By Mike Adams on April 4, 2017
In order to demand nationwide vaccine mandates
Mike Adams — Natural News April 2, 2017
The vaccine industry is unique in the fact that the more its products fail, the greater the demand for its faulty products. Simply stated, when vaccines are accidentally distributed with live viruses instead of attenuated (weakened) viruses, they cause the very outbreaks of disease they claim to prevent.
Once the outbreak happens, the pharma-funded mainstream media catapults disease hysteria into mass consciousness while calling for everyone to take more vaccines to “prevent the outbreak.” Those who weren’t vaccinated are always blamed for every outbreak, even when the outbreaks occur largely among children who have already been vaccinated.
OOPS… another live virus accidentally manufactured into vaccines
We already know that vaccine manufacturers sometimes ship LIVE viruses to production facilities, causing live viruses to be used in vaccines that subsequently infect vaccine recipients with the very disease they claim to prevent. We also know that vaccine manufacturers enjoy a unique legal protection from all lawsuits due to an act of Congress. As a result, faulty vaccines that accidentally (or intentionally) contain live viruses that spread disease outbreaks pose zero risk of liability to the vaccine manufacturers.
In summary, vaccine manufacturers experience enormous benefits from “accidental” outbreaks of disease caused by faulty vaccine manufacturing while having zero exposure to liability for such “mistakes.” As a result, vaccine manufacturers have every incentive to use vaccines as a vector to introduce infectious disease outbreaks into the population, after which they enjoy enormous profits and government funding grants thanks to all the “fake news” media hysteria that claims vaccines are the only solution to the very problem that was caused by vaccines in the first place.
Virologists working for Merck even filed a False Claims Act with the federal government, describing how they were forced to falsify vaccine clinical trial results to trick the FDA into approving vaccines that they said would contribute to the spread of infectious disease.
It’s the perfect racket: Create a product that spreads disease while convincing the entire world that your product is the only solution to stopping the spread of disease. Every outbreak earns you more money and prestige while the government grants you absolute legal protection from all lawsuits, meaning you can place literally anything into a vaccine — live viruses, heavy metals, radioactive isotopes, etc. — and face no financial or legal repercussions whatsoever. (RELATED: Follow the latest breaking news on vaccines at Vaccines.news.)
Vaccine companies have the means, the motive and the lack of ethics to wage false flag attacks against children
In this podcast, I explain how and why vaccine companies have the means, the motive and the lack of medical ethics to pull off “vaccine false flag” attacks that target children with live infectious agents (essentially biological weapons).
Even more, I predict that because the vaccine industry is losing the public relations war due to accelerating efforts of public education — such as The Truth About Vaccines documentary series that’s about to go public — the vaccine industry is unquestionably plotting to carry out a vaccine false flag “outbreak” and then blame the so-called “anti-vaxxers” for the medical mayhem that follows. This outbreak, in turn, will be used to demand nationwide vaccine mandates that criminalize “anti-vaxxers” and seek to place the government is a position of absolute control over your body.
Hear the full podcast at the Health Ranger Report podcast site, or listen below:
Learn more about the tyranny of vaccine “science” at ScienceTyranny.com
Australian Mandatory Vaccines Push & PM’s Big Pharma Wife
Australian mandatory vaccines are ever closer to becoming a reality – or perhaps they already are for those needing welfare and public education.
The Australian Government has decided that it’s No Jab, No Pay policy wasn’t quite fascist enough, so it has upped the ante by going one step further.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull is trying to forge a policy where parents with unvaccinated children will not be able to enroll them in public school! That’s right: it’s Australian vaccine fascism.
No Jab, No Pay may also become No Jab, No Play if the PM and his Big Pharma wife, Lucy Turnbull, get their way.
Let’s take a further look at the push for Australian mandatory vaccines, keeping in mind the horrendous history of vaccines, which have injured, sterilized, paralyzed and killed countless people all over the world.
No Jab, No Play
The Independent reports in its article Unvaccinated children could be banned from attending preschool across Australia that Aussie PM Turnbull is pushing for Australian mandatory vaccines by making public education dependent upon vaccination rates:
“Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has written to state and territory leaders to push for nationally consistent laws to protect young children from disease. (…)
“At our next Coag [Council of Australian Governments] meeting I propose we agree that all jurisdictions implement legislation that excludes children who are not vaccinated from attending childcare or preschool, unless they have a medical exemption.
“Vaccination objection is not a valid exemption. We must give parents the confidence that their children will be safe when they attend childcare and preschool.
“Parents must understand that if their child is not vaccinated they will be refused attendance or enrollment.”
When Turnbull writes “vaccination objection” above, he refers to what is known as the philosophical or religious objection or exemption, which is the right of the individual to refuse vaccination on the grounds that it goes against his or her philosophical (or religious) beliefs.
The cute phrase No Jab, No Play was used by Australian Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt.
It sounds clever, however it disguises a horribly authoritarian objective of forcing parents to make the choice between poisoning their child with toxic vaccines or getting free public education – a choice which for most families would be very difficult given the high price of private education in Australia.
Like many nations with 2-party political systems, the Australian Left (the Labor Party) doesn’t offer any opposition to the push for mandatory vaccines.
It was the outspoken Pauline Hanson who criticized Turnbull for this move, but she was (predictably) put back into place by the force of the Australian Medical Association. Again from The Independent:
“Pauline Hanson was forced to apologise after she was criticised by the Australian Medical Association and others for suggesting vaccines were not safe and incorrectly claiming that parents could conduct their own tests to evaluate vaccination safety.
She told the ABC’s Insiders programme that successive governments had “blackmailed” people into having their children vaccinated because Australia has a policy of withholding childcare fee rebates and welfare payments from parents who do not have their children fully immunized.”
The article ‘No Jab, No Pay’ Policy Has A Serious Ethical Sting points out how this No Jab, No Pay policy hurts poorer Australian families:
“The “no jab, no pay” policy has harms beyond the physical: it may unfairly deny funds to people who already suffer from hardship.
While much attention is given to the half of non-vaccinators who consciously refuse, people have failed to vaccinate for other reasons such as having an ill child, or being caught up in what may be an already difficult separated family situation.
People who do not vaccinate for reasons other than disagreement and concern tend to have lower household incomes (60% have a household income less than A$50,000) and lower education levels (34% have year ten or less education).
Single-parent households are also over-represented in this sub-population – 21% versus 15% of families nationally.”
Big Pharma and Lucy Turnbull
If you think the PM is pushing vaccines because he cares deeply for the health of ordinary Australians, think again. Lucy Turnbull is chairman of the pharma corporation Prima Biomed and is the PM’s Big Pharma wife.
She has worked closely with Big Pharma giants GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis. The Sydney Morning Herald in 2015 reports that the Turnbulls were listed as “the third biggest shareholder” in Prima Biomed.
The 2 Assumptions Underpinning the Push for Australian Mandatory Vaccines
There are 2 fundamental assumptions behind Turnbull’s ploy. The first assumption is that of herd immunity.
I have discussed this concept in an earlier article entitled Herd Immunity vs. Viral Shedding: Who’s Infecting Whom?, but here’s the basic point: herd immunity is based on faulty logic and numerous assumptions.
It assumes vaccines work, it assumes the vaccinated don’t carry disease and it assumes vaccine-induced immunity is as good as natural immunity. As it turns out, it may in fact be the vaccinated who are spreading the disease through viral shedding.
The second assumption is that the State or the Government has the power to force you to take any medicine it deems fit for the sake of “public safety”.
Of course, protecting public safety is a legitimate function of Government, but where it gets tricky real fast is that dictators, autocrats and tyrants always (almost without exception) justify their draconian acts by claiming they are protecting the public. It’s always the same excuse.
How many times have we heard the hackneyed phrase national security? At a certain point we have to evaluate whether it’s more important to preserve individual rights, liberty and sovereignty – or the “rights” of the abstract “group”. Who owns your body? You or the Government?
Here’s the bottom line: forcefully medicating people without their informed consent is a drastic and extremely coercive step, even if herd immunity were a completely watertight theory and even if every single vaccine were safe and effective – two rather big, fat and rotund “ifs”. However, the entire concept of informed consent is being watered down.
Informed Consent Under Attack
The push for Australian mandatory vaccines is more evidence that the concept of informed consent is under attack.
As the Organic Prepper reports, the US Government is helping out Big Pharma in America by watering down informed consent even further. A new law was passed in December 2016 endorsing an informed consent waiver:
“A new law quietly passed last December contains a waiver of informed consent that eliminates the requirement of pharmaceutical companies to let you know if a medication or vaccine given to you or your child is experimental. Wow. One last Christmas surprise from President Obama.
This is according to Section 3024, “Informed Consent Waiver for Clinical Investigations” of H.R. 32, the “21st Century Cures Act.” Here’s the wording of the text:
Clinical testing of investigational medical devices and drugs no longer requires the informed consent of the subjects if the testing poses no more than minimal risk to the subjects and includes safeguards.
“Clinical testing” is not clearly defined. Furthermore, who the heck gets to decide what “minimal risk” is? The pharmaceutical companies? The FDA? Medical professionals? How incredibly patronizing.”
The truth is that mandatory vaccines go against the Australian Constitution, as well as ideals in the Hippocratic Oath and the Australian Medical Association’s Code of Ethics.
However, those pushing the vaccine agenda have ways around this, such as by introducing fake health threats and health scares (e.g. the dreaded zika virus caused by a pesticide) to try to justify the imposition of quarantine laws:
“As a general rule, there are no diseases for which vaccination is compulsory for persons living in Australia.
“However … where cases of quarantinable diseases arise, quarantine officers have the power to require a person who is subject to quarantine to submit to vaccination or prophylaxis if this is considered necessary to prevent the spread of the disease or is specified in the International Health Regulations.
“The Quarantine Act 1908 (Cth) was amended in 2008 to meet certain requirements under the International Health Regulations (2005) for vaccinations and other health measures related to travelers.”
Here is an excerpt from the Hippocratic Oath:
“With regard to healing the sick, I will devise and order for them the best diet, according to my judgment and means; and I will take care that they suffer no hurt or damage. Nor shall any man’s entreaty prevail upon me to administer poison to anyone; neither will I counsel any man to do so.”
Here is an excerpt from the Australian Medical Association’s Code of Ethics:
“Approach health care as a collaboration between doctor and patient.”
How exactly is mandatory vaccination a “collaboration”?
Conclusion: Beware of Creeping Soft Push for Australian Mandatory Vaccines
The No Jab, No Pay and No Jab, No Play are examples of creeping soft policy whereby the Australian Government is trying to coerce people into accepting vaccinations without trying to mandate it in law (which would be difficult, unconstitutional and result in pushback).
So it’s using strong-handed tactics to mess with people using its services (welfare, public education) and get the vaccination rates higher through the back door.
Informed consent is being constantly eroded, despite the fact it is cornerstone concept in medicine (and in law), because it recognizes the right of the individual to choose (or not choose) his own treatment.
To allow governments and corporations to run roughshod over this right is to pave the way for medical tyranny. It is to allow collectivism to triumph over individualism. It is to allow third parties the legal right to dictate to you what you must put inside of your body.
See for yourself how NWO agenda man Bill Gates admitted that vaccines lead to depopulation. Governments only try to push mandatory vaccines on people who don’t know about them. How informed are you?
By Makia Freeman, Guest author, HumansAreFree.com / Related: Bill Gates Foundation Announces Population Control Microchip
What Are Laboratory Rats Indicating About Wi-Fi Exposures The High Tech Industries Deny?
Wi-Fi (Wireless Fidelity) is everywhere: Planes, trains, schools, workplaces, cafés, and even doctors’ offices, which I find quite unfathomable, since those microwave frequencies are harmful to the brain, i.e., one of the non-thermal radiation wave adverse health effects the industry’s associations, e. g., ICNIRP, deny but falsely promote as safe, in my opinion.
Microwave energies are in the gigahertz (GHz) range — think microwave ovens! Would you leave your microwave oven door open while it is cooking dinner?
Then, apply that same logic to the exposures you experience in all the places stated in the paragraph above.
We are living in a sea of unfettered microwave exposures which are not safe for the human brain — especially in developing fetuses and young children, regardless of what vested interests tell you about the ‘science’.
As consumers, we need to reexamine our ‘second nature’ habits regarding Wi-Fi technology, I offer.
Demographics document pedestrian deaths are increasing dramatically and attributed to the use of smart phones while walking on city streets, crossing into traffic and not paying attention to traffic patterns due to being absorbed in texting or some electronic device activity.
Recently, I wrote about newly published scientific studies and the effects of EMFs/RFs produced by microwave energies; see “Science Speaks Out About Electromagnetic Frequencies.”
One of the recently published papers cited is “The effect of Wi-Fi EMF on object recognition tasks in male rats” Hassanshahi A, Shafeie SA, Fatemi I, Hassanshahi E, Allahtavakoli M, Shabani M, Roohbakhsh A, Shamsizadeh A.
The effect of Wi-Fi electromagnetic waves in unimodal and multimodal object recognition tasks in male rats. Neurol Sci. 2017 Mar 22. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-2920-y.
[Epub ahead of print], which has remarkable findings that must be considered as to how they apply to human brains and behavioral tendencies, including interferences with or lack thereof, in view of Wi-Fi gigahertz EMF (electromagnetic frequency) exposures.
The Hive Mind: 5G, Smart Grid, and the Coming ‘Global Brain’
This truly is “canary in the coal mine” stuff, which needs to be scrutinized more carefully by all segments of society: regulatory agencies, especially the FCC in Washington, DC; the medical profession, which should not be overwhelmed by the pontifications of skewed and obsolete microwave science of the 1900s as ‘safe’;
school districts in their fervor to supply ‘state-of-the-art’ education for students by exposing them to Wi-Fi in classrooms only to be magnified by the number of computers tying into and amplifying exposures;
states utility commissions, who need to become proficient in Wi-Fi adverse health effects, aka non-thermal wave adverse health effects, from ZigBee radio transmitters in electric, natural gas and water AMI Smart Meters; and consumers who are ‘addicted’ to quick-access Internet, iPhone, and all the gadgets powered by Wi-Fi.
Why should everyone be concerned about Wi-Fi and GHz? Well, in the Hassanshahi et al article mentioned above, the rats developed cognition problems from Wi-Fi exposure, which should not be taken lightly or pushed under medical or scientific carpets!
Quoting from the Abstract of that published paper:
“Considering the recent reports about some hazardous effects of Wi-Fi signals on the nervous system, this study aimed to investigate the effect of 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi radiation on multisensory integration in rats.
“In conclusion, results of this study showed that chronic exposure to Wi-Fi electromagnetic waves might impair both unimodal and cross-modal encoding of information.”  — [CJF emphasis added]
That means the poor rats brains became addled. What are those laboratory rats telling us? As a society, we seem to have more problems with cognition, i.e., ADD, ADHD, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Alzheimer’s disease, plus various other forms of dementia. Here is the National Institute on Aging’s website on “Types of Dementia.”
Clearly, there are numerous ‘actors’ complicating the cognition problems assaulting modern lifestyles: neurotoxic vaccines; toxic chemicals in agriculture, animal husbandry and food processing; pharmaceutical drugs used inappropriately for recreational highs; herbicides, pesticides and other ‘killing’ chemicals; and, last but not least, high-tech-microwave-operated appliances and gadgets.
Consumers really need to rethink and examine the ultimate repercussions of constant exposure to unseen non-ionizing radiation waves impacting our central nervous system, brain and cognition.
Is losing one’s mental capabilities worth the ‘convenience’ of tech-gadgets and their slick merchandising campaigns constantly foisted upon children and adults to buy more electronic ‘toys’?
Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.
Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.
Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)
Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available.