There are a lot of aggressive, warlike neocons in America who suffer from vicious sinful pride, diabolical self-righteousness and political paranoia. The neocons are willing to drag down and destroy all of humanity in Armageddon because North Korea is a threat to the security of the United States.
The neocons would sacrifice thousands of American troops, inculding Navy personnel, and South Korea and Japan in a quest for victory that would lead to World War III (TRIB LIVE 27 May 2017).
The US is more and more aggressive to Russia – in spite of Pres. Trump´s good will to live in peace with his friend Putin. But the neocons and their masters, the military industrial complex, seem to have kidnapped Trump, enforcing him to wage an aggressive policy against Russia.
Or did Masons Putin and Trump at their meetings at the G20 meeting recently simply agree on the Illuminati game (The Albert Pike-William Carr plan)?
The New York Times 28 July 2017: Russia took its first steps on Friday to retaliate against proposed American sanctions for Moscow’s suspected meddling in the 2016 election, seizing two American diplomatic properties in Russia and ordering the United States Embassy to reduce staff by September.
The Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement, “This yet again attests to the extreme aggressiveness of the United States when it comes to international affairs.”
The Guardian 28 July 2017: The House of Representatives overwhelmingly voted on Tuesday to approve new sanctions on Russia, setting up a potential showdown with the White House. Vladimir Putin has accused US lawmakers of “insolence”, and promised Russia will retaliate if the latest round of US sanctions against Russia are signed into law.
By the way: When I compare the above Pres. Putin with KGB Putin I see clear differences.
Is Putin really Putin – or a double – as purportedly claimed by the real Putin´s wife, Lyudmila (The Daily Star 24 Dec. 2016) after the original Putin was poisoned in 2014?
Left: Young KGB Vladimir Putin.
I found significant differences in age stable parameters: Young Putin´s lips are much thicker than those of Pres. Putin. Young Putin has no antitragus in his right ear, while Pres. Putin has a pronounced one. Young has a straight, regular nose, while Pres. Putin has a plump nose with a septum prominating much more downwards than that of KGB Putin and more marked nose wings. Pres. Putin´s eyebrows and upper orbital rim is curved – while that of KGB Putin is nearly horizontal.
Also. the below photos from The daily Star are clearly not of the same Putin.
“We are behaving in a very restrained and patient way, but at some moment we will need to respond,” said Putin at a press conference with his Finnish counterpart, Sauli Niinistö.
“It’s impossible to endlessly tolerate this kind of insolence towards our country,” Putin said, referring to the sanctions. “This practice is unacceptable – it destroys international relations and international law.”
It´s a very dangerous game: Putin is not stupid and has reserved the right of a preemptive strike
Global Res. 27 July 2017: Painting Russia as the Enemy.
Before any war, the state always embarks on an outlandish campaign to demonize the target in the eyes of the people. One logical conclusion to be drawn from the incessant array of anti-Russian propaganda that has been promulgated by the West in recent years, is that it is designed to inculcate in the minds of the western public that Russia is the enemy, in preparation for a future war.
In recent years, the world has become increasingly more unstable. Tensions between Russia and the US have reached a level not seen since the height of the Cold War, with some even arguing that we have surpassed this point by now. The US is continually provoking Russia, as the hawks in Washington cannot stand the fact that Moscow has stood up to the neocons in Syria.
Perhaps the US is trying to intimidate Russia so that it backs down, but this is a very dangerous game to play. How many times can the US poke the Russian bear before the bear responds?
The world stands on the edge of a dangerous precipice, as it slides towards war
Baiting Russia into a Military Response in Syria?
Although the official US narrative was that they were protecting US-backed forces on the ground, one cannot help but question the justification used by a country that has repeatedly lied and deceived in order to launch imperial wars.
There is a very real danger that the decision to shoot down a Syrian jet was designed to provoke Syria to respond militarily to US forces, therefore providing justification for a full-scale invasion of Syria by the US and her allies.
Moreover, and more dangerously, there is a potential that this incident was designed (by rogue elements with the US) to provoke Russia to respond militarily to the US in Syria, providing justification to start a hot war with Russia, and launch a pre-emptive nuclear attack on Russia.
Although this may sound like madness, we should not underestimate how mad the neocons are. The US and Russia have reportedly already come extremely close to a direct confrontation in Syria earlier this year. In April, after the US launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at a Syrian airfield, Russia was “an inch from confrontation” with the US, according to the Iranian President, Hassan Rouhani.
Any followers of Dr. Paul Craig Roberts work, the former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy, who also worked at a variety of US think tanks in Washington, will know that he has repeatedly warned that some belligerent and crazed elements within Washington are actually considering launching a pre-emptive nuclear strike on Russia.
These persons with Jewish names were responsible for the Iraq war.
It is not just Dr. Roberts that is warning of this apocalyptic scenario however. At the end April, the Deputy Head of Operations of the Russian General Staff, Lt. Gen. Viktor Poznikhir, warned of the potential that the US could launch a “sudden nuclear missile strike” against Russia:
“The presence of US missile defense bases in Europe, [and] missile defense vessels in seas and oceans close to Russia, creates a powerful covert strike component for conducting a sudden nuclear missile strike against the Russian Federation.”
Russia Today 27 July 2017: Army Chief Mark Milley: “It’s a very serious situation, and it’s not going in a good direction,” he said.
A ground war in the Korean Peninsula would be “deadly” and “horrific,” the general explained, with some 25 million people in the metropolitan area of Seoul within reach of North Korean conventional artillery and chemical weapons.
“Do I think North Korea’s military would be destroyed? I do,” he said. “But that would be done at a high cost in terms of human life.”
As terrible as war in the Korean Peninsula would be, Milley added, so would be “a nuclear weapon detonating in Los Angeles.”
The Daily Mail 30 July 2017: Donald Trump is poised to order a military strike against North Korea ‘within the next year’ after the communist state said it had successfully fired a ballistic missile capable of hitting the US mainland.
Pentagon officials have laid out plans to obliterate a nuclear weapons facility operating deep within a mountain in the rogue state.
What´s behind the Temple Mount Riots in Jerusalem: The 3. Temple to Signalize End of the World
On 14 July 2017, a terror attack at the Temple Mount in Jerusalem escalated into riots causing even an emergency meeting in the UN. And that´s not the first time.
As I have previously written there are strong forces in Israel and in Judaism moving forbuilding the 3. Temple (Ezekiel 40-47) – even demanding Pres. Trump´s help for it. Ezekiel´s 3. temple is thought by the Pharisees and a by a majority of Jews to be built by the Moschiach ben David in the end time, but a minority think with the famous Maimonides that Jews should build it as soon as possible. In fact, Rothschild´s Supreme Court building in Jerusalem does look very much like a temple for the god of Judaism and its layer, Freemasonry, viz. Lucifer and here and here
And this temple is being prepared in minute details right now
The Temple Mount Heritage Foundation was proposed by Culture Minister Miri Regev and Environmental Protection and Jerusalem Minister Ze’ev Elkin, with an annual budget starting at $550,000.
Left: Supreme Court in Jerusalem. Note the Illuminati pyramid on the roof.
The Electronic Intifada 24 July 2017: Plans to rebuild the “third Temple” on the Dome of the Rock would require the demolition of the al Aqsa Mosque, one of Islam’s holiest sites.
Apart from provoking tumultuous outrage among Muslims worldwide, the destruction of the al Aqsa Mosque ties in with various end time prophecies about the rebuilding of the “Third Temple”.
If it is indeed rebuilt we will know for certain that we are in the midst of the “end times”. As the biblical prophets foretold that this would be accompanied by widespread wars and destruction, as will almost certainly happen if the al Aqsa Mosque is demolished to make way for the Third Temple.
I suspect that the people who are behind the campaign for the rebuilding of the Third Temple know this. But they aren’t really interested in the Third Temple, their real objective is the conflict and tumult that would follow the demolition of the al Aqsa Mosque. Ed.
Temple Institute head Yisrael Ariel, who has called for the destruction of churches and mosques and the mass slaughter of those who refuse to accept his extreme version of Judaism, at the al-Aqsa mosque compound in June.
Since the gun battle at the al-Aqsa compound on 14 July that ended in the deaths of three Palestinian citizens of Israel and two Israeli police, Israeli media have largely focused on outrage that anyone would carry out an attack at a holy site, while praising Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s collective punishment against the Palestinian population. (On 26 July 2017).
“Netanyahu and [PA leader Mahmoud] Abbas both acted responsibly to prevent a holy war; but the Arab world’s condemnation of Israel is a reason for concern,” read the subheading of an analysis by Haaretz’s Barak Ravid.
Missing from commentaries across the board has been any acknowledgement of the role played by fanatical settlers intent on wresting control of the al-Aqsa compound in occupied East Jerusalem and eventually destroying it as part of an apocalyptic vision. (Chabad Lubavitch).
The compound, known to Muslims as Haram al-Sharif and to Jews as Temple Mount, includes the al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock. It is one of the holiest shrines for Muslims all over the world, as well as a touchstone of Palestinian identity.
Israelis who seek to take over al-Aqsa see the 14 July attack and subsequent violence as an opportunity to advance this agenda. Immediately after the incident, the Temple movement’s official body released a statement calling to expel Palestinians from the compound: “We must liberate the Temple Mount from the murderous Islam and return it to the people of Israel.”
“Looking forward to building the Temple this year and hope that you will soon see the face of our righteous Messiah,” Baruch Marzel one of the most extreme leaders among Israel’s West Bank settlers, wrote last week in an open letter to the mufti of Jerusalem – the top Muslim official in the city.
Bezalel Smotrich, a Jewish Home party lawmaker, does not want to wait that long. “I would set up a synagogue on the Temple Mount today, this morning,” he said on Monday.
Under Israeli military protection, these settlers and extremists tour the grounds on a daily basis, hoping to provoke violent reactions from Palestinian worshippers by shouting and singing nationalistic anthems.
This then provides occupation forces with the necessary pretext to enact harsh measures, with the eventual goal of cleansing non-Jews and replacing the Muslim holy sites there with a Jewish temple, thus triggering a civilizational clash with Islam.
Yehuda Glick, a longtime leader of the Temple movement, now a Likud Party lawmaker, last week welcomed Israel’s ban on Muslims entering the al-Aqsa compound in the days following the shootings.
“This is an enormous game changer,” he said. “Everything is part of the redemptionprocess but the things that happen on the Temple Mount are especially so.”
“Radical Muslims who desecrate with blood the holiness of the Temple Mount, the holiest place to the Jewish people, have no right to be there,” Glick and the Jewish Home party’s Shuli Moalem-Refaeli said.
Last week, Glick held a Temple movement emergency session in the Knesset building, Israel’s parliament. Attendees included genocide advocate Rabbi Yisrael Ariel and Bentzi Gopstein, leader of the anti-miscegenation youth movement Lehava.
Yisrael Ariel, the chief rabbi of the Temple movement, articulated an apocalyptic end times scenario in 2015. “[God] is the one who commanded us to go from city to city conquering them, and to impose the seven laws [of the Sons of Noah] throughout the world,” Ariel said.
Ariel added that if Muslims and Christians “raise the flag of [surrender] and say, ‘From now on, there is no more Christianity and no more Islam,’ and the mosques and Christian spires come down,” then they would be allowed to live. “If not,” he warned, “you kill all of their males by sword. You leave only the women.”
“We will conquer Iraq, Turkey [and] we will get to Iran too,” Ariel proclaimed.
Ariel is the founder and head of the Temple Institute, the government-funded group that has published detailed blueprints and a computer animation of what the Temple, to be built over the ruins of al-Aqsa, will look like.
The Temple Institute has received funding from Israel’s education ministry to develop a curriculum to instill “longing for the Temple” in children as young as those attending kindergarten. In 2013, Israel’s mayor of Jerusalem, Nir Barkat, presented Ariel with an award for his organization’s work.
In 2012, Zevulun Orlev, one of the party’s lawmakers in the Knesset, called for the construction of a temple at the compound, saying that removing the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa mosque would mean that the “billion-strong Muslim world would surely launch a world war.”
The point is: Solomon´s Temple was not located on the Temple Mount – but at the Gihon Spring several hundred meters away – proven by archaelogy!
Before the destruction of the 2. Temple of Herod´s, Roman Fort Antonia was on the “Temple Mount” – and the Temple south of it. So, the Western wall, the Wall of Wailing has nothing to do with the Temple. That wall was the western wall of Fort Antonia – and built 25 years after Herod´s death!
This messianic extremism has taken hold in the Likud Party of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as well.
In 2014, Likud’s Moshe Feiglin, then deputy speaker of the Knesset, explained the fanatical worldview. “We are in the major front of the fight for the free world against the evil forces of the most extreme Islam,” Feiglin asserted. “Behind the violence, there is a spiritual battle, and the core of that battle is that place – the Temple Mount.”
Many other Israeli politicians are following the Temple movement’s lead.
A Likud Party website has launched a petition to “raise the Israeli flag on the Temple Mount.”
“The Temple Mount is not in our hands,” the petition declares. “We must change this absurdity.”
Transport minister Yisrael Katz has vowed that Israel “will not cede sovereignty” over al-Aqsa. “We need to close the Temple Mount to Muslims for an extended period of time,” Jewish Home lawmaker Moti Yogev said.
Incitement from Israeli officials has become commonplace in recent years. Dozens of Knesset members have given verbal, and even material, support to the Temple movement.
But Israel’s official chief rabbis have long formally prohibited prayer by Jews at the compound for theological reasons – out of concern that Jews could inadvertently desecrate places that must remain ritually pure.
In keeping with this tradition, leaders in Israel’s Orthodox Jewish community blame those who insist on going to the al-Aqsa compound to pray for the resulting bloodshed.
“Those who visit the Temple Mount are turning the Israeli-Arab conflict into a religious conflict,” the Eidah Chareidis, a major anti-Zionist Orthodox Jewish organization in Jerusalem, has warned.
However, as Feiglin revealed at a Knesset session in 2013, the call for Jews to be allowed to pray at the compound is a pretext for an Israeli seizure of the site.
“Let’s be truthful. The struggle here in not about prayer,” Feiglin admitted. “Arabs don’t mind that Jews pray to God. The struggle is about sovereignty. That’s the true story here. The story is about one thing only: sovereignty.”
Some of the Israeli politicians identify with the movement themselves, while others understand it is politically expedient to make public statements in support of Israeli sovereignty at al-Aqsa.
Avi Dichter – former chief of Bet Shin´s secret police – posted on Facebook a photo of himself in front of the Dome of the Rock with text reading, “Open the Temple Mount for Jews.”
As Dichter said in 2013 when he was public security minister – before embracing the Temple movement’s agenda – Jewish prayer at al-Aqsa, “will serve as a provocation, resulting in disorder, with a near certain likelihood of subsequent bloodshed.”
That may be precisely what many Israelis hope for. Following a stabbing attack by a Palestinian on Friday that left three Israelis in the illegal settlement of Halamish dead, Tzachi Hanegbi, a senior Likud minister and close ally of Netanyahu, threatened Palestinians with a “third Nakba” – a reference to Israel’s mass expulsions and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in 1948 and 1967.
Compiled below this article, The Electronic Intifada 24 July 2017 brings a list of current and former Knesset members and ministers who have supported the Temple movement’s apocalyptic goals to varying degrees.