End of WW II – MASS GRAVE LIES = COGNITIVE ILLUSION

The National Association ofForensic Historians TM

 

Using skeptical inquiry and forensics to expose historical and archaeological fraud.

 

* * * * *

BELZEC, CHELMNO, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II

 

Are 2 Million People Really Buried In 75 Graves?

 

It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II – hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of corpses were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at the four very small, precisely known locations of – Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II. (Yad Vashem alleges that over two million people were murdered at these four sites.) However, despite all the deceptive allegations / insinuations to the contrary, the simple truth is; the largest of the – four – extant so-called “huge mass graves” ever located / proven to exist at these four sites – in which actual, verified human remains have literally / truly been physically unearthed / tangibly located by archaeologists / forensic investigators – by means of bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science; contains the remains of – only six people!

Note: All four of the so-called “huge mass graves” were uncovered at Sobibor and contain a grand total of – only ten skeletons!

 

  

WHAT  KIND  OF  TRUTH  REQUIRES  LIES  TO  DEFEND  IT?

 

 

Lest you think there must be some truth to this “huge mass graves” canard

 

(That’s the psychology of the big-lie technique at work)

 

The National Association of Forensic Historians TM presents

THE  N.A.F.H.  CRIME  SCENE  INVESTIGATION  CHALLENGE TM

$75,000.00
REWARD

For proving    just  1 / 1,000  of  1%   of the fraudulently alleged buried remains claims

  

WHAT  KIND  OF  TRUTH  REQUIRES  LAWS  TO  PROTECT  IT?

 

THE  75  SO-CALLED  HUGE MASS GRAVES

 The site of the      alleged crime The number of deceivingly alleged huge mass graves The number of jews allegedlyexterminated at each site The method allegedly used by the Germans to conceal their crime
Belzec
33 600,000 *

Dig the bodies out of the alleged “graves;” then burn them on pyres made from railroad rails; then throw all the bones and teeth back into the same alleged “graves;”then cover all the physical evidence with a layer of sand.

Chelmno

15 152,000 *

Sobibor

16 250,000 *

Treblinka II

11 900,000 *
* * * * * Total    75   Total    1,902,000   –   * Source Michael Shermer

 

 

A layer of sand can make a huge mass grave filled with tons of bones and teeth magically disappear?

 

Just what part of – the scientific method – do the self-deceiving true-believers not understand?

 

Just what part of – forensic science – do the self-deceiving true-believers not understand?

 

Just what part of – geophysics – do the self-deceiving true-believers not understand?

 

Just what part of – logic – do the self-deceiving true-believers not understand?

 

The site of the     alleged graves The weight of the alleged remains that would have been left behind – IF – the story is true The number of teeth that would be mixed in with the alleged millions of pounds of bone fragments
Belzec
4.380 million pounds *

19.200 million

Chelmno

1.110 million pounds *

4.864 million

Sobibor

1.825 million pounds *

8.000 million

Treblinka II

6.570 million pounds *

28.800 million

* Calculations are derived from figures used by Arnulf Neumaier in his treatise on – TREBLINKA

 

* * * * *

 

Just what part of – no mass graves = massive fraud – do the simple-minded true-believers not understand?

 

Who are the real deniers: those who believe in the scientific method – or – those who believe in magic?

 

Who in their right mind believes that a layer of sand can – dematerialize – a huge mass grave?

 

What kind of – self-deceiving coward – refuses to acknowledge such an obvious big-lie?

 

Just what part of – physically impossible – do the true-believers not understand?

 

Who in their right mind could espouse such a – nonsensical – “theory”?

 

Why are skeptics being – jailed – for publicly doubting this drivel?

 

How – unconscionable – is it to persecute non-believers?

 

What are the purveyors of this – fraud – afraid of?

 

* no mass graves = no mass murder *

 

* no mass murder = holohoax *

 

* * * * *

Even though the orthodox tall-tales about the alleged Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II “holocausts” are classic big-lies replete with absurd physical impossibilities, the sham “skeptic” MICHAEL SHERMER wants you to believe the cognitive illusion that they have been scientifically proven. To illustrate the machinations that Shermer has gone through in support of this guise, look at these quotes from his book – Denying History: “The purpose of this book is to… show precisely, with solid evidence… how historians know that it happened as it did… we must obey the rules of reason and apply the tools of science… This process is practiced by all scientists… historical scientists, geologists, paleontologists and archaeologists, to prove that anything in the past happened… We must review the physical evidence.”

Shermer furthers this glaringly transparent charade with these additional duplicitous claims in – Denying History: “To debunk the deniers, can’t we just go there and see for ourselves? The answer, of course, is “yes.” We can no longer ignore the deniers… We cannot remain silent anymore. It’s time to respond… We went to Europe to conduct research at… Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzec… We wanted to see for ourselves just what evidence there is at the camps and to take the opportunity to examine firsthand the claims… How is it that so much physical evidence can come to be doubted?

WHAT PHYSICAL EVIDENCE? – Over the years, there have been at least 4 claimed so-called “crime scene investigations” of Treblinka II, and a number of claimed investigations of the other 3 camps as well – yet to date, it can still be categorically stated that; archaeologists / forensic investigators have never located / proven the existence of even one mass grave at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor or Treblinka II that contains so-much-as – 1 / 1,000 of 1% – of the alleged remains –NOT ONE!

The other side of Shermer’s shameless attempt at deception is exemplified by these DELIBERATE OMISSIONS from – Denying History, the most blatant being these HERE: “It seems inconceivable that you were unaware of the existence of the two forensic investigations of TreblinkaOr did you suppress them? Long story short about these two claimed exculpatory forensic investigations: In August of 1944, the Soviets carried out a thorough “crime scene investigation” of Treblinka II, and their numerous excavations uncovered refuse pits – filled with burned and unburned trash. No mass graves were claimed to have been found at Treblinka II. Yet another forensic examination was claimed to have been carried out by the Poles in November of 1945. Their excavations allegedly began, as the story goes, in one of Treblinka II’s trash pits – which had been falsely identified as a “huge mass grave” by a so-called “eyewitness.” No human remains were claimed to have been found in the trash pits. As well, two dubious ground penetrating radar surveys of the camp have added to the abundance of scientific / archaeological fraud (the Polish excavation allegations remain unproven) and it is a fact that neither the Soviets nor the Poles ever proved that even an ounce of actual human ash or remains of cremated human bones existed in the camp. Polish investigator Zdzislaw Lukaszkiewicz even admitted after the so-called “crime scene investigation” that: During the work on the terrain, I found no mass graves.”

So now you know why Shermer shamelessly ignores the inconvenient fact that no mass graves have ever been proven to exist – at any time – at Treblinka II and what were once alleged to have been ordinary refuse / burn pits are now fraudulently being passed off as “huge mass graves.” You also now know that Shermer’s deceitful claims / allegations / insinuations have been thoroughly DEBUNKED: That is the only way to understand this subject. It has to be studied carefully. If you slow down and look at the logic, his illusion doesn’t work. Shermer has set up his argument in such a way that the ordinary methods of logic do not apply…This is like a shell game: you have to watch what he’s doing… The Shermer principle is not logic… The jumping together phenomenon is how illusionists produce their illusions.”

  

MASS  GRAVE  LIES  =  COGNITIVE  ILLUSION

 

 

The rules for laying claim to

THE  N.A.F.H.  CRIME  SCENE  INVESTIGATION  CHALLENGE TM  REWARDS

 

$1,000.00 – will be remitted for each one of the 75 claimed / alleged / insinuated “huge mass graves” of Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II – identified by The N.A.F.H. – that are proven to contain the remains of at least 19 people. ($100.00 will be remitted for each one that is simply proven to contain human remains.)

 

To begin the incredibly easy four-part process of laying claim to each reward (and to set any and all required rules and questions):

 

First – Potential claimants must contact The N.A.F.H. and submit their 50 answers to Part One of the – Mass Graves / Buried Remains Forensic Evaluation Form:

 

 

#1 – Has it ever been claimed / alleged / insinuated in orthodox historiography and/or the media that; during WW II, Germany constructed and administered four camps in Poland called Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#2 – Is it known – with the utmost certainty – that; during WW II, Germany actually constructed and administered four camps in Poland called Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#3 – Is it reasonable to doubt that; during WW II, Germany constructed and administered four camps in Poland called Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#4 – Has it ever been proven – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that; during WW II, Germany actually constructed and administered four camps in Poland called Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#5 – If your answer to question #4 is – Yes. – then; if you wanted to, could you post said proof on an internet website – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#6 – Has it ever been claimed / alleged / insinuated in orthodox historiography and/or the media that; in total, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of jews were transited to the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#7 – Is it known – with the utmost certainty – that; in total, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of jews actually set foot in the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#8 – Is it reasonable to doubt that; in total, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of jews set foot in the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#9 – Has it ever been proven – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that; in total, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of jews actually set foot in the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#10 – If your answer to question #9 is – Yes. – then; if you wanted to, could you post said proof on an internet website – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#11 – Has it ever been claimed / alleged / insinuated in orthodox historiography and/or the media that; in total, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of jews were murdered at the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#12 – Is it known – with the utmost certainty – that; in total, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of jews were actually murdered at the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#13 – Is it reasonable to doubt that;; in total, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of jews were murdered at the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#14 – Has it ever been proven – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that; in total, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of jews were actually murdered at the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#15 – If your answer to question #14 is – Yes. – then; if you wanted to, could you post said proof on an internet website – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#16 – Has it ever been claimed / alleged / insinuated in orthodox historiography and/or the media that; in total, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of corpses were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” within the boundaries of the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#17 – Is it known – with the utmost certainty – that; in total, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of corpses were actually buried in numerous “huge mass graves” within the boundaries of the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#18 – Is it reasonable to doubt that; in total, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of corpses were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” within the boundaries of the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#19 – Has it ever been proven – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that; in total, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of corpses were actually buried in numerous “huge mass graves” within the boundaries of the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#20 – If your answer to question #19 is – Yes. – then; if you wanted to, could you post said proof on an internet website – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#21 – Has it ever been claimed / alleged / insinuated in orthodox historiography and/or the media that; despite the passage of decades, legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators can still locate extant WW II era graves with the use of modern forensic science and geophysics – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#22 – Is it known – with the utmost certainty – that; despite the passage of decades, legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators actually can still locate extant WW II era graves with the use of modern forensic science and geophysics – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#23 – Is it reasonable to doubt that; despite the passage of decades, legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators can still locate extant WW II era graves with the use of modern forensic science and geophysics – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#24 – Has it ever been proven – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that; despite the passage of decades, legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators actually can still locate extant WW II era graves with the use of modern forensic science and geophysics – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#25 – If your answer to question #24 is – Yes. – then; if you wanted to, could you post said proof on an internet website – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#26 – Has it ever been claimed / alleged / insinuated in orthodox historiography and/or the media that; legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have located / proven the existence of numerous discernable / measurable extant mass graves within the boundaries of each of the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#27 – Is it known – with the utmost certainty – that; legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have actually located / proven the existence of numerous discernable / measurable extant mass graves within the boundaries of each of the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#28 – Is it reasonable to doubt that; legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have located / proven the existence of numerous discernable / measurable extant mass graves within the boundaries of each of the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#29 – Has it ever been proven – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that; legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have actually located / proven the existence of numerous discernable / measurable extant mass graves within the boundaries of each of the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#30 – If your answer to question #29 is – Yes. – then; if you wanted to, could you post said proof on an internet website – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#31 – Can you currently prove – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that; at least one of the 75 claimed / alleged / insinuated extant graves of Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II identified by The N.A.F.H. – has actually been located / proven to exist, in which legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have, via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented methodology – literally unearthed scientifically verified human remains – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#32 – If your answer to question #31 is – Yes. – then; if you wanted to, could you post your alleged proof on an internet website – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#33 – Can you currently prove – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that; within the boundary of each of the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – at least one of the 75 claimed / alleged / insinuated extant graves identified by The N.A.F.H. – has actually been located / proven to exist, in which legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have, via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented methodology – literally unearthed scientifically verified human remains – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#34 – If your answer to question #33 is – Yes. – then; if you wanted to, could you post your alleged proof on an internet website – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#35 – Can you currently prove – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that; all 75 of the claimed / alleged / insinuated extant graves of Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II identified by The N.A.F.H. – have actually been located / proven to exist, in which legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have, via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented methodology – literally unearthed scientifically verified human remains – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#36 – If your answer to question #35 is – Yes. – then; if you wanted to, could you post your alleged proof on an internet website – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#37 – Can you currently prove – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that; at least one of the 75 claimed / alleged / insinuated extant graves of Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II identified by The N.A.F.H. – has actually been located / proven to exist, in which legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have, via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented methodology – literally unearthed the remains of at least 19 people – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#38 – If your answer to question #37 is – Yes. – then; if you wanted to, could you post your alleged proof on an internet website – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#39 – Can you currently prove – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that; within the boundary of each of the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps – at least one of the 75 claimed / alleged / insinuated extant graves identified by The N.A.F.H. – has actually been located / proven to exist, in which legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have, via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented methodology – literally unearthed the remains of at least 19 people – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#40 – If your answer to question #39 is – Yes. – then; if you wanted to, could you post your alleged proof on an internet website – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#41 – Can you currently prove – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that; all 75 of the claimed / alleged / insinuated extant graves of Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II identified by The N.A.F.H. – have actually been located / proven to exist, in which legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have, via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented methodology – literally unearthed the remains of at least 19 people – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#42 – If your answer to question #41 is – Yes. – then; if you wanted to, could you post your alleged proof on an internet website – Yes. – or – No. – ??

 

#43 – The MAXIMUM number of the 33 claimed / alleged / insinuated – discernable / measurable extant graves of Belzec identified by The N.A.F.H. that you can currently prove – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that have actually been located / proven to exist in which legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have, via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented methodology – literally unearthed scientifically verified human remains; is no less than __?__.

 

#44 – The MAXIMUM number of the 33 claimed / alleged / insinuated – discernable / measurable extant graves of Belzec identified by The N.A.F.H. that you can currently prove – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that have actually been located / proven to exist in which legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have, via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented methodology – literally unearthed the remains of at least 19 people; is no less than __?__.

 

#45 – The MAXIMUM number of the 15 claimed / alleged / insinuated – discernable / measurable extant graves of Chelmno identified by The N.A.F.H. that you can currently prove – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that have actually been located / proven to exist in which legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have, via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented methodology – literally unearthed scientifically verified human remains; is no less than __?__.

 

#46 – The MAXIMUM number of the 15 claimed / alleged / insinuated – discernable / measurable extant graves of Chelmno identified by The N.A.F.H. that you can currently prove – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that have actually been located / proven to exist in which legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have, via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented methodology – literally unearthed the remains of at least 19 people; is no less than __?__.

 

#47 – The MAXIMUM number of the 16 claimed / alleged / insinuated – discernable / measurable extant graves of Sobibor identified by The N.A.F.H. that you can currently prove – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that have actually been located / proven to exist in which legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have, via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented methodology – literally unearthed scientifically verified human remains; is no less than __?__.

 

#48 – The MAXIMUM number of the 16 claimed / alleged / insinuated – discernable / measurable extant graves of Sobibor identified by The N.A.F.H. that you can currently prove – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that have actually been located / proven to exist in which legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have, via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented methodology – literally unearthed the remains of at least 19 people; is no less than __?__.

 

#49 – The MAXIMUM number of the 11 claimed / alleged / insinuated – discernable / measurable extant graves of Treblinka II identified by The N.A.F.H. that you can currently prove – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that have actually been located / proven to exist in which legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have, via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented methodology – literally unearthed scientifically verified human remains; is no less than __?__.

 

#50 – The MAXIMUM number of the 11 claimed / alleged / insinuated – discernable / measurable extant graves of Treblinka II identified by The N.A.F.H. that you can currently prove – with the same standard of proof applied in U.S. criminal courts – that have actually been located / proven to exist in which legitimate archaeologists / forensic investigators have, via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented methodology – literally unearthed the remains of at least 19 people; is no less than __?__.

 

 

Second – Potential claimants must then request and confirm receipt of the official rules.

 

Third – Potential claimants must then post their alleged proof on an approved website.

 

Fourth – If a potential claimant can get Michael Shermer to categorically endorse their eligibly submitted proof (by explicitly stating that said posted proof meets his own, Skeptic Magazine’s and The Skeptics Society’s expressed and implied standards of proof), the claimant will receive the promised reward. And please note that; if Shermer refuses to endorse an eligibly submitted proof – alternative methods for obtaining official endorsement are available – including the option of obtaining an affirmative judgment from a U.S court of law. (Why are true-believers so afraid of defending their self-deceiving belief in this transparent charade – from a witness stand?)

 

Note: The N.A.F.H. challenges any doubtful eligible potential claimant to a specific individual reward offer to accept a wager on its ability to prove that it has the ways and means to make good on the promised payment. To date, no one has dared to accept the wager, nor has anyone even made an attempt at laying claim to the cash reward offered for disproving the reality that – The C.S.I. Challenge is in fact backed by an association of financial supporters. And for those weak-willed true-believers who lack the courage, integrity and character to accept – The C.S.I. Challenge; The N.A.F.H. also offers – a cash reward for simply identifying / proving any untrue statement of fact found on this webpage.

 

Remember – if the alleged Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II “holocausts” really did happen, then there actually would be numerous discernable extant huge mass graves filled with the remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of people to prove it. So this is not a historical issue per se; this is about –SCIENCE – and all that is being done here is the common-sense act of simply asking to see the alleged “archaeological proof” that the weak-minded true-believers insist is so “undeniable.” (Remember also – legitimate scientists do not refuse to answer pertinent questions about their claimed discoveries.) If the so-called “scientific proof” for the existence of the phantom “huge mass graves” of Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II really does exist – as is deceptively claimed / alleged / insinuated – then the numerous cash rewards offered by The N.A.F.H. would be claimed in a heartbeat. And that is a fact that only a self-deceiving coward would refuse to admit<spanstyle=’color:maroon’>.

 

  

MASS  GRAVE  LIES  =  ARCHAEOLOGICAL  FRAUD

 

 

* * * * *

 

* The 33 so-called “huge mass graves” of Belzec (#1/1 though #33/33 of the alleged 75) are shown and numbered in the maps on pages 117 & 118 in this link here:

http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=9   (Click on the PDF Download Option.)

 

* The 15 so-called “huge mass graves” of Chelmno (#1/34 though #15/48 of the alleged 75) are shown in the map on page 167 in this link here:

http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=23   (Click on the PDF Download Option. Contact The N.A.F.H. for its grave numbering system for this camp.)

 

* The 16 so-called “huge mass graves” of Sobibor (#1/49 though #16/64 of the alleged 75) are shown in the map on page 7 in this link here:

http://sobibor.info.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Report-by-Y.Haimi-autumn-winter-2012-2013.pdf   (Contact The N.A.F.H. for its grave numbering system for this camp.)
* The 11 so-called “huge mass graves” of Treblinka II (#1/65 though #11/75 of the alleged 75) are shown in the map in this link here:

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/58004000/gif/_58004030_treblinka_464.gif   (Contact The N.A.F.H. for its grave numbering system for this camp.)

 

* * * * *

 

  

MASS  GRAVE  LIES  =  SCIENTIFIC  FRAUD

 

 

* * * * *

 

TRUTH  DOES  NOT  FEAR  SKEPTICAL  INQUIRY!

 

All information on this website constitutes a fair use of any copyrighted material as provided

for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Last updated on 2 / 17 / 16. All rights reserved.

 

For more information, contact – The N.A.F.H. at: treblinkafraud@yahoo.com

 

* * * * *

 

 

Why do people continue to espouse forensically refuted lies even after being

confronted with the incontrovertible facts that refute them? Because you can’t

convince a true-believer of anything – for their beliefs are not based on science

and reason – they’re based on blind faith and a weak-willed NEED to believe.

Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool critical thinkers – but rather;

Only to give self-deceiving cowards an excuse not to think at all.

* * * * *

A hallmark of self-deceiving cowards is their acceptance of

 authority as their truth – rather than the truth as their authority.

 

 


 

Rense.com


As Many As 150,000 Jews
Served In Hitler’s Military

10-31-3

 

(Reuters) — As many as 150,000 men of Jewish descent served in the German military under Adolf Hitler, some with the Nazi leader’s explicit consent, according to a U.S. historian who has interviewed hundreds of former soldiers.
 
Bryan Mark Rigg, history professor at the American Military University in Virginia, told Reuters on Thursday that the issue of soldiers of partial Jewish descent was long a somewhat taboo subject, overlooked by most academics as it threw up thorny questions.
 
“Not everybody who wore a uniform was a Nazi and not every person of Jewish descent was persecuted,” he said. “Where do they belong? They served in the military but lost mum at Auschwitz.”
 
According to the Nuremberg Laws of 1935, Jews or those of partial Jewish descent were unfit for military service, but Rigg tracked down and interviewed more than 400 former soldiers of partial Jewish descent — labelled “Mischlinge” (“half-caste”) by the Nazis.
 
He estimates there were about 60,000 soldiers with one Jewish parent and 90,000 with a Jewish grandparent in the Wehrmacht, the regular army as distinct from the Nazi SS.
 
“They thought ‘if I serve well they’re not going to hurt me and not going to hurt my family’,” he said.
 
However, on returning home from the campaign in Poland at the start of the war to find persecution of their families worsening, many soldiers classified as half-Jewish started to complain, prompting Hitler to order their dismissal in 1940.
 
But many of these so-called half-Jewish soldiers continued to serve, sometimes due to delays in the discharge order reaching the front, because they concealed their background or because they applied and won clemency for good service.
 
Many senior officers with Jewish ancestry won special permission to serve from Hitler himself.
 
“History is not so black and white. History about Mischlinge shows how bankrupt the Nazi racial laws were,” said Rigg.
 
SENSITIVE SUBJECT
 
While Germany has long been aware of men serving as soldiers who Nazi race laws should have classified as Jewish, most notably former Chancellor Helmut Schmidt and Luftwaffe Field Marshal Erhard Milch, Rigg’s large estimate has surprised many.
 
Die Welt daily called Rigg’s book “Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers” “one of the most important Holocaust studies of recent years”. The author was in Berlin to launch the German language version.
 
“The Mischlinge suffered the same fate in academic life as they did in real life. There was nobody to speak for them,” Rigg said. “People thought it could be misinterpreted, it would be like saying: ‘look they did it to themselves’.”
 
Rigg, who has served in the U.S. Marines and as a volunteer in the Israeli army, was moved to research the subject after he discovered his own Jewish ancestry while probing his family tree and after a chance meeting with a Jewish Wehrmacht veteran.
 
Many of his subjects were telling their story for the first time and in some cases their families knew nothing of their Jewish heritage. “They would talk their hearts out, telling me all about this schizophrenic story they went through,” he said.
 
He is convinced that most of the soldiers of Jewish decent were not aware of the Nazis’ systematic murder of Jews, noting that most half-Jews reported to deportation stations in 1944.
 
“Most say they do not feel guilty about serving in the military, they feel guilty about what they didn’t do to save their relatives,” he said.

Disclaimer
Email This Article

MainPage
http://www.rense.com

This Site Served by TheHostPros—————————————————————————————–

Before and after the “Holocaust”: Jewish population numbers in 1933 and 1948

By wmw_admin on November 30, 2013

Rebel of Oz — Nov 30, 2013

For over a century, the Jewish World Almanac has been widely regarded as the most authentic source for the world’s Jewish population numbers. Academics all over the world, including the editors of the Encyclopedia Britannica, used to rely on the accuracy of those numbers. Here is what the World Alamanacs of 1933 and 1948 had to say about the world population of Jews.

World Almanac 1933

World Almanac 1948

In other words, according to the World Almanac the world population of Jews increased (!) between 1933 and 1948 from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000. If the German government under Adolf Hitler had – as alleged – murdered six million Jews those losses should have been reflected in the Jewish population numbers quoted in the World Almanac.
The suspicions raised by above numbers concerning the veracity of the allegations made against the Hitler government are confirmed by the official three-volume report by the International Committee of the Red Cross, released 1948 in Geneva, according to which 272,000 concentration camp inmates died in German custody, about half of them Jews. The following article elaborates.

A Factual Appraisal Of The ‘Holocaust’ By The Red Cross

The Jews And The Concentration Camps: No Evidence Of Genocide

There is one survey of the Jewish question in Europe during World War Two and the conditions of Germany’s concentration camps which is almost unique in its honesty and objectivity, the three-volume Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War, Geneva, 1948.
This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral source incorporated and expanded the findings of two previous works: Documents sur l’activité du CICR en faveur des civils détenus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), and Inter Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War (Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by Frédéric Siordet, explained in the opening pages of the Report that their object, in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality, and herein lies its great value.
The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and Western Europe by the Germany authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify the Convention. The millions of civilian and military internees held in the USSR, whose conditions were known to be by far the worst, were completely cut off from any international contact or supervision.
The Red Cross Report is of value in that it first clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained in concentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the two categories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the second type as “Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German, “Schutzhäftlinge”), who were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the occupation forces” (Vol. 111, p. 73). These persons, it continues, “were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons.” (P.74).
The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permit supervision by the Red Cross of people detained on grounds relating to security, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained important concessions from Germany. They were permitted to distribute food parcels to major concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and “from February 1943 onwards this concession was extended to all other camps and prisons” (Vol. 111, p. 78). The ICRC soon established contact with camp commandants and launched a food relief programme which continued to function until the last months of 1945, letters of thanks for which came pouring in from Jewish internees.

Red Cross Recipients Were Jews

The Report states that “As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily. >From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1,112,000 parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps” (Vol. III, p. 80). In addition to food, these contained clothing and pharmaceutical supplies. “Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Flöha, Ravensbrück, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and in Central and Southern Germany. The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III, p. 83).
In the course of the war, “The Committee was in a position to transfer and distribute in the form of relief supplies over twenty million Swiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organisations throughout the world, in particular by the American Joint Distribution Committee of New York” (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter organisation was permitted by the German Government to maintain offices in Berlin until the American entry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of their vast relief operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans but from the tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases of relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.
The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions which prevailed at Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits there in April 1945. This camp, “where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75). According to the Report, “‘The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions. From information gathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy. . . two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. They confirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p . 642).
The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aid then ceased, and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile. However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.

No Evidence Of Genocide

One of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: “In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp …” (Vol. III, p. 83).
Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.
In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like the Vatican representatives with whom they worked, the Red Cross found itself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocide which had become the order of the day. So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff) – Incidentally, it is frequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in gas chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Report makes nonsense of this allegation. “Not only the washing places, but installations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by the delegates. They had often to take action to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged” (Vol. III, p. 594).

Not All Were Interned

Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population,” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination programme”, and with the claim in the forged Höss memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing “every single Jew he could lay his hands on.”
In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that “A large proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646).
Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. “The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries” (Vol. I, p. 645).
As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,” says the. Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued.
The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary,” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government of the United States … now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. I, p . 649).
Biedermann agreed that in the nineteen instances that “Did Six Million Really Die?” quoted from the Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War and Inter Arma Caritas (this includes the above material), it did so accurately.
A quote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of the International Committee of the Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross’ International Tracing Service) under oath at the Zündel Trial (February 9, 10, 11 and 12, 1988).

The above is chapter nine from the book “Did Six Million Really Die?”.

Source

Posted in Essential Reading, Hidden and Revisionist History, Israel, ‘Anti-Semitism’, Zionism and US-UK allies | 14 Responses


 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s