Global warming HOAX unravels…

Globalist science fraud engineered to control humanity, not save it

Mike Adams — Natural News Dec 2, 2015

The global warming being pushed on us by global governments is a science fraud. The satellite data purported to show a warming “trend” over the last hundred years has been fraudulently altered to show a warming trend where none exists.

What the data really show are an obvious cooling trend over the last hundred years (see below). But because this cooling trend doesn’t fit the globalist agenda of enslaving the population under a system of absolute behavioral control, the data had to be altered to fit the government narrative of global warming / climate change.

I used to casually believe the global warming narrative, but when I took a closer look at the data and motivations of those pushing the global warming agenda, it became obvious to me that global warming is a massive scientific hoax being perpetrated for political reasons.

I’ve just posted a podcast that explains the systemic fraud and deception being carried out by “climate change alarmists” in their effort to enslave all of humanity under globalist regulatory control that would dictate all human activity (including breathing).

In this podcast, shown below, I cover:

• The utterly false premise that any government wants to “help the people” or “save the planet.” History shows that governments only exist to expand their power, crushing freedom in the process.

• The fake media’s false narrative and why the mainstream media is nothing more than a puppet for totalitarian government.

• Why governments remain totally silent on the real threats to humanity such as Fukushima radiation, mercury in vaccines, fluoride in water, GMOs grown in open field experiments and the total medical fraud of toxic medications such as statin drugs.

• Why CO2 is a gift to the planet that can create food abundance and reforestation as CO2 levels rise.

• How governments destroy the careers of scientists who aren’t willing to perpetuate the global warming hoax.

• In what ways global warming “science” mirrors Adolf Hitler’s eugenics science from the 1930’s.

• How satellite temperature data was systematically faked to create the illusion of global warming where none exists.

• How “science” has now been almost universally corrupted by corporations and governments, abandoning the very principles of real science.

Listen to my full podcast here.

Source


The ‘97% consensus’ of scientists on climate change is complete bunk…

Mike Adams — Natural News Dec 14, 2015

Global warming icon. Click to enlarge

The brain-dead leftist media isn’t really in the news business anymore. It’s actually in the business of zombie control… with the zombies being, of course, the leftist libtard obedient propaganda swallowers who are easily fooled by sleight-of-hand trickery being paraded as science. (Then again, there are also CONtards on the right who are easily fooled by fraudulent “GMO science,” so the criticism deserves to be equally distributed across the political establishment…)

If you’ve ever has the misfortune of listening to the libtard leftist media, you’ve probably heard the claim — repeated like a mantra chant to Gaia — that “97% of scientists believe in man-made climate change” (or some similar paraphrased version of this fraudulent claim).

Fortunately, there’s a book by Mark Steyn that helps sort out the truth from the fiction. It’s called A Disgrace to the Profession and features short essays and articles by scientists who speak out against the global warming / climate change hoax being perpetrated on the world.

What follows is the shocking explanation behind the so-called “97% consensus” statistic being spouted everywhere by libtards and libtard scientists (and yes, the term “libtard” is intended to be offensive… especially to libtards…).

The 97% consensus claim is total science FRAUD based on selective editing of the survey data

From “A Disgrace to the Profession”:

An opinion survey of earth scientists on global climate change was conducted by Margaret R K Zimmerman, MS, and published by the University of Illinois in 2008.

Aside from his support from Dr Pantsdoumi, Mann often claims the imprimatur of “settled science”: 97 per cent of the world’s scientists supposedly believe in catastrophic anthropogenic global warming requiring massive government intervention. That percentage derives from a survey conducted for a thesis by M R K Zimmerman.

The “survey” was a two-question, online questionnaire sent to 10,257 earth scientists, of whom 3,146 responded.

Of the responding scientists, 96.2 per cent came from North America.

Only 6.2 per cent came from Canada. So the United States is overrepresented even within that North American sample.

Nine per cent of US respondents are from California. So California is overrepresented within not just the US sample: it has over twice as large a share of the sample as Europe, Asia, Australia, the Pacific, Latin America and Africa combined.

Of the ten per cent of non-US respondents, Canada has 62 per cent.

Not content with such a distorted sample, the researchers then selected 79 of their sample and declared them “experts.”

Of those 79 scientists, two were excluded from a second supplementary question. So 75 out of 77 made it through to the final round, and 97.4 per cent were found to agree with “the consensus”. That’s where the 97 per cent comes from.

So this is a very Michael Mann “reconstruction”: just as a couple of Californian bristlecones can determine the climate for a millennium, so a couple of dozen Californian scientists can determine the consensus of the world.

Nonetheless, the compilers also invited comments from respondents and published them in the appendices. In terms of specific scientific material, the hockey stick attracted three comments – one blandly positive, the other two not so much.

Wow, you mean the 97% consensus number comes from just 75 scientists that were hand-picked from an email survey?

Yep. Out of all the hundreds of thousands of scientists in the world, only 75 of them were selected to “count” for the climate change survey.

Not quite the “settled science” you’ve been told, is it?

So if I send out an email survey to 1000 people, and then I hand-pick the 75 responses I like the best, then can I proclaim those results to be “settled science” too? Will Al Gore champion my cause and demand billions in reparations from first world nations on my behalf?

Of course not. The very idea is total fraud. Yet this is the science fraud upon which the entire mainstream media and government climate frenzy is based.

It’s all just climate quackery.

 Sources:
.
.
.

Source


Ahead of climate summit, French use emergency laws to put activists under house arrest

Reuters — Nov 28, 2015

paris_a_battle_with_no_front

France has put 24 green activists under house arrest ahead of the United Nations climate talks, using emergency laws put in place following the Paris shootings, Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said on Saturday.

Cazeneuve said the activists were suspected of planning violent protests at the talks which kick off on Sunday, a day ahead of the opening ceremony, and run until Dec. 11.

The conference, also dubbed COP21, is seeking to agree a deal that signals a break with a rising reliance on fossil fuels, blamed by a U.N. panel of scientists for causing more floods, heat waves and rising sea levels.

“These 24 people have been placed under house arrest because they have been violent during demonstrations in the past and because they have said they would not respect the state of emergency,” Cazeneuve said in a speech in Strasbourg.

Following the Nov. 13 attacks on Paris in which 130 people were killed, the French government declared the state of emergency, banning public demonstrations and giving police extended powers of search and surveillance.

“These people have no connection at all with the terrorist movement, but our forces need to be totally focused on the protection of the French people,” Cazeneuve said, saying any serious public disturbance would distract police from their fight against terrorism.

He did not specify how long the activists would remain under house arrest, but French media reported that they would be confined to their homes for the duration of the U.N. conference.

Greenpeace France director Jean-François Julliard said that, to his knowledge, all the ecologists under house arrest were pacifist activists who had never committed any violent acts nor been charged with anything.

“We have the feeling that (the government) wants to stifle criticism from the militants, but they are going about it in the worst possible way, this is repression,” he said on BFM television.

The interior ministry said 312 people – including the 24 green campaigners – have been put under house arrest in France since the state of emergency was declared on Nov. 14.

(Reporting by Gilbert Reilhac and Geert De Clercq; editing by David Clarke/Jeremy Gaunt)

Source

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.