Netanyahu Held Secret Talks With Saudi Prince Salman in Amman – Israeli Media

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman Al Saud (L) and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

© Sputnik / Alexei Druzhinin/Mikhael Klimentyev

MIDDLE EAST

Get short URL
313

Last year, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu admitted that Tel Aviv develop “secret contacts” with Saudi Arabia despite the fact that the two countries have no diplomatic relations.

Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had held secret talks in the Jordanian capital Amman, according to the Israeli newspaper Maariv.

The negotiations were reportedly held on the sidelines of a visit to Amman by White House special adviser Jared Kushner and US Middle East envoy Jason Greenblatt.

READ MORE: Iran Blames Saudi Arabia for Paying Billions to US, Israel

One of Maariv’s political analysts, Jacky Hugi, was quoted by the Iran Front Page news website as saying that “a close friend” had told him about the Netanyahu-Salman meeting, “claiming that there were direct contacts between the two parties, both Saudi and Israeli, under the auspices of King Abdullah II of Jordan.”

Earlier, Haaretz reported that Netanyahu secretly met Jordan’s King Abdullah II in Amman, where they discussed regional developments and the strengthening of bilateral economic ties.

In November 2017, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu admitted that despite having no diplomatic relations with Riyadh, Tel Aviv had had “contacts” with Saudi Arabia, which he said “have been kept in general secret.”

READ MORE: Saudi Arabia ‘May Hope Israel Will Do the Job for Them and Fight Iran’ – Analyst

The same month, Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot revealed that his country was ready to share intelligence with Riyadh in order to “face Iran.”With Riyadh rejecting allegations about bolstering its relations with Tel Aviv, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman recognized Israel’s right to exist earlier this year.

The reported thaw comes amid escalated tensions between Iran, considered a threat by Israel and Saudi Arabia, which cut off diplomatic ties with Tehran in January 2016 following protests in front of its diplomatic premises in Tehran and Mashhad.



Palestine Tear Gas c84ab

Any relief for the people suffering in Gaza will have to come from outside the UN, so long as the US has veto power on the Security Council. As during the Vietnam War, the Council is deadlocked by the US veto.

The UN was created to protect the sovereignty of its member states and organize a multilateral, conceivably military response to violations of any member state’s sovereignty, but Palestine has never been allowed to become a sovereign member state, and the US uses its military dominance to trample all over the UN Charter anyway. Who’s going to provoke the 800-pound gorilla in the room?

So officials calling for another UN investigation in Gaza are just dodging the obvious: Israel is massacring Palestinian civilians again, but “the UN”—meaning the Security Council—has no power to stop it. Gazans remain caged in the world’s largest concentration camp, where the water is poisoned and sewage goes untreated. Electricity is rationed, even in hospitals, where doctors operate without morphine or anything more than aspirin. Gazans can’t leave, and the blockade keeps food, medicine, and construction materials from getting in and Palestinian exports from getting out. As Norman Finkelstein said on the 05.16.2018 broadcast of Democracy Now, “Gaza is the only place on Earth where the place is unlivable and the people can’t move.” Last week UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein said that Gazans “are, in essence, caged in a toxic slum from birth to death.”

If I were to go on about Israel’s criminal cruelty in Gaza, AHT readers would no doubt stop reading, because we know all this, as do readers of other marginalized left media in the US. We also know, as Joe Lauria writes in Consortium News, that the U.S. Media Whitewashes Gaza Massacre[s], if it even covers them at all. Gaza has been the top story in left and/or antiwar outlets since the latest massacre, but the silence of the US corporate press is barely broken by anything but editorials blaming Gazans or Hamas. The Canadian, European, and even Israeli press seem less locked down, but will European nations do anything to upset their own Zionist lobbies? For weeks most of the headlines including the name of British Labor Leader Jeremy Corbyn were about the latest person alleging he’s an anti-Semite.

The US Congress and President are wholly beholden to Israel, this president even more than his predecessors, and if any US Senators or Representatives have voted against legislation to condone, enrich, or arm Israel in the past 10 years, I must’ve been watching the NBA playoffs. Fifty-five of a hundred Senators are cosponsoring S. 720, a bill to criminalize the “Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement.”

UN Ambassador Nikki Haley has already vetoed a UN Security Council resolution calling for another investigation, even though such an investigation would be no more than another gesture because the US would veto any action proposed.

The government of Kuwait has called for a UN peacekeeping force to protect civilians in Gaza, but no such force could be organized in a way that would satisfy both Israel and Gaza, and if Israel didn’t welcome it, it would never get past the US veto. In “No HoldsBarred: Rwandan Troops Arethe Solutionfor Gaza,” one of Rabbi Shmuley Boteach’s more delirious essays in The Jerusalem Post, he suggested that Rwandan troops are best suited to serve as peacekeepers in Gaza because Rwanda suffered a genocide like the European Holocaust and would therefore be prepared to protect Israelis from Palestinians. You can’t make this stuff up.

The Rwandan massacres were not like the European Holocaust anyway—not a one-sided state bureaucracy subjugating, confining, and exterminating minority groups. In Rwanda, Hutu and Tutsi attacked each other, and the US and UK were pursuing their own geostrategy in the background. However, Israel finds advantage in equating the two and sharing the genocide trademark with Rwanda’s military dictatorship.

No way out?

There are few imaginable solutions beyond the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement, which hasn’t managed to rein in Israel’s aggression so far. Is it foolish to imagine that European nations and/or Israel’s other trading partners would impose sanctions? According to the Observatory of Economic Complexity, the top export destinations for Israeli products are the United States ($24B), China ($3.25B), Hong Kong ($2.89B), Palestine ($2.86B) and India ($2.13B). Israel imports the most products from the United States ($8.56B), China ($5.86B), Switzerland ($4.05B), Germany ($3.8B) and Belgium-Luxembourg ($3.44B).

We can of course forget the US because the Zionist lobby bushwhacks even the mention of sanctions, and both China and Hong Kong have quietly warm relations with Israel based on expanding trade relations. In April 2017, the South China Post reported that officials of Israel and Hong Kong had been meeting “to further strengthen economic ties,” including Israel’s “participation in Beijing’s belt and road initiative to revive land and maritime trade along the old Silk Route.” China is also known for sticking to business rather than politics, but that doesn’t mean it’s beyond grandstanding. In December 2017, The Diplomat reported that “China Vows to Play an Active Role in Settling the Palestine-Israel Issue,” but all that meant was that they’d just held a symposium about it in Beijing, as they did in Beijing in 2003 and Jerusalem in 2006. Palestine needs another symposium like it needs another investigation or another Operation Protective Edge.

This is all grandstanding on the international stage as a slow-motion genocide continues, and India joins in too. Time for India to Play a Role in Israel-Palestine Peace?, another Diplomat essay, says that India depends on Iranian oil, and buys 40 to 45 percent of Israel’s defense exports, but that “Indian foreign policy is also driven by a need to increase global standing and prestige. Palestine-Israel, being the world’s most high-profile conflict, provides ample opportunity for New Delhi to present its credentials as a global leader, and compete with China as a champion of the developing world.” How much more shamelessly, cynically self-serving could a nation get?

That leaves Palestine, Switzerland, Germany, and Belgium-Luxembourg as Israel’s other most significant trading partners. Israeli exports $2.86 billion worth of products to Palestine, but we can forget about any sanctions coming from that helpless direction.

Germany, Switzerland, and Belgium-Luxembourg together export roughly $11.4 billion worth of products to Israel, roughly $3 billion more than the United States and conceivably enough to make Israel uncomfortable if they imposed sanctions. However, calls for the protection of human rights or stopping genocide typically mask the concerns of global corporations, which have little to gain in Palestine. In 2003, France and its dashing Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin appeared heroic for refusing to join the US and UK in the Iraq War and voting against it on the UN Security Council. However, according to oil expert Antonia Juhasz, France had ulterior motives; Saddam Hussein had in fact agreed to open Iraqi oil fields to French, Russian, and Chinese corporations, but not to those of the US and UK.

Optimism is hard to muster, but cynicism is a dead end. There ain’t no power like the power of the people, and the power of the people don’t stop—if it can get organized and call out all this grandstanding for what it is. Palestine is the one cause I know of that can turn out huge crowds all over the world, as it does every time Israel starts “mowing the lawn” in Gaza again.

*(Palestinians run for cover from tear gas during clashes with Israeli security forces near the border between Israel and the Gaza Strip, east of Jabalia on May 14, 2018, as Palestinians protest over the inauguration of the US embassy following its controversial move to Jerusalem. Image credit: Mohammed Abed/ AFP/ Getty Images)

 

WRITER

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.