Angry New York Times’ Staffers Walk Out over Planned Layoffs

  • The New York Times Building in midtown Manhattan

    The New York Times Building in midtown Manhattan | Photo: Reuters

Published 29 June 2017
The president of the NewsGuild of New York called the expected layoffs “humiliating.”

Hundreds of journalists — many of them copy editors at the New York Times — walked out from their offices Thursday and staged a protest in front of the newspaper’s office in response to management talk of cutting the copy editing department in half.

RELATED:
ESPN to Lay Off 100 On-Air Talent: Source

“Top managers sat stone-faced at desks as staffers gathered about them and then walked out via the stairways,” Poynter, a journalism training website, reported.

“New York Times editors, reporters, and staff will come together to leave the newsroom and their offices in protest of management’s elimination of copy editors,” said a statement by the NewsGuild of New York.

Calling the expected layoffs a “humiliating process,” NewsGuild President Grant Glickson, wrote in an open letter, “Cutting us down to 50 to 55 editors from more than 100, and expecting the same level of quality in the report, is dumbfoundingly unrealistic.”

On Wednesday afternoon, nearly two dozen editors also wrote a letter to Executive Editor Dean Baquet and Managing Editor Joe Kahn expressing their outrage over the cuts and demanding they reconsider the move.

Banquet said in a statement, that the newspaper has a higher ratio of editors to reporters than its competitors.

“After a year and a half of uncertainty about their futures, New York Times editors and staff have expressed feelings of betrayal by management. The staff has been offered buyouts and if a certain number of buyouts is not reached, layoffs will ensue for the editorial staff and potentially reporters as well,” Glickson wrote.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

NATO to Continue Occupation, Sending Thousands more Troops to Afghanistan

  • NATO has said that the 13,000 U.S. and NATO troops currently in Afghanistan is not enough.

    NATO has said that the 13,000 U.S. and NATO troops currently in Afghanistan is not enough. | Photo: REUTERS

Published 30 June 2017 (5 hours 15 minutes ago)
The NATO Secretary General said that he did not see an end to operations “this year, or next, or in the near future.”

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization announced on Thursday that it will be sending several thousand more troops to Afghanistan, saying they did not see an end to the operations “in the near future.”

RELATED:
NATO States to Raise Defense Spending by 4.3 Percent

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg told press that the 13,000 troop force currently occupying Afghanistan was “too low,” and that several thousand more troops will be added to operation “Resolute Support” through 2017 “and beyond.”

“Our military authorities have requested a few thousand more troops for the mission in Afghanistan and today I can confirm that we will increase our presence in Afghanstan,” the Secretary General said Thursday.

“We do not believe that this operation in Afghanistan will be simple and we do not think it will be peaceful this year or next or in the near future,” he continued.

Stoltenberg has previously called Afghanistan a “generational” effort, rather than a “one-off event,” speaking in February.

The Secretary General said that 15 out of 29 NATO member nations have pledged to support the troop presence increase, and that he is expecting more to join.

While he emphasized several times that the NATO troops were not there for combat, but rather “training, assisting, and advising,” of Afghani troops, he also said that the move was intended to break what he called a battlefield “stalemate.”

Earlier this month U.S. Defense Secretary Mattis indicated that the United States was “not winning” its two-decade war, and requested troop levels to be adjusted. Currently, United States forces account for over half of the total NATO allied troops in the country.

“Its not like you can declare a war over,” Mattis said. “What is the price of not fighting this war? And in that case we’re not willing to pay that price.”

British Defense Secretary Michael Fallon has said that the United Kingdom would be in Afghanistan “for the long haul,” and has committed to sending troops to bolster the NATO effort.

NATO defense spending is also on the rise, which Stoltenberg said he was “glad” about.

“I’m glad to say that we expect this will be the third consecutive year of accelerating defense spending increases across European allies and Canada, with a 4.3 percent real increase in defense spending,” he said.

The NATO Secretary General said the organization will “always honor” their soldiers who “paid the ultimate price.” While at least 2,000 U.S. soldiers have died in Afghanistan since the 2001 invasion, it is Afghani civilians who have born the brunt of the violence resulting from the invasion, with at least 30,000 killed violently in a conservative estimate by Brown University’s Watson Institute.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s