My own immediate reactions to this latest terrorist attack are mixed. The less I say the better. So I invite commentary from our readers. Feel free to express your thoughts and ask the pertinent questions our cowardly media shy away from and refuse to address. This reminds me so much of the fatuous response to 9/11: “Why do they hate us so much?” That’s a bit like Jack the Ripper asking: “Why am I so unpopular among prostitutes?”
JACK THE RIPPER:
“Why am I so unpopular among prostitutes?”
One thing I noticed this morning about the BBC coverage of the event was the sanctimonious hypocrisy of the coverage. The exploitation of national sorrow, by whipping up emotion to a fever pitch, was little short of disgusting. This was done by roping in children, whenever possible, to be interviewed.
We were introduced to a classroom of primary school children, for example, all supposedly shattered with grief at the mass murder that had taken place in their midst. Unfortunately, some of the children were smiling when questioned. The object of the classroom scene? I have no idea. I can only guess. Maybe to offer “counseling” to “traumatized” school children by their equally traumatized female teacher.
The frequent mention of “tears” by the BBC reporter fell flat, given that all the people targeted by the camera looked either bored, baffled, or prone to smiling. A pathetic poem was read out to a vast crowd in the square by a national poet. Punctuated with long significant pauses, as if to allow time for the wiping away of countless tears by ten thousand kleenex tissues, the poem was greeted with rapturous applause. Here was a crowd more concerned with its own emoting than with asking the big question — WHY?
WHY HAVE WE BEEN ATTACKED? WHAT HAVE WE DONE TO DESERVE THIS? HAVE WE PROVOKED THIS ATTACK ON OUR COUNTRY BY THE OBNOXIOUS AND IRRESPONSIBLE MISBEHAVIOR OF THE WAR CRIMINALS WHO GOVERN US? ARE THE REAL CRIMINALS, THE REAL TERRORISTS, THE ONES WHO ATTACK MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRIES LIKE IRAQ AND LIBYA TO PLEASE AND ADVANCE THE INTERESTS OF A SHITTY LITTLE COUNTRY BUILT ON STOLEN LAND?
These are the capital letter questions that no one in the media has the courage to ask. Even asking them is almost a crime and misconstrued as “showing sympathy for terrorists”.
The elephant in the living room was never once mentioned, as I say, in the media coverage.
All the wrong questions were asked and all the wrong answers were supplied.
We learned that much more must be done “to stop the radicalization of young Muslims.” Bewilderment was expressed that young Muslims who had been born and bred in England’s green and pleasant land and exposed to “British values” — values that are never described but are always presumed to be impeccable — should allow themselves to be “radicalized”.
How regrettable it is that these young Muslims, exposed to the “British values” of media porn, fashionable binge drinking and cocaine snorting, have not taken the hint and turned — like millions of other indigenous young Brits — into a bunch of binge-drinking, model citizen morons.
Sad to think they have somehow managed to resist their indoctrination, these horrible ingrates!
Instead, these misguided wretches have directed their attention to terrorist activities such as reading the Qur’an, attending their local mosques, and being “radicalized” by their evil imams into shunning the noble Western values of drug taking, alcohol consumption and non-stop sexual debauchery.
Yes, the Qur’an has a lot to answer for. Whatever Western values are, the Qur’an preaches the opposite. It teaches young women to dress modestly, for example, instead of flaunting their flesh and looking like whores. No wonder the Qur’an is hated.
Of course the Qur’an should be banned! How else are the values of Sodom and Gomorrah to prevail?
“Radicalization” is the pejorative term for the outrage felt by Muslims at the illegal bombing of their lands by the Anglo-Americans sphere, at the instigation of Israel and international Jewry.
“Radicalization” is the justifiable anger felt by Muslims against THIS WAR CRIMINAL for the illegal bombing of Iraq and the death and displacement of millions of innocent people.
If young Muslims are angry at what the West has done to Libya and Gaddafi, they have every right to be angry.
The elephant in the living room whose name is never mentioned by the nauseating lackeys who run our mass media, and who poison the minds of millions with their never-ending lies and pornographic sleaze, what is the name of this unmentionable elephant in the living room?
I don’t know. I wish I did. I will settle for “Blowback” or “Karma”.
VIDEO : 3 mins
The release of secret archive reveals that the British elite was overwhelmingly Masonic and that Jack the Ripper was protected by the Masonic police force.
Ancestry recently made public a secret archive containing the names of over two million British Freemasons from 1733 to 1923. The list “reveals the extent of Masonic influence in the upper reaches of society at the height of Britain’s imperial grandeur”. It also includes the name of who is thought to be Jack the Ripper.
According to new records, Jack the Ripper was an obscure singer whose identity was shielded by fellow Masons. His murders were intricately planned Masonic rituals.
In the book They All Love Jack: Busting the Ripper, Robinson argues that all of the Ripper killings bore the stamp of Masonic ritual; the symbol of a pair of compasses carved into the face of Catherine Eddowes, the removal of meal buttons and coins from the bodies of Eddowes and Annie Chapman and the cryptic graffiti daubed on a wall in Goulston Street, which he says was “the most flagrant clue of all.”
The new archives prove for the first time that singer Maybrick and his brother James were both masons.
– The Telegraph, Was Titanic inquiry scuppered by the Freemasons?
This new information proves what occult researchers have been claiming for decades: Jack the Ripper’s murders were Masonic blood rituals.
Four of the five female Ripper victim’s throats were all cut from left to right in accordance with the masonic Entered Apprentice “penal sign.” In some cases their intestines were severed, lifted out of the body and placed over the poor victim’s left shoulder. In masonic ritual, the three “Juwes,” Jubela, Jubelo and Jubelum, are all killed by having their bodies ripped open and the entrails thrown over their left shoulders.
The Ripper murder ritual also pertained to the significance of place in masonic immolation. Catherine Eddowes’ body was dumped in Mitre Square, London. Mitre tavern, at the entrance to the square, was the meeting place of the masonic Lodge of Joppa. According to masonic mythology, it was on the coast of Joppa that the three “Juwes” were captured. Also, mitre and square are the basic tools of the mason. Eddowes apron, soaked with blood, was discovered on Goulston Street in a hallway of a building. Above the bloody apron, on the wall, a message had been written in chalk: “The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing.”
The double negative reference is not to Jewish people but to the aforementioned three Entered Apprentices of masonic mythology, who were both ritually murdered and themselves ritual murderers. The message was erased by Sir Charles Warren, the Chief Commissioner of Police and one of the highest Freemasons in Britain. Warren nevertheless made a note of the message which can be found in the files of the Public Record Office, in the section “Private Letter Book of the Metropolitan Police.”
– Michael A. Hoffman, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare
As it is the case for many ritualistic “unsolved” mysteries, the true identity of Jack the Ripper was concealed by an overwhelmingly Masonic police force and government.
And they reveal that Freemasons were in prominent positions in the Scotland Yard inquiry including the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Charles Warren and the colleague he appointed to be his “eyes and ears” on the case, Chief Inspector Donald Swanson.
Two coroners who ruled on the murders, Wynne Baxter and Henry Crawford and at least three of the police doctors who examined the bodies were also members of the masons.
Maybrick, who was on the Supreme Grand Council of Freemasons, travelled the country as a performer.
His entry in the carefully handwritten records, describes him as a “vocalist” and states that he was a member of the St Andrew’s Lodge from 1863 until 1887 – meaning he left just a year before the nine-week period in 1888 when five women were murdered in the East End of London, one of the biggest unsolved crimes in British history.
Sir Charles is said to have been a senior member of the Masonic society. He was a founder member of the Quatuor Coronati lodge, and an authority on Freemasonic history and ritual.
Robinson told the Telegraph: “It was endemic in the way England ran itself. At the time of Jack the Ripper, there were something like 360 Tory MPs, 330 of which I can identify as Masons.
“The whole of the ruling class was Masonic, from the heir to the throne down. It was part of being in the club.
‘Part of the whole ethic of Freemasonry is whatever it is, however it’s done, you protect the brotherhood – and that’s what happened.
“They weren’t protecting Jack the Ripper, they were protecting the system that Jack the Ripper was threatening. And to protect the system, they had to protect him. And the Ripper knew it.”
– Op. Cit. The Telegraph
A Masonic Elite
The archive also reveals the extent of Masonic influence in all fields of society, including Monarchs Edward VII, Edward VIII and George VI.
While the individual Masonic connections of some of those included – such as Sir Winston Churchill and Edward VIII – are well known, the records from 1733 to 1923 offer the first comprehensive view of the reach of freemasonry over the age of Empire.
On the military field, those listed range from the Duke of Wellington to Lord Kitchener. In the arts it includes writers such as Oscar Wilde and Rudyard Kipling; the actor Sir Henry Irving while names from the musical world include both Gilbert and Sullivan.
The explorers Ernest Shackleton and Captain Robert Falcon Scott also feature while scientists listed range from Edward Jenner, the pioneer of vaccines, to Sir Alexander Fleming, the discoverer of penicillin.
In the world of charity and social reform Dr Thomas Barnardo is among those listed while businessmen include Harry Selfridge while Thomas Telford heads a list of thousands of engineers who ensured Britain’s industrial dominance.
In addition to Edward VIII, monarchs present include Edward VII and George VI.
While most of the entries simply include names, lodges and initiation dates, of the smaller number which specify professions there are 5,500 police officers of different varieties, thousands more military figures, 170 judges, 169 MPs, 16 bishops and at least one Indian prince.
Although the data of this archive stops at 1923, things did not change. The occult elite is, more than ever, an occult elite.