David Irving – Jailed and Beaten For Telling Truth of 2nd World War

As I became aware of the huge lie about Hitler and WWII I find the star historian, and now one of the only experts you can trust, is David Irving. Here in this nearing the end of his journey talk, he tells how he was put in solitary confinement for four hundred days (no small hell, I’ve been for three days – you go ape second day) because telling the truth in Austria is currently against the law, and you can still be thrown in prison for saying anything about the truth of what really happened in WWII. The difference with David Irving as he well describes himself is that he actually went to the sources like Hitler’s personal staff, who only talked with him because he had written a book on the bombing of Dresden. All you have to do is listen to a few of these lectures of him on YouTube to be convinced he is an extraordinary and essential figure for a very important truth that was kept from us, and I certainly plan on reading as many of his books as I can.


Shocking Free Speech Loss in Europe!!! (Irving AU)

David Irving in Australia explains the total control of the Jewish Zionists here in Los Angeles, ordering countries in Europe and around the world, actually ORDERING governments, to ban, keep out, arrest, and charge with crimes of free speech, David Irving, from speaking the truth he found in the archives about World War Two. It is absolutely shocking, and he very well explains the situation leaving no doubt to the reasonable listener that he is sincere, honest, and most probably right about what he has found, and further there is absolutely no evidence of criminal, hate mongering, or any associated element that would justify what has happened to him worldwide. This is absolutely shocking, explosive information on the current situation of earth, and we better all pay attention and be ready to stand up. We are under tyranny. Covert tyranny! Upload this!

David Irving jailed for Holocaust denial

The British revisionist historian and Nazi apologist David Irving was today sentenced to three years in prison after he admitted denying the Holocaust.An eight-member jury at a court in Vienna convicted Irving, 68, a few hours after it began its deliberations on the first day of his trial.

Irving had pleaded guilty to denying the Holocaust in two speeches on a visit to Austria in 1989, but said at the trial that he had later changed his views.

The speeches included a call for an end to the “gas chambers fairy tale”, and claims that Adolf Hitler had helped Europe’s Jews and that the Holocaust was a myth.

Irving told the court today he had revised his opinion after seeing the personal files of Adolf Eichmann. Speaking in German, he told the court he now accepted that the Nazis had killed millions of Jews.

At one stage, while giving evidence, he expressed sorrow for “all the innocent people” who died during the war. “I made a mistake when I said there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz,” he said.

Austria has the world’s stiffest laws against denying the Holocaust and Irving could have faced a maximum of 10 years in prison.

The defence had called for leniency, citing his admission and his claims that he had changed his viewpoint.

The prosecution, however, had accused Irving of changing his position as a “tactic” to escape a harsh sentence, and said the historian was an icon for neo-Nazis and revisionists around the world.

Irving appeared shocked as the sentence was read out. Moments later, an elderly man who identified himself only as a family friend called out: “Stay strong, David – stay strong,” before he was escorted from the courtroom.

Irving’s lawyer Elmar Kresbach immediately announced he would appeal the sentence. “I consider the verdict a little too stringent. I would say it’s a bit of a message trial”.

This morning, when he arrived at court, Irving told reporters: “History is a constantly growing tree – the more you know, the more documents become available, the more you learn. And I have learned a lot since 1989.

“Yes, there were gas chambers. Millions of Jews died. There is no question. I don’t know the figures. I’m not an expert on the Holocaust.”

Irving, who has written around 30 books, said he considered it “ridiculous” that he was standing trial for remarks made 17 years ago.

Handcuffed and wearing a navy blue suit, he arrived at the court carrying a copy of one of his most controversial books, Hitler’s War, which challenges the extent of the Holocaust.

Later in court he said he had never written a book about the Holocaust, which he called “just a fragment of my area of interest”.

The controversial historian has been in custody since he was arrested in November while driving in southern Austria, despite being barred from the country. He had been on his way to address an extreme-right student fraternity in Vienna.

In 2000, Irving sued the US Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt for libel at the British high court and lost. The presiding judge in that case, Charles Gray, wrote that Irving was “an active Holocaust denier … anti-Semitic and racist”.

He was fined several thousand pounds in 1992 in Germany for saying the Auschwitz gas chambers were a hoax.

He is said to have spent recent months in prison awaiting trial after he was denied bail writing his memoirs, under the working title Irving’s War. His lawyer said last month Irving was getting up to 300 fan letters a week from supporters around the world.

Irving has contended in the past that most of the people who died at concentration camps such as Auschwitz were not murdered but rather succumbed to typhus and other diseases.

Since you’re here …

… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever, but far fewer are paying for it. Advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.

If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to support it, our future would be much more secure.




You certainly have already heard about the horrible Manchester, England, bombing of a concert attended by little girls that killed 22 and wounded 59 — done by another Mudslime freak suicide bomber. The concert was by Ariana Grande — a mixed race something “pop diva” promoted to educate our young girls how to be cheap sluts and mudsharks in our brave new world.

This is supposedly the bomber, Salman Abedi. Note how the (((lefty media))) will call him “British” simply because he was born in Manchester. My White little tushie.

But you got to understand a few other things “they” never talk about in the mainstream media that has put us White people into this nightmare.

While it’s probably untrue Einstein once said: “The definition of insanity is doing something over and over again and expecting a different result,” but he could have. Now Albert Einstein was a Jew, as you probably know (he’s like a God to Jewry). Yet what they always conveniently forget to mention is that Einstein did say Zionism is pretty much the same as Nazism. Einstein realized they were plenty of hard core Zionist Jews ready to bollix up our Mr. Nice Guy brains to support the Jews invading the Levant (what they used to call Israel); to recreate a supposedly ancient homeland they’ve obsessed over for thousands of years. Jews know the deal.

The Father of our country, George Washington, said in his farewell address that getting in bed with foreign interests invites retribution and serious dangers to our republic. He was alluding to the Brits versus the French, since this was the big brouhaha of the time, but the same logic applies to the business with the Jew Zionist psychos versus the dirty terrorist A-rabs. George Washington had no idea about what subversive idiocies were to eventually infect this nation. Of course, there were hardly any Jews in America then.

Basically, what the agents of all this BS in our lands wants you to think it’s a bad thing to be “isolationists.” These are the ones who want our lands opened up to foreigners to come live here. But they don’t really want any more big fat Greek or Italian weddings, only non-White Moslem Semites from the Arab world, Asians and blacks from Africa, including ridiculous places like criminal Somalia and Nigeria.

As if we need any more such freaks in our lands.

This globalism business is a well-funded MEME promoted to our young so our race goes along with the gradual, self-destruction of White people in our own lands. You think blacks really give a crap? Sure, they might act like it just to get into the pants of some idiot White chick, get more government freebies on a silver platter, or out of Black Africa if they were unfortunately born there. It’s all been a big Jew scam, people.

This is because the main goal is not some kind of “Global Village” BS, but the dilution of White demographics in our own lands so us Whites don’t have the political and social power to expose the real rats behind it. The long term goal is to gradually turn us Whites into a dumbed-down mud race before we can stop it. This effort is clearly visible across the political and media spectrum and enforced by “PC,” yet they act like it’s nothing but crazy conspiracy talk. Clever.

This is why the least sign of White awakening creates panic among these people. They fully realize if the “Narrative” falls apart, they might face all sorts of dangers.

I realize I’m just a hard charger type of White guy. Rah, rah, America and all that jazz. That’s certainly why I used to be a big Trump guy. Absolutely true. Trump, quite obviously, turned out to be a full-fledged Zionist Jew suck-up. A traitor like all the others.

And you might have told yourself “I want to be sympatico with the Jews, since they are “God’s Chosen” and us White non-Jews treated them so terribly with pogroms and Der Fuehrer’s gas chambers. Guess what? That’s exactly what they want you to think.

In fact, if you think about all the TV programming, you can pick out this line of reasoning quite clearly. Hell, you can’t turn on the TV for five minutes before you come across something buttressing up all this.

Yep, I’m talking about brainwashing. I say that a lot here. Most folks think that means some shadowy guys in lab coats, working us like lab rats using scary forms of science in the locked backrooms of the TV networks.

No, it’s people who look no different from you or I, but have an “agenda” to turn America into some weird, mentally and sexually mixed-up, immoral society where any of us Whites who dare to “fight back” are turned into pariahs and screamed at like we’re the evil baddies.

The media Jews have been sleazing us up for decades. It distracts us from them, plus earns their corporate media beaucoup dineros. Just stop and imagine all the personal heartaches these dirtbag creeps have caused in our lands with their ever-increasing filth!

Just think about the non-stop BS about Trump colluding with the Rooskies. It goes on and on and on, doesn’t it? Even FOX news reports on it all the time. It’s pounded in our skulls across the mediaverse. That’s how they shape History to support their long-running agenda. George Orwell had these commie creeps pegged.

Think about all the tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer money being wasted on this Russian nonsense. Basically, they are trying to gin up American anti-commie patriotism to find an excuse for why their lefty political favorite, Hillary, lost to Trump. Meanwhile, we have to listen to the never-ending TV crap while our country goes to hell in a handbasket.

Hell, Obama himself did a TV commercial for globalist liberal Emmanuel Macron in the French elections. Imagine Putin making a commercial for Trump back in 2016?

What we’re dealing with here is a form of hypocrite hysteria that has infected the body politic of our once formerly White countries, especially the US of A.

This is due to “PC” or political correctness. Everybody knows this is going on. It is a carefully crafted social engineering program running for decades and meant to silence with social fear us decent Christian White people.

You might be asking: “How are they getting away with all this, Mr. Smarty Pants Nazi?!” Well, for one thing, they got us at each other’s throats for saying the least thing. There’s no well-funded outfit protecting our race like the Jews and blacks have everywhere. If there was, you can bet they would be screaming “NAZI” just like you called me.

I’m just here to tell you folks who come to my site what I think is going on. Call me crazy.


Jews Attack Chuck Woolery for Exposing Jewish Role in Communism

Lee Rogers

Daily Stormer
May 30, 2017

Chuck Woolery just exposed the Jewish role in Communism on Twitter. The Jews are very angry at him for this.

Former game show host Chuck Woolery recently started doing a political podcast that’s primarily geared towards boomer conservatives. Even though he’s pro-Israel, he has revealed some very uncomfortable historical facts to his audience.

A few months back he exposed the Frankfurt School as being an originator of the Marxist doctrines we see in place today. As most of you already know, the Frankfurt School was founded mostly by Jews.

He’s taken this one step further pointing out the historical Jewish connections to Communism. Here’s a few of his recent tweets.

Believe it or not. Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin were both Jewish. I was shocked to find, most of the original Soviet Communists were Jewish

Amazing to me, I point out that Marx and Lenin were Jewish, Fact of history, and now I’m being called anti Semitic? why do people do this?

What’s great is that he really hasn’t backed down either. He just posted this a few hours ago.

Can’t get my head around being pro Israel and being called an antisemite just for pointing out historical facts. Not my fault. It’s history

Unfortunately, he does seem to be a bit confused about the significance of his statements. Hard to say if that’s intentional or not. He just claimed that Lenin and Marx betrayed and persecuted the Jews through Communism.

and betrayed the people,their people, and ultimately persecuted them without mercy through .

In reality, it was Jews through Communism who persecuted Christians. He should really look into the Holodomor. Millions of White Christians in Ukraine died from starvation as a result of Jewish Bolshevik policies.

Despite that, Jews everywhere have been going nuts over this. He’s being accused of anti-Semitism etc.. simply for exposing a very uncomfortable historical fact.

Let’s review.

Karl Marx had Jewish lineage and had family ties to the Jewish Rothschild banking family.

It has been admitted that Vladimir Lenin had Jewish lineage.

The vast majority of Bolsheviks who took over Russia in the revolution were Jews. Even Vladimir Putin has pointed this out. The revolution was funded by Jewish bankers like Jacob Schiff who was a Rothschild agent.

Leon Trotsky a prominent Bolshevik was Jewish.

Communism is simply an extension of Judaism. This is a fact. The evidence proving this is overwhelming.

While we obviously have differences with Woolery, his tweets linking Jews to Communism are 100 percent correct. It is hilarious to see all these Jews squirming at the fact that he has exposed this. Some of them are trying to claim that Communism came from Marx’s atheism. Some are resorting to name calling. It is really quite pathetic to see the nonsense they’re coming up with to conceal the Jewish component to Communism.

Look at some of the responses Woolery has gotten.

This faggot has demanded that Woolery stop tweeting because he tweeted a historical fact.

There appears to be confusion regarding my remarks about Marx and Lenin having Jewish roots. Make no mistake about this, I stand with Israel

Then you have this crazy Jew calling Woolery a Jew hater even though he’s pro-Israel. Talk about unhinged!

There appears to be confusion regarding my remarks about Marx and Lenin having Jewish roots. Make no mistake about this, I stand with Israel

@chuckwoolery “I stand with Israel, but I hate those fucking Jews!”-you

Hopefully more people will become familiar with these very important historical facts.

It helps explain why the world is the way it is today.


State Department Can’t Explain Why It Criticizes “Democratic Process” in Iran But Not in Saudi

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
May 31, 2017

Watch as Stuart Jones, a high-level acting official in the State Dept, is asked why they criticize Iranian elections but never Saudi Arabia:

Yet another brilliant example of the fundamental dishonesty of the modern political system.

These people are not able to defend their own positions, and sometimes, they don’t even pretend to be able to.

I mean, srslsy – why would you not have some answer prepared for this question? It’s like when you ask a Jew why Jews are allowed to have an ethnic state and whites are not – they stutter and them end up saying something about “muh Holocaust.”


This could be the most uncomfortable State Department press briefing moment yet.

During a press conference about US President Donald Trump’s recent trip to the Middle East, AFP journalist Dave Clark asked a department official why the US criticizes the Iranian elections and its record on democracy, but not Saudi Arabia.

“How do you characterize Saudi Arabia’s commitment to democracy, and does the administration believe that democracy is a buffer or a barrier against extremism?” Clark asked.

Stuart Jones, acting assistant secretary for Near Eastern Affairs, took a full 19-second pause before responding with a brief comment, saying that during this trip, the US made “significant progress with Saudi and GCC partners in both making a strong statement against extremism”.

“Clearly, one source of extremism, one terrorism threat, is coming from Iran, and that’s coming from a part of the Iranian apparatus that is not at all responsive to its electorate,” Jones added.

The entire modern political landscape can be summed up as: “trust us, goyim – we’re God’s chosen people.”

@DaveClark_AFP Good God. That’s the longest pause I’ve ever seen from a us official

@shadihamid It was pretty awkward being there, especially as I wasn’t trying to embarrass Jones himself

All Religions Are True – All Lead to the Same God / Teachings of Sri Ramakrishna

Aum: Copyright J.B. Hare 1999, All Rights Reserved


All Religions Are True, All Lead to Same God | Teachings of Sri Ramakrishna


In this first video of the “Teachings of Sri Ramakrishna” series, Sri Ramakrishna outlines the Advaita Vedantic truth that all religions of the world are true; and all religions lead to the same ocean of God (also known as the Sat-Chit-Ananda Divine Consciousness in Vedanta).

However on account of the spiritual immaturity of the followers, who have never experienced God themselves, who have never seen God “Pratyaksha” that is face to face, who therefore indulge in narrow-minded interpretations of religious texts; it is on account of the spiritual ignorance of such followers, that the fires of bigotry, casteism, racism and fanaticism have succeeded in deluging the world.

The above video references the Ramakrishna Kathamrita (also known as the Gospel of Ramakrishna) by Swami Abhedananda. This book records the day-to-day teachings of Sri Ramakrishna. These teachings were originally noted by Mahendranath Gupta, a direct disciple, in the Bengali language. They were later translated into English by a couple of people, one of whom was Swami Abhedananda, a God-realized direct disciple of Sri Ramakrishna. This video references Swami Abhedananda’s translation.

One day after meeting Putin, French President Macron meets with ISIS-Al Qaeda leaders in Paris

If you ever needed any more proof that the new wonder-boy French President is nothing more than a neo-liberal, globalist puppet, then look no further than Macron’s recent meeting in Paris with Syria’s opposition, known as the Riyadh-based High Negotiations Committee (HNC)…which includes political and armed groups trying to overthrow the Assad government.

Macron says he seeks to review French policy on Syria’s war with Saudi-Qatari-Turkey funded jihadists, but welcoming a terrorist organisation to Paris, one day after meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin, and days after ISIS bombed Manchester Arena, is no way to revaluate a failed western regime change operation of a sovereign nation…or maybe it is exactly the way Macron’s globalist rulers want him to behave when dealing with Syria.

Reuters reports

The unannounced meeting with Riad Hijab and a broader delegation from the Riyadh-based High Negotiations Committee (HNC), which includes political and armed groups, came as Macron seeks to review French policy on the six-year civil war.

“The president spoke of his personal commitment to the Syria dossier and of his support for the Syrian opposition in view of a political transition,” his office said in a statement.

Opposition officials were not immediately available for comment on the meeting.

Macron’s electoral victory has offered an opportunity for Paris to examine its policy on Syria with some considering the previous administration’s stance as too intransigent and leaving it isolated on the subject.

Macron, a newcomer to international diplomacy, said on Monday that his priority in Syria was to eradicate Islamist militants.

Alongside Putin in 17th century palace of Versailles outside Paris, Macron on Monday said he had agreed to set up a working group with Russia, including to exchange information. It was not immediately clear what that would entail.

Macron’s government says it backs U.N.-mediated peace talks in Geneva. However, Macron also called for a “political and diplomatic framework to build peace” without specifying whether it was a new initiative or part of the U.N. process.

More on the Riyadh-based High Negotiations Committee (HNC)…

The HNC was founded in December 2015 at a conference held in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, which was attended by around 100 delegates. At the end of the conference, a joint statement was issued to confirm the formation of “a High Negotiations Committee for the Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces (HNC), with its headquarters in Riyadh, to undertake the tasks of choosing a negotiating delegation and to act reference point for negotiators with the representatives of the Syrian regime on behalf of the participants”.

The group’s chief negotiator, Mohammed Alloush, a member of Jaish al-Islam, resigned from the HNC in May 2016 because of the lack of progress in the Syrian peace process.

In September 2016, the HNC set out a detailed transition plan for Syria, committing the country to democratic and religious pluralism. The 25-page document was launched in London and was welcomed by the United Kingdom’s government.

In January 2017, the HNC announced that it will support the Syrian peace talks in Astana, which began on 23 January.

In February 2017, the HNC chief coordinator Riyad Farid Hijab rejected a statement by Staffan de Mistura that the latter will select delegates for the Syrian opposition in Geneva. He also objected to the participation Democratic Union Party (PYD) in the Geneva conference.

The HNC has faced criticism from Russia because it includes groups like Ahrar al-Sham and Jaysh al-Islam. Its transition plan in September 2016 was also criticized by the opposition Kurdish National Council and the Assyrian Democratic Organization due to it not addressing minority ethnic groups in Syria.

The Kurdish National Council withdrew from the HNC on 29 March 2017 in protest to the latter’s opposition to federalism and human rights for Kurds in Syria.

More on Riad Hijab

Riyad Farid Hijab was Prime Minister of Syria from June to August 2012, serving under President Bashar al-Assad. From 2011 to 2012, he was Minister of Agriculture.

On 6 August 2012, the Syrian government released a statement saying that Hijab had been dismissed.

Shortly thereafter a man describing himself as Hijab’s spokesman and several news organizations stated he had resigned and defected to the rebel side in the Syrian civil war.

Hijab is the highest-ranking defector from the Syrian government.


5 reasons Macron is more unstable than Erdgoan

A Mad Sultan is easier to deal with than a crazed pussy.

French President Emmanuel Macron has lumped the three very different figures of Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan into the same category saying that they all see the world in terms of ‘power’. The clear question is, what is the antithesis of power in this instance? But like with most strange accusations made by Macron, he refused to clarify his cryptic remark.

Frankly, the only thing that the three leaders have in common is that their speeches are far easier to understand than Macron whose rhetoric is often impenetrable even in his native language.

But of the three leaders Macron picked on,  Erdogan is the only one famous for being unpredictable, flippant, overly prideful, arrogant and often undiplomatic. In this sense he is the only one like Macron.

Macron is however in fact worse.

Here’s why. 

1. Erdogan Would Never Insult Trump, Putin or Xi 

Even many seasoned western diplomats have commented on the agitated schoolboy attitude that Macron displayed in front of Vladimir Putin by insulting the leader of a vastly more powerful nation to his face and when he was an invited guest no less. It is virtually unheard of for a President who invites a foregn leader as a guest to use a public press conference to slander the media, domestic policies and foreign policies of the guest in question, but this is exactly what Macron did to President Putin.

Then there is the homoerotic handshake that Macron gave to a rather bemused and bored looking Donald Trump, something that strikes of arrogance as much as oddness.

Erdogan is at least wise enough to generally only talk about his desire to build a new-Ottoman style Turkish power base in front of his own supporters at home. When meeting with the Presidents of superpowers whether Russia, China or the United States, Erdogan is always considerably more measured in  his words, even if his pompous attitude at times slips through.

In other-words the Erdogan at home is much more unhinged than the Erdogan abroad, especially when he’s with leaders of more powerful countries.

Erdogan is flippant but not stupid. Macron appears to be both.

2. Erdogan Is Actually In Charge 

One way to command respect is to actually have the ability to back up what is said. While Erdogan’s ambitions of re-conquering former Ottoman lands will probably not be able to happen, the fact is that Erdogan rules Turkey with a supreme, near dictatorial level of control. His army is his, so is his diplomatic corps. A recent Presidential Referendum in Turkey made the powers of the Turkish Parliament more or less irrelevant.

Macron by contrast has a domestic policy which he more or less  happily surrenders to the EU and a foreign policy controlled by NATO.

Vladimir Putin was quick to question whether France has a military policy in Syria that is independent of the agenda and tone set by the United States. This remark quickly shut Macron up.

3. Erdgoan Preaches But He Doesn’t Lecture 

Erdogan likes to tell other countries that they need to become more ‘Turk friendly’ and that it is somehow the right and duty of Turks to go forth and carry good tidings of the Sultan. When this is directed at country’s once enslaved by Ottoman Turkey such remarks are inflammatory. But when the remarks are directed at western and central Europe (as they often are), it is rather amusing as these European countries are doing far more to destroy themselves than Erdogan and his followers ever could.

By contrast, Macron lectured Vladimir Putin like a little schoolgirl trying to overcompensate for lack of affection from her parents by brown nosing the teacher. It’s a kind of sickness. Putin was not amused. He kept his cool and doubtlessly restrained his desire to teach Macron why he has a black belt in Judo.

Macron also wants to lecture Donald Trump about the glories of doing politics like the loser that Macron is. I’m sure Trump is far more frightened of Mar-A-Lago running out of chocolate cake than he is of Macron’s threats.

Erdogan is naked in his desire to spread his own unique definition of Turkishness throughout parts of the world. Macron by contrsast thinks the entire world should become as weak and compromised and ideologically driven by liberalism as he is. The rest of the world doesn’t care and never will. He ought to realise that.

4. Sultans Command More Respect Than Pussies 

Erdogan has earned the nickname ‘Mad Sultan’ among his detractors. He’s earned it for good reason. He behaves like a neo-Ottoman sultan in terms of his policies even though he’s more of a right-wing South American style dictator in terms of his style and execution of governance.

READ MORE: Erdogan: a mad sultan or a far-right South American style dictator?

It may be mad but it is bold.

Macron’s by style can best be described in the inimitable words of Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov when he commented on the American election circus…

5. Turkey Is Still A Relevant Nation 

With few exceptions a leader is only as powerful and consequently respected as his country is powerful. Turkey, whether one loves or hates Erdogan, is a powerful country with an economy which holds a great deal of potential and a young vibrant population.

Turkey is changing the course of regional history, right now for the worse but because of this, Turkey cannot be ignored and should not be. There was a Turkey before Erdogan and there will be a Turkey long after him. Russia’s leadership realises this which is why they conduct good relations with Erdogan in spite of many difficult prevailing circumstances.

France by contrast is merely a province. It is a political province of the EU, a military and foreign policy province of the US and an economic province of the Rothschild banking cartel whose butler is now the President.

Macron’s inability to think normally, logically and reasonable will be his undoing. Erdogan has managed to be strong enough and at times wise enough not to let his much more manly ego get in the way.

‘Entire Land Is Ours’: Israel Legalizes Palestinian Land Theft

  • A boy rides his bicycle past houses in the Israeli settlements of Ofra, in the occupied West Bank, Feb. 6, 2017.

    A boy rides his bicycle past houses in the Israeli settlements of Ofra, in the occupied West Bank, Feb. 6, 2017. | Photo: Reuters

Published 6 February 2017
Ahead of the late-night vote, Likud minister Ofir Akunis told parliament, “We are voting tonight on the connection between the Jewish people to its land.”

Israel passed a law Monday retroactively legalizing about 4,000 settler homes built on privately-owned Palestinian land in the occupied West Bank, a measure that human rights groups have called “theft” and one that would end any hopes for Palestinian statehood.

Palestine Wants ICC to Investigate New Israeli Settlement Push

Hanan Ashrawi, a senior member of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the main Palestinian political umbrella body, said in a statement that the law gave settlers a green light to “embark on a land grab.”

“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his extremist, racist coalition government are deliberately breaking the law and destroying the very foundations of the two-state solution and the chances for peace and stability.”

The U.N. Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process Nickolay Mladenov said in a statement that the law “will have far-reaching legal consequences for Israel and greatly diminish the prospects for Arab-Israeli peace.”

The news came just hours after Israel conducted airstrikes in the Palestinian Gaza strip injuring at least two Palestinians, the first attack by Israel in months that results in casualties.

Witnesses told Ma’an news agency that at least eight Israeli missiles were fired at several locations across the besieged Palestinian territory. Israel said it was responding to a rock thrown from the strip that landed in an open space and resulted in no damages or injuries.

Under the new law, settlers could remain on the land if they built there without prior knowledge of Palestinian ownership or if homes were constructed at the state’s instruction. Palestinian owners would receive financial compensation.

Israel Approves More Illegal Settlements, Expects Trump Support

But its passage may only be largely symbolic as it violates Israeli Supreme Court rulings on property rights. Israel’s attorney general has said it is unconstitutional and that he will not defend it in front of the Supreme Court.

Ahead of the late-night vote, Likud minister Ofir Akunis told parliament, “We are voting tonight on the connection between the Jewish people to its land. This entire land is ours.”

Although the legislation, passed by a vote of 60 to 52, was backed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right-wing coalition, political sources have told news outlets that Netanyahu privately opposed the bill over concerns it could provide grounds for prosecution by the International Criminal Court in the Hague.

But the far-right Jewish Home party, a member of the coalition looking to draw voters from the traditional base of Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud party, pushed for the legislation after the forced evacuation of 330 settlers last week from an outpost built on private Palestinian land.

With Netanyahu under police investigation on suspicion of abuse of office, Likud has been losing in opinion polls, therefore Netanyahu did not stand in the way of the vote because he did not want to alienate his supporters and boost Jewish Home’s base.

The Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem condemned the bill’s passage, saying it “proves yet again that Israel has no intention of ending its control over the Palestinians or its theft of their land.”

The group said that the passage of the law just weeks after the U.N. Security Council passed a resolution calling for the halt of settlement building was a “slap in the face” to the international community by Israel.


Days After Lebanon’s Liberation Day Celebrations, Israel Building ‘Mock Lebanese Village’ to Fight Hezbollah

  • Israeli soldiers carry their belongings in an area near the Israel-Lebanon border Jan. 29, 2015.

    Israeli soldiers carry their belongings in an area near the Israel-Lebanon border Jan. 29, 2015. | Photo: Reuters

Published 30 May 2017

Hezbollah has warned that any such war between the two would end in a “guaranteed loss” for the Israeli regime.

Just days after Lebanon celebrated the 17th anniversary of its Resistance and Liberation Day, when southern Lebanon was freed from Israeli occupation thanks to the efforts of Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah, the Israeli army announced the creation of a new training facility — a mock Lebanese village — in case of war with the Shia resistance group.

Hezbollah to Saudis: Flatter Trump All You Want, He Only Cares About Israel and Money

The Snir facility, being built in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, will have multiple entry points, a mock Hezbollah command and control headquarters, residential buildings, mosques, and public buildings, Press TV reported.

“(Snir) is a Lebanese village, showing the Lebanese challenge, which is growing greater; showing the Lebanese enemy (Hezbollah), which is developing. In the village, there are people acting as enemy fighters, who are very close to the types of threats that we expect from Hezbollah in the next round,” Brigadier General Einav Shalev, commander of the Army’s Ground Forces Division said.

“We’re studying (Hezbollah’s tactics) closely. We’re preparing troops to dress like Hezbollah, to act like Hezbollah, to think like Hezbollah,” he added.

The army plans to finish the construction of the center, being built by German construction engineering company M+W Group, by the end of next year, with three similar facilities in the coming years.

“We have nothing like this in the State of Israel,” the senior Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) officer said, adding that the center will become its most advanced urban combat training center.

Back in February, Israeli Intelligence Minister Yisrael Katz threatened Lebanon by saying the entire country would be a target if Hezbollah fired on the occupied territories.

Qatar State News Retracts ‘Hacked’ Article That Defended ‘Enemies’ — but Still Faces Wrath of Allies​​​​​​​

Lebanese President Michel Aoun responded by saying that any Israeli attempt to violate Lebanon’s sovereignty would be met with the “appropriate response,” Press TV reported.

Naim Qassem, Hezbollah’s deputy leader, also stated in defiance last month that the resistance movement’s high level of defense readiness has thus far deterred Israel from launching a new act of aggression against the country. He warned that any such war between the two would end in a “guaranteed loss” for the Israeli regime.

US Military Aggression against Syria: US Drops Leaflets in Tanf to Warn Syrian Military Not to Advance, Orders Retreat

In a blatant but not altogether surprising display of arrogance and aggression, the United States recently dropped leaflets on the al-Tanf road, warning the Syrian military to halt its advance toward Tanf and demanding a retreat.

According to reports both by Leith Abou Fadel of Al-Masdar and from SouthFront, the leaflets were dropped after the Syrian military had advanced to the Shehmi area, which is located about 55km from the city of Tanf. The leaflets not only warned the SAA to stop advancing but demanded that it withdraw to the Zaza triangle.

The images can be seen at the SouthFront website in the article “US-Led Coalition Drops Leaflets Warning Syria Not To Approach Al-Tanf Town.

According to local sources cited by SouthFront, the leaflets contained sectarian expressions.

Syrian TV reported that the SAA has managed to advance in and around the Scientific Research area of the eastern desert of the Suweida countryside. The Syrian military was also able to repel an attack launched by the Western-backed terrorist group known as the Free Syrian Army in the same area.

In addition, SouthFront has reported that the “US-led forces” used Switchblade suicide drones in order to target the SAA positions with Grad missiles south of Zaza.

The move toward Tanf is significant because it puts Syrian military forces moving toward U.S. and U.K. Special Operations Forces stationed at the same location.

The base, located at al-Tanf, has been operational for around a year.

Image result for al-tanf

Al-Tanf border area (Source: Yemenpress)

As RT reports,

The area is of substantial strategic importance to the regime, as controlling it would help re-establish a road link with Iraq to the south.

In June 2016, Russian jets, providing top cover for the Syrian military, bombed the base. No casualties were reported.

In April, the base reportedly came under attack from Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL).

The UK government refused to comment in line with its long standing policy relating to Special Forces operations.

The US has reportedly warned against further encroachment on the base and it remains unclear how foreign troops would respond to contact with Syrian forces.

The precise disposition and number of UK forces in unknown though they are likely to be either British Army personnel from 22 SAS or Royal Marines from the SBS – Britain’s so-called ‘Tier 1’ operators. Other units that operate under the same ‘no comment’ umbrella include the Special Forces Support Group (SFSG), formerly the 1st Battalion of The Parachute Regiment, which supplies additional troops to SF operations and the shadowy Special Reconnaissance Regiment (SRR), which provides expert close surveillance capabilities.

The possibility of a direct Syrian clash with US/UK forces and thus a Russian clash with US/UK forces is now becoming very real as the Syrian government does not seem ready to allow the US and UK to simply invade and occupy any more territory than they already have.

By now, it should be clear that the presence of the FSA in the Tanf area is nothing more than ruse designed to provide a tar baby for the Syrian military to fire upon – going under the guise of “moderate rebels” – which will then allow the West to scream that Syria is attacking moderates, violating agreements, and threatening American soldiers, and thus justify some type of U.S./U.K. reprisal.

Still, it appears that Syria and its Russian allies may be reaching the end of their patience with America’s arrogant invasions and chest thumping in Syria. The obvious strategy for the Syrian military is to lift the siege of Deir ez-Zour and retake Raqqa before America, Kurds, or America’s Kurdish terrorist forces are able to do so and thus begin choking the ability of terrorists to move back and forth, supply, and direct military efforts against the Syrian government. After the immediate goal is reached, the SAA will be tasked with surgically removing the cancer inflicted upon the country by the United States.

Brandon Turbevillearticle archive here – is the author of seven books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 andvolume 2, The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria, The Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President, and Resisting The Empire: The Plan To Destroy Syria And How The Future Of The World Depends On The Outcome. Turbeville has published over 1000 articles on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s radio show Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST atUCYTV. His website is BrandonTurbeville.com He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com.

Featured image: Southfront.org


Was Egypt’s Coptic bus attack a smoke screen?

“Targeting the Coptic Christians in Egypt is not something new, as a matter of fact it has lately morphed into some kind of a systematic pattern”

Bodies lie in the desert after the bus attack on Coptic Christians near Minya in Egypt

Report by Dr. Ashraf Ezzat

For Veterans Today – Alexandria, Egypt

In less than six hours, Egyptian security apparatus has been able to investigate the deadly attack on a bus carrying Christians to a remote monastery in Upper Egypt, identify the perpetrators, and swiftly act in retaliation by striking targets, not inside Egypt, but in Libya. Well, that was a faster reaction than that which was conducted by those sluggish British policemen in Manchester. I think England should dump the American CIA guys (Who took responsibility for Manchester leaks) and instead focus on bolstering intelligence sharing with the (truly professional and relentless) Egyptian security authorities.

The Egyptian fighter jets carried out strikes on Friday directed at camps in Libya which Egyptian military authorities claim have been training (Islamist) militants who killed dozens of Coptic Christians earlier in the day. The latest estimate of the dead is 29 dead and 24 seriously wounded. The Coptic group was heading to the Saint Samuel Monastery, outside Minya city, about 220km south of Cairo, when the masked attackers, who came in three pickup trucks, opened fire on them before fleeing the scene.

Targeting the Coptic Christians in Egypt is not something new, as a matter of fact it has lately morphed into some kind of a systematic pattern (well-funded and trained – and politically manipulated, I might add)

Does anyone still remember the horrific church bombing in Alexandria which killed 21 Coptic Christians, few months before the January revolution back in 2011? I still do, because I was two hundred meters away from the Church, 15 minutes before the blast.

In the initial investigations that were not completed, the Security Apparatus of Mubarak was found somehow implicated in orchestrating the bombing. It was too obvious who would benefit from that attack. The bombing would create a strong public feeling of uncertainty and fear, a smoke screen to allow Mubarak (under the extended emergency law) to win another term in office. It is worth mentioning here that 2018 is the year of the upcoming Presidential Elections in Egypt (under yet another extended emergency law)

President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi said he had ordered strikes against what he called terrorist camps, declaring in a televised address that states that sponsored terrorism would be punished.

“Egypt will never hesitate to strike terror camps anywhere … if it plans attacking Egypt whether inside or outside the country,” Sisi said.

Trump and El-Sisi’s meeting in Washington last April

Meanwhile, Egyptian military sources reported on Friday that Egyptian air force planes carried out six strikes directed at militant (terrorist) camps near Derna in Libya. The city of Derna is in Eastern Libya, between Benghazi and the Western Egyptian borders with Libya.

That makes Derna not only a strategic location for Egypt but also for general, Khalifa Haftar, a Libyan military officer and the head of the Libyan National Army in East Libya which is opposed to the UN-backed Tripoli government.

Haftar is supported by the military in Egypt, United Arab Emirates’ government and some sources say the American CIA.

After the latest (positive) meeting of President Trump with President Sisi in Wshington, one wouldn’t expect the US to issue a condemnation of the Egyptian strikes in Libya.

It seems that both presidents had a mutual understanding on fighting terrorism in the Middle East, where Egypt’s military and air force is expected to play a major role on the ground (especially in Libya and Sudan).

East Libyan forces loyal to General, Khalifa Haftar said they participated in the Egyptian air strikes, which had targeted rebel forces linked to the so called Islamic State (IS) at a number of sites and would be followed by a ground operation.

Sources in Derna heard four powerful explosions and informed some online news media that the strikes had targeted camps used by fighters belonging to the Majlis al-Shura militant group.

But Majlis al-Shura spokesman Mohamed al-Mansouri said in a video posted online that the Egyptian air strikes did not hit any of the group’s camps, but instead hit civilian areas. In the past two years, the Egyptian air force has carried out several strikes on Derna, notably in February 2015 and March 2016, which targeted the same militias of Majlis al-Shura.

Libyan General, Khalifa Haftar

Although Mansouri also denied any link between the Majlis al-Shura group and the IS-suspected attack earlier on Friday, in a contradictory move, the Islamic State group on Saturday claimed responsibility for the attack.

Clothes and shoes of Coptic Christians could be seen scattered in and around the bus, while the bodies of some of the dead civilian victims lay in the desert sand nearby, covered with black sheets.

Eyewitnesses said three small buses were attacked. First to be hit was a bus taking children to the monastery as part of a church-organized trip, and the other two buses that followed were taking the families.

The gunmen boarded the vehicles and shot all the men and took all the women’s gold jewelry. Then the masked militants shot the women and children in the legs.

Security forces launched a hunt for the attackers, setting up dozens of checkpoints and patrols on the desert road.

Egyptian/Coptic Christians, whose church dates back nearly 2,000 years, make up a minority sect of about 10 percent of Egypt’s population of 92 million.

They say they have long suffered from persecution, but in recent months the frequency of deadly attacks against the Coptic Christians has increased. About 70 have been killed since December in bombings claimed by Islamic State at churches in the cities of Cairo, Alexandria and Tanta.

An Islamic State campaign of murders in North Sinai forced hundreds of Christians to flee the vast Northern Governorate (bordering Israel) in February and March.

In the aftermath of those subsequent attacks, many Christians feel insecure and constantly threatened. They say that the state either does not take their plight seriously enough or cannot protect them against militant Islamic attacks.