Donald Trump: Zionist Trojan Horse


Based on comments

Donald Trump, an overzealous Zionist warmonger, is a Trojan horse that we have let inside the gates. The 2016 presidential election was perhaps one of the most brazen psyops ever conducted against the people of the U.S.


Hillary Clinton lost the election because she was supposed to lose. Her political career was already finished well before the election. She was politically “all used up”; that is, obsolete, and no longer  reinventable into anything useful.

It must be obvious to anyone with six brain cells that in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton was very useful as an actor whose carefully crafted role was to make Trump look reasonable by comparison – mainly in the realm of foreign policy, and especially in regard to relations with Russia.

Hillary Clinton was a natural for her role as herself: a wild-eyed madwoman, slavishly obedient to the Jews and intent on confrontation, particularly confrontation with Russia, regardless of consequences.

Trump’s role, on the contrary, was that of the “why can’t we all just get along together” protagonist. He emerged as eminently reasonable in his attempt to seek a peaceful rapprochement with a nuclear armed Russia.

For millions of Americans, it was a straightforward choice between a man with a responsible foreign policy and a wild-eyed witch with a vampiric blood lust for endless wars fought on behalf of our Jewish masters.

Considering that Trump was “independently wealthy” and not overly dependent on political donations; considering that that he presented the positive image of a loving father and grandfather; considering that he was a successful businessman with lots to lose in an unnecessary nuclear war; and, finally, considering that he was an apparent political “outsider” with a history of questioning Obama’s improprieties; considering Trump had all these good things going for him, he looked like a natural winner.

Everything Trump said and appeared to stand for seemed to say: “I am the man of the moment. Vote for me. There is no alternative.”

This is why the Jews didn’t run Sanders against Trump: because Sanders, as corrupt as he may be, stood a better chance against Trump than Hillary Clinton did. In large part, this was because Saunders wasn’t seen as a wild-eyed, maniacal warmonger who would risk WW3 for the Jewish agenda.

It’s now almost self-evident that the only reason the Jews pushed Hillary forward as a candidate was that she was really bad. They couldn’t have found a scarier, more unelectable candidate had they advertised for one under the words: “Political candidate wanted for major role in government. Must be mad, bad, and dangerous to know — preferably psychopathic. Sane, well-balance candidates need not apply.”


The Jews’ strategy in 2016 apparently harkens back to the strategy used by the Jew-controlled Johnson campaign in 1964 against Barry Goldwater. The maniacal Clinton, in her sheer unelectability, is reminiscent of Goldwater. Back then, the Johnson campaign used the famous “Daisy” attack ad to graphically show the American electorate what would happen in the event of a Goldwater victory. According to Wikipedia, this strategy was considered to be an important factor in Johnson’s landslide victory over Goldwater. Though only aired once in the political campaign, the Daisy Girl ad “is considered to be an important factor in Johnson’s landslide victory over Barry Goldwater. It remains one of the most controversial political advertisements ever made.”

Of course the Jews didn’t really need to make an updated version of the Goldwater ad to give Hillary Clinton’s candidacy the kiss of death. This is because they understood that most people today realize only too well what the consequences of a war with Russia would be, especially a nuclear war. And these are the people that the Jews depended on to swing the election to their candidate of choice, Donald Trump.

This is why Obama decided to seriously ramp up tensions with Russia in the early fall of 2016, as the presidential campaign reached a climax, giving the electorate a little taste of what would happen if the wrong person won. And the message was clear: Either vote for Trump or vote for nuclear war.

So we did what we were supposed to do and elected Trump, thereby bringing the Trojan horse inside the gates. The Trojan horse has now delivered its evil payload, but the psyop continues in the form of faux liberal opposition.

As Trump empowers warmongers and reneges and reverses himself on his most important campaign promises, he is being portrayed as a “victim” by some of his more ardent supporters — as one deserving our continued loyalty, even while he sets us up for all the wars he promised to avoid.

In an article by Arch Stanton published on this website in August last year, Are the Jews secretly backing Donald Trump … while pretending to hate him as ‘the new Hitler’, Lasha Darkmoon writes these words in her introductory note. They attempt to explain and clarify Arch Stanton’s view—which may not necessarily be her own view—that Trump was secretly the Jews’ candidate of choice all along:

LD :  “Arch Stanton makes a highly controversial claim in this article: that the Jews are going flat out to give the impression they hold Trump in total detestation, portraying him as the ‘New Hitler’ who will unleash Armageddon if elected. However, the same Jews are deliberately (in their controlled media) making Hillary Clinton look increasingly unelectable, Stanton claims, and they are doing their best to whip up a tremendous enthusiasm for Trump among the masses. In other words, Trump is their man of choice — but they need to pretend they hate him…. Meanwhile, everything will be going according to the covert Jewish plan. Trump will be doing exactly what the Jews secretly want, but to a background of simulated Jewish horror.”

If Trump were not “Israel’s bitch”, as he has often been accused of being, the first thing he would have done is to order an independent investigation into 9/11.

So why hasn’t he done that?

Conclusion: we need to seriously consider the possibility that Trump is a Trojan horse who will end up doing exactly what the Jews want — thereby betraying the millions of people who were duped into voting for him.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of anyone associated with this website.
Like this? Share it now.

Ex-UNHRC envoy: No Palestinian state on Trump’s watch

American Jewish academic and former United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) Special Rapporteur for occupied Palestine Richard Falk in recent interview with Arab journalist Abdo Emara discussed several issues affecting the Middle East such as Jewish support for the Zionist entity, anti-Semitism, Israel and Egyptian blockade of Gaza Strip, Palestinian Islamic resistance Hamas, United Nations’ failure to support Palestinian cause, Israel’s anti-democracy policy in the region, Arab governments support for Palestine, and Donald Trump presidency.

Nothing positive for the Palestinian people can emerge from the wave of speculation that Trump will soon broker the ultimate peace deal. Israel is content with managing the status quo while gradually increasing its territorial appropriations via settlements, wall, security claims, and various demographic manipulations. Palestine lacks credible leadership capable of representing the Palestinian people. This partly reflects the low credibility and poor record of the Palestinian Authority and partly the deep split between Hamas and Fatah. Palestinian unity and credible leadership is a precondition for the resumption of genuine diplomacy. Geopolitical pressure should not be confused with diplomacy, and will not produce a sustainable peace even if the PA is force fed a one-sided outcome favorable to Israel that is disguised as a solution,” said Richard Falk.

Richard Falk agrees with fellow American Jewish academic and author Noam Chomsky that the US considers a democratic ME as threat to Israel.

Israel opposes the emergence of democracy in the Middle East for several reasons. The most obvious reason is that Arab governments to the extent democratic are more likely to reflect in their policies, the pro-Palestinian sentiments of their citizenry. As well, Arab governments that adhere to democratic values are more likely to act in solidarity with the Palestinian struggle. Also, it is easier for Israel to work out pragmatic arrangements with authoritarian leaders who have little accountability to their own people and have demonstrated a cynical readiness to sacrifice the Palestinians for the sake of their own national strategic interests. This has become most evident in the kind of diplomacy pursued by the Gulf monarchies in recent years, dramatically evident during the three massive attacks on Gaza by Israel during the past decade that have devastated a totally vulnerable civilian population,” said Falk.

Dr. Falk said the Zionist regime considers Egypt under military dictator Gen. Abdul Fattah al-Sisi, a Crypto Jew, as an ally.

Richard Falk said that none of the ME Arab rulers support Palestinian struggle against Israel except non-Arab Iran.

I would say that none of the Arab countries is genuinely supportive of the Palestinian struggle at the present time. With a note of irony the most supportive countries in the region are non-Arab: Turkey and Iran, and their support is extremely limited. It is a sad commentary on the drift of regional politics that the Palestinians are without governmental support in the Arab world, a reality magnified by the fact that if the publics of these countries were in a position to make policy, the Palestinians would be strongly supported. In this regard, including in the West, Palestinian hopes for the future are increasingly tied to the interaction of their own resistance in combination with a growing solidarity movement in Europe and North America. The UN and traditional diplomacy, as practiced within the Oslo framework for more than 20 years have proved to be dead ends when it comes to protecting Palestinian rights,” said Falk.

On Hamas new policy declaration, Falk said: “I believe the Hamas document moves toward the adoption of a political approach to its relations with both Israel and Egypt. By a political approach I mean a willingness to establish long-term interim arrangements for peaceful coexistence with Israel and normalization with Egypt. Hamas expresses this willingness by indicating a readiness to allow the establishment of a Palestinian state on territory occupied by Israel since the end of the 1967 War. Such a shift by Hamas does not acknowledge the legitimacy of Israel as a state nor does it involve a repudiation of the 1988 Hamas Charter, although it does abandon the anti-Semitic rhetoric and seems more disposed to pursue its goals diplomatically and politically rather than by reliance on armed struggle, without giving up in any way rights of resistance, including armed resistance.”

Professor Richard Falk was one of the three American activists who visited Iran on a fact-finding mission during anti-Shah protests in 1979. On their way back, the three paid a courtesy visit to Imam Khomeini who was living in exile in Paris at that time.

On the Zionist antisemite smoking gun, Falk said: “With the support of Israeli lobbying groups and ultra Zionist pressure groups and activists, there is a concerted campaign in Europe and North America to defame critics of Israel by calling them ‘antisemites.’ Especially since the Nazi genocide, to be called an antisemite whether or not there is any responsible basis for such accusations has become one of the most effective ways to discredit and distract. Even when accusations do not silence a critic, as in my case, they have detrimental and hurtful effects.”

Since the assassination of JFK in 1963 no US president had the courage to stand-up to pressure from America’s powerful Jewish lobby groups to force the Zionist regime to live in peace with the native Palestinians displaced by Jewish terrorists during 1948-49. Since the occupation of the West Bank, Gaza and al-Quds (East Jerusalem) during Israel’s 1967 War of Aggression US presidents started paying lip service to the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state over land occupied by Israel in 1967 which was rejected by the successive Zionist regimes. No president had the ball to withhold US$6-12 billion annual military aid and other handouts in order to force the Zionist regime to hold peace negotiation without preconditions.

Ken O’Keefe on Israel, Jewish power, & Donald Trump

UK Baroness Warsi irks Jewish Lobby again!

In August 2014, Baroness Sayeeda Hussain Warsi resigned from David Cameron’s government over its Israeli butt-licking policy against Palestinians. Tuesday, on a Twitter post she likened the killing of four Jew worshippers in occupied East Jerusalem synagogue to the Jew extremists storming Islam’s third most sacred building, the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

Grant Shapps, the Jewish president of the ruling Conservative couldn’t take Warsi’s comparison sitting-down. He called her statement “racist” and said she doesn’t speak for the Tory party.

On Tuesday, two young Palestinian cousins carrying knives and a pistol attacked a group of Zionist worshipers who were allegedly among the Jewish extremists calling for the demolition of Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of Rock over the so-called Holy Wailing Wall. The cousins killed four Jews while wounding another eight before they were shot dead by Israeli soldiers protecting the synagogue. One of the soldiers later died of his wounds.

Some Israeli sources suspect that the attack was in response to the murder of Yusuf Hassan al-Ramouni, 32, Egged bus driver on Sunday. The bruises on his body show that he was killed by Jew settlers before hanged to look like a suicide case.

As a usual collateral punishment, Israeli police used “skunk” trucks to spray putrid water in Jabel Mukabar neighborhood where the cousins lived. Police also arrested 12 relatives of the attackers while wounding a dozen other residents who protested against the arrests.

According to UK’s Jewish Mail Online, among the four dead was one British rabbi and three American rabbis – all carrying dual Israeli passports. I bet these rabbis were incarnation of American Rabbi Bruch Goldstein who butchered 50 Muslim worshippers at the Ibrahimi Mosque in Hebron in 1994.

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu immediately issued a statement blaming Peres’ Palestinian Gandhi Mahmoud Abbas and Hamas for the attack. Netanyahu made a similar accusation against Abbas and Hamas to justify Israel’s 50-day war on Gaza in July this year. Mahmoud Abbas immediately denied the accusation.

Jew extremist groups lead by Rabbi Yahuda Glick, a follower of Rabbi Meir Kahane, are carrying out violent demonstrations, shouting “the mosque will burn, the temple rebuilt” at the so-called Temple Mount, which, historically, is remains of an old Roman castle. Glick was shot a week ago and is still in a hospital recovering from his injuries while his attacker, allegedly a Palestinian, was killed at the spot by Glick’s security guards.

Israeli foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman has condemned the demonstrators saying they have no right to pray at Al-Aqsa Mosque. Archbishop Attallah Hanna, of the Greek Orthodox Church in Palestine and Jerusalem, strongly denounced the Israeli military and fanatic Israeli groups who attacked and invaded the al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem.

King Abdullah II, the strongest Arab ally of the Zionist entity has recalled his ambassador from Tel Aviv in protest to Zionist regimes’ support for the Jewish hooligans demonstrating at the Al-Aqsa compound.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.