The Pope and the Third Temple in Jerusalem

  Saturday, 21 April 2012

Pope third jewish temple   A Call to Everyone in the World to Send a Letter to the Pope

The Temple Mount and Land of Israel Faithful Movement sent a letter to Pope Benedict XVI in Rome requesting him to return to Israel — without delay — the Holy Temple Menorah, the vessels, and the treasures that were stolen by the Romans and taken to Rome when they destroyed the Holy Second Temple in Jerusalem in the year 70 ce. These Temple vessels will be used by the priests of Israel in the Holy Third Temple.
We are working intensively so that the Holy Third Temple will soon be built in the lifetime of our generation. By this act we are answering the prophetic call of the G‑d of Israel to His People to rebuild His Holy House on the Holy Temple Mount in Jerusalem now, as Israel is experiencing the climax of the time of redemption in the Holy Land of Israel.
We have sent to the Pope a call from the G‑d and People of Israel to respond without delay. After the destruction of the First Holy Temple by the Babylonians in the year 586 bce, the Persian King obeyed the call of G‑d upon him and returned the vessels of the First Holy Temple which Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, stole when he destroyed the First Temple in Jerusalem. King Cyrus encouraged the Jewish people to rebuild the Holy Temple of the G‑d of Israel in Jerusalem. He even set free the Jewish people from their captivity and sent them back to the Land of Israel. The G‑d of Israel richly blessed him for this:

Thus says the L‑rd thy redeemer….Who says to Cyrus, my shepherd, who shall perform all my will: saying to Jerusalem, Thou shalt be rebuilt; and to the temple, Thy foundation shall be laid….Thus says the L‑rd to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have held, that I may subdue nations before him, and loose the loins of kings; that I may open before him doors and gates which shall not be shut; I will go before thee, and make the mountainous places level: I will break in pieces the gates of brass, and cut in sunder the bars of iron: and I will give thee the treasures of darkness, and hidden riches of secret places, that thou mayest know that I, the L‑rd, who call thee by thy name, am the G-D of Israel. For Jacob my servant’s sake, and Israel my elect, I have even called thee by thy name: I have surnamed thee, though thou hast not known me. I am the L‑rd, and there is none else, there is no G-D beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me: that they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the L‑rd, and there is none else….” (Isaiah 44:24,28; 45:1-6)

Everyone in the world is called to also send a letter to the Pope asking him to return the Holy Temple Menorah, the vessels, and the treasures to Israel without delay. Please ask your friends, family, and acquaintances to also send such a letter of request to the Pope. We have included our original letter below to the Pope for your information. The address for Pope Benedict XVI appears at the top of our letter below.
Any person who writes a letter to the Pope about this matter will be blessed by G‑d and will have an important part in the historical redemption and rebuilding of the end-time Holy Temple of the G‑d of Israel in Jerusalem. If possible, please also send us a copy of your letter to the Pope to ouor address below.
Thank you so much and may the G‑d of Israel bless you richly.
Gershon Salomon, Chairman
The Temple Mount and Land of Israel Faithful Movement
Jerusalem, Israel

[Actual letter sent by the Temple Mount and Land of Israel Faithful Movement to the Pope]B’esrat HaShem
With the Help of G‑d
February 20, 2012
Pope Benedict XVI
Apostolic Palace
Vatican City 00120
Re: The return of the Holy Temple Menorah, Vessels and Treasures to Jerusalem
Pope Benedict XVI,
A Call to Pope Benedict XVI from the G‑d and People of Israel to Return Without Delay the Holy Temple Menorah, the Vessels and the Treasures that are presently located in the Vatican, to G‑d’s People Israel in Jerusalem.
The Temple Mount and Land of Israel Faithful Movement in Jerusalem, which is dedicated to the rebuilding of the Holy Third Temple on the Holy Temple Mount in Jerusalem during the lifetime of this generation that is now experiencing the prophetic end-time redemption of the People of Israel in the Promised Holy Land given by G‑d to Israel in an eternal covenant, is calling you to answer the call of the G‑d and People of Israel to return to the State of Israel, with no delay, the Jewish Temple Menorah and other Temple Vessels and Treasures that were taken away to Rome by the Romans in the year 70 ce after they destroyed the Holy Temple of G‑d in Jerusalem.
As you well know, in the year 70 ce the Roman Empire occupied Jerusalem, the eternal capital of the G‑d and People of Israel, and the Land of Israel. They destroyed the Holy Temple of the G‑d of Israel on the Holy Temple Mount in Jerusalem and demolished and burned the city of Jerusalem. They robbed and took away with them to Rome the seven-branched Holy Menorah and many other Holy Temple Vessels and Treasures used by the Jewish priesthood in the worship of the G‑d of Israel in the Holy Temple. Titus, who destroyed the Holy Temple and burned it, built his Triumphal Arch in Rome on which is depicted until today the Holy Menorah and other Temple Vessels carried to Rome by Jewish captives. Since this terrible event in the history of Israel and mankind, we know very well that the Menorah, the Vessels and the Treasures that were taken to Rome have remained in the vaults of the Vatican. Travelers and visitors to the Vatican throughout history have reported seeing them.
This is G‑d’s timing to return these vessels to Israel, and you are called by the G‑d of Israel to return them with no delay to Jerusalem to be used in the Holy Third Temple that is soon to be rebuilt. Today the reestablishment of the Kingdom of G‑d and Israel by the G‑d of Israel is the most exciting fulfillment of G‑d’s end-time prophecies and promises.
The climax of this prophetic time will be according to the Word of the G‑d of Israel with the rebuilding of His end-time Holy Temple on the Holy Temple Mount in Jerusalem soon, in our lifetime, exactly as all the prophets of Israel prophesied:

And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the Lord’s house shall be established on the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow to it. And many people shall go and say, ‘Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the G‑d of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths; for from Zion shall go forth Torah, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. And he shall judge among the nations, and shall decide for many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, nor shall they learn war any more. But they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig tree; and none shall make them afraid: for the mouth of the LORD of hosts has spoken it.” (Isaiah 2:2-4, Micah 4:1-4)

Israel is presently experiencing the fulfillment of all the last days and end-time redemptive promises of G‑d for His People Israel. The G‑d of Israel is rebuilding in these days, together with His Chosen People Israel, His Holy Kingdom in the Promised Holy Land that He gave to His People Israel in an eternal covenant. As we said before, the climax of this prophetic time is going to be the soon rebuilding of the Holy Temple of G‑d in Jerusalem by His People Israel exactly as it was prophesied by the prophets Isaiah, Micah and all the other prophets of Israel. The rebuilding of the Holy Temple of the G‑d of Israel by His People Israel will have a deep significance for all of mankind. Real peace for all the nations will come to pass only when Israel rebuilds G‑d’s Holy Temple on the Holy Temple Mount in Jerusalem and fulfills the end-time call of G‑d given to His People Israel: “Build Me a temple and I will dwell among you” (Exodus 25:8).
It is the time for you to return the Holy Temple Menorah, the Vessels and the Treasures to Israel with no delay to be used in the Holy Temple of G‑d that is soon to be built. Cyrus, the ancient Persian King obeyed the call of G‑d during the time of the redemption of the Jewish people after the destruction of the First Holy Temple and he returned the vessels from the First Temple that Nebuchadnezzar, the King of Babylon, robbed when he destroyed the First Holy Temple in Jerusalem in the year 586 bce. The G‑d of Israel blessed King Cyrus exactly as He promised to Abraham and His Seed Israel: “I will bless those who bless you and curse those who curse you” (Genesis 12:3). King Cyrus was so blessed and appreciated by the G‑d of Israel for what he did that G‑d even called Cyrus “my Machiach” (in Hebrew: “my Anointed“) (Isaiah 45:1-7). King Cyrus even encouraged the Jewish people to rebuild the House of G‑d in Jerusalem, set them free from their captivity and regathered them back to the Land of Israel (Ezra 1).
You are called by the G‑d of Israel to do what the great emperor Cyrus did in his time and you will be blessed and deeply appreciated for this by the G‑d of Israel. More than this, it will be for you the greatest privilege and considered as a major historical deed that no other Pope before you had the privilege to accomplish.
You are called to appreciate the major godly redemptive event that is taking place in the Holy Land of Israel at this very special time in the history of Israel and all of mankind. The prophet Zechariah in his prophecy described word-by-word the exciting godly event that is presently taking place in Israel. In the midst of his prophetic words is the rebuilding of the Holy Temple of the G‑d of Israel in Jerusalem where the G‑d of Israel will dwell again in the midst of His People Israel:

Again the word of the L‑rd of hosts came to me, saying, Thus says the L‑rd of hosts; I was zealous for Zion with great zeal, and I was zealous for her with a great fury. Thus says the L‑rd; I have returned to Zion, and will dwell in the midst of Jerusalem: and Jerusalem shall be called The city of truth; and the mountain of the L‑rd of hosts, The holy mountain. Thus says the L‑rd of hosts; Old men and old women shall yet again dwell in the streets of Jerusalem, and every man with his staff in his hand for the fullness of days. And the streets of the city shall be full of boys and girls playing in its streets. Thus says the L‑rd of hosts; If it be marvelous in the eyes of the remnant of this people in these days, it will also be marvelous in my eyes, says the L‑rd of hosts. Thus says the L‑rd of hosts; Behold, I will save my people from the east country, and from the west country; and I will bring them in, and they will dwell in the midst of Jerusalem; and they will be my people, and I will be their G‑d, in truth and righteousness. Thus says the L‑rd of hosts; Let your hands be strong, you that hear in these days these words by the mouth of the prophets, who spoke on the day that the foundation of the house of the L‑rd of hosts was laid, saying that the temple might be built….Thus says the L‑rd of hosts; It shall yet come to pass, that there shall come people, and the inhabitants of many cities: and the inhabitants of one city shall go to another, saying, Let us go speedily to entreat the favor of the L‑rd, and to seek the L‑rd of hosts: I will go also. And many peoples and strong nations shall come to seek the L‑rd of hosts in Jerusalem, and to pray before the L‑rd. Thus says the L‑rd of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men out of all the languages of the nations shall take hold, and shall seize the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that G‑d is with you.” (Zechariah 8:1-9, 20-23)
In the year 1990 the Temple Mount and Land of Israel Faithful Movement dedicated and anointed a foundation stone for the Holy Third Temple to begin the process of the rebuilding of the House of the G‑d of Israel on the Holy Temple Mount in Jerusalem and to fulfill the call of G‑d to His People Israel through the prophets Zechariah, Isaiah, Micah, Haggai and other prophets of Israel. This cornerstone was brought to Jerusalem during an exciting event and is waiting to be laid on the Holy Temple Mount through an historical decision by the Israeli Knesset and government in order to start the process of the rebuilding of the Holy Temple of G‑d. The Temple Mount Faithful Movement is doing a public campaign in Israel and all over the world to make it a reality in the lifetime of our generation.

We look forward to you answering this call of the G‑d and People of Israel with no delay and to return the Holy Menorah, Vessels and Treasures of the Holy Temple of the G‑d of Israel, that are presently in the Vatican, back to Jerusalem, the eternal capital of the G‑d and People of Israel, so that they can be used in the services of the priests of Israel in the Holy Third Temple that is soon to be rebuilt on the Holy Temple Mount in Jerusalem. The entire world is waiting for you to answer this call of the G‑d and People of Israel with no delay. All of mankind will appreciate this historical event.
We look forward to your prompt reply.
Sincerely in the Name of the G‑d of Israel,
Gershon Salomon
Chairman, The Temple Mount and Land of Israel Faithful Movement

The Temple Mount and Land of Israel Faithful MovementP.O. Box 18325, 4 Aliash Street, Jerusalem, IsraelTelephone: 02.625.1112 / FAX: 02.625.1113

  Before the Black Pope’s “War on Terror,” (2001-2020?)
                                       After the Black Pope’s “War on Terror,” (2030?)
The Pope’s Finished Third Hebrew Temple in Jerusalem,
Seat of Government for the final Pope of Rome, who,
Upon Recovering from his Mortal Sword Wound to the Head,
Will Become the Abomination of Desolation; the Beast; the Antichrist;
As foretold in the Scripture of Truth by:
the Hebrew/Jewish/Israelitish Prophet (Daniel 9:27);
Joshua/Yeshua (Jesus),
the Hebrew/Jewish/Israelitish Messiah of Israel (Matthew 24:15);

the Hebrew/Jewish/Israelitish “New Covenant” (Jeremiah 31:31) Apostle (Revelation 11:1)



He (the Jew)  has always placed his main dependence on cultivating friendship with kings and nobles . What cared the Jew if the people gnashed their teeth against him, so long as the king and the court were his friends? Thus there was always, even through most of the severely trying times, “a court Jew,” one who had bought by loans and held by the stranglehold of debt an entrance to the king’s chamber. Source The International Jew

The poor jew always gravitate to “revolutionarypolitics .  You have a Rothschild cousin Karl Marx becoming the Messiah of the Poor The “Russian Bolshevik Revolutionaries” were similarly financially and otherwise aided by Capitalist American Jews

Thus you have the “Court Jews‘ on the one hand and the “Revolutionary jews” on the other …….. all part of the same highly networked tribe/cult/religious group

If world leader need a nudge to do the bidding of AL Judaan the “front line options” of Bribe Blackmail and Boycott are tried first . The money media and embedded agents everywhere are usually enough for most leaders who sue for peace

Sometimes things DON’T work out  Kings and democratically elected leaders sometimes just refuse to play along They even take steps that go against the interests of the Chosen Lot. Sometimes things go wrong with the “revolutionary” Sometimes goyim don’t wage wars for Jews in time sometimes they dont respond to Jewish propaganda Usually there’s ONE INDIVIDUAL a leader or a “gentile revolutionary” or a patriotic incorruptible local leader who becomes a hindrance Jewish assassination

At this point Al Judaan looks for a “fatal intervention” commonly known as an assassination

The Talmud  doesnt just discourage murder it actively encourages murder of Gentile leaders who dont play kosher tunes with the saying Sanhedrin 59A Tob Shebbe Goyim Harog (The Best of the Gentiles must be killled)

This is by no means a recent phenomena The Sicarii (1st Century AD) were a Jewish group which used murder, kidnapping and terrorism to support their cause.   According to Josephus, who is an unfriendly source, the Sicarii would hide short daggers under their cloaks, mingle with crowds at the great festivals, murder their victims, and then disappear into the crowd

One important charateristic of these assassinations is that almost always the Jews involved have local accomplices and help The assassinations would be dangerous failures otherwise which even the superb jewish media control would not be able to contain  Thus Kennedys assassination involved elements in the CIA and Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination involved the CIA and elements of RAW (Indian Security agency) Ditto for Gen Patton’s and Robin Cooks assassination


thpattonrajiv2big cookpalme150px-Annalindh

Kennedy, Gen George Patton, Rajiv Gandhi ,Itzak Rabin 

Robin Cook ,Olaf Palme ,Anna Lindh

The assassination of President Kennedy by the CIA Mossad and the Jewish Mafia (Lansky)

The assassination of Gen George Patton

The assassination of Rajiv Gandhi by the CIA & Mossad

Robin Cooks assassination days after he exposed the “Al Queda”

The possible Mossad link to Olav Palme’s assassination

Possible Mossad link to Anna Lindhs assassination


bernadottePyotr Stolypin LOC 07327.jpg

Count Folke Bernadotte ,   Pyotyr Stolypin, Ernst vom Rath

The assassination of Count Folke Bernadotte by the Stern Gang

The assassination of Pyotry Stolypin by jew Dmitry Grigoriyevich Bogrov

The assassination of Ernst vom Rath by jew Herschel Feibel Grynszpan which lead to Kristallnacht

After the formation of the state of Israel assassination of hapless Palestinian leaders became state policy After Deir Yassin Tob Shebbe Goyim Harog became a very real and deadly policy Hundreds of Palestinians were killed Heres a list of 50 Palestinian leaders killed by Israel  PALESTINIAN LEADERS KILLED BY THE STATE OF ISRAEL

This list of 9 assassinated leaders and 50 assassinated Palestinian irritants to All Judaan is but a small sample of the policy of Tob Shebbe Goyim Harog

Satanic Jesuit Triumvirate: Adolfo Nicolas, Peter-Hans Kolvenbach & Pope Francis I


By Eric Jon PhelpsFebruary 8, 2014 00:19 UPDATED

Jesuit General Adolfo Nicolas 2009 angry

The three most powerful men in the world are Jesuit priests.  The order of their power is as follows:  First, “the Black Pope” and Jesuit Superior General Adolfo Nicolas; secondly, former Black Pope and Jesuit Superior General Peter-Hans Kolvenbach; and lastly, “the White Pope” and Vicar of Christ/Vicar of Horus Pope Francis I.  Pope Francis I is the first pope who is openly a member of the military order of the Society of Jesus.  As to national identity, Black Pope Nicolas is a Spaniard; ex-Black Pope Kolvenbach is a Dutchman; and the present White Pope Bergoglio is an Italian.   These three arch criminals under bloody oaths rule the world on behalf of Satan, “the god of this world” (II Corinthians 4:4).

What this means is these three men rule all the governments of the nations through the Black Pope’s perfected international intelligence community directed by the Jesuits from Rome through London and Washington, D.C.  All central banks are ruled by the agents of these men.  All the armies of the most powerful nations (US, Russia, China, Germany, etc.) are ruled by these men.  All the secret societies are ruled by these men.  All mafia families conducting every sort of organized crime are ruled by these men.  All entertainment and news outlets are ruled by these men.  There is nothing outside of their immediate temporal power, i.e., the power ruling the governments of all nations today.


The only One Who can set back their Satanic power is the Lord Jesus Christ seated at the right hand of His Father on High, and given all power in heaven and in earth (Matthew 28:18-20; Psalm 110:1).  The Body of Christ, being the true Church/Assembly of the Risen Son of God, also has the power to set back Satan’s “mystery of iniquity” imposed by the Jesuit Triumvirate.  For those in Christ Jesus, it is now time to act in obedience to the Word of God.  As was done by our Puritan-Calvinist fathers in Holland, Great Britain, France and America, so shall we do today.

Jesuit Rule of the Supreme Court of the United States of America


By Eric Jon PhelpsFebruary 5, 2014 21:09

SMOM, Magistral Villa, Rome, 1999

SMOM Grand Council, Magistral Villa, Rome, 1999

The diabolical and damnable Society of Jesus is in complete control of the Supreme Court of the United States via Jesuit Georgetown University.  There are now six Roman Catholics and three Jews loyal to Jesuit Pope Francis I making up “the Court.”  Two of those Jews, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer, are members of the New York City-based Council on Foreign Relations overseen by the city’s Archbishop, Timothy Cardinal Dolan.  These Agents for Rome are all “Yankees;” not one is from the American South!  No Protestants or Baptists are allowed, especially Av1611 Reformation Bible-believing Protestants and Baptists!  The Chief Justice is John Roberts who, after casting the deciding vote for pro-socialist-communist/pro-cartel-capitalist “Obama Care,” immediately left the country for Malta.  There, for a job well done after betraying his “right wing” backers, Roberts was inducted into the Sovereign Military Order of Malta commanded by British blue-blood and Grandmaster, Matthew Festing.

SMOM Fra Matthew Festing 79th Grand Master 2008

Israel Warns: Europe Will be Destroyed if Anti-Israel Boycott Continues


Israel has released a threatening video, warning Europe that if they don’t stop their boycott campaign against Israel, their continent will be obliterated.

THE VIDEO, released by a pro-Israel PR firm, depicts ISIS militants destroying European cities with Jerusalem’s blessing. (ILLUSTRATION: Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel) reports:

The video was released yesterday on the Facebook social network by Hallelu, a little-known PR outfit dedicated to improving the international image of the State of Israel, and has already racked up over five thousand video views.

The minute-long video has high production values and features 3-D animation and a script with a pointed political message. The plot of the narrative is as follows:

In the opening scene, a massive boulder as large as an entire village, emblazoned with the logos of the Islamic State and the Al Qassam Brigades of Hamas, begins to roll down a hill towards a Disney-esque medieval municipality labeled “Europe”.

As it picks up momentum, a gargantuan rock-creature with a blue Star of David on its shoulder attempts to slow the ISIS-boulder’s descent, but is unsuccessful on its first attempt. The boulder rolls past a peak with an Israeli flag planted at its precipice and continues its descent down the mountain.

Looking weary but undeterred, the Jewish-or-Israeli-identified rock-creature leaps ahead of the boulder’s path and with great effort manages to stop it in its tracks. Though the rock-creature saves most of the city from being crushed to dust, the inertia of the boulder drives the rock-creature into the spire of a structure at the entrance to town, causing that one building to collapse.

In immediate response, signs saying “Boycott Israel” pop out of town’s towers and the city lets loose with a barrage of missiles aimed at the rock-creature, including a large rock inscribed with the logo “BDS” — a reference to the Boycott-Divest-Sanctions movement that targets Israel.

Though the projectile seems to cause no physical harm to the rock-creature, his facial expression turns to a grimace, and he elects to remove himself from the boulder’s path and allows it to complete its original trajectory, completely crushing “Europe”-town, before rolling right into a body of water and sinking straight down.

In the final seconds of the video, the screen goes to black and the viewer is told, “Israel is fighting your war — Support Israel,” while the heavy footsteps of the rock-creature are audible in the background. The clip concludes with a credit screen bearing the logo of the Hallelu Foundation.

The message of the video seems glaringly obvious: Islamic armies will first fight Israel, but eventually they will attempt to annihilate Europe; if Europeans don’t appreciate the way that Israel combats Islamists, and aren’t willing to accept the inevitable costs of this war of civilizations, Israel will abandon the ungrateful gentiles to their deserved fate: extinction.

Among the most-recognized names that Hallelu counts as “Foundation Members” on its website are three prominent patriarchs, columnist Ben Dror Yemini of top-selling Israeli daily newspaper Yediot Ahronot, Arabist professor Dr. Mordechai Kedar of Israel’s Bar Ilan University, and Greek Orthodox Patriarchate spokesperson Father Gabriel Nadaf.

Yemini has advocated rounding non-Jewish African refugees out of Israeli cities and into desert detention centers, in order to prevent Jewish African-Israeli women from dating them. Kedar has advocated threatening to rape the mothers and sisters of Palestinians in order to deter them from carrying out attacks against Israel. In recent years, the Israeli government carried out each of these proposed policies.

Nadaf leads efforts to draft Christian Palestinian citizens of the country into Israel’s army. A close ally of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, he was one of only six people to light torches at an official state ceremony for Israel’s “Independence Day” earlier this month. Days before the ceremony was held, it emerged that Nadaf has been accused of sexual harassment by several of the young men that he tried to draft into the IDF.

Two other Hallelu “Foundation Members” have connections to the Netanyahu government, as well. The group’s “Director of External Relations” Rena Riger was Netanyahu’s Director of Foreign Affairs while he was Israel’s Minister of Foreign Affairs from 2002 to 2003. Also, “Foundation Member” Wilhelm Roth has also served as Chair of the Foreign Affairs Advisory Committee to Danny Ayalon between 2011 and 2013, when he was Netanyahu’s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, according to Roth’s Linked In profile.

In the last year, the Netanyahu government has begun to publicly accuse Boycott-Divestment-Sanctions activists of posing an existential threat to the State of Israel, and has apportioned huge budgets to combat the phenomenon. Last month, a top ruling Likud party lawmaker, Minister of Transportation Yisrael Katz, threatened BDS activists with “focussed civil elimination”. While the threat was vaguely worded, it suggested that boycott campaigners could face lethal retribution from Israel.

The first video to be published by the Hallelu Foundation, released just over a year ago, explains the group’s raison d’être.

Complaining that all previous public relations efforts by Israel were ineffectual — “we just really suck at explaining what the hell is going on here” — the clip’s narrator proposes that Hallelu be made the over-arching PR promoters of the State of Israel:

“Hallelu was founded in order to thoroughly change the way we think of hasbara [propaganda]. It intends to tell the world the true story, and has the exact plan of how to do so. At first, the Hallelu Foundation plans to become an umbrella organization for all Jewish organizations in Israel and abroad that deal with hasbara.”

The narrator goes on to explain that the group intends to not only defend Israel from charges of human rights violations, but to go on the offensive, as well: “Hallelu plans to start a series of unprecedented attack campaigns, the likes of which we’ve never seen, both in content and in range.”

Hallelu’s attack forces will target media outlets that publish negative reports about Israel’s actions, the video says. “A battery of lawyers will legally pursue any website, newspaper, TV network in Israel and abroad that will spread lies about Israel’s operations,” the narrator states. “The anti-Israel organizations will learn: they can’t write whatever they want anymore.”

Interestingly, the video also debunks one of the oft-repeated talking points of Israel’s most vocal defenders: that Boycott-Divest-Sanction activists hate Jews and target Jews just because they are Jews. “Has everyone turned anti-semite? No, they haven’t,” the narrator explains. “They do exactly what we would do in their place: they boycott, demonstrate, apply international pressure, stop tourists, investors, performing artists.”

Update: The high-quality animation component of the video was not an original creative work, but rather an enhancement of a sampled clip, nearly all of a seventy-second award-winning CG short called “A Tale of Momentum & Inertia” by Portland, Oregon animation studio HouseSpecial. Presumably, Hallelu would prefer that this fact not be widely known, and not only for reasons of legal copyright. In the original HouseSpecial animation, the massive boulder which destroys an Israeli settlement of some sort and the village “Europe” — identified as Hamas and ISIS — is actually inadvertently created by the Jewish-or-Israeli-identified rock-creature himself, when he tries to build a structure of some kind, perhaps an altar, on the top of a hill. If Hallelu’s political metaphor is then expanded to also include the introductory footage from “Momentum & Inertia” that the would-be hasbara mavens chose to cut, it would mean that in Israel’s efforts to build some kind of structure on a hill, it created ISIS and Hamas, which then destroy an Israeli settlement and the European continent.

* * *

Source: YourNewsWire

Classic Audio: Israel — Facing the Truth

Flag of Israel surrounded by U.S. flags

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following essay written by Kevin Strom was used as the text for an American Dissident Voices broadcast in 1993. Included is the original audio of that broadcast, which may be streamed or downloaded. It will serve as the first in a series of classic audio files that will be uploaded soon. Be sure to bookmark and return to National Vanguard to check for new updates!

by Kevin Alfred Strom

Listen to the broadcast (1993)

IT WAS a bright summer day on the 8th of June, 1967. The United States Navy intelligence ship, the U.S.S. Liberty, was peacefully sailing on the clear waters of the eastern Mediterranean. It just so happened that on that very day, the government of Israel was finalizing its preparations for the invasion of Syria which was planned for the following day. The intelligence ship’s full-time mission was the interception of all radio communications in the area, so a decision was made by the Israeli government that the U.S.S. Liberty presented a threat to the secrecy of their war plans. On that fateful day Israeli warplanes and torpedo boats attacked the Liberty with a merciless barrage of torpedoes, machine gun fire, rockets, and napalm. They attacked her in wave after wave, again and again and again. They blasted a 40-foot hole in the side of the ship with their torpedoes. When the Liberty failed to sink they sent in helicopter gunships and machine-gunned the lifeboats. The clear intent of the attackers was that no American be left alive. The attack took place in broad daylight and lasted for over two hours. Only when the Sixth Fleet had sent rescue aircraft did the attackers finally withdraw. All through the assault, the ship was flying a clearly visible and brand new American flag. Israeli reconnaissance planes had been tracking the Liberty for five and one half hours prior to the attack. 171 American sailors were casualties, and 34 were killed.

The official story put out by the Israeli government was that the attack was a mistake, and an apology was issued by Israel and accepted by the US. No action was taken against Israel for attacking an American ship and killing American soldiers. A conspiracy of silence surrounded this tragedy, and few Americans have ever even heard of it. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Thomas Moorer and Secretary of State Dean Rusk stated publicly that Israel deliberately attacked the Liberty. Rusk stated in his memoirs “I was never satisfied with the Israeli explanation…. I didn’t believe them then, and I don’t believe them to this day. The attack was outrageous.” Nevertheless, the media downplayed the affair, which, had it been perpetrated by any other country than Israel, would have been a cause celebre and possible grounds for war. The controlled media told us that the attack lasted only five minutes and that it was followed by an immediate apology and offer of assistance. Survivor James Ennes, Jr., who was on the Liberty that terrible day, recently stated “The official lid on this story remains almost as tight as the day it was first applied.”

Many survivors, soldiers, scholars, and patriots have had their doubts about that official explanation, and in 1991 their doubts were confirmed. Evidence released that year by the U.S. Embassy in Beirut included an intercepted radio conversation of an Israeli pilot who communicated with his base “It’s an American ship,” and his headquarters ordered him to continue the attack. Now there is no doubt at all.

James Ennes, Jr.: One of the outspoken survivors of the attack on the Liberty.

How is it possible that so great an atrocity has been covered up? Such a cover-up would have to involve large numbers of individuals at the highest levels of the US government as well as the cooperation of the major news media in this country. Such a cover-up did occur, and an investigation of the strange relationship between the state of Israel, the United States government, and the US news and entertainment media will reveal a key to the understanding of many of the problems that currently plague our nation. Understanding this key will lift a veil from your eyes, and you’ll finally be able to see the political power structure as it really is, instead of how the commentators and network executives want you to believe that it is.

The Greatest Parasite

The state of Israel can truly be described as a gigantic, swollen parasite fastened on the American people. Most Americans are not aware of how much money is poured from the US Treasury into Israel. According to former Congressman Paul Findley, “Each year, US aid to Israel exceeds that given to any other country. Since 1987 direct economic and military aid has annually totaled $3 billion or more. In addition, financial arrangements worked out solely for Israel bring the total to about $5 billion a year. This does not include such generous programs as the $10 billion loan guarantee granted Israel in 1992. US law provides for the termination of all aid, economic and military, to any nation that develops nuclear weapons or ‘engages in a consistent pattern of gross violation of internationally recognized human rights.’ For years, the US government has been aware of Israel’s development of a nuclear arsenal and its persistent human rights violations. But no president or Congress has ever taken steps to terminate aid, as required by law, or even reduce it….”

According to information obtained by West Virginia Senator Robert Byrd, the total direct aid to Israel (again not counting many special deals, loans that are never paid back, tax breaks, etc.) by the end of 1991 added up to $53 billion. Adjusted for inflation, that figure would be much higher. From 1979 on the amount of money directly given to Israel totalled $40.1 billion. The amount given to Egypt, which in a way can also be considered aid to Israel since it is essentially a payoff to the Egyptian government in return for their subservience to Israeli domination in the Middle East, is the second largest amount given to any recipient. You may be surprised to learn that the total aid given to these two countries is more than that given to all other countries combined!

Now none of these figures include special low-interest loans made to Israel, many of them guaranteed by the US government. The $10 billion in loan guarantees made by US taxpayers to Israel is just one example of these loans. Now some of you might not know just what a loan guarantee is. What it means is this: If the government of Israel can’t pay back its creditors on time, then the US taxpayer – that’s me and you, my friend – foots the bill.

According to Paul Findley, “Since 1985 all US aid to Israel has been a grant, meaning that not a penny of it has to be repaid. [And w]hen Israel pays interest and principal on loans given before 1985, it does so with US tax dollars. This curious process began in 1984 when Democratic Senator Alan Cranston of California sponsored what became known as the Cranston amendment. It stipulates that economic aid to Israel each year will be at least equal to its annual repayments (principal and interest) of its debt to the United States. In the wry words of then Secretary of State James A. Baker III in testimony before the Senate in 1992, …’we can always pay ourselves back with the money that we appropriate for Israel to do so.’

“The effect of this amendment is to guarantee that Israel will always receive enough US aid to cover its debt obligations. In actual practice, Congress always awards Israel funds far in excess of these obligations. No other country enjoys such an arrangement.”

Former Congressman Paul Findley

Not Only Money, But Blood

This great swollen parasite thrives not only on our money but on our very life’s blood itself. The Gulf War was fought primarily to protect Israel’s continued military dominance in the Middle East. Iraq was never a threat to America. But it was a potential threat to Israel. Saddam Hussein fell into a trap when US Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie told him that Iraq’s longstanding claims to Kuwait were merely an inter-Arab matter, and would not draw a negative US response if acted upon. You all know what happened after Hussein fell for that trap. Perhaps you recall the absolute hysteria in the controlled media when Iraq shot a half dozen or so missiles, mostly duds, at Israel during the war. Few bothered to calculate to come up with the fact that an equivalent number of bombs and missiles were hitting Iraq every few seconds. The controlled media cynically used us by making an appeal to our patriotism and implying that anyone who didn’t go along with the slaughter wasn’t “supporting our troops.” Americans died, Americans were wounded, Americans were crippled – all for the interests of a certain foreign nation. The leading supporter of this twisted crusade in the US Congress – top Israel booster Steven Solarz.

And the gulf war is just one instance of many. Americans died for Israel in Lebanon, too. You know, Lebanon provides an interesting parallel with the Gulf War. All Iraq had to do was to refuse to instantly comply with a UN resolution demanding that they withdraw from Kuwait, and shortly thereafter a rain of bombs and missiles was falling and over 100,000 Iraqis were instantly converted into cinders as they retreated across the sand back into Iraq. But in 1982, Israel brutally invaded and occupied Lebanon. No “smart bombs” rained down on Israel. In fact, Israel still occupies southern Lebanon and hardly a peep of protest against this violation of a sovereign state’s borders is heard. Israel’s history is a history of territorial expansion and some Israeli political leaders talk openly of “Eretz Israel,” which means “Greater Israel,” incorporating much of what is now Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan. What you may not know is that while Iraq committed the New World Order “crime” of failing to obey one UN resolution fast enough, Israel has steadfastly refused to obey not just one UN resolution, but an incredible 69! Israel’s actions have brought outrage from a majority of the UN’s member states on 69 separate occasions. They have condemned Israel for the destruction of Arab villages, for the murder of innocent women and children, for making war on neighboring states, for refusing to withdraw from invaded and occupied territory, for killing protesting students, for killing civilians protesting being expelled from their homes, for a transcontinental bombing raid against Tunisia, and for dozens of other violations. And on 29 other occasions, UN resolutions with real teeth in them, calling for Israel to withdraw from stolen land and allow self-determination for the Palestinian people among other things, would have been adopted but were vetoed by the one dissenting vote of the United States. When it comes to the exercising of any kind of real power against those who violate UN resolutions, it seems that some countries are “more equal than others.”

Israel gets away not only with an expansionist foreign policy, but with repeatedly and endlessly violating the most elementary human rights of her subject peoples. Although Israel’s PR men would have us believe that Israel is an island of Western values in the Middle East, the truth is quite the opposite. Paul Findley quotes former President Bush, who stated in 1992, “This is a relationship based on a shared commitment to democracy and to common values,” and then goes on to point out that “Israel practices as state policy a number of measures that are illegal in the United States and other Western countries. These include assassination, kidnapping, expulsion, detention without charges or trial, land confiscation, and collective punishment – not to mention Israel’s long-standing practice of espionage against the United States, its principal benefactor.”

How They Do It

The power of the Israel Lobby is so great in this country that former president Jimmy Carter was prompted to say, after he left office of course, that no politician dared to oppose its demands, because to do so would be “political suicide.” They take our money, we fight and die in their wars, and, since both political parties are in their pocket, the American people don’t have any choice in the matter. How do they do it?

They can do it because they are rich, they are organized, and they have the power to suppress criticism through their control of the American media. Most of all, though, they can do it because we let them.

The primary Israeli lobbying organization is called the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC for short. It is unquestionably the most powerful lobby in Washington. It coordinates the activities of over one hundred pro-Israel political action committees. AIPAC has an annual budget of $15 million, with 50,000 dues-paying members, and offices in nine US cities. If a Congressman or Senator toes the Israeli line, AIPAC can direct thousands of contributions into his reelection campaign. If a representative becomes “rebellious,” however, all that cash will flow just as swiftly into his opponent’s coffers.

The New York Times, which can hardly be considered an anti-Israel institution, described AIPAC in 1987: “[AIPAC] has gained power to influence a presidential candidates choice of staff, to block practically any arms sale to an Arab country and to serve as a catalyst for intimate military relations between the Pentagon and the Israeli army. Its leading officials are consulted by State Department and White House policy makers, by senators and generals.”

At AIPAC’s 27th annual policy conference in 1986 AIPAC executive director Thomas A. Dines revealed that AIPAC’s influence was so pervasive that Secretary of State George Schultz had vowed to “build institutional arrangements so that eight years from now, if there is a secretary of state who is not positive about Israel, he will not be able to overcome the bureaucratic relationship between Israel and the U.S. that we have established.”

One State Department official was quoted as saying: “We used to have a two-track policy [in the Middle East, considering the interests of both sides]. Now only Israel’s interests are considered.”

And it isn’t just campaign money that’s involved. As readers of Who Rules America, our in-depth research report on media bias and control in America well know; forces friendly to Israel and her international interests have effective control over the major television and radio networks, and the major newspaper and magazine-publishing groups in our nation. That is the primary reason why these news sources nearly always take an internationalist, leftist, America-last position. A strong, confident, nationalist America might not be friendly to alien control over so many of our institutions, and so the media bosses do all they can to make sure such an America never comes into being again. Naturally, their services are available to ruin the political career of any who would oppose Israel, or to boost the image of Israel’s friends.

If a Congressman or Senator toes the Israeli line, AIPAC can direct thousands of contributions into his reelection campaign. If a representative becomes “rebellious,” however, all that cash will flow just as swiftly into his opponent’s coffers.

A Time to Rediscover Freedom and Independence

Today the American government and our media of entertainment and information are literally helpless prisoners of this foreign power, the power that lies behind the nation of Israel. This sad state of affairs exists primarily because most Americans are too fat and too happy to bother themselves about the future of America, too willing to take the easy road of believing the lies delivered by the smiling newscaster as he reads his script. But some of us are willing to do the research to find out what is really going on, and to take seriously the responsibility which that knowledge places on our shoulders. We say, and as long as you are willing to support this broadcast with your voluntary contributions, we will continue to say: Not one cent to Israel while a single child or old age pensioner of OUR people goes to bed hungry and cold. Not one cent to Israel while a single one of OUR able-bodied men is without a job. Not one cent to Israel while she violates our laws, kills our soldiers, and steals our military secrets. Low-interest loans, loan guarantees, and loans paid back with our own money to Israel? Hell, no! Let’s give those loans to our own people, to real traditional Americans, to our young men and women just starting out and trying to raise children who will be a credit to their pioneer ancestors, to our farmers who are losing their farms to faceless banks and corporations. Where are the low-interest loans for them? Here in rural West Virginia and maybe in your part of the country as well, roads could be paved, hospitals and schools and libraries could be built, credit could be extended to our entrepreneurs – but “money is tight.” Despite the highest taxes in history, our government is broke and we are criminally mortgaging our children’s future to pay yesterday’s debts. Under such conditions, it is the height of insanity if not treason to be sending our money to Israel.

Since Americans have been so unconcerned about their nation, and unwilling to do the hard and dirty work of maintaining control of their government and their media, a vacuum has been created. A vacuum that the special interests have been only too happy to fill. And the Israel Lobby is the mother of all special interests. The parasitic organism has grown so large and so malignant that it now cannot be removed except by radical surgery. Our political system is literally paralyzed by the parasite, so we must now look to ourselves to regain our freedom. We must awaken our fellow Americans to their peril. This effective control of our government by a foreign power is the greatest peril that our people have ever faced.

There is a new book which has provided much of the source material for my essay today. It has gathered together, in well-organized form, all the essential documentation of the power of the Israel Lobby. And it reveals the hidden side of the state of Israel, the side that the controlled media don’t want you to see. It is by former Congressman Paul Findley, and is entitled Deliberate Deceptions: Facing the Facts About the US-Israeli Relationship. Deliberate Deceptions will demolish the fallacies that prop up the illegitimate power structure in America today. Congressman Findley is retired from politics and has no partisan axe to grind. It is easy to tell the truth when that truth is a popular truth. Much harder is a task like Findley’s, to tell Americans the hard truth, the difficult truth, the truth that brings down the fury of that power structure upon you. If you are a thinking American who is concerned about the dangerous downward slide of our nation in recent years, you need to read Deliberate Deceptions.

* * *

From American Dissident Voices, October 23, 1993

Source: National Alliance

Edwin Wright: Zionist Jews Worked to Capture US Government

Edwin M. Wright (pictured) was an intelligence agent and State Department employee in the 1940s and 1950s. Though an internationalist and an advocate of a plan for bringing refugee Jews to America, he saw clearly the danger posed by Zionism. His account of Jewish crimes and manipulations makes riveting reading. His personal experiences of Jewish bullying (and even impersonation!) of Presidents and officials, vote-buying, and much more are absolutely amazing and convincing.

THE MATERIAL I gave Professor McKinzie was of a very controversial nature — one almost taboo in U.S. circles, inasmuch as I accused the Zionists of using political pressures and even deceit in order to get the U.S. involved in a policy of supporting a Zionist, theocratic, ethnically exclusive and ambitious Jewish State. I, and my associates in the State Department, felt this was contrary to U.S. interests and we were overruled by President Truman…

Zionists and Christian Fundamentalists have frequently used the Hebrew Bible as an authority for justifying a Jewish State. As late as summer 1976, Candidate Jimmy Carter stated, ‘I am pro-Israeli, not because of political expediency, but because I believe Israel is the fulfilment of Biblical prophecy.’

So the Bible– and belief that it is God’s Holy Word and infallible, became a useful tool in Zionist propaganda. I take the point of view that the Bible is a mixture of Hebrew legends and myths and cannot be used as an element in U.S. foreign policy.

The Zionists were very successful in using religion for political purposes. This is prohibited by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which states the Government should recognize no ‘religous establishment.’ In the case of Zionism and Israel, the U.S. has recognized and supported a religious establishment–viz: the State of Israel which in turn discriminates against all non-Jewish religions.

Zionists, since Truman’s decision in 1947-48, have lived in a Fool’s Paradise. They assumed their control of the US government, press and public was permanent and based an ‘moral’ values — therefore, the US at all times would give Israel total support. Zionists seem to live in a dream world of their own creation and think the rest of the world should accept their dream. They seem quite incapable of facing reality.

Esther got her Gentile King drunk, then wheedled his signet ring and sent out an order to the Jews–so they slew 75,000 innocent Persians (Esther 9:16). The Book of Esther is not history. It is parody. The Ahasuerus of Esther is probably the Seleucid King Antiochus IV Epiphanes (165 B.C.) and Mordechai is probably a symbol for Judas Maccabeus. Esther represents the beautiful dream of a Messianic Jewish State. There is a lesson nevertheless in this immoral and violent story. A political marriage of any political power with Messianic Zionism is certain to produce disaster.

Time is vindicating the point of view of those State Department specialists whom Truman said he could not trust because they were ‘anti-Semitic.’

The third step in Zionism was that they must have large enough a state in order to keep the whole Jewish population there. At that time there were about fourteen million Jews, and now that meant owning a very large territory. It is not brought out in Zionist propaganda in America, but what they claim is all the territory from the Suez Canal clear north to the mountains of Cappadocia, in southern Turkey. [Statement by Herzl. Also see Numbers 34; Genesis 15:18, Joshua 13, II Samuel 8:5-6.] It includes all of Lebanon, much of Syria, Jordan, and Sinai. This is the territory they call ‘Eretz Israel,’ the land of Israel, which is mentioned in the Bible.

I might mention here that I have found Zionism very deceitful. There is a double meaning in all the words Zionists use, and [Chaim] Weizmann himself said one time, ‘Let the British or anyone else talk about Zionism and they can use our terminology, but we know what the meaning of it is. It has one meaning to us, one meaning to the Gentiles.’ They’ve always had this double-entendre in everything that they have done. Whenever they use words you have to try to find out what is the context in which they are using these words.

Domestic issues are not based on intelligence, but on self interest of a smaller group, and I think in this connection I think I should mention specifically two. One was what we called the China Lobby, a very odd and indiscriminate group of people who never were really organized, but had a tremendous influence upon government. They eventually were captured by Senator [Joseph R.] McCarthy. The other were the Zionists, who were more organized. They had been working for a long time to capture the U.S. Government; to use it for purposes of developing a Jewish state. In other words, we had two lobby groups in America who knew little about the area at all, who had certain ideological concepts of society and America. When the people from the fields reported what was unpopular to these groups, they were fired.

…when the election was coming up in 1946 in New York, the group of New York Jews called upon Mr. Truman. [Alan Taylor, op. cit. p.93] Emmanuel Cellar was the head of this committee. Rabbi Steven Wise and several others were in it. They called upon Mr. Truman and said, ‘We have just been talking with Mr. [Tom] Thomas Dewey. He is willing to come out and declare for a Jewish state, and we are going to turn our money and urge the Jews to vote for him unless you beat him to it.’ Then Emmanuel Cellar pounded upon Mr. Truman’s desk and said, ‘And if you don’t come out for a Jewish state we’ll run you out of town.’

Henry Byroade made a talk in Philadelphia in April 1954. …In it he made this statement: ‘I have some advice for both Arabs and for Jews. Israel should think of itself as a state living in the Middle East and that it must live with its Arab neighbors. The Arabs must cease to think of themselves as wanting to destroy Israel and should come to terms with Israel itself.’ …The next morning Henry Byroade got a call from Nathan Goldman, who was in California. [Nathan Goldman was president of the World Jewish Congress and many years president of the World Zionist Organization…] He used his first name and said, ‘Hank, did you make that speech in Philadelphia that was reported in the papers today?’

Byroade said, ‘Yes, I made that speech.’

He said, ‘We will see to it that you’ll never hold another good position.’

The Zionists are organized in 17 (now 31) different committees and groups in America. They are all inter-related by what’s called the Association of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations. These are the presidents of the 31 Zionist organizations. All they have to do is to send in a letter to any one of them and these 31 will reproduce it in mimeograph and send it out to all their organizations. As a result of one letter you’ll get hundreds of replies coming in attacking me. This is the type of constant fear that a Government official lives under because of the mimeograph machine and the xerox machine.

Mr. Truman himself has the most remarkable of all statements in there, a memo that’s quoted, in which he says, ‘Something’s going on and I don’t know what it is. Somebody called up the President of Haiti and he said that it was I. [F.R.U.S., 1947 , Vol. V, p. 1309.] He said, “We want you to vote for the Zionist program.” As a result the President of Haiti changed his vote to satisfy what he thought was me. I don’t know who this fellow was that called him up.’

In other words, somebody impersonated President Truman and threatened the President of Haiti. There were people who used President Truman’s voice and name and he didn’t know who they were. The State Department never found out who they were, but this is the way decisions are made in Washington. I think I know who that fellow was. It was Robert Nathan, because I met Robert Nathan frequently at the U.N. I had met him out in the Middle East, and he was the one who was running to the telephone booth and calling up the President of Liberia, calling up Costa Rica, telling them, “Unless you will vote for our program, we will see to it that the American interhighway system is not built through your country.” These people assumed that Nathan and Co. were acting for America and nobody had consulted them at all. This kind of thing went on at the U.N. and in Washington and if you want the documentary proof of it, it’s in Mr. Truman’s statement.

Before I read this statement of Mr. Truman’s I’ll have to explain what the situation was. There was tremendous pressure upon the governments of other countries to vote for the partition program, which the Zionists had accepted. I was at the U.N. and was Mr. Henderson’s assistant and was there when he read some of these memos. I was reporting back to the State Department what was happening at the U.N.

There were a number of Jewish Zionists at the U.N., like Robert Nathan, Bernard Baruch, and various other people, who were calling up the chiefs of other states and saying, “Unless you vote for this partition program, the United States will not build a road in your country; will not help you in aid or will not do something else.” They were pretending they had the authority of the President of the United States to determine policy, when they were just one individual operating on their own. They had no authority, no official position, but they were using the importance of the United States as a threat against these countries.

That’s an official document. Somebody represented himself as the President of the United States to some foreign countries. This was the kind of threat that the Zionists used to change votes at that last session when finally it was voted by a small majority of two or three.

It’s very rare that a country of which no boundaries are known is recognized. There are also other questions: When you recognize a state do you recognize its claims to people outside the state? The Zionists have always claimed that the Jewish nation is wherever a Jew is, anywhere in the world. Every Jew, therefore, is part of this Jewish nation. Golda Meir repeated this when they asked her what the boundaries of Israel are. She said, ‘Wherever there’s a Jew, there is Israel. It’s not a line on a map.’

‘Constantly they kept asking me, “Why does the United States behave this way?” I couldn’t explain it to them.’

Nobody can explain it, because you’ve got to know how they buy congressional and senatorial votes through speeches; how they control the five electoral states, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, etc. You have to understand the weighting of the Jewish vote in America and the contribution to the party systems. By the time we explained that to Arabs they’d say, ‘But aren’t you corrupt?’

The answer is, ‘Yes, we’re corrupt.’

Read the full article at The Truman Library

Austria: Jews Forbid Long List of License Plate Number and Letter Combinations


This is hilarious, and Austrian patriots should prank the censors by coming up with 100,000 new “secret codes” that will then be forbidden too.

AUSTRIA is cracking down on personalised number plates used by neo-Nazis, by banning lesser-known codes with hidden far-right symbolism. (ILLUSTRATION: Austria was joined to Nazi Germany from 1938-1945.)

Letter combinations such as HJ or NS — denoting Hitler Youth and National Socialism — have long been prohibited on personalised plates in Austria.

Now transport officials have published a list of more than 30 more cryptic codes that have been banned.

They include number combinations such as 88, which represents “Heil Hitler”.

New legislation, which came into force on Thursday, also outlaws the use of IS or ISIS on personalised number plates in a bid to stop people showing their support for the Islamic State group.

‘No Place in Society’

“It has been forbidden to have obvious Nazi number plates since personalised plates went on sale in 1989,” a spokeswoman for Austria’s transport ministry told the BBC.

“But then we learned that the far-right scene is moving away from the more obvious codes to more hidden ones.

“So we had to change the law. Civil servants deciding if someone can choose a certain number plate now know which codes are being used by the far-right scene.”

Combinations no longer allowed include:

  • BH — Blood and Honour
  • 420 — 20 April, Hitler’s birthday
  • 1919 — meaning SS, as S is the 19th letter in the alphabet
  • WAW — White Aryan War
  • FG — Fuehrer’s Geburtstag (leader’s birthday)
  • 88 — Heil Hitler, due to where H comes in the alphabet

Only new number plates will be affected by the change in the law.

Abbreviations now outlawed include FG, which stands for “Fuehrer’s Geburtstag”, meaning “leader’s birthday”, and WP for “white power”.

Normal number plates in Austria -- as shown -- are generated automatically by region, but some motorists choose their own.
Normal number plates in Austria — as shown — are generated automatically by region, but some motorists choose their own.

Number combinations have not previously been included, but now codes such as 18 — meaning ‘Adolf Hitler’ because of where A and H come in the alphabet — are also now prohibited.

The new list was compiled in co-operation with the Mauthausen Committee, an organisation representing former concentration camp prisoners. Officials say it is not exhaustive.

Austrian Transport Minister Alois Stoeger, who pushed for the law change, has said: “National Socialist ideology has no place in our society.”

More than half a million Austrians have currently personalised licence plates, according to Austria’s public broadcaster, ORF.

The move in Austria follows similar efforts in Germany to crack down on neo-Nazi symbols.

In Germany, the law says that number plates must not offend public morals. Each state has its own list of banned combinations, and some are stricter than others.

But attempts to introduce a federal solution, similar to that in Austria, have been unsuccessful so far.

* * *

Source: BBC

German Translation Published: The Unholy War, Der Unheilige Krieg

911 AttackAS DER SCHWERTER, a patriotic German-language Web site, has published a translation of Kevin Alfred Strom’s American Dissident Voices program, “The Unholy War.” The German translation follows:

Ich schreibe diese Sendung am 11. September 2014, dem dreizehnten Jahrestag der 9/11-Anschläge. Heute wäre auch der 81. Geburtstag von Dr. William Pierce gewesen, dem Gründer der National Alliance. 1994 wies Dr. Pierce uns auf den Seiten von National Vanguard darauf hin, daß der jüdische „heilige Krieg“ gegen nichtjüdische Semiten im Nahen Osten, oft unter Einsatz von Amerikanern als Kanonenfutter, sich bis zu dem Punkt aufheize, daß amerikanische Arbeiter „aus hohen Gebäuden draußen bleiben sollten“, wie dem World Trade Center – eine Bemerkung, die sich sieben Jahre später als recht vorausahnend erwies.

Früher am heutigen Tag sprach ich mit einem Mann, der völlig frustriert von Amerikas jahrzehntelanger Verwicklung in nahöstliche Kriege und von den terroristischen Rückwirkungen, die das nach sich zieht – und angesichts einer der frommen „Wir müssen uns 9/11 erinnern“-Botschaften des Establishments – mit der Äußerung herausplatzte: „Wir können am besten gedenken, indem wir jeden einzelnen von dem verdammten Moslemungeziefer vom Antlitz der Erde tilgen!“

Ich antwortete: „Und dich dazu zu bringen, daß du das denkst, ist genau der Grund, warum dieser Terrorakt ausgeführt wurde. Ich stimme schon zu, daß die Einwanderung nichtweißer Moslems gestoppt und dann umgekehrt werden sollte. Sie sind nicht kompatibel mit unserer Rasse oder Zivilisation. Aber diejenigen, die in ihren Heimatländern bleiben, sollten in Ruhe gelassen werden, und die schändlichen Morde an ihnen und die Invasionen in ihren Heimatländern, alles ausgeführt im Interesse von Israel, sollten sofort gestoppt werden.“

Ich erläuterte auch kurz, daß es eine israelische Verwicklung in die 9/11-Anschläge gab – die herbeigeführt oder allermindestens zugelassen und gefördert wurden, mit dem ausdrücklichen Zweck, einen neuen Krieg anzufangen – mit den Vereinigten Staaten auf eine Seite und Israels vermeintlichen Feinden auf der anderen.

Mein frustrierter Freund wischte meine Erläuterungen beiseite und sagte, die Israelis wären ihm auch scheißegal, und von ihm aus sollten wir Atomwaffen einsetzen, um den ganzen Nahen Osten zu einer Glasplatte zu machen.

Ich verstehe seine Frustration und seinen Zorn. Familienmitglieder und Freunde von ihm sind in dieser anscheinend endlosen Serie von Kriegen gestoben – der längsten in unserer Geschichte, ohne Ende in Sicht. Es gibt zweifellos Millionen von Amerikanern, die genauso fühlen. Aber ohne auch nur ein Grundverständnis davon, wie sie durch Tricks und Manipulation dazu gebracht wurden, jemand anderes’ „heiligen Krieg“ zu führen, sind sie machtlos, etwas gegen ihre erbärmliche Knechtschaft zu tun, eine Knechtschaft sogar bis in den Tod.

Hören Sie also zu – und gewinnen Sie etwas Verständnis.

Der Mossad, Israels Geheimdienst, beschattete die Terroristen von 9/11 – und ermutigte sie wahrscheinlich und kontrollierte sie in gewissem Ausmaß – und warnte nie das amerikanische Volk. Haben Sie von dem Spionagering der „israelischen Kunststudenten“ gehört? Wahrscheinlich nicht, obwohl es möglicherweise der größte Spionagering ist, der jemals auf amerikanischem Boden geschnappt wurde – insgesamt etwa 200 Agenten. Der Spionagering wurde hochgenommen, und viele seiner Agenten, die Informationen über das amerikanische Militär, die Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) und andere Regierungseinrichtungen und Gebäude gesammelt hatten, wurden geschnappt. Es wurde später enthüllt, daß ein volles Drittelder gefangenen israelischen Spione in denselben Gemeinden in Florida und New Jersey wohnten wie die 9/11-Entführer – und daß fünf von ihnen in den Monaten unmittelbar vor den Anschlägen in derselben Straße wohnten wie Mohammed Atta.

Es ist wichtig zu betonen, daß das nicht irgendeine spinnerte Verschwörungstheorie ist: Dies ist die Art von Verhalten, das Geheimdienste und Geheimpolizeibehörden normalerweise praktizieren – es ist das, was sie tun. Ein riesiger Prozentanteil der „wegen Terror Verhafteten“ des FBI sind zum Beispiel Regierungsagenten, die Gruppen radikaler Moslems infiltrieren und dann finanzieren, sie anspornen und zu illegalen Handlungen verleiten, oft mit von der US-Regierung selbst gelieferten Waffen, für die die unglücklichen Sündenböcke die Agenten oft bezahlen, wenn die Handschellen und Kameraverschlüsse gleichzeitig klicken. Zu jedem beliebigen Zeitpunkt haben nicht nur das FBI und die CIA und MI5, sondern auch, da können Sie sicher sein, der Mossad Dutzende oder Hunderte teils echte, teils falsche radikale Gruppen, die sie „führen“. Diese gekaperten Gruppen stehen nicht nur unter nahezu totaler Überwachung, sondern auch unter einem bedeutenden Maß an tatsächlicher Kontrolle. Sie werden nicht nur für Schauprozesse benutzt, um zu zeigen, daß die Behörde „den Terror bekämpft“, sondern können leicht als Sündenböcke bei der Begehung gewalttätiger oder anderer illegaler Taten benutzt werden, die die Behörde selbst nicht zu begehen wagt, aber dennoch als Teil irgendeines breiteren Planes ausgeführt haben will.

Am 21. Dezember 2001 reichte der investigative Reporter Carl Cameron vom Fox News Channel einen Bericht über die Verhaftung von sechzig israelischen Spionen durch das FBI und andere Ermittler der Regierung, die die Ereignisse des 11. September untersuchten, ein, von denen einige verdächtigt wurden, vorab von den Anschlägen gewußt zu haben. Dem Bericht zufolge waren über 140 Geheimdienstagenten des jüdischen Staates, von denen viele sich als „israelische Kunststudenten“ ausgaben und manche als Straßen- und Kioskverkäufer, in einer früheren Phase der Ermittlungen verhaftet worden, die vor dem 11. September begannen. Diese 200 israelischen Spione wurden als nur die Spitze des Eisbergs einer „sehr aggressiven“ israelischen Geheimdienstoperation gegen die Vereinigten Staaten betrachtet – eines der größten Spionageringe in der amerikanischen Geschichte. Laut Geheimdokumenten, die Cameron gesehen hatte, drangen die „Kunststudenten“, die den Verkauf originaler Gemälde zu Billigpreisen als Köder benutzten, in Militärbasen, die Drug Enforcement Administraion, das FBI und Dutzende von Regierungseinrichtungen, Geheimanlagen und sogar in die Privatwohnungen von Polizeibeamten, Geheimdienstpersonal und Richtern ein. In mehreren Fällen wurde bewiesen, daß diese angeblichen „Kunststudenten“ unter großen Kosten aus Israel eingeflogen zu werden pflegten, bei der Landung in den Vereinigten Staaten ein Auto mieteten und dann direkt zum Haus eines US-Regierungsbeamten fuhren, das Haus unter dem Vorwand des Verkaufs von Gemälden betraten – und dann, wenn das vorgetäuschte Verkaufsangebot vorbei war, dabei beobachtet wurden, wie sie das Wohnviertel verließen, ohne an die Tür eines einzigen anderen Einwohners in der Nachbarschaft zu klopfen. In zahlreichen anderen Fällen wurden die Israelis dabei beobachtet, wie sie um geheime Regierungsgebäude herumwanderten oder diese betraten, von denen manche so geheim waren, daß sie aus Landkarten entfernt worden waren, in isolierten Gegenden lagen und sogar ohne Straßenadresse waren – Gebäude, von denen nicht einmal die Einheimischen wußten, daß sie in Wirklichkeit geheime Regierungseinrichtungen waren.

Mr. Cameron zitierte einen höheren Beamten, der sagte: „Beweismaterial, das diese Israelis mit 9/11 in Verbindung bringt, ist als geheim eingestuft. Ich kann Ihnen nichts über Beweismaterial sagen, das gesammelt worden ist. Es ist als geheim eingestufte Information“, und unter Verweis auf das Fehlen jeglicher offizieller öffentlicher Erklärungen zu dieser Geschichte sagte er: „Ermittler in der DEA, in INS und FBI haben alle Fox News gesagt, daß es als Karriereselbstmord betrachtet wird, israelischer Spionage nachzugehen oder sie auch nur anzudeuten.“

Nach einer Beschwerde der proisraelischen Lobbygruppe AIPAC killte das stark jüdische Management bei Fox News die Story, und Besucher auf der Seite von Fox Web erhalten jetzt nur eine Meldung: „Diese Story ist nicht mehr verfügbar“, wenn sie darauf zuzugreifen versuchen. Sie ist gelöscht worden, sogar aus ihren Archiven. Glücklicherweise brachen ein paar mutige Reporter beimSun-Sentinel in Florida und bei der französischen Zeitung Le Monde die Verdunklung dieser Geschichte.

Seit dieser Zeit haben sich Beweise angesammelt, daß einige in Israel vorab wußten, daß die Anschläge stattfinden würden, und nichts taten, um sie zu verhindern oder die amerikanischen Opfer zu warnen. Odigo, eine israelisch-amerikanische Instant-Messaging-Firma, bestätigte, daß zwei israelische Arbeitnehmer Botschaften erhielten, die sie zwei Stunden zuvor vor den unmittelbar bevorstehenden Anschlägen warnten, bevor die Flugzeuge abhoben. Die Firma sagt, daß die Angestellten der Firma erst von den Nachrichten erzählten,nachdem die Anschläge stattfanden, zu welcher Zeit Odigos Reaktion eine Kommunikation mit israelischen Sicherheitsdiensten war. Falls der unbekannte Informant ein Moslem war, warum wurde keiner der Hunderten von Moslems gewarnt, die im World Trade Center arbeiteten? Falls der Informant kein Jude war, warum wurden israelische Arbeitnehmer für den Erhalt der Warnung ausgewählt?

Bei einigen der verhafteten israelischen Spione wurde entdeckt, daß sie den beschuldigten 9/11-Entführern anscheinend dicht gefolgt waren, einschließlich Mohammed Atta. Mehr als ein Drittel der israelischen Agenten operierte in Gemeinden in Florida, wo zehn der neunzehn Entführungsverdächtigen wohnten – und zu fliegen lernten. Fünf israelische Agenten wohnten sogar in derselben Straße wie Atta in Hollywood, Florida – der Stadt, wo Atta und drei andere Terrorverdächtige eine Zeitlang vor den Anschlägen wohnten, was die Vermutung stärkt, daß Israel die 9/11-Verschwörer beschattete und von ihren Aktivitäten und Plänen wußte. Im Wissen um all dies tat Israel nichts, um die Amerikaner vor der unmittelbar bevorstehenden Katastrophe zu warnen, und berechnete möglicherweise den enormen Propagandawert der Anschläge dafür, das amerikanische Rindvieh zu einer Stampede zu bewegen, um die semitischen Feinde der Juden im Nahen Osten abzuschlachten, angefangen mit den Taliban und eskalierend zu einem vage definierten „Krieg gegen den Terror“, wobei als „Terror“ definiert wird, daß man eine Regierung frei von jüdischer Oberaufsicht hat oder will.

Nicht lange nach dem 11. September änderte sich die Einstellung des FBI gegenüber dem größten Spionageskandal seit Jahrzehnten abrupt. Plötzlich waren Enthüllungen über israelische Spionagetätigkeit mehr als nur „Karriereselbstmord“ – sie wurden zu einer Bedrohung für die Kriegspläne der Zionisten im Nahen Osten. Genauso plötzlich waren die Verdächtigen in keiner Gefahr mehr, wegen Spionage angeklagt zu werden, und man sagte uns, daß sie bloß wegen „routinemäßiger“ Regelwidrigkeiten bezüglich Visa und Einwanderung festgehalten würden. Die Gesamtsumme ihrer Bestrafung: sie wurden zurück nach Israel geschickt. Der für diese Entscheidung direkt verantwortliche Mann: Michael Chertoff.

Chertoff hat eine interessante Geschichte – er ist am berühmtesten als George Bushs Chef der „Homeland Security“ – aber wenige wissen, daß er Doppelstaatsbürger von Israel und den Vereinigten Staaten ist und einmal Anwalt von Dr. Magdy Elamir war, einem moslemischen Verdächtigen in einem Geldtransferschwindel um Nuklearmedizin mit direkten Verbindungen zu Al Kaida, und der auch verdächtigt wurde, Terroristen zu finanzieren. Und noch weniger wissen, daß gegen Elamir – Chertoffs ehemaligen Klienten – und seinen Bruder im Jahr 2001 vom US-Justizministerium wegen Terror ermittelt wurde, daß man sie aber davonkommen lassen hat, während Chertoff dort Vize-Justizminister war. Chertoffs Aufgabe nach 9/11 war, die israelische Verwicklung zu vertuschen und so gut wie möglich alle Beweise dafür zu verschleiern. Auf seinen Befehl wurden die Ermittlungen zur Verbindung der Kunststudentenspione zu den Terroranschlägen gestoppt und ihre Anklagen einfach auf „Visaverstöße“ heruntergesetzt, worauf sie einfach nach Israel zurückgeschickt wurden.

Zu einer weiteren und noch verdächtigeren israelische Geheimdienstoperation in Verbindung mit den Ereignissen von 9/11 gehörten die „tanzenden Israelis“ und eine als Fassade dienende „Umzugsfirma“ in israelischem Besitz namens Urban Moving Systems.

Nur ein paar Minuten nachdem das erste Flugzeug im World Trade Center einschlug meldete eine Einwohnerin von New Jersey, daß sie eine Gruppe von Männern mit „nahöstlichem Erscheinungsbild“ sah, die den Anschlag von einem hohen Aussichtspunkt aus beobachteten, lachten, freudig tanzten, sich abklatschten und Feuerzeuge entzündeten, wie es Fans bei Rockkonzerten tun. Einmal wurde gemeldet, daß sie auf ihrem Lastwagen standen, der das Logo von Urban Moving Systems trug. Nachdem sie geschnappt wurden, stellte sich heraus, daß sie alle Israelis waren, die illegal hier arbeiteten, und daß „Urban Moving Systems“ eine Tarnfirma des israelischen Geheimdiensts war, die auch etwa 500.000 Dollar an US-Regierungskrediten für 2001 und nur für 2001 erhalten hatte. Ihr Eigentümer, Dominik Suter, floh sofort nach Israel, und der Inhalt des Dutzends von Festplatten, das in seinem Büro zurückblieb, ist von der Regierung als geheim eingestuft worden.

Diese Männer filmten und fotografierten den Anschlag, und Bilder, die von der Polizei aus ihrer Kamera entnommen wurden – von denen eines einen Verkehrsüberwachungshubschrauber zeigt, dessen Zeitschiene bekannt war – beweist, daß sie ihre Beobachtung innerhalb von Minuten nach dem Einschlag des ersten Flugzeugs begonnen hatten, wenn nicht vorher. Als sie von der Polizei angehalten wurden, nahmen sie sofort an, daß die Anhaltung etwas mit 9/11 zu tun hatte, und äußerten etwas in der Art von „Wir sind Israelis. Wir sind nicht Ihr Problem, die Palästinenser sind Ihr Problem.“ In ihrem Lastwagen waren Karten vom Stadtzentrum von New York City, auf denen bestimmte Gebäude hervorgehoben waren, einschließlich Aussichtspunkten sowohl nördlich als auch südlich der Türme, von denen sowohl der erste als auch der zweite Einschlag am leichtesten beobachtet und dokumentiert werden konnte. Spuren von Sprengstoff wurden in dem Wagen entdeckt. Später wurde ein ähnlicher Transporter voller Sprengstoff angehalten, bevor er sein offenkundiges Ziel, die George Washington Bridge, erreichen konnte, während gleichzeitig ein anonymer Telefonanruf die Polizei auf die Existenz noch eines weißen Transporters aufmerksam machte, wobei dieser unglaublicherweise das Bild eines Flugzeugs auf der Seite aufgemalt hatte, das in die Zwillingstürme kracht. Berichten zufolge war es ein „unschuldiger Umzugstransporter“, der an eine Gruppe „ethnischer Nahostler“ vermietet war.

Kurz danach wurde in Tennessee eine weitere mit Israel in Verbindung stehende Gruppe verhaftet, die dort versuchte, falsche Identitätsausweise gemäß den damals laxen Führerscheingesetzen dieses Bundesstaates zu besorgen, und einer der Gruppe hatte am 5. September ausgestellte Bescheinigungen, die ihm Zugang zu gesperrten Wartungsbereichen des World Trade Center verschafften.

Wiederum wurden unter Michael Chertoffs Aufsicht alle diese geschnappten israelischen Geheimdienstagenten nach Israel entlassen, nachdem sie wegen einfacher Einwanderungsverstöße angeklagt worden waren.

Meine Damen und Herren, wir stehen am Rande eines universalen Krieges. Der uralte Konflikt zwischen den Semiten des Nahen Ostens und den teilweise semitischen Juden wurde am 11.09.2001 in etwas zu uns gebracht, bei dem die Beweise darauf hindeuten, daß es eine Operation war, die geplant wurde, um die Vereinigten Staaten in einen Krieg gegen Israels Feinde zu verwickeln. Der Zweck der Operation war, das amerikanische Volk wütend zu machen, sodaß wir solch einen Krieg unterstützen würden. Dieser Krieg hat sein diesem Datum angedauert und sich gesteigert. Es ist kein Krieg gegen einen bestimmten Staat oder eine bestimmte Nation. Es ist kein Krieg, an dem wir als Volk irgendein Interesse haben. Und es ist nicht wirklich ein Krieg gegen den Terror, obwohl es ein Terrorkriegist. Es ist einfach ein unerklärter Krieg zur Abschlachtung von Israels Feinden, in ziemlich der gleichen Art, wie die Juden die Abschlachtung ihrer Feinde fröhlich in ihrer Thora beschreiben.

Unter der Regie der jüdischen Machtstruktur zerschlugen wir Afghanistan und den Irak und setzten dort Marionettenregierungen ein. Wir taten dasselbe in Libyen und versuchen dasselbe in Syrien. Wir ermorden weiterhin unzählige Tausende mit unseren Drohnen am Himmel über mehreren nicht kriegführenden Nationen. Weil Rußland gegen „unsere“ Kriegspläne ist, ertönt die jüdische Propaganda nun gegen diese Nation, was möglicherweise einen noch tödlicheren Konflikt erahnen läßt.

Dies ist ihr Krieg, nicht unserer. Laßt die jüdischen Vorherrschaftsstreber ihre eigenen Kriege führen und ihre eigenen Grenzen schützen. Richten wir statt dessen unseren Reichtum und unsere Energie und die Leben unserer jungen Männer auf den Schutz unserer eigenen Bollwerke und jener der europäischen Zivilisation selbst, die sehr des Schutzes bedürfen. Richten wir auch unsere Energie darauf, das Verständnis und die Fähigkeit zu gewinnen, um die Fesseln der Erde zu zerreißen und unsere eigene Aufwärtsevolution zu dirigieren. Das sollte unsere Sache sein, nicht zu sterben, damit der reichste Stamm der Welt auf irgendeinem Sand im Nahen Osten herumkommandieren kann, der ihnen von ihrem primitiven, imaginären Wüstengott versprochen wurde. Definiert die Staatsbürgerschaft neu auf rassischer Basis – wie es die Gründerväter taten – und verbannt beide Seiten in diesem Todesspiralenkrieg von unseren Küsten.


Source: As Der Schwerter

Englsh ICH BIN URSULA Ursula’s Message in English


Germany Still Occupied: Ursula Haverbeck Sentenced to Ten Months for Doubting Jewish “Holocaust” Stories

by Michael Walsh and National Vanguard staff

IS THERE neither honor nor a modicum of courage in today’s Germany? What other nation on earth would sentence an 87-year old lady to ten months in prison for expressing an opinion? Today marks Germany’s deepest humiliation.

On Thursday, 12 November 2015, Mrs, Ursula Haverbeck (87) was sentenced to ten months in prison without parole by the magistrate Björn Jonsson (48) at the District Court of Hamburg.

She had expressed publicly, during the so-called “Auschwitz trial” of Lueneburg against Oskar Gröning (94) in the spring of 2015, that she ands many others do not believe in the criminally-defined “historical fact” of the so-called “Holocaust” or in the supposedly “established historical fact” that there had been, in the German concentration camps such as the camp Auschwitz-Birkenau, “gas chambers” for the systematic mass killing of Jews.

In her view, all the scientific evidence speaks against these quasi-legally imposed “obvious facts.”

Mrs Haverbeck does not accept the verdict of the judge and will file an appeal. The verdict against Ms. Haverbeck will therefore not be imposed immediately.

* * *


87-year-old Ursula Haverbeck  (pictured) has been sentenced to imprisonment in Germany for doubting that people were “exterminated” by “gassing” in the Nazi concentration camp in Auschwitz.

The defendant, in good spirits, reiterated her doubts in the courtroom. She arrived without a lawyer, and defended herself. Some fifty of her supporters crowded the courtroom and the hall outside.

She was accused of giving an interview to the German magazine Panorama in which she stated that Auschwitz was not an extermination camp but a labor camp. The mass murder of Jews had not taken place, she said.

unnamed2.jpg.pagespeed.ce.HQKuUsBy4nHaverbeck, former chairwoman of the now-banned freethought association, “Collegium Humanum,” told the judge,”Here, I stand.”

Turning to the prosecutor she asked, “How do you as a lawyer prove the accusation that Auschwitz was an extermination camp?” Her request for a revisionist historian to give evidence that at Auschwitz no one had been gassed, was rejected by Judge Jönsson who stated: “It is futile to argue with people who do not accept the facts.”

The German government prosecutor maintained that the defendant’s “fanatical delusion” had not abated and that, despite her advanced age, Ursula Haverbeck must be sentenced to 10 months in prison without parole. The judge agreed and the sentence was imposed.

In 2009, Haverbeck was fined thousands of dollars in the District Court of Bad Oeynhausen, for having given offense to Charlotte Knobloch, president of the Central Council of Jews.

German Jewess Charlotte Knobloch deeply offended
German Jewess Charlotte Knobloch deeply offended

* * *

Source: Renegade Tribune

FBI: Weiner Sexting Computer Found to Contain Questionable Hillary Clinton Emails


Probe into War Hag’s emails reopened by bureau

THE FBI is now reopening its probe of Hillary Clinton’s emails after discovering more of the Democratic candidate’s emails on the computer of Jewish politician Anthony Weiner (pictured), who is the target of another FBI investigation relating to his illegal “sexting” of a 15-year-old girl.

The FBI is investigating whether there is classified information in new emails uncovered during the sexting investigation of disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner, the estranged husband of one of Hillary Clinton’s closest aides.

FBI Director James Comey told Congress in a letter that the emails prompted investigators to take another look at whether classified information had been mishandled, which had been the focus of its recently closed, criminal probe into Clinton’s use of a private email server. Comey couldn’t guarantee that the latest investigation would be finished before Election Day.

Comey did not provide details about the emails, but a U.S. official told media outlets that the emails emerged through the FBI’s separate sexting probe of Weiner, who is separated from Clinton confidant Huma Abedin. She served as deputy chief of staff at the State Department and is still a key player in Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Federal authorities in New York and North Carolina are investigating online communications between Weiner and a 15-year-old girl. The U.S. official was familiar with the investigation but was not authorized to discuss the matter by name and spoke on condition of anonymity.

The disclosure came less than two weeks before the presidential election and thrust a political liability for Clinton back into the headlines that her campaign thought had been resolved and had begun to recede from the minds of voters. The FBI said in July its investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server was finished.

John Podesta, the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, said Comey should immediately provide more information to voters.

“It is extraordinary that we would see something like this just 11 days out from a presidential election,” Podesta said in a statement. “The director owes it to the American people to immediately provide the full details of what he is now examining.”

Comey stressed in his letter that the FBI could not yet assess “whether or not this material may be significant,” or how long it might take to run down the new investigative leads.

“In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation,” Comey wrote. “I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.”

It was unclear what the emails contained, who sent them, or what connection they might have to the yearlong investigation the FBI closed in July without recommending criminal charges. The FBI probe focused on whether Clinton sent or received classified information using a server in the basement of her New York home, which was not authorized to handle such messages. Abedin was interviewed by the FBI as part of its investigation.

Comey said in July that his agents didn’t find evidence to support a criminal prosecution or direct evidence that Clinton’s private server was hacked.

Podesta said he was confident the new information will not produce any conclusions different from the one the FBI reached in July.

Comey, who has talked often about the FBI’s need to be accountable to the public, promised extraordinary transparency about the investigation and during intervening months has authorized the release of investigative files from the case, which are normally kept confidential.

That stance also left Comey, a career federal prosecutor who has served under both Republican and Democratic administrations, open to criticism from leaders in both parties that he was trying to influence the outcome of the presidential race.

Clinton campaign supporters were already suggesting the FBI director was putting a thumb on the scale. Had he waited until after Nov. 8 to announce the discovery of the new emails, however, Comey would surely have faced criticism for sitting on major news until after the new president had been selected.

State Department spokesman Mark Toner said the department learned about the FBI letter from news reports and did not get any notification from the FBI. Toner pledged the department would “cooperate to the full extent that we can.”

White House spokesman Eric Schultz declined to comment beyond reiterating President Barack Obama’s support for Clinton. …


Speaking to cheering supporters at a rally in New Hampshire, Trump used Comey’s new letter to attack Clinton.

“We must not let her take her criminal scheme into the Oval Office,” said Trump, who has pledged to “lock up” his political rival if elected. “Perhaps finally justice will be done.”

* * *

Source: MovieTVTechGeeks

Huma Tragedy: Whole Bitch is Burning Down

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 30, 2016


This has been the greatest weekend of my life.

The Paki slut Huma is saying she had no knowledge of the emails being on the Jew husband’s jailbait monitor.

CBS News:

In another twist to the investigative saga over Hillary Clinton’s private emails, CBS News has learned that Huma Abedin, a top Clinton aide and longtime confidant, says she has no knowledge of any of her emails being on the electronic device belonging to her estranged husband, disgraced ex-congressman Anthony Weiner.

A source familiar with the investigation told CBS News that the computer where FBI investigators found the latest trove of emails belonged to Weiner, not Abedin. The two separated earlier this year, following news of Weiner’s continued sexting practices.

As of late Saturday, investigators were still trying to obtain a warrant to examine Abedin’s own emails, and no one within the FBI is believed to have actually read them yet.

The emails in question were first discovered after the FBI began their investigation of Weiner, who was placed under scrutiny in September because of a sexting scandal involving a minor.

Earlier this year, Abedin, under oath in a sworn deposition, said she had given up all relevant electronic devices she had used for emails relating to her work at Clinton’s State Department.

An attorney with Judicial Watch, the conservative-leaning watchdog group, asked Abedin during a deposition in June, “How did you go about searching for what records you may have in your possession to be returned to the State Department?”

“I looked for all the devices that may have any of my State Department work on it and returned — returned — gave them to my attorneys for them to review for all relevant documents. And gave them devices and paper,” Abedin said in response.

CBS News reported earlier this week that even Comey’s superior, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who presides over the Justice Department, disagreed with Comey’s decision to inform Congressional leaders about the case’s latest developments.

Lynch’s representatives cited long-standing practices not to comment on ongoing investigations, along with specific DOJ guidance to be particularly cautious of doing so during charged election years.

Comey sent the letter to House and Senate committee leaders despite Lynch’s recommendations.











Seriously though, I am going to restate my belief that Comey acted under pressure from the agents themselves. I don’t know how they were able to exert more pressure on him than Clinton, Obama and Lynch already were, but that has to have been what happened. Or rather, it is the single most likely option.

I also don’t know how much it had to do with the Weiner laptop. I think that is just the out they gave Comey.

Still though.

You gotta give the man credit.

Here’s a real WaPo headline from today.


Compare to a July 6th piece by the WaPo editorial board.


Whatever his reason for doing it: respect.

It probably isn’t a very good reason. But who knows, maybe it is.

Maybe he had a vision from God.


Anyway. I don’t know. Who cares? I don’t care.

By the by, it’s being reported that they had the laptop for two weeks before he announced on Friday.

It isn’t surprising that Huma would have the juiciest documents. I am starting to think that she is basically functioning as Hillary’s handler. She appears to be incredibly intelligent and ambitious for a brown person. And she is always right there, isn’t she?

Trump is pushing for Huma to be dropped, which would presumably cause Hillary to lose it completely. Even if she isn’t her handler, she is at the very least her empowering girlfriend, who is with her through thick and thin, and definitely acting as her “brains” in that she is advising every decision she makes.

Pence is also involved in the “dump Huma” push, calling for her to release the emails herself.

Obviously she’s not going to release the emails, but it’s a very good troll. Because people are led to ask “but why tho?”

Weiner as Jewish Spy Angle

A lot of people have been putting forward the idea that Weiner could have been a Jew-Israeli spy, which is why he would have had the emails on his own laptop. I understand the thinking there, but it seems to me relatively unlikely. Well, it’s unlikely that the reason the emails were on his computer is that he’s a Jewish spy. It might not be unlikely that he’s a Jewish spy, at least in some capacity, but we have no evidence to that effect.

Basically, Hillary was extremely careless with her online security, and the Mossad would have had access to the emails either way. They have access to basically everything already – the only private company that will hack the iPhone is an Israeli company.

It could make sense that Weiner was going through his wife’s email because he’s a weird obsessive Jew. Or it could make sense that she used his computer when they were traveling together for any number of reasons and he just never deleted the emails. Or it could have been her computer that she gave him because his broke. All sorts of things are possible.

The bottom line, however, is that this is basically a hoax anyway.

This is pretty much proved by the fact that they’re claiming they haven’t even seen the emails, as they don’t have a warrant to open them yet.


The Justice Department and FBI officials are working to secure approval that would allow the FBI to conduct a full search of top Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedein’s newly discovered emails, sources familiar with the discussions told CNN.

Government lawyers haven’t yet approached Abedin’s lawyers to seek an agreement to conduct the search. Sources earlier told CNN that those discussions had begun, but the law enforcement officials now say they have not.

Either way, government lawyers plan to seek a search warrant from a judge to conduct the search of the computer, the law enforcement officials said.

The issue is complicated because the computer is considered to belong to Anthony Weiner, her estranged husband, and the case may raise spousal privilege legal protections for Abedin.

Government lawyers hope to secure the warrant to permit investigators to review thousands of emails on a computer Abedin shared with Weiner, officials said.

It’s really, really hard to believe they would drop this bomb just because of “uh well this computer has emails we haven’t read which maybe could possibly pertain to the Clinton investigation, so we’re just gonna like, make sure she loses the election by announcing this right now.”

I don’t think that the Weiner laptop was the real game-changer. I think it’s an excuse to change the game, by people we don’t know for reasons we may never know.

Whatever the case:

Praise Kek.


We have sewn his will into these tubes.

And we shall reap the juicy bounty of an America made great again.

Hail Victory.


People believe wrongly that the “Holocaust” is based on an enormous body of “irrefutable evidence.” Those who deny it happened must be either insane, or nearly insane—and driven by only the foulest of motives. The exact opposite is the case. It is the Holocaust claims which are, in fact, driven by a fanatical Jewish campaign of systematic and wholesale lying—and hardly any evidence at all. What little “evidence” there is turns out to be bogus or totally irrelevant. Holocaust revisionists are the true “whistleblowers” who deserve the greatest respect for what they continue to endure in their pursuit of Truth. America pretends to care about “human rights” but has no problem with the imprisonment of revisionists in Germany and elsewhere, even of revisionists who were in the US seeking political asylum for merely speaking against the most monstrous hoax ever.

What is not addressed in any depth here is the major reason for why people believe in the hoax. My guess is that people believe the hoax because they want to believe. It fills some deep emotional need—perhaps to overcome a sense of inferiority compared to the Germans, or to somehow join the dominant group in society. The exact answer is beyond any understanding of this writer—but it is an enormously important question nonetheless in the same way that one should try to understand why people believe in religion. Holocaust belief is a kind of new religion—as irrational and ridiculous as any other religion but enormously appealing. For those who have not totally lost their minds, the following reasons for rejecting the hoax may have meaning.

1) There are NO autopsy reports of any Nazi gassing victims from any western doctors. Although there were many thousands of corpses available in German concentration camps by the end of the war and although at least 1,000 autopsies were performed, none showed any evidence of death by poison gas or poison. Dr. Charles P. Larson made those autopsies to find proof of gassings but found nothing. No other western doctors ever claimed to have found any forensic medical evidence of gassings either. So, what indicators of gassing were the doctors looking for? Larson gives no answer but the simple fact is that if there had been gassings with carbon monoxide or cyanide, the indications would have been extremely dramatic and readily visible. The corpses would have been bright cherry RED. The Soviets had supposedly performed autopsies (on red corpses from CO) to support their diesel gas van claims at the Kharkov and Krasnodar trials in 1943—but those trials were such obvious shams that almost no one takes them seriously today.

2) Except for two poor quality photographs allegedly taken near Krema 5 at Birkenau (see Pressac), there are NO photographs that are even alleged to be of corpses of Nazi gassing victims from any German concentration camps. Both photographs were obviously retouched and clumsily, especially one naked female in the foreground with flailing arms. They also fail totally to show any signs of hypostasis. Some darker areas should have been evident even in black-and-white photos.

The photographs that are endlessly shown from Belsen, Dachau and elsewhere—and misused deliberately—have nothing to do with gassings. The captions for those photos from any number of news or government sources clearly fail to even claim they are of gassing victims. For nearly everyone else, however, those photos are “undeniable proof that the Holocaust really happened, even with poison gas.” The evidence from trials and confessions is largely unknown by comparison. The deaths shown were caused, in nearly all cases, o-n-l-y by natural causes brought on by the Allied terror bombing and strafing of civilians and civilian targets. One example of the catastrophic Allied bombing was the attack on the electric power station that powered the water supply to Bergen-Belsen shortly before the camp was taken over by the British at the request of the Germans. Without water for drinking or bathing, people suffer terribly and cannot possibly wash lice feces from their bodies either. The ongoing typhus epidemic with its episodes of fevers as high as 105 degrees Fahrenheit was made far worse because of the lack of water to rehydrate victims after their fever episodes. The inevitable dehydration caused, no doubt, many of the deaths. Similar horror pictures of emaciated corpses or sick people can be taken in any hospital anywhere in the USA today—even without the addition of terror bombing. Just remove the pajamas and bedsheets of those who have died. A pile of naked victims of cancer, or AIDS, or hepatitis or any number of other diseases looks no better than a pile from Bergen-Belsen.

Was FDR starved and tortured before he died on April 12, 1945? He died less than one month before the end of the war that he had done so much to bring about. Although his funeral casket was paraded through Washington with a great outpouring of public sorrow, his corpse was totally hidden from view. There are NO pictures of his remains. Why? No doubt his naked remains would NOT have looked any better than any of the corpses at Belsen. FDR could have been tossed into any of the open pits without drawing any attention at all. From the pictures we have of FDR at the Yalta Conference in February of 1945, he was little more than skin and bone already at that time, two months before his actual death. FDR died in America after receiving the best medical care and nutrition available anywhere. Poetic justice? Yes, of course!

3) There are NO German documents to identify any gassing victims. For those who think otherwise, let the USHMM, or the ADL, or anyone else provide such a document.

4) For “overwhelming” Holocaust evidence, what one is given aside from photos of people who died from natural causes is anecdotal rubbish. So-and-so was last seen being sent to the “left,” or “right,” (it doesn’t even matter) usually by Dr. Mengele (with a “conductor’s baton” and wearing a “monocle” according to Elie Wiesel: Night, page 29 in Bantam paperback—just like Erich von Stroheim) and never seen again—but, sometime later (half-an-hour, or so) smoke was seen rising from the chimney of the crematoria just down the road and, therefore, darling so-and-so must have been gassed. That is as good as it gets, folks. An inconvenient fact for the Jewish liars who told such tales is that according to a CIA report,“ The Holocaust Revisited,” Feb 1979, page 11: “Although survivors recalled that smoke and flame emanated continually from the crematoria chimneys and was visible for miles, the photography we examined gave no positive proof of this.”That is an understatement because the CIA had more than fifty high resolution photos from large format negatives taken by US reconnaissance aircraft when gassings were supposedly most frequent, every day during the summer of 1944 (4 April through 13 September 1944). The CIA experts could NOT find the slightest trace of smoke from any crematoria. Clearly, the “eyewitnesses” LIED.

5) There are NO German documents that speak of gassing. For those who think otherwise, let the USHMM, or the ADL, or anyone else provide such a document.

6) Elie Wiesel and many tens of thousands of Jewish “survivors” c-h-o-s-e to leave Auschwitz and go west by January of 1945 with the very same people who had supposedly been murdering them by the thousands every day for years. How is that possible if Auschwitz had been any kind of “extermination camp?”

According to Night, just before Auschwitz was to be “liberated” by the Soviets, both Elie and his father trekked west with the Nazis in a terrible winter on foot by their own choice. They had both chosen, in effect, to c-o-l-l-a-b-o-r-a-t-e with the Nazis and work (no free ride waiting in a Gasthaus) to defend the Reich. Some of Wiesel’s exact words in Night, paperback edition (Bantam Books, 1960) page 78 are:

“The choice was in our hands. For once we could decide our fate for ourselves. We could both stay in the hospital, where I could, thanks to my doctor, get him [the father] entered as a patient or nurse. Or else we could follow the others. ‘Well, what shall we do, father?’ He was silent. ‘Let’s be evacuated with the others,’ I told him.”

7) Claims about how Nazi gas chambers functioned are wild, fantasmagorical speculation based on torture, intimidation and perjury, especially by Jews—and not on any German documents, or scientific evidence, or on any other gassings ever in the entire history of the world. As to the use of torture on German defendants—Rudolf Hoess, former commandant of Auschwitz, who appeared as a “witness” at Nuremberg was definitely “tortured” and his Jewish torturer Bernard Clarke even admitted it later in the book LEGIONS OF DEATH by Rupert Butler, pages 236-38.

8) The most thoroughly stupid gas chamber claims were those that insisted Diesel exhaust was the source of carbon monoxide to murder nearly two million Jews in the so-called Aktion Reinhardt Camps (Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor), and in “gas vans” in Russia. This writer can take credit for the fact that those claims are finally being abandoned (very quietly, of course) by some leading “Holocaust scholars,“ at least in Germany:—Achim Trunk and Peter Witte.

The final straw for the mass murder by diesel HOAX may have been an essay in the Journal of Forensic Science, September 2008 entitled “Diesel Fumes Do Kill.” On page 1206: “Lastly, an extensive literature review produced no scientifically reported cases of fatal CO poisoning attributed to diesel fuel exhaust. …in the medical examiner arena, lethal CO poisoning from inhalation of diesel fumes from any make or model of on-road vehicle is virtually unheard of and contemporary literature foes not report it.” Although the report concludes that the authors had discovered one case of such poisoning, their research was critically flawed by their failure to properly treat the blood chemically to counter the effects of decomposition which had occurred in the corpse. The fact that death from diesel exhaust is possible has never been denied by this author. The report shows, however, that diesel exhaust as a source of lethal concentrations of CO is absurd for exposures of less than several hours. A recent Filing before the US Court of Appeals explains the medical issues on pages 14-20 and 32. It seems the Kentucky court had prior to this ruled wrongly against the trucking firm and the truck manufacturer more out of a desire to protect Kentucky institutions than anything else.


The emerging alternate claim that gasoline exhaust was used instead of diesel exhaust is even more stupid. Deaths from gasoline engine exhaust would have definitely been from carbon monoxide because of the extremely high percentages of CO present before the advent of catalytic converters and environmental concerns. But for the so-called “Holocaust,” the “eyewitnesses” ALL failed to even mention any of the stunningly bright cherry red coloring that appears on nearly all corpses of people who died from carbon monoxide or from cyanide. Were the “eyewitnesses” all color blind? Of course, not. They simply lied—ALL of them!

There is one important exception, however, and that is a Dr. Theodore Friedrich Leidig of the Kriminal Technisches Insititut (KTI) who supposedly claimed to have seen an experimental gassing of Russian POWs in a gas van at Sachsenhausen resulting in red corpses. Such a story would have also been perfectly consistent with earlier Soviet claims made in 1943 during the Kharkov and Krasnodar show trials (with red corpses from CO) about homicidal gas vans but with diesel engines. By the end of the war, the Soviets had simply moved their homicidal gas van hoax to Germany itself. Leidig was smart enough to know, apparently, that any competent forensic doctor could not possibly be so stupid as to claim such corpses (from gasoline engine exhaust) were anything but red. No doubt, there were some accidental gassings from the widespread use of producer gas vehicles (18% to 35% CO) throughout the war and that is what probably was involved here—if there is any truth to Leidig’s claims at all and nothing more sinister than that. A forensic pathologist like Leidig would have been expected to determine the cause of death precisely. After the war, such incidents were so useful for supporting the hoax and Soviet propaganda, especially in connection with Sachsenhausen which was under Soviet occupation in East Germany. Why would the Soviets change their story about how the Nazis committed mass murder? It had worked so well for them before. Just drive the same message with some “evidence” from Leidig. The Sachsenhausen gassing van claim was essentially the same Soviet claim as had been made by the Soviets in 1943.

9) The numbers of “Holocaust survivors” are enormous—even today. The numbers are well into the hundreds of thousands even sixty years after the war. In 2003 an Israeli demographer, Sergio Della Pergola, stated in an official Israeli report that there were 1.092,000 Jewish Holocaust survivors alive in the world in 2003. Those huge numbers imply that there were many millions of Jewish “Holocaust survivors” alive at the very end of the war. Moreover, many YouTube videos from “survivors” give personal details about how fiendish Nazis kept multitudes of Jews alive for many months, even years inspite of a supposed policy of extermination. Why would the Nazis have done that if they were trying to “exterminate” the Jews? Did they want hundreds of thousands of Jewish “eyewitnesses” to help hang them after the war? The alleged crematoria-gas chambers at Birkenau, for example, were in full, open view of nearly every inmate there. Why even bother with concentration camps if the goal is to exterminate people?

10) The “six million” number itself is pure Jewish mythology—with a life entirely of its own. The number had been used repeatedly long before Hitler. Read the research from Eric Hunt and Don Heddesheimer. The magic number had been used repeatedly already in the nineteenth century—as early as October 31, 1869—as a metaphor for perceived or future persecution of Jews by the Czar, or whomever.

11) Carbon Monoxide was used throughout German-occupied Europe as an inexpensive, alternative fuel (Holzgas or Generatorgas–“Producer Gas” in English) to drive more than 500,000 motor vehicles. It was made from woodchips and scrap wood, dead branches, twigs, etc. (available almost everywhere including the remotest backwoods of eastern Poland) by burning the wood with a restricted air supply in special gas generators, usually mounted at the backs of trucks and buses. The performance was terrible but at least the vehicles could function—and the cost of the fuel was minimal. The concentration of CO produced in this way varied from 18% to 35% and was extremely lethal. It was also flammable, even explosive. Its use required careful training and licensing and safety precautions by the drivers of all such vehicles. The gas would have also been ideal for mass murder since it was far more deadly than gasoline engine exhaust (only 7%–12% CO). Ironically, this technology has never been implicated in any of the Holocaust gassing scenarios anywhere. Any danger of explosion in a likely homicidal gas chamber would have been easily eliminated by simply running water through the shower nozzles which the gas chambers also contained, supposedly.

Given the desperate shortages of fuel and raw materials throughout the war, especially in German-occupied Europe, the use of diesel or gasoline engines as a source of carbon monoxide should be seen as one of the dumbest ideas imaginable. No doubt, people do dumb things but surely after a few gassings with engine exhaust, someone would have tried to find something better. The diesel engines even had trouble starting, according to Kurt Gerstein, and that supposedly influenced Rudolf Hoess to use Zyklon-B instead in Auschwitz. Well, why use an engine in the first place when the fuel everyone was urged and eventually even required to use by law as an alternative to gasoline or diesel fuel was itself far more toxic—and as cheap as dirt? Why, indeed? If the engine exhaust for mass murder claims persist, one should also condemn the Nazis for being the most technically ignorant mass murderers in all of human history. Can anyone who knows the facts about what was happening in technology during the war, really believe the Germans were that dumb? Are historians capable of recognizing the inherent technical absurdity of the gassing claims, especially for the so-called Aktion Reinhardt camps? Probably not!

12) Cyanide gas from Zyklon-B was used ONLY to keep people alive. It had been used worldwide, even in the US in New York City of all places, since the 1920’s to fumigate ships, railroad cars, buildings and everything that might be harboring dangerous pests such as rats and lice. Its lifesaving use in German concentration camps such as Auschwtz was and still is marked by the brilliant Prussian Blue staining of the brick walls near to where it was used—even on the exteriors of the exterior brick walls which have been subject to more than half a century of weathering. But, but, but—where people were supposedly gassed to death by the thousands with the same substance every day, there is NO trace of blue staining at all.

Cyanide escapes from Zyklon-B granules s-l-o-w-l-y unless the gas is forced out, preferably with warm air. Zyklon-B was made to work that way. Since no such forcing of cyanide is even alleged, (the fans were supposedly turned ON o-n-l-y after the victims were all dead) the ONLY way that anything like the mass execution times of as few as three minutes could possibly have occurred (Vrba-Wetzler Report of 1944) would have been by using enormous amounts of Zyklon-B, at least ten times more than the amounts needed to simply kill the victims over several hours. Such huge quantities of Zyklon-B would have given at least as much opportunity for cyanide to penetrate the surrounding stucco-covered brick walls as at the delousing stations. For people familiar with Zyklon-B and how it was actually used, the solution to the dilemma would have been obvious. Simply insert a mesh basket with Zyklon-B granules almost anywhere into the warm air ductwork which the mortuaries all had–and turn ON the blowers to force warm air through the granules and through the mortuaries during the actual mass execution. That is how standard DEGESCH Zyklon-B fumigation chambers worked in Dachau and in hundreds of locations throughout German-occupied Europe. In this way, at least 90% of the Zyklon-B would have also been saved—and the deadly cyanide gas would have been dispersed quickly to all parts of the gas chambers. Pockets of cyanide-free air where victims might crouch to escape the deadly gas would have been impossible. The hoax defenders are trapped by the fact that all of the self-described “eyewitnesses” claimed the fans were turned ON only a-f-t-e-r everyone was dead. The “eyewitnesses” obviously LIED and the Zyklon-B gassing stories are rubbish!

13) The use of crematoria in German concentration camps is portrayed as shameful, even criminal, when, in reality, it is no more deplorable than the use of crematoria anywhere in the USA today. From page 78 of the linked source, left: “The average time for a cremation cycle of newer retorts is around 2 h or less, not counting the preheating of the chamber or the cooldown.”Cremation is, in fact, the recommended way to dispose of corpses generally to prevent the spread of many contagious diseases through ground water. If the purpose had been to merely dispose of evidence of mass murder, cremation makes no sense at all since one of the main purposes of cremation is to r-e-c-o-v-e-r at least a small portion of cremains to be returned to family members in urns. For disposal of bodies without any recognizable cremains, i-n-c-i-n-e–r-a-t-i-o-n as applied to ordinary garbage is far more effective since any human cremains will be thoroughly mixed with other waste. The fuel required is also far less. In Auschwitz-Birkenau, for example, large incinerator ovens were located in the crematory buildings also but it has never even been alleged that those ovens were ever used to incinerate corpses. Cremation was also used on Ellis Island and delousing chambers were used on nearby Hoffman Island.

14) Large Zyklon-B gas chambers for fumigating entire railroad trains, several railroad cars at a time, were strategically located in eastern Europe. Some known locations are Posen and Budapest, More than likely, Auschwitz-Birkenau also had such a gas chamber for railroad cars but there is no known proof of this yet. In any event, all such gas chambers would have been ideal for mass extermination. Intended victims trapped inside cattle cars could have easily been pulled into such chambers. The railroad cars after gassing could have been removed with corpses and disposed of in any number of ways later on. But, although such a technology would have been obvious to anyone familiar with Zyklon-B and how it had historically been used worldwide to fumigate hundreds of thousands of railroad cars, even in the USA—it has never been implicated anywhere in the Holocaust mythology. How could the fiendish Nazis not have thought of applying this superb technology?


Carbon monoxide was supposedly used to murder two million Jews in Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor and elsewhere—more than twice as many as were supposedly killed with cyanide from Zyklon-B. So, where were the piles or pits of bright Cherry RED corpses? Corpses of CO poisoning are well known to be bright Cherry RED with only rare exceptions. But the supposed “eyewitnesses” never, ever, even mentioned such unforgettable spectacles. On the contrary, they insisted that the bodies were either “blue” (Kurt Gerstein, for example) or “unremarkable.”

The image above is probably the best of many available today showing what corpses from cyanide and carbon monoxide poisoning look like. This stunning image is from the Textbook of Maritime Medicine. “Fig. 10.9.2:Bright red lividity on the dorsal side of the body as the expression of lethal carbon monoxide poisoning. Livor mortis is bright red in cases of carbon monoxide or hydrocyanide poisoning (or in cases where the corpse is kept in cold storage). Carbon monoxide is a colourless and odourless gas that arises, for example, from incomplete fuel combustion. Thus it is always necessary – primarily for self-protection – to consider or exclude carbon monoxide poisoning, particularly when bodies with bright red lividity are found in engine rooms, after engine room fires (automatic carbon dioxide fire extinguishing system!) or in boiler houses.” 

Piles of corpses have been misused to condemn Germany—but, it has NEVER been claimed in any western trials that any of the corpses were RED in color. So, what about all those “eyewitnesses” to alleged mass gassings of millions of Jews with carbon monoxide (from diesel or gasoline engines) in the Aktion Reinhardt camps (Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor) and even Chelmno? What about those piles, even mountains, of naked corpses that countless people were supposedly able to see? Wouldn’t the “eyewitnesses” have noticed that spectacular coloring? Of course, they would have been stunned. They would have remembered it years later for any of the countless, anti-Nazi war crimes trials if they were not simply lying. What they “remembered” at best were simply the black-and-white photographs that we are all programmed to remember. Readers should confirm for themselves the dramatic coloring by Google-searching on the internet for “images” linked to “cherry red lividity.”Were all of the “eyewitnesses” color-blind? Of course, not! They were simply telling whatever came into their heads, even the clumsiest of lies, to support the hoax and completely exonerate themselves, if possible. They knew what was expected of them. Although the reference materials of that era made it clear (text without color photos) that corpses from cyanide or carbon monoxide poisoning would be “cherry red,” that had no effect in the countless, farcical trials of NS era defendants. What mattered was that the hoax be embedded on paper and that the Germans as a people be guilty forever. It was like “original sin”with an anti-German twist. Nonetheless, those clumsy lies also carried within them the time bombs for the hoax’s total destruction today.

Read more at:

Ingrid Jaradat: Israeli Politics on Jerusalem

30 SEP
11:09 PM

Ingrid Jaradat, a lobbyist and expert on Jerusalem affairs discusses, with the Alternative Information Center (AIC), Israeli politics on Jerusalem and the problem of a lack of specific solidarity strategies regarding the city.

Jaradat, who is a former director of Badil, a civil society organization working on Palestinian residency rights, states that it is not enough to speak about occupation and settlements in general because, “in the wider public perception, Jerusalem has a separate agenda.”

Speaking about the Palestinian population in Jerusalem Jaradat says that its daily concern is about protecting its existence, as East Jerusalem has been transformed by military occupation, and is losing its Arab characteristics.

The Palestinian population is confined to live in enclaves.

Jaradat also speaks with AIC about Palestinian resistance: “The main form of resistance is the routine, a silent attempt to stay in Jerusalem,” she says as she called for solidarity activities relevant to Jerusalem and the lives of its Palestinian residents.

“We don’t lack opportunities and targets in Jerusalem,” she concludes.

Edited for American English by

At AIC official: “Shimon Peres, As He Was”

Illegal Israeli Colonists Cut Palestinian Olive Trees In Bethlehem

29 OCT
1:51 PM

A group of extremist Israeli colonists invaded, earlier Saturday, a Palestinian olive orchard in Wad al-Harayeq area, south of Nahhalin town, west of Bethlehem, and cut more than 18 large olive trees.

The assailants apparently tried to cut more trees, but a fence that was around large areas of the orchard foiled their attempts.

Journalist Hani Fannoun told the Maan News Agency that the lands, owned by his family, are located close to the Gush Etzion settlement block, especially Beit Ayin colonialist outpost.

Fannoun added that the orchard, and the lands around it, were illegally confiscated by Israel, but the family managed to regain control over their orchards more than twenty years ago, after heading to the Israeli Supreme Court.

Fannoun also stated that the land in question is more than ten Dunams (2.47 Acres), and that the lands around it have been illegally confiscated by Israel and became part of Israeli colonies in the area.

It is worth mentioning that various orchards in the area have been subject to frequent similar attacks by groups of extremist Israeli colonizers, especially before and during the olive harvest season.

Palestine: Historical background

Image: Copyright : Rostislav Ageev

Historical Background

Source: Lest we forget

Palestine dates back to about 3000 BC, and for 1900 years (between 3000-1100 B.C.) it was the land of the Canaanites. Throughout this period, the Egyptians occupied it until 1200 BC when the Philistines took it over. They were followed by the Israelites (1000-923BC: 77 years), the Phoenicians (923-700BC), the Assyrians (700-612BC), the Babylonians (until 539BC), the Persians (until 332BC), the Macedonians (until 63BC), the Romans (until 636AD), the Arabs (636-1200: 564 years), the Crusaders (1099-1291), the Ayubiyyin (1187-1253), The Memluks (1253-1516) followed by the Ottoman rulers (400 years) until 1917 (the year of the Balfour Declaration). The British Mandate took over in 1919 and officially took effect in 1922.

It is clear from this chronology that the Jewish Kingdom was only one many which settled in the land of Palestine. The country became predominantly an Arab (and Islamic) country towards the end of the 7th Century. In 1516, it became a province of the Ottoman Empire with a rich mix of Arab (Muslim and Christian) and Jewish cultures; these people believed themselves to belong to a land called Palestine.

It is worth noting that, according to Illene Beatty, a well-known archaeologist, “the extended kingdoms of David and Solomon, on which the Zionists base their demands, endured for only about 73 years…then it fell apart…Even if we allow independence to the entire life of the ancient Jewish kingdoms, from David’s conquest of Canaan in 1000 B.C. to the wiping out of Judah in 586 B.C., we arrive at [only] a 414-year Jewish rule”.

When empires eventually disappeared, sovereignty became the natural aim of the indigenous people of the land. Where colonialism refused to let go, national wars of liberation took hold until independence was achieved. In places where the population, through brute force, was annihilated or ethnically cleansed by the occupying communities, the latter became the new nation states (as did happen in the Americas and elsewhere).

In the Middle East, after WW1, the victorious Allies divided the region between the French and the British. These mandated states, under the guidance of the League of Nations, eventually evolved into nation states as their Mandate periods came to an end.

Except, of course, for Palestine.

Modern Palestinians descended from sundry invading peoples; Canaanites, Edomites, Eremites, Moabites, Assyrians, Egyptians, Philistines, Hebrews, Greeks, Romans, Arabs, Europeans, Turks.
As for the  Biblical allusions to the kingdoms of Saul, David  and Solomon , in archaeological circles there is an ongoing controversy about whether Biblical texts can be equated to history. It is widely accepted that the Bible originated in the 7th Century BCE, 300 years after David and other historical aberrations encompass the palaces officially ascribed to Solomon in Megiddo which are dated long after Solomon’s time.
“There is no evidence of a United Monarchy no evidence of a capital in Jerusalem or of any coherent, unified political force that dominated western Palestine, let alone an empire of the size the legends describe. We do not have evidence for the existence of kings named Saul, David or Solomon; nor do we have evidence for any temple at Jerusalem in this early period. What we do know of Israel and Judah of the tenth century does not allow us to interpret this lack of evidence as a gap in our knowledge and information about the past, a result merely of the accidental nature of archeology. There is neither room nor context, no artifact or archive that points to such historical realities in Palestine’s tenth century. One cannot speak historically of a state without a population. Nor can one speak of a capital without a town. Stories are not enough.” The Bible in History: How Writers Create a Past, Thomas L Thompson
Furthermore, Israel scholar, professor Shlomo Sand has challenged the zionists claim to the ‘land of Israel’ and  called to question that there was  a historic Exodus.
“Shlomo Sand’s recent book The Invention of the Jewish People is just such a study. The book’s thesis is that the obsessively held Zionist/Israeli notion of the Jews as an ethnically identifiable people existing since biblical times and having their origins in the ancient land of ancient Israel is unsupportable. ” Lawrence Davidson.



The external perception of why this happened to Palestine differs greatly from the internal perception of the Palestinians themselves.

‘Britain to blame for Israeli-Palestinian conflict’ – George Galloway

Pro-Palestinian activists held banners and denounced Israeli aggression, following violent clashes and attacks by Israel Defense Forces on Palestinian civilians. According to former MP and current Respect Party leader George Galloway, “Britain is the cause of all this disaster”

Rt. US Army Colonel: US aid to Israel is for killing Palestinians

Former US army colonel and diplomat calls $38B in aid to Israel over the next 10 years ‘outrageous’

Ann Wright, member of the crew of Amal-Hope and Zaytouna-Oliva, with only female activists on board, poses before set off for the Gaza Strip from the port of Barcelona under the banner

Ann Wright, member of the crew of Amal-Hope and Zaytouna-Oliva, with only female activists on board, poses before set off for the Gaza Strip from the port of Barcelona under the banner “The Women’s Boat to Gaza” to break the Israeli blockade on Gaza on September 14, 2016 in Barcelona, Spain. ( Albert Llop – Anadolu Agency )

Ann Wright, an American activist who was arrested earlier this month among 13 women activists sailing to Gaza to protest Israel’s blockade of the Gaza Strip, slammed Washington’s military aid to Israel in an interview with Anadolu Agency on Saturday.

“It is outrageous that the US government has decided that over the next 10 years we will be giving $38 billion to the state of Israel,” said Wright, a retired US army colonel, former diplomat, and human rights activist.

She was on the Zaytouna-Oliva, the Women’s Boat to Gaza which sailed from Barcelona, Spain on September 15, attempting to break Israel’s nine-year naval blockade of Gaza.

Saying that the Israeli military is already well funded and the country has a dynamic economy, Wright argued: “The United States is giving money to Israel for the specific purpose of killing Palestinians because that is essentially what the Israeli military does.”

She added that the Israeli military is using Gaza as a staging ground for military exercises.

Spotlight on ‘horrific’ blockade

The boat trip organised by Freedom Flotilla Coalition, an umbrella group organising humanitarian trips to Gaza, was carrying food, medicine, and other humanitarian aid for the people of Gaza when it was intercepted and seized on October 5 by the Israeli Navy.

The Israeli military towed the boat to the port of Ashdod and detained the women for up to four days before deporting them.

Wright said the Freedom Flotilla Coalition has organised several flotilla trips to Gaza to protest the Israeli blockade since 2008, but this time they wanted just women to take part in the trip to attract more international attention.

“The whole point was to bring media attention to the fact that the Israeli government still has this horrific blockade on Gaza,” she said.

Despite the media attention showered on the Zaytouna-Oliva, the American media was “singularly not interested” in their effort because American “media sponsors did not want them to cover anything negative about Israel,” she lamented.

Recalling Israeli commandos’ 2010 raid on the Mavi Marmara aid ship, killing 10 Turkish activists, Wright said that they were wondering how the Israeli military would respond to a boat with just women on board.

She said that it was a female Israeli sailor who first get on their boat and took control of it.

The sailors had neither combat gear nor guns, she added.

Seized in ‘international waters’

According to Wright, when it was seized, their boat was in international waters, 34 miles from the shores of Gaza and 14 miles from Israel’s self-declared security zone.

The activists were sentenced to a 10-year ban from entering Israel, Wright said, but added that she had no interest in travelling to Israel.

Wright said that the US government is also tracking her activities due to her views on Washington’s policies on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as well as US military activities across the globe.

“We call on the US government to end its support for the criminal policies of the state of Israel,” she said.


Asia & AmericasIsraelMiddle EastNewsPalestineUS

Standing Rock tribe protests over North Dakota pipeline Clashes erupt as police break up protest camp in the path of pipeline construction that threatens sacred land.

| 29 Oct 2016 12:18 GMT | US & Canada, United States

Cannon Ball, United States – Thousands of Native Americans have been camping out in North Dakota since April to protest against a pipeline that is meant to cross sacred burial grounds and the Missouri river – the main water source for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.

Last week, some protesters moved their camp directly in the path of the proposed pipeline as construction nears the river, but on Thursday morning, police descended on the camp with a show of force not yet seen in the months of peaceful protests.

Clad in riot gear and backed by armoured vehicles, the police cleared the protest camp, using sound cannons, pepper spray, taser guns, and shotguns said to contain beanbags against the protesters.


More than 100 people were arrested, including elders praying peacefully in the roadway, according to the Morton County Sheriff Department.

The department said a protester fired three shots at police, but Al Jazeera could not independently verify this allegation.

Some protesters shouted at police, built and lit fire to barricades, and a few threw water bottles and logs at the officers as tensions rose, but most remained nonviolent as protest leaders urged colleagues to fall back from the superior government force.

Police continued to march south into the night, blocked only by a burning barricade set up by protesters as dusk fell.


UN Warns US-Saudi War Threatens Mass Starvation in Yemen


United Nations aid agencies warned Friday that Yemen, after 18 months of savage bombardment in a US-backed war waged by Saudi Arabia and its fellow oil monarchies, is facing a catastrophic crisis threatening mass starvation.

More than 10,000 people have been killed since the Saudi regime began its bombing campaign in March 2015. Millions more have been displaced, and urban areas and essential infrastructure have been reduced to rubble.

According to statements issued by UN agencies, over 14 million Yemenis, more than half the population, is now living in hunger, while 7 million are on the verge of starvation.

In a press briefing in Geneva Friday, the UN children’s agency UNICEF said that at least 370,000 children are at risk of severe malnutrition, and without urgent treatment will die. Fully 1.5 million children are malnourished.

Aya, 2 years old, in Hodeidah main hospital being checked against acute malnutrition [Photo: WFP/Abeer Etefa]

The World Food Program (WFP) reported that almost half the children of Yemen are already suffering irreversibly stunted growth due to malnutrition. “An entire generation could be crippled by hunger,” said the WFP’s Yemen director, Torben Due.

The UN agency found that at least 10 of the country’s 21 governorates are on the brink of famine.

“It is really a dire situation on the ground. When you see mothers who have little to eat themselves and they see their children slipping away, it just breaks your heart,” said WFP spokeswoman Bettina Luescher. “It really is shocking and horrible to see this in the 21st century.”

The threat of mass starvation is compounded by a rapidly spreading cholera epidemic, which has recorded 1,410 cases in just the three weeks since the outbreak was first detected.

This human tragedy is not merely the byproduct of a war waged by the wealthy and parasitical Gulf monarchies, backed by Washington, against the poorest nation in the Arab world. Rather, it is this war’s intended effect.

The supposed aim of this war is to reinstate what is routinely referred to as the “internationally recognized government” of President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi, a stooge of Saudi Arabia who was placed in power through a 2012 election in which he was the sole candidate. He was supposed to step down in two years, but unilaterally extended his term and then, amid charges of wholesale corruption, was forced to flee the country after the Houthi rebels, based in the north and supported by elements of the military, took over the capital of Sana’a.

The Saudi regime, fearing any opposition in the region, refused to accept the rise of the Houthis, a political movement based on the Zaidi Shia group, which has enjoyed limited support from Iran.

In addition to a murderous bombing campaign that has targeted schools, hospitals, residential neighborhoods and factories, the Saudi-led coalition of Gulf sheikdoms, backed by the US Navy, has also imposed a sea blockade that has choked off the impoverished country’s supplies of food and medicine. Before the war, Yemen imported 90 percent of its food. The blockade has sent the price of food and other basic necessities soaring out of reach of much of the population.

There is also mounting evidence that air strikes have been deliberately targeted at destroying the country’s ability to provide its own food. The British daily Independent cited a study by London School of Economics researchers who documented “357 bombing targets in the country’s 20 provinces, including farms, animals, water infrastructure, food stores, agricultural banks, markets and food trucks.” Their conclusion: “…the Saudis are deliberately striking at agricultural infrastructure in order to destroy the civil society.”

Agriculture is a major sector of the national economy of Yemen [Photo: WFP/Abeer Etefa]

In other words, with the aid of US imperialism, Saudi Arabia and its allies are attempting to starve an entire population into submission in what constitutes one of the great war crimes of the 21st century.

The UN reports came just days after Reuters photos from a Yemeni hospital of a starving 18-year-old girl, literally reduced to skin and bones, gained some international attention.

The photographs recall nothing so much as the horrific images that came out of Biafra in the late 1960s, when the Nigerian government waged a genocidal war to suppress the secessionist territory. That attempt to starve a people into submission is credited with spawning the modern-day “human rights” movement, with its plethora of NGOs and its overriding imperialist hypocrisy.

There is no such international reaction to the crimes carried out against the people of Yemen, however, which are largely ignored by the Western media and supported by the ruling parties not only in Washington but also the United Kingdom and all the other imperialist powers.

The media and the UN agencies have euphemistically referred to the slaughter being inflicted upon the Yemenis by the Saudi monarchy and the Pentagon as “the forgotten war.” In reality, the immense human suffering inflicted by this war of aggression has not been forgotten, it has been deliberately blacked out by those in Washington and Riyadh who are determined to deepen it to the point of mass murder in order to achieve their strategic objectives.

Samantha Power, the US ambassador to the United Nations, who made a lucrative career posturing as a human rights champion, was one of the leading proponents within the Obama administration for US support for the war against the people of Yemen. She has also been one of the principal defenders of the Saudi regime within the United Nations, which on Friday re-elected the blood-soaked monarchy to its human rights council.

Power, who has led the demonization of Russia over alleged war crimes in Aleppo, has, for obvious reason, shown no such sympathy for those dying from starvation and US bombs in Yemen.

Since the beginning of the war, the Pentagon has provided logistical and intelligence support, including the aerial refueling of warplanes, without which the Saudi bombing campaign would be impossible. Moreover, the US has poured a whopping $115 billion in arms into the kingdom since Obama took office, resupplying bombs and missiles dropped on Yemeni homes, schools and hospitals.

Following an October 8 Saudi bombing of a funeral, killing over 140 people, the Obama administration and the Pentagon issued hollow statements about US support to Riyadh not being a “blank check” and Washington’s military backing being reevaluated “so as to better align with US principles, values and interests.”

Within days, however, a spokesman for the US Central Command told reporters that nothing had changed, and that the US was continuing to provide aerial refueling of Saudi warplanes so that they could strike their targets in Yemen. Then on October 12, the US Navy fired Tomahawk cruise missiles at Yemeni installations in retaliation for what it claimed were failed missile attacks on a US warship.

Earlier this week, US Central Command Chief General Joseph Votel flew to Riyadh for talks with Saudi officials, including the regime’s defense minister, Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Votel told reporters that he wanted to “hear Saudi concerns” and that it was “important to maintain confidence in the relationship.”

The threat of the war in Yemen not only continuing, but seeing a more direct US military escalation is likely to intensify in the aftermath of the US presidential election.

Michael Morell, the former acting director of the CIA and key adviser to Hillary Clinton’s campaign, spoke on Tuesday before the Center for American Progress, the think tank founded by the Clinton campaign chairman, John Podesta, calling for a more aggressive US policy to punish Iran for its “malign behavior in the region.”

Morell, who has previously advocated bombing Syrian government positions and carrying out military actions to “make Russia pay a price” for its presence in that country, claimed that Iran is shipping arms to the Houthis in Yemen. He said he would support “having the US Navy boarding their ships and if there are weapons on them to turn those ships around.”

In other words, the preparations are being made for a far wider US war in the region, with the threat that it will spill over into a global conflict.

‘Saudi Arabia one of top repressive countries’: What’s behind US special ties with Riyadh?

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks with Saudi Arabia's King Salman © Kevin Lamarque
Saudi Arabia has become by far the number one purchaser of US weapons, with $115 billion deals under the Obama administration alone. Congress has just rubber-stamped every single one, says author and activist Medea Benjamin.

Chris Hedges discussed US-Saudi relations with Medea Benjamin.

Saudi Arabia carried out 158 executions, 63 for non-violent drug crimes last year, often through public beheadings. Early this year, it executed 47 men for terrorism-related offenses, including the prominent Shia cleric Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr. It practices gender apartheid against women, who are not allowed to drive, are banned from most jobs, and are controlled by male guardians. It prohibits freedom of expression, including freedom of religion. Homosexuals can be put to death.

It promotes a fundamentalist form of Sunni Islam throughout the Muslim world known as Wahhabism, which sanctifies violence against those considered infidels or apostates, including Sufis and Shiites. The autocratic Saudi royal family, whose wealth is estimated at 1.4 trillion dollars, lives in unimaginable extravagance, and often decadence. Yet Saudi Arabia is considered one of the US’ closest allies in the Middle East.

RT: Let’s talk about this special relationship with Saudi Arabia, especially in light of the fact, as you point out in the book, the US now takes only 13 percent of Saudi oil…

Medea Benjamin: Yes, certainly the relationship was started out on the basis of oil when the Saudi Kingdom was first established in 1932, then oil was discovered in the 1930s, and then for 12 different administrations, Republican and Democrat, a close relationship with the Saudis based on oil. But as the years went by, the US produced more of its own oil, imported more from Canada, and so oil is not as important as it was. The US wants to be able to control where that oil goes to other countries. But the relationship has really started to shift in terms of what is the big focus, and I think the big focus is now that they have become the number one purchaser of US weapons by far. $115 billion over the last eight years – that is just under the Obama administration alone. It is a staggering sum, and it is amazing that it has been 43 different deals just under the Obama administration, and Congress has just rubber-stamped every single one.

READ MORE: At least 60 killed by Saudi-led coalition airstrike at Yemeni prison

RT: What about Saudi society? Give us a profile what Saudi Arabia is like.

MB: One of the most repressive countries in the world, where there is no freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, no political parties, no unions allowed, where dissent  is treated as treason. You can be beheaded for insulting Islam, for insulting the King, for spreading atheism, for being convicted of being a homosexual, for sorcery. There is discrimination against entire groups of people like women who are not only forced to fully cover in public, it is the only country where women aren’t allowed to drive. A guardianship system where women have to have a male legal guardian from the day they’re born to the day they die. It is the most sex-segregated society in the world. Immigrant population, which is huge – of a 30 million population, 10 million are migrant workers, many of whom are coming from some of the poorest countries in the world and are treated like indentured servants.

READ MORE: UNHRC vote on Russia out, Saudi Arabia in — ‘shocking and shameful’

RT: Let’s talk about how they are treated.

MB: First, let’s say slavery was only eliminated in 1962 in Saudi Arabia, and with this huge oil money that has flooded the country, many people, including middle-class Saudis, have used the money to bring in foreign workers and it is a sponsorship program. You can’t just say: “I’m from the poor country in Bangladesh, I am going to go try my luck in Saudi Arabia.”. You have to have a sponsor, and the sponsor then becomes like your owner – you couldn’t even leave the country if you don’t get permission from your employer. And you’re treated like an indentured servant. You have no redress, you have no ability to fight back, the only thing you can do is try to contact your embassy, and good luck if they’re going to come to your town…

How many innocent people in have to die before US cuts weapons sales to ??? Collaboration w must end!

RT: Let’s talk about Yemen. Saudi Arabia has sealed off the country, they are using cluster bombs, they are attacking power plants, water purification plants, schools, factories that make potato chips, health clinics, they have just bombed a mourning hall. What are they doing there?

MB: They took the country that was already one of the poorest in the Arab world and they have turned it into a catastrophic situation. We count the 10,000 plus people who have died but it is way more than that if you look at people who have died because they can’t get food and they can’t get medicine. And 80 percent of the population now is depending on humanitarian aid, they import most of their food and they can’t get it in. There is a blockade that the Saudis are imposing, so this is just a catastrophic situation.

RT: What is this relentless bombing campaign of Yemen about?

MB: It’s all about their nemesis with the Iranians and their fear that the tribal group, Houthis, that is closer to the Shia, they fear that this will give the Iranians a inroad on their border, and this is all about fighting Iran through a proxy war with US weapons, with US logistical support, with US refueling their planes in the air, with US intelligence and with US diplomatic cover.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Fall of ISIS in Mosul may push terrorists to launch attacks in Europe – German spy chief

German police © Fabrizio Bensch
The defeat of Islamic State militants in their Iraqi stronghold Mosul may spark terrorist attacks across Europe, the head of the German Federal Office for Protection of the Constitution (BfV), Hans-Georg Maassen, has said.

Speaking to German media outlet Deutschlandfunk, Maassen acknowledged that the jihadists “possibly stand with their backs to the wall” and can “effectively face defeat” in the Iraqi city, adding that the BfV is “closely watching the situation in Mosul.”

The Iraqi Army and allied militias backed by the US-led coalition launched an operation to retake the country’s second-largest city on October 17.

“That is good. But this can lead to the consequence that this situation may alert its [IS] supporters in Europe, that it can lead to violent attacks,” the BfV chief warned.

He added though that security services in Germany are preparing for such an event. “This is what we want to prevent and we also adjust ourselves accordingly, so that it can be avoided.” Maassen did not name any imminent threat facing Germany.

Yet according to the intelligence chief, the BfV should prepare itself for “different scenarios,” including cases when well trained fighters [who could] simultaneously stage suicide attacks or terrorist acts with Kalashnikov assault rifles.” This was the case during IS-inspired terrorist assaults in Paris in November 2015 as well as suicide bombings in Brussels airport and metro station in March this year.

“And then we have the case of a lone wolf who is not really a lone wolf because, as we have now encountered in a number of cases, these people are being radicalized and led via instant messenger service, via the internet,” Maassen said.

On September 21, police in the German city of Cologne raided a refugee compound, arresting a 16-year-old Syrian refugee over suspicion he was allegedly planning a terrorist attack.

Law enforcement officials released a statement saying the young man had attended a mosque in Cologne and “has radicalized himself in a very short time.” The Syrian came to the attention of police on June 10, 2016, after sending IS-related images to his friends.

German police are now also investigating whether a 16-year-old girl named Safia, who stabbed a police officer in Hannover earlier in October, may have been directed by IS.

In response to the case, Maassen said that Islamic State is increasingly trying to address young people via social networks to “radicalize them.”

One of the most recent terrorist plots was foiled in early October in the eastern city of Chemnitz, when a 22-year-old Syrian national, Jaber al-Bakr, was captured after a two-day manhunt.

Although a special operation had been launched by the authorities, the man was only detained when three fellow Syrians tied him up and alerted police.

Al-Bakr later committed suicide in his cell. Prior to the manhunt authorities in Germany had reportedly received a tip-off from US intelligence services that the Syrian was planning a terrorist attack, possibly on Berlin airport, after intercepting his phone calls with IS in Syria.

In July, Germany was shaken by several attacks committed by asylum seekers. On July 18 a man believed to be an Afghan refugee injured five people on a train near the town of Wurzburg.

While just a week later, another asylum seeker, this time from Syria, launched a suicide attack at a festival in the city of Ansbach, injuring 15 people. In both cases the perpetrators had pledged allegiance to IS.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Israel must annex West Bank settlements if UNSC adopts Palestinian resolution – education minister

The West Bank Jewish settlement © Ronen Zvulun
Israel should declare sovereignty over the occupied territories in the West Bank, which is home to Israeli settlers, if the UN adopts any Security Council resolution further condemning illegal settlement activity, Israel’s education minister said.

The Palestinians have initiated several unilateral resolutions at the UN Security Council over the years with an aim to condemn Israel over its illegal construction activities in Judea and Samaria. They hope that international pressure might help to facilitate peace settlement talks with the Jewish state.

In September, Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas assured the UN General Assembly that Palestine would renew its strive to pass a Security Council resolution declaring Jewish “settlements” illegal.

As debates in the Security Council continue, Israeli Education Minister Naftali Bennett urged the Israelis to be ready to annex the settlement areas if the UNSC votes on any resolutions on the matter.

“There is a discussion that in the coming months the UN Security Council will force a resolution on Israel. If that happens, we need to have an appropriate Zionist response, immediate sovereignty over Judea and Samaria, including Maaleh Adumim, Gush Etzion, Ariel, Ofra and Beit El,” the minister said at a political meeting in Jerusalem on Sunday night.

“The UNSC council [sic] resolution should be a trigger to put this plan into action,” said Bennet. “Gentlemen, it is time to extend our sovereignty in the land of Israel.”

“Why do I say this? The entire story of settling [the land] and Zionism is a story of a great vision and the determination to see that vision through,” the minister said.

“Each time there was a clear vision and the determination to carry out that vision. The next step is the responsibility of us all…after 50 years, it is time for sovereignty,” he concluded.

It remains highly unlikely that the Security Council will pass a resolution before the November 8 US election. Last month, a group of 88 US senators urged President Barack Obama to veto one-sided UN resolutions on the Israeli-Palestinian Arab issue.

As Bennet called into action the plan to fully annex the settlements, settlers already started to prepare for Monday’s demonstration on the opening day of the Knesset. The activists and the right-wing politicians plan to demand a new bill to annex the third largest West Bank settlement, Ma’aleh Adumim, home to over 37,000 people, the Jerusalem Post reported.

As part of their campaign, activists glued large photographs of former Israeli political heavyweights, including Shimon Peres, Ehud Barak and Ariel Sharon, on buildings, implying that they supported the occupation.

The Peres family attacked the group for using photographs Israel’s former president, who died last month.

“It’s a crude advertising trick,” the family said. “There is no end to the cynicism of this campaign. They know very well that Peres opposed the occupation.”

More than 500,000 Israelis live in settlements in the West Bank and around East Jerusalem, built since the 1967 Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories. The occupied territories have been seeking full independence from Israel for decades, with Palestinians demanding full recognition as a sovereign state from the UN and the international community.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Adolf Hitler’s Bunker Recreated in Berlin

A replica of Adolf Hitler’s bunker, where the German leader spent his final days at the end of World War Two, has opened in central Berlin inside a former Wehrmacht air raid shelter.

Adolf Hitler spent the last phase of World War Two stuck inside a bunker, as recreated here in a NS-era air raid shelter in Berlin.

A mock-up of Hitler’s living room-cum-office – but the furniture is not from the original bunker.

The Führer’s desk: As fighting raged outside, the Führer was holed up with his closest associates, including Eva Braun, who he married inside the bunker in his final hours.

This is believed to be the last official photo of Hitler – he shot himself on 30 April 1945.

The bunker, as seen in this model, had 30 rooms. It was located in the Reich Chancellery gardens near the Brandenburg Gate.

Photos tell the story of Hitler’s bunker in 1945 – some show Soviet troops posing inside it.

A US soldier inside the burnt-out bunker after Hitler’s suicide in 1945.

Soviet soldiers at alleged Hitler grave. In 1945, Soviet soldiers posed at Hitler’s alleged makeshift grave in war-ravaged Berlin.

In 1959, communist East Germany removed the debris of Hitler’s bunker – a notice is all that marks the spot now.


Berlin’s Holocaust memorial is falling apart

Published: 23 May 2014 13:00 GMT+02:00

Facebook Twitter Google+ reddit

Since its opening nine years ago, 44 of the 2,711 columns in the €27-million landmark have needed steel reinforcement, and the Süddeutsche Zeitung reported that another 380 steel collars have been ordered to keep the landmark safe for visitors.

The paper said that 2,200 of the 2,711 concrete stones were now damaged.

In 2010, two columns were lifted via crane and transported to the Aachen Institute for Building Research, where they were examined for the possible cause of decay, but one has still not been returned.

According to the foundation, the missing column remains in Aachen where a material sample is being taken.

Designed by US architect Peter Eisenman, the memorial near the Brandenburg Gate came under staunch criticism when the first cracks were discovered, shortly after it opened. When it was unveiled in late 2004, Eisenman described the material used as “the best concrete Berlin has ever seen”.

But on Friday, the 81-year-old said the fault lay with the memorial’s foundation. “Things have been changed to save money,” he told, adding he would not be paying for the damage.

But Uwe Neumärker from the foundation said the method of upkeep was agreed upon before construction. “It’s not been decided behind anyone’s back,” he said.

And the question of who should be held responsible for the decay of the stones remains paramount, as estimated repair costs could reach millions of euros.

In 2012, at the request of the memorial’s foundation and the city’s development department, the Berlin regional court opened an investigation into the construction company.

The probe aims to determine the cause of the memorial’s decay, and thereby find out if the construction firm should be held accountable.

But memorial lobbyist Leah Rosh feels that the increased focus on the memorial’s decay is unnecessary. “It is completely natural that the concrete would wear a bit,” she said.

While many of the blocks, which way up to 16 tonnes, show visible signs of wear and tear, memorial visitors can wander the site without fearing for their safety.

The columns are examined every six months, and those most severely damaged will receive the steel collars, preventing stone crumbling from the up to 4.7-metre high structures.

SEE ALSO: US orders Holocaust relic return

John Sack – An Eye for an Eye: The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945

An Eye for an Eye: The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945 is a book by John Sack, which states that some Jews in Eastern Europe took revenge on their former captors while overseeing over 1,000 concentration camps in Poland for German civilians. The book provides details of the imprisonment of 200,000 Germans “many of them starved, beaten and tortured” and estimates that “more than 60,000 died at the hands of a largely Jewish-run security organization.”

Sack was born to a Jewish family in New York City. His work appeared in such periodicals as Harper’s, The Atlantic, Esquire and The New Yorker. He was a war correspondent in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and the former Yugoslavia.

A correspondent and later a bureau chief for CBS News in Spain, he authored ten books, including the controversial title, An Eye for an Eye: The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945. The book caused an uproar because Sack reported that, at the end of World War II, a number of Jewish Holocaust survivors, ran some Polish-Communist concentration camps and prisons, where they allegedly tortured and killed German and Polish civilians, including women and children.

Sack has responded to American critics of the book who say that it is “sensational and its charges inadequately attributed to source” by replying that his extensive research left little doubt that Jews ran the Swietochlowice camp “from the bottom to the top”. He added “It pains me as a Jew to report this”.

Sack expressed surprise at criticisms denying the accuracy of his claims, asserting that the main points have been repeatedly confirmed by others, the TV program 60 Minutes and the New York Times among them.

Excerpt from David Irving’s Real History Conference, Cincinnati USA 1999

The Holocaust is not just murder. Nor is it just mass murder. Nor is it even just genocide. US Paul Eisen – On holocaust Victim Supremacy

– Updated

We Once Again Revisit the Greastest Psy Ops Event of the 20th Century


… by  Jim W. Dean, VT Editor           … featuring  Paul  Eisen


Sure, I know some of you might be thinking…”Why do we need to go back into this snake pit again?’”

Thanks for asking, because there is a good reason. The holocaust smokescreen is still being used by certain people to commit crimes for which they tell us the big H is their get out of jail card. And no one is allowed to do this…but them.

We don’t publish things here without a reason. We recently had the humiliating display of a defeated Republican Party thinking that the best way back into the leadership saddle was by reading their AIPAC crib notes well during the Hagel Senate hearing.

The Lobby that does not exist is hankering to show everybody that they are still feared and can car jack the American political process, maybe not all the time, but a lot.

There is always a line of American helpers wishing to display their willingness to subvert the democratic process of their own country if some goodies are provided. In Congress they wear knee pads so they are easier to spot.

The Israelis shot themselves in both feet starting with their taking a world wide beating on the Palestinan UN vote. At the same time Netanyahu was playing chickein with his Likud-NeoCon ploy to intimidate Obama into getting onboard an Iran attack in return for their ‘maybe’ not killing his second term. Yeah. You could trust people like this. Just look at their record.

To shore up their tough guy image prior to the recent elections the Likuds expanded their settlement programs, some old fashioned vote buying there, and yet still lost 25% of their seats despite teaming up with Leiberman’s racist party.

But the self destructing Israelis have not changed their spots. They just formed a new nationalist party and have hooked up with the settlement thugs to increase their chances of getting some good ministries under their control.

They basically are all maneuvering to get into the best position to rob each other to the best of their ability. This is one of the reasons that ‘WWII victims’, over a third of them are eating in soup kitchens.

They are fighting over who are going to be the officers on the Israeli Titanic. Ok, I know some of you are thinking I am hyping now, but I have the perfect cover. In the Oscar nominated film, The Gatekeepers, all the living Shin Ben chiefs agreed that the continued occupation of the Palestinians was dooming the future of Israel. I feel very comfortable using them as references.

These Shin Bet leaders are not optimistic regarding ‘enlightened political leadership’ being delivered any time soon by angels. In the film they showed how they felt their political class had betrayed them by never really intending to want peace because they would lose their main tool for dominating the public which peace would take away.

The elite Jewish mobsters exploit their own people by playing the eternal victims, the Iran outside boogeyman, and hustling America which always has to be made to heel, to keeping dishing out the money fighting for Israel and ruining our own future.

Part of America’s accepting all of this like the walking dead is because more and more, voters have been “do anything the Lobby tells you to do or you will be a bad person.” The Christian Zionists are a separate situations, traitors to their own country.

The Lobby people and their disloyal minions invest a lot of effort keeping the door locked on folks finding out the depths to which they have been scammed. They know there will be a terrible retribution with they find out, and they are right.

We need to move that date forward folks, because America is part of the West Bank, in it’s own way.


The War for the Spirit

… by Paul Eisen



We are entitled to search for the truth.

The real crime committed by the National Socialists – the exclusion, disempowerment, deportation, enslavement, death by omission and by commission and expulsion of a people simply because they were that people – was a terrible one.

One does not need gas chambers to make the targeting of Jews, just because they are Jews, extraordinary and unacceptable.

Nonetheless, if this targeting did not extend to extermination, if there were no gas chambers and if six million Jews did not die, then we should know it and, if necessary, address the implications.

If there is some reason why we should not investigate this matter, then the onus is on those who would deny us that right, to say why. Those who would deny us that right have tried to say why, but in my view they have failed miserably.

But what does it matter how many Jews were murdered and in what way and with what intention? A murder is a murder and one murder is one murder too many. What difference will it make whether the Holocaust is proven or not?

Will it have any affect whatsoever on the status and attitudes of Israel or on its behavior towards the Palestinians – issues on which we pressingly need to focus?

But the Holocaust is not just murder. Nor is it just mass murder. Nor is it even just genocide. There have been plenty of murders, mass murders and even genocides, but none have been memorialized like the Holocaust. The Holocaust is held to be the worst crime in human history, and this is not because more people were killed or because they were killed more brutally or more senselessly.

Three million Polish Jews are held to have died in the Holocaust. Three million Polish non-Jews also died in the same period of history – yet the Jews, as evidenced by the memorialisation accorded them, are seen as more important. Fifty million people died in the Second World War, including twenty million Russians, ten million Germans and Austrians and six million Jews. Yet only the Jews warrant a “Holocaust”’.

Is this because it was only Jews who were targeted for obliteration simply because they were Jews, and because it was only Jews who were exterminated in such a cool, premeditated and modern fashion by such an advanced, liberal and enlightened nation in the heart of Christian Europe?

If the revisionists should prove their case that Jews were not targeted for extermination, that there were no gas-chambers and there was no six million, would there then be no Holocaust? Would Jews become just more tragic victims of a tragic period of history, on a par with the millions of other victims, including the thousands upon of thousands of German civilians slaughtered in the terror bombing of German cities by the western allies?

The revisionist community has probably said just about all it can say and proved all it can prove and have probably made the case sufficiently to at least cast doubt on the veracity of the Holocaust narrative. Future historians may well reject the Holocaust as history, but the Holocaust may yet go on, no longer as history but as ideology and even theology.

Even though the evidence may lead us to accept that there never was intent to eliminate every single Jew from Europe, or any gas-chambers at Auschwitz, or anything near six-million victims, this may not make one iota of difference any more than archeological evidence might prove that there was no Exodus from Egypt and medical science might throw doubt on the virgin birth.

Because there is another possibility – that the suffering of the Jews is held to be the worst crime in human history not because of the nature of the crime but because of the nature of the victims. Maybe Abe Foxman had it just about right when he wrote:-

(The Holocaust is)… “not simply one example of genocide, but a near successful attempt on the life of God’s chosen children and, thus, on God himself”

Because it may be that the Holocaust is not just special, it may be that the Holocaust is sacred. It may be that speaking of the Holocaust alongside other atrocities is like speaking of the Passion as being the crucifixion of one troublemaker and two thieves. It may be that the Holocaust is a narrative of suffering greater than just of one person on a cross.

If Auschwitz is something other than a horror of history, if it goes beyond the ‘banality of evil’, then Christianity totters on its foundations. Christ is the Son of God, who went to the end of the humanly endurable, where he endured the cruelest suffering.

If Auschwitz is true, then there is a human suffering which simply cannot be compared with that of Christ… In this case, Christ is false, and salvation will not come from Him…… Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ. Claude Lanzmann

So the Holocaust and Jewish suffering, no longer history, now theology, have become a religious imperative for Jews, and more critically for all Jews, even for those Jews who regard themselves as secular, who haven’t been near a synagogue since they were children, even for those Jews who don’t much consider themselves Jews.

Take ten Jews today, maybe three will worship God, perhaps nine will worship the state of Israel, nine-point-five may worship “The Jewish People” but nine-point nine-nine-nine recurring will worship Jewish suffering and the Holocaust. The Holocaust resolves the great dilemma of modern Jewish life – how to be a Jew when you no longer believe in the Jewish God.

Secular Jews have found many gods to replace the one they reject – Marx and Trotsky, atheism, psychoanalysis, multiculturalism, human rights, money and success, and of course, Zionism – there’s lots to choose from but only one that serves as a catch-all for everyone. And if you don’t believe it, try this – go find the most educated, secular, progressive, enlightened, perceptive, sensitive Jew you know – deny the Holocaust and then stand back.

But the Holocaust is not confined to Jews. The Holocaust is not only the central martyrdom and therefore a religious focus in modern Jewish history but also, if not in world history, then certainly in American and European history.

All over North America and Western Europe: Holocaust museums – cathedrals to the new religion with their own priests and priestesses; Abe Foxman, Deborah Lipstadt, Elie Wiesel, Simon Wiesenthal, abound – the biggest and best in Washington DC with all the other symbols of American nationhood and power.

Holocaust Chairs at major universities, memorials, foundations, conferences and symposia, books, magazines, films, TV documentaries. The further we travel in time from the actual events the greater the sacralisation. But these are only the outward manifestations.

The Holocaust, the ultimate in suffering is a paradigm for all Jewish suffering and for all intolerance, discrimination and hatred against Jews and this is in itself is a paradigm for all suffering and all intolerance, discrimination and hatred against all people.

That’s why a major Holocaust Museum in the U.S. is able to style itself as simply “The Museum of Tolerance”, and that’s why those who dare to challenge the Jewish claim to a particularity of suffering are nearly always accused of “intolerance” or of “promoting hate”.

The Holocaust may be the ultimate symbol of Jewish power, the most visible means by which the Jewish will in this world is enforced and displayed to a cowering non-Jewish world. It proclaims that Jews are suffering and Jews are innocent so Jews can do what they like and, by association the state of the Jews is also suffering, is also innocent and can also do what it likes.


The Emperor’s new clothes


But the world doesn’t jump because it feels sorry for Jews. As Israel Shamir says, compassion and guilt may get you a free bowl of soup but not a lot else, and certainly not the ninety billion deutschmarks paid in reparations by the Federal Republic of Germany to the infant state of Israel, the billions of dollars paid by successive US governments to maintain that state, nor the free pass given to Israel by just about everyone to do pretty much what it likes to the Palestinians.

The power of the Holocaust is not the power to arouse pity and compassion in the rest of the world. Anyone can see that Israel has no need of our pity or compassion and neither have Jews. Israel is not weak and Israel is not innocent and neither are Jews. What is harder to see is how anyone could ever have thought otherwise.

Could it even be the same with the Holocaust? Is it not by now plain that there is very little evidence to support the Holocaust narrative, that the extermination narrative just doesn’t add up, and that the issue of the gas-chambers could, as Ingrid Rimland reminded us, be settled easily by forensic investigation,

“I suggest that forensic science ought to settle that disagreement about what Germans did or did not do in World War II in an open public forum.”

Why has this not been done? Everyone must know that if the establishment could disprove revisionist claims they would, so why haven’t they?

And anyone can visit any number of websites and find mountains of evidence against the veracity of the Holocaust, so why don’t we?

The reason is the same reason why courtiers have, since time began, acted as if a stark naked emperor was beautifully attired – because they have to.

The power of the Holocaust is the same power as enabled a few thousand Englishman to rule hundreds of millions of Indians; a few hundred French aristocrats to rule a few million French peasants and a Czar and a few hundred Russian nobles to rule millions of Russian serfs.

It is the same power that all over the world and throughout human history has enabled the prosperous few to rule over the impoverished many. It is the very essence of power in this world; the power of bluff. As an unclothed Emperor can force people to believe that he is clothed, so the Jewish and Holocaust establishments can make us believe that black is white in the Holocaust narrative and that Jews and Israel are suffering and innocent.

And if they can’t make us believe it, they can still make us say that we believe it. To the wannabee dissenter, the power behind the Holocaust says this, “Watch it! If we can enforce this we can enforce anything!”

But why should we care if Jews choose to create for themselves such a mythology, even if that mythology has been accepted by so many others? The answer is: we must care because if the Holocaust is false, then there are those who suffer under that falsehood.

First, if the special status of Jews is removed, then the equal status of every single non-Jew who died in that same time, till now demeaned and denigrated, is immediately restored to its rightful and equal place. And there are other victims too. The German people stand accused and found guilty of having committed the worst crime in human history.

The Poles, Ukrainians, Latvians, Lithuanians etc. etc. stand accused and found guilty of aiding, abetting and even applauding the commission of the worst crime in human history. Add to them the Catholic Church and the Pope, the Americans and British who stand accused and found guilty of not having done enough to prevent the commission of the worst crime in human history.

Add to them Christianity and Christians who throughout the ages stand accused and found guilty of laying the foundations for the commission of the worst crime in human history.

And finally, you may as well throw in pretty much the entire non-Jewish world accused and guilty of what amounts to simply not being one of the chosen victims of the worst crime in human history, and therefore condemned forever to hush their voices whenever the word ‘Jew’ is mentioned and to stand silently as the myth of Jewish chosenness in the Holocaust is propagated.


The weapons of the poor

There is one other victim: a present, pressing, ultimate victim. The Palestinian people -denied, denigrated and abused by a power which uses the Holocaust as a shield behind which any and every atrocity may take place – are surely the primary sufferers under the Holocaust.

On March 22, 2001 Robert Faurisson wrote a paper for the proposed Beirut Conference on Revisionism and Zionism, which he knew would never be presented. He was right. The conference was cancelled due to external pressure, largely by Jewish groups. In his paper for the first time, Faurisson addressed the Arab world.

First he put it to them that an intelligent adversary may say that they fear something when they don’t, and that they don’t fear something when they do. Thus their enemies’ firepower is deflected from those places where it may do real damage to those areas where it can do little damage.

Then he listed those things that Zionists do not fear: They do not fear military power – they’ve more than enough of their own and anyway, they know that anyone who has military power is far more likely to support them rather than oppose them. They do not fear anti-Semitism – on the contrary they feed on it to create sympathy for their cause.

They do not really fear denouncers of Holocaust exploitation – the Norman Finkelsteins and the Peter Novicks – so long as they do not challenge the Holocaust itself. After all, the fiercest critic of something can (albeit often unwittingly) become its staunchest guardian – (If Norman Finkelstein says it, it must be true.)

They do not even fear anti-Zionism since Zionism, like Jewish power itself, has the wondrous ability to transform itself into anything it wants – left/right, religious/secular, one-state/two-state – all provide fertile ground for Zionism and Jewish particularity.

Nor do they much fear attacks on the founding myths of Israel – that is, all of them except one. Finally, they do not even fear being called Judeo-Nazis. On the contrary, being labeled by one’s adversaries as a Nazi merely affirms that ‘Nazi’ is the very worst thing imaginable.

He then told his audience what Zionists do fear: They fear the weapons of those who have nothing left to lose – the poor and the weak. They fear the stones and suicide bombers of the Palestinian Intifada – and they fear the weapons of that other Intifada – the words of the revisionists.

Zionists truly fear the weapons of the poor (children’s stones, their slingshots like that of David against the giant Goliath, the suicide attacks) and all that may endanger persons and business; they fear a demeaning of their brand image.

But they are above all apprehensive of “the poor man’s atomic bomb”, that is, the disintegration, by historical revisionism, of the lie of the gas chambers, the genocide and the six million; they dread this weapon that kills no-one but that would not fail, if properly used to explode their big lie like a bag of hot air… lose the “Holocaust” is to lose the sword and the shield of Israel as well as a formidable instrument of political and financial blackmail.

Despite their honourable intentions and dedicated efforts, the solidarity movement, which includes many Jews of conscience, has had little success in stopping the Zionist juggernaut. The truth is that the only thing that has stalled it has been Palestinian steadfastness and Palestinian stones.

Although they will never say so, Palestinians must know that they are not just facing the might of the Israeli state but also the power of organized world Jewry and its primary arm, the Holocaust. Perhaps Palestinians should consider lobbing a few stones in that direction. Perhaps we all should.

Editing: Jim W. Dean

A Jewish Defector Warns America: Benjamin Freedman Speaks on Zionism – Part III

Posted by Ingrid Zundel


Now, for this country to now be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT.

One million tons of TNT is a megaton. Now, our nuclear bombs have a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT. That was when they were first developed five or six years ago. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

So, what do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. And why will it take place? It will take place because Act III. . . the curtain goes up on Act III.

Act I was World War I. Act II was World War II. Act III is going to be World War III.

The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. Now, that is just as true as I am standing here, because not alone have I read it, but many here have read it, and it’s known all over the world.

Now, what are we going to do? The life you save may be your son’s. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don’t know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren’t permitted to know it.

Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Others knew it. Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there.
I was ‘confidential man’ to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the Finance Committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson’s brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and also indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement.

Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand, and President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. And that’s how they got us into World War I, while we all slept.

Now, at this moment… at this moment they may be planning this World War III, in which we don’t stand a chance even if they don’t use nuclear bombs. How can the United States — about five percent of the world — go out and fight eighty to ninety percent of the world on their home ground? How can we do it… send our boys over there to be slaughtered? For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their ‘commonwealth’? They’ve fooled you so much that you don’t know whether you’re coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, “Gentlemen, any witness that you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony.” That is correct. I don’t know from what state you come, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness said one lie, disregard his testimony.

Now, what are the facts about the Jews?

The Jews — I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don’t call them Jews. I refer to them as “so-called Jews”, because I know what they are. If Jesus was a Jew, there isn’t a Jew in the world today, and if those people are Jews, certainly our Lord and Savior was not one of them, and I can prove that.

Now what happened? The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world’s population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars.

They were a warlike tribe that lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe — and to reduce this so you don’t get too confused about the history of Eastern Europe — they set up this big Khazar kingdom: 800,000 square miles. Only, there was no Russia, there were no other countries, and the Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe — so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That’s how big and powerful they were.

Now, they were phallic worshippers, which is filthy. I don’t want to go into the details of that now. It was their religion the way it was the religion of many other Pagans or Barbarians elsewhere in the world.

Now, the [Khazar] king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith — either Christianity, Islam — the Moslem faith — or what is known today as Judaism — really Talmudism. So, like spinning a top and calling out “eeny, meeny, miney, moe,” he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion.

He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of these rabbis with their teachings, and opened up synagogues and schools in his kingdom of 800,000 people — 800,000 thousand square miles — and maybe ten to twenty million people; and they became what we call Jews. There wasn’t one of them that had an ancestor that ever put a toe in the Holy Land, not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and they ask us to support their armed insurrection in Palestine by saying:

“Well, you want to certainly help repatriate God’s chosen people to their Promised Land, their ancestral homeland, It’s your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and kneel and you worship a Jew, and we’re Jews.”

Well, they were pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish [were converted]. And it’s just as ridiculous to call them “people of the Holy Land,” as it would be. . . there are 54 million Chinese Moslems. Fifty four million! And, Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., so in that time, 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief.

Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, where the city of Mecca is located, where Mohammed was born. . . imagine if the 54 million Chinese called themselves ‘Arabs’. Imagine! Why, you’d say they’re lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith; a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia.

The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported from the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants that were Christians. They weren’t different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.

Now, these Pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns. . . they were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. They likewise, because their king took the faith — Talmudic faith — they had no choice. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So everybody — they lived on the land just like the trees and the bushes; a human being belonged to the land under their feudal system — so they [Khazars] all became what we call today, Jews!

Now imagine how silly it was for the Christians. . . for the great Christian countries of the world to say, “We’re going to use our power, our prestige to repatriate God’s chosen people to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land.”

Now, could there be a bigger lie than that? Could there be a bigger lie than that?
And because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, they have the ministers in the pulpit, they have the politicians on the soap boxes talking the same language . . . so naturally you’d believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn’t call black black anymore — you’d start to call black white. And nobody could blame you.

Now, that is one of the great lies. . . that is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world. Because after two wars fought in Europe — World War I and World War II — if it wasn’t possible for them to live in peace and harmony with the people in Europe, like their brethren are living in the United States, what were the two wars fought for? Did they have to — like you flush the toilet — because they couldn’t get along, did they have to say, “Well, we’re going back to our homeland and you Christians can help us”?

I can’t understand yet how the Christians in Europe could have been that dumb because every theologian, every history teacher, knew the things that I’m telling you. But, they naturally bribed them, shut them up with money, stuffed their mouths with money, and now. . . I don’t care whether you know all this or not. It doesn’t make any difference to me whether you know all these facts or not, but it does make a difference to me [for this reason]. I’ve got, in my family, boys that will have to be in the next war, and I don’t want them to go and fight and die… like they died in Korea. Like they died in Japan. Like they’ve died all over the world.

For what?

To help crooks hold on to what they stole from innocent people who had been in peaceful possession of that land, those farms, those homes for hundreds and maybe thousands of years? Is that why the United States must go to war? Because the Democratic Party wants New York State — the electoral vote? Illinois, the electoral vote? And Pennsylvania, the electoral vote?… which are controlled by the Zionists and their co-religionists?. . . the balance of power?

In New York City there are 400,000 members of the liberal party, all Zionists and their co-religionists. And New York State went for Kennedy by 400,000 votes. Now, I don’t blame Mr. Kennedy. I’m fond of Mr. Kennedy. I think he’s a great man. I think he can really pull us out of this trouble if we get the facts to him. And I believe he knows a great deal more than his appointments indicate he knows. He’s playing with the enemy. Like when you go fishing, you’ve got to play with the fish. Let ’em out and pull ’em in. Let ’em out and pull ’em in. But knowing Mr. Kennedy’s father, and how well informed he is on this whole subject, and how close Kennedy is to his father, I don’t think Mr. Kennedy is totally in the dark.

But I do think that it is the duty of every mother, every loyal Christian , every person that regards the defense of this country as a sacred right, that they communicate — not with their congressman, not with their senator, but with President Kennedy. And tell him, “I do not think you should send my boy, or our boys, wearing the uniform of the United States of America, and under the flag that you see here, our red, white and blue, to fight there to help keep in the hands of these that which they have stolen”. I think everyone should not alone write once, but keep writing and get your friends to write.

Now, I could go on endlessly, and tell you these things to support what I have just asked you to do. But I don’t think it’s necessary to do that. You’re above the average group in intelligence and I don’t think it’s necessary to impress this any more.

But. . . I want to tell you one more thing. You talk about… “Oh, the Jews. Why the Jews? Christianity. Why, we got Christianity from the Jews and the Jews gave us Jesus, and the Jews gave us our religion”. But do you know that on the day of atonement that you think is so sacred to them, that on that day… and I was one of them! This is not hearsay. I’m not here to be a rabble-rouser. I’m here to give you facts.

When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, the very first prayer that you recite, you stand — and it’s the only prayer for which you stand — and you repeat three times a short prayer. The Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months — any oath, vow or pledge that you may take during the next twelve months shall be null and void.
The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force and effect, and so forth and so on.

And further than that, the Talmud teaches: “Don’t forget — whenever you take an oath, vow, and pledge — remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and that exempts you from fulfilling that”.

How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.

And we’re going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason. (…)

[The rest of this presentation consisted of Mr. Freedman explaining his informational outreach and a follow-up question-and-answer period. I am sure that audio tapes exist that can be ordered from dissident websites, maybe even from Amazon.]

Benjamin Freedman’s 1961 Speech at the Willard Hotel (Complete)

Jewish Fingerprint: GAZA
  • Thumbnail

  • Oh?

Reflections on Canada’s failure as a free and democratic society – Monika Schaefer’s open letter responding to the witch hunters at the Alberta Society of Fiddlers


  • Monika Schaefer e6903

August 30, 2016

Dear Monika,

As President of the Alberta Society of Fiddlers, and on behalf of the Board of Directors and Executive, I am writing to advise you of decisions made at a special ASF meeting called on August 17th, 2016.

As a result of your recent public comments regarding your views on the Holocaust, we are relieving you of your duties as Director for the Yellowhead West Region of the ASF, and also rescinding your invitation to be an instructor at our upcoming music camp at Camp HeHoHa in February of 2017.

Thank you for your past contributions to our society.

We wish you all the best in your future endeavours,


Randy Jones, President 

Alberta Society of Fiddlers


Open letter to the Alberta Society of Fiddlers:

September 23, 2016

Thank you for the registered letter in which you informed me of the outcome of your meeting. I am being relieved of my duties as ASF Director of the Yellowhead West Region, and you are rescinding the invitation for me to be an instructor at Camp HeHoHa in February 2017. Here are my questions and comments.

At the time of the meeting, I was on the board of directors of the Alberta Society of Fiddlers. Therefore, I would expect that I should be informed of a meeting, especially if I was the subject of the meeting. Was there any attempt to contact me? It seems there was not, and if not, why not? Was there a prior meeting to discuss whether I should be invited? Is there a record of the discussion leading up to the special meeting? Who made the decision to have a special meeting? Is there a record of the special meeting? Was there a vote? Were minutes taken? I would like to see those minutes please. I would like to know if my membership will be next to be terminated. What indication do I have that I would be welcome to attend an ASF event in future?

My classes at Camp HeHoHa the last two years were well received, and the feedback, by all accounts, was very good. You are telling me now that because of my interpretation of the events of WW2, I am no longer welcome to teach at fiddle camp. Surely this is setting a precedent that a person’s opinions about history trumps their ability to play or teach the fiddle.

Last February I had the same views on the history of WW2 as I have now. I have been studying these matters for a few years now. Did anyone complain? Of course not! I did not talk much about history or politics during the camp, and definitely not in class. Whenever I have attended fiddle camp as a student or as an instructor, it was to immerse myself in the joy of playing music together with others in this wonderful musical family which has now been broken. And even if I had discussed history or politics in private conversations, what would be the problem?

We find ourselves in a world where certain conversations can only be whispered behind closed doors, and other conversations are permitted in public. Who would have imagined this could happen in our own province of Alberta in Canada? Who would have thought George Orwell’s world of thought control would prove to be so prophetic? It is shameful that the Alberta Society of Fiddlers is participating in this thought control.

I wonder what this saga teaches young people. If I was to return to the camp as a student like in years past, have you not set me up to be treated as a leper? Surely when asked why I am no longer teaching, I would tell the truth. It was not my teaching that received a failing grade, but my opinions and conclusions about an event which took place 70 years ago. I think the ASF action teaches young people to be conformist, and if they were to disagree with a prevailing view, they sure had better keep it to themselves and lie publicly about their beliefs.

This is becoming an international story. Here is a quote from a recent article by Editor-in-Chief of The American Herald Tribune, Professor Anthony Hall:

“The new configurations of authority are extending to important agencies like the Royal Canadian Legion, Jasper National Park [Parks Canada], and the Alberta Society of Fiddlers. Those overseeing these important institutions are made to feel empowered to impose arbitrary sanctions and punishments against an individual who dared to question enshrined orthodoxy.

The message is made clear that the vibrance of art and culture, the wellbeing of veterans as well as the need to protect some of Alberta’s most majestic Alpine environments have become secondary commitments. The treatment in Jasper National Park of violinist Monika Schaefer signals the end of our free and democratic society. Our right and need to express independent thought, the starting point of collective self-determination, has been sacrificed in order to enforce supine obedience to the sanctification of an historical interpretation that must not be subjected to sceptical scrutiny and reconsideration.”

I am in good company with regards to my understanding of the history of WW2. Gerard Menuhin, son of famous (Jewish) violinist Yehudi Menuhin, has written a book called “Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil”. Here is a book review and synopsis.

From the volume of messages of support that I have been receiving, it is becoming quite clear to me that there are people in every village, town and hamlet who agree with my conclusions on the “holocaust”. These messages have come to me from all over Canada and the world, and from many places in Alberta. But the vast majority of those people do not speak publicly about it, because there is a high price to pay. They are afraid of losing their jobs, their friends, and their community standing. An example is made of anyone who dares speak out, to frighten others who might be tempted to question the prevailing dogma. I invite you to read about “ritual defamation”, something that I am becoming an expert on. Evidence and facts have no bearing in this process.

Of the people who have viewed my “Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the holocaust”, those who have voted their approval or disapproval online have consistently done so in a ratio of approximately 3:1 likes over dislikes. Although not the final word, this ratio suggests that many see this video as a positive contribution, well within community standards.

Given that there are people all over Alberta who share my views, are you not now obliged to screen all potential instructors for their political views and their historical understanding? You have set the precedent by your actions against me. In the past, the sniff test might have been whether you believed the earth was flat. People used to be persecuted for saying the earth revolved around the sun.

Free thinkers are often found within the artistic community. I remember long ago hearing about political prisoners in countries far away, such as poets in the Soviet Union who were jailed because of their writings. A tyrannical state is threatened by free thinkers, so the tyrannical state often persecutes its artists. But it is strange when the artist community persecutes their own. That is the context in which I find the actions of the Alberta Society of Fiddlers to be so shocking.

The old adage “the victors write the history books” is not just about choosing the font. We have all been subjected to a life-time of indoctrination. If you have not done independent study of “The Holocaust” outside of the parameters of our schooling and Hollywood, then it is completely understandable that you disagree with my views. However, it is another matter altogether when you demonstrate such a Pavlovian response to my short video in which I apologize to my mother for having held her to account for the horrors of WW2 after having learned that the prevailing dogma is not correct.

I will give just one example to show that you cannot be 100% right and me 100% wrong. I remember learning in school either late 1960s or early ‘70s that the Germans were so evil and depraved that they made soap, lampshades and shrunken heads out of the bodies of Jews. Now they do not teach that propaganda anymore, because that has been proven to be lies. That puts a crack in the untouchable edifice of this narrative.

Aware people are everywhere. I know that. I am hearing from them. Does this mean you will all start looking over your shoulder wondering who else shares my views? Or might it give you cause to reconsider your certainty over this issue? And even if you are absolutely certain that I am 100% wrong, consider the fact that there is no other event in history for which debate is not permitted, quite literally against the law in many countries. There is something wrong with that picture. Only lies need to be protected by laws. The truth stands on its own.

This event called “Holocaust” has replaced our religions. Apparently I am a heretic, and the Alberta Society of Fiddlers is metaphorically burning me at the stake. I think in light of future history, this decision you have made will prove to be one of the more consequential in ASF history.

Will you have the courage to print this letter in your next newsletter? If not, why not? You might say it has no relevance to the fiddling world and the usual contents of that newsletter. Precisely! My views on the “holocaust” also have nothing to do with my participation in the fiddling world of the ASF. But by your actions, you have made the subject of WW2 part of the fiddling world in Alberta.


Monika Schaefer




  •  Canada Israel 1262e

In recent days I discovered that the Canadian branch of the Israeli-US-based Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith is reporting that I am “well known for using academic credentials to deny the Holocaust.” On August 29, Daniel Leons-Marder mirrored the Canadian B’nai Brith report under the title, Facebook Allows “Kill All Jews” Post on Wall of Canadian Professor. In an item Leons-Marder claims has been shared 11,000 times, he asserted “B’nai Brith Canada reported the image, which was ruled acceptable [by Facebook] within two hours, when it was alerted to it having been posted on the Facebook page of Canadian Academic Professor Anthony Hall, who is a holocaust denier.”

FB allows 66848

The B’nai Brith’s Aug. 29 announcement starts with a bald statement that “Police have launched an investigation into an antisemitic Facebook post that was exposed by B’nai Brith Canada last Friday.” The earlier August 26 statement emphasized the role of Facebook, introducing me in the controversy as being “well known for using [my] academic credentials to deny the Holocaust and promote 9/11 conspiracy theories.”

fb Hall 44cca

Under the headline, “Killing Jews Is Now an Acceptable Message, Facebook Says,” the B’nai Brith announced,

“Antisemitism in all forms is rampant on social media, but this is the clearest, most obvious kind of antisemitism one could possibly create,” said Michael Mostyn, B’nai Brith CEO. “The classification of this as antisemitic cannot be challenged, and the fact that this promotes violence towards Jews is beyond dispute. Regardless, Facebook has deemed it acceptable despite its ‘community standards’ containing clear provisions against hate speech. The Jewish community deserves no less protection or respect than any other when it comes to hate speech and threats of violence.”

“Every year, upon publication of our Annual Audit of Antisemitic Incidents, a contingent of detractors accuses us of saying the sky is falling, and that antisemitism does not exist in Canada,” said Amanda Hohmann, National Director of B’nai Brith’s League for Human Rights. “Content like this is proof positive that not only antisemitism of a genocidal nature exists in Canada, but the systems that are supposed to protect us from racist hate speech don’t consider hatred of Jews to be problematic.”

B’nai Brith has reported the post to Lethbridge Police Services.

fb BB 22ad8

The Canadian B’nai Brith’s post, together with those of others that have mirrored B’nai Brith’s announcement, constitute the first time I have seen myself described in print as a ‘holocaust denier.” What is the definition used by the thought police to decide who is or is not a “holocaust denier? Are there many holocausts or only one? Who owns the term, “holocaust?” If there are exclusive rights, how were they obtained?

In the eyes of the B’nai Brith, is a “holocaust denier” anyone who disagrees with any element, large or small, of its favored historical interpretation? Is the B’nai Brith naturally hostile to anyone that retains independent, evidence-based perspectives on some of the most fraught issues of historical interpretation in contemporary times?

What is behind the creation of the original post that set the controversy in motion? Who created it and why? Is this whole episode an engineered crisis? Is one of its purposes to fend off the criticisms of those that accuse the B’nai Brith and related Zionist agencies of claiming “the sky is falling” with their Orwellian system of Annual Audits of Antisemitic Incidents. Please see below the map published to present cartographic interpretations by the Coordination Forum for Countering Antisemitism.

Map BB 9fccd

As shall be explained below, the B’nai Brith has failed to perform due diligence in its handling of this matter. Its officers did not even attempt back up their provocative characterizations of me with even a shred of genuine evidence. The organization opted instead to exploit for its own political agenda the shock value inherent in the vile contents of an item allegedly posted, apparently very briefly, on my FB page. The item is said to have been posted by Glen Davidson. I did not ever see it on my FB page. I did not invite nor did I even have any knowledge of it until recently.

In its material the B’nai Brith describe the post as a “depiction of a White man assaulting an Orthodox Jew accompanied by a lengthy, violent anti-Semitic screed beside the photograph.” Here is the post, which I first saw sometime early in September as part of a smear piece published about me at “Aussie Dave’s” Israellycool.

Hall BB 01a73

To reiterate and to be absolutely clear, I did not post this social media item myself. I did not create it or solicit it. I do not approve of its contents. In fact I of course strongly condemn the message conveyed in both the image and the text. Due diligence demands, however, that I look further into this matter.

The B’nai Brith in Action

My initial research into the item’s content is leading me to the opinion that the image probably emerges from some sort of staged situation, one that seems to include the application of photo shop techniques. The most basic questions that must now be pressed concern the source of the atrocious text. From whence does it originate? Certainly I did not write it. Glen Davidson did not write it. Who did write it and why? Not once yet have I seen this deeper question posed by those who are exploiting the vile item to dramatize a real or concocted dispute with Facebook.

Quite possibly by design, the miniscule, densely compressed text is very difficult to read especially on small digital devices. Could this attribute be because the text was conceived not as a means of winning adherents but rather as a justification for political actions like the B’nai Brith’s current hate speech campaign highlighting my academic position at the University of Lethbridge?

I first saw the item among a number of screen shots all dedicated to “Aussie Dave’s” nomination of me as “Anti-Zionist-Not-Anti-Semite of the Day.”

Hall Zionism bf767

I remember being particular interested in the part of the post that mentioned Ryan Bellerose, a Metis man and convert to Judaism who has recently been hired as the B’nai Brith’s new Western Canadian representative. Most of my attention zeroed in on Aussie Dave’s suggestion to his readers that they communications to the president of my University, Dr. Mike Mahon. I also took note of a screen shot of an item on U of L letterhead where Dr. Mahon responds to  “JP.” Who is “JP”?

I can trace one thread of this matter’s origins to a recorded telephone call I listened to a year ago. Its source was Amanda Hohmann, National Director of B’nai Brith’s League for Human Rights. In August of 2015 Ms. Hohmann telephoned the manager of a community venue in downtown Edmonton Alberta. Ms. Hohmann aim on behalf of her employer was to shut down a book promotion event. At the time Dr. Barrett along with his wife, two sons a dog and me were touring Alberta to call attention to an edited text entitled We Are Not Charlie Hebdo. Dr. Barrett edited the volume to which I had contributed an article.

The venue’s manager, Richard Awid, taped Ms. Hohmann’s intervention and subsequently played it back for me. Here is how I described this part of the episode in an article entitled “B’nai Brith Moves to Quash Free Speech in Canada,”

Mr. Awid was somewhat dumbfounded that a small event at his community hall, “one of 100 such venues in Edmonton,” would elicit such an intense response from a very powerful organization in Toronto. He played back to me on his answering machine a recorded message he received at about 9 am on August 12 from Amanda Hohmann. Ms. Hohmann explained that she had received “a few complaints” about “Mr.” Kevin Barrett on the B’nai Brith’s “anti-hate hotline.” (1-416-633-6224; 1-800-892-2624)

Ms. Hohmann asserted that

“Mr. Barrett is a known anti-semite conspiracy theorist, a Holocaust Denier, and 9/11 Denier and all sorts of other things.”

Ms. Hohmann made no effort whatsoever to give background proof of her allegations or to identify the sources of the supposed “complaints.” Nevertheless she proposed to Mr. Awid that he should “cancel the event and let Mr. Barrett know he is not welcome in Edmonton.”

Hohmann 4485a

In this telephone call the B’nai Brith’s “human rights” director tried to defame a colleague offering absolutely no proof whatsoever to provide evidentiary backing for her directive from Toronto that Dr. Barrett should not be welcome in Alberta’s capital. I believe the Western world currently supports many Amanda Hohmanns paid very well to target and slander regularly individuals like Dr. Kevin Barrett.

Are the protagonists in these ugly witch hunts ever held accountable for the excesses? Are there any constraints on the increasingly severe incursions of the Zionist thought police? What remedies are or are not available for the likes of Dr. Barrett who is a Muslim man. Along with the rest of the omma, Dr. Barrett and his family are regularly subjected to heavy does of “hate speech” and sometimes worse?

When Richard Awid, a Muslim himself, did not adhere to Ms. Hohmann’s instructions, the B’nai Brith was able to send in a representative of the “hate speech” unit of the Edmonton police. The officer monitored the first part of the event and then left after informing Dr. Barrett that our presentation deemed was not to be hate speech by the police force he represented. I recall wondering at the time, does that bizarre episode foreshadow an era when all university classes will be policed by officials answerable to agencies like the B’nai Brith? Is that where this is leading?

The B’nai Brith has been front and center in Canada’s increasingly notorious record of aggressively policing citizens for supposed thought crimes and speech crimes. The B’nai Brith’s assault on free speech in Canada includes among its objects for criminalization Doug Collins, Malcolm Ross, Jim Keegstra, Ernst Zundel, Terry Tremaine, David Ahenakew and, most recently, Arthur Topham.

Topham 62b25

The case against Arthur Topham and his Radical Press is still ongoing. By following at a distance the tawdry prosecution of the self-employed reporter, publisher, editor and carpenter in Quesnel British Columbia, I was made aware of a very significant text published in 1941. Theodore Kaufman’s Germany Must Perish outlines an extremely ruthless strategy of genocidal destruction of a whole people. Has this classic description of genocidal intent and methodology been ever given prominence in a school curriculum in Canada?

My reading of an Internet copy of the text, one that became integral to the proceedings of the Topham trial, caused me to reflect on how one-sided the whole discourse on genocide is becoming. The suffering of one group is highlighted and elevated above all others while the suffering and assaults imposed on other groups is often downplayed, ignored or even denigrated. I had no idea before the B’nai Brith-instigated prosecution of Arthur Topham that there was such a detailed plan to annihilate the entire German people.

I only recently have become fully aware of the extent of the murder, rape and pillage of several millions of Germans after 1945 in American prisoner war camps and in orgies of Soviet-instigated ethnic cleansing in Eastern Europe. Where are the museums to promote public education about these crimes against humanity? Where is the museum to commemorate the horrendous intergenerational genocide of perhaps a hundred million Indigenous peoples in the Holocaust of the Americas since 1492? Will future You Tubers make videos to ask elderly members of today’s generation what they did or didn’t do about the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians now underway in order to clear the way for Greater Israel?

Free speech 8de57

Thought Police Wreaking Havoc on Campus

The B’nai Brith is becoming especially aggressive in campaigns to have individuals fired from their work for expounding historical interpretations it does not like. The B’nai Brith boasted menacingly on September 15 of having destroyed the career of Nikolas Balakas, a long-serving lab technician at York University’s Department of Astronomy and Physics. The announcement that Canada’s most ruthless thought police agency had succeeded in its campaign to get York University to fire its employee was written by Aidan Fishman. Mr. Fishman is Campus Advocacy Coordinator of B’nai Brith Canada.

After counting coup on Mr. Balaras’s dismissal, Mr. Fishman concludes with the following plea that the University of Lethbridge should follow York University’s example. The B’nai Brith official wrote,

“Unfortunately not every administration is prepared to act with such decisiveness [as that of York University], as the ongoing saga surrounding Professor Anthony Hall at Lethbridge University shows. I hope that the administration in Lethbridge can use the excellent example set by York University on this matter, and take appropriate steps to ensure that their students are not similarly subjected to hatred and antisemitism on campus.”

Who is the real author of this “ongoing saga?” Where is the proof as of today that University of Lethbridge students are being subjected “to hatred and anti-Semitism on campus.” I have not once seen this kind of language appear in 26 years of teaching evaluations. Where is there any accountability for floating this kind of vicious agenda of smear? The intrusion into this matter of a B’nai Brith official described as Campus Advocacy Coordinator is, as far as I know, setting precedents at my school. What is the nature of the “advocacy” Mr. Fishman is “coordinating”?

The effort of B’nai Brith’s “campus coordinator” and possibly others of his group to inject themselves into the internal governance of the University of Lethbridge brings to mind a similar controversy brewing at Oberlin College. Oberlin College is a renowned Liberal Arts school in Ohio whose origins long predate the American Civil War. There Dr. Joy Karega has been suspended with pay from her teaching position as a result of a controversy also involving Facebook posts. I have written a lengthy open latter on the matter to Oberlin President, Dr. Marvin Krislov. The text, which has been mirrored on other web sites, was first published at American Herald Tribune.

Karega AHT 95018

In my effort to reach out to President Krislov, Dr. Karega and the other students and faculty involved in what has definitely become a fiasco for the Oberlin community, I proposed in my open letter that we all work together to mount a joint academic conference. I proposed that my own Liberal Education program at the University of Lethbridge ally itself with the embattled Liberal Arts College in Ohio to organize an event aimed at bringing thoughtful academic commentary to address a mounting crisis in higher education in North America.

I hereby invite Aiden Fishman to join this initiative and thereby embark on a constructive course rather than the trajectory of negativity implicit in his present preoccupation with hate talk and advocacy for division. Of course Mr. Fishman is far from alone in the type of “advocacy” in which he is engaged. There is a barrage of interventions currently underway from organizations like the AMCHA Initiative, the Simon Wiesenthal Center for Campus Outreach, Hillel, the American Jewish Congress, David Horowitz’s FrontPage and Daniel Pipes’ Campus Watch to mention only a few. As currently on full public display at Oberlin College, these well-funded and deeply staffed interventions invariably wreak havoc on the principles of academic freedom and civil academic discourse on campus?

I suggested the following title for the event.

Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theories:

A Rational or Irrational Phrase in Academic Discourse?

In my research research into the Joy Karega/Oberlin debacle I became aware of the concerted campaign in 2014 to destroy the career of Prof. William I. Robinson. Dr. Robinson is Professor of Sociology at the University of California at Santa Barbara. Like Dr. Joy Karega, Dr. Steven Salaita, Dr. Hatem Bazian, Dr. Rabab Abdulhadi, Dr. Richard Falk, me and many others, Dr. Robinson includes in the curriculum some focus on the plight of Palestinian people.

Caption: Prof. Richard Falk, Former UN Rapporteur and Princeton University Professor of International Law, Speaks on the Issue of Academic Freedom at the University of California at Santa Barbara

The sociologist refused to back down from incorporating in his teaching critical perspectives on the harsh treatment of Palestinians especially in Gaza and the so-called Occupied Territories. Amidst proliferating Jewish settlements and the constant repressions of the Israeli police state, many Palestinians continue to eke out marginal existences on the heavily militarized lands set aside for them by the United Nations in Resolution 181. Resolution 181, an international instrument calling for partition of Palestine and UN trusteeship over Jerusalem, constitutes the primary law at the roots of the Israeli entity in its present form.

Abdulhadi 1ed77

Robinson books 2ccbc

Prof. Robinson has written of his ordeal in August of 2014 on Truthout. In an article entitled “Repression Escalates on US Campuses,” the sociologist explains,

The persecution to which I was subjected involved a litany of harassment, slander, defamation of character and all kinds of threats against the university by outside forces if I was not dismissed, as well as hate mail and death threats from unknown sources. More insidiously, it involved a shameful collaboration between a number of university officials and outside forces from the Israel lobby as the university administration stood by silently, making a mockery of academic freedom.

The disciplinary procedure initiated against me by UCSB officials involved a host of irregularities, violations of the university’s own procedures, breaches of confidentiality, denial of due process, conflicts of interest, failure of disclosure, improper political surveillance, abuses of power and position, unwarranted interference in curriculum and teaching and so on. As I would discover during the course of the ordeal, individuals inside the university and in positions of authority had linked up with agents of the lobby outside the university in setting out to prosecute me.

Will the same toolbox of wrecking instruments deployed at the University of California be shipped in from the United States and unpacked at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta Canada? Will the administration of my own school continue to uphold the University of Lethbridge’s good reputation as an institution of higher education where the vital principles of academic freedom and civil academic discourse are expressed and defended?

On several occasions I have publicly lauded the U of L for creating an environment of academic freedom. I made this observation, for instance, at the University of Lethbridge’s book event when in 2011 my volume, Earth into Property, was launched. In this 900+ page peer-reviewed academic text published by McGill-Queen’s University Press, I incorporate analysis that the B’nai Brith flippantly trivializes as “9/11 conspiracy theories.”

Deeply corrupt agencies like the B’nai Brith have a lot to lose when the basic facts about what really happened on 9/11–who did what to whom—become the common knowledge of the general public. That day may be approaching far faster than those hiding behind the tired old memes about “conspiracy theories” anticipate.

How much longer can the evidence of 9/11 be concealed behind the ruthless kind of ad hominemattacks that have become the well known-specialty of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith in all its many constituent parts? How much longer will the public tolerate the hate propaganda and professional assaults that are obliterating the fundamental integrity of so many of our most important institutions?

What other lies and deceptions are being fed to the public on a regular basis? What is the level of public confidence these days in the trustworthiness of society’s key institutions including government, media, police and agencies of higher education? Who can say public confidence in these entities is high?

What is the appropriate role for universities in addressing issues of officialdom’s fraud and malfeasance especially in situations that have large implications for public policy? If even tenured university faculty can be intimidated into shying away from the professional responsibility to distinguish truth from falsehood, but especially in situations that threaten power’s imperatives, who will perform this vital function? Politicians? Talking heads on TV? Who will speak truth to the unaccountable power that the B’nai Brith in its current reckless demeanor so abundantly epitomizes?

Ritual Defamation in the Social Media Circus

To return to the Facebook post that lies at the root of this controversy, I have already publicly condemned the contents of the offending item in the September 16 edition of False Flag Weekly News. I currently co-host this regular broadcast along with one of its founding partners, Dr. Kevin Barrett.

I noticed a reference to my public condemnation of the item in question in the comments section of the B’nai Brith’s own web post of August 29. A commenter going by the name of Andrew Blair observes,

It is important to realize that Professor Hall publicly condemns that image and text. Go to False Flag Weekly, at minute 36, to see and hear his denunciation.When I put on my “fairness” glasses and look at that image I see Tony Hall in the headlock, and the arms locking his head are the image and the text. Does anyone else see that, or are my “fairness” glasses defective?

“Andrew Blair’s” question certainly resonates with me. The B’nai Brith’s description of the image in its news announcements refers to “a White man assaulting an Orthodox Jew.” Is the Orthodox Jew not a White man too? What is there to say that the aggressor in this image is not Cherokee or Mohawk or Palestinian for that matter?

What are the politics of the B’nai Brith’s choice of words in its racialized approach to its public announcement highlighting this inflammatory image? What effect is being sought? Did the image emerge from a real or staged situation? If it was the former, what was the event? Where did it happen? Who took the photograph? Have the investigators in the B’nai Brith-police-hate-crime-complex explored such matters.

Is the B’nai Brith’s emphasis on “police investigations” itself a staged tactic of sorts? Is it meant to dramatize the main story line aimed ultimately at seizing control of strategic instruments of Internet comminication. The subplot, which is certainly intended to harm me personally and professionally, is that crazed and genocidal anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists– even “holocaust deniers”— are running around loose with full Internet access even in Lethbridge Alberta?

My own best best assessment is that the offending social media item seems likely to have been produced by photo shop juxtapositions of different images. The “White man’s” head and the “Orthodox Jew’s” crushed glasses both look like inserts. The white wing of the victim’s crushed and displaced glasses seems to have been drawn in. There are signs of graphic tinkering in the relationship between the huge muscular arm in the forefront and the squeezed face of the suffering victim.

The reversal of Talmudic-style contempt for the Other (the Goy) cries out the pictured message of Jewish victimhood. The provocative power of the image is reinforced by the B’nai Brith’s very racialized description. In my recent research I have discovered that this image and others images very much like—images that often feature the same racist “White man”— show up in on many Internet posts, even one I found translated into German.

Garisson 2191d

Ben Garisson fa323

Where the picture provides the main message, the text provides the “evidence” of the antisemitism that the B’nai Brith and its allied agencies are simultaneously engaged in inventing, cultivating, spotlighting and publicly combating. What justification would there be for the existence of the  Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith without the métier of antisemitism?  The primary essence of the B’nai B’rith entities is to advance the agendas of the Israeli entity in the Diaspora, in other words in Canada, USA, Britain, France. Australia, and many other countries.

The text in the offending item is perhaps the most appalling excerpt of gutter prose I have ever seen. Its contents are so reprehensible that they demand careful consideration. Like an illegal drug planted by corrupt police on a targeted individual, the reprehensible social media item has been metaphorically put on my digital front door step and then advertised by the B’nai Brith to advance its own political agenda. I am left with little alternative but to respond as decently and as conscientiously to a crime in progress.

The author, it is claimed by the item’s creator, is Ben “Tel Aviv Terror” Garrison. This Garrison person has many nicknames. He is made to exclaim,

“There was never a Holocaust, but there should have been and, rest assured, there WILL be, as you serpentine kikes richly deserve one. I will not rest until every single filthy. Parasitic kike is rounded up and slaughtered like the vermin they are. The White man has had more than enough of International Jewry and we are fully prepared to smite the parasite for the millionth time. The greedy, hook nosed kikes know that there days are numbered and, unlike in the past, they now have nowhere to run. This time, there will be no kikes left alive to spead around the planet like cockroaches. We will get them ALL into the oven and their putrid memory will finally be erased from the planet once and for all. Like all parasites the Jew will continue to reproduce until every last one has been wiped out. This is why it is crucial that all kikes are ruthlessly and mercilesslt butchered for the good of us all. KILL ALL JEWS NOW! EVERY LAST ONE!” Ben “Tel Aviv Terror” Garrison

What kind of demented mind would come up with such a macabre celebration of envisaged mass murder? What would be the motivation to pen such a blatant incitement to hate and slaughter of a specific people?

My research into the offending item’s origins quickly led me to the many Internet profiles and posts of Ben Garrison. Ben Garrison is apparently a real person who lives in Montana. It turns out that this Ben Garrison, the sole named individual in the miniature text of the offending Facebook post, is also the aggressor in the photo shopped image. Adorned with dark glasses and a cowboy hat, Garrison is pictured as (in the words of B’nai Brith) as “the White man assaulting an Orthodox Jew.”

Ben Garrison

The real life Ben Garrison is often described as a libertarian political satirist. He is a prolific cartoonist whose cartoon and personal images lie at the center of an increasingly contentious media circus. Significantly Facebook figures centrally in the many-faceted narrative of Ben Garrison. Perhaps his Facebook connection is a major reason why B’nai Brith and related agencies chose Garrison’s Internet personae as poster boy for its hate speech campaign of fund raising and ritual defamation.

Holocaust Studies experts at Tel-Aviv University are among the most outspoken proponents of the view that Ben Garrison is indeed the kind of bigoted psychopath who would in real life utter provocations to the genocide of Jews. These Israeli academicians would probably argue it is entirely in character for Ben Garrison to have actually have declared with sincerity, “Kill All Jews.” The hypothesis that Ben Garrison’s racist screed should be taken at face value is implicit in the wording and headlines of the posts by B’nai Brith, Daniel Leons-Marder’s Everyday Antisemitism and the Coordination Forum for Countering Antisemitism.

The smear campaign’s architects and engineers are attempting a controlled demolition of my reputation in their quest to harness Facebook more fully to their own agendas. These architects and engineers count among their allies the creators and authors at Encyclopedia dramatica, Of Ben Garrison the encyclopedia’s drama experts report, “Scholars from Tel-Aviv University’s Center for Holocaust Studies have ominously described him [Ben Garrison] as the most racist man in the universe, and the biggest existential threat to the Jews since Hitler.”

This characterization runs counter to the dominant view that Garrison is “the Internet’s most trolled cartoonist.” According to a Breitbart article entitled “Ben Garrison: How the Internet Made a Fake White Supremacist”,

Montana-based artist Ben Garrison isn’t a violent Neo-Nazi, or even a white nationalist. He’s a polite, accomplished cartoonist, with no history of overt or covert racism. His true political leanings are libertarian, anti-elitist, and anti-globalist. Garrison is, in fact, the victim of one the most extraordinary and longest-running smear campaigns on the internet.

For a mixture of amusement and spite, in a trolling spree that has lasted over six years, thousands of online pranksters and real neo-Nazis have been remixing his cartoons into racist caricatures. Most Ben Garrison cartoons attack the government, corporations, and political movements.

However, almost immediately after one is published, it is remixed into a new version that attacks Jews, African-Americans, or other minorities. These are rapidly disseminated in troll communities and sometimes become more widely-shared than the originals.

Garrison cartoons 53de5

Garrison cartoon 2db39

If Breitbart has it right and Tel-Aviv’s Center for Holocaust Studies has it wrong, then the real Ben Garrison could not have written the disgusting text that goes along with the offensive image of the cartoonist putting his victim in a headlock. If Ben Garrison is not to be understood as the kind of person who could have come up with the wording replicated and publicized by Amanda Hohmann, Daniel Leons-Marder,and B’nai Brith’s CEO, Michael Mostyn, then these individuals are involved in a telling case of false flag deception.

Given the nature of their dubious employment in what Norman Finkelstein has labeled the “Holocaust Industry,” I find it difficult to believe that these individuals as well as their bosses, underlings and associates were not aware of the controversy swirling around Ben Garrison. After all, I was able to discovered the basic outlines of the Garrison controversy in a few google searches after viewing the posts featuring Mostyn’s, Hohmann’s and Leons-Marder’s comments. Is this group merely incompetent? Are its members part of a concerted agenda to change the public policies of many agencies, including those of the Canadian government, Facebook and the University of Lethbridge, through calculated misrepresentations, frauds and incitements?

In an Internet post entitled “Ben Garrison on Trolls” the Montana cartoonist is said to speak for himself. Interestingly, Garrison’s observations begin with his reference to the very same Facebook reference to “community standards” that supposedly initiated the B’nai Brith’s slander of me.

“This page wasn’t removed. We reviewed the page you reported for harassment. Since it did not violate our community standards, we did not remove it. Thanks for your report.”

This is the message [writes Ben Garrison] I received after reporting a hate page on Facebook. Near the top of the hate page was a statement that encouraged the extermination of all Jews. Along with that statement was a photo of my face and the name Ben Garrison. Trolls had stolen my artwork and photos from my blog, my cartoon site as well as my fine art site and had concocted an entire page devoted to spewing libelous hate. The troll entity called the page ‘Ben Garrison Cartoons—the Official Site.’  The trolls had stamped the name ‘Ben Garrison’ onto as many hateful images as possible throughout the page. How does one stop such blatant libel? Where do these trolls come from? Is it even possible to track them down? Why do they do such terrible things? Why me?

As I found out, it’s not just me. Many others have suffered the same outrageous indignity. It appears that trolls are no longer content merely talk to each other on sordid sites such as ‘4chan’ or ‘Stormfront.’ They want to go mainstream.  Therefore, social media are a natural target for them. Do they really believe the vitriolic memes they are shoveling, or are they merely playing an elaborate prank? It doesn’t matter. Their memes of hate must not go mainstream. Facebook must wake up and block the hate before it gets established. Hate speech is not free speech. Hate speech is blind, one-dimensional blackness. It is not reasoned debate.  It loudly shouts for the murder of human beings and Facebook is providing them a megaphone for that purpose.

In my view the largest weight of available evidence points to the conclusion that Ben Garrison did not write the “Kill All Jews” commentary. If Ben Garrison did not write the planted text, then who did?

Could the B’nai Brith’s highlighted social media item have been produced by a Zionist group, agency or individual? Why might partisans of Israel do such a thing? Could it be to provide the ammunition for smear campaigns directed against individuals and groups that criticize Israel? Could it be to create incidents to justify appeals for money such as those accompanying the B’nai Brith’s slanderous posts aimed at damaging the reputation of the University of Lethbridge and my tenured academic role in it as a 26-year member of the Arts and Science Faculty?

Worse, much worse, can be envisaged. Could it be that the production and planting of the of the Ben Garrison post as well as others like it might be deployed to provide “evidence” in thought crime and speech crime litigation, the ultimate specialty and raison d’etre of the B’nai Brith?  It is easy to imagine how such an outlandish and extravagant expression of hostility as that said to come from Garrison could be rendered useful to Crown prosecutors serving the Zionist masters.

Regardless of its source, there is no doubt that the Ben Garrison post could conceivably be exploited as a tailor made item to assist Crown prosecutors serving the agenda of B’nai Brith and related agencies. Such an item could definitely be deployed in a litigious assault on designated targets in order to establish webs of connection linking alleged hate speech with genocidal intent as well as the semantic nuke in the Zionist arsenal of weaponized words.

The conspiracy to advance the public perception that the engineered phrase, “holocaust denial,” has any internal and external coherence as an outlawed category of forbidden thought and speech runs absolutely contrary to the intellectual viability of the academy as well as the health of society more generally. The basic premise of the world’s most fraught term creates a false dichotomy that is coming to epitomize the decline of evidence-based rationality beneath the ascent of a new kind of orthodoxy combining both religious and secular elements.

Those that want to entrench and enforce an outlawed realm of forbidden thought and articulation brandish the weaponized term like an ideological sniper on steroids. They have no interest in providing definitions of where orthodoxy ends and where denial begins. As I am discovering by raising even a simple call for “open debate” on the main platform of Zionism’s unaccountable power, there are harsh new authoritarian forces that need to be called to account if we are even to slow down the police state incursions in our post-911 world.

The new configurations of authority are extending to important agencies like the Royal Canadian Legion, Jasper National Park, and the Alberta Society of Fiddlers. Those overseeing these important institutions are made to feel empowered to impose arbitrary sanctions and punishments against an individual who dared to question enshrined orthodoxy.

The message is made clear that the vibrance of art and culture, the wellbeing of veterans as well as the need to protect some of Alberta’s most majestic Alpine environments have become secondary commitments. The treatment in Jasper National Park of violinist Monika Schaefer signals the end of our free and democratic society. Our right and need to express independent thought, the starting point of collective self-determination, has has been sacrificed in order to enforce supine obedience to the sanctification of an historical interpretation that must not be held subjected to sceptical scrutiny and reconsideration.

How many are now being held, including some Canadians, in dark European dungeons for questioning any aspect of the unrelenting vilification of Germany as home of the most the most evil society of monsters ever to walk the face of the earth? Will we ever be able to liberate ourselves from the spell that is causing us to become so blind and unresponsive to the holocausts we ourselves are imposing on the natural world and also on the besieged worldwide community of our Muslim brothers and sisters?

What are the chances that the nuclear holocaust currently being promoted by our governors can be held back when those most intent on making war not peace are so firmly in charge? Is there a connection between the decline of the anti-war movement and the rise of the militarized police state currently deploying false flag-induced fears to constrain our ability to think, speak and act in conformity with the imperatives of survival? What we most require at this moment is simple affirmations of life’s beauty and integrity. Instead we are delivered coercive dictates demanding we deny what we our reason and research tells  us to be true.

How did we the academics, but especially we the historians, allow it to happen that a whole category of the European past has been declared off bounds to unfettered discussion and critical investigative scholarship? By allowing this development to proceed, a very sweeping and consequential precedent is being set.

How did we the citizens allow the principle to develop that government can declare that whole subject areas of research and publication to have been so perfectly interpreted, so correctly dealt with in every detail, that no revision and modification of existing conclusions can be allowed. What is the role of the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai B’rith in enforcing the ruthless bulldozing aside of the most basic foundations of freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and adherence to rigorous standards of scientific inquiry.

The B’nai Brith and Ben Garrison, the poster boy for the Zionist organization’s hate speech campaign, are exactly on the same page when it comes to Facebook. Both Ben Garrison and the B’nai Brith seek to constrain free speech on the Internet more tightly. Is this convergence of agendas a coincidence or are more calculated deceptions at play here? To publicize his desire that Facebook be more proactive in censoring the Internet, Garrison produced the following cartoon.

Ben Garisson Cartoon 61739

Facebook and Israel; Ben Garrison and the B’nai Brith

My FFWN co-host, Dr. Kevin Barrett, has evaluated the evidence surrounding the Garrison post and concluded it was “very likely produced by B’nai Brith itself, or other Zionist extremists of like mind, as a PR operation. No wonder they are “monitoring” the police to make sure they behave themselves.

Presenting his own version of the B’nai Brith’s highlighted image, Dr. Barrett continues

The absurd rant with its lurid references to “greedy hook-nosed kikes” and so on does not pass the smell test. Whoever created this image obviously did not do so with the intention of convincing the public to take action against Jews and/or Zionists. On the contrary, it appears to have been designed for the opposite purpose: To convince the public that crazed, foul-mouthed, murderous anti-Semites are a clear and present danger.

Virtually every time a swastika is spray painted on a synagogue, the culprit turns out to be a “self-hating” Jewish Zionist trying to conjure up the specter of an “anti-Semitic threat.” Would an investigation of the provenance of this image find something similar?

Dr. Barrett observes that“the manufactured incident smearing Tony Hall may be part of a coordinated program, orchestrated from Tel Aviv, to try to stop the rise of the ever-increasing virtual army of pro-Palestine social media users.”

As highlighted in Telesur, the government of Israel and Facebook have been represented at the highest level in a series of meetings aimed at conspiring to hold back the growing flood of social media posts subjecting Israel’s maltreatment of the Palestinians to sceptical public scrutiny.

fb telesur 7fd31

This recent development well demonstrates the specious nature of B’nai Brith’s characterization of Facebook as some kind of rogue agency unwilling to act immediately to pre-empt an existential threat emanating from Lethbridge. More likely the B’nai Brith’s alarmist posts in late August of 2016 were, in part at least, a ploy to divert attention from the reality that social media, but especially Facebook, is more and more being harnessed to Zionist goals and agendas.

Was the B’nai Brith’s deployment of the racist side of Ben Garrison’s dual public personae calculated to serve the double purpose of both smearing me and my school as well as leading interested parties to a surprising “libertarian” voice for the suppression of Internet freedom? What should be done about Internet trolls such as those at the B’nai Brith that have shown themselves to be unrelenting in planting lies and innuendo with the aim of silencing criticism of Israel?


Three Israelis Arrested on Suspicion of Organ Trafficking


Surgeon among suspects; traffickers would approach poor people and offer to buy a kidney for transplant in Turkey.

Sharon Pulwer Oct 29, 2016 6:52 PM
Three people were arrested last week on suspicion of organ trafficking, one of whom is a doctor already standing trial for similar offenses in the past.
The three were arrested on Tuesday at the end of a month-long undercover investigation. On Wednesday, the Rishon Letzion Magistrate’s Court ordered Dr. Michael Ziss and Shlomi Biton held without bail, and released the third suspect to house arrest.
Ziss, a surgeon, was extradited from Ukraine to Israel in 2009 on similar suspicions. He and Biton were eventually charged with organ trafficking and conspiracy to commit a crime in that case, which is still being heard by the Be’er Sheva District Court. But in October 2014, the court rejected the prosecution’s request to keep Ziss in jail until the end of his trial.
In the new case, the three men are suspected of running a complete trafficking operation: locating people willing to sell a kidney, locating patients willing and able to pay for one and then arranging the transplant. Police said the traffickers would approach poor people who were in debt and propose that they sell a kidney for transplant. The actual transplants were performed in a Turkish hospital, with the donors posing as relatives of the patient. The patients paid hundreds of thousands of shekels for the service.
At Wednesday’s court hearing, police said the ring was working on dozens of such deals. In at least one case, the transplant was actually completed, and there is evidence that the patient paid Ziss. The other cases were at earlier stages of the process.
The National Transplant Center stressed that it was not involved in any of the transactions and that no illegal transplants were performed in Israel.
Selling organs is illegal everywhere in the world except Iran. But Israel is considered a major player in the organ trafficking business, and the number of Israelis who have sold kidneys via traffickers is estimated at between 10,000 and 20,000.
Although recipients pay hundreds of thousands of shekels for the kidney, the donor, according to various reports, gets only between 60,000 and 100,000 shekels ($16,000-$26,000). The rest of the fee goes to the head of the trafficking ring, the doctor overseeing the transplant, the lawyer who prepares the false affidavits, and expenses such as hospital and hotel fees.
One reason Israel is considered fertile ground for organ traffickers is that postmortem organ donation rates are among the lowest in the Western world, mainly for religious reasons. As of January 2016, 1,153 Israelis were awaiting organ donations, including 843 who needed kidneys.
read more:

FBI Director Comey’s ‘Leaked’ Memo Explains Why He’s Reopening the Clinton Email Case

21st Century Wire says…

21WIRE reported on Friday about the FBI’s surprising announcement that it would be reopening the Clinton email case due to new evidence of ‘classified information’ found on sex cheat Anthony Weiner’s (newly estranged husband of Clinton chief aid Huma Abedin)  computer which was subject to a seperate investigation. Will this really yield anything significant in the 10 days running-up to the Nov 8th election, or is this just clever Democrat party smoke and mirrors? It seems that Washington’s political tricksters have already sprung into action…

After Comey’s shock announcement, a “leaked” memo appeared out of nowhere, supplied to Fox News, in which Comey and the FBI seem to be going through a routine set of prescribed political moves designed to implement damage control.

ELITE CIRCLES: FBI head James Comey and friend Hillary Clinton.

Certainly, a desperate Democratic Party, and an even more desperate Obama White House (over the last 3 weeks, Obama and his wife Michelle have been out campaigning more that Hillary Clinton herself), could be pressuring or nudging the FBI on this volatile issue which could easily tilt a close presidential race against Donald Trump. Aside from the obvious potential of another Clinton scandal, yesterday’s FBI move could also be a prelude to the following possible scenarios:

  1. Protect the President, who is already deeply tied to the Clinton email cover-up
  2. Democratic Party Machine has created a distraction to cover-up latest Wikileaks dump.
  3. FBI are trying to restore lost public confidence over allegations of favoring Hillary Clintons.
  4. Create a controlled explosion this weekend to clear the decks for another salacious Trump scandal next week.

NOTE: Despite calls from the Clinton camp for FBI to disclose what they have (which they cannot by law anyway, you’d think Hillary would have already known that), it is highly unlikely that the FBI will release any real specifics before the election – if they have anything at all. It’s just too early to tell. 

SEE ALSO: FBI James Comey was board member of HSBC – Clinton Foundation & Drug Cartel ‘bank of choice’

The FBI director stoked outrage last month when he announced that he would not recommend the Justice Department seek an indictment against Clinton or any of the other parties to the investigation – allowing Clinton to dodge any criminal probe before the election – despite the fact that Comey stated to a Congressional investigative committee that Clinton was “extremely careless,” and that Clinton openly lied about her handling classified information on her unsecured private server throughout her tenure as the US Secretary of State.

Zero Hedge adds:

“Now, it is the democrats turn to rage at Comey and the FBI, although Comey likely did not have much choice: had he kept the information secret, it certainly would have leaked as we predicted; as such his best recourse was to come clean, although many have speculated about the cryptic nature of the disclosure. Needless to say, all Comey would need to do to regain the Demcorats’ trust and favor is to announce in just a few days that nothing material has been found and that the second probe is also over.”

Here is “leaked” (aka ‘just covering my ass) memo from FBI director James Comey:


Watch this space.

Here is a highlight reel of Hillary Clinton lying on at least 5 occasions when asked direct questions about her illegal private email server:

READ MORE ELECTION NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire 2016 Files

SHOUT! POLL: Which US Oligarch Family is More Corrupt?

21st Century Wire asks….

HAVE YOUR SHOUT: Which US oligarch family is more corrupt, the Clintons, or the Bushes?

VOTE, comment and engage…

READ MORE ELECTION NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire 2016 Files

Haaretz: “Thanks to Trump, We Can Better Understand How Hitler Was Possible”


America isn’t Nazi Germany and Trump isn’t the Führer. But today it is easier to grasp how millions of people accepted the outrageous lies and dangerous delusions offered by the tyrant.

Chemi Shalev Oct 28, 2016 11:15 AM
 19comments   Zen Subscribe now
 Shareshare on facebook  Tweet send via email reddit stumbleupon

Republican U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump holds a rally with supporters in San Diego, California, U.S., May 27, 2016.Jonathan Ernst, Reuters
Opinion Trump’s deep dive into fascist, anti-Semitic conspiracy thinking
Opinion The Trump-fueled ‘safe spaces’ for anti-Semitism few American Jews ever see
Opinion I hadn’t been called a kike since fourth grade. Donald Trump changed all that
American articles have ascribed the term “Lügenpresse,” recently hurled at reporters in some Donald Trump rallies, to the Nazi era. That’s partially accurate. The derogatory German term for “lying press” was already being widely used by German Catholics a century before the Nazis came to power to describe their opponents in the liberal and democratic newspapers. The term was back in vogue in the First World War to cast aspersions on the foreign media and their negative reporting on Deutschland. The term Lügenpresse was then exploited by the Nazis as catchphrase for Jewish-owned and other liberal media outlets, but it was no less prevalent over the past year among Germans who accused modern German media of covering up sordid crimes committed by Muslim immigrants. So it is a loaded term with deep roots in German consciousness that sounds detached and even ridiculous in an American context – except, possibly, if you’re a Nazi yourself. 
This is not to say that comparisons between the rise of Donald Trump and the ascent of Adolf Hitler are inappropriate. On the contrary: Such analogies may be light years from perfect, but they are hardly misplaced. It just seems to me that the emergence of the specifically German word Lügenpresse provided a convenient peg for some in the media to remake a connection that they have otherwise been shying away from in recent months, either because they are wary of the expected pushback or because, as Americans, they would prefer not to believe that America in 2016 bears any resemblance whatsoever to Germany of the 1920’s or 1930’s.
Nonetheless, some of the elements of the Nazi ascent to power, as well as the emergence of other totalitarian regimes in Europe at the time, can provide clues and early warning signs to explain Trump’s success in the Republican primaries and his continuing popularity as we approach the presidential elections. Conversely – and this has been dealt with less in the media – Trump’s astonishing selection as the GOP candidate for the presidency, his continuing appeal to millions of Americans and the basic characteristics of his message have provided a new and valuable viewing angle on one of the last century’s most perplexing questions: how was Adolf Hitler possible? 

And please spare me your “how dare you compare” indignation, if you are so inclined. I do not claim that America is Nazi Germany, that Trump is Hitler or that another Holocaust is just around the corner. But the blanket ban on using the most discussed, most debated and most researched issue of the 20th century as a reference point for viewing current events is, in my view, beyond ridiculous. Especially as it usually comes from people who routinely depict every two-bit Arab propagandist as a Goebbels and every minuscule human rights NGO as successors of kapos and Judenrats.  
Viewed through the lenses of the current presidential campaign, historical descriptions of Hitler’s appeal to the German masses suddenly seem hauntingly familiar. Take, for example, Hitler biographer Ian Kershaw’s description of the recurring themes in Hitler’s speeches: “The contrast of Germany’s strength in a glorious past with its current weakness and national humiliation – a sick state in the hands of traitors and cowards who had betrayed the Fatherland to its powerful enemies and behind them, the Jews…a cheating and corrupt government and party system presiding over economic misery, social division, political conflict and ethical collapse.”
Or Richard Evans, writing in The Coming of the Third Reich: “He gained much of his oratorical success by telling his audiences what they wanted to hear. He used simple, straightforward language that ordinary people could understand, short sentences, powerful emotive slogans…There were no qualifications in what he said; everything was absolute, uncompromising, irrevocable, undeviating, unalterable, final. He seemed, as many who listened to his early speeches testified, to speak straight from the heart, and to express their deepest fears and desires. Increasingly, too, he exuded self-confidence, aggression, belief in the ultimate triumph of his party, even a sense of destiny.”
skip – fb share button
Sharing is caring. Spread the word

Of course, most people didn’t take Hitler seriously at first. Refined Germans viewed him with distaste and dismissed him as a buffoon, and not only because of his melodramatic speeches and volatile gestures. Writing in the New Statesman, social critic William Crotch recounted his own impressions of the future German dictator in the late 1920’s: “Another thing that struck me was the man’s utter incapacity to deal with important details….His talk was a succession of vague generalities, couched in attractive if flowery language, but showing in every case either complete ignorance or at least complete contempt for detail.”
But while Hitler was becoming the darling of the masses nonetheless, he never considered himself one of them. As historian Yaakov Talmon wrote in Myth of the Nation and Vision of Revolution, Hitler was contemptuous of the slow-witted German masses. “Denying them rational understanding, judgment, willpower, and mental balance, he composed an astonishingly shrewd vade-mecum (handbook, CS): how to bamboozle them with hysteria and incitement, oversimplification and repetition, stunts and tricks, parades and ceremonials. Brooding morbidly over its lost glory and wallowing in an ecstasy of self-pity, a defeated Germany offered a uniquely propitious target for the possessed demagogue to cast his spell and hypnotize its masses: he and they shared the same resentment of defeat and foreign dictation.”
In The Origins of Totalitarianism, Hannah Arendt writes that initial successes of the Nazis and other totalitarian movements in the 1920’s and 1930’s stemmed from their reliance on hitherto politically uninvolved masses desperate for economic and social relief. Their success proved “that democratic government had rested as much on the silent approbation and tolerance of the indifferent and inarticulate sections of the people as on the articulate and visible institutions and organizations of the country.” Having been detached from political discourse and ignorant of recent history, Arendt writes, these masses were willing to accept bold lies and bald assertions as fact and to adopt the fantastical depictions of reality made by their leaders. And this was before the age of the Internet and social media, when the so-called Lügenpresse could still dictate the public’s agenda. 
skip – Email Alerts
Sign up below and receive every new Chemi Shalev analysis directly in your inbox
For me, at least, the rise of Donald Trump has been an eye-opener. Watching so many Americans fall under his spell has provided a prism to the hypnotic influence that Hitler had on Germans close to a century ago. How justified grievances and genuine economic plight, the disintegration of classes in society and the formation of others in their stead could combine with resentment, racism and downright ignorance to bring a patently unqualified and dangerous person so close to a position of so much power. How masses of Germans were willing to accept and support the litany of lies, the fountains of fabrications and dangerous delusions offered by Hitler. How hatred toward foreigners and those perceived as foreigners can burst out from the underground and then be drummed up to fever pitch. How the established leadership of a country, like that of a political party, can find itself weak and paralyzed even when faced with such an existential danger. How a politician more disciplined, more focused, more knowledgeable and more persuasive than Trump – but with the same dangerous ideas – might have easily made up the 5-10 percent of popular support that Trump seems to be missing.
Of course, it goes without saying that freethinking and individualistic Americans are not regimented discipline-yearning Germans. Or that the U.S. is strong and resilient, while Hitler would never have come to power without the double whammy of Germany’s crushing defeat in World War I and the catastrophic 1929-1930 depression, though perhaps I underestimate the ability of modern social media and cynical politicians to create a delusional world in which things seem just as bad today. Or that the united forces confronting Trump in 2016 are nothing like the splintered body politic of the late Weimar Republic – hopefully – with the Communists exerting a radical influence in the other direction that pulled Germany apart.
“How did Adolf Hitler – described by one eminent magazine editor in 1930 as a “half-insane rascal,” a “pathetic dunderhead,” a “nowhere fool,” a “big mouth” – rise to power in the land of Goethe and Beethoven? What persuaded millions of ordinary Germans to embrace him and his doctrine of hatred? How did this “most unlikely pretender to high state office” achieve absolute power in a once democratic country and set it on a course of monstrous horror?” asks Michiko Kakutani in her New York Times book review of Volker Ullrich’s new biography of Hitler. The answer, I propose, is clearer today than it was before Trump emerged on the scene.
Even if you believe the polls and assume that the 2016 elections will have a happier ending and that Donald Trump will soon wind up as a sorry footnote in history, it’s hard to deny that his stupendous success thus far has been, at the very least, educational. As Evans writes: “The story of how Germany, a stable and modern country, in less than a single lifetime led Europe into moral, physical and cultural ruin and despair is a story that has sobering lessons for us all.” 
read more:

NWO Top of The Snake: The men called Jesuits rule the world

Eric Jon Phelps – These men called Jesuits rule the world

Vatican Assassins: “Wounded In The House Of My Friends”

The wicked history of the Jesuit Order is covered from its inception in 1534 to 2007.  This history includes the terrible manslaughter of WWI and WWII—the Black Pope’s Second Thirty Years’ War (1914-1945).  The Cold War Hoax is also detailed, including the attempt of President Kennedy to end that papal crusade against the Asian Buddhist peoples of the Far East.  Francis Cardinal Spellman is proven to be the mastermind behind the murder of Kennedy.  The Cover-up continues today at the hands of the Pope’s American Roman Hierarchy and Knights of Malta ruled by Jesuit Provincials.

Putin Massively Influenced by Jewish Illuministic/Masonic Ideologies

In the midst of what  US Congress already called the 3rd World War – others call it the “War on Terror” (“justified” by western false flag operations) many are looking  towards  a “saviour”: Russia’s Vladimir Putin and his Putinism. Some say only he could save  world peace.

However, the following will show that this man is being affected by very dangerous ideas: He is a Jew, who was brought up and is anchored in master race-Talmudism. In particular, his Rabbi is a Chabad Lubavitch seeing the goal of his life in bringing about the coming of the Judaic Messiah, Ben David, through a world war. For this purpose, he is influencing Putin (Gog / Magog?). Furthermore  Judaists  emphasize that Communism is Judaism – and vice versa. Therefore, and  because Putin is a former KGB agent and boss of the FSB, the KGB’s successor, Putin was able to say, that the fall of the Soviet Union was the catastrophe of the 20th century. Hence his bad habit of killing his critics.

Another Rasputin of Putin´s is Alexander Dugin, who, like the very influential Igor Panarin,  put the satanic Eurasianism into Putin´s, his government´s, and the Russians´ heads: The restoration of the Romanov empire including Alaska plus the EU!

Dugin’s ideology is “fascist fascism.” Dugin says, the meaning of Russia is to trigger Doomsday. Death is the beginning of life, says this atheist!

But most of all,  Putin is a Royal Arch Mason and obedient to his Grand Master. According to a classmate, he was selected as the Antichrist of the Illuminati. Russia´s  central bank and thus Russia is in the claws of Rothschild´s FED.

Putin is furthermore very strongly influenced by 3 nationalist philosophers of the 19th century and has imposed on his Governors to read their works: Nikolai Berdyaev, Vladimir Solovyov and Ivan Ilyin. “The Russian messianic idea”, wrote Berdyaev “always raised Russia as a country   that would help to solve the problems of mankind.” Putin sees himself as this “Messiah”.

Putin is ruling because he is a real national hero in the eyes of his people -more so the more he opposes the US (Crimea). Nationalism is the religion of the Russians, who are mostly atheists. This nationalist religion is supported by the Russian Orthodox Church, whose priests are largely Crypto-Jews. The patriarchs were and is former KGB agents who probably informed against many.

To what extent has all this Pharisee-Illuminati-Masonic National-Fascism affected Putin in his role at the end of the world?

According to the European Leadership Network,  NATO and Russia are seriously preparing  for war. A former adviser to Vladimir Putin warned that Putin has been planning the 3rd World War for the past 10 years.

The consultant spoke of Putin not thinking that Ukraine is a country, but a country which originally belonged to Russia. He also sees Poland, Hungary and Romania in the same light, which raises the question: Has Putin also directed his attention on these countries?

A Russian Kremlin critic, Piontkovsky, says Putin wants to destroy NATO and the United States.
An analyst closely affiliated to Foreign Minister Lavrov, Fyodor Lukyanov, says, the mood in the Russian people and in the foreign policy elite is very bleak: war is quite possible – and the warnings are becoming stronger by the day.

One danger is that Russia is weak – and is not toe to toe with the US in conventional war. Therefore, Putin puffs himself up, making himself stronger than he is, calculating that the West will give in to his strong will out of fear of confrontation. His nuclear threshold is now low – and his weakness – even politically domestically – could force him into a big War.

* * * * * *

While the world stands in what the US Congress has already dubbed WWIII – others call it “The War on Terror” (“justified” by western false flag operations) – mankind is looking towards a savior: Russia´s Vladimir Putin and his Putinism.  What kind of “savior” Putin is will ensue from the following.


Putin´s  Valdai speech shows him distancing himself from the Western unipolar world order.

Renowned Stephen Lendman writes: “Putin forthrightly works for peace and stability. He deserves universal support – he is the Best Hope for World Peace”. Many think Lendman is right. But is he?

Sputnik 2 Oct. 2015 Quotes Der SternThe Russian president has been able to convince the West that those who want peace in Syria should cooperate with Assad.

Russian President Vladimir Putin is again winning the respect on the international arena as he managed to offer a constructive solution for Syria, while other countries were at a loss . “Putin is doing everything right — at least everything to ensure the interests of his own country.”

BUT: According to the Moscow Times 3 Aug. 2015, the Russian political and financial system is utterly corrupt and cynical. Putin is one of the richest persons in the world (how did this poor backyard boy manage that? In the KGB or through its successor, Putin´s even worse FSB the boss of which he was? Or through the many Jewish oligarchs around him?

The Independent 15 March 2015:  Vladimir Putin says Russia was preparing to use nuclear weapons ‘if necessary’ and blames US for Ukraine crisis.

What does Putin really think. What is his background – apart from his Communist past?
Putin said: The break-up of the Soviet union was the catastrophe of the century

1. Pharisaic Jews
I have previously warned against Putin and mentioned his Jewish roots based on Russian genealogist study – also referred to by Henry Makow. He was brought up by a  Jewish Talmudic family.

Interview by Daryll Bradford Smith from The French Connection with a well-informed Russian – after the 10:00 min. mark : Putin is Jewish and his mother´s surname was Shalomova in Putin´s autobiography – a Jewish name later changed to Shelomova. She converted to Russian Orthodoxylike so many Crypto-Jewish priests.

chabad-putinIndeed, Putin is close interwoven with the Jewish Doomsday sect, the Chabad Lubavitch, whose aim is to promote the second coming of the Judaic Messiah, rebbe schneerson, ben David in the middle of a great war (Gog & Magog – Putin Gog?) – a political genius to make Israel the ruler of the world:

Forward News 5 Oct. 2015Berel Lazar is sometimes called “Putin’s rabbi” and is Russian chief rabbi –though coming from Italy..

Today, Lazar said, Russia has in Vladimir Putin its “most pro-Jewish leader,” whom he credits with “fighting anti-Semitism more vigorously than any Russian leader before him.”

Putin-jewLazar also has considerable clout in the Jewish communities of Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan, and elsewhere.

But Lazar and Putin’s relationship seems to go deeper than political expediency. In 2012, Lazar led the Russian leader on a tour of Jerusalem’s Western Wall. And last year Putin made Lazar a member of Russia’s prestigious Merit to the Fatherland order.

Judaism is a radical Revolutionary  ideology which sees Non-jews as outlawed goyim (cattle): According to Vladimir Putin, 85% of members of the first Soviet government were Jews.And its God is Lucifer – not the Father of Christ.

The following  is from the French Connection  by Daryll Bradford Smith:

1) Some call it Marxism — I call it Judaism.” (The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935). 2) The Communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows that, just as in the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism, so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism.”(A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 143-144). 3): “The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, …whose goal is to create a new world order. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the world.” (The American Hebrew September 10, 1920).

Karl Marx was a cousin of Nathan Rothschild who paid him for the Communist

2) Freemasonry/Illuminism
putin necktieI have previously written about Freemasonry as Judaism/Pharisaism for Non-Jews – founded in modern shape by the Rosicrucians/Jesuits. Its goal is Pharisaic world hegemony as described 118 years ago by the Learned Elders of Zion.

Putin is a Royal Arch Freemason – like all KGB, MI6 and MI5 agents. Putin is a Royal Arch Freemason – possibly playing the role as the Illuminati Antichrist. Putin wears scarab on his necktie and shows many Masonic hand signs.

Bibliotheca Pleyades: The scarab symbolized the strength of the body, the resurrection of the soul, and the Eternal and Incomprehensible Creator, Ra, in His aspect as Lord of the Sun. It was the symbol of Egyptian soldiers – and is widely used in  Freemasonry.
Although a Putin confident has stated that Putin would nationalize Rothschild´s Russian central bank – he has not done so. So, he and Russia are still under Rothschild control. It is stated that Putin has no choice but to change to Stalin Mode.

3) National messianism
Putin is deeply nationalistic- religious – influenced by three 19, century philosophers: The Kremlin recently assigned three philosophic books to regional governors by Nikolai Berdyaev, Vladimir Solovyovand Ivan Ilyin.” They foresee Russia´s greatness under one autocrat.
Russia would transcend secularism and atheism and create a unified spiritual kingdom.“The Russian messianic conception, Berdyaev wrote, “always exalted Russia as a country that would help to solve the problems of humanity.”  Putin sees himself as this “savior” (The New York Times 3 March 2014).

This paranoia was further promoted by a Kremlin insider´s , Igor Panarin´s, vision of the Russian empire rising again – led by Putin. Panari was the dean of the Russian foreign ministry’s diplomatic academy and a frequent guest on Russian TV stations. The European Union joining China and Russia’s “Eurasian Union”as part of a triumvirate of global domination. The US would collapse – and Russia retake Alaska.(The Telegraph of London 2009).

4) Alexander Dugin´s (Putin´s Rasputin) Eurasianism
The National Review 18 June 2014:  Dugin is the mad philosopher, redesigning the brains of much of the Russian government and public, filling their minds with a new hate-ridden totalitarian ideology whose consequences can only be catastrophic in the extreme, not only for Russia, but for the entire human race.Dugin is antisemitic!

In recent months,the embrace of Duginist ideas by the Putin regime has become ever more evident. But now, with the appearance of “The American Empire Should Be Destroyed”: Alexander Dugin and the Perils of Immanentized Eschatology”, by James Heiser, we finally have a book-length treatment.

dugin-geopoliticsDugin was expelled from the Moscow Aviation Institute for involvement in pro-Nazi mystical circles in the early 1980s.
Russia must unite around itself all the continental powers, including Germany, Central and Eastern Europe, the former Soviet republics, Turkey, Iran, and Korea, into grand Eurasian Union strong enough to defeat the West (USA). In order to be so united “from Lisbon to Vladivostok,” this Eurasian Union will need a defining ideology, and for this purpose Dugin has developed a new “Fourth Political Theory” combining all the strongest points of Communism, Nazism, Ecologism, and Traditionalism,

From Traditionalism, he derives a justification for stopping free thought. All the rest is straight out of Nazism. What Russia needs, says Dugin, is a “genuine, true, radically revolutionary and consistent, fascist fascism.

Only a global crusade against the U.S., the West, globalization, and their political-ideological expression, liberalism, is capable of becoming an adequate response. . . The American empire should be destroyed.”

It is not an exaggeration to state that Dugin’s intended goal is the End of the WorldThis is Russia´s task.”

In 2001, [Stephen] Shenfield observes that Dugin’s eschatological view is “Manichean”. Dugin admixes Christian concepts, often repeating the notion that the West is the realm of “Antichrist.” Death is the way to immortality. Love will begin when the world ends. We must long for it, like true Christians.

The man who thinks that the “meaning of Russia” is “the End of the World” is the man whose geopolitical doctrine is being implemented by the ruler of Russia.Putin-datan-horns

In short, Dugin’s Eurasianism is a satanic cult. This is the ideology behind the Putin regime’s “Eurasian Union” project.
And he thinks the Ukraine is a sine qua non for the Eurasia.

5) The Russian people
I have previously writtenIn Russia you are dealing with a major European nation, a nation of aggressive, hierarchical, revanchist, statists, brought up on the cult of war and militaristic exploits, which does not recognize the modern world system and considers the stoic endurance of hardships and privations as a part of life.

The Russian people are said to be mostly atheists.  Most Russians identify themselves with  the Church, because it is part of their national heritage, not for religious reasons.

6) The Orthodox Russian Church
This Church is through and through infiltrated by Crypto-Jews  – renowned Brother Nathaniel Kapner is one of them. Although he is a sworn enemy of Judaism, he worships Jewish Putin – as does this Church as such.

Here follows a Kapner-apotheosis of Putin to whom the future belongs (God have mercy upon us!)

Its patriarchs are former KGB agents hailing the rulers and taking the highest positions in that church.  Present patriarch, Kirill, said: Putin is helping Russia become more powerful and regain its old positions,as a country that respects itself and enjoys the respect of all others.”

This is Antichristian since Christ said that his kingdom was not of this world. Putin is an Antichristian dictator who liquidates his critics.

So, Talmudic Jewish Masonic Putin, an Illuminati puppet and feigned Christian , surrounds himself with Jewish Oligarchs who have made him one of the richest men in the world. A patriotic people and Church demand him to restore the Soviet -Union – as does his Rasputin, Alexander Dugin – who even demands the EU to become a Russian Vassal. Additionally, Dugin preaches redemption of the soul through death and sees Russia´s task to bring about the end of the world. So does Putin´s rabbi, the Lubawitscher Chabad, Berel Lazar, who will bring about the Coming of the Judaic Messiah, ben David through the Apocalypse.

So, to what extent has all this Jewish Illuminati-Masonic  national-fascism influenced  Putin towards his role in the end of the world?


NATO-RussiaThe European Leadership Network has brought a sinister analysis, which I have previously described :  “Both exercises (NATO and Russia)  show that each side is training with the other side’s capabilities and most likely war plans in mind. “While spokespeople may maintain that these operations are targeted against hypothetical opponents, the nature and scale of them indicate otherwise: Russia is preparing for a conflict with NATO, and NATO is preparing for a possible confrontation with Russia.”

A former adviser to Vladimir Putin is warning the nations that Putin has been planning World War 3 for the past decade. Speaking to a conference in Lithuania, the former presidential adviser Andrey Illarionov said the invasion of Ukraine and the takeover of Crimea was always in the cards with Putin wanting to spark a major conflict in the Baltic region.

The adviser spoke of Putin not believing the Ukraine was a country but a state that originally belonged to Russia. He also sees Poland, Hungary and Romania in the same light which begs to question does he have his sights set on those countries as well?

It was Andrei Piontkovsky, a Russian political analyst and frequent Kremlin critic, who first suggested the theory, last August, that Putin’s plan for the Baltics was more sophisticated, and more calculated, than anybody realized.


Max Fisher VoxThe prospect of a major war, even a nuclear war, in Europe has become thinkable, experts warn, even plausible.

Widely considered both an influential leader and an unofficial interpreter of Russia’s foreign policy establishment, Fyodor Lukyanov is chief of Russia’s most important foreign policy think tank reflecting the state and its worldview. He is known to be close to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. I interviewed Lukyanov. When the discussion turned to the risks of war, he grew dire: “There is a growing concern within Moscow’s foreign policy elite.
Regular Russian people don’t desire war, but rather feared it would become necessary to defend against the implacably hostile United States.

encirclement of Russia-China“The perception is that somebody would try to undermine Russia as a country that opposes the United States, and then we will need to defend ourselves by military means,” he explained.

Such fears, vague but existential, are everywhere in Moscow.  For most Americans, such predictions sound improbable, even silly. But the dangers and the warnings are growing every week.

The story of that war, if anyone is still around to tell it, will begin with Russian President Vladimir Putin trying to solve a problem: Putin’s Russia is weak. It can no longer stand toe to toe with the US. It no longer has Europe divided in a stalemate; rather, it sees the continent as dominated by an ever-encroaching anti-Russian alliance. This is made more urgent for Putin by his political problems at home.In 2012, during his reelection, popular protests (instigated by the US/Soros) and accusations of fraudweakened his sense of political legitimacy. The problem worsened with Russia’s 2014 economic collapse.

Putin’s answer has been to assert Russian power beyond its actual strength — and, in the process, to recast himself as a national hero guarding against foreign enemies.
kaiser-Wilhelm-PutinKnowing his military is outmatched against the Americans, he is blurring the distinction between war and peace, deploying tactics that exist in, and thus widen, the gray between: militia violence, propaganda, cyberattacks, under a new rubric the Russian military sometimes calls “hybrid war.

I have previously compared Prussia´s Otto von Bismarck with Putin – and Bismarck´s puppet (in the 19. century, at least) Kaiser Wilhelm II.

He believes the West will ultimately yield to his superior will. To solve the problem of Russia’s conventional military weakness, he has dramatically lowered the threshold for when he would use nuclear weapons, hoping to terrify the West such that it will bend to avoid conflict. In public speeches, over and over, he references those weapons and his willingness to use them. He has enshrined that a nuclear war could be winnable

Putin is more popular than ever (also among common westners).

Russia’s aggression, born of both a desire to re-engineer a European order that it views as hostile and a sense of existential weakness that justifies drastic measures, makes Putin far more willing to accept the dangers of war.

Joseph S. Nye, former Assistant Defense Secretary and chairman of the US National Intelligence Council confirms this.


  • The Jew World Order Unmasked

    by ZionCrimeFactory


    THE RULE OF the Talmudic Jew in modern times is nearly one of an absolute monarch of a country. The Jews, through their complete domination of world finance and banking — through their malignant monopoly of the mass media of America, Britain, France, Canada and other Western powers — through their influential and vast network of subversive “lobby groups” — through their dominion over the courts and law profession in general — not to mention their pernicious presence inside the highest levels of government of the most powerful countries — have thus taken full control of the entire planet, as was foretold in ancient Jewish religious texts.

    As the former Malaysian Prime Minister, Dr. Mahathir Mohamed, explained: “The Jews rule this world by proxy, they get others to fight and die for them… They have now gained control of the most powerful countries … This tiny community have become a world power.” Dr. Mahathir spoke the truth, and the reality of his words couldn’t be more clear; all one has to do is look around you and observe the terrible power of the treacherous Jews. The Jewish-Zionist terrorist leader Ze’ev Jabotinsky (founder of the Jewish terror group Irgun Zevai Leumi) proudly proclaimed: “There is only one power which really counts. The power of political pressure. We Jews are the most powerful people on earth, because we have this power, and we know how to apply it.” (Jewish Daily Bulletin, July 27, 1935) The fact that the vicious crimes of this disgusting criminal’s insidious terrorist organization — such as the King David Hotel bombing and Deir Yassin Massacre — are not mentioned in Western history texts or at all covered in High School and University history classes, is a testament to the veracity of his exultant statement.

    Jewish power is supremely epitomized by the fact that criticism of Christianity, Islam, or any other major religion is fully permissible in our societies, but criticism of Jews and Judaism, on the other hand, is taboo, off-limits and socially and politically dangerous. As the saying goes, if you want to know where the power lies ask whom you cannot criticize.

    It’s quite interesting to note that the researchers of the “New World Order” who endeavor to deflect attention away from the Jews — such as Alex Jones, Jim Marrs, Alan Watt, Mark Dice, etc — are not silenced or suppressed, but in fact promoted by the Jewish controlled press. These purported critics of the New World Order and Illuminati who employ vague terms like “elites”/”globalists”/”the establishment”/”the military industrial complex”, and who regularly invoke a confusing deluge of elusive entities and kosher poltergeists (everything from Satanists, Occultists, Freemasons, Jesuits, Nazis, Fascists, Knights Templar, WASPs, British Royalists, Reptilians, Space Aliens, etc) are free to promote their theories and ideas on radio, television, the internet and in books, uninhibited. Their radio shows are not being cancelled, their books are not being taken off the shelves or blocked from publication, their videos are not being censored or expunged from video sharing websites, their websites and blogs are not being shut down on a whim, they are not being fined or thrown in prison for “hate speech.” On the contrary, we can find these kosher clowns being highlighted on mainstream Jewish propaganda television networks, like the History Channel, and making appearances on MSM talk shows, like The View. Critics of Jewish power, Zionism and the Jewish criminal network couldn’t even dream of achieving that level of notoriety. I wonder why?

    Freemasons are often talked about by these people, but what they deliberately conceal from their audiences is the fact that the masons are subordinate and beholden to the Jews, which is admitted in the masons’ own books. On page 249 of “Duncan’s Ritual and Monitor” it states that Masonry is subservient to Judaism, noting that a recipient of the Royal Arch Degree pledges himself “For the good of Masonry, generally, but the Jewish nation in particular.” The undeniable fact that Freemasonry itself is based on the rites and rituals of the Jewish religion and the mysticism of the Jewish Cabala, is also purposefully glossed over by these deceivers.

    The Protocols of Zion make clear this intention to use subservient Gentiles (shabbas goyim) as scapegoats,

    “GENTILE masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of action of our force, even its very abiding-place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery.” (The Protocols of Zion, 4:2)

    Those of us who name Jews as the prime mover behind the New World Order — which we have dubbed the “Jew World Order” — are ruthlessly suppressed, censored, harassed, terrorized, arrested, imprisoned, and in some extreme cases even killed. There is no “Jesuit Internet Defense League” that goes around trying to censor YouTube videos that are critical of the Jesuit Order and the Vatican; but there is a “Jewish Internet Defense Force”, a predatory gang of scheming Jews who relentlessly go around sabotaging blogs and websites critical of Jews, Israel or Zionism, and who are responsible for the removal of thousands of videos as well as the banishment of thousands of YouTube channels and users of other video sharing websites. The Vatican doesn’t have a paid army of internet trolls who roam around popular websites like YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, posting comments glorifying the Vatican and smearing all critics of the Vatican as “anti-Catholic bigots”. But the Israeli government — and its vast network of Zionist lobby organizations like the World Jewish Congress, Anti-Defamation League and B’nai B’rith — has on its payroll thousands of Jew zealots called “Hasbara” roaming the net spewing pro-Zionist propaganda, attacking anyone critical of anything Jewish, Israeli or Zionist, as an “antisemite” and “fascist nazi”. It’s not Catholic Jesuits who are training their pupils to manipulate Wikipedia to favor their causes and ambitions, it’s Zionist Jews who are doing that. Doesn’t that tell you something? Only criminals attempting to evade exposure and censure would have to resort to such depraved, bottom-feeding behavior.

    Look at all of the prominent people over the years whose careers have been ruined simply for expressing an opinion or stating a fact that the Jews don’t want the public to hear. For instance, Helen Thomas, a fifty year veteran of the White House Press Corps, was recently pressured to resignafter she was recorded on videotape telling the Israeli Jews to “get the hell out of Palestine.” Shortly after the video surfaced Organized Jewry went on a rampage and witch-hunt, unleashing a barrage of hate against the honorable Helen Thomas for her brave remarks, even calling on journalism schools and groups to revoke any honors given to her in previous years. Reflecting on the debacle, Thomas told an interviewer, “You can’t criticize Israel in this country and survive.” In a speech Thomas further remarked,

    “We are owned by propagandists against the Arabs. There’s no question about that. Congress, the White House, and Hollywood, Wall Street, are owned by the Zionists. No question in my opinion. They put their money where their mouth is…We’re being pushed into a wrong direction in every way.”

    Then there was the incident involving Rick Sanchez, a veteran CNN news anchor with his own show called “Rick’s List”. Sanchez was promptly fired from his position at CNN after he insinuated that the American mass media is controlled by Jews in a radio interview. (“Rick Sanchez: Jon Stewart A ‘Bigot,’ Jews Run CNN & All Media.” The Huffington Post. 10/1/2010) Why is it that Rick Sanchez — being a Gentile — is not permitted to state the obvious fact that Jews own and control the media when a Jewish reporter from the LA Times, Joel Stein, can freely — without any repercussions — write an article entitled “How Jewish Is Hollywood?” in which he arrogantly brags about Jewish control of Hollywood, the news media, government and finance, stating:

    “Jews totally run Hollywood. … As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. … I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.”

    Conservative journalist and writer Joe Sobran, a long-time syndicated columnist for the National Review until he was predictably fired for “antisemitism,” eloquently explained the befuddling nature of Jewish power. Sobran opined that if you want to make it in American politics you have to know all about it, but, at the same time, can’t ever refer to it openly, for fear of the Jews:

    “Talking about American politics without mentioning the Jews is a little like talking about the NBA without mentioning the Chicago Bulls. Not that the Jews are all-powerful, let alone all bad. But they are successful, and therefore powerful enough: and their power is unique in being off-limits to normal criticism even when it’s highly visible. They themselves behave as if their success were a guilty secret, and they panic, and resort to accusations, as soon as the subject is raised. Jewish control of the major media in the media age makes the enforced silence both paradoxical and paralyzing. Survival in public life requires that you know all about it, but never refer to it. A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend that the Jews are powerless victims; and if you don’t respect their victimhood, they’ll destroy you. It’s a phenomenal display not of wickedness, really, but of fierce ethnocentrism, a sort of furtive racial superpatriotism.”

    In an essay reprinted in the May 27, 1996, issue of the New York Times Ari Shavit, an Israeli columnist, reflected on the Israeli slaughter of more than a hundred Lebanese civilians the month before: “We killed them out of a certain naive hubris. Believing with absolute certitude that now, with the White House, the Senate, and much of the American media in our hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our own….” This Israeli simply confirmed what many Americans already knew and had known for decades, which is that the Jewish/Israeli lobby — not Jesuits, Occultists, Satanists or shape-shifting Reptilians — control the White House, Congress and the Senate, like a marionette. Well-known political commentator, and former presidential candidate, Pat Buchanan, once declared: “Capitol Hill is Israeli occupied territory.” Former US congressman Paul Findley documented the reality of Buchanan’s statement in a book called, “They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel’s Lobby”. On page 161 of Findley’s book, he quotes Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, who, with blunt vexation at the Jewish-Israeli hold on the United States, said:

    “I’ve never seen a President — I don’t care who he is — stand up to them [the Israelis]. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn’t writing any­thing down. If the American people understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don’t have any idea what goes on.”

    British MP, Tom Dalyell, echoed these sentiments when he proclaimed, “A Jewish cabal have taken over the government in the United States and formed an unholy alliance with fundamentalist Christians.” Former US congresswoman Cynthia McKinney has come out and blamed the pro-Israel Lobby in America (AIPAC, ADL, AJC, ZOA, etc) for ruining her political career. While in congress McKinney refused to sign the pro-Israel pledge and took a pro-Palestinian stance. Because of this, McKinney said “war was declared” on her by the Jewish lobby who eventually ousted her from Congress by funding and supporting her political opponents. In 2009 she told an interviewer that “more than 99% of Congress work for Pro Zionist Israeli interests.” Former US congressman, Jim Trafficant, was also targeted and then destroyed by the Jewish lobby for not being a groveling pro-Israel stooge, and for helping out a falsely accused so-called “Nazi war criminal” named John Demjanjuk who the Jews attempted to crucify for “war crimes” that never happened. (See: Collins, Michael Piper. Target Trafficant. American Free Press, 2005) After serving a seven year prison sentence on trumped-up corruption charges, he fearlessly came out swinging stating in a television interview that,

    “…Israel has a powerful stranglehold on the American government. They [the Jews] control both members of the House, and the Senate. They have us involved in wars in which we have little or no interest. Our children are coming back in body bags. Our nation is bankrupt over these wars. And if you open your mouth, you get targeted. And if they don’t beat you at the poll, they’ll put you in prison […] They’re controlling much of our foreign policy. They’re influencing much of our domestic policy. Wolfowitz as undersecretary of defense manipulated President Bush number two back into Iraq. They’ve pushed definitely, definitely to try to get Bush before he left to move into Iran. We’re conducting the expansionist policy of Israel and everybody’s afraid to say it. They control much of the media, they control much of the commerce of the country, and they control powerfully both bodies of the Congress. They own the Congress.”

    University of Chicago Professor, John Mersheimer, and Harvard academic Stephen Walt, felt the perilous wrath of the Jew lobby. A vicious smear campaign was launched against them after they published a study exposing the insidious influence of Israeli lobby groups — principally the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee — entitled, “The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy”. Fox News reporter Carl Cameron confirmed the capability of the Jewish-Israeli lobby to silence and extirpate anyone they don’t like. In his censored four part series on Israeli espionage against the United States, Cameron stated, Investigators within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told Fox News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying … is considered career suicide.”

    The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations lists on its board of members fifty-one of America’s most powerful Zionist hate organizations that wield tremendous influence in American political life. Jewish author J.J. Goldberg, in his book “Jewish Power: Inside the America Jewish Establishment” (pp. 38-39), noted that there are approximately 300 national Jewish organizations in the United States with a combined budget estimated in the range of $6 billion — a sum greater than the gross national product of half the members of the United Nations. (cited in MacDonald, Kevin. The Culture of Critique, Chapter 7) And that doesn’t even take into account the influence of individual wealthy Jews, Jewish families and Jewish Wall Street banking houses like Goldman Sachs, who mete out billions of dollars in campaign contributions to both the Democrat and Republican parties. (See: Collins, Michael Piper. The New Babylon: Those Who Reign Supreme. American Free Press, 2009) Henry L. Feingold, writing in his book “Jewish Power in America: Myth and Reality”, stated that “Over 60 percent of campaign funds collected by the Democratic party and a respectable percentage of Republican campaign funds stem from Jewish sources.” Jews are quite candid about their attempt to manipulate the US political process to their benefit — the New Yorker reported that at a conference, the Jewish supremacist Haim Saban (an Israeli-American multibillionaire media mogul) outlined several ways in which Jews can be influential in American politics: “make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets.” Couple all that with the Jewish death-grip on the mass media and Hollywood, in conjunction with the Jewish stranglehold on world finance and you have total Jewish ethnic domination of America, a virtual slave society reminiscent of the Soviet Union.

    This phenomena of Jewish targeting of political opponents is not limited to America, it’s also quite apparent in Canada, Europe, Australia, and in pretty much all nations where Jews live. The ravenous Canadian Jewish Congress had a Liberal Party candidate named Leslie Hughes removed by her party for writing a 2003 article suggesting Israel had foreknowledge of 9/11 (not only did Israel have foreknowledge, they did it). Many Canadian patriots such as Ernst Zundel, Paul Fromm, Terry Tremaine, Arthur Topham, Marc Lemire, and others, have been prosecuted by the tyrannical Canadian government — at the behest of evil Jewish lobby groups like the CJC, B’nai B’rith, Simon Wiesenthal Center, etc — for their internet writings criticizing Jews, Zionism or Israel.

    In 2009 an Australian anti-Zionist activist named Brendon O’Connell was arrested and charged under Australia’s Orwellian “racial vilification” law after an altercation he had with two Zionist Jews who photographed him and other pro-Palestine activists at a rally without asking permission. For calling the two Zionist spies “racist, homicidal maniacs” and describing Judaism as a “racist, homicidal cult” (statements totally congruent with the facts), the righteous patriot O’Connell was handed down a hefty three year jail sentence! If the Vatican and the Jesuits — instead of Jews/Israel — were the object of O’Connell’s criticism do you think he would be in prison right now? Of course not.

    The brilliant Douglas Reed, Britain’s preeminent WWII correspondent for the London Times, went from being a celebrated, revered author, playwright and journalist with an army of fans, to a non-person scorned in the press and whose books publishers wouldn’t touch with a fifty foot poll. Why? Because he started writing about the Jewish Question, Zionism, and the long-term Jewish conspiracy to impose a world government on an enslaved humanity. (See: The Controversy of Zion)

    Alexander Solzhenitsyn was the once-famous Russian dissident, a survivor of a Soviet Gulag concentration camp who authored several books about the horrific experiences he, and his Russian countrymen, endured during the communist hell of Soviet Russia (See: The Gulag Archipelago I & II). Then he stopped being famous and now he is a non-person (now deceased). It happened because he told truths about the predominant Jewish role in the Bolshevik revolution and the Soviet Regime. (See: 200 Years Together) So the Jews in the media wrote him out of history — he disappeared quicker than the people that Stalin did not like vanished.

    Another strong indication of the menacing Jewish stranglehold on the West is the wicked Stalinist-style State repression of Holocaust Revisionists. In a well-organized censorship campaign, International Jewish Supremacist groups — principally the World Jewish Congress — have successfully lobbied over a dozen European governments to criminalize holocaust revisionist research. All around the world holocaust revisionist scholars and ordinary people who dare question any aspect of the farcical holocaust™ dogma have been harassed, vilified, smeared, slandered, fined heavily, jailed, physically assaulted, terrorized, and in one instance murdered. Courageous and esteemed revisionist scholars such as Arthur Butz, Mark Weber, Germar Rudolf, Robert Faurisson, Ernst Zundel, Fredrick Toben, Juergen Graf, Carlo Mattogno, David Cole, Ditlieb Felderer, Carlos Porter, and many others, have suffered tremendous hardships because of their brilliant work debunking the holocaust™ myth.

    Taking into account these simple observations, we can confidently assert that International Jewry are the cap of the pyramid of world power and influence. Everything else serves as a distraction and convenient smokescreen for this fundamental reality.

    Imperium Judaica — Bolshevism and Zionism As Instruments of Jewish Intrigue

    Jews have long been in control of the world, and continue to rule it today. This is revealed to us simply by observing the actions and words of the leaders of World Zionism and World Communism, the twin vehicles of global Jewish subversion.

    With the advent of Communism in the early 19th century, we saw the world plunge into a brutal chaos of social cataclysm and economic decay. Indeed, the goal of International Communism was never to “free the workers” from capitalist oppression, but rather to further enslave them to a small cadre of self-declared and self-perpetuating elite vanguards who ruled their subjects with an iron fist. From its inception, Communism and Socialism was a Jewish endeavor to usurp the remaining Gentile nations free from Jewish control, plunder their wealth, and enslave and murder the best of their people!

    Communism’s Talmudic Jewish roots couldn’t be more apparent. The Jew Karl Marx, a descendant of a long line of Talmudic rabbis, is widely viewed as the principal progenitor of the ideology of Communism. Less known, however, was Communism’s true prophet — the Jewish supremacist, Talmudist, and racist Zionist Moses Hess, whom Marx called the “Red Rabbi.” (See: Avineri, Shlomo. Moses Hess: Prophet of Communism and Zionism. NYU Press, 1987) Hess was Marx’s guide and teacher, and converted both Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels to Communism. These two sordid snakes — Marx and Engels — went on to author “The Communist Manifesto”, “Das Kapital”, and other works, which crystallized this wretched brain-trust of sanguinary scoundrels and their grandiose dreams of a one-world global communist dictatorship.

    In 1920, Winston Churchill — who later sold out to the Jews and became their tool — ominously warned the world of the menacing movement that was Jewish Bolshevism. Writing in the Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920, page 5, Churchill opined:

    “This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus — Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire…

    There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and an the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders.”

    Many misinformed patriots have been led to believe Churchill’s “Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People” article (quoted above) was somehow a courageous anti-Zionist statement — it was not. In fact, in the concluding paragraph of the article Churchill gave a ringing endorsement of Zionism, encouraging Jews to follow the course of Zionism rather than Bolshevism:

    “Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system. Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally, and Dr. Weissmann in particular. The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people.”

    Churchill was, by his own admission, a radical Zionist who — as Prime Minister of Britain during WWII — hypocritically went on to collaborate with Bolshevism, establishing a cozy relationship with Josef Stalin’s genocidal Soviet Bolshevik Regime. Churchill’s abhorrence of Bolshevism disappeared as rapidly as his reservations about International Jewry as soon as it suited his personal ambitions. Even his “Zionism versus Bolshevism” article was disingenuous in the sense that he offered the world a Hobson’s choice of “Zionism or Bolshevism”, a false dilemma in that both options produced the exact same result: a World Government under Jewish domination as foretold in the Hebrew Old Testament. Churchill knowingly failed to inform his readers that ideologies to Jews are like the many arms of Vishnu. They all emanate from the same place with the same goal: the desire for a New World Order under Jewish rule! Apparent conflicts among Jews are more about tactics than disputes about ultimate goals. Zionism and Communism are but two tentacles of the same Talmudic monster — cut and fashioned out of the same Jewish cloth!

    History’s most famous critic of Jewry, Adolf Hitler, eloquently explained this Jewish trick in his book, Mein Kampf,

    “The Jew’s domination in the state seems so assured that now not only can he call himself a Jew again, but he ruthlessly admits his ultimate national and political designs. A section of his race openly owns itself to be a foreign people, yet even here they lie. For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.” (A. Hitler, English translation by Ralph Manheim, Mein Kampf, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, New York, (1971), pp. 324-325.)

    The mischievous and cruel doctrines of Marx and Hess were zealously adopted by the world’s Jews who saw in it an opportunity to crush the Gentiles once and for all. A Jew named Baruch Levy, in a letter to Karl Marx, stated that Communism was — after all — merely a way to transfer all the wealth of the world into Jewish hands and so fulfill the messianic vision of the treacherous Talmud:

    The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this new world order the Children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.” (Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, La Revue de Paris, p. 54, June 1, 1928)

    Jewish author Bernard Lazare tells us that Karl Marx was indeed a Talmudist:

    “He had that clear Talmudic mind which does not falter at the petty difficulties of fact. He was a Talmudist devoted to sociology and applying his native power of exegesis to the criticism of economic theory. He was inspired by that ancient Hebraic materialism, which, rejecting as too distant and doubtful the hope of an Eden after death, never ceased to dream of Paradise realized on earth. But Marx was not merely a logician, he was also a rebel, an agitator, an acrid controversialist, and he derived his gift for sarcasm and invective, as Heine did, from his Jewish ancestry.” (Lazare, Bernard. “Antisemitism, Its History and Causes”, p. 129)

    In its article on “Messianic Movements”, the Encyclopaedia Judaica writes: “In his letters to Leopold Zunz referred many times to the European revolution of 1848 as ‘the Messiah.’ Even many Jews who left the faith tended to invest secular liberation movements with a messianic glow.”

    The Jewish supremacist rabbi, Harry Waton, confessed that not only is Communism Jewish, but that it is simply a mechanism for Jewish world dominion and the subjugation of all non-Jews — a fulfillment of the megalomaniacal messianic vision of the Torah and the Talmud. In his 1939 book, “A Program for The Jews and An Answer To All Anti-Semites: A Program for Humanity”, the racist rabbi wrote:

    “It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism; all this was in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews. The Jews should realize that Jehovah no longer dwells in heaven, but he dwells in us right here on earth; we must no longer look up to Jehovah as above us and outside of us, but we must see him right within us,” (p. 148)

    “Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth. Now, indeed, this is the historic destiny of the Jews,” (p. 99)

    “Judaism is communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhood of man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society. It is with these spiritual weapons that the Jews will conquer the world and the human race.” (p. 100)

    Peculiar isn’t it that the supposed arch anti-capitalist, Karl Marx, never spoke a negative word about the Jewish banking dynasty, the Rothschilds, the richest of the world’s capitalist financiers, war profiteers and exploiters of the working class. This isn’t so puzzling when you understand that Marx was working for the Rothschilds all along. (See: Red Symphony) Mikael Bakunin, the prominent anarcho-syndicalist thinker and rival of Karl Marx, assailed Jewish control of the World Revolution, blasting Marx and his phony liberation ideology (Marxism) as a Rothschild-backed con for the Jewish financial oligarchy to undermine, loot and pillage the wealth of Gentile nations. Bakunin said,

    Himself a Jew, Marx has around him, in London and France, but especially in Germany, a multitude of more or less clever, intriguing, mobile, speculating Jews, such as Jews are every where: commercial or banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades, with one foot in the bank, the other in the socialist movement, and with their behinds sitting on the German daily press — they have taken possession of all the newspapers — and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they produce. Now, this entire Jewish world, which forms a single profiteering sect, a people of bloodsuckers, a single gluttonous parasite, closely and intimately united not only across national borders but across all differences of political opinion — this Jewish world today stands for the most part at the disposal of Marx and at the same time at the disposal of Rothschild. I am certain that Rothschild for his part greatly values the merits of Marx, and that Marx for his part feels instinctive attraction and great respect for Rothschild. This may seem strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the large banks? Oh! The Communism of Marx seeks enormous centralization in the state, and where such exists, there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, which, speculates on the work of the people, will always find a way to prevail ….” (Michael Bakunin, Polémique contres les Juifs, 1869)

    Benjamin Disraeli, the Jewish Prime Minister of England from 1874-1880, repeatedly warned about the machinations of his trouble-making kinsmen. In his novel, Conigsby, Disraeli made one of his characters say,

    “I had on my arrival (at St. Petersburg) an interview with the Russian Minister of Finance, Count Canerin; I beheld the son of a Lithuanian Jew…. I had an audience on my arrival at Madrid with the Spanish minister; I beheld one like myself, the son of a Nuovo Christiano, a Jew of Aragon. In consequence of that transpired at Madrid I went straight to consult the President of the French Council; I beheld the son of a French Jew…. We fixed on Prussia…. Count Arnim entered the cabinet, and I beheld a Prussian Jew. So you see, my dear Coningsby, that the world is governed by very different personages to what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.

    Then, four years after the Jewish-engineered outbreaks of 1848, Disraeli returned to the subject in his book Lord George Bentinck, stating,

    The influence of the Jews may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe. An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property… The natural equality of men and the abrogation of property are proclaimed by the secret societies who form provisional governments and men of Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them.

    Chaim Weizmann, the 20th century’s preeminent Zionist influence-peddler, architect of the ‘Balfour Declaration’, and first president of Israel, is quoted as saying: “A beneficent protection which God has instituted in the life of the Jew is that He has dispersed him all over the world.”(JEWISH GUARDIAN, Oct. 8, 1920.) Now compare this with the last clause of Protocol No. 11, of The Protocols of Zion: “God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of dispersion, and from this, which appears to all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth all our strength, which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world.” The remarkable similarity between Weizmann’s pronouncement and the passage from the Protocols proves that the Jewish Learned Elders exist, Weizmann chief among them.

    This Hidden Hand of Jews was subtly identified by Walter Rathenau (1867-1922), a German-Jewish industrialist, writer, and statesman who served as Germany’s Foreign Minister during the Weimar Republic. Writing in the Wiener Freie Presse, December 24, 1912, he said: “Three hundred men, each of whom knows all the others, govern the fate of the European continent, and they elect their successors from their entourage.” This reality was confirmed by Jean Izoulet, a Jewish professor at the College of France and a member of the Jewish-Masonic secret society Alliance Israelite Universelle. Writing in his 1926 book “Paris Capital of Religions”, Izoulet said: “I certainly do not want to relinquish their Magisterium temporal the three hundred bankers who, at the moment, dominate the world.”

    At the Zionist congress held in Basel in 1898, Dr. Mandelstam, a professor at the University of Kiev, proclaimed: “The Jews energetically reject the idea of fusion with the other nationalities and cling firmly to their historical hope of world empire.” (Chamberlain, Houston Stewart. “Foundations of the Nineteenth Century“, p. 335) The Talmudic Jew David Wolffsohn was Theordore Herzl’s successor as leader of World Zionism and chairman of the World Zionist Organization (WZO). He presided over the Zionist Congress at the Hague in 1907 and gave the opening and closing speeches. The New York Times tells us that in his closing address Wolffsohn pleaded for more unity among the Jews and said that Jewry eventually must conquer the world! (“ZIONIST LEADER DIES. – David Wolfsohn Was Once Chairman of International Committee.” The New York Times. 17 Sept. 1914.)

    In 1922 at a Zionist conference in Carlsbad, California, Zionist leader Nahum Sokolow boastfully gloated that the League of Nations (predecessor of the United Nations) was a Jewish construct and tool, and that Jerusalem will one day be capital of the world upon the realization of their dark plans:

    “The League of Nations is a Jewish idea, and Jerusalem some day will become the capital of the world’s peace. We Jews throughout the world will make the League’s struggle our own and will not rest until there is ultimate victory.” (“SAYS JEWS OF WORLD WILL BACK LEAGUE – Dr. Sokolow Tells Zionist Congress Jerusalem Will Be International Peace Capital.” The New York Times. 28 Aug. 1922.)

    Theodore Newman Kaufman was an American Jew who published a book in 1941 calling for the extermination of the entire German race and nation in a “final solution” of sterilization. (See: Kaufman, Theodore N. Germany Must Perish! Newark, NJ: Argyle Press, 1941) In the same year of his book’s publication, this devilish Jew gave an interview to The Canadian Jewish Chronicle in which he fervently articulated his desire not only for the annihilation of all German Gentiles, but also for Jewish World Government, stating:

    “I believe that the Jews have a mission in life. They must see to it that the nations of the world get together in one vast confederation. ‘Union Now’ is the beginning of this. Slowly but surely the world will develop into paradise. We will have perpetual peace. And the Jews will do the most to bring about this confederation, because they have the most to gain.”

    Kaufman’s call for “Union Now” was strangely similar to a proclamation made by Adolph Crémieux, a prominent French-Jewish lawyer and statesman who founded the Jewish Masonic order “Alliance Israelite Universelle” in Paris in 1860. At an Alliance meeting Crémieux declared in true ‘Protocols’ style: “The Alliance is not limited to our cult; it voices its appeal to all cults and wants to penetrate in all religions, as it has penetrated into all countries. Let us endeavor boldly to bring about the union of all cults under one flag of “Union and Progress”: such is the motto of humanity.” Crémieux and his secretive Jewish order were named as the prime conspirators in the formulation of The Protocols of Zion, in an enlightening essay entitled, “The Protocols of the Ruffle Crested Kikes of Zion”.

    In 1940, Arthur Greenwood — the Deputy Leader of the British Labour Party and member of the British War Cabinet — made a vocal pledge to American Jewry that upon the defeat of the Axis Powers in WWII he would do his utmost to help realize the formation of a “New World Order” in the world, led and dominated by the Jews. The groveling Zionist stooge proclaimed,

    “When we have achieved victory, as we assuredly shall, the nations will have the opportunity of establishing a new world order … In such a world it is our confident hope that the conscience of civilized humanity would demand that the wrongs suffered by the Jewish people in so many countries should be righted.”

    He added,

    “In the rebuilding of civilized society after the war, there should and will be a real opportunity for Jews everywhere to make a distinctive and constructive contribution.” (See this facsimile of the New York Times article)

    In 1946, the US government put to Stalin a proposal for World Government, penned by two Globalist Jews — Bernard Baruch and David Lilienthal. Baruch was a wealthy Jewish Wall Street tycoon, and influential adviser to five American presidents. In World War I he was Woodrow Wilson’s chief adviser on national defense and was appointed chairman of the War Industries Board (1918-1919), thus bringing the American war machine under the heel of Jewish financiers. Baruch, and a contingent of his kinsmen, helped frame the economic provisions of the Versailles Treaty of 1919 which carved Germany into pieces after WWI. In his address to the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission on the 14th of June, 1946, Baruch made the following “Protocolist”, One-Worldist pronouncement:

    “Behind the black portent of the new atomic age lies a hope which, seized upon with faith, can work out salvation … Let us not deceive ourselves: we must elect world peace or world destruction. … Peace is never long preserved by weight of metal or by an armament race. Peace can be made tranquil and secure only by understanding and agreement fortified by sanctions. We must embrace international cooperation or international disintegration.”

    Baruch also predicted the “Cold War” between the US and the USSR. In 1948, during a speech before the Senate’s Special Committee Investigating the National Defense Program, he said,

    “Although the shooting war is over, we are in the midst of a cold war which is getting warmer.”

    Fellow Zionist kingpin, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, peculiarly predicted the ascendancy of Woodrow Wilson to the presidency, and in his autobiography, “Challenging Years,” (p. 161) boasted “that an immensely influential hidden power” — with which he was intimately acquainted — “had chosen Wilson as a major pawn in their political game” even before the president of Princeton University had entered into politics. Wise would go on to become one of Wilson’s chief advisers who was instrumental in persuading Wilson to support the ‘Balfour Declaration’. Wilson, of course, was the “poodle on a string” of the conniving Protocolist Jews, having signed into law two of the most important planks of their Communist Manifesto — Plank #2, “A heavy progressive or graduated income tax,” and Plank #5, the creation of a central bank, “with exclusive monopoly.”

    Perhaps in a fit of rebelliousness against his masters, Woodrow Wilson made this ominous remark about the secret forces controlling the United States government from behind the scenes,

    “…we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world — no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.” (Woodrow, Wilson. New Freedom: a Call for the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People. [S.l.]: Indypublish Com, 2007, p. 201)

    Further clarification and confirmation of this ongoing Jewish World Government project was provided by Israel’s first prime minister — the Jewish supremacist, Talmudist, Zionist terrorist and Bolshevist internationalist — David Ben-Gurion. In 1962, Ben-Gurion predicted the end of the Cold War in the late 1980s, and went on to express a burning desire for world governance, led by the Jewish nation:

    “The image of the world in 1987 as traced in my imagination: the Cold War will be a thing of the past. Internal pressure of the constantly growing intelligensia in Russia for more freedom and the pressure of the masses for raising their living standards may lead to a gradual democratization of the Soviet Union. On the other hand, the increasing influence of the workers and farmers, and rising political importance of men of science, may transform the United States into a welfare state with a planned economy. Western and Eastern Europe will become a federation of autonomous states having a Socialist and democratic regime. With the exception of the USSR as a federated Eurasian state, all other continents will become united in a world alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the scene of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah.” (Gurion, David Ben & Duchovny, Amram. David Ben-Gurion, In His Own Words. Fleet Press Corp., 1969, p. 116; also quoted in Look Magazine, January 16, 1962, p. 20)

    Ben-Gurion reiterated his ostentatious dreams of a Jewish Utopia when he said: “Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel and world Jewry, it aspires to become the spiritual center of the world.” The Israeli prime minister was a chauvinistic Jewish supremacist who stated his rotten aims openly. He spilled the blood of tens of thousands of Palestinians and was responsible for the uprooting and beheading of their nation. He, along with his clique of ferocious Zionist bandits, gangsters and thugs, masterminded “the Nakba” which has been described as “the mass deportation of a million Palestinians from their cities and villages, massacres of civilians, and the razing to the ground of hundreds of Palestinian villages.”

    Flaunting his Jewish pride and arrogantly mocking his victims by falsely claiming to be a victim, Ben-Gurion sanctimoniously said:

    We would not have taken on this war merely for the purpose of enjoying this tiny state. There have been only two great people: the Greeks and the Jews. Perhaps the Greeks were even greater than the Jews, but now I can see no sign of that old greatness in the modern Greeks. Maybe when the present process is finished we too will degenerate, but I see no sign of degeneration at present. […] Suffering makes a people greater, and we have suffered much. We had a message to give the world, but we were overwhelmed, and the message was cut off in the middle. In time there will be millions of us — becoming stronger and stronger — and we will complete the message. […] Our policy must be the unity of the human race. The world is divided into two blocs. We consider that the United Nations’ ideal is a Jewish ideal.

    Ben-Gurion believed Jews to be living gods on earth, superior to Gentiles in every way, stating:

    “My concept of the messianic ideal and vision is not a metaphysical one but a socio-cultural-moral one … I believe in our moral and intellectual superiority, in our capacity to serve as a model for the redemption of the human race. This belief of mine is based on my knowledge of the Jewish people, not some mystical faith; the glory of the divine presence is within us, in our hearts, and not outside of us.” (Hertzberg, Arthur. The Zionist State. Jewish Publication Society, 1997, p. 94)

    Ben-Gurion’s “prophesy” of an earthly Jewish kingdom ruled from Jerusalem was similarly expressed by the Temple Mount Faithful organization newsletter (2000), which says:

    “The real “United Nations Organization” will be the Kingdom of G-d which will soon be established in Jerusalem, based on the holy laws of G-d. The Temple will again be the heart, soul and focus of Israel and the nations. Mashiach ben David will come and will be the king of Israel and the world. He will come to Jerusalem and rule from there and establish the Kingdom of G-d over all the world. Jerusalem instead of New York will be the center of the this godly “United Nations Organization” and a new era of justice, spiritual holiness, a real law based on the word of G-d in the Torah and a real peace will open and will be established in Jerusalem exactly as Isaiah prophesied: “The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem. And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the Lord’s house shall be established on the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow to it. And many people shall go and say, Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths; for from Zion shall go forth Torah, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. And he shall judge among the nations, and shall decide for many people; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, nor shall they learn war any more. O house of Jacob, come, and let us walk in the light of the Lord.” (Isaiah 2:1-5)”

    As demonstrated by the Jewish supremacist group “Temple Mount Faithful,” the ancient Jewish plan for world ownership is prophesied in the Jewish Old Testament book of Isaiah. This book, among others, exemplifies the Jewish supremacist mentality. For example, in Isaiah 60:16, it says: “Thou shalt also suck the milk of the Gentiles, and shalt suck the breast of kings: and thou shalt know that I the LORD am thy Saviour and thy Redeemer, the mighty One of Jacob.” Isaiah 61:5 reiterates this concept of Gentile servitude to the Jews, stating: “And strangers [non-Jews] shall stand and feed your flocks, and the sons of the alien [non-Jews] shall be your plowmen and your vinedressers.” Isaiah 60:5 and Isaiah 61:6 prophesied that the Jews will come to possess all the wealth of the world: “the wealth of the nations [the Goyim] shall come unto thee [the Jews]. … You will feed on the wealth of nations, and in their riches you will boast.”

    When Ben-Gurion referred to “everybody” in his Protocolist Prophecy he was most likely only referring to Jews, since the Zohar states: “’living soul’ refers to Israel, who have holy living souls from above, and “cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth” to the other peoples who are not ‘living soul’.”

    This view is corroborated by the crazed ravings of many prominent Jewish rabbis, including many of Judaism’s most revered sages. Take for instance, Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi (1745-1812), the founder of the extremist Jewish sect “Chabad” who cursed Gentiles, claiming we possess evil souls: “Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever… All Jews are innately good, all Gentiles are innately evil.” (quoted in Foxbrunner, A. Roman. Habad: the Hasidism of R. Shneur Zalman of Lyady. University of Alabama Press, 1992, p. 108)

    Rabbi Kook the Elder, the revered father of the messianic tendency of Jewish fundamentalism, said, “The difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews—all of them in all different levels—is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.” (quoted in Shahak, Israel & Mezvinsky, Norman. Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. London: Pluto Press, 1999, p. 176)

    The late, highly revered Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the “Lubavitcher Rebbe” who headed the Chabad movement and wielded great influence in Israel as well as in the U.S., explained that, “The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: ‘Let us differentiate.’ Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of ‘let us differentiate’ between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world…A non-Jew’s entire reality is only vanity. It is written, ‘And the strangers shall guard and feed your flocks’ (Isaiah 61:5). The entire creation [of a non-Jew] exists only for the sake of the Jews…” (Ibid., p. 59)

    An immigrant to Israel from the U.S., Rabbi Ginsburgh speaks freely of his belief in the Jews’ genetic-based, spiritual superiority over non-Jews: “If you saw two people drowning, a Jew and a non-Jew, the Torah says you save the Jewish life first. … If every simple cell in a Jewish body entails divinity, is a part of God, then every strand of DNA is part of God. Therefore, something is special about Jewish DNA…If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value.” (Ibid., p. 62)

    Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the head of Shas’s Council of Torah Sages, declared that Gentiles exist solely to serve the Jews as slaves. According to the rabbi: “Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel.” (Mandel, Jonah. “Yosef: Gentiles Exist Only To Serve Jews.” The Jerusalem Post. 10/18/2010) And these are just the statements Jews have made aloud. Just imagine how they talk when they know Gentiles aren’t listening.

    Another cardinal proof of the Zionist World Conspiracy was the incredible foresight displayed by Zionist leader Simon Maximilian Südfeld (alias Max Nordau), Theodore Herzl’s close confidant who convinced him to organize the first Zionist conference in Basel, Switzerland in 1897. At the sixth Zionist Congress in 1903 — eleven years before World War I commenced and forty-five years before Israel was established — Nordau spoke of a coming “World War” resulting in the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine, which England would help to procure for them:

    “Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, the Zionist Congress, the English Uganda proposition, the future world war, the peace conference where, with the help of England, a free and Jewish Palestine will be created.” (quoted in Rosenthal, Litman. “A Prophet Speaks”, American Jewish News, New York, Vol. 4, No. 2, September 19, 1919. p. 464; also quoted in Stevens, Richard P. Zionism and Palestine Before the Mandate. Institute for Palestine Studies, 1972, p. 153)

    Strange and incredible — is it not? — that a leading Zionist Jew was able to predict the course of events of the next several decades. It appears Max Nordau was not the only Jew with an uncanny gift of foresight. Leading communist ideologue and co-author of “The Communist Manifesto”, crypto-Jew Friedrich Engels, made it clear that he and his fellow communist comrades were comfortable with human sacrifices amounting to the loss of tens of millions of lives, in order to pave the way for revolution and a global communist imperium. In 1887, Engels somehow knew a “World War” was on the horizon and would soon arrive on the shores of Europe, laying waste to Europe’s empires and thus leaving the continent vulnerable to communist revolution, upheaval and subversion:

    No other war is now possible for Prussia-Germany than a world war, and indeed a world war of hitherto unimagined sweep and violence. Eight to ten millions soldiers will mutually kill each other off and in the process devour Europe barer than any swarm of locusts ever did. The desolation of the Thirty Years War compressed in three or four years and spread over the entire continent: famine, plague, general savagery, taking possession both of the armies and of the masses of the people, as a result of universal want; hopeless demoralization of our complex institutions of trade industry and credit, ending in universal bankruptcy; collapse of the old states and their traditional statecraft, so that crowns will roll over the pavements by the dozens and no one to be found to pick them up; absolute impossibility of foreseeing where this will end, or who will emerge victor from the general struggle. Only one result is absolutely sure: general exhaustion and the creation of the conditions for the final victory of the working class.” (quoted in Wolfe, David Bertram. Marxism, One Hundred Years In The Life of a Doctrine. Dial Press, (1965), p. 67)

    Another who predicted the impending doom of a grand European conflict was Jan Gotlib Bloch, a Polish crypto-Jew, banker/financier, Zionist activist, “campaigner against Russian antisemitism“, and acquaintance of Theodore Herzl. In 1899, Bloch published a book about military warfare titled, “Is War Now Possible?”, within which he envisioned a “long war”, a “great war of entrenchments”, which would involve some ten million men. Bloch asserted that economic factors would be “the dominant and decisive element in the matter” and that the future of war was not fighting but famine, resulting in the bankruptcy of nations and the break-up of social organization of societies. (Ferguson, Niall. “The Pity of War”, p. 9)

    It is clear that International Jews foresaw the First World War. Did they do nothing but foresee it? The facts do not stop at foresight, but run on to provocation. Perhaps prominent Zionist Jews and Communist Jews were cognizant of the eventual outbreak of a World War because they strove to bring it to fruition utilizing their unmatched money, media and political clout?

    The Protocols of Zion gives us insight into this question,

    “We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.” (The Protocols of Zion, 7:3)

    Zionist Jew kingpin, Chaim Weizmann, admitted as much in a letter to Winston Churchill. Historian David Irving documented Weizmann’s venture to persuade Churchill to help the Zionists create a Jewish Fighting Force — an army of Jewish terrorists to be used as a battering ram to forcefully overtake Palestine and wantonly genocide the Arabs living there — in exchange for the Jews’ dragging America into WWII on England’s side. The arrogant and conceited Jew, Weizmann, couldn’t help but boast about how his fellow Jews “did it in the last war and are keen to do it again”:

    “On September 10, 1941 Weizmann therefore wrote an outspoken letter to the prime minister in which he recalled how the Jews of the United States had pulled their country into war before; he promised that they could do it again – provided that Britain toed the line over Palestine. Two years had passed since the Jewish Agency had offered the support of the Jews throughout the world – the Jewish ‘declaration of war’ on Germany; a whole year had passed, he added, since the P.M. had personally approved his offer to recruit Jews in Palestine for service in the Middle East or elsewhere. For two years the Agency had met only humiliation. Ten thousand Palestinian Jews had fought in Libya, Abyssinia, Greece, Crete, and Syria, he claimed, but this was never mentioned.

    ‘Tortured by Hitler as no nation has ever been in modern times,’ Weizmann continued, ‘and advertised by him as his foremost enemy, we are refused by those who fight him the chance of seeing our name and our flag appear among those arrayed against him.’ Artfully associating anti-Zionists with the other enemies populating Churchill’s mind, Weizmann assured him that he knew this was not of his doing – it was the work of those responsible for Munich and the 1939 White Paper on Palestine. ‘We were sacrificed, in order to win over the Mufti of Jerusalem and his friends who were serving Hitler in the Middle East.’

    “Then Weizmann came to his real sales-pitch: ‘There is only one big ethnic group [in the USA] which is willing to stand, to a man, for Great Britain, and a policy of “all-out aid” for her: the five million Jews. From Secretary Morgenthau, Governor [of New York State] Lehmann, Justice [Felix] Frankfurter, down to the simplest Jewish workman or trader, they are conscious of all that this struggle against Hitler implies.’ British statesmen, he reminded Churchill, had often acknowledged that it was these Jews who had brought the United States into the war in 1917. ‘They are keen to do it – and may do it – again.’ All that he and the Jews of the United States were asking for, therefore, was the formation now of a Jewish Fighting Force.” (Irving, David. Churchill’s War: Triumph in Adversity Vol. 2. Focal Point Publications, 2001, Pp. 76-77; also see this facsimile of Weizmann’s letter to Churchill)

    The “godfather of Zionism”, Theodore Herzl, was not shy about admitting that the Jews do indeed possess the necessary power to bring about world wars and revolutions, stating: “The wealthy Jews control the world…In their hands lies the fate of government and nations. They (the Jews) set governments one against the other and by their decree governments make peace. When the wealthy Jews play, the nations and the rulers dance.”

    In his book “Jewish State”, Herzl spoke of the Jews’ “terrible power of the purse”:

    “Every point which arises in the relations between nations is a question of might. I do not here surrender any portion of our prescriptive right when I make this statement. In the world as it now is and will probably remain, might precedes right. For us to be loyal patriots as were the Huguenots who were forced to emigrate is therefore useless. … The Jews must acquire economic power sufficiently great to overcome prejudice against them. When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, but when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse.

    The desolate reality of Jewish warmongering was elucidated in the August 1877 issue of Frank Leslie’s “Popular Monthly”, later known as “The American Magazine”, which reported:

    “To-day, the great Jewish bankers, such as the Rothschilds, may almost be said to hold in their hands the peace of Europe. They are creditors of most of the Governments of the world and there are few nations willing to risk the dangers and losses of war unless they have assurance from these potent capitalists of such monetary aid as may be necessary for carrying on a campaign. In the present European war, one of the combatants, having nothing to lose, is reckless of the consequence to her already bankrupt treasury, and the other, while yet the conflict has scarcely begun, has been compelled to seek the aid of Jewish bankers to secure means for its prosecution.”

    In 1881 the prestigious banking journal, Rhodes’ Journal, informed us that Jewish international bankers held the keys to peace and war in Europe (often instigating the latter for monetary gain, evidently):

    “It must be admitted that the Jewish people control the financial markets of Europe, possessing a much greater influence than in this country. The Emperor of Russia found that he could not place a loan in the Continental markets, because Rothschild did not view such a loan as favorable to the interests of England. A few Jewish bankers are therefore really the arbitrators of peace and war in Europe.”

    The Black Rabbi of Inlé, a blogger who confusingly criticizes Jews and incessantly bashes Adolf Hitler simultaneously, compiled numerous quotes on the immense influence of the Rothschild family on his page King of The Jews, some of which I will reproduce below:

    The Rothschilds’ official biographer, Niall Ferguson, explained the “quasi-royal status” of this Jewish banking dynasty and how their wealth is believed by some Jews to be “for a higher purpose… to avenge the wrongs of Israel”:

    “To poorer Jews throughout Europe, Nathan Rothschild’s extraordinary rise to riches had an almost mystical significance—hence the legend of the “Hebrew talisman,” the magical source of his good luck, which became associated with him in Jewish lore. This extraordinary story—a version of which was published by an anonymous author in London just four years after Nathan Rothschild’s death (1836)—imagined that the source of Nathan’s financial success was his possession of a magical talisman. His wealth was in fact intended for a higher purpose: “to avenge the wrongs of Israel” by securing “the re-establishment of Judah’s kingdom—then rebuilding of thy towers, Oh! Jerusalem!” and “the restoration of Judea to out ancient race.” (Ferguson, Niall. The House of Rothschild: Volume 1: Money’s Prophets: 1798-1848, Viking, (1999), pp. 21/22)

    Ferguson added that,

    “… because of their wealth, other Jews looked to them for leadership in their pursuit of equal civil and political rights. As we shall see, this leadership was forthcoming from a remarkably early stage… acquiring quasi-royal status in the eyes of other Jews.” (Ibid., p. 22)

    The Niles’ National Register published in 1828 states:

    “… the house of Rothschild certainly stands preeminent at the recent death of one, who was thought the richest banker in Europe.”

    The Niles’ National Register published on Sept 19, 1835, says:

    “The ROTHSCHILDS are the wonders of modern banking … we see the descendants of Judah, after a persecution of two thousand years, peering above kings, rising higher than emperors, and holding a whole continent in the hollow of their hands. The Rothschild govern a Christian world. Not a cabinet moves without their advice. They stretch their hand, with equal ease, from Petersburgh to Vienna, from Vienna to Paris, from Paris to London, from London to Washington. Baron Rothschild, the head of the house, is the true king of Judah, the prince of the captivity, the Messiah so long looked for by this extraordinary people. He holds the keys of peace or war, blessing or cursing.”

    The Bankers Magazine printed in 1847 states:

    “The five brothers (Anselm, Solomon, Nathan, Charles & James) have taken part in most of the great financial affairs of Austria, of France, of England, and of almost every country. They have formed among themselves an invincible phalanx. By themselves, or by their agents, they have exercised a great control over the principal places in Europe, and, faithful to their habit, never to undertake anything separately and to concert all their operations, they have followed one unvaried and identical system. Their power was such, that at one time they were free to make either peace or war.

    The Ladies’ Repository published in 1863 states:

    “Baron Lionel Rothschild, the first Jew ever admitted into the English Parliament, and the wealthiest man, it is believed, now residing on our planet.”

    The Cyclopaedia of Commercial & Business Anecdotes printed in 1865, writes:

    “The Rothschilds, Wealthiest Bankers in the World. The house of Rothschild is the impersonation of that money power which governs the world.”

    The Review of Reviews printed in 1890 opined:

    “The change in the position of the Jew within the last half of the century is one of the most remarkable character. Fifty years ago the Jew was inert and imbecile. Now he exercises a power greater than in the days of David or Solomon. The Jews to-day influence more people, control more bullion, and exercise more legislative power than they did when they had their temple their land, and their sceptre.”

    Printed in 1905, Jewish Literature & Other Essays says:

    “The palaces of the Rothschilds, the richest family in the world, harbor many a warm heart, whose pulsations are quickened by the thought of Israel’s history and poetic heritage. Wealth has not abated a jot of their enthusiasm and loyal love for the faith.”

    Printed between 1901 and 1906 The Jewish Encyclopedia asserted:

    “It is a somewhat curious sequel to the attempt to set up a Catholic competitor to the Rothschilds that at the present time the latter are the guardians of the papal treasure.”

    British economist J. A. Hobson’s seminal book, “Imperialism”, published in 1902, states:

    “Does anyone seriously suppose that a great war could be undertaken by any European State, or a great State loan subscribed, if the house of Rothschild and its connections set their face against it?”

    The Missionary Review of the World, Volume 29, printed in 1906 disclosed:

    “The Possession of Wealth: One Jewish banking house is estimated to control $30,000,000,000. The Rothschilds in ten years loaned $482,000,000. Nearly one-half of the gold coined, of the entire world, is said to be in Jewish hands.”

    In 1909, seven years before becoming British Prime Minister, David Lloyd George stated in a speech:

    “I should really like to know, is Lord Rothschild the dictator of this country? Are we really to have all the ways of reform, financial and social, blocked simply by a noticeboard, ‘No thoroughfare. By order of Nathaniel Rothschild’?”

    Another of the family biographers, Derek Wilson, conceded that critics of the Rothschilds have legitimate reasons for anxiety, affirming:

    “The House of Rothschild is immensely more powerful than any financial empire that has ever preceded it, and it is able to control governments behind the scenes, secretly.”

    Dutch economist Ad Broere, in his 2010 book “Ending The Global Casino,” informs us that,

    “The 19th century became known as the age of the Rothschilds when it was estimated they controlled half of the world’s wealth. While their wealth continues to increase today, they have managed to blend into the background, giving an impression that their power has waned. They only apply the Rothschild name to a small fraction of the companies they actually control.”

    Jewish leader, Louis Marshall, subtly confessed that the schemes of Zionism were a long-term plan for Jewish power-grabbing, stating: “Zionism is but an incident of a far-reaching plan: it is merely a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon.” This Jewish World Plot is not a new phenomena by any means, and most likely originated with the advent of Judaism itself over 3000 years ago. A shocking clue to its existence was left behind in 1492 by the Grand Sanhedrin which resided in Constantinople,

    “In 1492, Chemor, chief Rabbi of Spain, wrote to the Grand Sanhedrin, which had its seat in Constantinople, for advice, when a Spanish law threatened expulsion. This was the reply:

    Beloved brethren in Moses, we have received your letter in which you tell us of the anxieties and misfortunes which you are enduring. We are pierced by as great pain to hear it as yourselves.

    The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis is the following:

    1. As for what you say that the King of Spain 3 obliges you to become Christians: do it, since you cannot do otherwise.

    2. As for what you say about the command to despoil you of your property: make your sons merchants that they may despoil, little by little, the Christians of theirs.

    3. As for what you say about making attempts on your lives: make your sons doctors and apothecaries, that they may take away Christians’ lives.

    4. As for what you say of their destroying your synagogues: make your sons canons and clerics in order that they may destroy their churches.

    5. As for the many other vexations you complain of: arrange that your sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that they always mix in affairs of State, that by putting Christians under your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged on them.

    6. Do not swerve from this order that we give you, because you will find by experience that, humiliated as you are, you will reach the actuality of power.

    (Signed) PRINCE OF THE JEWS OF CONSTANTINOPLE.” (L. Fry, Waters Flowing Eastward: The War Against the Kingship of Christ. TBR Books, Washington, D. C., (2000), pp. 51-52; also see these facsimiles of this letter, one & two)

    The Jews hide behind a bogus veneer of victimhood in order to deceive naive Gentiles about their sinister agenda and carnivorous quest for World Governance. This guilt and sympathy peddling charade is laughably transparent. Zionist kingpin, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise (1874-1949) — the co-founder of the World Jewish Congress and other subversive groups — frantically howled that the whole of Christendom owes the Jews a homeland in Palestine for perceived wrongs done to the Jews. Wise annoyingly squawked: “The rebuilding of Zion will be the reparation of all Christendom for all the wrongs done to the Jews.” In 1900 Rabbi Wise let slip the premeditated hoax of holocaustianity when he spoke of “6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism.” That was one of dozens upon dozens of references and invocations of the cabalistic fable of “6,000,000 persecuted, dead or dying Jews” from 1900 through 1945, leading up to the creation of the state of Israel on the back of this deceptive, yet obvious hoax, in 1948. (See: Heddesheimer, Don. The First Holocaust: Jewish Fund Raising Campaigns with Holocaust Claims during and after World War One. Chicago, IL: Theses & Dissertations, 2003; see also: The “Six Million” Myth)

    United States Federal Judge, Julian Mack (1866-1943), chaired a plethora of Zionist organizations and worked vociferously to establish a Zionist state on stolen Palestinian land. In true Jewish supremacist fashion, this rabid nutcase demanded money from Christians to fund the heinous Zionist colonial project in Palestine, saying that this must be done “in appreciation of the debt which all the world owes to the Jews.” Believing the world owes them, these pompous, supremacist Jews don’t just demand Palestine — they want the entire planet handed over to them on a silver platter along with all of its valuables and treasures!

    These damning facts, quotes and pronouncements — taken together — are extremely significant bits of evidence bearing on the existence of the Jewish World Plot and the authenticity of the Protocols of Zion. Many of these astonishing statements are completely mimetic of what is outlined in the Protocols — a one-world tyrannical state governed by Jews upon which a Jewish World Tyrant, whom they refer to as the “King Despot of the Blood of Zion” (a descendant of the House of David), will be crowned king and rule the earth:

    “Ever since that time we have been leading the peoples from one disenchantment to another, so that in the end they should turn also from us in favor of that KING-DESPOT OF THE BLOOD OF ZION, WHOM WE ARE PREPARING FOR THE WORLD.” (The Protocols of Zion, 3:15)

    “The recognition of our despot … will come when the peoples, utterly wearied by the irregularities and incompetence – a matter which we shall arrange for – of their rulers, will clamor: “Away with them and give us one king over all the earth who will unite us and annihilate the causes of disorders – frontiers, nationalities, religions, State debts – who will give us peace and quiet which we cannot find under our rulers and representatives.” (The Protocols of Zion , 10:18)

    “When the King of Israel sets upon his sacred head the crown offered him by Europe he will become patriarch of the world.” (The Protocols of Zion, 15:23)

    Much of this was affirmed by a man named Benjamin Freedman, a former Zionist and former Jew who converted to Christianity and became an outspoken critic of Zionism and international Jewish intrigue. Freedman was a successful New York businessman who had been for many years on a first name basis with many leading Zionist power-brokers as well as several American presidents. Thus he had intimate first-hand knowledge of international politics, the role Jews played in it and influence they wielded over it. He wrote a book called “The Hidden Tyranny” and, in 1961, gave a very illuminating speech at The Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C., primarily exposing the role of Zionist Jewry in bringing America into World War I in return for British support for the Zionist ambition to seize and colonize Palestine at the war’s end.

    In light of the facts and information illustrated herein, the grim reality of this global Jewish conspiracy thus cannot logically be denied by any reasonable person. Only those who are partisan, or otherwise sympathetic, to Jewry will deny the existence of this cold-blooded conspiracy against Gentiles.

    Club Death Judaica — Bolshevist Bloodletting

    As previously noted, Communism — also known as Bolshevism — is a Jewish confidence trick — a swindle to establish Jewish control over Gentile nations that were not compliant with the aims of International Finance Jewry. The so-called “Russian Revolution” of 1917 was not a Russian phenomenon at all, but rather a well-organized and executed Jewish coup d’etat. The first communist-led upheaval of 1905 was also the work of plotting Jewish agitators and radicals. These are well established facts, not spurious claims as the lying Jews would have you believe.

    The Jewish controlled press, Hollywood movie industry and intellectual domain of most Western countries, have endeavored to not only downplay the role of Jews in Bolshevism, but also to whitewash Bolshevik atrocities. A conspiracy of silence regarding the monstrous crimes of Communism continues even today, whilst we are pummeled from every direction with ridiculous and nonsensical Zionist propaganda about an impossible “holocaust of six million Jews”. Snake-like liars masquerading as “journalists”, “professors” and “historians” even strive to glorify or romanticize Communism and murderous Marxist revolutionaries. These sleazy, scum-ridden shills not only never criticize anything having to do with Communism, but always describe it as a sincere and timely experiment with the greatest of social advantages.

    At the time, Jews openly bragged that the “Russian” revolution was their making. They were the financiers, the revolutionaries and the bloodthirsty horde of murderous “Cheka” secret police officers (later known as the NKVD, OGPU, KGB, etc) who were responsible for liquidating untold millions of Russians and Eastern Europeans. Now Jews say, “Who, us? No, Jews had nothing to do with it! You’re just antisemitic!” Even those Jews who might still be alive and who took part in the massacres now deny that Jews were involved in these crimes. Even though anti-Semitismbecame a capital crime punishable by death after the revolution of 1917 (as you shall see), Jews now ludicrously assert that they were “persecuted.” Even though the Christian churches burned while the synagogues were left untouched, Jews now foolishly deny that they were protected. Even though Christian priests and nuns were tortured, executed en masse and forced to sweep the streets — while Jews and rabbis lived high on the hog — Jews now comically claim they were victims of Bolshevism! This is the tried and true victim strategy that Jewish criminals have employed for millennium to evade and escape justice for their hideous crimes.

    The Jews had harbored tremendous enmity for the Russian Czars, firstly because they were Christian, and secondly because the Czars kept the Jews marginalized and in check by restricting them to their own areas (the so-called “Jewish Pale”), and reined them in when they got out of line. For those reasons, among others, fanatical Russian and Eastern European Jews mobilized revolutionary terror brigades to depose and assassinate the Czars. In 1881, Czar Alexander II was assassinated by Jews. Heir to the throne was Czar Nicholas II, the Jews’ next target.

    The first communist-inspired, Talmudic upheaval in Christian Russia occurred in 1905, led by the Masonic Jews Leon Deustch, Vladimir Lenin, Leiba Bronstein (alias Leon Trotsky) and Trotsky’s guide and mentor Israel Helphand (alias Alexander Parvus) — the multimillionaire financier who was also a political adviser of the “Young Turks” (i.e. crypto-Jews who sparked a revolution in Ottoman Turkey in 1908, to facilitate Zionist ambitions). Parvus raked in millions in profits from the sale of weapons and foodstuffs to the Turkish Army, who — under the captainship of the crypto-Jewish “Young Turks” — carried out the Armenian massacres of 1915, slaying 1.5 million Christians. (See: Bjerknes, Christopher Jon. The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians, 2006)

    Jews boastfully claimed responsibility for the 1905 revolutionary uprising. For example, The Maccabean of London wrote in an article entitled “A Jewish Revolution” in November of 1905:

    “The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution, a crisis in Jewish history. It is a Jewish revolution because Russia is the home of about half the Jews of the world, and an overturning of its despotic government must have a very important influence on the destinies of the millions living there and on the many thousands who have recently emigrated to other countries. But the revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution also because Jews are the most active revolutionists in the Tsar’s empire.” (quoted in: L. Fry, Waters Flowing Eastward: The War Against the Kingship of Christ. TBR Books, Washington, D. C., (2000), p. 40.)

    Bolshevist undertakings, like Zionist ones, were subsidized by wealthy Jewish loan-sharks. In preparation for the 1905 revolution, Jewish bankers manufactured a war between Russia and Japan. They had long been conducting a perfidious economic war against Russia by sabotaging Russia’s ability to secure Western loans and by financing Russia’s enemies. This was done in a malicious effort to weaken Russia economically and physically, thus making it ripe for revolution, communist subversion and Jewish plundering. Prominent Jewish banker and “philanthropist”, Jacob Henry Schiff — the Rothschild emissary in America who headed the powerhouse Kuhn, Loeb & Co. bank in New York — financed the Japanese war effort against Russia by floating them a loan of $200,000,000 USD. (See also: “Genocidal Jewish Supremacist Jacob H. Schiff” & “Jewish Bankers Again Target Russia for Revolution” for a plethora of sources documenting Schiff’s schemes against Russia)

    The Jewish Communal Register of New York City 1917-1918 wrote of Jacob Schiff,

    “The firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., floated the large Japanese War loans of 1904-05, thus making possible the Japanese victory over Russia. […] Mr. Schiff has always used his wealth and his influence in the best interests of his people. He financed the enemies of autocratic Russia and used his financial influence to keep Russia from the money market of the United States.”

    Not only did the raging Russophobe Jacob Schiff finance Russia’s enemies to attack her, but he also financed the distribution of revolutionary propaganda to Russian POWs being held in Japanese prison camps during the 1904-1905 Japanese-Russo war. He had hoped that this propaganda would poison their minds against the Czar and upon their return to Russia at the war’s end they would commit mutiny and help install the Jewish communists into power.

    Although the attempted revolution of 1905 failed to bring down the Russian Czarist government, the Marxist Jews had caused a great deal of carnage. The murderous bloodletting of the Jews was noted by William Eleroy Curtis, in a speech he delivered to the National Geographic Society on 14 December, 1906:


    Perhaps these reforms are the cause of the present tranquility, because the revolutionary leaders nearly all belong to the Jewish race and the most effective revolutionary agency is the Jewish Bund, which has its headquarters at Bialystok, where the massacre occurred last June. The government has suffered more from that race than from all of its other subjects combined. Whenever a desperate deed is committed it is always done by a Jew, and there is scarcely one loyal member of that race in the entire Empire. The great strike which paralyzed the Empire and compelled the Czar to grant a constitution and a parliament was ordered and managed by a Jew named Krustaleff, president of the workingmen’s council, a young man only thirty years old. He was sent to the penitentiary for life, and had not been behind the bars more than three weeks when he organized and conducted a successful strike of the prison employees.

    Maxim, who organized and conducted the revolution in the Baltic provinces, is a Jew of marvelous ability. Last fall he came over here lecturing and collecting money to carry on the revolutionary campaign, but for some reason has vanished and nobody seems to know what has become of him.

    Gerschunin, the most resourceful leader of the terrorists, who was condemned to life imprisonment in the silver mines on the Mongolian frontier, has recently escaped in a water cask, and is supposed to be in San Francisco. He is a Polish Jew only twenty-seven years old. I might enumerate a hundred other revolutionary leaders and every one of them would be a Jew. Wherever you read of an assassination or of the explosion of a bomb you will notice in the newspaper dispatches that the man was a Jew. The most sensational and dramatic episode that has occurred since the mutinies was on October 27, when, in the very center of Saint Petersburg, at the entrance of Kazan Cathedral, four Jews held up a treasury wagon and captured $270,000. They passed the package to a woman, who instantly vanished, and no trace of her has ever been found; but they were all arrested and were promptly punished. On the 8th of November a few Jewish revolutionaries entered a treasury car near Ragow, in Poland, got $850,000 and disappeared.

    Every deed of that kind is done by Jews, and the massacres that have shocked the universe, and occurred so frequently that the name ‘pogrom’ was invented to describe them, were organized and managed by the exasperated police authorities in retaliation for crimes committed by the Jewish revolutionists.” (W. E. Curtis, “The Revolution in Russia”, The National Geographic Magazine, Volume 18, Number 5, (May, 1907), pp. 302-316, at 313-314.)

    Author Juri Lina, on page 141 of his book “Under the Sign of the Scorpion”, described the unbridled terror inflicted by the Marxist Jews:

    20 000 people were killed or crippled as a result of the terrorist actions in the years 1905-06, according to the film director Stanislav Govorukhin. Novoye Vremya put the total figure at 50 000 in March 1911. Both Parvus and Trotsky began to understand that all these sporadic terrorist actions would not be enough to support and decisively change the outcome of the coup attempts in October (when the all-out political strike was organized and terrorist actions were staged), December 1905, and in January 1906, when the last, desperate attempt to overthrow the Tsar’s regime was made. Lenin, who sceptically followed the events in Russia from his exile, came to the same conclusion. Mass terror was needed for a victory. The “revolutionaries” dreamed of civil war.

    The Masonic Jews fumed with anger upon realizing the utter failure of their putrid plans to overthrow the Czar and establish a Jewish tyranny; but their homicidal dreams and desires lived on. They immediately began plotting another revolution, which manifest in the year 1917.

    These mealy-mouthed Marxist Jews slyly preached against capitalism by day, whilst hobnobbing with the richest of America’s and Europe’s Jewish capitalist bankers by night, who had been covertly subsidizing their baneful Bolshevist agitation activities for quite some time. This farcical Hebraic ruse couldn’t have been more transparent. For example, the Jewish Marxist revolutionary, Leon Trotsky, socialized and played chess with über “bourgeois” Zionist Jew banker, Baron Rothschild, in Vienna. (Nedava, Joseph. “Trotsky and the Jews”, Jewish Publication Society of America, (1972), p. 36) In 1916, the mischievous, lying Jew Trotsky was summoned to the United States by the aforementioned Jewish mega-banker Jacob Schiff, and was given the task of recruiting and training Russian-Jewish immigrants from the Lower East Side of New York City as Marxist terrorist radicals for the Bolshevik revolution.

    On March 27, 1917, Trotsky and his 300 well-trained Jewish communists from Manhattan’s Lower East Side, boarded the Norwegian steamer “Kristianiafjord” for a journey that brought them to St. Petersburg in Russia. Before departing, Jacob Schiff gave Trotsky and his congregation of cabalist conspirators $20,000,000. Simultaneously, Lenin and his Jewish comrades — facilitated by the German government — boarded a sealed train car which took them from Scandinavia to Petrograd, sitting on ten million dollars in gold supplied by Germany’s richest Jewish banker, Max Warburg (whose brother Paul, strangely enough, was the chief architect of the Federal Reserve System, the Rothschild-controlled central bank of the United States).

    Henry Wickham Steed, the chief editor of The Times, discerned that this financial aid went beyond the Kerensky regime, stating that,

    “the prime movers [of the Bolshevik revolution] were Jacob Schiff, Warburg, and other international financiers, who wished above all to bolster up the Jewish Bolshevists in order to secure a field for German and Jewish exploitation of Russia.” (Steed, Henry Wickham. Through thirty years, 1892-1922: a personal narrative, Volume 2. Doubleday, Page & Company, 1924. p. 302)

    In “Czarism and Revolution,” Omni Publications, Hawthorne, California, (1962), pp. 231-232, we learn of the tidal wave of Jewish money flooding into the Bolshevist cause,

    “In an excerpt from a secret report, dated New York, 15 February, 1916, (quoted from Boris Brazol, “The World At the Crossroads”, 1921, Boston, Small, Maynard and Co., Publ, p. 19) we read: “The Russian Revolutionary Party in America has decided upon a policy of overt action. Risings and disturbances may, therefore, be expected at any moment. The first secret meeting, marking the commencement of this new period of violence was held on the East Side in the evening of February 14th and was attended by 62 delegates of whom 50 were veterans of 1905, while the remaining 12 were newly joined members. The majority consisted of Jewish intellectuals, some of whom were professional revolutionaries. The discussions at this meeting were mainly centered around the opportunities offered and the means available for staging a revolution on a grand scale in Russia, the present time being considered extremely propitious. As previously reported, the party had just received from Russia secret information to the effect that all the necessary preliminaries for an immediate rising had been concluded. The only question of concern to the meeting was that of a possible shortage of funds; however, as soon as it arose, several members announced that no fears should be entertained on that subject as, at the appropriate time, the necessary money would be supplied by the sympathizers. In this connection the name of Jacob Schiff was repeatedly mentioned.”

    A copy, dated September 23rd, 1919, of “To Moscow,” published in Rostov, contains further interesting facts about the part played by Jacob Schiff in the 1917 revolution. According to this paper, the information is based on a document originating from the French High Commissioner in Washington. The authenticity of this document cannot be contested as it was extracted from the archives of one of the high French government offices. Later it was quoted by Gen. Nechvolodov in his book, previously mentioned (pp. 97-104). Nechvolodov claims that it was drafted by official branches of the American Services and handed by them to the French High Commissioner. I present a few quotations:

    “In February 1916, it was learnt that a revolution was being fomented in Russia and that the following persons and business concerns were engaged in this destructive enterprise: 1) Jacob Schiff; 2) Kuhn, Loeb & Co. (Directors: Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mortimer Schiff, Jerome H. Hanauer); 3) Guggenheim; 4) Max Breitung.

    “It would therefore appear that the revolution in Russia, which broke out one year after this information was first reported, was sustained by Jewish interests.

    “In April 1917, Jacob Schiff publicly declared that it was thanks to his financial support that the revolution in Russia had succeeded.

    “In the Spring of the same year, Schiff commenced to subsidize Trotsky, who also received a contribution from ‘Forward’, a Jewish publication of New York.

    “Simultaneously, Trotsky and Co. were also being subsidized by Max Warburg and Olaf Aschberg of the Nye Bank in Stockholm, another Jewish concern, the Rhine-Westphalian Syndicate and Jivotovsky, a wealthy Jew whose daughter later married Trotsky. Relations were thus established between multi-millionaire and proletarian Jewry.”

    There follows a list of names drawing attention to the predominance of the Jewish element in the first Soviets. This document, after stressing the ties linking Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and other Jewish financial establishments, expresses the opinion “that the Bolshevik movement to a certain degree is the expression of a more general Jewish movement and that certain Jewish banking houses are interested in its furtherance.”

    Jacob Schiff did indeed publicly boast that “thanks are due to the Jew” that the revolution in Russia had succeeded. Juri Lina documented in similar terms how Jewish loan-sharks from America and Western Europe were throwing money at the Bolsheviks:

    It was above all Jacob and Mortimer Schiff, Felix Warburg, Otto H. Kahn, Max Warburg, Jerome J. Hanauer, Alfred Milner and the copper family Guggenheim who financed the Bolsheviks, according to the Jewish historian David Shub.

    A document (861.00/5339) in the archives of the U.S. State Department confirms this. Two further names are mentioned in this document: Max Breitung and Isaac Seligman. All those people were Jews and freemasons. According to the same document, plans to depose the Tsar were made in February 1916. There are always some people who make money out of wars and revolutions. We must not forget this when we seek to understand history.

    The Zionist banker and freemason Max Warburg played an important role in funding the Communist propaganda in Russia. He saw to it that the industrialist Hugo Stinnes agreed to give two million roubles to the Bolsheviks’ publishing activity on the 12th of August 1916. (Zeman, “Germany and the Revolution in Russia, 1915-18. Documents from the Archives of the German Foreign Ministry”, London, 1958, p. 92.) Thus there are documents extant which show that Max Warburg and other super-wealthy Jews supported Communism. These statements are not just made up, as certain know-it-alls have claimed.” (Under the Sign of the Scorpion, p. 180)

    Of course, the Jew bankers got a great return on their investment. The Jew Bolsheviks methodically despoiled the wealth and valuables of Russia and the Czar, shipping boat loads of gold back to the vaults of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. in America, Warburg banks in Germany, and their own private bank accounts in various countries:

    “The banker Jacob Schiff had given Leon Trotsky 20 million dollars to organise a Bolshevik take-over. That gamble certainly paid off. 600 million roubles in gold were transferred to the United States of America between 1918 and 1922, according to the historian Gary Allen. In the first half of 1921 alone, the banking house of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. made a profit of 102 290 000 dollars on the wealth the Bolsheviks had robbed, according to the New York Times, August 23rd, 1921. Multiply that sum by one hundred and you have the present-day value of that money. The Russian historian Dmitri Volkogonov revealed after findings in the Communist Party archives that “just the Tsarina’s private reserves amounted to 475 million roubles in gold (plus 7 million for the crown jewels)”. (Dagens Nyheter, 31st of August 1992.) The Bolshevik financial department Goskhran confiscated all of this. Some Swedish journalists (including Staffan Skott) have, in accord with the prevailing myth, tried to explain that most of this wealth was handed over to the Communist parties in other countries, while millions of Russians died of starvation. That is not entirely accurate. According to the historian Igor Bunich, Lenin and Trotsky took care of this money personally. The gold, meanwhile, was smuggled out of Russia and deposited into personal bank accounts around the world. (30 tons of gold per year were produced in the Tsarist era in Russia.)” (Under the Sign of the Scorpion, p. 237)

    Immediately upon their arrival in Russia, the bloody banditry of Jewry commenced, unleashing a carnivorous crusade of destruction never before seen or heard of. The revolutionary turmoil of 1917 — led by the name-changing crypto-Jews Vladimir Ulyanov (alias Lenin), Leiba Bronstein (alias Leon Trotsky), Jacob Sverdlov, Moisei Uritsky, Lev Rosenfeld (alias Kamenev), Grigory Radomylsky (alias Zinoviev), Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich, Karl Sobelsohn (alias Radek), Israel Helphand (alias Alexander Parvus), Rosalina Zalkind, Aaron Kuhn (alias Bela Kun), and a thousand and one other Jew Bolsheviks — wrought the stench of death upon the Russland, converting Russia into a temple of evil. When Lenin’s Bolsheviks seized the State in October of 1917, the Russians had become sacrificial lambs to be sent to the slaughterhouse by the new kosher communist butchers who ruled the country with an iron fist.

    One of the first acts of brutality that set the stage for the following seventy years of bloodshed, famine, poverty and death, was the cold-blooded assassination of the Russian Imperial family, the Romanov’s — Czar Nicholas II, his wife, daughters and son — by a death squad of Jewish Bolshevik brigands. On orders of Jacob Schiff, the Romanov’s were shot and bayoneted in the Ipatiev House in Ekaterinburg where they had sought refuge, by a coterie of homicidal Jewish assassins: Jacob Sverdlov (first president of the Soviets), Yankel Yurovsky (Cheka general, known as an avid reader of the Talmud), Goloshchekin, Safarov, Voikov, and Syromolotov. The members of the Imperial family in closest succession to the throne were assassinated the following night.

    In “The Last Days of the Romanovs” (p. 393), Robert Wilton, on assignment for The London Times in Russia for 17 years, summed up the “Russian Revolution” in these words:

    “The whole record of the Bolshevism in Russia is indelibly impressed with the stamp of alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov and carried out by the Jews Goloshekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov, and Yurvsky, is the act, not of the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.

    The Jewish domination in Russia is supported by certain Russians: the “burgess” Ulyanov alias Lenin, the “noble” Chicherin, the “dissenter” Bonch-Bruevich. They are all mere screens or dummies behind which the Sverdlovs and the thousand and one Jews of Sovepedia continue their work of destruction; having wrecked and plundered Russia by appealing to the ignorance of the working folk, they are now using their dupes to set up a new tyranny worse than any that the world has known.

    Sovietdom has consecrated three heroes to whom monuments have been erected: to Karl Marx, to Judas Iscariot, and to Leo Tolstoi, the three names that are associated with the Revolution, Apostasy and Anarchism; two of them Jews.”

    This “stamp of alien invasion”, as Robert Wilton put it, was unmistakably Jewish and Talmudic. Anti-Zionist author Douglas Reed explained the ethnic clues left behind by the Judaist killers of the Romanov family, and its incredible meaning:

    “The chief reason for recounting the details of the pogrom of the Romanoffs is to point to the “fingerprint” which was left in the room where it was done. One of the assassins, presumably their leader, stayed to exult and put a significant signature on the wall, which was covered with obscene or mocking inscriptions in Hebrew, Magyar and German. Among them was a couplet which deliberately related the deed to the Law of the Torah-Talmud and thus offered it to posterity as an example of the fulfilment of that law, and of Jewish vengeance as understood by the Levites. It was written in German by someone who parodied the Jewish poet, Heinrich Heine’s lines on the death of Belshazzar, the imaginary potentate whose murder is portrayed in Daniel as God’s punishment for an affront offered to Judah:

    Belsazar ward aber in selbiger Nacht
    Von selbigen Knechten umgebracht.

    The parodist, sardonically surveying the shambles, adapted these lines to what he had just done:

    Belsatsar ward in selbiger Nacht Von seinen Knechten umgebracht.

    No clearer clue to motive and identity was ever left behind.” (The Controversy of Zion, p. 195)

    As Douglas Reed aptly noted, the mocking inscription left on the wall of the Ipatiev House where the Romanovs were butchered were lines adapted from a poem by German-Jewish poet, Heinrich Heine, which alluded to the death of a Gentile ruler (Belshazzar, cleverly spelled Belsatsar) in the well-known Old Testament story, who saw “the writing on the wall” foretelling his destruction (Daniel 5), and was killed as punishment for his “offenses” against the Jews’ bloodthirsty deity. The intended symbolism was obviously that another Gentile king, the Tsar, was killed as an act of Jewish retribution. (See also: Waters Flowing Eastward, Chapter: “The Writing on the Wall”, for the cabalistic significance of these inscriptions) Interestingly, the wealth of the Rothschild family — which can be credited with bringing these Jew communists to power in Russia — is believed by some Jews to be “for a higher purpose… to avenge the wrongs of Israel.” Also of great relevance to this story is the fact that poet Heinrich Heine was a friend of Karl Marx, and had once subtly remarked that most Gentiles had no idea about Jewish schemes or worldly ambitions, but that we would find out only after becoming their slaves! Heine said,

    The deeds of the Jews are as little known to the world as their true nature. Some think they know the Jews because they have seen their beards — but that’s all that appeared of them. In the Middle Ages and in modern times too the Jews are a walking mystery. This mystery will be resolved, perhaps, and all will be revealed, on the day which the prophet has foretold: when there will be only one shepherd and one flock, and when the righteous who suffered for the salvation of mankind will receive recognition and glory.” (Prawer, Siegbert Salomon. Heine’s Jewish Comedy: A Study of His Portraits of Jews and Judaism. Oxford: Clarendon, 1983. p. 622)

    The Jewishness of Communism/Bolshevism and the Soviet Regime was attested to not only by the Russian people, but also by American, British, and other government officials and commissions, intrepid journalists who witnessed the 1917 Bolshevik coup first hand, and even some braggadocious Jews themselves.

    Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, one of the top Jewish mafia kingpins in the world (when alive), once declared: “Some call it Marxism — I call it Judaism!” (The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935)

    The Jewish Chronicle of London, April 4, 1914, boasted that Bolshevism is Judaism, stating:

    “There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism.”

    The September 10, 1920, edition of American Hebrew Magazine pompously bragged:

    “The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction, and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the world.”

    On the 12th of April, 1919, the newspaper Kommunist (Kharkov) published comrade M. Kohan’s article “The Jews’ Services to the Working Class”, where he wrote the following:

    It can be said without exaggeration that the Great Socialist October Revolution was brought about through the hands of the Jews . . . the red five-pointed star, which was known as a Judaic symbol in ancient times, has now been taken over by the Russian proletariat . . . Jewish commissars as leaders of committees and soviet [council-kahal] organisations lead the Russian proletariat to victory . . . Could the dark and oppressed masses of Russian workers and peasants throw off the yoke of the bourgeoisie themselves? No, it was the Jews from beginning to end who showed the Russian proletariat the way to the rosy dawn of internationalism and who to this day rule Soviet Russia. The proletariat can feel secure in the hands of the Jews. We can be calm while comrade Trotsky commands the Red Army.” (quoted in “Under the Sign of the Scorpion”, p. 133)

    The 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia’s article on “Socialism” tells us: “While in Germany socialism has attracted individual Jews, in Russia it has become a movement of the Jewish masses.”

    In 1906, The New York Times reported on a gathering of anti-Russian, pro-communist Jews in Berlin, Germany. Dr. Paul Nathan, a well-known Jewish publicist, called for Russia’s destruction:

    “Dr. Nathan read to the meeting a circular (from the Russian Czarist government) addressed to the (Russian) garrison of Odessa, calling upon the soldiers to “rise and crush the traitors who are plotting to upset the holy Government of the Czar and substitute for it a Jewish empire.” He concluded with an appeal to the Jewish money powers of the world to arrest Russia’s career as a borrower. The financiers of the world should call a halt to Russia, not only for humanitarian reasons, but for practical reasons. Russia’s bankruptcy is an established fact, he added.”

    The Encyclopedia Judaica’s article on Communism substantiates much of what so-called “anti-Semites” have long been saying about Communism and the Soviet experiment’s Jewish origins, motives and character. It confesses,

    “The Communist movement and ideology played an important part in Jewish life, particularly in the 1920s, 1930s, and during and after World War II. […] Individual Jews played an important role in the early stages of Bolshevism and the Soviet Regime. […] In some countries Jews became the leading element in the legal and illegal Communist parties and in some cases were even instructed by the Communist International to change their Jewish-sounding names and pose as non-Jews, in order not to confirm right wing propaganda that presented Communism as an alien, Jewish conspiracy. […] The Bolshevik faction contained a number of Jews mainly in the field of organization and propaganda … They included such people as Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), M. Liadov (Mandelshtam), Grigory Shklovsky, A. Soltz, S. Guzev (Drabkin), Grigory Zinoviev (Radomyslsky), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld), Rozaliya Zemliachka (Zalkind), Helena Rosmirovich, Yemeli Yaroslavsky (Gubelman), Serafimer Gopner, G. Sokolnikov, I. Platnitsky, Jacob Sverdlov, M. Vladimirov, P. Zalutsky, A. Lozovsky, Y. Yaklovlev (Epstein), Lazar Kaganovich, D. Shvartzman, Simon Dimanstein … Trotsky [Bronstein], M. Uritsky, M. Volodarsky, J. Sleklov, Adolf Joffee, David Riazanov (Goldenbach), Yuri Larin and Karl Radek (Sobelsohn).” (see this facsimile of the Encyclopedia Judaica’s article)

    Ted Pike, in his article “Jewish Activists Created Communism,” provides the following commentary concerning the Encyclopedia Judaica’s revealing article on Jews and Communism:

    “It [the Encyclopedia Judaica’s article on “Communism”] continues by admitting that the “anti-Semitic” counteroffensive of the White Russian armies in 1918 “drove the bulk of Russian Jewish youth into the ranks of the Bolshevik regime.” This means that the majority of all young Soviet Jews were communists. Jews, it says, found great opportunity within Bolshevism, “occupying many responsible positions in all branches of the party and state machinery at the central and local seats of power.” (p. 791) The highly disproportionate amount of Jews in the Party hierarchy is also admitted in the Encyclopedia Judaica’s article:

    “During the Revolution Jews played a prominent part in the party organs. The politburo elected on Oct. 23, 1917 had four Jews among its seven members. The Military Revolutionary Committee, appointed to prepare the coup, was headed by Trotsky and had two Jews among its five members. In the early years of the Soviet regime, Jews were in many leading positions in the government and party machinery…” (page 797, 98)

    The Encyclopedia Judaica goes on to inadvertently clarify why the native Russians were so bent on “anti-Semitic” activities. When the Russian people heroically attempted to regain their freedom from the communists, the Judaica says “compact Jewish masses in these areas [were utilized] as a counterweight, which would swing the balance in the centralist regime’s favor.” (p. 798)  In other words, “the bulk of Jewish youth” in every outlying hamlet of Russia became the “compact Jewish masses” whose task it was to forcibly impose and maintain communist slavery upon freedom-loving peoples. Jews and the Russian populace were locked in a death struggle for survival and the future of Russia. Is it any wonder that the White Russians rose up in rage, even to the point of liquidating their oppressors? Who would not have done the same?”

    In “The Jewish Experience” (1996, p. 364), Jewish author Norman Cantor freely admits and proudly boasts of the Jewish cast that comprised the Bolshevik hierarchy in Russia, stating,

    “The Bolshevik Revolution and some of its aftermath represented, from one perspective, Jewish revenge. . . . During the heyday of the Cold War, American Jewish publicists spent a lot of time denying that—as 1930s anti-Semites claimed—Jews played a disproportionately important role in Soviet and world Communism. The truth is until the early 1950s Jews did play such a role, and there is nothing to be ashamed of. In time Jews will learn to take pride in the record of the Jewish Communists in the Soviet Union and elsewhere. It was a species of striking back.”

    Author Edward Schoonmaker, writing in “Democracy and World Dominion” (1939, p. 211), confirms Cantors rhetoric and elaborated on how Jewish synagogues were left untouched by the Bolsheviks, while the Christian churches were all burned to the ground:

    “Fifteen years after the Bolshevist Revolution was launched to carry out the Marxist program, the editor of the American Hebrew could write: “According to such information [as] the writer could secure while in Russia a few weeks ago, not one Jewish synagogue has been torn down, as have hundreds—perhaps thousands—of the Greek Catholic churches. . . .” (American Hebrew, Nov. 18, 1932, p. 12.) Apostate Jews, leading a revolution that was to destroy religion as the “opiate of the people,” had somehow spared the synagogues of Russia.”

    Another Jewish writer, Sever Plocker, also lent credence to much of what “the anti-Semites” say about Jews and Communism, in an article published on entitled, “Stalin’s Jews”. He rightly reminded us that “some of the greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish.”

    British and American intelligence reports relayed information about the Jewishness of Bolshevism and the new Soviet regime, describing the Bolshevik leadership as being as much as 90 percent Jewish. Robert Wilton, the previously mentioned correspondent of The London Times on assignment in Russia during the communist revolution of 1917, outlined the ethnic make-up of the Bolshevik State as such:

    “According to the data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 556 important functionaries of the Bolshevik State there were in 1918-1919: 17 Russians, 2 Ukrainians, 11 Armenians, 35 Lets, 15 Germans, 1 Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 2 Poles, 2 Finns, 1 Karaim, 457 Jews.

    As the decades past by—after the fateful year 1917—Judaized Khazars kept a firm hand on the helm of the government in the occupied land of Russia. In due time they built a bureaucracy to their heart’s desire.”

    In a report of the American Expeditionary forces to Siberia, March 1, 1919, compiled by Captain Montgomery Schyler — speaking of events following the decline of the First Provisional Government — it reads:

    “These hopes were frustrated by the gradual gains in power of the more irresponsible and socialistic elements of the population, guided by the Jews and other anti-Russian races. A table made in April 1918 by Robert Wilton, the correspondent of the London Times in Russia, shows that at that time there were 384 “commissars” including 2 Negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22 Armenians and more than 300 Jews. Of the latter number, 264 had come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial government.”

    Schyler frankly described the Bolshevik movement as being “guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type,” from the outset. Reverend George E. Simons, the Superintendent of the Methodist Episcopal Church in Petrograd from 1907 to 1918, was an eyewitness to the Bolshevik Revolution. He testified before the United States Senate, and stated that most of the Bolshevist leaders were Jews from the Lower East Side of New York City:

    “Out of 388 members of the new Russian government, only 16 happened to be Russians. One was an American Black. All the rest, 371, were Jews. Of these 371 Jewish Bolshevik leaders, no less than 265 of them were from the Lower East Side of New York City.”

    In 1919, the US Senate held a subcommittee inquiry into “Bolshevik propaganda”. An American teacher named R. B. Dennis who had worked as a teacher in Russia during the revolution said that the Bolshevik leaders were all “Russian Hebrews” who had previously lived in America “anywhere from 3 to 12 years.”An American banker named William Welsh who had worked in Russia between July 1916 and September 1918 told the committee: “It might be well to explain a little the general fact that most of the Bolshevik leaders are Jews, in order to avoid misunderstanding. In Russia it is well known that three-fourths of the Bolshevik leaders are Jewish.”

    Shortly after the Bolshevik Revolution, the U.S. ambassador in Russia sent a dispatch to Washington confirming that most of the Bolshevik leaders were Jews who had been previously exiled for revolutionary activities:

    “The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.” (see this image of the appropriate text)

    Mr. Summers, US Consul General in Moscow on May 2, 1918, sent a telegram to the Secretary of State in Washington DC saying in part:

    “Jew predominant in local Soviet government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population which tends to regard oncoming Germans as deliverers.”

    In 1919 the British parliament compiled a White Paper on Bolshevism titled, “Russia No. 1 A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia“. In it we find that Bolshevism is portrayed as a movement carried on by the Jews and despised by the Russian people. An overview of the relevant portions of this document relating to the Jewish hand in Bolshevism in Russia, is as follows:

    “The relevant pages concerning Jews and Bolshevism are pp. 6, 23, 28, 32, 33, 41, 57, 65, 68, 78 – on p.6 (of the document, not the pdf) we find a telegram from Sir M. Findlay to Mr. Balfour relaying a report by the Netherlands Minister at Petrograd, which contains the following message:

    I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world, as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”

    p. 23 signifies that the Jews had preferential treatment, as they were allowed to engage in illicit trading, while all other trade was at a standstill, it also contains documentation to the effect that Bolshevism was despised by the Russians, but carried out by Jews;

    p. 28 says: “The Bolsheviks can no longer be described as a political party holding extreme communistic view. They form relatively small privileged class which is able to terrorise the rest of the population because it has a monopoly both of arms and of food supplies. This class consists chiefly of workmen and soldiers, and included a large non-Russian element, such as Letts and Esthonians and Jews; the latter are specially numerous in higher posts. Members of this class are allowed complete licence, and commit crime against other sections of society.”;

    p. 32 states “The Bolsheviks comprised chiefly Jews and Germans, who were exceedingly active and enterprising. The Russians were largely anti-Bolshevik, but were for the most part dreamers, incapable of any sustained action, who now, more than ever before, were unable to throw off the yoke of their oppressors. Night after night the counterrevolutionary Societies held secret meetings to plot against the Bolsheviks, but never once was a serious attempt made to carry through the conspiracy. The starving condition of the people quite paralysed their will-power.”;

    p.33. document # 33 says: “From examination of several labourer and peasant witnesses I have evidence to the effect that very smallest percentage of this district were pro-Bolshevik, majority of labourers sympathising with summoning of Constituent Assembly. Witnesses further stated that Bolshevik leaders did not represent Russian working classes, most of them being Jews.”;

    p. 41, document # 38, reveals that the party responsible for the murder of the Romanovs consisted entirely of Jews

    p. 56 document # 56, says again that Bolshevism was a movement led by Jews,

    p. 57, The Results, says that after the Revolution, Jews became the possessors of most of the business houses, it states: “All business became paralysed, shops were closed, Jews became possessors of most of the business houses, and horrible scenes of starvation became common in the country districts. The peasants put their children to death rather than see them starve. In a village on the Dvina, not far from Schlusselberg, a. mother hanged three of her children. I was conducting a funeral in a mortuary of a lunatic asylum at Oudelnaia, near Petrograd, and saw the bodies of a mother and her five children whose throats had been cut by the father because he could not see them suffer.”

    p. 65, “The Terror”, notes the persecution of Russians for thought crimes, and the fact that people had to pay intermediaries, who were mostly Jewish, before they could obtain their release;

    p. 68 shows that the food supply committees were entirely in the hands of Jews, and that anti-Semitism was rampant because of the extreme misery that ensued after the Jews had obtained control;” (summary provided by Blissentia)

    In November of 1917, the Foreign Minister of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Count Ottokar von Czernin, wrote:

    “I have during the last few days received reliable information about the Bolsheviks. Their leaders are almost all of them Jews with altogether fantastic ideas, and I do not envy the country that is governed by them.”

    Sir Paul Dykes was an MI6 espionage agent working undercover in Bolshevik Russia for the first few years after the revolution. Upon his return home to Britian, he published a book about his experiences called “Red Dusk and the Morrow” (1922). In it he relates an interesting conversation he had with a Lithuanian who told him about overhearing a Bolshevik figure say:

    “Our power is based on three things: first, on Jewish brains; secondly, on Lettish and Chinese bayonets; and thirdly on the crass stupidity of the Russian people.” (Red Dusk and the Morrow, p. 316)

    Overzealous Jews oftentimes inadvertently give themselves away by tacitly admitting to things that they would otherwise try to deny. Two New York Jewish publications, “Jewish Life” and “Jewish Voice”, tacitly confessed that Communism is Judaism when they told their readers,

    “anti-communism is anti-Semitism! … Scratch a professional anti-communist and you’ll find an anti-Semite!”

    Besides being a Bolshevik mass murderer, Leon Trotsky-Bronstein was also a crypto-Zionist who had attended the sixth Zionist congress in Basel in 1903. In a 1937 interview in the New York Jewish newspaper, Daily Forward, Trotsky hinted at the real motives behind his revolutionary activities when he pathetically crowed: “The longer the rotten bourgeoisie society lives, the more and more barbaric will anti-Semitism become everywhere.” ‘Bourgeoisie’ was clearly a Judeo-Bolshevik code-word for Gentile.

    Lenin’s Jewish roots was a state secret, but was finally revealed by declassified KGB files and put on display in Moscow’s State Historical Museum in 2011. Lenin couldn’t have made it more obvious that he was a crypto-Jew, seeing as he had nothing but glowing esteem for the Jews and immediately decreed “antisemitism” a crime punishable by execution! The human-devil, Lenin, praised the Jews as the best revolutionaries, saying: “The clever Russian is almost always a Jew or has Jewish blood in him.” (Dmitri Volkogonov, Lenin: A New Biography, p. 112). He was surely referring to himself.

    Lenin heaped accolade and adulation on the Jews, revealing that not only was he a Jew, but a chauvinistic Jewish supremacist. He once said,

    “There the great universally progressive features of Jewish culture have made themselves clearly felt: its internationalism, its responsiveness of the advanced movements of our times (the percentage of Jews in democratic and proletarian movements is everywhere higher than the percentage of Jews in the general population.) …Those Jewish Marxists who join up in the international Marxist organizations with the Russian, Lithuanian, Ukrainian and other workers, adding their might (both in Russian and in Jewish) to the creation of an international culture of the working class movement, are continuing the best traditions of Jewry.” (quoted in: Gould, Allan. What Did They Think of the Jews? Jason Aronson Inc., 1991, p. 241; Baron, Joseph L. Stars and Sand: Jewish Notes by Non-Jewish Notables. Jewish Publication Society of America, 1944, p. 175)

    The two-faced cheat Lenin — the so-called “man of the people”, “champion of the workers” — even defended parasitic Jewish usury and loan-sharking,

    “And those gentlemen on the right benches talk about the Jews exploiting the peasants, about Jewish usury! But thousands of Jewish merchants would not skin the Russian muzhik in the way the true Russian, Christian landlords do! The interest claimed by the worst usurer is not to be compared with that claimed by the true Russian land lord, who hires the a muzhik in the winter for summer work or who forces him to pay for a dessiatine of land in labour, money, eggs, chickens, and God alone knows what else!” (V.I. Lenin, Draft for a Speech on the Agrarian Question in the Second State Duma, 1907)

    Lenin, the monstrous criminal, excitedly advocated every manner of deception, barbarity and wickedness. He encouraged lies and deceit, stating, “We must utilise all possible cunning and illegal methods, deny and conceal the truth,” noting that, “A lie told often enough becomes the truth.”

    Deceitful Jewish propagandists have duped the world into believing that German Nazi leaders Joseph Goebbels and Adolf Hitler invented and utilized the “big lie” technique as a method to fool the German masses. This is false and nothing more than psychological projection. In reality, Goebbels stressed that good propaganda must be accurate and truthful, stating that,

    “Good propaganda does not need to lie, indeed it may not lie. It has no reason to fear the truth. It is a mistake to believe that people cannot take the truth. They can. It is only a matter of presenting the truth to people in a way that they will be able to understand. A propaganda that lies proves that it has a bad cause. It cannot be successful in the long run.” (Weber, Mark. “Fraudulent Nazi Quotations.” Institute for Historical Review.)

    In 1941, Goebbels published an article in which he charged British propagandists with adopting the “big lie” technique, stating, “The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.”(Goebbels, Joseph. “Churchill’s Lie Factory,” 1941) Adolf Hitler, in Mein Kampf, identified and condemned the “big lie” technique as an invention and tactic of the Jews:

    “In this they [the Jews] proceeded on the sound principle that the magnitude of a lie always contains a certain factor of credibility, since the great masses of the people in the very bottom of their hearts tend to be corrupted rather than consciously and purposely evil, and that, therefore, in view of the primitive simplicity of their minds, they more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a little one, since they themselves lie in little things, but would be ashamed of lies that were too big. Such a falsehood will never enter their heads, and they will not be able to believe in the possibility of such monstrous effrontery and infamous misrepresentation in others.…” (Mein Kampf, p. 231 of the Manheim translation)

    Upon his assumption of power, the repulsive crypto-Jew Lenin decried “antisemitism” in the harshest possible terms. He chastised “antisemitism” as a “counter-revolutionary” act, and thus it was punishable by death. Even “anti-Semitic” speech constituted the death penalty, or life imprisonment, in the Jew-hell of Soviet Russia. If being against Jews was “counter-revolutionary” than that must have meant that all the “revolutionaries” were Jewish. In July of 1918, Lenin signed an order of the Council of People’s Commissars which declared antisemitism and pogroms a “mortal danger to the revolution [i.e. the Jewish takeover]“:

    The Council of People’s Commissars declares that the anti-Semitic movement and pogroms against the Jews are fatal to the interests of the workers’ and peasants’ revolution and calls upon the toiling people to fight this evil with all the means at their disposal.

    National hostility weakens the ranks of our revolutionaries, disrupts the united front of the toilers without distinctions of nationality and helps only our enemies.

    The Council of People’s Commissars instructs all Soviet Deputies to take uncompromising measures to tear the anti-Semitic movement out by the roots. Pogromists and pogrom-agitators are to be placed outside the law.” (Baron, Salo Wittmayer. The Russian Jew Under Tsars and Soviets, Macmillan, (1976), p. 180; Strauss, Herbert A. Hostages of Modernization, Walter De Gruyter, (1993), p. 1324)

    A. Nelson Field remarked in Appendix B of his book, All These Things: “Lenin was married to a Jewess, spoke Yiddish in his family circle, and Dr. Chaim Weizmann, Jewish Zionist leader, was quoted in the London Jewish Chronicle of December 16th, 1932, as saying that Lenin had taken part in Jewish student meetings in Switzerland thirty-five years before. He is generally regarded as a Russian, but there is doubt.”

    Lenin’s love affair with Jewry undoubtedly stemmed from his own Jewish roots and being in love with himself, since he was an egomaniac. In an asinine attempt to cover over their blood-stained tracks, Jewish apologists today often go around claiming that Josef Stalin was a big “anti-Semite”who hated and persecuted Jews. This idiotic canard has no basis in reality; on the contrary, Stalin was an instrument of the Jews, a “shabbas goy.”

    Let’s just look at what Stalin himself said about anti-Semitism,

    “National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of cannibalism.

    Anti-semitism is of advantage to the exploiters as a lightning conductor that deflects the blows aimed by the working people at capitalism. Anti-semitism is dangerous for the working people as being a false path that leads them off the right road and lands them in the jungle. Hence Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable, sworn enemies of anti-semitism.

    In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty.” (Josef Stalin, Works Vol. 13)

    So, Stalin compared anti-Semitism to cannibalism and upheld the anti-antisemitism law decreed by Lenin in 1918, restating that anti-Semitic Russian patriots were “liable to the death penalty”! Some Jew hater, eh? Furthermore, at the 1945 Yalta conference — a meeting of the Allied leaders and policy-makers during WWII — we find that Stalin proclaimed himself to be a Zionist. (“Stalin Called Himself a Zionist — Picture of Red Leader Unfolded.” The New York Times. 17 Mar. 1955.) Professor Kevin MacDonald, in his review of Juri Slezkine’s book “The Jewish Century”, informs us that not only was Stalin not “anti-Semitic” but, on the contrary, had launched a massive campaign to combat anti-Semitism:

    “From 1927 to 1932 Stalin established an ambitious public campaign to combat anti-Semitism that included fifty-six books published by the government and an onslaught of speeches, mass rallies, newspaper articles, and show trials ‘aimed at eradicating the evil.’”(MacDonald, Kevin. “Stalin’s Willing Executioners: Jews as a Hostile Elite in the USSR”, p. 25)

    Jewish journalist Sever Plocker tells us: “Jewish historian Sebag Montefiore has written that during the darkest period of terror, when the Communist killing machine worked in full force, Stalin was surrounded by beautiful, young Jewish women.” Sebag Montefiore, writing in “Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar” (p. 267), noted that, “Stalin was surrounded by Jewesses – from Polina Molotova and Maria Svanidze to Poskrebysheva and Yezhova. Beria’s son, reliable on gossip, dubious on politics, recalled that his father gleefully listed Stalin’s affairs with Jewesses.” The “Wolf of the Kremlin“, pp. 169-71 (1987), alleges that Stalin was married at one point to the Jewess Rosa Kaganovich, Lazar Kaganovich’s sister.

    Despite all the spin and sophistry of Jewish gatekeepers, Stalin was surrounded by Jews throughout the entirety of his brutal reign, with the ferocious Jew Lazar Kaganovich at his right hand side. In his 1939 book “European Jungle”, Major Francis Charles Yeats-Brown — a British war hero and award winning writer — gives us a synopsis of the clique of Jews encircling Stalin, still dominating the Soviet Union during and after the “Great Purges” of the late 1930s:

    “The population of Russia was then (in 1918) 158,400,000, of whom 7,800,000 were Jews. The present population is about 170,000,000, and probably the same proportion — say 5 per cent — are Jews. Yet in 1935, in the Central Committee of the Communist Party, consisting of 59 members, 95 per cent were Jews — i.e., 56 members — while the other three members were married to Jewesses: Stalin, Lobov, and Ossinsky.

    Among the Ambassadors and Ministers of the U.S.S.R. in 1935 the following were believed to be Jews:

    In Berlin: M. Suritz.
    In Paris : M. Louritz.
    In Rome : M. Stein.
    In Tokyo : M. Yureneff .
    In Ankara : M. Karakhan.
    In Brussels : M. Rubinin.
    In Oslo : M. Yakoubowich.
    In Stockholm : Mme. Kallontai.
    In Bucharest : M. Ostrovski.
    In Riga: M. Brodovsky.
    In Tallin: M. Karski.
    In Helsingfors : M. Asmous.

    In the same year (1935) the League of Nations Delegation consisted of one Georgian, M. Swanidze, and seven Jews, MM. Litvinov, Rosenberg, Stein, Markus, Brenners, Hirschfeld, Helphand.

    At present, with the purges in progress, it is impossible to give the Semitic percentages in the Russian Government. Certain it is that they are very much higher than the percentage of Jews to the population, both in the lower and upper grades of the State service, which means, in Russia, of practically all employment.

    During his travels along the border districts of the U.S.S.R., M. Jean Fontenoy found that 90 per cent of the directors and secretaries of the collective farms he visited were Jews. Field workers received a maximum of 27 days’ pay a month: the president and secretary 80 to 90 days’ pay a month. The words Communist and Jew were synonymous with the peasants: they thought that the Jews were the rulers of the land.

    In Kremlin circles the two brothers-in-law of Stalin, Lazarus and Moses Kaganovitch, are Ministers of Transport and Heavy Industry respectively; the guard of the Kremlin is confided to the Jewish Colonel Jacob Rappoport; while the concentration camps, with their population of 7,000,000 Russians, are in charge of a Jew, Mendel Kermann, aided by Lazarus Kaman and Semen-Firkin, both Jews. The prisons of the country are governed by the Jew Kairn Apeter. Foreign policy is almost wholly in Jewish hands, beginning with that man of many aliases, M. Meyer Moses Polyanski, alias Enock Finkelstein, alias Gustav Graf, alias Buchmann, Harrison, Maximovitch, Wallach, Berr, and Litvinov, the Foreign Minister of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, at whose breakfast-table Mr. Eden found pats of butter stamped with the slogan, “Peace is indivisible.” What peace, M. Litvinov may sometimes ask himself, will Russian Jews have in the days to come?”

    An article appearing in the Russian International News Agency, dated June 5th, 2005, admitted that almost no Jews served on the front lines as rank and file officers in the Red Army, but were appointed by Stalin as chiefs and commanders, directing the “Russian goyim” from relative safety — in the war against their Nazi nemesis — and how genocide-yearning Jews like Ilya Ehrenburg were instrumental in war-time propaganda efforts:

    There were a number of outstanding Jewish military commanders: M. Katukov, Marshal of Armored Troops; Y. Smushkevich, Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force; and General M. Shmelev, Chief of Staff of Long-Range Aviation. In addition there were 92 Jewish generals and 9 army and flotilla commanders. In total, there were 270 Jewish generals and marshals.

    Furthermore, Stalin’s inner circle included four Jewish ministers (people’s commissars): Lazar Kaganovich, Boris Vannikov, Semyon Ginzburg and Isaak Zaltsman. These men were responsible for the railroads, ammunition, military construction and the tank industry.

    Jews were also instrumental in shaping the ideology that would underpin the Soviet role in the war. Initially the Soviet people did not know what to make of the Nazi attack. Firstly, the Soviet Union once considered Germany an enemy but more recently had viewed it as a potential ally against Britain and the U.S. Secondly, the Soviet people, brought up to believe in internationalism, had thought that the German soldiers, i.e. German workers and peasants, would refuse to attack a socialist state and instead would join with the Russians to fight the oppressors, German capitalists.

    This myth had to be urgently dispelled.

    A Jewish intellectual, Ilya Erenburg, played a key role in this. He had traveled extensively and was perhaps the only Jew in the USSR who was aware of the racist motivations for the war. He was a military correspondent in Spain during the Spanish civil war, and his world outlook was informed by this experience. Six International Brigades had fought on the side of the Republicans in that war, and these units had included 6,000 Jewish volunteers.

    By the time the Germans attacked, Erenburg was resolutely opposed to fascism. He had all the main national newspapers, Pravda, Izvestia and Krasnaya Zvezda at his disposal, as well as the national radio stations. He emphatically rejected the internationalist dogma and called on the nation to, “Kill the Germans!””

    Even well into the 1950s Jews ruled over the USSR. Although Jews comprised a tiny 1.25 to 1.75 percent of the Soviet population, they constituted over 50 percent of the staff of various governmental departments, according to the Soviet politician Ekaterina Furtseva. (See: The Soviet Government and the Jews 1948-1967) While millions of Russian Gentiles languished in the Gulag slave camps succumbing to starvation, disease, exhaustion and the bitter cold climate, Soviet Jewry lived in a lap of luxury:

    “Slezkine describes the life of the largely Jewish elite in Moscow and Leningrad, where they attended the theater, sent their children to the best schools, had peasant women for nannies, spent weekends at pleasant dachas, and vacationed at the Black Sea.” (MacDonald, Kevin. “Stalin’s Willing Executioners: Jews as a Hostile Elite in the USSR”, p. 24)

    Many Jews around the world saw the Soviet Union as essentially the first Zionist State — their beloved “Israel”. This reality was supremely elucidated in the following astonishing quotation, which is attributed to the “Central Committee of the Petersburg Branch of the Israelite International League”:

    “Sons of Israel! The hour of our ultimate victory is near. We stand on the threshold to the command of the world. That which we could only dream of before us is about to be realized. Only quite recently feeble and powerless, we can now, thanks to the world’s catastrophe, raise our heads with pride. We must, however, be careful. It can surely be prophesied that, after we have marched over ruined and broken altars and thrones, we shall advance further on the same indicated path. The authority of the, to us, alien religions and doctrines of faith we have through very successful propaganda, subject to a merciless criticism and mockery. We have brought the culture, civilization, traditions and thrones of the Christian Nations to stagger. We have done everything to bring the Russian people under the yoke of the Jewish power, and ultimately compelled them to fall on their knees before us.

    We have nearly completed all this but we must all the same be very cautious, because the oppressed Russia is our arch-enemy. The victory over Russia, gained through our intellectual superiority, may in the future, in a new generation, turn against us. Russia is conquered and brought to the ground. Russia is in the agony of death under our heel, but do not forget, not even for a moment, that we must be careful! The holy care for our safety does not allow us to show either pity or mercy. At last we have been allowed to behold the bitter need of the Russian people, and to see it in tears! By taking from them their property, their gold, we have reduced this people to helpless slaves. Be cautious and silent! We ought to have no mercy for our enemy. We must make an end of the best and leading elements of the Russian people, so that the vanquished Russia may not find any leader! Thereby every possibility will vanish for them to resist our power. We must excite hatred and disputes between workers and peasants. War and the class-struggle will destroy all treasures and culture created by the Christian people. But be cautious, sons of Israel! Our victory is near, because our political and economic power and influence upon the masses are in rapid progress. We buy up Government loans and gold, and thereby we have controlling power over the world’s exchanges. The power is in our hands, but be careful, place no faith in traitorous shady powers!

    Bronstein (Trotsky), Apfelbaum (Zinovieff), Rosenfeld (Kamaneff), Steinberg, all of them are like unto thousands of other true sons of Israel. Our power in Russia is unlimited. In the towns, the Commissariats and Commissions of Food, House Commissions, etc., are dominated by our people. But do not let victory intoxicate you. Be careful, cautious, because no one except yourselves will protect us! Remember we cannot rely on the Red Army, which one day may turn its warfare on ourselves. Sons of Israel! The hour for our long-cherished victory over Russia is near; close up solid your ranks! Make known our people’s national policy! Fight for eternal ideals! Keep holy the old laws, which history has bequeathed to us! May our intellect, our genius, protect and lead us!”

    The origin of this extraordinary tract was described by Juri Lina (on page 157 of “Under the Sign of the Scorpion”) in the following way:

    “On the night before the 9th (22nd) of December 1919, during the Estonian war of liberation against the Bolsheviks, a Jewish battalion commander, Shunderev, fell in a battle against Estonian troops. Among his papers there was a secret circular containing an appeal to all Jewish chiefs for the forming of a secret Zionist society. The letter was written in Russian by the central committee at the Israeli World Union’s department in Petrograd on the 18th March 1918. The entire text was published in two Estonian newspapers.”

    When the Soviet Red Army invaded and brutally occupied Eastern Poland, the Baltic States, Finland, and other parts of Eastern Europe in late 1939/early 1940, large percentages of the Jewish populations of those countries collaborated with their Soviet communist conquerors. These Jews voluntarily led the NKVD death squads to hunt down and execute so-called “class enemies” (patriots, nationalists, anti-communist resistors, etc), and forcibly led the round-up and deportation via cattle cars of millions of Eastern European civilians to the Soviet Gulags where they met grisly deaths. Author Mark Paul, writing in “Neighbours on the Eve of the Holocaust: Polish-Jewish Relations in Soviet-Occupied Eastern Poland, 1939-1945“, documented the treacherous perfidy of Poland’s Jews and its cover-up by Western “scholars”:

    “This state of affairs played into the hands of Holocaust historians who, preoccupied with Jewish victimization under the Nazi regime, ignored, glossed over or simply denied the fact of Jewish collaboration with the Soviet invaders of Poland both, in 1939-1941 and again, from 1944 onward. Indeed, in recent years we have witnessed a concerted effort to relegate Jewish misconduct to the realm of unfounded perception on the part of the Poles that has no, or little, basis in fact. Thus a serious void or, worse still, denial about these thorny issues permeates Western scholarship – at most we find apologetics. The most recent, and disturbing, trend in that scholarship has been to focus on the German invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941 and play down to the point of dismissing or obscuring the brutal Soviet occupation that preceded that event.

    Even compelling reports of Jewish collaboration with the Soviet occupiers, found in key documents from that period, are ignored or discounted out of hand, such as the charge levelled by the legendary Polish courier, Jan Karski, who was made an Honorary Citizen of Israel for his role in warning the West about the Holocaust and cannot be accused of harbouring hostility toward the Jews. Writing in early 1940, at a time when the mass deportations of Poles were not yet underway, Karski reported:

    “… The Jews have taken over the majority of the political and administrative positions. But what is worse, they are denouncing Poles, especially students and politicians (to the secret police), are directing the work of the (communist) militia from behind the scenes, are unjustly denigrating conditions in Poland before the war. Unfortunately, one must say that these incidents are very frequent, and more common than incidents which demonstrate loyalty toward Poles or sentiment toward Poland.”

    A Jewish woman from Wilno concurred with that assessment, when she wrote during the war:

    “… Under Bolshevik rule an anti-Jewish current grew significantly. In large measure, the Jews themselves were responsible for this… . At every turn they mocked Poles, yelled out that their Poland was no more… The Jewish communists dallied with the patriotic sentiments of Poles, denounced their illegal conversations, pointed out Polish officers and former government officials, freely worked for the NKVD, and took part in arrests. …The Bolsheviks on the whole treated Jews favourably, had complete faith in them and were confident of their devoted sympathy and trust. For that reason they put Jews in all of the leading and influential positions which they would not entrust to Poles, who formerly occupied them.”

    Soon thereafter Jewish collaborators, in their positions as local officials, police, and NKVD agents, played a key role in populating the Gulag with their Polish neighbours. They identified them and put them on lists of “class enemies”; they arrested them and evicted them from their homes; and they helped to dispatch them by cattle car to the far reaches of the Soviet Union. While certainly not universal, this was by no means a marginal phenomenon, and, given the lack of condemnation of such activities by Jewish leaders, Poles were entitled to assume that in fact it reflected a widespread attitude.”

    Unfortunately, that study by Mark Paul — although still very useful — completely overlooked the sublime research of Holocaust Revisionists, as it contains a fair bit of false ‘holocaust’ propaganda. Nonetheless, it demonstrates candidly what provoked so many Poles (and Ukrainians, Latvians, Estonians, Lithuanians, Romanians and Hungarians for that matter) to collaborate with the Germans when the German Wehrmacht launched an offensive against the Soviets in 1941, driving them out of Eastern Europe and the Baltic States. These patriots saw the Nazis as liberators from Soviet-Communist oppression, which was in actuality Jewish oppression.

    Communism was spearheaded by Jews not only in Russia, but everywhere in the world where Jews lived including Western & Eastern Europe, America, Canada, Australia and South Africa. (See: Hoffman II, Michael A. “Judaic Communists: The Documentary Record”, Revisionist History, 2006; Britton, Frank L. Behind Communism, 1953; Leese, Arnold Spencer. Bolshevism Is Jewish! London, England: Imperial Fascist League, 1939; Ehrt, Adolf. Communism in Germany: the Truth about the Communist Conspiracy on the Eve of the National Revolution. Berlin: Eckart-verlag, 1933; “Jews and Communism: The South African Experience”, author unknown) The communist regimes imposed on Eastern and Western Europe during and following the Second World War — principally in Ukraine, Poland, Romania, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, East Germany, and the Baltic States — were just as Jewish-dominated as the Soviet Union. (See: David, Trefor. The Bloody Red Streak. London, England: Britons Pub. Society, 1951.)

    The bloodiest butchers of the 1917 Bolshevik revolution, and the following decades of communist rule, were the Marxist-Masonic Jews Vladimir Lenin (first dictator of the USSR), Leon Trotsky-Bronstein (founder/commander of the Red Army), Lazar Kaganovich (Stalin’s right hand man for his entire reign), Moisei Uritsky (Cheka chief in Petrograd), Jacob Sverdlov (first president of the Soviets), Grigory Zinoviev, Lev Kamenev, Yankel Yurovsky (Cheka terrorist), Genrikh Yagoda (NKVD chief), Laverenti Beria (NKVD chief), Bela Kun (Lenin’s chief terrorist in the Crimea, also the dictator of Hungary’s short-lived communist regime in 1918), Rosalina Zalkind, Leonid Reichman (NKVD chief), and the overseers of the vast and harrowing Soviet Gulag slave labor/death camp apparatus: Aaron Soltz, Naftali Frenkel (a Turkish Jew), Yakov Berman, Sergei Zhuk, Yakov Rapoport, Nakhimson, Yakov Moroz, Abramson, Pliner, Matvei Berman, Samuil Kogan, Samuil Firin, Biskon, Finkelstein, Serpukhovsky — all Jews. The murderous tyrant Josef Stalin, although not a Jew, was simply following in the blood-stained footsteps of Lenin and obeying the dictates of his Jewish overlords.

    Words cannot do justice in describing the merciless bloodlust of these Marxist Jews. Many of the leading Jewish rulers of Russia forthrightly announced their murderous desires and genocidal ambitions. All the Jewish Bolshevik leaders were teeming with an implacable hatred for everything Russian and sought to exterminate the very concept of race, nationality and culture.

    Despite the sugar-coated fables of Bolshevist apologists, the Masonic Jew Trotsky was a merciless monster who organized the genocide of millions of Russians, leading the “Red Terror” alongside Lenin in the early and most savage years of the Soviet regime. In Under the Sign of the Scorpion, p. 149, Juri Lina captured the true sadism and despotism of Trotsky, who had an insatiable appetite for terror:

    “After coming to power, Trotsky became Lenin’s right-hand man. It was actually Trotsky who ruled Russia during Lenin’s illness. He mercilessly caused the people suffering of a magnitude the world had never seen before. In the beginning Trotsky wanted to use the guillotine to execute people, but was scolded for this idea.

    He was a cynic and a sadist of the worst sort. He often executed his victims personally. He murdered his hostages in the cruellest manner and even ordered children killed. He ordered disciplinary executions. There are plenty of documents about these cruelties preserved in the archives of the Communist Party.”

    Jewish-Soviet Commissar, Grigory Zinoviev, was a human demon, if there is such a thing. This homicidal maniac would regularly scream for genocide. In a speech he delivered in 1918, Zinoviev announced Bolshevist plans for the annihilation of 10,000,000 Russians, stating emphatically,

    “To overcome our enemies we must have our own Socialist Militarism. We must win over to our side, 90 millions out of the 100 millions of population of Russia under the Soviets. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them; they must be annihilated.”  (A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. Great Britain: Foreign Office, (1919), p. 99)

    He also malevolently howled,

    “The bourgeoisie kill separate individuals; but we kill whole classes!”

    His partner in crime, Lenin, made similar blood-curdling decrees. In 1908, Lenin made it perfectly clear what he intended to do once in power, stating: “real, nation-wide terror, which reinvigorates the country.” Lenin said that he was happy to see 90 percent of the population of Russia perish, so long as the remaining people believed in him and his communist system, stating,

    “What does it matter if 90 percent of the Russian people perish, provided the surviving 10 percent bring about a World Revolution?” (quoted in: The Kokomo Daily Tribune – September 27, 1924 – page 4; Time Magazine – February 11, 1924; Impressions of Soviet Russia (1924) By Charles Sarolea, p. 84; Stillborn Crusade: the Tragic Failure of Western Intervention in the Russian Civil War, 1918-1920, (1996), by Ilya Somin, p. 4; The Communist Shakes His Fist by Bruce Reynolds, (1931), p. 171)

    Lenin was fond of exterminating people. He ordered Russian Orthodox Christian priests to be shot on sight, slaughtered like cattle! This isn’t so surprising, since killing Christians is not considered murder, or a sin, in Judaism. Lenin and the Marxists used famine as a weapon of mass annihilation. Author Harun Yahya, writing in “Communism in Ambush”, pp. 45-48, outlined Lenin’s deliberate policy of utilizing man-made famines as an instrument of genocide:

    “Famine, Lenin explained, “in destroying the outdated peasant economy, would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith not only in the Tsar, but in God too.” Lenin told the Politburo, “In fact the present moment favors us far more than it does them. We are almost 99 percent sure that we can strike a mortal blow against them [our enemies] and consolidate the central position that we are going to need to occupy for several decades to come. With the help of all those starving people who are starting to eat each other, who are dying by the millions, and whose bodies litter the roadside all over the country, it is now and only now that we can-and therefore must-confiscate all church property with all the ruthless energy we can still muster… All evidence suggests that we could not do this at any other moment, because our only hope is the despair engendered in the masses by the famine, which will cause them to look at us in a favorable light or, at the very least, with indifference.

    Lenin devilishly proclaimed that anyone who did not give up their grain to the government were to be killed: “Begin a merciless campaign of terror and a war against the farmers and other bourgeois elements who are hiding an excess of grain.” Lenin and Trotsky’s “Red Terror” crusade against Gentiles was carried out by the most ruthless, savage and feared secret police agency ever to exist — the Cheka (later known as the NKVD, OGPU and KGB). The word “Cheka” is not simply an acronym in Russian for “Special Commission for Fighting Counter-Revolution.” According to Brother Nathanael Kapner (a former Jew who converted to Christianity and is now an outspoken critic of Jewry) “Cheka” is a play on the Hebrew expression for animal slaughter, “Shechita“. Makes perfect sense.

    Felix Dzerzhinsky, the first chief of the Cheka, explained the modus operandi of his death-dealing organization, emphatically stating,

    “We stand for organized terror. The Cheka is obligated to defend the revolution and conquer the enemy even if its sword does by chance sometimes fall upon the heads of the innocent.”

    A Jewish Chekist named Martin Latsis, declared:

    “We are exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class!”

    The brutish Cheka was a thoroughly Jewish institution not only at the higher levels, but even amidst rank-and-file officers. W. Bruce Lincoln, an American professor of Russian history, stated that in Ukraine, “Jews made up 80% of the rank-and-file officers of the Cheka.” Jewish historian Leonard Shapiro tells us that, “Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka stood a very good chance of finding himself confronted with, and possibly shot by, a Jewish investigator.” (Russian Studies, 1988, p. 286)

    In late 1922, the New York Times reported that there were some hostilities toward Jews in the Ukraine, but that this was being stamped out violently with the help of a “Jewish army” of allegedly 500,000 soldiers. This Zionist army was mobolized on behalf of their Jewish-Bolshevik brethren in Moscow to inflict terror and enforce a grain tax on Ukrainian Gentiles. The Jewish-owned New York Times, being a repulsive Zionist and Bolshevist mouthpiece, absurdly depicted this essential part of the Red Terror as heroic, justified Jewish self-defense; but it let slip some revealing facts nonetheless. (See this facsimile of the NYT article)

    These slaughterous policies established by Lenin and Trotsky continued under Stalin’s reign. In 1932, Stalin ordered his Jewish deputies to coordinate a man-made famine-genocide in the Ukraine to weaken the nationalist spirit of the proud Ukrainian people who sought independence from communist tyranny. Lazar Kaganovich, Lavrenti Beria, Genrikh Yagoda, among other bloodthirsty Jewish Chekist/NKVDist hoodlums, pleasurably implemented Stalin’s collectivization orders with a Talmudic fervor, wiping out seven million Ukrainian men, women and children, in a few short years in an unprecedented ‘holocaust’ of human life. (See: Moroz, Valentyn. Nationalism and Genocide: The Origin of the Artificial Famine of 1932-1933 in Ukraine. The Institute for Historical Review, 1985) Canadian journalist, Eric Margolis, keenly summarized the barbarity of this tragedy as such:

    “As Britain’s socialist government cleared the way for a gaudy show trial of that Great Satan of the left, Chile’s Gen. Augusto Pinochet, the 65th anniversary of this century’s bloodiest crime was utterly ignored. Leftists now baying for Pinochet’s head don’t want to be reminded of the Unknown Holocaust. In 1932, Soviet leader Josef Stalin unleashed genocide in Ukraine. Stalin determined to force Ukraine’s millions of independent farmers – called kulaks – into collectivized Soviet agriculture, and to crush Ukraine’s growing spirit of nationalism. Faced by resistance to collectivization, Stalin unleashed terror and dispatched 25,000 fanatical young party militants from Moscow – earlier versions of Mao’s Red Guards – to force 10 million Ukrainian peasants into collective farms. Secret police units of OGPU began selective executions of recalcitrant farmers. When Stalin’s red guards failed to make a dent in this immense number, OGPU was ordered to begin mass executions. But there were simply not enough Chekists (secret police) to kill so many people, so Stalin decided to replace bullets with a much cheaper medium of death – mass starvation. All seed stocks, grain, silage and farm animals were confiscated from Ukraine’s farms. […]

    OGPU agents and Red Army troops sealed all roads and rail lines. Nothing came in or out of Ukraine. Farms were searched and looted of food and fuel. Ukrainians quickly began to die of hunger, cold and sickness. When OGPU failed to meet weekly execution quotas, Stalin sent henchman Lazar Kaganovitch to destroy Ukrainian resistance. Kaganovitch, the Soviet Eichmann, made quota, shooting 10,000 Ukrainians weekly. Eighty percent of all Ukrainian intellectuals were executed. A Ukrainian party member named Nikita Khruschchev helped supervise the slaughter. During the bitter winter of 1932-33, mass starvation created by Kaganovitch and OGPU hit full force. Ukrainians ate their pets, boots and belts, plus bark and roots. Some parents even ate infant children. The precise number of Ukrainians murdered by Stalin’s custom-made famine and Cheka firing squads remains unknown to this day. The KGB’s archives, and recent work by Russian historians, show at least seven million died. Ukrainian historians put the figure at nine million, or higher. Twenty-five percent of Ukraine’s population was exterminated. […]

    Kaganovitch and many senior OGPU officers (later, NKVD) were Jewish. The predominance of Jews among Bolshevik leaders, and the frightful crimes and cruelty inflicted by Stalin’s Cheka on Ukraine, the Baltic states and Poland, led the victims of Red Terror to blame the Jewish people for both communism and their suffering. As a direct result, during the subsequent Nazi occupation of Eastern Europe, the region’s innocent Jews became the target of ferocious revenge by Ukrainians, Balts and Poles. […]

    Stalin’s murder of millions was simply denied, or concealed by a left-wing conspiracy of silence that continues to this day. … Socialist luminaries like Bernard Shaw, Beatrice and Sidney Webb and PM Edouard Herriot of France, toured Ukraine during 1932-33 and proclaimed reports of famine were false. Shaw announced: “I did not see one under-nourished person in Russia.” New York Times correspondent Walter Duranty, who won a Pulitzer Prize for his Russian reporting, wrote claims of famine were “malignant propaganda.” Seven million people were dying around them, yet these fools saw nothing. The New York Times has never repudiated Duranty’s lies. […]

    Western historians delicately skirt the sordid fact that the governments of Britain, the United States and Canada were fully aware of the Ukrainian genocide and Stalin’s other monstrous crimes. Yet they eagerly welcomed him as an ally during World War II. … None of the Soviet mass murderers who committed genocide were ever brought to justice. Lazar Kaganovitch died peacefully in Moscow a few years ago, still wearing his Order of the Soviet Union, and enjoying a generous state pension.” (Toronto Sun, ”Remembering Ukraine’s Unknown Holocaust,” December 13, 1998)

    In a sickening display of Talmudic insolence, Aleksandr Feldman — the leader of the Ukrainian Jewish Committee — sought to undermine a Ukrainian government motion to prosecute a case against the Soviet criminals who orchestrated the Holodomor genocide, for the predictable reason that all of the names on the published list of conspirators were Jewish:

    KIEV, Ukraine (JTA) — A Jewish group in Ukraine is objecting to a criminal case brought over the “Great Famine” committed in the 1930s. The nation’s security service is pressing the case against a list of former Soviet officials accused of committing the Holodomor, which caused the deaths of millions in Ukraine in 1932-33. Most of the names on the list were Jewish. Ukrainian lawmaker Aleksandr Feldman, leader of the Ukrainian Jewish Committee, said last week that it was “a farce” to press the case. “All organizers of the Great Famine are dead,” he said. Last July, the Ukrainian Security Service released a list of high-ranking Soviet state and Communist Party officials — as well as officials from NKVD, the police force of Soviet Russia — that essentially blamed Jews and Latvians responsible for perpetrating and executing the famine because most of the names on the list were Jewish. The Ukrainian Jewish Committee called on the secret service to revise the list, which incited interethnic hatred, in order to clear up the “inaccuracy.”” (JTA, “Jewish Group Objects To ‘Great Famine’ Case,” June 15, 2009)

    To add insult to injury, on a state visit to Ukraine the vile war criminal — Israeli president Shimon Peres — told the Ukrainians to “forget history”, stating in true Orwellian newspeak,

    “If I were asked what advice Ukraine, I would say: forget history, history is not important at all. … You will not be able to not repeat the mistakes of the past, you just, make new.” (BBC World, “Israeli President Advises Ukrainians to Forget History,” November 25, 2010)

    Sheer chutzpah! As they malevolently and hypocritically endeavor to censor and suppress open discussion of their countless crimes against humanity and command Gentiles just “forget history” (history that isn’t favorable to Jews, that is), demonic Jews are still — almost 70 years after WWII — continuously spearheading psychotic witch-hunts against elderly German WWII vets accused of committing crimes against Jews that, in all likelihood, never even occurred! (See: YnetNews, “90 Year Old Nazi Hit Man Jailed,” 12/15/2011)

    The litany of torturous, blood-curdling atrocities committed by the Marxist Jews against the long-suffering Russians (and other European peoples: Ukrainians, Belarussians, Poles, Hungarians, etc) are calculatingly listed by author Juri Lina, in his monumental work “Under the Sign of the Scorpion“. One should approach the following text on an empty stomach, as the blunt descriptions of these grotesque, satanically-inspired misdeeds is simply nauseating:

    “Lenin and his accomplices did not arrest just anyone. They executed those most active in society, the independent thinkers. Lenin gave orders to kill as many students as possible in several towns. The Chekists arrested every youth wearing a school cap. They were liquidated because Lenin believed the coming Russian intellectuals would be a threat to the Soviet regime. (Vladimir Soloukhin, “In the Light of Day”, Moscow 1992, p. 40.)

    The role of the Russian intellectuals in society was taken over by the Jews.

    Many students (for example in Yaroslavl) learned quickly and hid their school caps. Afterwards, the Chekists stopped all suspect youths and searched their hair for the stripe of the school cap. If the stripe was found, the youth was killed on the spot.

    The author Vladimir Soloukhin revealed that the Chekists were especially interested in handsome boys and pretty girls. These were the first to be killed. It was believed that there would be more intellectuals among attractive people. Attractive youths were therefore killed as a danger to society. No crime as terrible as this has hitherto been described in the history of the world.

    The terror was co-ordinated by the Chekist functionary Joseph Unschlicht. How did they go about the murders? The Jewish Chekists flavoured murder with various torture methods. In his documentary “The Russia We Lost”, the director Stanislav Govorukhin told how the priesthood in Kherson were crucified. The archbishop Andronnikov in Perm was tortured: his eyes were poked out, his ears and nose were cut off. In Kharkov the priest Dmitri was undressed. When he tried to make the sign of the cross, a Chekist cut off his right hand.

    Several sources tell how the Chekists in Kharkov placed the victims in a row and nailed their hands to a table, cut around their wrists with a knife, poured boiling water over the hands and pulled the skin off. This was called “pulling off the glove”. In other places, the victim’s head was placed on an anvil and slowly crushed with a steam hammer. Those due to undergo the same punishment the next day were forced to watch. The eyes of church dignitaries were poked out, their tongues were cut off and they were buried alive. There were Chekists who used to cut open the stomachs of their victims, following which they pulled out a length of the small intestine and nailed it to a telegraph pole and, with a whip, forced the unlucky victim to run circles around the pole until the whole intestine had been unravelled and the victim died. The bishop of Voronezh was boiled alive in a big pot, after which the monks, with revolvers aimed at their heads, were forced to drink this soup.

    Other Chekists crushed the heads of their victims with special headscrews, or drilled them through with dental tools. The upper part of the skull was sawn off and the nearest in line was forced to eat the brain, following which the procedure would be repeated to the end of the line.

    The Chekists often arrested whole families and tortured the children before the eyes of their parents, and the wives before their husbands. Mikhail Voslensky, a former Soviet functionary, described some of the cruel methods used by the Chekists in his book “Nomenklatura” / “Nomenclature” (Stockholm, 1982, p. 321): “In Kharkov, people were scalped. In Voronezh, the torture victims were placed in barrels into which nails were hammered so that they stuck out on the inside, upon which the barrels were set rolling. A pentacle (usually a five-pointed star formerly used in magic) was burned into the foreheads of the victims. In Tsaritsyn and Kamyshin, the hands of victims were amputated with a saw. In Poltava and Kremenchug, the victims were impaled. In Odessa, they were roasted alive in ovens or ripped to pieces. In Kiev, the victims were placed in coffins with a decomposing body and buried alive, only to be dug up again after half an hour.”

    Lenin was dissatisfied with these reports and demanded: “Put more force into the terror!” All of this happened in the provinces. The reader can try to imagine how people were executed in Moscow. The Russian- Jewish newspaper Yevreyskaya Tribuna stated on the 24th of August 1922 that Lenin had asked the rabbis if they were satisfied with the particularly cruel executions.

    The Russian people remember with horror their Jewish executioners, all of whom had their own methods for getting rid of their enemies. Ashikin in Simferopol made his victims march stark naked before him whereupon he hacked off their arms and ears with his sword before he personally pressed out their eyes and cut off their heads. The chief executioner in Nikolaiev, Bogbender, had his victims walled in alive. Deutsch and Wichman worked in Odessa. They claimed to have no appetite until they had killed several hundred goys. The Chekists in Voronezh committed ritual murders. Among other things, they used to boil their victims alive. That was a common method of getting rid of goys and Jewish renegades. Nearly all the inhabitants of Pyatigorsk were exterminated. All this information was published in the Russian newspaper Russkoye Vosskresenye, No. 3, 1991.

    It is impossible, for lack of space, to describe all the butchers and their crimes. I shall just mention some numbers. During a single year in power, the Bolsheviks exterminated 320 000 clergymen (Molodaya Gvardiya, No. 6, 1989). A total of 10 180 000 “class enemies” were murdered between 1918 and 1920. Another 15 million people died during the civil war. During the famine of 1921-22, another 5 053 000 people perished. The Bolsheviks, headed by Lenin, managed to destroy over 30 million people during their first four years in power.

    In 1917, 143.5 million people lived in the part of Imperial Russia, which later became Soviet Russia. Russia had lost more than 20 per cent of her population by 1922. Only 131 million lived there in 1923. It has been calculated that Russia’s population, under normal circumstances, should have increased to 343 million by the middle of the 1950s, that is, if the development had continued as it had begun in the Tsarist era. 165 million people disappeared. Who in the West mourns for them? There were 178 million left.

    Kaganovich and his cronies brought about this genocide by the introduction of confiscatory taxation on those peasants who remained after the extermination of the “kulaks”. Meanwhile, he sent out new gangs of fanatical activists who commanded enforcement patrols, especially in the Ukraine, where the borders to the other Soviet republics had been closed off. The political activists took away every grain of corn and every egg, every vegetable and every fruit of the farms’ produce. Convoys of trucks carried all the food away. Each piece of bread, which should have been brought to the starving, was confiscated at the border. Every Ukrainian, who might be suspected of the least, often invented, attempt at lessening the full impact of the famine or of hiding foodstuffs from the authorities, was shot or sent to the labour camps. (Robert Conquest, “The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collektivization and the Terror-Famine”, Alberta, 1986.)

    Each morning, wagons drove about to collect the dead in the Ukraine and southern Russia. Bodies lined the roads in Central Asia too. Cannibalism became increasingly common in the Ukraine in 1934. Several sources show that the famine even brought forth actual slaughterhouses for orphaned children, whose meat was later sold.

    The systematic killing of large numbers of children began as early as 1934. After all, they cost money… In Moscow, the murders were carried out in the prison dungeons of the Lubyanka, the Butyrka and the Lefortovo. Stalin and Kaganovich had their most famous victims cremated at night, following which they had the ash smuggled out and buried in a mass grave in the Donskoye graveyard. This seemed the safest way to complete the total elimination of their important victims.

    Far from all of those killed in the jails of Moscow during the 1930s, the 1940s and the beginning of the 1950s were cremated. Most of them were thrown into various mass graves in Moscow. One of those hitherto unknown mass graves was found in the Kalitinsky graveyard in southern Moscow. The NKVD used it as a dumping site for bodies for several years in the 1930s.

    The covered lorries arrived at around five in the afternoon, every single day for seven years between 1934 an 1941. They drove up to the far end of a ravine, turned around and reversed up to the edge. The trucks were painted blue-green and lacked side-windows. Instead, large letters on the sides of the truck announced SAUSAGES or MEAT and sometimes CAKES. When the truck had backed up to the edge and stopped, a hatch was opened at the back and two officers wearing NKVD uniforms, rubber boots, long rubber aprons in black and gold and elbow-length rubber gloves seized the corpses by the heads and legs and threw them down into the ravine. Two other soldiers waited down below with shovels and threw some earth on the bodies. The corpses were always naked. They all had bullet holes in their heads; a small entry hole in the back of the neck and large exit hole in front. They had been shot from behind. The executioners had an unlimited supply of alcohol. They were usually drunk, sometimes extremely.

    The KGB admitted in July 1990 that there were also mass graves in the Donskoye and Vagankovskoye cemeteries in Moscow. A large execution site has now been found in Kuropaty, six miles from Minsk, the capital of Byelorussia. At least 102 000 people were murdered there, including many women. Witnesses have related that the executions began in the evenings and continued through the nights. The executioners wore NKVD uniforms. The witness Mikolai Karpovich saw how people stood lined up by a mass grave. They were gagged and blindfolded. To save bullets, the executioners usually tried to shoot two people with each shot. Executions took place there every day between 1937 and June 1941.

    The people who lived near the Kuropaty forest could hear salvoes of shots and prisoners begging and screaming for their lives. There were at least five such execution sites around Minsk, where the butchers worked in shifts. Uniformed NKVD men used to take part in the dance in the village of Kuropaty at around 11 o’clock on Saturday evenings. (Expressen, 18th of October 1988.)

    About fifty mass graves in this area have later been opened. Prisoners who were taken to Kuropaty in the winter were forced to step out of the carriages in the severe cold, whereupon they were showered in icy water and ordered to return to the carriages. Not many survived until the following morning. The heads were cut off from all the frozen corpses. The survivors were killed at the edge of the mass grave, into which all the victims were thrown.

    Moscow Television related on the 12th of September 1989 that nearly 300 000 victims had been found in an abandoned goldmine near Chelyabinsk. This was the largest mass grave. The Communists killed up to 250 000 “enemies of the people” in the forest of Bykovnya near Kiev between 1937 and 1941. Most were shot in the neck, but a few had also been poisoned by smoke (Dagens Nyheter, 25th of March 1989). That place had earlier been called the grave of the victims of fascism. The bodies of many Jews were supposed to have been hidden there, but this lie was exposed after the fall of Communism.

    From 1943, the Chekists managed to collect two million children per year. Beria became a dreadful executioner during the Second World War, since he was able to conceal his crimes as the work of the Nazis. He had nearly 20 million people captured and sent to slave camps. According to the latest estimates, the Soviet Union lost at least 32 million, possibly 45 million, citizens during the Second World War. The historian Nikolai Tolstoy claims that most of them (presumably 20 million) were killed by order of Lavrenti Beria. All those deaths were blamed on the Germans.

    Stalin, Kaganovich and Beria had 25 700 Polish citizens executed in April 1940. The murder of more than 4000 Polish officers (including many of Jewish blood) in Katyn was brought to light by the Germans. It was Ivan Krivozhertsev who informed the Germans about the mass graves in the Katyn forest. No one wanted to listen to the Nazis’ claim that it had been the work of the Bolsheviks, since the Soviet Union had blamed the Germans.

    It was only on the 14th of October 1992 that a copy of the decision signed by Stalin and passed by Molotov, Kaganovich, Kalinin and others, was handed over to the Polish President Lech Walesa by the Russian government. It was not really so strange that Jewish Chekists had also executed Jewish officers (including Abram Engel, Samuel Rosen, Isaak Gutman, Isaak Feinkel and others) who had served in the Polish army. After all, the Old Testament states that Yahweh is equally merciless against his own chosen people (Joshua 24:19). They were regarded as traitors!

    The President of the United States of America Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and the British Prime Minister Anthony Eden, prohibited all publicity about this mass murder. Roosevelt officially asserted that the events in Katyn were a German plot. Winston Churchill warned his ministers: “The whole subject must be avoided!” At the same time, he assured Stalin that he would do all he could to silence the Polish exile newspapers in London.

    Voice of America was not, even in the 1970s, allowed to relate that the Bolsheviks had killed the Polish officers. Hans Holzapfel, the Jewish chief of the European section, was responsible for the censorship.

    It is now known exactly what happened. The mass murders began in April 1940. The Polish officers, wearing winter uniforms, were brought in small groups – 30-40 at a time – to the execution site. They were then shot in the neck, one at a time, whilst standing by the edge of the mass grave.

    The NKVD continued working every day for nearly six weeks. A total of 4143 officer’s bodies were found. 4421 people were killed in the Katyn forest, according to the documents. All the identified bodies proved to be former prisoners from Kozielsk. The prisoners who had been incarcerated in the Starobielsk (near Kharkov) and Ostashkov (near Kalinin) camps were murdered elsewhere. The latter amounted to 10 131 (3820 + 6311) people. Another 7305 Polish citizens were murdered in Byelorussia and the Ukraine. The pertaining documents were marked: “Must never be opened!”

    Kaganovich founded actual slave camps, where the inmates worked in chains. Of the most important Jewish camp commanders (Aaron Soltz, Naftali Frenkel – a Turkish Jew -, Yakov Berman, Sergei Zhuk, Yakov Rapoport, Nakhimson, Yakov Moroz, Abramson, Pliner, Matvei Berman, Samuil Kogan, Samuil Firin, Biskon, Finkelstein, Serpukhovsky). Lazar Kogan was picked out as insufficiently effective. He was executed in 1938 and replaced by another Jew.

    As Juri Lina has conclusively shown, in the hectic, war-ravaged period between 1939-1945 Soviet butchers Stalin, Kaganovich and Beria cunningly concealed their colossal war crimes by blaming them on the Nazis. Acting as de facto propaganda publicists for Bolshevism, the Jewish-controlled press of Western Europe and the United States made easy work of scapegoating the Nazis for Jewish-Communist malfeasance. In his 1982 book “Stalin’s Secret War,” the Russian historian Nikolai Tolstoy exposes as a fraud the official Soviet claim, widely parroted by the Western media, that 20 million Soviet citizens were killed by the Axis Forces during the Second World War. Tolstoy demonstrates that most of those 20 million were actually victims of the Soviet regime itself! All of those deaths were falsely blamed on the Nazis. (See: Charles Lutton’s review of “Stalin’s Secret War”) Russian historian Anton Antonov-Ovseyenko estimates, in “The Time of Stalin — Portrait of a Tyranny,” that the Soviet rulers had killed more than eighty million of their own people to keep themselves in power!

    Moreover, the Zionist propaganda myth of ‘The Holocaust’ has been steadily unraveling over the past four decades. Leading Jews have confessed that the “5,000,000 non-Jews” supposedly killed in the so-called ‘Holocaust’ is a complete fabrication — an invention of the pathologically lying Jew, Simon Wiesenthal. Zionists Deborah Lipstadt, Peter Novick and Yehuda Bauer — three prominent promoters of the official Holocaust narrative and liars in their own right — have all denounced Wiesenthal’s larcenous lie about the imaginary “five million non-Jewish” victims of the Nazis that he conjured out of thin air as a marketing ploy to elicit interest in the holocaust genre from non-Jews. If Jews are willing to make up five million Gentile deaths and attribute it to the Nazis, how many Jewish deaths do you suppose they’d be willing to fabricate?

    Of course, folks familiar with revisionist research already understand that no more than 200,000 Jews died in Nazi concentration camps. And none of those deaths were from gassing (nor by electrocution, steaming, or any of the other mountains of outrageously false propaganda claims), but mostly by natural causes — disease and starvation — mainly as a result of the inhuman Allied policy of saturation bombing of Germany’s supply lines which caused a stand-still in shipments of foodstuffs, medicine and other supplies to the camps. (See: VHO, CODOH, IHR, Holocaust Denial Videos, The “Six Million” Myth, Winston Smith Ministry of Truth)

    The Jewish Terror Reigns Supreme

    Where in the world did the Jewish Bolshevists get the inspiration for such malevolence, hatred and homicidal bloodlust? Look no further than the religion of Judaism itself:

    "And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them." (Deuteronomy 7:2)

    But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth.” (Deuteronomy  20:16-18)

    You shall wipe out the memory of Amalek from under the heavens; you shall not forget.” (Deuteronomy 25:19)

    … And now, go and smite Amalek and destroy everything that is theirs; do not have mercy on them, but kill every man and woman, child and infant, ox, sheep, camel and donkey.” (Samuel I 15:3)

    “The best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed.” (Talmud: Soferim, Chapter 15, Rule 10)

    These ultra violent Judaist dictates were reiterated in the Protocols of Zion,

    “We are interested in just the opposite—in the diminution, the KILLING OUT OF THE GOYIM.” (Protocols of Zion, 3:7)

    “…our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to WIPE OUT ANY GOYIM WHO OPPOSE US BY DEED OR WORD.” (Protocols of Zion, 5:1)

    The Jews have, for thousands of years, taught their own to mass murder the best non-Jews. They believe it is their racial mission to do so. Judaism, of course, is no mere “religion.” It is in actuality a criminal conspiracy: a license to lie, cheat, steal, murder, rape, pillage, plunder and swindle the inferior “Goyim.” (See: Hoffman, Michael. Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit. Independent History and Research, 2008)

    Regardless of one’s view of Christianity (I personally am irreligious), it should be noted that its holiest days celebrate life (Christmas — the birth of the Christ child, Easter — the resurrection of Christ) or reconciliation to their Deity (Good Friday). The holiest days in Judaism, on the other hand, celebrate military victories and the mass slaughter of Jewish enemies (Passover, Purim, Hanukkah). (See: David Duke’s “Christmas versus Hanukkah Peace and Love vs War and Hate,” “The Purim Celebration of Hate” & “Purim II Promoting Genocide“) Whenever varying Gentile groups proved to be an obstacle to Jewish economic domination or Jewish political ambitions, many Jews called for and worked feverishly to carry out — either directly or by proxy — the mass extermination of said group.

    When — in the late 1800s and early 1900s — the Russians proved resilient to Jewish revolutionary banditry, this is what manifest from the Jew’s lips:

    “To overcome our enemies we must have our own Socialist Militarism. We must win over to our side, 90 millions out of the 100 millions of population of Russia under the Soviets. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them; they must be annihilated!”Jewish Communist leader Grigory Zinoviev

    When — in the 1930s and 1940s — the Germans proved resilient to Jewish domination, subversion and swindles, this is what manifest from the Jew’s lips:

    “A final solution… Thus we find that there is no middle course; no act of mediation, no compromise to be compounded, no political or economic sharing to be considered. There is, in fine, no other solution except one: That Germany must perish forever from this earth!” — Jew Theodore N. Kaufman (Germany Must Perish! Newark, NJ: Argyle Press, 1941)

    When — in recent times — the Arab and Muslim peoples proved resilient to Jewish thieving of their land and despoiling of their resources, this is what manifest from the Jew’s lips:

    “It is forbidden to be merciful to them. You must send missiles to them and annihilate them… The Lord shall return the Arabs’ deeds on their own heads, waste their seed and exterminate them, devastate them and vanish them from this world!” — Rabbi Ovadia Yosef (quoted by BBC News, “Rabbi Calls for Annihilation of Arabs,” April 10, 2001)

    The iconic leader of the Protestant Reformation, Martin Luther, pinned the tail on the donkey back in 1543 when he wrote,

    “They (the Jews) are real liars and bloodhounds […] Their heart’s most ardent sighing and yearning and hoping is set on the day on which they can deal with us Gentiles as they did with the Gentiles in Persia at the time of Esther. Oh, how fond they are of the book of Esther, which is so beautifully attuned to their bloodthirsty, vengeful, murderous yearning and hope. The sun has never shone on a more bloodthirsty and vengeful people than they are who imagine that they are God’s people who have been commissioned and commanded to murder and to slay the Gentiles.” (On The Jews and Their Lies, 1543)

    The legendary author and truth hero, Eustace Mullins, eloquently explicated the origins of this miserable tribe of bandits and brigands:

    “Hebrew means “one who is from across the river.” Rivers were often the boundaries of ancient nations, and one from across the river meant, simply, an alien. In every country of the ancient world, the Hebrews were known as aliens. The word also, in popular usage, meant “one who should not be trusted until he has identified himself.” Hebrew in all ancient literature was written as “Habiru”. This word appears frequently in the Bible and in Egyptian literature. In the Bible, Habiru is used interchangeably with “sa-gaz”, meaning “cutthroat”. In all of Egyptian literature, wherever the word Habiru appears, it is written with the word “sa-gaz” written beside it. Thus the Egyptians always wrote of the Jews as “the cutthroat bandits from across the river”. For five thousand years, the Egyptian scribes identified the Jews in this manner.” (Mullins’ New History of the Jews. Staunton, VA: International Institute of Jewish Studies, 1978, p.26)

    Knowing what they think of Gentiles, knowing what they have done to Gentiles, knowing what they will continue to do to Gentiles if we let them — how does any sane Gentile not feel outrage and indignation at this lot of fearsome beasts and bloodsuckers? It is hardly surprising that there exists widespread dislike of Jews. But what is surprising is that there are so few patriots in America, Canada, Europe and Australia, willing to express their outrage against the Jews, not only for what they did to the Russians and Eastern Europeans under Communism, or what they’re doing to the Palestinians and other Arabs under the flagship of Zionism, but for what they have done and continue to do to those of us in North America and Western Europe — lying to us, deceiving our people, and using us to wage their wars for them. You might remember some of the unflattering facts about the Jews outlined in this treatise the next time you hear a Jew dishonestly whining about how badly their kind have been treated throughout history.