NEW WORLD ORDER EXPOSED by former Jew Benjamin H Freedman


Video 2 h

Amazing speech by Benjamin H Freedman a Jewish man who totally exposes the New World Order from it’s beginnings to what they have planned for the future.

The Black Pope AKA “Father General” or
Superior General of the Society of Jesus.

Who’s Superior?

“Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?” George W Bush —Florence, S.C., Jan. 11, 2000

How come we don’t have a man as intelligent as Peter Hans Kolvenbach as the President of the United States? Instead we get people like George Bush.

There’s a new Black Pope: Reverend Father Adolfo Nicolás Pachón, S.J., S.T.D. (born April 29, 1936) is a Spanish priest of the Roman Catholic Church. He is the thirtieth and current Superior General of the Society of Jesus, the largest male religious order of the Roman Catholic Church. ~More Info

Jesuit Headquarters in Rome Italy

Jesuits Countering the Reformation.

Jesuits are the Counter-Reformation.

The Reformation wanted freedom from the papacy and challenged their authority by showing that their doctrines were unbiblical.

CIA                            FBI  

Who formed the CIA? It was a Catholic Knight of Malta, William “Wild Bill” Donovan. He was considered the “father of the CIA.” he was also the former head of the OSS before he was used to create the CIA.

Donovan was given an especially prestigious form of knighthood that has only been given to a hundred other men in history. ~Source

Over the years there have been many CIA bosses who were also Knights of Malta and/or jesuit trained.

Like CIA directors, William Casey, Allen Dulles, William E. Colby, John McCone, George Tenet. CIA Officers, William F. Buckley, Jr., James Jesus Angelton.

Nazi Officers, Reinhard Gehlen, Heinrich Himmler, Franz von Papen.

Other Fascist Leaders who were Knights of Malta, Benito Amilcare Andrea Mussolini, Augusto Pinochet.

These are just a few….

Who Formed the FBI? It was a powerful Roman Catholic who was also a Knight of Malta and a trustee of The Catholic University of America. Charles Joseph Bonaparte.

Here you can see they are still close knit. From Left to right you have: Louis B. Freeh, director of the FBI (When Waco went down), President of CUA (Same University Bonaparte’ was a trustee of) David M. O’Connell, C.M., SJ (Jesuit), and Cardinal Bernard Law of Boston (Big time Pedophile Priest).

Some more CIA – Knights of Malta Connections:

Director of such propaganda organizations as the U.S. Information Agency, Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty. Also executive vice-president of CBS-TV and vice-chairman of RKO General Inc. He is currently chairman of the board of trustees at the Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank.

William Simon
Treasury Secretary under President Nixon. In the private sector, he has become one of America’s 400 richest individuals by working in international finance. Today he is the President of the John M. Olin Foundation, a major funder of right-wing think tanks.

William F. Buckley, Jr.
CIA agent, conservative pundit and mass media personality.

James Buckley
William’s brother, head of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty.

Clare Boothe Luce
The grand dame of the Cold War was also a Dame of Malta. She was a popular playwright and the wife of the publishing tycoon Henry Luce, who co founded Time magazine.

Francis X Stankard
CEO of the international division of Chase Manhattan Bank, a Rockefeller institution. (Nelson Rockefeller was also a major CIA figure.)

John Farrell
President, U.S. Steel

Lee Iacocca
Chairman, General Motors

William S. Schreyer
Chairman, Merrill Lynch.

Richard R. Shinn
Chairman, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.

Joseph Kennedy
Founder of the Kennedy empire.

Baron Hilton
Owner, Hilton Hotel chain.

Patrick J. Frawley Jr.
Heir, Schick razor fortune. Frawley is a famous funder of right-wing Catholic causes, such as the Christian Anti-Communist Crusade.

Ralph Abplanalp
Aerosol magnate.

Martin F. Shea
Executive vice president of Morgan Guaranty Trust.

Joseph Brennan
Chairman of the executive committee of the Emigrant Savings Bank of New York.

J. Peter Grace
President, W.R. Grace Company. He was a key figure in Operation Paperclip, which brought Nazi scientists and spies to the U.S. Many were war criminals whose atrocities were excused in their service to the CIA.

Thomas Bolan
Of Saxe, Bacon and Bolan, the law firm of Senator McCarthy’s deceased aide Roy Cohn.

Bowie Kuhn
Baseball Commissioner

Cardinal John O’Connor
Extreme right-wing leader among American Catholics, and fervent abortion opponent.

Cardinal Francis Spellman
The “American Pope” was at one time the most powerful Catholic in America, an arch-conservative and a rabid anti-communist.

Cardinal Bernard Law
One of the highest-ranking conservatives in the American church.

Alexander Haig
Secretary of State under President Reagan.
dmiral James D. Watkins
Hard-line chief of naval operations under President Reagan.

Jeremy Denton
Senator (R–Al).

Pete Domenici
Senator (R-New Mexico).

Walter J. Hickel
Governor of Alaska and secretary of the interior.

When this group gets together, obviously, the topics are spying, business and politics.

The CIA has also used other religious and charity organizations as fronts. For example, John F. Kennedy — another anticommunist Roman Catholic who greatly expanded covert operations — created the U.S. Peace Corps to serve as cover for CIA operatives. The CIA has also made extensive use of missionaries, with the blessings of many right-wing, anticommunist Christian denominations.

But the World Grows Wise…
It was only a matter of time before other nations caught on to these fronts. They learned that when the CIA comes to their countries to commit their crimes and atrocities, they come disguised as American journalists, businessmen, missionaries and charity volunteers. Unfortunately, foreigners are now targeting these professions as hostile. In Lebanon, terrorists held U.S. journalist Terry Anderson hostage for nearly seven years, on the not unreasonable assumption that he was a spy. Whether or not this was true is beside the point. The CIA has put all Americans abroad at risk, whether they are CIA agents or not. In hearings before the Senate in 1996, many organizations urged Congress to stop using their professions as CIA cover. Don Argue of the National Association of Evangelicals testified: “Such use of missionary agents for covert activities by the CIA would be unethical and immoral.” 13

From the Cold War to the Class War

~More detailed info

Christianity or Paganism?(This topic moved HERE)

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Martin Sheen
(My information on Martin Sheen has been moved HERE)

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
(Left) Pope Pius XII with Bishop Fulton Sheen.
(Hitler’s Pope, Signed a Concordat With Hitler in 1933)

Bishop Fulton Sheen is the one Martin Sheen took his stage name after. Martin Sheen’s real name is, Ramon Gerardo Antonio Estevez.

Another Movie Martin Sheen played in is called, “The Conflict” a.k.a. “Catholics”

Watch Online

Link One

Link Two

Synopsis: In this drama, a conservative Catholic priest (Martin Sheen) representing the Pope (And the Black Pope) is sent to Ireland to settle down a few influential radical priests whose doctrine is contrary to standard church guidelines. AKA The Conflict. ~ Sandra Brennan, All Movie Guide.

Description: “…In the near future, the Catholic church has joined with other western religions in an ecumenical movement that has washed out much of the original message of the religion. A group of Irish monks have begun saying the mass again in Latin and have begun to have an international following. Martin Sheen is sent from Rome to bring them to task and they must confront what is truly…….”

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Martin Sheen (Jesuit Coadjutor) and some other Jesuit protesting the shooting a some Jesuits in El Salvador.

Martin Sheen gets an audience with pope John Paul II

The Titanic


Martin Sheen narrated National Geographic: Secrets of the Titanic andDiscovery’s Two Part Documentary. Now get this, the pictures that were used in this film were taken by a Jesuit Priest Francis M. Browne, SJ from Ireland who boarded the ship and exited conveniently before the last fateful voyage. When the Titanic went down, so did three of the richest and most prominent men in the world. These three men were against the forming of the federal Reserve Bank to whom all Americans are indebted and in bondage to. Additional link

The Three men of Whom I speak were:

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Benjamin Guggenheim John Jacob Astor IV Isidor Straus

“Dear Brother Eric and Brethren in Christ Jesus,

The National Geographic special “The Secrets of the Titanic” is on YouTube. Here the links to the five parts (about 10 min each) of the documentary. Watch it while it’s still available.Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5

At 6:16 of Part 1 Coadjutor Sheen describes authentic pictures of Titanic before she sailed for the last time. These photos were taken by Irish Jesuit Fr. Francis M. Browne (referred to as “a vacationing priest”) by Coadjutor Sheen never admitting Browne was a Jesuit nor does he explain why Jesuit Browne disembarked from Titanic after briefing Temporal Coadjutor Captain Edward John Smith that he had bring Titanic down deliberately and ignore any warnings of icebergs. Disclaimer-the following info (I’m paraphrasing) was on Wikipedia which I am not completely sure of in terms of veracity. I will see if
more credible and reliable sources confirm this.

> >From

Browne’s Jesuit provincial forewarned him by ordering him to “GET OFF THAT SHIP-PROVINCIAL” after he requested permission from his superior
Father Provincial to travel to New York with an American millionaire couple who offered to pay Jesuit Browne’s way to New York and back in exchange for his company during the voyage.

This web site is the Father Browne Photographic Collection. Not surprisingly it does not detail what Jesuit Browne’s provincial actually told him but it does say he was ordered to disembark from the doomed Titanic.

Robert D. Ballard is reported to be the first to discover the wreckage of the Titanic. It is disputed whether Ballard truly found the remnants of Titanic because a Royal Navy vessel in 1977 according to found it first.
Ballard and coadjutor Sheen worked together in this documentary. Ballard directed it and Sheen narrated. As a matter of fact, Ballard will be my graduating class’ guest Commencement speaker on May 21. I believe it is possible Ballard is a coadjutor himself because he refuses to address the possibility that a rival team of discoverers got to Titanic first. He might be aiding the Jesuit cover-up. Perhaps because Ballard receives the praise of the Pope’s CFR press, notoriety, fame, and recognition for his discovery he keeps his mouth shut not telling the truth (for fear of death) about why Titanic was sunk and was always meant to be destroyed from its inception just like the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center.

Brother Nicholas”

Charlie Sheen and Alex Jones


Alex Jones is a CIA agent of the continued Project Mockingbird and Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor and alternative Media Gatekeeper for the Vatican. 

Mel Gibson

Mel Gibson receiving his Honorary Doctorate at LOYOLA “Jesuit” Marymount University in LA back in May 2003. Who’s he with? Jesuit William J Fulco.

mel gibson anti-semitic jesuit catholic

Fr. Bill Fulco, SJ, professor of ancient Mediterranean studies at Loyola Marymount University, translated Mel Gibson’s film script for The Passion of the Christ into Aramaic and Latin and was language coach for the actors on location in Italy.

Mel Gibson’s first name comes from a 5th-century Irish saint, Mel, founder of the diocese of Ardagh containing most of his mother’s native county, while his second name, Columcille is also linked to an Irish saint. Columcille is the name of the parish in County Longford where Anne Reilly was born and raised. – Hutton Gibson’s new Web site

Hutton Gibson’s Video

Another Link Exposing Mel Gibson’s “The Passion”

Arnold Schwarzenegger

Christoph Cardinal Schoenborn, the Archbishop of Vienna, is shown here after celebrating a Mass for the Dead. As befits such an austere ceremony, the Cardinal is wearing the simple mitre of plain white damask. This would also be the kind of mitre he would wear if in the presence of the Pope.

Steve Saxton – SMOM

Sheikh Saeed Bin Maktaum Bin Rashid Bin Saeed and Sir Steven Saxton

Steven Saxton: Chairman, Founder, and CEO of Hollywood Studios International In 2004, he was inducted as a Knight by the Knights of Malta Coptic Catholic. Sir Steven Saxton’s nomination has been endorsed by Grand Master H.S.H. Prince Antonio Ruspoli, approved by Cardinal Stephanos II, Patriarch of Alexandria, blessed by his eminence, Pope John Paul II and is on record at the Vatican in Rome .

Steven Saxton visits with His Highness Sheikh Majid Bin Mohammed bin Rashid al Maktoum in Dubai

Mark Wahlberg Has A Vatican Cross In His Bedroom

Mark WahlbergReligious The Departed star Mark Wahlberg has turned his bedroom into a sacred space, complete with holy water and the replica of a crucifixion art piece that stands at the Vatican. The Catholic actor takes his religion seriously and claims his Frederick Hart clear resin cross with a statue of the crucified Christ inside is one of his proudest possessions.

Wahlberg showed off the sculpture, which stands in an antechamber of the master bedroom he shares with girlfriend Rhea Durham and their two kids, as part of a recent interview with movie magazine Premiere. Wahlberg says, “(Hart) was a famous sculptor who’s done all kinds of religious work… for cathedrals and stuff. There’s two of these (sculptures) – one in the Vatican and one here. The actor keeps a bottle of holy water by the side of the Hart cross so he can use the antechamber as his own personal chapel whenever he’s home.”

Lionel Ritchie 

Lionel Ritchie with J. Donald Monan, SJ.
(President of Jesuit Boston College)

Lionel B. Ritchie—“a superstar in the dazzling Motown constellation,” said his BC citation—who received an honorary degree on May 19. Ritchie was recognized for his role in producing “We Are The World,” a chart-topping song that raised millions of dollars to fight famine in Africa. During the ceremony, at the urging of Fr. Monan, Ritchie sang a verse of “We Are the World,” and was joined in song by the many thousands on the field and in the stands.

TOM CRUISE – Is he a Psy-op? (Full Page Here)

Hmmm, why would i say that..? Well, first off, he was raised Catholic and he even studied to be a Catholic Priest. His mother is a practicing Catholic AND Scientologist. Tom Cruise is also godfather to Jennifer Lopez’s and Marc Anthony’s twins. Lopez and Anthony are very religious Roman catholics so it’s odd that they would have Tom Cruise to be the godfather of their Catholic twins.

Here’s where a big piece of a possible Psy-Op (Psychological Operation) comes in. Tom’s former wife, Nicole Kidman is a Roman Catholic and stated publically that scientology isn’t compatible with catholicism and thus aided the split between them ending in divorce. What more public way could Roman Catholicism be divided from Scientology?

Oh, I could go on here and piece together a lot more regarding this. But let me say Scientology is very odd in itself. I believe Scientology is in fact a huge Psy-Op. Think about the fact that L Ron Hubbard was NAVY Intelligence officer. He then starts this religion and begins stating that the CIA and FBI is bad. Congressman leo Ryan who was Jesuit trained was an outspoken critic of Scientology and then was assassinated in Guyana investigation Jim Jones and Jonestown. In the wake of Leo Ryan’s assassination, CAN (Cult Awareness Network) was created. CAN went after Scientology and was sued by scientology and Scientology won, and then took over CAN. Are you beginning to see what’s happening?

There seems to be a tremendous drama being played out before our eyes. The whole thing seems contrived and I suspect the ending of this drama won’t be very nice.

-Thomas Richards

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Rupert Murdoch (More on this topic here)

04/03/08 Murdoch defends News Corp The Georgetown Voice – Washington,DC,USA by John Cooke Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation is just like the Jesuits, he told a mostly-full Gaston Hall yesterday, “except we don’t insist on vows of 

(Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of News Corporation)Papal Knight of St. Gregory. Rupert Murdoch was born Catholic. His mother’s maiden name was “Greene”  In 1998 Rupert was made a Knight of the Order of St. Gregory the great. Another Knight of the Order of St Gregory the Great was John J Raskob who was married to another “Greene” (Helena).

Greene is not of Jewish origin. You can see the roots of the Greene name here.

Later some Jews took the name “Green (e)” but it’s highly unlikely and is not proven that Rupert’s mother was Jewish or that Raskob’s wife was Jewish.

Interesting point, The powerful and controversial Roman Catholic, José María Aznar is President of the Board of Directorsof Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation

Re: NewsCorp

Dear friends,

Here’s good tidbit of information. Viet Dihn, main architect of the U.S. Patriot Act is also on the board of directors of the powerful News Corporation owned by Rupert Murdoch.

  • Viet Dinh Professor of Law Georgetown University

And the powerful Roman catholic, Fascist, former president of Spain, and personal friend of King Juan Carlos of Spain, José María Aznar is current President (of the board of directors). He is the one Hugo Chavez called a Fascist and King Juan Carlos told Hugo to “shut up”.

To the left Chavez calls Aznar a “Fascist” and above you see they are all really allies.

(Mr. Aznar has been a Distinguished Scholar at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Georgetown University since 2004 ~Link

Another member of the Board is, Andrew Stephen Bower Knight (born 1 November 1939 in England) is a journalisteditor, and media baron.

He was educated at the Roman Catholic school Ampleforth College, where he was appointed Head Boy, and was awarded an Exhibition to Balliol College, Oxford(MAModern History).

Director of Rothschild Investment Trust Capital Partners plc since 1997

Interesting and strange connection: Another NewsCorp board member Rod Paige(2nd Link)was sitting with George W. Bush at the Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida, when Bush received the news that a second plane had hit the World Trade Center in the September 11, 2001 attacks.

He is also prominent member of Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc.

Walter Annenberg, created TV Guide Was also a Knight of the Order of St Gregory.

U.S. Media Executive/Publisher/Diplomat

As a media magnate Walter Annenberg controlled important properties in the newspaper, television, and magazine industries. Perhaps most significantly, he was responsible for the creation of TV Guide, the largest circulation weekly magazine in the world, a magazine central to understanding television in America. He was also very active in the arena of American politics, and served as United States Ambassador to the Court of St. James. In his later life, Annenberg became renowned for his substantial philanthropic activities, which included significant donations to educational institutions and public television.

Henry R. Luce (center) – Knight of Malta; Member, Council on Foreign Relations; Editor, Time/Life, whose office was in Rockefeller Center across the street from Cardinal Spellman’s St. Patrick’s Cathedral; purchased the Zapruder Film for 150,000 Federal Reserve Notes two days after the assassination and published the notorious forgery of Sward holding a rifle on the cover of Life magazine. (Cardinal Spellman, Right) From VaticanAssassins.Org

Chris Matthews Pat Buchanan

Chris Matthews as a
Holy Cross student

Pat Buchanan as Georgetown
University Student

Phil Donahue
In 1953, Donahue was a member of the first graduating class of St. Edward High School, an all-boys college prep Catholic high school run by the Brothers of Holy Cross in suburban Lakewood, Ohio. He graduated from the University of Notre Dame with a B.B.A. in 1957.

When Billy Graham appeared on the Phil Donahue Show of October 11, 1979, in discussing Pope John Paul II’s visit to the United States of America, Billy Graham said, “I think the American people are looking for a leader, a moral and spiritual leader that believes something. And he (meaning the pope) does.

Al Roker
He was raised Catholic (in the faith of his devoutly Catholic mother) and graduated from the prestigious Xavier High School in New York City,

Fr. Jonathan Morris (born August 221972 in Cleveland, Ohio), is an American Roman Catholicpriest and vice-rector of the Legionaries of Christseminary in RomeItaly. He is currently a news contributor and analyst for the Fox News Channel.

From 2002 to 2004, Morris worked as a theological advisor in the making of Mel Gibson‘s motion picture The Passion of the Christ.

Tim Russert 

Tim Russert of NBC (Who was trained by Jesuits) was the Master of Ceremonies at The Catholic University of America Twelfth American Cardinals Dinner New York Friday, April 27, 2001. He also was given the honorary degree of Doctor of Humane Letters by Br. Liguori of The Congregation of Christian Brother’s Iona College.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Political analyst James Carville and Tim Russert Catholic Politicians in the U.S.: Their Faith and Public Policy ~LINK

Interesting Fact: James Carville who accredited for getting Clinton elected president married someone who was instrumental in getting George HW Bush elected.

Here is a video clip of Tim Russert giving Louis Farrakhan a platform to preach his jew hating propaganda. Video

Farrakhan With Rev. M. Pfleger
Who hates the 2nd Amendment

Farrakhan “I’m to black people what Pope is to white people”

July 09, 2008

Minister Louis Farrakhan is currently the leader of a reconstituted Nation of Islam, the original organization having been renamed and eventually dissolved by Warith Deen Muhammad. The Nation of Islam’s National Center and headquarters is located in Chicago, Illinois and houses its flagship Mosque No. 2, Mosque Maryam in dedication to Mary, mother of Jesus.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Inside of Mosque Maryam (Notice the eight pointed star
which is associated with black magic)

Farrakhan’s Early life

Farrakhan was raised within the West Indian community in the Roxbury section of Boston, Massachusetts. His mother had emigrated from Saint Kitts and Nevis in the 1920s; his father was a Jamaican cab driver from New York, but was not involved in his upbringing.

As a child, he received training as a violinist. At the age of six, he was given his first violin and by the age of 13, he had played with the Jesuit Boston CollegeOrchestra and the Boston Civic Symphony. A year later, Walcott went on to win national competitions, as well as the Ted Mack Original Amateur Hour. He was one of the first blacks to appear on the popular show.

In Boston, Farrakhan attended the prestigious Boston Latin School. The school symbol is Romulus, the mythical founder of Rome! and English High School, graduating from the latter1. He attended college for two years at Winston-Salem State University teachers college, but left to continue a career as an entertainer. In the 1950s, Farrakhan became an up-and-coming calypso singer. He recorded several calypso albums under the name “The Charmer.” [1] In 1955, while headlining a show in Chicago entitled “Calypso Follies,” he first came in contact with the teachings of the Nation of Islam.

Check out this ARTICLE Called: “Louis Farrakhan claims he is both a Muslim and a Christian (Catholic)” Quote from article, “A packed house welcomed Minister Louis Farrakhan to St. Sabina Catholic Church on Friday night with a standing ovation and cheers for his health.

The 74-year-old provocative Nation of Islam leader, who has endured a series of health setbacks, didn’t speak from the Quran but from the Bible (The Catholic [Per]Version).

“Even though I am a Muslim — I don’t apologize for that — I’m also a Christian,” he told the crowd at 1210 W. 78th Pl. “Islam considers the Bible a sacred book.” (Yes, but the Bible considers Islam a Daughter to the Mother of Abominations – Revelations 17:5)

“Reverend” Jesse Jackson

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Joseph Retinger (Right)

Description: The key person in the formation of the Club Bilderberg has been Joseph Retinger. The plan of the British intelligence was using Joseph Rettinger, one of the founders of the European Movement in organizing the Club Bilderberg as the real power in the shadows behind the American and European governments.

As Coleman continues this segment of detailing the Committee of 300 structure, he moves on to Joseph Rettinger, “Perhaps the most important member of the Bilderbergers, a foreign policy body 52 of the Committee (of 300)… Rettinger was a well-trained Jesuit priest and a 33rd Degree Freemason.” pp. 51-52 Source

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Jesuit Trained William (Bill) Clinton who is supposed to be Baptist
(maybe he means to say Papist) receives of the heretical ‘holy eucharist’.

More about Clinton Crimes and Jesuit affiliations and pictures.

John Forbes Kerry receives his law degree from the Jesuit’s Boston College

Senator Kerry received the “Founder’s Medal”, the highest award of the Boston College Law School in honor of achievement and service in the legal profession at the 1990 Law School Commencement.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Jesuit Trained, Liberal democrat, pro-abortion, Skull and Bonesmember John Forbes Kerry
receives heretical ‘holy eucharist’ which only devout practicing Catholics may partake of.

Catholic Skull and Bonesmen Bush and Kerry attending Catholic Mass on Ash Wednesday. (Where a priest makes a mark of a cross in ashes on their foreheads.) 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – As a tribute to his outstanding service as a member of the United States House of Representatives, Georgetown University Law Center Professor Robert F. Drinan, S.J. was presented a Congressional Distinguished Service Award.

Left to right: Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.), Prof. Robert Drinan, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca.), and Dean T. Alexander Aleinikoff.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif. greets Pope Benedict XVI, as President Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice look on. (AP Photo / April 16, 2008)

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Hugo Chavez

If you want more info on Hugo Chavez, I Created a whole page for him HERE.

Alex Jones thinks Hugo Chavez is a hero of some sort and so do many others in the ‘Truth Movement’ as well. But if you do some research you will find that Chavez is a devout Roman Catholic Socialist who has given himself many dictatorial powers as Hitler did through theEnabling Act.

The following taken from online blog:

About two months ago, after hearing all the praise everyone was giving Chavez, including Alex Jones and others alike, I decided to look into this guy a little. I discovered that he called for a New World Order not once, but twice BEFORE everyone started praising him and this has bothered me greatly since I found this out. And today, for the THIRD time he has called for a New World Order so lets see if these big-shot ‘truth seekers’ will start talking about this now. I have emailed a link to Paul Joseph Watson ( so lets see if this article gets posted and if Alex Jones speaks out about this on his show… which is due to start in two and a half hours. I have also emailed Jack Blood and urged him to talk about this on his show. Chavez is part of the problems we are facing in the world today and it’s time for everyone to stop talking about him as if he is some kind of god. My guess is that Chavez is part of the ‘bring down America’ agenda which we are clearly seeing taking place right now.

Here’s Texe Marrs quoting from Catholic Chavez. Texe Marrs is proving
himself to be a anti-semetic Jesuit coadjutor as well.

Extra Links: Evangelists and Rome – Transcripts
“pat robertson” catholic – Google Search
Christian Coalition’s Catholic front
Pat Robertson – General Teachings/Activities
Challenge to Texe Marrs
Benny Hinn – Catholic Mystic
“benny hinn” catholic – Google Search 

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

From the common man, to mainstream political entities, they must all kiss this man’s hand! This is an open act of worship the pope is receiving with complete agreement.

Often the pope won’t even raise his hand for the person to kiss it. They literally have to bow before him to kiss his hand dangling at his side as we see Mexico’s former President Vincent Fox doing in that photo. It used to be not so many days past that it was the pope foot you must kiss as is shown in this etching…

Hugo Chavez said: I am a Catholic and a Christian and a very committed Christian and I was talking to the Pope about the struggle against poverty -I call it Christ’s cause. Then he was talking about the first time he had met Fidel Castro. Search Alex Jones’ web site. Notice that not one word of Hugo Chavez’s call for a NWO is mentioned. Why? Alex is supposed to be covering everything pertaining to a NWO.

Former President of
Mexico Vincent Fox

Additional Links Associated With Chavez Calling For a New World Order
One Two Three

Ronald Reagan

Ronald Reagan and his wife Nancy with Pope John Paul II.
Under Reagan’s presidency official diplomatic ties were reestablished between the Vatican and the U.S. they were broken in 1865 after President Lincoln’s assassination and for orchestrating the Civil War!!

Knight of Malta and Future President Bush Sr was Vice president at the time (under control of the Jesuits). Many say he was really running everything. George H. W. Bushwas a ex CIA agent, the former director of the CIA, former director of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) the former ambassador to the United Nations and also the son of Prescott Bush who was a Nazi banker and senator.

George Bush with Cardinal Egan and former Governor of the State of New York Hugh L. Carey, Cardinal Egan.

Excerpt from vaticanassassins.orgThe power of the Archbishop of New York has not diminished but rather grown.

Today, the man who wields the power of Cardinal Spellman from the Powerhouse in New York – St. Patrick’s Cathedral across the street from Rockefeller Center and continues to suppress the truth about the assassination of President Kennedy by virtue of his Oath as a Cardinal, is the arch-conspirator, traitor to his American countrymen and master of the infamous, Jesuit-trained agitator, high-level Freemason and CFR member, former President Bill Clinton, and now master of Skull and Bones member, President George W. Bush, whose father, George H. W. Bush, is also a high-level Freemason, a former Director of both the CFR and CIA, as well as a participant in the Kennedy Assassination.

Donald Rumsfeld meets Pope Paul VI in 1964. Rumsfeld was a young member of the United States House of Representatives for the 13th Congressional District in Illinois at the time.

Pope Paul VI with the Black Pope at that time, the twenty-eighth Superior General (1965-83) of the Society of Jesus, Fr. Pedro Arrupe, S.J.

John F. Kennedy, Cardinal Spellman and Richard Nixon.


Francis Cardinal Spellman – Jesuit-trained at Fordham University in New York and the American College in Rome; Archbishop of Rome’s wealthiest and most powerful Diocese; Military Vicar of the American Empire controlling the Knights of Malta, Shriner Freemasonry, the Knights of Columbus and the Mafia’s Commission; the acting King of the Pope’s Fourteenth Amendment Holy Roman American Empire ruling from his Palace in the city of the Empire State along with his Papal Maltese Knights of the Roundtable overseen by the Professed Jesuits Jesuits under Extreme Oath of the Fourth Vow) at Fordham University including now Cardinal Avery Dulles, the nephew of past Secretary, Vice President, and President of the Cardinal’s Council on Foreign Relations (1933-1950), past CIA Director until fired by President Kennedy and member of the deceptive Warren Commission.

The Jesuits notorious uncle was none other than The Gentleman Spy, Rome’s prostitute Protestant Presbyterian and Shriner Freemason, Allen Dulles. Spellman therefore controlled the Council on Foreign Relations, the FBI, the CIA, Military Intelligence including the Office of Naval Intelligence and the Secret Service, the Power and Mastermind behind the assassination of President Kennedy and subsequent Cover-up, continued by Cardinals Cooke and O Connor.

The present Archbishop, Cardinal Egan will continue the Great Jesuit Cover-up, as evidenced by his Oath as a Cardinal, his first and foremost loyalty is not to the People of the Constitutional Republic of these United States, but to his master in the Vatican, his supposed King of kings and Lord of lords, Jesuit General Kolvenbachs “infallible” god who sits in St. Peter s Chair, Pope John Paul II! For he holds the Devils Papal Office of the Jew-hating and blasphemous Seventh Roman Caesar who has not yet come and, when indwelt by Satan upon rising from the dead, will be the Eighth Roman Caesar – the beast Revelation 17:10,11.

33rd degree Freemason Gen. MacArthur and Military VicarCardinal Spellman

Father Edmund A. Walsh, S.J. conferring with 33rd Degree Freemason General Douglas MacArthur in Tokyo, 1948.

Strongly anti-Communist, it is alleged that Walsh was the man who first suggested to Senator McCarthy hat he use this issue in order to gain political prominence.
Walsh vigorously promoted anti-Communist thought throughout his career.

Senator Joseph McCarthy who was a Graduate of a Jesuit University must have been easy to manipulate at the hands of Jesuit Edmund Walsh who suggested to McCarthy that he could make a name for himself by taking an extreme anti-communist
stance thus coining the term McCarthyism which also ended up with the Senators total downfall

For more on this Read the 4th Chapter of Avro manhattan’s “Vietnam, Why did we go?”

Former Governor of Florida, Jeb Bush, meeting with Pope Benedict

Groveling before a MAN. He’s no Vicar of Christ either. Here Jeb Bush is being made a 4th degree K of C.

If Bush is a Christian and says Jesus is his Saviour
then why is he giving the pope an idol of Mary?

Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, greets Supreme Knight
of Columbus (which is the ‘right arm of the Catholic church’ in American)
Carl A. Anderson and Ted Koppel, who narrated Washington Speaks.

President Kennedy sits with Pope John Paul VI

Former New Jersey Gov. Brendan Byrne with the Pope and future Pope

Bush, The Catholic Papal Puppet

Pope John Paul II with the trilateral commission 

Montini [a.k.a “pope” Paul VI] pictured giving a speech on October 4, 1965
at the United Nations Montini in his address to the United Nations, called
that godless monstrosity [The UN] “the last, best hope of mankind…”


This is a hand sign of the devil worshippers (goat horns).

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

The First Black Pope and Jesuit General Ignatius Loyola who was Formerly a military soldier, a witch and a member of the Illumbrados.

This is the third Jesuit General (Black Pope)
Francis Borgia who is always depicted with a skull.
Notice the Crown on the skull….

Papal Octopus

Former Black Pope with his predecessor Pedro Arrupe

This is the Jesuit General (the Black Pope) Peter-Hans Kolvenbach with Pope John Paul II (who worked for I.G. Farben helping make the Zyklon B cyanide gas which killed hundreds and thousands of Jews at Auschwitz)

Black Pope Peter-Hans Kolvenbach with Pope Benedict Formerly
Cardinal Ratzinger and before that Hitler youth

Picture of Ratzinger when he was Hitler youth.
Couldn’t they find someone else to be Pope?

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Peter-Hans Kolvenbach, SJ
(born in Druten, November 30, 1928),
is the 29th and current Superior General
of the Society of Jesus,
the largest religious order
of the Roman Catholic Church.
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting At Vatican Council II,
Fr. Joseph Ratzinger (above right)
receiving orientation from his mentor,
progressive theologian Karl Rahner SJ.
(Society of Jesus)

In January 1933, the Belgian mathematician and Catholic priest Georges Lemaitre traveled with Albert Einstein to California for a series of seminars.
After the Belgian detailed his Big Bang theory, Einstein stood up applauded, and said, This is the most beautiful and satisfactory explanation of creation to which I have ever listened. Lemaitres theory, the idea that there was a burst of fireworks which marked the beginning of time and space on a day without yesterday, was a radical departure from prevailing scientific understandings, though it has since come to be the most probable explanation for the origin of the universe. (In other words, a Jesuit was behind the embarrassing doctrine of the “Big Bang” theory. -TR )

January 20, 1942 – The Wannsee Conference…… another Lie Crused


One of the high-profile claims in this regard was made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, at the UnitedNations in 2009, when he held up a copy of the minutes of the Wannsee meeting, and told the world that:

“There, on January 20, 1942, after a hearty meal, senior Nazi officials met and decided how to exterminate the Jewish people. The detailed minutes of that meeting have been preserved by successive German governments. Here is a copy of those minutes, in which the Nazis issued precise instructions on how to carry out the extermination of the Jews. Is this a lie?”

The simple answer to Netanyahu’s question is, yes, this is a lie. An outright, shameless, blatant lie.

The actual minutes of the Wannsee Conference can be read in their entirety—in the original German here,

In reality, the Wannsee meeting and its minutes do not contain a master plan to kill Jews;

– Nowhere in the meeting’s minutes is genocide discussed, planned, proposed, or even suggested;

– The Wannsee meeting never discussed gas chambers, shootings, or any of the fantasies propagated by the exterminationists;

– The Wannsee Minutes reported that there were only 4.5 million Jews under German control (yet 4.3 million Jewish compensation claims have been lodged against the postwar German government);

– The Wannsee meeting was a planning meeting on how Europe’s Jews should be deported, via transit camps, to the East; with able-bodied Jews being forced to build roads and other labor intensive tasks in those regions;

– The Wannsee Conference also made allowance for specific exceptions to Jewish evacuation, such as Jewish German World War I veterans; ALL Jews over the age of 65; and ALL Jews working in industries vital to the German war effort, to be released from the threat of evacuation and be allowed to stay in Germany.

There is therefore, no justification for the allegation that the Wannsee Conference was a ‘master plan for mass murder’ and everyone who claims this to be the case, from Netanyahu down, is simply lying.

Yehuda_BauerThat the Wannsee Conference never discussed killing Jews in any way, has actually been confirmed in public by Yehuda Bauer, professor of Holocaust Studies at the Avraham Harman Institute of Contemporary Jewry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Bauer is also the founding editor of the journal Holocaust and Genocide Studies, and a member of the editorial board of the Encyclopaedia of the Holocaust, published by Yad Vashem in 1990.

He is not, therefore, as some Holocaust storytellers claim, some obscure figure, but a leading and major—in fact, one of the most senior—Jews promoting the Holocaust fable.

As long ago as 1992(!), Bauer, speaking at a conference held in London to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Wannsee meeting, told the audience that the claim that Wannsee was a “master plan” to kill Jews was nothing a but a “silly story.”

Bauer’s remarks were reported in the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of January 23, 1992, and the Canadian Jewish Times of January 30, 1992.


Titled “Nazi Shceme Not Born at Wannsee, Israeli Holocaust Scholar Claims,” the JTA report continued:

London (JTA)—An Israeli Holocaust scholar has de-bunked the Wannsee Conference, at which top Nazi officials are said to have gathered at a villa in a Berlin suburb in 1942 to draw the blueprints of the ‘Final Solution.’

According to Prof. Yehuda Bauer of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Wannsee was a meeting, ‘but hardly a conference’, and ‘little of what was said there was executed in detail.’

Bauer addressed the opening session of an international conference held here to mark the 50th anniversary of the decision to carry out the “Final Solution”. “But it was not made at Wannsee”, the Czech born scholar said.

The public still repeats, time after time, the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination of the Jews was arrived at, Wannsee was but a stage in the unfolding of the process of mass murder,” he said.


His comments were repeated in the Canadian Jewish News, which read as follows:

Wannsee’s importance rejected 

London (JTA) — An Israeli Holocaust scholar has debunked the Wannsee Conference, at which top Nazi officials are said to have gathered at a villa in a Berlin suburb in 1942 to draw the blueprints of the “Final Solution.”

According to Prof. Yehuda Bauer (photo) of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Wannsee was a meeting, “but hardly a conference”, and “little of what was said there was executed in detail.”

“The public still repeats, time after time, the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination of the Jews was arrived at.”

In other words, even the leading “Holocaust scholar” in Israel knows that to claim that the Wannsee Conference was all about “killing Jews,” or as Netanyahu told the United Nations, that the minutes contain “precise instructions on how to carry out the extermination of the Jews . . .” is an outright lie, a “silly story.”

Once again, like everything else associated with the “Holocaust,” the Wannsee Conference myth collapses when subjected to even the most basic investigation.

 Armistice 1918

The Treaty of Versailles


The Contradictions & Impossibilities Of The “Holocaust by Bullets” Allegation & Why It’s Critical The Story Is Believed

By John Wear

The “Holocaust by Bullets” is becoming an increasingly popular theme among defenders of the Holocaust story. The allegation is that the Einsatzgruppen with support of the German army attempted to murder every Jew in the Soviet Union. This article will discuss the absurdity of this allegation.

The Traditional Analysis

Jewish Princeton University historian Arno Mayer summarizes the mass shootings carried out by the Einsatzgruppen in the Soviet Union:

Even so, and notwithstanding the unparalleled magnitude of the Jewish suffering, the extermination of eastern Jewry never became the chief objective of Barbarossa. The fight for Lebensraum and against bolshevism was neither a pretext nor an expedient for the killing of Jews. Nor was it a mere smoke screen to disguise the Jewish massacres as reprisals against partisans. The assault on the Jews was unquestionably intertwined with the assault on bolshevism from the very outset. But this is not to say that it was the dominant strand in the hybrid ‘Judeobolshevism’ that Barbarossa targeted for destruction. In fact, the war against the Jews was a graft onto or a parasite upon the eastern campaign, which always remained its host, even or especially once it became mired deep in Russia.

When they set forth on their mission, Einsatzgruppen and the RSHA were not given the extermination of Jews as their principal, let alone their only, assignment.[1]

In Mayer’s analysis, the massacres of the eastern Jews were not part of a comprehensive plan of extermination. Rather, the killing of Jews in the Soviet Union occurred as the result of the inexorable radicalization of the war in the east, and because many Soviet Jews were classified by the SS as carriers of Bolshevism.[2]

In the eyes of the SS and the civilian population of the Soviet Union, many Soviet Jews were regarded as being responsible for or accomplices to the Communist acts of violence. For example, the massacres of Jews committed by Ukrainians and SS men in July 1941 in Lemberg and other Galician towns were primarily retaliations for the mass murders of Ukrainians committed by the Soviets between June 22 and July 2, 1941. The reports of the Einsatzgruppen furnish evidence of this:

In Tarnopol 5,000 Ukrainians kidnapped, 2,000 murdered. As counter measures arrest operation initiated against Jewish intellectuals, who shared responsibility for the murder and besides were informers for the NKVD. Number estimated at about 1,000. On July 5, approximately 70 Jews rounded up by Ukrainians and shot. Another 20 Jews killed on the road by military and Ukrainians, as response to the murder of three soldiers who were found chained in jail, with tongues cut out and eyes gouged out.[3]

Other Jews were shot in retaliatory measures after the discovery of Soviet torture chambers. For example, after the discovery of a torture chamber in the Tarnopol courthouse, the Germans reacted as follows: “The troops marching through who had the opportunity to see these atrocities, above all the bodies of the murdered German soldiers, killed all of the approximately 600 Jews and set their houses on fire.”[4]

The dominant and active role of Jews in the Bolshevik Revolution & the Soviet Union was well known. Even Winston Churchill highlighted the predominant Jewish role in the world-wide communist movement in the following 1920 article.

Modern Historiography

Israeli Holocaust historian Yitzak Arad and other historians are now promoting the idea that the Einsatzgruppen with support of the German army murdered almost every Jew in the Soviet Union.[5] In his book The Holocaust in the Soviet Union, Arad discusses the difficulty of obtaining exact figures of Jews who died in the Soviet Union during World War II.

The absence of accurate Soviet statistics on the number of evacuated Jews into the Soviet rear areas and German documentation on the number of Jews remaining in the occupied Soviet territories makes it difficult to sum up the number of Jews who perished in these territories. The Soviet administration did not conduct any kind of census of the inhabitants, including Jews, who survived the German occupation. German statistics are incomplete on the number of Jews murdered during the years of occupation. The Einsatzgruppen reports and other German documents give the numbers of Jews murdered by them in specific locations, but they don’t include all of the murder sites, and there is doubt as to the accuracy of these statistics. Reports on the many massacres conducted by the Orpo and local police forces are only partial.[6]

Despite this lack of documentation, Arad produces estimates of Jewish deaths in the German-occupied Soviet Union during World War II that show only slight variations. Arad estimates that there were 2,612,000-2,743,500 Jews in the German-occupied Soviet Republics. Of this number, 103,000-119,000 Jews are estimated to have survived, while 2,509,000-2,624,500 Jews are estimated to have died.[7] Using the mid-range of these estimates, this equals a Jewish death rate of 95.85%, with a survival rate of only 4.15%.

Arad estimates that there were 2,105,000-2,225,000 Jews in the German-occupied Soviet Republics of Belorussia, Ukraine and Russia. Of this total, 42,000-55,000 Jews are estimated to have survived, while 2,063,000-2,170,000 Jews are estimated to have died. Using the mid-range of these estimates, Arad thus estimates that only 48,500 Jews survived out of 2,165,000 total Jews in Belorussia, Ukraine and Russia.[8] This equals a Jewish death rate of 97.76% in these three Soviet republics, with a survival rate of only 2.24%.

Arad provides no documentation for his estimated Jewish death totals in the Soviet Union. Arad’s assumed death total of Jews in the Soviet Union is absurd. The German army and the Einsatzgruppen were engaged in a monumental struggle against the Soviet army. The Germans could not possibly have killed such a high percentage of Jews based solely on verbal orders from Heinrich Himmler[9] while engaging in battles of epic proportions with the Soviets.

Yitzak Arad has given out false historical information in the past to support the official Holocaust story. Regarded by many as the leading Treblinka expert, Arad distorted a report dated November 15, 1942 by saying the report referred to gas chambers instead of steam chambers as the murder weapon at Treblinka.[10] Arad had to make this change because the official historiography now states that steam chambers were never used to kill Jews at Treblinka.[11]

Mr Arad neglects to acknowledge the Bolshevik Holocaust killed by some estimates approx. 60 million people and that the role of numerous Jews, including Stalin’s Jews, were also known and widely resented as depicted in this non-too-subtle graphic. It is logical that war & reprisals against Soviet Bolsheviks would therefore include suffering & fatalities by some Jews. Claiming 98% died is such an extreme overreach it insults the memory of all victims of Bolshevik-Communism.
Aktion 1005

Since the bodies of the alleged 2.5 million murdered Soviet Jews have not been found, the official Holocaust historiography claims that they were cremated in what is called Aktion 1005. An article in the Encyclopedia of the Holocaust defines this operation:

Operation 1005, code name for a large-scale activity that aimed to obliterate the traces of the murder of millions of human beings by the Nazis in occupied Europe.”[12]

It is unrealistic to assume that Aktion 1005 succeeded and the Germans exhumed and burned over 2.5 million bodies. This would mean that within a period of 13 months the Germans had to have emptied thousands of graves in a territory of more than 1.2 million square kilometers–all without leaving behind any material or documentary traces. The mass exhumation of such a large number of bodies in such a short period of time is quite impossible.[13]

Furthermore, we know that no Soviet planes discovered and photographed the burning bodies, because otherwise the Soviets would have exploited the photographs for propaganda purposes. The thousands of pyres burning through the night would have been photographed by the Soviets if such mass exhumations had taken place.[14]

Yitzak Arad attempts to explain away these problems by stating that Aktion 1005 was a failure:

Aktion 1005 was a highly classified operation. Orders and reports were given and received verbally, and no German documents were saved to provide evidence. The SS, which was responsible for the operation, did everything in its power to prevent a leak of information on the site…

There is no way of knowing how many corpses were cremated in the course of the operation—hundreds of thousands, certainly, possibly even millions. But millions of corpses remained in the pits in which they had been buried. This tangible evidence—the corpses of millions of Jews and non-Jews, murdered by Nazi Germany and its collaborators in the occupied Soviet territories—remained for posterity. In its main objective—destroying the evidence of mass murder—Aktion 1005 failed.[15]

The problem with Arad’s explanation is that neither the Soviets nor anyone else have found the mass graves in which large numbers of Jews were supposedly buried in the Soviet Union. Germar Rudolf writes:

After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, numerous mass graves, containing altogether hundreds of thousands of bodies of victims of the Soviets, were discovered, excavated, and investigated. Not only was the number of victims determined, but in many cases the specific cause of death as well. In the same regions where many of these mass graves were found, one million Jews are said to have been shot by the Einsatzgruppen. Yet no such grave has ever been reported found, let alone dug and investigated, in the more than half a century during which these areas have been controlled by the USSR and its successor states.[16]

Thus, the undocumented and imaginary Aktion 1005 provides no evidence of a German program of genocide against Soviet Jews.

Arad’s mass graves are not present in this dramatic Wikipedia map of the Holocaust in Russia. By I, Dennis Nilsson, CC BY 3.0

The Einsatzgruppen trials that took place in Nuremberg from September 1947 to April 1948 form the basis for the allegations that the Einsatzgruppen and other German forces murdered millions of Jews and other people in the “Holocaust by Bullets”. The defendants in these trials were 24 commanding and senior officers of the Einsatzgruppen.[17]   

Benjamin Ferencz, the chief prosecutor at the Einsatzgruppen trials, has admitted to using death threats to obtain evidence. Ferencz said in an interview:

You know how I got witness statements? I’d go into a village where, say, an American pilot had parachuted and been beaten to death and line everyone up against the wall. Then I’d say, “Anyone who lies will be shot on the spot.” It never occurred to me that statements taken under duress would be invalid.[18]

Ferencz, who enjoys an international reputation as a world peace advocate, further related a story concerning the interrogation of an SS colonel. Ferencz explained that he took out his pistol in order to intimidate him:

What do you do when he thinks he’s still in charge? I’ve got to show him that I’m in charge. All I’ve got to do is squeeze the trigger and mark it as auf der Flucht erschossen [shot while trying to escape]…I said “you are in a filthy uniform sir, take it off!” I stripped him naked and threw his clothes out the window. He stood there naked for half an hour, covering his balls with his hands, not looking nearly like the SS officer he was reported to be. Then I said “now listen, you and I are gonna have an understanding right now. I am a Jew—I would love to kill you and mark you down as auf der Flucht erschossen, but I’m gonna do what you would never do. You are gonna sit down and write out exactly what happened—when you entered the camp, who was there, how many died, why they died, everything else about it. Or, you don’t have to do that—you are under no obligation—you can write a note of five lines to your wife, and I will try to deliver it…” [Ferencz gets the desired statement and continues:] I then went to someone outside and said “Major, I got this affidavit, but I’m not gonna use it—it is a coerced confession. I want you to go in, be nice to him, and have him re-write it.” The second one seemed to be okay—I told him to keep the second one and destroy the first one. That was it.[19]

This and other admissions by Ferencz cast an immediate shadow over the entire proceedings. Is this the sort of legal person who can be relied upon to present fair and objective evidence at a major trial?[20]

Benjamin Ferencz took only two days to present the 253 captured documents in the Einsatzgruppen case. These documents were the primary evidence used to convict the defendants in these trials.[21]

The accuracy and authenticity of the Einsatzgruppen reports have been called into question by many researchers. The originals of the Einsatzgruppen reports have never been produced, and many of the copies that have been produced show clear signs of postwar additions. For example, Einsatzgruppen Report No. 111 contains garbled wording and a clear addition to the end of a paragraph (highlighted in bold below):

These were the motives for the executions carried out by the Kommandos: Political officials, looters and saboteurs, active Communists and political representatives, Jews who gained their release from prison camps by false statements, agents and informers of the NKVD, persons who, by false depositions and influencing witnesses, were instrumental in the deportation of ethnic Germans, Jewish sadism and revengefulness, undesirable elements, partisans, Politruks, dangers of plague and epidemics, members of Russian bands, armed insurgents—provisioning of Russian bands, rebels and agitators, drifting juveniles,Jews in general.[22]

Defenders of the Holocaust story often state that the Einsatzgruppen reports were captured by the U.S. Army when they took control of the Gestapo Headquarters. However, even Benjamin Ferencz has admitted that the copies of these reports originated with the copies held by the German Foreign Office in Berlin, which makes them Soviet-origin papers.[23]

The unreliability of the Einsatzgruppen reports was acknowledged in the trial of German Field Marshal Erich von Manstein in 1949. Von Manstein’s lawyer demonstrated that whole areas claimed by the reports to be “cleared of Jews” actually contained many flourishing Jewish communities that were untouched throughout the entire war. The trial court accepted the argument that the Einsatzgruppen reports were unreliable, and Von Manstein was acquitted in regard to the Einsatzgruppen activities in his command sector.[24]

Dr. Arthur Robert Butz explains why the Einsatzgruppen documents were forged:

It is not difficult to see why these documents exist; without them the authors of the lie would have no evidence for their claims except testimony. We have seen that with Auschwitz there was an abundance of material facts to work with and whose meanings could be distorted: shipments of Jews to Auschwitz, many of whom did not return to their original homes, large shipments of a source of hydrogen cyanide gas, elaborate cremation facilities, selections, the stench. The situation with the Einsatzgruppen was different; there was only one fact, the executions. Standing alone, this fact does not appear impressive as evidence, and this consideration was no doubt the motivation for manufacturing these documents on such a large scale.[25]


The Einsatzgruppen were assigned the tasks of killing Soviet Commissars and fighting partisan activity in the Soviet Union. Large numbers of Jews and non-Jews were killed in these operations.

Because German forces were always limited and always in demand at the front, German military authorities were all the more fearful of the disruptions partisans could bring. Consequently, the Einsatzgruppen and German army officers took severe measures against partisan activity in the Soviet Union. This resulted in the Einsatzgruppen and the German military engaging in mass killings of partisans, including the execution of many civilians. However, the Einsatzgruppen did not serve the additional purpose of committing genocide against Soviet Jewry.[26]

The increased death toll in the “Holocaust by Bullets” is being used today by Yitzk Arad and other historians to offset the diminishing estimated deaths in the German camps. This is the only way in which the alleged 6 million deaths in the so-called Holocaust can still be maintained.      

Buy Germany’s War

Suggested Articles:

The Dirty Secret About Life The Buchenwald Camp – Communist Jews Starved Fellow Jews

Why The Holocaust Story Was Invented

The 2 Million: The Rape of German Girls & Women, Incited By Bolshevik Communists


[1] Mayer, Arno, Why Did the Heavens Not Darken? The ‘Final Solution’ in History, New York: Pantheon Books, 1988, p. 270.

[2] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Transit Camp or Extermination Camp?, Washington, D.C.: The Barnes Review, 2010, p. 208.

[3] Ibid., p. 262.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Arad, Yitzhak, The Holocaust in the Soviet Union, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2009, pp. 125-133.

[6] Ibid., p. 517.

[7] Ibid., p. 525.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Ibid., p. 131.

[10] Arad, Yitzhak, Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka: The Operation Reinhard Death Camps,Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 1987, pp. 354-355.

[11] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Transit Camp or Extermination Camp?, Washington, D.C.: The Barnes Review, 2010, p. 63.

[12] Gutman, Israel (ed), Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, 4 vols., New York: Macmillan, 1990, article “Aktion 1005,” Vol. 1, p. 11.

[13] Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Transit Camp or Extermination Camp?, Washington, D.C.: The Barnes Review, 2010, p. 226.

[14] Ibid.

[15] Arad, Yitzhak, The Holocaust in the Soviet Union, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2009, pp. 355-356.

[16] Rudolf, Germar, The Rudolf Report: Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the “Gas Chambers” of Auschwitz, Washington, D.C.: The Barnes Review, 2011, p. 40.

[17] Winter, Peter, The Six Million: Fact or Fiction?, 4th edition, The Revisionist Press, 2015, p. 22.

[18] Brzezinski, Matthew, “Giving Hitler Hell”, The Washington Post Magazine, July 24, 2005, p. 26.

[19] Jardim, Tomaz, The Mauthausen Trial, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012, pp. 82-83.

[20] Winter, Peter, The Six Million: Fact or Fiction?, 4th edition, The Revisionist Press, 2015, p. 24.

[21] Maguire, Peter, Law and War: International Law and American History, New York: Columbia University Press, 2010, p. 138.

[22] Winter, Peter, The Six Million: Fact or Fiction?, 4th edition, The Revisionist Press, 2015, pp. 24-25.

[23] Ibid., p. 25.

[24] Ibid.

[25] Butz, Arthur R., The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry, ninth edition, Newport Beach, CA: Institute for Historical Review, 1993, p. 200.

[26] Ibid., pp. 197-204.

FBI documents found on pedophile Anthony Weiner’s laptop contained classified information

Huma Abedin and Hillary Clinton leaked classified docs to pervert Weiner.

If justice truly is blind, than the latest Judicial Watch revelation that at least five emails (among the 2,800 documents stored on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner) were in fact determined to be classified, should place Huma Abedin and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton swiftly in prison for treason.

President of Judicial Watch Tom Fitton announced Thursday that the State Department will be releasing a portion of the documents found on Anthony Weiner’s laptop on Friday.

The Gateway Pundit, previously reported that conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch revealed in October the State Department admitted it received 2,800 Huma Abedin government documents from the FBI that were found on her husband Anthony Weiner’s laptop.

Judicial Watch’s president Tom Fitton says in his experience dealing with Abedin emails on Weiner’s laptop, docs will include classified information.

The FBI seized Weiner’s laptop after he was caught sexting with an underage teenager and discovered CLASSIFIED INFORMATION on the disgraced politician’s computer.

The Daily Mail now reports that at least five emails determined to be classifiedwere found among 2,800 documents stored on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner, whose then-wife Huma Abedin was deputy chief of staff to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The State Department released hundreds of pages of materials Friday afternoon, including a total of eight pages classified at the ‘confidential level,’ the third most sensitive level the U.S. government uses.

The emails date from 2010, 2011 and 2012 and concern discussions with Middle East leaders including some from Israel, the United Arab Emirates, Hamas and the Palestinian Authority.

Large portions, including entire pages, were redacted before the documents’ release.

Three of them were sent either to or from an address called ‘BBB Backup,’ which one email identifies as a backup of a Blackberry Bold 9700, presumably belonging to Abedin.

One page of a document released Friday is heavily redacted and marked ‘classified’; it mentions ‘update on Hamas-PA talks,’ referring to the Palestinian Authority.

Another is a four-page ‘call sheet’ meant to guide Clinton through a sensitive phone call with Benjamin Netanyahu.

The work-related emails and other documents were recovered from Weiner’s computer last year by the FBI.

Civilians like Weiner, who was once a congressman but resigned in mid-2011, are prohibited from possessing or reading classified documents without a security clearance.

Zerohedge reports that as a civilian, Weiner – though once a congressman, was unlikely to have possessed the proper clearance to view or store the classified documents on his laptop.

A sample of the documents can be seen below, first, a “Call Sheet” prepared for Hillary’s discussion with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu:

An update regarding “Hamas-PLO Talks”…

Zerohedge further reports that in at least two instances, Abedin directly forwarded Anthony Weiner official conversations – one of which included Hillary Clinton and senior advisor Jake Sullivan with subject “Lavrov” – referring to Russia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Sergey Lavrov. The email discusses an official response by a “quartet” of envoys (The US, EU, UN, and Russia) over Israel’s announced changes to its Gaza policy, ending a contentious blockade.

One wonders why Anthony Weiner would need to know about this?

Abedin also forwarded Weiner an email discussion from July 22, 2012 which had previously been released by WikiLeaks – which included the Ambassador to Senegal, Mushingi Tulinabo. While the contents of the email are redacted, Senegal had elected a new President earlier that month. Of note, the Clinton Foundation has supported or been involved in several projects in the country.

Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton had this to say about the new Huma, Hillary document dump from the US State Department…

“After years of hard work in federal court, Judicial Watch has forced the State Department to finally allow Americans to see these public documents. It will be in keeping with our past experience that Abedin’s emails on Weiner’s laptop will include classified and other sensitive materials. That these government docs were on Anthony Weiner’s laptop dramatically illustrates the need for the Justice Department to finally do a serious investigation of Hillary Clinton’s and Huma Abedin’s obvious violations of law.”

Fitton also noted how “outrageous” it is to have Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin walk out “of the State Department with classified documents and the Obama FBI and DOJ didn’t do a thing about it.”

Thanks to @JudicialWatch, State Department now posting government docs from Clinton/Abedin found on Anthony Weiner laptop. Weiner campaign received classified info through Abedin/Clinton emails. Docs being posted here:

Zerohedge reports that Huma Abedin was spotted heading into the Hillary Clinton offices in midtown Manhattan earlier today just a few hours before the release of the 2,800 emails.  Seems you’re never too old to be called into the Principal’s office…We’re confident this will all be promptly dismissed by Hillary as just another effort to “criminalize behavior that is normal “because what government employee hasn’t shared classified materials with their convicted pedophile husband? Certainly, just another boring day in Washington.

Jews Jacok Frank & Weinstein

Viciousness and Ignorance: New York Times Columnists on the Rampage

Amanda Hess and Manohla Dargis on the Weinstein-Spacey-Louis C.K. affairs

The New York Times has been at the forefront of the campaign over sexual misconduct in the entertainment industry in particular, which has now been extended to the political arena (preposterously in the case of Sen. Al Franken). The newspaper has devoted considerable resources and published dozens of articles and “exposés” on the subject since early October, when it ran a story recounting allegations of sexual harassment against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein.

Harvey Weinstein (Photo credit: David Shankbone)
Harvey Weinstein (Photo credit: David Shankbone)

The campaign has a deeply reactionary and anti-democratic character. The Times and other media outlets, on the basis of allegations alone, have already ruined the lives and careers of a number of individuals and there is no reason to believe they will stop there. In its treatment of the issue, the Times entirely disregards elementary constitutional rights, including the presumption of innocence, due process, the ability of the accused to confront and respond to witnesses and more. The individuals in question are pronounced, either by the Times or by those it cites, to be monsters, worthy of destruction.

The methods of the McCarthyite witch-hunts of the 1950s have been taken out, dusted off and brought to bear without any serious opposition within the artistic world. Once again, individuals are named and denounced, found guilty and excluded with hardly a voice being raised against the process. All of this has taken place without a single charge being laid, much less a guilty verdict having been reached by a jury.

This may outrage the Times’ editors and surprise a large portion of the newspaper’s readership but Weinstein, Brett Ratner and James Toback—not to mention Kevin Spacey, Louis C.K., Franken and countless others being drawn into the dragnet of yellow journalism—are owed the legal protections due every citizen.

The attack on democratic rights often begins with relatively easy, even “guilty” targets and proceeds from there. The elimination of constitutional protections, under conditions of a ruling elite moving at the speed of light toward authoritarianism and war, has extremely dangerous implications for the entire population. Today’s moral guardians may well find themselves bearing a share of the responsibility for openly dictatorial and fascistic measures in the not so distant future.

Amanda Hess (
Amanda Hess (

Two recent articles in the Times exemplify the ignorant and pernicious character of the current offensive on sexual matters, “How the Myth of the Artistic Genius Excuses the Abuse of Women,” by Amanda Hess, and “Louis C.K. and Hollywood’s Canon of Creeps,” by Manohla Dargis.

Neither author shows any evidence of having thought through the issues involved. Hess makes a number of wide-ranging comments about art and the history of art on the basis of superficial observations about recent developments in the American entertainment world. She writes like a glorified lifestyle columnist, which is what she is. On her own website, she cites the comment of fellow columnist Benjamin Freed in regard to her work, “I can’t think of anyone who writes about personal identity or relationships in a more intelligent or engaging fashion.”

Dargis, a film critic at the Times, has apparently composed her piece on sexual misconduct primarily out of personal spite and bitterness. Her article is hardly more than a series of unenlightening complaints and grumbles about Louis C.K. and Woody Allen and their purported relations with or fantasies about young women. If anything, her comment is pitched at an even lower and more vindictive level than Hess’s. She begins her article: “Soon after Harvey Weinstein was first outed as a sexual predator, I created a document titled ‘Creeps’ in which I tried to list every man who had sexually harassed or assaulted me.” Frankly, why should anyone be the slightest bit interested? Let us hope that Dargis finds the will-power to control the urge to share her story with the rest of the world.

These are two highly paid, privileged members of the American affluencia, writing for a “prestige” publication, who would have one believe they are horribly oppressed. It’s all self-pitying nonsense for starters, and that needs to be said.

Louis C.K.
Louis C.K.

It is also useful to bear in mind, to put matters in proper perspective, that Hess and Dargis write for a newspaper that published barefaced lies about “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq (notably by the infamous Judith Miller), which helped justify the criminal US intervention responsible for more than one million deaths. Dead Iraqis, Afghans, Syrians, Libyans, Somalis, Yemenis and Pakistanis do not perturb our authors, both of them undoubtedly supporters of Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party, one of the two war parties.

Ultimately, such individuals—like their counterparts in academia engaged in what might be termed “gender cleansing”—are most interested in clearing a career and income path for themselves. A vicious settling of scores is at work here. There is almost nothing as ruthless as the petty bourgeoisie when it smells blood. The watchword in these circles today is clear enough: certain tides taken at the flood “lead on to fortune.”

A very large portion of the top posts in the entertainment and media world is held by men. Hess and Dargis would like to see them pushed out the door. That would open things up and make life generally more pleasant—and lucrative—for people like themselves.

Would the female sector of the corporate species be any less swinish in their own fashion (or more talented) than Weinstein and the others if that sought for eventuality were to come to pass? One doubts it. Their lack of compassion and empathy, the absence of any democratic sensibility in what they write, provide a sense of what Hollywood et al would look like under their domination, and it is not a pretty prospect.

For her part, Hess would like to rewrite artistic and cultural history. She wants to do away “with the idea of ‘separating the art from the artist’ … Whenever a creative type (usually a man) is accused of mistreating people (usually women), a call arises to prevent those pesky biographical details from sneaking into our assessments of the artist’s work.”

Kevin Spacey (Photo credit: Pinguino k)
Kevin Spacey (Photo credit: Pinguino k)

Referring to “the Hollywood players accused of sexual harassment or worse—Harvey Weinstein, James Toback, Kevin Spacey and Louis C.K.,” Hess goes on, “We’re learning more every day about how the entertainment industry has been shaped by their abuses of power. It’s time to consider how their art has been, too.”

It may be time for such a consideration, but Hess doesn’t indulge her readers by actually offering one. She carelessly throws a number of things into the pot, including Bernardo Bertolucci’s alleged mistreatment of Maria Schneider in the making of Last Tango in Paris (1972) and Danish filmmaker Lars von Trier’s disoriented cinematic rubbish, within which “riling actresses” is hardly the greatest of his crimes, but comes up with very little of substance. She cannot stop herself from smearing Roman Polanski in passing, but, again, since she makes no concrete analysis of any of Polanski’s film work, her pledge to examine the “art” in light of sexual misconduct remains a dead letter.

Hess, like Dargis, concentrates much of her time and energy on the case of Louis C.K. Her description of his work, however, suggests that the comic, for all his peculiarities and excesses, has been capable of providing more insight into sexual and social relations than Hess herself. Disapprovingly, in the light of the recent accusations, she writes, “What once looked like creative provocations now read like justifications of a moral universe where women are as complicit in sexual violation as men are, and where sex that begins with force easily gives way to mutual desire.”

The subjectivism in Hess’s approach should be noted. “We once admired Louis C.K. for his comic efforts,” she argues, in effect, “but now we’ve discovered they mean something quite different.”

Hess claims that a “proclivity for reprehensible acts is built right into the mythos of the artistic genius—a designation rarely extended to women. … The art excuses the crime.” While she refers sweepingly to 19th century culture, Hess again excuses herself from providing one example of the trend she identifies.

The relationship between the life and personal behavior of the artist and his or her body of work is a complex one. No one ought to suggest that talent or even genius excuses everything. As we noted years ago at the time of the “rehabilitation” of Hollywood director-informer Elia Kazan, an accurate assessment of artistic achievement inevitably requires “making a certain distinction between the artist and his or her art. We do not go searching through garbage cans for all the ways in which the writer, painter or composer falls short. But the distinction is a relative, not an absolute one.” Mozart is remembered fondly as a human being, while Wagner, the composer of much beautiful music but a horrible anti-Semite, is not.

At that time, the opposite argument to Hess’s was often being made: artists like Kazan were boasting in their memoirs of their rotten behavior and implying that rottenness was a necessary ingredient of artistic genius. We noted that imperfect human beings produced art, along with everything else. “They inevitably sin against others and against themselves,” we wrote. “But why make a virtue out of those inevitable errors and misdeeds, much less a program? History teaches us that class society occasionally mutilates very gifted people beyond recognition, so that artistic genius and personal vileness coexist within a single human being. Why not simply recognize this as an unfortunate fact of that society, another sign of its incompatibility with the demands of human happiness, and not as a proof that genius feeds on vileness?”

However, criticism of the existing social order and what it does to people is beyond Hess and Dargis, a pair of extraordinarily self-satisfied petty bourgeois.

On the basis of her arguments, Hess would presumably urge reconsidering or even proscribing the work of every male artist who mistreated women (or who were merely alleged to have done so). She and Dargis essentially rejoice in the destruction of Louis C.K. and Kevin Spacey. Dargis writes of the former: “I don’t feel bad for him or mourn a career that may be over. He’s rich and can crawl into a cushy hole.” An individual capable of writing such a foul sentence, shamelessly expressing delight in another person’s humiliation, is worthy only of contempt.

In fact, the purging of Spacey and Louis C.K. and the series with which they are connected will have an immediate impact on television in particular, not to mention a chilling effect on possible future ventures, helping to render the medium less critical and more conventional. If Hess and Dargis were allowed to carry out their purges, the results would be disastrous for cultural life.

Already we have the appalling example of Spacey being excised from a finished film, Ridley Scott’s All the Money in the World, and his scenes re-shot with Christopher Plummer in his stead. Stalin comes to Hollywood! Scott and Plummer ought to be ashamed of themselves, but there is no indication they are.

Louis C.K. is not a fiend deserving to be liquidated. He appears to suffer from emotional disorders that find expression in his compulsive exhibitionism. There must certainly have been a way to deal with his form of behavioral disorder without ending his career as an actor and comic. Perhaps one of his producers, directors or agents might have done more, or anything, to help Louis C.K. if he or she had not been so fixated on making as much money off the comic’s work as possible.

What if the moral criteria advocated by Hess and Dargis were to be applied retroactively?

August Strindberg
August Strindberg

Perhaps the writings of Ernest Hemingway, August Strindberg and Lord Byron (notorious for their stormy or difficult relationships with the opposite sex), the films of Charlie Chaplin (who married 18-year-old Oona O’Neill when he was 54) and the paintings of Egon Schiele (arrested for having sex with a teenage girl) and Fra Filippo Lippi (the Renaissance artist who scandalously seduced a young nun) should be removed from libraries, cinemas and galleries, respectively. Charles Dickens abandoned his wife for a younger woman, Leo Tolstoy broke from his on the eve of his death.

Oscar Wilde could easily be viewed as a sexual “predator” for his relationships with working class adolescents. And let us not forget that Lord Alfred “Bosie” Douglas, was not quite 21 when he first had sex with Wilde. Of course, there is evidence that Bosie may have been the aggressor, but let’s not quibble over facts and miss the bigger moral picture. Perhaps the Marquess of Queensberry, Lord Alfred’s father, deserves belated thanks for having served as the agent of Wilde’s destruction.

Oscar Wilde
Oscar Wilde

Should we continue down the list of artistic miscreants whose works might, in light of their notorious exploits, merit destruction? The painter Caravaggio and the poet François Villon may well have been murderers. Balzac, a little less recklessly and bloodily, had a child with one married woman and a decade-long intimate correspondence with another. Conservative contemporaries generally regarded him and his work as immoral and dangerous. What about Frida Kahlo, the icon of present-day feminists, who was relentless in her pursuit of sexual conquests, choosing targets of both genders?

Hess, Dargis and the rest of the middle class moralizers never stop to consider whether there is an element in art that transcends the individual life and personal conduct.

In fact, the more insightful writers on aesthetics over the past two centuries have understood that the great artist immerses him or herself as thoroughly as possible in the material at hand, largely setting aside his or her own personality and its individual characteristics. The artist becomes the particular means through which the theme that has seized him or her is formed.

But Hess and Dargis construct art according to their own petty intellectual and moral dimensions, as something narrow and thoroughly subjective. Of course the artist deals in sensations and perceptions, but as Marxists insist, the question of questions is: “Do our subjective sensations have objective significance?”

Our authors never concern themselves with whether or not the work of a given artist, even with his or her socially produced deformities, contributes to our understanding of the world and of ourselves. One of the difficulties is that both operate in the shallow and stagnant waters of contemporary American popular culture, where nothing especially illuminating does occur at present.

Dargis writes: “One fallacy about criticism is that it can be practiced objectively, as if we could see and write about movies from some sort of out-of-body experience. As if it were possible for me to watch a movie in which women are abused for no apparent reason—without even a pretense of narrative rationale—and view this exploitation as simply another formal attribute, like the cinematography, soundtrack or superb camerawork.”

As is the habit with philistines, Dargis identifies “objectivity” with passive impartiality. The aim is not to write about or regard films from “some sort of out-of-body experience,” but to treat them with regard for their truthfulness, their correspondence to the way the world is. Films that present women or any other portion of humanity in a dishonest or exploitative manner need to be rejected, although again Dargis’s selective perception is worth noting. She is evidently not upset by films that defend US imperialism’s crimes and paint Iraqis as a form of alien life, having placed Clint Eastwood’s foul, pro-military American Sniper at the top of her list of 2014 films “that meant the most to me.”

American Sniper (2014)
American Sniper (2014)

Art arrives at objective truths about reality, as science does, although obviously by other means. The recent series Geniusplayed upon Albert Einstein’s supposed misdeeds as a husband. It chose to suggest, as the WSWS review observed, that his first wife, Mileva Maric, “came up with the ideas and mathematics for special relativity and that Einstein essentially stole her ideas.” This was wrongheaded enough, but suppose another film or series were to take a different tack: that the theory of relativity itself is tainted and needs to be reexamined in the light of Einstein’s unhappy relations with certain women in his life.

There is a lengthy intellectual and social history behind the retrograde positions advanced by Hess and Dargis, as they have emerged and flourished within the well-heeled professional middle class.

On the one hand, we have suffered through decades of postmodernism and identity politics with their extreme subjectivism and relativism, which write off the possibility of establishing the objective truth about society or history. On the other, whatever meager democratic residue that remained within official American life has been worn away through the endless “war on terror,” with its “human rights” justifications of military interventions, detention without trial, torture and other atrocities, along with a series of manipulated sex scandals.

The entire identity politics crowd in the US, like the establishment as a whole, is moving sharply to the right, toward support for censorship, political or moral witch-hunting and outright repression. The Weinstein-Spacey-Louis C.K affairs (with more to come!), combined with the “fake news” and anti-Russia campaigns, have simply provided these people the occasion for more brazenly embracing a right-wing, anti-democratic program.

(Republished from World Socialist Web Site by permission of author or representative)




Social media like Twitter is revealing in that it demonstrates the interpretative frameworks of various so-called “influencers” and their followers. Case in point was a Twitter storm between Laura Loomer and one Tariq Nasheed, a black self-described historian and MLK Conservative. Nasheed has 212,000 Twitter followers, has a radio show and spends most of his efforts playing on the one-trick pony “white supremacist” epithet. He does this against personalities in the Alt-Right, including what The New Nationalist (TNN) feels is controlled-opposition Alt-Right. Loomer has 114,000 followers on Twitter.

Nasheed decided to challenge some assertions from Loomer that Jews control the media and finance. He asked for evidence that this was the case.

Laura Loomer (a Jew) set Nasheed straight. Hundreds of cognoscenti jumped all over the rather elementary factoid about Jewish Power like it was some kind of revelation and Eureka moment. It was retweeted, discussed, and given likes all over Twitter.

TNN Takeaway: We wonder if Loomer, as a Jew, is just bragging, or does she have a larger issue to address?  We also wonder what the response would have been if little ol’ goy TNN had called Nasheed out for his astonishing ignorance of such an important fact. We would suggest that it is at worst prohibited or at best frowned upon. Indeed, the brainwashing is so pervasive that ownership of such a topic is claimed by Jews. We here at TNN have a modest goal of extending the Overton Window wide enough to permit non-Jews to enter this conversation. Would that be okay, controllers?

In the meantime, here are the facts about Jewish ownership and management control of all media. To Nasheed: Jewish control is not the same animal as “white” control. As usual, we need to ask the Loomer-Nasheed cognescenti: How has that been working for ya?

Who controls the news? Of the 67 senior executives of the major television and radio news networks, 47 are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 70%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major television and radio news networks by a factor of 35 times, or 3,500%.

Who controls corporate media? Of the 12 senior executives of the “Big Six” media corporations, nine are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 75%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the “Big Six” media corporations by a factor of 37.5 times, or 3,750%.

Who controls Hollywood?  Of the 60 senior executives of the major Hollywood studios, trade unions, and talent agencies, 50 are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Hollywood studios, trade unions and talent agencies by a factor of 41.5 times, or 4,150%.

Who controls television? Of the 64 senior executives of the major television broadcast networks, cable networks and production companies, 56 are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 88%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major television broadcast networks, cable networks and production companies by a factor of 44 times, 4,400%.

Who controls music? Of the 50 senior executives of the major music labels and trade organizations, 39 are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 78%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major music labels and trade organizations by a factor of 39 times, or 3,900%.

Who controls radio? Of the 46 senior executives of the major radio broadcast networks and station owners, 28 are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 61%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major radio broadcast networks and station owners by a factor of 30.5 times, 3,050%.

Who controls advertising? Of the 46 senior executives of the major advertising corporations and trade associations, 31 are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 67%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major advertising corporations and trade associations by a factor of 33.5 times, 3,350%.

Who controls print news?  Of the 65 senior executives of the major newspapers and news magazines, 42 are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 65%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major newspapers and news magazines by a factor of 32.5 times, 3,250%.



I get PTSD each time I look at photos of this Laura Loomer Jewess. And those tits! lol

The sadistic kike Laura Loomer has posted a tweet exposing the Jewish control of the media. There is some debate about Rupert Murdoch being a Jew, but if this Jewess says he is a Jew than we’ll just run with it. At the very least he’s a Zionist who has supported all sorts of Jewish causes.

JEWISH Owners/ CEOs of Top Media companies:

FOX News: Rupert Murdoch
CNN: Jeff Zucker
NBC: Brian Roberts
CBS: Murray Rothstein
ABC: Robert Iger
NY Times: Arthur Sulzberger Jr
Facebook: Mark Zuckerberg
HBO: Richard Plepler

Do you need me to name any more  for you Tariq? 

Even if you want to convince yourself that Rupert Murdoch isn’t Jewish, Disney chairman Bob Iger IS Jewish, & he’s buying Fox. His company just made its agreement official to buy 21st Century Fox in a $52.4 BILLION deal.

So, now Fox will be Jewish owned too.

Sit down, Tariq. 

But considering Loomer’s track record, it is safe to assume that this is part of some type of diabolical kike plot. After all, this is the same Jewess who lied about her tire being slashed. If she speaks truth, it is likely designed to further a larger goal that she has.

But why else would a Jewess like herself willingly expose the Jewish control of the media? Is she trying to make us believe that she’s a good self-hating Jew? Is she trying to attract a Nazi to rape?

Nice try Laura. Even though we appreciate you exposing the filthy kikes who control the media, you will never be accepted in our circles. You are a racial enemy who has a track record of spreading lies and deception for thousands of years. You should just crawl back into the hole you came from.













POTUS Trump opens up new front against Jeff Bezos and Amazon

Amazon should pay “MUCH MORE” in shipping fees.

US POTUS Donald Trump tweeted out that Amazon should pay ‘MUCH MORE’ to ship packages, as the US President claims that the current status quo makes Jeff Bezos’ Amazon richer while the US Postal Service loses money.

The feud between Trump and billionaire globalist Bezos has been on consistently shaky ground considering the Amazon CEO also owns anti-Trump news outlet The Washington Post.

‘Why is the United States Post Office, which is losing many billions of dollars a year, while charging Amazon and others so little to deliver their packages, making Amazon richer and the Post Office dumber and poorer?’ the president asked on Twitter.

‘Should be charging MUCH MORE!’

Why is the United States Post Office, which is losing many billions of dollars a year, while charging Amazon and others so little to deliver their packages, making Amazon richer and the Post Office dumber and poorer? Should be charging MUCH MORE!

Via The Daily Mail

The USPS has posted losses for 11 straight years, largely on the basis of gigantic legacy pension and health care costs.

And while online shopping has led to growth in its package-delivery business, fewer Americans send letters via first-class mail every year.

Federal regulators moved recently to allow bigger jumps to stamp prices beyond the rate of inflation, which could eventually increase companies’ shipping rates.

Amazon, on the other hand, has the markings of an unstoppable juggernaut – and one analysis shows that the Postal Service is giving it a free ride.

An April report from Citigroup found that the fast pace of change in the shipping business has left the USPS struggling to allocate its expenses correctly.

Bureaucrats have fixed the share of infrastructure costs associated with packages at a 5.5 per cent, but package shipments now make up 25 per cent of the USPS’s business.

Factoring in the actual expenses associated with delivering more packages than their price model allows for, boxes should cost postal customers $1.46 more than they do, on average – building the equivalent of a government subsidy into the final price.

‘It is as if every Amazon box comes with a dollar or two stapled to the packing slip — a gift card from Uncle Sam,’ a Wall Street Journal commentator wrote in June.

Amazon acquired Whole Foods Markets in August, pushing its third-quarter revenue to $43.7 billion.

Amazon’s stock price has jumped by 23 per cent in the past 90 days.

Yet the company continues to see shipping as a loss-leader, reporting that it lost $7.2 billion shipping packages in 2016.

Customers can receive free two-day shipping on most items by paying for a $99 annual ‘Prime’ membership. Some of those packages arrive via USPS but many are sent through UPS and FedEx.

Even with the cost of shipping, Amazon posted an overall profit of $2.4 billion in 2016, up from $596 million a year earlier.


Fury over Amazon denial books

Autralian Jewish News

AMAZON has come under fire for offering books on Holocaust denial to the public and could be in breach of the Racial Discrimination Act.

The B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission (ADC) has slammed Amazon for offering titles such as Did Six Million Really Die?The Six Million: Fact or Fiction?The Myth of the Extermination of the Jews and The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry.

All these titles are available from the online provider through a simple Google search that takes readers to the Amazon site.

ADC chair Dr Dvir Abramovich told The AJN this week that Amazon Australia could be in breach of Section 18C of the federal Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits material likely to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” on the basis race or ethnicity.

He said Amazon Australia “should not be a hothouse and a cesspool of racism, xenophobia and bigotry and should not act as a gateway for young people to enter a world of hatred”.

“It is inexcusable for Amazon Australia to serve as a vehicle and a platform for bigots to disseminate and propagate their toxic and harmful invective. Literature that promotes and incites hatred against the Jewish people by demonising and defaming them, that denies and trivialises the Holocaust, and which foments racial violence, should not be normalised and mainstreamed,” he stated.

“I am sure that neo-Nazis, racists and radical groups, who cannot offer their heinous materials to traditional publishers, are delighted that this vile content, which glorifies Nazis and white supremacists, and which dehumanises Jews, is available in hard copy and ebook format for mass consumption.

“At a time of a dramatic rise in anti-Semitism, hate speech, and violence against Jews, to have such revolting, poisonous tracts, easily accessible for download, only helps to blow on the embers of prejudice and extremism.”

Abramovich added, “Companies have a moral responsibility and should review and evaluate their practices and guidelines. We urge Amazon Australia to do the right thing, and to withdraw these titles from its virtual shelves immediately.”

Amazon’s head office in the United States had not responded to The AJN at the time of going to press.


Amazon’s holocaust of holocaust books: MSM in denial

Amazon has “kindled” a bonfire of historical and scientific books – just like the Nazis did 80 years ago

False Flag Weekly News embedded above! Watch REAL news media (as opposed to the fake news MSM) cover this and all the other biggest stories of the week, featuring special guest Vinnie Eastwood. Click HERE for the list of stories we covered.

By Kevin BarrettVeterans Today Editor

The mainstream media (MSM) are refusing to report’s recent burning, shredding, and suppressing of at least 147 scientific and historical books. Most, though not all, of the suppressed titles involve what is loosely termed “holocaust revisionism.”

This is outrageous, un-American suppression of freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Yet the NY Times, Washington Post, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, and all the rest of the supposed “free press” won’t even report it, much less protest.


If Trump and Steve Bannon ever decide to send thugs in jackboots into corporate mainstream media offices (including Amazon offices, where Bezos and his Washington Post front for the CIA) to eject or imprison those “enemies of the American people,” many of us who would otherwise have defended the media, had it been remotely doing its job, are going to feel ambivalent, to put it mildly. The ongoing media coverup of all of the worst aspects of US Deep State corruption — 9/11 and other false flags, political assassinations, the pedophile elite, wars for Israel, and so on — has led many people of good will to feel even more contempt for the MSM than Trump does.

And now, the MSM’s silence in the face of Amazon’s latest atrocity is the last straw.

This is not a matter of “suppressing hatred.” It is a manner of maintaining officially-mandated hatred (of Germans, primarily; and by extension, of anyone Zionist Jews don’t like, such as Arabs, Muslims, and Palestinians).

Amazon has “kindled” a bonfire of historical and scientific books – just like the Nazis did 80 years ago

Interviewed on Truth Jihad Radio last night, leading revisionist publisher Germar Rudolf explained that virtually all of Castle Hill Publishers’ 68 books banned by Amazon on March 6th are dispassionate scientific and historical treatises. They feature no incitements to hatred, nor any derogatory language toward any racial, ethnic, or religious groups.


So why were they banned?

Rudolf’s one-word answer: “Success.” He elaborated:

“Just over two years ago, in December 2014, we had our first collision with Amazon. At that time a new book came out by the Swiss-British Jew Gerhard Menuhin, Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil, published by the Barnes Review. They were looking for a (distribution) partner in the UK. My company, Castle Hill Publishers, took it on.

“It was the perfect moment for such a book to become successful…on the topic of Jewish power and influence, and the manipulation of the holocaust narrative to protect themselves from criticism. Because it was written by a person of Jewish descent, people take him seriously. When a ‘goy’ writes a book like this, and there are dozens out there, nobody takes them seriously, because people have a psychological twist in their minds that criticism of Jews has to come from Jews, otherwise it’s the third rail, you can’t touch it.

“Sales (of Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil) were going through the roof. It was Christmas season; that’s when people buy presents. Orders were coming in so fast that we had problems fulfilling, we had problems getting the books. Sales were going exponentially up. And Amazon has a policy that if you don’t fulfill your order within a certain time frame, you can get in trouble. So we got in trouble, and they pulled the plug on us. But the kind of trouble we were in is not a reason to cancel an account. And they refused to reinstate us. The same thing happened to Barnes Review, even though they were not in violation of anything, they had no fulfillment issues. So it wasn’t about fulfillment, it was the result of a massive complaint coming from certain quarters that didn’t like this book being successful.

“So then we shifted to printers who work directly with Amazon, and expanded our offerings. At the end of last year we had some 100 titles listed, almost all of them highly controversial. And soon we were observing sales statistics with some of these books that were similar to comparable books representing orthodoxy. Sometimes ours were selling better than those of the orthodoxy. And that development was prevalent since last summer and early fall. I was observing that we were catching up and overtaking the sales of the other side.

“Well, the Jewish lobby can read those statistics too. It is a matter of cultural hegemony. This topic is extremely crucial for their cultural hegemony: Put a guilt trip on everyone because of the poor Jews being exterminated, and the threat of them being exterminated again. They can manipulate everyone, including their own people: Jews are being educated to be paranoid against non-Jews, to keep the sheep in the flock. So they use it for both sides. So these (sales statistics) showed there was a paradigm shift, a cultural threat, and if they let it happen it would strike at the very core of their hegemony. And so something was bound to happen.

“The first case of them screaming bloody murder came in Australia, where our sales were first overtaking those of the other side. Then starting in fall last year, the Guardian and others were saying this (success of holocaust revisionist books) was scandalous.

“Then we had, here in the US, the case of (Jewish) cemetery vandalism, which I think kick-started the whole thing…whether it was a false flag or a real event still needs to be investigated.

“Then you see Yad Vashem saying Amazon really should pull those books, because in this atmosphere, anything has to be done to combat anti-Semitism. And again, they quoted irrelevant books; they never really named any of the things that were targeted (to avoid giving them publicity). And that was in early March. Then we had the ‘incident’ in New York that wasn’t an incident; it was basically just a neglected cemetery. Things had crumbled over the years, and nobody cared. But  in the current atmosphere of paranoia, they screamed bloody murder and used it to twist some more arms. And then Amazon pulled the plug.

“I got a notification on Amazon Kindle, the ebook branch, that has almost a monopoly, that a huge list of 70 titles had been pulled, and if I ever tried to post anything similar to that content again, I face penalties up to termination of my account.”


Other publishers have also had their books suppressed. The total number of banned books is heading into the hundreds.

As I recently wrote in an article for American Free Press:




Germar Rudolf writes (March 12, 2017):

Here is the latest list of books banned by Amazon. The count is up to 147 titles, 72 current, 75 out-of-print.

Note that almost all books banned by Amazon last Monday, march 6, were also simultaneously banned by Barnes & Noble. They are supposed to be competitors, but when it comes to these things…

Revisionist Books Banned by Amazon (72)
Title (linked to CHP Amazon Store
The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (2015) Buy it! USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: A Judge Looks at the Evidence (2015) Buy it! USA UK DEU
Der Holocaust: Die Argumente (2nd ed.) Buy it! USA UK DEU
The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry (2015) Buy it! USA UK DEU
Holocaust High Priest Buy it! USA UK DEU
Auswanderung der Juden aus dem Dritten Reich Buy it! USA UK DEU
The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt”, vol. 1 Buy it! USA UK DEU
The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt”, vol. 1 Buy it! USA UK DEU
The Real Case for Auschwitz Buy it! USA UK DEU
Schiffbruch Buy it! USA UK DEU
Vorlesungen über den Holocaust Buy it! USA UK DEU
Die Bunker von Auschwitz Buy it! USA UK DEU
Der Holocaust vor Gericht Buy it! USA UK DEU
Die Leuchter-Gutachten Buy it! USA UK DEU
Air Photo Evidence Buy it! USA UK DEU
The Giant with Feet of Clay Buy it! USA UK DEU
Der Jahrhundertbetrug Buy it! USA UK DEU
Die Zentralbauleitung der Waffen SS Auschwitz Buy it! USA UK DEU
Chelmno Buy it! USA UK DEU
Sobibor Buy it! USA UK DEU
Der Auschwitz-Mythos Buy it! USA UK DEU
Kardinalfragen an Deutschlands Politker Buy it! USA UK DEU
The Cremation Furnaces of Auschwitz, vol. 1 Buy it! USA UK DEU
The Cremation Furnaces of Auschwitz, vol. 2 Buy it! USA UK DEU
The Cremation Furnaces of Auschwitz, vol. 3 Buy it! USA UK DEU
“Die Vernichtung der europäischen Juden”. Raul Hilberg… Buy it! USA UK DEU
Breaking the Spell Buy it! USA UK DEU
Debating the Holocaust Buy it! USA UK DEU
The Central Construction Office of the Waffen SS Auschwitz Buy it! USA UK DEU
Dissecting the Holocaust Buy it! USA UK DEU
The First Holocaust Buy it! USA UK DEU
The Leuchter Reports Buy it! USA UK DEU
Exactitude. Festschrift for R. Faurisson Buy it! USA UK DEU
Holocaust-Revisionismus Buy it! USA UK DEU
Jewish Emigration from the Third Reich Buy it! USA UK DEU
Debunking the Bunkers of Auschwitz Buy it! USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: Plain Facts Buy it! USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: Nackte Fakten Buy it! USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: Die erste Vergasung Buy it! USA UK DEU
Feuerzeichen: Die Kristallnacht Buy it! USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: The First Gassing Buy it! USA UK DEU
Das Konzentrationslager Stutthof Buy it! USA UK DEU
Curated Lies Buy it! USA UK DEU
Concentration Camp Stutthof Buy it! USA UK DEU
Fail: “Debunking Holocaust Denial Theories” Buy it! USA UK DEU
Special Treatment in Auschwitz Buy it! USA UK DEU
Auschwitz Lies Buy it! USA UK DEU
Sonderbehandlung in Auschwitz Buy it! USA UK DEU
Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil Buy it! USA UK DEU
Gesundheitsfürsorge in Auschwitz Buy it! USA UK DEU
The Holocaust: An Introduction Buy it! USA UK DEU
Fail: “Denying the Holocaust” Buy it! USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: Crematorium I Buy it! USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: Krematorium I Buy it! USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: Open-Air Incinerations Buy it! USA UK DEU
Freiluftverbrennungen in Auschwitz Buy it! USA UK DEU
Belzec Buy it! USA UK DEU
Treblinka Buy it! USA UK DEU
Sobibor Buy it! USA UK DEU
Concentration Camp Majdanek Buy it! USA UK DEU
Inside the Gas Chambers Buy it! USA UK DEU
Auschwitz-Lügen Buy it! USA UK DEU
Till Bastian, Auschwitz und die Auschwitz-Lüge Buy it! USA UK DEU
Fail: “Denying History” Buy it! USA UK DEU
Healthcare in Auschwitz Buy it! USA UK DEU
The Gas Vans Buy it! USA UK DEU
Der Holocaust: Die Argumente (3rd ed.) Buy it! USA UK DEU
Chelmno Buy it! USA UK DEU
P. Winter, The Six Million: Fact or Fiction Buy it! USA UK DEU
D. Hoggan, The Myth of the Six Million Buy it! USA UK DEU
V. Thorn, The Holocaust Hoax Exposed Buy it! USA UK DEU
S. King, The Bad War Book Search USA UK DEU
Revisionist Out-of-Print Books Banned by Amazon (75)
Title Availability Amazon Store
Das Rudolf Gutachten, 1st ed. 1993 Book Search USA UK DEU
Das Rudolf Gutachten, 2nd ed. 2001 Book Search USA UK DEU
The Rudolf Report, 1st. ed. (2003), pb Book Search USA UK DEU
The Rudolf Report, 1st. ed. (2003), hc Book Search USA UK DEU
Dissecting the Holocaust, 1st edition (2000) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: Nackte Fakten, 1st ed. (1995) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: Plain Facts, 1st ed. (2005) Book Search USA UK DEU
Vorlesungen über Zeitgeschichte, 2nd ed. (2005) Book Search USA UK DEU
Vorlesungen über Zeitgeschichte, 3rd ed. (2012) Book Search USA UK DEU
Vorlesungen über Zeitgeschichte, 4th ed. (2015) Book Search USA UK DEU
KL Majdanek, 1st ed. (1998) Book Search USA UK DEU
KL Majdanek, 2nd ed. (2003) Book Search USA UK DEU
Concentration Camp Majdanek, 1st ed. (2003) Book Search USA UK DEU
Concentration Camp Majdanek, 2nd ed. (2004) Book Search USA UK DEU
Konzentrationslager Stutthof, 1st ed. (1999) Book Search USA UK DEU
Concentration Camp Stutthof, 1st ed. (2003) Book Search USA UK DEU
Concentration Camp Stutthof, 2nd ed. (2004) Book Search USA UK DEU
Riese auf tönernen Füßen, 1st ed. (1999) Book Search USA UK DEU
The Giant with Feet of Clay, 1st ed (2001) Book Search USA UK DEU
The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (1977) Book Search USA UK DEU
The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (1985) Book Search USA UK DEU
The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (1992) Book Search USA UK DEU
The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (1998) Book Search USA UK DEU
The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (2003) Book Search USA UK DEU
Die Auflösung des osteuropäischen Judentums 1st ed. (1983) Book Search USA UK DEU
The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry, 1st ed. (1983), pb Book Search USA UK DEU
The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry, 1st ed. (1983), hc Book Search USA UK DEU
The First Holocaust, 1st ed. (2003) Book Search USA UK DEU
The First Holocaust, 2nd ed. (2005) Book Search USA UK DEU
Treblinka: Vernichtungslager oder Durchgangslager? (2002) Book Search USA UK DEU
Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp, 1st ed. (2003) Book Search USA UK DEU
Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp, 1st ed. reprint (2010) Book Search USA UK DEU
Belzec: Propaganda, Zeugenaussagen, archäologische Untersuchungen, historische Fakten (2004) Book Search USA UK DEU
Belzec in Propaganda, Testimonies, Archeological Research, and History, 1st ed. (2004) Book Search USA UK DEU
Belzec in Propaganda, Testimonies, Archeological Research, and History, 1st ed. reprint (2010) Book Search USA UK DEU
Sonderbehandlung in Auschwitz, 1st ed. (2003) Book Search USA UK DEU
Special Treatment in Auschwitz, 1st ed. (2004) Book Search USA UK DEU
The Bunkers of Auschwitz, 1st ed. (2004) Book Search USA UK DEU
Jewish Emigration from the Third Reich, 1st ed. (2004) Book Search USA UK DEU
The Central Construction Office of the Waffen-SS and Police Auschwitz, 1st. ed (2004) Book Search USA UK DEU
The Leuchter Reports, 1st ed (2005) Book Search USA UK DEU
The Leuchter Reports, 2nd ed (2005) Book Search USA UK DEU
The Leuchter Reports, 3rd ed (2012) Book Search USA UK DEU
Debating the Holocaust, 1st ed. (2009) Book Search USA UK DEU
Freiluftverbrennungen in Auschwitz, 1st ed. (2014) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: Open Air Incinerations, 1st ed. (2005) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: Open Air Incinerations, 1st ed. reprint (2010) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz-Lügen, 1st ed. (2005) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz-Lügen, 2nd ed. (2012) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz-Lies, 1st ed. (2005) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz-Lies, 2nd ed. (2011) Book Search USA UK DEU
Sobibor, Holocaust Propaganda and Reality, 1st ed. (2011) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: Die erste Vergasung, 1st ed. (2007) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: Die erste Vergasung, 2nd ed. (2014) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: The First Gassing, 1st ed. (2005) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: The First Gassing, 2nd ed. (2012) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: Crematorium I, 1st ed. (2005) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz: Krematorium I, 1st ed. (2014) Book Search USA UK DEU
Auschwitz – The Case for Sanity (2010) Book Search USA UK DEU
Chelmno: A German Camp in History and Propaganda, 1st ed (2011) Book Search USA UK DEU
Inside the Gas Chambers, 1st ed. (2014) Book Search USA UK DEU
The Gas Vans, 1st ed. (2011) Book Search USA UK DEU
Air Photo Evidence, 2nd ed. (2014) Book Search USA UK DEU
The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt”, 1st ed. (2013) Book Search USA UK DEU
Breaking the Spell, 1st ed. (2014) Book Search USA UK DEU
B. Kulaszka (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die? (1992) Book Search USA UK DEU
W. Stäglich, Der Auschwitz-Mythos (1979) Book Search USA UK DEU
W. Stäglich, Der Auschwitz-Mythos (2011) Book Search USA UK DEU
W. Stäglich, The Auschwitz Myth (1986) Book Search USA UK DEU
W. Stäglich: Auschwitz: A Judge Looks at the Evidence(1990) Book Search USA UK DEU
J. Graf, Der Holocaust auf dem Prüfstand (1993) Book Search USA UK DEU
G. Rudolf, Holocaust-Revisionismus, 1st ed. (2005) Book Search USA UK DEU
G. Rudolf, Kardinalfragen zur Zeitgeschichte (1996) Book Search USA UK DEU
I. Weckert, Flashpoint: Kristallnacht 1938 (1991) Book Search USA UK DEU
I. Weckert, Feuerzeichen: Die Reichskristallnacht (1981) Book Search USA UK DEU
Germar Rudolf


Syria Eyewitnesses Provide Evidence of US Support of ISIS Terrorists


(Home – Stephen Lendman). 

Contact at

Trump lied claiming his administration’s highest priority is “defeat(ing) and destroy(ing)” ISIS and other terrorist groups.

Washington created and supports them. Trump continues the imperial agenda he inherited from his predecessors – a warrior president deploring peace and stability.

Earlier photographic evidence showed ISIS using US-made TOW-guided anti-tank missiles against government forces.

Their tanks, artillery, mortars and other heavy weapons come from foreign suppliers – notably from America, other NATO countries and Israel.

Without their material support, ISIS and other terrorist groups couldn’t exist.

Earlier Russian Defense Ministry satellite images showed US support for these groups, including their use of US-produced Humvee armored vehicles used by Pentagon special forces.

Sergey Lavrov earlier condemned Washington’s refusal to combat al-Nusra terrorists, calling US policy “absolutely unacceptable.”

New accusations of US support for ISIS come from eyewitnesses, reported by Syrian media – residents of Deir Ezzor saying US helicopters evacuated jihadist fighters.

Sources reported them taken to al-Hasakah province in northeastern Syria, the area controlled by US forces.

Damascus informed UN authorities about what’s going on to no avail, no actions taken by the world body to denounce US support for ISIS and other terrorist groups.

Earlier Syrian reports said US helicopters evacuated wounded ISIS fighter to receive medical treatment from Doctors Without Borders.

Russia’s Defense Ministry accused the US-led “coalition” of training jihadist fighters in al-Hasakah, reorganizing the so-called New Syrian Army, comprised of cutthroat killers.

Earlier reports indicated US helicopters evacuated ISIS field commanders from Raqqa, Deir Ezzor, and Mayadin.

Russia’s reconciliation center in Syria also accused the US-led “coalition” of relocating jihadist fighters to continue combatting government forces.

Washington’s goal in Syria remains unchanged – regime change, replacing Assad with pro-Western puppet rule, controlling the country, looting its resources, subjugating its people, and isolating Iran ahead of a similar strategy to undermine its government.

Geopolitical conditions are dismal, Trump continuing the belligerent agenda of the Clintons, Bush/Cheney and Obama – escalating conflicts, not ending them, risking war in new theaters.

Prospects for the new year look grim, no end of Washington’s rage for imperial wars of aggression. Its aim for unchallenged dominance threatens everyone.

Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the CRG, Correspondent of Global Research based in Chicago.

My newest book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”


Call It Like You Hear/See It!


Health Editor’s note:  Have you ever heard someone talking and want to say, “Why are you speaking?”  I certainly have. Guess what!  Even if the person who is speaking is the “now president of the U.S., there can be a resounding “WHY ARE YOU TALKING MOMENT OR TWO.” I do not even think you need to be a psychiatrist/psychologist to make a diagnosis about someone’s mental state.  After all, it can just be your opinion and you are not getting paid for that……..Carol 

‘Goldwater Rule’ Under Fire Again

Psychiatrist calls APA dictum ‘paternalistic’ and ‘outdated’

by Shannon Firth, Washington Correspondent, MedPage Today December 27, 2017

The New England Journal of Medicine rekindled the debate over whether psychiatrists should speak publicly and candidly on the state of President Trump’s mental health, in a pair of articles published Wednesday.

Facing off were Claire Pouncey, MD, PhD, a psychiatrist for Eudaimonia Associates in Philadelphia, and Jeffrey Lieberman, MD, past president of the American Psychiatric Association (APA), which has long promulgated a rule for members strictly forbidding them from commenting on any individual’s mental health without having performed a personal examination.

Technically Section 7.3 of the APA’s code of ethics, it’s often called “the Goldwater rule.” The APA issued it following a successful lawsuit by then-Sen. Barry Goldwater (R-Ariz.) against a magazine named Fact that published an article quoting psychiatrists who gave him mental illness diagnoses based solely on Goldwater’s public statements.

When psychiatrists began openly defying the rule earlier this year, the APA doubled down. It declared that “any opinion on the affect, behavior, speech or other presentation of an individual that draws on the skills, training, expertise and/or knowledge inherent in the practice of psychiatry” can only be provided in the context of a formal, in-person procedure.

In her Perspective article, Pouncey defended another psychiatrist, Bandy Lee, MD, MDiv, of the Yale School of Medicine’s Law and Psychiatry Division, who recently published a collection of essays entitled The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President, setting off a new wave of discussion around the issue.

“[T]awdry, indulgent, fatuous tabloid psychiatry:” that was Lieberman’s succinct review of the book in Psychiatric Times.

Pouncey objected. “The APA keeps reiterating that in order to make a formal psychiatric diagnosis, you have to have a sit-down formal diagnostic interview and you have to get a release of information to share the information,” she said.

Such rules are “paternalistic” and tantamount to a “gag order,” she said in a phone call with MedPage Today.

“Everyone uses psychiatric terminology except for us, because the APA says that for us to use it constitutes a formal diagnosis, and I’m saying, ‘No, it doesn’t,” she said.

While her use of diagnostic language carries more weight than that of, for instance, a reporter for MedPage Today, Pouncey said, that shouldn’t preclude psychiatrists from using such terms — and it doesn’t stop them being citizens.

Moreover, she said the association’s rules are “outdated.” Comments to the press, “middle-of-the-night tweets” and public statements, are all sources of information from which psychiatrists and others can evaluate public figures, she said.

While it’s important to be mindful, Pouncey said, “We can’t stop being the people that we are and wearing the various social hats that we wear, and we shouldn’t have to.”

As for the book, Pouncey said, it isn’t about diagnosis at all.

“This book is about dangerousness. What the author is doing is saying these neuropsychiatric patterns show someone who doesn’t have the ability to make safe decisions,” she told MedPage Today in a phone call.

In her NEJM article, she wrote, “I believe that the APA, in the interest of promoting public health and safety, should encourage rather than silence the debate the book generates. And it should take caution not to enforce an annotation that undermines the overriding public health and safety mandate that applies to all physicians.”

Pouncey was not entirely dismissive of the rule, saying it “reminds us to remain humble about the claims we can reasonably make and to present ourselves responsibly for the sake of our patients and our profession.”

But the APA’s continued insistence on the rule contradicts the “moral obligation” language of Section 7 of the American Medical Associations’ Principles of Medical Ethics, which stresses physician’s duty to promote public health and safety, Pouncey argued.

In response, Lieberman, of the Department of Psychiatry for the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York City, firmly backed the APA position.

Lieberman wrote that “brand[ing] elected officials with neuropsychiatric diagnoses” is “political partisanship disguised as patriotism.” He cited historical examples of psychiatrists’ unsavory involvement in politics, including “collusion in Nazi eugenics” and “the involuntary confinement in mental hospitals of dissidents and religious groups in the People’s Republic of China.”

He also noted there is an existing mechanism by which the president can have a psychiatric diagnosis made or ruled out: the 25th Amendment, under which the vice president and cabinet can require it.

While Lee and Pouncey may be acting in “good faith” they espouse a “misguided and dangerous morality,” Lieberman asserted.

For more discussion on “misdiagnosing Trump” see MedPage Today’s exclusive interview with prominent psychiatrist Allen Frances, MD, who led creation of diagnostic criteria for narcissistic personality disorder.