Jews are Chosen to be the “Counter-Voice in the Conversation of Mankind”

Diversity Macht Frei
July 12, 2017

In the modern age, Jews are usually wary of publicly claiming to be the Chosen People or, rather, the Chosen Race. But if you read their own publications you still occasionally come across this kind of Jewish supremacism. Here we have an example from Jonathan Sacks, former Chief Rabbi of Britain.

Israel, in its history and laws, would be God’s witness. It would testify to something larger than itself. So it proved to be.

The historian Barbara Tuchman wrote: The history of the Jews is . . . intensely peculiar in the fact of having given the Western world its concept of origins and monotheism, its ethical traditions, and the founder of its prevailing religion, yet suffering dispersion, statelessness and ceaseless persecution, and finally in our times nearly successful genocide, dramatically followed by fulfilment of the never-relinquished dream of return to their homeland. Viewing this strange and singular history one cannot escape the impression that it must contain some special significance for the history of mankind, that in some way, whether one believes in divine purpose or inscrutable circumstance, the Jews have been singled out to carry the tale of human fate. 

Why, if God is the God of the universe, accessible to every human being, should He choose one nation to bear witness to His presence in the human arena? This is a profound question. There is no short answer. But at least part of the answer, I believe, is this. God is wholly Other. Therefore He chose a people who would be humanity’s ‘other’. That is what Jews were – outsiders, different, distinctive, a people who swam against the tide and challenged the idols of the age. Judaism is the counter-voice in the conversation of mankind.

Judaism is God’s question-mark against the conventional wisdom of the age. It is neither an easy nor a comfortable fate to be “a people that dwells alone”, but it is a challenging and inspirational one.


There is often a striking factual correspondence between the claims made by antisemites and the claims made by Jews or philosemites. They see the same sets of facts in different ways but don’t necessarily disagree about what the facts are. This is a perfect example.

Antisemites claim that Jews are a hostile, alien presence in any country they live in. They subject the peoples they live among to ceaseless critique, mocking and challenging their traditions and mythologies, denigrating their sense of the sacred, undermining the healthy self-confidence that is the prerequisite for any successful national life. And they embrace or invent movements for revolutionary change, even when that change is disruptive or destructive.

The picture painted by Rabbi Jonathan Sacks is not in any factual way different from this. He simply sees the Jewish role as eternal carping critic to be useful and desirable; a great boon to the peoples the Jews live among.

No doubt a critical outside perspective can occasionally be thought-provoking and healthily stimulating. But the Jewish critique of European civilisation, as expressed in movements like Communism and immigrationism, threatens its continued existence and, in practice, gives rise to a lot of dead bodies. It is not hard to see how the Jewish presence in one’s country – the “counter-voice in the conversation of mankind” – might be regarded as menacing and undesirable, and likely to cause extraordinarily unpleasant things happening that otherwise would not have happened.

Antisemitism is not demonic. It is not evil. It is not inexplicable or irrational. It is an entirely natural, rational and moral response to the inevitable effect of having “eternal outsiders” inside the walls, sneering at one’s way of life and endlessly scheming for ways to subvert and undermine it.

And, of course, when the roles are reversed, when uppity Gentiles dare to talk back to the Chosen, subjecting Jewish traditions, culture and mythology to the same spirit of critique, Jews, strangely, don’t seem to appreciate it. They don’t appear to regard it as a useful service being performed for them, helping them down the path to self-improvement. Instead, they insist that such criticism is evil and the people offering it must be silenced and suppressed.

It would be good, for Jew and non-Jew alike, if the Jews would indeed dwell alone, whether on another planet or in a country of their own, far removed from the vital and organic human societies they apparently feel a demoniac compulsion to disrupt.



Below is a long list of facts refuting the Greatest Lie Ever Told:

An Introduction to Holocaust Revisionism

Care must be taken not to give a platform for deniers… or seek to disprove the deniers’ position through normal historical debate and rational argument.”

— ‘Guidelines for Teaching about the Holocaust’ at the Stockholm International Forum, 2000

“One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one.”

— “34 reputable historians” published in the prominent French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979

“It is necessary to recognize that the lack of traces involves the inability to directly establish the reality of the existence of homicidal gas chambers.”

— French ‘historian’ Jacques Baynac, Le Nouveau Quotidien (Lausanne, Switzerland), Sept. 3, 1996, p. 14.

“Mass human cyanide gas chambers have never existed in human history.” The affirmation here is that normal hygiene technology functioned in an ordinary, normal manner in the German labour camps: that is the core essence of what is today meant by “Holocaust denial.”

The three victor nations, Russia, America and Britain, collaborated together at Nuremberg to fabricate the horrorillusion, which would enable the US/UK to gain the post-war moral high ground, even after incinerating the German cities with two million tons of bombs. People were loath to believe that such a thing could have happened – until maybe after Iraq, when we saw how British-American intelligence had fabricated the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) lie without a tremor of conscience. Only then, I suggest, does it start to dawn upon the world that the notion of big human gas chambers was the original WMD hoax.

– Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom Breaking the Spell — The Holocaust, Myth & Reality

“The Holocaust is a deeply anchored belief even in people who know very little about it. We can see that not only does disbelief in the Holocaust myth threaten modern Jewish identity as shaped by political Zionism, but for others it brings into question the credibility of those in authority who told everyone it was true: the state, the churches, the schools, and media of every kind. These sources are the same ones people trust and depend on every day for information. If these trusted authorities are wrong about the Holocaust, what else are they wrong about? What other dishonesties are they promoting?”

– John Weir, The Holocaust as Myth: Betraying the Public Trust

“If the Holocaust were unimportant, we wouldn’t have around 20 countries on this planet outlawing its critical investigation. In fact, this is the only historical topic that is regulated by penal law. This is proof for the fact that the powers that be consider this topic to be the most important issue to keep under their strict control. Those censoring, suppressing powers are the real criminals—not the historical dissidents they send to prison.”

– Germar Rudolf, Logic and Reason Can and Will Destroy the Holocaust Establishment

“The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.”

– Robert Faurisson, The revisionists’ total victory on the historical and scientific level

1. The only thing at Auschwitz resembling a human gas chamber was constructed in 1946 by Stalin.

2. Not a single diagnosis of death by cyanide poisoning is on record for any German labour camp.

3. No trace whatever remains of the millions of bodies allegedly gassed in the German labour camps.

4. None of the war generals after the war who wrote their memoirs made any allusion to human gas chambers or indeed to any intention to exterminate an ethnic group.

5. The Red Cross made normal, routine visits to Auschwitz during the war, and its published reports made no allusion to any ongoing human gassing there.

6. No authentic documents attesting to “The Holocaust” exist anywhere.

7. The Bad Arolsen archives list everyone who lived and died in all the German labour camps. The question naturally arises as to what is the total number recorded in this tremendous archive. Clearly the managers of this archive are not at liberty to tell of this or they would be jailed for so awful a crime.

Auschwitz: A Labour Camp

Auschwitz produced synthetic rubber, medical and armament supplies.

The Auschwitz camp complex was set up in 1940 in what is now south-central Poland. It was originally constructed to house Polish prisoners of war and political prisoners just as Britain and the United States built internment camps for German, Italian and Japanese civilians and partisans; but quickly became a labour camp to supply the German war effort and consisted of 39 sites. The British Intelligence decrypts revealed that Jews comprised only 39% of the inmates on average with Poles 65% and Russians a mere 3%. Auschwitz I was the original camp and served as the administrative centre for the whole complex. Construction on Auschwitz II (Birkenau) began in October 1941 to ease congestion at the main camp. Monowitz, or Auschwitz III, was a large industrial site where gasoline was produced from coal. In addition there were dozens of smaller satellite camps devoted to the war economy.

Auschwitz was a major work camp that had forty different industries. The true reason for the existence of the Auschwitz camp is revealed in these little shown pictures of the industrial complex which surrounded the camp – most of it within full view of the interior of the camp itself.

The surrounding work camps were connected to German industry and included arms factories, foundries and mines. They used the prisoners for most of the labour. The largest work camp was Auschwitz III (Monowitz). It started operations in May 1942 and was associated with the synthetic rubber and liquid fuel plant Buna-Werke owned by IG Farben. Eleven thousand labourers worked at Monowitz. Seven thousand inmates worked at various chemical plants. Eight thousand worked in mines. Approximately 40,000 prisoners worked in labour camps at Auschwitz. Some put the number of prisoners who worked at Auschwitz at 83,000. We don’t know the exact number but what is clear is that tens of thousands of prisoners worked for the German war effort in the Auschwitz prison complex.

Inmates were mostly assigned to general work such as building roads and irrigation installations, or to the support of civilian (Polish and German) workers.

Auschwitz Birkenau 1942Birkenau 1942

Auschwitz workers

Inmates working in the Siemens airplane factory at Bobrek sub‐camp, an airplane factory called Siemens Schuckert Werke.

Inmates at work in Auschwitz III – Monowitz factory.

The Monowitz industrial complex was where most of Auschwitz’s inmates were put to work in a variety of heavy industries, ranging from rubber manufacture, medical supplies, armaments and clothing.

auschmapThe photograph below shows the tailor’s workshop at Auschwitz I, where prisoners would make up clothing for use by the German army.

Garment workshop at Auschwitz. Jean-Claude Pressac claims that these sewing machines were brought along with them by women deportees. The innumerable photographs of the deportation show not one single woman carrying a sewing machine on her back. Pressac’s interpretation is a perfect example of groundless and deliberate misinterpretation.

Buna‐Werke synthetic rubber factory.

Auschwitz was the site of Germany’s newest and most technologically advanced synthetic rubber plant; and Germany was the world’s leader in this particular field of technology. Shortly after the First World War the Germans were cut off from their supply of natural rubber.

Auschwitz was picked because it was a railway centre.
Auschwitz I: Do you build a hospital next (30 metres) to a gas chamber? Does the Camp Commander live 400 yards from the gas chamber?

The Americans had a camp at Auschwitz before the Germans

Typhus and DoughboyAuschwitz is the German name for Oświęcim, the town in and around which the camps were located.

Following WWI the Americans set up a quarantine, disinfection and work camp at Oświęcim (Auschwitz) in 1919 to combat typhus.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.