As if President Donald Trump had been transformed into a master politician overnight, his 27-hour visit to Israel left many analysts mystified.
Quoting former Israeli political adviser Mitchell Barack, the New York Times referred to Trump as the “Liberace of world leaders,” in reference to the flamboyant, piano player Wladziu Valantino Liberace, known as “Mr. Showmanship,” who was, at times, the highest paid entertainer in the world and his successful career lasted over four decades.
New York Magazine quoted former U.S. ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro trying to decipher the supposedly complicated persona of Trump.
“Either Trump’s visit was substance-free — or he ‘is being uncharacteristically subtle’ in planting the seeds for a new round of peace negotiations,” the magazine quoted and paraphrased Shapiro’s tweets.
“Liberal” U.S. media, which has stooped to many lows in its attacks on Trump — including his family, his mannerism, his choice of words, even mere body language — became much more sober and quite respectful in the way they attempted to analyze his short trip to Israel, and the very brief detour to Bethlehem, where he met with Palestinian Authority leader, Mahmoud Abbas.
“Mr. Trump’s speech at the Israeli Museum was so friendly and considerate of Israeli emotions,” reported the New Your Times, “that one right-wing Israeli legislator described it as deeply expressive of the ‘Zionist narrative.’”
Palestinian emotions, however, were of no consequence, neither to the Trump entourage nor, of course, to the New York Times or others in mainstream media.
The Washington Post, on the other hand, still found fault, but, certainly not because of Trump’s lack of balance and his failure to deride the Israeli Occupation and Israel’s mistreatment of Palestinians.
Despite the fact that Trump has, indeed, fully embraced a “Zionist narrative,” and a right-wing version of it, making no reference to a Palestinian state, he still fell short. His performance at Israel’s national Holocaust Memorial did not impress the Washington Post.
Max Bearak wrote, “Trump’s entry in the guest book at Israel’s National Holocaust Memorial was strangely upbeat, self-referential and written in his signature all caps: ‘IT IS A GREAT HONOR TO BE HERE WITH ALL OF MY FRIENDS — SO AMAZING & WILL NEVER FORGET!’”
Bearak found such choice of words and the style in which it was written sort of offensive, especially if compared with the supposed thoughtfulness of former President Barack Obama.
In contrast, Obama wrote a significantly longer note, which partly read, “At a time of great peril and promise, war and strife, we are blessed to have such a powerful reminder of man’s potential for great evil, but also our capacity to rise up from tragedy and remake our world.”
Neither then nor now did the Washington Post bother to examine the historical context in which this particular sentence was written and find the hypocrisy of the whole endeavor. If they bothered to ask Palestinians, they would have found a whole different interpretation of Obama’s words.
Indeed, wherever occupied Palestinians look, they find “man’s potential for great evil”: a 400-mile Israeli wall being built mostly over their land; hundreds of military checkpoints dotting their landscape; a suffocating military occupation, controlling every aspect of their lives. They see the holiest of their cities, Bethlehem and Al-Quds — Occupied East Jerusalem — subdued by a massive military force; thousands of their leaders thrown into prison, many without charge or trial. They see siege; an endless war; daily deaths and senseless destruction.
But since none of this matters to the “Zionist narrative,” it subsequently matters so very little to mainstream U.S. media, as well.
Trump’s trip to Israel, however short was a master stroke by the ever-unpredictable Liberace of world politics although it takes no particular genius to figure out why.
From a U.S. mainstream media perspective, to be judged “presidential” enough, all U.S. presidents would have to commit to three main policies. They are, in no particular order: privileging the economic business elites, waging war at will, and unconditionally supporting Israel.
So far, U.S. media, which has been otherwise polarized based on political allegiances, has taken a break from its raging conflict over Trump’s presidency and rallied behind him on two separate occasions: when he randomly bombed Syria and during his visit to Israel.
Ironically, the man has often been judged for lacking substance on numerous occasions in the past. In fact, his trip to Israel was the most lacking and most divisive. However, the fact that he consistently reiterated Israeli priorities was enough for the media to give him a chance. Their collective verdict seems to rebrand his lack of substance as his unique “subtle” way of making politics.
Israeli media, which is often more critical of the Israeli government than U.S. media ever dare, needed to keep up with its “democratic” tradition. But Trump’s groveling also gave them little room for criticism. The often-impulsive president stuck to the script this time and followed his repeatedly rehearsed speech and media comments to the letter.
But Josefin Dolsten insisted on finding a way to nitpick, composing for the Times of Israel the “seven awkward moments from Trump’s Israel trip.”
One of these awkward moments, Dolsten wrote was “a White House statement listing Trump’s goals for the trip includ(ing) a hilarious (and juicy!) typo: ‘Promote the possibility of lasting peach’ between Israel and the Palestinians. Yes, we get it — it meant to say peace, but who’s to say the two sides can’t bond over some delicious fruit?”
For Palestinians, it must not be easy to find the humor in these tough times. Hundreds of their prisoners, including their most popular leader, Marwan Barghouti, were enduring a prolonged and life-threatening hunger strike in which they were making the most basic demands for better treatment, longer visitation hours with their families and the end of arbitrary detentions.
More telling, on the day Trump along with right-wing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lectured Palestinians on peace, Tuqua Hammad, a 17-year-old, was shot for allegedly throwing stones at Israeli military vehicles at the entrance of her village of Silwad, near Ramallah.
The teenager “was shot in the lower extremities and Israeli troops prevented a Palestinian ambulance from accessing the victim to treat her,” the Ma’an news agency reported.
A few miles away, Trump was writing his remarks after visiting Israel’s Holocaust Museum. Regrettably, he failed to meet the expectations of the Washington Post, for unlike Obama, he was not poignant enough in his language and style.
The irony of the whole story is inescapable, but U.S. media cannot see this, for it also seems to follow a script, in which Palestinian rights, dignity and freedom are hardly ever mentioned.
Dr. Ramzy Baroud has been writing about the Middle East for over 20 years. He is an internationally-syndicated columnist, a media consultant, an author of several books and the founder of PalestineChronicle.com. His books include “Searching Jenin,” “The Second Palestinian Intifada,” and his latest “My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza’s Untold Story.”
Mexican Towns Form Self-Defense Groups to Stop Organized Crime
Mexican towns in the state of Guerrero are fighting back against organized crime with an armed, community police force after growing tired of appealing to the Mexican state for protection.
Almost 2,000 people from 10 towns in the municipal regions of Eduardo Neri and Tepecoacuilco formed local self-defense groups to protect themselves from the rising levels of violence and insecurity, reported local media.
The towns are located in the middle of a turf war between organized criminal groups Guerreros Unidos and Los Rojos, who are battling for control of the lucrative region. The area is home to several mines, including the Los Filos mine, owned by Canadian company Goldcorp.
“People are afraid that innocent lives could be lost in the shootouts,” said Leonardo Avalos Ferrer, leader of the self-defense groups.
“We believe it is necessary. We are not doing this because we want to. We can’t continue to let in people who steal cars, extort us and hurt people who are not to blame,” he told El Sur.
To mark the announcement, supporters and members of the newly-formed groups marched Sunday down the Mexico-Acapulco federal highway. The protesters wore white T-shirts with the label “Community Police,” the national coat of arms and the name of the community they belonged to.
Members of the community police force in the neighboring Heliodoro Castillo municipal, as well as workers from the mine, supported the march. No state or federal authority agreed to meet with the protesters.
“We don’t want to keep asking for more security. It’s tiring to keep asking and I don’t think there will be a response. It’s been like this for many years and we don’t think going to authorities will change anything,” said Avalos Ferrer.
The armed community groups announced that starting Sunday they will install roadblocks at the entrance of Mezcala, the entrance point to Carrizalillo, where many of the mines are located.
“We think this is the best way for the government to see that Mezcala and its neighboring communities want peace,” Avalos Ferrer said.
The state of Guerrero is one of the most dangerous in Mexico. Just recently, 100 presumed members of a drug cartel assaulted seven journalists covering a story on drug-related crime.