The Neocon Zionist Coup and Why It Matters to America

From Libya, to Sudan, to Iraq, to Afghanistan- Syria, Lebanon, Egypt and Iran.. Who benefits really from these conflicts? The answer is very simple: Isr


Why Judaism Isn’t Like Other Religions.


From The Jews to 911 to the 6 Million Figure – John Kaminski


Zionism’s Master Plan for World PowerEncJud_zionist-congresses-bd16-kol-1169-1170-rede-rassist-Herzl-Basel-1898A [Documented and foot noted]

This article is not intended to focus on the Jewish people, only the individuals listed.

Before the American Mercury Magazine came into its present ownership, it was owned and controlled by a noted patriot by the name of Russell Maguire. He was a man of wealth and intelligent business initiative.

He became alarmed over what he knew to be Zionism’s Master Plan for World Power. A documented research manuscript came into his hands and he had the courage to publish it.

Following its publication, he was the victim of attempted blackmail, physical threat, danger of assassination and the complete sabotage of his business enterprises. His life became so harassed that he left America for an isolated island home where he felt he could be safe from harassment, persecution and the risk of death itself.

Herewith is the Manuscript that this courageous patriot had the courage to reproduce.

A Chronology of the Zionist Master Plan for World Domination

Virtually all of the items included in this chronology are direct quotations from Zionists or from their books. At the end of this article there will be listed the various books, their authors, the publishing firms and the dates of publication. I. B. means “International Banker,” A. M. means “American Mercury,” p. means “page,” MMM means ‘Money Made Mysterious.”

Theodor Herzl published “The Jewish State.” It became the Zionists’ bible. The following exact quotes are from Herzl’s book:

1. “When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of all revolutionary parties; at the same time, when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse.” p.10.

2. ” . . . the longer Anti-Semitism lies in abeyance the more fiercely will it break out.” p. 4.

3.”Universal brotherhood is not even a beautiful dream. Antagonism is essential to man’s greatest efforts.” p. 42.

1. Lord Edmond Rothschild of London and Jacob H. Schiff of New York City, two of the Elders of Zion, got Theodor Herzl (of Austria) to arrange for the World Zionist Congress at Basel, Switzerland; 197 delegates met there and laid out a plan of World Conquest with plans for a World Government. Herzl, founder of Zionism, in opening the meeting, raised his right hand and repeated an ancient oath of the Talmudists:

“If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, may my right hand forget its cunning.” Herzl also said at this meeting: “We are one nation. We are neither American nor Russian Jews, but only Jews!” He also said: ‘With a few exceptions that do not figure at all, the entire press of the world is in our hands.”

2. Dr. Mandelstam said on August 29 at the opening of the Zionist Congress of 1897: “The Jews will use all their influence and power to prevent the rise and prosperity of other nations and are resolved to adhere to their historic hopes; i.e., to the conquest of world power.” LE TEMPS, Paris, September 3,1897.

3. The Zionist Organization of America was organized in 1897 with Richard Gottheil of Columbia University as its first president, and Rabbi Stephen Wise as the first secretary. Branches for women (Hadassah), and children (Young Judea) were soon organized. ZIONIST NETWORK, p. 32.

Dr. Mandelstam, professor of the University of Kiev, Russia, at Basel Zionist Congress in 1898 said: “The Jews energetically reject the idea of fusion with the other nationalities and cling firmly to their historical hope, i.e., of world empire.” THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY, by H. S Chamberlain, Vol. I, p. 335. Also p. 221 of DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION.

1. Theodor Herzl, the Zionist leader, went to see Abdul Hamid the Sultan of Turkey, to buy land for the Zionists in Palestine. When the Sultan said “no” he had a revolution on his hands Note later item in 1914.

2. Between 1900 and the outbreak of World War I (1914), the United States was flooded by large waves of immigration from Eastern Europe.

1. Because President William McKinley in the United States refused to be a stooge for the International Bankers, he was killed by Russian Zionist, Zolkozh. Presidents Lincoln [on Good Friday] and Garfield had been previously murdered.

2. Doctor Leopold Kahn summed up these sentiments when speaking about Zionism in a Jewish school at Pozrony (Bratislava) in 1901: “Jews will never be assimilated and will never adopt the customs or morals of strangers. The Jew will remain a Jew under all circumstances.” WORLD CONQUERORS, p. 21.

1. Lenin joins Trotsky in Switzerland on Editorial Board of Zionist publication ISKRA (THE SPARK). It was printed in Munich, Germany.

2. Kuhn, Loeb & Co. was one of the founders and chief financiers of the scandalous Panama Canal Co.

1. Dr. Simon Flexner, one of three busy brothers became director of laboratories of the Rockefeller Institute. AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1958, p. 105.

2. At the Sixth Zionist Congress in 1903 at Basel Switzerland Dr. Max Nordau, an Elder of Zion said we quote from the AMERICAN JEWISH NEWS, New York, Vol. 4, No 2, September 19, 1919, “Theodor Herzl has considered it his duty to maintain valuable relations with this great and progressive power (England). Herzl knows that we stand (in 1903) before a tremendous upheaval of the whole world. Soon, perhaps some kind of world congress will have to be called, and England, the great, free and powerful England, will then continue the work it has begun with its generous offer to the Sixth (Zionist) Congress in 1903. And if you ask me now what has Israel to do in Uganda, then . . . let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, the Zionist (1897) Congress, the English Uganda proposition (1903), the future World War (1914-1918), the peace conference (1919-1920) where with the help of England a free and Jewish Palestine will be created.”

“Like a mighty thunder these last words came to us, and we all were trembling and awe-struck as if we had seen a vision of old.”

The above speech was also printed in the FASCIST (London) February, 1937. The same speech has been mentioned in a number of books, including (on page 221) DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION, by the great educator, Edwin D. Schoonmaker, publisher, Richard R. Smith, New York City, 1939.

3. Speyer & Co., the Zionist banking house, gave Mexico a loan of 12 & one half million dollars and secured all oil concessions in Mexico. From then on intrigue dominated Mexico.

1. Kuhn Loeb & Co. (a Rothschild international banking firm) financed the war of Japan against Czarist Russia. (A planned revolution in Czarist Russia followed one year later.)

2. Chaim Weizmann commented as follows on Theodor Herzl’s JUDENSTAAT:

“Four years ago world Jewry was divided into two camps: one on the east and one on the west. And when Herzl arrived and said to us that we must unite Eastern and Western Jewry, we carried out this order accordingly. Our unity today is Herzl’s legacy to the Jewish people.”

Theodor Herzl’s JUDENSTAAT states: “Wir sind ein Volk!”Q”We are one people!” And today this is the only unity existing in a world divided into two hemispheres.

“We are one people despite the ostensible rifts, cracks and differences between the American and Soviet democracies. We are one people and it is not in our interests that the West should liberate the East, for in doing this and in liberating the enslaved nations, the West would inevitably deprive Jewry of the Eastern half of its world power.” Chaim Weizmann statement in WORLD CONQUERORS, p. 227.

3. International Workers of the World (IWW) starts promoting violence and trouble in U. S. Austrian-born Felix Frankfurter later was counsel for IWW anarchists.

1. Sidney Hillman (Schmoul Gilsman) was educated as a Rabbi. See WHO WAS WHO IN AMERICA, Vol. II, p. 254.

2. Abortive Revolution in Russia failed. It was led by Sidney Hillman who later came to the U.S. to direct “world operations.” Another leader in the same revolution was Leon Trotsky ( Leiba Davidovitch Bronstein). During the revolution the Rothschilds helped finance, they had their termites in Russia destroy and sabotage the oil wells and refineries. It took many years to offset this tremendous sabotage. It handicapped Czarist Russia some years later when “Planned World War I” started.

3. Intercollegiate Socialist Society formed. Felix Frankfurter, a founder.

4. A copy of THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION was recorded in the British Museum, in London.

5. We quote from p. 76 of THE WORLD AT THE CROSS ROADS, by Boris Brasol:

“According to the information of the LONDON JEWISH CHRONICLE, the contribution of international Jewry to the Russian revolutionary cause in 1905 reached the sum of #874,341. (Nearly $4,500,000 U.S.)

No wonder that Mr. George von Longerke Meyer, United States Ambassador to Russia during the Russo-Japanese War, stated in an official letter dated December 30, 1905, to Mr. Elihu Root, then U. S. Secretary of State, that:

“The Jews have undoubtedly to a large extent furnished the brains and energy in the revolution throughout Russia.”

Nevertheless, in 1905, the revolution financed by Jacob H. Schiff failed.

1. In 1906 a dissolution suit was brought by the Attorney General, for the U. S. Government, against Rockefeller’s Oil Company. The case was closed in 1908. The U. S. Supreme Court ruled against the Rockefeller interest in May 1911 and fined them $29,000,000. The State of Texas issued an injunction against the Rockefellers doing business in that state. William H. Allen’s book, ROCKEFELLER: GIANT, DWARF, SYMBOL gives some of the details of the Rockefellers’ prior questionable operations. When the Rockefellers maneuvered out of the fine of $29 million, Federal Judge Landis, who conducted the government trial, bitterly commented: “You can’t convict a million dollars.” AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1958, p. 104.

From the beginning the Rockefellers were financed by the Kuhn Loeb & Co. and other Zionist bankers. The Rothschilds advised and guided the Rockefellers. They had a deal to divide the world petroleum markets. See ROTHSCHILD’ AND ROCKEFELLERS: DEDICATED MONOPOLISTS, in the AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1958, p. 100.

2. In the JEWISH ENCYCLOPAEDIA (1906), we read:

“It (Schiff’s firm) subscribed for and floated the large Japanese war loan in 1904-1905.” THE ALIEN MENACE, p. 112.

3. The Rothschilds financed ALLIANCE ISRAELITE UNIVERSELLE, published in Russia and elsewhere in 1907: “Capture the press! Through it everything will come to you in the natural course of events.” Adolphe Cremioux. Founder, ALLIANCE ISRAELITE UNIVERSELLE, quoted from A. Shamakoff, ADDRESS IN DEFENSE OF T. DOKSHIN AND OTHERS, p. 36. Moscow: University Printing Office, 1907.

1. Labor Zionist Organization of America Q Poale Zion – was organized in the U. S. to shape labor activities.

2. “There was another great crisis when the Knickerbocker Trust failed because manipulators of the millionaire class wilfully created a run on the banks, from which they emerged incomparably more powerful, having bought up the stock of the ruined victims which held to resell at par. At the same time the Steel Trust was able to complete its absolute monopoly. Solomon Loeb of Kuhn Loeb & Co., was a member of the Knickerbocker Trust.” DEADLIER THAN THE H. BOMB, p. 45.

1. The Socialists financed by the International Banking group said they would, in the future, “bury the whole capitalist system.”

2. On advice of the Rothschilds the Belgian Government acquires the Belgian Congo. Edward Seugier is sent to Elizabethtown. War, minerals and other reasons were mentioned later.

3. Abraham Flexner became education expert for the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1958, p 106.

4. Federal Council of Churches of Christ organized at suggestion of Rothschild. Rockefeller and Carnegie interests active in it. Their Foundations later flow funds into it. 75 per cent of its finances have come from sources outside of its church membership. Congregations don’t vote. “Selected” delegates meet only once each four years.

5. During a heated Congressional investigation into white slavery, The American Jewish Congress was formed. See p. 96, INTERNATIONAL JEW by Henry Ford, Sr. During years that followed, the AJC and Federal Council of Churches were to work closely together on many projects.

1. Walter Rathenau, Zionist, Financial Dictator of Germany, selected by International Bankers after World War I in THE WIERNER FREE PRESSE,

December 25, 1909: “Only 300 men, each of whom knows all the others, govern the fate of Europe. They elect their successors from their entourage. These Jews have the means in their hands of putting an end to the form of any State which they find unreasonable.”

2. THE UNSEEN EMPIRE OF FINANCE, a carefully documented research book by E. Alexander Powell, declared in The SATURDAY EVENING POST, June 19, 1909: “The European peoples are no longer under the Government of respective nations. They have passed under another scepter. They have become the subjects of another Power Q a Power unseen, but felt in palace as in cottage, in Russia as in Spain, by every parent and child, by every potentate and every laborer. No nation on the European continent has any longer an independence that is more than normal. The political autonomy of every one of them has been surrendered to the will of a despotism before which every kingdom and empire and republic fawns in the most abject subserviency.” Above also in ZIONIST NETWORK, p. 6, by Senator Jack B. Tenney.

1. “Mr. Paul Warburg was brother-in-law to Mr. Jacob H. Schiff. Warburg was born in Germany. His brothers conduct the powerful German banking house of M. Warburg and Company, Hamburg, financing the German shipping industry and controlling the Hamburg-American and North German Lloyd lines. Herr Max Warburg, head of this banking house played an important part in German politics, particularly at the time the Kaiser fled to Holland. Dr. Carl Melchoir, a partner in it, was one of the five German delegates-in-chief at the Peace Conference at Versailles (1919), and in later years (1930) was prominent in the founding of the Bank for International Settlements. This was the central bank of the central International Settlements, the central bank of the central banks established in Switzerland, which has been internationalized in peace and war alike, it pays no taxes, and it is above and beyond all law.” ALL THESE THINGS, by A. N. Field, p. 5.

2. Correspondence of the Rothschilds to the German Kaiser reveals Rothschilds wanted World War I delayed. (They needed our Federal Reserve Act to finance World Wars.) INTERNATIONAL JEW by Henry Ford, Sr., P. 204.

3. The International Group running the Carnegie Foundation trustees’ meeting “discussed the advantages of changing our government and institutions through war.” (Later Alger Hiss was president of this “international” outfit.)

4. “I felt constrained to point out (to Kaiser Wilhelm II on his last visit to England in 1911) that the Jews . . . had captured and controlled the larger part of the German press. He did not dissent.” Herbert Henry Asquith, Prime Minister of England 1908 – 1916. THE GENESIS OF THE WAR, New York, 1923, p. 89.

5. The Zionist organization sent a German geologist, Professor Blankenhorn, to investigate the potentialities of the Dead Sea region in Palestine. THE ALIEN MENACE, p. 168.

1. Bernard Baruch ushered into the President’s office in the White House his very weak professor, Woodrow Wilson.

2. Richard J. H. Gottheil wrote that “The closer Jews are kept within the fold, the greater their interest in Jewish life and thought.”

3. The best pamphleteers, the ablest journalists of Europe kept on the payroll of the various financial groups, were feverishly preparing public opinion for the future conflict between the European countries. Boris L. Brasol.

4. ” . . . Finally it should be borne in mind that the press bureaus and the great Eastern dailies exert a disproportionate influence on the American press as a whole . . . The foreign news which came through these bureaus was primarily composed for the New York papers, so, in the last analysis, the control of the New York press meant the control of the entire American press.” Horace C. Peterson.

5. ” . . . The Northcliffe (Jewish-owned) press did more before and during the war to embitter and deliberately poison the English mind against Germany than any other agency.” Clinton Hartley Grattan.

1. Colonel E. Mandell House wrote a book, PHILIP DRU, ADMINISTRATOR David-Rex-Universe, See AMERICAN MERCURY, November 1954, p. 131 (Researchers say that E. Mandell House was an agent of the Rothschilds.)

2. President Wilson (during brief moments when he was not dominated by Brandeis, Baruch, Frankfurter, etc.) wrote “we know that something intervenes between the people of the U. S. and the control of their own affairs at Washington.” FAR AND WIDE, p. 327.

The Hidden Hand put across five related items in 1913:

1. Graduated income tax law was passed. (16th Amendment.) A fundamental rule, laid down by The Communist Manifesto, for destroying of society is “A heavy, progressive or graduated income tax.”

2. The Federal Reserve Banking Act was passed, December 23 Q two days before Christmas. It permitted aliens, through our privately owned Federal Reserve Banks to finance the world wars which were “planned.” Elihu Root blasted this dangerous act in the Senate December 13,1913. (See MONEY MADE MYSTERIOUS- 3rd Book.) 4,000 pages of fine print was later slipped into it! It was cooked up at Baruch’s Jekyl Island in a secret conference.

3. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was organized by B’nai B’rith. (Its pressure and intimidation record, and the sad events that happened thereafter, speak for themselves.)

4. The Rockefeller Foundation was established. Thereafter this outfit and the ADL were to cooperate. (Remember the 2 blades of a pair of scissors.)

5. U. S. senators would no longer he selected by the legislatures of each of the states. Thereafter senators would be elected by the masses. This gave the Internationalists and their Controlled Press control of the senators by their control of all communication media. They already had it on the Congressmen.

From this date forward, we were to be lied to, brainwashed and betrayed: Nationalism was thrown out the window for un-American internationalism. The money properly belonging to the citizen was taken from him by the Marxist graduated income tax and squandered by the internationalists through “their controlled government.” Planned and promoted wars followed.

1. As Zionists pushed England into war, U. S. had at the critical Constantinople post (Turkey) Henry Morgenthau, Sr., as Ambassador and Louis Einstein as its special minister.

2 Paul M. Warburg said, at a Congressional hearing: “I only decided to become a citizen after I was convinced the U. S. money system would be reformed.” THE HIDDEN EMPIRE, p. 63.

3. Five men who were later to head various governments (Lenin of Russia, Ebert of Germany, Branting of Sweden, MacDonald of England, Stauning of Denmark) met as members of the International Socialist Bureau of the Second International!

4. Trotsky was introduced and recommended to them (Kuhn, Loeb & Co) by the publisher of the . . . revolutionary newspaper, FORWARD of New York . . . Henry Coston, LES FINANCIERS QUI MENENT LE MONDE, Paris, 1955, p. 114.

5. “One by one the Jews are capturing the principal newspapers of America . . . ” From letter of Sir Cecil Spring-Rice (British Ambassador to U.S.) to Sir Edward Grey (British Foreign Minister), November, 1914.

6. At the start of World War I, Edmond Rothschild told Dr. Chaim Weizmann that “It would spread to the Middle East , where things of great significance to Political Zionism would occur.” FAR AND WIDE, p. 285.

7. Colonel C. Repington recounts a conversation he had (April 5, 1921) with Count Mensdorff, who was Austrian Ambassador in London in 1914, as follows: “Mensdorff thought that Israel had won the War; they had made it, thrived on it, profited by it. It was their supreme revenge on Christianity.” AFTER THE WAR, p. 155, Constable, 1922.

8. Lloyd George, who was counsel for the Zionists in England, was made premier of the English Government and chosen to “perform” during World War I. His secretary was Sir Philip Sassoon Rothschild. AMERICAN MERCURY – KNOW – December, 1958.

9. “The part which Jews all over the world play in white slavery is one of the foulest blots on our people.” JEWISH WORLD, March 18, 1914.

10. “Mr. Paul Moritz Warburg practically controls the financial policy of the Administration.’ Sir Cecil Spring-Rice, British Ambassador to the U. S. From ALL THESE THINGS, by A. N. Field, p. 5.

11. “Assimilation is national suicide.” Louis D. Brandeis before Menorah Society, Columbia University.

1. In 1915, while the U. S. was at peace, Bernard Baruch took part of his annual income of $2,000,000 to finance the training of soldiers to fight in a war which Baruch said he knew was ‘certain.” AMERICAN MERCURY Q October, 1956, p. 83.

1. After months of terrific battle in Congress, Louis D. Brandeis was confirmed as Supreme Court Justice. He is the uncle of Felix Frankfurter, who years later dominated the Supreme Court. Christopher Sykes, son of Sir Mark Sykes, (who was the Secretary of the British War Cabinet) wrote a book TWO STUDIES IN VIRTUE, and, referring to the Balfour Declaration and the, part played by his father in advancing Zionism, Sykes said, – on page 183 of his book:

“He (Mr. James MalcolmQMalkom, a Zionist) then told Sir Mark Skyes of a very curious and powerful influence which Zionists could exert. One of President Wilson’s closest advisers and friends was Justice Louis D. Brandeis, a Jew with the passionate Zionist faith of a recent convert.

“That Wilson was attached to Brandeis by ties of peculiar hardiness, because, so the story ran, in his earlier days the future President had been saved by this man (Brandeis) from appearing in a damaging lawsuit. It was said that Brandeis was regarded by Wilson as the man to whom he owed his career.”

(Researchers said President Wilson was involved in “moral problems” at Princeton University, that Samuel Untermeyer had some damaging letters returned to Wilson after Brandeis was put on the Supreme Court). Re: Mrs. Peck, we quote from others:

“Woodrow Wilson’s friendship with Mrs. Hulbert Peck (of Princeton, New Jersey) . . . lasted for seven years . . . It was wrecked in the end by gossip. The so-called Peck scandal furnished the zest for the whispering campaigns of two Presidential elections . . . Wilson had written hundreds of letters to the charming divorcee.” George S. Viereck 80.283.

“It seems that the Peck letters were finally acquired by the Wilson estate.” George S. Viereck.

“Mrs. Peck never demanded and Woodrow Wilson never paid hush money or blackmail.” (Edward Mandell House) Probably correct Q putting Brandeis on the Supreme Court researchers say was the price the American public paid!

2. “A note drawn up by the American official (intelligence) services and transmitted by the High Commissioner of the French Republic in the United States, contained the following passage: ‘In February 1916, it was learned for the first time that a revolution was being fomented in Russia. It was discovered that the undermentioned persons and concerns were engaged in this enterprise of destruction:

(1) Jacob Schiff; (2) Kuhn, Loeb & Co., Directors: Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mortimer Schiff, Jerome Hanauer; (3) Guggenheim; (4) Max Breitung.” (From the American Consulate, Elbridge D. Rand, American Consul, Geneva, Switzerland, dated January 21, 1929.) National Archives, Dept. of State, Decimal File, 1910-1929, No. 861.4016/325.

3. Of the 63 delegates of the Committee of Russian Revolutionists that met in New York City, 50 were veterans of the 1905 revolution.

4. Zionists secretly cook up Palestine “deal.” Documents available.

5. The notorious “Sunrise Conference” in Washington. The record of this sinister planning was suppressed. (In 1938 the enemy got our Senate Military Affairs Committee to hold a similar conference. Senator Bridges said in the NEW YORK HERALD TRIBUNE, March 2, 1939, “If the American people ever learned what was said there Q the nation would be shocked and stunned.” DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION, p. 312.

6. President Woodrow Wilson was re-elected on the slogan “He kept us out of war.” (At the same time, he and his foreign advisers were secretly taking steps to involve us in this unnecessary war.)

1. The Bolshevist Revolution was not, as it is called, a revolution, but actually an invasion. DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION, p. 210.

2. Rabbi Wise says (New York Times 3/24/17): “I believe that of all the achievements of my people, none has been nobler than the part the sons and daughters of Israel have taken in the great movement which has culminated in free Russia” (revolution). From speech of Rabbi Stephen S. Wise March 23, 1917 to the mass meeting celebrating the revolution in Russia.

3. (April) Jacob H. Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. made a public declaration that it was thanks to his financial help that the Russian Revolution had succeeded.

4. “I have just had a long talk with Simonds of the NEW YORK TRIBUNE. He is prepared to help us (Zionists) to speak with vigor, editorially, on our behalf, but I think a word of yours to him will be important.” Letter of Rabbi Stephen S. Wise to Justice Louis D. Brandeis – May 10.

5. We quote from the JEWISH COMMUNAL REGISTER of New York City: “The firm of Kuhn Loeb & Company floated the largest Japanese war loan of 1904-05 thus making possible the Japanese victory over Russia” . . . “Jacob Schiff financed the enemies of autocratic Russia and used his financial influence to keep Russia from the money markets of the United States.”

6. ” . . . The uprising of July 4, 1917, was intended to overthrow the Provisional Government according to the plans of Lenin and Trotsky. The revolutionaries were disconcerted by the intervention of a solitary regiment which had been withdrawn from the front and scattered themselves. Lenin escaped but Trotsky was arrested. Their cause appeared lost. But the Bolshevists had given proof of their courage, and a telegram arrived to bring them news of the financial support of Jacob Schiff, who was determined to push the Russian Revolution to the end. The importance of these funds placed at the disposal of Lenin and Trotsky in order to foment the Bolshevik insurrection of October, 1917, has not been fully realized. This action overthrew the Kerensky government and set up the Soviet regime. How these funds got to them is known. The United States Government published in October, 1918, a series of official documents entitled The German-Bolshevik Conspiracy.” Henry Coston, LES FINANCIERS QUI MENENT LE MONDE, Paris, p.114.

7. Max Warburg of Hamburg (Sept. 21) opened by cable an account at (Rothschilds) Nya Banken in Stockholm, Sweden for Trotsky (Bronstein).

8. October 17. Zionists dominated England and France, betrayed the Arab-Moslem people and bargained away their Palestine territories. Lawrence of Arabia, an Englisman who was loved, trusted, and respected by the Arabs, returned to the British Government the decorations they gave him. (Shouldn’t Eisenhower, as Commander-in-Charge of the U. S. Armed Forces, also return the valuable military decorations he received from Soviet Russia?)

9. ” . . . Wladimir Olaf Aschberg . . . acted as the intermediary (in Stockholm, Sweden) between Kuhn, Loeb & Co. in New

York City and the firm of Max Warburg (in Hamburg) when they were financing the (Bolshevik) revolution of October, 1917. Aschberg was the head of the Nya Banken in Stockholm and later, in 1921, founded the Russian Commercial Bank. Thanks to this institution he became in a sense the dictator of Soviet finances.” Henry Coston, LES FINANCIERS QUI MENENT LE MONDE, Paris, p. 115.

“In the match between these two heavyweights (the United States and the Soviet Union) the International Finance of the United States will have trained the adversary.” Comte de Saint-Aulaire, GENEVA VERSUS PEACE, London, 1937, p. 75) (Library of Congress: JX1975,S.32) (He was the French Ambassador to the Court of St. James, London, from 1920 until 1924.

10. From the great book WORLD REVOLUTION Q THE PLOT AGAINST CIVILIZATION by the famous English historian, Nesta H. Webster, p. 93, we quote: “In a word, the peasant inherited from the aristocrat; he was disinherited by the usurer. Here is the true history of the disinherited, not in France alone, but in Russia, in Austria, in Poland; everywhere that the worker lives by tilling his own soil the abolition of feudalism has led to the domination of the money-lender, and the money-lender is in most cases a Jew.”

11. We quote from Page 187 of TWO STUDIES IN VIRTUE by Christopher Sykes, as follows:

“Sokolow made a simple request, namely that the Zionist Committee should have facilities for commuications abroad. He pointed out they were an international body – should be granted Governmental privileges.

“It was agreed that the War Office and the Foreign Office would send Zionist letters and telegrams by way of Embassies, Consulates or Headquarters.”

12. Jacob H. Schiff, the leader of Zionists, finances the complete rewriting of the Bible provided it is done under Jewish auspices. See his book p. 63, VII, also AMERICAN MERCURY, July, 1958, p. 120.

13. On Good Friday, April 6, 1917, the conspirators got the United States to foolishly declare World War I on Germany and to become an ally of the Revolutionists who had invaded and now dominate Russia. (It was also on Good Friday, April 14, 1865 that Abraham Lincoln was murdered.)

14. “Official information emanating from Russia itself informed the world that Communism, while barbarously opposed to every form of Christianity, made it a crime for any comrade to utter a single word of reproach against the Jews.”

“The 1917 list of those who, with Lenin, ruled many of the activities of the Soviet Republic, disclosed that of the 25 quasi-cabinet members, 24 of them were atheistic.”

“Between the years 1917 and 1938, more than 20 million Christians were murdered by the Communistic government in Russia.”

“Between these same years, 40 billion dollar of Christian property was appropriated by the Lenins and Trotskys, the Zinofieffs and the Kemeneffs, the Litvinoffs and the Lapinskys – by the atheistic Jews and Gentiles Q both of Russia.”

“Those were the desperate days when Christians were not expelled from their native land but were the targets for the machine gun which beat out its tattoo against human hearts; incredible days when the altars of Christ were desecrated and the servants of Christ were massacred on every multiplying Calvaries.” From nationwide broadcast of Rev. Charles E. Coughlin, Sunday, Nov. 29, 1938.

15. Since 1917, Red Russia has been the land base for the conspirators. Later, evil men in the U. S. financed and industrialized it. AMERICAN MERCURY, January 1959, Mercury’s Opinion, p. 110.

1. ” . . . I think that a Jewish Palestine must become a war aim for America . . . ” Letter of Dr. Chaim Weizmann to Justice Louis D. Brandeis, Supreme Court, dated January 14.

2. Sixty-Fifth Congress, House Document 1868, Exhibit 243, “Paper Relating to Foreign Relations of the United States” contains a whole series of documents showing that the International

Bankers financed Lenin and Trotsky (Bronstein). Transfer of funds started in June, 1917. Document 9 shows that the international banking house of M. Warburg opened an account for Comrade Trotsky to purchase arms, etc. Also Document 12 shows transfer of funds for “agitation against England and France.”

3. Soviet Russia law passed. “From 3/1/18 on, the right to possess women having reached the age of 17 and not more than 32, is abolished. Women proclaimed to be the property of the whole nation. The former owners may retain the right of using their wives without waiting for their turn.” THE HIDDEN EMPIRE, p. 47.

4. The United States Secret Service (2nd Army Bureau) named the persons who financed the Bolsheviks in 1916. The State Department, under Jewish pressure, destroyed this report. As the report remarks: “All Jews.”

5. ‘We are living in a highly, organized state of socialism. The state is all; the individual is of importance only as he contributes to the welfare of the state. His property is only (his) as the state does not need it. He must hold his life and his possessions at the call of the state.” Bernard M. Baruch in THE KNICKERBOCKER PRESS, Albany, New York, August 8, 1918.

(This ties in with (Rothschilds) Alliance Israelite Universelle which sent out bulletins “Nationalities must disappear, religion must be suppressed. But Israel (i.e., Zionism) must not disappear.”)

6. The First World War brought to Edward Rothschild, and his associates, more than one hundred billion dollars of profit. THE SECRET WORLD GOVERNMENT by Major General Count Cherep-Spiridovich.

7. Bolshevist revolutionaries in Russia murdered adults and children of the royal family, and many others, thus launching their regime, in blood.

8. Bernard Baruch, testifying at a Congressional inquiry, said: “I had more power than any other man in the war.”

9. U. S. Government paid Col. E. Mandell House $60,000 for expenses in N.Y.C. (for 6 months, July 1 to December 31, 1918.)

10. Bernard Flexner joins Roger Baldwin and his counsel of Zionist delegation to 1919 Peace Conference. (Records of both of these men speak for themselves.)

11. How these subsidized alien revolutionaries, having invaded Russia, proceeded to murder and rob on a wholesale scale has been recorded by many persons who had the misfortunate to be in Russia during the Bolshevik Revolution. THE ALIEN MENACE, pages 113-114.

12. Those who wish to go further in the history of this plot against civilization should consult the books quoted; also RUSSIA’S RUIN, by Wilcox (Chapman & Hall, 1919). THE ALIEN MENACE, p. 114.

13. See MERCURY article, pages 115-ll6, February, 1958 entitled “Felix Frankfurter and Louis D. Brandeis.” On 3/2/18 they, Frankfurter from Paris and Brandeis in the U.S., were raising a million dollars (for Weizmann to use in London).

14. Very few Christians ever read THE WORLD SIGNIFICANCE OF A JEWISH STATE by Braintruster A. A. Berle. Berle and Herzl had much in common.

1. Of the making of the peace of 1919, Dr. E. J. Dillon of the LONDON DAILY TELEGRAPH wrote in his book THE INSIDE STORY OF THE PEACE CONFERENCE, Harpers, 1920 that the delegates to the Conference from Eastern Europe set down the formula: ” ‘Henceforth the world will be governed by the Anglo-Saxon people, who in turn are swayed by their Jewish elements’ . . . and who regard it as fatal to the peace of Eastern Europe.” Page 497.

2. Between 1919 and 1924, three million recorded immigrants came to the U. S., mostly from Eastern Europe.

3. Professor J. R. Commons of the University of Wisconsin testified before the United States House of Representatives Barking and Currency Committee in 1927 that a member of the Federal Reserve Board had told him that the great inflation of 1919 was deliberately created by the Federal Reserve Board. ALL THESE THINGS by A. N. Field, p. 6.

4. Council of Foreign Relations was launched by Rothschild and Rockefeller at the sinister Versailles Peace meeting. The following two groups were set up to do the job:

I. Royal Institute of International Affairs, London.

II. Council on Foreign Relations, New York City (U.S.)

Annual grants by Rockefeller Foundation provided a direct, continuous method of control of both organizations. Carnegie Foundation and later Rockefeller Foundation were to constitute a gigantic lobby and pressure group serving to brainwash, influence and warp (or ‘mold”) the various nations’ policies. Top officials were influenced to come to the Council of Foreign Relations for “advice” and “guidance.” See facts in reprint WEINBERG REPLACES BARUCH.

5. If you read THE INSIDE STORY OF THE PEACE CONFERENCE (Harpers) by Dr. E. J. Dillon, you will see the characters who put across the vicious Versailles Peace Treaty. It made a subsequent World War inevitable.

6. In the new constitution recently adopted in the USSR we have another interesting provision which bears upon this passing of Russia. The Christian religion has for centuries been the religion of the Slav, as it has been the religion of the other races of Europe. We have seen the record of hatred of the Bolsheviki and the Soviet Government in relation to that religion.

7. In article 124 of the new Soviet constitution we find the following:

“Freedom to perform religious rites and freedom of antireligious propaganda is recognized for all citizens.” Significant as this is, it becomes even more significant when taken in connection with a provision in the preceding article, 123:

“Any direct or indirect restriction of these rights . . . as well as any propagation of racial or national exceptionalism or hatred and contempt, is punishable by law.”

8. The following extracts are quotes from the testimony of those who appeared before the U. S. Senate Overman Committee. Also printed in DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION, per pages listed.

“The leaders of the movement, I should say, are about two-thirds Russian Jews.” William C. Huntington, Commercial Attache of the United States Embassy at Petrograd from June, 1913, to September, 1918. Page 69.

“In Russia it is well known that three-fourths of the Bolshevist leaders are Jewish.” Mr. Welsh, for two years a junior officer of the National City Bank in Russia. Page 269.

“When the Bolsheviki came into power, all over Petrograd we at once had a predominance of Yiddish proclamations, big posters, and everything in Yiddish.” Dr. Simons, Pastor of the Methodist Church in Petrograd, p. 142.

In the YALE REVIEW in an article entitled The World Menace, Mr. Henry C. Emery LL.D., former chairman of the United States Tariff Board supported this testimony. “No one who ever made a visit to Smolny Institute, when that was the headquarters of the Bolshevist government in Petrograd, could fail to understand how easy it is to get the impression that the Jews have at last seized power.”

9. Potent international financial interests were at work (at the Peace Conference) in favor of the immediate recognition of the Bolshevists. Those influences had been largely responsible for the Anglo-American proposal in January (19l9) to call Bolshevist representatives to Paris at the beginning of the Peace Conference . . . The well known American-Jewish banker, Mr Jacob Schiff, was known to be anxious to secure recognition for the Bolshevists . . . and Tchitcherin, the Bolshevist Commissar for Foreign Affairs, had revealed the meaning of the January proposal by offering extensive commercial and economic concessions in return for recognition.”

Henry Wickham Steed, THROUGH THIRTY YEARS, New York 1924 Vol. 2, p 301. Mr. Steed was the Editor of THE TIMES, London. Library of Congress D 397. S75.

10. Victor Marsden, the (London) MORNING POST reporter who spent many months in Russia, stated that “among the 545 leading Bolshevik officials there were 377 Jews at the birth of Bolshevism.”

11. The German people were robbed and weakened by inflation. As a result of the international bankers’ conspiracy, it took a billion-mark stamp (5 billion pre-war dollars) to send one letter in Germany.

12. British War Cabinet issues official “White Paper” listing Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and other Zionist bankers who financed Red Russian Revolution.

13. In March, Third International was organized by Zionists. See H. Fish Report.

14. March 1, Capt. Schuyler reported. Here are exact quotes from document in our possession:

“You will think I am hot about this matter (Bolshevism) but it is I feel sure one which is going to bring great trouble on the United States when the judgment of history shall be recorded on the part we have played. It is very largely our fault that Bolshevism has spread as it has….” From confidential report of Capt. Montgomery Schuyler, Chief United States Army Intelligence Officer, Omsk, Siberia, to Lt. Col. David Prescott Barrows, Intelligence Officer, American Expeditionary Forces, Vladivostok, Siberia, March 1,1919, p. 2. National Archives, Military Intelligence Files.

15. ” . . . The prime movers (for the recognition of the Bolshevists at the Peace Conference in 1919) were Jacob Schiff, Warburg and other international financiers, who wished above all to boIster up the Jewish Bolshevists.” Henry Wickham Steed, THROUGH THIRTY YEARS, New York, 1924, Vol. 2, p. 302. Library of Congress: D 397. S 75.

16. ” . . . Trotsky was furnished large sums of money in America and . . . sent to Russia.” Erich Ludendorff, KRIEGSHETZE UND VOLKERMORDEN IN DEN LETZTEN 150 JAHREN. Muenchen, 1936, p. 149. General Ludendorff was Commander-in-Chief of the German Army in World War I. Library of Congress: D 359. L 86, 1939.

17. “The collapse of these three Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia) in their old form represents a considerable gain for the carrying on of a Jewish national policy, and the fact that the same war, which brought about the world-wide recognition of Zionism, also brought about the fall of three anti-Jewish powers, is a unique coincidence which may well give cause for thought.” DER JUDE, Vol. 3, p. 449, Dr. Martin Buber, Publisher, Berlin 1918-1919.

18. The Communist Party was set up in the U. S. on September 1, 1919. William Z. Foster (wife, Esther Abramovich) became its first general secretary. THE DAILY WORKER, the Communist New York daily, began its first publication about the same time.

19. The Versailles Peace Conference imposed on Germany the harsh conditions that sent the nation reeling toward Communism, depression, and finally despotism.

20. Bernard Baruch was invited to become the Soviet Union’s peace-time adviser on industry and resources.

21. Dr. Weizmann said “we do not aspire to found a Zionist State. We cannot hope to rule in a country in which only 1/7th of the population at present are Jews.” FAR AND WIDE, p. 318.

22. In the hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Sixty-Sixth Congress, Document 106, p. 536, we quote:

Senator McCumber questions President Woodrow Wilson: “Do you think if Germany had committed no act of war or no act of injustice against our citizens that we would have gotten into this war?”

President Wilson: “I do think so.”

Senator McCumber: “You think we would have gotten in anyway?”

President Wilson: “I do.”

23. Poisonous propaganda started to flow into the minds of United States citizens.

24. “Jewish hopes for the future depend on two linchpins. One is the League of Nations idea, and the other is the British Government, and we need scarcely say that we refer to Jewish hopes in the widest application of the term.” THE JEWISH WORLD, London, January 15,1919 (No. 2392), p. 5

“There must be a proper lookout for the civic and political rights and the status of Jews in various countries unless there be established a Power above all nations . . . ” as above, p. 5.

25. “Peace” Conference in Paris in 1919 made the resumption of war inevitable, owing to its impossible financial clauses.

At this conference the chief financial adviser to the German delegation was Dr. Carl Melchior, partner of Max Warburg, whose brothers Paul and Felix were partners of Jacob Schiff, in Kuhn, Loeb & Co. The chief economic adviser to the American delegation was Bernard M. Baruch, the dictator of the all-powerful War Industries Board in America during the war and an associate in business of Jacob H. Schiff. The British economic delegation was headed by Lord Cunliffe, former Governor of the Bank of England and a partner in the international Jewish banking house of Goschen (ancestral cityQLeipzig, Germany). In connection with this conference, Lloyd George wrote in his memoirs: “They (the international bankers) swept statesmen, politicians, jurists and journalists all on one side and issued their orders with an imperiousness of absolute monarchs who knew that there was no appeal from their ruthless decrees.” DEADLIER THAN THE H BOMB, p. 47.

26. The second reason for large scale Communist exploitation of the United States was our traditional lack of any laws prohibiting or regulating immigration into the United states and our negligence or politics in enforcing immigration laws when they had been passed (Chapter II, IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA.) “The illegal entry of aliens into the United State] is one of the most serious and difficult problems confronting the Immigration and Naturalization Service . . . Since the end of World War II, the problem of illegal entry has increased tremendously . . . There is ample evidence that there is an alarmingly large number of aliens in the United States in an illegal status. Under the alien registration act of 1940 some 5,000,000 aliens were registered.” THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SYSTEMS OF THE UNITED STATES, pp. 629, 630.

The third principal reason for the Communist exploitation of the United States was the absence of any effective policy regarding resident foreigners even when their activities are directed toward the overthrow of the government. Thus in 1950 several hundreds of thousands of foreigners, among the millions illegally in this country, were arrested and released for want of adequate provisions for deporting them.

As shown in Chapter II, “persons of Khazar background or traditions had entered the United States in large numbers in the waves of immigration between 1880 and the outbreak of World War I in 1914. The Soviet seizure of Russia took place in 1917, however, and the hey-clay for Communist-inclined immigrants from Eastern Europe was the five-year period between the end of World War I (1919) and the passage of the 1924 law restricting immigration. Recorded immigrants to this country in that brief span of time amounted to approximately 3 million and large numbers of newcomers were from Eastern Europe.” THE IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA by John Beaty, p. 45.

27. Lenin said: “The first World War gave us Russia, while the Second World War will hand Europe to us.” (Note the certainty of World War II. It came, “as planned” – 2O years later.)

The urging of dual loyalty by Dr. Nahum Goldman, who is president of the World Zionist Movement and also president of the World Jewish Congress makes real Americans very concerned. See AMERICAN MERCURY, June, 1959, This Is What They Said, p. 146.

Events That Have Confirmed
the Research Summarized in
the Preceding Manuscript:
1. Five million dollars worth of research by the late Henry Ford resulted in the production of THE INTERNATIONAL JEW. This almost cost Mr. Ford his life and his company.

2. The Outline is consistent with the PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION, smuggled out of Russia and translated by a great English journalist. When the Jews told Mr. Ford that the PROTOCOLS were a forgery, he said: “I don’t believe they are a forgery, but whatever they are they fit what is going on as the Jew attempts to gain world power.”

3. By manipulations involving the First World War and the Second World War, the Jews were able to steal $20,000,000,000.00 (Twenty Billion dollars) worth of real estate, drive millions of helpless Arabs Q both Christian and Moslem Q into a desert to starve, die and suffer and establish what intelligent observers refer to as the counterfeit State of Israel. In the fulfillment of this project, they indulged in genocide, napalm slaughter and every known form of barbarism that could be meted out to an oppressed and defeated people.

4. In 1967 they seized the entire Holy Land and invaded Jordan and Egypt and announced their purpose through their Number One Zionist spokesman, Ben-Gurion, who said, “We shall make of this the Supreme Court of Mankind.”

5. Although the Jew Zionists helped create the United Nations, they fouled their own brood and they were completely condemned by the United Nations, representing the reaction and the awakening of world-wide sentiment.

6. Jew Zionists have organized a world-wide screaming and complaining campaign against the Soviet Union because of its alleged mistreatment of the Jews. There is no way to know whether this means that the Jews have now ‘fouled their brood’ in the Soviet Union or whether it is a false front to mislead the world in preparation for the day when the Soviet Union will join with the Zionists in subduing the Arabs and capturing two-thirds of the world’s oil supply. It is important, however, that every reader of this manuscript have a photostatic copy of the Report of Military Intelligence referred to in Item 7 on Page 29 which reveals that out of approximately 300 commissars in the first Communist government of Russia, 284 were Jews from New York and scattered portions of America.


The following books are listed in the same order as they were mentioned in above article.

THE JEWISH STATE by Theodor Herzl, 1896,

ZIONIST NETWORK by Senator Jack B. Tenney, Standard Publications, P. O. Box 2003, Sacramento, California


DEMOCRACY AND WORLD DOMINION by Edwin D. Schoonmaker, Richard R. Smith, New York, 1939

THE WORLD CONQUERORS by Louis Marschalko, Joseph Sueli Publications, London, 1958

THE WORLD AT THE CROSS ROADS by Boris Brasol, Boston, 1921. . . ROCKEFELLER: GIANT, DWARF, SYMBOL by William H. Allen, Institute for Public Service, New York, 1930


DEADLIER THAN THE H-BOMB by Commander Leonard Young…





THE ALIEN MENACE by Lt. Colonel A. H. Lane, Boswell Printing & Publishing Co., Ltd., 10 Essex St. Strand, London, W. C. 1, 1932


FAR AND WIDE by Douglas Reed, Jonathan Cape, 30 Bedford Square, London, 1951

THE HIDDEN EMPIRE, published in London

AFTER THE WAR, published by Constable in 1922

TWO STUDIES IN VIRTUE by Christopher Sykes


GENEVA VERSUS PEACE by Comte de Saint-Aulaire, London, 1937



THE SECRET WORLD GOVERNMENT by Major General Count Cherep-Spiridovich, New York, 1921



THROUGH THIRTY YEARS by Henry Wickham Steed, New York 1924


DER JUDE by Dr. Martin Buber, Publisher, Berlin, Vol. 3 1918-19 .


Disclaimer: The opinions rendered are the authors and not necessarily those of this website or 6 Million Fairy Tales

Christianity and its False Prophets

Sorcery and Witchcraft: Christianity’s Celebrity Prophets

July 28, 2016


The Church has made False Idols of Prophecy Celebrities who are identified in the Comment below.
“If they were ever to fervently call out by name the wicked rulers of our modern era, they would be stripped of their fame and fortune in an instant.”
Jason Charles is the Filmmaker behind 9-11- Core of Corruption, (reviewed here.) He also came out with a film called Christ Alone that destroys many of the topics I talk about. 
By Jason Charles 
(Excerpt by
Many people go around from church to church … talking about the latest and greatest piece of prophetic insight. That’s because there’s no risk preaching this prophecy stuff to Christian congregations; in fact, just the opposite. That’s because these modern Christians eat it up and spend billions of dollar annually on the media and books produced by these neo fortune tellers.
 They are celebrity prophets, people love them and  hang on to their every word. With every new crazy theory and book they produce they get richer and richer. These are not prophets, they tickle ears, and are allowed their platforms and space. If they were ever to fervently call out by name the wicked rulers of our modern era, they would be stripped of their fame and fortune in an instant. The life of a prophet, because of their relentless pronouncement of truth to power becomes synonymous with official persecution and the ire of the wicked culture.
Foretelling, something that is finalized in, and speaks only of Christ alone should be a dead art, but instead it has become mysterious, captivating and even a lucrative occupation, exactly how the false prophets and sorcerers where in the days of the wicked kings of Israel.
So if these celebrity prophets are literally interpreting signs in the heavens (Bloodmoons), uncovering hidden, supposed verses with prophetic truths (numerology, and Bible Codes), and layering prophecy verses onto current events (Foretelling) what is it they are actually doing? They are engaging in sorcery and witchcraft. God says these people are a curse and that he will make their knowledge foolish.
“Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the LORD that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself; That frustrateth the tokens of the liars, and maketh diviners mad; that turneth wise men backward, and maketh their knowledge foolish.” Isaiah 44:24-25
God speaking through the Prophet Jeremiah discerned their intents and called these types “lying prophets” that speak from their own deceitful hearts.
“How long shall [this] be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, [they are] prophets of the deceit of their own heart.”  – Jeremiah 23:26
If you truly think that there is a role for “foretelling” type prophecy, then you must believe the final word, prophecy and life of Christ Jesus must not be sufficient and somehow you can add something to the scriptural record.
This is a blasphemy and heresy and should be a convicting realization for anyone who is obsessed with these things. Charismatics, Mormons and other false religions that emphasis miraculous signs and knowledge over the principles of scripture are in God’s eyes liars and deceivers. He didn’t give them a “word”, He gave them Christ.
If you really want a up close look at the failings of these would be modern prophets and how they interact with the political scene simply look at the failed presidential candidacy of Ted Cruz. He was made out to be the next messiah by tele-vangelists and his family, and lost horribly showing the false nature of their prophecy. READ HERE They are a sorry lot to say the least.
The right use of prophecy is the difference between freedom or slavery within our society.
When the Christian church is wholly sold-out to the ear-tickling, prophecy pimps who foretell everything other than Christ crucified, they become fat, lazy, entertainment driven, Christians.
All they know how to do is feast on the latest fear-mongering prognostication on the radio or TV. They are caught up in the razzledazzle of prophetic speculation and mystery. This thinking has taken over the American church, and dominates the thoughts and worries of millions. Foretelling is done away with, Christ is sufficient.
We need to drop all this sorcery type foretelling that we see in the churches today. We need more people using their voices to call out the leadership of our churches, corporations, and political institutions. A calling back to the sound moral, and theological teaching and reasoning we once knew in this country.
Teachings that held this country together for well over 200 years now. Jesus called out the powers that be, he died at their hands, not the people’s hands. It was them he directed his words of warning too.
True prophetic teaching preaches the conviction of sin, the salvation of Christ Jesus, and the principles of Christian Liberty to a lost world.
Our nation would be so much freer if only Christians were demanding a return to moral instruction and teaching, instead of filling their minds with speculative drivel. The obsession with prophecy speculation in favor of moral instruction and chastisement is a net loss on our society.
As a result we have exactly the kind of pagan, profane and disgusting culture that sends us into the hands of God’s righteous judgment, just like the pagan nation of Israel in ancient times.
“But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain.
” Titus 3:9
First Comment by Glen:
It’s all a scam. Just another form of mind control and a way for another set of psychopath’s to line their pockets with the cash of the fools and uniformed.  The biggest fools of them all are the so called “Christian Zionist”. They have no clue everyone in the picture above and the heads of ALL major religions worship their true master Lucifer.
People also fail to see the importance of the 501c3 tax exemption for these “ministries”. The following quote is from the IRS web site. “To be tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, an organization must be organized and operated exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3), and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates.” In other words, all churches that use this exemption are basically forbidden from criticizing anything about the government. They have become nothing more than another propaganda wing for the government.
As long as we allow these scoundrels to keep us divided and fighting about who’s God is better, we will continue to be lead around by the ring through our noses. We will never be truly free and forever controlled. Maybe it’s time we started thinking for ourselves and realize our future and the future of mankind is in our hands alone. After all, we are all just outlaws on that long road to freedom.
Barbara identifies the imposters pictured above-
Henry:   I went to Jason’s web site “WakeTheChurch”.org and the first thing I looked up was his statement of faith. This same statement of faith would be found on every religious leaders web site he was criticizing making him just a different flavor of the same system. (I also noticed he recommended Steve Quayle as a link who posts many false and ridiculous prophesies on his web site).
But, yes,  I can identify most  of the false prophets.  Mike Murdock, who is on the bottom row right next to the logo “SO4J”, was one of Judy’s original handlers when she was used in rituals at ORU.  She remembered seeing him at Roy Clark’s ranch outside of Tulsa.  Ken Copeland (Oral Robert’s private pilot for a while) is another one who she was in a ritual with and told me it is one of her worst memories.  Blood splattered everywhere.  Ken is smack dab in the middle of the photo pointing his finger in the air. He also has been to the Vatican with Pope Francis.   Paula White is right below him and I believe that she is MK’d.   She has a condo in Trump Towers. On the top row two I don’t know, but the second one in is Rick Warren, Jesse Duplantis, Creflo Dollar,  Joseph Prince; T.D. Jakes, Sid Roth, Joel Osteen, I forgot the last guys name but he was the one caught in a sex scandal a few years ago.  I talked with a woman on the phone a few years ago who was used in a [satanic] ritual with Billy Graham and Rick Warren’s father.  The second row has John Hagee, Todd Bentley (from the Lakeland Revival scandal), Ken Copeland’s wife, Joyce Meyer and Benny Hinn.  I forgot the first guys name.  On the bottom row is Robert Tilton (look up the farting preacher on you tube), Rod Parsley, I forgot the guys name next to Paula White,  Mike Murdock and Marilyn Hickey.  Christianity today is like entering the twilight zone.   So few will ever be able to come out of the religious mind control programming, it’s so deep and entrenched, being passed on from generation to generation.

– See more at:


Emperor Constantine

Christianity is a copycat religion created by Emperor Constantine (for political purposes). (Incidentally, Constantine murdered his wife and his son, and later,  the Church made him a Saint.)

(For greater shocking revelations, see “Crimes of the Popes”, here) : )

Saint Constantine’s  copycat religion was based upon a myth (The Persian savior god Mithra, crucified 600 B.C. ?  400 B.C.?), which was based on other similar myths, all the way back to Chrishna of India (a mythical god that some claim was “crucified” around 1200 B.C.). There were 16 mythical crucifixions before Christ. The belief in the crucifixion of Gods was prevalent in various oriental or heathen countries long prior to the reported crucifixion of Christ.  Of the 16 crucifixions, most were born of a virgin and about half of them on December 25th.

At, take a look at the book “Beyond All Religion-Beyond religious SCRIPTURES and practices that support intolerance violence and even war, A PEACEFUL WORLD AWAITS”. Website: Included: How is this for religious intolerance? Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said, “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” Muhammad married a 6 year old girl. Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonism had 24 wives, one was 14 years old. Smith was convicted of fraud (of being an “imposter”- a con man), in a court of law.. Then he wrote “The Book of Mormon..”. The story of Moses is patterned after the story of Sargon the Great. Moses did not exist.   Christianity was invented for political purposes by the Roman  Emperor Constantine (“The Great”) in 325 A.D. based on the myth of Mithra (Persian savior god born on December 25th). Look at “Compassion Center” on Facebook. A wonderful alternative to religion.

Emperor Constantine-continued: There were too many religions in Rome in 325 A.D.  A Council was called in an endeavor to amalgamate the many religions of the Roman Empire into one.  Christianity plagiarized older myths and legends historicized to suit the Roman Catholic Church while combining the numerous religions existing at the time (Krishna, Horus, Mithraism, Osirian, Isis, and many other mystery religions).  For unity and to stop all the conflicts between the numerous religions…

Christianity was INVENTED. Eusebius (Bishop of Caesarea in Palestine  “Father ofChurch History“) attended the Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D. and was a friend of Emperor Constantine, who also attended and made the keynote speech. Constantine  instructedEusebius to organize the compilation of a uniform collection of new writings developed from primary aspects of the religious texts submitted at the council.  Eusebius has been described as  follows:  Jacob Burckhardt (19th century cultural historian) dismissed Eusebius as “the first thoroughly dishonest historian of antiquity”. He has been also described as “a political theologian”. He favored doctoring his history in his own words to “be useful first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity”. Edward Gibbon (18th century historian –“The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire”) dismissed his testimony on the number of martyrs and impugned his honesty At first, there was controversy about the new religion at the Council of Nicaea.  Some claimed it was a fiction and Christ was a fiction, but they did not prevail. .

(To be clear on this matter, I say don’t trust Eusebius’s  reports of the Apostles or how the Apostles died, and be suspicious of all of his writings.)  – Author Samuel Butler

Eusebius then arranged for scribes to produce fifty sumptuous copies to be written on parchment in a legible manner, and in a convenient portable form, by professional scribes thoroughly accomplished in their art (ibid.).

Bishop Eusebius

These orders, said Eusebius, were followed by the immediate execution of the work itself we sent him [Constantine] magnificently and elaborately bound volumes of three-fold and four-fold forms (Life of Constantine, vol. iv, p.36).  They were  the New Testimonies, and this is the first mention (c. 331) of the New Testament in the historical record. With his instructions fulfilled,  Constantine then decreed that the New Testimonies would thereafter be called the word of the Roman Saviour God (Life of Constantine, vol. iii, p. 29) and official to all presbyters sermonising in the Roman Empire.

He then ordered earlier presbyterial manuscripts and the records of the council burnt and declared that any man found concealing writings should be stricken off from his shoulders (beheaded).





In 391 A.D., Christian Emperor Theodosius I ordered the destruction of all pagan (“heathen” they were also called) temples. The Christian Patriarch Theophilus of Alexandria (Egypt) complied with this request. Seizing this opportunity, Theophilus exerted himself to the utmost to expose the pagan mysteries to contempt, the Serapeum also he showed full of extravagant superstitions, (and) the commander-in-chief of the troops in Egypt, assisted Theophilus in demolishing the heathen temples (and) then he destroyed the Serapeum. -Historia Ecclesiastica

The Serapeum housed the Great Library of Alexandria. Why there are no records of Jesus Christ?

Federic William Farrar

It is not possible to find in any legitimate religious or historical writings compiled between the beginning of the first century and well into the fourth century any reference to Jesus Christ and the spectacular events that the Church says accompanied his life. This confirmation comes from Frederic Farrar (1831-1903) of Trinity College, Cambridge:

“It is amazing that history has not embalmed for us even one certain or definite saying or circumstance in the life of the Saviour of mankind … there is no statement in all history that says anyone saw Jesus or talked with him. Nothing in history is more astonishing than the silence of contemporary writers about events relayed in the four Gospels.”  (The Life of Christ, Frederic W. Farrar, Cassell, London, 1874)

This situation arises from a conflict between history and New Testament narratives.  Dr Tischendorf made this comment:

“We must frankly admit that we have no source of information with respect to the life of Jesus Christ other than ecclesiastic writings assembled during the fourth century.” (Codex Sinaiticus, Dr Constantin von Tischendorf, British Library, London)

There is an explanation for those hundreds of years of silence: the construct of Christianity did not begin until after the first quarter of the fourth century, and that is why Pope Leo X (d. 1521) called Christ a “fable” (Cardinal Bembo:  His Letters…, op. cit.), and later Pope Paul III expressed similar sentiments, saying that there was no valid document to demonstrate the existence of Christ.  He confessed that Jesus never existed, adding that he was no other than the sun, adored in its Mithraic sect…”


You will be surprised:  From: :

What (your local) Church doesn’t know and/or wouldn’t want you to know,  if they knew.

It has often been emphasized that Christianity is unlike any other religion, for it stands or falls by certain events which are alleged to have occurred during a short period of time some 20 centuries ago. Those stories are presented in the New Testament, and as new evidence is revealed it will become clear that they do not represent historical realities.

The Church agrees, saying:

“Our documentary sources of knowledge about the origins of Christianity and its earliest development are chiefly the New Testament Scriptures, the authenticity of which we must, to a great extent, take for granted.” (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. iii, p. 712)

The Church makes extraordinary admissions about its New Testament. For example, when discussing the origin of those writings, “the most distinguished body of academic opinion ever assembled” (Catholic Encyclopedias, Preface) admits that the Gospels “do not go back to the first century of the Christian era” (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. vi, p. 137, pp. 655-6).

This statement conflicts with priesthood assertions that the earliest Gospels were progressively written during the decades following the death of the Gospel (sic) Jesus Christ. In a remarkable aside, the Church further admits that, “the earliest of the extant manuscripts [of the New Testament], it is true, do not date back beyond the middle of the fourth century AD”– (Catholic Encyclopedia, op. cit., pp. 656-7).

That is some 350 years after the time the Church claims that a Jesus Christ walked the sands of Palestine, and here the true story of Christian origins slips into one of the biggest black holes in history. There is, however, a reason why there were no New Testaments until the fourth century: they were not written until then, and here we find evidence of the greatest misrepresentation of all time.  It was British-born Flavius Constantinus (Constantine, originally Custennyn or Custennin) (272-337) who authorized the compilation of the writings now called the New Testament.

Yes, but what about references to the four Gospels supposedly before the 3rd Century A.D.?

For example: What about Tacitus, Roman Historian, who wrote about the persecutions of the early “Christians”?

Regarding Tacitus, (Senator and Historian of the Roman Empire) these writings supporting the persecution were mysteriously found in the 15th century in the forests of Germany, following a reward offered by Leo X for old writings, and following a history of forgeries in Catholicism:  In any case, there has been serious questions about the integrity of the famous passage about Christians.

From: Gordon Stein denied the authenticity of this passage, arguing: (1) no corroborating evidence that Nero persecuted the Christians (2) there was not a multitude of Christians in Rome at that date (3) Christian was not a common term in the first century (4) Nero was indifferent to various religions in his city (5) Nero did not start the fire in Rome (6) Tacitus does not use the name Jesus (7) Tacitus assumes his readers know Pontius Pilate Yes, but what about Josephus?

His reference to Jesus in Testimonium Flavianum has been claimed as a later addition, (Forgery-Author) not questioning the authenticity of the main work.



In part:

Josephus’s Testimonium Flavianum Examined Linguistically Greek Analysis Demonstrates the Passage a Forgery In Toto

From D.M. Murdock 
 Author of
Who Was Jesus?
 D.M.Murdock[at] (With gratitude to Dr. Paul J. Hopper for his review of this paper)
The passage about Jesus Christ in Jewish historian Josephus’s writings
 has been debated for centuries, as concerns its authenticity totally, partially or not at all 
. This brief “testimonium” is proffered by Christian apologists as the “best evidence” for the historicity of Jesus, but it has been declared many times to be a forgery in toto. A recent study by a renowned linguist confirms this analysis of the entire passage as an interpolation by a Christian scribe, likely during the fourth century or late

Yes, but what about Pliny the Younger’s letter to Emperor Trajan 112 A.D.(Pliny was not a contemporary of Jesus, and he never mentions “Jesus”?) Pliny the Younger (c. 61 – c. 112), the provincial governor of Pontus and Bithynia, wrote to Emperor Trajan c. 112 concerning how to deal with Christians, who refused to worship the emperor, and instead worshiped “Christus”.

What about that?

Charles Guignebert

Charles Guignebert, who does not doubt that Jesus of the Gospels lived in Gallilee in the 1st century, nevertheless dismisses this letter as acceptable historical evidence:

“Only the most robust credulity could  reckon this assertion as admissible evidence for the historicity of Jesus” –

Nevertheless, I was concerned about the possibility of far older Gospels when I was stating that Christianity was invented around 325 A.D., but the research thread leads back to Eusebius, the FORGER, (“Papias, quoted by Eusebius…”).

Eusebius was the dishonest Church Father historian of antiquity who made up a lot of Church history. we shall introduce into this history in general only those events which may be useful first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity”. The research thread (about older Gospels) also leads to the “spurious” writings of Irenaeus: .



What about  pre-nicene so-called “Early Christian” (Gnostic?) writings?They disagreed with each other, were riddled with conflict and forgeries, of questionable and confusing timing and origin , had conflicting opinions about supposed truths,  and were not coherent enough for an organized religion. So the myth of Mithra, the Persian Savior God, was chosen by Emperor Constantine and Bishop Eusebius as the model to create the new religion , Christianity.  What if there are references to Christ and/or Jesus in pre-nicene writings? That doesn’t mean Jesus or Christ existed.  What if there are references to “fairies” in pre-nicene literature?  That wouldn’t mean fairies existed,  prior to the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD or later, even if the Council claimed the existence of fairies and made it doctrine, with severe penalties for those who denied their existence.

Yes, but what about Church father Justin Martyr’s purported use of the New Testament gospels? From Acharya S., Biblical scholar: ( “No verbatim quotes or unambiguous citations from the canonical gospels as we have them appear anywhere in Justin’s extant works.” Matthew, Mark and Luke are never named by Justin; nor is John. Nor does Justin Martyr name any of the evangelists in any known text.

All of the Gospels were written by anonymous authors, not by the actual disciples .  In fact, the Church doesn’t even have the anonymous writings that purport to be written by a disciple that was written before the middle of the 4th century. “The earliest of the extant manuscripts [of the New Testament], it is true, do not date back beyond the middle of the fourth century AD”– (Catholic Encyclopedia, op. cit., pp. 656-7).

That is saying, they have no manuscript of Mark,. no manuscript of Matthew nor Luke, nor John, written before the middle of the  4th century.

Retired Episcopal Bishop says Hell is an invention of the church to control people with fear:

Information about Eusebius, Constantine, and Paul. FATHER EUSEBIUS, FORGER: (One view, for what it’s worth-a bit harsh) _______________________________________

US planning to keep military forces in Afghanistan for “decades”, to restore the CIA sponsored drug trade

US planning to keep military forces in Afghanistan for “decades”

Thomas Gaist — World Socialist Web Site Jan 27, 2016

An Afghan farmer collects raw opium from poppies in Balkh province, Afghanistan. Heroin production in the country has increased significantly in recent years. Click to enlarge

The US military plans to maintain a presence of thousands of US forces in Afghanistan for “decades,” unnamed senior US military officials told the Washington Post Tuesday.

“The US was supposed to leave Afghanistan by 2017. Now it might take decades,” unnamed US military leaders cited by the Post said.

The confirmation of long-term US troop deployments to Afghanistan has been prompted by the instability of the US-backed regime in Kabul, whose tenuous hold over the capital is threatened by insurgent forces including the Taliban, al Qaeda and ISIS, the US officials said.

Current Afghan President Ashraf Ghani is a US and NATO stooge imposed through a managed election geared to deflect popular hatred of the previous US- backed ruler, Hamid Karzai. Ghani was described by the US officials as a “willing and reliable partner” who can “provide bases to attack terror groups not just in Afghanistan, but also throughout South Asia for as long as the threat in the chronically unstable region persists.”

US officials added, “There’s a broad recognition in the Pentagon that building an effective Afghan Army and police force will take a generation’s commitment, including billions of dollars a year in outside funding.”

The US-NATO intervention in Afghanistan will also require “constant support from thousands of foreign advisers on the ground,” the officials said.

“We’ve learned that you can’t really leave,” an unnamed Pentagon official said. “You’re going to be there for a very long time.”

Unnamed Obama administration officials confirmed the White House’s support for the plans, saying that the US intervention is analogous to that in South Korea, where Washington has deployed tens of thousands of soldiers since the end of the Second World War to cement its domination over the Pacific Rim.

The Post report, which amounts to a de facto US government press release, comes amid a broader upsurge of escalatory moves by the US military in Central Asia, the Middle East and North Africa.

Last week the Obama administration signed orders authorizing the US military to expand its military operations in northeast Afghanistan in the name of targeting the Islamic State. US Department of Defense chief Ashton Carter announced further deployments of US ground forces to Iraq, pledging to put “boots on the ground.” US Vice President Joseph Biden declared that Washington is prepared to seek a “military solution” in Syria.

On Friday, US General Joseph F. Dunford said that the US is on the verge of launching “decisive military action” in Libya, in coordination with a NATO coalition.

Dunford’s statements have signaled “the opening of a third front in the war against the Islamic State,” according to a New York Times editorial Tuesday. The new US war in Libya “could easily spread to other countries on the continent,” the Times admitted, before calling for the US Congress to pass a new authorization to use military force.

With the US and European powers engaged in a competitive scramble over the redivision of the world, the announcement that US forces will remain in Afghanistan for untold decades underscores the centrality of the Central Asian region in the strategic calculations of US imperialism.

The US ruling class and military establishment seek to utilize Afghanistan as a permanent military outpost for operations throughout South and Central Asia. Washington is determined to project power throughout the entire Eurasian landmass as part of its campaign to destabilize Russia and China and foster conditions more suitable to US control over the world’s decisive economic centers.

On Sunday, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a prominent US think tank, noted, “Major geopolitical shifts and internal dynamics are setting the stage for possible increased great-power competition in Central Asia.” The Carnegie report calls for the US to “prioritize regional engagement with Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan” and “harness Russian and Chinese actions to advance US interests.”

The US military presence in Afghanistan is a key component in the global struggle against Moscow and Beijing, as US imperialism’s strategists openly state. As a result of increased involvement by Russia and China, “the region is becoming less hospitable to the projection of US power,” the Carnegie Endowment wrote.

Last April, the Obama administration released a plan, “An Enduring Vision for Central Asia,” laying out provisions to deepen US security and military ties to the region and build up “human rights” organizations.

US Secretary of State John Kerry followed up on the White House’s “vision” by visiting the region in November for talks with leaders of five Central Asian governments, establishing a new forum known as the C5+1 to streamline the collaboration of US-aligned forces in the region.

Central Asian states “have aided in the War on Terror and have the potential to serve as a bulwark to Russian and Chinese influence,” George Washington University’s International Affairs Review noted last week in a report, “Achieving America’s Vision for Central Asia.”

China’s energy-rich western province of Xinjiang has also increasingly become a focus for US imperialism’s network of State Department-backed NGOs. “Xinjiang Seethes Under Chinese Crackdown,” the New York Times warned at the beginning of January.

The Chinese ruling elite has sought to deepen its own involvement in Afghanistan, spurred on by the crisis of the US-backed regime. Beijing strives to insert itself into the US- and Pakistan-backed Afghanistan Peace Process, as part of its efforts to construct a Eurasian-wide economic and political alliance to counter efforts by the US to isolate the Chinese economy.

Afghanistan’s foreign ministry arrived in Beijing on Monday for week-long talks aimed at a political deal that would integrate sections of Afghanistan’s economic elite into the commercial and infrastructure network being developed by the Chinese government.

“A stable Afghanistan could become a critical transportation hub and market for Chinese goods, and another investment opportunity for President Xi Jinping’s grand economic plans for Central Asia,” the Times wrote in a report Sunday, “China Considers Larger Role in Afghanistan Peace Process.”

“The big backdrop is that the United States will have withdrawn most of its troops from Afghanistan with the antiterrorism mission unfinished,” Du Youkang of Shanghai’s South Asia Studies Center at Fudan University in Shanghai told the Times on Sunday. The Post report is a statement from the Obama administration and the military that, in fact, the US has no intention of withdrawing its forces.


Heroin Dealer in Chief. Afghanistan, Source of 90% of The World’s Heroin

In-depth Report:

A heroin surge is shocking and awing Americans, 165,000 of who will be killed the next ten years. How does 415,000 kilograms (913,000 pounds) of heroin from US-occupied Afghanistan get to US each year?

Opium Wars I & II were British troops forcing farmers in India and Pakistan, colonies of Britain then, to grow opium which Brits pushed on the Chinese to try to make China a colony of Britain too. In the 1980′s, CIA grifters flew weapons to Contras in Nicaragua and flew crack cocaine back to the USA . The DEA did nothing to stop CIA felons from dealing crack in the USA.

CIA organized, trained and armed the Mujahideen (later re-named Taliban) to fight a 1979 Soviet invasion into Afghanistan and to push heroin on Russians. CIA contracted NLC trucks to send weapons through Pakistan to Afghanistan and to bring heroin back. After Soviet withdrawal, Taliban took control of Afghanistan’s government.

Afghans (who earn $55 a month on average), given choices between starving, freezing or growing opiumthey get pennies a pound for, often choose the latter. The Taliban outlawed opium in 2000. Afghan opium farmland decreased from 91,000 hectares (1999) to 7,600 hectares (2001).

Why did US invade Afghanistan in 2001? Iraq was invaded because Bush, Rumsfeld etc. claimed Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Which was a lie. Another reason, Bush gets bored by peace. (Satan also gets bored by peace if I’m recalling my Sunday School classes correctly.)

September 11, 2001, nineteen terrorists (15 Saudi Arabians, 2 from United Arab Emirates, 1 Egyptian and 1 Lebanese) killed 2,977 people by crashing hijacked airplanes in US. The terrorists got their training at Huffman Aviation flight school in Florida. Government officials decided to attack, not Saudi Arabia where most terrorists come from, but Afghanistan. Why? The government narrative has been sketchy.

Afghanistan became the #1 worldwide producer of opium and heroin by 1995. The CIA created Taliban government exported opium and heroin to Iran, Russia and China addicting millions, causing enormous economic damages, heroin-fueled crime waves plus deadly epidemics (AIDS, Hepatitis C).

Have CIA officers recruited agents in Iran, Russia or China? Is it easier to recruit heroin addicts? Would CIA officers dangling taxpayers cash or heroin at addicts help to make them agents? US schools are mandated for 13 years, when we learn things like cause, effect, motives, means, logic, reasoning, deductive reasoning. Of course it’s easier to recruit addicts. Why not recruit sober agents instead, is it because sober people are not interested in working for the US government.

Afghanistan, source of 90% of Earth’s heroin, ended 90% of Earth’s heroin problems when Taliban outlawed opium in 2000. The reason for War in Afghanistan was because Taliban outlawed opium growing which ended economic wars (opium wars) against Iran, Russia and China.

The world’s heroin market collapsed by 2001, producing a heroin drought. War in Afghanistan was “to restore the CIA sponsored drug trade to its historic levels and exert direct control over the drug routes.”. The Afghanistan War was CIA retaliation against Taliban for outlawing opium.

There’s a tactic called ‘flatten tire fix tire.’ Pop someone’s car tire then appear to “help” when the flat’s discovered. Clever huh? A more evil variant of ‘flatten tire fix tire’ is hooking people on drugs, then appearing, cash or drugs in hand, when users need a fix.

More evil, physically torturing innocent people causing severe chronic pain (e.g. forcing innocent people to sit on the floor, legs crossed, hands cuffed behind their backs, banging their heads to the floor, repeatedly, snapping spines), then dangling painkillers until they become addicted, needing painkillers for chronic pain caused by US government-sponsored torture. There’re many layers to the onion which is opium war being waged.

Brits waged old school opium war, US government’s waging opium war now. 90% of Earth’s heroin comes from occupied Afghanistan. US government’s been occupying Afghanistan since 2001.

When investigating serious crimes, like heroin dealing killing 165,000 Americans a decade, means and motives are revealing. US military and CIA had the means to overturn Taliban’s opium ban (which they did) and transport tons of heroin into US each week. Motives point to whodunit, who’s transporting this heroin into US to kill 165,000 Americans.

A Revolutionary War was fought for rights like taxation with representation. Trillions were spent on War in Afghanistan because Taliban outlawed opium. 2,372 US Soldiers killed in Afghanistan. Thousands of Veterans committed suicide. Hundreds of thousands became disabled. Secret police agencies not saying what’s what means we don’t have taxation with representation. Again.


Can Americans have democracy, a nationwide ballot referendum to vote if we want to wage opium war against others and against US? Tens of millions of innocent lives were destroyed because of heroin from US-occupied Afghanistan. The War in Afghanistan began as an opium war against Iran, Russia and China, the tables are turning into an opium war against Americans on track to kill 165,000 Americans (2016-2026).

Americans, 5% of Earth’s population, take 60% of painkillers on Earth. USA #1 for heroin addiction now too. US government and corporate executives are waging opium war. Against US. Americans are themost drugged people on Earth.

US government installed Hamid Karzai, CIA agent, as Afghanistan’s President in 2002 to restore the drug trade. Ahmed Wali Karzai, heroin dealer, was Hamid’s brother. “The Afghan narcotics economy was a carefully designed project of the CIA”. “A convicted heroin trafficker, Izzatullah Wasifi, was appointed by Karzai to head an anti-corruption agency.” US government made Afghanistan into a narco state. By 2006,LA Times reported Afghan heroin flooding in, but wouldn’t investigate how. 1,000,000 people worldwide have been killed by heroin from US-occupied Afghanistan.

189,000 Americans were heroin addicts in 2001. White House reported 1,500,000 US heroin addicts by 2010. That figure shot up (2010-2015) to 2,500,000 heroin addicts.

Afghan opium spread from 7,600 hectares (2001) to 224,000 hectares (2014). US heroin deaths skyrocketed 1,779 (2001) to 10,574 (2014) and are on track to hit 16,500 in 2016.

Year #, Afghan opium hectares, # US heroin addicts, # US heroin deaths (by year)

Click for pictures of US soldiers guarding Afghan opium.

2,500,000 heroin addicts plus 2,000,000 casual heroin users means 1/70 Americans use heroin. Crime waves are surging, ruining families and neighborhoods, shocking and awing victims being robbed and sometimes killed by addicts craving another piece of heroin pie from US-occupied Afghanistan.

Hepatitis C, a deadly virus, is surging; users share needles. Sovaldi, a Gilead Biosciences drug, costing $84,000, cures Hep C. 200,000 users catching Hep C annually means $16,500,000,000 added profit for Gilead Biosciences annually. Donald Rumsfeld was Gilead Biosciences CEO before becoming Secretary of Defense in 2001.

Pure heroin costs $450/gram in the USA. Regular users take 400 mg daily, light users as little as 25 mg, heavy users a few grams. 1,000 Americans try heroin their first time every day.

224,000 hectares of Afghan opium can make 560,000 kilograms of heroin annually. $450/gram x 1,000 x 560,000 equals $252,000,000,000 cold hard cash annually. $252,000,000,000 makes the fattest 6-figure gravy train government salary look like chump change. $252 billion annually dealing heroin could supplement CIA’s Congressional financing (or be Plan B for CIA financing).

52,833 US heroin deaths occurred (2001-2014). US heroin deaths quadrupled (2002-2013), doubling from 2010 to 2013, and are slated to double again (2013-2016). Heroin deaths will kill 165,000 Americans (2016-2026). Plus thousands more from heroin-related diseases and heroin-fueled robberies and home invasions. $252 billion from Afghan heroin is blood money, your hands are covered in blood.

In 2013, an American died every 64 minutes from heroin, now, an American dies every 32 minutes. Americans being killed at a rate of 165,000 per decade by Afghan heroin is triple the 55,000 Americans killed in the Vietnam War (1965-1975).

Government officials, claiming War in Afghanistan was somehow supposed to make us safer against terrorism, which killed 2,977, need to answer how is killing 165,000 Americans saving 2,977Americans?

2,500,000 US addicts x 0.4 grams daily x 365 days/year equals 365,000 kilograms. Light users take 50,000 kilograms annually. US heroin demand is 415,000 kilograms annually. 166,000 hectares of opium are needed to make 415,000 kilograms of heroin. 1 hectare = 25 kilograms opium = 2.5 kilograms heroin.

DEA’s 2015 Heroin Threat Assessment focuses on 7% of US heroin from Latin America. Why’s DEA focusing on only 7%? Why’s DEA silent, dead silent, about the other 93%? They don’t want to upset the Afghan heroin cart.

(Approximately 3% comes from Southeast Asia or synthetic sources.)

Why are DEA bosses (tacitly) approving 90% of heroin in US from US-occupied Afghanistan? How high up in government does this heroin dealing racket go? Why did DEA do nothing (1980′s) to combat crack cocaine from Latin America flown into USA on CIA planes? DEA hasn’t been held accountable, while CIA grifters made billions dealing crack in US. The Treasury Department, another finger of the same glove, did nothing about billions in tax-free cash made by CIA felons. Tax evasion is a felony too. No red flags when CIA officers get megabucks in excess of their government salaries?

$252 billion a year worth of Afghan heroin is big business blood money. Overdoses are 40x more likely from heroin than other illicit drugs like cocaine; overdoses are 3x more likely from heroin than from pharmaceutical painkillers. If heroin users switched to pharmaceuticals, 110,000 Americans would be saved each decade. A restoration of the Taliban government in Afghanistan would end Afghan opium production, the heroin epidemic would end, and 165,000 Americans would be saved each decade.

Could US heroin come from anywhere but US-occupied Afghanistan? No. The small fraction of heroin from places like Myanmar and Mexico isn’t enough to feed the American heroin appetite. The White House declared 10,500 hectares of opium in Mexico and 1,100 hectares in Colombia produces 28,000 kilograms of heroin annually. The most USA can import from Latin America is 28,000 kilograms, not enough for 1/10 of US heroin addicts. The White House omitted mention of 224,000 hectares of Afghan opium.

Only one country on Earth, US-occupied Afghanistan, grows enough opium to supply the American heroin habit. Current facts and figures about countries growing illicit opium:

All countries growing illicit opium, other than US-occupied Afghanistan, can produce 198,000 kilograms of heroin, not enough for even half of US heroin demand. Of these 198,000 kilograms, Vietnam, China, Pakistan and Iran’s opium is exclusively for domestic consumption. The balance, 192,000 kilograms, that can come from Myanmar, Laos, Mexico, Colombia and Tajikistan, mostly goes to Asian, Latin American, Australian and European markets.

Most heroin in the US comes from US-occupied Afghanistan, there is no other physical possibility to explain where all this heroin comes from. There is no other mathematical possibility to explain where all this heroin comes from.

62% of Afghans are illiterate. There are no Afghan chemical factories. Acetic anhydride, needed to make heroin, is imported. Stopping imports of acetic anhydride stops the manufacturing of heroin. US government enabled (or facilitated) acetic anhydride imports. Who’s selling? Who’s buying? Purchase records exist.

US methaqualone (Quaalude) deaths dropped from 117 (1980) to 0 (1990). A Presidential scandalpredated methaqualone’s ban, when Dr. Bourne, White House Drug Abuse Adviser, wrote a Quaalude prescription for a White House Assistant. This drug scandal may have cost Democrats the White House in 1980. The success in outlawing methaqualone was outlawing chemicals to manufacture methaqualone. Likewise, acetic anhydride can be outlawed.

Indisputable facts: US invaded Afghanistan in 2001, has occupied Afghanistan since, Afghan opium spread from 7,600 hectares (2001) to 224,000 hectares currently, US-occupied Afghanistan is by far the #1 heroin producer worldwide, the Afghanistan War (longest war in US history) cost over a million lives, a trillion dollars and has destroyed tens of millions of lives.

How does heroin from US-occupied Afghanistan get to US? The simplest and fastest way is airplane. US military and CIA-chartered airplanes fly from US-occupied Afghanistan to US every week. People getting on military and CIA planes aren’t searched. People getting off military and CIA planes aren’t searched. It’s a simple matter of will if military and CIA people wish to bring heroin to US. They’ve gotten Hail Mary passes.


A CIA source confirmed CIA “big boys” are transporting heroin from Afghanistan to the USA. Before 2009, CIA heroin shipments were smaller and more sporadic. After 2009, CIA heroin shipments into the US were “green lighted” becoming larger and more regular.

Since 2010, US policy permits opium growing. Each Afghan opium hectare equals 15 US heroin addicts plus 1 American heroin death each decade. Kalitta and Aero are but two contractors which have routinely flown from US-occupied Afghanistan to US.

CIA people are not serving and protecting US. CIA people serve and protect themselves. Only. There are no checks and balances on intel agencies, they’re military or paramilitary (“just following orders”) and they repeat “national security” to try to ward off oversight and effective checks and balances.

CIA people were arrested burglarizing and bugging Democratic Party Headquarters at the Watergate Hotel to fix the 1972 Presidential elections. CIA people try fixing elections and picking politicians worldwide, US included. One Watergate burglar, Hunt, was involved with President Kennedy’s murder in 1963, when CIA did a coup in the USA.

Congressional hearings then oversight committees, with limited power, began after Watergate. Former Senate Intelligence Oversight Chair Rockefeller lamented “I only get what they want to give me”. Senator Moynihan introduced legislation to abolish CIA in 1991 and 1995, because CIA, a lawless secret police agency, means a US secret police state. CIA is incompatible with free democracy. Former Secretary of State Acheson warned about CIA, “I had the gravest forebodings about this organization and warned the President that as set up neither he, the National Security Council, nor anyone else would be in a position to know what it was doing or to control it.”

The list of who has the means to transport tons of Afghan heroin to US each week is a short list. Military and CIA.

US military may transport heroin, although there’s no large-scale history of military transporting drugs. CIAhas a history dealing drugs. CIA smuggled heroin (1970′s) in Soldier body bags from Vietnam. Much of the heroin flooding into US from US-occupied Afghanistan is coming in with CIA felons on CIA aircraft just as much of the cocaine that came into US from Nicaragua came in with CIA felons on CIA aircraft (1980′s).

The President is responsible for CIA. The buck stops with Obama for 35,470 US heroin deaths (2009-2014) and all crimes committed by CIA since 2009.

CIA has a history of harming, harassing, swarming, blackmailing, blacklisting, assaulting, murdering,poisoning, committing felonies, drug dealing, torturing, menacing, terrorizing, experimenting on people and worse. CIA’s been on a mass murder spree since before MLK’s murder. CIA is a cult of death. They’re thugs and killers.

CIA is an organization of grifters, professional con men and con women. 90% of CIA officers are in USA. Few CIA officers go abroad, unless there’s something like billions of dollars in heroin ready to deal. CIA people are psychopaths, thieves, prostitutes, pimps, sex traffickers, drug dealers, mass murderers and worse. They feel no remorse, psychopaths don’t have the capacity to feel remorse for their crimes. They fear getting busted and punished for their crimes. CIA people make national insecurity. They make more money and get more power for each new national insecurity and each new enemy they make.

To figure out whodunit, dealing millions of pounds of Afghan heroin to kill 165,000 Americans a decade, means and motives are key. Military and CIA foxes guarding the opium house are prime suspects. CIA people are grifters, they grift, lie, deceive, omit truth, con, trick, cheat, sexually assault, attempt to rape,rape, forced bestiality, promote prostitution, sex traffic, attempt to murder, murder, serial kill, mass murder, rob, steal, terrorize, menace, gang stalk, brutalize, torture, blacklist, blackmail, experiment on people, deal drugs and worse. What else does CIA smuggle besides drugs, anyone or anything can be smuggled on drug routes. CIA felons smuggled kilos of heroin from Vietnam to US (1970′s) in Soldier’s body bags. CIA felons make money dealing drugs. CIA dealing tons of crack cocaine in the USA (1980′s) was a dry run for CIA dealing thousands of tons of heroin from US-occupied Afghanistan (2001-present).

Is military dealing heroin too? Only way to find out is honest law enforcement monitoring and searching government people, planes and ships. State police maybe better suited since DEA has a history approving CIA drug dealing in USA, DEA’s been busy at sex parties, FBI approved millions of CIA felonies (1947-present) and often ganged up with CIA to harass, harm, terrorize, brutalize, blacklist, blackmail, torture (and worse) journalists, whistleblowers, candidates, dissidents, activists, clergy and a whole host of other Americans, MLK to present.

If investigated, CIA would take evasive measures like 3 card montes transferring heroin plane to plane (or ship) in transit. Some Afghan heroin is already routed through Mexico. CIA agent John Abbotsford stated “We run the Afghan opium trade.” Afghan heroin dealer Toor Jan described how heroin’s sold to government translators to government officials who ship heroin on government planes from Kandahar’s Military Airbase.

After 14 years of occupation, investigators can begin searching government people, planes and vessels and can monitor opium seedlings to heroin in transit. All that’s needed is honest enough investigators. Has the USA become too much of a Pablo Escobar-Scarface banana republic to accomplish that?

General Martinez took down Escobar’s cartel. People, like Martinez, can take down the CIA drug cartel the way Escobar’s cartel was taken down. If only a few hundred CIA “bad apples” deal heroin then there should be no problem. Afghanistan’s government in 2000 outlawed opium and within a year it was all but gone. Why can’t US and US “supported” Afghan government do the same now? How high up are heroin dealing profits going in US government?

Commander in Chief Obama can conduct full investigations and thorough monitoring of military and CIA. Or Obama can do nothing and have a legacy as Heroin Dealer In Chief.

Government people claiming American lives so sacred, using scare tactics and terror tactics to scare and terrorize us that a secret police state must be constructed, trillions in more taxes spent plus endless war to save 2,977American lives from ever again being killed in terrorist attacks, their claims are obvious lies and hypocrisy if they do nothing about 165,000 Americans being killed by heroin from US-occupied Afghanistan.

US government (DEA, FBI) protects CIA drug dealers and goes after their competitors (non-CIA dealers)gangster style. ISIS now deals some Afghan heroin. CIA, unable to win hearts and minds anywhere, lost some of it’s Afghan heroin trade to ISIS.

Obama singlehandedly controls the world’s largest known drug manufacturing, transporting and distribution network and Obama’s Central Intelligence Agency has an over 50 year long association with being the most powerful and dangerous global drug cartel.”

War in Afghanistan killed 2,372 Soldiers, many Veterans and 52,833 Americans from heroin (2001-2014). By transporting heroin from US-occupied Afghanistan to US, CIA’s not protecting Americans, they’re doing the opposite of protecting. CIA killed 55,105 Americans and destroyed millions of lives, so far, because of the Afghanistan War.

The buck stops with US Chief Executive Obama for what people working for CIA, an executive agency, have done since 2009. Every count of sex trafficking, promotion of prostitution, attempted rape, rape (raping underage boys on US bases), assault, murder, torture, US government sponsored terrorism, drug dealing, all crimes committed or caused by CIA are because of Obama’s actions or negligence. Stop the crimes. Enough is enough. Stop it already.

Obama’s mother worked in Indonesia, a CIA battleground in the seemingly endless war on communism, where millions of innocent people were murdered. Some say she was CIA, she stated she did charity work for charities like the Ford Foundation. Obama worked at a known CIA front company, Business International Corporation. Was Obama CIA? Putin’s man enough to publicly state he was KGB, can Obama publicly state if he worked for CIA?

President Bush was CIA Director. President Bush II, son of a CIA director. If 3/4 of recent Presidents were CIA before their “elections”, is CIA picking our Presidents for us (rigging ballots, sabotaging campaigns, fixing elections) like they did in 1972? Press freedom (USA #49) means looking beyond the windows (and window dressing) at who are the deep state corporate executives and unelected government officials, what they’re doing, planning, why, bribes, charities, lobbyists, speech and bookpayments, banks laundering their money and so forth.

This report’s about 2 parts of government which made war in Afghanistan (military and CIA), why (retaliation against Taliban for outlawing opium, to poison millions of innocent people with heroin and profits from a heroin dealing opium war), why Afghan opium fields expanded from 7,600 hectares to 224,000 hectares (to poison millions of innocent people with heroin, wage economic warfare and $252 billion annually dealing heroin), the explosion of heroin (from 189,000 to 2,500,000 US heroin addicts), US heroin deaths shooting up (1,779 in 2001 to 10,574 (2014) to 165,000 Americans to be killed (2016-2026)), means, motives and how heroin from US-occupied Afghanistan gets to US: CIA planes (and possibly military planes too).

What can be done: a new agency solely to investigate government criminality, outlaw Afghan opium and search government people, planes and ships. The many ineffective and corrupt people at agencies like DEA and FBI can be let go, new people with integrity can be hired. CIA can be abolished, their tasks re-assigned to State Department. State Police can assist searching people, planes, ships and investigating anyone exiting US government facilities for trafficking (drug sniffing dogs, ask questions like have you been in US-occupied Afghanistan, heroin capital of the world). Improved drug policy can reduce dealer profit motives, reduce drug impurities and inconsistencies (overdose causes), decriminalize personal possession like Portugal did and more treatment programs.

Afghan heroin killed 53,833 Americans (2001-2014). This 14-year Afghanistan War is one sick twisted and highly lethal US government failure of “keeping Americans safe.” Government actions and inactions in US-occupied Afghanistan killed 55,105 Americans (Soldier and heroin deaths). Obviously, government has other motives than “keeping Americans safe.” The Afghanistan War is lingering on for so long because of $252 billion cash annually from the heroin there.

Afghan heroin is on track to kill 165,000 Americans (2016-2026). In 2000, Afghanistan’s government, the Taliban, outlawed opium and within a year it was all but gone. Commander In Chief Obama can do that and if he doesn’t then beyond any shadow of doubt he’s the Heroin Dealer In Chief.

Tons of heroin from US-occupied Afghanistan get into US each week. Government planes have flown un-searched every week from US-occupied Afghanistan to US (2001-present). Commander In Chief Obama can bring about effective monitoring and searching of government people, planes and ships. Stat. As if 165,000 American lives depend on that, because 165,000 American lives do depend on that. If Obama refuses to effectively monitor and search government people, planes and ships, then no doubt he’s Heroin Dealer In Chief.

Obama has the blood of 35,470 Americans (heroin deaths 2009-2014) on his hands for either his willful actions “green lighting” heroin transport from US-occupied Afghanistan to US or his negligence in allowing these fatal felonies.

If this heroin epidemic coming from US-occupied Afghanistan hasn’t ended by January 2017, then Obama’s legacy will be Barack Hussein Obama II, Heroin Dealer In Chief. All previous drug epidemics came from drugs flooding in from sovereign nations abroad. This highly lethal opium war of a heroin epidemic is the first ever drug epidemic to invade US from a US-occupied nation, Afghanistan.

Payday, Bowing to Pressure: Between 1953 and 1992, the Federal Republic of (West) Germany paid out more than $35 billion in reparations to the Zionist state and to millions of individual “victims of National Socialism.”

West Germany’s Holocaust Payoff to Israel and World Jewry

By Mark Weber — April 2012 Institute for Historical Review

The passions and propaganda of wartime normally diminish with the passage of time. A striking exception is the Holocaust campaign, which seems to grow more pervasive and intense as the years go by. Certainly the most lucrative expression of this seemingly endless campaign has been West Germany’s massive and historically unparalleled reparations payoff to Israel and world Jewry for the alleged collective sins of the German people during the Hitler era. Between 1953 and 1992, the Federal Republic of (West) Germany paid out more than $35 billion in reparations to the Zionist state and to millions of individual “victims of National Socialism.”

How did this remarkable program get started? How lucrative has it been? What does it suggest about the “six million” figure? And what are its social and political implications?

Bowing to pressure

In September 1945, shortly after the end of the Second World War, Jewish leader Chaim Weizmann submitted a memorandum on behalf of the Zionist Jewish Agency to the governments of the United States, the Soviet Union, Britain and France “demanding” (in the words of the Encydopaedia Judaica) “reparations, restitution and indemnification due to the Jewish people from Germany” The western Allies lost no time in responding favorably to Weizmann’s demands. /1 The American government was particularly eager to have the Germans pay up. /2 As a result, the German government set up by the western Allies at Bonn in 1949 never had any real choice but to acknowledge the alleged collective guilt of the German people during the Hitler era and pay what was demanded.

Indeed, a major provision of the treaty of May 1952 by which the United States, Britain and France granted “sovereignty” to the Federal Republic of (West) Germany obligated the new state to make restitution. /3 West German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer laid the emotional and psychological groundwork for the reparations program when he solemnly declared to the Bundestag on September 27, 1951:

The Federal government and the great majority of the German people are deeply aware of the immeasurable suffering endured by the Jews of Germany and by the Jews of the occupied territories during the period of National Socialism … In our name, unspeakable crimes have been committed and they demand restitution, both moral and material, for the persons and properties of the Jews who have been so seriously harmed …

Adenauer went on to promise speedy conclusion of restitution and indemnity laws and announced that reparations negotiations would begin soon. Accordingly, delegations representing the Bonn government, the State of Israel and an ad hoc organization of Jewish groups began talks in the Netherlands in March 1952.

The representative of the Jewish organizations was the “Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, Inc.” or “Claims Conference,” a body formed for the sole purpose of demanding maximum reparations from the German people. The 20 member organizations represented Jews in the United States, Britain, Canada, France, Argentina, Australia and South Africa. Jews in the Soviet Union, eastern Europe and the Arab countries were not represented. /4

The West German government was under pressure to conclude quickly a reparations agreement satisfactory to the Jews. In his memoirs, Chancellor Adenauer wrote:

It was clear to me that, if the negotiations with the Jews failed, the negotiations at the London Debt Conference [which were going on at the same time] would also run aground, because Jewish banking circles would exert an influence upon the course of the London Debt Conference which should not be under-estimated. On the other hand it was self-evident that a failure of the London Debt Conference would bring about a failure of the negotiations with the Jews. If the German economy was to achieve a good credit standing and become strong again, the London Conference would have to be ended successfully. Only then would our economy develop in a way that would make the payments to Israel and the Jewish organizations possible. /5

Zionist leader Nahum Goldmann, President of the World Jewish Congress and chairman of the Claims Conference, warned of a worldwide campaign against Germany if the Bonn officials did not meet the Zionist demands: “The non-violent reaction of the whole world, supported by wide circles of non-Jews, who have deep sympathy with the martyrdom of the Jewish people during the Nazi period, would be irresistible and completely justified.”/6 The London Jewish Observer was more blunt: “The whole material weight of world Jewry will be mobilized for an economic war against Germany, if Bonn’s offer of reparations remains unsatisfactory.” /7

The talks culminated in the Luxembourg Agreement, which was signed on September 10, 1952 by West German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, Israeli Foreign Minister Moshe Sharett and World Jewish Congress President Nahum Goldmann.

A Legal Novelty

This agreement between the West German government, on the one hand, and the Israeli state and the Claims Conference, on the other, was historically unprecedented and had no basis or counterpart in international law. For one thing, the State of Israel did not exist at the time of the actions for which restitution was paid. Moreover, the Claims Conference had no legal authority to negotiate and act on behalf of Jews who were citizens of sovereign countries. Jews were represented in an internationally recognized treaty with a foreign state not by the governments of the countries of which they were citizens, but rather by a supranational and sectarian Jewish organization.

It was as if the Catholic citizens of the United States had allowed themselves to be represented in a treaty with a foreign government not by the U. S. government, but rather by some ad hoc supranational Catholic organization or by the Vatican. The Luxembourg Agreement thus legally implied that Jews everywhere, regardless of their citizenship, constitute a distinct and separate national group and that world Jewry was a formal party to the Second World War. /8

Nahum Goldmann, a co-signer of the Agreement, was one of the most important Jewish figures of this century. From 1951 to 1978, he was president of the World Jewish Congress, and from 1956 to 1958, he was also president of the World Zionist Organization. In his autobiography, Goldmann recalled his role in the negotiations and the remarkable nature of the agreement:

My negotiations with German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer and his associates, which culminated in the Luxembourg Agreement of 1952, make up one of the most exciting and successful chapters of my political career.

There hardly was a precedent for persuading a state to assume moral responsibility and make large-scale compensation for crimes committed against an unorganized ethnic group lacking sovereign status. There was no basis in international law for the collective Jewish claims … /9

In a 1976 interview, Goldmann said that the agreement “constituted an extraordinary innovation in the matter of international rights” and he boasted that he had obtained 10 to 14 times more from the Bonn government than he had originally expected. /10

The Payoff for Israel

The agreement meant economic security for the new Zionist state, as Goldmann explained in his autobiography:

What the Luxembourg Agreement meant to Israel is for the historians of the young state to determine. That the goods Israel received from Germany were a decisive economic factor in its development is beyond doubt. I do not know what economic dangers might have threatened Israel at critical moments if it had not been for German supplies. Railways and telephones, dock installations and irrigation plants, whole areas of industry and agriculture, would not be where they are today without the reparations from Germany. And hundreds of thousands of Jewish victims of Nazism have received considerable sums under the law of restitution. /11

Goldman said in 1976:

Without the German reparations, the State of Israel would not have the half of its present infrastructure: every train in Israel is German, the ships are German, as well as the electricity, a large part of the industry … without mentioning the individual pensions paid to the survivors … In certain years, the amount of money received by Israel from Germany exceeds the total amount of money collected from international Jewry-two or three times as much. /12

As a result of the West German reparations program, wrote Jewish historian Walter Laqueur:

The ships laden with German capital goods began to call at Haifa regularly and unfailingly, becoming an important — ultimately a decisive — factor in the building up of the country. Today [1965] the Israeli fleet is almost entirely “made in Germany,” as are its modern railway equipment, the big steel foundry near Acre, and many other enterprises. During the 50’s and early 60’s about one-third of investment goods imported into Israel came from Germany … In addition to all this, many individual Israelis received restitution privately. /13

It is difficult to exaggerate the impact of the program: the five power plants built and installed by West Germany between 1953 and 1956 quadrupled Israel’s electric-power-generating capacity. West Germans laid 280 kilometers of giant pipelines (2.25 and 2.5 meters in diameter) for the irrigation of the Negev (which certainly helped to “make the desert bloom”). The Zionist state acquired 65 German- built ships, including four passenger vessels. /14

Payments to Individuals

West German reparations have been paid out through several different programs, including the Federal Indemnification (or Compensation) Law (BEG), the Federal Restitution Law (BReuG), the Israel Agreement, and special agreements with 12 foreign countries (including Austria). /15 By far the most important of these has been the BEG indemnification law, which was first enacted in 1953 and revised in 1956 and 1965. It was based on a compensation law promulgated earlier in the American zone of occupation.

In the words of a background article about the reparations program that appeared in a 1985 issue of Focus On, an official publication of the Bonn government, the BEG laws “compensate those persecuted for political, racial, religious or ideological reasons-people who suffered physical injury or loss of freedom, property, income, professional and financial advancement as a result of that persecution.” It also “guarantees assistance to the survivors of the deceased victims.” /16

The BEG compensation law defined “persecution” and “loss of freedom” very liberally. It stipulated payments for Jews who had simply been required to wear the yellow star, even in Croatia, where the measure was ordered by non-Germans. Payments were also ordered for any Jew who was ever in a concentration camp, including the one in Shanghai, China, which was never under German control. The BEG law authorized payments to any Jew who was ever arrested, no matter what the reason. This meant that even Jews who were taken into custody for criminal acts were entitled to German “compensation” for “loss of freedom.” /17

The 1965 revision of the BEG specified that Germany was to be held accountable for measures taken by Romania, Bulgaria and Hungary as early as April 1941, if these actions had deprived the victims of all their freedom. The fact that these countries acted against the Jews in 1941 independently of Germany did not matter. /18

Significantly, the many Jewish survivors living in the Soviet Union and the other Communist countries of eastern Europe were not covered by West Germany’s BEG compensation program. /19 And, of course, Jewish “Holocaust survivors” who died before the West German compensation law (BEG) was enacted in 1953 or before it really became effective in 1956 also never received BEG restitution money.

By the end of 1980, a German government agency reported, the number of successful claims was 4,344,378, with payments reaching 50.18 billion German marks. About 40 percent of the claimants lived in Israel, some 20 percent were living in West Germany, and 40 percent elsewhere. /20 The Focus On article cited above noted that between October 1953 and the end of December 1983, the West German government paid out 56.3 billion marks on a total of 4,390,049 claims from individuals under the BEG legislation. /21

Nevertheless, the Atlanta Journal and Constitution stated in 1985 that about half of the Jewish “survivors” in the world have never received reparations money. “An estimated 50 percent” of the Holocaust “survivors throughout the world are on West German pensions,” the newspaper reported. /22 In addition to survivors in Communist countries who are not entitled to West German compensation, the paper reported that many Jewish survivors living in the United States have never received reparations money. The paper found that 79 percent of the Jewish “Holocaust survivors” living in the Atlanta area had, at one time or another, asked the Bonn government for restitution. About 66 percent received something.

About 40 percent of those receiving BEG compensation money live in Israel, the Focus On article reported, while 20 percent live in West Germany and 40 percent live in other countries. /23 It would thus appear that about 80 percent, or 3.5 million, of the 4.39 million claims are from Jews.

Although the number of BEG compensation claims is larger than the number of individual claimants, it is nevertheless difficult to reconcile these figures with the legendary “six million” Jewish wartime dead, particularly since at least half of the world’s Jewish “survivors” never received German compensation.


The Luxembourg Agreement obligated the West German government to pay three billion German marks to the State of Israel and 450 million marks to various Jewish organizations. Accordingly, the West German Finance Minister announced in 1953 that he expected that the reparations payments would eventually total four billion marks. Time would prove this a ludicrous underestimate. /24

By 1963, the German people had already paid out 20 billion marks, and by 1984 the total had risen to 70 billion. /25 In late 1987 the West German parliament approved an additional 300 million marks in “restitution to the victims of National Socialist crimes.” The Bonn government announced at that time the 80 billion marks had already been paid out and estimated that by the year 2020 the payoff would total 100 billion marks which, at recent exchange rates, would be the equivalent of $50 billion. /26

Although the West German reparations program is accepted and often praised in the democratic West, it is also, at least implicitly, strikingly undemocratic in two fundamental respects:

First, it regards Jews not as equal and fully integrated citizens of whatever country they live in, but rather primarily as members of an alien and cosmopolitan national group.

Second, it is based on the premise that the German nation, including even the Germans who grew up since 1945, is collectively guilty of terrible crimes, contrary to the democratic notion of individual responsibility for crime.

West Germany’s lucrative and historically unparalleled payoff to Israel and world Jewry is a legacy and permanent reminder of Germany’s catastrophic defeat in 1945 and subsequent domination by foreign powers.


  1. “Reparations, German,” Encyclopaedia Judaica, Vol. 14, pp. 72-73.
  2. D. v. Westernhagen, “Wiedergutgemacht?,” Die Zeit, No. 41, Oct. 5, 1984, p. 33.
  3. “Restitution in Germany,” Focus On, May 1985, p. 2.
  4. K. Lewan, Journal of Palestine Studies, Summer 1975, pp. 48-49.
  5. Konrad Adenauer, Erinnerungen 1953-55 (Stuttgart 1966), pp. 140-142. Quoted in: K. Lewan, Journal of Palestine Studies, Summer 1975, pp. 53-54.
  6. Quoted in. K. Lewan, Journal of Palestine Studies, Summer 1975, p.54.
  7. J. Kreysler and K. Jungfer, Deutsche Israel-Politik (Munich 1965); p. 33. Quoted in: K. Lewan, Journal of Palestine Studies, Summer 1975, p. 54.
  8. L. Sebba, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 450, July 1980, p. 206.
  9. N. Goldmann, The Autobiography of Nahum Goldmann, p. 249.
  10. LeNouvel Observateur, Oct. 25, 1976, p. 120. See also interview with Robert Faurisson in The Journal of Historical Review Winter 1981 (Vol. 2, No. 4), pp. 350, 373.
  11. N. Goldmann, Autobiography, p. 276.
  12. Le Nouvel Observateur, 25 Oct. 25, 1976, p. 122.
  13. W. Laqueur, Commentary, May 1965, p. 29.
  14. Nicholas Balabkins, West German Reparations to Israel. Cited in K. Lewan, Journal of Palestine Studies, Summer 1975, p. 42.
  15. “Restitution in Germany,” Focus On, May 1985.
  16. “Restitution in Germany,” Focus On, May 1985, p. 3.
  17. R. Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews, Vol. 3, p. 1166.
  18. R. Hilberg, Destruction, Vol. 3, p. 1173.
  19. R. Hilberg, Destruction, p. 1170. The New York Times reported in 1983 that the clients of the New York office of the Conference on Material Claims Against Germany “are primarily newly arrived Russian Jewish] victims of the Nazi era” (D. Margolick “Soviet Emigre Lawyer …,” The New York Times, Thursday, March 10, 1983, p. B2.)
  20. Canadian Jewish News, Nov. 12, 1981, p. 4 (or, Dec. 11, 1981, p. 4), and Nov. 26, 1981, p. 6. Source cited: German Information Centre in New York.
  21. “Restitution in Germany,” Focus On, May 1985, p. 3.
  22. The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, March 31, 1985,14A,15A,17A.
  23. “Restitution in Germany,” Focus On, May 1985, p. 3.
  24. D. v. Westernhagen, Die Zeit, Oct. 5, 1984, p. 36.; “Restitution in Germany,” Focus On, May 1985.
  25. D. v. Westernhagen, Die Zeit, Oct. 5, 1984, p. 36.
  26. “Bundestag Approves Additional DM 300 Million for Victims of Nazis,” The Week in Germany (New York German Information Center), December 11, 1987. The dollar value of the German mark has fluctuated over the years. A recent exchange rate was 50 cents per mark.



 – The Truthsseeker

World War II and the Holocaust: An Unspeakable Truth, Israel’s Vested Interest in Fueling German Guilt


Normalization is a word commonly used in the context of current Israeli-German relations. Its meaning: not quite forgiving, nor forgetting, but moving on. Yet while its users support their claim by pointing at the hordes of Israelis moving to Berlin and the young Germans discovering Tel Aviv’s night life, the underlining truth is different. The so-called normalization would never spread from the streets and beach bars to the diplomatic level, by Israel’s own design.

The spokeswoman of the Israeli embassy in Berlin met a few months ago with a group of Israeli reporters. What was said in the room only they know, but according to Haaretz, she openly admitted that it’s in Israel’s interest to maintain German guilt about the Holocaust. Seeking full normalization of relations is not a goal, she allegedly stated during the closed briefing.

Both the spokeswoman and the Foreign Affairs Ministry in Jerusalem claimed the statements were inaccurate and taken out of context, but regardless, it’s hard to argue with their content.

Suggesting that Israel benefits from German guilt is, in many ways, stating the obvious. Guilt is the reason Germany is building submarines for Israel and selling them far below cost, guilt is the reason Berlin often avoids criticizing Israel even when its European partners strongly condemn the Jewish state, and guilt was the reason chancellor Angela Merkel unprecedentedly defined Israel’s security as part of Germany’s raison d’état. So why would Israel want to dry up the well from which it drinks?

This policy may not be officially dictated to Berlin’s Israeli embassy from Jerusalem, but in this regard, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is already leading by example. His routine comparison between Nazi Germany and Iran, Hamas, and most recently the BDS movement, are designed to do just that – address the guilty conscience of the international community, and especially its leaders.

His insistence on reusing this metaphor time and again is only proof of its effectiveness, as opposed to the nuclear duck metaphor, for example, which was mentioned only once. There’s no reason to change a broken record if it still plays. The collective Israeli memory of the Holocaust may prefer to emphasize the manifestations of Jewish heroism during the Third Reich, but politically, playing the victim serves Israel much better.

Especially at a time when Europe is turning increasingly against Israel, when leading European states like France and Sweden are championing the Palestinian statehood bid, and in Hungary and Greece anti-Semitism raises its ugly head, Israel needs to hold on to every friend it has – and there’s no stronger glue than guilt.

But the use of remorse as a political tool must remain unspoken. The editorials criticizing Netanyahu after every Nazi comparison aren’t motivated strictly by the boredom of journalists. The blatantly cynical use of the Holocaust memory doesn’t sit well with the victim persona Israel is interested in projecting. Therefore, it must remain a state secret: an open admission of Israel’s undiplomatic fondness of its allies’ sore spots is a sure fire way of drying up that well.

Polina Garaev is the i24news correspondent in Germany.

Untold Truths About the Planned War on Iran

Press TV — February 4, 2013

Also see:

War with Iran: The Hidden Story the US Navy Does Not Want You to Know About

-The Truthseeker

Iran’s FM Extolls Country’s Ability to Restore Nuke Program

Nasser Karimi — Associated Press July 19, 2016

Bushehr nuclear plant. Click to enlarge

Iran’s foreign minister on Tuesday extolled the country’s ability to bring its nuclear program back on track as limits on the landmark 15-year accord between Tehran and world powers ease in the coming years.

Mohammad Javad Zarif said a document, submitted by Iran to the International Atomic Energy Agency and outlining plans to expand Iran’s uranium enrichment program, is a “matter of pride.”

He said it was created by Iran’s “negotiators and industry experts” and that even foreign media have noted Iran is likely to strive for restoring its full enrichment after 10 years.

Zarif’s remarks, carried by the semi-official Fars news agency, followed revelations the day before of the confidential document — an add-on agreement to the nuclear deal with world powers — that Iran gave the IAEA.

The document, obtained by The Associated Press in Vienna, outlines Tehran’s plans to expand its uranium enrichment program after the first 10 years of the nuclear deal.

It’s the only text linked to last year’s deal between Iran and six world powers — the United States, Britain, France, Russia, China plus Germany — that has not been made public, although U.S. officials say members of Congress who expressed interest were briefed on its substance.

Zarif said the addendum to the nuclear deal will soon be made public, but he did not elaborate.

“God willing, when the complete text of the document is published, it will be clear where we will stand in 15 years,” he said.

The document was given to the AP by a diplomat whose work has focused on Iran’s nuclear program for more than a decade, and its authenticity was confirmed by another diplomat who possesses the same document. Both spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to share or discuss the document.

It says that as of January 2027 — a date which will mark 11 years after the implementation early this year of the deal, reached last July between Tehran and world powers — Iran will start replacing its mainstay centrifuges with thousands of advanced machines.

Centrifuges churn out uranium to levels that can range from use as reactor fuel and for medical and research purposes to much higher levels for the core of a nuclear warhead. From year 11 to 13, says the document, Iran will install centrifuges up to five times as efficient as the 5,060 machines it is now restricted to using.


Associated Press Writer George Jahn contributed to this report from Vienna.


Patrick Clawson Calls For False Flag Attack To Get USA to War with Iran

Lifting the Veil, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Scripting the 3rd World War Israeli Lobbyist Calls For False Flag Attack To Get USA to war with Iran after referencing numerous staged or invited attacks that caused wars in history including Pearl Harbor!! As crazy as that sounds there is truth to at least foreknowledge of the attack by Roosevelt. A must read to start off is…We need a huge anti war movement when you realize what a war with Iran means, and this character all but promised they will bring the USA to war with them. Not to downplay the tragedy of the current unnecessary and horrific wars being waged and fomented, but Iran war means world war of unimaginable consequences and potentially nuclear hell on Earth…

Reuters | January 11, 2012 5:47 PM ET
More from Reuters

The car belonging to Iranian nuclear scientist Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan is lifted at a blast site outside a university in northern Tehran. Ahmadi-Roshan was killed by a bomb placed on his car by a motorcyclist.

REUTERS/IIPA/Sajad SafariThe car belonging to Iranian nuclear scientist Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan is lifted at a blast site outside a university in northern Tehran. Ahmadi-Roshan was killed by a bomb placed on his car by a motorcyclist.

Iran nuclear scientist death: Iran asks UN Security Council to condemn ‘terrorist’ act

By Louis Charbonneau

UNITED NATIONS — Iran urged the UN and Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on Wednesday to condemn the latest in a series of assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists, which it said were “cruel, inhumane and criminal acts of terrorism.”

Despite Tehran’s outrage at the killing of an Iranian nuclear scientist in broad daylight, Iran has no viable avenues for international prosecution or condemnation of what may be an attempt by Western powers or Israel to sabotage a nuclear program they fear is intended to produce weapons.

Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful and has defied Security Council demands — backed up by four rounds of U.N. sanctions — that it stop enriching uranium.

Iran’s U.N. Ambassador Mohammad Khazaee appealed to Ban and the 15-nation council “to condemn, in the strongest terms, these inhumane terrorist acts and to take effective steps towards elimination of terrorism in all its forms and manifestations.”


FARS NEWSIranian nuclear scientist Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan

“Any kind of political and economic pressures or terrorist attacks targeting the Iranian nuclear scientists, could not prevent our nation in exercising this right” to pursue its nuclear program, Khazaee said in a letter, obtained by Reuters.

The United Nations has not heeded previous Iranian calls for condemnations of similar assassinations. Even if the Security Council were to take up the issue, the United States could use its veto power to block even the mildest condemnation.

Ban’s spokesman Martin Nesirky told reporters earlier on Wednesday that the United Nations was aware of the reports out of Tehran but had no immediate comment.

But Christof Heyns, the U.N. special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, said in a statement to Reuters the Wednesday assassination seemed to reflect a “worrying trend of extrajudicial executions of nuclear scientists in Iran.”

“The killings are unlawful and should be condemned,” Heyns said. “The onus is on the Iranian authorities to investigate what has happened, to make the evidence known and to bring the perpetrators to book.”

Tehran blamed the United States and Israel for the attack, although Khazaee left that out of his letter. The White House denied any U.S. role and Israel declined to comment.

National Post Graphics

National Post GraphicsClick to see an enlarged version about modern spies & espionage.


“Based on the existing evidence collected by the relevant Iranian security authorities, similar to previous incidents, perpetrators used the same terrorist method in assassinating Iranian nuclear scientists,” Khazaee said.

He said the assassins worked by attaching “a sticky magnetic bomb to the car carrying the scientists and detonating it.”

In October 2011, Khazaee complained to the council and Ban Ki-moon about the hits on Iranian scientists in a letter responding to U.S. allegations that Iran had plotted to assassinate Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to Washington.

In early November, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said he had 100 “undeniable documents” proving the Washington was behind the “terrorist acts” in Iran.

Saeed Jalili, the secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, said Iran was handing over to the United Nations all the evidence of U.S. plots. Nothing came of the Iranian complaints.

National Post Graphics

National Post GraphicsClick to enlarge this map of the region

Later in November, the overwhelming majority of the 193-nation U.N. General Assembly voted to condemn the alleged Iranian plot. Unlike the Saudis, Iran was unable to secure a condemnation of the assassinations of its scientists.

In the absence of war, targeted killings are illegal under international law. If Israel or the United States were found to be involved in the assassinations, it would violate the U.N. Charter, which bans the use of force against sovereign states.

Tehran could launch legal proceedings in Iran. The International Court of Justice in The Hague, established by the U.N. Charter, would be the most obvious international forum for Iran to bring a legal case. But the court will only hear cases where states involved jointly request its involvement.

One of the reasons the Saudi plot angered U.N. member states was that it was aimed at an envoy of a sovereign government. U.N. member states traditionally have no tolerance for threats against diplomats, whether friend or foe.

In 2010, Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency was accused of sending a hit squad to assassinate a Hamas militant in a Dubai hotel. The suspected agents were caught on videotape following their target in the hotel.

Authorities in Britain and other European capitals launched their own investigations into the Dubai hit, but not because a member of Hamas had been killed. They were irritated by the fact that fraudulent European passports were used by the hit squad.

© Thomson Reuters 2012

How Mossad killed an Iranian Scientist [Part1] [English]

“Holocaust 101”

“Holocaust 101”

This document below was prepared and posted on the Zundelsite as an “Introduction to Revisionist Thought” during the first week of January, 1996. It was meant to be a lead-in to an Internet debate with another website, Nizkor, a “Holocaust Promotion Lobby” website.

This debate was aborted after the Simon Wiesenthal Center was notified of this debate and immediately went into an all-out offensive, starting with an article in the New York Times January 10, 1996, followed by 2000 letters to ISP’s and university presidents in an attempt to prevent Revisionist material from being published on the Web.

In response to this censorship move, “computer kids” and cyberspace journalists worldwide took up the “sheltering” of the Zundelsite by creating Zundelsite Mirrors. From mid-January to mid-February, it was high electronic drama as in the most prestigous universities, “Zündel-Mirrors” sprang up spontaneously. We know of Zündel-Mirrors as far away as Australia.

The eventual outcome of this “first ever” Internet Cyberspace Stand-off and similar battles for Freedom of Speech on the Net was the US Communications Decency Act, rammed through the US Congress by special interest groups but recently dismissed as unconstitutional by three Philadelphia judges.

This judgment, presently, is on appeal.

The struggle for Freedom of Speech on the Net continues.

Ernst Zündel Replies:
Rebuttal #1:

Before I get into the actual rebuttal, I would just like to call attention to a few important points in (Nizkor’s) detailed, elaborate summary:

1. I am described by Nizkor, citing Canada’s Security Intelligence Review Committee, as a “. . . prolific publisher of hate literature.” That is not quite correct.

In Canada, the distribution of hate literature is a criminal offense, as is bank robbery and child molestation. If you call me a bank robber in print and I am not a bank robber, that is called libel. If you call me a child molester and I am not a child molester, that is called libel also.

You called me in electronic print a “. . . prolific publisher of hate literature.” You have just libeled me.

I have lived and worked in Canada for almost 40 years and have never been convicted of having published and/or distributed hate literature in that country. I have never even been charged with having published and/or distributed hate literature in Canada, although in Canada there are such things as “hate laws.”

In point of fact, various judicial and police bodies, after extensive study, have specifically cleared me of that charge. Had there been proof, my enemies would have made sure I would have been charged and convicted.

I have been charged with “. . . spreading false news,” a frivolous charge a malcontent, multi-millionaire Jewess brought against me. It cost Canadians approximately $6 million . . . and all, for what? The Supreme Court of Canada decided in the end that society may be enriched by cultural and intellectual diversity, which does include unpopular views on history and other matters of discomfort to certain minorities.

Below I summarize 8 points to serve as “Holocaust” Revisionism 101. Before I do so, I would like to state what I mean when I refer to certain individuals and groups collectively as the “Holocaust Promotion Lobby.”

I use the phrase as a generic term to describe those people who have a vested interest in keeping the Holocaust Myth alive and who will act politically to make sure that this happens.

The Holocaust Promotion Lobby is a summarizing construct meant as a shortcut to describe a subset of the human race, most but not all of whom are Jews, with unique and identifying social and political characteristics and dedicated to the maintenance and enhancement of a dogma called the “Holocaust.”

I use this phrase for summarizing purposes, as in “The Flower Generation” describing a hedonistic youth culture or “The Jet Set” describing the rich.

I will leave it up to each individual, Gentile or Jew, to decide for himself whether or not he belongs in that group.

What Revisionists are offering below is the state of the art on Revisionism as of right now. The final word is not yet in; it will come when more people in all kinds and sorts of disciplines will kneel into the murky matter of the “Holocaust” and find out for themselves was is and isn’t true.

To capture the essence of what follows below, readers will need to understand that, after years of insisting that “. . . the Revisionists don’t MERIT a response!” and refusing to engage in debate, at the beginning of the year a serious debate was actually planned – or so, at least, we thought.

A world-wide censorship move was unleashed to stop this debate from happening. Part of this effort by our opposition apparently caused Nizkor to back out of the debate, insisting that they merely talked of “linking.” It is unfortunate that a debate didn’t happen, but that is now water under the bridge.

The Nizkor folks now say that they prefer to “link,” so we will let them “link.” We would have liked a real debate with mutual and respectful cooperation. However, that was not to be, but since we promised we would answer a rebuttal, that is what we are doing now.


By way of introduction, Revisionism has taken hold as an intellectual revival movement all over the world. People are beginning to ask questions about the Holocaust. These questions are uncomfortable. No longer can the Holocaust Promotion Lobby ignore the global interest in the TRUE facts surrounding very murky claims pertaining to the “Holocaust” by shouting “Anti-Semitism!”

In essence, Revisionism claims can be grouped into eight fairly distinct topics. They are, as elaborated below:

1. The Revisionist claim: The Holocaust is useful postwar propaganda that started as a systematic, insidious campaign during World War II as one of the tactics employed by moneyed interests to rally the troops and engage the world, specifically America, in what turned out to be, essentially, a fratricidal war.


The principle behind this propaganda was: “Let’s get an enemy to kill an enemy.”

How was this done? In old-fashioned, time-tested ways.

Sophisticated war-time propaganda about an enemy’s alleged “atrocities” is nothing new. It is an effective psychological weapon, routinely employed to keep the home-grown troops fired up so that they believe that they are fighting for a righteous, patriotic cause. The enemy is demonized with systematic atrocity stories. The media repeats over and over and over again how cruel and demonic he is.

This tactic was used by the Allies – extensively. Here is one piece of evidence:

On February 29, 1944 the British Ministry of Information sent the following note to the higher British clergy and to the BBC:


I am directed by the Ministry to send you the following circular letter:

It is often the duty of the good citizens and of the pious Christians to turn a blind eye on the peculiarities of those associated with us.

But the time comes when such peculiarities, while still denied in public, must be taken into account when action by us is called for.

We know the methods of rule employed by the Bolshevik dictator in Russia itself from, for example, the writing and speeches of the Prime Minister himself during the last twenty years. We know how the Red Army behaved in Poland in 1920 and in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Galicia, and Bessarabia only recently.

We must, therefore, take into account how the Red Army will certainly behave when it overruns Central Europe. Unless precautions are taken, the obviously inevitable horrors which will result will throw an undue strain on public opinion in this country.

We cannot reform the Bolsheviks but we can do our best to save them – and ourselves – from the consequences of their acts. The disclosures of the past quarter of the past quarter of a century will render mere denials unconvincing. The only alternative to denial is to distract public attention from the whole subject.

Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately the public is no longer so susceptible as in the days of “Corpse Factory.” the Mutilated Belgian Babies,” and the “Crucified Canadians.”

Your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans and Japanese which have been and will be put into circulation by the Ministry.

Your expression of belief in such may convince others.

I am, sir, Your obedient servant
H. Hewet, Assistant Secretary

There was even a postscript, as follows:

The Ministry can enter into no correspondence of any kind with regard to the communication which should only be disclosed to responsible persons. (Rozek, Edward J., Allied Wartime Diplomacy: A Pattern in Poland, John Wiley and Sons, NY. page 209-210)

This is quite an astounding document. This letter is ample evidence that during World War II, the Allies used atrocity propaganda against Hitler Germany to distract their own people from the atrocities being committed primarily but not exclusively by the Red Army – their “comrades”! – in the invasion of Europe as Hitler’s war drew to an end.

Note, though, that there was nothing in this letter that talked of gassing people.

Why not? Because foolish atrocity propaganda is something else again. The gas chamber claim was floated briefly as a propaganda test kite but was quickly abandoned as too “unbelievable.” If atrocity fiction is found to be so gross, outlandish and implausible that thinking, feeling people simply cannot swallow it, it is not in an army leader’s interest to peddle such a “crime.”

This was the case originally with the “gas chamber” claim.

In point of fact, the British Ministry of Information at first requested British clergy to help spread the “gas chamber” story which was planned to be put in circulation by the Ministry. (Rozek, Edward J., Allied Wartime Diplomacy, pp 108-110. John Wiley and Sons, New York ) However, from the start, it was judged to be too problematic and bizarre and, therefore, it was quickly withdrawn as a potential strategic embarrassment.

Some of the “lesser” so-called “crimes” that people were willing to swallow did survive and thrive for a while, both during World War I and World War II – some of them for longer periods than others.

For example, many of the older generation, both in Europe and America, still vividly remember the macabre World War I Allied propaganda claims of the German “. . . cadavers-into-soap factories,” the “. . . chopped-off hands of Belgian babies,” the “. . . crucified Canadian soldier” stories – all of which proved to be lies, and for some of which post WWI Allied statesmen even apologized to the Germans.

Some even remember the incredible, hysterical claim made by the then-Governor of New York State, even in 1917-18, (!) that the Germans had been “. . . exterminating millions of Jews.”

Even more telling was the claim about the “. . . six million”! (Glynn, Martin, The Crucifixion of the Jews Must Stop The American Hebrew, October 31, 1920.)

So you see – the “six million” story is old. Very old.

It had been peddled before. In a recent book entitled “Keystone of the New World Order: The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism,” the author, Ben Weintraub makes the point that the number has, in fact, mythical significance because it is based on cabalistic sources. (Weintraub, Ben, The Holocaust Dogma: Keystone of the New World Order, Cosmos Publishers, 1994)

Unfortunately, it took a gullible, systematically miseducated populace such as we have today, coupled with relentless brainwashing by a corruptible lap dog media, to peddle the lie for decades the way it has been peddled. In World War I, there was no electronic media. After WWII, this handy tale was dusted off and heaved once more against the German people.

The massive psychological onslaught really only started, however, with the fictitious television series, “Holocaust,” shown worldwide to an estimated 100 million people. Next there was “Schindler’s List.” There were thousands of other production not nearly as vicious in impact, but cumulatively destructive.

Let us be very clear on one point: There would have been no hesitation to use the story of the “gassings” even during the war – had it been plausible. However, even during the war, the leadership of the Allied Nations – such as Churchill and Roosevelt as well as those of the Catholic hierarchy, including the then-Pope Pius XI – knew from their various intelligence agencies, spies on the ground, inmates with radio transmitters inside various camps (including inmate soldiers, inmate priests, even those who took confessions of local military, police and guard personnel) that no organized mass exterminations by gassing or any other means were going on inside these camps.

How did they know?

The Allied leaders had detailed aerial photos, none of which corroborated the hysterical claims then made by Zionist agitators like Rabbi Stephen Wise and others around the world. It simply wasn’t true. There were no gassings of people going on – only of lice! The story was a cheese with many, many holes. And it was judged as problematic.

As a consequence, the Allied leadership specifically removed any reference to “gas chambers” in their wartime atrocity propaganda, even in their diplomatic dispatches, because there was no proof. (Allied Diplomacy in Wartime, Samisdat Resource Book, pp 108-110)

In August of 1943, the Allies decided officially not to make this specific allegation of “gas chambers” against the Nazis in a published declaration on the grounds of “insufficient evidence to justify the statement regarding execution in gas chambers.” ( Foreign Relations of the United States Diplomatic Papers, 1943. Samisdat Resource Book)

The Allies and the Pope thus did not need to deny what did not take place – except in the feverish brains of the Zionists who were jockeying through unique “victimhood” for the creation of the State of Israel and postwar political advantage (including massive reparations payments from Germany) which needed the accusation of genocide against the Jews.

And, as we will explain in more detail, the trials at Nuremberg were based on those accusations. The Zionists needed a conviction, in order to leverage the guilt money out of a craven government created by the Allies.

2. The Revisionist claim : There is no proof that the Holocaust, as depicted by the Holocaust Promotion Lobby and the highly politicized Hollywood industry, actually occurred.

Revisionists don’t claim that Jews didn’t suffer. They don’t argue the fact that Jews were, in fact, unwanted in Germany, and that there was a state policy to remove them as a “parasitic people” harmful to the country.

It is absolutely true that Jews were incarcerated and often treated cruelly. They were seen as the enemy, just as in our times the “Nazis” are seen as the enemy of entrenched oligarchies.

Revisionists do claim and argue that there was no state policy that called for the “mass extermination of the Jews” or any other unwanted minorities. The Allies, independently and singly, interrogated 26,000 functionaries of the National Socialist regime immediately after Germany’s defeat, all based on the same set of questions. Some people might have thought of lying for their own benefit by implicating others.

Not one German official reported knowing of such a program. They all said that the first time they heard about it was from the Allies after the war.

This really gets down to the nitty-gritty of where the story of the mass extermination came from – which is the Rudolf Hoess “confession.”

The Rudolf Hoess Confession is an incredibly “incriminating” document. All evil stems from it. Here is the background story.

Rudolf Hoess, the former wartime commandant of Auschwitz “confessed” to the most incredible things during the Nuremberg Trials in this widely used and much-quoted “document.” A good overview from a human interest story point of view of how that was accomplished is given in the Zundelsite Internet editorial: “Nuremberg: The Crime that Will Not Die” It is a summary worth reading.

Many Germans, at Nuremberg and elsewhere where they were made to stand trial for “war crimes.” have “confessed” to brutalities under “duress” or inducements. Documents, testimony and confessions as well as affidavits presented at Nuremberg and elsewhere were frequently produced and signed after psychological and physical torture of its authors.

For proof of torture of captured Germans by the Allies, read Legions of Death, a book by Rupert Butler, an English writer, who gives a vivid description of how the wartime, one-time Concentration Camp Commandant, Rudolf Hoess, was beaten mercilessly and drugged with alcohol for several days before he signed his famous “confession” admitting to two-and-a-half million of people gassed in gas chambers in Auschwitz.

Suffice it to say here that this so-called “confession” was written in English, and that Hoess did not speak or even understand English. (2Butler, Rupert, Legions of Death, Hamlyn Paperbacks, Great Britain, 1983, pp 10-12)

Julius Streicher, to name another German official who was savagely tortured by American interrogators to extract a “confession,” reported that he was beaten so badly that he lost 40% of his hearing. He was kept naked in an unheated cell and was made to drink from the latrine. Guards forced his teeth open with a stick so as to spit in his mouth. (“Streicher Opens His Case,”, London Times, April 27. 1946)

This information was later expunged from the Nuremberg Trial transcripts, with the consent of the president of the Tribunal and even the “defense” lawyer.

Yet another source is the Simpson van Rhoden Commission of Enquiry into the conduct of US interrogators during the Malmedy-Dachau trials. This commission reported mistreatment and tortures, including mock trials, the administering of fake confessions by equally fake “priests,” beatings, hoodings etc. to get forced confessions out of prisoners. (The Progressive, written by Judge Edward L. Van Rhoden in February of 1949 entitled American Atrocities in Germany)

Here is a sample of how such “confessions” were routinely obtained:

“American investigators at the U.S. Court in Dachau, Germany, used the following methods to obtain confessions:

Beatings and brutal kickings. Knocking out teeth and breaking jaws. Mock trials. Solitary confinement. Posturing as priests. Very limited rations. Spiritual deprivation. Promises of acquittal (ed. expl: if the victim implicated fellow prisoners to corroborate the Allied trial scenarios) . . . All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair.” (Did Six Million Really Die? Report of the Evidence in the Canadian “False News” Trial of Ernst Zündel – 1988, Edited by Barbara Kulaszka, pp 44-45)

U.S. Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone, referring to the Nuremberg trials and speaking of the American Chief Prosecutor, Jackson, had this to say, as quoted in a Viking Press hard cover, “Harlan Fiske Stone: Pillar of the Law:”

“Jackson is away conducting his high grade lynching party in Nuremberg,” he remarked. “I don’t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law.

This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas.” (Mason, Thomas, Harlan Fiske Stone: Pillar of the Law, Alpheus The Viking Press, page 746)

An accusation does not make a fact. A headline does not make a fact. A tortured prisoner making a “confession” cannot make his words a fact.

Here is another good example of a “well-documented” crime:

The Germans were accused at Nuremberg of having killed 15,000 Polish officers and members of the Polish elite at Katyn. Seven German military officers and soldiers were executed by the Soviets after a trial in which more than 4,000 (!) sworn affidavits and dozens of “experts” and “witnesses” were proffered by the Stalinist prosecutors.

In 1989, Soviet leader Gorbachev admitted publicly that the Stalin regime was responsible for these mass murders of the Poles. Not the Germans. America’s ally – Joseph Stalin! – had ordered the killings!

So if Judge Thomas T. Johnson of the California Superior Court, and Judge Thomas of the Toronto District Court took smug “Judicial Notice” of the Holocaust, they based it on “readily available” documentation tortured and coerced out of the victims of Allied torture masters.

What kind of “documented evidence” is that? It would not be permissible in any U.S. or Canadian Court.

In Nuremberg and in many subsequent trials against so-called “Nazi war crimes” these methods were routinely accepted and “acceptable” as a matter of policy and “the rules.”

3. The Revisionist claim: The numbers of “Holocaust” victims are irresponsibly exaggerated.

The numbers game of alleged Jewish losses is indeed a vexing one. Many, many people of all nationalities disappeared or perished in the war and cannot be accounted for. Some lie in the ashes of Allied bombings of German cities and buried beneath collapsed buildings; others were incinerated in bomb-caused Allied firestorms; still others perished in the Russian Gulags long after the shooting had stopped.

It is unfair and incorrect to claim – as is routinely claimed – that if a person cannot be accounted for, he or she perished due to genocide – or, worse yet, due to gassings.

In fact, the “Holocaust” is the best example of “. . . death proved by the stories of million of survivors.”

Does that not make you think?

The media is full of “survivor” organizations existing in every major city of the Western World – from Toronto to Johannesburg; from Rio de Janeiro to Los Angeles.

Suffice it to say that the Germans have paid over 4,300,000 pension and restitution claims; 40% of those recipients live (or lived) in Israel. Others are of Jewish background but have chosen to live in other parts of the world.

If so many millions of Jewish people died at the hands of the Germans, why are there so many survivors?

Aficionados of the “Holocaust” have often called Jacob Robinson a “historian” and “internationalist jurist” and referred to him as a prime source of authoritative information on what happened to the Jews.

Jacob Robinson was, in fact, a cunning East European Jewish shyster with a diabolical plan and agenda. He was the inventor/creator of the “revolutionary concept” of the idea of the Nuremberg Trial for Germany’s leaders and the German Reparations scheme.

According to Nahum Goldman, former President of the World Jewish Congress,

“. . . Apart from my encounter with the survivors of the concentration camps after the liberation, I only returned officially to Germany in order to meet Chancellor Adenauer and open negotiations about reparations. These reparations constitute an extraordinary innovation in terms of international law.

Until then, when a country lost a war, it paid damages to the victor, but it was a matter between states, between governments. Now for the first time a nation was to give reparations either to ordinary individuals or to Israel, which did not legally exist at the time of Hitler’s crimes. All the same, I must admit that the idea did not come from me.

During the war the WJC (World Jewish Congress) had created an Institute of Jewish Affairs in New York (its headquarters are now in London). The directors were two great Lithuanian Jewish jurists, Jacob and Nehemiah Robinson. Thanks to them, the Institute worked out two completely revolutionary ideas: the Nuremberg tribunal and German reparations. (Goldman, Nahum, The Jewish Paradox, Grosset & Dunlap, 1978, p 122)

Put two and two together.

Reparation claims are based on number of victims – somewhat like an insurance claim after a plane crash and a subsequent fire. It pays to keep these numbers high. No mystery to that.

Now visualize an insurance company that has to pay for a fire in which, supposedly, some family members perished. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that if the insurance company is prevented from checking vital documents, such as: “. . . who was actually booked on that plane. . . ? – a non-existent “victim” uncle or aunt could conceivably materialize, defrauding the insurance company. These things are known to have been done to some insurance companies.

To trot out the old canard of the “Protocol of Wannsee” (of Jan. 20, 1942) allegedly outlining the Nazi plans to “annihilate the European Jews” shows real chutzpah. Even the Jewish Holocaust expert Yehuda Bauer of Hebrew University in Jerusalem has said that Wannsee was a meeting, but “hardly a conference,” and that “. . . little of what was said there was executed in detail.”

Here is the quote in full, under the title: Wannsee’s importance rejected, in the Canadian Jewish News, Jan. 30, 1992:

“The public still repeats, time after time, the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination of the Jews was arrived at. Wannsee was but a stage in the unfolding of the process of mass murder.” (Canadian Jewish News, Jan. 30, 1992)

According to the New York Times, November 12, 1989, (Bauer) added when chided saying that he would not want to “. . . add grist for the mills of the deniers of the Holocaust: “They can add, you know. . .” (Auschwutz Revisionism: An Israeli Scholar’s Case, NYT, Nov 12, 1989)

They did, and they do.

By doing so, they “shrunk the Holocaust.” Let us take Auschwitz, for example. According to a December 10, 1995 summary prepared by Dr. Faurisson, here is a telling visual:

(In this graph, the tallest bar represents 9 million persons, and the smallest bar represents 630,000 – 710,000, of whom 470,000 – 550,000 were believed to have been Jews. (For the actual and detailed verification of both numbers and sources, go to Dr. Faurisson’s textual document, marked Appendix A)

The ever-shrinking numbers of Auschwitz “victims” should give skeptical people – people who apply common sense to this topic – pause to ponder. Yehuda Bauer, Jewish Holocaust scholar, admitted the falsity of the 4 million figure in a November 1989 article, where he comments on the cruel manipulation of the numbers of victims in Auschwitz by Zionists and Communist propagandists and liars alike. (Auschwitz Revisionism: An Israeli Scholar’s Case. NYT, November 12, 1989.)

Let’s mention the Red Cross here as well. This so-called “humanitarian” organization has much to do with the fact that the numbers are so unreliable.

The Red Cross played an ignoble role during and especially after the war when dealing with alleged “Nazi atrocity” stories and statistics. (See sworn testimony of Charles Biederman during the Zündel Trial. Did Six Million Really Die? Report of the Ev idence in the Canadian “False News” Trial of Ernst Zündel – 1988, Edited by Barbara Kulaszka, pp 80-84. It is worth reading in its entirety.)

Below I am merely offering two excerpts of this testimony, as summarized in the Zündel Transcripts by Barbara Kulaszka in her book: “Did Six Million Really Die?”:

“Access to the documents was limited by the Bonn Agreements of 1955 to former persecutees and their legal successors on the grounds that the documents were all person-related and therefore not open to the public. (11-2497, 2498). The wording used in the Bonn Agreement was that the archives were “only to be evaluated in the interests of the former persecutees themselves or their successors.” (12-2676). The only exception to this rule, as provided for under the agreements, was that representatives of any of the ten Allied governments of the supervisory body had the right to inspect the documents. (11-2497) Any application by one of the ten governments for access was reviewed by the Director of the ITS (Internal Tracing System); if the Director felt it was not justified, he could submit the application to the International Commission for the final decision. He could not remember any request by Israel being denied. (12-2711)”

In other words, Israel can look at the data, but German researchers and historians cannot. Revisionists cannot. Ernst Zündel cannot. Mr. Wiesenthal, presumably, can.

The Kulaszka trial transcript summary goes on to say:

Biedermann confirmed that as of December 31, 1983, the total number of deaths registered with the Special Registry Office and various other registry offices was 373,468. (11-2515) This figure represented death certificates issued pursuant to received applications and was based, with respect to the Special Registry Office, on camp records kept by the Nazis during the war. (11-2516, 2517)

Biedermann agreed that at an international conference held by the International Committee of the Camps in Vienna in 1977, the then director of the ITS, Albert de Cocatrix, gave a speech which indicated that as of December 31, 1976 a total of 357,190 names of persons who died in concentration camps had been registered at the Special Registry Office. Biedermann confirmed that these numbers actually came from the ITS. (12-2640 to 2646) He pointed out, however, that these figures resulted from applications. If an entire family had died, there was no one to make an application for a death certificate. Secondly, the ITS had complete documentation for only two of the twenty-two concentration camps. For the remainder, it had either partial or no documentation. Therefore, if an application was made for a person who had allegedly died in one of these camps, the ITS would not have the records to justify a request to the Special Registry Office for a death certificate. (12-2647)

It is really ridiculously simple. The numbers game on which the reparations claims are based could be laid to rest tomorrow.

The Red Cross via its International Tracing Service in Arolson, headed by Red Cross delegate, Charles Biedermann, has important information on hand of every concentration camp inmate who ever went through a German prisoner-of-war or civilian concentration camp. These 14 million pieces of information could, with today’s computer technology, OCR software etc. be sifted, categorized, analyzed and double-checked. In a very short time, this information could be made available to the public, which would put an effective end to all the abuse, misinterpretation, fudging and falsifying of alleged and real numbers of “Nazi victims.”

The German Government can and should have checked the inmates’ records 50 years ago. Why is this not being done? A good guess is that then it would have been revealed for all the world to see that false reparations claims were made and billions were paid and have been fraudulently collected for a long time.

There are letters by the Arolson Tracing Service which at least give a partial glimpse at what is available in those archives there. The Red Cross, by accepting the currently worded 10-nation agreement or mandate with which it administers this macabre but important legacy of WW II, has become a willing accomplice in obfuscating research and is, in fact, hiding historical facts.

I am on record saying that the Red Cross is deliberately stone-walling an honest investigation into one of the saddest chapters in human history. If the Red Cross does not like this justified criticism, let them get out of the business of hiding the truth from the public looking for answers.

Holocaust faker explains himself .

GERMANY – German university slammed for claim Israel harvests Palestinian organs

organ trade

“This is an ugly and outrageous demonstration of Jew hatred. This is not a university – it is a hatred factory. One would think that in Germany of all places people would understand the pernicious nature of hatred and racism under a pseudo academic guise”, Emmanuel Nahshon, the foreign ministry’s spokesman, wrote The Jerusalem Post by email on Thursday.


JERUSALEM POST – A German university faced scathing criticism from Israel’s foreign ministry for teaching students that the Jewish state is an apartheid government that harvests Palestinian organs and commits genocidal atrocities.

“This is an ugly and outrageous demonstration of Jew hatred. This is not a university – it is a hatred factory. One would think that in Germany of all places people would understand the pernicious nature of hatred and racism under a pseudo academic guise”, Emmanuel Nahshon, the foreign ministry’s spokesman, wrote The Jerusalem Post by email on Thursday.

The HAWK University of Applied Sciences and Arts in the city of Hildesheim in the German state of Lower Saxony has taught a course assaulting Israel’s existence for at least 10 years.

The academic Dr. Rebecca Seidler, who blew the whistle on the anti-Israel seminar, told the Post she was slated to teach a course on Jewish life in Germany, but was presented with course material for a seminar titled “On the Social Situation of Young People in Palestine.” After Seidler reviewed the seminar articles and material, she told the Post in a telephone interview on Thursday, she could not teach a seminar with “such anti-Semitic and anti-Israel” content.

The Post examined scores of articles for the course curriculum for the period 2015-2016. One seminar article from 2009 titled “Our sons are plundered of their organs” by the Swedish journalist Donald Boström, claims Israel harvests Palestinian organs. The article was translated into German for the seminar.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu compared the organ-harvesting report at the time to “medieval libels that Jews killed Christian children for their blood.” In an interview with Israel Radio, Boström later casted doubt on his sourcing, adding that he could not verify the stories of his Palestinian informants.

Articles for the seminar ranged from “Apartheid in the Holy Land” to “70 victims of torture in Israeli prisons since 1967” to “Third Class Citizens: The targeted discrimination of Arab Israelis.” The source for the article on “Third Class Citizens” is the far left weekly Junge Welt–a socialist paper accused of stoking modern anti-Semitism in Germany.

Additional articles covered “The Israeli Apartheid Wall” and Israeli violations of the rights of Palestinian children. The curriculum features poetry from the late hardcore anti-Zionist writer Erich Fried, whose literature makes parallels between Israel and the Hitler movement. Several articles accused Israel of “ethnic cleansing” of Palestinians. One document from the German-Palestinian Society on Jewish groups who massacred Palestinians invites the HAWK students to become members of the pro-Palestinian NGO.

In a statement published on the HAWK’s website, the president of HAWK ,Dr. Christiane Dienel, cited articles in the Post, the German Jewish weekly Jüdische Allgemeine Zeitung, and criticism from the Central Council of Jewish in Germany as stifling debate at the HAWK.

She wrote the goal of the coverage is “with all means to prevent that different perspectives to this conflict [Palestinian] are allowed at the University.” Dienel added “moral pressure and the completely unfounded accusation of anti-Semitism” are used to ban criticism at our university.

In a statement to The Jerusalem Post on Thursday, the HAWK doubled-down on its decision to continue teaching the material on Israel harvesting Palestinian organs and the allegations Israel is an apartheid state.

“The ethics committee has no reservations to continue the seminar ‘On the Social Situation of Young People in Palestine’. There is no evidence that the academic course promotes anti-Israeli or anti-Semitic sentiments. The committee appreciates that the Faculty conveys an accurate image of the situation in Israel…,” wrote the HAWK’s press department.

When asked if the Post can interview the members of the ethics committee, Florian Klan, a spokesman for HAWK, declined to provide the names.

The HAWK press statement said, “The range of courses and seminars at the HAWK University of Applied Sciences and Arts is designed to teach students to examine pieces of information critically from different and potentially conflicting sources and to engage in the resulting discourses. We do not consider it a valid method of academic evaluation to judge a seminar purely based on supplied reading materials.”

The Berlin-based Amadeu Antonio Foundation, an organization devoted to combating anti-Semitism, racism and xenophobia, wrote a detailed expert opinion in 2015 on the HAWK seminar.

According to the report’s findings, which was authored by Jan Riebe, the seminar is not about “ the social situation of young people in the Palestinian territories. It serves to demonize Israel. “

Riebe said the seminar aims to convey that Israel could be construed in the same way as National Socialism, as well as the former apartheid regime in South Africa. Riebe wrote the course material propagates “old and new anti-Semitic resentments” and a historical picture that is hostile to Israel. He described the syllabus material as “non-academic.”

The Associate Dean of the Los Angeles-based human rights group the Simon Wiesenthal Center, Rabbi Abraham Cooper, told the Post on Thursday: “Genocidal Jew-hatred and racist ideology were incubated, validated, and promoted by German universities from the earliest days of the Third Reich.”

Cooper added, “In 2016, this despicable, extreme anti-Semitism and anti-Israel canard masquerading as a ‘course’ should be denounced by leaders of German academic and Medical circles.

Further, no German taxpayer funds should be used to promote the blood libel.”

The complaints of Seidler, the German Jewish academic who refused to teach the seminar, were rebuffed by Christa Paulini, the dean of the social work department, in 2015. Paulini told Seidler that she reacted in a ”personally sensitive” way to the seminar material.

The Debts Problem Highlighted in “The Secret of Oz” – Bill Still

My friend, Bill Still, has given me written permission to post this awesome, award winning documentary here and asks that you purchase the DVD at You can go to his channel for other great news and documentaries also:

Return American Government to the Constitution and Natural Law or Continue Existence as Debt Slaves and Chattel, the Choice is yours America

The beginning of sorrows for the modern age in America…


Since 1861, everything that has been done by the District of Columbia or the Several States in compliance with the District has no constitutional authority whatsoever, since the government created by the Constitution ceased to exist. We have been living either under a military dictatorship under Abraham Lincoln or under a globalist, corporate oligarchy that gained control after their agents murdered Lincoln; eventually gaining complete control over the reins of power, with Americans none the wiser.

With the incorporation of 1871, the oligarchy began slowly and systematically altering the way we conduct business and view our world… like a frog in a kettle we’ve been made accustomed to the corporate world view and taught less and less about the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God. Today we live under corporatism that has expanded and enveloped the American Republic and after 154 years, we’ve lost the knowledge of what it truly means to be an American.

The national status of Washington, D.C….

The District of Columbia is FOREIGN to the Several States and in a state of war against the natural rights of the people within them. It is NOT a party to the Constitution since Congress adjourned sine die, so people contracting with them are not doing so under Article I, Section 8, and clauses 17 and 18. It is a totally foreign entity like France or Spain and not constrained by any limitation of our Constitution and Bill of Rights. The United States Code and the Uniform Commercial Code has replaced our Constitution and Bill of Rights today; all outcroppings of the Lieber Code introduced by the Lincoln dictatorship, in 1863.

Note that I’m NOT quoting any Supreme Court or other inferior court case on any of this… since the Supreme Court is the legal department of the corporation, not government of the people. When it comes to the American Republic, the Supreme Court as constituted today has no jurisdiction or bearing since it is a corporation. Organic government is part of the natural world and pertains to the Laws of Nature and is constituted to secure our natural rights, no more.

The Supreme Court today is part of the corporate government, having no requirement or incentive to respect or abide by the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The corporations control and pay ALL the corporate courts and your tax dollars go to the stockholders of the Federal Reserve System, which includes the Rothschild Bank of London; they determine how they’re spent, not Congress.

Fiction vs Natural…

Corporations are legal fictions created by government for facilitating commerce by among other things, LIMITING LIABILITY. When you limit liability, you remove a commensurate amount of responsibility for actions performed by limiting compensation for damages to those that are harmed. Officers of corporations are also protected from personal liability for the actions of the corporation as a whole. Individual People have no such protection from liability and are still held fully liable for their actions under the law unless they incorporate; do you see the vicious circle here?

In my opinion, changing the playing field in favor of corporations by limiting their corporate liability over individuals is not only unfair but unjust since government is favoring their creation, not the People. Going one step further, by government incorporating itself it is now no longer a government of the people but another corporation representing the interests of its fellow corporations. Government in America has completely severed its connection to and reliance on the People and today views us as human resources, with them in the position of god.

Even non-profit corporations are managed by people who are not volunteers; many who received exorbitant salaries and bonuses for administering the corporation… so the term non-profit is just a bit deceiving in my view. Look into the Red Cross, animal rights groups, or political organizations incorporated as non-profits; they all bring in huge sums of money, little of which actually goes for the intention you sent your money in for… supporting the bureaucracy before the cause.

Despite all the marketing and hype to the contrary, corporations are all about one thing, money. Limited American government is about one thing, securing our Natural Rights. It appears that America has turned to worshipping money instead of the Creator. The oligarchy’s United States Government, Inc., has driven us into a state of debt unparalleled in human history. I have seen reports that their unfunded liabilities for their social programs, corporate subsidies, foreign bribes and wars, banking derivatives, and other expenses not permitted under the Constitution exceed $1.5 quadrillion dollars; many times the GDP of the whole world.

Restoring the American Republic…

I believe if we’re to regain our freedom, we must return to the Constitution as of March 1861 and the American Republic constituted at that time before secession; return to government of the people and accountable to them. I also believe the debt of the United States Government, Inc. should be repudiated and the corporation and its subsidiaries posing as State Governments dissolved, all political entities should return to their organic Constitutions or charters as applicable. States that were admitted by the corporation should return to the status of territory until Congress, lawfully constituted, can consider their admissions as of the current date of admission, not retroactively (ex post facto). In my opinion, all borrowing for programs and spending that is not specifically permitted by the Constitution is not legitimate public debt since the people have not given their consent through the Constitution.

“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:’

‘The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.’

‘Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.’

‘A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.’

‘No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” — 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256:

Politicians using our credit for the purpose of buying votes or filling the pockets of favored corporations through legislation outside the authority of their oath of office are committing fraud; the people should not be on the hook for fraudulent debt.

Let the bankers and their corporations pay the debt that was contracted for their benefit for purposes outside the Supreme Law of the American Republic; we have been plundered enough!

The following excerpt from our Declaration of Independence states in no uncertain terms the principles of American law, the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God, which is Natural Law.

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.’

‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.— That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” — Declaration of Independence, 1776.

Unless and until We the People understand what has happened to America and act accordingly, which is not petitioning or otherwise engaging politically with the District of Columbia or any corporate municipality in America, we will remain human resources to be used or disposed of at the oligarchy’s direction and will. Our local governments must be forced to unincorporate and return to their natural accountable state. Officers serving us in government must understand that they are personally liable to us should they attack our natural rights; everyone must respect the principle of “do no harm”.

©2015 by Thomas Mick, All Rights Reserved.
Permission to distribute for non-commercial purposes is hereby granted, in whole or part, provided attribution and a link to this article is included. Commercial distribution without the written permission of the author is prohibited.

My efforts to restore the American Republic consume all my time; it is my full-time job; at this time I survive on the support of those who believe in what I’m doing and wish for me to continue. To support my efforts please send contributions to

The Secretive Bank of England — Controlling the World’s Money Supply

With the enactment of the privately owned central bank, the Bank of England provided the model for the financial enslavement of governments, and their citizens.

Well before the conflict for establishing a National Bank in America or the eventual surrender to the money changers with the betrayal in instituting the Federal Reserve, the history of the Bank of England needs to be studied.

Relying on British historians may seem to invoke a cultural bias; however, the range and wealth of information on this topic comes from an earlier age. Further research will expand this understanding and many of the sources cited can fulfill this objective.

For purposes of a mainstream account, the official site of the Bank of England provides a flowery version about the background and purported success of the scheme proposed by “William Paterson, envisaged a loan of £1,200,000 to the Government, in return for which the subscribers would be incorporated as the “Governor and Company of the Bank of England”.

Although the new bank would have risked its entire capital by lending it to the Government, the subscription proved popular and the money was raised in a few weeks.

The Royal Charter was sealed on 27 July 1694, and the Bank started its role as the Government’s banker and debt-manager, which it continues today.”

“The bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing.” – William Paterson

THE FORMATION OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND by Halley Goodman provides a detailed and well sourced chronicle and background.

“The goldsmiths evolved to become the original private bankers of the time. Since  goldsmiths already had as part of their trade private stores of gold and stout vaults to store them in, entrepreneurs could entrust their own gold to them for safe keeping, for a fee, and receive a paper receipt for the deposit.

“The goldsmiths could then lend monies against these deposits for an additional fee. Mr. Hartley Winters declares that “some ingenious goldsmith conceived the epock-making notion of giving notes…and so founded modern banking.”

Merchants would deposit “their money with the goldsmiths and received from them receipts” that “…were payable on demand, and were transferred from one holder to another in payment of debts.”

“These receipts or notes from the goldsmith bankers, often in the form of a letter, are some of the earliest surviving cheques in England. Given the economic realities of the time, although deposits provided the funds for their business, most of the clients of these goldsmith bankers were usually borrowers rather than depositors.”

From such humble origins, the foundation was laid to invent a central bank that would create money out of thin air and loan it at interest to the government, who lost it sovereignty for making this Faustian bargain.

Secrets of the Bank of England Revealed at Last!

The Charter of the Bank of England (1694) with the Great Seal of William and Mary. The first usury central bank to be incorporated in England.

The Bank of England account, published by Cassell, Petter & Galpin cites a rocky start and opposition from the goldsmiths.

“In 1696 (very soon after its birth) the Bank experienced a crisis. There was a want of money in England. The clipped silver had been called in, and the new money was not ready.

Even rich people were living on credit, and issued promissory notes. The stock of the Bank of England had gone rapidly down from 110 to 83.

The goldsmiths, who detested the corporation that had broken in on their system of private banking, now tried to destroy the new company.

They plotted, and on the same day they crowded to Grocers’ Hall, where the Bank was located from 1694 to 1734, and insisted on immediate payment — one goldsmith alone demanding £30,000.

The directors paid all their honest creditors, but refused to cash the goldsmiths’ notes, and left them their remedy in Westminster Hall. The goldsmiths triumphed in scurrilous pasquinades entitled, “The Last Will and Testament,” “The Epitaph,” “The Inquest on the Bank of England.”

It did not take long for the Jewish bankers to set their sights on Paterson’s bank and financers for the English regime. Brother Nathanael Kapner adds his audacious viewpoints.

“The new King William III soon got England involved in costly wars against Catholic France which put England deep into debt. Here was the Jewish bankers’ chance to collect.

“So King William, under orders from the Elders of Zion in Amsterdam, persuaded the British Treasury to borrow 1.25 million pounds sterling from the Jewish bankers who had helped him to the throne.

“Since the state’s debts had risen dramatically, the government had no choice but to accept. But there were conditions attached: The names of the lenders were to be kept secret and that they be granted a Charter to establish a Central Bank of England. Parliament accepted and the Jewish bankers sunk their tentacles into Great Britain.”

Actual control of the fiat central bank is discussed in Who owns the Bank of England?

“A very famous story relates to the Bank of England and the infamous Rothschilds, that all powerful banking family.

This story was re-told recently in a BBC documentary about the creation of money and the Bank of England.

It revolves around the Battle of Waterloo in which Nathan Rothschild used his inside knowledge of the outcome and his faster horses and couriers to play the market by getting the result of the battle before anyone else knew the outcome.

He quickly sold his English bonds and gave all the traders who looked to him for guidance the impression that the French had won at Waterloo.

The other traders all rushed to sell their bonds before the market crashed thinking that they were now worthless and a massive fire-sale occurred as brokers clamered to get rid of their stock.

This massive sell off quickly drove the price of the bonds down to 5% of their original worth.

Once the bottom had dropped out the market Nathan Rothschild then re-bought as many bonds back as he could at hugely discounted prices and in doing so he multiplied his wealth twenty times in 3 days of trading.

At the same time as becoming immensely wealthy he also became the single largest debtor to the English government which ultimately gave him control over the bank of England.” — (Read more on the subject here).

If you are so inclined to do your own research, two sources, HISTORY OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND written by Dr. A. Andreades and Complete Histories: Bank of England to 1694, are worthy of review.

“As you can see by the 250-year chart of Bank of England stock, the shares showed no real trend during the 1700s, rose in price during the Napoleonic Wars as England left the gold standard and suffered inflation, declined in price from around 1818 to 1845 during the deflation that followed, rose in price for the rest of the 1800s as the Bank gradually increased its dividend, plunged until 1920 as inflation occurred without any compensating rise in the dividend, then gradually rose in price until the Bank was nationalized in 1945.

“The behavior of the Bank of England’s stock encapsulates the general behavior of the British stock market over that 250-year period.”

Now for most of its history the privately held, Bank of England was extremely profitable to its owners. The method for charging interest on the creation of money has been the prime vehicle for driving both public and private debt throughout modern times.

The Guardian reports in the article, The truth is out: money is just an IOU, and the banks are rolling in it.

“The Bank of England let the cat out of the bag. In a paper called “Money Creation in the Modern Economy“, co-authored by three economists from the Bank’s Monetary Analysis Directorate, they stated outright that most common assumptions of how banking works are simply wrong, and that the kind of populist, heterodox positions more ordinarily associated with groups such as Occupy Wall Street are correct.

“In doing so, they have effectively thrown the entire theoretical basis for austerity out of the window.”

The entire monitory financial system is based upon charging usury on the creation of national currencies.

No larger debtor exists then governments. The perfection of the Rothschild fraud is founded upon charging compound interest on the very medium of exchange that serves as legal tender.

The Bank of England set the stage for the centralization of all banking under the umbrella of banksters control.

In order to discover all the secrets of manipulating the financial system, one must comprehend, the first and primary lesson; that central banks do not function as beneficiaries to their host nation, much less the ordinary “little people”.

Keeping this deplorable rip-off system extorting their pound of flesh is the principal objective of the financial elites. Interest on government bonds must be paid. More debt needs to be incurred. And the framework for human impoverishment lies at the feet of central banking.

Reference: Batr


3 ‘City States’ Rule the World

Full Article with movie links –…

3 City States that control the whole world, and their rolls:

City of London – FINANCE: Receives taxes from their subjects (slaves) in Canada and the United States. They design and control our financial and banking systems.

Vatican City – RELIGION: The Pope wants to merge all the religions into one, which is absolute nonsense. The Pope broke off from the truth (confusingly referred to as The ‘Eastern Church’ or ‘Eastern Orthodox Church’ or ‘Orthodox Church’ or ‘Orthodox’) about 1000 years ago.

Washington DC – MILITARY: Death camps and stacks of black plastic coffins that can hold six to ten bodies each, are piled high in a long train-like fashion, as far as the eye can see, in the United States, today.

These three are sovereign, corporate entities that are not part of the countries they are located in. They have their own laws, and identities, as indicated by their respective flags

Full Article –…

The “CITY” in London

The “City”, also known as the “square mile” an area of 677 hectares in London is just like the Vatican City in Rome their own state. The City-State, pays no tax, has its own courts, its own laws, their own flag, their own private police at about 2,000 men, and a night population that underestimates 9000 inhabitants.

Here are the Bank of England, a privately owned institution which is not subject to regulation by the British Parliament, and in fact is a sovereign world power. Moreover, Lloyds of London (insurance), London Stock Exchange (stock exchange) Fleet Streets newspapers and publishing, offices in all British banks, offices in 385 foreign banks, and 70 U.S. banks.

Internationally they use the “Crown Princess” as a symbol of power but the real power belongs to the bankers and not the royal house. It is very difficult to gain an insight into the persons who effectively control the Bank of England. A name that leaked is Rothschild.

The “City of London” is an economic entity which is legally separate from England and in control of all lawyers and banks across the world – including the Federal Reserve in the USA! The “City” is also the English seat of the world’s Freemasonry with the United Grand Lodge of England as the center…

Washington, District of Columbia

The flag of the Washington District of Columbia has three red stars. One for each city state in the empire. This empire rule the world economically through London’s “City”, militarily by the District of Columbia, and spiritually by the Vatican. The Constitution for the District of Columbia operates under a tyrannical Roman law known as the lex fori and has no similarities to the U.S. Constitution…

The Vatican in Rome

Vatican’s assets include massive investments by Rothschild in the UK, France and the U.S., billions of shares in oil and weapons companies like Shell and General Electric, Bethlehem Steel. The Vatican is the world’s largest owner of private property and its gold reserves are stored by the Bank of England and the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank…

Jewish banishment and the City of London

Earthlinggb’s Blog – February 26, 2011

Anyone thinking very logically and simply would simply ask one question:


Henk Ruyssenaars’ article on July 10th 2006 drew attention to the book “Descent into Slavery” by Des Griffin in which the real meaning of the term “City of London” is explained. The following is an excerpt from that article.

“To the majority of people the words “Crown” and “City” in reference to London refer to the queen or the capital of England.

This is not the truth. The “City” is in fact a privately owned Corporation – or Sovereign State – occupying an irregular rectangle of 677 acres and located right in the heart of the 610 square mile ‘Greater London’ area. The population of ‘The City’ is listed at just over four thousand, whereas the population of ‘Greater London’ (32 boroughs) is approximately seven and a half million.

“The Crown” is a committee of twelve to fourteen men who rule the independent sovereign state known as London or ‘The City.’ ‘The City’ is not part of England. It is not subject to the Sovereign. It is not under the rule of the British parliament. Like the Vatican in Rome, it is a separate, independent state.

“The City”, which is often called “the wealthiest square mile on earth,” is ruled over by a Lord Mayor. Here are grouped together Britain’s great financial and commercial institutions: Wealthy banks, dominated by the privately-owned (Rothschild controlled) Bank of England, Lloyd’s of London, the London Stock Exchange, and the offices of most of the leading international trading concerns. Here, also, is located Fleet Street, the heart and core of the newspaper and publishing worlds.

The Lord Mayor, who is elected for a one year stint, is the monarch in the City. As Aubrey Menen says in “London”, Time-Life, 1976, p. 16:

“The relation of this monarch of the City to the monarch of the realm [Queen] is curious and tells much.”
It certainly is and certainly does!
When the Queen of England goes to visit the City she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple Bar, the symbolic gate of the City. She bows and asks for permission to enter his private, sovereign State. During such State visits “the Lord Mayor in his robes and chain, and his entourage in medieval costume, outshines the royal party, which can dress up no further than service uniforms.”

The Lord Mayor leads the queen into his city.
The symbolism is clear. The Lord Mayor is the monarch. The Queen is his subject.

The small clique who rule the City dictate to the British Parliament. It tells them what to do, and when. In theory Britain is ruled by a Prime Minister and a Cabinet of close advisers. These ‘fronts’ go to great lengths to create the impression that they are running the show but, in reality, they are mere puppets whose strings are pulled by the shadowy characters who dominate behind the scenes. As the former British Prime Minister of England during the late 1800s Benjamin D’Israeli wrote:

“So you see… the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes”
(Coningsby, The Century Co., N.Y., 1907, p. 233).

This fact is further demonstrated by another passage from Menen’s book:

“The Prime Minister, a busy politician, is not expected to understand the mysteries of high finance, while the Chancellor of the Exchequer is only expected to understand them when he introduces the budget. Both are advised by the permanenet officials of the Treasury, and these listen to the City. If they suspect that some policy of the government will back-fire, it is of no use their calling up British ambassadors to ask if it is so; they can find out more quickly from the City. As one ambassador said: “Diplomats are nowadays no more than office boys, and slow ones at that. The City will know. They will tell the Treasury and the Treasury will tell the Prime Minister.”

Woe betide him if he does not listen. The most striking instance of this happened in recent history. In 1956 the then Prime Minister, Sir Anthony Eden… launched a war to regain the Suez Canal. It had scarcely begun when the City let it be known that in a few days he would have no more money to fight it; the Pound would collapse. He stopped the war and was turned out of office by his party. When the Prime Minister rises to address the Lord Mayor’s banquet, he hopes that the City will put more behind him than the gold plate lavishly displayed on the sideboards.”

The British government is the bond slave of the “invisible and inaudible” force centred in the City. The City calls the tune. The “visible and audible leaders” are mere puppets who dance to that tune on command. They have no power. They have no authority. In spite of the outward show they are mere pawns in the game being played by the financial elite.

It is important to recognise the fact that two separate empires were operating under the guise of the British Empire. One was the Crown Empire and the other the British Empire.

The colonial possessions that were white were under the sovereign – i.e. under the authority of the British government. Such nations as the Union of South Africa, Australia, New Zealand and Canada were governed under British law. These only represented thirteen percent of the people who made up the inhabitants of the Britsh Empire.

All the other parts of the British Empire – nations like India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Cyprus and colonies in Central Africa, Singapore, Hong Kong and Gibraltar were all Crown Colonies. These were not under British rule. The British parliament had no authority over them.

As the Crown owned the committee known as the British government there was no problem getting the British taxpayer to pay for naval and military forces to maintain the Crown’s supremacy in these areas.

The City reaped fantastic profits from its operations conducted under the protection of the British armed forces. This wasn’t British commerce and British wealth. The international bankers, prosperous merchants and those members of the aristocracy who were part of the “City” machine accumulated vast fortunes .

About seventy years ago Vincent Cartwright Vickers stated that :

….”financiers in reality took upon themselves, perhaps not the responsibility, but certainly the power of controlling the markets of the world and therefore the numerous relationships between one nation and another, involving international friendship and mistrusts… Loans to foreign countries are organised and arranged by the City of London with no thought whatsoever of the nation’s welfare but solely in order to increase indebtedness upon which the City thrives and grows rich…”
In “Empire of the City” E. C. Knuth said:

” This national amnd mainly international dictatorship of money which plays off one country against another and which, through ownership of a large portion of the press converts the advertisement of its own private opinion into a semblance of general public opinion, cannot for much longer be permitted to render Democratic Government a mere nickname. Today we see through a glass darkly: for there is so much which it would not be in the public interest to divulge.”…

The battle for power and riches is an ancient one, but any attempt to make sense of the present world situation where the bulk of humanity is being herded like sheep into a corral without some knowledge of history is a difficult if not impossible task.

At present names have been replaced by groups, capitalists, republicans, democrats, terrorists, corporations, NATO, UNO, NAFTA, EMI, ECB, ASEAN. Names that are spewed out like confetti in an endless list of anonymity.

In spite of modern technology the figures in the background remain blurred. Mention the word “Jew” or “Conspiracy” and everyone with few exceptions will turn away. Why? Fear? Of what? What is the magic talisman which makes the mention of these co-religionists a no-go area? Is it because they have infiltrated every aspect of human activity? Is it they who are pulling the strings which are leading the world on its downward slope?

The Jew has been mistrusted since way back. But what is apparent now is that any attempt to offer an answer to the question is clamped down upon. What does that indicate? Above all it indicates that these shadowy figures fear more than anything else the truth.

Professor Jesse H. Holmes, writing in, “The American Hebrew,” expressed the following similar sentiments:

“It can hardly be an accident that antagonism directed against the Jews is to be found pretty much everywhere in the world where Jews and non-Jews are associated. And as the Jews are the common element of the situation it would seem probable, on the face of it, that the cause will be found in them rather than in the widely varying groups which feel this antagonism.
In Europe and Russia alone, the Jews have been banished 47 times in the last 1,000 years: Mainz, 1012; France, 1182; Upper Bavaria, 1276; England, 1290; France, 1306; France, 1322; Saxony, 1349; Hungary, 1360; Belgium, 1370; Slovakia, 1380; France, 1394; Austria, 1420; Lyons, 1420; Cologne, 1424; Mainz, 1438; Augsburg, 1438; Upper Bavaria, 1442; Netherlands, 1444; Brandenburg, 1446; Mainz, 1462; Lithuania, 1495; Portugal, 1496; Naples, 1496; Navarre, 1498; Nuremberg, 1498; Brandenburg, 1510; Prussia, 1510; Genoa, 1515; Naples, 1533; Italy, 1540; Naples, 1541; Prague, 1541; Genoa, 1550; Bavaria, 1551; Prague, 1557; Papal States, 1569; Hungary, 1582; Hamburg, 1649; Vienna, 1669; Slovakia, 1744; Mainz, 1483; Warsaw, 1483; Spain, 1492; Italy, 1492; Moravia, 1744; Bohemia, 1744; Moscow, 1891.

(The above is excerpted from The Synagogue of Satan by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock.)

Of what were these people guilty to arouse such a reaction from so many diverse people?

Well, in England, it’s very interesting:

IT ALL STARTED with The Edict of Expulsion of 1290 AD.
The Jews would have us believe that their expulsion from England by Edward I (reigned 1272-1307) was due to their money lending endeavors. The real reason was due to the Jews’ crime of blood ritual murders.

The Orthodox Christian historian of the 5th Century, Socrates Scholasticus, in his Ecclesiastical History, 7:16, recounts an incident about Jews killing a Christian child:

— “At a place near Antioch in Syria, the Jews, in derision of the Cross and those who put their trust in the Crucified One, seized a Christian boy, and having bound him to a cross they made, began to sneer at him. In a little while becoming so transported with fury, they scourged the child until he died under their hands.” —

Here are a few examples which led to the English expulsion of the Jews in 1290 AD:

1144 A.D. Norwich: A twelve year-old boy was crucified and his side pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden in a tree. A converted Jew to Christianity named Theobald of Cambridge informed the authorities that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever return to Palestine. The boy has ever since been known as St. William.

1160 A.D. Gloucester: The body of a child named Harold was found in the river with the wounds of crucifixion.

1255 A.D. Lincoln: A boy named Hugh was tortured and crucified by the Jews. The boy’s mother found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew named Jopin. 18 Jews were hanged for the crime by King Henry III.

1290 A.D. Oxford: The Patent Roll 18 Of Edward I, 21st June 1290 contains an order for the Gaol delivery of a Jew named Isaac de Pulet for the murder and blood letting of a Christian boy. Only one month after this, King Edward I issued his decree expelling the Jews from England.
(See Sources #1 Below )

JEWISH BANKERS FROM AMSTERDAM led by the Jewish financier and army contractor of Cromwell’s New Model Army, Fernandez Carvajal and assisted by Portuguese Ambassador De Souza, a Marano (secret Jew), saw an opportunity to exploit in the civil unrest led by Oliver Cromwell in 1643.

A stable Christian society of ancient traditions binding the Monarchy, Church, State, nobles and people into one solemn bond was disrupted by Calvin’s Protestant uprising. The Jews of Amsterdam exploited this civil unrest and made their move. They contacted Oliver Cromwell in a series of letters:

Cromwell To Ebenezer Pratt of the Mulheim Synagogue in Amsterdam,
16th June 1647:
— “In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England: This however impossible while Charles living. Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape.” —

To Oliver Cromwell From Ebenezer Pratt, 12th July 1647:
— “Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and Jews admitted. Assassination too dangerous. Charles shall be given opportunity to escape: His recapture will make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences.” —

Cromwell had carried out the orders of the Jewish financiers and beheaded, (yes, Cromwell and his Jewish sponsors must face Christ!), King Charles I on January 30 1649.

Beginning in 1655, Cromwell, through his alliance with the Jewish bankers of Amsterdam and specifically with Manasseh Ben Israel and his brother-in-law, David Abravanel Dormido, initiated the resettlement of the Jews in England.
(See Sources #2 Below )


WILLIAM STADHOLDER, a Dutch army careerist, was a handsome chap with money problems. The Jews saw another opportunity and through their influence arranged for William’s elevation to Captain General of the Dutch Forces. The next step up the ladder for William was his elevation by the Jews to the aristocratic title of William, Prince of Orange.

The Jews then arranged a meeting between William and Mary, the eldest daughter of the Duke of York. The Duke was only one place removed from becoming King of England. In 1677 Princess Mary of England married William Prince of Orange.

To place William upon the throne of England it was necessary to get rid of both Charles II and the Duke of York who was slated to become James II of the Stuarts. It is important to note that none of the Stuarts would grant charter for an English national bank. That is why murder, civil war, and religious conflicts plagued their reigns by the Jewish bankers.

In 1685, King Charles II died and the Duke of York became King James II of England. In 1688 the Jews ordered William Prince of Orange to land in England at Torbay. Because of an ongoing Campaign of L’Infamie against King James II contrived by the Jews, he abdicated and fled to France. William of Orange and Mary were proclaimed King and Queen of England.

The new King William III soon got England involved in costly wars against Catholic France which put England deep into debt. Here was the Jewish bankers’ chance to collect. So King William, under orders from the Elders of Zion in Amsterdam, persuaded the British Treasury to borrow 1.25 million pounds sterling from the Jewish bankers who had helped him to the throne.

Since the state’s debts had risen dramatically, the government had no choice but to accept. But there were conditions attached: The names of the lenders were to be kept secret and that they be granted a Charter to establish a Central Bank of England. Parliament accepted and the Jewish bankers sunk their tentacles into Great Britain.


MAYER AMSCHEL BAUER OPENED a money lending business on Judenstrasse (Jew Street) in Frankfurt Germany in 1750 and changed his name to Rothschild. Mayer Rothschild had five sons.

The smartest of his sons, Nathan, was sent to London to establish a bank in 1806. Much of the initial funding for the new bank was tapped from the British East India Company which Mayer Rothschild had significant control of. Mayer Rothschild placed his other four sons in Frankfort, Paris, Naples, and Vienna.

In 1814, Nathanael Rothschild saw an opportunity in the Battle of Waterloo. Early in the battle, Napoleon appeared to be winning and the first military report to London communicated that fact. But the tide turned in favor of Wellington.

A courier of Nathan Rothschild brought the news to him in London on June 20. This was 24 hours before Wellington’s courier arrived in London with the news of Wellington’s victory. Seeing this fortuitous event, Nathan Rothschild began spreading the rumor that Britain was defeated.

With everyone believing that Wellington was defeated, Nathan Rothschild began to sell all of his stock on the English Stock Market. Everyone panicked and also began selling causing stocks to plummet to practically nothing. At the last minute, Nathan Rothschild began buying up the stocks at rock-bottom prices.

This gave the Rothschild family complete control of the British economy – now the financial centre of the world and forced England to set up a revamped Bank of England with Nathan Rothschild in control.
(See Sources #4 Below )


(As much as that is possible given Rothschild secrecy)
A PRIVATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION exists today in England known as “The City.” It is also known as The Jewish Vatican located in the heart of Greater London:

A Committee of 12 men rule The Jewish Vatican. They are known as “The Crown.” The City and its rulers, The Crown, are not subject to the Parliament. They are a Sovereign State within a State.

The City is the financial hub of the world. It is here that the Rothschilds have their base of operations and their centrality of control:

  • The Central Bank of England (controlled by the Rothschilds) is located in The City.
    * All major British banks have their main offices in The City.
    * 385 foreign banks are located in The City.
    * 70 banks from the United States are located in The City.

London Stock Exchange is located in The City.
* Lloyd’s of London is located in The City.
* The Baltic Exchange (shipping contracts) is located in The City.
* Fleet Street (newspapers & publishing) is located in The City.
* The London Metal Exchange is located in The City.
* The London Commodity Exchange (trading rubber, wool, sugar, coffee) is located in The City.

Every year a Lord Mayor is elected as monarch of The City. The British Parliament does not make a move without consulting the Lord Mayor of The City. For here in the heart of London are grouped together Britain’s financial institutions dominated by the Rothschild-controlled Central Bank of England.

The Rothschilds have traditionally chosen the Lord Mayor since 1820. Who is the present day Lord Mayor of The City? Only the Rothschilds’ know for sure…
(See Sources #5 Below )

Sources #1: Ariel Toaff, Bloody Passover-Jews of Europe and Ritual Homicide, 2007 Click Here; J. C. Cox, Norfolk Churches; Victoria County History of Norfolk, 1906; Arnold Leese, Jewish Ritual Murder In England; Henry III, Close Roll 16; Joseph Haydn, Dictionary of Dates.

Sources #2: Isaac Disraeli, Life of Charles I, 1851; Hugh Ross Williamson, Charles and Cromwell; AHM Ramsey, The Nameless War; Lord Alfred Douglas, Plain English, 1921; Geoffrey H. Smith, The Settlement Of Jews In England

Sources #3: John Harold Wood, History of Central Banking in Great Britain; Gustaaf Johannes Renier, William of Orange

Sources #4: Frederick Morton, The Rothschilds; Benjamin Disraeli, Coningsby

Sources #5: E.C. Knuth, The Empire of The City; Des Griffin, Descent Into Slavery


Israel’s Tightening But Weakening Grip

Israel’s near-seven-decade oppression of the Palestinian people has cost it popular support worldwide and led Zionists to rely more and more on paid-off political allies to shield Israeli interests, observes Lawrence Davidson.

By Lawrence Davidson

Zionism’s range of influence is shrinking. One can see this progression worldwide. At a popular level the Israelis have lost control of the historical storyline of Israel-Palestine. They may teach their own citizens their version of the story, the one wherein the Jews have a divine and/or historical right to all of Palestine’s territory. But beyond their fellow Zionists and the loony Christian Right, no one else believes this story. Significantly, an increasing number of Jews no longer accept it either.

None of this means that the Zionists are not still influential. Yet their influence no longer has a broad popular base. It is now largely restricted to Western government circles. Of course, that is still impressive, and such lobby power does a lot of damage in the West through the corruption of elites and the perversion of state policies. We are seeing examples of this in the many stories of American police officers being trained by Israelis while (coincidently?) episodes of police brutality in the U.S. multiply.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held a security meeting with senior Israeli Defense Forces commanders near Gaza on July 21, 2014. (Israel government photo)

It is to be noted, however, the Zionist ability to maintain a close connection between Western governments and Israel is now based on their ability to spread around enormous sums of money, and not on what once was popular emotional admiration for the “Israeli experiment.” In truth the Zionists are left with a narrowing base of support for a country that is increasingly seen as, at best, inhumane and racist and, at worst, ruthless and criminal.

Zionism’s internal reaction to the loss of popular support is to defensively circle the wagons ever more tightly and press on with transparently illegal policies of settlement expansion and oppression.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is the secular-political leader of this hunker-down strategy. However, for Jews worldwide what is perhaps more alarming, and certainly as depressing, is the role played by Judaism’s religious representatives – members of Israel’s rabbinic officialdom – who keep publicly calling for, and religiously justifying, the slaughter of Palestinians. Here are some recent examples:

In early March of 2016 Israel’s chief Sephardic rabbi, Yitzhak Yosef, announced that it is “a religious imperative” to execute “Palestinian assailants” as soon as they are apprehended, despite more judicious directives given by Israel’s military high command and law courts. Yosef then managed to show himself utterly out of touch with the history of Palestinian resistance (which he incorrectly mixes up with modern terrorism) when he declared that “It deters them too. The moment a terrorist knows that if he comes with a knife he won’t return alive, that will deter them. That’s why it’s a mitzvah [a blessing] to kill him.” There is, of course, no evidence that such a policy of on-the-spot executions deters Palestinian violence.

Yosef’s call for on-the-spot executions is actually a follow-up to a statement made by his predecessor, Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu, in 2007. At that time Eliyahu pronounced that “there was absolutely no moral prohibition against the indiscriminate killing of civilians during a potential massive military offensive on Gaza.”

In December 2015, Chaim Kanievsky, an important “ultra-Orthodox” Israeli rabbi, instructed the members of United Hatzalah, a West Bank settler-run ambulance service, that when confronted with a Palestinian “terrorist” who has “a life-threatening condition, they should leave him or her to die.”

This pronouncement has sparked a lively debate among some Israeli rabbis, but the resulting impact on the practice of Israeli ambulance crews has been to give them an excuse to disregard their obligations under international law, and leave injured Palestinians untreated.

This attitude has long been evolving, and it has even produced the equivalent of “saintly” figures. For instance, there is the American Zionist settler Baruch Goldstein who in 1994 killed 24 Palestinian worshipers and injured another 125, at the Ibrahimi Mosque in Hebron. The settler community at Kiryat Arba has erected an elaborate tomb to Goldstein with an epitaph that reads, in part, that he had “clean hands and a pure heart.” The tomb remains today a site of pilgrimage for Zionists of genocidal inclination.

All those Zionists who justify the murder of Palestinians lawfully resisting unlawful occupation are themselves in violation of international law. Those who rationalize this behavior by evoking violent and wrathful biblical images go further and put themselves in the same category as Al Qaeda and ISIS fanatics.

An Existential Dilemma

Zionism did not start out advocating slaughter. The original Zionist preference for the disposal of the Palestinians was “transfer” –  the removal by force or economic inducement of the Palestinians from conquered Israeli territory into the surrounding Arab lands. This scheme, in its forceful guise, was put into effect during the 1948 and 1967 wars. This certainly cleared out some of the indigenous population, but by no means everyone: there are today some 6 million Palestinians living under Israeli control.

For most of those who have remained, policies of enforced poverty, enforced immobility and daily harassment have made life miserable. It has also encouraged continuous violent resistance among Palestinians and a corresponding growing frustration among Israeli Jews. This frustration soon began to encourage Zionists, both secular and religious, to replace the traditional notion of transfer with newer visions of slaughter.

An Israeli soldier prepares for a night attack inside Gaza as part of Operation Protective Edge, which killed more than 2,000 Gazans in 2014. (Israel Defense Forces photo)

The participation of the rabbis, who play the role of “spiritual guides” for millions of Orthodox Jews, in preaching a call to murder creates an existential dilemma for the adherents of the Jewish religion – existential because it speaks to the religion’s evolving nature.

In terms of its present adherents, it places them in the same situation experienced by many Catholics and Protestants during the eras of the Crusades and Reformation wars. It was in those eras that official religious institutions and leaders espoused and religiously rationalized wholesale slaughter.

Today we have created standards, supported by international law, that render such repulsive behavior illegal. But the Zionist leadership seems not to care about such standards and laws.

There are certainly those among today’s Jewry who understand the watershed nature of this turn of events. In August 2014, the American rabbi Michael Lerner, editor of Tikkun Magazine, called on his fellow Jews to “mourn for the Judaism of love and generosity that is being murdered by Israel and its worshipers around the world, the same kind of idol-worshipers who, pretending to be Jewish [are] actually assimilated into the world of power.”

The organization of Rabbis For Human Rights attempts to ally with Palestinians so as to keep alive the notion that there are still Jewish religious leaders who understand the potentially humane essence of their religion. Organizations such as Jewish Voice for Peace give an alternative for Jewish laity who want to work against Zionist policies.

In the meantime, increasing numbers of Western Jews have silently broken with Israel and the Zionist movement. They have retreated to a passive apolitical position, rendering Israel no aid. Unfortunately, Jews in active opposition to Zionism, be they rabbis or laity, while growing in number, are still insufficiently organized to challenge Zionist political influence in official circles.

The existential problem that now confronts Judaism is the logical consequence of the World War II era alliance made by the religion’s leadership and the secular ideology of Zionism.

There are clear historical reasons why this alliance was made: a millennium of anti-Semitic persecution in the West culminating in the Nazi Holocaust; the existence of the national state as the premier model for collective self-protection; the colonial tradition that rationalized European control of non-European lands; and finally an age-old religious devotion to biblical tales of wandering and conquering Israelite tribes.

This offers the context within which the modern Jewish religion got captured by the Zionist movement, but whatever you think of these reasons, none of them, nor all of them together, mitigate the predictable disastrous consequences, laced with racism, chauvinism, intolerance, and violence, that was bound to follow Judaism’s collaboration with Zionism. As Rabbi Lerner says, the end product of all of this sends him into mourning.

An Israeli strike caused a huge explosion in a residential area in Gaza during the Israeli assault on Gaza in 2008-2009. (Photo credit: Al Jazeera)


In the eyes of increasing numbers, the country of Israel is a pariah state, and the behavior of its rabbinical officialdom may have already thrown its religious establishment into similar disgrace.

Those Jewish organizations that stand against the Israeli debacle are like candles burning in an otherwise political-religious darkness. Their struggle will go on. Indeed, it may never cease until Israel’s racist behavior ceases.

But right now, it has become evident that it is not only the existence of the Palestinians that Zionism threatens. It also has put in danger whatever humane instincts are left within organized Judaism.

Lawrence Davidson is a history professor at West Chester University in Pennsylvania. He is the author of Foreign Policy Inc.: Privatizing America’s National Interest; America’s Palestine: Popular and Official Perceptions from Balfour to Israeli Statehood; and Islamic Fundamentalism.



חייל מוציא להורג פלסטיני השרוע פצוע על הרצפה לאחר שזה דקר חייל

לתשומת לבכם: זהו סרטון קשה מאוד לצפייה.

לפי דיווחים בתקשורת, שני פלסטינים, עבד אל-פתאח א-שריף ורמזי אל-קסראווי, נורו הבוקר למוות לאחר שדקרו חייל, שנפצע באורח בינוני בתל רומידה בחברון. בתיעוד וידאו שצילם עימאד אבו שמסיה ושהועבר לבצלם ניתן לראות את א-שריף השוכב על הכביש לאחר שנפצע, תוך שכל הנוכחים מתעלמים ממנו. הצוות הרפואי אף הוא התעלם ממנו, תוך שהגיש סיוע לחייל הדקור, שעל פניו נראה שמצבו הרפואי היה קל משל א-שריף. אז ניגש אליו חייל ומוציא אותו להורג ביריה בראשו מטווח קרוב. מהתיעוד עולה כי א-שריף היה בחיים לפני הירי.

בשניה 0:19 הוא נראה מיישר את הראש שהיה מוטה לשמאל, ולאחר מכן, בשנייה 0:26 מטה את הראש ימינה.

רגע הירי: 1:59 הירי

גל האלימות שהחל באוקטובר 2015 הוא מזעזע וברור כי על כוחות הביטחון להגן על הציבור ולעשות שימוש בכוח הנדרש לשם השגת מטרה זו, בהתאם לנסיבות. החוק בנושא זה ברור אף הוא: ירי במטרה להרוג אדם מותר אך ורק במקרים שבהם הוא מסכן חיי אחרים.

הוצאה להורג ברחוב, ללא חוק וללא משפט היא תולדה ישירה של שיח מתלהם של שרים בממשלה ושל נבחרי ציבור ושל אווירה ציבורית של דה-הומניזציה. אמנם מעת לעת השמיעו גורמים בכירים אמירות המצדדות במחויבות לשמירה על החוק ובהימנעות משימוש בכוח רב מהנדרש, כמו דברי הרמטכ”ל לאחרונה ודברים שכתב השר לביטחון פנים לבצלם בתשובה רשמית. אולם, מול אמירות אלו עומדות

התבטאויות פומביות הפוכות, כדוגמת זו של השר לביטחון פנים, עצימת עין מוחלטת של רשויות


America and Israel: An Unbreakable Bond

Shimon Peres, Ehud Barak, Benjamin Netanyahu, and other leaders describe how President Obama has strengthened the relationship between the United States and Israel.

Greenwald Explains What Out-of-Touch Media Doesn’t Get About Trump, Russia, and US Electorate

Published on

‘People have been so fucked by the prevailing order in such deep and fundamental and enduring ways that they can’t imagine that anything is worse than preservation of the status quo’

Glenn Greenwald

“You have this huge portion of the populace in both the U.K. and the U.S. that is so angry and so helpless that they view exploding things without any idea of what the resulting debris is going to be to be preferable to having things continue,” Glenn Greenwald toldSlate. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/flickr/cc)

Donald Trump poses “extreme dangers” to the United States and the world, journalist and co-founding editor of The Intercept Glenn Greenwald says in a new interview published atSlate.

But to stop the GOP presidential nominee from getting elected, “U.S. media and U.S. elites” must take a lesson from the recent Brexit debacle, he warns—and bending over backwards to link Trump to Russian President Vladimir Putin isn’t the right approach.

“U.K. elites were uniform, uniform, in their contempt for the Brexit case, other than the right-wing Murdochian tabloids,” Greenwald told Slate contributor Isaac Chotiner by phone.

“They all sat on Twitter all day long, from the left to the right, and all reinforced each other about how smart and how sophisticated they were in scorning and [being snide] about [U.K. Independent party] and Boris Johnson and all of the Brexit leaders, and they were convinced that they had made their case,” he said. “Everyone they were talking to—which is themselves—agreed with them. It was constant reinforcement, and anyone who raised even a peep of dissent or questioned the claims they were making was instantly castigated as somebody who was endangering the future of the U.K. because they were endorsing—or at least impeding—the effort to stop Brexit. This is what’s happening now.”

He continued:

Do you think the people voting for Donald Trump because they feel their economic future has been destroyed, or because they are racist, or because they feel fear of immigrants and hate the U.S. elite structure and want Trump to go and blow it up, give the slightest shit about Ukraine, that Trump is some kind of agent of Putin? They don’t! Just like the Brexit supporters. The U.K. media tried the same thing, telling the Brexit advocates that they were playing into Putin’s hands, that Putin wanted the U.K. out of the EU to weaken both. They didn’t care about that. That didn’t drive them.

He cautioned pundits and the political elite against harboring a limited perspective about Trump supporters and their beliefs:

One of the things that is bothering me and bothered me about the Brexit debate, and is bothering me a huge about the Trump debate, is that there is zero elite reckoning with their own responsibility in creating the situation that led to both Brexit and Trump and then the broader collapse of elite authority. The reason why Brexit resonated and Trump resonated isn’t that people are too stupid to understand the arguments. The reason they resonated is that people have been so fucked by the prevailing order in such deep and fundamental and enduring ways that they can’t imagine that anything is worse than preservation of the status quo. You have this huge portion of the populace in both the U.K. and the U.S. that is so angry and so helpless that they view exploding things without any idea of what the resulting debris is going to be to be preferable to having things continue, and the people they view as having done this to them to continue in power. That is a really serious and dangerous and not completely invalid perception that a lot of people who spend their days scorning Trump and his supporters or Brexit played a great deal in creating.

Filmmaker Michael Moore floated a similar argument last week, when he (apologetically) predicted that Trump will beat Hillary Clinton in November.

“I live in Michigan,” he said in an interview. “Let me tell you, it’s going to be the Brexit strategy.”

“I think one of the things I’ve been concerned about this week is…that we’re sitting in our bubble having a good laugh at this shitshow, as you say, of a [Republican National Convention], but the truth is that this plays to a lot of people that he has to win to become the next president,” Moore explained at the time. “The population of schools has been wrecked, and the news media is just insipid and stupid and doesn’t give the people the facts about what’s going on.”

Meanwhile, Greenwald denounced hysteria around Trump’s relationship with Russia in general and specifically the billionaire’s call on Wednesday for Russia to find Clinton’s “missing” emails. “[T]he history of linking your political opponents to Russia is a really dangerous and ugly one in the U.S.,” Greenwald said.

This echoes a charge leveled Wednesday by editors of The Nation, who wrote that “[i]n their zeal to prevent Donald Trump from becoming president—a goal we share—representative voices of the liberal establishment have joined with the forces of neoconservatism to engage in what can only be described as McCarthyist rhetoric.”

Chotiner’s interview with Greenwald also tackled the timing and source of the DNC leak; Edward Snowden’s life in Russia; and Trump’s recent statements about NATO.

Share This Article

Published on

‘A Travesty’: Chelsea Manning Faces New Charges After Suicide Attempt

‘While Chelsea is suffering the darkest depression she has experienced since her arrest, the government is taking actions to punish her for that pain’

A rally for Chelsea Manning. (Photo: Reuters)

A rally for Chelsea Manning. (Photo: Reuters)

U.S. whistleblower Chelsea Manning may face additional charges and solitary confinement relating to a suicide attempt earlier this month, according to her attorneys.

The charges include “resisting the force cell move team,” “conduct which threatens,” and “prohibited property,” the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said Thursday. If convicted, Manning could face an additional nine years on her sentence, indefinite solitary confinement, and placement back into maximum security. She may also lose any chances of parole.

Manning is currently serving 35 years at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas military prison for helping WikiLeaks expose classified government and U.S. military documents in 2010. Sheconfirmed her suicide attempt on July 8 after several days of being kept out of contact with her defense team.

As the ACLU noted, Manning, a transgender woman, has been denied healthcare and other rights while serving out her sentence in a male prison. Her attorneys say she has been denied additional medical treatment after her suicide attempt.

“It is deeply troubling that Chelsea is now being subjected to an investigation and possible punishment for her attempt to take her life. The government has long been aware of Chelsea’s distress associated with the denial of medical care related to her gender transition and yet delayed and denied the treatment recognized as necessary,” said Chase Strangio, ACLU staff attorney. “Now, while Chelsea is suffering the darkest depression she has experienced since her arrest, the government is taking actions to punish her for that pain. It is unconscionable and we hope that the investigation is immediately ended and that she is given the health care that she needs to recover.”

Manning has previously been threatened with additional charges including indefinite solitary confinement for violations such as having an expired tube of toothpaste in her cell.

The new investigation comes as Manning continues to appeal the decades-long sentence her team calls “grossly unfair and unprecedented.”

Evan Greer, campaign director at the digital rights group Fight for the Future, which has long advocated for Manning’s release, said Thursday, “The U.S. government’s treatment of Chelsea is a travesty. Those in charge should know that the whole world is watching, and we won’t stand idly by while this administration continues to harass and abuse Chelsea Manning.”

Share This Article

News > Sport

Israeli Collective Punishment of Palestinians Extends to Soccer

  • Hebron

    Hebron’s Al-Ahly Wael Mresat (L) fails to score against Gaza Strip’s Shejaia during the 2015 Palestine Cup final at al-Yarmouk Stadium in Gaza City. | Photo: Reuters

Published 26 July 2016
Israel prevented nine soccer players from crossing from the West Bank into Gaza to join their team for the opening match of the Palestine Cup.

Israel controls everything in Palestine even when it comes to sports events far away from politics and security.

Israel’s Battles in Sports, Law and Science

The Israeli authorities prevented at least nine Palestinian soccer players from crossing from the West Bank to Gaza Tuesday to participate in the first match of the Palestine Cup at Gaza’s Al-Yarmouk Stadium between Hebron’s Ahly al-Khalil and Shabab Khan Younis.

According to Ma’an News Agency, the nine players included Ahly al-Khalil’s three best players who also play for the Palestinian national team: Ahmad Harbi, who began his career with Hapoel Umm al-Fahm; Abdullah Jaber, born in Taybe; and Mahmoud Daif Allah, resident of East Jerusalem.

The match took place Tuesday and saw Ahly al-Khalil win 1-0 despite missing more than half of its lead players. The Palestinian agency said Tuesday the seven were still waiting at the Erez crossing, on the border between Israel and Gaza, for permission since Monday. In total Ahly al-Khalil had 11 players, as opposed to Shabab Khan Younis, which had at least 16 players.

Israel Closes Palestinian TV Channel to Protect ‘Sovereignty’

Samer al-Sha’arawai, a member of Ahly al-Khalil’s management, issued a press release Monday saying that, “Palestinian Football Association told us that 33 members of the West Bank delegation were allowed to enter, yet seven players were denied entry permits, all of them part of Palestinian society in ’48 territories. We are in constant contact with the association and hope that the problem will be solved so that everyone can enter the Strip.”

Such moves show how the Israeli occupation exerts its power and control over Palestinians in every aspect of their daily lives, going beyond the simple and flawed Israeli argument of “self-defense” and extending to the level of collective punishment.

The news comes as Israeli bulldozers destroyed 11 Palestinian homes in Qalandiya, near Jerusalem, which brings the number of demolitions this year to 86. Israeli human rights group Bt’Selem said this year’s number is the highest in more than a decade.


News > World

Palestine Wants Justice for UK Support of Balfour Declaration

  • The lawsuit will claim that the Balfour Declaration led to the Nakba, the Palestinian term used for the creation of Israel which means catastrophe.

    The lawsuit will claim that the Balfour Declaration led to the Nakba, the Palestinian term used for the creation of Israel which means catastrophe. | Photo: IMEMC News

Published 26 July 2016

The Palestinian Authority called on the Arab League to assist them in filing a legal motion against the UK government over the Balfour Declaration.

Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Maliki requested legal assistance on Monday from fellow member countries of the Arab League to help them move forward with a lawsuit against the British government for implementing a document known as the Balfour Declaration almost 100 years ago.

The historic document, which recommended the creation of a “national home for the Jewish people,” prompted the settlement of Palestinian land and eventual establishment of the Israeli state in 1948.

West Bank: Israel Seizes Largest Amount of Land in Years

“We call on the secretariat general of the Arab League to support us in preparing a legal file to raise against the British government for issuing the Balfour Declaration and thereafter implementing it as a mandatory authority,” he said during the the 27th Arab League Summit on Monday.

Meanwhile, during his speech, Maliki – who spoke on behalf of the Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas – criticized regional governments that have considered restoring relations with Israel “before the end of the Israeli occupation.”

“We warn Arab states of the concept of ‘regional cooperation and security,’ which is aimed at creating regional security cooperation between Arab countries and Israel and normalizing relations before the end of the Israeli occupation,” Maliki added.

Maliki went on to note that the Palestinian government supports the creation of an independent Palestinian state based on pre-1967 border resolutions. Israel annexed East Jerusalem following the 1967 conflict and considers all of Jerusalem its capital, a claim that has failed to win international recognition.

To date, Israel has refused to return to the 1967 borders and has been unwilling to discuss the issue of East Jerusalem.

Palestine Will Ask the Security Council to Resolve State Borders

Over 500,000 Israelis are currently living in 120 illegal settlements built since 1967, including in Jerusale m—considered illegal by a range of international and regional bodies like the U.N, the EU, among others.

The news comes as the Israeli human rights watch group B’Tselem announced on Monday that Israel has destroyed more Palestinian households in the West bank in 2016 than it had every other year in the last decade.

Jew Rats Trash Talking Trump Left AND RIGHT

WOLF BLIZER CNN CLOSE UPJews like Wolf Blitzer of CNN are obviously biased against Trump and have been pushing the subversive Globalist Jew “Agenda” for decades.

By Phillip Marlowe (the INCOG MAN)

I just can’t believe how much our nation is under control by these dirty Jew rats. It’s ridiculous how they have these subversive creeps now everywhere pushing the Jew line of bull — long busy turning America into a Third World crap hole so they don’t feel threatened by a resurgence of White racial solidarity.


So, I’m watching the supposedly “conservative” FOX news yesterday and they trot out Iraq war/CIA media asset, Judith Miller and this radio host, Ellen Ratner (right), to gibber about the Democrat’s convention in Philadelphia. Now, most Whites out there might not know Miller and Ratner are both Jews. Sure, a few might suspect Ratner by her super Jew-ugly face, but are still too programmed by “PC” not to factor Jewishness into the over-all equation of how this lousy bunch is screwing up America.

The two start going on about how the last night of the democrat’s convention was so patriotic with all the flags (procured suddenly somewhere after republicans talked about the obvious absence during the first three days). The two FOX pundits said democrats now look more pro-American than republicans and what a big role-reversal that is. Right.

Then the two FOX News Jews started fawning over a bunch of multicult “vets” the dems marched out on stage alongside this retired general creep, who viciously attacked Trump for absolutely no reason. The two then praised the Muslim parents of a Muslim soldier dying in some overseas Jew NWO war and how the mother bravely wore her Muslim hajib outfit on stage, like it was so great. This liberal Jew media BS is getting quite insane.

JONAH GOLDBERG SILOThen the two mention Jonah Goldberg (who they bring on FOX all the time) writing that the dem’s convention was about “loving America” while the republican convention was about “loving Trump.” Well, guess what? Goldberg is yet another anti-Trump Jew. And he’s described as a “prominent conservative writer” by CNN. Oh sure. He’s a giant backstabbing liberal Jew GD rat just like all the rest!

Speaking of CNN, they had Wolf Blitzer, Jake Tapper and Dana Bash giving the play-by-play at both conventions. All three of them are Jews, natch. Plus, the commentators were mostly Jews or blacks, with a White liberal suck-up or two to round things off. Any Trump supporters are for the rest to talk down to.

Then we got ourselves the White traitor bastards like Stephen Colbert of the “Late Show” who answers a question out of his studio audience during a break about what he would most like to ask Trump. He thinks he’s being so funny by saying he would ask Trump “how does Vladimir Putin’s d–k taste like?” Of course, the word “d–k” is bleeped out, but you can tell that’s what he’s said. In his excitement of being all so cute and clever, Colbert prances away on stage like he’s Groucho Marx, a long dead Jew “comic.” Friggin’ Jews love that Marx guy.

Man, I’d love to see this overpaid little Colbert punk sent to jail and see what he thinks about tasting a little homie d–k, which we all know would happen.

Colbert also brought on Jon Stewart —  who’s real last name is Leibowitz — to trash talk Trump on the very night he gave his acceptance speech at the GOP convention. Stephen Colbert is a total whore for Jewry, no doubt at all.

DIRTY JEWS ON TV MONTAGEThis is only a handful of the Jews they bring on TV to brainwash America nowadays. Jews have been pushing Marxist Jew subversions on America for decades — that’s why we have all this immigration, black and faggot crap ramping up like crazy. It’s the lousy Jews behind it all: Wake up to it!

Hillary Clinton is going to tax the living crap out of us. Not only does she want to make you pay more out of your paycheck to the government, she wants to tax you 25% if you buy a gun. All kinds of new taxes and surcharges are in store. Do you like to drink coke or other sodas? Her “everyman” VP Tim Kaine wants a steep tax on beverages, for crying out loud. Her Marxist crap is projected to cost Americans an additional 1 trillion dollars.

The selfish, spoiled blacks don’t care — they’re the ones getting most of it.

Speaking of guns, we all know she wants to wipe out the Second Amendment, regardless of what she said during her acceptance speech. She’s a liar, everyone knows it. Why do you think that Jew NY mayor, (((Michael Bloomberg))), came on insulting Trump, when he was supposed to so buddy-buddy with him and Trump always used to say good things about? Because Bloomberg is a HUGE anti-gun nut (like most lousy Jews) and thinks he can disarm us White Americans once Shillary gets in.

Then the media Jews and Hillary got all sorts of wacky when Trump said in his acceptance speech “I’m the only one to fix things.” Uh, Trump was talking about the simple political choice between him and Hillary, obviously enough. They play acted like Trump was getting all stuck-up and dictator-like. These brainwashing tricky-dicks know exactly the kinds of bull they can blow up into a mess.

The paranoid Jews believe any White guy like Trump might turn into another Adolf Hitler overnight. This Jew/Nazi/Holocaust crap is friggin’ never-ending — just like the black BS over slavery and Jim Crow. It’s insane what the Jew rats are doing to Trump.

These media Jews have no problem making a mountain out of a molehill to paint who they hate as the evil baddie. Pay attention and you’ll spot this tactic all the time.

You got to ask yourself: Do these dirty Jews get to trash-talk anyone they don’t like anytime they damn well please? Apparently, they can. We can’t say squat or else they call us “Nazis” or the dreaded, all-inclusive “White SUPREMACISTS.”

The Jew-owned media is also pushing the bit about the Russians supposedly hacking the DNC servers and releasing emails of the Democrat establishment undermining the campaign of Bernie Sanders; like proto-dictator Trump is in cahoots with evil Russian dictator Putin. Jews hate Putin since he booted out all the Jew oligarchs busy robbing the country after the fall of communism. Plus, he threatens their Jew NWO-instigated “color revolution” theft of the Ukraine. Putin a pal of Trump? The horror, the horror.

And if you’re worried about Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s career, well don’t, because once things settle down and Sanders gets some sleep back in Vermont, she’ll get to keep her congress seat and have any job she wants — maybe back in as DNC boss. Nothing ever really bad happens to fellow Jews. Look how they gave Jeff Zucker the head job as president at CNN Worldwide after his big Jay Leno/Conan O’Brien Tonight Show screw-up at NBC Entertainment. They called it “one of the biggest debacles in TV history.” But that never matters when it comes to chummy Jews.

The whole Jew race is one giant, nepotistic global crime family!

Then they gave Trump living hell over him jokingly asking the Russians for Hillary’s deleted emails, like it was so terrible. Didn’t Hillary insist the 33,000 emails she deleted had nothing classified? Just personal stuff, like her daughter’s expensive cosmetic surgeries while living in a swanky multi-million dollar Manhattan condo with no job other than a brief stint as a NBC reporter doing two lousy stories in her whole career, or her nerdy husband — the Jewboy son of a Goldman Sachs scam artist and convicted tax dodger?

And where was all the patriotic anger from the dems and media over the fact Hillary even had an easily hackable personal server in her basement to begin with? To these traitors, it means JACK!

Elise Labott: I can tell right off the bat this smiling baby rat is trained for pro-Zionist hasbara activities in the USA by the motherland. She was briefly "suspended" for a pro-Syrian "refugee" immigration tweet, but is now safely back at work like nothing ever happened.

Elise Labott was trotted out on CNN to talk about the evil Putin Rooskies behind the DNC email hack turned over and released to Wikileaks. They literally described it as “another cold war spy story,” like we’re supposed to get all up in arms over Trump colluding with the enemy. Right. Jew psychos are now calling out Julian Assange as an anti-Semite since he tweeted something impertinent about the “Tribe” getting way too excited over all this email business.

Yeah, everyone is now getting it about these dirty rotten creeps — BIG TIME.

And you just know Globalist Jewry is behind pushing this ridiculous Trump/Russian angle, since Labott is obviously a trained Hasbara operative of the Zionists in Israel (they say her heritage is French, but it’s more like French Jew— they have these rotten Jews over there turning the country into a racial pigsty, too).

CNN brings her up on screen whenever something comes up dealing with sacred Israel having to slaughter Palestinians. Same thing going on with this other fat old Jew cow woman who’s name escapes me at the moment, but Wolf Blitzer (who’s about the biggest jackass Zionist AIPAC plant on TV) brings on all the time like she’s a such insightful world affairs expert. I’m quite certain both are Globalist Jew plants.

Now we know the media is liberal and biased up the ying-yang. It was so so obvious during the conventions. But it’s more than that — the media has long been busy brainwashing our race into committing racial suicide. That’s exactly what they have been doing to us White people.

White people: Our race has been totally screwed by these dirty Jew rats brainwashing us for decades. Thankfully, many other Whites are now starting to get it.

Jew Rat2

Print Friendly
Download PDF

French Teacher wrote “The Shoah was designed and organized by Jews.”

French Teacher Prosecuted For Sharing Holocaust Theories On Facebook
Posted on July 31, 2016 by Sean Adl-Tabatabai in News, World // Comments (0)
Teacher in France prosecuted over Holocaust post on Facebook

A French school teacher has been placed under criminal investigation for allegedly posting a comment about the Holocaust on her Facebook page.

France’s Education Ministry have ordered an investigation into the teacher who they say instructed her students to follow her page, where she wrote “The Shoah was designed and organized by Jews.” reports:

CRIF, the umbrella group of French Jewish communities, complained to the ministry about the teacher earlier this week, according to a report Thursday in the group’s newsletter.

It did not name the female teacher in question but said she teaches at the prestigious Janson-de-Sailly school, a post high-school preparatory course, and that she invited the course’s students to follow her Facebook page.
The CRIF report was based on original reporting by the Le Canard Enchainé, a satirical weekly, which, alongside cartoons and satirical articles, also features investigative journalism items and news.

According to Le Canard Enchainé, the teacher wrote on her Facebook page against “the American Jewish lobby,” saying it supports Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.
She also wrote that French President Francois Hollande “is a Jew who benefited from his belonging to that community to ascend in politics and who now denies this,” pretending to have a Catholic father. Hollande “is Jewish and denies it.

Backpedaling will begin all over, now that it is less beneficial for Jewry,” the teacher also wrote, according to the CRIF newsletter.

Satire: Dieudonné/Faurisson/Joe Lecorbeau – Shoah Hebdo 

Alain Soral – deutsche Untertitel: Holocaust-Mahnmal Berlin, Holocaust-Religion, Judeokritik

Holocaust Born in Washington DC

April 22, 2016



(Passengers on SS St. Louis. Jews are also pawns in the illuminati game.) 
The holocaust was engineered by Illuminati Jews 
 in Washington DC to justify the creation of Israel
 and replace Christ’s martyrdom  
as the central metaphor of divine sacrifice.
The “Chosen People” are to replace the Messiah.

In 1938-39, just before Europe erupted in an inferno for Jews, all the exits were sealed shut.
The Nazis allowed Jews to leave, but no country allowed them to enter.
by Henry Makow Ph.D.

(from April 14, 2013)

In May 1939, the passenger liner “St. Louis” carrying 900 German Jewish refugees was turned away from Havana. The passengers’  costly tourist visas had been revoked by Cuban authorities. The liner lingered near the coast of Florida but FDR refused to let it dock. Reluctantly, the ship returned to Europe where the refugees were divided among four Allied countries, of which three were soon overrun.

The image of unwanted Jews was seared into the collective Jewish psyche. It argued the necessity of a homeland in Israel as insurance against anti-Semitism. Millions of Jews devoted their money and lives to wresting Israel from its rightful owners and building a Jewish sanctuary there. Millions of non-Jews were recruited to this cause. World peace has hung in the balance ever since.

FDR famously said nothing in history happens by accident. Given what we know about Jewish power, it is impossible to believe these refugees were not admitted. This gruesome spectacle was staged to manipulate Jews, and give them a kind of moral impunity, is repugnant to consider.

perl-1.jpgA book, “The Holocaust Conspiracy”  (1989)  shows how Allied and neutral governments ensured that most Jews would remain in Europe and would die. The author William R. Perl argues that  a parallel Nuremberg Trial is necessary for “those leading figures in the Allied and neutral camps” who “knowingly and willingly co-operated in the German annihilation scheme.” (34)

William Perl (1906-1998) was not some armchair conspiracy theorist like me.  He was a lawyer in Vienna in the 1930’s who helped organize illegal transits to Palestine  for the Revisionist Zionists.  He negotiated with Adolf Eichmann face-to-face; and after the war, he prosecuted Nazi war criminals.

In this book, Perl argues that the Jewish holocaust was part of an international conspiracy. But of course, he didn’t understand that the perpetrators were “the Illuminati,”  the highest rung of Freemasonry empowered by the world central banking cartel.  Their goal is to create a world government tyranny dedicated to Lucifer with its capital in Jerusalem.

Holocaust means “burned offering.” By what logic can we call this genocide a “sacrifice”?  By Illuminati logic of course! They sacrificed Jews to hoodwink the world into establishing a Masonic state in Israel. The design of the Israeli Supreme Court is proof that this is exactly what has transpired. Modern Israel was Masonic from its conception.


William Perl states that there were “deliberate, concerted steps to thwart rescue actions…not only by individuals in power but by governments.” He says this failure to rescue was more than a simple lack of action but a “deliberate  set of actions bound to ensure the success of the German annihilation plans.” While this seems “unbelievable,” he says the documents available make this conclusion “not only logical but inescapable.” (16)

For example, Morgenthau’s Treasury Dept. investigated the State Department and identified a half dozen top officials it described as “an American underground to let the Jews be killed.” The report was especially critical of John J. McCloy, assistant Secretary of War, who later became the Rockefeller’s lawyer, the President of the World Bank and a member of the Warren Commission. Yes children, he was Illuminati.

Perl says that next to the Nazis, the British “carry the heaviest guilt” for the Jewish holocaust because they fought tooth and nail to block the escape route to Palestine. In fact, the first person killed by the British in WW2 was a Jewish refugee on the vessel “Tiger Hill.”

Now you ask, if the Rothschilds control England, and wanted to set up a national home for Jews, why wouldn’t England let all these Jews go to Israel? The answer is that this action would demonstrate to Jews that they didn’t need a state and didn’t need to become the lethal weapon they have become in the hands of the Rothschilds.

The Soviets were supposed to be a Jewish front. But Perl also blames the USSR. Information was tightly controlled in Russia. The  Soviets  did nothing  to warn the  Jews of what they could expect from the Nazis.  (In his biography  of Hitler, John Toland describes Jews in the Ukraine greeting the Nazis as saviors.)

Just to illustrate the transnational nature of the Illuminati, in Feb 1942, a Soviet submarine torpedoed the “Struma” a disabled cattle boat crammed with 760 Romanian Jewish refugees. There was one survivor. Why this gratuitous murder of Jews? More souls sacrificed for the Luciferian New World Order capital.

The Allies also blocked Nazi attempts to ransom Jews and calls to bomb the concentration camps, although factories five miles from Auschwitz were demolished in 1944. In all this, the Allies were supported by the  Zionist establishment, which is directed by the Illuminati.


History teaches that the Illuminati consists of Satan-loving Jews and non-Jews; and exploits and kills anyone who doesn’t fit into its plan for a Luciferian NWO.  Think of the victims of 9-11 or Hiroshima or the 80 million casualties of the World Wars.

At first glance, Israel would be a prime candidate for a repeat of the Jewish holocaust as most Israelis probably don’t see themselves in Masonic NWO terms.

Fellow Winnipegger Barry Chamish is the leading exponent of the view that the Illuminati, through its CFR arm, controls Israel and intends to spare Jerusalem, but sacrifice the  rest to  its ultimate goal.

His scenario is plausible given Master Mason Albert Pike’s prescription for three world wars, the last resulting in the destruction of political Zionism and Islam.
In Europe, the Muslim invasion serves a double purpose. It dilutes and destroys European national cultures, an Illuminati Jewish goal, while making Jews seems like the victim of Muslim “anti Semitism” at the same time. Jews need only worry if “Christians” and Muslims were to unite.
In America,  the Jewish role bears a remarkable resemblance to  their position in the Weimar Republic. Their role in government, culture and the economy is well out of proportion to their numbers. As witting and unwitting tools of the Illuminati, they are seen by many as undermining Christian and American interests.Pastor Chuck Baldwin  made the comparison with Jesus and the “moneychangers.”  “It is too bad that today’s pastors and Christians do not share Jesus’ disdain for the current generation of moneychangers, because it is the moneychangers who are in the process of destroying these United States of America–and our pastors and Christians either do not see it, or, if they do see it, do not seem to care.”

Americans, like the Germans before them, are not anti Semitic by nature. The economic situation in Germany had to deteriorate before Hitler could come to power. The real question is, does the Illuminati have anything to gain from an attack on Jews?

In the short term, as long as they need Zionists to control America, no. But as the New World Order becomes more onerous, and the position of Americans more perilous, the Illuminati (i.e. Cabalists, Freemasons) may be happy to use Jews as their scapegoats once again. After all, pawns are made to be sacrificed.


Note: If you are a holocaust minimizer, we both agree it was a political psy-op. We just disagree on the numbers. Do not write to me. Here is my position.

Moreover I believe Hitler was created by the Illuminati.

Compare the article above with this review of a new book “FDR & the Jews”  which portrays FDR, an Illuminati Jew, as a Christian, and whitewashes his role in the holocaust.
Related Banker Plot to Remove FDR Was a Ruse
———— Did Kissinger Really Say -No israel in 10 Yrs?

– See more at:

1,000s Turkish forces surround NATO’s Incirlik air base for ‘inspection’ amid rumors of coup attempt

A military aircraft is pictured on the runway at Incirlik Air Base, in the outskirts of the city of Adana, southeastern Turkey. © Stringer
Some 7,000 armed police in heavy vehicles surrounded the Incirlik air base used by NATO forces in Adana in what a Turkish minister called a “security check.” With no official explanation, speculations have arisen about a new coup attempt or VIP visit.

READ MORE: Anti-US rally staged at NATO Incirlik air base in Turkey (VIDEO, PHOTOS)

Hurriyet reported earlier that Adana police had been tipped off about a new coup attempt, and forces were immediately alerted. The entrance to the base was closed off.

Security forces armed with rifles and armored TOMA vehicles used by Turkish riot police could be seen at the site in photos taken by witnesses.

@Brasco_Aad Pro Erdogan/AKParti supporters (civilians) are trying to get near the air base, but are being held back by Military Police

@Brasco_Aad These heavy dump trucks are being made ready to enter Air Base (are they trying to close it?)

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter
View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

derken üssünde olağanüstü hareketlilik.giriş çıkışları tutmuş tetikte bekliyor.

Turkey’s minister for EU Affairs downplayed the situation in a Twitter post, saying a “security inspection” was carried out.

ADANA’dayım. İncirlik veya Adana’daki başka yerle ilgili bir sıkıntı yok. Genel güvenlik değerlendirmesi de yaptık. Herhangi bir sorun yok

“We did the general security check. There is nothing wrong,” he tweeted from Adana.

Some supporters of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan have reportedly flocked to the cordon surrounding the base. The scene, however, did not appear as massive and tense as the recent Adana protests demanding for the base to be shut down.

Situation in the Turkish/American air base near . Turkish police have shut down the entrance/exit of the base : Local source

More and more Pro AK Parti / Erdogan supporters (Turkish) arrive at the gates of Air

View image on Twitter

On Thursday, a huge rally marched towards the NATO base, as people with loudspeakers chanted anti-American and anti-Israel slogans. The demonstrators claim that the US had a hand in the failed July 15 coup attempt in which 270 people died. Tens of thousands people, including members of the military, police, judiciary, media, and civil service, have been arrested in connection with the coup, which Turkish officials say was organized by US-based cleric Fethullah Gulen, Erdogan’s former ally, who is now his most hated rival.

READ MORE: Anti-US rally staged at NATO Incirlik air base in Turkey (VIDEO, PHOTOS)

In the wake of the coup attempt, several military officials at the Incirlik Air Base, including its commander, General Bekir Ercan Van, were arrested on treason charges by Turkish authorities, which claimed that one of the rogue F-16 planes taking part in the rebellion to overthrow Erdogan’s government had been refueled there.

The general had even reportedly attempted to seek asylum in the US, but his plea was apparently rejected.

Incirlic Air Base is used by both the Turkish and US militaries and is vital to the US-led anti-terror bombing campaign in Syria and Iraq. It also serves as one of six NATO storage sites for US tactical nuclear weapons in Europe. The exact number of nuclear bombs kept at the base is unknown, although, according to various estimates, it may store up to 90 warheads.

The US-led coalition’s airstrikes had to be halted for several days when power was cut at the base. US military personnel stationed there had to switch to an internal power supply.

READ MORE: Local authorities block access to air base in Turkey that houses US nukes

The “inspection” at the base comes as the Turkish government announced a sweeping military reform on Saturday. In an interview with TV broadcaster A-Haber, Erdogan unveiled plans to scrap all military academies and replace them with a new national defense university.

The commanders of the different branches of the Turkish armed forces are to be put under the defense minister’s chain of command. In addition, Erdogan wants the National Intelligence Organization (MIT) and military chief of staff to report directly to him, which would require a new constitutional amendment to be passed by the parliament.

Communication with has been cutoff. Cannot reach them by email or phone.

It also comes on the eve of a visit from a top US military official, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Joseph Dunford, who is scheduled to arrive in Turkey on Sunday. Diplomatic sources quoted by Hurriyet claim Dunford will go visit both Ankara and Incirlik.

At this time, it looks like is readying for either a VIP or inspection. We are not finding any evidence of a coup or takeover.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

More From The Web

‘Merkel must go’: Rally in Berlin slams open-door refugee policy

A large demonstration against German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s refugee policies has been held in the German capital of Berlin, with protesters shouting “Merkel must go!” A counter-rally has also been staged in the city.

READ MORE: Majority of Germans don’t believe Merkel will handle refugee crisis – poll

Hundreds of people gathered for a right-wing rally at Berlin’s central railway station demanding that Angela Merkel step down. The crowd was waving German national flags, as well as the flags of the German empire and those of the German anti-Nazi resistance movement from World War II.

The protesters were shouting “We are the people!” and “Merkel must go!” Some were also holding up placards and banners reading “Merkel must go” and “The queen of smugglers. Merkel must leave.”

Speakers at the rally addressed the protesters, demanding that Merkel introduce a cap on new arrivals and implement tougher security measures.

“Merkel destroys Germany,” one protester told RT correspondent at the scene.

“It is not acceptable that we let people in our country without correct checks. We have a situation with people arriving and it is unclear what their intensions are,” another protester said.

The anti-Merkel rally was organized by an activist group called “We are for Berlin, we are for Germany” to express discontent with the Chancellor’s open door migration policy. It is the third such rally organized by this group. Two others were held in March and May, German media report.

About 1,350 people took part in the demonstration, according to police.

Derzeit laufen vor ca. 1350 Zuhörern die Redebeiträge zur Kundgebung “Merkel muss weg”.

At the same time, a counter-rally organized by some leftist groups was being staged in the German capital under the slogan “For a united Berlin – against right wing hate!” Demonstrators there held up posters reading “Berlin is better without Nazis!”

About 1,000 people took part in the counter-rally, according to the German media.

View image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on Twitter

counter-demo against Neo-Nazi rally in Berlin Today.

People in motor boats and even floaters staged another counter-protest on the Spree River under the slogan “For a tolerant and open Europe!”

Some 1,700 officers were deployed at the sites of the demonstrations to keep the rallies separated and prevent possible clashes between their participants, but both rallies ended peacefully and without incident, according to police.

Merkel has faced mounting criticism since she recently reiterated that she will stick to her open door policy for refugees, maintaining that Germany is still “safe,” despite the recent deadly attacks there, most of which were committed by migrants.

Her reaffirmation has provoked massive public outrage on social media.

READ MORE: ‘She declared war on own people’: Merkel vows to stick to open door policy, faces online uproar

Germany has seen five deadly assaults in just over a week. Three were committed by asylum seekers, two of whom are being investigated for links to Islamic State (IS, formerly ISSI/ISIL).

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Crimea referendum reflected people’s will – French delegation head

French MPs by the State Council of the Republic of Crimea. © Alexandr Polegenko
Crimea’s reunification with Russia reflects the will of the majority of the Crimean people, the head of a French delegation visiting the peninsula says. He added that if it had not joined Russia, it could have been turned into a battle zone like east Ukraine.

A group of French PMs led by the National Assembly member and the former transport minister Thierry Mariani, who initiated the debate on lifting the anti-Russian sanctions in the French parliament, went to Crimea to see what life was like. This is the second time he has been to the peninsula since it re-joined Russia.

“The referendum on Crimea’s accession to Russia reflected the will of the people,” Mariani said, adding that, during their visit to the peninsula, the French delegation “got an impression that the decision to reunify with Russia corresponds with the majority opinion” of the Crimean population.

Mariani also stressed that, if it was not for the referendum, the peninsula could have been turned into another battlefront like eastern Ukraine, so “whatever the conditions, the referendum had to be held – and quickly.”

“I am very attentive to everything that is said about the events that occurred two years ago. I believe that, if Crimea had not joined Russia, there would have been the third front here, alongside with the ones in Lugansk and Donetsk,” the lawmaker said as cited by TASS. “It could happen.”

At the same time, Mariani stressed that the major goal of the delegation is to “understand what really happens [in Crimea].” The delegation came to Crimea “to see what has changed” and to discuss“some issues that suddenly acquired significant importance in Europe,”he said referring to the issue of Crimean Tatars.

The lawmaker emphasized that he sees what rights have been granted to the Crimean Tatars and “would also like to see”similar rights are granted to the Russian-speaking minorities in the Baltic States, “for example, in Latvia.”

“It is better to be a Tatar in Crimea than a Russian in Latvia. But Europe prefers to forget about it,” Mariani told RT France.

Face to face with leadership Konstantinov, Aksyonov, Slutskiy, Poklonskaya, Balbek. rights on agenda

Other members of the delegation also said that they came to Crimea to form an independent opinion about the situation on the peninsula and to see it firsthand.

“The information we receive is often so contradictory that the best way… to understand what happens is to come [here] and to see everything directly on the ground,” Michel Voisin, the head of the French delegation in the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, who came to Crimea for the first time, told RT France.

He stressed “information coming from the media can be true as well as fake, so every lawmaker should have his own independent vision of such issues as the situation in Crimea.”

Some of the delegation’s members also confirmed to RT France that they see Crimea as a part of Russia and believe that the international community will recognize Crimea’s accession in the coming years.

“I am sure that no one today wants really to return to the previous state of things,” Michel Terrot, an MP from the French Republican Party said, referring to Crimea having been part of Ukraine in 1954-2014.

“I believe that it will take time [for the international community] to officially recognize Crimea [as a part of Russia]. For some years, the situation will remain out of the legal framework but, in fact, Crimea has become a part of Russia … and it will remain as a part of Russia even if the international community is far from recognizing it,” Socialist lawmaker Jerome Lambert said.

“I believe that the issue of the recognition of Crimea will be positively resolved in the coming years. However, it will require effort both from Russia and the international community,” said Patrice Verchere, an MP from the Republican Party.

In the meantime, the parliamentarians also expressed confidence that France should further actively develop ties with Russia regardless of the sanctions imposed against it by the western countries over the situation in Ukraine.

“The issue of relations with Russia is beyond the framework of the internal political struggle. Many lawmakers and many French citizens are really interested in proper development of relations with Russia,” Lambert told RT France.

“I am sure that France will benefit if it will maintain close ties with Russia,” Terrot said.

According to Mariani, almost all members of the National Assembly and Senators that came to Crimea supported the resolutions against anti-Russian sanctions that were adopted by the French legislature earlier this year.

In June, the French Senate voted in favor of a resolution designed to lift EU-imposed sanctions slapped on Russia in 2014 over the crisis in eastern Ukraine and Russia’s reunification with Crimea.

In late April 55 members of the French National Assembly supported a similar resolution, submitted by 85 French MPs calling on the government not to extend EU-imposed sanctions on Russia.

Thierry Mariani already headed another delegation of French MPs that visited Crimea in July 2015. Back then he said that he saw no grounds to keep Russia sanctions in place.

Memorial visit ends in wreath & flower laying ceremony – over 15,000 killed at this site alone during WW2 occupation

Now, the French delegation consisting of twelve French lawmakers, including both the National Assembly members and the Senators, have arrived on the peninsula for a second time as they take part in a three day visit. The French Foreign Ministry refused to support the lawmakers’ initiative both in 2015 and in 2016.

Meanwhile, European public opinion is gradually shifting in Russia’s favor as roughly a third of Europeans and a quarter of Americans consider Crimea a part of Russia two years after its accession, according to a poll conducted by the British research company Populus and its French counterpart Iflop in March.

The Republic of Crimea refused to recognize the new government in Kiev, which came to power through an armed coup in February 2014. Crimea and Sevastopol, a city with a special status on the peninsula, voted for independence from Ukraine and re-joined Russia in a referendum on March 16, 2014. The decision was supported by about 97 percent of voters with an 83 percent turnout.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Jeremy Corbyn Calls for End to UK ‘Arms Bazaar’ Policy in Middle East. No More Weapons for Saudi Arabia


Speaking to MEE, Labour leader calls for powers for Parliament to control arms sales to Saudi Arabia and oversee deployment of special forces

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has demanded a root-and-branch review of Britain’s alliance with Saudi Arabia in the wake of the brutal Saudi interventions in Bahrain and the Yemen.

Corbyn: ‘If we want to live in a world of peace, then there has to be a foreign policy that reflects that’ (AFP)

Speaking to Middle East Eye, Corbyn called for a fundamental change in Britain’s relationship with the Middle East, establishing a foreign policy based on democracy rather than military interventions. The Labour leader said that Britain’s relationship with the Saudi monarchy should focus on human rights – not arms sales.

“We have got to look again at the whole arms relationship with Saudi Arabia and look again at the foreign policy of Saudi Arabia, sustained by the supply of arms largely, but not exclusively, from Britain which is used… both in Bahrain and in Yemen. Bahrain has now had significant Saudi involvement for quite a long time to prop up the regime there,” Corbyn said.

The Labour leader claimed that the British government was responsible for the deaths of Bahraini protesters: “Well who’s guilty? Who is responsible? Are we not responsible? We sold those arms knowing they were going to be used in Bahrain.”

He said Britain was “incredibly selective” on human rights issues. “We sign up of course to the Universal Declaration, the European Convention and we do have the Arms Export Control Committee in Parliament, but we are actually very selective about this and we’ve done precious little about Saudi Arabia for a very long time.”

Corbyn said that if he became prime minister he would reinstate human rights advisers in British embassies around the world, put human rights clauses in the contracts British firms make, and clamp down on arms sales: ”If we want to live in a world of peace, live in a world of justice towards human rights, then there has to be a foreign policy that reflects that. That is where I’m at.”

Call for war powers act

Breaking new ground, Corbyn called for an American-style “war powers act” to give Parliament new powers to block military intervention. He said the “parliamentary convention now requires that for the deployment of British troops there has to be a parliamentary mandate. Except – and they’ve all used the except – when there are special forces involved. The question of this of course goes back a long way to Vietnam in 1963, when the US managed to have I think 50,000 advisers to the South Vietnamese government before the Congress was even invited to vote on whether or not it should be involved in the Vietnam War. I think the parallel is a very serious one.”

He insisted that MPs should have oversight and control over when British special forces – and not only the regular army – get involved in combat.

Asked about MEE reports establishing the presence of British special forces in Libya, the Labour leader said: “Clearly Britain is involved. Either through special forces in Libya or through arms supplies to Saudi Arabia to the war in Yemen. And indeed by the same process to the supply of anti-personnel equipment that is being used in Bahrain by Saudi Arabia. So I think we have to have a War Powers Act that is much more watertight on this.”

He said the effect of British intervention in Libya has been to destroy the state and create in its place an arms bazaar: “A number of us pointed out in debates in the House at that time that if you simply destroyed the structure of the Libyan state, which is what happened, then you will end up with a series of warring factions.

And the spread of arms which were given to the opponents of Gaddafi has then spread into Mali and many other places. So we’ve actually created an arms bazaar of in some cases relatively small scale arms, but nevertheless very powerful ones.

Backing for Blair prosecution

Corbyn said he supported the families of British soldiers killed in Iraq in their efforts to bring a private prosecution against former prime minister Tony Blair.

He pointed to the words he used when he apologised on behalf of the Labour Party for the invasion of Iraq: “The words I said during the apology [were]: ‘those that are responsible for the war in Iraq must be prepared to face up to their responsibilities’.

“People must face up to their responsibilities for what they did. I met the families of the soldiers who died, and when you meet a family of anyone who has died it’s very hard. I meet the families of young people who have been stabbed to death. It’s very hard for them to understand their son’s life has gone through a random act of violence.

If you join the army,  you join knowing there are risks involved. Obviously. And then you die in a war like Iraq. And then it becomes apparent that the war was based on misinformation or deception, that it wasn’t a necessary war, that it wasn’t a defensive war, and your son or daughter has died in that particular conflict. It’s very hard for those families to come to terms with that, so I spent a lot of time over the past years talking to the families of those that have died. They are very, very impressive people. I think the way Reg Keys and Peter Bradley have conducted themselves is very, very impressive.

The families are appealing for funds to create a team of lawyers that will mount a private prosecution accusing Blair of “misfeasance in public office” on the grounds that he misused his constitutional powers, which led to mass casualties.

Corbyn told MEE he viewed the departure of Hilary Benn as shadow foreign secretary as a chance to develop Labour policy regarding Israel and Palestine.

He said that thanks to recent changes in Labour’s foreign affairs team “you will see more on this from me,” adding that “I will be developing foreign policy a great deal and my views and determination to promote a peace settlement in the Middle East which obviously has to involve recognition of Palestine as something that is very important to me.”

Confident mood

A tanned Corbyn, who on Thursday saw off a legal challenge over his place on the ballot for a new leadership contest brought by Labour MPs, appeared more relaxed and confident than at any time since he was elected Labour leader 10 months ago.

He laid down a clear marker to the majority of Labour MPs who had repeatedly called for him to step down. He said he was dismayed at the way they had launched a coup against him following the Brexit vote: ”I was appalled at the way it was conducted and the way it was designed to cause maximum damage to the party day in day out. I was invited to resign. I absolutely refused to do so. I said I’m responsible for the people who elected me. I’m responsible for the mandate I was given. I will carry out that responsibility – and so I have.

I think some of them [Labour MPs] are confusing the position of the parliamentary party with the party as a whole. The parliamentary party is very, very important, but it is not the entirety of the Labour Party, and I have reached out in a way no other leader ever has in appointing people to my shadow cabinet last September who were very critical of me; some of whom remained critical within the shadow cabinet.

Corbyn said he expected more former shadow ministers who had joined the parliamentary revolt against him to return to the front bench, as MP Sarah Champion did this week.

The Labour leader spoke of his political heroes from the British radical dissenting tradition. He cited the British pamphleteer and political activist Tom Paine as one of his main influences and William Godwin as another, adding that “long-term political changes often come from quite profound and very brave individuals”.

When asked whether he saw himself in the tradition of Paine and Cobbett, Corbyn replied: “You don’t want to put yourself into history too quickly. But I do draw inspiration from those people that stood up in very difficult circumstances.”

Second referendum not ruled out

However, Corbyn notably failed to rule out a second referendum on last month’s Brexit vote.

He ruled one out for “the immediate future,” adding “one has to respect the result”.

However, he added that “at some point in the future, somebody might say we ought to have a referendum on how we deal with the future with Europe”.

The Labour leader presented himself as a new kind of political leader, challenging the elitist, modernising politics of Tony Blair and David Cameron.

The New Labour project was very much Third Way economics, it was aggressive foreign policy, and it was essentially marketisation of a lot of public services. I’m trying to take things in a very different direction of a human rights, democracy-based foreign policy rather than an interventionist one, and an economically interventionist economy in Britain in order to promote good-quality jobs and employment as well as promote decent levels of public service.

With Labour Party membership now more than half a million since his election and still growing, he claimed that he had brought a “new audience” into British politics.

I think there is, because it’s an involvement of a new audience in politics who felt very disillusioned. It is very difficult to measure everything on the basis of personal contact, emails, postcards, whatever it happens to be. But I meet a significant number of people – a significant number of people have contacted me and said ‘I’ve now become interested in politics because what I see with the Labour Party at the moment is that you’re trying to reach out in a way that no one has reached out before.’

Holocaust® Liars: Concerned Citizens and Friends of illegal Immigration Law Enforcement


Concerned Citizens and Friends of illegal Immigration Law Enforcement       508-875-0835


Holocaust Liars

Holocaust Lies Intro

Lots of lies here click here…….

“The bigger the lie the more people will believe it”

Even if the “holocaust” were true, which it is not, the war crimes and mass atrocities committed by the US and Britain were far worse and far more cowardly than anything the Nazis are even accused of committing. The US and Britain murdered as many people as they possibly could—women, children, babies included—by deliberately r-o-a-s-t-i-n-g them to death with massive incendiary air attacks and firestorms (so-called “strategic bombing” and “area bombing”, et c), with incendiary bombs including napalm, and even with nuclear bombs.

Cremation facts don’t add up click here

Elie The Weisel

More on Elie the Weasel click here

Holocaust historians rely heavily on so-called “survivor testimony” to support the extermination story. But such “evidence” is notoriously unreliable. As one Jewish historian has pointed out, “most of the memoirs and reports [of “Holocaust survivors”] are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks and apologies.” (Samuel Gringauz in “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950, Vol. 12, p. 65)



“…most of the memoirs and reports [of ‘Holocaust survivors’] are

full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic

effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing,

would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…”

–Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950,

Vol. 12, p. 65



Holocaust Hoax Archive click here

The Big Lie movie click here

All sorts of lies here

The Big Lie

Which story would you believe?

       Real Gas Chamber                    Fake Gas Chamber

Lots of LIES click here…..

A Challenge to DEBATE Any and All self-described “Holocaust Survivors!”

On any screening of YouTube, one can SEARCH for “holocaust survivors.”One will quickly get many video accounts from living “holocaust survivors.”I have begun challenging them in the YouTube comments sections to debate me personally with the text below. The question I put to them as loudly as I possibly can is: “If the Nazis had really been trying to kill them, how did they possibly survive?”

There are still today hundreds of thousands of so-called “holocaust survivors” including many thousands who spent time in Auschwitz. ALL of them are, in fact, living p-r-o-o-f (not merely “evidence”) for the simple fact that there was absolutely no attempt by the Germans to exterminate the Jews of Europe. All were kept alive by the Germans with food, water, shelter, medical care, clean clothing (free of lice), security and more. If the intended victims had simply been denied any of those essential ingredients, they would have died without any need for gas chambers or mass shootings. The “survivors” had in fact been treated rather well by the Nazis under the horrific circumstances that the Allies had imposed on everyone in German-occupied Europe.The Nazis and Germans had fed the “survivors” and provided them with shelter, medical care and clean lice-free clothes, security, and so much more as best they could in spite of a terrible war in which their own country was being turned into a crematory oven by the criminally insane Allies.

So, to all “holocaust survivors”—stop lying and whining!

Let’s have a debate about it—with me and not just with brainwashed, innocent school children. Surely, the Phoenix New Times can help arrange such a public debate with sufficient police security and wide public interest in this enormously important subject. There are limits to how many challenges I can post myself. Perhaps others will post similar challenges–publicly as well. If people simply copy and paste the above challenge (with or without my name), that is fine with me. Friedrich Paul Berg

10 Trick Questions for “Holocaust Survivors”

Holocaust survivors are like zombies. After all, that’s how they survived—right? If they look like zombies even sixty years after the war, like Elie Wiesel, all the better. It makes their horror tales all the more compelling. They are still human, at least partially—but they have been programmed to lie with great skill omitting inconvenient facts in order to boost the holocaust mythology. And of course, avoid serious questioning by people who are not totally sympathetic and programmed themselves. How dare anyone ever doubt their stories. It all brings them endless rewards. It also excuses the crimes and real atrocities of their fellow Jews, especially in the Middle East.

  1. When did you enter a concentration camp or labor camp and when did you leave?
  2. How old were you when you entered?
  3. What job skills did you have if any?
  4. What did you actually do throughout your incarceration in such camps?
  5. Were you fed and how often?
  6. Were you given shelter?
  7. Were you given clean clothing and how often?
  8. Were you ever too ill to work and were you given medical care?
  9. For how long were you ever unable to work?

10, Why do you believe the Germans had ever wanted to kill you?

The trick questions are not really tricky at all. They are simply the kinds of normal and reasonable questions that defense attorneys should always ask prosecution witnesses. However, we have all been so thoroughly programmed with holocaust propaganda that hardly anyone ever dares to ask the right questions. The zombies are like saints. The real “trick” is to simply ask the questions!

No doubt, there are many other “excellent” or even “better” questions to put to self-described “holocaust survivors” than the ten I have chosen.
The trick is to actually put the questions to the “survivors.”
Take their magic halo away from them.

If the holocaust “historians” were reasonable or fair, they would have to admit that their claim that ALL Jews were targeted for extermination is totally false and that huge numbers were definitely targeted for “survival.”

Holocaust survivors are like Coca-Cola. They are everywhere! When I was much younger, I believed as most people believed that only a tiny handful of Jews “survived.” To actually meet a “survivor” was like seeing that rare person who had actually come back from the dead. After the Schindler’s List movie became successful, Steven Spielberg began making video recordings of “survivors.” The numbers of such recordings quickly grew into the tens of thousands—and then one began seeing statistical studies from Jews showing that the numbers of “survivors,” alive even into the twenty-first century, were well into the hundreds of thousands. Such numbers mean that the numbers of “survivors” at the end of WW2 must have been in the millions. Can one continue to believe that only those capable of hard work as slaves were allowed to survive? Of course, not!

Will Jews ever admit that there is something grossly wrong with the tale they have promoted so successfully and for so long? Will Jews ever tell the truth?

What is the Holocaust really about?

The Holocaust is not, and never has been, about this touted “Jewish victimhood.” It is about extortion, Power politics, money, revenge and hate!

As John F. Kennedy said, “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth – persistent, persuasive and realistic.

Here are the liars again click here….

Simon Wiesenthal was a LIAR! click here


Cremation expert tells the whole story Click here


There Is No Physical Evidence of the Holocaust

There is no physical evidence of the holocaust. No bodies (killed by gassing), no murder weapons (‘gas chambers’), no documents, no  photographs, no intercepted communications (although the Allies broke the German encryption codes). There is only ‘testimony’. This was recently admitted by one of the most respected holohoax scholars, Robert Jan Van Pelt, arguing that Birkenau should not be preserved, Pelt states

“Ninety-nine per cent of what we know we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove . . . it has become part of our inherited knowledge. I don’t think that the Holocaust is an exceptional case in that sense. We in the future – remembering the Holocaust – will operate in the same way that we remember most things from the past. We will know about it from literature and eyewitness testimony. . .”

Van Pelt is right in that there is no physical evidence of the holocaust, but as for other historical events, like WW II for example, he may have overlooked a few things !

Schindlers list lie….

The true story of Schindler and of his list of 1300 Jews to be “saved” came from his wife, who called Steven Spielberg an all out lair and that his film was “packed with lies.” at a presentation of her autobiographical book, and indicated that her husband Oscar was a selfish, greedy man…

“Spielberg’s film … portrays Oscar as a hero of this century. That is not true. Neither he nor I were heroes. We were just what we were able to be. In war we are all souls without a destiny,”—Emilie Schindler Memoirs

“They say in that book (Keneally’s Schindler’s List) that I gave the Jews the food in their mouths. I never had time to find out who was sick and who had to be fed (by hand). I am no good as a nurse, I tell you frankly. I have no talent for nursing . . . I bought the food for everyone.” —Emilie Schindler

“Schindler was a drunkard. Schindler was a womanizer. His relations with his wife were bad. He often had not one but several girlfriends. Everything he did put him in jeopardy. If Schindler had been a normal man, he would not have done what he did.” —Mosche Bejski, on of the Jews in Schindler’s factory, which he “saved” to be a cheap laborer, and for no other reason.

“THERE WAS NEVER A SCHINDLER’S LIST. It was drawn up by a man called Goldman. This man took money to put a name on that list – no money, no place on the list. I was told this by a Dr Schwartz, in Vienna; he had paid in diamonds to save his wife…” —Emilie Schindler

“Emily Schindler – Memoirs” portrays her husband Osker as a greedy man whose interest in saving Polish Jews from Adolph Hitler’s death camps was to have cheap labor for his factory. She also admits purports that without his factory running, Oskar Schindler would have been drafted to the SS and sent to the front lines. For remember, Schindler was a Nazi, who entertained Nazi’s on a constant basis in his wealthy home. How else do you keep a good thing going but by wining and dining your superiors?

“What matters now is being able to take our people somewhere else, so that we can continue to work,” —Emilie Schindler

Again, the point must be made that no person and no race is above corruption. Only a brave few individuals, of which the Schindler family were not.

“What does he know about my life? Absolutely nothing.” —Emilie Schindler, referring to Spielberg.

“Steven Spielberg only gave me $50,000 for making a film about the Holocaust and my husband, and he never asked me permission, he just did it.”   Emilie Schindler, Drudge, June 1, 1999.

David Cole in Auschwitz

46 unanswered questions on the “Gas Chambers”

YouTube Partners with Mossad and ADL to stop guys like me

The Holocaust Story how much if FALSE?

What they don’t tell you!

Want to hear some good stories… here

Why Jews are Hated.

Gas chambers were for delousing…not killing

Nine hours of video that expose the Holohoax Scam

Propaganda and Myth’s

Not Guilty at Nuremberg

The “GAS” chamber LIE

The Jewish “WITCH” Hunt for John Demjanjuk

The famous Leuchter Reports

The Auschwitz Swimming Pool

Zionist ran the camps

Auschwitz Museum director admits
“Gas” Chamber Hoax
click here

How could the Jews be “Exterminated” when the Germans had…

No Order, No Plan
No Budget, No Weapon
No expert report stating:
This was a homicidal gas chamber
No Bodies examined by forensics saying

This is or was the body of a person killed by poison gas.

This makes NO Sense! Yet people believe it!

HoloHoax CASH Industry

It’s called take the money and run…….

Elizabeth Dole, former president of the American Red Cross, and wife of former Sen. Bob Dole, revealed that the official death records from Auschwitz had been uncovered in the Soviet Archives. It listed 70,000 deaths from all causes.

Click on above for article link….

This from a Pro Holocaust writer…

 In his book, Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers, published by the [Beate] Klarsfeld Foundation and meant to refute revisivonists, Jean-Claude Pressac admits that over 95% of the Zyklon B used by the Germans was used to disinfect. He assigns only 5% to homicidal purposes.

How could so little usage “kill” so many people?


As Barton Biggs reports in his book, Wealth, War, and Wisdom:

‘By the end of 1935, 100,000 Jews had left Germany, but 450,000 still [remained]. Wealthy Jewish families… kept thinking and hoping that the worst was over…
So where did the 6 million deaths figure come from?

The Six Million Swindle

Videos you won’t see in School

Be patient site takes a while to load.


If 6 million Jews Died than explain this!

– World Almanac,1933,pg.419 world Jewish population(15,316,359)

– World Almanac,1936,pg.748 world Jewish population(15,753,633)

– World Almanac,1938,pg.510 world Jewish population(15,748,091)

–  World Almanac,1940,pg.129:World Jewish Population(15,319,359)

– World Almanac, 1949, pg. 289:World Jewish Population 15,713,638

There were 394,279 MORE Jews in 1949 than in 1940?

Facts Vs LIES

The false books….

– “Surviving with Wolves” by Misha Defonseca
– “Fragments: Memories of a Wartime Childhood” by Binjamin Wilkomirski- “Stolen Soul” by Bernard Holstein
Five Chimney’s by Olga Lengyel

are just a few examples of the faux-Holocaust genre. The sector combines delusional authors, unscrupulous publishers and reviewers who fail to check the most basic facts and gullible readers.

Denis Avery another LIAR!

Why they are promoting him

Lampshade controversy my a$$

By: David Mullenax 

I am still dumbfounded at how many people fall for many of the myths of the alleged “Holocaust” of WWII. The lampshade controversy (lampshades made of human skin)  mentioned in Lampshade a WWII mystery was proven fraudulent years ago, yet American citizens still believe in it and will continue to do so even after learning there is no evidence of their existence.

It’s no fault of their own, however. After being subjected to half a century of Holocaust propaganda, that Jewish professor Norman Finkelstein labels, “The Holocaust Industry”, what could one expect? After a while, when a lie is repeated thousands of times, everyone starts believing.

There are numerous other Holocaust myths that have been proven fraudulent by scientists and academics, but are continuously peddled by those in Hollywood as fact, such as the Jewish soap myth and the gas chambers. To this day, there has not been one bar of soap produced or any forensic evidence that prove the gas chamber story.

However, there have been scientists and engineers who have taken forensic samples of the alleged gas chambers, which disprove their existence. Fred Leuchter, a gas chamber expert, performed a study on a variety of concentration camp sites (including Auschwitz) and reported, “Chemical analysis supports the fact that these facilities were never utilized as gas execution facilities.”

Dr. William Lindsey, a chemist at DuPont, declared after an onsite investigation of the alleged gas chamber sites, “I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with Zyklon B [hydrocyanic acid gas] in this manner. I consider it absolutely impossible.”

So tell me, why is it that so many media outlets continue to promote known falsehoods? The answer is simple: “Show me the money!”

Presently, the state of Israel has received $84 billion from Germany, $134 billion from the United States, and $1.25 billion from Switzerland, and there seems to be no end in sight.

I guess Professor Finkelstein was right in his book, The Holocaust Industry, when he stated this shakedown may turn out to be the “…greatest robbery in the history of mankind.”

Check out our Contest Winners for most bizarre HoloHoax tales

Here are the best entries for our Annual David McCalden Most Macabre Halloween Holocaust Tale Challenge.

Simon Wiesenthal was a FRAUD!

Holohoaxes 101

Delli Strummer Holocaust liar click here

Holocaust Liars Claim to SHAME

Elie “The Weisel”
the first and foremost LIAR


The Rosenblatts false love story

Misha Defonseca living with Wolves lie

The Official Death Records of Auschwitz

All camp deaths under 300,000!

The Real Victims of the Holocaust

Joseph Burg’s testimony


In The ‘False News’ Trial of Ernst Zündel — 1988 Joseph G. Burg was the twelfth witness called by the defense. He testified on Tuesday, March 29 and Wednesday, March 30, 1988. For an eight or nine year period prior to 1981, Zündel had been in communication by letter and in visits with Joseph G. Burg, a Jewish author who had written several books on the Second World War. These books included Guilt and Fate, Scapegoats, Zionist Nazi Censorship in the Federal Republic of Germany, National Socialist Crimes of Bad Conscience by Germans Against Germans under Zionist Direction and Major Attacks of Zionists against Pope Pius XII and the German Governments. Burg had discussed these books with Zündel and believed the latter had received them.

In his books, Burg dealt with the subject of the alleged Nazi extermination camps. Burg had spoken to hundreds of people who had been in Auschwitz and had visited the camp in the fall of 1945. Burg had wanted to see the crematoria, the hospitals, and in particular, a large new bakery. He also wanted to find the gas chambers although at that time gassings were not yet in fashion. He did not find any gas chambers. Burg formed the opinion that there were no “extermination” camps at all, that gas chambers had never existed and that there had been no plan to exterminate the Jews of Europe.

After the war, Burg heard a lot about the allegations that people were gassed at Auschwitz and Majdanek. He proved that it was either out of stupidity or propaganda. Up to now, he pointed out, no document had been found showing who gave the order for gassings, who built them and where they were built. The German authorities especially had been called the “super-bureaucrats.” It therefore couldn’t be that after all these years not a document could be found.  Burg testified that he spoke to hundreds of people who serviced and operated the crematoria but the people who operated gas chambers were impossible to find.(The reason being they didn’t exist)  Nobody had published anything in which it was claimed that he worked in a gassing institution for human beings. There was literature about gassing that was completely contradictory. Why? Because it was all made up. These opinions were published in his books.

The only gassing that were done were on clothes and areas with lice problems.


 What is Holocaust Revisionism

Treblinka and the 1.9 million. lies

The TRUTH” about Treblinka

Treblinka was not an extermination camp.. video!

It is a historical fact that literally millions of deaths fraudulently alleged to have occurred at Auschwitz and Majdanek and “proven” in the Nuremberg show trial didn’t happen, and it is a historical fact that out of the myriad number of people claimed by orthodox historians to have died via “homicidal gassings” at Auschwitz, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor and Treblinka – not one single person has ever been proven to have died via poison gas in a homicidal gas chamber at any of the six camps – NOT ONE!

* * * * *

The National Association of Forensic Historians TM is offering a – $6,000.00 reward * – to anyone who can provide the names of just one person – WITH PROOF – who died by means of poison gas in a homicidal gas chamber at Auschwitz, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor and Treblinka. (* $1,000.00 per name / camp.)


The Most Debated Question of Our Time
By Dr. Edward.R. Fields

“Since the Second World War, Jews have been treated with silk gloves. Without Auschwitz, there would be no Israel.”

– by Nathan Goldmann, the Founder of Israel as quoted from Paris Match, December 29, 1979

The “Holocaust” has given Israel a tremendous psychological advantage over the Gentile world, particularly America and Germany. By exploiting the guilt complex instilled in non-Jews, they have obtained:

Over $65 billion in aid from Germany.
Over $55 billion in aid from America. Israel, a prosperous country, receives $3.2 billion, (or $8 million a day) in foreign aid – more than any other country.
The 45,000 Jewish immigrants from Russia have the highest annual quota after Mexico. They enter as “refugees” without having to prove persecution! As “refugees” they are automatically entitled to full welfare benefits not subject to welfare reform cuts.
Nonstop holocaust brainwashing in schools, TV, movies and books has placed Israel and organized Jewry above criticism!

Official Holocaust Figures Reduced
Immediately after World War II, Allied authorities declared that “Jews had been gassed” in all German concentration camps. It later discovered that the many bodies photographed in the camps died during the waning days of the war – from typhus, cold and starvation. Simon Wiesenthal, of the “Holocaust Center” in Los Angeles, stated in Books and Bookmen, April 1975, page 5, “No gassing took place in any camp on German soil.” The Jew L.P. Beria headed the Soviet NKVD secret police from 1938 to 1953. In 1945, he announced that they had discovered a “holocaust” of six million Jews. This conveniently occurred only in camps in Poland! Beria would not allow any outside investigators to examine these sites. The Jewish-owned New York Times reported in 1945 that Soviet Russia supplied the figure of four million Jews having been put to death, “in the gas chambers of Auschwitz.” However, in July of 1990, the Polish government reduced this figure to 1.1 million and it was accepted by Jewish groups. Despite this evidence, the “official figure” of six million dead was not lowered to three million!

(It should also be noted that Elizabeth Dole, president of the American Red Cross, and wife of former Sen. Bob Dole, revealed that the official death records from Auschwitz had been uncovered in the Soviet Archives. It listed 70,000 deaths from all causes.)


No Holocaust Order Ever Given
The Germans are noted for being meticulous record keepers. There was no attempt made to destroy wartime records, 1,100 tons of which were seized in the U.S. Zone of occupation alone. British Historian, Colin Cross, writes in his biography of Hitler, on page 313: “There does not exist then, anything like a written order signed by Hitler for the extermination of the Jews in Europe.”

Madagascar is a vast island off the coast of Africa in the Indian Ocean, then owned by France. Thousands of pages of German documents have been located providing a thorough study of the feasibility of establishing a Jewish homeland on the island of Madagascar. Plans were made for the reimbursement of the 25,000 French citizens who lived there. Even the government of France studied the plan. Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, considered Madagascar a possible site for a Jewish state. He also considered Kenya, Africa, the Sinai from the Suez Canal to the Gaza Strip, and a huge area in southern Poland, but they really wanted Palestine.

The German Foreign Ministry on January 25, 1939 issued a document on the solution to the Jewish problem which stated: “The end policy in regard to the Jews is the emigration of all Jews living in the territory of the Old Reich.”

In Auschwitz Notebooks, we read that all of the top German leadership supported this plan. “On November 12, 1938, Goring had mentioned the question of Madagascar. Himmler himself had dreamed of that since 1934, a witness assures us. After the armistice of June 1940 (surrender of France), the idea was propounded by the Foreign Ministry and approved by Himmler as well as by Hitler himself.”

For these reasons SS official Reinhard Heydrich organized the Central Office for Jewish Emigration on February 11, 1939. Once the war began, this was no longer possible. Thus Hitler ordered the internment of Jews as enemy aliens and deported them to the east. On January 27, 1942, Hitler said: “The Jews must leave Europe. The best thing is that they go to Russia.”

Roosevelt did the same thing as Hitler by ordering 120,000 Americans of Japanese descent living on the West Coast interned in concentration camps. In March 1942 Roosevelt accused them of being “security risks.” The Japanese men, women and children were imprisoned behind barbed wire fences and armed guard towers in the blazing hot desert.

The Nuremberg War Crimes Trial heard testimony from Hans Lammers as to what he considered the “Final Solution of The Jewish Problem.” Lammers was Chief of the Reich Chancellery and personally close to Himmler and Hitler. Lammers said he asked Himmler what was the “final solution.” Himmler replied: “The Jews must be evacuated from Germany!” He said that Hitler told him the same thing. In other words, “The Final Solution” was –emigration! When asked, “when did you first learn that five million Jews had been exterminated,” Lammers replied that it was “here” at the Nuremberg trials! Herman Goring also told the court that the first time he had heard anything about a holocaust was, “right here at Nuremberg!”

Auschwitz was a massive military-industrial complex of 39 camps of which 19 mainly employed Jews. The factories at the “Monowitz No. 16 Camp” alone employed 126,000 workers. Holocaust expert, Leon Poliakov of Paris, in Breviary of Hate, page 134, in 1979 wrote that the Jewish Warsaw Ghetto was one of the Germans’ “most important supply centers. The second in economic importance was the Lodz ghetto because it manufactured all kinds of goods, and, in particular, its textile industries constituted support of great value to the German economy.”

Heinrich Himmler feared a typhus epidemic in the camps. Eastern European Jews were very unhygienic and were often blamed for the spread of typhus. On December 28, 1942, Himmler ordered that, “the death rate in the camps must be reduced at all costs.” (Source, Reitlinger’s book, The Final Solution.) On January 20, 1943, chief inspector of the camps, Richard Glucks, answered Himmler, “Every means will be used to lower the death rates.” (Source, Nuremberg Trial Document No. 1523.) The death rate had indeed been reduced from 8.5% in July 1942 to 2.8% in June 1943.

On April 17, 1943, Hitler asked Admiral Horthy, regent of Hungary for, “100, 000 Jews to work on a new pursuit plane program.” (Source, Reitlinger’s book, Die Endlosung, 1956, page 478.) In May 1944 Hitler personally ordered that 200,000 more Jews be put to work in construction and “other important military works.”

The Jews were vital to the German war industry. It would have been counter productive to exterminate them. In fact, the SS arrested Karl Koch, commandant of Buchenwald, for mistreating and unjustly executing some prisoners. After being found guilty by a military court, Koch was sentenced to death and shot. If there was actually a “holocaust” he would have been honored instead of executed.

Shindler’s List features Commandant Amon Goeth, who in reality did abuse prisoners. However, the film fails to inform viewers that he had been arrested by the SS and was in prison awaiting trial at war’s end. Most of the gruesome pictures of bodies we see in “made for TV” holocaust dramas are those who died of starvation and disease during the final chaotic months of the war. An example is Dachau. Some 54 died in January 1944 and 101 in February 1944. When food and medical supplies could not be delivered due to Allied bombings, 2,888 died in January and 3,977 in February 1945.


The Impossibility of Mass Gassings
Auschwitz had no mass graves. The cremation of four million bodies would have left 15,000 tons of ash which was never found. Many tons of coal would have been necessary for such mass cremations. Initially, the Soviets told conflicting stories about how the six million perished in the camps under their control. At first they claimed that the inmates had been “steamed” to death. On December 5, 1945, a Communist judge issued the following “Accusation No. 6” against defendant Hans Frank at Nuremberg:

“A large boiler for the production of superheated steam was injected into the interior of the rooms. The doors are closed hermetically and the long asphyxiation of the victims by the steam begins. At the start, screams came from inside, they die down slowly; after 15 minutes, the executions are completed.”

This story was not believable. It was then changed to allege that trucks were backed up to the “death chambers” and carbon monoxide gas was pumped into the rooms. This claim too was “forgotten” and the Soviets then charged that the Germans changed the “steam chambers” into “gas chambers.”

The Soviets came up with a novel idea of how the Jews were exterminated at the Belzec camp. “The Jews were ordered to undress as though to take a bath. They were led in fact into a building that could hold hundreds of people. The water was filled up to their necks. Then a powerful electric current was sent into the metal flooring and within a few seconds all the Jews, thousands at a time, were dead.”

Soviet prosecutor L.N. Smirnov actually read this accusation into the record at the December 19, 1945, session of the Nuremberg trial. This story finally evolved to execution by “Zyklon B” gas. This was a widely used pesticide to kill lice which was the biggest health threat in the camps. Had the Germans actually wanted to perform mass exterminations, they had products one-thousand times more deadly such as Sarin and Tabun nerve gas!

Austrian Engineer Walter Luftl issued a report in March 1992, in which he found that, “Zyklon B is utterly unsuited for the purposes of systematic mass murder.”

Fred Leuchter, America’s foremost expert on executions, took a team of investigators to Auschwitz in 1988 and reported: “I traveled to Poland to investigate the alleged execution gas chamber facilities at the three concentration camps of Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek. My forensic analysis and subsequent report proves beyond any shadow of a doubt that there were no gas execution facilities operated by the Nazis at these sites.”

Leuchter also examined the capacity of the so-called “gas chamber building” at Birkenau. The Nuremberg Tribunal’s document No. L-022 stated: “1,765,000 Jews were gassed at Birkenau between April 1942 and April 1944.” However, Leuchter found that even if used at full capacity “only 105,688” persons could have been “gassed.” His team scraped forensic samples from brick, mortar and concrete to find traces of cyanide compounds which would be present for centuries. They were submitted to the Alpha Analytical Laboratories of Ashland, Massachusetts. In March 1988, the Alpha report found that no cyanide elements, consistent with what could be expected to be found in a gas chamber, were present.

A retired German judge, Dr. Wilhelm Staglich said: “The extermination thesis stands or falls with the allegation that Auschwitz was a ‘death factory.'”

Fred Leuchter’s finding: “We have provided the definitive proof that there were no execution gas chambers utilized for genocidal purposes by the Germans at these wartime camps. The simple fact is that the holocaust story is not true.”


How Many Jews Actually Died?
The World Almanac for 1947, in quoting figures supplies by the American Jewish Committee states that the world Jewish population in 1939 was 15,688,259. The New York Times of February 22, 1948, stated that the world Jewish population ranged from 15,600,000 to 18,700,000, excluding some 600,000 to 700,000 living in Palestine. How could the Jewish population have increased so rapidly after losing six million during World War II? Walter Sanning, the author of Dissolution of European Jewry, says that no less than 2,200,000 Jews had emigrated out of Europe leaving 2,847,000 Jews residing there at the height of the German occupation in June 1941. After the war, 3,375,000 Jews, according to the Red Cross, applied for holocaust reparations. This figure included many of the emigrants. Thus, the actual number of those who died at the camps from all causes ranges between 150,000 and 300,000.


“Holocaust” Silences Opposition
Hardly a week goes by without a new holocaust story in the media. Bernard Postal wrote in Jewish Week, July 14, 1979:

“Not until the Holocaust, did anti-Semitism become taboo. There was a time when anti-Semitic speeches were an open factor in national (political) campaigns. The Holocaust puts a taboo on overt anti-Semitism among upper-level statesmen and publicists.”

Zionist spokesmen have often boasted that, “The shattering effect of the holocaust on the Christian conscience results in a feeling of collective indebtedness to the Jews.”

The Red Cross issued a massive, three volume, 1,600 page report on the camps after the war, part of which reads: “In the final moths of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims.” … Gen. Kaltenbrunner. . . Allowed the Red Cross to distribute relief packages and one (Red Cross) delegate was authorized to stay in each camp (as an observer). Does this sound like a holocaust?


What About Real Holocausts?
Why doesn’t the film industry or news media produce documentaries about the numerous true holocausts of Gentiles during this century such as:

The Soviet Holocaust of Christian Russian Kulak farmers. (1924 – 1930) – 15 million exterminated!

The Holocaust of the Ukranian farmers, (1930- 1933) – 7 million starved to death.

The Holocaust of Russian political prisoners, (1919 – 1949) – 12 million perished.

The Pol Pot Communist Holocaust in Cambodia (1975) – 2.5 million slaughtered.

Armenian Holocaust by the Turks, (1915) – 1.5 million people killed.

Bear in mind that the Jews are the only racial group with  organizations like the World Jewish congress and AIPAC which wields fearsome power!



Some  new facts about Auschwitz are at last beginning to make a tentative  appearance. They are contained in a recent work called Die Auschwitz-Lüge:  Ein  Erlebnisbericht von Theis Christopherson (The Auschwitz Legends:  An Account of  his Experiences by Thies Christopherson, Kritik  Verlag/Mohrkirch, 1973).  Published by the German lawyer Dr. Manfred  Roeder in the periodical Deutsche  Bürger-Iniative, it is an eye-witness account of Auschwitz by Thies  Christopherson, who was sent to  the Bunawerk plant laboratories at Auschwitz to  research into  the production of synthetic rubber for the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.  In May 1973, not long after the appearance of this account, the  veteran Jewish “Nazi-hunter” Simon Wiesenthal wrote to the Frankfurt  Chamber of  Lawyers, demanding that the publisher and author of  the Forward, Dr. Roeder, a member of the Chamber, should be brought  before its disciplinary commission.  Sure enough, proceedings began  in July, but not without harsh criticism even  from the Press,  who asked “Is Simon Wiesenthal the new Gauleiter of Germany?” (Deutsche  Wochenzeitung, July 27th, 1973). Christopherson’s account is certainly  one of the most important documents for a re-appraisal of Auschwitz.  He spent  the whole of 1944 there, during which time he visited  all of the separate camps comprising the large Auschwitz complex,  including Auschwitz-Birkenau where it is  alleged that wholesale  massacres of Jews took place. Christopherson, however, is  in no  doubt that this is totally untrue. He writes: “I was in Auschwitz  from  January 1944 until December 1944. After the war I heard about  the mass murders  which were supposedly perpetrated by the S.S. against the Jewish prisoners, and  I was perfectly astonished. Despite all the evidence of witnesses, all the  newspaper reports  and radio broadcasts I still do not believe today in these  horrible  deeds. I have said this many times and in many places, but to no  purpose. One is never believed” (p. 16). Space forbids a detailed  summary here  of the author’s experiences at Auschwitz, which include  facts about camp routine  and the daily life of prisoners totally  at variance with the allegations of  propaganda (pp. 22-7). More  important are his revelations about the supposed  existence of  an extermination camp. “During the whole of my time at Auschwitz,  l  never observed the slightest evidence of mass gassings. Moreover,  the odour of  burning flesh that is often said to have hung over  the camp is a downright  falsehood. In the vicinity of the main  camp (Auschwitz I) was a large farrier’s  works, from which the  smell of molten iron was naturally not pleasant” (p.  33-4). Reitlinger  confirms that there were five blast furnaces and five  collieries  at Auschwitz, which together with the Bunawerk factories comprised Auschwitz III (ibid. p. 452). The author agrees that a crematorium  would  certainly have existed at Auschwitz, “since 200,000 people  lived there, and in  every city with 200,000 inhabitants there  would be a crematorium. Naturally people died there — but not  only prisoners. In fact the wife of Obersturmbannführer A. (Christopherson’s  superior) also died there” (p. 33). The  author explains: “There  were no secrets at Auschwitz. In September 1944 a  commission of  the International Red Cross came to the camp for an inspection. They were particularly interested in the camp at Birkenau, though  we also had  many inspections at Raisko” (Bunawerk section, p.  35). Christopherson points out  that the constant visits to Auschwitz  by outsiders cannot be reconciled with allegations of mass extermination.  When describing the visit of his wife to the  camp in May, he observes:  “The fact that it was possible to receive visits from  our relatives  at any time demonstrates the openness of the camp administration.  Had Auschwitz been a great extermination camp, we would certainly  not have been  able to receive such visits” (p. 27). After the  war, Christopherson came to hear  of the alleged existence of a  building with gigantic chimneys in the vicinity of  the main camp.  “This was supposed to be the crematorium. However, I must record  the fact that when I left the camp at Auschwitz in December 1944,  I had not seen  this building there” (p. 37). Does this mysterious  building exist today? Apparently not; Reitlinger claims it was  demolished and “completely burnt out in  full view of the camp”  in October, though Christopherson never saw this public  demolition. Although it is said to have taken place “in full view of the camp”,  it was allegedly seen by only one Jewish witness, a certain Dr.  Bendel, and his  is the only testimony to the occurrence (Reitlinger,  ibid, p. 457). This  situation is generally typical. When it comes  down to hard evidence, it is  strangely elusive; the building was  “demolished”, the document is “lost”, the  order was “verbal”.  At Auschwitz today, visitors are shown a small furnace and  here  they are told that millions of people were exterminated. The Soviet  State  Commission which “investigated” the camp announced on May  12th, 1945, that  “Using rectified coefficients . . . the technical  expert commission has  ascertained that during the time that the Auschwitz camp existed, the German  butchers exterminated in this  camp not less than four million citizens …”  Reitlinger’s surprisingly  frank comment on this is perfectly adequate: “The world has grown  mistrustful of ‘rectified coefficients’ and the figure of four  millions  has become ridiculous” (ibid, p. 460). Finally, the account of Mr.  Christopherson draws attention to a very curious circumstance.  The only  defendant who did not appear at the Frankfurt Auschwitz  Trial in 1963 was  Richard Baer, the successor of Rudolf Höss  as commandant of Auschwitz. Though in  perfect health, he died  suddenly in prison before the trial had begun, “in a  highly mysterious way” according to the newspaper; Deutsche Wochenzeitung (July  27th,  1973). Baer’s sudden demise before giving evidence is especially  strange,  since the Paris newspaper Rivarol recorded his insistence  that “during the whole  time in which he governed Auschwitz, he  never saw any gas chambers nor believed  that such things existed,”  and from this statement nothing would dissuade him.  In short,  the Christopherson account adds to a mounting collection of evidence  demonstrating that the giant industrial complex of Auschwitz (comprising  thirty  separate installations and divided by the main Vienna-Cracow  railway line) was  nothing but a vast war production centre, which,  while admittedly employing the  compulsory labour of detainees,  was certainly not a place of “mass  extermination”.


DISSECTING THE HOLOCAUST,  Germar Rudolf, pg 128-131- ABSURD CLAIMS (everywhere) (buckle up – it’s bizarre). Doesn’t get any more UNREAL…. oh, wait… IT IS. Thousands of people were convicted of crimes against humanity because of these statements. NO ONE could challenge them. No cross examination, NO DEFENSE. No rules of evidence. If it was stated, IT WAS TRUE. Submitted for your approval:

Examples of Absurd Claims Regarding the Alleged National Socialist Genocide child surviving six gassings in a gas chamber that never existed; woman survived three gassings because Nazis kept running out of gas; fairy tale of a bear and an eagle in a cage, eating one Jew per day; mass graves expelling geysers of blood; erupting and exploding mass graves; soap production from human fat with imprint “RIF ” – ‘Reine Juden Seife’ (pure Jewish soap), solemn burial of soap;

The SS made sausage in the crematoria out of human flesh (‘RIW’– ‘Reine Juden Wurst’?);lampshades, book covers, driving gloves for SS officers, saddles, riding breeches, house slippers, and ladies handbags of human skin; pornographic pictures on canvasses made of human skin; mummified human thumbs were used as light switches in the house of Ilse Koch, wife of KL commander Koch (Buchenwald); production of shrunken heads from bodies of inmates; acid or boiling-water baths to produce human skeletons; muscles cut from the legs of executed inmates contracted so strongly that they made the buckets jump about; an SS-father potshooting babies thrown into the air while 9-year old SS-daughter applauds and shrieks: “Papa, do it again; do it again, Papa!” Jewish children used by Hitler-Youth for target practice; wagons disappearing on an incline into the underground crematoria in Auschwitz (such facilities never existed);forcing prisoners to lick stairs clean, and collect garbage with their lips; injections into the eyes of inmates to change their eye color; first artificially fertilize women at Auschwitz, then gas them; torturing people in specially mass-produced “torture boxes” made by Krupp; torturing people by shooting at them with wooden bullets to make them talk; smacking people with special spanking machines; killing by drinking a glass of liquid hydrogen cyanide (which, scientifically considered, evaporates quickly and would endanger those who pouring it into said glass); killing people with poisoned soft drinks;

Underground mass extermination in enormous rooms, by means of high voltage electricity;blast 20,000 Jews into the twilight zone with atomic bombs;killing in vacuum chamber, hot steam or chlorine gas;mass murder in hot steam chamber;mass murder by tree cutting: forcing people to climb trees, then cutting the trees down;killing a boy by forcing him to eat sand;gassing Soviet POWs in a quarry;gas chambers on wheels in Treblinka, which dumped their victims directly into burning pits; delayed-action poison gas that allowed the victims to leave the gas chambers and walk to the mass graves by themselves;rapid-construction portable gas chamber sheds;beating people to death, then carrying out autopsies to see why they died;introduction of Zyklon gas into the gas chambers of Auschwitz through shower heads or from steel bottles;electrical conveyor-belt executions;bashing people’s brains in with a pedal-driven brain-bashing machine while listening to the radio;cremation of bodies in blast furnaces;cremation of human bodies using no fuel at all;394 x skimming off boiling human fat from open-air cremation fires;

Mass graves containing hundreds of thousands of bodies, removed without a trace within a few weeks; a true miracle of improvisation on the part of the Germans;killing 840,000 Russian POWs at Sachsenhausen, and burning the bodies in 4 portable ovens;removal of corpses by means of blasting, i.e., blowing them up;SS bicycle races in the gas chamber of Birkenau;out of pity for complete strangers – a Jewish mother and her child – an SS-man leaps into the gas chamber voluntarily at the last second in order to die with them;blue haze after gassing with hydrogen cyanide (which is colorless);singing of national anthems and the Communist International by the victims in the gas chamber; evidence of atrocity propaganda of Communist origin;a twelve-year old boy giving an impressive and heroic speech in front of the other camp children before being ‘gassed’;filling the mouths of victims with cement to prevent them from singing patriotic or communist songs.

Mama Merkel got right with her Holocaust and now there is kebab ficki ficki  Mama Merkel got right with her Holocaust and now there is kebab ficki ficki all over Jewmany ———————————————————————————–
Fred Leuchter - 25 - Map of ountries with Holo Denial Laws
[Image] Eighteen, mostly European countries that ban telling the truth about the so-called “Holocaust”.

HAARP – Total Population Control

March 1995 – U.N. delegates meet in Copenhagen, Denmark, to discuss various methods for imposing global taxes on the people of the world.

Sept. 1995 – “Popular Science” magazine describes a top secret U.S. Navy installation called HAARP (High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) in the state of Alaska. This project beams powerful radio energy into the earth’s upper atmosphere. One of the goals of the program is to develop the capability of “manipulating local weather” using the techniques developed by Bernard Eastlund.

(The program has been underway since 1990.)

Total Population Control

[Editor’s Note: This is a highly revealing and insightful overview of the ELF, GWEN towers, and HAARP inter-connection. It was posted some time ago on Al Bielek’s web site before Al went off the air, but its content is as timely today as when it first came out. The same author, Nicholas Jones, posted an excellent article about Chemtrails, Peanut Buter and Barium Sandwichs on Jeff Rense’s web site a few months ago. This might be the same Nicholas Jones who is a BBC journalist and author of two books on Spin Control…Ken Adachi]By Nicholas Jones
July 12, 2002

Earth is wrapped in a donut shaped magnetic field. Circular lines of magnetic flux continuously descend into the North Pole and emerge from the South Pole. The Ionosphere, an electromagnetic-wave conductor, 100 kilometers [62 miles] above the earth, consists of a layer of electrically charged particles acting as a shield from solar winds.

Earth Resonant Frequency
Natural waves are created which result from electrical activity in the atmosphere. They are thought to be caused by multiple lightning storms. Collectively, these waves are called ‘The Schumann Resonance‘, with the strongest current registering at 7.8 Hz. These are quasi-standing [scalar], extremely low frequency (ELF) waves that naturally exist in the earth’s electromagnetic cavity which is the space between ground and the Ionosphere. These ‘earth brainwaves’ are identical to the frequency spectrum of our human brainwaves.

[Frequency nomenclature: 1 hertz = 1 cycle per second, 1 Khz = 1000cps, 1 Mhz =1 million cps. Wavelength: A 1 Hertz wave has a wavelength that is 186,000 miles long, A 10 Hz wave is 18,600 miles long, etc. Radio-waves move at the speed of light (186,000 miles per second)]

The Creator designed living beings to resonate to the11 natural Schumann Resonance frequency pulsation in order to evolve harmoniously. The Ionosphere is being manipulated by US government scientists using the Alaskan transmitter called HAARP, (High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) which sends focused radiated power to heat up sections of the Ionosphere, which bounces power down again. ELF waves produced from HAARP, when targeted on selected areas, can weather-engineer and create mood changes affecting millions of people. The intended wattage is 1,700billion watts of power.

Geomagnetic Waves & GWEN
Sixty four elements in the ground modulate, with variation, the geomagnetic waves naturally coming from the ground. The earth’s natural ‘brain rhythm’ above is balanced with these. These are the same minerals found in red blood corpuscles. There is a relation between the blood and geomagnetic waves. An imbalance between Schumann and geomagnetic waves disrupts these biorhythms. These natural geomagnetic waves are being replaced by artificially created low frequency (LF) ground waves coming from GWEN Towers.

GWEN (Ground Wave Emergency Network) transmitters placed 200 miles apart across the USA allow specific frequencies to be tailored to the geomagnetic-field strength in each area, allowing the magnetic field to be altered. They operate in the LF range, with transmissions between LF 150 and 175 KHz. They also emit waves from the upper VHF to the lower UHF range of 225 – 400 MHz. The LF signals travel by waves that hug the ground rather than radiating into the atmosphere. A GWEN station transmits in a 360 degree circle up to 300 miles, the signal dropping off sharply with distance. The entire GWEN system consists of, (depending on source of data), from 58 to an intended 300 transmitters spread across the USA, each with a tower 299-500 ft high. 300 ft copper wires in spoke-like fashion fan out from the base of the system underground, interacting with the earth, like a thin shelled conductor, radiating radio wave energy for very long distances through the ground.

The United States is bathed in this magnetic field which can rise from ground up to 500 ft, but goes down into basements, so everyone can be affected and mind-controlled. The entire artificial ground-wave spreads out over the whole of the USA like a web. It is easier to mind-control and hypnotize people who are bathed in an artificial electromagnetic-wave.

GWEN transmitters have many different functions including:

1. controlling the weather,
2. mind control,
3. behavior and mood control, and
4. sending synthetic-telepathy as infrasoundto victims with US government mind-control implants.

GWEN works in conjunction with HAARP and the Russian Woodpecker transmitter, which is similar to HAARP. The Russians openly market a small version of their weather-engineering system called Elate, which can fine-tune weather patterns over a 200 mile area and have the same range as the GWEN unit. An Elate system operates at Moscow airport. The GWEN towers shoot enormous bursts of energy into the atmosphere in conjuction with HAARP. The website  wrote an expose of how the major floods of the Mid-West USA occurred in 1993.

Atmospheric Vapor Rivers
Enormous, invisible rivers of water, consisting of vapors that flow, move towards the poles in the lower atmosphere. They rival the flow of the Amazon River and are 420 to 480 miles wide and up to 4,800 miles long. They are 1.9 miles above the earth and contain a volume of water equivalent to 340 lbs of water per second. There are 5 atmospheric rivers in each Hemisphere. A massive flood can be created by damming up one of these massive vapor rivers, causing huge amounts of rainfall to be dumped. The GWEN Towers positioned along the areas north of the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers were turned on for 40 days and 40 nights, probably mocking the Flood of Genesis. (This was in conjunction with HAARP, that creates a river of electricity flowing thousands of miles through the sky and down to the polar ice-cap, manipulating the jet-stream , like the Russian Woodpecker.) These rivers flooded, causing agricultural losses of $12-15 billion. HAARP produces earthquakes by focusing energy along fault lines. GWEN Towers are located on the fault lines and volcanic areas of the Pacific Northeast.

In 1963, Dr Robert Beck explored effects of external magnetic-fields on brainwaves showing a relationship between psychiatric admissions and solar magnetic storms. He exposed volunteers to pulsed magnetic-fields similar to magnetic-storms, and found a similar response. US 60 Hz electric power ELF waves vibrate at the same frequency as the human brain. UK 50 Hz electricity emissions depress the thyroid gland.

Human Vulnerability
Dr Andrija Puharich in the 50’s/60’s, found that clairvoyant’s brainwaves became 8 Hz when their psychic powers were operative. He saw an Indian Yogi in 1956 controlling his brainwaves, deliberately shifting his consciousness from one level to another. Puharich trained people with bio-feedback to do this consciously, making 8 Hz waves. A healer made 8 Hz waves pass into a patient, healing their heart trouble, her brain emitting 8 Hz . One person emitting a certain frequency can make another also resonate to the same frequency. Our brains are extremely vulnerable to any technology which sends out ELF waves, because they immediately start resonating to the outside signal by a kind of tuning-fork effect. Puharich experimented discovering that

A) 7.83 Hz (earth’s pulse rate) made a person feel good, producing an altered-state.
B) 10.80 Hz causes riotious behaviour and
C)  6.6 Hz causes depression.

Puharich made ELF waves change RNA and DNA, breaking hydrogen bonds to make a person have a higher vibratory rate. He wanted to go beyond the psychic 8 Hz brainwave and attract psi phenomena. James Hurtak, who once worked for Puharich, also wrote in his book  The Keys of Enoch that ultra-violet caused hydrogen bonds to break and this raised the vibratory rate.

 Puharich presented the mental effects of ELF waves to military leaders, but they would not believe him. He gave this information to certain dignitaries of other Western nations. The US government burned down his home in New York to shut him up and he fled to Mexico. However, the Russians discovered which ELF frequencies did what to the human brain and began zapping the US Embassy in Moscow on 4 July 1976 with electromagnetic-waves, varying the signal, including focusing on 10 Hz. (10 Hz puts people into a hypnotic state. Russians and North Koreans use this in portable mind-control machines to extract confessions. A machine was even found in an American church to help the congregation believe!) The Russian “Woodpecker” signal was traveling across the world from a transmitter near Kiev. The US Air Force identified 5 different frequencies in this compound harmonic Woodpecker signal that was sending signals through the earthand the atmosphere.

Nikola Tesla revealed in 1901 power could be transmitted through the ground using ELF waves. Nothing stops or weakens these signals. The Russians retrieved Tesla’s papers when they were finally returned to Yugoslavia after his death.

Puharich continued to monitor the Russian ELF wave signal while in Mexico and the higher harmonics produced  in the MHz range (5.340 MHz). He met the CIA and started working for them. He and Dr. Robert Beck designed equipment to measure these waves and their effect on the human brain. Puharich started his work by putting dogs to sleep. By 1948/49 he graduated to monkeys, deliberately destroying their eardrums to enable them to pick up sounds without the eardrum intact. He discovered a nerve in the tongue could be used to facilitate hearing. He created the dental tooth implant which mind-control victims are now claiming was surreptitiously placed in their mouth by controlled dentists causing them to hear ‘voices in their head.’  The implant was placed under dental caps or lodged in the jaw.

Vaccine Implants
Implants are now smaller than a hair’s width and are injected with vaccine and flu shots. Millions have had this done unknowingly. These ‘biochips’ circulate in the bloodstream and lodge in the brain, enabling the victims to hear ‘voices’ via the implant. There are many kinds of implants now and 1 in 40 are victims from ‘alien abduction’ statistics, though 1 in 20 has also been gauged.  The fake alien abduction event, revealed to be actually the work of  US military personnel using technology to make hologram spaceships outside, virtual reality scenarios of going onto a spaceship with humans in costumes, has been astutely perceived. Though real alien abductions do occur, the ‘alien abduction’ scenario has been useful to stop any further investigation or accountability of government  authorities by poor victims who would face mockery and appear silly.

Are we being forced to respond to an artificially induced vibratory rate by global masters who want this planet to have a sudden leap in evolution, populated by the psychically aware and therefore a superior class of humans or is the agenda designed to eliminate billions of people who are ‘useless eaters’, deceptively being disposed by electro magnetically-induced cancers and diseases?

Electromagnetic Disease Transmission, ELF, & Chemtrails
The physics and engineering behind electromagnetic disease transmission are frightening. Diseases can be reproduced as ‘disease signatures’ in that the vibration of a disease can be manufactured and sent on to be induced. (The brainwave pattern of hallucinogenic drugs can also be copied and sent by ELF waves to induce ‘visions’.) Once diseases are sprayed in the air, electromagnetic-waves attuned to the disease, using harmonics and subharmonics, will make them more lethal and infectious by sending particular disease frequency  death-patterns.

Chemtrails are being sprayed daily all over USA (and other countries too) in a white crisscross pattern. They contain diseases and chemicals which affect our state of consciousness. They can produce apathy which works in conjuction with fluoridation of the water, as well as aspartame and drugs. Fluoride disables the willpower section of the brain, impairing the left occipital lobe.

Fluoride and selenium enable people to ‘hear voices‘. ELF waves create disturbances in the biological processes of the body and these can be activated in the population once the diseases are introduced into the body from the chemtrails.

Some chemtrails have been analyzed and shown to be creating cleavages in spacial perceptions, blocking the interaction of various amino-acids that relate to higher-consciousness and to increase dopamine in the brain producing a listless, spaced-out state of lower reactive mind.

Basically, the goal is to fog the difference between the real and unreal and some of this could be connected with the many UFO abductions occurring en-mass. Hundreds have been witnessed laid out on tables and implanted. Intelligence agencies are in league with each other behind this disablement of the masses to such a point that they can’t even fight back. In order for the perpetrators to do what they want, they need  the overall ‘frequency’ of each victim to function at a specific rate below the threshold of awareness.

Could this be part of a greater plan with mind-control transmitters covering the whole of USA and England, cleverly disguised as cell phone towers and trees? The power from microwave towers may be turned up to such a level that people can die.

A brain functioning at beta-level (above 13 Hz) is agitated and can’t change its perceptions, if it is artificially maintained by technology to that frequency. This may increase body electricity in others, giving them psychic powers. Is this linked to the New-Agers claim of a rising 12-14 Hz Schumann Resonance, inching us towards the 4th dimension? Stimulants ingested globally from caffeine genetically-modified plants, may also produce an impact on the ‘global-brain’ in the ionosphere collecting our  brainwaves. New-age channellers say we are going into 4th dimensional frequency. They ‘heard’ the voice of some ‘ET’ who told them.

However, some ‘ETs’ may be local boys. Voices in the head were produced in prisoners in Utah prisons using Tesla technology. Each of the prisoners received the same message from an ‘ET’. Today, it seems, it’s easy to produce ‘voices in the head’ without implants.

A prisoner called David Fratus in Draper Prison, Utah in 1988 wrote:

“I began to receive, or hear, high-frequency tones in my ears. When I plug my ears..the tones are still inside and become amplified. It’s as if they had become electrified echo chambers with the sounds coming from the inside out..I began to hear voices..into my inner ears as vivid as though I were listening to a set of stereo headphones..with the end result being that I am now having my brain monitored by an omnipotent computerized mind reading or scanning machine of some sort “

Hundreds of inmates at the Gunnison Facility of the Utah State Prison, and the State Hospital were subject to this brand of mind-control in order to test it. In the early 1970s, this was brought out in the Utah U.S. District Court, because inmates who had been subjected to this Tesla-wave mind-control in prison had tried unsuccessfully to fight back in court.  The University of Utah researched how Tesla-waves could be used to manipulate the mind into hearing voices, overriding and implanting thoughts into the mind, and reading the thoughts, as well as developing eye-implants.Tracking
Cray computers, using artificial-intelligence, monitor the victims of government implants sending pre-recorded sound-bytes or occasional live messages. They are picked up by satellite and relayed to whatever large TV broadcasting antenna, GWEN tower or other microwave antenna is near the victim. It’s believed that some type of body implants pick up the signal and broadcast the correct Tesla-wave pattern to create voices within the victim.

The tracking implant keeps the staff and the satellite system informed every few minutes as to exactly where to send the voice signals. The master computer and central HQ for this is reported to be in Boulder, CO. It is thought that transponders are being made there as well. The central cellular computer is in the Boulder, CO National Bureau of Standards building.  AT&T is also cooperating in this project. Several government agencies work together on this.

Tim Rifat of UK wrote that

“this inter-cerebral hearing is used to drive the victim mad, as no one else can hear the voices transmitted into the brain of the target. Transmission of auditory data directly into the target’s brains using microwave carrier beams is now common practice.  Instead of using excitation potentials, one uses a transducer to modify the spoken word into ELF audiograms, that are then superimposed on a pulse modulated microwave beam.”

The Sydney Morning Herald on 21 March 1983 published an article by Dr Nassim Abd El-Aziz Neweigy, Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Agriculture, Moshtohor Tukh-Kalubia, Egypt. It stated:

“Russian satellites, controlled by advanced computers, can send voices in one’s own language interweaving into natural thoughts to the population of choice to form diffused artificial thought. The chemistry and electricity of the human brain can be manipulated by satellite and even suicide can be induced. Through ferocious anti-humanitarian means, the extremist groups are fabricated, the troubles and bloody disturbances are instigated by advanced tele-means via Russian satellites, in many countries in Asia, Africa, Europe and Latin America.”

Another source says that these have been fed with the world’s languages and synthetic telepathy will reach into people’s heads making people believe God is speaking to them personally to enact the Second Coming, complete with holograms! The Russians broke the genetic code of the human brain. They worked out 23 EEG band-wave lengths, 11 of which were totally independent. So if you can manipulate those 11, you can do anything.NSA Cray computers can remotely track people just knowing the specific EMF waves (evoked potentials from EEGs in the 30-50 Hz, 5 milliwatt range) of a person’s bioelectric-field. Each person’s emissions are unique and they can remotely track someone in public.

Maxwell’s ‘Hidden’ Etheric Component
Evoked-potentials officially don’t exist in physics, but in 1873 a Scotsman, James Clerk Maxwell, discovered electromagnetic waves have 3 components:

He discovered waveforms which exist at a certain number of right-angled rotations away from the electromagnetic-field. These are hyperspacial components, not subject to constraints of time and space. He claimed that electromagnetic-radiation waves were carried by the ether and the ether was disturbed by magnetic lines of force. The hidden component is called only ‘potential’ now and not normally used except for covert hyperdimensional physics and to manipulate consciousness itself via electromagnetic-waves covering vast areas of the planet.

Approx. one person in 3000 is naturally sensitive to this magnetic-waveform component, the telepathic types (according to a writer called “Majix”), but we are all capable of tuning into this magnetic component by tuning our subconscious to it. Maxwell’s successors thought potentials were akin to mysticism, because they believed fields contain mass which cannot be created from apparently nothing, which is what potentials are, both literally and mathematically – they are an accumulation or reservoir of energy; but this hasn’t been taught in mainstream physics.

Thought Control
Subliminal words in the correct electromagnetic-field that expresses human consciousness, attuned to the human brain, can enter our minds at a subconscious level. Our brain activity patterns can apparently be measured and stored on computer by super-computers. If a victim needs subliminal-thoughts implanted, all that is necessary is to capture, save on computer, and target the person’s brainwave pattern to send them such low frequency subliminal-messages that they actually think it is their own thoughts [confirmed by Al Bielek and Preston Nichols with the Montauk Project in Long Island]. The researcher Majix says our brains are so sensitive that they are like liquid-crystal in response to the magnetic component of the earth.

We are sensitive to earth’s magnetic changes, changes in the ionospheric cavity and re-resonate those frequencies ourselves. We are incredibly complex, beyond comprehension and a type of biocosmic transducer. He adds:

“Physicists in Russia correlate the mean annual magnetic-activity, electro-magnetic and electro-static fields on human behavior and medical indications.They are similar to biorhythms.These magnetic frequencies can be manipulated. Our brain waves can mimic magnetic frequencies from very simple equipment at extremely low power levels. From half a second to 4 seconds later, the neurons and brainwaves are driven exclusively by the device, with power levels almost nonexistent. All one needs is a circularly polarized antenna aimed up at the ionospheric cavity and they can manipulate the moods of everyone within a 75 sq. mile area. The body picks up these  “new” manipulated waves and begins to correspond immediately.  “Sleep” frequency will make everyone become tired and sleep.”

In 1967, an “internationally renowned scientist” and Christopher Hills, a pendulum expert, communicated with some ETs. (It is not known who the scientist was, but at one time both Hills and Puharich were with the medium Eileen Garrett at a time when Puharich was communicating with ETs.)In short, ETs communicated with us via modulated radio-waves, between 10,000 and 20,000 cycles below the known electromagnetic-spectrum. In the carrier-wave by amplitude modulation, mixed with frequency modulation. Single band energy, transmission power less than 25 watts. A naturally present wave on earth, the brain modulated – a wave that resonates between the earth and the ionosphere. All humans influence the ionosphere in this manner. A reflecting technique is involved. The brain modulation consisted of pulses, akin to those known from neuro pulses. Two humans can use this. It’s related to something akin to low frequency radar and to ultrasonic techniques, but qualified. A mixed electro-acoustic wave function. The  electromagnetic-wave induced an ultrasonic transduction in human tissue. The brain radiation has a sonic component to it as well as an electromagnetic component. Electromagnetic-radiation has a sonic component and it’s dependent on the medium through which it travels.

The scientist cut through months of work. Now HAARP is slicing up the ionosphere, the world-brain, like a microwave knife, producing long tear incisions destroying the membrane which holds the reservoir of data accumulated by all earth’s history. A healer called Mr. “A” claimed to receive “Ancient Wisdom” from this protective Magnetic-Ring of energy which stores within it all knowledge since time began. Ruth Mongomery  wrote about him in Born To Heal.

He claimed that if our energy flow is cut off from this magnetic-field, the Universal-Supply is obstructed and we are no longer in tune and start to get sick. The Power from this travels in split-seconds around the world and is available to anyone who is capable of receiving it and handling it. The waves from The Ring automatically translated into words in his mind, as wisdom to diagnose and heal others, coming from the storehouse of knowledge here since the beginning of time. He produced instant  miracles, knitting broken bones and removing arthritis. A photo caught forked lightning coming from his fingers.

In Let’s Talk MONTAUK, Joyce Murphy shows that experiments on the 410-420 MHz cycle have been done which could affect the”window frequency to the human consciousness” as a whole:

“He (Preston Nichols) used equipment to learn that whenever a 410-420 MHz signal appeared on the air, the psychic’s minds would be  “jammed.” Tracing the signal to Montauk Point and the red and white radar antenna on the Air Force Base..”

In Encounter in the Pleiades by Peter Moon and Preston Nichols,  Preston wrote that:

“Dr. Nicholas Begich has picked up 435 MHz signals connected to HAARP and that a mind control function is being employed. He says that 400-450 MHz is the window to human consciousness because it is our reality’s background frequency.”

Tim Rifat wrote in his Microwave Mind Control in the UK article   that cellular phones use 435 MHz.  UK police use 450 MHz exclusively. Dr. Ross Adey used this for CIA behavioral modification experiments. Police have a vast array of antennae to broadcast this frequency all over the UK. Adey used 0.75mW/cm2 intensity of pulse modulate microwave at a frequency of 450 MHz, with an ELF modulation to control all aspects of human behavior. 450 MHZ radar modulated at 60 Hz greatly reduced T-lymphocyte activity to kill cultured cancer cells. A study of  USA  60 Hz powerlines repeated this finding.

Nicholas Jones

US Air Force Admits in Defense Hearing to HAARP Experiments

While HAARP and weather control has been called a conspiracy theory by the mainstream media and government officials, during a Senate hearing on Wednesday, David Walker, deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for science, technology and engineering,dropped a bombshell.

Answering a question asked by Lisa Murkowski, in relation to the dismantling of the $300 million High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program in Gakona this summer, Walker explained that the Air Force took control over HAARP from the Navy and completed all needed experiments:

“We’re moving on to other ways of managing the ionosphere, which the HAARP was really designed to do,” he said. “To inject energy into the ionosphere to be able to actually control it. But that work has been completed.”

Strong evidence shows that HAARP was created and has been used for weather control, with enough juice to trigger hurricanes, tornadoes and earthquakes. [1], [2]

This is not the first time a public official has acknowledged that HAARP and weather control is not only possible, but has been and continues to be, used as a “super weapon,” as evidenced by a statement in 1997 by former U.S. Defense Secretary William Cohen, where he said:

“Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts.”

So, HAARP was/is not a conspiracy theory after all. Watch the question and answer session below:

By Susan Duclos, Wake up Americans;

Just because they are dismantling the HAARP installation in Alaska, it does not mean that they are giving up weather modification. This installation became outdated, and it cannot even be leased anymore, so they are moving forward.

“It is reported that smaller, mobile versions of HAARP exist. Let us refer to Nick Begich’s book,Angels Don’t Play this HAARP:

Is it possible that the HAARP scientists could have miniaturized the technology so that they don’t need such a large area of land and electrical power as called for in Eastlund’s pattents? Manning asked him.

“It’s entirely possible,” he [Eastlund] replied. “They have had a lot of good engineers working on it for some time. I would hope they have improved it.”

Aviation Week reports in 2008 that the United States Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is developing an airborne version of HAARP. BAE Systems, the article tells us, is to demonstrate this unit by towing it, ‘behind a helicopter.’ — Reference; buy book on Amazon;

Here is a picture of what is described as a mobile HAARP ship:


  1. EU Parliament Documents Prove HAARP is a Weapon + HAARP in Action;
  2. Rosalind Peterson, the US president of Agriculture Defence Coalition is addressing the United Nations on chemtrails, geoengineering, and weather modification (HAARP);
  3. USA Threatened Japan with HAARP-Caused Earthquakes Prior to Fukushima;

US FEMA Concept…..when Human Rights for Individuals come to an End….

1979 – FEMA, which stands for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, is given huge powers. It has the power, in case of “national emergency”, to suspend laws, move entire populations, arrest and detain citizens without a warrant, and hold them without trial. It can seize property, food supplies, transportation systems, and can suspend the Constitution.

Not only is it the most powerful entity in the United States, but it was not even created under Constitutional law by the Congress. It was a product of a Presidential Executive Order. An Executive Order becomes law simply by a signature of the U.S. President; it does not even have to be approved by the Representatives or Senators in the Congress.

A state of “national emergency” could be a terrorist attack, a natural disaster, or a stock market crash, for example. Here are just a few Executive Orders associated with FEMA that would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These Executive Orders have been on record for nearly 30 years, and could be enacted by the stroke of a Presidential pen:

# 10995: Right to seize all communications media in the United States.

# 10997: Right to seize all electric power, fuels and minerals, both public and private.

# 10999: Right to seize all means of transportation, including personal vehicles of any kind, and total control of highways, seaports, and waterways.

# 11000: Right to seize any and all American people and divide up families in order to create work forces to be transferred to any place the Government sees fit.

# 11001: Right to seize all health, education and welfare facilities, both public and private.

# 11002: Right to force registration of all men, women, and children in the United States.

# 11003: Right to seize all air space, airports, and aircraft.

# 11004: Right to seize all housing and finance authorities in order to establish “Relocation Designated Areas”, and to force abandonment of areas classified as “unsafe”.

#  11005: Right to seize all railroads, inland waterways, and storage facilities, both public and private.

# 11921: Authorizes plans to establish Government control of wages and salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institutions.

Govt. “Threat List”: 8 Million Americans Will be ARRESTED When Martial Law is Imposed

The government has been compiling a list of names since the 1980′s called “Main Core“.

This list contains the names of people who it considers to be ‘threats’ and would be the victims of having their constitutional rights ‘suspended’ in the event of an emergency or if martial law is declared.

These people would be the first to be tracked, detained, questioned, and basically targeted for detention due to being labeled a threat of some sort.

The criteria for being placed on the list is rather loose, as is the criteria for a “national emergency”, however government sources have said that if you’re on the list that you can plan on being detained should martial law be declared.

A senior government official, who’s served with 5 administrations, said that:

“There exists a database of Americans, who, often for the slightest and most trivial reason, are considered unfriendly, and who, in a time of panic, might be incarcerated. The database can identify and locate perceived ‘enemies of the state’ almost instantaneously.”

Even though this program has been around since the 80′s, one can’t help but wonder if the post 9/11 NSA has used its spy programs to exponentially expand the list, which is a terrifying prospect if you’re one of the people the DHS has labeled as a “domestic terrorist” for your conservative values.

We know that the FBI, Defense Department and local police have worked to infiltrate and spy on peaceful domestic groups because they were seen as threats, and the revelations from Snowden have shown us that the NSA reads our Facebook posts, scans our emails, follows our Twitter accounts, listens to our phone calls, etc.

So can we assume that anybody who’s ever spoken out against the government is on the list and will be the first to be paid a visit should SHTF? So much for the massive spy network being used to ‘protect’ us from terrorism.

In a article last year one of their journalists did some digging into Main Core and what he found merely confirms what Snowden had to say. His article was lengthy and detailed, but a main part that stuck out was this:

“The following information seems to be fair game for collection without a warrant: the e-mail addresses you send to and receive from, and the subject lines of those messages; the phone numbers you dial, the numbers that dial in to your line, and the durations of the calls; the Internet sites you visit and the keywords in your Web searches; the destinations of the airline tickets you buy; the amounts and locations of your ATM withdrawals; and the goods and services you purchase on credit cards. All of this information is archived on government supercomputers and, according to sources, also fed into the Main Core database.”

As of 2008 it was well known the list had over 8 million people on it and since then billions have been spent to expand the surveillance operations and identify enemies of the state. In an article last summer an anonymous government official spoke to a reporter and had this to say:

“We know all this already,” I stated. He looked at me, giving me a look like I’ve never seen, and actually pushed his finger into my chest. “You don’t know jack,” he said, “this is bigger than you can imagine, bigger than anyone can imagine. This administration is collecting names of sources, whistle blowers and their families, names of media sources and everybody they talk to and have talked to, and they already have a huge list. If you’re not working for MSNBC or CNN, you’re probably on that list. If you are a website owner with a brisk readership and a conservative bent, you’re on that list. It’s a political dissident list, not an enemy threat list.”

If that’s not enough to send chills down your spine think about this, the government is building a massive data center out in Utah to store the 2.1 gigabits per hour it collects and keep it for easy indexing.

So what started out as a means to protect us has been transformed into a surveillance monster that’s being used against us, to protect the government and the people within it if things go south.

Unfortunately the mainstream media won’t report on this and if they do it’s to ‘reassure’ us that the NSA and its spy programs are there for our ‘protection’, meanwhile it being used to figure out who to round up when the failed policies of our government finally catch up to us and our economy collapses before our eyes. The constitution is no longer effective in protecting our God given rights.


I want to remind you that the FEMA camps are now officially activated and that the round up has begun with the homeless people in multiple states across the USA.

leaked document dated February 2010 (FM 3-39.40, also known as “Internment and Resettlement Operations” and signed by Joyce E. Morrow – Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of the Army) shows that not only FEMA will be responsible for the detainees, but also the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department of Defense (DOD) and the United Nations (UN).

Yes, the UN will operate on American soil!

The document also states that inside the camps, the guards will have to identify political leaders and political activists, and execute indoctrination programs on the rest of the detainees.

This is Nazi Germany all over again!

Most of you probably know by now that the DHS has acquired 2,700 light tanks and 2 billion hollow-point rounds. I want to stress that the DHS should be regarded as a private army of mercenaries, because they are not part of either the US Police or the US Army.

But they are ready to wage wars on American soil. DHS insider warns: “Preparations Have Been Finalized to Respond to a Crisis of Unprecedented Magnitude Within the United States.”

I don’t know just how many people realize, but we may be just one false flag away from FEMA’s extermination camps.

Sources: TellmenowBeforeitsnews; | Additions by Alexander Light,;


ONE False Flag Away From FEMA’s Extermination Camps

Mankind has always engaged in a series of forced removal of its political undesirables, which usually culminated with deadly consequences. This fact is not lost upon the inhabitants of this country.

The United States has a checkered past when it comes to the treatment of political undesirables.

In this country, Plymouth Colony banished individuals who had the “wrong beliefs” and the “wrong attitudes” to a near certain death in the New England winter.

This was followed by the Indian Removal Act, initiated by President Andrew Jackson, which led to the infamous Trail of Tears.

The latter incident led to the widespread practice of placing Native American tribes on reservations under very unhealthy, and often deadly consequences. In 1942, America citizens of Japanese descent were sentenced to relocation camps for the crime of being the wrong race in a time of war.

Map of active FEMA camps waiting for inmates in case of Martial Law

The Germans also had their concentration camps and the Russians had their Gulags, and on and on it goes. Despite the fact that history is replete with examples of forced incarcerations of political undesirables and in many cases, extermination of innocents, most Americans refuse to believe it could ever happen here.

We are too civilized or we have the Bill of Rights, are the two most common justifications used to reinforce the mass denial systems of the sheep of this country. Yet, another voice emerges on this topic from the world of scientific research. The psychological research is stunning in that it shows that a holocaust could occur in the United States and the circumstances would not have to be extraordinary for this to occur.

Stanley Milgram and the Solomon Asch Experiments on Obedience

In 1963, after listening to Americans proclaim their superiority to the Nazis by indicating that our fair and virtuous society would never engage in what the Germans did in the pre-WWII years, Yale University professor, Dr. Stanley Milgram, set out to test that unproven hypothesis.

What the Milgram research indicated was that 67% of the population are nothing but a bunch of sheep as the experiment proved that most subjects would follow the orders of a perceived authority figure to put an innocent to death even where there was a distinct absence of real coercion. Milgram proved that most people need very little provocation to carry out a “Lord of the Flies” agenda.

Prior to the Milgram experiment, Solomon Asch conducted his own experiment on mindless conformity. Asch demonstrated that just under 60% of the people could be coerced into giving what they knew was the wrong answer by the ever so subtle application of peer pressure.

By having six confederates in the experiment, give the wrong answer, most of the test subjects would also give what was obviously the wrong answer in an effort to go along to get along. Americans, like any other people, are largely conformist sheep.

People in this country who mistakenly believe as most Americans did in 1963 that we could never have a genocidal internment in this country, believe so at their own peril.

Related: We Are All Terrorist Now: Senate 93-7, ‘Indefinite Detention’ Bill;

Some Americans who believe that this event is inevitable, are obviously not aware of the follow up research in response to the Milgram and Solomon Asch experiments, for it there was a silver lining the research, it is that when people become aware of our tendencies to conform are known, the rates of compliance go down. Therefore, simply knowing about the phenomenon makes it less likely to occur.

What is most frightening to me is that when we compare the psychological experiments of the 1960′s to today’s population, it is noteworthy that the people of the 1960′s did not live under the NDAA, Executive Order 13603 and REX 84. This means that genocidal internment is much more likely today.

A Ray of Hope for Spreading the Word

Later research confirmed that when people are educated about the subtleties of peer pressure, group think and our need to obey, the Milgram and Solomon Asch rates of compliance dropped by about 50%.

The totality of this research has clear implications for our time in history. If we educate as many people about what is really going on in this country with regard to the loss of civil liberties and current events, we can lessen the likelihood that Americans will engage in genocidal internment of its own citizens. The disinfectant of the light of day is our best ally.

Everyone, and I mean everyone needs to become a citizen journalist and report on the abuses of this administration and the banksters  who control the politicians. For if we do next to nothing, we are very likely sealing our fate. Consider the words of warning of Solzhenitsyn:

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?

Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?

The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If… if… We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…  We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

The people of Russia acquiesced because they were not educated. We have the internet, which is the ultimate in the modern day example of the Committees of Correspondence. We can educate the country and diminish the threat. And every exposure of the truth needs to be accompanied by the message, “Do Not Comply”!

What happens when the “authorities” come for the people that they intend to abuse. Can one enter into a detention center and expect to come out alive and in intact?

The Two Biggest Threats to Your Survival

Imagine how a man who is deprived of everyone he has ever cared about, and at the same time this man has lost his house and all of his possessions and is separated from his family, sent to a detention center, how will he survive?

There are two primary dangers facing detainees and the biggest danger consists of bad luck and that your showers will actually emit cyanide instead of water resulting in your demise. And the second danger detainees will face is the loss of hope as we succumb and let psychologically let go of the virtues of life. For how will you find meaning in your life, when you’re separated from everything that  you’ve ever known and loved?

If you are sent to the camps in the upcoming clamp down, there are things you can do to exercise control over the things of which you have influence.

One of the founding fathers of the modern psychology movement, Victor Frankl, wrote about these challenges in a book entitled, Man’s Search For Meaning, which was based upon his imprisonment during WWII.

Frankl believed that the greatest loss of life in the concentration camps was the loss of individual hope. In the book, Frankl described how person after person in the death camps lost hope, pulled the covers up over their head and died.

Many of the concentration camp survivors were very resilient people and were able to manufacture their own subculture while in the death camps. This helped to provide a connectivity to other human beings which provided a glimmer of hope for the detainees in the midst of abject despair.

Related: FEMA Camp Round Up Has Begun: The Homeless First;

Frankl spent four years in Auschwitz and everyone in his family, which were imprisoned along with him, died in the camp. Frankl began to seek ways to carve out a life worth living. He used his talents, as a psychiatrist, to give aid and comfort to people who were losing hope.

In doing so, he connected with people at a very deep level. As a result, he found his meaning in life. He also used his imagination to hope for a better day. He used to look at the birds flying overhead and he imagined that he was one of them and for a brief moment, he was not bound by the armed guards and the fences around the camp. He was free to  go anywhere and do anything. He was, for a brief time, totally free.

This reminder kept his inner spirit alive and made him yearn for the day that his life would improve. Frankl maintain hope.

There Were Resisters to the Forced Incarcerations

When they come for you, what does history say about resisting incarceration? There were those in the camps that did resist as they ran from the relocation trains, and/or attacked their captors. In almost every instance, resisting authorities at the time of arrest was almost 100% fatal most often ending with a bullet in the back of their head.

What enhanced survivability was forming a set of meaningful communities in the camps. Within the death camps, a legitimate subculture appeared as the people played cards and actors, musicians, comics, singers, and dancers all entertained small groups who came together for a few hours to forget their  horrific levels of dehumanization. Inmates formed close relationships with one another and this was their grass roots form of resistance.

The voices of history are clear, if you’re ever forced into a re-education camp, pray for good luck and develop meaningful relationships among your fellow detainees as well as find pleasure in the small things over which you will have some measure of control.

Some Inmates Resisted

If you allowed yourself to be taken to a camp, could you organize a resistance and somehow win your freedom? There were some that tried just that. However, the results were not promising.

In Treblinka, seven hundred Jews were successful in blowing up the camp on August 2, 1943. All but 150 of the inmates perished in retaliation for their efforts. Only 12 Treblinka inmates survived the war. In Sobibor, Jewish and Russian inmates mounted an escape on October 14, 1943.

One in ten successfully escaped, about 60 out of 600. The prisoners involved in the escape survived to join the Soviet underground. In Auschwitz, on October 7, 1944, one of the four crematoria was blown up by Jewish workers, whose job it was to clear away the bodies of gas chamber victims. The workers were all caught and 100% of them were executed.

The lesson seems clear, if you allow yourself to be taken, you’re probably not coming out of the experience alive.

What is the lesson that one should draw? First, do not get caught by the so-called authorities, and I know that is easier said than done. Secondly, some will survive, not many, by choosing to go along to get along. Third, you can try to escape but the odds for survival are long.

To survive by going along to get along, requires a fair amount of luck to survive. If you are not one who wants to risk their life to chance, I believe history teaches that mounting an organized escape effort may be the best chance for survival that an inmate possess  Some will survive, but not most.

What About Community Resistance?

Can a community mount a successful resistance against forced genocidal internment? Despite the stereotype which betrays all death camp detainees (i.e. Gypsies, Jews, homosexuals, political dissidents and the handicapped) as meekly going to their death, there were plenty of communities which mounted a resistance.

For example, on September 3, 1942, seven hundred Jewish families escaped from the Tuchin Ghetto, located in the Ukraine. However, the Nazis hunted them down, and only 15 survived.

By 1943, the residents in the famous Warsaw Ghetto, had organized an army of about 1,000 men, mostly unarmed and without military equipment. In January 1943, German soldiers entered the ghetto to round up more Jews for shipment to the death camps. They were met by a volley of bombs, Molotov cocktails, and a few bullets from the sparse number of firearms which had been smuggled into the ghettos. Twenty German soldiers were killed.

Related: FEMA Camps Activated for Homeless People: NOT a Conspiracy!

The action encouraged a few members of the Polish resistance to support the uprising, and a few machine guns, some hand grenades, and about a hundred rifles and revolvers were smuggled in.

The Germans returned with almost 3,000 veteran SS troops and overcame the resistance. It is true that nearly 300 Germans were killed. However, the rebel losses were estimated at 15,000. Some survived and some actually did escape, but not many.


What is the takeaway from these experiences? Unfortunately, it is an almost certain death sentence if one allows themselves to be incarcerated by a ruthless totalitarian regime. We have seen that resistance at the point of arrest is futile. Armed and organized resistance which includes community involvement, produces long odds for survival, but some do survive.

Resisting captors inside of the concentration camp, by any means necessary, is nearly fatal in every case. Acquiescing to authority, while one carves out a life under very dire circumstances, provides the best chance for survival while in the camp. However, under these conditions, one’s survival is highly dependent on being lucky.

I used to have survivors of the Holocaust come and speak to my sociology students. Subsequently, I asked all of these former death camp prisoners, what was the number one factor in their survival?

Almost to a person, they stated the number one factor in their survival was luck. I was told that the Nazis would herd people to the showers which they knew was a death trap, and they were the next in line, but were turned away, because the quota had been met. It just wasn’t their day to die.

The moral of the story is clear, we need to resist with everything we have and we can best do that by shining the light of day on what is happening to us. Research shows this will dramatically lessen the rates of compliance. Everyone needs to be that reporter on the front line. Get to work and expose the NDAA, EO 13603 and REX 84.

By Dave Hodges, The Common Sense Show;


DHS Prepares Your Children for FEMA Camps – Indoctrination in School

Public schools in cooperation with the department of homeland security are now teaching kids safety measures, and advising that they seek relief in FEMA camps in a time of crisis.

But are these post disaster relief camps, or military internment camps?

FEMA , the Red Cross, and the department of homeland security are now using taxpayer money to educate children in public schools about ‘getting ready for disaster’.

But why would government agencies hold interest in this? Is it because they want schools to be safer, or because they want citizens to flee to FEMA camps in a time of crisis?

A disaster that very well could be orchestrated by a government agency, one might add. So what are these ‘disaster relief’ camps like? A quick google search for ‘FEMA camps’ would turn up thousands of results. Yet contrary to what one may think, leaving these camps may not be voluntary.

FEMA disk given to school children | Photo: Cassius Methyl

In fact, a leaked document signed by Joyce E. Morrow (administrative assistant to the secretary of the army) suggests that disaster relief camps may actually be military internment camps. The document is titled ‘internment and resettlement operations’, and it describes these camps in great detail, stating that ‘civil support is the department of defense support to civil authorities for domestic emergencies. Civil support includes operations that address the consequences of natural or man-made disasters, accidents, terrorist attacks, and incidents in the U.S.’ .

To sum it up, this leaked document confirms plans by the department of defense to operate internment prison camps for citizens during a crisis . But why would they need a crisis to imprison large amounts of people, and why would they imprison large amounts of people in the first place? But the real question is, do these prison camps tie in with FEMA?

And if so, is FEMA preparing children in public schools to accept going to an internment camp if there is a disaster? Perhaps the military internment camps to be used for disasters, and the FEMA camps to be used in times of crisis, are unrelated. But given the recent NDAA , allowing for the legal indefinite detainment of American citizens, and the political weather, it seems this isn’t such a far out possibility.

It isn’t a nice issue to think about, but spreading the word about the possibility of an American holocaust would be arguably the most effective way to stop such an event.

By Cassius Methyl, Intellihub; | Additional: Education World;

Palestinian children paying a hard price under occupation – The World turns a blind eye to this…..

Palestinian children paying a hefty price under occupation


In spite of damning evidence regarding Israel’s deliberate targeting of minors, little has been done by the international community to hold Tel Aviv accountable for such crimes

By Osama Al Sharif, Special to Gulf News
17:51 July 29, 2016

Image Credit: Hugo A. Sanchez/Gulf News

The time may not be ripe for the resumption of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) and it may never be. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is presiding over one of the most radical, right-wing, ultra-nationalist governments in the history of Israel. His seven-year-old premiership has seen unprecedented expansion of illegal colonies in the West Bank and occupied East Jerusalem, expropriation of Palestinian lands, encirclement of cities, towns and refugee camps by colony blocs and Jews-only highways, demolition of hundreds of Palestinian houses and imposition of collective punishment against hundreds of thousands of civilians. His 50-day massive military campaign against the beleaguered Gaza Strip in July 2014 resulted in the death of thousands, of which 63 per cent were civilians, including 500 children, according to Israeli human rights group B’Tselem.

All of these crimes have passed without international scrutiny or reprimand. Israel remains the only state that is impervious to international law and United Nations Security Council resolutions. This indemnity has encouraged it to enforce the most horrific types of punishment against Palestinians, especially children. For decades, Palestinian children have paid a heavy price owing to Israeli occupation, but under the Netanyahu government, the targeting and persecution of children have reached record levels.

For decades, Palestinian children have paid a heavy price owing to Israeli occupation …”-Osama Al Sharif

According to various reports, 116 Palestinian children aged between 12 and 15 years were held under Israeli military detention at the end of December 2015 — an 11-fold increase from the previous year. By April this year, the number of Palestinian children in Israeli detention centres reached 440.

But that is not all. In a 2013 review of Israel’s child rights record, the UN Committee on the Rights of Children said it had deep concern about the reported practice of torture and ill-treatment of children arrested, prosecuted and detained by the military and the police. In November of last year, the Palestinian Prisoners Club said that at least 600 Palestinian children had been arrested in occupied Jerusalem alone in the first half of 2015 and that roughly 40 per cent were sexually abused. And in January of this year, the Independent cited a report published by The Public Committee Against Torture in Israel, saying that “children accused of minor crimes were subjected to public caging, threats and acts of sexual violence and military trials without [legal] representation”.

In June last year, Military Court Watch, a West Bank-based nongovernment organisation, published a report in which it stated that “it is estimated that since 1967, some 95,000 (Palestinian) children may have been detained (by Israeli forces), of which 43,000 were arrested in night raids and 59,000 physically assaulted”.

Last February, Israel arrested 12-year-old Dima Al Wawi and sentenced her to five months in prison. And in June, an Israeli court sentenced 14-year-old Fadi Shalloudi from occupied Jerusalem to 100 days in prison, and a fine of 2,400 Israeli shekels (currency), after he was held under house arrest for nine months. The head of the Palestinian Detainees’ Committee, said that at least 65 children from occupied Jerusalem have been detained, then forced under house arrest, since the beginning of this year.

Since Palestinians in the West Bank revolted against Israeli occupation last October, the number of those shot dead by soldiers crossed 230, including 53 children, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry. The last victim was Mohammad Sidqy At-Tibakhi, 12, who was shot in the chest at close range in the town of Al Ram and he died of serious wounds.

But in spite of damning evidence regarding Israel’s deliberate targeting of Palestinian children, little has been done by the international community to make Tel Aviv accountable for serious crimes. It is unfortunate that Arab countries have failed to draw the world’s attention to the killings and abuse of Palestinian children.

The only meaningful reaction has come recently from an unlikely source: The United States Congress. In June this year, 20 members of Congress signed a letter to President Barack Obama, calling for the appointment of “a special envoy for Palestinian youth” to collect information necessary to actively promote Palestinian children’s human rights. The letter expresses concern for Palestinian children under 18 years living “under the constant fear of arrest, detention and violence at the hands of the Israeli military”, and declares “the situation on the ground is rapidly deteriorating and we must act now”. Obama is yet to approve of such an appointment, which the Israeli government is likely to resist and condemn.

There is a long list of crimes that Israel has committed and continues to commit against Palestinians. Many disturbing studies have been conducted on the psychological effects of occupation and violence on Palestinian youths. While the US is unable, or unwilling, to induce Netanyahu to engage the PNA in a new cycle of negotiations, it can at least intervene to stop the wanton extrajudicial killings and arrests of Palestinian youths. This is the least that Obama can do as he prepares to leave the White House. He had promised too much at the beginning of his presidency. Now he has an opportunity to step in and secure the high moral ground on this particular issue.

Osama Al Sharif is a journalist and political commentator based in Amman.


United Nations

1 MAY 2015

Palestinian Rights Committee Hears Call for Israel to Be Held to Account for Violations against Children during Gaza Conflict

Committe on the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People,

369th Meeting (PM)

The top Palestinian diplomat at the United Nations this afternoon called on the Organization to include Israel’s army among the parties that committed grave violations against children during armed conflict, and to hold it accountable for attacks last year on United Nations-run schools sheltering civilians in Gaza.

“We appeal to all those involved including [Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict] Leila Zerrougui to include Israel on the list and to not cave to pressure to exclude Israel,” Riyad Mansour, Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine to the United Nations, told a meeting of the Committee on the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People.  He also appealed to the Committee’s Chairman to speak to the Secretary-General’s senior aides on the matter.

Mr. Mansour was referring to the Secretary-General’s next annual report on children and armed conflict, due in June, which would include an annex listing parties that recruit or use children, kill or maim children, commit rape and other forms of sexual violence against children or engage in attacks on schools and/or hospitals in situations of armed conflict on the Council’s agenda.

Israel, Mr. Mansour said, qualified to be on the list as deliberate attacks on more than 270 schools and 75 health centres in Gaza last July and August had left at least 540 Palestinian children dead and 3,000 injured.  Adding that more than 400,000 Palestinian children still suffered from the traumatic effects of the war, he called it a clear example of the occupying Power’s collective punishment against Gaza’s 1.8 million residents — of which half were children.

“Those are human beings; they deserve justice and therefore accountability should be addressed by the Secretary-General, the Security Council and all those that respect the lives of human beings,” Mr. Mansour said.  Many of those killed were civilians sheltering in schools run by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA).

“The United Nations has to make sure that when they raise the flag over their facilities, then people should be granted protection,” he said.  He thanked Jordan’s Permanent Representative for facilitating talks on the matter during her country’s term as Council President in April and said he would continue to work with her on the matter.

Mr. Mansour also expressed frustration over the slow pace of international aid for Gaza’s reconstruction.  He said that, during the Council’s 21 April debate on the Palestinian question and other Middle East issues, the situation in Gaza was scrutinized extensively.  Frank statements were made on the challenges on the ground in Gaza, and the need for Israel to lift its blockade on the enclave and permit the entry of promised funds for rebuilding, which remained in “the realm of promises not in the realm of implementation”.

Similarly, on the West Bank, Mr. Mansour said:  “We do not see significant or noticeable improvement in East Jerusalem, or the so-called Area C or of the miserable situation in the Gaza Strip.”

He also voiced dismay over the Council’s failure to adopt a resolution setting a timeframe to end the occupation and create a Palestinian State within pre-1967 borders.  Such a text must also set the basis for a political settlement and just resolution for Palestinian refugees, as well as create a new mechanism for “serious negotiations between us and the Israelis” involving all relevant Arab countries that could influence the talks in a positive way, he said.

If “one superpower holding a veto” in the Council failed to accept such a text, then he proposed the holding of an international conference to implement the Arab Peace Initiative, he said, stressing that “this one country is holding things close to their chest, saying they are reassessing and re-evaluating, but they are not telling us much more”.

Nevertheless, he welcomed the French Foreign Minister’s announcement that his delegation would take the lead and New Zealand’s role in that regard.

The Director of the UNRWA New York Office, Richard Wright, also took the floor, noting that today marked the sixty-fifth anniversary of the commencement of its operations.

Since its inception, UNRWA had made huge efforts to build the human capital of Palestine refugee population, he said.  But, huge challenges remained, notably the growing gap between needed and available resources, particularly for confronting emergencies in Syria and Gaza.  On 2 June, he announced, the Agency would hold a high-level conference entitled “UNRWA@65”.

“The tone we wish to convey is that, if UNRWA is to continue to act as a stabilizing factor, then it has to be backed and supported to continue the work it has done over the last 65 years until a just and lasting solution is found to the Palestine refugee issue in accordance with United Nations resolutions,” Mr. Wright said.  He expressed hope for a simple and short outcome document of agreed conclusions.

The conference would feature a morning plenary session and two panel afternoon discussions, including one on protection challenges for vulnerable groups, such as children, people with disabilities, youth and women, and another on Palestine refugees in armed conflict.  Six Palestinian refugees from Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria would participate.

Also addressing the Conference would be the Secretary-General and General Assembly President, Jordan’s Foreign Minister, European Union Commissioner for Humanitarian Assistance, State Secretary for Foreign Affairs of Sweden and Turkey’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, among other senior officials, Mr. Wright said.  The top three UNRWA donors — the United States, Saudi Arabia and the European Union — and key hosts Jordan and Palestine had been invited to speak, as had all United Nations Member States and Observers, as well as non-governmental organizations.

Briefing on recent developments, Fodé Seck (Senegal) Chair of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, said that 1 April was a historic day, as the State of Palestine had become a State party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.  The same day, Nikolay Mladenov replaced Robert Serry as the United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process and the Secretary-General’s Personal Representative to the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian Authority.

A subsidiary body of the General Assembly, the Committee is mandated to support Palestinian rights, the peace process towards a two-State solution based on pre-1967 borders and a just resolution of all final status issues.  Established in 1975, it also mobilizes aid for Palestinians.

Mr. Seck said he delivered a statement during the Council’s 21 April open debate, as well as during the United Nations Seminar on Assistance to the Palestinian People, held in Vienna from 31 March to 1 April.

Wilfried Emvula (Namibia), Committee Vice-Chair, provided a summary of the Vienna seminar, saying its theme of “speeding up relief, recovery and reconstruction in post-war Gaza” was timely, given the slow pace of reconstruction and the mounting frustration of the Gaza population.  The structural problems of the blockade, Gaza’s housing and environmental crisis and its energy and water deficit, which were threatening the very viability of the enclave, were also discussed.

The seminar generated considerable interest, he said, with officials of 49 Governments, the European Union, League of Arab States, Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), 12 United Nations agencies and 27 non-governmental organizations in attendance.

The Committee also approved the provisional programme for the United Nations Round Table on the Legal Aspects of the Question of Palestine, scheduled for 20 to 22 May in The Hague.  The event, to be held in a closed, invitation-only format, would aim to explore legal ways and means to support achievement of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, as well as efforts to build the State of Palestine’s capacity in the context of its recent accession to the International Criminal Court.

The Committee, in addition, welcomed the arrival of the new Permanent Representatives of Pakistan, Malaysia and Sri Lanka to the United Nations.  Noting that Sri Lanka headed the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories, and that Malaysia was a member, Mr. Mansour said the new ambassadors would be an important addition to the Committee’s work and the search for justice for the Palestinian people.

Also today, the Committee, on the recommendation of its Working Group, approved the applications of three non-governmental organizations seeking accreditation for participation in its activities:  Jerusalem Legal Aid and Human Rights Center of Ramallah; the Youth Vision Society of Gaza; and UFree Network of Norway, as an observer.

For information 
Palestinian medic tries to comfort a wounded boy at Shifa hospital in Gaza City, northern Gaza Strip,
Jewish Fingerprint :


Intelligent ‘anti-Semitism’ for thinking Gentiles…..

The new Heroes: Whistleblowers


declaration of independence 3

Whistle-blowing reflects doing the right thing. It exposes wrongdoing. It does so because it matters.

Edward Joseph Snowden follows a noble tradition. Others before him established it. Daniel Ellsberg called his NSA leak the most important in US history. More on him below.

Expressions of patriotism can reflect good or ill. Samuel Johnson said it’s the last refuge of a scoundrel. Thomas Paine called dissent its highest form. So did Howard Zinn.

According to Machiavelli:

When the safety of one’s country wholly depends on the decision to be taken, no attention should be paid either to justice or injustice, to kindness or cruelty, or to its being praiseworthy or ignominious.

Ben Franklin

Tolstoy said:

In our day the feeling of patriotism is an unnatural, irrational, and harmful feeling, and a cause of a great part of the ills from which mankind is suffering; and consequently, this feeling should not be cultivated, as is now being done, but should, on the contrary, be suppressed and eradicated by all means available to rational men.

Philosophy Professor Stephen Nathanson believes patriotism involves:
  • special affection for one’s own country;
  • a sense of personal identification with the country;
  • special concern for the well-being of the country; and
  • willingness to sacrifice to promote the country’s good.

United States Whistleblower ~ Paul Revere

Socrates once said:

Patriotism does not require one to agree with everything that his country does, and would actually promote analytical questioning in a quest to make the country the best it possibly can be.

Founding Father & U.S. Patriot Charles Carroll: In the first version of his last will and testament, the only Catholic Signer of the Declaration of Independence, Charles Carroll, wrote on December 1, 1818: “I, Charles Carroll. . . . give and bequeath my soul to God who gave it, my body to the earth, hoping that through and by the merits, sufferings, and mediation of my only Savior and Jesus Christ, I may be admitted into the Kingdom prepared by God for those who love, fear and truly serve Him.”

“Without Morals A Republic Cannot Subsist Any Length of Time”

–U.S. Patriot Charles Carroll

The best involves strict adherence to the highest legal, ethical and moral standards. Upholding universal civil and human rights is fundamental. So is government of, by and for everyone equitably. Openness, accountability and candor can’t be compromised.


Breaking => Benghazi Whistleblower Justice: The Answer To 2013 Is 1776!

When governments ill-serve, exposing wrongdoing is vital. It takes courage to do so. It involves sacrificing for the greater good. It includes risking personal harm and welfare. It means doing what’s right because it matters. It reflects patriotism’s highest form.

U.S. Patriot Julian Assange

Daniel Ellsberg, Bradley Manning and Julian Assange are best known. So is Mordechai Vanunu. More on him below. Few remember Peter Buxtun. He’s a former US Public Health Service employee.

Taken at the Gathering of Mustangs, Columbus, Ohio. P-51 B painted in the colors of the Tuskegee Airmen.

He exposed the Tuskegee syphilis experiment.

About 200 Black men were infected.

In 1966 U.S. Patriot Peter Buxton blew the whistle on the U.S. Public Health Service's Tuskegee Experiment, in which poor rural black men in Alabama were not told they had acquired syphilis (which they had previously contracted) as part of an experiment to learn about the long-term affects of untreated syphilis. Photo: File

It was done to watch their progression.

They were left to die untreated.

Whistleblowing stopped further harm.

U.S. Patriot Mark Felt Decades after the Watergate scandal claimed Nixon's presidency, Mark Felt was revealed as Woodward and Bernstein's confidential source,

William Mark Felt, Sr. (August 17, 1913 – December 18, 2008)[1] was an agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), who retired as the Bureau’s Associate Directorin 1973. After denying his involvement with reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein for 30 years, Felt revealed himself to be the Watergate scandal‘s whistleblower, “Deep Throat” on May 31, 2005.

Click To Enlarge

A. Ernest Fitzgerald held senior government positions. In 1968, he exposed a $2.3 billion Lockheed C-5 cost overrun. At issue was fraud and grand theft. Nixon told aides to “get rid of that son of a bitch.”

Michael Cavallo (R) presenting his foundation's 1988 Cavallo Prize for Moral Courage in Business & Govt. to Ernest Fitzgerald, whistleblower

Defense Secretary Melvin Laird fired him. Fitzgerald was a driving force for whistleblower protections. He fought for decades against fraud, waste and abuse. He helped get the 1978 Civil Reform Act and 1989 Whistleblower Protection Act enacted.

G.E. Worst Bailout In U.S. History!

Gregory Minor, Richard Hubbard and Dale Bridenbaugh are called the GE three. They revealed nuclear safety concerns. So did Arnold Gundersen, David Lochbaum and others. At issue then and now is public safety over profits.


Mordechai Vanunu was an Israeli nuclear technician. He exposed Israel’s secret nuclear weapons program. He paid dearly for doing so.

He was charged with espionage and treason. In 1986/87, he was secretly tried and sentenced. He was imprisoned for 18 years. He was confined in brutalizing isolation. He’s been harassed and deprived of most rights since.

Mordechai Vanunu

Daniel Ellsberg called him “the preeminent hero of the nuclear era.” In July 2007, Amnesty International (AI) named him “a prisoner of conscience.” He received multiple Nobel Peace Prize nominations.

Daniel Ellsberg was a military analyst working for the RAND Corporation in 1971 when he provided the New York Times with a series of documents known as the Pentagon Papers. The Times wrote that the papers

Vanunu said “I am neither a traitor nor a spy. I only wanted the world to know what was happening.” People have every right to know.

Mark Edward Whitacre came to public attention in 1995 when, as president of the BioProducts Division at Archer Daniels Midland, he was the highest-level corporate executive in U.S. history to become a Federal Bureau of Investigation whistleblower.

Mark Whitacre was an Archer Daniels Midland senior executive. He exposed price-fixing, wire and tax fraud, as well as money laundering.

He had his own cross to bear. He was prosecuted and imprisoned. He lost his whistleblower immunity. After eight and a half years, he was released on good behavior.

Dr. Jeffrey Wigand, former VP for research and development at Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., became famous for the Russell Crowe role he inspired in the 1999 film

Jeffrey Wigand was Brown & Williamson’s research and development vice president. He went public on 60 Minutes. He exposed deceptive company practices. He was fired for doing so.

B & W enhanced cigarette nicotine content. It was done without public knowledge. At issue was increasing addiction. Wigand told all. He received death threats for doing so. He now lectures worldwide and consults on tobacco control policies.

U.S. Patriot Gary Webb

The Tragic Saga of Gary Webb ~ Movie To Begin Filming Summer 2013

Gary Webb was an award-winning American journalist. His investigative work exposed CIA involvement in drugs trafficking. His book “Dark Alliance: The CIA, the Contras, and the Crack Cocaine Explosion” told what he knew.

New York Times, Washington Post, and other media scoundrels assailed him. They did so wrongfully and viciously. Then and now they support CIA crimes. They abhor truth and full disclosure. They ruined Webb’s career. They did so maliciously.

In December 2004, Webb was found dead at home. He died of two gunshot wounds to the head. Reports called it suicide. Critics believe otherwise. Two wounds suggest murder. Doing the right thing involves great risks. Webb paid with his life.

Hodler, an IOC member since 1963, set off the bid scandal that led to the biggest ethics crisis in the history of the International Olympic Committee. In 1998, he detailed what he called systematic buying and selling of votes in the host city selection process for the 2002 Winter Games. The crisis led to an unprecedented purge of IOC members, with six delegates expelled and four resigning for receiving improper gifts or benefits.

Swiss lawyer Marc Hodler was International Ski Federation president and International Olympic Committee member.

In 1998, he exposed 2002 Salt Lake City winter games bid-rigging. Olympism profiteering, exploitation and corruption is longstanding.

Deceptive hyperbole promotes good will, open competition, and fair play. Olympism’s dark side reflects marginalizing poor and other disenfranchised groups, exploiting athletes and communities, as well as sticking taxpayers with the bill for profit.

madoff obama

Harry Markopolos exposed Bernie Madoff’s hedge fund operations. He called them fraudulent. He obtained information firsthand. He got them from fund-of-fund Madoff investors and heads of Wall Street equity derivative trading desks.

U.S. Patriot Harry M. Markopolos is a former securities industry executive, and an independent forensic accounting and financial fraud investigator

He accused Madoff of operating “the world’s largest Ponzi scheme.” Large perhaps but not the largest.

Wall Street firms make money the old fashioned way. They steal it. They do so through fraud, grand theft, market manipulation and front-running. They scam investors unaccountably. They bribe corrupt political officials. In return, they turn a blind eye.

Compared to major Wall Street crooks, Madoff was small-time.

Others mattering most control America’s money. They manipulate it fraudulently for profit.


9/11 Completely Unmasked: Black 9/11~ Money, Motive, Technology, & Deniability!

Coleen Rowley a former FBI agent who documented pre-9/11 Agency failures.

She addressed them to Director Robert Mueller.

Many people know that Osama Bin Laden was never wanted by the FBI for the crimes of 9/11. In fact, when the FBI was presented with evidence of controlled demolition, it was acknowledged as, “an interesting theory, backed by thorough research and analysis.”

A registered letter was sent to FBI Director Robert Mueller. The letter was written pursuant to Title 18 USC § 2382 “Crimes and Criminal Procedure” or “Misprision of Treason”.

The penalty to a sworn official who violates “Misprision of Treason” by not reporting or acting on the evidence can lead to criminal prosecution, a prison term and a fine. Contained in the letter were references to Richard Gage, AIA and his presentation “9/11: A Blueprint for Truth”.

Political Vel Craft

WASHINGTON, : Minneapolis-based FBI agent Colleen Rowley testifies in the US Senate Judiciary Committee room 06 June 2002 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, during a hearing on the FBI responce to information about the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks on US soil. Rowley said that the FBI is an

She explained in Senate Judiciary Committee testimony. She now writes and lectures on ethical decision-making, civil liberty concerns, and effective investigative practices.

Joseph Wilson, Former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, Debunks Iraq-Niger Uranium Deal and Why the U.S. Went to War


Joseph Wilson is a former US ambassador who exposed Bush administration lies. He headlined a New York Times op-ed “What I Didn’t Find in Africa.”

“Did the Bush administration manipulate intelligence about Saddam Hussein’s weapons programs to justify an invasion of Iraq,” he asked?

Based on my experience with the administration in the months leading up to the war, I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq’s nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat.

Bush administration officials accused Wilson of twisting the truth. So did Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and other scoundrel media editors. They front for power. Wilson explained what people have a right to know. He was unjustifiably pilloried for doing so.

Wendell Potter is former Vice President of corporate communications at CIGNA, one of the United States' largest health insurance companies. In June 2009, he testified against the HMO industry in the U.S. Senate as a whistleblower.

Wendell Potter was a senior CIGNA insurance company executive. He explained how heathcare insurers scam policyholders. They shift costs to consumers, offer inadequate or unaffordable access, and force Americans to pay higher deductibles for less coverage.

Sibel Edmonds an FBI translator of intelligence has implicated the US State Department in quashing investigations which had linked the 9/11 terrorist network to a global drug trafficking ring.

Sibel Edmonds is a former FBI translator. She founded the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition (NSWBC). She did so to aid “national security whistleblowers through a variety of methods.”

The ACLU called her “the most gagged person in the history of the United States.” She knows firsthand the consequences of secret, unaccountable government operations.

Her memoir is titled “Classified Woman: the Sibel Edmonds Story.”

  1. Rothschild An MI5/6 Cronie & Sons: Implicated With George Soros In Some Of The Filthiest Drugs-For-Weapons Operations.
  2. HSBC Helped Rothschild CIA Mossad Terrorists, Soros Mexican Drug Cartels Launder Money, Senate Report Says!
  3. Breaking: Hillary Clinton To Face Charges Behind Supplying U.S. Weapons To Rothschild/Soros Mexican Drug Cartel ~ Fast & Furious!

U.S. Patriot Mark Klein: Leaked knowledge of cooperation with AT&T and the NSA in installing network hardware to monitor, capture and process American telecommunications.

Mark Klein is a former AT&T employee turned whistleblower. He revealed blueprints and photographs of NSA’s secret room inside the company’s San Francisco facility. It permits spying on AT&T customers.

U.S. Patriot Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, U.S. Air Force (Ret.), who worked in the Pentagon and witnessed first-hand how a controversial intelligence operation was set up after 9/11, gives an insider’s account of how neo-conservative Defense Department officials selected and manipulated intelligence to justify a U.S. invasion of Iraq.


Karen Kwiatkowski is a retired US Air Force lieutenant colonel. She exposed Defense Department misinformation and lies. She discussed how doing so drove America to war.

Ann Wright is a former US Army colonel/State Department official. In 1997, she won an agency award for heroism.

She’s more anti-war/human rights activist/person of conscience than whistleblower. In 2003, she resigned from government service. She did so in protest against war on Iraq.

U.S. Patriot Edward Snowden a former CIA computer technician went public on Sunday as the source behind the daily drumbeat of disclosures about the nation's surveillance programs, saying he took the extraordinary step because

Edward Joseph Snowden continues a noble tradition. On June 8, London’s Guardian headlined “Edward Snowden, NSA whistleblower: ‘I do not expect to see home again.’ ”

He leaked information to The Guardian and Washington Post. He exposed unconstitutional NSA spying. He served as an undercover intelligence employee.

Asked why he turned whistleblower, he said:

The NSA has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything. With this capability, the vast majority of human communications are automatically ingested without targeting.

If I wanted to see your emails or your wife’s phone, all I have to do is use intercepts. I can get your emails, passwords, phone records, credit cards.

I don’t want to live in a society that does these sort of things.

I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded. That is not something I am willing to support or live under.

NSA spies globally, he said. Claims about only doing it abroad don’t wash. “We collect more digital communications from America than we do from the Russians,” he said.

Previous articles said NSA works with all major US telecom companies. They do so with nine or more major online ones. They spy on virtually all Americans.

They target everyone they want to globally. NSA capabilities are “horrifying,” said Snowden. “You are not even aware of what is possible.”


GMO Monsanto Infested With Fraudulent Inside Trading By Corrupt Scientists!

Pope Francis: God Is Real, Concrete Person, Not Mysterious, Intangible Mist: Catholic Communities Band Together After Missile Attack In Waco, Texas!

“We can plant bugs in machines. Once you go on the network, I can identify (it). You will never be safe whatever protections you put in place.”

Asked what he thought might happen to him, he said “Nothing good.”

He left America. He moved to Hong Kong. He fled for his safety. He knows he can’t hide. If US authorities want him targeted, they’ll act no-holds-barred.

If they want him arrested, they’ll find him. If they want him disappeared, imprisoned and tortured, he’s defenseless to stop them. It they want him dead, they’ll murder him. Rogue states operate that way. America’s by far the worst.

DNI head James Clapper accused Snowden of “violat(ing) a sacred trust for this country.I hope we’re able to track whoever is doing this,” he said.

These type comments expose America’s dark side. So does unconstitutional NSA spying and much more. Washington flagrantly violates fundamental rule of law principles. It does so ruthlessly. At stake is humanity’s survival.

Snowden fears recrimination against his family, friends and partner. He’ll “have to live with that for the rest of (his) life,” he said.

I am not going to be able to communicate with them. (US authorities) will act aggressively against anyone who has known me. That keeps me up at night.

Asked what leaked NSA documents reveal, he said:

That the NSA routinely lies in response to congressional inquiries about the scope of surveillance in America.

America “hacks everyone everywhere.” he said. “(W)e are in almost every country in the world.”

“Everyone, everywhere now understands how bad things have gotten – and they’re talking about it.”

On June 9, London Guardian editors headlined “Edward Snowden: more conscientious objector than common thief,” saying:

What’s next is certain. US authorities “will pursue Snowden to the ends of the earth.” America’s “legal and diplomatic machinery is probably unstoppable.”

Congress should eagerly want to hear what Snowden has to say, said Guardian editors. They should “test the truth of what he is saying.”

They know full well. Many or perhaps most congressional members are fully briefed on what goes on. They’re condone it. So do administration and judicial officials.

Obama could stop it with a stroke of his pen. So can congressional lawmakers. Supreme Court justices could uphold the law.

Lawlessness persists. Moral cowardice pervades Washington. America’s dark side threatens everyone. There’s no place to hide.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at 

His new book is titled How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War.

Also visit his blog site at and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon.

All programs are archived for easy listening. 

Global Political Awakening

U.S. Patriot Terry Lakin

“Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the Command in Chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”

-John Jay our nation’s first Chief Justice-

U.S. Patriot Former CFO Douglas D. Keeth filed suit against his employer, United Technologies Corporation, for inflating billing to the government for helicopter contracts. The aircraft maker reportedly offered Keeth $1 million to keep quiet, but he wouldn't and eventually claimed $22.5 million in reward money after United Technologies was forced to pay back the government $150 million in 1994. Photo: Greg Mathieson/Mai, File

The Obama Dead Pool & Kill List!

U.S. Patriot Lt. Quarles Harris. Another day, another creepy murder related in some way to Barack Obama. There is something about this guy that leads to unusual murders wherever his name arises. The most recent unusual death involves the fatal shooting of a key witness in the passport file fraud investigation.

U.S. Patriot U.S. Army Private Bradley Manning is accused of passing thousands of diplomatic cables and intelligence reports to the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks. The documents included videos, diplomatic cables and logs pertaining to the United States involvement in the war in Iraq.