June 25, 2017
Not even a real communist.
It’s a pretty widely understood fact that Jews are going to Jew you over. However, some people imagine that communist Jews will Jew you over less, or perhaps in a different manner than Hollywood Jews, Jewish bankers, Jewish feminists, Jewish pornographers, Israeli Jew terrorists and so on.
Alas, ye goyim.
‘Tis not so.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and his wife, Jane Sanders have hired prominent defense attorneys amid an FBI investigation into a loan Jane Sanders obtained to expand Burlington College while she was its president, CBS News confirms.
Politico Magazine first reported the Sanders had hired lawyers to defend them in the probe. Sanders’ top adviser Jeff Weaver told CBS News the couple has sought legal protection over federal agents’ allegations from a January 2016 complaint accusing then-President of Burlington College, Ms. Sanders, of distorting donor levels in a 2010 loan application for $10 million from People’s United Bank to purchase 33 acres of land for the institution.
According to Politico, prosecutors might also be looking into allegations that Sen. Sanders’ office inappropriately urged the bank to approve the loan.
Burlington attorney and Sanders supporter Rich Cassidy has reportedly been hired to represent Sen. Sanders. And high-profile Washington defense attorney Larry Robbins, who counseled I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, is protecting Jane Sanders.
Ms. Sanders’ push for the liberal arts college’s costly land acquisition was cited in a press release by the college when it shut down in 2016.
Brady Toensing of Burlington, the man responsible for the claims filed to the U.S. attorney for Vermont, was a chairman for the Trump campaign in his state.
“I filed a request for an investigation in January 2016 and an investigation appears to have been started right away,” he said in an email to CBS News. “It was started under President Obama, his Attorney General, and his U.S. Attorney, all of whom are Democrats.”
“My only hope is for a fair, impartial, and thorough investigation,” Toensing added.
Weaver told CBS News that Toensing’s claim that Sen. Sanders used his influence to lobby for the loan is a “political charge” that is “baseless” and “false.”
And as for the claim that Ms. Sanders manipulated the loan application, Weaver said, “The loan was approved by the financial board at the college.”
Bernie was basically a total fraud.
You know, even I was fooled. Because I was like, it’s possible for a Jew to genuinely believe in this communist stuff, because it does ultimately destroy a society, even if certain aspects of it make sense.
And when he was first campaigning, he actually said that mass nonwhite immigration is a way for big business to drive down wages, and that it was corporations who had played the biggest role in mass immigration. This was a part of his platform.
Of course, he had to switch that up after he was pounced on as a skin-hater. But the fact he said it at all made me think he could have been a true believer.
Like, for example, Corbyn is an honest true believer in communism.
Though the difference is, he isn’t Jewish.
The tell that Bernie wasn’t really a true believer was that he wouldn’t condemn Israel to support the Palestinians, which is a hard left position that pretty much all hard-leftists have, even a lot of communist Jews. Basically, this is because they view Jews as white people oppressing brown people.
That was the tell.
Then, he endorsed Hillary Clinton, and was attacked by all of his own supporters. After that, I think most people realized he was a fraud. Even his most diehard people (except the women, I would assume).
The difficult fact of the matter is that on trade and war – which were key elements of the Sanders platform – Trump was a whole lot closer to Sanders than Hillary. Of course, no one expected him to endorse Trump, but I think a lot of people did expect him not to endorse Hillary.
There is a lesson here: if you’re going to get a person’s face tattooed on you, you should wait until they’re dead.
Honestly, tattoos have become really trendy and absurd at this point. My advice to young people is: don’t get any tattoos at all.
If you want to get a nationalist tattoo, just get it on your chest. That way you get reminded of it every morning in the mirror, but no one else sees it unless you’re at the beach or wearing a think white shirt.
Bernie on the Brand
As I’m writing about Bernie Sanders – which isn’t something that comes up very often these days – I’ll note his recent comments on the Democratic brand.
He said it was probably worse than Trump’s.
I recently wrote about the branding problems the Democrats have right now, in relation to their attempting to oust Pelosi.
They are claiming that she – presumably along with Schumer – have created a bad brand.
But they have created the only brand that is possible, given their circumstances. Obviously, a lot of Bernie’s proposals would be popular – such as returning to a pre-Reagen system of taxes on corporations or an anti-WWIII platform – but are impossible because of their need for donors who would be opposed to such changes in the platform.
Along with this, all of Bernie’s supporters were white. Or I mean, 97+%. He had fewer colored supporters than Trump, that’s for sure – Trump at least got some older blacks who aren’t happy with Obama’s decision to remove police from black neighborhoods or his decision to stop putting crack dealers in prison, along with a few Mexicans who would prefer if American remain a majority white country because they came here because they didn’t want to live in Mexico.
Bernie though – I don’t know if you saw these rallies, but it was just all whites.
Utopian socialism is obviously Jewish, but it tends to only be white people who are interested in it.
The situation with Corbyn is a little bit different, as most of the nonwhites in the UK are Islamic, and Corbyn is anti-Israel.
But blacks and Latinos just have zero interest in the Bernie product.
In fact, blacks seemed to hate him even more than they hate Trump.
You notice that Black Lives Matter has pretty much disappeared since the election. And that isn’t for a lack of funding.
I recently read a long article about that on Buzzfeed, which said that they don’t have any direction and so they’re squabbling with one another. According to the reigning progressive dogma, they should be at war with Donald Trump – but they just aren’t. They appear to not care at all.
Though I don’t know why this is, I would assume it is because Trump is a masculine authority figure, and on a subconscious level, blacks just naturally respond to that. People have also suggested that they respect his swagger and the fact that he’s rich (he’s mentioned in over 100 rap songs), but that is sort of part of the same thing.
My point here is: The Democrats can’t change their platform. They have zero wiggle room. They have to be simply an opposition party, and hope to be able to oust Trump and get amnesty to the however many millions of illegal Latinos are in the country (no one knows the number, I personally believe it is between 25 and 35 million – the government has been claiming 11 million for like 20 years, but they admit they don’t actually know) so they can just have overwhelming numbers of people who will vote against whatever the white male option is.
It’s an incredibly easy nemesis for the GOP to defeat, but they are all bought and paid for, so they are as opposed to Trump as the Democrats themselves.
It’s a mess.
I predicted Hillary would have taken Bernie as her VP. I still think that was an obvious move.
I actually owed Jazzhands McFeels either $1000 when that didn’t happen, but we settled that with some other favor, I can’t remember what it was.
Do you guys think she would have won if she would have done that?