tripoli with the support of Qatar, Sudan and Turkey. He is dependent on the government of Tripoli, which is dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood, and rejects the government of Tobruk, which is supported by Egypt and the United Arab Emirates.

Mahdi al-Harati’s career path attests to the links between Al-Qaïda in Libya, the Free Syrian Army, Daesh and the Muslim Brotherhood, which destroys the theory of a democratic revolution in Syria. It also reveals the support offered to this network by the United States, France and Turkey.

The transfer of Daesh combatants from Syria to Yemen

The intelligence report reveals that the Turkish secret services organised the transfer of Daesh combatants from Syria to Yemen. Some were transported by plane, and others by boat to Aden.

This accusation had already been made, on the 27th October 2015, by the spokesman for the Syrian Arab Army, General Ali Mayhub. According to him, at least 500 Daesh jihadists had been assisted by the Turkish MIT for their journey to Yemen. They had been transported by two planes from Turkish Airlines, one from Qatar Airways and one from the Emirates. Once arrived in Aden, the jihadists were divided into three groups- the first group travelled to the Bab el-Mandeb straits, the second to Marib, and the third group was sent to Saudi Arabia.

This information, which had been widely developed by the pro-Syrian Arab media, was ignored by the Western Press. Yemeni General Sharaf Luqman, spokesman for the military faithful to ex-President Saleh, confirmed the Syrian accusation and added that the jihadists had been welcomed by mercenaries from Blackwater-Academi.

The transfer of Daesh combatants from one theatre to another attests to the coordination of operations in Syria and Yemen. It implicates Turkey, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Blackwater-Academi.

The « Tatar village »

The Russian intelligence report also evokes the case of the « Tatar village », a Tatar ethnic group initially based in Antalya, then moved further north by the MIT to Eskişehir. Although the report specifies that it includes Al-Qaïda combatants and that it helps Islamist combatants in Syria, it does not explain why this group was moved farther away from Syria, nor what its activities were.

The Tatars are the second Russian minority, and very few of them adhere to the jihadist ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood or Hizb-ut-Tahrir.
- However, in March 2012, Arab islamists from Tatarstan attacked an exhibition concerning Syria – « The Cradle of Civilisation » – at the museum in Kazan. A little later, on the 5th August 2012, a group of jihadists, both Arabs and Tatars, met secretly in Kazan – also present were representatives from Al-Qaïda.
- In December 2013, a group of pan-Turkish Tatar jihadists from the Azatlyk (Freedom) movement, left the Syrian theatre to travel back to Ukraine and assume the organisation of security on Maidan Square while waiting for the coup d’Etat ; meanwhile other militants from the same organisation demonstrated in Kazan.
- On the 1st August 2015, a Tatar World Congress was organised in Ankara, with the support and participation of the Ukrainian and Turkish governments. Its President was the famous Cold War CIA agent Moustafa Djemilev. Its members decided to create an « International Muslim Brigade » to « free » Crimea. Djemilev was immediately received officially by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan [12]. The Brigade disposes of an installation in Kherson (Ukraine). It organised several sabotage operations in Crimea, including a huge electricity blackout (triggered from Ukraine), and then, unable to enter Russia en masse, moved to reinforce Ukranian troops in Donbass.

If the UN Security Council were to look into the question of the « Tatar village », they could not fail to notice that the United States, Turkey and Ukraine were sponsoring Tatar jihadists in Syria, Crimea and Tatarstan, including members of Al-Qaïda and Daesh.

The Turkmen of the Sultan Abdulhamid Brigade

Although Turkey never lifted a finger to help the Iraqi Turkmen massacred by Daesh, it relied on the support of Syrian Turkmen against the Syrian Arab Republic. They were organised by the « Grey Wolves », a paramilitary political party, historically linked to NATO secret services in their fight against communism (the « Gladio » network). They were, for example, the group that organised the attempted assassination of Pope Jean-Paul II, in 1981 [13]. The Grey Wolves are present in Europe, and are particularly involved with the Belgian social-democrats and the Dutch socialists. They have set up European coordination, working from Frankfurt. In reality, they are not a party in themselves, but form the paramilitary branch of the Nationalist Movement Party, MHP (Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi).

The Turkmen Brigades and the MIT organised the pillage of the factories in Aleppo. Turkish experts came to dismantle the machine-tools which were shipped to Turkey,where they were re-assembled. Simultaneously, they occupied the frontier with Turkey, where the MIT set up and supervised the jihadist training camps.

In November 2015, it was the star of the Syrian Turkmen, Turkish citizen Alparslan Çelik – member of the Grey Wolves and one of the commanders of the Sultan Abdoulhamid Brigade – who gave the order to kill the two Sukoï-24 pilots who had just been shot down by the Turkish aviation, assisted by a Saudi AWACS. One of the pilots was in fact executed.

In 1995, the Grey Wolves had organised, with the Turko-US real estate company Celebiler Isaat (who finance Hillary Clinton’s electoral campaigns), a vast recruitment drive for 10,000 jihadists to go and fight in Chechnya. A training base was installed in the university city of Top Kopa in Istanbul. One of the sons of General Djokhar Doudaïev directed the transfer from Turkey via Azerbaïdjan with the MIT.

The Russian intelligence report reveals that the MIT created the Sultan Abdoulhamid Brigade – which unites the main Turkmen militia – and that it trained its members on the base at Bayır-Bucak, under the direction of instructors from the special intervention forces of the Turkish Army and agents from the MIT. It specifies that the Turkmen Brigade collaborates with Al-Qaïda.

Any more serious research would lead the Security Council to re-open old criminal files and note the links between the Sultan Abdoulhamid Brigade, the Grey Wolves, Turkey, the United States and Al-Qaïda.

The IHH and İmkander

The Russian intelligence report reveals the role of three Turkish humanitarian NGOs in the delivery of weapons to the jihadists – IHH, İmkander and Öncü Nesil. The final declaration of the International Syria Support Group (ISSG), which met in Munich on the 11th and 12th February, seems to validate this accusation since it stipulates that from now on, the United States and Russia will verify that humanitarian convoys only transport humanitarian materials. Until now, the government and the Press in Damascus have continued to accuse these NGOs of supporting the jihadists, but no-one listened. In September 2012, a cargo chartered by the IHH transported weapons to Syria on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood [14].

I am only aware of the first two organisations mentioned.

The IHH is an association founded and led by the Turkish Prosperity Party (Refah) of Necmettin Erbakan, but without statutary or organic links with him. It was first of all registered in Germany, at Fribourg-en-Brisgau in 1992, under the name Internationale Humanitäre Hilfe (IHH), then in Istanbul in 1995, under the name İnsani Yardım Vakfı. As its new acronym was İYV and not IHH, it preceded its name with İnsan Hak ve Hürriyetleri, which in Turkish means « Human Rights and Freedoms ». Under the cover of humanitarian aid to the Muslims of Bosnia and Afghanistan, it supplied them with weapons, in accord with NATO strategy. After that, it lent military support to the Islamic Emirate of Ichkeria (Chechnya) [15]. In 2006, it organised a monumental funeral, without the body but with the presence of tens of thousands of militants, at the Fatih mosque in Istanbul, for the Chechen jihadist Chamil Bassaïev, who had just been killed by the Russian Forces after the massacre he had commanded at the school in Beslan [16].

The IHH acquired world renown by organising, with the AKP, (successor to Refah) the « Freedom Flottilla », which was intended to bring humanitarian aid to Gaza by breaking the Israeli embargo, once again with White House approval, in a US attempt to humiliate Israëli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Amongst the passengers was Mahdi al-Harati, mentioned above. The UN Commission presided by Geoffrey Palmer attests to the fact that, contrary to the allegations, the flotilla was not transporting any humanitarian cargo. This leads to the conclusion that the IHH knew that it would never arrive in Gaza, and thus begs the question of what the true aims of the expedition may have been.

On the 2nd January 2014, the Turkish police – who had just questioned the sons of three Ministers and the director of a major bank concerning money laundering – intercepted a truck-load of arms from the IHH destined for Syrian jihadists [17]. Following that, the police searched the head office of the IHH. In his offices, it interrogated Halis B., suspected of being the leader of Al-Qaïda in Turkey, and İbrahim Ş., second in command of that organisation for the Near East [18]. The government managed to remove the police officers and free the suspects.

İmkander (in Turkish “Fraternity”, by reference to the Muslim Brotherhood) is another « humanitarian » association, created in 2009 in Istanbul. It specialised in aid to the Chechens and the defence of the jihadists in the Caucasus. It organised a media campaign in Turkey when the representative of Dokou Oumarov (the self-proclaimed « Emir of the Caucasus »), Berg-Khazh Musaev (known as Emir Khamzat), was assassinated in Istanbul. At the time, the FSB considered that it was at war with any states which gave military support to the jihadists, and did not hesitate to kill them in those countries (like Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev in Qatar, and Umar Israilov in Austria). İmkander organised vast funeral services at the Fatih mosque in Istanbul.

On the 12th and 13th May 2012, with the support of the Istanbul city hall, İmkander organised an international congress – in the tradition of the CIA congresses during the Cold War – in order to support the independentists in the Caucasus. At the end of the meeting, the Congress of the Caucasian People was created as a permanent body, recognising the unique authority of the Emir of the Caucasus, Dokou Oumarov. The delgates accused the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation of having carried out the genocide of the Caucasian people. In a video, Emir Dokou Oumarov called for all the People of the Caucasus to join the jihad. Russia reacted strongly [19].

In 2013, Russie asked the Security Council 1267/1989 Committee to place İmkander on the list of organisations linked with al-Qaïda. The United Kingdom, France and Luxembourg opposed this. [20]. Indeed, while İmkander claims to lend political support to Al-Qaïda in the Caucasus, according to the Western powers, Russia has not supplied sufficient proof of its participation in military operations.

Thes two NGOs are directly implicated – in arms trafficking for IHH, and in political support for İmkander. They dispose of the support of the AKP, the party created by Président Erdoğan to replace Refah which was outlawed by the Constitutional Court.

What can be done with the Russian intelligence report ?

It is unlikely that the Security Council will study the Russian intelligence report. Questions concerning the role of the secret services are generally treated in secret. In any case, the United States will have to make clear what they intend to do with their ally Turkey, which has been caught violating Council Resolutions.

This information adds to that already available concerning the personal ties between President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Yasin al-Qadi, the banker for Al-Qaïda [21], and the role of Erdoğan’s son, Bilal, concerning the commerce of oil stolen by Daesh [22].

There is no doubt that the Turkish ranting about a possible military invasion of Syria is simply intended as a diversion. In any event, if war were to break out between Turkey and Russia, this report would deprive Ankara of the support of NATO (article 5 of the United Nations Charter).

Pete Kimberley




How Europe aids the occupation

In his new book Europe’s Alliance with Israel: Aiding the Occupation, journalist David Cronin traces the intricacies of the relationship between the State of Israel and institutions such as the European Union and NATO. In doing so, it exposes the bad faith behind Europe’s position as a neutral force and its claims to support the basic rights of the Palestinian people. Below, David Cronin responds to Sarah Irving’s questions.

| 2 JANUARY 2011

JPEG - 25.7 kb
General Gabi Ashkenazi (center) during a meeting at NATO Headquarters.

Sarah Irving: Your background is mainly as a writer on European affairs and institutions. What made you want to write about Europe’s relationship with Israel and the Palestinians?

David Cronin [1]: A couple of things. Firstly, I was in Israel and the OPT [occupied Palestinian territories] in 2001, as part of an EU “peace mission” shortly after the 11 September 2001 attacks in the US. I remember in particular going to a press conference that [former Israeli Prime Minister] Ariel Sharon gave in the King David Hotel in Jerusalem and being very shocked by the arrogance and vitriol I saw coming from him. He started off welcoming people to — I can’t remember his exact words — something like the “eternal capital of the Jewish people for the past 3,000 years” without conceding in any way that it was also the capital of the world’s other two great monotheistic religions. He talked about how he rejoiced every time a Palestinian suicide bomber blew themselves up, because Palestinians were killing themselves in the process. I was shocked by this, but the other thing he said was to accuse the EU of funding “Palestinian terrorism,” and I’d never heard this before, it was all new to me.

I suppose I was a bit gullible and you think there’s no smoke without fire, so at least it conveyed the impression to me that the EU was supporting the Palestinians. Chris Patten was the EU’s External Relations commissioner at the time and he was very skillfully presenting the EU as an “honest broker” — constantly emphasizing that the EU was doing what it could to further the “peace process,” that the EU was the biggest donor to the Palestinian Authority and helping it to develop an embryonic Palestinian state. I took a lot of things at face value.

The turning point for me was quite mundane. I attended a conference organized by one of the UN committees on Palestine in the European Parliament in Brussels in 2007, and there was a session which addressed the EU’s relationship with Israel. That was the first time that I really became aware of the other side of the story or was given any real information about how far the EU is in bed with Israel. I was struck by the fact that there was a lot of literature — the works of [Noam] Chomsky and so on — on America’s relationship with Israel, but nothing apart from a couple of academic publications addressing Europe’s relations with Israel. So I decided that if no one else was going to write a book about it I might as well have a go myself.

SI: What do you see as the strongest “push” factors behind Europe’s attitudes? You identify various elements in the book — Holocaust guilt, economic self-interest, US influence — what are the main forces within this interplay of capitalist and political forces?

DC: It’s a combination of things. Henry Kissinger once said that the EU would never in a million years be a significant player in the Middle East. There’s no doubt that America is still the big player in global politics and continues to be despite the rise of China, but the EU is far from powerless. It’s Israel’s largest trading partner and the largest provider of aid to the PA, so in economic terms it has a lot of leverage.

The EU’s association with Israel is based on an agreement that came into effect in 2000; article 2 of that agreement states that it’s conditional on respect for human rights. EU officials argue that the human rights clause is aspirational, but lawyers say it’s what the EU itself calls an “essential element.” It’s clearly legally binding and there is an obligation on the part of the EU to invoke that clause and if necessary punish Israel when it steps out of line. I argue that the problem is one of cowardice — there is no political will to stand up to either the Israelis or to American hegemonic power in global affairs.

Israel has been developing closer relations with both the EU and NATO and the same strategic thinking is driving that, and in some cases the same people are driving the process. Tzipi Livni, when she was [Israeli] foreign minister, realized that it might be a mistake for Israel to be overly dependent on the US. She and her advisers realized that there were other emerging powers in the world. They got agreements to upgrade Israel’s relationships with the EU and with NATO at the same time, November 2008. Gabi Ashkenazi, the head of the Israeli army, has visited NATO headquarters on many occasions and Israel has taken part in joint NATO exercises. In July 2010 a number of Israeli soldiers were killed in a helicopter crash in Romania [2]. It received very little attention in the mainstream press, but it’s a clue to how intimately Israel is involved in EU-NATO affairs.

SI: A lot of the book is about what Israel gets out of the relationship. But what are the benefits for the EU?

DC: That’s a good question, because it’s debatable whether it’s really in EU interests to buddy up to Israel in the way that it has. There is a school of thought, and I have some sympathy with this, that the EU would be better off forgetting about Israel and concentrating on developing closer relations with Arab states. But the main factors are the business and economic opportunities.

Back in 2000, under the Lisbon Agenda [3], the EU set an official target of becoming the most advanced information-based economy in the world. But where the EU talks about it, the Israelis have gone ahead and done it. Intel is developing the next generation of computer chips in its facility in Israel. A lot of the “sexy” developments on the Internet have been developed there. The Israelis devote something like 5 percent of their GDP to technological research, roughly twice as much as the Americans. The Lisbon Agenda set an objective of 3 percent, but in most cases has failed to deliver. So the most important aspect of the EU’s relationship with Israel is scientific cooperation. The Israelis have been part of the EU’s Framework Program on Scientific Research since the 1990s — I saw some figures last week saying that there are 800 EU scientific research projects in which the Israelis are involved and their value comes to something like 4.3 billion Euros between 2007 and 2013. There is a feeling amongst EU officialdom that it needs to have good relations with the Israelis because they are so scientifically advanced.

The flip side is that a lot of the scientific triumphs that the Israelis celebrate are intimately linked to the occupation. As I mention in the book, Elbit [the maker of drones used in Gaza] and Israeli Aircraft Industries are amongst the beneficiaries of EU scientific research grants. From an EU taxpayer’s point of view, we are aiding the Israeli war industry.

SI: At the recent NATO summit a new missile defense program was announced with Russian cooperation for the first time, apparently intended to operate from US warships in the Mediterranean. What implications does this have for Israel’s relations with NATO?

DC: A lot. If we talk about what happened with the [Gaza aid] flotilla, legally that was an attack on Turkey. The Mavi Marmara was a Turkish ship and Turkey is a member of NATO and called for an emergency meeting of NATO after that attack [4]. We can only imagine what the reaction would have been if that was North Korea, for example, all hell would have broken loose. But this was Israel, so although there was a strongly-worded statement released by NATO condemning the attack, there have been no long-term repercussions. I gather that there is even still military cooperation between Turkey and Israel, and Turkey has been using Israeli weapons in its attacks on the Kurds in northern Iraq.

In terms of the new NATO strategic concept and missile defense system, there’s been a lot of talk about involving Israel. A lot of NATO officials have, I know, gone to Israel and there have been conferences in Airport City near Tel Aviv on how Israel will cooperate with this project. Israel has developed a lot of technology that NATO is very interested in, such as the Iron Dome missile intercept system, so the Israelis are certainly up to speed and being consulted, and it’s quite conceivable that they have a direct role in the new missile defense system that NATO is getting all excited about [5].

SI: Leaders like Nicolas Sarkozy in France talk a lot about Iran’s nuclear program but ignore Israel’s. Do you give any credence to the “Samson option,” the theory that European nations are acutely aware of the battery of Israeli nuclear weapons which could destroy any European capital with almost no warning? [6]

DC: Sometimes you have to state the obvious but the point here, which most commentators unfortunately miss, is that the level of hypocrisy is astounding. We know that Israel has a very considerable nuclear capability and has never come clean about it. Unlike Iran, it’s not party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and doesn’t allow any inspections of its facilities, but the Iranians are told that they cannot develop any nuclear capability while we know the Israelis already have this. The double standards are very obvious. In terms of the “Samson option,” it probably is something that’s in the minds of EU leaders. It’s not something I’ve looked into, but I wouldn’t dismiss that theory.

SI: Researchers like Daoud Hamoudi at Stop The Wall have raised serious concerns about industrial zones which are being funded, supposedly as “aid,” by European countries. Israeli settlements have already been using cheap Palestinian labor for export production for many years. Export processing zones in Southern Africa and Central America have often brought dire working conditions and been short-lived sources of prosperity, until a competitor country lowers its standards even further. Is this a future we could see in Palestine?

JPEG - 22.3 kb

DC: We have to ask why the EU is so keen on promoting Mahmoud Abbas and Salam Fayyad. Their democratic legitimacy is virtually nil. Abbas’ term as elected president has expired. The EU presents itself as upholding democratic principles and — rightly — tells candidates for membership that they have to live up to certain standards, yet in the case of the Palestinian territories it’s forgotten them. It decided to ignore the results of a democratic election in 2006 because the Palestinians, in the EU and America’s eyes, “voted the wrong way.”

The case of Salam Fayyad is particularly troubling. Here’s a guy who’s not very popular at all amongst his own people but is a real darling of the West. We have to ask why that is, and the only answer I can come up with is that he’s been inculcated with the neoliberal way of thinking that pervades Washington and Brussels. He’s a former employee of the World Bank and the IMF and, as I say in the book, the paper that he drew up — “Towards a Palestinian State” — is very similar to the kind of structural adjustment programs that the IMF forced on much of Africa in the 1980s and has been preparing to force on my own country, Ireland [7]. We’re talking about slashing public sector wages and expenditure in most areas except — significantly — security, and making the private sector the engine of growth. So your analysis is spot on, the idea of Palestine being a sweatshop for Israel.

SI: You’ve written for The Electronic Intifada about EU involvement in training the Palestinian Authority’s security forces, supposedly as a state-building program. What do you think the EU’s vision of Palestine looks like? Are we talking about a very small area with tight security and an economically neoliberal regime?

DC: I’m not sure if I’d even use the word “vision” — I’m not sure the EU has any vision. The “two-state solution” is a kind of mantra for the EU, but I don’t think there’s much serious analysis of what they mean by that. The Oslo accords, for all their flaws, did at least talk about Gaza and the West Bank as one unit but now it’s almost impossible for a Palestinian to travel between them, and Israel controls too much of the West Bank for a viable two-state solution. I think the EU’s representatives are hiding behind rhetoric at the moment. They’re not presenting any long-term strategic thinking about where they want to go, other than to strengthen their relationship with Israel at the expense of the Palestinians.

We should bear in mind that the EU is presenting the COPPS police mission [the EU training mission in the West Bank] as a kind of precursor to a police force for an independent Palestinian state, but these guys have no authority to arrest Israeli settlers or to go into Area C [parts of the West Bank where, under the Oslo accords, Israel retains control over law enforcement and building and planning]. More than 60 percent of the West Bank is off-limits to this police force. There is also a lot of prima facie evidence that the EU is turning a blind eye to abuses carried out by the Palestinian police. There’s evidence of torture being gathered by Palestinian human rights organizations, so it’s quite disgusting that the EU is presenting this as a benign aid to the Palestinians.

JPEG - 22.5 kb
Colin Smith (EUPOL-COOPS Commander) and General Hazem Atallah (Palestinian Police chief) under de facto president Mahmoud Abbas’ portrait.

SI: One of the problems with books is that they can be out of date as soon as they come off the press. Are there any major developments that you’d flag up in the EU’s relationship with Israel?

DC: The main thing is that in autumn 2010 Kathy Ashton, the EU foreign policy chief, recommended that Israel should be elevated to the status of a “strategic partner.” It’s not entirely clear what this means, but it suggests that Israel would get the same ranking as the US or China in how it’s prioritized by EU officialdom.

Ashton has been a disaster in her relations with Israel. To be fair she has made some strong statements about Jerusalem and the expansion of Israeli settlements there, and about the prison sentence handed down to [grassroots activist] Abdullah Abu Rahmeh, which surprised some people. But otherwise she’s treated the Israelis with kid gloves. She’s gone to Gaza a couple of times, but refused to meet Hamas — she’s tried to present the missions as entirely humanitarian and downplayed any political significance. Whatever you think of Hamas, they won an election that was recognized as free and fair by the EU’s own observers in 2006. It’s inconceivable that Kathy Ashton would go anywhere else in the world and refuse to meet the local political leadership. When she was in Jerusalem this summer she gave a joint press conference with [Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor] Lieberman and the only prisoner that she expressed any concern about, in public at least, was Gilad Shalit. She totally ignored the fact that every year Israel locks up 700 Palestinian children, in most cases for nothing more serious than throwing stones, and in many cases they’re abused in jail. But Kathy Ashton in her wisdom doesn’t seem to be interested in the abuse of Palestinian children and is more interested in the fate of a soldier who should certainly be treated humanely and released, but who was enforcing a brutal military occupation.

SI: You end your book with the argument that the European Union presents opportunities for campaigners for Palestinian sovereignty. What do you see as the most effective tactics? Are Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) worth targeting?

DC: I’ll answer the second question first. I was opposed to the Lisbon Treaty, but one good thing is that it has given more powers to the European Parliament which, for all its flaws, is a directly-elected institution. I didn’t go into this in much detail in the book, but of the three main EU institutions — the Council of Ministers, the European Commission and the Parliament — the Parliament has been the least malleable. Despite very heavy lobbying, a majority of MEPs supported the Goldstone report into the attack on Gaza in 2008-09. More recently, the European Parliament has been blocking a technical agreement which would make it easier for Israeli industrial goods to comply with EU rules by harmonizing standards. It’s quite boring and very unsexy but the European Parliament, or at least one of its committees, has been asking awkward questions and has delayed the entry into force of this agreement.

So it might not be able to freeze all relations with Israel, but the parliament can certainly make life more difficult for it. There is definitely a case for EU citizens to put pressure on their MEPs to get them to stand up to pressure from the Israel lobby. There’s a lot of lobbying by Israel and there’s a “Friends of Israel” cross-party alliance so it’s very important that the Palestine solidarity movement counteracts this very well-resourced and nontransparent lobby that’s trying to influence key institutions.

To the other question, I think to put it very simply and perhaps crudely, ordinary people can’t wait for their politicians and civil servants to take action against Israel. That’s why I think the BDS [boycott, divestment and sanctions] campaign should be supported. But we shouldn’t forget that it’s a tactic, not an entire strategy, and we need to use other tactics as well. Israel invests a lot of time, energy and money in presenting itself as “the only democracy in the Middle East,” and the Palestine solidarity movement needs to marshal all its resources to counter this very slick propaganda.

Source: Electronic Intifada

[1] Born in Dublin in 1971, David Cronin is the Brussels correspondent of Inter Press Service news agency. He wrote for a variety of Irish publications before moving to Belgium in 1995. After working as a research assistant and press officer in the European parliament, he became the European correspondent with The Sunday Tribune, Dublin, in 1998. He then worked as political correspondent for European Voice, a weekly newspaper owned by The Economist, from 2001 until 2006.

[2] “Tsahal in Romania“, Voltaire Network, 30 July 2010.

[3] The Lisbon Strategy, also known as the Lisbon Agenda or Lisbon Process, was an action and development plan for the economy of the European Union between 2000 and 2010.

[4] “Freedom Flotilla: The detail that escaped Netanyahu, Voltaire Network, 8 June 2010.

[5] “Le bouclier de l’invincibilité“, Réseau Voltaire, by Nicolas Ténèze, 19 March 2010.

[6] Israel aims its nuclear warheads at Europe, Voltaire Network, 11 March 2010.

[7] Program of the Salam Fayyad Government, Voltaire Network, 26 August 2009.


Greece Drafts EU Emergency Migrant Action Plan

Refugees and migrants walk after disembarking from passenger ferry Blue Star1 at the port of Piraeus, near Athens, Greece, February 20, 2016.

© REUTERS/ Michalis Karagiannis


13:24 28.02.2016(updated 13:33 28.02.2016)

Immigration Policy Alternate Minister said that Greek government drafted an EU plan of emergency action to control the number of migrants and refugees.

ATHENS (Sputnik) – The Greek government drafted an EU plan of emergency action to control the number of migrants and refugees, Immigration Policy Alternate Minister Ioannis Mouzalas said Sunday.

“We have a contingency plan which should be implemented now. We hope that the EU will move faster,” Mouzalas said on air with the Mega television network.

Around 22,000 migrants and refugees have found themselves stranded in Greece after the Baltic transit route countries drastically cut entrance numbers. Mouzalas projected the figure to grow more than twofold by mid-March.

“There are plans when borders are closed…We are building emergency camps – not the usual reception centers – with tents in fields,” he stressed, allaying fears that the migrants and refugees would stay in Greece indefinitely.

He said 3,000 undocumented migrants returned to their homelands voluntarily under the International Organization for Migration’s (IOM) program.

Mouzalas further reassured that there would be “nothing wrong” with declaring a state of emergency in the southern region of Attica as a means of civil defense.

Commenting on the northern border that Macedonia sealed off earlier, the minister said Greece was preparing an online advertisement campaign with the United Nations for broadcast in Turkey so that migrants and refugees decide not to cross the Aegean.

IOM said this year’s migrant crossings from Turkey to southern Europe exceeded the 120,000 mark this week, nearly four months earlier than in 2015.


Refugees, stranded for several days, take part in a protest at the Greek-Macedonian border as they wait for the border crossing to reopen near the Greek village of Idomeni February 27, 2016

Refugee Crisis Responses : EU, US Must ‘Stabilize the Situation in Syria’

© REUTERS/ Yannis Behrakis


14:02 28.02.2016(updated 14:10 28.02.2016)

The early resolution of the Syrian crisis may add significantly to solving the current migration gridlock in Europe, according to Westy Egmont, director of the Immigrant Integration Lab at Boston College.

In an interview with Sputnik, Westy Egmont, director of the Immigrant Integration Lab at Boston College, said that improving the situation in Syriaas soon as possible may greatly contribute to resolving the ongoing refugee crisis in Europe.

“EU countries and the US should figure out what can be done in Syria. The quicker we manage to stabilize the situation in Syria, the better it will be for all those interested in the resolution of the migration crisis,” Egmont said.

He also called for creating an effective mechanism to regulate migrant flows, urging the EU to change its stance on refugees.

Refugees and migrants arrive on a dinghy at the port of Mytilene, on the Greek island of Lesbos, after crossing the Aegean sea from Turkey, on February 18, 2016
Refugees and migrants arrive on a dinghy at the port of Mytilene, on the Greek island of Lesbos, after crossing the Aegean sea from Turkey, on February 18, 2016

“It seems to me that it is quite possible for Europe to [adopt a] much more positive posture toward migration-related issues and elaborate a [quota] system that will effectively work,” he pointed out.

In this regard, he specifically stressed the necessity of all parties concerned to discuss the topic at the negotiating table.

Earlier this week, UN Refugee Agency spokeswoman Melissa Fleming told Sputnik that the policy which has become widespread among European nations to reduce migrant flows will be unable to solve the ongoing migrant crisis.

She said that the majority of refugees come to Europe from Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan, areas that have been heavily affected by internal conflicts and targeted by terrorist groups, including Daesh and the Al-Nusra Front.The European Union is currently struggling to manage a massive refugee crisis, with hundreds of thousands of people leaving conflict-torn countries in the Middle East and North Africa for Europe.

Earlier this week, a number of EU states, particularly those from the Western Balkans, adopted a number of refugee containment policies, deploying their militaries along their national borders and introducing quotas on the influx of migrants.


In this photo taken from the Turkish side of the border between Turkey and Syria, in Akcakale, southeastern Turkey, a Turkish soldier on an armoured personnel carrier watches as in the background a flag of the Kurdish People's Protection Units, or YPG, is raised over the city of Tal Abyad, Syria, Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Turkish Shelling of Syrian Territory Confirmed by Several Sources

© AP Photo/ Lefteris Pitarakis


12:21 28.02.2016(updated 14:33 28.02.2016)

Details of Tal Abyad shelling from Turkish territory has been confirmed through several channels, including the Syrian democratic forces, according to Russian Defense Ministry.

Russia has received information of an assault on the northern Syrian town of Tal Abyad from Turkish territory, the head of the ceasefire monitoring center at the Russian Hmeymim airbase in Latakia said Sunday.

“The Russian center for the reconciliation of the warring parties in Syria received late on February 27 information about the attack from Turkey on the Syrian city of Tal Abyad,” Lt. Gen. Sergei Kuralenko told reporters.

Russia’s ceasefire monitoring center has asked its US counterpart in Amman, Jordan, to explain the shelling:

“The Russian center appealed to the US reconciliation center in Amman for explanations about the shelling of Syrian territory from the Turkish side, a member of the US-led anti-Islamic State coalition.”

Kuralenko said the assault was carried out by armed units backed by heavy artillery.”The information was later checked and confirmed through several channels, including the Syrian Democratic Forces [inter-ethnic and religious militia alliance],” he specified.

SDF spokesman Talal Salou told RIA Novosti earlier on Sunday that Kurdish militias have repelled Deash from Tal Abyad, a town straddling the Syrian-Turkish border.

Israel ‘Opens Dams’ Deliberately Flooding Gaza Strip near Deir Al Balah

Gaza strip

BETHLEHEM (Ma’an) — The Gaza government’s Disaster Response Committee announced late Friday that Israeli authorities had opened up dams just east of the Gaza Strip, flooding numerous residential areas in nearby villages within the coastal territory.

Committee chairman Yasser Shanti said in a press conference that Israeli authorities had opened up dams just to the east of the border with the Gaza Strip earlier in the day.

He warned that residential areas within the Gaza Valley would be flooding within the coming hours.

He said that the move by Israeli authorities would flood areas in Moghraqa and other parts of Deir el-Balah in central Gaza, and he called upon residents of areas near the Gaza Valley to evacuate their homes in preparation for the anticipated flooding.

The Gaza Strip is currently under a state of emergency due to severe weather conditions caused by a historic storm front moving south across the Levant.

Fuel shortages have caused daily life in the Gaza Strip to grind slowly to a halt since early November, as power plants and water pumps are forced to shut down, cutting off access to basic necessities for Gaza residents.

Lack of diesel fuel is a result of the tightening of a seven-year-long blockade imposed on the territory by Israel with Egyptian support.

The Gaza Strip has been under a severe economic blockade imposed by the State of Israel since 2006.

The Empire Will Strike Back

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by’s Robert Gore, via The Burning Platform blog,

The populist revolt fueling non-mainstream political movements in both Europe and the US flows from a single source: you can not fool all the people all the time. The central lie of our time is that governments can and should forcibly assume control of individuals’ lives, in the name of vague and always shifting greater goods. The Command and Control Futility Principle holds that governments and central banks can control one, but not all variables in a multi-variable system. The number of variables global governments and central banks have arrogated to their purported control has grown beyond measure. Breakdowns are visible everywhere, and as those failures exact their ever-increasing toll on the masses, the masses are pushing back.

The last financial crisis was a watershed. Capitalism’s rough justice was obviously, and gallingly, not allowed to play out. Favored financial institutions didn’t face the consequences—insolvency and bankruptcy—of their promotion of various bubbles and their leveraged business models. They were bailed out with taxpayer funds. Especially galling was that they knew they were going to be bailed out. More salt on the wound: improvident homeowners and housing speculators who took on too much mortgage debt were, other than a few spotty government programs, not bailed out or even offered appreciable relief. Since the crisis passed, banks have operated on the assumption they will be bailed out again during the next crisis. Despite all the hype about improved capital ratios and cleaned up loan books, fractional reserve banking is still fractional reserve banking; a leveraged business model that is wiped out if enough loans and speculations go bad.

Still more salt: despite unprecedented government debt and spending, new programs, particularly Obamacare, central bank debt monetization, and ultra-low interest rates, the purported recovery is the weakest on record, with the labor force participation rate at a multi-decade low, the number of people on food stamps recently reaching a record high, and real incomes back where they were in the 1970s. Those ultra-low interest rates have destroyed the incentive to save and forced retirees back into the workforce (the one group whose labor force participation rate has increased), but provided cheap funding to the carry-trade set, stock options-laden corporate executives, and Silicon Valley moguls. Their trophy art, cars, mansions, and spouses grace the media. That’s beyond salt, it’s rubbing people’s noses in it.

The messes the globalist powers that be have made outside their jurisdictions are even larger than the ones inside.Led by the US, the Western powers have bestowed unending chaos on the Middle East and Northern Africa. They have achieved none of their goals, (see “How To Defeat Your Enemies”) but have created massive blowback with the spread of terrorism and the refugee inundation of Europe. Not only have the war-torn lands not been reordered along liberal democratic lines, but mountains of money and barrels of blood continue to be spent in perpetual war. Meanwhile, ordinary citizens in Western homelands, not the elites, are left to contend with terrorist attacks, refugees burdening already strained social welfare systems, and obnoxious and illegal behavior by some of the new entrants. The elites shun even acknowledging these problems.

It comes as a surprise only to the elites and their media mouthpieces that the peasants are revolting, tired of their prevarication, arrogance, and ineptitude. Don’t, however, expect them to pay attention to anything so insignificant as the popular will; they won’t go gentle into that good night. In the US, the establishment can live with Hillary, and if either Trump or Sanders—the revolution’s candidates—wins, the new president will soon learn who actually runs the government. Or he will have an unfortunate accident or heart attack. However, the Empire is leaving nothing to chance; it has already initiated a preemptive counterattack.

The counterattack has three overlapping fronts: war, the economy, and civil liberties.

The Quagmire to End All Quagmires” stated that “the US faces the danger of being dragged into World War III.” That phrasing may have been an error (SLL reserves the right, in perpetuity, to make mistakes, see “On Failure”). The US government most likely won’t get “dragged” into World War III; it will probably initiate it. If Turkey and Saudi Arabia invade Syria, assume they’ve been green-lighted by the US government, which will join them in the carnage.

As the economy goes down in flames, central bankers and the usual totalitarian creeps are embracing negative interest rates and bans on cash. Negative interest rates self-evidently destroy the incentive to save, the foundation of honest capitalism and progress. Many commentators have pointed out that negative rates lead to an increased demand for zero return cash, so the monetary Dr. Strangeloves have to ban it to drive money into the banking system. Although negative interest rates are patently absurd and counterproductive, always strong selling points for the Strangeloves, the real reason for locking money in the banking system is to prevent a systemic run. As in the last crisis, on a mark-to-market basis the leveraged banking system—with the largest US and European banks still massively exposed to derivatives—will be recognized as insolvent and subject to a run unless money is kept locked in the banks and expropriated.

This assault on financial freedom goes hand in hand with the war against civil liberties, a specious battleground in the concocted “War on Terrorism.” The mainstream media and even some of the non-mainstream blogosphere have been filled with articles about the “complexity” of the Apple-FBI standoff on encryption. The word “complexity” is often a tip-off that someone’s about to pull an intellectual fast one.

Encryption is simple. It’s one of those issues most people dread: an either-or. Either one’s computer communications are encrypted and safe from prying eyes, or they are not. There is no middle ground, and Apple is ostensibly cutting its throat asking Congress, of all people, to come up with one. Encryption that has been compromised, for any reason, is useless. At Apple and the rest of Big Tech’s behest an encryption “compromise” will emerge that fatally compromises encryption, cementing Big Tech’s partnership with government. Lovers of liberty and privacy will be left searching for quite possibly illegal encryption developed by smaller, guerrilla software outfits.

Many will say that deliberate war, economic destruction, and technological repression are inconceivable; such a strategy is contradictory, counterproductive, depraved, deranged, diabolic, deadly, pathologic, sociopathic, psychotic, and out-and-out evil. All of the above, but if that’s your reaction, read, or reread, “Life, Or Death?” SLL recently posted Matt Bracken’s “Burning Down the House in 2016.” Bracken shares SLL’s forebodings of impending disaster, and it’s an excellent article, but he makes a mistake: granting the destroyers their stated intentions.

The proto-Marxist Jacobins of the French Revolution put it this way: “Out of order, chaos.” But first the Jacobins had to create the chaos, with an artificially engineered grain shortage leading to food riots, which they exploited for their revolutionary ends. Vladimir Lenin put it this way, when told that bread riots were breaking out in Russia: “The worse, the better.” The better for creating the optimal revolutionary conditions. The Black Panthers, revolutionary Marxists of the 1960s, said, “Burn, baby, burn.”

The currently existing social compact has to be burnt to the ground before the new world economic order can be built up from the ashes. This will be as true in 2017 as it was in 1917.

Regardless of the rhetoric—Liberté, égalité, fraternité; Dictatorship of the Proletariat; The Thousand Year Reich; The New World Order—the truth is that the means—destruction and death—are the ends. Psychopaths kill millions of people because…they enjoy killing millions of people. As SLL posited in “Life, Or Death?”, citing Ayn Rand, a malevolent desire to kill others is, at root, a desire to kill one’s self. The slogans, the supposed omelets that justify cracking all those skulls eggs, are dross.

That imparts analytic clarity to the future. When one understands that one’s life is on the line, one must fight with everything one has. Or else.


A Coherent Explanation of Obama’s Foreign Policy

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Eric Zuesse,

Foreign policy is both economic and military. An interpretation of U.S. President Barack Obama’s foreign policy will be presented here that explains both his economic and his military decisions to-date, and that shows he’s been carrying out the policies of his predecessors in office.

On economic matters, he has turned out to be the most ambitious ‘free-trader’ of any U.S. President: he has proposed three gigantic international-trade treaties, two with North Atlantic countries (TTIP for products and TISA for services), and one with Pacific countries (TPP), not only in order to serve America’s aristocracy at the public’s expense (an international “race-to-the-bottom” in terms of workers’ wages, and race to the top in terms of stockholders’ profits and executive pay) (like NAFTA on steroids), but in order to extend the NATO military alliance against Russia, to include now these trade treaties as a companion economic alliance against Russia (to reduce Russian trade with Russia’s biggest market, which is Europe).

Obama’s economic initiative with North Atlantic countries is even more intensive than his one with Pacific countries,because his TTIP & TISA would be economic treaties that would extend the North Atlantic Treaty, or NATO, directly from the military realm into the economic realm. With his TTIP & TISA, Obama is pursuing, essentially, a NATO economic  alliance to complement the military one — virtually the same members as NATO. TPP is less important, because that treaty attempts to isolate China, not Russia — and Russia is to be conquered before a conquest of China can be even seriously considered (in some future U.S. Presidency, though Obama is also ratcheting-up the military hostility against China).

NATO was formed in the 1949 North Atlantic Treaty as being nominally an anti-communist mutual-defense treaty against the Soviet Union. But when the Soviet Union and its communism, and that communist group’s equivalent of the NATO mutual-defense treaty, their Warsaw Pact, all disbanded in 1991, NATO continued on, now as being a purely anti-Russian military alliance.In 1990, the representatives of U.S. President George Herbert Walker Bush had told Mikhail Gorbachev of the Soviet Union that NATO wouldn’t expand eastward toward Russia, wouldn’t try to do to Russia what Nikita Khrushchev had tried to do to the U.S. in the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 (place nuclear missiles right next door), and Gorbachev accepted those assurances and disbanded the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact on that basis, but GHW Bush had actually lied there, and NATO not only continued on, it went right up to the very borders of Russia — exactly what the GHWB Administration had promised that the U.S. would never do.

U.S. President Bill Clinton continued this GHWB policy of conquering Russia bit-by-bit by bringing into NATO the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland — a direct violation of Bush’s verbal promise to Gorbachev. However, Bush had actually intended  this violation: Bush had told both Helmut Kohl of Germany and Francois Mitterrand of France that the promise made to Gorbachev was only a lie, and that as far as fulfilling it, “To hell with that — we prevailed, they didn’t!” Clinton — and his successors — merely followed through on Bush’s lie. Bush’s son George, in 2004, brought into NATO: Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia.

And that brought us to Obama’s Presidency, which is increasing this assault and threat against Russia to reach now a red-hot, no longer merely Cold, War. The bloody battlefields in this war so far have been in the countries that had been allied with Russia: Libya, Syria, and Ukraine. But the Cold War against Russia became hot in Ukraine first. That’s where Obama crossed Vladimir Putin’s red line.

Russian leader Putin had long set as his red line that the U.S. mustn’t extend its NATO to include Ukraine, which has the longest border with Russia of any European country: 1,576 kilometers. If the U.S. is going to attempt a blitz-attack against Russia from next door, then Ukraine would be the most-dangerous country from which to launch it, and NATO membership for Ukraine would be the key to such success.

In February 2014, Obama arranged a coup that overthrew the Russia-friendly and democratically elected President of Ukraine and replaced his government by one that’s headed by the rabidly anti-Russian Arseniy Yatsenyuk.Obama’s operative who selected Yatsenyuk, Victoria Nuland, during the buildup to the coup, explained that“Since 1991 [the breakup of the Soviet Union] .. we’ve invested over five billion dollars to assist Ukraine” to “build democratic skills and institutions” (which Ukraine already had, and which Obama — via her — was now tearing down).

When she mentioned “1991,” she was thereby acknowledging  that GHWB had actually begun the overthrow of Ukraine. It was an exceedingly bloody coup d’etat in Ukraine, and Putin had always said that if Ukraine were to be added to NATO, that would be totally unacceptable — but now it was already in the process of happening.

Immediately, the nuclear-arms race was resumed. This was very good for America’s ‘defense’ contractors such as Lockheed Martin, but not only for them. Right behind Nuland on the platform when she spoke of “1991” was the “Chevron” sign; and Chevron was the American oil-and-gas company that bought the rights to explore for oil and gas in western Ukraine — the area of Ukraine that had voted the most strongly against  the man whom Obama overthrew. (Chevron thus bought the safest  gas-rights. The locals there were happy to have a U.S. company exploring there.) Subsequently, a son of U.S. Vice President Joe Biden became appointed by the Ukrainian owner of Ukraine’s largest gas-exploration company in eastern Ukraine, to become a board-member. (That area was extremely hostile towards the United States, angry against the overthrow, and the residents there demonstrated against that company’s fracking and wanted to shut them down.) The American VP didn’t object that his son might become a billionaire from America’s Ukrainian coup — this was considered acceptable by the Obama regime and the aristocracy that it served (most of the U.S. public were never even informed of the now-booming Ukrainian-U.S. corruption).

The overthrow of Ukraine’s democratically elected President (who had been corrupt himself, just as all  of Ukraine’s post-Soviet leaders had been) was an effort by Obama not only to take over Ukraine but to further isolate Russia, virtually all of whose former Warsaw Pact allies were by now now firmly in the anti-Russian NATO camp.

However, Obama had actually been preparing for a renewed war against (now) Russia (no longer against the Soviet Union and communism), ever since he first became President in 2009, when his Administration responded to Syria’s drought-provoked 2008 request for food-aid not with food but with scheming to overthrow also that ally of Russia. And, then, Obama dusted off an old CIA plan from 1957, which had been drawn up by the mastermind of the successful 1953 overthrow of Iran’s freely and democratically elected progressive President Mohammed Mossadegh (replacing him with the brutal Shah); and, in this 1957 plan for Syria, the secular Ba’athist Party that ruled Syria was to become replaced by Saudi-allied Sunni fundamentalists — but this plan was placed on-hold until an appropriate time, which finally arrived during the Obama regime, when the widespread ‘Arab Spring’ demonstrations added fuel to the fires of Syria’s drought.

That 1957 plan was itself a part of a longstanding CIA program.

After Putin responded to those recent foreign invasions of Syria by Saudi-backed jihadists, by Russia’s starting on 30 September 2015 an all-out bombing-campaign against those tens of thousands of foreign invaders, Saudi Arabia and its fundamentalist-Sunni ally Turkey tried to draw the United States directly into an all-out invasion of Syria against both the Assad government and its now-committed Russian ally.

In response, the Saud family teamed up with their Sunni-fundamentalist ally-and-NATO-member Turkey, to seek Obama’s support for an all-out ‘Western’ invasion of Syria to defeat both Assad and Russia, as well as to defeat two other allies of Assad: Iran and its Hezbollah ally in Lebanon.

President Obama then reached out to the leaders of various European NATO member-nations, to seek at least one of them to join with the U.S. in making this not only a fundamentalist-Sunni invasion to overthrow and replace Syria’s Ba’athist government — the only remaining secular government in the Mideast. Thus far,Obama has failed to find any; and he seems unwilling to join the Sunni-Islamic countries as the only non-Islamic invader. However, Obama’s Secretary of State, John Kerry, is threatening to complete the 1957 CIA plan without Europe’s participation, if there’s no other way to do it. And the aristocracy’s Council on Foreign Relations recently headlined, “Divide and Conquer in Syria and Iraq; Why the West Should Plan for a Partition.” That ‘partition’ or breakup of Syria is the 1957 CIA plan. But that threat seems likely to be pure bluff from Kerry. After all, Kerry himself also says, “What do you want me to do? Go to war with Russia? Is that what you want?” He doesn’t want that. And he wasn’t bluffing when he said that he doesn’t. And Obama seems to recognize that the U.S. and NATO need at least several more years in order to have all the pieces in place for it to be launched.

As regards Ukraine, Obama seems to have given up there, too. Ukraine is being left to rot, into perhaps sequences of regime-replacements and spiraling chaos: it’s a wrecked country.

The end-result of Obama’s foreign policies, thus far, is to turn Russia’s allied nations into failed states. Whether his successor as the U.S. President will be satisfied with that (after all: it does hurt Russia), or else will ‘go for the gold’ (as Obama has thus far unsuccessfully tried to do) and resume the active quest to conquer Russia, might depend upon whether Obama can get his ‘trade’ deals passed and implemented; because, if that effort fails, then one would be hard-pressed to see any way in which the 1990-Bush-initiated war against Russia will be won, short of some sort of desperate nuclear invasion, for which Russia might be sufficiently well prepared so that whomever the survivors of that war would be (including even the top stockholders in firms such as Lockheed Martin) would wish they weren’t survivors. After all: what would any currency be worth then? Maybe enough to buy a gun and bullet to finish oneself off. Even for those corporate CEOs, their golf-days would be over, and only grim days would remain. But that’s when the true stature of such American Presidents as GHWB, Clinton, GWB, and Obama, would likewise become clear — to those survivors, or at least to the ones that don’t have the gun, or the bullet, or otherwise haven’t yet expired. It’s like the recognition-of-truth that people such as Palestinians, or Auschwitz-victims, or ISIS-victims, might have in their final moments. But here it would be happening even to the few aristocrats who cause such things to occur. Wouldn’t that be “a refreshing change”? After everything is said and done, and no one is around to enjoy it? But, anyway: it would be a change, and it would also be ironic. However, no one would be around to enjoy even the irony of it.

Obama has been carrying out a bipartisan Republican-and-Democratic foreign policy; it’s the policy of America’s aristocracy. Its results have been horrible for the world, but they’ll be even worse if it succeeds. Not only will there then no longer be democracy (but instead a global government by international corporations), but if it succeeds all the way, there won’t even be much of anything except universal misery and mass-death. It is, unquestionably, an extremely ambitious foreign policy. Thus far, it seems to be entirely in accord with the foreign policy of the Saud family. However, that may be about to change: perhaps Obama, and the United States, will simply quit its alliance with the Sauds, and separate from them. But, will Europe separate from NATO? If not, then the anti-Russia policy will continue even if the Sauds’ alliance with the U.S. comes to an end.

*  *  *

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.



The Central Bankers’ Greatest Blunder Yet: Negative Rates = Deleveraging

Tyler Durden's picture

In a world which has long since crossed the monetary twilight zone of negative rates, and which is spiraling ever deeper into NIRP, below we present some quite fascinating observations on debt, NIRP and how the latter leads to the deleveraging of the former, and thus encourages global deflation – something which in retrospect will be (and in many cases already has been) seen as a central bank fatal flaw, and confirmation said central bankers have zero understanding of the process they have unleashed.

From HSBC’s Anton Tonev.

Negative rates = deleveraging

  • Negative interest rates on developed world sovereign bonds could reduce debt burdens and may be a market solution to overleveraging
  • While the side effect of extreme money creation is inflation, the side effect of extreme debt creation is deflation
  • We argue that the need for further deleveraging may be a reason why negative interest rates persist in sovereign bond markets

Bonds and deleveraging

While conventional theory suggests that central banks set base interest rates and that negative rates are a result of low inflation and slow economic growth, we suggest there may be an alternative explanation. Drawing on historical and cultural analogies, we view negative rates as a possible market response to the growing levels of debt and inequality in income and wealth.

In April last year, Switzerland became the first country to issue a 10-year sovereign bond at a negative yield. By the end of 2015, about a third of newly issued eurozone sovereign bonds came with a negative yield. Investors who buy these bonds and hold them to maturity will receive less than they put in and the issuer will ultimately pay back less than borrowed. Through this mechanism, we believe that negative interest rates can be a useful tool for deleveraging.

We recognise that the challenge to this view is that the objective of this policy has been to encourage even more leverage; the case of the Swedish housing market comes to mind. The majority of the countries with negative yields on their government bonds have high levels of either government or private debt (or in some cases both). Historically, one would expect government yields to go up to discourage the issuance of more debt. This is not happening now. Why? We suggest that, precisely because of the high level of debt and the need to deleverage, nominal yields in those countries have become more and more negative to encourage the issuance of more debt and slowly roll down the existing debt stock.

This suggests the market may be indicating there is too much debt. But this has an implication for the creation of new money, which is essential for the normal functioning of the economy. Most of the money creation in the developed world is done by the private banking  system through issuing loans. If there is no demand for new debt, the money creation process stalls. In other words, while under the gold standard our money creation was constrained by the availability of gold, in the current “fiat” monetary system, we cannot issue new money without the issuance of new debt. However, the system after 1971 was much more flexible than the metallic standard before because, as long as the economy was expanding, the banks could always find someone willing to borrow from them and thus increase the money supply.

Nevertheless, there is a natural limit to how much debt an economy can sustain. The time after the financial crisis of 2008 coincided with ever decreasing rates of growth and, as a result, not only could the banks not find people to lend to (thus money supply growth slowed down) but people started deleveraging (which caused total liquidity to contract – see Figure 12).

The US, and by extension most of the developed world post 2008, was in a very similar situation to where it was for most of the nineteenth or the early twentieth centuries, i.e. a deflationary environment characterised by intense progress (in our case we are starting to finally see the benefits of the Internet) and the inability to boost the money supply and thus create inflation.

Figure 12. Total US liquidity decreased after the 2008 crisis

It is this economic necessity and the mathematical impossibility of paying interest continuously which has created the present situation of negative interest rates: in our view the market has found a way to keep the monetary system going but this time without the risk of ever increasing debt.

In the past, we used to deal with too much debt either using market forces, like growth and inflation, or non-market forces, like debt jubilees, debt restructurings or excessive seigniorage. History is full of examples which reinforce the notion that putting an unbearable burden on debtors would ultimately send the whole economy into a depression. Debt jubilees were very common in Mesopotamia, for example, where, by some accounts there were around thirty episodes of general debt cancellations from 2400 to 1400 BC.

In 1819, as agriculture prices dropped, US state governments imposed moratoria on farmers’ debt payments and some debt was even completely forgiven. During the Great Depression, the US government, through the Home Ownership Loan Corporation, helped struggling homeowners by sometimes substantially lowering their mortgage payments. “One of the largest transfers of wealth (from creditors to debtors) in the history of the world”, however, happened when the US government broke off the gold standard in 1933. This was equivalent to restructuring its debt as, by removing the gold clause in US Treasury securities and devaluing the dollar, creditors’ claims were cut by more than 40%.

None of these options was used after the Great Recession of 2008. In addition, the developed world economies seem unable to generate growth and inflation sufficient to offset the rise in debt. Without a policy response, the market is taking the matter in “its own hands” by starting to reduce the level of debt (in present value terms) via negative yields on sovereign bonds.


Ex-Vatican ambassador dies before his child abuse trial


Autopsy ordered after Vatican’s former envoy to Dominican Republic, Jozef Wesolowski, dies of apparent natural causes.

28 Aug 2015 10:53 GMT | Vatican, Dominican Republic, Abuse, Human Rights, Sexual assault

Wesolowski, would have been the first high-ranking church official to be tried on paedophile charges [AP]

The Vatican has said that its disgraced former ambassador to the Dominican Republic, Jozef Wesolowski, has died of apparent natural causes.

A statement from the Vatican said Jozef Wesolowski was found dead in his Vatican room early on Friday, where he had been under house arrest. The Vatican prosecutor ordered an immediate autopsy.

The Polish-born Wesolowski was due to go on trial on July 11 at a Vatican tribunal on charges of abuse and possession of child pornography. However, the hearing was postponed after he was taken ill.

Vatican defrocks top archbishop for child sex abuse

Wesolowski would have been the first high-ranking church official to be tried on paedophile charges. The case was seen to be a test of the Vatican’s pledge to stamp out abuse.

Wesolowski had been expelled under canon law procedures but was facing a jail sentence if convicted in the Vatican’s civil tribunal.

Wesolowski was charged with paying for sex with and abusing children in the Dominican Republican between 2008 and 2013.

He was also charged with possession of child pornography, dating from as recently as his return to Rome in 2013.

Last year, Pope Francis likened the actions of individuals who commit such crimes to a “satanic mass”.

The charges have been part of a crackdown by Pope Francis on clerics and employees of the Church who exploit minors.

Source: Agencies



Pope creates tribunal for bishop child abuse cases

Unprecedented Vatican department will judge bishops accused of covering up or not preventing sexual abuse of minors.

11 Jun 2015 07:30 GMT | Human Rights, Europe, Vatican, Pope Francis, Abuse

Pope Francis has created a new Vatican tribunal section to hear cases of bishops who fail to protect children from sexually abusive priests.

Wednesday’s announcement came years after victims groups started urging the Vatican to establish clear procedures to make bishops more accountable for abuse in their dioceses, even if they were not directly responsible for it.

The reform involves the creation of a new crime of “abuse of episcopal office” in canon law, Reuters news agency reported.

Father Federico Lombardi, a Vatican spokesman, said that the bishops could also be judged if they had failed to take measures to prevent sexual abuse of minors.

The complaints against the bishops would be initially investigated by one of three Vatican departments, depending on under whose jurisdiction the bishops fall, before being judged by the doctrinal department.

The Vatican said the pope had approved proposals made to him by a commission advising him on how to root out sexual abuse of children.

Part of the task of the commission, which is made up of 17 clerics and ordinary people from around the world, is to help dioceses put in place “best practices” to prevent abuse and work with victims in a process of healing. Eight members are women.

The worldwide scandal, which first became prominent in Boston in 2002, has seen known abusers shunted from parish to parish instead of being defrocked and handed over to authorities.

Last February, Francis ordered bishops the world over to cooperate as a matter of priority with the commission to root out “the scourge” of the sexual abuse even if it unearths new scandals.

Source: Reuters



Australian cardinal: Church ‘mucked up’ on sex abuse

George Pell, the Vatican’s finance minister, faces grilling via videolink from Australian child sex abuse inquiry.

29 Feb 2016 02:12 GMT | Vatican, Religion, Abuse, Human Rights, Christianity

Australian Cardinal George Pell says the Catholic Church has made “enormous mistakes” after becoming the highest-ranking Vatican official to give evidence on sexual abuse of children in the Church.

Pell, 74, held up a Bible as he was sworn in to answer questions by Australia’s Royal Commission into Institutional Response to Child Sexual Abuse in front of victims in a Rome hotel room.

Around 15 abuse victims and support staff travelled to Rome on the back of a crowd-funding campaign to see the Vatican’s treasurer give evidence after he said he was unable to travel to his native Australia because of heart problems.

Pope says ‘God weeps’ for sex abuse of children

While strictly speaking an Australian affair concerning events decades ago, the hearing has taken on wider implications about accountability of Catholic leaders because of Pell’s high position in the Vatican, where he serves as finance minister.

“The Church has made enormous mistakes and is working to remedy those but the Church in many places, certainly in Australia, has mucked things up, has let people down,” Pell said as he began answering questions via video link to the commission in Sydney.

“I’m not here to defend the indefensible.”

Pell has become the focal point for victims’ frustration over what they say has been an inadequate response from the Catholic Church to the abuse claims.

Al Jazeera’s Claudio Lavanga, reporting from Rome, said Pell will face questioning daily until Wednesday.

He said the cardinal is not accused of sexual abuse.

“He is not facing criminal charges, but should the abuse commission rule that he ignored or protected abusers, his position as the Vatican’s economy chief could become untenable,” he said.

READ MORE: Pope ends US visit with vow to ‘punish’ sex abusers

There were scuffles between security guards and journalists when Pell arrived at the Rome hotel a few hours before the hearing began at 10pm Italian time on Sunday (21:00 GMT), which is 8am Sydney time on Monday.

“We need the Vatican to stand up and take responsibility rather than hide behind legal processes and please help us heal the future,” David Ridsdale, one of the abuse victims, told reporters as he entered the hotel.

“We don’t want any more survivors. We need to be the last of the survivors. That’s our message.”

Pell and his supporters say he has done no wrong and that he has become a lightning rod for all cases of abuse.

Source: Al Jazeera And Reuters


WW II – Daily Life in Auschwitz from British Intelligence decrypts, 1942

Daily Life in Auschwitz
from British Intelligence decrypts, 1942

British Intelligence successfully decoded messages from the German labour-camps through the year 1942. It happened at Bletchley Park, where the famous Enigma codebreaker, with the huge calculating-engine called Colossus beside it, opened the German codes. That had a key role in Britain winning the War by giving vital info about submarine positions etc, – but, little attention has been given to its disclosures about the concentration-camps. Kept as top-secret for fifty years, that material was finally released in the mid-1990s. Before that, historians had little more to go on, than a summary of it made by the British intelligence-analyst F.H. Hinsley, back in 1981, where he obscurely stated:”The return from Auschwitz, the largest of the camps with 20,000 prisoners, mentioned illness as the main cause of death, but included references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts to gassings.”[1]

Once this data was released, an unexpected problem arose: the priceless decrypts – the most authentic information anyone could possibly want about daily camp life under the Nazis – yielded no crumb of evidence that any ‘Final Solution’ had been ongoing! Quickly, experts had to start started apologising for how British Intel had somehow ‘failed to apprehend’ the Holocaust.[2] More recently the historian Nick Terry has concluded, ‘It would therefore seem as if British intelligence was largely hoodwinked in the first half of 1942.’[3]

Was it?

Rather feebly, experts were obliged to conjecture – as Holo-historians had been doing through the previous decade – that innocuous-sounding phrases concealed the fiendish meaning and intention. For example, sending Jews ‘to the East’ alluded to mass gassing.[4] But is that really how historians are meant to behave? Should not their conclusions be drawn from the data, rather than imposed upon it? We here explore the view, that the understanding by British Intelligence of these decrypts, was sound.

I came to peruse these top-secret wartime documents in the Public Record Office in the autumn of 2012[5], thrilled to turn over the crinkly pages with old, blue typewriter-print and MOST SECRET… NEVER TO BE REMOVED FROM THE OFFICE red-inked across the top. Here were confidential wartime documents from the head of MI6 to the Prime Minister Winston Churchill, plus decrypts straight from Auschwitz! I apprehended why the Holo-historians had not wanted to know about these priceless wartime texts…

Summer of 1942
The year 1942 is a turning-point in our story, when Exterminist historians believe that the terrible mass gassing of Jews began, at Auschwitz. The ‘machinery of mass murder’ to use Jean-Claude Pressac’s phrase, got going! As Dr Terry explained, ‘the machinery of the death camps was in place and the policy of “selection” on the ramps at Auschwitz was instituted from July 17, 1942[6].’ August was the month when the biggest and worst typhus epidemic hit the camps. That shock reverberated though Auschwitz in particular as the long-extinct disease of typhus, a bacillus carried by body lice, returned to haunt the labour-camps. A Polish resistance movement might have introduced it to the German military:[7] civilians entering the camp had brought it, not the inmates deported there.[8] New protocols called ‘special treatment’ (‘Sonderbehandlung’) were swiftly developed and implemented,[9] for all camp members, that involved routines of hair shaving, cleansing and delousing of clothing, bedding and living quarters.[10] Two uttely different interpretations of that summer, one Exterminist and the other Revisionist, stand before us when reading the following decrypts.

Here are inmate figures[11] from the decrypts, for Jews, Poles and Russians, at quarter-year intervals:

Total       Jews     Poles    Russians
January 1942    9884        191      9186    2095
April          10242       1296      8475     354
July           16369[12]   6241      7676     153
October        16996       7500      6470      –
January ’43    28350      11332     12646      –
There were more Poles than Jews in the camp: Jews comprised 39% of the inmates on average, Poles 65% and Russians a mere 3%. (The two categories of Poles and Jews are overlapping, maybe why the ‘totals’ here given don’t add up.) Many people have conjectured that far larger numbers than these had been arriving but not departing, unmentioned in any monthly reports:[13] but in that case, what would have been the point of keeping meticulous daily records of people coming and going? Some eighty-five thousand persons arrived at the Auschwitz camp that year.[14] It’s hard to see more than forty thousand Jews arriving, from those figures, plus others coming and going. The camp’s Monthly Reports often have many Jews leaving the camp, as well as arriving. Of the deaths in the camp that year, nearly sixty percent were Jewish[15], and in such a nightmarish situation one can appreciate how stories got going.

Each monthly bulletin reports on the previous month. The report for June (with camp names in capitals) said:

V Labour and Industry
The shortage of manpower leads to a considerable employment of prisoners outside as well as inside concentration camps. There are constant enquiries regarding the trade of prisoners and evidence on the part of undertakings and firms of demand for prisoner labour.
On May 1st, LUBLIN can provide: 1200 clerical workers and students, 200 bakers, 150 butchers, 350 agricultural workers and 800 workers of various trades, total 2700. (85/7). On the same date DR. Caesar is informed that KL RAVENSBRUECK disposes of 3 German speaking women horticulturalists and 2 botanists. (85/12). The transfer of 95 skilled workers and 180 unskilled workers to the GUSTLOFF works is arranged on May 13th at the rate of RM 5,00 per day and per prisoner for skilled workers, and RM 4,00 for unskilled workers. (60/8). KL DACHAU sends 18 prisoners to the Versuchsanstald fuer Ernaehrung und Verpflegung on May 15th., at a rate of RM 0,30 per day per prisoner. (70/8) 20 prisoners are required on June 22nd. For laying a field cable from ENNSDORF to MAUTHAUSEN (139/15). In KL FLOSSENBUERG, prisoners who are not fit for heavier work will be employed on repair work, and the finishing of children’s toys. (80/28). A demand for 30 to 40 prisoners comes from a cement factory (131/18). Himmler himself requires by 10 a.m. on May 27th the number of glass blowers available in KLA (86/34); and canvassing of makers of musical instruments is proceeding in July (174/1).[16]

At last it can be told – prisoners not fit for heavier work had to finish off children’s toys.
Beside the monthly totals, comments such as these were written:
Dachau: on 19 May, 18 prisoners to be transferred.  20 May, 67 prisoners leave. 20 carpenters sent from Dachau to Mauthausen.
Auschwitz: A Pole escaped, 13 May. 15 May, Himmler expresses his interest in the tanning experiments.[17] 9 June: Typhus, 18 out of 106 died.
August: ‘On 5 June AUSCHWITZ is told that for political reasons they will not receive 2,000 Jewish workers, but on 17 June Jewish transports from Slowakia are announced..’ June 9: ‘Typhus dominates the camp: 18 out of 106 cases have died before 15 June; 22 out of 77 further cases have died before 22nd June.’ Camp MAUTHAUSEN: ‘They are told that Dr. Ruscher is allowed to use coloured photography which is necessary for his experiments. On 4 May a prisoner is shot in flight.’

September  ‘For the first time returns are given for deaths of prisoners: the figures for August are: NIEDERHAGEN 21, AUSCHWITZ 6829 (or 6889) men, 1525 women; BUCHENWALD 74; FLOSSENBURG 88. The AUSCHWITZ figure represents about 30% of the total given in the IPCC figures; the cause is likely to be typhus, as typhus was rife in June (see last summary) and a policeman is suspected of typhus in September. Deaths must constitute a large proportion if not all of the “departures” mentioned in the GPCC figures, which total 5325 for 19 days of August. During 19 days of August arrivals total 4989 so that they nearly balance deaths. About half of the prisoners are Jews. AUSCHWITZ is said to be under a ban on 4th September. Deaths in BUCHENWALD represent a tiny proportion of the departures.’[18]

Suddenly, a vast mortality was reported in one camp – viewed by British historian Nick Terry as part of a covert Jew-extermination program.[19] But that is not a logical inference, on account of the way camp mortality then plummeted after September,[20] once the epidemic had been brought under control. Typhus plus typhoid fever and dysentery, diahorrea etc., were raging in the camp, a real nightmare with inmates banned from leaving owing to the risk of infection: as David Irving wrote: ‘There was evidently a deadly epidemic raging at the camp, since a message of September 4 in reply to a request for a thousand prisoners for building the Danube railway, stated that Auschwitz could not provide them until the ‘ban’ (Lagersperre) on the camp had been lifted.’[21]The ‘ban’ confirms that the terrible peak in mortality was caused by infectious diseases and not something else.

Camp Kommander Rudolf Hoss applied for some rubber truncheons, but was advised they were ‘unobtainable in Breslau.’[22]There is a report of some executions taking place:  ‘Executions are reported: a Russian civilian is shot when attempting to escape from NIEDERHAGEN. FLOSSENBERG is allowed a lorry and a bus to convey Polish civilians to a wood for execution. A prisoner is hung in HINZERT and nine more are shot.’ One may conjecture that, if a Polish resistance movement had indeed started the typhus epidemic, the execution of a whole busload of Poles in September could have been payback.
October: ‘The large influx of Russian civilians, Jews and Poles continues and it is reasonable to suppose that deaths from typhus are still high in AUSCHWTZ and probably in other camps such as NIEDERHAGEN and HINZERT. Concentration camp prisoners are being used in large numbers in COLOGNE, and there is evidence of a cutting down of outside commitments to increase the number of prisoners available for war work. A new camp is intended at DEBICA. SACHSENHAUSEN evidently contains Englishmen as it has asked for an English interpreter. Some light on conditions in Concentration camps is shown by the instruction that a visiting labour commission is not to be shown either “special quarters” (Sonderunterbringung) or, if it can be avoided, “prisoners shot when escaping.”

A fall in the inmate population was discussed:
Auschwitz: ‘The total falls from 22,455 on 1st Sept. to 17,365 on 30th Sept. and to 16966 on 20th Oct. No figures for deaths have been given this month and therefore it cannot be said what proportion of the daily departures, which amounts to 2395 on 7th Sept, 1429 on 8th Sept, and otherwise vary between 550 and 47, are due to death: it is however known that at least 11 SS men have been taken into hospital on suspicion of typhus during October. As about 2,000 men in the total are always unaccounted for, it is difficult to be certain in what categories the arrivals and departures belong. But on 7th Sept. the numbers of political prisoners, Jews and Poles have fallen by 1, 2020 and 284 respectively, a net loss of 2305; the net loss in the total column in 2379; therefore it is clear that the majority of the departures are Jews.

That sudden drop of several thousand in inmate population was due, the analyst concluded, not to illness but to departures,chiefly Jews. He was scrutinising the several columns of data. Some ten percent of the total camp inmates are ‘always unaccounted for’ he concluded – which helps to resolve the vitally-important issue: with all the comings and goings in the labour-camps, about ten percent – which here amounts to two thousand out of some twenty thousand – remain unregistered. In this situation, there cannot be tens of thousands of Jews continually arriving, as Hilbert wants to believe. Instead, a majority of the departures are Jewish. That ought to settle quite a bit of the ongoing debate.
November: ‘the use of prisoners for war industries on a large scale is discussed below…the largest transference is the move of Jews to AUSCHWITZ for the synthetic rubber works. Another major movement is the transference of sick prisoners to DACHAU. Meanwhile typhus continues, particularly at AUSCHWITZ… the women’s camp remains stationary at about 6500 because arrivals balance departures.’

Jews are here being imported into AUSCHWITZ as skilled industrial labour, at the Buna-Monowitz plant. The report for Dachau confirmed this: ‘Large departures .. due to prisoners being sent on war work to Auchwitz and other places, which removes all but 9 of the Jews and many Russian civilians.’ The camp total was around ten thousand. Thus, sick prisoners were being farmed out to the Dachau camp, while fit-to-work Jews went the other way.

In December there were over twenty thousand inmates at Auschwitz: ‘half of these numbers are Jews and large numbers arrive and depart every day.’

For January of 1943 at Auschwitz, ‘The Buna-werk is still employing 2210 men of whom 1100 are on the actual work. Jewish watchmakers are sent to SACHSENHAUSEN where they are urgently needed. Typhus cases continue to be reported although strenuous measures have been adopted and 36 cases were found among the new batch of prisoners on 22 Jan.’

Jews are alluded to in these decrypts with a respectful tone, being imported into Auschwitz as skilled industrial labour, or urgently needed as watchmakers somewhere else. Clearly, one can either have an ongoing program of extermination or have workers capable of doing skilled work – but, not both. This new and detailed info about the camps has to comprise a final stake through the heart of the Exterminist thesis.

These decrypts allude several times to Heinrich Himmler in relation to the camps: that he took an interest in some tanning experiments, that he asked about how many glass blowers were available, and that he sought out makers of musical instruments. On 17 July, 1942 he visited Auschwitz and it’s always claimed that he ‘witnessed a mass gassing.’[23] One has a choice here, between two different stories, between two different worlds.

These primary-source documents show a momentous change in the summer of 1942, with the outbreak of typhus and the initiation of ‘special treatment’ routines. Sudden death arrives, but I suggest that no intentional extermination is happening. Winston Churchill’s speech about ‘We are in the presence of a crime without a name…’ on 24 August 1942, no doubt alluded, as Dr Terry has made clear, to what decrypts had been telling him about the brutal Russian campaign – and not, as has been alleged in certain quarters, to ‘the Holocaust.’[24] [25]

A focus upon these British Intelligence decrypts could exert a terminal effect upon the ‘Holocaust’ industry. Holo-tomes tomes roll off the press (Dr Terry had kindly sent three hundred titles published since 2000), but have they not ignored this primary-source data? They omit discussing what the decrypts describe, for the very reason that we are here concerned to expose it.

The Primary Sources
We seek out the primary-source data, in order to find the truth. For example, there are two raw-data sources, which are more or less independent, for how people died in the German labour-camps: the Death-Books of Auschwitz, and the Arolsen Archives (now called the International Tracing Service), a database collected by the International Red cross over the last sixty years. The latter covers all the German labour-camps. These two sources have two important things in common: a roughly similar number of Jewish deaths recorded, around thirty thousand, for the Auschwitz camp, and also that neither source records one single death by gassing.

The British-intel decrypts didn’t record the deaths but only ‘departures’ – which includes deaths –  except for the one month of August 1942 when it gave a figure, and we’ve shown how this is fully compatible with the number given by the Death-Books for that month.
But, if anyone still wants to believe in huge numbers of Jews brought into the camps, not being recorded as ‘arrivals’ and then gassed right away – a quintessentially unverifiable concept – then a different kind of argument will have to become relevant, of intact coke records. This has not here concerned us, but the records of coke consumed by the cremation-ovens do impose a strict ceiling upon the number of bodies that can have been cremated.

Thus we emerge from Storyland, we leave behind us the Fairy Tale from Hell, which a Culture of Untruth wanted to manipulate. Instead we choose to analyse the actual, primary-source data. Nowadays hardly anyone believes the words of politicians, and we respectfully suggest that uncensoring the truth would be the best way to make progress towards a civilisation that would be worth living in. We politely request open debate concerning the meaning of these British-intelligence decrypts.[1] British Intelligence in World War Two, HMSO, 1981 F.Hinsey Ed., Vol. II, p.673.

[2] BBC Radio 4 ‘Holocaust Documents Released’ 20 May 1997: Holocaust-historian Sir Martin Gilbert on how historians ‘failed to notice….’ etc.

[3] Nick Terry, Conflicting Signals: British Intelligence on the ‘Final Solution’, 1941-1942’, Yad Vashem Studies 32, 2004, pp. 351-396, p.382.

[4] Robert van Pelt, Auschwitz 1270 to the Present, 1996: ‘…the words “further East” meant gas chambers.’ Also, of course, ‘passing through’ (as in the numbers that ‘passed through the camp’) alluded to ‘the process of extermination,’ p.326. The East was a ‘domain of redemption’ for the German nation, he explained!

[5] Search for ‘Public Record Office’ then go to the Discovery catalogue, and insert a file name, eg HW 16/65.

[6] N. Terry, Op. Cit. p.382.

[7] Irving, Churchill’s War, p.964 ref. 28 (citing archive sources in US)

[8] Rudolf Report, 2003, p.60.

[9] On July 29, a radio message authorized the camp administration to pick up gas for disinfestation: “The permit for travel by truck, from Auschwitz to Dessau for the collection of gas, which is urgently required for the disinfestation of the camp, is hereby issued.” Mattogno, Special Treatment, p.45.

[10] See Carlo Mattogno’s book Special Treatment in Auschwitz for evidence of the meaning of this term.

[11] Go to our What really happened site and click on ‘Auschwitz population in Excel’ and the excel spreadsheet will give you the monthly means: or for raw data examine the decrypt-data starting here.

[12] This total for July was published by the Red Cross, see Mattogno op cit p.23.

[13] That number cited by Hilberg is wholly impossible in relation to mortality figures: the muffle-furnaces or cremation-ovens, about fifty of them in Auschwitz-Birkenau, take one hour per body-cremation, were operated over twelve hours of the day, and were each online for about half of the time: which gives a maximum of around one hundred thousand cremations possible in the year: see Carlo Mattogno, ‘The Crematoria ovens of Asuchwitz and Birkenau’, inDissecting, ed. Rudolf.

[14] For that computation, see our ‘Deaths at Auschwitz in 1942.’

[15] This figure comes from ‘The Death Books of Auschwitz,’ analysed in Ref. 13. But, there was a far lower proportion in 1943, a mere 24%: see our ‘Deaths at Auschwitz, 1942’

[16] Decrypt HW 16/65 August 1942, p.21.

[17] But NB Himmler’s visit to Auchwitz was on 17-18th July: Mattogno, ref. 10, p.17

[18] This September report is enormously important, as giving a link or a comparison with the monthly deaths recorded in the Death Books of Auschwitz (2005) –discussed here.

[19] Terry op. Cit., p.386.

[20]  For analysis, see NK, Deaths at Auschwitz in 1942.’

[21] David Irving, Churchill’s War,  p548.

[22] Decrypt HW 16/6 5 Oct 1942: Irving ibid., p.700 (NB I couldn’t find that decrypt).

[23] This claim is ‘ incessantly repeated and never proven:’ Mattogno, ref 10,, p.17.

[24] See Terry op. Cit. P.360.

[25] See Jurgen Graf’s Giant with Feet of  Clay for this topic: it’s a rebuttal of Raol Hilberg’s three-volume ‘classic’ Destruction of the European Jews, 2003, which treats of the Russian campaign in its 2nd Volume.


Holocaust faker explains himself .



A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry
Published by: HBB Press
History Behind Bars

The Case For Auschwitz

By Robert Jan van Pelt, Indiana University Press Bloomington, IN 2002. 570 pp., with notes, bibliography, indexed.

Henry Gardner

It is strange that an event, or rather a series of events that have marked the history of the 20th century perhaps more strongly than any other with the possible exception of the annihilation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, should never have generated any kind of true historical debate. Whatever exchange of arguments did occur, took on the form of a dialog the French call un dialogue de sourds – the other side does not exist.

One of the reasons for this lack of an open exchange of ideas may be the fact that for nearly fifty years the camps at Auschwitz and Birkenau, were, if not inaccessible, at least not open to independent researchers; moreover, it was not even known to the general public that an enormous amount of documents had survived the end of World War Two, safely tucked away in Soviet and other archives.

It is the merit of Professor Robert J. van Pelt to have put Auschwitz back on the European map with the well-researched and most readable book on the history of the town and its region,Auschwitz, 1270 to the Present, which he wrote together with Deborah Dwork. After the famous trial in early 2000 in which David Irving sued Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt for libel, professor van Pelt summed up his work for the defendants in a further book, The Case for Auschwitz. This work is much less easy to read than the previous one, as it presents an incoherent selection of snippets from the history of the camp and disappoints the reader who was hoping for a comprehensive and conclusive presentation.

Now, good books should make you think, and in that sense The Case… is a good book. It makes you wonder about quite a number of things, especially if it is read together with other publications on this painful subject such as Roseman’s second thoughts – reconsiderations as he calls them – on the Wannsee conference in which he does away with many a cherished dogma, Hilberg’s book on the sources of the Holocaust which quietly drops such long-standing and formerly essential witnesses as Kurt Gerstein or Jan Karski, or Yehuda Bauer’s Rethinking the Holocaust which mentions in passing that the Nazi regime was not as totalitarian as most people seem to think or speaks of the difficulty of documenting the really central events of the Holocaust. This short list of recent critical writings about the German persecution of the European Jews is far from complete, particularly if one thinks of Fritjof Meyer’s article in Osteuropa (5/2002) which, in spite of its many errors, certainly opened up new vistas.

Yet Another Book on AuschwitzFaced with this array of publications that somehow stray from previous positions, the reader begins to feel that there is a kind of quiet redeployment of forces going on behind the scenes, with fictional treatments crowding center stage, and academic works with rather different viewpoints being published away from the public eye. Taking things a little further, the reader wonders about the way in which a revolutionary reassessment might take place, if it ever came to that. He comes to the conclusion that by all means one would try to avoid upsetting the traditional apple-cart and to make this a very much drawn-out affair with a great deal of smoke being generated to cover a more or less orderly retreat. The objective would be to gain as much time as possible for a consolidation of essential acquisitions, but also to relegate the whole matter to the realm of history, hoping that only a few researchers will spend time and energy on these questions. As long as much political or other profit can be reaped from the present state of things, however, there will be a tendency to keep the old ideas alive, in spite of any new evidence. Perhaps this book on Auschwitz is an example of the strain that has developed in this field of history.

Robert J. van Pelt confronts us with a copious serving of materials which he has grouped according to the type of source – intentional, legal, accidental – but in the end all this fails to convince that van Pelt really has a case. It is one thing to fend off a plaintiff in a libel suit before an English court, but quite another to sum up the evidence in such a way that an unbiased public will accept the arguments.

Robert Jan van Pelt lecturesRobert Jan van Pelt speaks at the Fifth Simon Wiesenthal Lecture, Vienna, 16 June 2011
By BuelentR (Own work) [GFDL ( or CC-BY-SA-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.0 (, via Wikimedia Commons

Van Pelt’s work is not, in the academic sense, a treatise based on a coherent progression of hypotheses and arguments that eventually arrives at a conclusion. It is, rather, a composite structure of many elements, no single one of which is really conclusive in itself or indispensable to the whole case. The author presents them to us and then selects from them individual traces which, when he views them as a whole, amount to some sort of evidence, a “convergence” of proof.

There are (at least) two things that appear odd about this procedure. The major one is the underlying tacit admission by the author that there is no indisputable proof of the uniqueness, singularity or whatever qualifier one might choose, of the Auschwitz crimes. The minor one is that by applying such a method, the author rejects the old legal rule “in dubio pro reo“ – that in case of doubt one should rule in favor of the accused; on the contrary, van Pelt interprets spurious items as he thinks fit and seems to hold that, at some point, a sufficient quantity of questionable elements will fuse into a new whole and serve as solid evidence against the accused.

The author was certainly not a lone wolf working on his own, and it would be surprising if he had not been aware or had not been made aware of these faults in his reasoning. One is thus led to think that perhaps David Irving, by taking the great risk of launching his libel suit, secretly intended to call the cards of his opponents and that we now see their hand, in the form of van Pelt’s book.

Pravda, or the Truth?If that actually was Irving’s intention, it certainly paid off in spite of the defeat he suffered in court, because one can henceforth concentrate on what appear to be the essential arguments in the case for Auschwitz.  Before we consider some of them in more detail, it is worthwhile noting van Pelt’s explicit statement that the official history of the camp, i.e. what was said about it once the Soviets had reached it, started with an outright invention and a monumental error, which some other people might be tempted to call a lie. The former is the statement by the reporter working for the Soviet party newspaper Pravda (Truth) that a high-voltage conveyor belt first electrocuted the victims and then dropped them into a blast furnace. The latter is the figure of 4 million victims announced in the Soviet special report published in May 1945. Until the fall of the Soviet empire, this figure was inscribed on metal tablets in the Auschwitz camp for all visitors to see; the figure has since been drastically reduced. The “Death Factory” with its mass electrocutions and subsequent hellish fire was later dropped in favor of the notionally more realistic gas chambers and crematoria.

The initial prevarications may perhaps be explained by the hue and cry of the last months of World War Two. Quietly dropping the impossible technical details was a relatively easy thing to do, although similar nonsense regarding the other German camps in Poland is part of the Nuremberg documents and therefore still legally binding for historians in some countries. The fact, however, that the figure of 4 million victims was a major element in the official presentation of the camp for a period of nearly fifty years shows the difficulty of charting a new course in these murky waters.

Naturally, one may argue that it matters little whether the present official figure of 1 million victims is true and the previous total was not, and perhaps morally there is a point here, but we must not forget that the basic argument regarding Auschwitz is not that masses of people were killed at that site (things like that have happened throughout history, unfortunately, and very much so during World War Two), but rather that, at Auschwitz, the outrageously high number of victims made it necessary for the perpetrators to invent, implement and perfect an industrial way of killing and that this “machinery of death“ constitutes a new quality in the long list of horrors man has inflicted upon his fellows.

The figure of 4 million victims thus served a double purpose. On the one hand, the Soviets used it to hide their own and – in time as well as in scope – far more extensive atrocities and, on the other, it conferred a new dimension upon the crimes committed by the Nazis and allowed the victors of World War II to justify any and all of their actions as being irreproachable in the fight against such a devilish enemy. Taking a step back, we find ourselves facing a circular argument: the enormity of the number of victims and the corresponding machine-like manner in which they were killed gave a quality of its own to the Auschwitz site, and because of this uniqueness it was henceforth futile to whittle down the numbers. Therefore, if one wants to gain a real insight into the case of Auschwitz, it is of great importance to evaluate the actual number of people who died there and the circumstances of their death – something that Fritjof Meyer has tried to do in a lame sort of way. What is needed now is not so much a computation from the top down, but a kind of zero-base analysis, a scrutiny of all the underpinnings of what many people regard as the crime of the millennium.

In doing so, one should not forget that the history of the Western World after World War Two rests, in its very essence, on our view of Auschwitz, and it does so in a multitude of ways, politically, morally, and economically. What is more, our perception of Auschwitz also shapes the future of our part of the world and while it is fairly safe to stick with traditional views when it comes to the West’s present political situation, these questions take on a different significance when we look at the problems that lie ahead.

But let us not diverge too far from our subject which is, after all, Robert J. van Pelt’s book, and let us take a closer look at some of the details he discusses.

A WitnessIn the chapter “Intentional Evidence” there is, for example, the witness Janda Weiss. He came to Auschwitz when he was 14 years old and, strangely enough, was not sent to the gas chamber right away, in spite of his young age. Instead, he was put to work as a kitchen helper and took food to the crematorium Sonderkommando to which he would a year later be assigned himself. Like so many other such witnesses, he was spared the fate that allegedly struck this unit regularly, and survived to tell his tale.

For a number of procedural reasons – Weiss made specific allegations and provided specific details – van Pelt agrees with Wilhelm Staeglich, the arch-revisionist, that Weiss should be taken seriously as a witness. So far, so good. But if we examine what Weiss had to say, at least two of the details he provided are so ludicrous as to disqualify him entirely.

There is, first of all, the story of elderly people being carted away from the “ramp” on a dump truck that took them straight to the burning trenches and tipped them into the fire alive. Leaving aside the question of whether it was possible to drive a heavy truck across the swampy ground of Birkenau without getting stuck, we reach a limit when we imagine this truck being carefully backed up to the edge of a trench blazing with fire and then dumping its uncooperative load. This can simply not be done in a matter of seconds and there is thus a serious risk of the truck catching fire or even exploding in the process. Any German soldier foolish enough to undertake such a highly risky and totally useless operation would certainly have been court-martialed for endangering government property, if not for outright sabotage.

There is also the question of what these trenches looked like: either the sides of the trench were banked, in which case the truck could not get close enough to the fire in such an operation, or if the banks were vertical, the tail end of the truck would extend into the flames and the edge of this make-shift trench would eventually crumble with disastrous results.

The other point where Weiss is talking nonsense is when he speaks about the lungs of the victims bursting from the gas, with a loud clamoring noise being heard three minutes after the gas had been fed into the chambers. He seems to imagine the lungs of the victims ballooning and eventually reaching the limits of the constraining power of the rib-cage. Sixty years on, the toxic effects of hydrocyanic acid should be clear to all concerned, and this statement alone should have convinced an intelligent person like van Pelt that the witness, at best, is reporting (false) hear-say but cannot himself be taken seriously.

This is only one example of many where the sources quoted by van Pelt are presented uncritically; this results in reports containing information that might be true if it were not for statements by the same person that clearly are not. This manner of presentation makes reading van Pelt’s book a difficult task. The reader has the feeling that the intention was less one of underpinning the traditional view of what happened at Auschwitz than one of confusing the other side by an assembly of truths, half-truths and errors, a jumble that has to be cleared before any real progress can be made in the discussion. This kind of tactic is akin to the blowing up of bridges behind an army in retreat, with the aim of slowing down the pursuers and keeping them occupied while new fortifications are being prepared.

The Gas ChambersThe centerpiece of any factual account of what happened or did not happen at the Auschwitz and Birkenau camps should be the discussion of the gas chambers, alleged or real. This topic is, of course, linked with that of the crematoria, so much so that the reader at large often confuses one with the other. Whereas for decades many authors maintained the belief that the crematoria were built specifically for the purpose of implementing the Holocaust, van Pelt’s opinion is not as blunt.

In their book on the history of the region of Auschwitz, van Pelt and Dwork speak only of the two smaller crematoria (IV and V at Birkenau) as having been purpose-built as extermination sites, the other two (II and III) having only later been modified for the purpose. They spend quite some time on the subject of Crematorium II which had initially been designed for the main camp at Auschwitz but was eventually built at Birkenau.

The “Chute”One of the points they scrutinize in particular with respect to this change of purpose and location is the access to the basement morgues. In the proposed design for Auschwitz, in late 1941, an entryway to a lower floor was located within the building and included, between two parallel flights of stairs, an item that the authors call a chute. The upper end of this stairway connected to a landing with a door towards the outside; the lower end was located in a vestibule from which an elevator provided the connection with the furnace room. Dwork and van Pelt attribute great importance to the fact that, when the original drawings were adapted for the Birkenau site, the SS design office did away with this chute. They argue that the reason for this modification was a change in the intended use of the crematorium – originally, “corpses were dropped through a chute but now live victims would walk to their death.”

The history of this chute is quite interesting: for a new crematorium, the SS design office at Auschwitz had proposed, in late October, 1941, a layout with a flight of stairs leading from an open porch to two morgues (“length as needed”) on the floor below, but without a chute. A month later, more detailed drawings were executed in Berlin, the entrance area was changed to a design more in keeping with the rest of the building, the access to the lower floor was moved to the other side, made wider, and a chute was added. Also, the location of the whole building, still within the main camp, seems to have been determined at that point, because these new drawings show a specific orientation. In February, 1942, this location appears on a layout plan for the main camp, shown on Plate 7 of the book by Dwork and van Pelt (Auschwitz, 1270 …).

The proposed site in the main camp was much too small to allow the incorporation of any morgues of the kind built later at Birkenau. The location, next to the small crematorium already existing, precluded anything but one short mortuary to be built, with its longitudinal axis perpendicular to the crematorium itself and a direct entrance to it would have used up even more space. Hence, when the location was changed from the main camp to Birkenau, modifications became not only possible but mandatory on account of the larger population of detainees and the rampant epidemics. Therefore, the major change in the design was the re-incorporation of two large morgues on the lower floor with direct access to one of them.

Dwork and van Pelt are not the only authors speaking of a “chute.” Franciszek Piper of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum also mentions such an item, not only for the planning stage but as an actual part of Crematorium III, which had a layout similar to Crematorium II, but not absolutely identical to it. In the book Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp he writes (p. 168): “Crematorium III had a second entrance … In addition to the stairway it housed a special concrete chute (Rutsche) through which corpses … were lowered straight down to the elevator shaft,” but he does not explain how this chute functioned; for corpses, some kind of metal half-pipe might have been suitable, but a concrete one much less so. In the face of Piper’s statement about the chute in Crematorium III, the argument brought forth by Dwork and van Pelt becomes rather weak

When it was decided to move the proposed crematorium to Birkenau other conditions, too, changed quite a bit. The ground at Birkenau was so swampy and the water-table so high that the lower floor could not be put completely underground; in fact, the ceiling slab of the morgues stuck out by about 90 centimeters. The differences in the type of ground between Auschwitz and Birkenau are clearly shown in various illustrations in the van Pelt / Dwork book; the photograph of construction work in the main camp on p. 232 is particularly telling when compared to the flooded drainage ditch being dug at Birkenau, p. 193, or to the ditch on p. 323, also full of water, in the “Kanada” section.

As far as the entrance to the morgues was concerned, the consequences imposed by these conditions were two-fold: at least in the case of Crematorium II for which van Pelt and others provide drawings, we can see that the original exit at the head of the stairs-cum-slide would now be blocked by the banked earthwork that was to cover the protruding part of the morgue next to it. Therefore, some other access to the basement became necessary (it may be that parts of the chute already built were simply blocked off). At Crematorium III, from what F. Piper says, this was avoided, possibly by a slight displacement of the morgue, which allowed the former stairwell with its chute to be retained. In both cases, around these crematoria there was enough room for a new, direct, straight and wide access to one of the morgues to be installed there; what remains of these steps is shown on p. 213 of The Case… for Crematorium II. The other morgue in the two crematoria, the alleged gassing room, was too close to a fence to allow such an access to be created.

These modifications presented obvious advantages: there was a direct access to the morgue area and stretchers could be handled with ease; furthermore, a new second entrance (at least for Crematorium II) or the old stairway-cum chute (at Crematorium III) allowed service personnel to enter the basement rooms without having to pass through the mortuary area.

The DoorsThe layout of the underground facilities of Crematorium II (and III, of similar design) is discussed at length in The Case…. One of the details to which van Pelt attributes great importance is the fact that when the stairs-cum-slide were abandoned for Crematorium II the double door leading into Morgue 1 (the alleged gas chamber) was turned around: it had formerly swung into the morgue and would now swing into the vestibule. Whether the doors should swing one way or the other in a homicidal gas chamber is, however, not so easy to answer, as we shall see further on.

The question of the way those doors opened is fairly involved. Leuchter, in his report about gas chambers, had argued that doors swinging into a gas-chamber would be difficult to open because of corpses piling up against them from the inside, and so van Pelt was pleased when he could show that the re-design of Crematorium II for its installation at Birkenau had also led to a re-orientation of the doors of Morgue 1 which now opened outwards. Part of the reason for this change is, however, the fact that those doors formerly had to open inwards, because they would otherwise have obstructed the foot of the stairs-cum-slide. With that element out of the way there was now a choice.

Although the various drawings of the underground facilities of these crematoria published by van Pelt always show double doors, ca. 2 m wide, for Piper the entrance to the alleged gas chamber measured only 1.92 by 1 meter wide (Anatomy …, p. 166). Piper does not say which way this narrow door opened.

Piper has spent his whole professional life at Auschwitz; R.J. van Pelt and his staff have visited the site and made detailed investigations there, and yet the two are not in agreement on what may be an essential element of the gas chambers – perhaps Yehuda Bauer was thinking of discrepancies like these when he spoke of the difficulty of documenting the Holocaust.

The CrowdThese design considerations direct our attention to a question which has not been treated in much detail in the many works on the subject, be they affirmative or revisionist: How does one move hundreds or even more than a thousand naked people calmly and efficiently from the undressing room to the gassing chamber? This is not as easy as it sounds, because one has to take into account the layout of those underground chambers and, anyway, crowd control is never a simple matter, especially if the crowd is mortally fearful.

A few figures, first of all: from the drawings and photographs published in The Case… and elsewhere one can deduce that the “undressing room“ measured about 8 m in width by 50 m in length, or about 400 sqm, whereas the “gassing chamber” was smaller: about 7 m wide and 30 m long, i.e. roughly 200 sqm.

This reviewer does not wish to argue about how many people one can actually squeeze into the space of a square meter (= 10 square feet) in order to kill them. What is more interesting is how much space they needed for undressing and arranging their clothes in a reasonably calm way – certainly for getting ready to go into the “bath“ they will need a lot more space than the one square foot per head van Pelt allows them for the final kill. The undressing room is about twice the size of the “gassing chamber“, but even if this now thins such a crowd to something like four persons on a square meter (or one on a square of 50 by 50 cm), the people cannot possibly undress in an orderly fashion and unrest will most certainly start spreading among the victims-to-be, if not already present.

Therefore, it is not convincing that the large crematoria were able to handle such masses of people at one time. To a certain extent, however, it is not even necessary to argue this point in one way or another, because for any mass killings, the bottleneck would be the crematoria, and there would always be enough time to divide large groups into smaller ones and spread the gassing operations.

Be that as it may, we are told that the still-unsuspecting victims, hundreds or even two thousand at one time, would walk down the ten steps from the outside, strip, leave their clothes somewhere in the undressing hall and then move on through a double door on the other side of the room. Before reaching this double door, they would have to squeeze into a passage about 5 meters long where the width of the hall (some 8 meters) suddenly narrowed to something like 2 meters. Once through this double door (let us assume that both wings of the door stood open) the victims would find themselves in a vestibule with a free floor area of about 4 by 4 meters, no windows, several closed doors facing them and something like a freight elevator against the opposite wall. Here, they were expected to make a 90-degree turn and enter the “bath“ which, at least for van Pelt, again had a double door, 2 m wide (opening against them, we are told). If we are to believe Piper, the crowd of victims had to squeeze through a single door half the width that van Pelt assigns to it.

Why did this crowd of frightened and naked people move at all? Well, somewhere behind them there were ferocious SS men with whips, and possibly dogs, yelling at them to move ahead, but as soon as the first ones to reach the gas chamber would have realized that there were no real showers, shouted that it was all fake and tried to make their way back against the advancing crowd, one can easily imagine that all would come to a stand-still in the narrow passage and the vestibule. The cordon of SS-men at the rear could beat the hell out of the poor naked people near them, but that would not hurt those further away; panic would ensue, with corpses piling up in the constricted space of the passage and the vestibule, and the dozen or so SS men somewhere at the back would be in great danger of being torn to pieces by the desperate crowd of hundreds of people milling around them.

As long as the victims were old people and young children, there might not be much active resistance, but we also hear that large groups of French and other fighters from the underground were killed in this way. It is doubtful that, in general, the victims were thoroughly searched before departure; certainly this was not done on arrival to those selected to be gassed and thus it would have been very easy for some of the doomed to hide knives or other weapons which would come in useful at close quarters, or they might simply use their bare hands.

If someone, in the turmoil, managed to jam the door to the “bath”(that was easy enough to do as it now opened outwards) there would be no way but to hack the crowd to pieces and then try to start over again, although in that case the survivors would no longer let themselves be led like lambs to the slaughter and would have had to be dealt with by more conventional means.

Much weight is attributed to the alleged fact that the killing procedure had two distinct phases – one of undressing and one of gassing. There is general agreement among all concerned that the delousing operation to which incoming detainees were subjected did indeed involve two steps – undressing and showering – but when reflecting on the difficult operation of moving thousands of naked people through underground chambers one wonders why the SS would really want to make things so difficult for themselves.

It would have been so much easier to move groups of people into a hall, shut the door on them and then introduce the gas. True, this would mean that the clothes those poor people wore could not easily be recovered, but this was, after all, not the main objective. The operation itself would have been a great deal easier and the dirty clothes could have been burned right along with their owners. Anyway, in the suitcases they had already given up there should have been enough clothing to make the SS happy.

The First CrematoriumWhile the Birkenau crematoria were the largest in the Auschwitz area, they were not the first to be operated there, as has already been mentioned. An existing building at the main camp had been equipped with Topf double-muffle ovens and a morgue which is said to have been used for the first gassings. Robert J. van Pelt quotes the testimony of the SS-man Pery Broad on pp. 224ff of his book. Broad claims to have observed from his office in the building of the Political Department the preparations for such actions. He even goes so far as to state what happened inside the building and what the eventual victims said to one another, but this is no doubt hearsay.

According to Broad, the victims, several hundred of them, at first stood in the courtyard of the crematorium, which was surrounded by a high wall and were then led into the building. If we follow the plan that Dwork and van Pelt publish as Plate 3 of their book, the victims at first entered a hall some 4 m wide and 6 m long, then turned right to move on, through a door of normal width, into the corpse-washing room which measured about 4 by 4 meters. Here, they made a left turn, passed through another door of normal width that led into the morgue. Broad states that they were accompanied by several guards who withdrew once the hall had been filled and who closed the door from the side of the corpse-washing room.

This account, again, is somewhat hard to accept, because the whole procedure certainly took some 5 or 10 minutes, which means that the victims at the front of the queue had plenty of time to notice that any showers that may have existed in the morgue were fake, and to react accordingly. It takes little effort to imagine the scenes that would then have taken place in the narrow space in front of the morgue.

Other CampsAlthough van Pelt does not discuss camps other than Auschwitz, the same general considerations of crowd management apply mutatis mutandis to the other extermination camps as well. At Treblinka, Sobibór or Belzec, the crowd of naked victims, perhaps 1000 or 2000 strong, is said to have stood waiting in a fenced-in open passage some 100 m long and perhaps 3 m wide, leading to the narrow side of a building almost a meter off the ground. The victims then had to climb 3 steps (each of them, it appears, half a meter high), go through a first door to enter a corridor about five feet wide with several normal-size doors on either side. These doors led into the gas chambers which in themselves measured about 4 by 8 meters and could thus accommodate somewhere between 100 and 300 people, depending on whose description the reader chooses to follow.

The guards at the entrance to the building would have had to count the people entering, stopping the queue once the quota for one of the rooms had been reached. Then the guards themselves would have had to enter the corridor, push any hesitating victims forcefully into the particular chamber being filled and close the door on the fighting and screaming crowd. Those outside had to witness all this until it was their turn. Once all the rooms had been filled, the diesel engine would be started up and the exhaust gas fed to the chambers. Even a proponent of the traditional view would have to admit that such a scenario may be difficult to put into practice.

A Year without GassingsIt may well be that similar perplexing pictures crossed Fritjof Meyer’s mind and that this strengthened his idea to discard, as killing places, the morgues of the crematoria. In his remarkable paper, Meyer states that, from the moment they were finished (March – June 1943), the crematoria were hardly used for gassings at all, with the killings probably (Meyer’s term) taking place in two little farmhouses. He attributes the stop on gassings to an order from Himmler given in April, 1943, which specified that all detainees, even those bedridden, should do useful work; however, Meyer does not say why the systematic killings were resumed a year later, nor why he believes that it was.

Regarding these little farmhouses there is the problem, however, that general agreement exists among traditional historians on their having been taken out of service in the spring of 1943, with “Bunker 1“ being dismantled and “Bunker 2“ being mothballed for a year. Putting two and two together, one may thus safely conclude on the basis of perfectly acceptable sources that for a period of about one year, from the spring of 1943 onwards, no systematic gassings took place in the Auschwitz-Birkenau area at all. In the light of this situation it would be indicated to re-examine all accounts of witnesses for this span of time, in an effort to weed out the unreliable ones.

The conclusion just mentioned is corroborated by the so-called Kas(z)tner Report, which van Pelt knows about but speaks of only indirectly by quoting the French revisionist writer Rassinier; he has the latter state that Kas(z)tner, a leading Jewish figure in Hungary at the time of the “Hungarian action,” claimed that the gas chambers at Auschwitz were out of action for 8 or 9 months between the fall of 1943 and May, 1944. Even though Rassinier’s quotation on the Kas(z)tner Report appears twice in van Pelt’s book, the author does not discuss it, nor does he include Kas(z)tner’s name in his index. Van Pelt does not dispute Kas(z)tner’s statement.

For those not familiar with Kas(z)tner’s activities at the time, let it be said that Kas(z)tner tried to negotiate, on behalf of the Germans, the “Jews-for-trucks” deal with the Allies. The negotiations did not succeed and only one group of about 2,000 Hungarian Jews was able to leave the Axis territory via Switzerland. Kas(z)tner was later mysteriously murdered in Israel.

The “Chimneys”Another topic that van Pelt treats in his book is the question of the little chimneys on top of the morgues of Crematoria II and III through which the Zyklon B pellets with their load of toxic hydrocyanic acid were supposedly introduced. There has been much discussion on the subject of these openings, the issue being whether there were any openings in the roof slab at all, what they may have looked like, what purpose they may have served, and when they were installed.

Among traditional historians, the argument runs as follows: although the basements of Crematoria II and III were not originally planned as gas chambers; they were modified for the purpose some time in late 1942. This meant (why, actually?) that holes had to be broken into the roof slab and little chimneys raised above them through which the Zyklon B pellets would be dropped into wire-mesh columns below. These latter devices assured an even distribution of the pellets and enabled their extraction, back up through the chimneys, as soon as the victims had died; removal of the bodies could thus start almost immediately. The reasons for such a rush to empty the gassing chamber are a bit unclear because the killing capacity of the morgues in any case exceeded the cremation capacity of the ovens; thus killing even more people than the crematorium could process would have would have made it difficult to dispose of the bodies promptly.

In a number of books one can find a photograph showing Crematorium II some time in the winter of 1942/43, during its construction phase. The aboveground section of the gassing chamber is visible, as are 4 box-like things on its roof slab, but their location do not quite correspond to the indications given by van Pelt or to the little smudges on air-reconnaissance photographs said to prove their existence.

What is reasonably clear, though, when one considers the height of the above-ground part of the morgue (about 90 cm, given by van Pelt and Dwork, p. 325) is the height of the boxes – about half the height of the morgue protruding from the ground, i.e. something like 50 centimeters. Now, while an object of that height may show up quite clearly on air-reconnaissance photographs, especially if the sunlight strikes it at a low angle, we must not forget that the roof slab of the morgues did not remain bare; in fact, the drawings shown by van Pelt clearly indicate that it was to be covered by a coat of bitumen, a layer of gravel and a layer of earth, coming to an aggregate height of about 50 centimeters. If we assume that the layer of earth would cover itself with vegetation, we may wonder whether the remaining height of those shafts would really show up on air-reconnaissance photographs in any way. The seven dormer windows on the roof of the two crematoria, each of them about one meter high, are hardly visible at all on the same print.

It is worth noting, in this respect, that on p. 208 of The Case…, van Pelt shows a drawing of what the wire-mesh columns may have looked like; the top of the column is contained in some kind of shaft with a lid on it, but this lid is almost flush with a line apparently indicating the surface of the earth cover on the crematorium roof. The arbitrariness in the design and in the interpretation of these wire-mesh columns thus becomes obvious.

There is another oddity here: van Pelt argues that the wire-mesh columns and the Zyklon B chimneys had been removed prior to the morgue below being blown up, and that, possibly, the holes had been filled in. It is relatively easy to dismantle the kind of wire-mesh column that witnesses have described (but what was done with them?), whereas, in order to remove the little chimneys, it would have been necessary to remove the earth around them as well, then possibly even fill in the hole (the author muses about this) before blowing up the whole thing – not really very convincing, prima facie. As an afterthought, van Pelt brings in the findings of another team claiming to have identified such holes in the rubble on the basis of reinforcing bars that had been cut and bent back on themselves. Not much can be said here about this assertion, because van Pelt gives no further details.

The Gas and the PelletsIn the background of these architectural considerations, there is a more basic question: The Auschwitz camp administration had been aware, practically from the moment it was established, of the work of Degesch Co., the makers of Zyklon B, in the field of the design and operation of disinfestation chambers. As a matter of fact, delousing chambers using the Degesch-Kreislaufsystem were in actual use for the treatment of clothing and other objects as part of the Auschwitz reception facilities – most if not all of the Zyklon B delivered to Auschwitz was employed for this purpose. It is even claimed that the Degesch work had inspired the camp authorities when it came to finding a suitable agent for mass killings, namely Zyklon B. This system functioned in a self-contained and automatic way: in a gas-tight chamber, the Zyklon B cans were safely opened mechanically, the pellets fell into a pan, and a stream of warm air facilitated the speedy release and a good distribution of the gas in the chamber.

This procedure could easily have been incorporated into the homicidal gas chambers of Crematoria II and III equipped, as they were, with ventilation facilities. It would merely have been necessary to connect the respective part of a Kreislauf chamber to the air intake of the ventilation system. Instead, we are told that for their homicidal objective the camp authorities opted for a very primitive and potentially hazardous solution that was not even simpler to install than a Kreislauftype might have been.

Regarding the toxic gas, the reader will notice in van Pelt’s book (p. 499) a line stating “… the cyanide degassed for twenty-four hours after the tin had been opened.” For this reason, the author tells us, it was necessary to remove the pellets from the gas chamber through the wire-mesh column before the doors of the chamber could be opened and the bodies taken out. Thus, some 30 minutes after the cyanide pellets had been dumped into the chimney, the little container which was now liberally giving off its poisonous load to the surroundings would have had to be pulled up again to roof level, emptied into a suitable receptacle and safely disposed of. While the supply of Zyklon B cans to the gassing installations has been described by numerous witnesses, no one has ever even mentioned, much less described, this unimpressive but unavoidable second phase of the operation. In fact, witnesses generally agree on the Red Cross vehicle that had, supposedly, brought the poison to the site driving away soon after the gas had been introduced into the chamber.

Furthermore, while one may still accept as possible this kind of primitive procedure for Crematoria II and III with their ventilation systems, such a method becomes inapplicable in the other crematoria or in the farmhouse “bunkers” where the pellets were simply dumped into the gas chambers through suitable openings. In the face of the argument put forth by van Pelt that Crematoria II and III were originally not conceived as homicidal installations and later had to be modified accordingly whereas Crematoria IV and V were built for that very purpose, a dilemma becomes readily apparent: If we are to believe the traditionalists, the farmhouse “bunkers” had proved on numerous occasions that it was sufficient to throw pellets into a room full of victims to achieve the desired result, including speedy removal of the corpses to make room for the next load of victims – but then why was it necessary to improve on this procedure by the installation of wire-mesh columns in Crematoria II and III when they were converted into gas chambers? And if it was necessary to find a better method for Crematoria II and III, why was this new way of doing things not applied to those crematoria (IV and V) that were, from the very beginning, conceived as killing machines?

Thus, the questions of whether the pellets had to be removed from the chambers or not and whether strong mechanical ventilation was needed or not become crucial: one cannot argue both one way (for Crematoria II and III) and the other (for Crematoria IV and V, and/or the bunkers). It is not at all clear why, if the farmhouse bunkers had functioned satisfactorily, it was necessary to install pellet removal devices in Crematoria II and III in spite of their very efficient ventilation system (van Pelt demonstrates this mathematically) while neither ventilation nor pellet removal was deemed advisable in Crematoria IV and V which were being built at the same time and claimed, by van Pelt and Dwork, to have been undisguised killing stations designed for this particular purpose. If we consider the matter in detail, this latter claim is certainly not convincing, because ventilation was as poor in Crematoria IV and V as in the “bunkers“, if not worse, quite apart from the fact that the floors could not be properly washed and that the ceiling of the death chambers was at a height of 2 meters and consisted of 3-cm Masonite board – porous and easily damaged.

The CellarsHere and there, in the text above, we have already looked at the various changes the underground morgues went through in the months before they were finally built as part of Crematoria II and III at Birkenau. If we go to one of the early plans for the new crematorium sketched out by the camp administration (Anatomy…, p. 202/3) we see that there were two morgues one labeled “B-Keller” perpendicular to the furnace hall), the other, “L-Keller” (in line with the furnace hall). It is likely that L-Keller stands for Leichenkeller, corpse cellar i.e. mortuary; B-Keller is not immediately clear, however. In the Anatomy text, the authors of the particular chapter (Pressac and van Pelt) explain that the ”B“ stood for “belüftet“, i.e. aerated, but this is not convincing, because both morgues were aerated in one way or another; also, from a linguistic point of view, this explanation jars uncomfortably.

What, then, does the ”B“ stand for? As everyone knows, the Germans have always been a most law-abiding people, even though the laws under which they have lived may not at all times have been very equitable. In 1934, the government, perhaps wanting to promote cremation (a Germanic custom, at least for VIPs), promulgated a law setting out the procedures that were to apply to crematoria. In view of the irreversibility of the process of cremation it was stipulated that the corpses had to undergo a “Leichenbeschau” (corpse inspection) before cremation. We know that, at least for Crematoria II and III, the German construction code which demanded a “dignified” appearance for such buildings was respected (to the point that the edges of doorways etc. were executed in sandstone). It is therefore highly likely, also in view of the activity of the camp surgeon, that corpse-inspection facilities would have been incorporated. If this assumption is accepted, such a place would logically have been labeled B(eschauungs)-Keller

In fact, this view becomes quite convincing when we look at the actual crematoria (II and III at Birkenau: There is now a direct entrance into one of the morgues which would take on the function of an inspection hall; after having been inspected, the corpses would be taken to the second mortuary and then to the ovens. The ventilation system added during the design phase corresponded to these functions: the inspection hall had only an air-exhaust, the intake being constituted by the wide door to the outside, whereas the interior location of the mortuary made both a fresh-air and an exhaust system mandatory. The final arrangement was an inversion of the two morgues with respect to earlier schemes as far as a B-cellar and an L-cellar are concerned – and in the process, the morgues are relabeled – but we must remember that, initially, the location had not yet been fixed and the plan of the crematorium would, in any case, have had to be adapted to the site chosen.

The Letter and the MemoThere is one document that is so important to van Pelt that parts of it are shown on the paper cover of his book; an English translation is given on p. 209f. It is the Zentralbauleitung reference copy (carbon copy?) of a letter written on 29 January 1943 to Kammler, a high-ranking SS-officer in Berlin, on the subject of the advancement of the construction works at Crematorium II. For van Pelt, the importance of this document resides in the fact that it explicitly mentions the designation “Vergasungskeller” for one of the underground morgues. This, he claims, is a telltale slip with a profound meaning.

In itself, this document presents a number of odd formal aspects: there are no fewer than three typing errors and one wonders whether such a letter, addressed to an important man in the SS-administration in Berlin, actually would have left the camp. Aside from that, it states that “the fires were started in the ovens … and they are working most satisfactorily.” Why is this strange? Well, on that very 29 January 1943, there was a meeting between the local representative of AEG, the supplier of the electricals for this crematorium, and Zentralbauleitung, the minutes of which van Pelt publishes on p. 330. The gist of the conversation was that it was impossible to finish the installation of the electricals by the end of January; as a stopgap measure, a limited hook-up by mid-February was aimed for.

The interpretation of the letter and/or the memo varies, depending on which of the books written by Pressac and/or van Pelt the reader consults. In his book on the Auschwitz crematoria, Pressac does not discuss the contradictory aspect of the two documents in detail and simply mentions the slip-up of the “Vergasungskeller.” In their joint chapter on the crematoria, in the Anatomy book (p. 227), Pressac and van Pelt again gloss over the situation and do not state explicitly that Kammler was told a lie with respect to the readiness of the crematorium. They say, however, that it was Kammler who spoke of a “Vergasungskeller,” in a letter dated 29 February 1943 by which he promoted Bischoff to a higher rank. Thus, there seems to exist some confusion as to who wrote what, when and to whom, especially as 1943 was not a leap year and thus had no 29 February.

The AEG memo, on the other hand, is discussed by Dwork and van Pelt in their book on the history of Auschwitz (1270, p. 330) but here the authors do not speak of the use of the word “Vergasungskeller,” although Anatomy had by then been in print for two years and van Pelt had co-authored the chapter on this very topic. Dwork and van Pelt do, however, quote a line from the AEG memo as saying “the capacity of the temporary system [of the electricals] would not allow for simultaneous ‘special treatment’ and incineration.” As opposed to that, the AEG memo reproduced by van Pelt in The Case clearly states, “an incineration with simultaneous special treatment will be made possible.” All this does not speak well of the care applied by van Pelt to the analysis and the interpretation of the evidence presented on such a major issue. If the critical analysis of an important and easily viewable document is so superficial, one wonders how other sources that are only cited have been handled.

HeatingWith respect to the purpose of Crematoria IV and V, van Pelt points out that their morgues contained “stoves” and argues that these stoves were put in to preheat the rooms to a temperature at which the Zyklon B pellets would quickly release the toxic gas. On the other hand, for the “bunkers,” no stoves have ever been mentioned and for Crematoria II and III, a heat recovery project was discussed with the Topf Co. but they apparently could also function without it. Hence, either the “bunkers” did not work well in the wintertime or the stoves in Crematoria IV and V are not worth much as proof.

Be that as it may, it is worth mentioning that the normal (living) human body releases energy at an average rate of something like 100 watts, or roughly 100 kilocalories per hour. Even if only 4 persons are crowded into a floor area of one square meter, this unit of space will receive almost half a kilowatt of energy (for van Pelt even eight persons can be crammed into one square meter, because the Germans based their streetcar designs on that load). In Crematorium IV or V, for example, where – to use reasonable figures – perhaps 350 people might have been herded into a space of about 90 square meters, such a space would have been warmed up by a total amount of human energy amounting to some 35 kilowatts – much, much more than would be used for heating in a normal building (something like 6 or 8 kW would be the usual practice in this case), and the atmosphere in that room would within minutes have reached a temperature amply sufficient for proper vaporization of Zyklon B pellets. This is another instance where van Pelt, trying to prove one story, invalidates another argument.

The SmokeA further example for this kind of dilemma is the smoke which witnesses claim to have seen rising from the chimneys of the crematoria. For some of the witnesses, the smoke was accompanied by flames, but this is certainly a decorative element we may discard. Most of the witnesses are in agreement on the point that the smoke was thick and black. In a way, it is a bit amusing to see that revisionists, for quite some time, maintained that there was no such smoke or, at least, that it was present only when the furnaces were initially fired up, whereas van Pelt goes to great lengths to convince his readers that the stacks of crematoria in operation smoked all the time. Today, somehow, revisionists have apparently accepted the idea that there was, indeed, visible smoke and so everybody should be happy.

Again, there is another side to the matter: if there was dense smoke whenever the crematoria were in operation, and if the period between May and October 1944 was the time when the gassings and burnings reached their peak, to the point that the crematoria could not absorb the alleged load of up to 25,000 corpses a day and the authorities again had to revert to open-air burnings, we should see smoke belching out all the time not only from the chimneys of all the operational crematoria, but also from the incineration trenches.

However, the air-reconnaissance photographs published by van Pelt, taken on 31 May, 26 June and 25 August 1944, show no smoke at all coming from any of the crematoria. This means that on at least three of the most hectic days of homicidal activity the crematoria themselves stood idle. On the photograph of 31 May, there is a wisp of white smoke in the yard behind Crematorium V, similar to what can be seen on the air-reconnaissance photograph dated 23 August 1944 that will be discussed below. Aside from this particular site, one can say that, when those photographs were taken, no open-air cremations of any kind had been going on anywhere in or near the camp for at least a day or two, if not more, because we know from the experience gathered during the foot-and-mouth epidemic which struck western Europe a few years ago that the pyres set up to incinerate the dead animals would burn for several days giving off much smoke, and smolder or be hot for up to two weeks.

Open-air IncinerationsThere exists an air-reconnaissance photograph taken on 23 August 1944, documented elsewhere. Like the others, it shows no smoke at all over the chimneys but this time, as on 31 May 1944, there is a small column of white smoke rising between Crematorium V and the camp perimeter; this has been interpreted as being proof of the gassing and burning of a convoy of 759 Jews from the Mauthausen camp that had arrived at Auschwitz the previous day. The photograph is clear enough for the size of the burning site to be estimated; the dimensions of Crematorium V, directly next to the fire, provide us with a convenient scale: We see that the site is perhaps 40 meters long and 5 meters wide; whether the wisp of white smoke comes from the whole site or only from one end is not easy to make out. We can also see that there was not much room on either side of the fire; it burned in the narrow space of about 30 meters between the camp fence and the crematorium.

The sad experience of the FMD epidemic has taught us that the most efficient pyre is long and rather narrow; it should not be made wider than some 3 meters. Wider pyres tend to collapse in the middle for lack of air and combustion will be incomplete; not much can be done about that when it occurs because one cannot get close enough to stoke the center. It is also safe to assume that the SS at Auschwitz, having had to burn at least some 50,000 to 100,000 corpses in earlier years, would have realized what was necessary to burn corpses on a pyre in the most efficient way.

With the proper kind of layout, the FMD procedures tell us, one can cremate half a dozen sheep-size animals per linear meter of pyre and this should also hold for a corresponding number of human beings, but the newspaper articles on FMD also report that it takes a couple of days to build such a pyre for 800 sheep carcasses, even using modern mechanical equipment, if only because of the fuel that has to be brought in and properly stacked. Taking into account the time it takes to build a pyre, the duration of the incineration itself, which extends over several days, and the fact that as long as there is still fatty or oily matter to be burned the smoke will be blackish rather than white it is quite doubtful that the white smoke is what remained of the detainees from Mauthausen, or any other such group of people, for that matter. If we take into account Höss’s assertion that, at that time, it was no longer possible to burn corpses at night, the interpretation of this wisp of whitish smoke as stemming from a pyre on which corpses were being burned becomes even more arbitrary.

The FuelWhen it comes to open-air incinerations, the question of fuel takes on great importance, because fuel consumption in this case is so much higher than for crematoria on account of the much higher heat loss. Here, again, we can use data gathered during the FMD crisis from which one can deduce that one cubic meter of dry wood would be needed to burn three average human corpses – a cord of dry wood for ten bodies. The questions concerning the logistics of fuel supply for the incinerations (other than coke for the crematoria) have hardly been touched upon in the literature, although they are crucial in this connection. These problems are glossed over by witnesses, who say simply that oil or methanol was poured over the corpses which then continued to burn by themselves in some sort of trench, but this is not particularly convincing.

We must realize that if thousands of corpses are to be burned continually in trenches (not the best arrangement anyway) it is highly dangerous to douse them with methanol, because this substance is volatile, toxic, may lead to blindness (even SS-men would be affected) and its vapors are explosive. By the time enough methanol has been poured over the corpses in a long trench, there would be enough of it in the air on a hot day to blow up when the fire is lit, the minimum explosive concentration of methanol being only a few percent by volume. It would also be practically impossible to add methanol or similar substances to a trench already on fire, to say nothing of the fact that once these flammable liquids have spent themselves, the corpses would be charred but still very much present, if only because the flames burn on the surface of the fluid and not around the bodies (as in the case of a stacked arrangement of wood and corpses). After Hitler and Eva Braun had committed suicide, their corpses were taken outside, doused with 40 liters of gasoline (which was then lit from a distance by means of a burning rag), but incineration was far from complete when the fire had died down.

Even if only a thousand corpses were to be burned daily in the open air, roughly 300 cubic meters (about 100 cords, or 30 truckloads) of dry wood would have to be brought to the sites for each load of bodies, and a site of over 100 meters in length would be blocked for at least a week because the ash retains the heat for a long time and cannot be handled right away for the operations of crushing residual bones and removing gold teeth that have been reported in the literature. Also, enough space around the sites would have to be made available, not only for the considerable activity associated with the building phase of the pyre, but also because, in the initial phase of the cremation itself, the heat radiation is so strong that a minimum distance of something like 100 feet on all sides would have to be maintained. This means that only insignificant numbers of corpses could have been burnt in spaces like the small area behind Crematorium V.

From the experience gathered with FMD incinerations, anyone can easily see that in terms of logistics, time, fuel, space etc. the material demands for the open-air incineration of 10,000 human corpses a day (as some witnesses would have us believe) would be so enormous as to exceed by far the capabilities of the Auschwitz camp administration. By itself, the fuel needed, about 3,000 cubic meters (some 1,000 cords) of dry wood, would have required the availability of a fleet of thirty 10-ton trucks, if each truck is assumed to have made ten trips a day (including loading and unloading), to say nothing of the source and the supply of (dry) wood that have never been described, or the way in which it was handled at the camp – or paid for, for that matter.

Furthermore, the initial generation of dense smoke, especially under varying wind conditions (direction and speed) would be very awkward with respect to the manning of any watchtowers nearby. The flames and intense heat associated with the early phases of burning would have to be taken into account in any kind of analysis of the possible location of pyres; any such activities in areas designated vaguely as “in the woods” or “behind this little farmhouse” (straw-thatched, to boot, as some witnesses would have us believe) must be regarded with great skepticism.

In the mass of statements about Auschwitz with which van Pelt confronts the readers of his book we also have a remark by the camp commander Höss regarding the operation of pyres. Höss said that, fundamentally, the capacity of cremation on pyres at Auschwitz was unlimited; it was only when enemy air activity became a threat over the Auschwitz area from 1944 onwards that problems arose, because it was no longer possible to burn corpses at night (this period of potential air-raids coincides, by the way, with the greatest homicidal activity ascribed to the camp).

At first glance, this sounds quite reasonable; the fires would, after all, be a good beacon for Allied bombers flying through the night. If we reflect a bit on this question, though, things become more than a little less convincing, especially in the light of the FMD evidence which tells us that such pyres burn and smolder for days on end. Therefore, if they were to be made safe for the night, they would have had to be extinguished – an operation which, while possible, would cause a terrible mess as can easily be imagined: the incinerations are said to have been carried out in trenches which would now end up being full of water and half-charred corpses, with wooden logs floating about. It would also be very difficult to restart such fires or any new fires at the same site the following day. The total length of the pyres needed for a repetitive daily load of 10,000 bodies would be several miles, because the business cannot be accomplished within 24 hours – we must remember that it takes several days for human or animal carcasses to burn completely on a pyre.

Even for a place as swampy as Birkenau the logistical problems of the corresponding water supply would be insuperable – and no witness has ever mentioned such a fire-fighting scene. In the unlikely case that fuel oil was used for the cremations, water would not be suitable for extinguishing the fire, because the burning oil floats on top and may even spill out over the sides of those “trenches” – a horrifying scenario for all concerned. Readers may draw their own conclusions regarding the reliability of any such statements.

Furthermore, one wonders if daylight burnings would really have been safer than night-time fires, because the inevitable thick black smoke from such fires is as good a signal for guiding bombers during the day as a blazing fire would be at night. Lastly, anyone conversant with bombing raids in World War II would know that by 1944 the technique of using a master bomber to mark the target had been perfected to a point where signals from the ground were perhaps helpful but in no way indispensable to the attackers, at any time of the day or night. We have here another example of van Pelt’s indiscriminate use of any argument he happens to come across.

All this is not to mean that no corpses at all were burnt in the open air at Birkenau. It is certainly true that the many victims (between 50,000 and 100,000 depending on whose book you read) of typhoid fever and other diseases that were counted before the Birkenau crematoria became operational had to be disposed of in this way, to say nothing of people who were shot or who died of ill-treatment during the period. Most of these burnings seem to have taken place in the autumn of 1942 outside the western limit of the camp.

The Man HimselfAnother aspect that has to be taken into account by anyone wanting to gain an insight into the history of the camps at Auschwitz and Birkenau is the question of the reliability of the statements of the commander of the camp, Rudolf Höss. It is by now common knowledge that he was tortured by his British captors and forced to sign an outrageous confession that was originally formulated in English. This can be seen clearly from the German word Ausrottungs-Erleichterungen used in the text Höss was made to sign, which is an erroneous translation of the expression “extermination facilities” used in the English text. It reads in German as “something that makes it easier to exterminate” and would never have been used by Höss himself to describe his task. The proper German word would have been ”Ausrottungs-Einrichtungen.”

We now know that the figure of 3 million victims admitted to by Höss is, to put it mildly, an exaggeration and this in itself should disqualify Höss as a witness. The least one could have expected from a man like van Pelt is that he would expose clearly how Höss’s exaggerated figures had been extracted from him and discuss why, in spite of this, some of the statements he made to the Allies or to the Poles should be retained; yet he does not do this, even going so far as to state explicitly at the very beginning of his book, that Höss, under cross-examination by the American prosecutor Amen, had been stated to have signed his confession voluntarily – in a conspiratorial way, one can perhaps understand what Höss wanted to convey.

Van Pelt himself says, however, that with the exception of Höss, no one in the camp had been able to gather sufficient aggregate data to establish a credible figure for the number of victims, and his uncritical attitude with respect to Höss’s confession therefore becomes hard to accept. A key witness such as Höss would certainly have warranted the pages of detailed exculpation van Pelt devotes to the Polish judge Jan Sehn who was overly quick, in those early days after the war, to draw his conclusions from various German terms involving the word “Sonder…” and who made a number of nonsensical or inexplicable statements that van Pelt presents in his text. The author recognizes some of them as incredible and says so (cremation capacity figures); others he simply lets stand as they are, the preheating of the morgue by portable coke braziers, for example, or the air being “pumped out” of the gas chambers before the Zyklon B pellets were thrown in.

These are half-truths: coke braziers were probably used in the morgues during construction, because the crematoria were built in the winter months, and air surely was exhausted from some of the morgues; that was, after all, why the ventilation system had been installed in the first place – but to present them as yet another element in a collection of “converging evidence” is weakening rather than strengthening the “case for Auschwitz.”

ConclusionAgain, this is the fundamental deficiency of the book: we are confronted with errors or impossibilities, but the author does not say anything more about them even though he does seem to notice these deficiencies; at times, he says that there is something questionable about certain aspects, but then does not go ahead and ask the necessarily implied questions. Far from telling you what you always wanted to know about the camp, R. J. van Pelt has put together a repetitious mixture of facts and fiction; his book shows on what shaky foundations our present view of Auschwitz and Birkenau is anchored.

As was noted initially, Yehuda Bauer of Yad Vashem has spoken of the difficulty of documenting the really central events of the Holocaust. By that, he must mean that no one has yet succeeded in presenting solid evidence for the gassings at Auschwitz or anywhere else, for if that is not what he means by “documenting the central events,” what is? Robert J. van Pelt may have written his book with the aim of surmounting Bauer’s difficulty, but far from having achieved this ambitious task, he has only opened up more cracks in the evidence and brought about new contradictions in its interpretation –The Case for Auschwitz is a book that need not have been written — and certainly should not be read, at least not if taken at face value.


David Cole – The Truth Behind The Gates Of Auschwitz 1 of 2


David Cole – The Truth Behind The Gates Of Auschwitz 2 of 2


Saudi Princess (Member Of Royal Family) Says Geoengineering Is A “Weapon Of Mass Destruction”



advertisement – learn more

A couple of months ago,  HRH Princess Basmah Bint Saud, humanitarian and daughter of King Saud, compared geoengineering science and programs to weapons of mass destruction, arguing that their implementation is like setting off a bomb without the nuclear explosion.

She also stressed that geoengineering threatens the world’s water and food supply, and is one of the keys of the “new power” in the world. She emphasized as well that the people behind these programs have a wealth of resources at their disposal, but are playing a very dangerous game with the planet’s equilibrium through geoengineering, and that this is a method of “slow poisoning.”

This occurred at the Istanbul Security Conference on December 5th, 2015, where she gave a keynote speech on “Global Justice and Ethics in the Changing World Order.”

You can see the full interview she did with Patrick Roddie below:

More On Geoengineering

“In recent years there has been a decline in the support for weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly into operational projects.” –  World Meteorological Association (source)

For those of you who don’t know, geoengineering is the deliberate and large-scale intervention into the Earth’s climatic system. This is done through various means, one of which is the spraying of chemicals into the atmosphere via planes. Weather modification actually dates back to the 1940s, when the General Electric Company demonstrated that a cloud of super-cooled water droplets could be transformed into ice crystals when seeded with dry ice. Shortly after this it was discovered that fine particles of pure silver iodide, with a crystal structure similar to that of ice, could be effectively used for global weather modification.

The Hughes Aircraft Company even has a patent dating back more than twenty years ago, to 1990. You can take a look at it here. It contains 18 claims to reduce global warming through stratospheric seeding with aluminum oxide, thorium oxide, and refractory Welsbach material.

Fast forward to today, with even more chemicals added to the mix, and it becomes clear why so many people are concerned about these initiatives. Since their inception in the 1940s, geoengineering programs have become increasingly more ubiquitous, springing up at various universities around the globe. The debate still rages on about whether these programs are actually operational, however, but for anybody who has done the research, it’s fairly easy to see the truth of the matter. According to M. Granger Morgan, the University and Lord Chair Professor of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University:

I want to reiterate what John said, which is I think that any research in this area needs to be open. I think it would be truly disastrous if, you know, we discovered a few years from now that there was a “black program” that some government had stood-up to sort of learn on-the-quiet how to do this. . . .

We do stuff in the stratosphere all the time, of course, and so it’s not as though the stratosphere is absolutely pristine. But you don’t want to have people going off and doing things that involve large radiative forcings; or go on for extended periods; or, for that matter, provide lots of reactive surfaces that could result in significant ozone destruction. (source) 

If we look at SPICE, a United Kingdom government funded geoengineering research project that collaborates with the Universities of Oxford, Cambridge, Edinburgh and Bristol, some of the proposed particles to spray in the air include:


Another Blow To Our Privacy: FBI Gets Court Order Forcing Apple To Install Spyware On iPhone


“The United States government has demanded that Apple take an unprecedented step which threatens the security of our customers. We oppose this order, which has implications far beyond the legal case at hand. 

This moment calls for public discussion, and we want our customers and people around the country to understand what is at stake.” (source)(source)

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has ordered Apple to remove security software located on the phone of a deceased murderer, but Apple has refused. The FBI then obtained a court order compelling them to do so, and Apple made clear their intention to fight the order.  In response, the bureau’s lawyers put out the following statement:

Based on Apple’s recent public statement and other statements by Apple, Apple’s current refusal to comply with the Court order, despite the technical feasibility of doing so, instead appears to be based on its concern for its business model and public brand marketing strategy. (source)

This entire controversy with Apple and the FBI was sparked by the ‘acts of terrorism’ that took place in San Bernardino last December. The FBI asked Apple to release data in their possession, and they provided it, but the FBI soon wanted more. As the statement put out by Apple reveals:

Specifically, the FBI wants us to make a new version of the iPhone operating system, circumventing several important security features, and install it on an iPhone recovered during the investigation. In the wrong hands, this software — which does not exist today — would have the potential to unlock any iPhone in someone’s physical possession.

The FBI may use different words to describe this tool, but make no mistake: Building a version of iOS that bypasses security in this way would undeniably create a backdoor. And while the government may argue that its use would be limited to this case, there is no way to guarantee such control.

The government is basically asking Apple to hack their own customer base and undermine years of security measures that protect their customers. The government is using the All Writs Act of 1789 to justify the expansion of its authority:

The government would have us remove security features and add new capabilities to the operating system, allowing a passcode to be input electronically. This would make it easier to unlock an iPhone by “brute force,” trying thousands of millions of combinations with the speed of a modern computer.

Apple then went on to explain just how dangerous such a move would be:

The implications of the government’s demands are chilling. If the government can use the All Writs Act to make it easier to unlock your iPhone, it would have the power to reach into anyone’s device to capture their data. The government could extend this breach of privacy and demand that Apple build surveillance software to intercept your messages, access your health records or financial data, track your location, or even access your phone’s microphone or camera without your knowledge.

Opposing this order is not something we take lightly. We feel we must speak up in the face of what we see as an overreach by the U.S. government.

We are challenging the FBI’s demands with the deepest respect for American democracy and a love of our country. We believe it would be in the best interest of everyone to step back and consider the implications.

You can read their entire press release that was made public last Tuesday HERE.

More Details About The Invasion Of Our Privacy

Ever since Edward Snowden, a former intelligence contractor, leaked the very first documentation that proved the existence of clandestine black budget operations, more people have started to voice their concern. His leaks had to do with the United States’ massive surveillance program:

The five eyes alliance is sort of an artifact of the post World War II era where the Anglophone countries of the major powers banded together to sort of co-operate and share the costs of intelligence gathering and infrastructure. . . . What the result of this was over decades and decades was sort of a supranational intelligence organisation that doesn’t answer to the laws of its own countries. . . . They not only share information – the reporting of results from intelligence – but they actually share the tools and the infrastructure when they work together against joint targets and services.

According to the Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute, the Five Eyes intelligence community is a cooperative and complex network of linked autonomous intelligence agencies which is here to protect us from various threats the world faces today, like terrorism. Ask yourself, if terrorist activities are the results of the Western military alliance (read more about that HERE), what is really going on here? Are we seeing false flag terrorism used to justify the infiltration of other countries and heighten the national security state in our own?  I believe all of this has been in the works for decades, and it’s continually getting worse. Our rights are being stripped away.

JFK said it best a number of years ago, referring to the fact that national security is used to justify the concealment of information:

The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. (source)

“It is ironic that the U.S. should be fighting monstrously expensive wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, allegedly to bring democracy to those countries, when it itself can no longer claim to be called a democracy, when trillions, and I mean thousands of billions of dollars have been spent on projects about which both the Congress and the Commander in Chief have been kept deliberately in the dark.” – Paul Hellyer, Former Canadian Defense Minister (source)

Our world of secrecy is ridiculous, and it even affects patent applications. As Steven Aftergood, from the Federation of American Scientists, reports:

Thus, the 1971 list indicates that patents for solar photovoltaic generators were subject to review and possible restriction if the photovoltaics were more than 20% efficient.  Energy conversion systems were likewise subject to review and possible restriction if they offered conversion efficiencies “in excess of 70-80%.” (source)


US Soldiers & Wikileaks Come Together & Tell The Truth About What’s Really Happening In The Middle East

Screen Shot 2016-02-20 at 12.33.08 PM

As the elections in the United States continue to attract attention, one major topic of concern is the so called ‘war on terrorism.’ The continuous conflict that’s plagued the Middle East for years continues to move forward, and as former 4 star United States General and Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO told us, the United States has been planning these ‘invasions’ of the Middle East for years. He stated that the US had plans to invade multiple countries long ago. (source)

What is the western military alliance doing in the Middle East? Why is the Middle East now polluted with a number of US military bases? Well, supposedly it’s to fight the ‘war on terror’ and stop the action of various ‘terrorist’ groups, but there’s one thing that still needs to be reiterated over and over again; as Former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook puts it,

“The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al-Qaeda, and any informed intelligence officer knows this. But, there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an intensified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive TV watchers to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the United States.”

The secretary is referring to what’s known as ‘false flag terrorism.’ It’s the idea that the western military alliance is funding, fabricating and encouraging ‘terrorist’ attacks in their own countries in order to justify the invasion, infiltration and take over of other countries. Al-Qaeda and ISIS are great examples.

As Canadian economist and Ottawa’s Emeritus Professor of Economics stated  the International Conference on the New World Order, which was organized and sponsored by the Perdana Global Peace Foundation,

“We are dealing with a criminal undertaking at a global level … and there is an ongoing war, it is led by the United States, it may be carried out by a number of proxy countries, which are obeying orders from Washington … The global war on terrorism is a US undertaking, which is fake, it’s based on fake premises. It tells us that somehow America and the Western world are going after a fictitious enemy, the Islamic state, when in fact the Islamic state is fully supported and financed by the Western military alliance and America’s allies in the Persian Gulf. … They say Muslims are terrorists, but it just so happens that terrorists are Made in America. They’re not the product of Muslim society, and that should be abundantly clear to everyone on this floor. … The global war on terrorism is a fabrication, a big lie and a crime against humanity.” (source) (source)

He then went on to speak about how these terrorist organizations are not independent organizations, that they are sponsored by the western military alliance.

Keep in mind, he is not the only ‘academic,’ researcher, military person or politician to bring this up. Evidence and statements from various people has been emerging for years.  Vladimir Putin is another recent example, having recently exposed a number of countries that are funding ISIS at the recent G20 Summit, you can read more about that here.

You can learn more about false flag terrorism in these articles:

Professors & Politicians Gather To Warn Us About The New World Order

US Intelligence Officer: “Every Single Terrorist Attack In The US Was A False Flag Attack

Award Winning American Journalist Exposes The True Origin Of ISIS & The “War On Terror.”

FBI Whistleblower: “U.S. Is Reviving Terror Scare With ISIS To Promote The Terror War Industry

Watch Steven Segal Say That American Mass Shootings Are “Engineered” By The Government

What’s Really Been Happening In The Middle East

Below is a very disturbing and well-known Wikileaks video exposing what happened (and is still happening) in the Middle East on a daily basis. It’s called “Collateral Murder,” and the solider you see in the video is Ethan McCord; he is one of many soldiers heard in the Wikileaks video who were deployed in Iraq.

There is some disturbing footage in it, but it’s a powerful tool to let people know about something that is commonly covered up, leaving the Western world oblivious to the reality of the situation.

We are made to believe that soldiers are sent over to these countries to fight terror, completely ignoring the fact that innocent people, for no reason, are being killed every day.

“The rules of engagement in Iraq are a joke.” (taken from video)

Not only that, these so called “terrorist” groups that are used to justify our incursion into these countries have ties to United States intelligence agencies. Al Qaeda is a great example of a group with such ties. You can read more about that idea here. The thought that these terrorist groups are a creation of Western intelligence agencies is scary to ponder, and begs the question, what’s going on? Where do these “terrorists” really come from and why are they doing what they are doing?

Right now, the focus has shifted away from Al Qaeda to other terrorist groups like ISIS and the same thing is happening in Syria, among other countries.

At the end of the day, it’s humans killing humans. Regardless of whoever, or whatever, influence is pulling the strings, it’s a human being pulling the trigger. It’s great to see many soldiers waking up and asking questions, because that’s the only way this is going to stop.

Here are some quotes by McCord taken from the video.

“If you feel threatened in any way, you’re able to engage that person. Many soldiers felt threatened just by the fact that you were looking at them, so they fired their weapons on anybody that was looking at them because they (I) felt threatened. We were told if we were to fire on anybody, and if it were to be investigated, that ‘officers will take care of you.’” 

“We were told by our battalion commander to kill every m***** f****** on the street.  Many soldiers would not do that, we decided we were going to shoot into the rooftops of buildings because, if you didn’t fire, the NCOs in your platoon would make your life hell.” 

“This happens on a daily basis, destroying vans full of children, the destruction of the Iraqi people happens on a daily basis.”

Former Air Force pilot Brandon Bryan is one of the first ever United States drone operators to speak out against what has been happening overseas for a number of years now, which is the murder of countless innocent lives. Bryan served as a sensor operator for what’s known as the “Predator program” from 2007 to 20011. He was responsbile for manning the camera on the unmanned aerial vehicles that carried out attacks overseas before leaving active duty in the Air Force, and, as Democracy Now reports, was actually given a certificate that credited his squadron for more than 1,500 kills.

The US clearly encourages and rewards this type of activity. Think about that while you consider what is still happening around the world, including in Syria.

Below is Bryant’s recounting of his first-ever lethal drone strike and the impact it continues to have on him to this day:

I didn’t really understand what it meant to kill at first. It was horrible. The first time was horrible, the second time was horrible, the third time was numbing, the fourth time was numbing, but of course the first time sticks with you the longest.

Brainwashing Young Soldiers & Americans With Patriotism

There is a great piece written on the Dalai Lama’s website regarding the mass brainwashing of human beings. This is something we touch upon regularly on our website, especially when it comes to incidents of terrorism and war, along with the creation of these groups who are carrying out these attacks all over the world. He writes:

Of course, war and the large military establishments are the greatest sources of violence in the world. Whether their purpose is defensive or offensive, these vast powerful organizations exist solely to kill human beings. We should think carefully about the reality of war. Most of us have been conditioned to regard military combat as exciting and glamorous – an opportunity for men to prove their competence and courage. Since armies are legal, we feel that war is acceptable; in general, nobody feels that war is criminal or that accepting it is criminal attitude. In fact, we have been brainwashed. War is neither glamorous nor attractive. It is monstrous. Its very nature is one of tragedy and suffering. (source)

This (above) statement really hits home. If you think about it, these vast and powerful organizations, and the military in general, “exist solely to kill human beings.” As the Dalai Lama touches upon, we are conditioned and made to believe that military service is something to be proud of. Sure, these men and women may be entering into the service in order to serve their country, with a tremendous amount of bravery and good hearted intentions going into that decision, but what they do not know is that this global war on terrorism is a complete fabrication. The enemy they are made to believe they’re defending their country from is actually a product of their own country.

He then goes on to state that:

Modern warfare waged primarily with different forms of fire, but we are so conditioned to see it as thrilling that we talk about this or that marvelous weapon as a remarkable piece of technology without remembering that, if it is actually used, it will burn living people. War also strongly resembles a fire in the way it spreads. If one area gets weak, the commanding officer sends in reinforcements. This is throwing live people onto a fire. But because we have been brainwashed to think this way, we do not consider the suffering of individual soldiers. No soldiers want to be wounded or die. None of his loved ones wants any harm to come to him. If one soldier is killed, or maimed for life, at least another five or ten people – his relatives and friends – suffer as well. We should all be horrified by the extent of this tragedy, but we are too confused. (source)

When a person signs up to supposedly ‘serve their country,’ they are most likely doing so with the best of intentions. They believe they are making a positive impact on the world, defending their country from radical terrorists. Many of these soldiers are completely unaware of truth behind the global war on terrorism and the so-called enemy they are going after.

Are soldiers really fighting for freedom, or are they fighting for elitist agendas under the guise of patriotism and a global terrorist threat? Patriotism is propaganda, and when combined with the fictitious, manufactured, terrorist threat, it makes one believe that there is something to defend, something to fight for.

In his paper “Consent Without Consent: Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Democracy,” Noam Chomsky quotes and adds to some important revelations by Edward Bernays:

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society.” To carry out this essential task, “the intelligent minorities must make use of propaganda continuously and systematically,” because they alone “understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses” and can “pull the wires which control the public mind.” Therefore, our “society has consented to permit free competition to be organized by leadership and propaganda,” another case of “consent without consent.” Propaganda provides the leadership with a mechanism “to mold the mind of the masses” so that “they will throw their newly gained strength in the desired direction.” The leadership can “regiment the public mind every bit as much as an army regiments the bodies of its soldiers.” This process of “engineering consent” is the very “essence of the democratic process.”

(Pages 10 & 11)

The Solution

The solution is for the human beings giving these orders and the the human beings following these orders to stop listening. The action step here is to have a shift in consciousness, and this can happen in a number of ways; one of them being creating awareness. If we want this mess to stop, a shift in thinking needs to take place. We are being used as tools. But just imagine what would happen if every human being on the planet refused to participate in war. What would our world look like then? While you could make the argument that intelligent robotic aircraft would take over, that still begs the question, who is making this aircraft? At the end of the day, there is a human being behind these killings. We are the cause, and at the same time we are the solution.

This is why we say change needs to come from within, and as more soldiers wake up to the truth about these wars, I have to believe that more of them will put down their weapons.

Thank You, Angela Merkel. You Ended EU: Nation States Have had Enough, Rebelling, Closing Borders

ADDENDUM: Sputnik 26 Febr. 2016EU politicians and European heads of state are desperately looking for ways to save the European project, but a series of powerful anti-EU shocks, and growing public distrust makes a Soviet-style collapse seem almost inevitable, French economist Charles Gave suggests.


The EU´s nation states have had enough of Schengen, the EU Commission´s and Merkel´s dictatorshhip. The are rebelling – disregarding the Commission and Merkel, closing their borders – leaving Greece holding the can.  Thus the EU came to an end. May it never resurrect!

The UK
DWN 21 Febr. 2016
The British Minister of Labour Iain Duncan Smith sees the EU on the verge of collapse because of the uncontrolled immigration. The open borders constitute an incalculable security risk.
Great Britain is probably going to leave  the EU after the referendum on 23 June

migrantsGreece on Thursday said it would not be left by the rest of the EU to become the “Lebanon of Europe” by hosting millions of migrants and refugees.
“A very large number (of participants) here will discuss how to address a humanitarian crisis in Greece that they themselves are  creating.”  Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras has said he will block EU decisions at the next summit – including the Brexit deal –  if Greece is left alone to deal with the migration crisis.
Every day  about 2000 new migrants arrive in Greece from Turkey. On the Macedonian border, rejected migrants are drifting around in towns, on the highways, and along the border.

“Since no EU counsellors have given Merkel a mandate to discuss the issue of refugees with Erdogan and Merkel’s claims to represent the EU were made without a collective decision they’re illegitimate,  French political analyst Didier Billion explained.
The German Chancellor has already provoked widespread public anger after calling on all EU member states to participate in a mandatory relocation scheme.

Austria / Balkans
Many countries in Europe have begun to plan for a refugee policy without German participation.
German Federal Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble (CDU): “The number of refugees must fall dramatically, otherwise we cannot make it” .

Erdogan-Merkel-Flüchtlinge-Türkei-EU-e1446587857375I am convinced that we can not sell all our values as at a bazaar at the summit with Turkey.” (German CSU EU politicians Markus Ferber)  DWN 24 Febr. 2016

The EU and the Turkish government will consult on the state of affairs of the refugee crisis on March 7. The EU has promised  Turkey visa facilitation, opening of further chapters of the accession negotiations and three billion euros of help if the government in Ankara restrains the migration flow towards Greece.

Austria and the countries of the Western Balkansconsulted on measures to stop the onward journey of migrants heading north. Greece, Germany and the European Commission were not invited to the meeting.
Austria’s Interior Minister Mikl-Leitner said the domino effect what Intended: “What we want is a chain reaction of reason.” Since Friday, Austria only allows 80 asylum seekers per day at its border and maximally 3200 transit migrants to Germany a day.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban
wants to let the citizens of his country have a referendum  on quotas adopted by the EU  for the distribution 160 000 refugees. In Budapest, there was little doubt about a No of Hungarians to accept refugees.

The corporative media are also actors

nathanail-prosfyges-708_0“Foreign reporters pay refugees 20 euros to act as if they have drowned. I saw it with my own eyes” said Bishop of Kos and Nisyros Nathanael.
The bishop said that mass media are tryingdrowned-kurdish-boyto present a fake picture of events, far from reality.

The New American 1. Febr 2016:  Europe, Africa, and the Middle East are all in the cross-hairs of billionaire George Soros, the global government-promoting Council on Foreign Relations, and other key globalist forces on the road toward what establishment voices regularly refer to as a “New World Order.”

Rothschild banking dynasty protegé and billionaire hedge-fund boss Soros, played an instrumental role in encouraging the myriad wars and the subsequent tsunami of refugees into Europe that was sparked by those wars.

The European Union, Soros said in a recent interview, is “on the verge of collapse”due to the sudden influx of well over a million Islamic refugees last year. Not coincidentally.”

Globalist former Goldman Sachs (Rothschild bank) boss Peter Sutherland, currently “serving” as the UN “special representative of the secretary-general for international migration,” openly declared that national sovereignty is an “absolute illusion” that must be “put behind us” in the interest of the refugee crisis and, more broadly, creating a “better world.”



Cowardice of German politicians keeps Merkel in power
It´s brewing in the Union: Cold disempowering threatens he Chancellor because she rejects the political reality in Germany and in Europe.

Veteran CDU members cannot remember such a rapid process of alienation. However, nobody wants to be  quoted – for fear of reprisals.  With her (lack of) policy, she has made  the AFD large, so it´s said.

The EU cannot be saved, thanks to Angela Merkel.

 soros-merkel2 evil spirits behind the migrant chaos and the EU mass immigration: George Soros and Angela Merkel.
I have previously described how Rothschild-Agent George Soros, the man behind the planning of the mass immigration to Europe and here in collaboration with Angela Merkel and the Muslim Brotherhood, demands the EU has to take 1 million migrants annually and give each of them  an € 15,000 pay a year (add  customary social benefits).

George Soros is now demanding that the EU should use its AAA rates to make enormous debt at the banks of his Lord and Master, Rothschild, and thus become further dependent on of this dynasty, who will  enslave all of us in their Agenda 21 one-world government.
sotchi-phoenix-roubleWe should be grateful to Merkel for her betrayal of Europe: Without it, the creeping mass immigration of Muslim masses would continue unhindered. Now Merkel is causing the imminent collapse of the impossible EU – and hopefully to some extent curb immigration. What then follows is Rothschilds chaos from which he wants his Agenda 21 one-world government to rise from the ashes like Phoenix  if we, the peoples of Europe,  allow him to do so.


This entry was posted in english, euromed. Bookmark the permalink.

Rothschilds Think Tank Brookings´ and John Kerry´s Solution: Split Syria into Autonomous Units. Much More Foreign Military

In Syria, the US and Russia with  conditional approval of the Syrian government have agreed on a a truce from Saturday. But it does not apply to the fight against the ISIS and the Al-Nusra (Al Qaeda) – both US children and proxies and a blind for illegal participation of the USA, Great Britain, France, in thisattack on  a sovereign country.
The US has instigated irreversible chaos in Syria.

Apparently, even the US does not believe in this cease-fire. So US Secretary of State  John Kerry states he has a plan B. The Russians do not like to hear that. 

Sputnik 24 Febr. 2016:  Kerry announced steps that would be made toward a backup plan that could include the division of Syria if the ceasefire planned for February 27 did not work.  Moscow is not looking at “Plan B,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Wednesday.

Kerry´s plan B is obviously the Brookings plan
I wrote about on 29 June 2015
 which foresees a division of Syria into small autonomous units. This is the way the NWO scorns the rights of a sovereign state: The US started this war without any legal reason, created chaos by creating and supporting ISIS and its child from the time of the Russian occupation of Afghanistan, Al-Qaeda (Al-Nusra).


Brookings is behind the major part of US legislation.   It is visited by a host of US and foreign politicians – in particular Israeli ones. Here one of the most dangerous visitors,  Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, John McCain. Brookings arrogantly ignores that acc. to NATO, in 2013 Syrian pres. Assad issupported by 70% 0f the Syrians, 20% are neither for nor against him – and 10% against him.

Brookings 22 Febr. 2016:  It is almost certain that there can be no lasting cessation of hostilities (in Syria). Indeed, I would argue that peace negotiations are actually dangerous and counterproductive, because they make us feel that current policy has a realistic chance at success when in fact it does not.

Those who have favored minimizing the U.S. role in Syria need to recognize that their counsel has become part of the problem, too.
ISIS now has affiliates in at least eight countries; the Syrian civil war has killed nearly half a million (??) and displaced more than ten million; U.S. intelligence considers a Paris-like attack here in the United States to be increasingly likely; America’s key Middle East allies like Turkey, Jordan, and Iraq remain besieged.
No U.S.-led invasion with 100,000 troops makes sense, and President Obama is persuasive when he makes that argument.

1. Whatever elements of a moderate opposition that we can find to work with must bemilitarily strengthened and assisted much more than is the case today. This will probably require 500 or 1,000 American advisors on the ground—rather than 50—in carefully chosen parts of Syria. It will also necessitate an increase in direct military assistance to opposition groups beyond the miserly amounts we have been providing.
We could retaliate against Syrian government planes that attacked civilian populations and moderate militias, at places and times of our choosing, as an added element of such a policy.

2. President Bashar Assad does not wish to step down from power and, with Russia and Hezbollah at his side, sees no reason to do so.

The only logical escape would seem to be a compromise that tolerates having Assad rule over some parts of Syria—largely, the Alawite and Christian parts—while creatingautonomous, self-governing and self-policing zones for other major groups.
Of course, ISIS and al-Nusra will need to be defeated. In the interim, Assad´s sector would have to get by with help only from Russia and Iran.

3. Finally, we need a muscular international peace enforcement operation   (50,000 or more at first and perhaps even 100,000 – with 10 to 20 percent of the total likely American forces) will almost surely be needed to uphold any deal that ultimately becomes possible ouside Alawite zones. Such a deal would have to include some fraction ofSyria’s big multiethnic cities—Aleppo, Homs, and/or Hama—within a Sunni Arab zone.

This is an open declaration of war on Syria by Brookings´ Mastermind, Rothschild.

Brookings is Rothschild´s instrument to have his plans implemented worldwide through the US government and military.
nat-rothschildNathaniel Rothschild
is a member of the International Advisory Council of the Brookings Institution. And Brookings president, Strobe Talbott, is on the Advisory Board of Rothschild´s and Jesuits Council on Foreign Relations. next to its Pres. R.Haas.

However, the problem is that all “Syrian” and “moderate” anti-Assad rebels cooperate with IS(IS) and Al Qaeda! – are now nearly beaten and not moderate at all,  which is unacceptable for Turkey and US conservatives.

In 2012, the US Defence Intelligence Agency brought the below information. So the Pentagon knows full well, that the Salafists (ISIL) alongside with the Muslim Brotherhood and AQI (Al Qaeda) are the insurgents in Syria. And the US, nevertheless, is  funding and training (in Turkey) and equipping them to build one or more enclaves within Syria. This document must be the background of the  above Brookings document






Expected False Flag Terror in Turkey Ticket for Turkish Invasion in Syria? Engdahl: US Trap for Russia

Washington’s strategy consists in spearheading a broader regional war by inciting Turkey, Saudi Arabia as well as Israel to do the “dirty work for us”. (Prof. Michel Chossudowsky Global Res. 12 Febr. 2016).


ankara-terrorNow the Turkish terror action unter false Flag  came (28 casualties) – which I predicted on 14 February  as a precondition for  Turkish Invasion in Syria. However, the Turkish government says, it will only invade, unless the US does, too (Reuters 16 Febr, 2016).

On January 22 in an interview with CNBC US Defense Secretary Ash Carter stated that the US intends to defeat Islamic State’s greatest strongholds: the northern Iraqi city of Mosul and the IS “capital” Raqqa, in Syria.

“We’re looking for opportunities to do more and there will be boots on the ground,and I want to be clear about that. But it’s a strategic question whether you are enabling local forces to take and hold rather than trying to substitute for them,”

DWN 18. Febr. 2016  und The Telegraph 18 Febr. 2016: The threat of broader war in the Middle East is increasing.
Few hours after an explosion in Ankara,  the Turkish government notes: There was an attack, perpetrated by the Kurds from Syria. Evidence for these claims do not exist. The drama increases the likelihood of an invasion of Syria. On Thursday, Turkey resumed its bombardment of Iraq again. It is unclear whether Turkey is  calling NATO  for help.

The site of the explosion is close to the Air Force Command and the Turkish General Staff. Because of its importance, this site is guarded by military and security forces like no other place in Ankara. An illegal intrusion into this area is virtually impossible.

Similarly to the until  now mysterious attack in Istanbul, which killed 10 German citizens, the Turkish government had detailed knowledge about the perpetrators at its disposal few hours after the deed.
Normally, the investigations of such cases take weeks or months.
The Turkish government has nevertheless begun to spread its interpretation: The assassin of Ankara would be a member of the Syrian Kurdish YPG militia.

On Thursday morning,  Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu held  a press conference  in Ankara. He announced that Syrian PYD / YPG was behind the attack..

In this sense, Both the YPG and the PKK are only “henchmen” used by other forces specifically against Turkey,  Davutoğlu said. “They want Turkey´s demise in a Turkish-Kurdish civil war.

These henchmen are used among others by the Syrian regime. The Syrian ambassador to the UN has recently said  that the regime supports the YPG actively and openly.
In the direction of the US and NATO, he said: We demand the same solidarity that we showed after 9/11.” It is unclear whether this is a call for assistance from the NATO.
The PKK rejects a direct responsibility for the attack in Ankara.



After the attack of 9/11 on the World Trade Center in New York  the alliance case was activated.
On Thursday morning i in southeastern Turkey,  a renewed attack on a military convoy took place, killing seven soldiers , the newspaper  Sözcü reports.


F.William Engdahl thinksthe USA stands behind Turkey, now that the ISIS and the “moderate rebels” have been knocked out  by Russia, introducing  as the next proxies  Turkey and Saudi Arabia into the field to trigger a regionwide oil war against Russia in the Middle East.

Tony Cartalucci Global Res. 17 Febr. 2016:  It should be noted that in all Western media stories, it is never precisely mentioned who the Kurds are fighting in Azaz – because it is ISIS.

Considering this, Turkey would be quite literally intervening to save ISIS and other hardcore terrorist groups sharing the city with it.
Just as US policy makers had plotted in 2009 to use an apparent “unilateral” attack by Israel upon Iran to provoke a retaliation the US could then use as a pretext to “reluctantly’ go to war, a similar strategy appears to be materializing along Syria’s borders today.  

Engdahl: “I’m going to make a prediction: The US Machiavellians have lured not only Turkey’s Erdogan and Saudi Arabia’s Prince Salman, but now Moscow into their trap in the Middle East. The initial losers in this unfolding deadly game will be Saudi, Turkey, Syria, Iraq and likely Russia.

It would be interesting to know what double-tongued Henry Kissinger told Putin at their meeting on 3. Febr.

But 2 things are certain:
1) None of the parties will make any move on their own: They all know that they  have their assigned tasks to perform at the given time in Rothschilds Big Game. TheirSuperlodges will se to that.
And Rothschild will act when God allows him to – in order to fulfil God´s plan established at the creation of the world in this Limbo.
2) The US will not allow Russia to win in Syria, which is happening now

This entry was posted in english, euromed. Bookmark the permalink.

The Coudenhove-Kalergi (Freemason and Jew-Lover) Plan – The Genocide Of The People Of Europe

Mass immigration is a phenomenon, the causes of which are still cleverly concealed by the system, and the multicultural propaganda is trying to falsely portray it as inevitable. With this article we intend to prove once and for all, that this is not a spontaneous phenomenon. What they want to present as an inevitable outcome of modern life, is actually a plan conceived around a table and prepared for decades, to completely destroy the face of the continent.

The Pan-Europe:

Few people know that one of the main initiators of the process of European integration, was also the man who designed the genocide plan of the Peoples of Europe. It is a dark person, whose existence is unknown to the masses, but the elite considers him as the founder of the European Union. His name is Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi. His father was an Austrian diplomat named Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi (with connections to the Byzantine family of the Kallergis) and his mother the Japanese Mitsu Aoyama. Kalergi, thanks to his close contacts with all European aristocrats and politicians, due to the relationships of his nobleman-diplomat father, and by moving behind the scenes, away from the glare of publicity, he managed to attract the most important heads of state to his plan , making them supporters and collaborators for the “project of European integration”.

The man behind White genocide Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi.

In 1922 he founded the “Pan-European” movement in Vienna, which aimed to create a New World Order, based on a federation of nations led by the United States. European integration would be the first step in creating a world government. Among the first supporters, including Czech politicians Tomáš Masaryk and Edvard Beneš and the banker Max Warburg, who invested the first 60,000 marks. The Austrian Chancellor Ignaz Seipel and the next president of Austria, Karl Renner, took the responsibility for leading the “Pan-European” movement. Later, French politicians, such as Léon Bloum, Aristide Briand, Alcide De Gasperi, etc will offer their help.

With the rise of Fascism in Europe, the project was abandoned and the “Pan-European” movement was forced to dissolve, but after the Second World War, Kalergi, thanks to frantic and tireless activity and the support of Winston Churchill, the Jewish Masonic Lodge B’nai B’rith and major newspapers like the New York Times, the plan manages to be accepted by the United States Government. The CIA later undertakes the completion of the project.

The Essence Of The Kalergi Plan:

In his book Practical Idealism, Kalergi indicates that the residents of the future “United States of Europe” will not be the People of the Old Continent, but a kind of sub-humans, products of miscegenation. He clearly states that the peoples of Europe should interbreed with Asians and colored races, thus creating a multinational flock with no quality and easily controlled by the ruling elite.

Kalergi proclaims the abolition of the right of self-determination and then the elimination of nations with the use of ethnic separatist movements and mass migration. In order for Europe to be controlled by an elite, he wants to turn people into one homogeneous mixed breed of Blacks, Whites and Asians. Who is this elite however? Kalergi is particularly illuminating on this:

The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals. Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It’s not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews [due to the actions taken by the French Revolution]

Although no textbook mentions Kalergi, his ideas are the guiding principles of the European Union. The belief that the peoples of Europe should be mixed with Africans and Asians, to destroy our identity and create a single mestizo race, is the basis of all community policies that aim to protect minorities. Not for humanitarian reasons, but because of the directives issued by the ruthless Regime that machinates the greatest genocide in history. The Coudenhove-Kalergi European Prize is awarded every two years to Europeans who have excelled in promoting this criminal plan. Among those awarded with such a prize are Angela Merkel and Herman Van Rompuy.

The incitement to genocide, is also the basis of the constant appeals of the United Nations, that demands we accept millions of immigrants to help with the low birth rates of the EU. According to a report published on January 2000 in «Population division» Review of the United Nations in New York, under the title “Immigration replacement: A solution to declining and aging population,” Europe will need by 2025 159,000,000 migrants.

One could wonder how there can be such accuracy on the estimates of immigration, although it was not a premeditated plan. It is certain that the low birth rate could easily be reversed with appropriate measures to support families. It is just as clear that it is the contribution of foreign genes do not protect our genetic heritage, but that it enables their disappearance. The sole purpose of these measures is to completely distort our people, to turn them into a group of people without national, historical and cultural cohesion. In short, the policies of the Kalergi plan was and still is, the basis of official government policies aimed at genocide of the Peoples of Europe, through mass immigration. G. Brock Chisholm, former director of the World Health Organization (OMS), proves that he has learned the lesson of Kalergi well when he says: “What people in all places have to do is to limit of birthrates and promote mixed marriages (between different races), this aims to create a single race in a world which will be directed by a central authority. ”


If we look around us, the Kalergi plan seems to be fully realized. We face Europe’s fusion with the Third World. The plague of interracial marriage produces each year thousands of young people of mixed race: “The children of Kalergi”. Under the dual pressures of misinformation and humanitarian stupefaction, promoted by the MSM, the Europeans are being taught to renounce their origin, to renounce their national identity.

The servants of globalization are trying to convince us that to deny our identity, is a progressive and humanitarian act, that “racism” is wrong, because they want us all to be blind consumers. It is necessary, now more than ever, to counter the lies of the System, to awaken the revolutionary spirit Europeans. Every one must see this truth, that European Integration amounts to genocide. We have no other option, the alternative is national suicide.

Translator’s note: Although the reasons due to which Kalergi made the choices he made are of no particular interest to us, we will try to answer a question that will surely our readers have already asked: Why a European aristocrat with Flemish, Polish, Greek-Byzantine roots and even with some samurai blood in his veins (from his mother) was such body plans and organ in the hands of dark forces? The reasons, in our opinion, are multiple, idiosyncratic, psychological and … women.

We therefore observe a personality with strong snobbish attitudes, arrogance, and, allow me the term, “degenerate elitism.” Also, the fact that his mother was Asian, perhaps created internal conflicts and frustrations, something that can happen to people with such temperament. But the most decisive factor must have been the “proper teenager”, which incidentally of course, was beside him, and became his first woman (at age 13): The Jewess Ida Roland, who would later become a famous actress.


Van Rompuy won the Coudenhove-Kalergi prize for the biggest contribution to White genocide.

The Award Of The Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize To President Van Rompuy

On November 16th 2012, the President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, was awarded the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize, during a special conference in Vienna, to celebrate 90 years of pan-European movement. The prize is awarded every two years to leading personalities for their outstanding contribution to the process of European integration.

A decisive factor that helped him win the prize was the balanced way in which President Van Rompuy executed his duties in the new position of President of the European Council, which was established by the Treaty of Lisbon. He handled this particularly sensitive leading and coordinating role with a spirit of determination and reconciliation, while emphasis was also given to his skilful arbitration on European affairs and unfailing commitment to European moral values.

During his speech, Mr Van Rompuy described the unification of Europe as a peace project. This idea, which was also the objective of the work of Coudenhove-Kalergi, after 90 years is still important. The award bears the name of Count Richard Nicolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), philosopher, diplomat, publisher and founder of the Pan-European Movement (1923). Coudenhove-Kalergi was the pioneer of European integration and popularized the idea of a federal Europe with his work.

Among the winners of the award, the Federal Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel (2010) and the President of Latvia Vaira Vike-Freiberga (2006), are included.

This article is a translation of an Italian article, originally posted on Identità.

Good video here on  “Preventing White Genocide:



»The Real Holocaust® Deal…….

OK, here’s the deal in a nutshell via this quicky graphic of what I and a lot of other people say about the so-called holocaust (see videos below):

Graphic from Gemar Rudolf’s site. Threatened with jail in his native Germany (just for saying the above — think about that); Rudolf fled to America for political asylum, married an American citizen and had a kid, but the Zionist-manipulated US government had him illegally arrested and deported back to Germany where the Zionist power structure had him thrown into the slammer. For real. And he isn’t the only one who had this happen to him, either. Considering what some people have gone through over this one long ago historical period, I would think you could at least spend a lousy few minutes reading a little on the subject, or maybe watching a short video or two.

WHAT THE ABOVE graphic basically says is that the whole bit about “industrial gassing” and the 6 million number is a crock of bull defecation. Below are a multitude of reasons why anyone in their right mind should have serious doubts on the whole thing.

First reason:

The Jews were bandying around the 6 million number since World War ONE and even before, actually. Get that WW ONE there. That’s from 1914 to 1918, for all those who failed World History.

Why? Because some of their Talmudic religious people said that 6 million Jews would have to be a “burnt sacrifice” before the “nation of Israel” can come back into existence. That’s right. This is why the crematoria and body burning stuff figures so prominently in the holocaust legend. It is readily apparent that insanely rich Global Zionist forces have subscribed to this belief system, and have used it to justify their actions in stealing Palestine from the people who lived there, even though they had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with any so-called “holocaust.”

Here, look at THIS LINK. It has a bunch of newspaper ads and articles going back way before WWII showing the Jews had a major hard for the 6 million figure long before Adolf Hitler.

Just go to this ONE EXAMPLE, from a Jew named Dr. Paul Nathan who writes in a New York Times article dated 1906, that the Russians were trying to “systematically exterminate” the 6 million Jews living there. This is just after International Jewry purposefully helped Japan defeat the Czar in the 1905 Russo-Japanese war by financing Japan and backroom deals to deny loaning any American or Western banker’s money to Christian Russia (pretty sorry since Czar Nicholas’ grandfather stood behind Abe Lincoln during the American Civil War).

In the 19th century and early 20th, Commie and Anarchist Jews were the original “domestic terrorists” of Russia, dedicated to overthrowing the Christian monarchy, destroying Gentile business owners (the evil “Capitalists”) and tearing the country apart so Jewry could take over. They finally succeeded after many years with the Bolshevik Red revolution of 1917, which was actually financed by extremely rich Wall Street banking Jews like Jacob Schiff and the Warburgs (Kuhn and Loeb banking house). This is a matter of historical fact, even though almost all Jews will totally lie to your face about it to this day.

Most Commies were indeed Jews, even those in the US itself (often “crypto-Jews,” or Jews with changed names hidden from the public). Why do you think the supposed “Evil McCarthyism” of the 1950’s is such a favorite topic for Hollywood movies and PC talk? Because it was the lousy Jews getting exposed, that’s why.

Second reason:

Back during WWII, the Jewish propaganda organs for America and Britain had been busy jacking up our countries left and right on how evil Hitler was (as you can see, the Jew propaganda over this guy is still going strong to this day). They had to continue the justification for the war, especially after all the dead American GI’s (about 418,000, virtually all White Gentile men), the horrific killing of between 600,000 and one million German civilians by aerial bombing and why we just happened to be allies of the murderous Communists (who would now assume the role of boogieman so the military/industrial complex and banker Jews could further milk our tax dollars until something new came along).

When the German concentration camps were opened by American troops in spring of 1945, inmates at a few of the camps (many non-Jews, as well) were sickly, some dead and dying from typhus, cholera and starvation brought on by all the insane allied bombing of Germany during the last few months of the war — just look at what the allies did to Dresden. The entire country was laid waste (vengeful Jews still love thinking about it).

All the emaciated bodies — dead or alive — made perfect propaganda imagery for the Zionists really behind the war, so they made full use of it, along with totally fabricated evidence in skin lampshades, soap and shrunken heads (taken from museums) — all supposedly made from the sad sack Jew inmates, so the Germans would look evil.

The intelligence/propaganda arm of America had on hand special Jewish agents and even film crews, like Billy Wilder, a big-time Jewish Hollywood director at the time (funny, how he was there at the right moment, huh?) to direct films and newsreels of the concentration camps getting liberated (please watch the video “Why America believes in the Holocaust” below).

Unlike US General Eisenhower’s POW camps, where around a million captured German soldiers were purposefully allowed to die through starvation and exposure in muddy fields after the war was over (bet you didn’t know that); the Germans did everything they could to minimize the deaths of Jews in the camps (they even had inmate hospitals for crying out loud). Then the whole system finally broke down due to the massive bombing campaign against Germany and advancing allied armies. Tens of thousands of concentration camp inmates died from typhus, but only at a handful of camps. Sure, many Soviet prisoners died from starvation and were worked to death during the war, but the Jew numbers were far less than what they want you to think, probably on the magnitude of the Armenian “holocaust, or upwards of 1.5 million tops.”

Hell, the Brits had the exact same typhus problem killing South Africa’s Boer women and children (German Dutch colonizers), locked up in the world’s very first concentration camps (no, it wasn’t the “evil” Germans who invented these); back when the Imperialistic Brits stole the place for diamonds and gold during the Boer war of the late 19th century.

Over the years, many photos have since been exposed as fake, like this famous one here.

The Germans fully understood such diseases were spread by biting fleas and lice, so they fumigated everything with something called Zyklon B to kill insect carriers. All the camps had special rooms built to “delouse” the inmate’s clothing and suitcases before storage. Zyklon B was pretty much just like “Raid” bug spray and only used as a fumigate (it wasn’t at all efficient for killing larger creatures like people quickly). Nor did the Germans have any sort of protective venting built into the supposed “gas chambers” (which were really just body storage cold rooms for the cremation of the daily dead from a very large slave labor population, with plans for expansion).

This disease-fighting effort came back to bite the methodical Germans in the ass big time.

Also, at Treblinka, the Jews say the Nazis used exhaust from the diesel engine of a captured Soviet tank and later tried to say it was from a captured Soviet submarine engine, which the Germans supposedly sailed up a freshwater river to the camp! This diesel C02 exhaust business was a totally ridiculous way to kill masses of people quickly, especially considering how much the Germans needed fuel for the war effort. More tellingly, the Germans could have easily built simple wood burning stoves to generate far greater amounts of carbon monoxide than diesel engines (they knew all about the technology). Germany also had plenty of deadly nerve gas they could have used, yet never once touched their stocks.

Zionist Global Jewry does not have the close control necessary to keep the holocaust story line straight (any open effort would be too easily noticed by the Goyim). In the years following WWII, this led to imaginative (but ignorant) little city Jews coming up with absolutely crazy stuff like electrified floors, suffocation using air vacuum pumps, even Jews riding along on conveyor belts in little chairs and having steel bolts driven into their heads (the insane idea was stolen from non-Kosher slaughter houses).

Totally impossible accounts from attention-seeking Jews are all over the place, yet Jews everywhere still expect you to believe every last word (or at least keep your mouth shut) — if you don’t, then you’re an evil “Nazi!” Jews have long used this slanderous tactic to get other non-Jews around you to think that before they might listen to a word you say.

And Global Jewry often rewrites history to suit their racial propaganda agenda (including black history for “White guilt” PC programming). On a number of occasions, they’ve beencaught red-handed making up crap but the Jew BS still continues even now. Turn on the TV and watch it in real time.

These never-ending Globalist Jew efforts have been greatly helped by their long-nurtured PC and by the liberals and Jews in the mainstream media — even FOX news is really just another PC bastion — they all basically work to keep our little brains occupied while they gradually and silently undermine our race in what was once our own lands. Pay attention and you’ll see it.

Unfortunately, most people out there still foolishly and blindly accept whatever they see on TV as fact (like everything you read in a book must be true). It’s actually been a long-running racial brainwashing effort, or “PSYOPS” program on all us befuddled “Goyim” (what the arrogant Jews call non-Jews) in the now formerly White countries of the West. Sucks royally, once you stop and consider just how many of us White Christian guys died in WWII, laying waste to fellow White people in Germany.

All these so-called “death camps” (6) were behind Soviet lines and impossible to visit for decades (to this day, Jews go overboard to prevent the least research at them). Many little Jews have long tried to say the camps in Germany were used for purposeful industrial killing, but even Israel’s “Yad Vashem” museum has long been forced to admit that was never true (along with all the skin lampshades, shrunken heads and soap crap touted as “evidence of German barbarity”).

The Soviets had used blatant genocide propaganda (including faked evidence andphotos) against Nazi Germany all through-out WWII. The Global Zionists simply continued and built on these Soviet lies ever since (Jews were all through-out Communist Russia from the beginnings). After the fighting ended in Europe, vengeful Polish and Soviet Jews, or American and British Zionist intelligence units, violently tortured German POWS of all ranks to make often impossible “confessions” that are still in use today.

Yep, they sure as hell did do all that.



The Holocaustianity — Zionism’s Big Lie

From Zion Crime Factory. His Google blogs were constantly getting censored by Jews, but he now has it on his own domain and hosting. Go to his link!

Above video does not have thumbnail, but works.

Why America Believes in the Holocaust. Episode #9 from Denierbud’s Buchenwald series. Go here for all his Holocaust videos: One Third of the Holocaust Above video deleted by ADL Youtube Thought Police:


The Treblinka Archeology Hoax
The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax debunks Zionist British Archaeologist Caroline Sturdy-Colls’ fraudulent “investigation” of Treblinka, which included digging near clearly marked Christian graves claiming to find new “hidden mass graves,” falsely assigning homicidal intent to a normal life-saving shower room at Majdanek, and misidentifying a terra-cotta tile excavated at Treblinka as belonging to the floor of a homicidal “gas chamber.”


Please watch another Treblinka video below for more information.

Third reason:

Global Jewry wants the White people of the West to feel guilt and sympathize with the Jews, so we support Zionist Israel (long a project of the “Money Trust”). Jews play this victimhood violin every chance they get, so we don’t get ticked on how they behave in America and how much of our taxpayer’s money we give to Israel (somewhere over 10 billion a year, making it well over 100 billion since the late ’90’s that we know about, but could be tons more).

They also don’t want us to say anything on how they treat the Palestinians (it’s really quite evil), as the Zionist Jews openly steal the land from them, blasphemously calling it’s God’s will. This is why so many regular Muslims now hate America and want to kill our ass.

They’ve also blackmailed the Germans for over 65 billion dollars, plus substantial taxpayer subsidies to build five sea-going, nuclear weapons-capable, incredibly silent submarines for Israel (why do the Zionists need those?). And Jews everywhere still want even more!

“The alleged Hitlerite gas chamber and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which opened the way to a gigantic political, financial fraud, whose principal beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism, and whose principal victims are the people of Germany – but not their rulers – and the entire Palestinian people.”

— Robert Faurisson

Sometime in the mid-to-late 1970’s, Global Jewry made a decision to turn up the holocaust propaganda dial on America (see below). Surely you’ve noticed how prevalent the holocaust brainwashing has become and how it keeps getting more intense by the year. America now has something like 16 holocaust museums (a substantial part of the budgets are paid for by your state and federal tax dollars). They have plans for even more. In Europe, they are even making holocaust indoctrination classes mandatory for small school children! That’s already occuring in America, to some extent.

Also, make clear note of all the constant “Evil Nazis” and holocaust stuff on TV channels like the “History” Channel and NatGeo they are playing these days. They are trying their best to amp up the brainwashing because Americans are now getting so sick and tired of “PC.”

After WWII, people knew that Jewry suffered under the Nazis. Sure, that much is a given. And there were massacres on the Eastern Front (Russia), but most of those were retribution at the hands of local populations (like the Ukrainians and Latvians) who suffered greatly from Communist Jews — often for decades. In fact, tens of millions of Russian Gentiles were starved to death, killed with a bullet in the back of the head or machine gunned by the predominately Jewish CHEKA and NKVD secret police (who actually had mobile gassing vans invented by a commie Jew).

In 1957, the government of the Soviet Union publicly admitted that 20 to 40 million had been killed since the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. A statician friend of Alexander Solzinitsyn, working in the Kremlin, pegged it at 66 million killed over the decades since the end of WWI.

And the majority of Stalin’s henchmen were unquestionably Jewish communists. Jews know this to be a fact. That’s why you rarely see JACK in the US media on this period of history, like on the “History” Channel. Think about it.

It’s actually White people who have suffered far more purposeful genocide than Jewry or any other race — most definitely far more than the Jews and quite possibly as much or more as the Chinese under Mao! Jews are absolutely no better than the Nazis and many Jews know this.

Right now, the Jews are doing to the Arab Palestinians pretty much what they endlessly say happened to them 65 years or so ago from the Nazis. Ironic, isn’t it? Unless, of course, you’re a Palestinian and then it’s tragic.

Jewry may in fact be the most genocidal race on the planet. The Talmud considers all non-Jews (like us White people) to be cattle and dealt with as they see fit. Jewry also believes God has promised them the entire planet. Many orthodox Jews even believe that once the “Mosiach” (Jew Messiah) comes, he’ll put to the sword everyone but the sacred Jews!

This whole business of “industrial gassing” has clearly been a giant Jewish/Zionist created “psyops” gig on the West. They played up the Jew victimhood schtick (actually changing the methods of mass death several times) to get the West to recognize the formation of Israel in 1948, but didn’t have the political and media power to openly push more lies down our throats until later.

“I’ve checked out the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct – not a single mention of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ’six million’ Jewish victims of the war. Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; Churchill’s Second World War totals 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.
In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ’six million’ Jewish victims of the war.”

— Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus, University of Ulster, December 5, 2005

Little Jewry has been so affected mentally by the holocaust propaganda, they go bonkers whenever anyone has the least little doubt about the holocaust (like me). This bunch has basically turned psychotic, screaming “never again” every five minutes. In Europe, the Jews have even passed laws passed to throw you in jail should you publicly utter a word. That’s right. Lawyers for “denier” defendants can even be jailed just for bringing up evidence that supports their client’s case! Can you believe that crap?

They want this same kind of censorship here in the US, too. In fact, the Jews have extremely well-funded, organized operations like the Anti-defamation League (about 45 million a year budget), dedicated to covering up and obfuscating of any inconvenient facts about the holocaust and Jewry in general. Hell, the mainstream media itself works totally in conjunction with Jewry to keep Americans stupid.

Youtube videos are often targeted by the Jewish Anti-defamation League (ADL) for deletion on anything they don’t like, especially the more powerful, persuasive and polished. Youtube actually works in conjunction with Jew special interests to get things taken down by using bogus “terms of service” violations. All of Denierbud’s “One Third of the Holocaust” videos were removed — obviously because he’s way too persuasive — even though the man went overboard with the caveat “I don’t hate Jews…” But that’s never enough for Jewry, especially when it goes against whatever BS they want you to believe. Watch Denierbud’s videos below, go to his site (if it’s even still up) and read what the man says — you’ll see.

It’s a constant battle to get the real truth out. Will you add your voice to the effort?

— Phillip Marlowe

More videos about the “holocaust”

Holocaust, Hate Speech & were the Germans so stupid?

If you’re new to the “holocaust question,” then you must watch this video from Anthony “Tony” Lawson, retired TV commercial director from Britain. Vimeo embed above since Youtube deleted it by using a totally bogus, lying excuse of copyright infringement. It’s too powerful for the Jews to let too many Goyim see it.

From Anthony Lawson:

Suppressing free and open discussion on any subject is as bad as telling lies, and knowingly suppressing the truth is the biggest lie of all, because it is based, not on a mistake or a genuine error, but on a deliberate intention to deceive.

Having been tortured, Rudolf Höss, who was the commander of Auschwitz from 1940 to 1943, almost certainly lied to save the lives of his wife and children. Even if torture and duress cannot not be proven, the overwhelming reason for recognizing the utter falsity of the Höss confession is that the gassing method he described was not scientifically plausible. Yet Höss’s conviction has stood, by inference, as a testament to the cruelty of Germans in general, since he was tried at Nuremberg, in 1947, and subsequently hanged on April 16th, 1947, in Poland.

With great respect for those who have tried—though harassed, punished, fined, imprisoned and otherwise abused—to tell it like it really was: Arthur R. Butz, Robert Faurisson, Paul Grubach, Gerd Honsik, David Irving, Kevin Käther, Nicholas Kollerstrom, Fred Leuchter, Horst Mahler, Ingrid Rimland, Germar Rudolf, Bradley Smith, Sylvia Stolz, Fredrick Töbin, Ernst Zündel and many others.

What do holocaust deniers believe?


VIDEO DELETED FOR AMERICAN AUDIENCES due to some BS about copyrights (just an excuse, they allow all kinds of things that have captured video and music)!

Questions: Why do they not care about Moon Hoax conspiracy theories but threaten any who question the Holocaust? (6:00).


One Third of the Holocaust. Part 1 of 26. Watch full version if possible (4 hours but worth it). You can watch parts HERE. Two of his videos are on this page. Go to Denierbud’s site, or watch the ones here, and ask yourself why the ADL Jews wanted it removed. It’s because the Jews don’t want the casual person exposed to such thinking! One Third of the Holocaust


Above video does not have thumbnail, but works.

Denierbud’s episode #2 video on the water well problem at Treblinka. Powerful evidence of the impossibility of what Holocaust people say occurred. It’s not long (3:06).Deleted from Youtube by embedded ADL Jews:

Denierbud investigated the inconsistencies and math behind a great deal of the Holocaust. His videos were so persuasive that the Jews went overboard in getting his videos removed from Youtube. To get his logical and very strong evidence out there, Denierbud has set-up a website, totally removed from all the Jewish efforts at censorship (for now) of this EXTREMELY important look at THE BIGGEST LIE of the 20th Century. You MUST spare just a few minutes and go to Denierbud’s separate website to watch episode #1, #11 and the conclusion video. Or watch the whole series. It’s that important. Go here: One Third of the Holocaust (gone!).


This link is for one of his two sole videos left on Youtube. It is on some scurrilous evidence presented at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal and the second is on how they censor him over a lousy Reader’s Digest article from 1943, but not some sex videos. Here’s that other “allowed” Youtube video: Denierbud on him being censored on the Reader’s Digest video.


How many Jews were killed at Auschwitz? Watch this and ask yourself: Why do these Jews still insist on 6 million?

Holocaust historians claim Treblinka was a death camp where 870,000 Jews were put to death with carbon monoxide (engine exhaust), and then buried in mass graves.

In 1999, an Australian team led by Richard Krege, a qualified electronics engineer, carried out a high tech exam of the soil using Ground Penetrating Radar, which can detect minute earth disturbances up to 30 meters down. But after 3 weeks of work the team found the ground had never been disturbed and numerous core sample analysis revealed no ash or bone particles (there should have been millions of loose teeth alone).

The results obtained by these researchers show with 100% certainty that mass gravesnever existed in the areas called Treblinka and Belzec. The Zionist-manipulated creation of Israel was largely based on these alleged deaths, and several million more which supposedly occurred at Auschwitz.


The “Holocaust” business has been a giant lie. Probably the biggest in all history.

Some videos may get deleted by embedded ADL Jewish Censors at Youtube, or other Jews elsewhere. Youtube videos will say “removed for terms of service violations” meaning the lousy Jews don’t want you to see it and the particular video can be deleted without too much notice by the Sheeple. Links to little blogs, like Zion Crime Factory (this is at least the 3rd link I’ve pasted in for him), also get deleted because of organized Jew pressure. Zion Crime Factory deleted AGAIN. Try this link:

Jews simply can’t have the public knowing anything about them (other than thinking they are so smart and victimized for no reason), or having the least doubt about the holocaust.


  • ———————————————————————
  • auschwitz holocaust


Aum: Copyright J.B. Hare 1999, All Rights Reserved


The Upanishads, Part 2 (SBE15), by Max Müller, [1879], at

THE Svetâsvatara-upanishad has been handed down as one of the thirty-three Upanishads of the Taittirîyas, and though this has been doubted, no real argument has ever been brought forward to invalidate the tradition which represents it as belonging to the Taittirîya or Black Yagur-veda.

It is sometimes called Svetâsvatarânâm Mantropanishad (p. 274), and is frequently spoken of in the plural, asSvetâsvataropanishadah. At the end of the last Adhyâya we read that Svetâsvatara told it to the best among the hermits, and that it should be kept secret, and not be taught to any one except to a son or a regular pupil. It is also called Svetâsva 1, though, it would seem, for the sake of the metre only. The Svetâsvataras are mentioned as a Sâkha 2, subordinate to the Karakas; but of the literature belonging to them in particular, nothing is ever mentioned beyond this Upanishad.

Svetâsvatara means a white mule, and as mules were known and prized in India from the earliest times, Svetâsvatara, as the name of a person, is no more startling than Svetâsva, white horse, an epithet of Arguna. Now as no one would be likely to conclude from the name of one of the celebrated Vedic Rishis, Syâvâsva, i.e. black horse, that negro influences might be discovered in his hymns, it is hardly necessary to say that all speculations as to Christian influences, or the teaching of white Syro-Christian missionaries, being indicated by the name of Svetâsvatara, are groundless 3.

The Svetâsvatara-upanishad holds a very high rank among the Upanishads. Though we cannot say that it is quoted by name by Bâdarâyana in the Vedânta-sûtras,

p. xxxii

it is distinctly referred to as sruta or revealed 1. It is one of the twelve Upanishads chosen by Vidyâranya in his Sarvopanishad-arthânabhûtiprakâsa, and it was singled out by Saṅkara as worthy of a special commentary.

The Svetâsvatara-upanishad seems to me one of the most difficult, and at the same time one of the most interesting works of its kind. Whether on that and on other grounds it should be assigned to a more ancient or to a more modern period is what, in the present state of our knowledge, or, to be honest, of our ignorance of minute chronology during the Vedic period, no true scholar would venture to assert. We must be satisfied to know that, as a class, the Upanishads are presupposed by the Kalpa-sûtras, that some of them, called Mantra-upanishads, form part of the more modern Samhitâs, and that there are portions even in the Rig-veda-samhitâ 2 for which the name of Upanishad is claimed by the Anukramanîs. We find them most frequent, however, during the Brâhmana-period, in the Brâhmanas themselves, and, more especially, in those portions which are called Âranyakas, while a large number of them is referred to the Atharva-veda. That, in imitation of older Upanishads, similar treatises were composed to a comparatively recent time, has, of course, long been known 3.

But when we approach the question whether among the ancient and genuine Upanishads one may be older than the other, we find that, though we may guess much, we can prove nothing. The Upanishads belonged to Parishads or settlements spread all over India. There is a stock of ideas, even of expressions, common to most of them. Yet, the ideas collected in the Upanishads cannot all have grown tip in one and the same place, still less in regular succession. They must have had an independent growth, determined by individual and local influences, and opinions which in one village might seem far advanced, would in another be looked upon as behind the world. We may

p. xxxiii

admire the ingeniousness of those who sometimes in this, sometimes in that peculiarity see a clear indication of the modern date of an Upanishad, but to a conscientious scholar such arguments are really distasteful for the very sake of their ingeniousness. He knows that they will convince many who do not know the real difficulties; he knows they will have to be got out of the way with no small trouble, and he knows that, even if they should prove true in the end, they will require very different support from what they have hitherto received, before they can be admitted to the narrow circle of scientific facts.

While fully admitting therefore that the Svetâsvatara-upanishad has its peculiar features and its peculiar difficulties, I must most strongly maintain that no argument that has as yet been brought forward, seems to me to prove, in any sense of the word, its modern character.

It has been said, for instance, that the Svetâsvatara-upanishad is a sectarian Upanishad, because, when speaking of the Highest Self or the Highest Brahman, it applies such names to him as Hara (I, 10), Rudra (II, 17; III, 2; 4; IV, 12; 21; 22), Siva (III, 14; IV, 10), Bhagavat (III, 14), Agni, Âditya, Vâyu, &c. (IV, 2). But here it is simply taken for granted that the idea of the Highest Self was developed first, and, after it had reached its highest purity, was lowered again by an identification with mythological and personal deities. The questions whether the conception of the Highest Self was formed once and once only, whether it was formed after all the personal and mythological deities had first been merged into one Lord (Pragâpati), or whether it was discovered behind the veil of any other name in the mythological pantheon of the past, have never been mooted. Why should not an ancient Rishi have said: What we have hitherto called Rudra, and what we worship as Agni, orSiva, is in reality the Highest Self, thus leaving much of the ancient mythological phraseology to be used with a new meaning? Why should we at once conclude that late sectarian worshippers of mythological gods replaced again the Highest Self, after their fathers had discovered it, by their own sectarian names? If we adopt the former

p. xxxiv

view, the Upanishads, which still show these rudera of the ancient temples, would have to be considered as more primitive even than those in which the idea of the Brahman or the Highest Self has reached its utmost purity.

It has been considered a very strong argument in support of the modern and sectarian character of the Svetâsvatara-upanishad, that ‘it inculcates what is called Bhakti 1, or implicit reliance on the favour of the deity worshipped.’ Now it is quite true that this Upanishad possesses a very distinct character of its own, by the stress which it lays on the personal, and sometimes almost mythical character of the Supreme Spirit; but, so far from inculcating bhakti, in the modern sense of the word, it never mentions that word, except in the very last verse, a verse which, if necessary, certain critics would soon dispose of as a palpable addition. But that verse says no more than this: ‘If these truths (of the Upanishad) have been told to a high-minded man, who feels the highest devotion for God, and for his Guru as for God, then they will shine forth indeed.’ Does that prove the existence of Bhakti as we find it in the Sândilya-sûtras 2?

Again, it has been said that the Svetâsvatara-upanishad is sectarian in a philosophical sense, that it is in fact an Upanishad of the Sâṅkhya system of philosophy, and not of the Vedânta. Now I am quite willing to admit that, in its origin, the Vedânta philosophy is nearer to the Vedic literature than any other of the six systems of philosophy, and that if we really found doctrines, peculiar to the Sâṅkhya, and opposed to the Vedânta, in the Svetâsvatara-upanishad, we might feel inclined to assign to our Upanishad a later date. But where is the proof of this?

No doubt there are expressions in this Upanishad which remind us of technical terms used at a later time in the Sâṅkhya system of philosophy, but of Sâṅkhya doctrines, which I had myself formerly suspected in this Upanishad,

p. xxxv

I can on closer study find very little. I think it was Mr. Gough who, in his Philosophy of the Upanishads, for the first time made it quite clear that the teaching of our Upanishad is, in the main, the same as that of the other Upanishads. ‘TheSvetâsvatara-upanishad teaches,’ as he says, ‘the unity of souls in the one and only Self; the unreality of the world as a series of figments of the self-feigning world-fiction; and as the first of the fictitious emanations, the existence of the Demiurgos or universal soul present in every individual soul, the deity that projects the world out of himself, that the migrating souls may find the recompense of their works in former lives.’

I do not quite agree with this view of the Îsvara, whom Mr. Gough calls the Demiurgos, but he seems to me perfectly right when he says that the Svetâsvatara-upanishad propounds in Sâṅkhya terms the very principles that the Sâṅkhya philosophers make it their business to subvert. One might doubt as to the propriety of calling certain terms ‘Sâṅkhya terms’ in a work written at a time when a Sâṅkhya philosophy, such as we know it as a system, had as yet no existence, and when the very name Sâṅkhya meant something quite different from the Sâṅkhya system of Kapila. Sâṅkhya is derived from saṅkhyâ, and that meant counting, number, name, corresponding very nearly to the Greek λόγος. Sâṅkhya, as derived from it, meant originally no more than theoretic philosophy, as opposed to yoga, which meant originally practical religious exercises and penances, to restrain the passions and the senses in general. All other interpretations of these words, when they had become technical names, are of later date.

But even in their later forms, whatever we may think of the coincidences and differences between the Sâṅkhya and Vedânta systems of philosophy, there is one point on which they are diametrically opposed. Whatever else the Sâṅkhya may be, it is dualistic; whatever else the Vedânta may be, it is monistic. In the Sâṅkhya, nature, or whatever else we may call it, is independent of the purusha; in the Vedânta it is not. Now the Svetâsvatara-upanishad states distinctly that nature, or what in the Sâṅkhya philosophy

p. xxxvi

is intended by Pradhâna, is not an independent power, but a power (sakti) forming the very self of the Deva. ‘Sages,’ we read, ‘devoted to meditation and concentration, have seen the power belonging to God himself, hidden in its own qualities.’

What is really peculiar in the Svetâsvatara-upanishad is the strong stress which it lays on the personality of the Lord, the Îsvara, Deva, in the passage quoted, is perhaps the nearest approach to our own idea of a personal God, though without the background which the Vedânta always retains for it. It is God as creator and ruler of the world, as îsvara, lord, but not as Paramâtman, or the Highest Self. The Paramâtman constitutes, no doubt, his real essence, but creation and creator have a phenomenal character only 1. The creation is mâyâ, in its original sense of work, then of phenomenal work, then of illusion. The creator is mâyin, in its original sense of worker or maker, but again, in that character, phenomenal only 2. The Gunas or qualities arise, according to the Vedânta, from prakriti or mâyâ, within, not beside, the Highest Self, and this is the very idea which is here expressed by ‘the Self-power of God, hidden in the gunas or determining qualities.’ How easily that sakti or power may become an independent being, as Mâyâ, we see in such verses as:

Sarvabhûteshu sarvâtman yâ saktir aparâbhavâ
Gunâsrayâ namas tasyai sasvatâyai paresvara 3.

But the important point is this, that in the Svetâsvatara-upanishad this change has not taken place. Throughout the whole of it we have one Being only, as the cause of everything, never two. Whatever Sâṅkhya philosophers of a later date may have imagined that they could discover in that Upanishad in support of their theories 4, there is not one passage in it which, if rightly interpreted, not by itself, but in connection with the whole text, could be quoted in

p. xxxvii

support of a dualistic philosophy such as the Sâṅkhya, as a system, decidedly is.

If we want to understand, what seems at first sight contradictory, the existence of a God, a Lord, a Creator, a Ruler, and at the same time the existence of the super-personal Brahman, we must remember that the orthodox view of the Vedânta 1 is not what we should call Evolution, but Illusion. Evolution of the Brahman, or Parinâma, is heterodox, illusion or Vivarta is orthodox Vedânta. Brahman is a concept involving such complete perfection that with it evolution, or a tendency towards higher perfection, is impossible. If therefore there is change, that change can only be illusion, and can never claim the same reality as Brahman. To put it metaphorically, the world, according to the orthodox Vedântin, does not proceed from Brahman as a tree from a germ, but as a mirage from the rays of the sun. The world is, as we express it, phenomenal only, but whatever objective reality there is in it, is Brahman, ‘das Ding an sich,’ as Kant might call it.

Then what is Îsvara, or Deva, the Lord or God? The answers given to this question are not very explicit. Historically, no doubt, the idea of the Îsvara, the personal God, the creator and ruler, the omniscient and omnipotent, existed before the idea of the absolute Brahman, and after the idea of the Brahman had been elaborated, the difficulty of effecting a compromise between the two ideas, had to be overcome. Îsvara, the Lord, is Brahman, for what else could he be? But he is Brahman under a semblance, the semblance, namely, of a personal creating and governing God. He is not created, but is the creator, an office too low, it was supposed, for Brahman. The power which enabled Îsvara to create, was a power within him, not independent of him, whether we call it Devâtmasakti, Mâyâ, or Prakriti. That power is really inconceivable, and it has assumed such different forms in the mind of different Vedântists, that in the end Mâyâ herself is represented as the creating power, nay, as having created Îsvara himself.

p. xxxviii

[paragraph continues]In our Upanishad, however, Îsvara is the creator, and though, philosophically speaking, we should say that be was conceived as phenomenal, yet we must never forget that the phenomenal is the form of the real, and Îsvara therefore an aspect of Brahman 1. ‘This God,’ says Pramâda Dâsa Mitra 2, ‘is the spirit conscious of the universe. Whilst an extremely limited portion, and that only of the material universe, enters into my consciousness, the whole of the conscious universe, together, of course, with the material one that hangs upon it, enters into the consciousness of God.’ And again, ‘Whilst we (the gîvâtmans) are subject to Mâyâ, Mâyâ is subject to Îsvara. If we truly know Îsvara, we know him as Brahman; if we truly know ourselves, we know ourselves as Brahman. This being so, we must not be surprised if sometimes we find Îsvara sharply distinguished from Brahman, whilst at other times Îsvara, and Brahman are interchanged.’

Another argument in support of the sectarian character of the Svetâsvatara-upanishad is brought forward, not by European students only, but by native scholars, namely, that the very name of Kapila, the reputed founder of the Sâṅkhya philosophy, occurs in it. Now it is quite true that if we read the second verse of the fifth Adhyâya by itself, the occurrence of the word Kapila may seem startling. But if we read it in connection with what precedes and follows, we shall see hardly anything unusual in it. It says:

‘It is he who, being one only, rules over every germ (cause), over all forms, and over all germs; it is he who, in the beginning, bears in his thoughts the wise son, the fiery, whom he wished to look on while he was born.’

Now it is quite clear to me that the subject in this verse is the same as in IV, II, where the same words are used, and where yo yonim yonim adhitishthaty ekah refers clearly to Brahman. It is equally clear that the prasûta, the son, the offspring of Brahman, in the Vedânta sense, can only be the same person who is elsewhere called Hiranyagarbha,

p. xxxix

the personified Brahman. Thus we read before, III, 4, ‘He the creator and supporter of the gods, Rudra, the great seer (maharshi), the lord of all, formerly gave birth to Hiranyagarbha;’ and in IV, 11, we have the very expression which is used here, namely, ‘that he saw Hiranyagarbha being born.’ Unfortunately, a new adjective is applied in our verse to Hiranyagarbha, namely, kapila, and this has called forth interpretations totally at variance with the general tenor of the Upanishad. If, instead of kapilam, reddish, fiery 1, any other epithet had been used of Hiranyagarbha, no one, I believe, would have hesitated for a moment to recognise the fact that our text simply repeats the description of Hiranyagarbha in his relation to Brahman, for the other epithet rishim, like maharshim, is too often applied to Brahman himself and to Hiranyagarbha to require any explanation.

But it is a well known fact that the Hindus, even as early as the Brâhmana-period, were fond of tracing their various branches of knowledge back to Brahman or to Brahman Svayambhû and then through Pragâpati, who even in the Rig-veda (X, 121, 10) replaces Hiranyagarbha, and sometimes through the Devas, such as Mrityu, Vâyu, Indra, Agni 2, &c., to the various ancestors of their ancient families.

In the beginning of the Mundakopanishad we are told that Brahman told it to Atharvan, Atharvan to Aṅgir, Aṅgir to Satyavâha Bhâradvâga, Bhâradvâga to Aṅgiras, Aṅgiras to Saunaka. Manu, the ancient lawgiver, is called both Hairanyagarbha and Svâyambhuva, as descended from Svâyambhu or from Hiranyagarbha 3. Nothing therefore was more natural than that the same tendency should have led some one to assign the authorship of a great philosophical system like the Sâṅkhya to Hiranyagarbha, if not to Brahman Svayambhû. And if the name of Hiranyagarbha had been used already for the ancestors of other sages, and the inspirers of other systems, what could be more natural than that another name of the same Hiranyagarbha

p. xl

should be chosen, such as Kapila. If we are told that Kapila handed his knowledge to Âsuri, Âsuri to Pañkasikha, this again is in perfect keeping with the character of literary tradition in India. Âsuri occurs in the Vamsas of the Satapatha-brâhmana (see above, pp. 187, 226); Pañkasikha 1, having five tufts, might be either a general name or a proper name of an ascetic, Buddhist or otherwise. He is quoted in the Sâṅkhya-sûtras, V, 32; VI, 68.

But after all this was settled, after Kapila had been accepted, like Hiranyagarbha, as the founder of a great system of philosophy, there came a reaction. People had now learnt to believe in a real Kapila, and when looking out for credentials for him, they found them wherever the word Kapila occurred in old writings. The question whether there ever was a real historical person who took the name of Kapila and taught the Sâṅkhya-sûtras, does not concern us here. I see no evidence for it. What is instructive is this, that our very passage, which may have suggested at first the name of Kapila, as distinct from Hiranyagarbha, Kapila, was later on appealed to to prove the primordial existence of a Kapila, the founder of the Sâṅkhya philosophy. However, it requires but a very slight acquaintance with Sanskrit literature and very little reflection in order to see that the author of our verse could never have dreamt of elevating a certain Kapila, known to him as a great philosopher, if there ever was such a man, to a divine rank 2. Hiranyagarbha kapila may have given birth to Kapila, the hero of the Sâṅkhya philosophers, but Kapila, a real human person, was never changed into Hiranyagarbha kapila.

Let us see now what the commentators say. Saṅkara first explains kapilam by kanakam 3 kapilavarnam . . . . Hiranyagarbham. Kapilo ‘graga iti purânavakanât. Kapilo Hiranyagarbho vâ nirdisyate. But he afterwards quotes some verses in support of the theory that Kapila was a

p. xli

[paragraph continues]Paramarshi, a portion of Vishnu, intended to destroy error in the Krita Yuga, a teacher of the Sâṅkhya philosophy.

Vigñânâtman explains the verse rightly, and without any reference to Kapila, the Sâṅkhya teacher.

Saṅkarânanda goes a step further, and being evidently fully aware of the misuse that had been made of this passage, even in certain passages of the Mahâbhârata (XII, 13254, 13703), and elsewhere, declares distinctly that kapila cannot be meant for the teacher of the Sâṅkhya (na tu sâṅkhyapranetâ kapilah, nâmamâtrasâmyena tadgrahane syâd atiprasaṅgah). He is fully aware of the true interpretation, viz. avyâkritasya prathamakâryabhûtam kapilam vikitravarnam gñânakriyâsaktyâtmakamHiranyagarbham ityarthah, but he yields to another temptation, and seems to prefer another view which makes Kapila Vâsudevasyâvatârabûtam Sagaraputrânâm dagdhâram, an Avatâra of Vâsudeva, the burner of the sons of Sagara. What vast conclusions may be drawn from no facts, may be seen in Weber’s Indische Studien, vol. i, p. 430, and even in his History of Indian Literature, published in 1878.

Far more difficult to explain than these supposed allusions to the authors and to the teaching of the Sâṅkhya philosophy are the frequent references in the Svetâsvatara-upanishad to definite numbers, which are supposed to point to certain classes of subjects as arranged in the Sâṅkhya and other systems of philosophy. The Sâṅkhya philosophy is fond of counting and arranging, and its very name is sometimes supposed to have been chosen because it numbers (sankhyâ) the subjects of which it treats. It is certainly true that if we meet, as we do in the Svetâsvatara-upanishad, with classes of things 1, numbered as one, two, three, five, eight, sixteen, twenty, forty-eight, fifty and more, and if some of these numbers agree with those recognised in the later Sâṅkhya and Yoga systems, we feel doubtful as to whether these coincidences are accidental, or whether, if not accidental, they are due to borrowing on the part of those later systems, or on the part

p. xlii

it impossible to come to a decision on this point. Even so early as the hymns of the Rig-veda we meet with these numbers assigned to days and months and seasons, rivers and countries, sacrifices and deities. They clearly prove the existence of a considerable amount of intellectual labour which had become fixed and traditional before the composition of certain hymns, and they prove the same in the case of certain Upanishads. But beyond this, for the present, I should not like to go; and I must say that the attempts of most of the Indian commentators at explaining such numbers by a reference to later systems of philosophy or cosmology, are generally very forced and unsatisfactory.

One more point I ought to mention as indicating the age of the Svetâsvatara-upanishad, and that is the obscurity of many of its verses, which may be due to a corruption of the text, and the number of various readings, recognised as such, by the commentators. Some of them have been mentioned in the notes to my translation.

The text of this Upanishad was printed by Dr. Roer in the Bibliotheca Indica, with Saṅkara’s commentary. I have consulted besides, the commentary of Vigñânâtman, the pupil of Paramahamsa-parivrâgakâkârya-srîmag-Gñânotta-mâkârya, MS. I. O. 1133; and a third commentary, by Saṅkarânanda, the pupil of Paramahamsa-parivrâgakâkâryânandâtman, MS. I. O. 1878. These were kindly lent me by Dr. Rost, the learned and liberal librarian of the India Office.


xxxi:1kaspatyam, p. 1222.

xxxi:2 Catal. Bodl. p. 271 a; p. 222 a.

xxxi:3 See Weber, Ind. Stud. I, pp. 400, 421.

xxxii:1 See Deussen, Vedânta, p. 24; Ved. Sûtra I, 1, II; I, 4, 8; II, 3, 22.

xxxii:2 See Sacred Books of the East, vol. i, p. lxvi.

xxxii:3 Loc. cit. p. lxvii.

xxxiv:1 Weber, Ind. Stud. I, 422; and History of Indian Literature, p. 238.

xxxiv:2 The Aphorisms of Sândilya, or the Hindu Doctrine of Faith, translated by E. B. Cowell, Calcutta, 1879.

xxxvi:1 Prathamam îsvarâtmanâ mâyirûpenâvatishthate brahma; See p. 280, l. 5.

xxxvi:2 Mâyî srigate sarvam etat.

xxxvi:3 See p. 279, l. 5. Sârvatman seems a vocative, like paresvara.

xxxvi:4 See Sarvadarsanasaṅgraha, p. 152.

xxxvii:1 Vedântaparibhâshâ, in the Pandit, vol. iv, p. 496.

xxxviii:1 Savisesham Brahma, or sabalam Brahma.

xxxviii:2 Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1878, p. 40.

xxxix:1 Other colours, instead of kapila, are nîla, harita, lohitâksha; see IV, 1; 4.

xxxix:2 See Vamsa-brâhmana, ed. Burnell, p. 10; Brihadâranyaka-up. pp. 185, 224.

xxxix:3 See M. M., India, p. 372.

xl:1 For fuller information on Pañkasikha, Kapila, &c., see F. Hall’s Preface to Sâṅkhya-pravakana-bhâshya, p. 9 seq.; Weber, Ind. Stud. I, p. 433.

xl:2 Weber, Hist. of Indian Literature, p. 236.

xl:3 This ought to be Kanakavarnam, and I hope will not be identified with the name of Buddha in a former existence.

xli:1 See I, 4; 5; VI, 3

Christopher Jon Bjerknes: Jewish Massacres (1913-2016)

Christopher John Bjerknes goes through the many mass murders conducted by the “Chosen” revolutionaries, with help from all of their idiotic “good goyim”.


Crimes of the Bolsheviks


. . . edited by Isabella Fanfani

An edited abridgment of A Sea of Blood: the Truth about Bolshevik Russia, a 12,000-word pamphlet originally published in Munich (1926) and authored by a Russian émigré  known as “Dr Gregor”.

Pictures and captions by Lasha Darkmoon

1.  Introduction

Nine years have already passed since an indescribable crime against humanity, the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, was systematically begun. Now in its ninth year [1926], a government exists which calls itself a worker-and-peasant government—but not one true worker or farmer has ever sat on it. For nine years, torture has been used in the name of democra­cy as an official instrument of the state. And in the name of socialism millions of upright individu­als have been murdered, put to death through starvation, or banished from home and hearth to every distant part of the globe.

In the name of the proletariat the Russian people has been subjugated by rank foreigners, their speech has been silenced, and their bodies sent—to the cheers of the [Jewish] Third International — into mass graves.

An old Russian expression says: “There are never more lies told than before a war and after a hunt.” And in point of fact the Great War [WW1] never had a true armistice; it never really ended. And the hunt for more human skulls — of course only Chris­tian and Aryan skulls will do — continues in accordance with a sinister and systematic plan. And thus the great lie blooms forth, in effect a form of worship of the Father of Lies,  by that international scum calling itself the Bolsheviks.

Mundus vult decipi! — the world wants to be deceived! It believes Soviet lies and fairy tales and even participates in this sick comedy, sending delegations of well-known people, leftists of course, incapable of understanding the Russian language, and sympathetic to boot with the goals of the Third International!

[The 3rd Internationale was the third great convention meeting held by ultra-radical Jews and Marxists in 1919 to coordinate Communist activities worldwide.]

Off these foreign guests go to Soviet Russia to “study” the situation. These splendid chaps have no idea what Russia was like before the Bolsheviks—and what it could have become without them in the meantime! On the other hand, the Soviet Union’s new friends show great knowledge and appreciation for our Russian caviar and vodka! The caviar is good, the vodka burns like fire going down, and in the brain-fog of democratic good will one somehow misses the rivers of blood, the dashed brain fragments, and the slithering clatter of mil­lions of slaves’ chains.

And so internationalist democracy celebrates its rites of sacrifice. The Christian lamb is slaughtered, and Annias and Caiaphas [Jewish leaders in the Sanhedrin who condemned Jesus to death], today representing international stock market capital, are the guests of honor at the feast.

Marx, Engels, Lenin and Trotsky

The four Jews—Marx, Engels, Lenin and Trotsky—who helped to destroy the Christian Russia of the tsars and replace it with an atheistic Communism in which 66 million Russian Christians were put to death in the gulags run by the  cheka.

2.  The systematic destruction of Russia

The old Russia no longer exists.

In its place we have a vast desert: its intelligentsia 90% annihilated, its middle class throttled, its work­ing class made serfs once again — but this time serfs in state-owned factories, workers who just for using the word “strike” can be put up against the wall! As for the farmer, now he is a mere beast of burden, a camel in the Soviet-made Sahara, laboring without question for his Jewish exploiters and nearly without pay.

For a non-initiate it must be entirely incomprehensible how such a mighty empire, seemingly in one night of revolution, could be set aflame at all four corners and destroyed.

However, in one night it did not happen.

The events of March 1917 — Kerensky’s middle-class overthrow of the tsar — and of November 1917 — the Bolshevik putsch against Kerensky’s government — were only the visible re­sult of years of patient, mole-like undermining activities by the Jewish Internationale: a work which did not begin in the criminal minds of Marx, Kautsky and Engels, but instead in an earlier alliance of Jewry with the higher grades of world Freemasonry.

These lofty “idealists” have tortured and killed, in the name of Russia’s workers and peasants — and according to their very own statistics — the following numbers of victims in the first four years of the glorious Russian Revolution: 28 bishops of the Church, 1,215 priests and 6,000 monks. Why? Just because they were bishops, priests and monks, and because they believed in God — who is of course merely a disposable middle-class superstition.

Next come 8,800 Christian doctors and their aides. Why? Because they represented non-Jewish middle-class medicine.

Now come the officers: 54,650 army and naval officers, 10,500 police offi­cers (lieutenant-rank and above) and 48,500 lower-ranking policemen. And for what reason? Because they were military and police officers, and we all know that “militarism” is no longer permissible for any nationalistic and Aryan-conscious white people. It is only allowed to Red bandits, who call themselves proletarians, to dig the real proletariat a mass grave.

Then there are 260,000 flag-loyal soldiers of the old army, all now executed. But even this statistic is trifling. Now come the intelligentsia: teachers, professors, engineers, building contractors, writers and judges — especially judges, because these were the most dangerous for a state ruled by convicted felons.

To them let us add lawyers, district attorneys and all the college-educated occupations — to reach the number of 361,825 murdered members of our most mentally demanding professions. I will not even tarry over our annihilated class of large landowners, consisting of 12,950 persons.

And when someone asks me how the Russian intelligentsia can bear the Bolshevik yoke, I always answer that the Russian intelligentsia is either literally six feet under or in exile, and that the tiny remainder left over has suffered such a blood-letting and systematic humiliation through the communist steamroller that they have forfeited every last bit of self-esteem and personal honor.

Finally, we come to the modest numbers of workers and peasants executed by the worker-and-peasant state. They amount to only 192,350 workers and 815,000 peasants. All these figures are official statistics pub­lished by the Cheka [forerunner of the KGB] and printed in easily obtainable Bolshevik newspapers during this period when the anti-communist White Russian forces were fighting Trotsky and the Red Army, [1917-1921].

All these facts can be verified in the complete volumes of informa­tion or excerpts published in 1922 by the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Kingdom of Serbia, the only coun­try in Europe which is fighting mercilessly against the disease of communism.

Even this enormous number of casualties is small compared to the mentally ill persons now running around free in Soviet Russia — four million eight hundred thousand of them. But this is no surprise. Even the old Russia did not have enough sanatoria and hospitals for them. Now the whole country has become a madhouse.

The murders continue and the blood flows on, albeit only Christian and Aryan blood.

When during the 1922 Famine, 30,000 human beings were dying every day, Jewish leader Trotsky made the sarcastic remark: “All the better — look at the paperwork that will save us now!”

3.  Tsars assassinated by the Jews

After Nicholas I, his son Alexander II mounted the throne, a true friend of his people. In 1861 he  abolished serfdom and gave the peasants land. This reform happened through the mir arrangement of village communities — an institution far closer to true and sincere communism than the capitalistic, tax-exploitative system we see in Soviet Russia today.

This same tsar, Alexander II, who in 1864 gave his people a whole new trial procedure for their court system — then the fairest and most progressive in Europe — underwent seven attempts to assas­sinate him, until finally, in an eighth attempt perpetrated by Goldmann, Liebermann and Zuckermann — can anyone mistake their race? — successfully carried out the wishes of London.

[Great Britain was by this time in the control of the Jewish bankers of the City of London.]

Alexander II, the great benefactor of his nation, was dynamited on March 1, 1881 — the very day that he was to bestow on his country a new, constitutional form of government.

Alexander II was gone.

Alexander III now became tsar. With respect to this monarch who preserved Euro­pean peace, we Russians were all convinced that when he died in 1894, he had succumbed to a normal illness — in this case an acute kidney infection. How great was afterward our amazement when we learned — on the run, in exile, and from Jewish sources — that this tsar too had fallen victim to the criminal minds of the tribe of Judah.

The Jew Saltus exults over this fact in his book The Imperial Orgy, published in New York in 1920. In·his foam-mouthed delirium over the successful downfall of the Christian-Aryan world he explains in his book how the Jews, working with the Entente powers — England, France, the U.S. and Italy — got rid of the tsars one after the other.

He further relates that, at the same time as Russian churches were praying for the health of the tsar, he was being cursed in the synagogues.

To the bedside of the sick tsar his personal physician, Zakharin, was summoned. Zakharin, a perfectly good Russian name, and yet — a Jew. When he arrived to see the tsar in Livadiya, he had the medicine all ready for him in his vest pocket. The kind of medicine is easy to imagine: a one-way ticket into the next world.

After the trusting tsar had swallowed the medication and was rolling in pain on his bed, Zakharin bent over-him — according to Saltus — with a diabolical grin on his face.

The tsar choked out the words “Who are you?”

Zakharin’s  answer: “I am a Jew!” And with enormous chutzpah, he then turned to the empress and the tsar’s ministers and said: “Not to worry, his majesty is only talking in a fever!”

Then he bent over the dying man and grinned at him again: “You are breathing your last breath—and we have won!”

This comes straight from the Jew Saltus in his book The Imperial Orgy.

4.  The murder of millions of Christians by the Cheka

And then the Russian Revolution came.

Who were these friends of the common people who in the name of freedom, equality, and democracy began annihilating the Christian-Aryan population?

Undoubtedly there were among them some true idealists who really believed that they could use murder and manslaughter, robbery and theft, to make a happier world and a new paradise of equality. The well-known result, however, was a living hell consisting of hunger, deprivation, despair and an equality only in one’s right to be murdered by the Jewish-controlled Cheka [forerunner of the KGB].

The word “Cheka” is not only an acronym in Russian for “Special Commission for Fighting Counter-Revolution,” but also a Yiddish expression for ani­mal slaughter. How fitting this expression! We Christians, who are called “goyim” or cattle, are in the Jewish view mere animals. Yahweh gave us human faces, however, so as to spare the Jews the distress of having servants who looked like animals. [Paraphrased]

The first provisional government [after the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and just before the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution] consisted exclusively of Freemasons of Romance-language initiation, from France or Italy, and funded by English money. The criminality of this “provisional government” knew no bounds, because it did the most despicable thing a government can do. It ignored the promises, purposes and ideals for which it was put in power—and for which it had overthrown the Tsar, head of state.

The nine months of this “government” was nothing but a gestation period, and horribly pregnant Russia gave birth to the mis­carriage from hell on October 27, 1917. It can rightly be said that power was lying there on the street and the Bolsheviks merely picked it up. To provide a show for the friendly democracies abroad,  there had to be street battles in Russia. And so the prime minister Kerensky, a half-Jew whose real name was Kirbis, meaning “pumpkin”, deliberately sent a battalion of women and young officer cadets into the jaws of a howling and murderous mob, where they were sadistically annihilated. Meanwhile Kerensky, dressed in a sailor suit, fled St. Petersburg.

Just before that, Kerensky had signed — for publicity reasons — an arrest warrant against the “traitor Trotsky” [Bronstein]. But when General Polovtsev showed up with his Cossacks in Trotsky’s apartment to arrest him, there sitting in a plush armchair with Trotsky was Kerensky, sipping a liqueur. He took the arrest warrant from the aston­ished general’s hand, theatrically tore it up, and sent the general on his way — a man who lacked the courage to simply arrest both these scum — for in a revolution, the first one to pick up his stick is on top.

In any case, the Russian and foreign publics were to be treated to scenes of urban warfare and bloodshed.

Aryan blood, of course.

5.  Lenin, a syphilitic psychopath

The Mensheviks, or “majority people”, wanted a peaceful socialist welfare state and limited state ownership of industries as in Sweden. The Bolsheviks, or  “minority people” [i.e., mostly Jews] wanted a reign of terror and total nationalization under Lenin and Trotsky.

The Mensheviks made only one condition: that Lenin explain himself with respect to allegations of theft from the Party. When the convention began and Lenin was challenged to give an account of himself, he stood up, stuck his hands in his pockets and proclaimed that his standing was so high in the party that he owed no one any answers.

When Lenin first arrived in Russia from Germany, he was already demented from untreated or poorly treated syphilis.


With this softening of the brain — a sort of gumming of the tissues — he was now fully qualified to pour his criminal fantasies into the ears of the foaming mob.

Russia already stood in flames, and the shabby gang of brigands were encouraged by Lenin’s slogan, “Rob back what they robbed from us!”

And so the mob hurled themselves upon the meager remains of Russian society. Under the joyful croakings of Jewry, Mother Russia was submerged.

The brain disease which afflicted Lenin continued to take its course. One insane idea after an­other issued forth from his government. The most renowned doctors in Germany boarded airplanes in an attempt to jerry-rig this decrepit swindler statesman, but he descended further and further into mental confusion. It is said that before his death he experienced a few shafts of mental light during which he crawled on all fours on the carpet and whimpered pitifully “Forgive me, Lord, forgive!”

Truly, truly the “international proletariat” can be proud: its leader a thief, its prophet a syphilitic, its greatest man a mass murderer.

Instead of leading mankind into the bright light above the clouds, it has jammed human­ity down into the sewer, and it is no accident that his mausoleum —“Lenin’s tomb” — looks today like a public lavatory.

The last of the Romanovs, Tsar Nicholas II and his family

After the February Revolution of 1917, Nicholas II abdicated his throne and took refuge with his family in a house in Yekaterinburg. The Czar, his wife, his son, his four daughters, his servants and family doctor were all killed in the same room by the Bolsheviks on the night of July 17, 1918. It has since been confirmed that Lenin ordered the clandestine killings from Moscow.

Veteran British journalist Robert Wilton explains in his cult classic, The Fall of the Romanovs,how the murder of the Tsar and his family was orchestrated entirely by Jews:

“The whole record of Bolshevism in Russia is indeliby impressed with the stamp of an alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov, and carried out by the Jews Goloshchekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov, and Yorovsky, is the act not of the Russan people, but of this hostile invader.” (Robert Wilton, The Fall of the Romanovs, p.148).

6.  Trotsky, another killer of Christians

Lenin’s great rival was a man who nearly exceeds him in treachery, viciousness and sadistic love of executions:  the Jew Laibe Bronstein, who now calls himself Leo Trotsky.

This Bronstein-Trotsky character formerly was an ultra-radical writer of gall-dripping articles for Jewish newspapers. But long before the war he was an agent of the tsarist secret police in Vienna, reporting on Russian Jews who had deserted from the Russian armed forces.

Trotsky, a full-blooded Jew, betrayed his racial brothers to the Russian government for 150 gold crowns a month [about $200]. This perhaps tells us all we need to know about him.

He moved to St. Petersburg and founded a very bourgeois and capitalist freight-moving business. Later he got into the business of lopping off heads when it became more advantageous to be a commu­nist. The whole communist system under Soviet Judea is shot through with bizarre values. While pure communism is said to promise a community of sharing, the slogan of Russian communism seems to be: “What’s mine is mine — and what’s yours is mine, too!”


“This anti-Bolshevik propaganda poster, dated to 1919, shows Leon Trotsky (born Lev Davidovich Bronstein) as a devil.  Elements of the imagery reveal anti-Semitism: a popular  anti-communist tactic was to overplay the role of Jews in the Russian Bolshevik Revolution.”(From a Zionist website, attempting to minimize the role played by Jews in the Bolshevik Revolution. See here).

The Chinese soldiers, presiding here over a mound of corpses and shooting Russian Christians to death, were hired mercenaries for the Jewish Bolsheviks. They did the Jews’ dirty work for them. Their reputation for sadistic torture on behalf of their Bolshevik employers was legendary. Thus they were responsible for introducing into Europe the infamous “rat torture”, a variation of which was to appear later as the horrendous climax of  Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty Four.


 “We must turn Russia into a desert populated by white negroes upon whom we shall impose a tyranny such as the most terrible Eastern despots never dreamt of. The only difference is that this will be a left-wing tyranny, not a right-wing tyranny. It will be a red tyranny and not a white one. We mean the word ‘red’ literally, because we shall shed such floods of blood as will make all the human losses suffered in the capitalist wars pale by comparison. The biggest bankers across the ocean will work in the closest possible contact with us. If we win the revolution, we shall establish the power of Zionism upon the wreckage of the revolution’s funeral, and we shall became a power before which the whole world will sink to its knees. We shall show what real power is. By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence.”

 — From the ‘Memoirs of Aron Simanovich’, quoted in The Nature of Zionism by Vladimir Stepin, Moscow, 1993, and translated from Russian into English by Clive Lindhurst.

7.  Fiendish tortures devised by the Jewish Cheka

For all time these names — the Jew Trotsky, the Pole Dzherzhinski, the Russian Moros,  the Latvians Lazis and Peter — all these being the original creators of the infamous Cheka — will stand out in world history as mass mur­derers.

Even the bloodiest persecutions of Christians under Tiberius or Nero and the most grotesque tortures of the Spanish Inquisition under Torquemada — a converted Jew — pale by comparison with the indescribably gruesome deeds committed by the Jewish and Latvian run Cheka.

A whole shelf of books with both written and photographic documentation has been published on this theme.

I need mention only The Blood Intoxication of the Bolsheviks by Nilostonsky, The Battle Against Bolshevism by Avalov, The Plague over Russia by Albert Rosenberg,Soviet Russia by Katharina Haug-Houg, and The Cheka by Georg Popov.

[Here now are some of the gruesome tortures devised by the Jewish Cheka for its mostly Russian Christian victims.]

When the Reds occupied a city, they took hostages — such as people wearing ties or workers in their Sunday best. They stripped them naked and then bound onto the stomach of the murder victim an empty flower pot into which a ravenous, starving rat was placed. Through the small water hole in the base of the flower pot a red-hot iron rod was pushed to torment the rat and make him wild, causing him to try to burrow himself away from the rod — and deep into the abdomen of the horrified human victim.

THE RAT TORTURE: A red-hot poker, when pushed through the bars of the cage, would force the maddened rat to escape by gnawing its way into the stomach of the human prisoner.

They lined up other victims in military formation, then ordered the first row to place one hand upon a wooden table. A nail was driven through the hand into the wood. Then they cut a full circle around the wrist skin, drenched the hand in boiling water and  pulled the hand and finger skin right off. This  they called“making gloves”.

Interestingly, each torture chamber had its own special torture lady, always a Jewess or Latvian female, usually with a nickname such as “Dora, the glove maker” or “Rosa, the glove lady.”

It comes as no surprise to us to learn that the chief justice of a criminal court in Moscow is also a Jewess, Anya Glusmann, who is said to love pronounc­ing death sentences above all else, and, according to a fawning newspaper article about her, she loves flowers and perfume after a “hard day’s work.”

There is more: such as placing a man’s head on an anvil, then slowly exploding it using a huge iron hammer with ever-increasing weights.

Those fated to suffer the same death the following day were ordered to pick up the brain and bone pieces, the nerve tissue and blood which they witnessed flying around the room. When ordered to their work they were told: “You are digging your own grave. You must be happy that tomor­row your own kind will be picking up the pieces of your cadavers.”

As for men of the cloth, they would bring priests into a church, marry them with a sow or mare in a sarcastic ceremony and then nail them to the cross over the altar.

The bishop of Voronesh was plunged live into a giant kettle of boiling water and his monks were forced at revolver point to take spoonfuls of this “soup”.

High-ranking clergymen had their eyes gouged out, the tongue severed, and the ears sliced off.

Then they were buried alive.

Or their abdomen was opened with a knife and the first section of their intestines was nailed to a telephone pole. They were then forced to run around the pole as their entrails unwound until death came.

Officers of the Russian navy were steamed to death in their own engine rooms.

They were chained to ce­ment blocks and hurled off the piers so that their tethered corpses, decomposing and rising under the waves, formed hideous, tossing forests of the dead.

General Viren of Kronstadt had both his arms hacked off and was then paraded around the downtown area until it became boring, whereupon he was shot.

Human beings had burning cigars pushed into their open eyes until they were blind, their entire body being roasted on spits.

Heads were squeezed slowly to the bursting point with special brain vises.

The German Army discovered a chamber full of these and similar devices, including a testicle-cracker, in an underground chamber in Ukraine in 1941. Adapted dentist drills were used to drill deep into the brain.

They sawed off the top of people’s skulls and forced others to eat their brains, whereupon the eaters then came under the saw and in turn had their own brains eaten. [Paraphrased]

Entire families were arrested and children tortured before the eyes of their bound parents, or the wife was tormented before the eyes of her husband or the reverse.

The Bolsheviks drove nails into empty wooden bar­rels, then jammed human beings inside, rolling the barrels around merrily.

Mass graves of people buried alive were found by the White Army. Victims of live burial usually have dirt in their mouth and nostrils from trying to breathe. The writhing bodies of these people were found in the most bizarre contortions.

And all this in the sweet name of freedom and democracy!

*          *          *

(Further corroboration for these horrendous crimes will be found in thisrecent article by Dr Lasha Darkmoon. The most detailed and impassioned account, however, remains Eustace Mullin’s cult classic The Secret Holocaust. The real holocaust was a Christian Holocaust by Jews of sixty-six million, mostly Christians.)


The dark history of communism and what the Jews don’t want you to know about it.

Jewish Bolshevism


bolshevik jews

How to Break the Power of the Jews

Confronting Netanyahu and the Ideology of Likud Zionism

In-depth Report:

If you are a Jewish family living in Paris or London, you are expected to conform to the mindset that the State of Israel is your personal insurance policy in the event that the scourge of anti­-Semitism should again become mainstream and Jews are prohibited from holding public, or any, office anywhere in Europe.

A scenario that depicts a concentration camp in London’s Hyde Park, and another under the shadow of the Eiffel Tower in Paris. A time when the horrors of another Holocaust could be visited upon the Jewish Diaspora communities of France and England.

The above statements are typical of those that Mr Netanyahu and his extremist right­-wing government would have you believe as they continue with their illegal settlement of over 500,000 Israeli citizens in the Occupied Palestinian West Bank and East Jerusalem, in violation of the 4th Geneva Convention on Human Rights (GCIV) and in contempt of the will of the United Nations for the establishment of a Palestinian state.

That is what the Netanyahu government would have you believe as they continue their blockade of essential goods and services against 1.8 million civilians in Gaza in a deliberate policy to starve the indigenous population into submission in this, its seventh year, and following upon the attempt by the IDF to totally destroy the infrastructure in Gaza during its viciously unprovoked attack upon the civilian population in July 2014.

And Mr Netanyahu is not wrong, as his policies are, in fact, increasingly successful in driving anti­-Semitic sentiment throughout Europe as an expression of the disgust of ordinary people at the tragedy that is supported and funded by a United States Congress that is complicit in carrying out the agenda of the Israel lobby.

This is the political movement that has been allowed to circumvent international law in its bid for regional power and hegemony and to violate the Geneva Conventions in its settlement policy in the Occupied Territories – a violation supported and funded by the Israel lobby.

Yet even this situation is compounded because Israel, who is not a member of NATO, is also the only undeclared nuclear weapons state on the planet with an estimated secret arsenal of up 400 nuclear warheads – entirely outside the inspection of the IAEA.

The above is a brief snapshot of the extremist right-­wing ideology that is the Likud Zionist movement. That there is an urgent requirement for a paradigm shift to be initiated by the European Union, is a need that now screams out for action.

The continuing dispossession and persecution of an entire indigenous people which has been the regional majority in the Holy Land for over a thousand years, is an issue that now needs to be confronted and dealt with by the United Nations General Assembly.

Failing which, there will be a [nuclear] war that will impact not only the Middle East but the whole of Europe. The EU must act because this new anti­-Semitism, and its inevitable consequences, can only be avoided by a global rejection of the Israeli government policy agenda.

Likud Zionism is not in God’s name nor in the name of Europe.

Snowden Sums Up The Presidential Campaign With Just One Tweet

Tyler Durden's picture

And so, just like that, with a sweeping victory in South Carolina, Sanders’ Socialism crawls back into its cage and crony capitalism is alive and well.

As Edward Snowden so perfectly sums up…

And in case you thought this was an exaggeration…

Since 2013 Hillary’s grand total is slightly less: $21.7 million for 92 private appearances.

Below we present the full breakdown of every publicly disclosed speech event by Hillary Clinton, together with the associated fee.

And as The Mises Institute’s William Andersen so eloquently summarised,

Despite Clinton’s newfound populist rhetoric, her economic agenda reflects her own lifestyle of practicing crony capitalism. Other than her promise to remove “red tape” for small business startups, Clinton’s economic propositions follow the same depressing line that we have seen from Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren: private enterprise extracts wealth from the economy, while the expansion of government power builds wealth and employment opportunities.


If one briefly can summarize Clinton’s policy-making viewpoints, it is this: Hillary Clinton believes that an economy should be a tool of the state and reflect the political interests of Washington. Anything else is called “greed,” or “profits before people.” Private employers and business owners should not seek to be profitable, but rather to bevirtuous, with the necessary virtue being decided by Clinton herself.


Hillary Clinton, a beneficiary of the very worst aspects of crony capitalism, has decided after all that she is an economic populist who wants to “share the wealth.” No one is mistaking her for Bernie Sanders or even Huey Long, but, nonetheless, she is a thoroughgoing statist telling voters that the way to improve the economy is to make it more difficult to produce things and force up business costs.


She clearly is not claiming to be a free-enterpriser and stands by her view that state control of economic exchanges will result in more exchanges and improved employment prospects and increased income. What she does not say is that the very economic burdens she promises to lay upon businesses will further erode the prospects of the American middle class she claims to support.


The economics of Hillary Clinton is first and foremost about expanding the power and scope of the US government, and as government gains more control, the more employers and business owners need to be in the good graces of American politicians. To be blunt, Clinton believes that people like herself can continually loot US businesses, with business owners paying their protection money without complain. After all, Hillary knows best; just ask her.

But none of that matters of course.


And so, as Patrick Buchanan recently asked, in a Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump race – which, the Beltway keening aside, seems the probable outcome of the primaries – what are the odds the GOP can take the White House, Congress and the Supreme Court?

If Republicans can unite, not bad, not bad at all.

Undeniably, Democrats open with a strong hand.

There is that famed “blue wall,” those 18 states and D.C. with a combined 242 electoral votes, just 28 shy of victory, that have gone Democratic in every presidential election since 1988.

The wall contains all of New England save New Hampshire; the Acela corridor (New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and Maryland); plus Michigan, Minnesota, Illinois and Wisconsin in the Middle West; and the Pacific coast of California, Oregon, Washington – and Hawaii.

Changing demography, too, favors the Democrats.

Barack Obama carried over 90 percent of the black vote twice and in 2012 carried over 70 percent of the Hispanic and Asian votes. These last two voting blocs are the fastest-growing in the USA.

A third Democratic advantage is simple self-interest.

Half the nation now receives U.S. government benefits – in Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, welfare, student loans, rent subsidies, school lunches and Earned Income Tax Credits, etc.

Folks who rely on government benefits are unlikely to rally to a party that promises to cut government. And as half the nation pays no income tax, these folks are unlikely to be thrilled about tax cuts.

Bernie Sanders, who promises free college tuition and making Wall Street and the 1 percent pay for it, knows his party.

While these realities of national politics would seem to point to inexorable Democratic dominance in coming decades, there are worms in the apple.

First, there is the strangely shrunken and still shrinking Democratic leadership base. As the Daily Caller reports, under Obama, Democrats have lost a net of more than 900 state legislature seats, 12 governors, 69 U.S. House and 13 Senate seats. Such numbers suggest a sick party.


Republican strength on Capitol Hill is again as great as it was in the last years of the Roaring ’20s.


Second, due to Trump, viewership of the Republican debates has been astronomical – 24 million for one, 23 million for another.


The turnout at Trump rallies has been unlike anything seen in presidential primaries; and what’s more, the GOP voter turnout in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada set new records for the party.


Yet voter turnout for the Clinton-Sanders race has fallen, in every contest, below what it was in the Clinton-Obama race in 2008.


Bernie’s millennials aside, the energy and excitement has been on the Republican contest, often a sign of party ascendancy.


Not only would Trump at the top of the GOP ticket assure a huge turnout (pro and con), he is the quintessence of the anti-Washington, anti-establishment candidate in a year when Americans appear to want a wholesale housecleaning in the capital.


As a builder and job creator, Trump would surely have greater cross-party appeal to working-class Democrats than any traditional Republican politician. Moreover, when Bernie Sanders goes down to defeat, how much enthusiasm will his supporters, who thrilled to the savaging of Wall Street, bring to the Clinton campaign?

This is the year of the outsider, and Hillary is the prom queen of Goldman Sachs. She represents continuity. Trump represents change.

Moreover, on the top Trump issues of immigration and trade, the elites have always been the furthest out of touch with the country.


In the 1990s, when Bill Clinton fought the NAFTA battle, the nation rebelled against the deal, but the establishment backed it. When Republicans on Capitol Hill voted for most-favored-nation status for China, year in and year out, did Republican grass roots demand this, or was it the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Business Roundtable?


On immigration, where are the polls that show Middle Americans enthusiastic about increasing the numbers coming? Where is the majority demanding amnesty or open borders?


The elites of Europe are as out of touch as America’s.


Angela Merkel, Time’s Person of the Year in 2015, is at risk of being dumped in 2016 if she does not halt the next wave of Middle Eastern refugees who will be arriving on Europe’s shores when the seas calm in the spring in the Aegean and the Mediterranean.


If we believe the immigration issue Trump has seized upon is explosive here, look to Europe. In the Balkans and Central Europe, even in Austria, the barriers are going up and the border guards appearing.


Mass migration from the Third World to the First World is not only radicalizing America. It could destroy the European Union. Anger over any more migrants entering the country is among the reasons British patriots now want out of the EU.

America is crossing into a new era. Trump seems to have caught the wave, while Clinton seems to belong to yesterday.

A note of caution: This establishment is not going quietly.


The Hidden Persuaders – How The Internet Flips Election & Alters Our Thoughts

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Robert Epstein, originally posted at,

The internet has spawned subtle forms of influence that can flip elections and manipulate everything we say, think and do

Over the past century, more than a few great writers have expressed concern about humanity’s future. In The Iron Heel (1908), the American writer Jack London pictured a world in which a handful of wealthy corporate titans – the ‘oligarchs’ – kept the masses at bay with a brutal combination of rewards and punishments. Much of humanity lived in virtual slavery, while the fortunate ones were bought off with decent wages that allowed them to live comfortably – but without any real control over their lives.

In We (1924), the brilliant Russian writer Yevgeny Zamyatin, anticipating the excesses of the emerging Soviet Union, envisioned a world in which people were kept in check through pervasive monitoring. The walls of their homes were made of clear glass, so everything they did could be observed. They were allowed to lower their shades an hour a day to have sex, but both the rendezvous time and the lover had to be registered first with the state.

In Brave New World (1932), the British author Aldous Huxley pictured a near-perfect society in which unhappiness and aggression had been engineered out of humanity through a combination of genetic engineering and psychological conditioning. And in the much darker novel 1984 (1949), Huxley’s compatriot George Orwell described a society in which thought itself was controlled; in Orwell’s world, children were taught to use a simplified form of English called Newspeak in order to assure that they could never express ideas that were dangerous to society.

These are all fictional tales, to be sure, and in each the leaders who held the power used conspicuous forms of control that at least a few people actively resisted and occasionally overcame. But in the non-fiction bestseller The Hidden Persuaders (1957) – recently released in a 50th-anniversary edition – the American journalist Vance Packard described a ‘strange and rather exotic’ type of influence that was rapidly emerging in the United States and that was, in a way, more threatening than the fictional types of control pictured in the novels. According to Packard, US corporate executives and politicians were beginning to use subtle and, in many cases, completely undetectable methods to change people’s thinking, emotions and behaviour based on insights from psychiatry and the social sciences.

Most of us have heard of at least one of these methods: subliminal stimulation, or what Packard called ‘subthreshold effects’ – the presentation of short messages that tell us what to do but that are flashed so briefly we aren’t aware we have seen them. In 1958, propelled by public concern about a theatre in New Jersey that had supposedly hidden messages in a movie to increase ice cream sales, the National Association of Broadcasters – the association that set standards for US television – amended its code to prohibit the use of subliminal messages in broadcasting. In 1974, the Federal Communications Commission opined that the use of such messages was ‘contrary to the public interest’. Legislation to prohibit subliminal messaging was also introduced in the US Congress but never enacted. Both the UK and Australia have strict laws prohibiting it.

Subliminal stimulation is probably still in wide use in the US – it’s hard to detect, after all, and no one is keeping track of it – but it’s probably not worth worrying about. Research suggests that it has only a small impact, and that it mainly influences people who are already motivated to follow its dictates; subliminal directives to drink affect people only if they’re already thirsty.

Packard had uncovered a much bigger problem, however – namely that powerful corporations were constantly looking for, and in many cases already applying, a wide variety of techniques for controlling people without their knowledge. He described a kind of cabal in which marketers worked closely with social scientists to determine, among other things, how to get people to buy things they didn’t need and how to condition young children to be good consumers – inclinations that were explicitly nurtured and trained in Huxley’s Brave New World. Guided by social science, marketers were quickly learning how to play upon people’s insecurities, frailties, unconscious fears, aggressive feelings and sexual desires to alter their thinking, emotions and behaviour without any awareness that they were being manipulated.

By the early 1950s, Packard said, politicians had got the message and were beginning to merchandise themselves using the same subtle forces being used to sell soap. Packard prefaced his chapter on politics with an unsettling quote from the British economist Kenneth Boulding: ‘A world of unseen dictatorship is conceivable, still using the forms of democratic government.’ Could this really happen, and, if so, how would it work?

The forces that Packard described have become more pervasive over the decades. The soothing music we all hear overhead in supermarkets causes us to walk more slowly and buy more food, whether we need it or not. Most of the vacuous thoughts and intense feelings our teenagers experience from morning till night are carefully orchestrated by highly skilled marketing professionals working in our fashion and entertainment industries. Politicians work with a wide range of consultants who test every aspect of what the politicians do in order to sway voters: clothing, intonations, facial expressions, makeup, hairstyles and speeches are all optimised, just like the packaging of a breakfast cereal.

Fortunately, all of these sources of influence operate competitively. Some of the persuaders want us to buy or believe one thing, others to buy or believe something else. It is the competitive nature of our society that keeps us, on balance, relatively free.

But what would happen if new sources of control began to emerge that had little or no competition? And what if new means of control were developed that were far more powerful – and far more invisible – than any that have existed in the past? And what if new types of control allowed a handful of people to exert enormous influence not just over the citizens of the US but over most of the people on Earth?

It might surprise you to hear this, but these things have already happened.

To understand how the new forms of mind control work, we need to start by looking at the search engine – one in particular: the biggest and best of them all, namely Google. The Google search engine is so good and so popular that the company’s name is now a commonly used verb in languages around the world. To ‘Google’ something is to look it up on the Google search engine, and that, in fact, is how most computer users worldwide get most of their information about just about everything these days. They Google it. Google has become the main gateway to virtually all knowledge, mainly because the search engine is so good at giving us exactly the information we are looking for, almost instantly and almost always in the first position of the list it shows us after we launch our search – the list of ‘search results’.

That ordered list is so good, in fact, that about 50 per cent of our clicks go to the top two items, and more than 90 per cent of our clicks go to the 10 items listed on the first page of results; few people look at other results pages, even though they often number in the thousands, which means they probably contain lots of good information. Google decides which of the billions of web pages it is going to include in our search results, and it also decides how to rank them. How it decides these things is a deep, dark secret – one of the best-kept secrets in the world, like the formula for Coca-Cola.

Because people are far more likely to read and click on higher-ranked items, companies now spend billions of dollars every year trying to trick Google’s search algorithm – the computer program that does the selecting and ranking – into boosting them another notch or two. Moving up a notch can mean the difference between success and failure for a business, and moving into the top slots can be the key to fat profits.

Late in 2012, I began to wonder whether highly ranked search results could be impacting more than consumer choices. Perhaps, I speculated, a top search result could have a small impact on people’s opinions about things. Early in 2013, with my associate Ronald E Robertson of the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology in Vista, California, I put this idea to a test by conducting an experiment in which 102 people from the San Diego area were randomly assigned to one of three groups. In one group, people saw search results that favoured one political candidate – that is, results that linked to web pages that made this candidate look better than his or her opponent. In a second group, people saw search rankings that favoured the opposing candidate, and in the third group – the control group – people saw a mix of rankings that favoured neither candidate. The same search results and web pages were used in each group; the only thing that differed for the three groups was the ordering of the search results.

To make our experiment realistic, we used real search results that linked to real web pages. We also used a real election – the 2010 election for the prime minister of Australia. We used a foreign election to make sure that our participants were ‘undecided’. Their lack of familiarity with the candidates assured this. Through advertisements, we also recruited an ethnically diverse group of registered voters over a wide age range in order to match key demographic characteristics of the US voting population.

All participants were first given brief descriptions of the candidates and then asked to rate them in various ways, as well as to indicate which candidate they would vote for; as you might expect, participants initially favoured neither candidate on any of the five measures we used, and the vote was evenly split in all three groups. Then the participants were given up to 15 minutes in which to conduct an online search using ‘Kadoodle’, our mock search engine, which gave them access to five pages of search results that linked to web pages. People could move freely between search results and web pages, just as we do when using Google. When participants completed their search, we asked them to rate the candidates again, and we also asked them again who they would vote for.

We predicted that the opinions and voting preferences of 2 or 3 per cent of the people in the two bias groups – the groups in which people were seeing rankings favouring one candidate – would shift toward that candidate. What we actually found was astonishing. The proportion of people favouring the search engine’s top-ranked candidate increased by 48.4 per cent, and all five of our measures shifted toward that candidate. What’s more, 75 per cent of the people in the bias groups seemed to have been completely unaware that they were viewing biased search rankings. In the control group, opinions did not shift significantly.

This seemed to be a major discovery. The shift we had produced, which we called the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (or SEME, pronounced ‘seem’), appeared to be one of the largest behavioural effects ever discovered. We did not immediately uncork the Champagne bottle, however. For one thing, we had tested only a small number of people, and they were all from the San Diego area.

Over the next year or so, we replicated our findings three more times, and the third time was with a sample of more than 2,000 people from all 50 US states. In that experiment, the shift in voting preferences was 37.1 per cent and even higher in some demographic groups – as high as 80 per cent, in fact.

We also learned in this series of experiments that by reducing the bias just slightly on the first page of search results – specifically, by including one search item that favoured the other candidate in the third or fourth position of the results – we could mask our manipulation so that few or even no people were aware that they were seeing biased rankings. We could still produce dramatic shifts in voting preferences, but we could do so invisibly.

Still no Champagne, though. Our results were strong and consistent, but our experiments all involved a foreign election – that 2010 election in Australia. Could voting preferences be shifted with real voters in the middle of a real campaign? We were skeptical. In real elections, people are bombarded with multiple sources of information, and they also know a lot about the candidates. It seemed unlikely that a single experience on a search engine would have much impact on their voting preferences.

To find out, in early 2014, we went to India just before voting began in the largest democratic election in the world – the Lok Sabha election for prime minister. The three main candidates were Rahul Gandhi, Arvind Kejriwal, and Narendra Modi. Making use of online subject pools and both online and print advertisements, we recruited 2,150 people from 27 of India’s 35 states and territories to participate in our experiment. To take part, they had to be registered voters who had not yet voted and who were still undecided about how they would vote.

Participants were randomly assigned to three search-engine groups, favouring, respectively, Gandhi, Kejriwal or Modi. As one might expect, familiarity levels with the candidates was high – between 7.7 and 8.5 on a scale of 10. We predicted that our manipulation would produce a very small effect, if any, but that’s not what we found. On average, we were able to shift the proportion of people favouring any given candidate by more than 20 per cent overall and more than 60 per cent in some demographic groups. Even more disturbing, 99.5 per cent of our participants showed no awareness that they were viewing biased search rankings – in other words, that they were being manipulated.

SEME’s near-invisibility is curious indeed. It means that when people – including you and me – are looking at biased search rankings, they look just fine. So if right now you Google ‘US presidential candidates’, the search results you see will probably look fairly random, even if they happen to favour one candidate. Even I have trouble detecting bias in search rankings that I know to be biased (because they were prepared by my staff). Yet our randomised, controlled experiments tell us over and over again that when higher-ranked items connect with web pages that favour one candidate, this has a dramatic impact on the opinions of undecided voters, in large part for the simple reason that people tend to click only on higher-ranked items. This is truly scary: like subliminal stimuli, SEME is a force you can’t see; but unlike subliminal stimuli, it has an enormous impact – like Casper the ghost pushing you down a flight of stairs.

We published a detailed report about our first five experiments on SEME in the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) in August 2015. We had indeed found something important, especially given Google’s dominance over search. Google has a near-monopoly on internet searches in the US, with 83 per cent of Americans specifying Google as the search engine they use most often, according to the Pew Research Center. So if Google favours one candidate in an election, its impact on undecided voters could easily decide the election’s outcome.

Keep in mind that we had had only one shot at our participants. What would be the impact of favouring one candidate in searches people are conducting over a period of weeks or months before an election? It would almost certainly be much larger than what we were seeing in our experiments.

Other types of influence during an election campaign are balanced by competing sources of influence – a wide variety of newspapers, radio shows and television networks, for example – but Google, for all intents and purposes, has no competition, and people trust its search results implicitly, assuming that the company’s mysterious search algorithm is entirely objective and unbiased. This high level of trust, combined with the lack of competition, puts Google in a unique position to impact elections.Even more disturbing, the search-ranking business is entirely unregulated, so Google could favour any candidate it likes without violating any laws. Some courts have even ruled that Google’s right to rank-order search results as it pleases is protected as a form of free speech.

Does the company ever favour particular candidates? In the 2012 US presidential election, Google and its top executives donated more than $800,000 to President Barack Obama and just $37,000 to his opponent, Mitt Romney. And in 2015, a team of researchers from the University of Maryland and elsewhere showed that Google’s search results routinely favoured Democratic candidates. Are Google’s search rankings really biased? An internal report issued by the US Federal Trade Commission in 2012 concluded that Google’s search rankings routinely put Google’s financial interests ahead of those of their competitors, and anti-trust actions currently under way against Google in both the European Union and India are based on similar findings.

In most countries, 90 per cent of online search is conducted on Google, which gives the company even more power to flip elections than it has in the US and, with internet penetration increasing rapidly worldwide, this power is growing.In our PNAS article, Robertson and I calculated that Google now has the power to flip upwards of 25 per cent of the national elections in the world with no one knowing this is occurring. In fact, we estimate that, with or without deliberate planning on the part of company executives, Google’s search rankings have been impacting elections for years, with growing impact each year. And because search rankings are ephemeral, they leave no paper trail, which gives the company complete deniability.

Power on this scale and with this level of invisibility is unprecedented in human history. But it turns out that our discovery about SEME was just the tip of a very large iceberg.

Recent reports suggest that the Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is making heavy use of social media to try to generate support – Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, Snapchat and Facebook, for starters. At this writing, she has 5.4 million followers on Twitter, and her staff is tweeting several times an hour during waking hours. The Republican frontrunner, Donald Trump, has 5.9 million Twitter followers and is tweeting just as frequently.

Is social media as big a threat to democracy as search rankings appear to be? Not necessarily. When new technologies are used competitively, they present no threat. Even through the platforms are new, they are generally being used the same way as billboards and television commercials have been used for decades: you put a billboard on one side of the street; I put one on the other. I might have the money to erect more billboards than you, but the process is still competitive.

What happens, though, if such technologies are misused by the companies that own them? A study by Robert M Bond, now a political science professor at Ohio State University, and others published in Nature in 2012 described an ethically questionable experiment in which, on election day in 2010, Facebook sent ‘go out and vote’ reminders to more than 60 million of its users. The reminders caused about 340,000 people to vote who otherwise would not have. Writing in the New Republic in 2014, Jonathan Zittrain, professor of international law at Harvard University, pointed out that, given the massive amount of information it has collected about its users, Facebook could easily send such messages only to people who support one particular party or candidate, and that doing so could easily flip a close election – with no one knowing that this has occurred. And because advertisements, like search rankings, are ephemeral, manipulating an election in this way would leave no paper trail.

Are there laws prohibiting Facebook from sending out ads selectively to certain users? Absolutely not; in fact, targeted advertising is how Facebook makes its money. Is Facebook currently manipulating elections in this way? No one knows, but in my view it would be foolish and possibly even improper for Facebook not to do so. Some candidates are better for a company than others, and Facebook’s executives have a fiduciary responsibility to the company’s stockholders to promote the company’s interests.

The Bond study was largely ignored, but another Facebook experiment, published in 2014 in PNAS, prompted protests around the world. In this study, for a period of a week, 689,000 Facebook users were sent news feeds that contained either an excess of positive terms, an excess of negative terms, or neither. Those in the first group subsequently used slightly more positive terms in their communications, while those in the second group used slightly more negative terms in their communications. This was said to show that people’s ‘emotional states’ could be deliberately manipulated on a massive scale by a social media company, an idea that many people found disturbing. People were also upset that a large-scale experiment on emotion had been conducted without the explicit consent of any of the participants.

Facebook’s consumer profiles are undoubtedly massive, but they pale in comparison with those maintained by Google, which is collecting information about people 24/7, using more than 60 different observation platforms – the search engine, of course, but also Google Wallet, Google Maps, Google Adwords, Google Analytics, Chrome, Google Docs, Android, YouTube, and on and on. Gmail users are generally oblivious to the fact that Google stores and analyses every email they write, even the drafts they never send – as well as all the incoming email they receive from both Gmail and non-Gmail users.

According to Google’s privacy policy – to which one assents whenever one uses a Google product, even when one has not been informed that he or she is using a Google product – Google can share the information it collects about you with almost anyone, including government agencies. But never with you. Google’s privacy is sacrosanct; yours is nonexistent.

Could Google and ‘those we work with’ (language from the privacy policy) use the information they are amassing about you for nefarious purposes – to manipulate or coerce, for example? Could inaccurate information in people’s profiles (which people have no way to correct) limit their opportunities or ruin their reputations?

Certainly, if Google set about to fix an election, it could first dip into its massive database of personal information to identify just those voters who are undecided. Then it could, day after day, send customised rankings favouring one candidate to just those people. One advantage of this approach is that it would make Google’s manipulation extremely difficult for investigators to detect.

Extreme forms of monitoring, whether by the KGB in the Soviet Union, the Stasi in East Germany, or Big Brother in1984, are essential elements of all tyrannies, and technology is making both monitoring and the consolidation of surveillance data easier than ever. By 2020, China will have put in place the most ambitious government monitoring system ever created – a single database called the Social Credit System, in which multiple ratings and records for all of its 1.3 billion citizens are recorded for easy access by officials and bureaucrats. At a glance, they will know whether someone has plagiarised schoolwork, was tardy in paying bills, urinated in public, or blogged inappropriately online.

As Edward Snowden’s revelations made clear, we are rapidly moving toward a world in which both governments and corporations – sometimes working together – are collecting massive amounts of data about every one of us every day, with few or no laws in place that restrict how those data can be used. When you combine the data collection with the desire to control or manipulate, the possibilities are endless, but perhaps the most frightening possibility is the one expressed in Boulding’s assertion that an ‘unseen dictatorship’ was possible ‘using the forms of democratic government’.

Since Robertson and I submitted our initial report on SEME to PNAS early in 2015, we have completed a sophisticated series of experiments that have greatly enhanced our understanding of this phenomenon, and other experiments will be completed in the coming months. We have a much better sense now of why SEME is so powerful and how, to some extent, it can be suppressed.

We have also learned something very disturbing – that search engines are influencing far more than what people buy and whom they vote for. We now have evidence suggesting that on virtually all issues where people are initially undecided, search rankings are impacting almost every decision that people make. They are having an impact on the opinions, beliefs, attitudes and behaviours of internet users worldwide – entirely without people’s knowledge that this is occurring. This is happening with or without deliberate intervention by company officials; even so-called ‘organic’ search processes regularly generate search results that favour one point of view, and that in turn has the potential to tip the opinions of millions of people who are undecided on an issue. In one of our recent experiments, biased search results shifted people’s opinions about the value of fracking by 33.9 per cent.

Perhaps even more disturbing is that the handful of people who do show awareness that they are viewing biased search rankings shift even further in the predicted direction; simply knowing that a list is biased doesn’t necessarily protect you from SEME’s power.

Remember what the search algorithm is doing: in response to your query, it is selecting a handful of webpages from among the billions that are available, and it is ordering those webpages using secret criteria. Seconds later, the decision you make or the opinion you form – about the best toothpaste to use, whether fracking is safe, where you should go on your next vacation, who would make the best president, or whether global warming is real – is determined by that short list you are shown, even though you have no idea how the list was generated.

Meanwhile, behind the scenes, a consolidation of search engines has been quietly taking place, so that more people are using the dominant search engine even when they think they are not. Because Google is the best search engine, and because crawling the rapidly expanding internet has become prohibitively expensive, more and more search engines are drawing their information from the leader rather than generating it themselves. The most recent deal, revealed in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing in October 2015, was between Google and Yahoo! Inc.

Looking ahead to the November 2016 US presidential election, I see clear signs that Google is backing Hillary Clinton.In April 2015, Clinton hired Stephanie Hannon away from Google to be her chief technology officer and, a few months ago, Eric Schmidt, chairman of the holding company that controls Google, set up a semi-secret company – The Groundwork – for the specific purpose of putting Clinton in office. The formation of The Groundwork prompted Julian Assange, founder of Wikileaks, to dub Google Clinton’s ‘secret weapon’ in her quest for the US presidency.

We now estimate that Hannon’s old friends have the power to drive between 2.6 and 10.4 million votes to Clinton on election day with no one knowing that this is occurring and without leaving a paper trail. They can also help her win the nomination, of course, by influencing undecided voters during the primaries. Swing voters have always been the key to winning elections, and there has never been a more powerful, efficient or inexpensive way to sway them than SEME.

We are living in a world in which a handful of high-tech companies, sometimes working hand-in-hand with governments, are not only monitoring much of our activity, but are also invisibly controlling more and more of what we think, feel, do and say. The technology that now surrounds us is not just a harmless toy; it has also made possible undetectable and untraceable manipulations of entire populations – manipulations that have no precedent in human history and that are currently well beyond the scope of existing regulations and laws. The new hidden persuaders are bigger, bolder and badder than anything Vance Packard ever envisioned. If we choose to ignore this, we do so at our peril


US Government ‘Asks’ Tech Companies To Tweak Algos, Promote Certain Content

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

You probably had no idea, but representatives from Silicon Valley, Hollywood and the U.S. government came together earlier this week to privately discuss how they could jointly fight ISIS propaganda online. Never mind the fact that ISIS is the child of reckless and inhumane preemptive wars of aggression perpetrated by the U.S. government. Such introspection naturally never crosses the mind of government bureaucrats ostensibly attempting to understand the epic disasters they created in the first place.

So who attended the meeting? We don’t know for sure because the plebes aren’t entitled to know such things. Fortunately, we have become privy to some information thanks to Buzzfeed News. Here’s what we learned:

WASHINGTON, D.C. — They flew in from New York, San Francisco, and Los Angeles to hole up in a windowless D.C. conference room for nearly five hours on Wednesday — representatives of the country’s top tech and entertainment companies brainstorming with U.S. counterterrorism officials to tackle one tough question: how to stop the spread of ISIS online.


The standoff between Apple and the FBI did not come up during the meeting, though the issues it involves are at the heart of the very things being discussed. As the role of technology in our lives continues its explosive growth, how will the balance between privacy and security play out in the new Silicon Valley-D.C. relationship?


Among the handful of Arab participants who took part in Wednesday’s event, the questions raised felt even greater.


“They wanted to figure out how to fight ISIS online, how to understand the psychology of those who support ISIS, and they invited almost no one who speaks for those of us in the Arab world, and from Arab communities, who have everything to lose from ISIS’s growing popularity,” said one Arab attendee, who estimated that less than 10% of the attendants were of Middle Eastern descent. “They don’t understand this community. That has been proven time and time again with their tone deaf messages. Why hold an event like this where there are ten white men outnumbering every Arab?”


The lack of voices from the Middle East at the event was raised repeatedly, with one attendee garnering applause when they asked why — in a discussion regarding ISIS’s appeal to young Arab-American Muslims — there was no one speaking to their appeal from within that community.

This is what happens when people fail upward and you have a country run by a cadre of incompetent, corrupt and clueless “elites.”

Other media outlets, who were leaked a list of attendees, revealed that Microsoft, Facebook, Apple, Google, Mediacom, and Edelman were among those attending from Hollywood and Silicon Valley. In a statement, the Department of Justice noted that Assistant Attorney General for National Security John Carlin, U.S. Chief Technology Officer Megan Smith, and Senior Director for Counterterrorism on the National Security Council Staff Jen Easterly all took part in the meeting.

Now here’s the most disturbing revelation.

Over the last year, the government has stepped up its overtures to Silicon Valley, meeting with tech executives in January on the subject of combatting ISIS online. The Department of Defense has opened an office in the San Francisco area, and the State Department has recently appointed its first representative to Silicon Valley. Tech executives who have met with the Pentagon team told BuzzFeed News that some of their requests have been “jarring.” In at least one case, the Pentagon spoke with several companies — who asked not to be named as a condition of discussing the meeting with BuzzFeed News — about tweaking their algorithms to promote certain types of content. Both Google and Facebook have made it clear that they would not make changes to their algorithms to bury results supportive of ISIS.

May as well just call it the Department of Propaganda. Truly unbelievable.

“That’s something that is always brought up in meetings. And it shows how little they understand us,” said the Google representative. “This is a Pandora’s box we won’t open, because if we answer a request by the U.S. government to feature one search result over another, what’s to stop other countries from requesting the same? What’s to stop each country from tailoring the search results of their citizens to their agenda? It’s not a path we are willing to explore.”

Read that again. It’s always brought up at meetings. Perfect example of why Apple needs to be supported in its battle with the FBI. The U.S. government wants nothing short of total control. See:

Video of the Day – John McAfee Proclaims “An Apple Backdoor is the End of America”

As the Apple vs. FBI Debate Rages, Congress Plots to Mandate Encryption Backdoors

Apple Vows to Defend Its Customers as the FBI Launches a War on Privacy and Security

At its core, said many attendees, the issue was the basic distrust the tech and entertainment companies have for the government, which has been amplified by the unprecedented attempt to force Apple to help the FBI break into an encrypted phone and the strong stance taken by tech companies including Google, Microsoft, and Facebook to stand behind Apple.

“It’s like you’ve been asked to partner up and dance with the bully at school who keeps trying to trip you in the hallways,” one attendee told BuzzFeed News after the event. “And even though you want to learn to dance, there isn’t a lot of trust to build on.”

America: This is Your Government.


Spinning the occupation: Israel and the media


We look at Israel’s crackdown on journalists over alleged media bias; plus, the media landscape in South Africa.

27 Feb 2016 12:40 GMT | Media, Israel, Palestine, Jerusalem, Battle for Jerusalem

Israel is facing a global image problem – and once again the state is blaming the media.

Over the past month, the Knesset has summoned foreign journalists to defend themselves against accusations of bias, particularly around their coverage of the protracted violence in Jerusalem and the West Bank.

For the domestic media, there has also been a tightening of controls since Arielle Ben Avraham was appointed the new chief military censor. Avraham recently issued a directive ordering news organisations, digital outlets, bloggers and even certain Facebook users to run stories about national security past military censors before publishing or posting.

All of this is happening while Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu doubles up as communications minister, showing how the Likud Party sees controlling the media narrative as critical to the wellbeing of its government.

Talking us through the story are: Lahav Harkov Levine, a reporter at the Jerusalem Post; Michael Schaeffer Omer-Man, the editor-in-chief at +972 Magazine; Uri Blau, a journalist; and Luke Baker, the Reuters bureau chief and head of the Foreign Press Association.

Other media stories on our radar this week: Chinese president Xi Jinping has made the rules of journalism clear for the country’s state owned news outlets; in Turkey, two prominent journalists accused of revealing ‘state secrets’ have been released after being held for three months; and a hot mic catches MSNBC’s Morning Joe hosts cosying up to Donald Trump.

Mandela’s legacy: The media in post-apartheid South Africa

Almost 22 years after the end of the Apartheid regime in South Africa, transformation of the country’s media is still a work in progress.

In terms of numbers, the media sector has done relatively well compared to other influential sectors in redressing inequalities. However, questions of ownership and the way the country is reported on remain.

The Listening Post’s Nic Muirhead went to South Africa to investigate the transformation issue in the country’s media.

Finally, President Xi Jinping’s state media tour was TV gold – but one of the most theatrical moments didn’t take place on camera – it came after the president visited the newsrooms of the Xinhua news agency. A deputy editor at Xinhua, Pu Liye, posted a poem in praise of the president on his WeChat account and Chinese web users had a field day with the poem long after it went viral. It was written in Mandarin, so we had it translated and read out, accompanied by a few pictures of the president on his media tour.

Source: Al Jazeera



Canada jumps on the anti-BDS bandwagon

The motion to condemn BDS can pass constitutional muster, but Canadians will be intimidated into total silence now.

28 Feb 2016 07:30 GMT | Canada, Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel, Politics, Middle East

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks with Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau [AP]
Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks with Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau [AP]


Antonia Zerbisias

Antonia Zerbisias is an award-winning Canadian journalist. She has been a reporter and TV host for the Toronto Star, the CBC, as well as the Montreal correspondent for Variety trade paper.


Last week, Canada jumped on the anti-BDS bandwagon, joining France, the United Kingdom and, as recent congressional rumbles become a roar, the United States.

The irony is, the motion to “reject the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions [BDS] movement” was not passed under the former Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper, whom Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dubbed “a great friend of Israel and the Jewish people“.

Instead, it was the recently elected Liberals, led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who got snookered by the opposition Conservatives into passing the latter’s motion “to condemn any and all attempts by Canadian organisations, groups or individuals to promote the BDS movement, both here at home and abroad”.

Inside Story – Will Trudeau’s victory make a change in Canada?

Those organisations include the United Church of Canada and its two-million members, as well as unions and universities.

Highly divisive

Snookered because, as Foreign Affairs Minister Stephane Dion took great pains to outline duringthe February 19 debate, just about anything to do with Israel is highly divisive in Canada, which voters witnessed last year during the federal election campaign.

“To me, this is further proof that the Conservatives have not learned from their mistakes and are still trying to divide Canadians on issues that should unite them,” argued Dion in the House at the start of the debate that lasted the better part of the day.

CANADA: Is it still ‘good for the Jews’?

He was followed, one by one, by Liberal MP after Conservative MP, all declaring their support for Israel, their revulsion of anti-Semitism, their denunciations of Hamas as a terrorist group.

When they spoke of ‘collective punishment’, it was merely to describe how BDS affects Israelis and not how Israel demolishes Palestinian homes.

But, in their more than 55,000 word-debate, there were two scant mentions of illegal settlements – and only to point out how nobody boycotts Turkey for its occupation of northern Cyprus, or Morocco for its takeover of the West Sahara.

When they spoke of “collective punishment”, it was merely to describe how BDS affects Israelis and not how Israel demolishes Palestinian homes. As for UN Resolution 194, which governs the Palestinian right of return and is one of the main aims of the BDS movement, it never came up – although it is plainly stated on the government’s Global Affairs website that Canada supports the resolution.

After his long and convoluted soliloquy on the merits of profitable relations with Israel, Dion concluded, with seeming regret: “We do not need fewer ties between Canada and Israel; on the contrary, we need more. We must implement the Canada-Israel free trade agreement in order to reduce technical barriers, enhance cooperation, increase transparency in regulatory matters, and reduce transaction costs for businesses. That is the way forward. We must oppose anything that stands in the way of stronger ties between Canada and Israel.”

Motion had to pass

And so, said Dion – who was conveniently in Berlin during the vote on February 22 – the motion had to pass.

Which it did: 229 to 51. Trudeau, who openly opposed BDSprior to his becoming prime minister, voted for it to pass.

Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau [REUTERS]

Among the abstentions and/or absentees were the leader of the Green Party, Elizabeth May, and 43 Liberals, including 10 Muslim Liberal MPs. Three Liberal MPs voted against the motion.

As one MP would later explain, his motivation was not support, or the lack of it, for Israel. Instead, his concerns were over freedom of speech.

Throughout, it was left mostly to the third and fourth place parties, the New Democrats (NDP) and the Bloc Quebecois, to vote against the motion.

They did so by reminding Trudeau that it was his father, the late Liberal Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, who, in 1982, bequeathed to Canada its Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees freedom of conscience, thought, belief and expression.

ALSO READ: Israel need not worry about Justin Trudeau

“The issue here is not about defining Israel and Palestine, which is a good debate that we should have, and we need that debate within the House,” exclaimed longtime NDP MP Charlie Angus.

“The question that has been put here is about the condemnation of individuals and organisations, including church people, teachers, and all manner of people. Whether the member agrees with them or not, it is the role of parliamentarians to stand up for individual rights. I am absolutely shocked that the member would stand with the Conservatives on a motion that specifically calls upon us to condemn individuals for their right to dissent.”

However, being condemned is one thing. Being outlawed is another. Canadians, so far anyway, still have the right to say what they like about the policies of the state of Israel, and they can also buy, or not buy, its products. Canada’s Charter would make it unconstitutional for any government motion to go any further than what was passed last week.

Pushing the envelope

That’s probably why the human rights organisation, Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME), is not only mockingly pushing the envelope on promoting BDS, it’s also pushing sticky notes to slap on offending products on store shelves.

What’s more, on the very same day that Parliament voted to condemn organisations that promote BDS, the student society at Canada’s prestigious McGill University voted 512-357 to support BDS. However, the vote was nullified over the weekend during the online ratification process.

According to Diana Buttu, a Canadian-born Arab Israeli and former adviser to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, told the Globe and Mail, “Canada follows international law and correctly labels Israel’s colonisation of the West Bank as illegal … Yet, the government passes a resolution condemning those who aim to uphold international law and Canadian foreign policy? It’s nuts.”

Perhaps not so nuts. The motion “to condemn” can pass constitutional muster. Meanwhile, Canadians – at least those already reluctant to speak out against Israel for fear of being labelled anti-Semitic – will be intimidated into total silence now.

Talk about chilling.

Antonia Zerbisias is an award-winning Canadian journalist. She has been a reporter and TV host for the Toronto Star, the CBC, as well as the Montreal correspondent for Variety trade paper.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial policy.

Source: Al Jazeera



Iran: Rouhani praises ‘people power’ after elections

Latest returns indicate a vote of confidence for the president and his reformist partners, after landmark nuclear deal.

28 Feb 2016 04:06 GMT | Iran, Elections, Hassan Rouhani, Middle East

  •  Millions crowded polling stations on Friday to vote for parliament and the Assembly of Experts [Raheb Homavandi/Reuters]
Millions crowded polling stations on Friday to vote for parliament and the Assembly of Experts [Raheb Homavandi/Reuters]

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani has earned an emphatic vote of confidence and reformist partners secured surprise gains in parliament in early results from elections that could accelerate the Islamic Republic’s emergence from years of isolation.

As of Sunday morning, latest results showed reformist candidates have taken 29 of the 30 seats in the capital Tehran, while Rouhani and his ally former president Hashemi Rafsanjani lead the winners in the assembly of experts, which is responsible for selecting the country’s next supreme leader.

A Reuters tally, based on official but partial results, also showed independents winning 44 seats, reformists 79, and hardliners 106 in the 290-seat parliament.

  Iran’s conservatives rally their supporters ahead of elections

A number of seats will be decided in run-offs in late April because no candidate won the required 25 percent of votes cast. Eight of the initial winners were women.

A loosening of control by the anti-Western hardliners who currently dominate the parliament could strengthen Rouhani’s hand to open Iran further to foreign trade and investment following last year’s breakthrough nuclear deal.

“The people showed their power once again and gave more credibility and strength to their elected government,” Rouhani said, adding he would work with anyone who won election to build a future for the industrialised, oil-exporting country.

The polls were seen by analysts as a potential turning point for Iran, where nearly 60 percent of its 80 million population is under 30 and eager to engage with the world following the lifting of most sanctions.

Nearly 33 million people voted to elect representatives to parliament and the country’s highest clerical body.

Supporters of Rouhani, who promoted the nuclear deal, were pitted against hardliners close to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who are wary of detente with Western countries.

Until now, the contest for this seat of clerical power was an unremarkable event, but not this time.

Because of Khamenei’s health and age, 76, the new assembly members who serve eight-year terms are likely to choose his successor. The next leader could well be among those elected this week.

READ MORE: Opinion: A tale of two elections: Iran versus the US

Al Jazeera’s Jonah Hull, reporting from Tehran, said while reformists and moderates were “expected to hold sway” in the capital, no one expected a countrywide landslide.

“The choices being made here broadly between conservatives and the moderate reformist bloc could well determine whether Iran moves towards greater tolerance, openness and much-needed economic reform, but in a system geared towards the ultimate power of religious conservatism, [where] old thinking and the status quo remain deeply entrenched,” Hull said.

Will elections change the course of Iranian politics?

Moderate voter Behrooz Broum told Al Jazeera that he “would like to have a better economy, a better life, with friendship all over the world”.

Yet, conservative support remained strong elsewhere. Zahra Ruzidar, a conservative voter, said she could not trust the United States.

“They keep insulting us. We came forward with honesty and negotiated an agreement, yet they keep threatening us. We are not afraid of threats,” Ruzidar told Al Jazeera.

The hardline conservative camp is largely made up of loyalists of Rouhani’s predecessor, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who, during his two terms in office, stoked tensions with the US and cracked down on internal dissidents.

In a bid to crowd them out, reformists have allied with moderate conservatives, many of whom split with the hardliners because of Ahmadinejad.

Reza Marashi, research director of the National Iranian American Council, said the results showed voters wanted change.

“Iranian voters delivered a strong message to the elite that political and social aspirations that have long been unmet neet to be addressed more robustly,” he told Al Jazeera.

In a pre-election interview with Al Jazeera, Ghanbar Naderi, of the conservative Kayhan newspaper, however said that he was not expecting that things will change after the elections, even as he had predicted a reformist victory.

“They are all career politicians,” he said, adding that it is time for older politicians to give way to the younger generation.

“We have great young minds in this country. But they are not given the chance.”


Reformists stormed to power with the 1997 election of President Mohammad Khatami, followed by the 2000 parliamentary elections that brought a reformist majority into parliament for the first time.

The movement pressed for an easing of Islamic social restrictions, greater public voice in politics, freedom of expression and better ties with the international community.

But that hold was broken in the next election in 2004, when reformist candidates were largely barred from running.

Ahmadinejad’s election victory in 2005 sealed the movement’s downfall. Reformists were all but shut out of politics for nearly a decade until Rouhani was elected.

  Iran gears up for parliamentary elections

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies


Jew Creeps Using The New Testament

You are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and stayed not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.John 8:44

The more I think about this, the angrier I get. The manipulative Jews are milking Christian Zionists left and right in this country and now have the nerve to use the New Testament in their brainwashing endeavors. Do these creeps ever leave anything untouched? Must they worm themselves into every facet of White people’s lives? Nothing is off limits to the Jew!

I was seething when I read this piece over at the Ugly Truth site about these two Jews; even though I had already read about the work of Amy-Jill Levine and Marc Brettler’s “Jewish Annotated New Testament.” The book is NOT to convert Jews, but to push the “Jesus was Jewish” bit on American Christians.

Basically, these Jews are transparently trying to gin up support of American Christians, just so the traitorous Zionists retain a giant base of support for their true mother country: Israel. They insist Jews are God’s Chosen Ones and America MUST support Israel or go to hell. What a steaming pile of horse crap!

The majority of Jews today have about as much connection to Jesus as the man on the moon. NADA. ZILCH. ZERO! If you got any guts, read on for short overview on why this is the real situation.

1) The Ashkenazi Jews comprise 85 to 95% of today’s Jews and are descended from peoples originally from Eastern Europe and Southern Russia. The lands they came from were called “Khazaria,” around the Black Sea, to the north of the Caucasus mountains (see old map on right — click to enlarge). That’s why they are sometimes calledKhazar Jews. Often, you can tell one by that smarmy, rat-like expression (both of the book’s authors have it — look carefully around the nose and mouth in the main photo above).

2) The Khazars were a Hunnish/Turkish race, who were converted in the 7th century AD by rabbis, or whatever was left of the Judahites coming up from Babylon to the south. These were the priestly elite — survivors from Jerusalem — after the Romans finally got sick of their asses and gave them the boot around 130AD. In the interval, they finished “The Babylon Talmud” in 499 AD. These rabbis were undoubtedly tripped out by surrounding Babylonian mystery cults and included the satanic Kabbalah — passing along demonic evils to this day.

3) The New Testament clearly shows Jesus’ ministry revolved around fighting the hypocrisies of this priestly elite class. Basically, the Jewish elite could have cared less about the little people of the countryside, nor of God himself, when it came to their cushy lives on the Temple Mount.

4) They were scared of Jesus gaining power and losing control of the tax-paying masses, so the Jewish elite forced the Romans to flog and nail Jesus to the cross.

5) The Jewish elite then spent the next century or so trying to stamp out the new upstart religion. They went out and stoned to death plenty of early Christians.

6) This hatred of Christianity survives to this day. In fact, the Talmud contains references to hating Jesus and us Gentiles. Medieval Ashkenazi rabbis invented all kinds of evil stuff on Mary and Jesus and that it was really the rabbis who strangled Christ in the trash heap of Gomorah. They hated the idea the Romans did their dirty work!

7) For generations, the descendents of the Khazar Jews grew up believing they really were really ancient Israelites of the Bible, and were actually from the “Promised Land.” This ancient insanity lives with us to this very day. In fact, it’s totally effed up the Palestinian people — some of which are indeed Christians! Tell me that’s not some shit?

8] When the crowd in Jerusalum selected Barabas over Jesus for execution, that was the moment the Jewish religion lost all claim to special favoritism from God. The deal was now off. Any human being could now claim salvation by believing in Jesus. Only because of some crazy bunch in southern Russia believing they were real-life Jews, do we even have this crap going on.

9) Some Jews have truly accepted Jesus and rejected Judaism, as well as Zionism (and not faking it for use in brainwashing Christians or personal gain). For this, they will be amply rewarded when the time comes. This goes for “Jews for Jesus” and Brother Nathan Kapner. Talmudic, Zionist Jews will come here and act all bunged-up, pretending to be all so White, simply because they want to pull a fast one on you readers!

10) They should work on their own anti-Christianity. Just think about all the Jews in Hollywood sliming Christians openly and on a daily basis.


OK, I know some of this not common knowledge. But that’s only because the Jews have worked hard keeping any of this from American citizens. That’s not the case in Israel, where the Jews all know about the Khazars. Hell, they take pride in being descendants of tough barbarians of the Eurasian steppes!

Should you be a Christian, you need to get wise to the giant game being played on your head.

Israel is causing all sorts of havoc in the Mideast and is trying to get America into a war with Iran — just like they did with Iraq. You’re paying at the pump right now for what the lousy Jews have been up to and you don’t have a clue.

You can tell both these authors do NOT accept Christ, but are still continuing down the path of Jewish destruction. They just want American Christians to go along with the Zionist show.

These Khazar Jews have been lying their asses off about so many things: The “holocaust,” central banking, brainwashing Whites into hating ourselves, racial frictions, the battle of the sexes, immigration of non-Whites into our lands, pushing homo and transgender crap, abortion, smearing us White people and getting our children to breed away with any non-White possible.

Hell, just turn on the TV for five seconds and you’ll see what the stinking Jews are up to. The Khazar Jew has been the absolute worst thing to happen to America!

— Phillip Marlowe


Walking Dead Race Mixing


Published On 02/22/2016 | By Marcus Cicero | Featured Articles, News, Society

The extremely popular show, The Walking Dead, which I have enjoyed for its almost surreal depiction of a world gone insane, has now descended onto a level of sickness worse than any zombie infection, depicting a minutes-long sex scene between main characters Rick Grimes and Michonne during last night’s feature episode.

While Rick, touted as the ultimate Alpha Male throughout the series, has many attributes we should try to emulate, bedding down with a textbook example of a primitive Negroid does not make the list of traits as far as I can see.

The idea for the relationship seems to fall upon the shoulders of writer Scott M. Gimple, who does appear to be Jew according to preliminary research, and follows a small string of other bestiality incidents, including a long-running romance between an Asian man, Glen, and a White woman, Maggie, although this is almost laughable considering its almost nonexistence in the real world.

Scott Gimple

From Vox:

Love is in the air on The Walking Dead.

In the most obvious sense, Rick and Michonne hook up at the end of this episode, before the real world (in the form of the guy Rick took back to Alexandria as a captive, though Rick probably wouldn’t describe it that way) intrudes.

It’s a pretty intriguing moment in the overall arc of the show, even if the show hasn’t built up to it, precisely. Sex may as well not exist on The Walking Dead, so rarely does it occur, so for the series to give in to a full-on kissing scene — and then a shot of Rick and Michonne snoozing in bed in the aftermath — is kind of surprising.



By Kyle Hunt

Source: The Jewish Psychological Operation to Condemn White Women


“White women do not destroy civilizations, Jews do!”  — Kyle Hunt

Just when we were really making some progress in exposing the jewish orchestrated genocide against Whites, a toxic narrative was injected. Instead of blaming jews for their obvious role in flooding all White countries with hordes of non-White invaders, while also condemning all the White traitors who let it happen, some of the biggest figures in our “movement” started pointing the finger at White women. Women are too horny and want to be ravaged by the savages, they are all feminists, they opened the borders because they are pathologically altruistic, and so on.

After our women started getting raped and assault en masse, some men started saying these women were asking for it, that they deserved it, and that they actually liked it, since “scientific” studies show many women fantasize about rape and even orgasm while they are being brutally defiled. Many of our kinsmen, acting as “good goyim”, lapped up this poisonous narrative that has been spreading like the plague.

Recently a video was released titled Why Women Destroy Civilization, which has been shared by many within our ranks and gone viral. It puts almost all of the blame for our current situation on the unrestrained sexual desires of White women. The video says that women have no loyalty to their in-group, which is why they are always out chasing after foreigners. It never mentions the conquering armies of men (both White and brown) who have created many of the mixed people of this world through rape, the fact that women actually have more loyalty to their men than vice-versa, and the jewish culprits behind race-mixing propaganda. Even still, most women stay loyal to their men, despite all of this programming.

Although there are some White women out fornicating with non-White men, it is still not a large percentage of our population, and not a reason to throw all of our loyal women under the bus. Also, why is it that White men having sex with Asian women is never seen as a problem by many people in our “movement”? In fact, many promote it, since Asian women make the perfect “waifu”.

Apparently no one saw the hypocrisy of The Daily Stormer posting this video about how women lack in-group loyalty, as Andrew Anglin did a video a few years ago with his “jail-bait” Asian girlfriend and was on radio program in 2012 saying that he does not date White girls and that Whites should be bred out of existence.

There have even been discussions on that site about how it’s perfectly righteous for White armies to rape the non-Whites they conquer.

Real Aryan!

The video mentioned above also blames “feminism” and basically states that all White women are feminists, without ever going into any details about some of the merits to first-wave feminist arguments, and who was behind the plague of second-wave feminism.

Lasha Darkmoon comments:

Kyle Hunt is making four important points here that need to be clarified:

(1) It is a mistake to assume that all women are feminists. (2) It is therefore wrong to blame all women for the excesses of feminism, given that many women are anti-feminists; such as myself, for example, who reject modern feminism completely. (3) The early feminists however, known as the “first wave feminists”, starting with Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797), are not to be included in the sweeping condemnation of feminism. This is because the reforms the early feminists suggested were valid ones: basically, that women should be treated fairly and not like chattels, nor should they be subjected to exploitation and brutal ill-treatment. No reasonable person, man or woman, would object to that basic principle.  (4) The rot set in with second wave feminism, which was deeply influenced by Jewish sources such as Marx and Freud, and these evils were to be taken to a new level of toxicity by third wave feminism.

By this time, the entire movement had been coopted by Jews, with Jewish feminists — e.g., Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, Andrea Dworkin — playing a disproportionate role in the promotion of a multitude of poisonous doctrines that have served to drive a wedge between men and women. The end result we see now: an enormous increase in misogyny and misandry. Never before in history has the hatred between the sexes been so virulent, thanks to the machinations of the cultural Marxists who tend to be disproportionately Jewish and serve a Jewish agenda. [LD]


55 Jewish Feminists

The video [linked by Kaminski in his article] shows images of absurd feminist stereotypes, a photoshopped image of a woman holding a sign saying that she will trade racists for rapists, and Femen protesters, implying that this is the wayall White women think and act. Of course the video does not make any mention of how Femen is funded by Jewish billionaire George Soros.



The solution given by the video is for men to severely control the sexuality and thinking of their women. It is a little vague as to how this exactly should be done, but I imagine when they speak of a return of “patriarchy”, they mean a return to the traditional Christian mindset, where women are basically confined to household chores and bearing children, covered head to toe in clothing. This is just swinging from one extreme to another, without ever realizing there is a happy medium between slutwalks and the nunnery.

In National Socialist Germany, women were not feminist whores, and although they were encouraged to be mothers with large families, women were not simply powerless possessions. Some women, such as Leni Riefenstahl and Hanna Reitsch, even surpassed male counterparts in their fields. National Socialists, who had been mired in a jewish pornographic culture for decades, did not seek to cover up all nudity and sexuality, but instead elevated the human form to new heights of beauty and spirituality, as is evidenced by their high art. This was also the way of many of our pre-Christian ancestors.

This desire to control women and view them as essentially worthless comes directly from jewish brains, going all the way back to blaming evil Eve for taking the apple in the garden of Eden. Observant jews thank YHVH every morning “that He didn’t make me a gentile, that He didn’t make me a woman, that He didn’t make me an ignoramus.” The Tractate Shabbat, sums up the attitude of jewish religious law toward women: they are “a sack full of excrement” with a bleeding hole. Jewish men essentially enslave their women and treat them worse than dogs. Haaretz even admits:

If a man and a woman are drowning in a river, first they’ll save the man, ‘who is obligated to perform more commandments,’ whereas a woman’s ‘wisdom is only in the spindle.’ In fact, ‘words of Torah should be burned rather than being given to women.’

This poison was passed onto the other two Abrahamic religions, Christianity and Islam. They all treat their women in a similar fashion, which is clearly demonstrated by their Orthodox dress (pictured). There’s no difference with a nun in her habit and a Muslim in her burka, but if you were to listen to the advice given by the video in question, this is the only solution to save civilization. I don’t know about you, but I don’t think that beautiful women in sundresses is really at the root of our problem.

Even though the video does not make ONE mention of Jews, many otherwise jew-wise people apparently could not see the jew rubbing his hands behind the scenes, and instead bought this psychological operation hook, line and sinker. John Kaminski, a former writer for this site, submitted a piece that I refused to post. In it, he says that blaming women is the ultimate third rail topic, which is even more dangerous than blaming jews:

More dangerous than talking about 9/11, Jews or exposing the government as a robotic phantom by the UN and the IMF, might well be this topic which is sure to set off at least half the world in an eruption of outrage and denial. Yes, this just might be the ultimate third rail topic, leading you to be torn apart, like the legendary Orpheus, by a rabid mob of outraged women.

‘Why women destroy nations’
(he links to the video)

Women don’t care about the welfare of their country or their civilization. They seek to maximize their chances of bearing viable offspring. The feminization of the West has been a disaster.

The damage done to the West might be irreparably damaged. It might not be able to be repaired.

So watch the video and know without doubt that when you do, you will have your hands tightly wrapped around the third rail. How you deal with the realization that women like the idea of their country being destroyed by a rampage of virile men might just determine the viability of our future and the fate of the world.

So he really thinks women like the idea of having their countries destroyed by these virile invaders?

I understand that generalizations can be useful sometimes, but this is poison being pushed here! Many, many women are vehemently opposed to what is going on, while many men are all for letting these invaders overrun their countries.

Also, the implication is that White women are in such a position of power that they can orchestrate the mass movements of millions of people and use government positions to provide the incentives and protections to the invaders. The people who espouse this line of thinking will use Angela Merkel as an example to prove how women are behind this, neglecting to mention that she is a Communist jew-lover (if not a Jewess herself), who is the puppet head of a still-occupied country.

No, let’s just blame White women for everything.

I bet those little girls in Rotherham (and all over the White world) actually invited the Pakistani rapists into their country and then begged to be sex slaves for them. They deserve what they get! It’s the same with all of those German women who were raped to death by Soviets in WW2, since “women like the idea of their country being destroyed by a rampage of virile men.”  I’m sure they were orgasming all night before having their brains bashed in. They deserved it!


German women and children destroyed by Stalin’s Red Army rapists
“Women like the idea of their country being destroyed by a rampage of virile men.”  — John Kaminski

LD comments: It is the above extremely toxic comment by Kaminski that has made the author of this article, Kyle Hunt, white-hot with rage — as he admits below. No matter how you look at it, it is an inexcusable comment to make. Did the two million German women who were mass raped by the Russian army after WWII welcome the attentions of the “virile men” who decided to go on a rape “rampage”? Did the German women in Cologne on Christmas Eve “like the idea” of being sexually assaulted by those “virile men” from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and North Africa?

Kaminski has argued that his comments have been misunderstood, misinterpreted, and taken out of context. It is not for me to pass judgement on Kaminski here except to say that he could have chosen his words more wisely. For example, how could he possibly say: Women don’t care about the welfare of their country or their civilization.” Such a comment is not only grossly unfair, it is offensive in the extreme to the vast number of women who DO care about the welfare of their country and civilization.

I care about the welfare of my country. I certainly don’t wish to see my civilization go down the drain. I’m sure Kyle Hunt’s wife feels the same way about her country and civilization. I’m sure there are millions of good women everywhere who feel outraged to be told: “You don’t care about the welfare of your country! You don’t give a damn about our great Western civilization! All you want to do is open your legs to ‘virile men’and be impregnated by their seed because all you’re after is ‘to maximize your chances of bearing viable offspring.’ “

Let Kyle continue. You can see he is really angry with Kaminski and would like to tear him apart apart, limb from limb, for uttering such abominations against the entire female sex. The crime Kaminski is being accused of is this: undiluted and indiscriminate misogyny. [LD]

KYLE HUNT: If I was on the air right now, instead of writing, I would be yelling!

I cannot express the rage I feel when White men allow their women to be blamed, instead of seeing how they are being victimized by Jews, non-White savages, and pathetic White men.

According to Kaminski, I am a male feminist for standing up for White women as they are being relentlessly assaulted from all angles. Others out there will say that I am “white knighting” for not going along with the toxic narrative of “Women Destroy Civilizations” and blaming our beloved mothers, sisters, wives, and daughters for everything that went wrong in our world.

Good, we need more White knights!!

Does this woman deserve to be spat upon by Muslims, jews, AND White men?

White womaan being spat upon by a foreigner


White women hold the key to our future – through their words, willpower, and wombs. Do not be fooled by the multi-faceted psychological operations being run to divide us from each other. White men and women need to stop fighting against each other, realize the existential threat facing us and our offspring, and come together to battle those who seek our destruction.

White women do not destroy civilization, Jews do!

And real White men do not condemn their women, they defend them! 


JEWS 103: When Jewish Chameleons Boast…


oathby Tanstaafl
Jewish morality





A series of similar false-flag attacks have occurred all over the globe with the same Israeli intelligence fingerprints. As The Most Honorable Elijah Muhammad has stated, this is now the “Jew’s civilization.” We are all now individually responsible for gathering and analyzing data to arrive at the truth. Here are some resources for critical thinkers and citizen journalists:

There is great concern over America’s and the West’s relationship with the Muslim world. These three items provide a clear record of the guidance and direction The Minister has offered on these critical issues:






VIDEO: Missing Links (Israeli involvement in 9/11) Devastating Indictment

VIDEO: Architects & Engineers – Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 –





Israel did 9/11 – All the Proof in the World…

Ehud Barak and Benjamin Netanyahu were among the chief architects of 9/11.
[See: How Ehud Barak Pulled Off 9-11 – Christopher Bollyn… ]

A de facto Zionist Jew world order already exists: Jewish control of government, banking, education and media is near total.

If – before the next 9/11 – you oppose it and a conscious critical mass of humanity is formed, it can be overthrown. If not, picture a Zionist future for your children… a boot stamping on a human face – forever.

Picture also a world without pathocratic Zionism, and the misanthropic, anti-Human, supremacist, parasitic, criminal Jewish cult of hate that bore it – a cult into which unfortunate children are from birth indoctrinated through terror.

Educate yourself about Zionist Jewish criminal history to avert such a future:

The Information Underground Forum:
Kenny’s Sideshow:

Mark Glenn – The Ugly Truth Podcast:
Daryl Bradford Smith – French Connection:
Ognir – The Info Underground Radio:
Michael Collins Piper:
Charles Giuliani – Truth Hertz:

Such brazen and often quite open conspiracy as has manipulated recent history
is only possible because it is believed impossible.


Dr. Alan Sabrosky interview – The Ugly Truth podcast (3/15/2010) with Mark Glenn…

Israel Did 9/11: All the Proof in the World – MonkeySeeMonkeyDo…

How Ehud Barak Pulled Off 9-11 – Christopher Bollyn…

WTC South Tower demolition – ABC5

Danny Jowenko interview – WTC7: The Smoking Gun of 9/11 – Originally broadcast on Dutch TV in VARA’s ‘ZEMBLA’ (9/10/2006)…

Palestinian children in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead massacre – Al Jazeera (01/2009)


Israel did 9/11 – All the Proof in the World


The Jews Are a Race, Not a Religion


by Charles Coughlin

Most White people know nothing at all about the nature of the Jews. The biggest delusion is that the Jews are a “religion.” The ancestors of most Jews came originally from Kazakhstan. The term “Ashkenazi Jews” refers to Jews, who originated in central Asia (Kazakhstan). These Jews immigrated to the Polish-Lithuanian Empire in the Middle Ages (hence the large Yiddish community in Poland and the Warsaw Ghetto) and then traveled from there to Western Europe. Even though the Jews have lived among Christian Europeans for hundreds of years, they have refused all attempts to be converted to Christianity. In fact the end result of having Jews in a White nation for a prolonged period of time is widespread moral corruption and a severe undermining of Christianity. Jews play the role of an anti-Christian virus in White societies.

The Jews are not a branch of the White race. The people of Kazakhstan are a mixture of mostly Asiatic races, including primarily Turks, Central Asians (related to the Iranians or Afghan people) and Mongol invaders, who were well known for their brutality. Most likely a few Mediterranean Jews immigrated to Kazakhstan centuries ago and began a community there. The Jewish leaders may have considered the people of this area very similar in attitude and personality to the original Jewish race and intermarried with them. One legend claims that a king of Kazakhstan declared that the entire nation should become Jewish.

The most important thing to remember about Jews is that they are an alien race. The definition of a Jew in Judaic law is someone, who has a Jewish mother. How can Judaism be considered a religion if you have to be born into it? That is the definition of a race! It would be somewhat alarming to White Americans if a foreign people such as the Japanese, got together in racial meeting houses once per week to promote their racial agenda. The Jews have cleverly claimed that their racial meeting houses, synagogues, are “religious” meeting houses “just like churches.” There is a passage in the New Testament, Revelations 2:9 that says “I know the slander of those, who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.” This passage correctly notes that modern synagogues have nothing to do with God and that the Jews are now an alien Mongol-Turkish-Central Asian race, not even related to the original Jews.

The Bible also speaks of Pharisees and Sadducees. The Pharisees believed in life after death and angels while the Sadducees were atheistic. Most Jews in recent decades put their trust in socialism, communism or the Democrat Party. The number of Jews, who actually believe in God, may be as little as twenty percent. Most Jews seem to look down on devout Christians as foolish simpletons, and this sentiment comes across strongly in the Jewish-controlled mass media. Every once in a while “an atheistic rabbi” will be mentioned on the news. The word “rabbi” means teacher and does not necessarily have any religious meaning. The vast majority of Jews are political leftists or Zionist imperialists, who secretly believe that their race should control the planet.

Ironically, the Ashkenazi Jews are the dominant Jewish group in Israel. They have first choice for housing and other perks while the North African Jews (the Sephardic Jews), who may have mixed Jewish and Arab (and even Black) ancestry, are treated as second class citizens. One Ashkenazi Jew found himself discriminated against in Israel for marrying a Sephardic Jew.

Jews have often been tolerated in European nations because it was believed that they would help improve trade. Jews, however, always brought along with them a seedy criminal element. Jews typically have been heavily involved in prostitution and loan-sharking. Jews also corrupt and undermine the nations that they infest.

Over the centuries, the Jews have interbred with Europeans, producing a more intelligent Jewish leadership with the same Asiatic business skill. Instead of being petty money-lenders and small time merchants, the mixed-breed Jews have created the powerful Rothschild and Warburg international banking families. The mixed-breed Jews similarly have become more sophisticated at interfering with and subverting European governments to suit their needs.

The first European nation to experience a large influx of Ashkenazi Jews was the Polish-Lithuanian Empire in the Middle Ages. This Empire was a major force in eastern Europe for several centuries (playing a similar role to the Austro-Hungarian Empire in central Europe.) In 1705, the Polish-Lithuanian Empire was devastated by the Black Plague, which was said to be carried by fleas inhabiting Jewish merchants and rats. The Jewish community grew considerably and contributed to rotting the Empire from the inside. The once strong Empire quickly lost its position in Europe and was literally wiped off the map of Europe. Russia, Prussia and Austria devoured the Empire in three partitions from 1772 to 1795. It is more than a coincidence that the first European nation invaded by these Jews in large numbers was corrupted from the inside and obliterated by its enemies.

Austria now had to face similar problems from its new Jewish subjects. Gradually an anti-Semitic press was established in Austria, which tried to resist the corrupting influence of Jews on Austrian society. As usual Jews were found to be involved in every lucrative criminal enterprise, especially prostitution and loan-sharking. Russia suffered an even worse problem with its Jews, who increasingly developed plans to murder the Russian royal family and to create an anarchist or communist revolution. Tsar Alexander II had attempted to reform Russian society by emancipating the serfs. Despite his good work, the Tsar was murdered by an early socialist terrorist group, called the “People’s Will.” The bomb-thrower, who killed the Tsar, was named Ignatei Grinevitski. Two of his terrorist associates had very Jewish names, Nikolai Sablin and Gesia Gelfman.

The Russian government then took a serious interest in the activities of the Jews. An agent of the Russian Secret Police discovered a Jewish plot called The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. These Protocols spelled out a Jewish plan to subvert and control governments through Jewish control of the press, bribery, blackmail and even seduction. (Anyone remember Monica Lewinsky or Chandra Levy?) Henry Ford commented that the Protocols fit world history. The Protocols call for the Jewish-controlled press to push Gentile nations into war against any nations that remove Jews from power. The Protocols were first published in Russian in 1897. A second printing in 1905 reached Western nations. After the communist takeover of Russia, the possession of a copy of the Protocols by a non-Jew would bring the death penalty.

By the time World War One broke out, the Jews in Russia, Austro-Hungary and Prussia (now Germany) had created widespread subversive socialist and communist organizations designed to topple the governments of those countries. By 1917 the strain of World War One had weakened Russia internally to the point that communists led by Jewish commissars were able to topple the government and murder the Tsar and his family. They established a brutal communist dictatorship that oppressed Christianity and murdered twenty million people in Russia and the Ukraine by the 1930s.

In 1918 Jews in Germany called for general strikes protesting the continuing war. These strikes undermined the war effort and led to Germany’s collapse and the Versailles Treaty, which unfairly placed the blame for the war on Germany and demanded huge reparations that later ruined the Germany economy. The Austro-Hungarian Empire similarly fell apart under the strain of the war and subversive maneuvers by Jews. The Kaiser fled Germany and the heavily Jewish Weimar Republic was born. The Weimar Republic is infamous for corruption, moral degeneracy and incompetence, and the German public eventually voted it out of existence.

The same race of Asiatic Jews, who destroyed the Polish-Lithuanian Empire and then Russia, Germany and Austro-Hungary, began immigrating from eastern Europe to England, France and America. New York City quickly filled up with Yiddish Jews, who then spread to all the other major American cities. America had a significant and increasing Jewish population going back to the 1850s. By 1913 the Jews had established enough political clout to create the Federal Reserve banking system, which effectively put the entire U.S. money system in the hands of Jewish bankers. Following that event, America was pushed into two world wars, which America got nothing out of. A Great Depression devastated America only sixteen years after the Jews took over our money system.

The Jewish role in politics grew even stronger after the Federal Reserve was established. The immigration floodgates were opened for Yiddish Jews, who massively increased the Jewish population of America during the 20s and 30s. The extremely corrupt Franklin Delano Roosevelt surrounded himself with Jewish advisors and was one of the biggest collaborators with the Jews ever. President Bill Clinton, another extremely corrupt Democrat President, also surrounded himself with Jewish advisors, lawyers and interns.

Today the Jews have large populations in all White nations. The United States has the largest population of Jews in the world. The result has been a rapid deterioration in morality and dramatic increase in political corruption. Traditional Christian values have been replaced with Jewish values, which support homosexuality and moral relativism. The Jews are aware that White people have in the past successfully overthrown their puppet governments. In response to this, the Jews are deliberately pushing the concepts of “diversity” and “tolerance” hoping that White people will racially mix with Blacks, Mexicans and Asians, producing a less intelligent population with no racial heritage. The Jews meanwhile will not interbreed with other races to any significant extent “for religious reasons” and emerge as the most intelligent surviving race ruling a vast brown dung heap of racial mongrels.

There is a clear path of destruction, starting with the Polish-Lithuanian Empire, which was wiped off the map. Then the nations, who overran that empire, Russia, Prussia and Austria were poisoned by Jewish socialists, who helped murder two Tsars and overthrow all three empires during World War One. Finally, the Jews invaded the United States. We are being forced to support Israel no matter what atrocities they commit against Palestinians (and we have become targets of terrorism become of Israel’s criminal behavior.) Our monetary system has been controlled by Jews since 1913. Christian morality has been suppressed and replaced with Jewish immorality. The Jewish-controlled media pushes homosexuality and race-mixing on a daily basis to destroy the White race. We can either learn from history and remove the Jews from power or join a list of destroyed empires, from which the Jews have built their fortunes.

1) The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion


The Most Monstrous MEME in All History

Old Palestinian man walks past the cruel Zionist “separation” wall in Bethlehem, where Jesus Christ was born and later fought the Sanhedrin’s (Jewish high priests) oppressions of the poor. The contempory wall behind the old man sports a poster of a mocking Jew from a French “art” project, almost certainly of a Eastern European (Ashkenazi) descent — bitterly ironic since this Palestinian man is probably more “Israelite” than the “Jews” in the posters. The Palestinians are now being victimized by the very same evil belief system, or “MEME,” that Jesus once was.

“No population remains pure over a period of thousands of years… But the chances that the Palestinians are descendants of the ancient Judaic people are much greater than the chances that you or I are its descendents.”

— Ashkenazi Jew, Professor Shlomo Sand in the book “When and How the Jewish People was Invented.” The Ashkenazim are the Eastern European Jews, mostly a Turkish/Hunnish (often called Mongol) race called “Khazars.”


First off, let’s make this one thing perfectly clear. When you see the word “Jew” around here, technically I mean “Talmudic Khazars.” Sound complicated? Yeah, it does, but it shouldn’t. These people use the confusion about this on Whites to hide behind. It’s easy for them to do, especially since they actually believe they are the Jews of the Bible — so it doesn’t take much acting to play the part if you’ve been raised to think that from the get-go!

Furthermore, the term “Judeo-Christianity” is a complete non-sense word because Judaism since those long ago days has really been the worship of something called the Talmud — which is NOT the same Old Testament of the Bible (the Torah displayed in Synagogues is merely symbolic, a totem no longer even read). And the word “anti-Semite” is a oxymoron as well, since the majority of Jews are actually descendants of a non-Semite people from the steppes of Eurasia — far from the Semitic peoples of the Middle East! The actual word “Jew” did not even exist until the 1700’s! This messed-up situation is due to a long-ago transfer of a religious “Meme” (more below).

The majority of “Jews” in the US and Israel, are a non-Semitic people, a bastardized, mixed-up Hunnish/Turkish group called the Khazars of the Caspian-Black sea area, who long ago converted to Judaism (usually described as Mongol/Turkish). Eventually, to get rid of remnants of them, Christian Russia forced them into an area of southern Poland and Russia called the Pale of Settlement. Some of them did migrate and travel into Germany and back again (which accounts for the German in the Yiddish language). They also moved into other Eastern European areas like Hungary and Romania. From these places, they immigrated into America in the late 1800’s. We now see how that’s turned out for this country as a whole.

These Khazars did not convert to the same Judaism of the people of Moses (the Old Testament), but to a power control system created by the High Priests of the Levites and the Pharisees of Jeruselum — the very same group who turned Jesus over to the Romans, according to the New Testament. The arrogant Talmud however, can’t even allow credit for that evil act to go to the Romans, bragging that it was the Pharisees themselves who executed Jesus; by strangling him in the same Golgatha trash heap where the word for hell comes from.

That same, often hateful, Talmud even says that “Yeschua Hanotsri” (Jesus of Nazerine), sometimes obliquely referred to as “the magician from Egypt,” now boils in a vat of excrement in hell (Gittin 57a).

Today’s so-called “Jews” are over 85% a mixed race of eastern European and southern Russian people called “Khazars,” who have inherited the Pharisee’s control and belief system called the Talmud. When you see photos of Orthodox Jews next to Palestinians in Israel, you will distinctly notice just how much they stick out like a sore thumb in this part of the world — foks, these are not the same Israelites of the Christian Bible!


It’s important to understand that the Talmud was a set of books created by the descendants of the Pharisees and Sadducee’s of Jerusalem during the time of Jesus. In fact, this kind of rabbinic thinking was exactly what Jesus was fighting against during his short ministry on earth. The Pharisees sought to control every little thing in the Israelite’s lives and if you did something against or didn’t do something they had a tiny rule about, than you committed a sin against God! Call them the ultimate in control-freaks.

In addition to this, the priestly class of the Levites believed all other nations and peoples should be utterly destroyed (all the smoting of men, women and children, even livestock, etc. etc.); that only the Judahites (besides the small tribe of Benjamin to survive to that point) were favored in God’s eyes (the Chosen people stuff). These Jews would one day inherit the entire world. This incredibly violent streak against other surrounding peoples and religions was codified (see Deuteronomy and Numbers) and passed down to today’s world. Ask the Palestinians and Lebanese all about it.

This is the real evil that Jesus, John the Baptist and the mystery cult of the Essenes (Dead Sea scrolls) were up against. The Pharisees and Sadducees were, at this point, a part of the Edumean (Edomites) power structure (Herod Antipas came from them). The High Priests had long since corrupted the law of Moses (if he ever even existed) for their own benefit. This group acted as tools, or puppets, of the more militarily powerful Roman overlords and worked to enrich themselves at the expense of the poor people of the countryside — those that only wanted to follow God’s basic commandments and live in peace, without getting taxed to death. Some things never change!

Jesus was a peaceful, non-violent revolutionary against these evil Roman tools, the Edumean Pharisees. That is until he went into the Temple area on the day before Good Friday and saw all the money changer’s tables and scam operations of those who sold animals for sacrifice. The sight of that turned him ballistic on the spot — he knew these money-grubbers were in cahoots with the High Priests and that sent him into a rage.

The Romans later themselves had quite enough of the stiff-necked, intransigent Jews and in 70AD and later in the Hadrian destruction of 130AD, they laid waste to Jerusalem, razing the Second Temple and kicking the corrupted Jews out. Most Jews in the countryside just hunkered down and tried to continue on with their lives (later to become the Palestinians). But the High Priest class, the Pharisees, escaped to places like Alexandria, Egypt and Baghdad, Babylonia because these were city dwellers, not country people (this was the real Diaspora). They took with them all their painful Talmudic control systems and books. Talk about baggage!


Reverend Ted Pike discusses the Khazar history in his movie “The Other Israel.”

The Jews had always been in Baghdad, ever since the days of enslavement by Nebakanezer (another Matrix movie parallel) and the High Priests found harbor in this left-behind Jewish community. There, they finished the Babylonian Talmud in 499 AD, incorporating many bizarre beliefs of the surrounding non-Jew cults.

Many scholars who study the Talmud have remarked on occult superstitions found in the Talmud. Some actually believe that it contains Satanic or Molech worship (an early G-d of the people in that part of the world), human sacrificial rites (including the Blood Libel). All this may account for Jewish behavior and the state of today’s world:

“Judaism is the religion of the Pharisees and the patrimony of Babylon, from whence the Talmudic and kabbalistic traditions of Judaism ultimately derive. Orthodox Judaism’s other major sacred book, the Kabbalah, is filled with astrological teachings, fortune-telling, gematria, necromancy and demonology…Orthodox rabbis place curses, cast spells and imagine they have powers greater than God, derived from their study of the Sefer Yezriah, a book of Kabbalistic magic.”

Michael Hoffman, “Strange Gods,” p.81

These Babylonian Tamudic priests had trade route contact with other Jews who migrated westward to Egypt, like the famous Jewish rabbi, Maimonides of Alexander, who stole the concept, or meme of Legos (“the Word”) from the White Greek Stoics or philosophers. This back and forth transmission of ideas among various Talmudic rabbi groups moved further west and north into the Iberian peninsula (Spain and Portugal). These were the Sephardic Jews, who were indeed Semitic and, to some degree, genetically the real descendants of the tribes of Moses.

Eventually, the beliefs of the Pharisees and Levite High Priest class in Babylon influenced the Khazars, due north of them near the Caspian sea and converted them to the Talmudic version of Judaism in the 8th Century AD. The Khazars were a mixed race of Huns, Turkish people and some Slavs, but mostly were Asiatic and completely different from the Semitic races of Abraham to the south and west.

It is an inarguable and historically-proven fact (like the Schechter and Kievan Letters) that these people converted to Rabbinical Judaism around 740AD, under King (called Bek) Bulin and his grandson, Obadiah. This was not, as some would try to tell you, a mere off-shoot of the minor Karaite sect, nor was it only confined to the ruling class. It was due to real Hebrew influences on a large population from a variety sources, such as Crimean Jewish outposts, Radanhite Jewish merchants and religious refugees from the Christian Byzantine and Muslim Persian empires.

The Babylonian Talmud was adopted as the “holy books” for a race that never, ever lived in the holy land.

Actual remnant Hebrews did come into Khazaria and interbred with the locals over time. This accounts for the presence of some Semitic DNA in today’s Ashkenazi Jews but also reveals a bottle-neck, or what is called a “Founder Effect” — at precisely the number of generations ago that this conversion took place (more below).

The transfer of the Talmudic Meme: This is the course of the belief and control system of the Pharisees, expelled from Jerusalem by the Romans (“the Diaspora”), and later became the religion of the semi-asiatic Khazar kingdom. This satanic meme resulted in the Ashkenazi Jews that now plague the Palestinians and the rest of the world today. The early Christian meme, followed similar outward path into the Roman and Byzantine worlds via Turkey (like with Paul of Tarsus), but the Byzantine world smartly outlawed any kind of Jew from civil service, intermarriage and education. All of this would eventually come back in a round-about fashion to haunt Christianity — oh yes, it would.


With the transfer of the Talmudic control system to the Kingdom of the Khazars, what we see is the movement of an idea or concept — a meme — from one racial group to another. The various religions of the world can be considered the ultimate “Memes” in human history.

Memes are:

  • An idea that, like a gene, can replicate and evolve.
  • A unit of cultural information that represents a basic idea that can be transferred from one individual to another, and subjected to mutation, crossover and adaptation.
  • A cultural unit (an idea or value or pattern of behavior) that is passed from one generation to another by nongenetic means (as by imitation); “memes are the cultural counterpart of genes.”

Today’s Jews go completely haywire over the whole Khazar business and hate it when us Gentiles talk about it (as usual, calling us “anti-Semites” or “Nazis,” if we dare) — because it logically calls into question their “ownership” of Palestine, the raison d’être of that outlaw State of Israel, as well as them wearing the precious mantle of being called “Israelite” and a “Chosen One.” This is one of the biggest “forbidden” subjects in history. They vigorously denounce it all as too “fantastic” to have occurred. But is it?

In fact, this kind of transfer of religious ideas from one racial stock to another has happened many, many times in history. Look at how Christianity diffused through-out the Roman Empire at the exact same time as the Talmud moved elsewhere. See how White Northern European peoples later accepted Christianity and turned against the Catholic church, evolving their own contrasting version (Protestant). Make note of Shinto Buddhism of Japan, which later formed the backbone to a Supremacist and Militarist ideology that had much to do with the origins of WWII. The correlations are many.

And it’s not at all unbelievable crazy man talk. Let’s say you were born into a society 1300 years ago that had no books, magazines, photos or TV. You had nothing to go on but what your parents, your fellow yurt dwellers and the neighborhood local leaders (rabbis) told you. It would only take a few generations for everyone to believe they are descendants of the ancient Israelites, or whatever religious group.

Although it can be described as Judaism, the Talmudic meme is not the same religion of Moses or the Israelites. It’s the anally compulsive mind-set of the Pharisee class, those that controlled every aspect (the dogmatic Halakhah Law) of the Jew’s life, keeping themselves in power. This same rigged game is played out to this very day, where untold numbers of rabbis live the lives of the indolent Talmudic “scholars,” not working and breeding large Jew families.

The Talmudic Khazar Jews have always been more comfortable living segregated in the cities — such as Brooklyn, NY — where the orthodox (Hasidic) men study the Talmud all day and don’t hold jobs contributing to America as a whole. Those that do work, usually ply Jewish trades like diamond merchants or scam ops like the Kosher rackets (which you pay into all the time and don’t know it), right along with the more secular-looking Jews who go out and practice usurious banking tactics on the surrounding Goyim populations.


What’s really bad is that a giant part of it concerns you but you don’t have a clue. Oh yeah. They believe that only by corralling you under political control (the NWO), and by forcing you to follow their special commandments for non-Jews, will G-d make the Jews one with him and bring back the rest of secular Jewry to the Talmudic code. This is called the “Seven Laws of Noah,” but secretly includes another 66.

Modern-day Talmudists also believe that us non-Jews are really “Amalek,” the eternal enemy to the Jews. The last mention of this was in the Bible 500 years before Christ. Today, almost all Christians have no idea they may belong to this secret enemy army of Jewry. You may actually be under a death sentence, just for being born! And they call us racists? Michael Hoffman explains “Amalek” here in this video link. The Amalek document he discusses in the video: Rationales Justifying Collective Punishment.

Although many Jews claim to be Atheists, the Talmudic mind-set is still a big over-all part of  of  Jewdom because of a real life “Supremacy” in how they think of themselves as a racial group, vis a vis the rest of the planet’s citizens. But it’s not YAHWEH whom they worship, but the Talmudic meme of Judaism that says they are mini G-ds themselves. Call it the overall gestalt of the modern day Jews:

“The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart’s blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs, or ceremonies we observe — whether we are Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, or merely spasmodic sentimentalists — we follow the Talmud. It is our common law.”

 – Herman Wouk, “This is My God.”

One way to see all this going on is to ask yourself this: Why do you not see the Talmud ever mentioned in the mainstream media, like in History Channel religious documentaries? Sure, you have the Torah (Tanach, or Old Testament) talked about, but never the Talmud. Oh, they might briefly mention the Zohar (Kabbalistic occult Jew gibberish), orMidrash (overly-imaginative rabbis dreaming up more crap about the old crap), but never the Talmud!

They simply wish to keep this whole subject in the dark with the Goyim masses because they don’t want our curiosity piqued and for us to dwelve deeper. The subject matter has obviously been made taboo for the mainstream media.

Jewish genetics: Obfuscated for the Goyim

One of the most common arguments (like in the heavily Jew-edited Wikipedia) against the Khazar business was a Hebrew University DNA study* done on the Paternal “Y” haplotype of male Jews which disproved the matter, but that’s a totally false description of the study.

In fact, the Y chromosome study confirmed that a influx did occur from a Central Asian source into present day Ashkenazim Jews. It indicated something called the “Founder Effect,” where a haplotype gene called R-M17 from a very small group of Middle Eastern men must have interbred within this Central Asian gene pool in the distant past and henceforth became a distinct part of Ashkenazim today. This was undoubtedly the Jewish traders and Talmudic rabbis who came up from Babylon and interbred with the Khazars during the conversion period of the 8th century (700-800AD). See Nature article PDF here.

In a book written by David Keys in 2000, he discusses this very thing and correlates it to historical evidence. Some important excerpts from Keys’ book:

“DNA tests on Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jews have revealed the possibility that at least one key section of the latter community may have genetic evidence of a potentially large-scale or even mass conversion which must have taken place sometime after around A.D. 700… the only known mass conversion within that time frame and in that geographical area was that of the Khazars in the eighth century… What seems to have happened is not only a potentially large-scale conversion of non-Jewish people, almost certainly Khazars, to Judaism, but also the adoption of Levite (Assistant Priest) status by a substantial number of the Khazar converts… A tenth-century letter of recommendation from the Jewish community of Kiev to Jewish communities outside Khazaria was signed by Jews with traditional Turkic nameswhose almost certainly Turkic Khazar ancestors had adopted second names… indicating that they saw themselves as descendants or close associates of the ancient tribe of Levi… Adoption of Cohenic or ordinary Levitical status by converts was and is expressly forbidden by rabbinical law, so the Khazars had to develop a mythic national history that gave them the right to Levitical status. They claimed that they were the descendants of one of the lost tribes of Israel and were not converts at all but merely returnees to Judaism. Furthermore, the tribe they claimed ancestry from was that of Simeon, the brother of the founder of the tribe of Levi….Probably it was the old pre-Jewish Khazar priests — the qams — who at the conversion had become Levites en masse…” (excerpts from pages 99-100)

David Keys. Catastrophe: An Investigation Into the Origins of the Modern World. New York: Ballantine Books, 2000. Keys summarizes the genetic findings of M. G. Thomas, Karl L. Skorecki, H. Ben-Ami, Tudor Parfitt, Neil Bradman, D. B. Goldstein,“Origins of Old Testament Priests.” in the magazine, Nature 394 (July 9, 1998): pg. 138-140. (you have to purchase the Nature article)

Note very carefully here the information in Key’s summary above, that the Turkish Khazars took the names of the Levite priesthood, who must have passed down the violent racial ideology and separatism from the Old Testament book of Deuteronomy against any neighbor or stranger — the other races living nearby.

This whole shebang is part and parcel of the Zionists in today’s world, and is at the root of all the evils now plaguing America and our geopolitics. The closer you study this whole matter, the more that this will become readily apparent to you and is at the root of what is called: “The Jewish Question.”

The “Y” haplotype report,* cited by Wikipedia as proof the Jews are really ancient Israelites (any other evidence is always carefully ignored by embedded Jew editors). In reality the report says the question remains unresolved on Ashkenazim Jews, who are the majority of today’s Jewish population. Here I quote directly from it:

“To address the degree to which paternal gene flow may have affected the Jewish gene pool, we estimated approximate admixture levels in our Jewish samples from Europe. This question remains unresolvedin particular for the Ashkenazi community.”Page 5 here

Many other scientists considered the sample data in this Y study as statistically extremely questionable in the first place, combining far too many countries, like Britain, Germany and Russia, all of which could not exclude Sephardic DNA, undoubtedly incorporated over the past centuries. The testing also had far too few samples of DNA (less than 60!) to begin with. Another big problem was that it centered around the paternal (male) gene; while Jews are now a maternal race (the priestly class was originally paternal long-ago), meaning you’re not considered Jewish if your mother wasn’t.

As a side note, the Y-chromosone report found only the barest amounts of “semitic” genetics for the so-called Ethiopian Negro Jews, imported into Israel back in the 1970’s because of all the King Solomon and Bethsheba biblical stories. Most of those Negroes have long since left, because of real racism against Negroes in Israel. They also didn’t have the same Talmudic background (Solomon was long before the Khazars); so the current day Talmudic Israelis actually forbade them from performing sacred rites in Israel, as well as not allowing intermarriage with “White” skinned Israelis, or even much else beyond manual labor.

Ashkenazim Jews are absolutely the biggest race hypocrites, ever!

But the most important truth that negates all these angry Jews against the whole Khazar history and Middle Eastern DNA question, isthat it just does not matter! That’s right, the Jews as a whole are really expressing that Supremacist Talmudic meme, which is at the heart of the matter now facing the White race!

This meme has had disastrous effects on the world: Geopolitics (Zionism, War, Iraq, 9/11 and other Mossad perfidious acts), the Geo-Economy (Central Banking, fiat money, immigration, the coming New World Order), inner racial hate for Muslims and the White people of the Western World (Islamofascism, the Holocaust Hoax, media slanders, “Multiculturism,” race and victimhood politics).

Whether they are this or that back then, makes little real difference when you take in the here and now!

So, let’s restate the issue here. The Ashkenazim Jews are not the original Israelites of the Bible, but usually believe themselves to be and want the surrounding Gentile populace to think so. They are a separate racial group, one that may look something like Whites and uses that fact against us when convenient or not, if that’s good for them, too. This race is based on a sometimes bizarre and hateful religious meme called the Talmud, created by the descendants of the Pharisees who had Jesus executed. This is NOT the same as the Old Testament Torah, like they want you to believe. And last, but certainly not least, today’s Jews that may not appear religious in outward behavior, have ingested the superiority meme promoted by the Talmudic Jews and pretty much all think they are “God’s Chosen people!”

— Phillip Marlowe


*The major sponsor for the “Y” Haplotype study was the Hebrew University, based in Jerusalem. They obviously had a built-in bias going back to Zionist history creation in the last century, or even before:

Sand suggests that the denial mechanism was rather orchestrated and very well thought out. The Hebrew University decision in the 1930’s to split Jewish History and General History into two distinct departments was far more than just a matter of convenience. The logos behind the split is a glimpse into Jewish self-realisation. In the eyes of Jewish academics, the Jewish condition and Jewish psyche were unique and should be studied separately. Apparently, even within Jewish academia, a supreme status is reserved for the Jews, their history and their self-perception.  As Sand insightfully unveils, within the Jewish Studies departments the researcher is scattering between the mythological and the scientific while the myth maintains its primacy. Yet, it often gets into a stalling dilemma by the ‘small devious facts’.  — Gilad Atzmon review HERE.

My blog page above on this: The Wandering Who?

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Two Hundred Years Together: From the Beginnings in Khazaria

Arthur Koestler’s 13th Tribe on-screen images, downloadable Free PDF Here Resource for Turkic and Jewish History

Go find and read: “The Jews of KHAZARIA” by Kevin Alan Brook (Jew) published by Jason Aronson, Inc. in 1999. This book explains in great detail where they really came from and where they went. The whole subject is something Jews often talk about among themselves but do not want us Goyim to even know the least thing about it.

TED PIKE’S “THE OTHER ISRAEL” KHAZAR SECTION WAS DELETED BY JEW ADL YOUTUBE MONITORS! The Jews don’t want this history to become common knowledge. The whole video may be watched on Google embedded above (for now). The small segment (below) on the Khazars was undoubtedly taken down by ADL Jews on the bogus excuse “terms of use violation.” Watch the embedded video above (58 minutes but worth it) and ask yourself “why?”


Download PDF