Ersnst Zündel on Leuchter report regarding Auschwitz investigation

Ernst Zündel’s 2015 Interview at First International Identitarian Congress in Mexico

This appears to be Ernst’s last interview, conducted approximately 2 years before his 2017 death. He was still sharp as a tack.


Germany: Since 1945 a Vassal State to Israel

An 87-year-old lady of high intelligence and spotless reputation, Frau Ursula Haverbeck of Vlotho, Germany, has recently been sentenced to 10 months in prison for speaking out against incessant German-bashing. What did she say? Demanding proof about alleged atrocities in Auschwitz,  as so repeatedly and vociferously claimed. She says no such proof can be found.Sheer heresy!

Specifically, Ms. Haverbeck insists that Auschwitz was a work camp, not a death camp. That’s good news – isn’t it? She agreed that there were casualties – as there will be in any war – but no deaths due to gassings. There never was a Führer plan to kill the Jews of Europe in government-sponsored, industrial-type fashion.

She said all this, and more, on an hour-long national television show called Panorama, similar to America’s Sixty Minutes.

imgres-2Frau Haverbeck (right) is certainly no skinhead. She comes across as poised, articulate, and very well-informed. For her heretical assertions, she is expected to be incarcerated for almost an entire year. For her principled stand on behalf of historical truth, she earned herself the leftist slur “Nazi-Oma,” repeated with palpable relish on just about every European network and print syndication.

Off with her head!

As Ian Greenlaugh, a VT colleague of mine, noted this morning:

What sort of nation throws 87-year-old women into jail for speaking the truth? Certainly not one that can consider itself to be a functioning free and fair democracy.

A “free and fair democracy?” Well, that’s exactly what Germany is not . We’re talking faux “democracy.”  The Bundesrepublik, as a truncated post-war Germany has been rechristened, is still a vassal state, a fossil of a war lost by the German military more than seven decades ago, as we are never allowed to forget.

Here’s what’s not widely understood. Germany is an Allied -occupied colony and has been for more than 70+ years, despite a threadbare democratic façade. A conqueror’s ceasefire was declared in 1945 when the military arm of the Third Reich surrendered.  A pro forma ceasefire came into effect on the 8th of May 1945 as part of the military alliance called NATO. But there was never a peace treaty. Ever.

A genuine peace treaty was never allowed to be born.

It is my firm contention that World War II didn’t end.  In Germany, there is a bitter saying that the Bundesrepublik has been installed “… to keep the Americans in, the Russians out, and the Germans down.” That folkish wisdom fits the situation.

In 1998 in an interview taped five years before Ernst Zundel was politically kidnapped in broad daylight on American soil, he explained to an Israeli reporter exactly what this means:

Germany’s political enemies currently in charge of that chunk of real estate, called “Germany” in the vernacular, have succeeded in inducing guilt complexes into an entire unsuspecting population leading to the classic symptoms of the massive national psychosis that we can see today. A jokester once observed that there are more televisions in Germany than there are bathtubs, which means that brains gets scrubbed more often and more thoroughly than backsides.

After seventy+ years after the Third Reich surrendered, Germany is still an occupied country, a fact kept from the German people, “re-educated” to the hilt. Your average German has not the faintest clue.

“Induced insanity”, as Dr. Rigolf Hennig, a noted German psychiatrist, has stated, “has little to do with intelligence but a great deal to do with suspension of logical thought brought about by pseudo-religious indoctrination.”

Let me try to explain that to you. As the Catholic Church relies on Infallibility, politically beholden  judges in the German courts rely on “Manifest Obviousness” or Offenkundigkeit – roughly akin to the Anglo-Saxon concept of “Judicial Notice” – meaning “… what exists need not be proven.” Tuesday follows Monday. The sun sets in the West. The moon shines bright at night. Moscow is the capital of Russia. Guilt on the German character is fixed for all eternity. They gassed six million Jews.

Disbarred attorney Horst Mahler, who was sentenced to more than 10 years for his politically incorrect statements

What do you call a country in the very heart of Europe that does not have its own elected government? A USA protectorate? An Israeli colony? A trial run for the New World Order? Twistspeak in the Orwellian mode?

Here is the seamy tale. Legally, the Bundesrepublik is not the legitimate successor to the Reich. Even Germany’s own highest Constitutional Court affirmed it. It cannot be the legitimate successor because, under international law, the “Reich” is still the legitimate state and two states cannot legally govern the same geographic area at the same time.  Just as Russia didn’t disappear after the Soviet regime collapsed, the German Reich continues to exist, regardless of politically motivated claims to the contrary.

Offenkundigkeit exists to enforce political dogma and punish heresy. It means that if you are unlucky enough to end up with a legitimate question – for instance, Did Six Million Really Die? – before a judge who toes the expected political line, the fix is in for you before the trial even begins. A defense on the merits of your case is strictly precluded by law. You are not allowed to argue what you suspect to be true, or what you know to be true, or what you can prove to be true. Offenkundigkeit stands in the courtroom like the golem that it is – and you better stand at attention!

You are forbidden by law to bolster your assertion or even your opinion with evidence such as forensic facts – and if an attorney is foolish enough to insist, he or she is “guilty” of the same “crime” as his or her defendant – “guilty by mere association and intent.

Think of it this way: A man of impeccable repute is falsely accused of being a thief. Since most defendants are unschooled on details of the law, he may assume that he must prove his innocence. Not so! According to law and convention, the state must prove he stole.

He claims he didn’t steal. He argues there’s no evidence he stole. He gets himself a lawyer. The lawyer argues that the accusation can’t be true – where is the evidence? The judge replies: “It’s obvious. Offenkundig. Are you a thief yourself? Shut up – or else, I’ll sentence you for stealing.”

Offenkundigkeit has, thus, become the Holy Cow of German jurisprudence regarding so-called “war crimes” – and, lately, hate speech crimes. It gives beholden judges court jester license.

How can a defense attorney then offer a solid rebuttal, if the law not only forbids it but endangers the attorney himself? The short answer is that he can’t. The long answer is written on the wind.

ez-39

Ernst Zundel (left) with his long-term German attorney, Jürgen Rieger, who died  mysteriosly after his client’s trial of a sudden heart attack

The German “war crimes” trials and now their modern version, “hate crimes” trials, are a farce. They are the bull horns of a military occupation that likes to dress itself in democratic finery but is, in fact, an autocratic instrument enforcing a false history. The simple truth is that the German Reich was not obliterated when the German Wehrmacht surrendered. It was kept feeble on purpose by the victorious Allies so it could be ruled by a malicious cabal that took over as a provisional government whose function  to this day is to ensure endless “reparation” for a “crime” forensic science disproved decades ago!

The Bundesrepublik – it’s acronym is BRD – was meant to be a temporary measure, but you know what happens when unwelcome guests invade your house, rob you of your property title, dig in their heels and stay put. If they have the power that you no longer have, you’re stuck with unwelcome intruders that write the rules for you!

The Bundesrepublik was never meant to last. It was put in its place because there was a vacuu
m – until such time as the ill-fated Germans, held to be pathologically addicted to authoritarian rule of grandiose design, were sufficiently “matured politically” to vote themselves a government more suitable to Allied tastes. This, sadly, never happened. From the Allies’ point of view, the occupation was a noble interim – on paper. Until desirable maturity in the German populace had taken root, the powers-that-be would rule the besieged, bloodied, starving, decimated Germans for their own good in their own ruins, and “re-educate” them thoroughly for as long as it took until they came to their senses.

Zundel Lead Attorney Sylvia Stolz was bodily carried out of the courtroom for insisting that her client had the right to submit exculpatory evidence. Subsequently, Stolz was sentenced to more than three years in prison, two-thirds of which she served.

Ceasefire, yes – but no peace treaty.

That ceasefire exists to this day. That means any minute new guns could start firing again!

The pity is that the Germans were never told of this provisional arrangement that would have given them their freedom as soon as they showed proper remorse and paid enough restitution for crimes alleged to have happened. The facts of the matter were quietly swept under the rug.

Thus was created a bottomless pit. A thoroughly “re-educated” German can never show enough remorse. Not as long as there is still a nickel to be filched or a submarine to be delivered as a gesture of “good will” to the State of Israel.

Three post-war generations came and went. The usurpers of Germany’s sovereignty stayed on because they liked their cozy nests. They made the Germans pay for their own occupation through an arrangement called Stationierungskosten paid out of the BRD treasury, defended by the Allies’ guilt cudgel called Offenkundigkeit. Nobody knew what to ask – until Ernst Zundel’s Mannheim trial brought that red herring to the fore.

is copy 2

 

 

(Left_  Judge Meinerzhagen, who sentenced Ernst Zundel to five years’ in prison and who told him during sentencing:  “ … Even a bird will refuse to fly over your grave!”

Time-tested Old-Testament hatred!

Today, most Germans fancy themselves to be benevolently ruled by a smug entity dressed up in democratic finery that still remains, in fact and law, a provisional administration kept carefully controlled. It still serves an alien agenda.

What alien agenda, you ask? The New World Order, waiting in the wings, that’s what._DSB5244 copy

Zundel supporters demonstrate in front of the German Embassy in Washington, D.C.

Zundel supporters demonstrate in front of the German Embassy in Washington, D.C.

Share…Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:

You Might Also Like
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

What the Holocaust establishment will never say about Anne Frank

While the story of Anne Frank is tragedy, the basic facts of the Frank family history fly in the face of the belief that Auschwitz was an “extermination factory.”

…by Jonas E. Alexis and David Merlin

 

David Merlin has a Bachelor of Arts degree in history and economics from the University of California, Berkeley. He also has a Juris Doctor. He is currently writing a book on the “Irving vs. Lipstadt” trial. He is a frequent contributor to the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust, CODOH.com.

Jonas E. Alexis: Anne Frank is arguably one of the most difficult personalities of World War II. She has been revered by political leaders of all stripes, including like Nelson Mandela. When the Ann Frank Exhibition was opened in 1994, Mandela, a Communist and Marxist/Leninist throughout his political career and a product of Jewish messianic and subversive movements, declared then that

The Anne Frank Exhibition explores the past in order to heal, to reconcile and to build the future. I think we will all agree that it is not the most pleasant thing to revive bitter memories, to invoke the pain and suffering of the past.

“But, like the people of the Netherlands and others in Europe who experienced the harsh realities of Nazism and fascism, like the people in the developing world who lived under the brutality of colonialism, we, in South Africa know too well that we cannot move forward with confidence if we ignore the past.”

How ironic that the man who uttered those words did not even think that Leninism was worse than Nazism or Fascism. Mandela was even trained by the Israeli Mossad!

In any event, there is now an Anne Frank Exhibition in South Africa, but there is not a single exhibition for millions upon millions of innocent people who suffered under Lenin and Stalin—not even in America, the land of “democracy” and “freedom.”

Beyoncé and Jay Z have even all the way to Amsterdam to visit the Anne Frank House, but they never asked the most damning question ever: whatever happened to other people who suffered under the Bolshevik Regime? Do they deserve our sympathy?

Are these people being fair? Are we really being careful with the historical account? One cogent observer by the name of Marc C. Digiuseppe has recently sent me his great assessment on the some of the problems facing the political and historical world which states in part:

“The German people were maligned and abused by the Western Oligarchs in World War I. The Oligarchs cleverly navigated a diplomacy that played upon Germanic Traditions—abstract notions of pride and honor—a rule of the clan that had endured for thousands of years…

“This entire process was then repeated upon the German people at the end of World War II.”

Absolutely true. The questions before us are simply these: When will the Holocaust establishment be fair to the German people, particularly those who suffered under the Red Army? When will they look at the death and evil on both sides of the historical equation? More importantly, what aren’t they telling us about Anne Frank?

Well, we’ll let Merlin answer that question for us.

Now, some readers will probably say that we are trying to deconstruct history here. Not at all. We should all sympathize for those who have suffered under violent regimes and for those who have absolutely and positively nothing to do with revolutionary movements.

In fact, we should all be able to separate good, bad, and indifferent people. But it is not fair to sympathize for one particular group while ignoring the suffering of others. And the Holocaust establishment has certainly tampered with the Anne Frank account. Now let us allow Merlin to talk about this issue.

David Merlin: There is a rather pretentious writer for the New York Times named Ed Rothstein. Mr. Rothstein specializes in pious critiquing of Holocaust tales and museums. He wrote an article about the Anne Frank extravaganza exhibit put on at the Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles. The article is entitled “Playing Cat and Mouse With Searing History.”[1]

Rothstein feels that people are drawing the wrong “lesson” from the exhibit. The exhibit is not horrible enough and “horrific circumstances are distilled into effervescent platitudes!” In fact, Mr. Rothstein has totally missed the history lesson.  Maybe Mr. Rothstein can be excused since the backstory history of the Frank family is never mentioned by Holocaust Believers.

While the story of Anne Frank is tragedy, the basic facts of the Frank family history fly in the face of the belief that Auschwitz was an “extermination factory.” To Quote Bradley Smith’s Blog,

“Official history is that non-working Jewish people arriving at Auschwitz were all ‘gassed.’ But of the eight sent to Auschwitz on September 3, 1944 from the Annex, not one of them was killed in a gas chamber. Instead, five of the eight were transported back to Germany-Austria in November 1944.”

Otto Frank

The details of the eight individuals from the Annex are:

  1. Anne Frank– sent to Auschwitz, then transported to Belsen where she died of typhus (in Belsen not Auschwitz).
  2. Otto Frank– left behind in Auschwitz with those in the sick barracks. Survived the War.
  3. Edith Frank-Holländer–left behind in Auschwitz as the Germans retreated.
  4. Margot Frank (Anne’s older sister) died of typhus in Belsen (not Auschwitz).
  5. Fritz Pfeffer, sent to Auschwitz then transported to Neuengamme concentration camp where he died on 20 December 1944. His cause of death is listed in the camp records as “enterocolitis.”
  6. Auguste van Pels born Auguste Röttgen (Hermann’s wife), whose date of death is unknown. Witnesses testified that she was with the Frank sisters during part of their time in Bergen-Belsen. According to German records, van Pels was sent to Bergen-Belsen concentration camp in Germany with a group of eight women on November 26, 1944. Hannah Goslar’s testimony was that she spoke to van Pels through the barbed wire fence “in late January or early February”. Auguste was transferred on February 6, 1945 to Raguhn (Buchenwald in Germany), then to the Czechoslovakia camp Theresienstadt ghetto on April 9, 1945.
  7. Peter van Pels died in Mauthausen (not Auschwitz).
  8. Hermann van Pels died in Auschwitz. It is often claimed that he was “gassed.” However, according to eyewitness testimony, this did not happen on the day of his arrival there. Sal de Liema, an inmate at Auschwitz who knew both Otto Frank and Hermann van Pels, said that after two or three days in the camp, van Pels mentally “gave up.” He later injured his thumb on a work detail, and requested to be sent to the sick barracks. There is no evidence whatever for the assertion that Hermann van Pels was gassed.

The pattern is the same with other groups closely associated with Anne Frank who were also sent to Auschwitz from Holland.

  1. Eva Geiringer — born May 11, 1929. Sent to Auschwitz May 1944 Step-sister of Anne Frank. Survived the War. Married Zvi Schloss, also refugee from Nazi Germany.   She is a co-founder of the Anne Frank Trust UK. Her experiences story was made into the play And Then They Came for Me – Remembering the World of Anne Frank.
  2. “Fritzy” Geiringer, mother of Eva, Married Otto Frank. Survived the War.
  3. Heinz Geiringer, brother. Survived Auschwitz but died on a forced march out of the camp.
  4. “Pappy” Geiringer. Survived Auschwitz but died on a forced march out of the camp.

The Geiringers were immigrants from Austria; They too ignored a call up for labor service received July 6, 1942 and went into hiding. They were found out on May 11, 1944, detained and were sent to Auschwitz that month.

  1. Janny Brandes-Brilleslijper. Was arrested for forgery. Was in the Westerbork, Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen concentration camps. Traveled to Auschwitz on the same train as the Frank family and to Belsen with Anne and Anne’s older sister Margot. Survived the War.
  2. Lientje, sister of Janny. Was in the Westerbork, Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen concentration camps with Janny. Survived the War.”

Not one of the group of 14 was gassed or executed.

There is more: Anne, Margo, Janny, and Lientje were put on trains and transported back across Poland into Germany. It is pretty obvious that they were not moved around due to their value as workers.

How do Believers in an alleged policy to “Exterminate all Jews” explain this?  Rothstein dances around the issue, playing up the tragedy and avoiding the actual history.

“Otto Frank, Anne’s father and the sole survivor of the “secret annex”

Rothstein also skims over the transportation problem with lurid rhetoric, “where the Germans had shipped her from Auschwitz along with other condemned souls in the waning months of the war.”

The point is exactly that the people transported out of Auschwitz were NOT condemned but saved.  Their later tragic deaths by disease, cold, etc. may have been negligence (or not) but to bray out that they were “condemned souls” is absurd and dishonest.

Even Rothstein’s “waning months of the War” claim is a conflation. Anne, et al were transported out in November 1944.

The display that Rothstein finds most meaningful in the Exhibit is a “symbolic” wall of children’s clothes: Typical of a Holocaust Believer to worship symbolism and ignore the Truth.

The obvious point is that (whatever German policy was earlier) by September 1944 the policy was not to “exterminate all Jews.”

The Shady Mr. Frank

The promoters of the Anne Frank story leave out unpleasant information about Otto Frank.

The official story was that Otto Frank and his family were detained because they were Jewish. However a recent book by Carol Ann Lee, The Hidden Life of Otto Frank (Penguin Books, 2003), brings to light never before documented information about Otto Frank.

The operative fact was that Otto Frank was always in need of money.  With one broken engagement already behind him, in 1925 Frank married Edith Hollander, a women with a substantial dowry and heiress to a scrap-metal and industrial-supply business.

It was, he later admitted, ‘a business arrangement’, though not even his well-to-do wife could help when, in the early Thirties, the family banking business plunged once again into the red.[2]

Getting out of Germany

Otto Frank and his family emigrated from Germany to Holland in 1933, evidently under a cloud of some illegal business transactions. It is interesting to note that the various Anne Frank Websites blame the emigration on anti-Semitic policies of the National Socialists.

However, Hitler did not gain power until after the passage of the Enabling Act on March 24, 1933 and the Nuremberg laws were not passed until September 1935.  By then Otto Frank had been in Holland for over two years.[3]

Frank had established his franchise for the Amsterdam branch of Opekta pectin company by September 1933, evidently after months of planning. Interestingly, Frank had previously managed  managed a large rival firm  named Pomosin, which also traded pectin to factories from the Dutch town of Utrecht.

All this clearly shows that failed business dealings had already prompted Otto Frank to look for a creditor free life in Holland.

 Business with the Germans

Holland did not give the Franks Dutch citizenship. When the Germans occupied Holland in 1940 Frank was happy to do business with the Occupying German Army (the pectin his firm produced was essential for the preservation of the German army’s rations.) In her book, Lee writes…”Otto Frank made a pact with the devil […]”

Otto manufactured and wholesaled pectin and other products to the German army.

“Pectin was a preservative that could be put to many uses, depending upon the type of pectin it was. All pectin was useful for food production, but certain kinds could be applied as a balm for wounds and as a thickener for raising blood volume in blood transfusions.

Other types of pectin were used in the steel industry as a hardener and in the oil industry as an emulsifier. Therefore, it is possible that the Wehrmacht used the pectin they bought from Otto Frank’s company for the war industry.”

Carol Ann Lee details evidence that after the War Otto paid hush money to people to keep his business dealings with the Nazis secret.

Otto Frank’s illegal activities

Frank illegally re-registered his business naming the husband of a secretary, Jan Gies, owner and changing the business name to Gies & Co. but Frank continued to act as an illegal “sleeping partner.”

Two years later, in July 1942, Margot Frank receives a call-up to report for a German work camp. Otto Frank went into hiding.

There is also the matter of the two Opekta employees, Martin Brouwer and Pieter Daatzelaa, who were arrested in March 1944 for dealing in counterfeit ration cards. They worked in the same building as the Annex.

Rather than mention what appears to be a sizable black market food and fake ration card ring centered at the Gies & Co building,  protectors of the “Anne Frank Brand name” make the dramatic claim that the family “had been betrayed”but, when Otto Frank was discovered in hiding, he and his family were illegal aliens in Holland with a string of legal violations by Otto Frank, including strong connections with a counterfeit ration card operation.

The family was held for almost a month at Westerbork Detention Center while all this was sorted out. When the Frank family’s legal status was determined they were all transported to Auschwitz. None of the women were registered into the camp and none seemed to work.

All of the family survived the alleged “Extermination Factory.” As mentioned above, Anne and her older sister were transported back to Germany, where Anne Frank died of typhus right at the end of the War.

The “official” Anne Frank website ignores all these inconvenient facts about Otto Frank and the Frank Family’s visit to Auschwitz.

Dutch ration cards from Amsterdam’s Dutch Resistance Museum

The Diary and the Anne Frank Brand Name

The pages that constitute the “Diary” were actually various loose sheets of paper allegedly left by the police strewn on the floor of the Annex.

Whatever else one can say about the “Diary,” it has been a huge goldmine and everyone connected with young Anne Frank has exploited her story, usually by establishing a “Foundation”  such as Eva Geiringer’s Anne Frank Trust UK.More than 30 million book copies have been sold along with movie rights, plays, and exhibits like the pay-to-view show at the Los Angeles Wiesenthal Center   ($15.50 to enter. Not included with general admission. Advanced reservations are recommended.)

In his will, Otto Frank bequeathed the original manuscripts to the Netherlands Institute for War Documentation. The copyright however belongs to the Anne Frank Fonds, a Switzerland-based foundation.

Over the years, there have been numerous legal brawls over ownership of the publishing rights.

For example,  Cornelis Suijk—a former director of the Anne Frank Foundation and president of the U.S. Center for Holocaust Education Foundation—announced in 1999 that he was in the possession of five pages that had been removed by Otto Frank from the diary prior to publication; Suijk claimed that Otto Frank gave these pages to him shortly before his death in 1980. It cost US$300,000 to Suijk’s Foundation to get the pages back to the The Netherlands Institute for War Documentation.

Also see: “a legacy feud is simmering between the owners of Frank’s writings — the Switzerland-based Anne Frank Fonds — and stewards of the “Secret Annex” museum visited by more than one-million people each year, the Anne Frank House.[4]

The disputes among the various trusts and foundations aside, they all unite in preserving the value of the Anne Frank Brand name.  The Netherlands State Institute for War Documentation paid for a report that claimed that the various papers were “authentic.”

But then, after years of claiming that the Diaries were the sole work of  Anne, The Anne Frank Fund, based in Basel, Switzerland, has claims that it holds exclusive copyright because Otto Frank was a co-author!

It all leads one to suspect that the various Anne Frank trusts, foundations, and museums are not shooting straight with the facts.

Conclusion

Obviously the detention and death by disease of Anne Frank is a tragedy but a review the facts puts a slightly different spin on the story than the myth making exploitation of the tragedy by the folks at Anne Frank House, the Anne Frank Fonds, and the Simon Wiesenthal Museum.


[1] Edward Rothstein, “Playing Cat and Mouse With Searing History,” NY Times, October 13, 2013.

[2] Rachel Cooke, “The Hidden Life of Otto Frank,” Guardian, July 14, 2002.

[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler.

[4] Matt Lebovic, “A most unseemly battle over the legacy of Anne Frank,” Times of Israel, December 18, 2014.

Related Posts:

Protocols of Zion Explained by Dr William Pierce………..Great Summary!


Great Summary of The Protocols of Zion Learned Elders Of Zion Explained!!


Today´s Scurge: The Tools of Protocols of the Wise Elders of Zion – Communism, Hollywood, Sex/Drugs.

The following video illustrates the “Protocols of the Wise Elders of Zion” – a program for cunning, sneaking, brutal world hegemony over contemptible Goyim (cattle)/Non-Jews “When we shall come into our Kingdom” – as I have written.

The video  shows some of the tools by which the Talmudists/Pharisees/Illuminati  and their stooge  Masonry (Judaism for Goyim= Cattle = Non-Jews) brainwash the Goyim to blindly be driven into the direction of what the Talmudists/Pharisees always saw them to be: Worthless animals with only one justification: To serve the Jewish 2master race”.
1) Communism
2) Hollywood – the NWO´s most efficient warriors against the teachings of Christ and the media
3) Perversion of youth through sex, drugs, anti-culture into soullessness.

In 1914, the chairman of the Jewish Congress stated: Jews must rule the world!”

wolfsohn1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


*************************************************************************************
Lerner Spectre, wife of Stockholm´s Supreme Rabbi: “Jews must lead the world”!

 When Jesuit, Jew and Rothschild agent Edward Mandel House on behalf of Pres. Woodrow Wilson  wrote the Peace Treaty of Versailles without any German participation – and so that WW2 was inevitable –  he used special literature: Some time ago, Stan Monteith, a pioneer NWO researcher and broadcaster, found a typewritten copy of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” in the papers of Col. Edward Mandel House at Yale University. Colonel House, at the peak of his powers, was the central figure at the Peace Conference.

The Protocols have been and are still being postulated by Jews to be a fraud – but this has never been proved in court. And the systematic fulfilment of them can only be explained by them being a fact.
Researcher and Rabbi Marvin Antelman writes in his Book “To Eliminate the Opiate” vol 1, p. xviii that the authors were the Jewish Schiffs Warburgs, Morgan, Rothschild, Rockefeller. 

Two remarkable statements are made:
a. East European Zionist Jews immigrated to America, established Hollywood (which they still own) and launched concept of “the American Dream” (about insatiable greed, greatness and immorality), i.e. they shaped the minds of the Americans (and thus of much of the world) the way the Zionists wanted them to be.
b. The question is not what the Germans did to the Jews, but what the Jews did to the Germans – see my post on the Unknown Adolf Hitler and  here.  Hitler was a Jew  – possibly a Rothschild – although Rabbi Antelman claims  Hitler was the deliberate ritual creation of a  ritual participated in by his   Jewish  and here mother, Klara Pölzl, and a  Sabbatean Frankist. So, there was any reason for this antisemite to conceal his family.  He is even said in 1912-13 to have had a Tavistock-brainwashing and being deconstructed to become  a British agent.  The Rothschild programmers work out of  Tavistock.

Haaretz 24 Aug. 2010:

 

 

 

 

 

Comment
The Protocols are the 2. Communist Rothschild Manifesto – Jewish world Hegemony, the NWOAgenda 21, Techhnocracy.  Karl Marx wrote the first of the kind by order and payment of his cousin, Nathan Rothschild of the London City.
It is Jewish Luciferianism with the one purpose to let the Pharisees have their final victory over Jesus Christ whom they know they could not defeat at Golgatha. They hate him, because he is their master´s absolute opponent in a world they see as belonging to Lucifer – not to his brother (see Book of Job) Jesus Christ, who tries to steal some of the souls which inescapably belonged to Lucifer and his stooges  – until Christ sowed his offer of salvation from the NWO-Limbo  which is as old and evil as Mankind.

 

 

This entry was posted in englisheuromed. Bookmark the permalink.
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-
Henry Kissinger, born Heinz Kissinger

A Who’s-Who List of Anti-White Jewish ‘Pseudo-Intellectual’ Quackery

By Thomas Müller

If I didn’t know any better, I’d think this was an organized conspiracy. Unlike “privileged whites,” Jewish pseudo-intellectuals are constantly handed the megaphone. The following is just a representative list. There are many more. In fact, I defy any reader to provide as examples two Judaics, who have a platform or are in academia, who oppose the dissemination of this nasty screed. #(((EverySingleTime))) #Getarealjob.

Hat tip to “Fellow White Person” @FellowWhites for creating this list in a satire format that will hopefully remain below the radar of Twitter’s algos and censors.

TNN Advisory: Absolutely do not harass or even communicate with these individuals. It’s exactly what they want, and it will backfire. Don’t be juvenile like Daily Stormer. Ignore them, and instead use your energies to spread awareness far and wide among the sleeping sheeple.

A Satirical Twitterstorm on Jewish Advocates for Migration, Multiculturalism and White Guilt
View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Robin Bernstein argues that Raggedy Ann was created as a proxy for Blacks so that White kids could learn to hang them! Horrific

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Larry Adelman is executive producer of RACE – Power of an Illusion. White identity is toxic and meaningless!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow Whites Jordan Weissman, Ross Levine & Yona Rubinstein assert that entrepreneurship is a sign of White privilege. Damn those Whites!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Lawrence A. Hirschfeld assures us that race is merely a construct and it’s very important to teach White kids about Whiteness.

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Jennifer Roth-Gordon wants you to understand the malleability of race and the centrality of Whiteness (so toxic!)White woman 👍🏻

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White, and Reform Synagogue star, Rachel Laser runs a consultancy firm specializing in White privilege and racism. I cherish her work

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Cory Silverberg insists that other White parents talk to their kids about the dangers of racism. A great anti-Whiteness ally!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Robin Alperstein is correct to call Trump a Nazi, and so right in her view that America was founded by evil racist Whites!!!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White David Aaronovitch argues that is is never right to defend White interests. I absolutely agree with David – morally disgusting!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Judy Finkel argues that white racial identity is a barrier to understanding diversity. We need to remove that barrier – NOW!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White and Hungarian Jewish fellow Frank Furedi argues that Whiteness is nonsense and white supremacy is irrational. Tell them Frank!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Adrien Schless-Meier argues that Whiteness is a zero sum game. I agree. We need to reduce Whiteness to ZERO 👊🏻

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Lucy Caplan is deeply concerned by the Whiteness of opera. And rightly so. We need more Africans and Arabs in our opera houses

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Warren Blumenfeld is a social justice and diversity pioneer. We thank him for his work!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Michael Rosen might look like you wouldn’t leave kids near him, but he writes kids books promoting migrants. Ends Whiteness!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Linda Martin Alcoff has written “The Future of Whiteness.” She happily predicts total extinction under immigration etc. Wow!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Alyssa Rosenberg writes very frequently on Whiteness, White privilege, and racial stereotypes. Crucial work Alyssa!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Allison Baum argues that diversity makes everything better and smarter. It’s so obvious. Whiteness is dumb, toxic, and evil.

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Steven Rothberg wants to help you get more diversity in your workplace. This is crucial to breaking down Whiteness.

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Jonah Goldberg is absolutely correct that White identity politics is inherently evil and pointless. Smash Whiteness!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Brian C Steinberg is founder and CEO of the Ally Group – diversity training pioneers that help dismantle toxic Whiteness!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Stephen Steinberg says that Whiteness is just part of the “ethnic myth.” Don’t fall for it – erase your Whiteness!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Solomon Goldstein-Rose wants an Act to promote diversity in education. We need to crush toxic White identity in White children!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White David Theo Goldberg wants you to learn about your filthy racist culture. Renounce it & join forces with this great White man!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Marlo Goldstein Hode was awarded her PhD for a thesis on “Affirming Whiteness.” She has a PhD in Whiteness! What a gal!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Maurice Berger just wants you to learn more about White lies and the myths of Whiteness. Listen to this great White man!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Justin C. Cohen is an expert on giving advice to other Whites on White privilege and toxic Whiteness. Best White man I know!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Judith Katz wants you to raise your White awareness and renounce your white privilege. Embrace guilt! Amazing White woman.

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White Amy Eshelman wants to give us an introduction to White privilege. What a fellow White!

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Fellow White and social justice icon Steve Cohen wants an end to borders NOW! Your land belongs to EVERYONE! What a White man!

“Fellow white people” is a widespread read-off-a-script scam that Jewish anti-white activists are running with all over on social media. They use this to promote their guilt shaming agenda and high-horse preaching. It’s easy to identify an Echoberg on Twitter, as their neurotic supremacist tendencies brings out pontificating that usually reveals their ethnicity.

Chosenite supremacist sing along “I’m Not White, I’m Jewish.”


This article originally appeared on The New Nationalist.


aipac

IF AMERICANS KNEW———————————

 

‘The US has lost the war in Syria and is now in bed with terrorists!’ : The Saker

SPUTNIK  INTERVIEWS  THE  SAKER

September 28, 2017. Here is the original and full transcript of my recent interview with Sputnik (by email). Due to the decision by the Sputnik editors to remove parts of my replies which I consider to be essential, I have taken the painful decision not to grant any further interviews to Sputnik. — The Saker

“ALL THE US WANTS IN WAR, WAR, AND MORE WAR!”

“It is hard to talk with people who confuse Austria and Australia”. — Vladimir Putin
(See Putin has openly mocked the United States)

Sputnik: Could you comment on the US recent actions in Deir ez-Zor? What could have been behind the alleged US provocations in the region?

The Saker: The US has lost the war in Syria. The good and the bad terrorists are in full retreat, Assad is firmly in power and nobody believes anymore that he can be removed. The Israelis are in a total panic mode. The Saudis are enraged. And the Russian peace initiative is backed by all the actors who truly matter: the Syrians themselves, of course, but also Iran and Turkey.  Even Hezbollah has declared victory. This is a massive loss of face for the Empire and a humiliation for the USA.

As a result, the Americans are falling back to their plan B – that is, to partition Syria, and keep control of at least some areas in the northeast of the country in order to keep US military forces (illegally) present in Syria, keep control of the oil fields east of the Euphrates river and continue to destabilize and subvert the liberated regions of Syria.

The Americans hope to achieve that by using the Syrian Kurds as their boots on the ground.  The problem with that plan is that with the help of the Russians, the Syrians have freed the city of Deir-ez-Zor and that their forces have now crossed the Euphrates river.  Now it is the American plan B which looks increasingly threatened.  This is why the Americans are engaging in terrorist attacks against Russian military personnel.

Sputnik: What are the US’ major objectives in Syria and what could Russia expect from the US-led coalition in the near future? Did the US State Department really abandon the idea to topple Bashar al Assad?

The Saker: The US-lead coalition is composed of three entities: the US armed forces, the good terrorists and the bad terrorists.  The rest of that ‘coalition’ is entirely theoretical.  This means that all that the Russians can expect from such a ‘coalition’ are more terrorist attacks, more provocations.

The US State Department can abandon the idea to topple Bashar al Assad or not, this will make exactly zero difference on the ground.

Secretary Tillerson has proven himself a weak man, unable to even contain Nikki Haley at the UN, never mind taking any effective actions against the Neocons and their allies in the US deep state.  The latter are now back in total control of the USA.

These people have a single operating mode: war, war and more war.

As for a sudden outbreak of peace, that is their worst nightmare.

The Russians fully understand that and this is why they work with everybody else in the region, even crazy states like Israel or Saudi Arabia.  At least those two are capable of making a deal and sticking to it. In contrast, the USA are what the Russians called “non-agreement capable” (недоговороспособны).

This is why even Putin said that it is “hard to talk with people who confuse Austria and Australia”.

Sputnik: Is it possible that Daesh struck some sort of a deal with the US in order to save the lives of terrorists and preserve their positions in Syria?

The Saker: Of course!  Daesh and all the other terrorist groups are working hand in glove with the United States.  The recent satellite photos published by the Russians prove that: they are all working together and they have been doing this for years.

Sputnik: Is it possible that Washington is considering Daesh and Al-Qaeda’s affiliate al-Nusra Front as an effective bulwark against the Assad regime?

The Saker: Not anymore.  That was their original plan, but now that all the terrorists, good and bad, have been either defeated or have switched sides and are part of the Russian peace plan, the last American hope is for the Kurds.  Of course, the Americans will still be working with Daesh, al-Qaeda, al-Nusra, ISIS and all of the other labels the various Takfiri groups use, but by now they know that it is over and that they will not topple the Syrian government or even conquer most of Syria.

Sputnik: If there is cooperation between US military personnel and Daesh, was it authorized by Washington or has the Pentagon/CIA taken the liberty to collude with terrorists in order to achieve America’s objectives (oust Assad, split Syria up) using all means possible?

The Saker: I don’t have access to secret US negotiations transcripts, but it is an easy guess to make that the CIA and the Pentagon have been working with Takfiri terrorist groups as far back as the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. This has then continued in Bosnia, Chechnia, Kosovo, and, of course, on 9/11 when Takfiri terrorists have been used as patsies to sit in the planes which were slammed in the Twin Towers before they, along with World Trade Center 7, have been brought down by controlled demolition.

You have to understand a simple but crucial fact: Takfiri terrorists are the foot soldiers of the Empire. They are the creation of the US and the US has always tried to control them, more or less successfully.

Sputnik: Could Moscow continue its cooperation (intelligence sharing and etc.) with Washington on Syria given the US controversial actions in the region? Will the US continue efforts to disrupt the Syrian Arab Army’s advance in Deir ez-Zor, Idlib, northern Syria? And what should Russia do to avoid possible US traps?

The Saker: Moscow should continue to engage in deconfliction efforts with the USA, just because there might be mentally sane US officers in Syria who would want to avoid a potentially very dangerous incident between US and Russian forces.  But the real solution is to begin to demand a full withdrawal of all US forces from Syria as they are they totally illegally.

The Russians should also accept as a fact that the US will continue to break agreements, refuse to abide by the terms of any negotiated deal, and continue to support all the terrorist forces in Syria and the rest of the region.

The United States are simply unable to collaborate in any meaningful way.  All they can do is sabotage any and all peace efforts and subvert the Syrian government.  This is very sad, but this is also a fact of life.

Instead, what the Russians should do is give their fullest support to the Syrian, Iranian and Hezbollah forces on the ground until they finally liberate Syria from all the terrorist forces, including the Americans.  

Source

If you are interested, you can find what Sputnik actually posted here


'Israeli flags won’t save you': Erdogan threatens Iraqi Kurds with famine over referendum

IF AMERICANS KNEW

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Why Invasion of Iraqi Kurdistan May Result in Collapse of Mid-East

Ekaterina Blinova

Sputnik: The Iraqi Kurdish issue should be solved only through diplomatic means, Israeli political analyst Avigdor Eskin told Sputnik. According to Eskin, one should take into account both the political and economic interests of regional and global players in the region, as well as the unstoppable Kurdish enthusiasm to gain independence.

In case Middle Eastern powers take a military option against Iraqi Kurdistan, blood will flow and a process of self-destruction by most of the region’s states will become inevitable, Israeli political analyst and commentator Avigdor Eskin told Sputnik, commenting on the results of the Kurdish independence vote.

On Wednesday, Iraqi Kurdistan’s High Elections and Referendum Commission announced that more than 92.73 percent of more than 3 million voters said “yes” to the region’s separation from Baghdad.

The Kurdish referendum has triggered protest from the governments of Iraq, Iran and Turkey. The three have signaled that they are ready to consider a wide range of options to tackle the Kurdish secessionism.

What’s Behind Iran, Turkey and Iraq’s Opposition to Kurdish Independence?

According to the political analyst, the states’ motivation is understandable: “While Iraq is losing a part of its territory, Turkey and Iran as well as Syria have every reason to fear that their Kurdish population would try to join their jubilant brethren in Iraqi Kurdistan.”

He highlighted that “Turkey is already suffering from an internal armed struggle with the Kurds.”

“The situation in Iran is less dramatic,” Eskin continued. “However, some fights with radical elements within the ethnic minority are taking place in the Kurdish region of Iran.”

And of course, one shouldn’t forget about the Syrian Kurds’ incentives to gain independence from Damascus, he noted.

“However, this does not mean that the war is the only option,” the Israeli analyst stressed.

For instance, Ankara threatened to undermine Iraqi Kurdistan’s energy business by “clamping” its main “oil artery” — the Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline.According to the Kurdish media outlet Rudaw, the Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) started exporting oil to the Turkish Mediterranean export terminal of Ceyhan in May of 2014 after Baghdad “froze payments to Erbil from the national budget as pressure and punishment for trying to go ahead with the oil sales.”

Still, according to Eskin, it is unlikely that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan will deliver on his promise to impose an embargo on the Kurds given the substantial investments Ankara and other powerful players had made in the region.

Why Oil Embargo on Iraqi Kurdistan is Highly Unlikely

As The Financial Times reported on September 21, Ankara has “helped build the KRG’s infrastructure, including constructing a $550m airport in Erbil,” with about 1,300 Turkish companies having business ties with the autonomous region.

One should also keep in mind that in June 2017 the KRG signed a 20-year-long deal with Russia’s Rosneft to cooperate on the exploration and production of hydrocarbons.

In accordance with the agreement, the Russian company “will get access to the major regional transportation system with the throughput capacity of 700,000 barrels per day (bpd)” with the prospect of expanding the existing pipeline up to “1 million bpd by the end of 2017.”

Furthermore, Rosneft and Iraqi Kurdistan are planning to launch a pipeline to export gas to Turkey and Europe by 2019.

Besides Rosneft, Russia’s Gazprom Neft company is currently engaged in three oil projects in the region.

The other two players interested in the uninterrupted flow of oil from Iraqi Kurdistan are the US’ ExxonMobil and France’s Total.

Iraqi Kurdistan has an estimated 45 billion barrels of oil reserves and 5.66 trillion meters of natural gas, according to the KRG’s Ministry of Natural Resources.

“We can guess that Rosneft, for example, would not have signed the contract for $4 billion if there were no certain assurances from the Turkish side. The same is in the case of major Western companies,” Eskin underscored, adding that Ankara’s threats were largely directed toward “rebellious Kurds.”

Why Israel Won’t Abandon Iraqi Kurdistan

The Israeli analyst drew attention to the longstanding alliance between Erdogan and Barzani.

“The Kurds in Iraq and their folks in Turkey are deeply divided,” Eskin said. “While the Barzani family leans more towards the West and towards Israel the secular Kurdish Workers’ Party (PKK) was rather ‘Marxist’ in Western terms.”

The analyst underscored that Israel has supported Iraqi Kurdistan since the early 1960s and it “will not abandon friends after 50 years of alliance.””Israel was the first country to assist the Kurds when ISIS [Daesh] started their extermination,” Eskin highlighted. “Israel always tried to develop friendship with other minority groups such as Kurds, Christians and Persians (before 1978).”

The current progress in relations with the Arabs will not alter Israel’s stance toward the Kurdish struggle for independence, he noted.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly voiced his endorsement of the Iraqi Kurds’ pursuit of sovereignty.

US, European Powers Not Interested in Splitting Iraq Up’

Eskin doesn’t agree with those who believe that the West is interested in splitting Iraq up: According to the Israeli political analyst, the US and its European NATO allies “want to see in Iraq a balance between different religious and ethnic groups rather than any kind of partitions.”

“Americans especially invested a lot of efforts and money in post-Saddam Iraq and they do not want to admit the failure of their foreign policy,” Eskin explained. “Britain and France do not want to admit that their map drawing [the 1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement] for the Middle East was a gross mistake. And nobody in Washington wants to get a reminder from the Kurds that their invasion in Iraq was a total failure.”

Therefore, on September 21 the UN Security Council members almost unanimously warned about “the potentially destabilizing impact” of the Kurdish referendum and “expressed their continuing respect for the sovereignty, territorial integrity and unity of Iraq.”

Mutually Acceptable Compromise is the Only Way Out

However, the reality on the ground now dictates its own rules. While a military solution would obviously deal a heavy blow not only to the Middle Eastern region, but also to the geopolitical and economic interests of global players, the only way out is a mutually acceptable compromise and non-violent concessions, the analyst suggested.

Eskin emphasized “the great wave of enthusiasm among the Kurds” adding that those who predicted that the plebiscite would be used as just a bargaining chip between the KRG and Baghdad had obviously misread the situation.

According to Eskin, “the compromise is obvious: [Iraqi] Kurdistan will not encourage the Kurds in Turkey and Iran to rebel and in exchange — no military pressure and no sanctions [will be imposed on it].”On the other hand, however, Baghdad risks losing both oil revenues and face in case Iraqi Kurdistan secedes.

Therefore, “there is an urgent need for cooperation between Russia and the US [on the issue],” the analyst believes.

While Washington still has influence on decision-makers in Iraq, Moscow has recently emerged as a powerful negotiator and broker in the Middle Eastern region. According to the analyst, the two may potentially help solve the Baghdad-Kurdish dilemma.

Meanwhile, the Russian Foreign Ministry emphasized “the need to avoid anything that could further complicate and destabilize the already conflict-ridden Middle Eastern region,” while commenting on the Kurdish independence vote.

Moscow underscored that it “maintains… unwavering commitment to the sovereignty, unity and territorial integrity of the friendly Iraq and other Middle Eastern states.” On the other hand, the ministry stressed that it “respects the national aspirations of the Kurds.”

It pointed out that “all disputes… between the Iraqi federal government and the government of the Kurdish Autonomous Region… should be resolved through constructive and respectful dialogue with a view to devising a mutually acceptable formula of coexistence within a single Iraqi state.”

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Sputnik.

Share.

Space Technology, Global Warfare, The Pentagon “First Strike Attack Plans”. Growing US Military Presence in “Asia-Pacific Pivot

Testimony of Bruce Gagnon at Zumwalt12 Trial

 1

First published in February 2017

My name is Bruce Gagnon and I work for the Global Network Against Weaspons & Nuclear Power in Space – this is our 25th year of operation.  I specialize on space technology and the missiles that are used by the military today.  Every thing the Pentagon does today is directed by space technology.

Most of the destroyers built at BIW carry advanced SM-3 interceptor missiles (Standard Missile -3) that are key elements in Pentagon first-strike attack planning.

Living in Bath I’ve felt a special responsibility to learn about the military role of the warships built at BIW.  They have nothing to do with defending the coastline of the US – the Zumwalt destroyer ‘christened’ on June 18, 2016 at BIW is a stealth, forward deployed, attack weapon to be aimed at China. I became particularly interested in where these ships will go when they head to the Asia-Pacific.

So in recent years I have travelled to places like Japan, South Korea, Australia, Philippines and Okinawa where the US is deploying a growing military presence under a strategy called ‘Asia-Pacific pivot’ created by President Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.  The pivot requires more ports-of-call for our warships, more airfields for our planes and more barracks for our troops.

The idea is to send 60% of US military forces into the Asia-Pacific in order to encircle China and Russia.  Imagine if the reverse was happening and China (or Russia) were lining up ships along our coasts and putting troops and bases near our borders in Canada or Mexico.  We’d go ballistic.

The reason I missed the jury selection process was because I was attending my son’s wedding in Taiwan at the same time.  From there I went to Okinawa for a week and stood beside local people who have been protesting outside a US Marine base daily for more than 900 days straight.

The reason for their protests is simple: the Marine base sits beside pristine Oura Bay which is now being measured for a twin-runway airfield for US war planes. The runways will sit on top of endangered coral reefs.   People make a living from this sacred water body where endangered sea mammals now live. Two million cubic meters of landfill will be put on top of the coral reefs in order to build the ten meter high airfield. There are presently 32 US military installations on Okinawa taking up 20% of the island.  The people have been protesting regularly since 1952 against US bases but you’d never know that in the United States because these protests are not reported in our corporate run media.

This is just one example of many as the US now has well over 800 military bases spread around the world.

I was compelled to sit in the roadway at BIW on June 18 as a cry to the American people. Look at what we are doing!  I tried to give voice to the many people (mostly farmers and fishermen) I’ve met in these places who are seeing their way of life destroyed because of expanding US bases in their communities.

We can’t afford endless war nor can we afford the $4-7 billion for each of the Zumwalt destroyers. Climate change and growing poverty are our real problems but there is sadly no money or political interest to deal with these issues here at home.

Even my neighbor who works at BIW told me the day after our arrests that we can’t keep paying for these warships.

We could save lives and the planet if we convert BIW to build commuter rail systems, wind turbines, solar and tidal power systems. This would both create more jobs and address climate change.

A study at UMASS-Amherst Economics Dept. called “The US Employment Effects of Military and Domestic Spending Priorities” says that we would double the jobs at a place like BIW if we built rail systems there.  The study reports that military spending is capital intensive while every other kind of investment is labor intensive.  That means more jobs when we build things we really need.

On May 21, 2015 a protest was held by the workers at BIW that shut down Washington Street in front of BIW for well over an hour.  I was contacted by a union member who invited me to march in that protest.  The person even called the union hall and spoke with the president of S6 to ask if it was OK that I came.  He said sure as long as I didn’t bring a sign.  They were protesting the growing outsourcing of work to non-union sources.  I arrived just before noon and stood around in the big crowd for about half an hour.  There were many hundreds of workers along Washington Street.

Finally the march started off down by the South Gate on Washington Street.  The entire street was shut down and no one was arrested – including me who was marching along in the crowd.  Traffic had to have been blocked for well over an hour.

We must think of our children and grand kids.  What do they need to survive?  More war or a real future on our planet?

I am not guilty of any crime – other than not doing enough to help stop this madness.  Our demands and our actions on June 18 were perfectly reasonable.

I wanted to alert our community to a larger crime – the crime of continued preparation for endless war and destruction of life on our beautiful and sacred Mother Earth.

My decision to sit down in the road was influenced by the oath I took when I joined the military. I took seriously my oath to defend the constitution and our country and I now believe what I was doing on June 18 was in line with that oath.

Thank you.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Trump and Israel Want War Against Iran, But It Won’t be One-sided

     

 

This week’s headlines have been dominated by reaction to US President Donald Trump’s bluster against North Korea during his address to the UN General Assembly on Tuesday. This has overshadowed the equally threatening and ominous references he made in the same speech to Iran.

Anyone listening to him will have been left with two impressions: Trump’s speech faithfully echoed the utterances of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, and it brazenly beat the drums of war against Iran.

Trump described Iran as a ‘rogue state’ and ‘corrupt dictatorship’ that exports violence, anarchy, and bloodshed. He also said that he had reached a decision regarding the P5+1 nuclear agreement with Iran, while declining to reveal what it is. This has led many observers to conclude that he will soon withdraw from the agreement, in line with his electoral promise to tear it up on the grounds that it is the worst agreement in US history, and in deference to the dictates of the Israel lobby.

Trump is widely expected to announce the US’ withdrawal from the agreement in mid-October when he testifies to Congress in his semi-annual review. This is likely to be accompanied by a further tightening of the sanctions and the economic blockade on Iran. And it could prompt the Iranian government to immediately resume the enrichment of uranium at very high levels, giving it the capacity it to produce nuclear warheads.

It was no coincidence that shortly before Trump spoke, Netanyahu demanded that the nuclear agreement be scrapped or altered, while likening Iran to a hungry tiger on a vicious rampage in the region and the world. Nor was it a coincidence for Israeli Chief of Staff Gadi Eizenkot to announce that Israel has plans already in place for attacking Iran and Hezbollah, which he described as an Iranian surrogate whose growing missile and intelligence-gathering capacity (via pilotless drones) was a top Israeli concern.

The Israeli occupation state is the only country that backs Trump’s stance. The EU is opposed to it, especially French President Emmanuel Macron who warned it would be a ‘mistake’ for the US to withdraw from the nuclear agreement. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov expressed the same view and vowed that his country would continue to uphold the deal.

Trump is literally implementing Israeli dictates. He is planning to drag his country and the world into a ruinous war in the Middle East: a war whose main victims will be Arabs and Muslims, and which will not spare the citizens of those states that host American military bases, which along with Israel can be expected to be targeted in any Iranian retaliation.

Iran will certainly not stand by with folded arms in response to the attempt to cancel the agreement it spent five years negotiating with the six major powers, and ratchet up the economic sanctions that have stifled it for decades and inflicted huge damage on its economy and its people’s livelihoods. President Hassan Rouhani replied by stressing that his country was ready for all scenarios, including that of immediately resuming its nuclear activities. Revolutionary Guard Commander Mohammad-Ali Jafari went further, threatening to deliver a painful blow to the US if compelled to do so. Saturday’s test of a new ballistic missile a few days after Trump’s speech – apparently taking a leaf out of North Korea’s book – was intended to demonstrate that Iran is not prepared to take his threats lying down.

After the failure of his plans in Syria and the entire region, and after the humiliating embarrassment inflicted on him by North Korean President Kim Jong-un, who defied him by carrying out fresh nuclear and missile tests, Trump wants to return to the Middle East in force and start fires there. He is confident that the region’s oil-rich governments will cover the war’s expenses and does not mind turning their citizens into their victims.

But the Israelis who are pushing for this war will also pay a heavy price. They too will not be secure, either during or after this war, as hundreds of thousands of missiles will be aimed at their cities and settlements from Iran, Lebanon and Syria. It would be the mother of all wars, and with Israel armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons, potentially the region’s last. This time round, however, it will not be one-sided.

Trump is playing with fire. He may not only burn his fingers but also millions of our innocent people unless he is restrained, and unless his deranged tendencies and the megalomania which dominates his behaviour and policies are brought under control.

Featured image is from the author.


——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
Shouldn’t they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?
‘MEET THE JEWISH MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’
Jared Kushner, David Friedman, Jason Greenblatt, Steven Mnuchin, Stephen Miller,

Carl Icahn, Gary Cohn, Boris Epshteyn, David Shulkin, Reed Cordish, Araham Berkowitz.
————————–

 

Superpowers failed to advance own plots in Iraq: Iran VP

Fri Sep 29, 2017 08:07AM
File photo of British forces in Iraq
File photo of British forces in Iraq

A senior Iranian official says superpowers have failed to advance their personal agendas in Iraq, emphasizing that Iran and Turkey should help the neighboring Arab state protect its borders against destabilizing acts.

In a phone conversation with Turkey’s Prime Minister Binali Yildirim on Thursday, Iranian First Vice President Is’haq Jahangiri described Iraq as an important country in the Arab world and said Tehran is strongly against the measures that threaten the country’s territorial integrity.

Jahangiri further slammed the secession referendum held Monday in Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan region, stressing, however, that “the schemes devised by superpowers for Iraq have faced defeat.”

In defiance of Baghdad’s stiff opposition, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) held a non-binding referendum on secession from the mainland. Kurdish officials said over 90 percent of the voters said ‘Yes’ to separation from Iraq.

With the exception of Israel, all major regional and international parties had voiced serious concerns over the move, saying it would compound the country’s problems.

Iraqi Kurdish officials have been harshly criticized for turning a deaf ear to Baghdad’s objections and going ahead with the unconstitutional plebiscite before any negotiations and consultations with the central Iraqi government.

In the run-up to the vote, both Tehran and Ankara had held conversations with Iraqi and Kurdish officials to help prevent the situation from getting out of hand.

Jahangiri further said, “Our consultations in Baghdad are to continue, and we are trying for the developments that have followed the referendum to be managed.”

The official said the Iraqi Parliament’s ratification and the decisions made by the government of Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi serve as the basis for any decision, stressing that “we should firmly stand by Baghdad in managing the situation.”

The legislature and the federal government have both outlawed the referendum.

International borders should not be manipulated under any circumstances, the official asserted. “We should fully support Iraq and Syria’s territorial integrity, and Iran and Turkey’s solidarity in this area is very important and instrumental,” Jahangiri stated.

Jahangiri also said the recent trilateral talks held among the Iranian, Turkish and Iraqi intelligence services as well as foreign ministers have proven beneficial.

Yildirim, for his part, censured the Kurdish vote as “a strategic mistake,” which is the result of excessive demands by certain people, and had further disturbed calm in the already troubled region.

He likewise said Ankara attaches great importance to Iraq and Syria’s territorial integrity, and is against disintegration and creation of fabricated governments in these countries.

The Turkish premier also said Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is set to travel to Tehran on October 4, expressing hope that the trip would witness appropriate decisions and agreements between the countries.


The Mossad’s role in the Kurdish Independence movement

The Mossad’s role in the Kurdish Independence movement

Mossad station chief Eliezer Tsafrir (far right) with Kurdish fighters in about 1975. In 1965 Ben Gurion directed the Mossad to train and supply Kurdish separatist guerillas. (Tsafrir was also active in Iran.)

Israeli strategists have long wished to balkanize the Middle East to make it easier for Israel to dominate the region. These efforts to break up the surrounding nations into smaller units were described by Moshe Sharett in the 1950s, by Yinon Oded in the 1980s, and more recently by the neocons in the Clean Break document. (See this article for more details.)

Since dismembering Iraq has long been desired, it is no surprise to learn of Israel’s role in assisting the Kurdish independence movement.

Michael Goldfarb reports on this in the The Forward; below are excerpts:

We have no friends but the mountains,” is an old Kurdish saying.

No friends but the mountains — and Israel — is the reality. There is a deep affinity between Israel and the Kurds. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was alone among world leaders when he endorsed Kurds preparing to vote in an independence referendum.

But it was a rare public declaration of this secret closeness. Israeli-Kurdish friendship is the geopolitical love that dares not speak its name, for the Kurds would prefer it be kept quiet. Open alliance with the Jewish State remains a taboo for most countries in the Middle East. It makes it all the more ironic that Kurdistan is commonly referred to as “Yehudistan”.

….. Israel has long held a slightly different view of the Kurdish struggle for independence. In some ways, Israel’s view is pragmatic. The Middle East could do with another secular democracy.

….. Eliezer Gheizi Safrir [usually spelled Tsafrir], Mossad’s station chief in Kurdistan in the mid-1970’s [said]:

“They called me Kak Gheizi,” he said proudly. Kak or kaka means brother. It is a term of friendship. “These are good people,” says Gheizi. “They share the same values as Jews.”

But the relationship between the Kurds and Jews has a historical aspect, too. Gheizi was there at the beginning, in the mid-60’s, when Mullah Mustafa Barzani, the first leader of the modern Kurdish independence movement, flew to Israel to ask David Ben Gurion for support.

“They asked us for three machine guns and one broadcasting station,” Gheizi laughs. “That was the beginning.”

Ben-Gurion knew the relationship had to be secret. The regional sensitivities were too great; Israel’s Arab neighbors would have seen overt help to Kurds trying to break away from an Arab country as an act of aggression.

For these reasons, Ben Gurion assigned the Mossad to handle it.

Next came training of the Kurdish guerillas, the peshmerga. “We gave them a whole line of training, from small group commander to battalion commander,” Gheizi explained. “We supplied them with field cannons thanks to the generosity of Arab Armies who left us this equipment in the wars.”

Israeli soldier Tzuri Sagi, right, was sent on a secret mission to aid Kurdish leader Mullah Mustafa Barzani in 1966.

But the main thing Mullah Mustafa wanted from Ben Gurion was an introduction. According to Gheizi, Barzani would tell Ben-Gurion, “Amrika, please bring Amrika to help us more.” When Barzani heard Henry Kissinger was in Israel, he called Gheizi and said, “Tell Yitzhak [Rabin] to bring him by the ear to meet us here.” But Israel was unable to deliver America.

But the history goes back much further than Ben Gurion. Jews lived in Kurdistan from the time of the destruction of the First Temple. Not all those dispersed during that catastrophe were taken to Babylon, and some ended up due north a few hundred miles in the Kurdish mountains. They remained there until the early 1950’s, when they were airlifted to Israel as post-colonial Iraq took on a determined anti-Semitic color. [This “anti-Semitic color” was helped when the Mossad bombed synagogues and made it look like this was done by Iraqi Muslims.]

….. Kurdish independence won’t happen soon, and relations with Israel will continue to be opaque. Mullah Mustafa’s son, Massoud Barzani, runs the Kurdistan Regional Government. Open acknowledgement of friendship with Israel will not help him.

Nor did it help when, two weeks ago, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan expressed his displeasure with the referendum and Netanyahu’s endorsement of it. This week, Bibi changed tactics and issued a cease and desist order to his cabinet, saying no one was to discuss the result publicly.

The love that dare not speak its name, the love that everyone in the region knows about, will continue to be pledged behind closed doors.

Google blocks Catalan independence info app following Spanish court ruling

Google blocks Catalan independence info app following Spanish court ruling
The High Court in Catalonia has ordered US tech giant Google to remove an application which provided information on where and how to vote in Sunday’s referendum on the region’s independence from Spain.

The judge said that the “On Votar 1-Oct” application on the Google Play smartphone app store violated the ruling of Spain’s Constitutional Court, which labelled the plebiscite illegal.

Google was also ordered to block any future applications developed by the gmail address “Onvotar1oct@gmail.com,” which was behind the banned app.

The judge said the appearance of the app once again showed the “reluctant attitude” of the Catalan government to previous court rulings to block referendum websites.

“They mean to dodge said blockades with computer applications for mobile devices, which, like the web pages, only promote and facilitate the holding of the referendum on October 1,” he said.

According to the Spain Report, Google has followed the court order and blocked the app which is now inaccessible from the Spanish territory.

“We remove content from our platforms when we receive a court order or when it violates our terms and conditions,” the company said.

The local authorities in Catalonia reiterated on Friday that the vote will go ahead as scheduled on Sunday, despite strong opposition from Madrid.

Spanish authorities have been actively working to prevent the vote as thousands of additional police were deployed to the region, with orders to take control of the voting booths.

Earlier this week, the organization managing the registration of domains ending in .cat was raided by the police.

READ MORE: ‘Repression ships’: Catalonia dockworkers refuse to serve Madrid police vessels

The .cat Foundation was forced to block websites with information about the referendum in accordance to a court warrant issued serval days earlier.

According to the organization, the court order, which saw stipulated that four four .cat domains related to vote be shut, was “unprecedented and absolute [in] scope.”

Around 140 websites related to the Catalan referendum were taken down in September in accordance with the court orders.

‘Critical moment for Spain’s democracy’: UN slams Madrid’s attempts to halt Catalan referendum

Spanish attempts to hinder the Catalonian independence referendum, scheduled for this Sunday, violate fundamental human rights, UN experts said, adding that Madrid “cuts off” public information “at a critical moment for Spain’s democracy.”

“Regardless of the lawfulness of the referendum, the Spanish authorities have a responsibility to respect those rights that are essential to democratic societies,” UN experts on human rights and the promotion of democratic order said in comments on Thursday.

The experts urged Madrid to ensure that their measures against the referendum “do not interfere with the fundamental rights to freedom of expression, assembly and association, and public participation.”

The UN was referring to the arrests earlier in September of top-ranking Catalonian officials, including Junior Economy Minister Josep Maria Jové. The Civil Guard repeatedly conducted searches of the Catalonian government buildings, and the Catalan president Carlos Puigdemont denounced the “totalitarian attitude” shown by the Spanish state in arresting Catalan officials at that time.

The Spanish state prosecutor also ordered a criminal investigation of 712 Catalan mayors for co-operating with the process.

“The measures we are witnessing are worrying because they appear to violate fundamental individual rights, cutting off public information and the possibility of debate at a critical moment for Spain’s democracy,” the UN experts said.

They also criticized Madrid’s decision to deploy some 4,000 police officers in Catalonia, with an order from the Government to “act in case the illegal referendum takes place”.

READ MORE: Clashes with police in Catalonia as authorities make arrests in referendum crackdown (VIDEOS)

“We are concerned that this order and the accompanying rhetoric may heighten tensions and social unrest,” the experts said. “We urge all parties to exercise the utmost restraint and avoid violence of any kind to ensure peaceful protests in the coming days.”

Catalonia is a region of some 7.5 million people in Spain’s north-east, which has its own language and culture, perhaps strongest in its capital, Barcelona.

The previous, informal independence referendum held in the region in 2014 saw 80 percent of those who voted choose independence. Nevertheless, the result was ignored by Madrid as the ballot was ruled unconstitutional.


Vatican diplomat accused of uploading child porn from Canadian church on Christmas

Vatican diplomat accused of uploading child porn from Canadian church on Christmas
Canadian police have issued an arrest warrant for a high-ranking Vatican diplomat suspected of uploading child pornography from a church in Ontario last Christmas holidays.

According to police in Windsor, Ontario, Carlo Capella,50, allegedly uploaded the child porn to a social networking site while visiting a place of worship last December.

“In February of 2017, the Windsor Police Service Internet Child Exploitation Unit received information that originated from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police National Child Exploitation Coordination Center indicating that a suspect in the city of Windsor had allegedly uploaded child pornography using a social networking website,” police explained.

Capella is wanted on charges of accessing, possessing and distributing child pornography police said. The offenses occurred between December 24 and December 27.

CBC reports the pornography is not believed to involve children from the area.

Capella is a Vatican diplomat in Washington and was recently recalled after the US State Department said there were “possible violation of laws relating to child pornography images” by one of its diplomats in Washington. While the State Department didn’t identify Capella, the Italian news agency ANSA did, which was later confirmed by other media outlets.

Capella has diplomatic immunity, meaning he can’t be prosecuted in the US.  The Vatican refused a request to strip Capella of his immunity, and said it was investigating the case. It yet unclear if the Vatican is investigating the Windsor case, or if this is a separate incident regarding child pornography.

The Diocese of London confirmed it helped authorities in an investigation of “possible violations of child pornography laws by using a computer address at a local church.” spokesman Nelson Couto said in a statement, the Windsor Star reports“No further comments can or will be made, as the Windsor Police Service has asked the Diocese of London not to discuss the investigation.”

READ MORE: Pope’s clemency for pedophile priests under scrutiny following latest scandal

Capella was born in Italy became a priest in 1993 before entering the Vatican in 2004. He was posted to India and Hong Kong.

The Catholic Church has been mired in sexual abuse scandals spanning generations across the world.

READ MORE: Over 4,000 children alleged victims of Catholic Church sex abuse in Australia since 1980 – probe

Pope Francis has said he would employ a zero tolerance policy over abuse within the church, but has been accused of moving too slowly on the issue. A 2013 law signed by the pontiff on crimes related to child pornography says crimes, “even if committed abroad,” carries a prison sentence of up to 12 years.