Pictures and captions by Darkmoon
Yes, it’s just another Jewish plot. And the way they’re doing it is by scamming the public into believing that these illegal immigrants—all of them adult males—are helpless “child refugees”.
These “child refugees”, who have conveniently lost their passports, claim to be under 18. Some of the child migrants even have bushy beards. The British government and the elite media argue that migrants tend to “age quickly”—because of their traumatic war experiences. You can’t make this up.
The dismantling of the Calais “Jungle” refugee camp has been marked by huge scenes of disorder with rioting, at least one gang rape, and much of the camp going up in flames. But there has been uproar in Britain too since the realisation that most of the thousands of “child refugees”, which the Prime Minister had agreed to accept, were neither children nor refugees.
From the moment these healthy, strapping adult male migrants stepped off the bus in London it was obvious that the British people had been subjected to yet another massive immigration deception. Those who enabled and organised this “child refugee” scam are brazening it out, safe in the knowledge there will be no comebacks for them.
First they attempted to prevent any more embarrassing pictures by throwing blankets over the arrivals so they resembled state witnesses at a Mafia trial. Then a screened walkway from the bus alighting point to the door of the reception centre was erected overnight for the same purpose. Dental tests to determine the real age of these youths were ruled out as an “invasion of privacy.” And there is no question of having them deported, so nothing can be done now. They’re here. Get over it.
But of course, it all works better if there is no clamour from the public. So the powers-that-be have resorted to the tried and tested method of stifling dissent. Anyone who sticks his head above the parapet to raise doubts is subjected to stern lectures about their moral shortcomings. BBC TV presenter Gary Lineker chastised his fellow British for their “shameful” attitudes, while Labour shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott attacked those who wanted to carry out dental tests to assess their age as “racist.” Pop singer Lily Allen became a media darling when, on behalf of the people of Britain, she made a tearful apology to the refugees for causing their plight.
Let that sink in. Britain caused the plight of the refugees.
After voting for Brexit, for ordinary British people, who have seen their schools, hospitals and welfare services strained to breaking point, a fresh influx of immigrants was not exactly what they had been looking forward to. After all, Britain has no legal or moral obligation to take these people. They were supposed to be the responsibility of the first country they arrived at in the EU. And why are they coming to racist Europe anyway? It’s incredibly short-sighted of them. Why not go to some Asian or African country? Or Israel?
This fresh burden will be placed squarely on the local authorities that receive the immigrants, and they are going to have to dig deeply. While the government is providing £40,000 ($48,000) per annum for each young refugee, the total annual cost is around £133,000 ($162,000). So tax increases — or reduced services in other areas — are predicted.
Naturally little of this will fall on the prosperous London boroughs filled with BBC-watching, morally uplifted Whites. Instead many migrants are being located in far-flung areas such as Devon or poorer northern communities already thronging with refugees, such as Bradford.
The tipping point in the long battle to admit these bogus “child refugees” seems to have been a multi-faith initiative in which more than 200 religious leaders led by the former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Williams and senior representatives from the Buddhist, Hindu, Muslim and Sikh faiths — signed a letter urging the Prime Minister to admit 3,000.
In a speech at a London synagogue, Lord Williams described the Calais camp as “a stain” on the British conscience. But in fact, this alleged multi-faith support was not what it appeared to be. It was largely organised by dozens of Jewish activists working through an organisation called Citizens UK that organised the casework and poured substantial resources into ensuring that the necessary amendments to the law would make it through Parliament.
The Calais “Jungle” crisis has brought the Jewish community together in a unity of purpose rarely seen outside the occasion of Israel’s various wars. From the highest communal levels to the smallest youth groups, it seems everyone Jewish has been mobilised in the cause of getting uneducated, unassimilable Muslim economic migrants into Britain.
It is a campaign they have chosen to frame in entirely moral terms. The Jewish community’s loud insistence has been that not only is Britain under a strict moral obligation to take these migrants but that there should be no upper limit. To do otherwise would be to undermine our reputation as a humanitarian country that wishes to describe itself as civilised.
Their arguments have been formed around highly emotional anecdotes and images. Time and again we have been treated to stories of children struggling in the squalor at the Calais “Jungle” camp. The iconic photographs of the lifeless body of three-year-old Syrian boy Aylan Kurdi washed up on a Turkish beach are frequently invoked.
The iconic picture (right) that reduced millions to tears
and allowed the luvvies to cry “Let ’em all in!”
You will notice that nowhere is there any consideration of the stress this is causing on existing British communities, especially those in the poorer areas where refugees are invariably housed. Nor is there any recognition of the profound unfairness this imposes on the native White community who will be required to support these strangers via the welfare system, health and housing services. Such a process is not only unaffordable, it makes a mockery of the basic idea that help from the welfare state is in return from previous tax contributions.
There is a largely unspoken reason for this: resentment over Britain’s perceived inadequacy in admitting Jewish refugees before World War II. In fact, Britain admitted many tens of thousands of Jews in the 1930s, but it is an article of faith amongst many Jews that Britain could and should have admitted many more.
Typical of this attitude was the speech of Rabbi Herschel Gluck, founder of the Muslim-Jewish Forum. He says he lost over 100 relatives in the Holocaust and implied that Britain’s wartime attitudes to refugees were to blame for this. “I feel obliged to ensure we don’t make the same mistakes,” he said.
Numerous references were made to the Kindertransport programme by which Jewish children from Europe were smuggled into Britain. (The TOO has already debunked much of this greatly mythologised episode.)
A veteran of that same Kindertransport is the figurehead for the Calais refugee crusade. eighty-four year old Lord Alf Dubs , a veteran Labour politician. He has tirelessly campaigned for mass immigration all his life. A former director of the Refugee Council, he somehow arrived in Britain aged six in 1939 despite Britain’s horrendous attitudes at the time, and was shown much Christian charity. Since then, he has chosen to repay this kindness by devoting his life to opening Britain’s borders to non-Whites from around the globe.
According to EU law, refugees should have been processed at the first country they arrived at, so some ruse had to dreamed up whereby Britain could allow their entry. This was done through a device known as the EU’s Dublin III regulation, whereby lone refugee children could be taken to any European country where they have a relative.
This was not enough for Lord Dubs. He wanted the “child refugees” in the Calais “Jungle” admitted to Britain without any “family reunion” qualification and pushed his own amendment which would oblige the British government to transfer to the UK any unaccompanied refugee children from Europe.
JEWISH POLITICIAN LORD ALF DUBS
“He has ceaselessly campaigned for mass immigration all his life,
devoting his life to opening Britain’s borders
to non-Whites from around the globe.”
The Occidental Observer has already shown the hugely disproportionate Jewish influence on a similar letter from senior lawyers. The same disproportionately Jewish influence can be seen in the plea from the 126 economists. One of the signatories was Jonathan Portes, who can be fairly regarded as the architect of Tony Blair’s mass immigration disaster.
So it seemed as if the passing of the Dubs amendment to an immigration bill was a foregone conclusion. But then at the vote in the House of Commons there was a problem. For Conservative politicians had not long finished fighting a general election campaign in which their voters had left them in no doubt how they felt about the never-ending waves of mass immigration.
In the House of Commons the Dubs amendment was defeated. Jewish campaigners could barely contain their anger.
The nagging, scolding words of Dr. Edie Friedman, director of the Jewish Council for Racial Equality, were characteristic.
As a result, children across Europe will remain cold, alone and at risk over the coming months. This was an opportunity to stand on the right side of history, to bring relief to just 3,000 of the 95,000 unaccompanied children who applied for asylum in Europe last year.
We wake up this morning on the wrong side of history and on the wrong side of compassion.The Immigration Bill has shown the UK at its worst, uncaring about the suffering of children a mere 30 miles away in places like Calais, but it has also shown us (sic!) at our best.
Rabbi Harry Jacobi too was beside himself with anger at MPs voting in accordance with their electorate’s wishes. For him loomed the shadow of 1938, when Britain decided to stop the flood of Jewish refugees.
Too many MPs with hardened hearts, just like the biblical story of Pharaoh. To close their eyes and hearts to unaccompanied children, to insist that it is alright to detain pregnant women, and that refugees can still be detained indefinitely simply on the say so of an immigration official. These are not the actions of a world-leading moral civilisation.
REAL CHILD REFUGEES FROM SYRIA
FAKE “CHILD REFUGEES” FROM THE THIRD WORLD—
the type being let into Britain right now under Jewish pressure.
Then, in one of his last acts as Prime Minister, David Cameron did a U-turn and announced he would allow the amendment to go through unopposed.
Now Britain could admit the bogus 3,000 “refugee children” unilaterally.
— § —
Citizens UK’s main task seems to be getting migrants or “refugees” into Britain and dispersed around the country. It describes itself as a “community organiser’s hub,” but is in fact an arm of the state with deep pockets and a nationwide network of affiliated organisations. It has fought many legal battles for refugees and succeeded in getting migrant “child asylum seekers” released from detention centres and housed in the wider community.
So how Jewish is it? At letterhead level it seems to be drawn from a cross-section of the community, but at organiser level, the Citizens UK appears to be disproportionately Jewish. (This tactic of recruiting sympathetic non-Jews and giving them highly visible position in Jewish-dominated causes has a very long history, going back at least to immigration battles in the early twentieth century, as recounted in Chapter 6 of SAID [p. 192ff] and Chapter 7 of Culture of Critique [e.g., pp. 249-250].) They include the Citizens UK spokeswoman, Rabbi Janet Darley, who, of course, has a tear-jerking story to tell. She said it was when a 15-year-old migrant fell under the wheels of a truck he was trying to board that she felt that she had to get involved.
For me, that was the deal breaker — I knew I couldn’t live with myself if I didn’t do everything I could to make sure there were no more dead children. … The Torah warns us against the wronging of a stranger. For us, this is core teaching and not an optional extra.
Another Jewish Citizens UK activist is senior organiser Charlotte Fischer, who is lobbying for Britain to increase the total number of “Syrian” refugees it has agreed to take from 20,000 to 50,000. “We are doing shamefully compared to Canada” she chides.
But the UK is doing awesomely compared to Israel. Doesn’t that count for anything?
— § —
Citizens UK campaigner Rabbi Danny Rich is co-chair of yet another arm of the refugee industry, the National Refugee Welcome Board. He clearly has the magic touch when it comes to getting access on the BBC. Since the beginning of September he has graced at least half a dozen BBC outlets including the main BBC TV news and the BBC World Service and gets softball kidglove treatment from all of them. He blithely brushed aside the concerns of ordinary British people: “Look at the Kindertransport and the contribution made to Britain over the last 70 years by those who escaped the Nazis. Look at the contributions made today by doctors, nurses and care workers, many of who were not English born.” Anyone doubting the distinctly Jewish flavour of Citizens UK would be advised to look at this promotional video.
Of course, no British refugee campaign would be complete without the presence of Rabbi Laura Janner-Klausner who can be guaranteed to be at the forefront at any number of “multi faith” immigrant events including a Citizens UK vigil outside the House of Commons.
Citizens UK is an umbrella organisation overseeing local grass roots initiatives for refugees all over the country, many of which are Jewish-organised. One of the main ones is called Safe Passage UK. In an article for the Jewish Chronicle,the two Jewish organisers described their work as “fighting injustice.” Apparently a group of synagogues had raised £200,000 for them in just a few weeks.
Rabbi Rebecca Birk was recently named by the Evening Standard as one of London’s most influential people for her fund raising for Safe Passage UK. Again, her entire rationale is bound up with her Jewish identity, framed, of course, as a moral imperative stemming from the inherently moral essence of Judaism. She says:
The Jewish identity is predicated on being a foreigner, relying on the kindness of strangers, it runs through our own theology really: doing good, mending the world. We talk of three pillars the world stands on — the Torah, divine service, and kind acts. It’s an anathema to be a Jew and only be concerned with oneself.
LD : The idea that all Jews are full of sweetness and light, overflowing with the milk of human kindness toward their fellow human beings, can be dismissed at once as bordering on the absurd. Here are two prominent Jews who would like to see the White race genocided and White women and children cruelly raped and killed:
1. HARVARD PROFESSOR DR NOEL IGNATIEF
2. RABBI ISHMAEL LEVITTS
— § —
A clear sense of Jewish identity also informed the efforts of the three fashionable north London women who decided to put their media careers on hold to set up the Help Refugees charity in the Calais “Jungle.” The women, two of whom are Jewish, have tapped into a lucrative market indeed, and their outfit was one of the biggest players in Calais. It has been a massive, trendy, profile-raising success. After setting up, they were inundated with corporate contributions, and now they run 26 projects from Israel and on the migrant trail all the way across Europe. Articles about them focus on “child refugees.” And because Hollywood is well-known for its high moralism, it is not surprising that actors such as Benedict Cumberbatch and Lena Dunham have lent their support.
Help Refugees even has a mobile kitchen on to the shores of Greece where their volunteers are helping refugees from Turkey from their dinghies and then seeing them off on their long journey across Europe. One of these women, Dani Lawrence, insists her parents fled anti-Semitism in Morocco in the sixties.
The Jewish community has an extremely high opinion of its charitable efforts. Their strong Jewish identities and loyalty to their tribe are obvious, and it is wonderful that all that philanthropy makes them feel so good about themselves. But it might be worthwhile for the White British to ask what exactly is in it for them, apart from Kosher certification?
It is time to ask some searching questions about the real motives that lie behind all this Jewish selflessness. After all, a charitable disposition towards Muslims is not exactly a characteristic of Jewish life anywhere else and certainly not in the Palestinian territories. And no question is guaranteed to infuriate Jewish activists more than asking why Israel doesn’t admit any refugees from Syria which is, after all, next door?
So what do they get out of this sudden influx of unassimilable immigrants who have neither the temperament nor inclination to fit into modern Britain? Sadly, as readers of TOO are all to familiar with (see, e.g., “Is immigration a Jewish value?“), the motivation is not compassion but veiled ethnic vindictiveness aimed at undermining and dispossessing ordinary British people.
The motivation is not compassion
but veiled ethnic vindictiveness
One of the questions that British people might also ask themselves is this: If those British people in the 1930s who had admitted waves of Jewish refugees could see the fruits of what they had done, what would they think?
If those British people, who were to suffer so much in a war they were told was about “freedom”, if they were to see the streets of Peckham, Newham or any number of London boroughs or cities today overrun by Third-Worlders, what would they think?
And if they were then to be told, in detail, about the role of Jewish activism, power and “philanthropy” in bringing about this transformation, what would their thoughts be then?Perhaps they would agree with so many of us. That the Jewish invocation to “heal the world” seems to be code-words for eradicating White identity and eradicating the power of Whites to control their own destiny.
And perhaps, instead of admitting these “child refugees,” Britain would have been better off remembering the words of another Jewish sage, economist Milton Friedman, who said “You can have a welfare state or you can have open borders, but you cannot have both.”
Barbara Lerner Spectre – Jews behind immigration into Europe
Jewess Barbara Learner Spectre calls for destruction of European Nations.
Jewish Hypocrisy – Flooding Europe with Immigrants
|It was the American Jewish Committee (AJC) which first vigorously advocated for open immigration in America beginning in 1914 until the great watershed in 1965.
Jewish politicians Behind The Open Immigraton Law of 1965:
* Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings on the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article entitled ‘Let’s open the gates’ that proposed immigration levels of 500,000 per year for 20 years with no restrictions on national origin.
* Congressman Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration for over 40 years in the House of Representatives, introduced similar legislation resulting in the “Cellar-Hart Immigration Bill,” the precursor to the fatal bill of 1965.
* Leo Pfeffer, a so-called, “Jewish Intellect,” (translate, “Christ-Hater”), wrote many treatises and books that propagandized for open immigration.
* Norman Podhoretz, a former leftist, now a Jewish “neo-con,” (he’s still a leftist), also wrote many articles promoting open immigration.
* Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the B’nai B’rith, (there is no end to their organizations), filed briefs in support of open immigration before the Senate Subcommittee in the early sixties leading up to the passing of the 1965 law.
Jewish Arnold Aronson (1911-1998) was founder and leader of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR). The LCCR, a powerful coalition of political and religious groups, organized major, countrywide lobbying efforts to aid passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Cellar and Javits were fanatical Zionists as well:
When it was unclear that President Harry Truman would support Zionism, Cellar and a committee of Zionists told him that they had persuaded Dewey to support the Zionist policy and demanded that Truman also take this stand. Cellar reportedly pounded on Truman‘s table and said that if Truman did not do so, “We’ll run you out of town. When he and a colleague opposed a Zionist resolution in Congress, Emanuel Celler, a New York Democrat who was to serve in Congress for almost 50 years, told them: “They ought to take you b…s out and shoot you.” Jacob Javits, another well-known senator, this time Republican, told a Zionist women’s group: “We’ll fight to death and make a Jewish State in Palestine if it’s the last thing that we do.” From: Alison Weir on the Early Days of the Israel Lobby
Double standards from the start
It was always the American Jewish Committee which filed amicus curiae, “friend of the court” briefs, with the judiciary to overturn so-called “racially discriminatory” statutes. During this same time period the Jewish National Fund in Israel was pursuing its purely discriminatory policy of leasing land to Jews on the specific condition that the Jew holding the lease would never sublease the land to any Arab.
Anti Defamation League of B’nai B’rith – ADL
An international Jewish and Zionist organization with offices in many countries. Commonly known as the ADL. B’nai B’rith is Hebrew for ‘Sons of the Covenant‘ the organization was founded about 165 years ago in New York.
Problably one of the most influential organizations in the US. The ADL is constantly lobbying for ‘hate crime laws’, internet censorship, laws against Christian symbols in public places, actively promoting race mixing and homosexuality (though not for Jews/ Israel).
The ADL mixes in the smallest affairs, when their brethren call for assistance, as in the case of the Danish Social Democrat Torben Lund who called Ariel Sharon a war criminal, and accused Jews of sticking together and using the antisemitism weapon on every occasion. The ADL’s Kenneth Jacobson was on the spot.
Thou shalt only have one Holocaust
Forbidden to criticize homosexuality
In California, the ADL, is the mainspring, along with the homosexual lobby, of inspiring California’s pro-homosexuality and same-sex marriage initiatives.
ADL helped create S.B. 1977, California’s ‘anti-hate’ statute, which forbids criticism of homosexuality in the public schools. It was written by liberal Jewish activist and ADL lackey Rep. Sheila Kuehl.
Ban Prayer in Public Schools: Greatest Accomplishment
Let the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith teach you how they have saddled 45 states with hate laws capable of persecuting Christians: ADL
A lot more information on the actvities of the ADL at the National Prayer Network
New more succes for the worlds biggest censorship lobby:
Haaretz 16 december 2008 – YouTube offers ‘Anti-Defamation League’ censorship role
B’nai B’rith helped fund Communist thugs
The video to the right shows footage of members of the Anti Racist Action (ARA), violent red fascists, demolishing a political opponent’s home while the Toronto police looks on. After that clip you see a meeting where B’nai B’rith personel is instructing ARA thugs.
This organization presents itself as ‘humanitarian’ but its current president Efraim Zuroff recently had the guts to openly defend Israeli hate laws against Christian missionary activity in Israel.
The Simon Wiesenthal Centre was criticized by the Irish President Mary Mcaleese for using crazy nazi allegations against the Limerick museum and the Irish Hunt family in order to raise funds. Danish article
The Simon Wiesenthal Centre & Nazi War Criminals
The Simon Wiesenthal Centre says it tracks down Nazi war criminals. To give an impression what that is about; nr. 5 on the organizations priority list is the Danish Nazi (German WWII collaborator) Soeren Kam (86) who now lives in Germany.
Soeren Kam has been accessory to the murder of a Danish citizen Carl Henrik Clemmensen (Gentile), during the German occupation. The man who fired the shots has already been executed for the crime, but Jewish pressure (assisted by the Zionist friendly anti-immigration Danish People’s Party) forced the Danish Justice department to ask for his extradiction, even though the circumstances of the murder are known, and Kam has admitted his part.
The Wiesenthal Centre fantasizes about Kam’s involvement in the persecution of Jews. (By the way the German commander Werner Best allowed all Jews to escape to Sweden during WWII, when the word came from Berlin in 1943 that the Jews must be arrested.) Also Danish Jews never had to wear the Star of David as in some other countries.
Whatever the truth about Soeren Kam; this is at the utmost small time business in regards with Nazi war crimes, which tells a whole lot about the Wiesenthal Revenge Centre. New book by Erik Haaest about Iron Cross rewarded Søren Kam.
Even the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), has acknowledged that the Wiesenthal Center makes ‘inaccurate’ and ‘exaggerated claims’ about anti-Semitism to raise money. In an internal memorandum, ADL official Justin Finger cited a Center fund-raising letter that is ‘replete with factual misstatements and exaggerations’ about anti-Jewish sentiment in the United States and Europe. Source
New book about Simon Wiesenthal and his many lies by Guy Walters:Times Online July 18, 2009 – Hunting Evil – The head Nazi-hunter’s trail of lies | Danish translationOlder book about the same subject by Gerd Honsik: Fiend and Felon – Power, Perjury and Murder in Simon Wiesenthal’s Footsteps
Jews Want “Refugees”—But Not in Israel
Every major Jewish organization in America has publicly demanded that America open its doors to hundreds of thousands of Muslim “refugees”—while at the same time supporting the Jews-only state of Israel which has barred all “refugees” from entering.
The Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA) has reported that eleven Jewish groups (including the Union for Reform Judaism, the Orthodox Union, the Rabbinical Assembly, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society HIAS, the National Council of Jewish Women, the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, the umbrella body for Jewish public policy groups, and many others) have formally urged Congress “not to roll back plans to accept Syrian refugees into the United States.”
Another JTA article (“For Jewish groups, Syrian refugees are a reminder—not a threat,” November 24, 2015), reported that the “consensus among the three major streams of US Jewry—Reform, Conservative, and Orthodox—is derived from a shared understanding of Jewish scripture, said Rabbi Jonah Pesner, who directs the Reform movement’s Religious Action Center.
The JTA article went on to quote Rabbi Steve Gutow, the outgoing president of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, who said that “sympathy for the refugee was written into the Jewish cultural genetic code.”
This latter opinion was echoed in an article in the Jewish Exponent, America’s second-oldest Jewish newspaper, published in Philadelphia. An article in that paper (“As Anti-Refugee Sentiment Builds, Jewish Agencies Push for Settlement,” November 25, 2015), quoted Rabbi Jennie Rosenn, vice president of community engagement at the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS) in New York, as saying that they had “been helping to connect local congregations with refugee families coming to their area.”
The Jewish Exponent said that Jews had “been spurred to action by the numerous High Holiday addresses dedicated to welcoming the stranger,” and quoted Rabbi Jonathan Roos of Temple Sinai in Washington, DC, who had spoken to his congregation about the need to assist Syrian refugees through the lens of Jewish law and tradition.
To that end, the Jewish Exponent continued, Roos’s Temple Sinai “has been working on the issue of refugees since 2014,” and although Temple Sinai “cannot directly sponsor refugee families, as congregations in Canada currently are,” Roos said that “Our own historical experience reminds us and points to the need to empathize, understand, and support the people who are in the same position.”
The overwhelming Jewish support for Israel, which has openly refused to accept even one refugee, contrasts dramatically with their support for the policy of promoting Muslim refugees into America.
It seems that Rabbi Steve Gutow’s “Jewish cultural genetic code” and Rabbi Jonathan Roos’s “need to empathize, understand and support” only extends as far as non-Jewish countries. When it comes to their country, Israel—which all these Jews fanatically support—this “need to empathize” is thrown out the window.
As reported earlier, the Israeli government has refused to accept any “refugees” from Syria or Africa—and is building a new wall to keep them out.
An official statement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said that “Israel is a small country, a very small country, that lacks demographic and geographic depth. Therefore, we must control our borders, against both illegal migrants and terrorism.”
Israel’s official view on barring Syrian “refugees” was also detailed in the LA Times of September 6, 2015 (“One country that won’t be taking Syrian refugees: Israel”), where Netanyahu repeated his assertion that Israel’s “lack of demographic and geographic depth” required controlling its borders against both “illegal migrants and terrorism.”
IsraAID is mainly financed by the Israeli government’s Department of Foreign Affairs, but, as the Jewish Exponent article revealed, it is also financially backed by Jews in America:
Rabbi Lance Sussman, senior rabbi of Reform Congregation Keneseth Israel in Elkins Park, is a trustee of IsraAID, which aims to “help Israel, help humanity.” As a trustee on the organization’s North American board, Sussman is trying to build up the organization and solicit donations for the work IsraAID conducts in Jordan, Turkey, and the shores of Greece.
The hypocrisy could not be clearer:
– In America, Jews are united in pushing for mass Muslim “refugee” immigration.
– In Israel, which these same Jews all fanatically support, all such Muslim “refugees” are completely barred, and prevented from entering by law and physical barriers.
It is impossible to escape the conclusion that the Jews know that mass Third World or Muslim immigration to Israel will destroy that nation’s homogeneity and Jewish identity.
It is also then equally impossible to escape the conclusion that the Jews also know that their demand for more mass Third World or Muslim immigration into America will destroy that nation’s homogeneity and identity—but because it is a non-Jewish state, they do not care and in fact encourage its destruction.
It is one law for the Jews, another for the Gentiles: the preservation of racial identity for Jews, and the destruction of racial identity for non-Jews.