An edited abridgement of a recent article on the Occidental Observer,
with an endnote by Lasha Darkmoon on the Jewish control of Europe.
Martin Luther King had a dream. So did Europe’s compassionate and caring Jewish community. After the Second World War, they thought that importing millions of Muslims would give them staunch allies against the White Christians who had persecuted them so unfairly for so long. With Muslim help, they hoped to bring about Eurocide: the death of White Christian Europe and its replacement by a rainbow continent firmly under Jewish control.
This dream of a progressive alliance was still alive in 1995, when the radical Franco-Jewish director Matthieu Kassovitz released a searing indictment of France’s racism and xenophobia.
According to an article in the Guardian:
The film was called La Haine (“Hatred”) and was the story of three young men in one of the wretched housing projects outside Paris, commonly referred to as la banlieue. The three lads were a north African, a black guy and an eastern European Jew/ … They were cheeky, funny and likable — a gang of what the French call “branleurs”, which is literally translated as “wankers” but really means young guys who mess about. The core of the story was, however, that they were also full of rage — against the police, but ultimately against a society that has pushed them to the margins. Much of the film’s comedy as well as its social comment comes from the gang’s misadventures in central Paris, a world as distant and alien to them as America.
The plot of La Haine is relatively simple, centering on the fact that Vinz, the angry young Jew, has got hold of a gun stolen from the police. He threatens to use it against them if his mate Abdel dies from his injuries after being held in police custody. When Abdel does die, Vinz’s moment for revenge comes when he has the chance to kill a neo-Nazi skinhead. He backs away, however, and finally hands the gun over to Hubert, the black boxer who is the most philosophical of the gang and totally against violence. The film ends with Vinz being accidentally shot dead by a policeman, who is taunting him with a gun. The shocking and powerful final scene is a standoff between Hubert and cop pointing guns at each other; the scene is framed by the traumatised face of Saïd, the north African member of the trio, and a voiceover saying that this is the “story of a society falling apart”.
— La Haine 20 years on: what has changed?
The Guardian, 3rd May 2015
So that was Kassovitz’s idea of a coalition of the oppressed: a sensitive Arab, a pacifist Black and a merciful Jew portrayed as allies. Like his vibrant homies, the Jew was living on the margins of society, struggling to survive police brutality and White racism. Even in 1995 that was an absurd scenario, but it was how Kassovitz wanted to portray French society. It was “falling apart” and les Gaulois — “the Gauls,” the native French — were to blame.
La Haine proved very popular with liberals around the world.
After all, it showed them what they wanted to see: that “cheeky, funny and likeable” minority youths in France were being cruelly oppressed by racist Whites. The film didn’t, of course, explore the epidemic of gang-rape in the banlieues, because that would have shown the minority scamps in the wrong light. As the Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown affairs in America also prove, liberals don’t like to complicate their morality tales with anything so sordid as reality.
Unfortunately, reality can intrude on liberals despite their best efforts.
La Haine has been exposed by time as a fantasy: in 2016, it’s obvious that “the hate” of Arabs and Blacks in France is directed firmly against Jews, whom they rightly see as the most powerful group in the French elite.
But Jews are still able to exploit Muslims and their misbehaviour for their own advantage.
Anti-White activists like Moshe Kantor, head of the European Jewish Congress, use Muslim terrorism to demand more surveillance and less free speech. The philosemite Mark Steyn writes constantly about Muslim attacks on Jews in Europe and portrays Jews as innocent victims gagged by Europe’s harsh laws against “hate-speech.” But he never discusses the central role of Jews both in creating those laws and in opening Europe’s borders to the Muslim World.
— § —
We see the same pattern in Britain as in France: Jews dreamed of a progressive alliance with Muslims against White Christian goyim, only to see their dreams cruelly shattered. The Jewish activist Jonathan Freedland described one shocking example in 2005, after he attended a memorial for a tragedy in the Second World War:
On March 27 1945 one of the last V2 rockets of the war landed on Hughes Mansions, a block of low-cost housing in London’s East End. Among the 134 people killed, 120 were Jews. Last Sunday [10 April 2005], survivors of the blast and relatives of those killed came back to Hughes Mansions for a memorial service. I was there along with much of my family, including my mother. Her own mother, Feige, and aunt Rivvy were among those killed 60 years ago. It took a full day to find them in the rubble.
People were choked with emotion from the start; they had come back to the spot where they had seen brothers, sisters, parents and friends die. They were expecting to feel sorrow. What they did not bargain for was fear. Within minutes, the mourners were pelted, first with vegetables, then with eggs. Some said they saw stones; others said they had been spat at. Gathered in old age to remember their dead, they felt under siege.
Looking around, it was difficult to spot individual culprits. All that were visible were groups of young Asian [i.e. Bangladeshi] men, standing on the balconies of the rebuilt block. Among the dignitaries at the service was the local MP, Oona King. When she spoke, she attacked the “ignorance” of the assailants and insisted that their real target was her. … Most of those there thought it much more straightforward. They believed this was an attack by Muslims on Jews. After all, the men wore skullcaps, the prayers were in Hebrew. There was no doubt who they were.
Pre-war Jews, like today’s East End Muslims, also lived in unforgiving poverty. They too were herded into the cramped streets of East London as the first stop for new immigrants. They too were reviled as outsiders, branded as parasites on the indigenous society. And they too were feared as a potential fifth column, suspected adherents of a violent, supranational ideology. The “Jewish menace” was said to be first anarchism and then Bolshevism. Today’s “Muslim peril” is jihadism. This is what grieved some of those mourners most. As they huddled together in fear, one spoke for all when she said: “This is so wrong. We should be on the same side.”
— Reviled as outsiders, The Guardian, 16th April 2005)
The “same side” is, of course, the side opposing the White Christian goyim.
Freedland claims that Jews and Muslims should be natural allies, because both have bitter experience of poverty and oppression. But it hasn’t worked out like that, and in 2016 civil war is raging in the Labour party between the pro-Jewish faction and the pro-Muslim faction. There is no pro-White faction in Labour, because it long ago abandoned the people it was founded to protect. Now it works to harm the interests of the White working-class, not to defend them.
The Conservative party contains no pro-White faction either: it is run by Jews for the benefit of Jews. The top of the party is dominated by strongly identified Jews like Lord Feldman and Robert Halfon, who have kept Britain’s borders firmly open to the Third World while legislating for gay marriage, mass surveillance and censorship. Unlike Labour, where Muslims have increasing autonomy, the Tories ensure that their Muslims are certified kosher. Sajid Javid, the business secretary, and Tariq Ahmed, “Minister for Countering Extremism,” are both former bankers. They have repeatedly demonstrated their loyalty to Jewish interests, which is why they remain in office.
But Sayeeda Warsi, formerly co-chairman of the Tories with Lord Feldman, has long since departed. The problem wasn’t her mediocrity or her hostility to White Britain, but her attempts to agitate for Muslim interests rather than Jewish. She was replaced as co-chairman by the Jew Grant Shapps; and when Shapps was sidelined after a financial scandal, Robert Halfon moved up the hierarchy to replace him.
Jewish control of the Tories is complete, which is why I trust neither side in the campaign over the EU Referendum being held on 23rd June this year. Lord Feldman and the part-Jewish David Cameron, representing the Tory establishment, want Britain to remain in the European Union; alleged Tory rebels like the part-Jewish Boris Johnson and the neocon Michael Gove want Britain to leave. It’s clear that neither side has the interests of the White British at heart, but Brexit—Britain leaving the EU—would nevertheless be an important symbolic step towards breaking the European Union as a tool of the hostile elite.
Mass immigration by Muslims and other Third-Worlders was meant to destroy White nationalism and bring about Eurocide. As we can see from the rise of nationalist parties everywhere from France and Sweden to Hungary and Germany, it’s having the opposite effect.
The hostile elite are not benevolent, but they’re not omnipotent either. Although they could suppress rebellion in a single nation, they will find it ever more difficult to suppress rebellion across an entire continent.
Their dreams of the death of Europe will, I think, turn out to be grossly optimistic.
An Endnote by Lasha Darkmoon
On the Jewish Control of Europe
For the benefit of our American readers, allow me to clarify and explain a few simple issues that will enable outsiders to see this whole British and European situation in context.
Britain, like the United States, is completely under Jewish control and can be regarded as America’s 51st state. There are American troops and military installations in Britain right now that the native Brits, even if they were so minded, would be unable to evict. Telling the Americans to “get out” would be unthinkable. They are now permanent guests here whose presence we must endure with patience and forbearance, pretending it’s for our good. The same situation applies even more forcibly in Germany, another Judeo-American colony in all but name.
In Britain, the Conservative party is the equivalent of America’s Republican party and represents the interests of the wealthy upper classes, while doing its best to give the impression that it entertains a robust affection for the the working man. The Labour party (or the Socialists) supposedly represent the interests of the proletariat and is the equivalent of America’s Democratic party. As in America, both parties are firmly under Jewish control, just as the mass media, the judiciary, the armed forces and academia also are. The Bank of England is equivalent to America’s Federal Reserve and makes no decision without first consulting its American oracles, i.e., the elite Jews who perch at the top of the financial pyramid where Lord Rothschild and his mighty minions sit enthroned in theocratic splendor.
Finally, the European Union—scheduled soon to become the “United States of Europe”—is also, as you might have guessed, completely under Jewish control. There is not a single powerful institution throughout the length and breadth of Europe that does not have some scheming Jew in the background, whispering his “advice” or jerking the puppet strings of his compliant marionettes. [LD]
Barbara Lerner Spectre calls for destruction of Christian European ethnic societies
Terminally Ill Jewish Whistleblower Aaron Russo Exposes The Zionist New World Order
“They are gathered together for war. . . . Let the wicked fall into their own nets.”
When I logged on to my computer this morning, the first email I noticed in my inbox contained a link to a shocking video which I could only watch with utter disbelief and revulsion. It came from my Roman Catholic correspondent Beverly. This surprised me because I’d always thought Beverly was an exemplary Catholic who would be willing to die for her Pope. After all, the Pope is enveloped in an aura of numinous sanctity, and according to hundreds of millions of pious Catholics, is believed to beinfallible.
My first reaction to this video, as I say, was entirely negative. It still is. Angry rants by young men full of sound and fury and the froth of surplus testosterone have scant appeal for me. Much of what this young scoundrel had to say, however, seemed to make a lot of sense to me, even though his manner of saying it was decidedly off-putting. Fortunately, I had a second video at hand which was more appealing and made precisely the same points in a nicer, more gentlemanly way. So I tag on this second video in order to soften the effects of the ill-mannered stridency of the first offering.
I think the general purport of what these two different videos are trying to say is this:
Don’t trust the Pope. He is either an infiltrator and secret agent of the Jews or maybe he is a even a crypto-Jew doing his best to transform the Church into a branch of the Synagogue.
— § —
Here are a few hard facts you need to consider carefully.
Only a couple of weeks ago, the Pope won the prestigious Charlemagne Prizefor 2016. If that doesn’t start alarm bells ringing for you, nothing will. The Charlemagne Prize is also known as the Coudenhove Kalergi Prize.
The first recipient of the Charlemagne Prize (in 1950) was the sinister Count Richard von Coudenhove Kalergi. Half Austrian and half Japanese, this mongrelized nobleman was a passionate philosemite who believed that the Jews were the spiritual elite of the world, the intellectual crème de la crème — in short, the Chosen People in every sense.
In addition, he viewed the White European race with loathing and not without a tinge of envy, being only half-white himself. Like many of the Jews he so admired—Lenin and Trotsky were two of his favorites—Count Kalergi saw the White race as “the cancer of human history“, a race that needed to be bred out of existence by forced interbreeding with the darker races of Africa and Asia.
He envisaged a future in which every European would look like an Ancient Egyptian and there were no white people left anywhere, most of them having disappeared into a muddy-complexioned and mongrelized mass.
Here is an abridged excerpt from a thought-provoking article translated from the Italian which will tell you more about Count Kalergi and his sinister plans: plans in which the present Pope is closely involved, given that both men share the same ideological values touted by the promoters of the Charlemagne Prize:
In his book Practical Idealism, Kalergi indicates that the residents of the future “United States of Europe” will not be the People of the Old Continent, but a kind of sub-humans, products of miscegenation. He clearly states that the peoples of Europe should interbreed with Asians and colored races, thus creating something akin to a multinational herd of livestock with no quality and easily controlled by [an essentially Jewish] ruling elite.
The only way to ensure this is for the governing elite to have complete control of who has children with whom. Kalergi proclaims the elimination of nations with the use of ethnic separatist movements and mass migration. In order for Europe to be controlled by an elite, he wants to turn people into one homogeneous mixed breed of Blacks, Whites and Asians.
Who comprises this elite? Kalergi is particularly illuminating on this point:
“The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.
It’s not surprising that the people who escaped from their ghetto prisons [i.e., the Jews] should become the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews due to the actions taken by the French Revolution.”
LD: In other words, he is saying that the ancien regime that prevailed before the French Revolution (1789-1799), consisting of an aristocracy of kings, nobles and Catholic clerics, was swept away as a result of Jewish machinations and replaced by a new aristocracy of Jews. Indeed, one of the first results of the French Revolution was the total emancipation of the Jews in France, in 1791, France being the first European nation to buckle under Jewish demands and surrender to Jewish pressures. The process of Jewish “emancipation”—a euphemism for Jewish takeover—was a long and steady one over the next 132 years, until by 1923 the Jews had achieved full emancipation or superior status in every European country. Note that the average Jew, even before full Jewish emancipation in Germany in 1871, was three times richer than the average German. (See here)
Although no textbook mentions Count Kalergi, his ideas are the guiding principles of the European Union.
The belief that the peoples of Europe should be mixed with Africans and Asians, to destroy our identity and create a single mestizo race, is the basis of all community policies that aim to protect minorities. This is not done for humanitarian reasons, but because of the directives issued by the ruthless [European] regime with its machinations for the greatest genocide in history: White genocide.
The Coudenhove-Kalergi European Prize (known also as the Charlemagne Prize) is awarded nearly every year to Europeans who have excelled in promoting this plan of ever further “integration”. Among those awarded with such a prize are Angela Merkel and Herman Van Rompuy.
LD: The prize is now mostly awarded every year.
The incitement to genocide is also the basis of the constant appeals to the United Nations that demand we accept millions of immigrants to help with the low birth rates of the European Union. According to a report published on January 2000 in Population Division Review of the United Nations in New York, under the title “Immigration replacement: A solution to declining and ageing population,”
Europe will need, by 2025, 159,000,000 migrants.
If we look around us, the Coudenhove Kalergi plan seems to be in full flow.
We face Europe’s fusion with the Third World. The plague of interracial marriage produces each year thousands of young people of mixed race: these are known as “the children of Count Kalergi.” Every one must see this truth: that “European integration” amounts to White genocide. (Emphasis added)
(Here is the original article in Italian)
THE TYPICAL EUROPEAN MALE IN 2050
“The man of the future will be of mixed race. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future will replace the diversity of peoples.” — Count Coudenhove Kallergi, recipient of the first Charlemagne Prize (1950)
Every single recipient of the Charlemagne Prize, from Count Coudenhove Kalergi in 1950 to Pope Francis in 2016, has been on the payroll of the Jews and has plugged multiculturalism and mass immigration with a view to the eventual disappearance of the White race into a mongrelized mass.
Who did his best in Britain to throw open the floodgates to endless hordes of migrants from the Third World? Answer: Tony Blair. Who did exactly the same thing in Germany a few years later? Answer: Angela Merkel. Both Blair and Merkel have been rewarded for their contributions to multiculturalism and the ongoing mongrelization of the White race. The Coudenhove Callergi Prize was awarded to Blair in 1999 and to Merkel in 2008.
Both Blair and Merkel are race traitors—and Blair, in addition, is a war criminal.
And now that it’s 2016 we must welcome the latest winner of the Coudenhove Kallergi Prize—a prize inseparable from the promotion of multiculturalism, mass immigration, and the slow and systematic genocide of the White race.
Step forward, Pope Francis!
To see the complete list of the recipients of the Coudenhove Kallergi (or Charlemagne) Prize, click here
VIDEO 1 : 3.18 mins
The second video is different in style. It is a quiet, reflective video in which former good popes prophesy, in their encyclicals, the coming of an anti-pope of evil. They do not identify this pope by name, but there has been much speculation recently that the present incumbent at the Vatican, Pope Francis, could be the one to whom these words in the Gospel of St Matthew apply:
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothes of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.”
— Matt. 7:15