May 3, 2017 at 10:56 am
Belgian Foreign Minister, Didier Reynders, has apologised before the Belgian Parliament after his country voted in favour of Saudi Arabia’s election to the UN Women’s Rights Commission.
Local media said Reynders emphasised during his speech before the Belgian Federal Parliament on his commitment to defending human rights and equality between men and women.
The minister also stressed that he is ready to hold a debate on relations between Belgium and Saudi Arabia and supported an arms embargo on the kingdom.
Reynders said federal authorities in Belgium would not support developing cooperation with Saudi Arabia unless relations between the two countries were clarified.
The election of Saudi Arabia to membership of the UN Women’s Rights Commission for the period from 2018-22 has raised questions in the West, especially after the kingdom was recorded at the bottom of the international gender equality list in 2016.
According to media reports, 47 out of the 54 United Nations Economic and Social Council member states voted in favour of Saudi Arabia.
According to UN Watch at least four other European countries said yes to Saudi Arabia in a secret vote.
Last week’s announcement that Saudi Arabia — easily one of the world’s most brutally repressive regimes — was chosen to head a U.N. Human Rights Council panel provoked indignation around the world. That reaction was triggered for obvious reasons. Not only has Saudi Arabia executed more than 100 people already this year, mostly by beheading (a rate of 1 execution every two days), and not only is it serially flogging dissidents, but it is reaching new levels of tyrannical depravity as it is about to behead and then crucify the 21-year-old son of a prominent regime critic, Ali Mohammed al-Nimr, who was convicted at the age of 17 of engaging in demonstrations against the government.
Most of the world may be horrified at the selection of Saudi Arabia to head a key U.N. human rights panel, but the U.S. State Department most certainly is not. Quite the contrary: its officials seem quite pleased about the news. At a State Department briefing yesterday afternoon, Deputy Spokesperson Mark Toner was questioned by the invaluable Matt Lee of AP, and this is the exchange that resulted:
QUESTION: Change topic? Saudi Arabia.
MR. TONER: Saudi Arabia.
QUESTION: Yesterday, Saudi Arabia was named to head the Human Rights Council, and today I think they announced they are about to behead a 21-year-old Shia activist named Muhammed al-Nimr. Are you aware of that?
MR. TONER: I’m not aware of the trial that you — or the verdict — death sentence.
QUESTION: Well, apparently, he was arrested when was 17 years old and kept in juvenile detention, then moved on. And now, he’s been scheduled to be executed.
MR. TONER: Right. I mean, we’ve talked about our concerns about some of the capital punishment cases in Saudi Arabia in our Human Rights Report, but I don’t have any more to add to it.
QUESTION: So you —
QUESTION: Well, how about a reaction to them heading the council?
MR. TONER: Again, I don’t have any comment, don’t have any reaction to it. I mean, frankly, it’s — we would welcome it. We’re close allies. If we —
QUESTION: Do you think that they’re an appropriate choice given — I mean, how many pages is — does Saudi Arabia get in the Human Rights Report annually?
MR. TONER: I can’t give that off the top of my head, Matt.
QUESTION: I can’t either, but let’s just say that there’s a lot to write about Saudi Arabia and human rights in that report. I’m just wondering if you — that it’s appropriate for them to have a leadership position.
MR. TONER: We have a strong dialogue, obviously a partnership with Saudi Arabia that spans, obviously, many issues. We talk about human rights concerns with them. As to this leadership role, we hope that it’s an occasion for them to look at human rights around the world but also within their own borders.
QUESTION: But you said that you welcome them in this position. Is it based on [an] improved record? I mean, can you show or point to anything where there is a sort of stark improvement in their human rights record?
MR. TONER: I mean, we have an ongoing discussion with them about all these human rights issues, like we do with every country. We make our concerns clear when we do have concerns, but that dialogue continues. But I don’t have anything to point to in terms of progress.
QUESTION: Would you welcome as a — would you welcome a decision to commute the sentence of this young man?
MR. TONER: Again, I’m not aware of the case, so it’s hard for me to comment on it other than that we believe that any kind of verdict like that should come at the end of a legal process that is just and in accordance with international legal standards.
QUESTION: Change of subject?
MR. TONER: Sure.
That’s about as clear as it gets. The U.S. government “welcomes” the appointment of Saudi Arabia to a leadership position on this Human Rights panel because it’s a “close ally.” As I documented two weeks ago courtesy of an equally candid admission from an anonymous “senior U.S. official”: “The U.S. loves human-rights-abusing regimes and always has, provided they ‘cooperate.’ … The only time the U.S. government pretends to care in the slightest about human rights abuses is when they’re carried out by ‘countries that don’t cooperate.’”
It’s difficult to know whether Mark Toner is lying when he claims ignorance about the case of al-Nimr, the regime critic about to be beheaded and crucified for dissident activism, which he engaged in as a teen. Indeed, it’s hard to know which would be worse: active lying or actual ignorance, given that much of the world has been talking about this case. The government of France formally requested that the Saudis rescind the death penalty. Is it really possible that the deputy spokesperson of the U.S. State Department is ignorant of this controversy? Either way, the reluctance of the U.S. government to utter a peep about the grotesque abuses of its “close ally” is in itself grotesque.
But it’s also profoundly revealing. The close U.S./Saudi alliance and the massive amount of weapons and intelligence lavished on the regime in Riyadh by the West is one of the great unmentionables in Western discourse. (The Guardian last week published an editorial oh-so-earnestly lamenting the war in Yemen being waged by what it called the “Saudi-led coalition,” yet never once mentioned the rather important fact that the Saudis are being armed in this heinous war by the U.S. and U.K.; it took a letter to the editor from an Oxfam official to tell The Guardian that the West is not being “complacent” about the war crimes being committed in Yemen, as The Guardian misleadingly claimed, but rather actively complicit.)
It’s not hard to understand why so many of the elite sectors of the West want everyone to avert their eyes from this deep and close relationship with the Saudis. It’s because that alliance single-handedly destroys almost every propagandistic narrative told to the Western public about that region.
As the always-expanding “War on Terror” enters its 14th year, the ostensible target — radical, violent versions of Islam — is fueled far more by the U.S.’s closest allies than any of the countries the U.S. has been fighting under the “War on Terror” banner. Beyond that, the alliance proves the complete absurdity of believing that the U.S. and U.K.’s foreign policies, let alone their various wars, have anything to do with protecting human rights or subverting tyranny and fanaticism. And it renders a complete laughingstock any attempts to depict the U.S. government as some sort of crusader for freedom and democracy or whatever other pretty goals are regularly attributed to it by its helpful press.
Caption: President Barack Obama, right, meets with King Salman of Saudi Arabia in the Oval Office of the White House, on Friday, Sept. 4, 2015, in Washington.
Israel refuses to compensate Palestinian family burned to death by settlers
May 3, 2017 at 9:46 am
Israel will not pay compensation to the family of Ahmad Dawabsha, the Palestinian toddler whose family were killed in an arson attack by Israeli settlers in 2015, Israeli Defence Minister, Avigdor Lieberman, has told a Knesset member in an official letter.
Yousef Jabareen, an Arab member of the Israeli Knesset, had demanded Lieberman to recognise the Dawabsha family as victims of a terrorist act and to pay financial compensation after settlers raided and torched the family home in Duma village.
“Compensation should be a right, not a gift,” he said, stressing that “the state needs to give him full compensation due to the severity of the incident and the loss he has suffered.”
Jabareen said that the family would now “turn to the courts” to seek redress and compensation for the young boy.
He accused Lieberman of implementing a racist policy towards the Palestinians. “The defense minister’s position is based on racial discrimination,” the Knesset member said in a statement, “If we were talking about Jewish settlers hurt by Palestinians, the victims would automatically receive compensation,” he added.
Responding to Jabareen’s accusations, the Israeli defence minister said that the six-year-old boy, who was badly injured in the attack, does not qualify as a “terror victim” and does not hold Israeli citizenship and therefore not entitled to compensation, the Israeli minister said.
The Israeli law stipulates that Israel must compensate Israelis affected by acts of terrorism, however, the law does not apply to Palestinians “who are not citizens or residents of Israel,” according to Lieberman’s letter.
In 2016, the Israeli attorney general, Yehuda Weinstein, rejected a request by Jabareen to recognise the Dawabsha family as “terror victims.”
Asa Winstanley: Israel’s fanatical settlers can get away with murder – literally
In January 2016, a 21-year-old Israeli settler—Amiram Ben-Uliel—and an unnamed 16-year-old minor were indicted for carrying out the Duma arson attack, during which two homes in Duma, south of Nablus, were raided. Ali Dawabsha, 18 months old, father Saad Dawabsha, his wife Riham, were burnt to death in the attack. Their toddler son, Ahmad, who was four at the time, was the only surviving member of the family after receiving medical treatment for severe burns.
The attack caused outrage in the occupied Palestinian territories and around the world.
Burn, Baby, Burn…Judaic hellfire, from the Dawabshe family to the Middle East and beyond
‘I will place you high in my councils Trash, and I will send you to burn…’
–The devil speaking to the pyromaniac ‘Trashcan Man’ in Stephen King’s horror novel The Stand
‘Oscars’ season is over, and as such, the infamous hive of enchanters, witches, and sorcerers making up that place of ill-repute known as Hollywood are now basking in the afterglow of yet another successful year.
And with good reason are they celebrating. As expected, the previous year’s black magic indeed did the trick in (further) intoxicating and incapacitating the collective American mind, degrading it deeper and deeper into its already seemingly bottomless stupor and narcosis. The ship of fools making up Populus Americanus, proudly and yet stupidly characterizing their sinking ship of state as ‘the land of the free’ and ‘home of the brave,’ continue their steady stampede backwards, all the while the Spielbergs, Weinsteins, Katzenbergs, Milchons, Seinfelds, Silvermans, Sandlers, etc, continue grinding forward with all the unstoppable inertia of an Israeli Merkava tank flattening a matchstick-constructed Palestinian home filled with terrified women and children.
Such success being ‘a wrap’ however–even amidst the ongoing reverberations of ‘Mazel Tov’, ‘L’Chaim’ and the celebratory clinking of wine glasses full of Manischewitz and Magen David–doesn’t mean that the ‘fat lady’ has sung and that those holding membership in the coven have been granted a sabbatical. Indeed, Hollywood sorcery after all being a never-ending/ever-occurring process and as unavoidable as death and taxes means that–just as the old saying indicates–‘the show must go on’, as there is no rest for the wicked and the Devil’s work is never done.
And nowhere is all this show business more apparent–complete with volume, makeup, theatrics and special effects–than with the all-star lineup and over-the-top ‘jrama’ on display in the aftermath of the recent ritual murders of 18-month old Ali Saad Dawabshe and his father Sa’ad by Jewish terrorists aiming to appease the violent, vengeful, vindictive god of Israel.
Despite what has been a very loud, public, and–at the risk of over-repetition–‘jramatic’ gang war taking place these days within the organized pro-Israel community (otherwise known as La Kosher Nostra) with right-wing Likud and left-wing Labor trading political bullets with each other on the streets of Tel Aviv, D.C., New York, etc, nevertheless both sides have now declared a temporary cease-fire of sorts in order to deal with what inarguably is one of the most dangerous existential threats the Jewish state has faced in a long time. The deliberate, premeditated, and (more importantly) religiously-driven incineration of a Palestinian father and his tiny son, not as an accident or ‘incident’ (as obligatorily portrayed in both Israeli and American media when it invariably takes place) has brought not only new curiosity to the kinds of ‘ethics’ guiding the Jewish state and her ‘chosen people’, but new clarity as well. This combination of both curiosity and clarity on the part of civilized Gentile peoples the world over (heretofore obediently compliant to Israel’s demands of blind acceptance and unquestioning recognition) and increasing in intensity on a daily basis portends nothing less than what paleontologists refer to as an ‘ELE’, or ‘Extinction Level Event’ in terms of the Jewish state’s future survivability. Similar in many respects to those moments where some Hollywood icon is caught on film saying or doing something erupting in some scandal where irrevocable damage is done to the refined and sophisticated image falsely crafted by their handlers for the furtherance and maintenance of their stardom, likewise the recent tragedy surrounding the deliberate holocausting of two innocent Palestinians has ripped away the thin mask of civility and ‘humanness’ inaccurately and unjustifiably attributed to the Zionist entity from its inception, a gross misappropriation of respect that has functioned as the primary mechanism by which this dysfunctional and dangerous criminal enclave has been provided an undeserved seat at the table of nations.
Now however, Gentiledom–whose political and monetary support is as intrinsically necessary to the continued existence of the Jewish state as healthy blood is to mosquitoes, lice, and other parasites–is obviously having second thoughts about further investment. The exponentially-increasing instances of overt, extreme, epileptic violence against non-Jews, both in Israel and beyond, resulting from the yet-to-be-named religiously-induced mental illness Jtosis (the inevitable end result of Judaic ‘ethics’ being imposed on an otherwise healthy human mind) is reviving all the old stereotypes fairly and accurately attributed to Jews as a group since the days of the Pharaohs as described in the book of Genesis. Day by day, with each new episode of violent, psychotic behavior on the part of the self-appointed/self-anointed Chosenites, the mountain of money and resources expended over the last century by groups such as ADL, WJC, etc, in drugging the Gentile mind with various hallucinogenic ideas designed to bring about the equivalent of an ideological ‘acid trip’ where Jews are seen as a harmless, powerless, beneficent people who just want to ‘get along’ with their Gentile counterparts shatters into tiny shards of sharp, cutting reality, leaving the broken fantasy naked before the world in all its brutal, ugly truth.
And both sides of the right/left spectrum operating at the higher levels within the Kosher Nostra power structure know this. They understand that this latest act of religiously-induced psychosis whereby a Palestinian father and his tiny son become the sacrificial burnt offerings in a Judaic black mass in honoring the violent, racist, Old Testament god of Israel stands no chance of being ‘explained away’ as typically takes place whenever the Jewish state embarks upon one of her chronic feeding frenzies of innocent non-Jews. Both sides know there is no amount of sorcery or seduction that can succeed in painting this as a case of the Jewish state ‘defending’ itself against terrorism or ‘protecting’ itself against those who pose an ‘existential threat’, as ceremoniously occurs each and every time some Judaically-inspired, ritualistic bloodbath explodes in Gaza or wherever.
Rather, they know that it is what it is, and, more importantly, that it will be seen for what it is–the deliberate, pre-meditated murder of 2 innocent Gentiles (more and more characterized these days by Jewish religious and political leaders as ‘donkeys’, ‘cockroaches’ ‘beasts walking on two legs,’ etc) by Judaic terrorists acting in accordance with what their Judaic ‘ethics’ demand.
As such then, both sides understand the looming danger associated with this latest act of Judaic terrorism in an up-until-now sleeping Gentile society of 7 billion souls coming to rational terms with the dangers posed–not only to those in the tragic circumstance of living in close proximity to the 6,000,000 + mentally-unstable individuals making up ‘the Jewish state’, but as well–to all Gentiledom by a sprawling, organized criminal conspiracy operating at the highest levels within the world’s most powerful nations and protected by layer upon layer of obscurity and duplicitous denial.
And it is for this reason then why suddenly–despite a years-long campaign of snarling, scratching, hissing, and biting at each other–the two otherwise bitter enemies are now putting down their Tommy guns, folding up their switchblades, pocketing their brass knuckles and finding themselves the best of friends. Putting aside their ‘differences’–in truth more methodological than ideological in nature–they are now seen rushing together with the same speed as newlyweds to their first-time marriage bed in offering their empty condemnations of the deliberate ritualistic murders of father and son Dawabshe and with all the same ‘jrama’, special effects, and theatricism successfully used year after year by extended family members with names such as Spielberg, Weinstein, Katzenberg, Milchon, Seinfeld, Silverman, Sandler, etc.
Netanyahu–personally responsible for the incineration of THOUSANDS of innocent Palestinians just like the Dawabshe family in the various bloodbaths he has personally ordered and overseen on a regular basis against the people of Gaza, nevertheless playing the role of the ‘compassionate‘ Jew acting in accordance with his ‘compassionate’ Judaism by visiting the hospital room of the surviving family members writhing in agony as they fight tooth and nail to save every microbe of life left in them following being doused in gasoline and set aflame by Jewish terrorists…Rabbis, both in Israel and throughout Gentiledom, slithering their way to the nearest microphone to condemn such savagery with truckloads of well-rehearsed, over-the-top theatrics and buckets of crocodile tears, claiming that such evil, barbaric behavior contradicts the basic precepts of ‘Jewish ethics’ as laid out in both the Torah and Talmud, despite the fact they themselves know better than anyone else exactly what appears in black and white and in impossible-to-misunderstand clarity within the various chapters and various books making up the beating heart of ‘Jewish ethics’, to wit–
“When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall save nothing alive that breathes…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy. You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…”–Book of Deuteronomy
…and all of this, with quivering, sympathetic lower lips and watery eyes gushing rivers of faux tears, a lump of behavioral Fool’s Gold meant to whet the appetites of world Gentiledom seeking some expression of humanity in a morally bankrupt Jewish state over-funded to the hilt by gullible Gentile investors.
But then, what must be remembered is that–as an operational protocol–lying is indeed as much the Judaic way as tomatoes are the main component making up tomato sauce. ‘Deception’ and ‘Judaism’ are as much irrevocably intertwined with each other as are the two strands making up the double helix in a molecule of DNA. It was neither by some grammatical accident that Israel’s Mossad happened to adopt ‘by way of deception, we shall make war’ as its motto, given that dishonesty, duplicity and all their synonymic cousins have always functioned as the pistons and spark plugs driving Jewish interests in their war against Gentiledom. Beginning with the biblical account of Abraham selling his wife Sarah into prostitution to Egypt’s Pharaoh under the pretext she was his ‘sister’ rather than his wife, to Jacob stealing his brother Esau’s inheritance through the Judaic involuntary reflexes of chicanery and identity fraud, to the Pharisee’s use of false witness and perjury in removing the troublesome Jesus of Nazareth as a political threat to Israel’s deliberate murderous attack on the USS LIBERTY that was characterized as a case of ‘mistaken identity’, lying–seen more as a virtue than a vice–is not as much ‘necessary’ in furthering Judaic interests as it is ‘indispensable’.
Indeed, the biblical account of Jesus praising the character qualities of Nathanael, one of His up-and-coming footsoldiers in the fight against Jewish supremacism, in saying ‘Behold, an Israelite in whom there is no deceit’ was not as much a compliment towards the individual as it was a general statement about the seemingly magnetic pull that those holding membership in the Judaic cult possess towards all flavors of dishonesty, a nuanced fact that sadly the ‘Christian West’ seemed to have overlooked when allowing this toxic element to dwell within its midst for the last 20 centuries now.
Besides the political damage–in both the near and distant future–that the deliberate burning-to-death of the Dawabshe family portends for Israel and for institutionalized Jewish power around the world, what both sides making up the Judaic right/left paradigm fear viz a viz this new ‘curiosity’ on the part of ‘the nations’ is a more-precise understanding of just what-the-hell (no pun intended) authentic Judaism in all its myriad of forms and structures truly is. Like any crime organization whose true nature must remain obscure and subterranean and whose members are sworn under pain of death never to reveal the inner workings of ‘the family’, likewise the inner workings of Judaism must be–as described by former AIPAC official Steve Rosen when discussing the machinations of the Zionist power structure in America–‘Like a night flower that thrives in the dark & shrivels up in the sunlight.’
Likewise then, Judaism as an organized conspiracy against Gentiledom can only exist where an accurate understanding of its inner workings remains foggy and confused. What the ‘made’ members of Kosher Nostra fear now resulting from the increasingly frequent instance of anti-Gentile Judaic violence is that along with this new curiosity comes its inevitable by-product–a chain reaction of sorts resulting in a reversal of the amnesial spell cast upon the Gentile mind over the last century as to the nature of the conspiracy working against them, thus revealing Judaism in all its forms to be the violent, racist, imperialist, rapacious ideology that it is.
The truth is, the only difference between what took place in setting aflame the Dawabshe family by Jewish terrorists and what takes place with periodic regularity by Israel in inflicting state-sponsored terrorism against Gaza (or wherever) is purely cosmetic. In the case of the Dawabshes, those tossing the Molotovs weren’t wearing IDF uniforms and doing so with courtesy-of-Uncle-Sam-state-of-the-art equipment and therefore forfeiting that certain degree of legitimacy that generally accompanies a nation’s right to engage in war to protect itself.
All those inclined to be receptive to the present theatrics surrounding the ritualistic murder of the Dawabshes and thus seduced into believing what both sides of the Judaic power structure are putting forth, namely that it is/was an aberration and an abrogation of ‘Judaic ethics’ should remember well that as Gaza was being annihilated, incinerated, immolated, and in general ripped to pieces by Judaic dogs clad in IDF uniforms during various Judaic massacres proudly bearing made-for-Hollywood titles such as ‘Cast Lead’, Pillar of Cloud’ and ‘Defensive Edge’, Jews the world over celebrated and supported the carnage taking place and did so in numbers as high as 95%. They danced in the streets, wrote supportive OpEds in their local papers, gathered at the border with refreshments to watch the carnage with shock and awe and Tweeted about the ‘orgasms’ they experienced when hearing about Palestinian children being killed.
In other words, thousands of families being incinerated in the very same religiously-ritualistic manner as the Dawabshes (and of Mohammed Abu Khdeir last year, forced by Jewish terrorists to drink gasoline before being set on fire) was a cause for celebration, but one family being burned to death was a cause for ‘soul searching?’
As they say on Oscar’s night before announcing the winner for best screenplay, ‘The envelope please…’
More than this though as it relates to the recent holocausting of the Dawabshe family, what the goombahs of Kosher Nostra fear more than anything is the Gentile nations coming to understand how central to Judaic ritual murder–past and present–is the burning of innocent living creatures. Lest we forget, it was none other than Abraham himself, as recounted in the book of Genesis, hearing voices in his head commanding him to murder his own son Isaac and then incinerate his young body in ‘proving’ his love to the god of Israel, just as took place with Mohammed Abu Khdeir, the Dawabshe family and every other family in Gaza or wherever when Israel hears the call of the wild and decides to obey it. Following the conquest of the Holy Land and the mass murder and displacement of every non-Judaic people living there, the slaughter and incineration of innocent living creatures then becomes the focal point of all Judaic religious ritual, to wit–
‘The priest is to lay his hand on the head of the goat and slaughter it at the place of the burnt offering. The priest is then to take some of the goat’s blood and smear it on the horns of the altar of burnt offering and then pour out the rest of the blood at the base of the altar. He shall remove all the fat and then the priest shall burn the victim on the altar as an aroma pleasing to the LORD, and in this way the priest will make atonement for the people of Israel and they will be forgiven their sins.’–Book of Leviticus
And today, Gentiles occupying no place higher in value than donkeys, sheep, and cattle, it is easy to see then how various holocausts of innocent people–from Mohammed Abu Khdeir to the Dawabshes to the people of Gaza and beyond–are consummated and then celebrated.
More than this though, what both wings of the Kosher Nostra vulture fear is the Gentile awareness that it is not just some small house owned by a Palestinian family named Dawabshe that has been set on fire, but rather that the entire world has been set ablaze, a case of deliberate mass-arson on the part of organized Jewish interests who believe that burning down the entire non-Judaic system of the civilized world becomes in effect ‘an aroma pleasing to the Lord’, as written in the various ‘holy’ books of Judaism. Besides the Judaically-engineered (and demanded) literal incineration of countries such as Iraq, Palestine, Libya, Syria, Yemen, etc, there are the symbolic infernos and holocausts to consider as well. Europe and the West, seen as the legacy of Rome and as the great, great, grandchildren of the same Romans who destroyed Jerusalem in 70 A.D. watch helplessly as their economies go up in flames, due entirely to the undeniable, overwhelming control that Judaic interests maintain over money and finance. The societies of the West–ravaged by the flames of moral and social breakdown as the Judaic virtues of vice, vulgarity, viciousness, venality, and violence become the new catechism–are powerless in extinguishing the flames presently devouring their communities and families, a situation due entirely to the undeniable, overwhelming control that Judaic interests maintain over media and other forms of mass-mind control. The political structures of the West, thousands of years old, having gotten their birth in ancient Greece and Rome, are now left smoldering ruins, as nations ranging from the US to Canada to Great Britain, France, Germany and beyond are unable to act in their own best interests, due entirely to the undeniable, overwhelming control that Judaic interests maintain over the political affairs of Gentile nations.
Like the character ‘Trashcan Man’ in Stephen King’s horror novel The Stand, a psychotic with a penchant for pyromania who hears voices in his head from the devil instructing him to burn, likewise will Israel and all her people continue to heed the call of the wild and to follow in the footsteps of all those who have done likewise in their own Judaic past because, at the end of the day, it is in the nature of the beast to do so.
All can be rest assured that the present Judaic theatrics surrounding the holocausting of Sa’ad Dawabshe and his infant son by Jewish terrorists acting in accordance with the ‘ethics’ of Judaism, theatrics represented in the present over-the-top/pedal-to-the-metal wailing and gnashing of teeth splayed across newspapers and the internet is but a small portion of the noise taking place surrounding it, in that after the show is done and the audience has gone home, behind closed doors where Gentile ears are not welcome are heard shouts of Mazel Tov’, ‘L’Chaim’ and the celebratory clinking of wine glasses full of Manischewitz and Magen David. The wailing is replaced with singing–nothing sad, somber, serious, or solemn, but rather–something orgasmic, such as that disco song from the 1970’s made fabulously popular by certain promoters with names such as Spielberg, Weinstein, Katzenberg, Milchon, Seinfeld, Silverman, Sandler, etc–
‘To my surprise…
One hundred stories high…
People getting loose y’all
Getting down on the roof
Folks are screaming…
Out of control…
It was so entertaining…
When the boogie started to explode
I heard somebody say
Burn baby burn…
Burn baby burn…
Burn baby burn…
Burn baby burn…
Satisfaction came in a chain reaction
Couldn’t get enough…
So I had to self-destruct…
The heat was on
Rising to the top
Everybody’s going strong
And that is when my spark got hot
I heard somebody say
Burn baby burn…
Burn baby burn…
Burn baby burn…
Burn baby burn…
Mark Glenn, 2015