The Planet is Full…..the Depopulation Agenda

The Depopulation Agenda

“Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries”. – Dr. Henry Kissinger

Depopulation has been utilized extensively throughout recorded history wherever it is written that large population groups were deliberately killed through violence or starvation.

PityOfWar071When resources were scarce the preferred option of conquerors was to kill the conquered.

When resources were abundant the conquerors would usually keep the conquered as slaves.

The Old Testament of the Christian bible, also known as the Jewish Torah, describes at great length the Israelites slaughter of every man, woman and child in town after town that they conquer. And this slaughter of every man, woman and child is stated as being commanded by the Jewish god Jehovah.

In essence what this describes is divinely inspired genocide or to use its current politically correct designation, depopulation, which sounds very clinical.

The word depopulate actually comes from the Latin, depopulatus, which means ‘to lay waste’, ‘to ravage, ruin’ a people, to reduce the population of a people, especially by violence, disease, etc.

There was always a eugenics element to this sort of genocide, in that the conquerors normally viewed the conquered as inferior, and so didn’t want to mix their ‘blood’ with ‘blood’ that would weaken their race.

The word eugenics actually comes from the Latin, Eugenius, meaning ‘well-born’, which, in a modern scientific sense, has taken on the meaning of being the movement devoted to improving the human species through the control of hereditary factors in mating.

Photo_Measuring_Babies“Eugenics is a social and scientific movement that seeks to replace natural selection with scientific selection. Eugenics is all about healthy, intelligent children and parental responsibility to future generations. The basic principle is that which has been successfully applied by animal breeders for millennia: like breeds like–at least usually, if not always.(1)
Once the continuity of humankind with the rest of the animal kingdom was established, invigorated attempts to improve the human genome became inevitable. Eugenics is, after all, quite simply, applied human genetics. Five of the first six presidents of the American Society of Human Genetics were also members of the board of directors of the American Eugenics Society. Historically, modern genetics is an offshoot of the eugenics movement, not the reverse.
At its root, eugenics is an interdisciplinary conceptualization of the genetic consequences of social practices for current and future humans. Human ecology does not limit itself to the present population but defines society as the entire human community over time; we should act as nature’s stewards, and simple parental responsibility mandates self-restraint. Thus modern eugenics goes hand in hand with neo-Malthusian thinking, which views the current global population as already exceeding the planet’s long-term carrying capacity.

Blausen_0060_AssistedReproductiveTechnology

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Positive eugenics refers to approaches intended to raise fertility among the genetically advantaged. These include such genetic techniques as in-vitro fertilization, egg transplants, and cloning ̧ and also ways to encourage use of those techniques, for example, targeted demographic analyses and financial and political stimuli. Pro-natalist countries (that is, those that wish to stimulate their birth rates) already engage in moderate forms of positive eugenics.

Negative eugenics, which is aimed at lowering fertility among the genetically disadvantaged, largely fits under the rubric of family planning and genetic counseling. This includes contraception, abortions, and sterilization. To ensure that such services are available to all on a nondiscriminatory basis, it is advocated that, at a minimum, persons with low income receive such services, free of charge.
Genetic engineering, which was unknown to early eugenicists, consists of active intervention in the germ line without necessarily encouraging or discouraging reproduction of advantaged or disadvantaged individuals. It will allow people to have their own biological children without passing on their most problematic genes.
National family policy provides a good illustration of how a eugenics policy might be implemented. A government can opt either to offer subsidized day care to all women, permitting those wishing to work the opportunity to pursue their careers (according to eugenicists, a praiseworthy approach), or it can subsidize only poor women, many of whom are thus encouraged to view childbearing as a source of income (according to eugenicists, a dysgenic approach).
migrants-continue-arrive-hungaryAnother example is presented by the starkly different positions of the U.S. and Canadian governments on immigration. The United States imports the underclass of other countries to do jobs Americans don’t want to do, while Canada, whose immigrants are easily just as ethnically diverse as are America’s, rates immigration applicants according to educational levels and skills, which correlate highly with intelligence.
Simultaneous with and analogous to China’s Cultural Revolution in the 1960s, an ideological upheaval arrived in America as a denial of Darwinism, declaring eugenics to be the ideology of Holocaust. As the timeline demonstrates, for Jews, who had practiced eugenics for millennia, it was a repudiation of their own history.
The squandering of a group’s genetic patrimony is not by any means an exclusively Jewish affliction. Humankind’s elites are generally disappearing. Economists study human fertility in terms of cost-benefit analysis. Children are no longer the economic advantage they once were when the economy centered around agriculture.
As opposed to its two universalist heresies–Christianity and Islam–traditional Judaism is an explicitly tribalist religion, but as Jews left the ghetto and were subsumed by modern secular culture, they attempted to reconcile tribalism with universalism, creating an internal tension which still rives Jewry today. The resolution of this tension was found in America in the 1960s and 1970s in the form of ‘multiculturalism.’

2015-01-17-HeschelandKingatSelma-thumb

————Marching from Selma—————- ———Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. (center)——– Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel (2nd from right)

The period witnessed a confluence of three major ideology-forming strivings for Jews: the anti-war movement, the civil rights movement, and the Holocaust Memorial Movement. Jews defended blacks in Selma and Little Rock and battled the police at the Chicago Democratic Convention, but it was the visual images of heaped-up corpses (from cholera and starvation inducing allied bombing) discovered in German concentration camps a quarter century earlier that most keenly triggered their protest. The result was anger, ‘radicalization’, and the pursuit of poorly compatible goals. The Holocaust had been seared into their collective memory, and they were determined at all cost to avoid the role of outsiders confronted with a unified native and hostile ethos. Thus they supported open borders, which would make them one minority group of many, even as they fiercely defended the right of the Zionist state to take precisely the opposite tack.

 No group of people has exemplified this desire for pure, untainted ‘blood’, more the the Jewish people, due to their supposed ‘chosen’ status, as declared by their god, Jehovah.
An important barrier to outsider infiltration into the genome was the establishment of the matriline as the determinator of Jewishness. (While there can always be doubts as to paternity, maternity is tough to simulate.)

330px-NAACP_leaders_with_poster_NYWTS

Herbert Hill (second from right), labor director of NAACP, with Thurgood Marshall (second from left)

It was the late 1960s that married–in the public mind–eugenics to racial hostility. Outraged over prejudice and hostility, Jews sought out fellow victims for sympathy and support, and Afro-Americans had certainly been victimized, by any standards. ‘Negro’ civil-rights organizations were Jewish-funded and even Jewish-staffed. Over and over the media repeated the word ‘racism’ in conjunction with ‘anti-Semitism.’ Even as their parents fled the cities, young Jewish radicals marched in Alabama and Little Rock. It was really quite idealistic.

But there was an understandable psychological need to understand what motivated the foe.
And that slot was filled when the phraseology was expanded to ‘racism, anti-Semitism, and… eugenics.’ No matter that the majority of eugenicists had publicly decried such hostilities and prejudices.
And since anti-Semitism was mentioned, let’s take a look at this concocted word.
anti-semitismAbsurd terminology is a reliable barometer of muddled and emotional thinking, and any serious reexamination of Jewish eugenics requires a reconstitution of vocabulary. The word ‘anti-Semite,’ for example, still hangs on as an anachronistic coinage of late nineteenth-century racial taxonomy, referring not only to Jews, but also to Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, and Arabs. Semites were supposedly the offspring of Shem, one of Noah‟s three sons. Historical maps printed at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries show the southern shores of the Mediterranean as settled by ‘Semites’ while areas north of the Mediterranean are indicated as inherited by ‘Aryans.’ The mythology is no longer taken seriously, although in all fairness it must be conceded that the Semitic
languages are recognized as a distinct linguistic family.
Thus, even though the concept ‘Semite’ has been debunked as mythology, ‘anti-Semites’ continue to populate the writings of even serious scholars. One could with equal success employ the term ‘anti-unicornism.’ Still more quixotically, the ‘Semite’ component of ‘anti-Semite’ does not refer to ‘Semites,’ but only to Jews. Lastly, at least some Ashkenazi roots reach back, not to Palestine, but to Khazaria, so that calling the Jews ‘Semites’ is nothing less than nonsense all around.
Iran-Cartoon-208x300‘Anti-Semitic’ is now universally used to mean ‘anti-Jewish,’ but its lack of etymological coherence becomes especially evident, not in the adjective, but in the noun. If one substitutes ‘Semite’ with ‘Jew,’ the result is the hilarious neologism =’Anti-Jew.’ And what is the proper terminology when the ‘anti-Semite’ is, say, an Arab, that is, a ‘Semite’? A ‘self-hater’?
The reason the word has persevered for so long is that its vagueness conflates hostility toward Jews with criticism of Jews, presenting a huge barrier to objective analysis. Thus, vocabulary predetermines not only the categories in which we think, but even the range of permitted topics.
Even though the term is a patent absurdity, it has a long history behind it that will allow it to cling to existence for at least a while longer.
Actually, the code word for eugenics has now been chosen. A search that troubled many a scholar has produced a startlingly simple result… ‘genetics.’ Even a brief perusal of Ha’aretz, Forward, or Jewish Week produces glowing recommendations of genetic procedures that are pure eugenics.”(1)

Zionism

genocidal-ben-gurion“Zionism (Hebrewצִיּוֹנוּת Tsiyyonut IPA: [t͡sijo̞ˈnut]after Zion) is a nationalist political movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel (roughly corresponding to PalestineCanaan or the Holy Land). Zionism emerged in the late 19th century in central and eastern Europe as a national revival movement, in reaction to anti-Semitic (?) and exclusionary nationalist movements in Europe. Soon after this, most leaders of the movement associated the main goal with creating the desired state in Palestine, then an area controlled by the Ottoman Empire.(2)
Until 1948, the primary goals of Zionism were the re-establishment of Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel, ingathering of the exiles, and liberation of Jews from the antisemitic discrimination and persecution that they experienced during their diaspora.
A religious variety of Zionism supports Jews upholding their Jewish identity defined as adherence to religious Judaism, opposes the assimilation of Jews into other societies, and has advocated the return of Jews to Israel as a means for Jews to be a majority nation in their own state.
25s1pwwZionism was established with the political goal of creating a Jewish state in order to create a nation where Jews could be the majority, rather than the minority they were in a variety of nations in the diaspora.”(2)
And this Jewish state was and is being created through the application of racism, eugenics, exclusion, colonialism and genocidal depopulation, which just so happen to be the actions that have been condemned so vociferously by the Zionist Jewish leaders who formulated and executed the plan to create a Jewish State in order to be free of those same actions being perpetrated against the Jewish people.
The actions taken by the Zionist leaders of the Jewish State of Israel provide a perfect example of the application of negative eugenics and negative depopulation applied directly to a large group of people against their will.
Shrinking-Palestine-1024x724At the same time, those same Zionist leaders believe they are taking the best action possible to advance the population and eugenics goals for the Jewish people.
As it happens this is a perfect microcosm of the greater global plan of population and eugenics control that is being carried out now by the same financier/oligarchs who are bankrolling and directing the process in the Jewish State of Israel.

The Popular Image of Eugenics

Capture“In the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum‟s exhibit ‘Deadly Medicine: Creating the Master Race,’ curator Susan Bachrach maintains that eugenics “culminated” in the Holocaust. And even though most people would be unable to provide a definition of eugenics, they nevertheless generally concur with Bachrach, who represents an institution that, according to its official Web site, ‘teaches millions of people each year,’ and there are at least sixty-two other Holocaust museums in addition.(1)
Capture2But even this outreach is dwarfed by mass media that in their totality reach audiences numbering in the billions–and this on a daily basis. A Yahoo search for ‘eugenics’ and ‘anti-Semitism’ produced 311,000 items. A Google search for ‘holocaust+eugenics’ produced a lengthy series of Web sites, the first of which (the most widely read) began with the sentence ‘Probably one of the most hideous aspects of the Third Reich was their notorious fascination and experimentation with Eugenics.’
The first sentence of the second item reads that ‘The eugenics movement… was the forerunner of the Holocaust.’
The third item was a review of the above-mentioned eugenics exhibit at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., making little distinction between German racial hygiene laws and eugenics and characterizing them as ‘diabolical’.
That hereditarian thought was on occasion viciously distorted is not open to dispute, but to present it solely as an instrument of the Holocaust is a grotesque falsification. The following passage from Rabbi George Benedict‟s 1926 Mother‟s Day Sermon at Temple Emanu-El, Roanoke, Virginia, presents a far different image of the eugenics movement than one might expect on the basis of the above:
orthodox-jews-2And what but eugenic development of the race of Israel, whom, according to the conception of Moses, God had chosen to be a pattern to mankind as a nation consecrated to holiness, is the prime intent beneath every one of the laws of Moses? Whether regarded hygienically, morally, or religiously, the whole purport of the Torah, the Law of Moses, is to separate Israel from the rest of mankind as a Chosen People, in order to be a noble people, a well-born race of men for their own superior happiness, as well as, by way of example, to be a blessing to the world.
A current version of Jewish eugenics is to be found on the Web site of the Chicago Center for Jewish Genetic Disorders:
Kapparot-chickenslaughter-YomKippur14Dor Yeshorim [‘Upright Generations’ in Hebrew] is an international, confidential genetic screening system used mainly by Orthodox Jews, which attempts to prevent the transmission of genetic disorders that have an increased frequency among members of the Ashkenazi Jewish community. The system was established to follow Jewish law, under which abortion is not allowed, while acknowledging that testing might prevent the birth of an affected child. Designed in the early 1980s by an Orthodox rabbi, the system tests young adults before they begin to contemplate marriage. Participants can then use the system to learn their genetic compatibility with potential marital partners.
Eugenics–inadvertent and explicit, historical and current–lies at the very core of Jewish identity. Jewish eugenics cannot be understood as standing apart from human eugenics.
By the 1930s a global consensus of support had been achieved for eugenics, especially among
physicians, including German physicians. (If Jews made up 1.2% of the Reich population, in 1925 they constituted 0.9%, and by 1933 the figure had been reduced to a mere 0.76%. But in large cities such as Berlin, Frankfurt, and Hamburg as many as 30% to 40% of the doctors were Jewish.
ADN_animationBut, beginning in the late 1960s, eugenics with its focus on the selectionary consequences of differential fertility was declared beyond the pale, replaced by its own offspring–the natural science of genetics, and also demography with its modern reluctance to probe further than ‘total fertility.’ Indeed, why differentiate if genetic variance in human populations is preordained to be inconsequential? Physical anthropology came to be viewed as a poor second to cultural anthropology, with sociology, criminology, and pedagogy following in lock step, and the arts–as always–bringing up the rear.
Contrary to claims advanced by eugenics foes, Hitler’s position on such topics was not a bone of contention vis-à-vis his American and British World War II foes. His arch-nemisis Winston Churchill, Churchill, was an ardent eugenicist.
25645In 1904, the Conservative government of Arthur Balfour had established a Royal Commission “On the Care and Control of the Feeble-minded,” which reported to the Liberal government and recommended compulsory detention and sterilization of the unfit. In 1912 Balfour had personally addressed the First Eugenics Conference in London, which was attended by then Home Secretary Winston Churchill, who called for ‘a simple surgical operation (sterilization) so the inferior could be permitted freely in the world without causing much inconvenience to others.’ In 1910, Churchill had asked the civil service to investigate implementation of the Indiana law on sterilization.
Even earlier, in 1899, he had written to his cousin Ivor Guest: ‘The improvement of the British breed is my aim in life.’ The poet Wilfrid Scawen Blunt (1840-1922) wrote in his diary:
330px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-14059-0005,_Potsdamer_Konferenz,_Winston_ChurchillWinston is also a strong eugenist. He told us he had himself drafted the [Mental Deficiency] Bill which is to give power of shutting up people of weak intellect and so prevent their breeding. He thought it might be arranged to sterilise them.
In 1937, pressed by William Peel (1867-1937), head of the Palestine Royal Commission, that Britain “might have some compunction if she felt she was downing the Arabs year after year when they wanted to remain in their own country,” Churchill showed himself to be not only a supporter of eugenics, but of the rankest ‘racial hygiene’ as well:
I do not admit that the dog in the manger has the final right to the manger, even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit, for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America, or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to those people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher grade race, or, at any rate, a more worldly-wise race, to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.
The timeline of Jewish eugenics demonstrates beyond doubt that Jews were welcome, active participants in the eugenics movement and that Jews even today are still in the vanguard of a eugenic worldview, a fact entirely unknown to most people.
Eugenics is now viewed by many in the United States largely through the lens of the Holocaust and is to such a degree awash with understandably raw emotion as to quash any cries of protest. The upshot of the situation is that a group of largely Jewish activists have so successfully undermined the very eugenic mechanism that made Jewry what it is as to pose an existential threat to Jewry. But Jewish common sense, plain and old-fashioned as chicken soup, has not only continued to hold sway
in the practice of eugenics, it has even managed to surf the scientific tide of newly found genetic knowledge–all the while paying lip service to the Holocaust-from-eugenics gospel!

Take a look a the following video on Holocaust ‘facts’:

Unlike the U.S. situation, this anti-eugenics view never even got off the ground in Israel. Behavioral scientist Aviad Raz (b. 1968) of Ben Gurion University is quite open in pointing out that both the word ‘eugenics‟’and the actual practice of eugenics enjoy broad approval in that country, and objections to eugenics–at least as far as genetic screening combined with eugenic abortions–are a ‘non-issue’ in Israel:
Eugenic ideologies and practices have persisted in Israel, in a thinly disguised mode, even after the holocaust, because they were an inherent and formative part of Zionism….For many of the above mentioned respondents, prenatal genetic testing was eugenic and was indeed supported precisely for that reason, since ‘eugenic’ for them meant the improvement of the health of progeny and carried positive rather than negative connotations.
Zionist and eugenicist Ludwig Gumplowicz (1838-1909) writes in Racial Struggle that a stronger people enslaves a weaker people and takes over its land:
How does this amalgamation come about? Only in eternal racial struggle, in war and ‘peace’–there is no other way. Man would have to cease being human, he would have to–if it were only possible shuffle off everything that nature had made of him.
Jewish-Austrian journalist Nathan Birnbaum, who coined the words ‘Zionism’ and ‘Zionist,’ maintains that “the secure foundation of nationality is always and everywhere race.”
330px-Flag_of_the_United_Nations_(1945-1947).svgThe driving force behind the Holocaust Memorial Movement is not just grief over the tragedy of the past but also the desire to legitimize the Zionist state. In 1975, by a vote of 72 to 35, with 32 abstentions, the UN General Assembly declared that Zionism was “a form of racism and racial discrimination,” essentially declaring the State of Israel to be illegitimate. As a counterbalance, Jewish groups massively funded the Holocaust Memorial Movement. In its turn, the Holocaust Memorial Movement attacked the eugenics movement with ever increasing fury.
Even though eugenics is as cross-disciplinary a topic as is possible, encompassing anthropology, bioethics, ecology, genetics, history, philosophy, political science, religion, etc., for many it has been reduced to a branch of Jewish studies–’Holocaust.’
A multiplicity of views is obviously preferable to the straitjacket of an artificially imposed group cohesiveness, but history teaches that disproportionate political power inevitably seeks to transform scholarly discourse into a propaganda tool.

Adolf Hitler

Scapegoat

How, the reader must inevitably ask, has it come about that the fundamental pro-eugenics thrust–not just of Judaism and Zionism, but of Jewry in its essence and totality–has been so assiduously concealed, but that eugenics has been wed in the public consciousness to an infatuation with the topic on the part of a German political figure?

Maybe there’s a clue in this editorial from the American Hebrew:
Mixed marriages are not only a religious evil. That they are this, is very generally conceded. No one who has studied the question will maintain that the offspring of such marriages is apt to be of much value to Judaism. There will spring up among us a large class which will be neither Jews nor Gentiles,but a hybrid–useless for all purposes of further development. But the question involves ethnological and sociological problems also. The maintenance of the Jewish race purity has caused the preservation of Humanity’s present system of Semitic civilization.
The law of fittest surviving, aided by the breeding of hereditary qualities in a pure race, has given the Jews a physiological and mental superiority which can be perpetuated only by the perpetuation of the race purity.
Despite the urging of German eugenicists, no eugenics laws are passed in Germany during the Wilhelmine period. It is only in the strongly Jewish influenced Weimar Republic that eugenics enters
the popular consciousness and that such legislation begins to be proposed.
The Jewish attitude toward eugenics is truly paradoxical. We are dealing here with a disconnect between practice and theory. For lack of a proper understanding of the nature of eugenics as a world view, the rage has been directed at the word, so that a number of alternative terms have been proposed–’reproductive genetics,’ for example (as if such a beast as ‘non-reproductive genetics’ actually existed). It is like writing an encyclopedia article about horses without using the word ‘horse.'(1)
1013_rabbi-ovadia-yosef-300x300The reason a ‘paradoxical’ disconnect seems to exist is because the actual practice of eugenics is reserved for the ‘chosen’ Jewish population while the theory put forward for the rest of humanity is that eugenics is evil (think Holocaust) and should be avoided at all costs, which has the ultimate effect of degenerating all others races, enabling the ‘chosen’ to dominate and control the rest of humanity.
After all, the Jewish diaspora became painfully aware of the physical and mental (genetic/eugenic) problems that resulted from their tribe’s limited amount of procreation with the many people they lived among during hundreds of years. During this time they also witnessed the physical and mental degradation of those other cultures due to various multiracial mixing.

Population Control

Nathan-Rothschild-and-famed-quoteThe financier/oligarchs that currently control the financial system, became aware sometime before the Malthusian theories came on the scene, that they would lose their control of the geopolitical realms unless they found a way to keep the world population from exploding beyond a certain level. Not to mention the fact that they would also have to experience an increasing incursion of their fox hunting grounds.
What the financier/oligarchs and their lackeys want is to live a very comfortable feudal fiefdom existence with just enough serfs around them to take care of their needs and provide their entertainment, which according to current estimates is around 500 million to 2 billion people.
feudalism-then-and-now-hierarchy.jpg.w560h467
KWN-Fitzwilson-V-3292015
<<<<The chart above is close, except it skips those above the lackey Central Bankers.
Since the ranks of the financier/oligarchs were heavily populated by the same Zionists that were instrumental in the formation of a Jewish homeland, once they had control of the world economic system and they created a Jewish state, the next focus became decreasing world population, with a particular emphasis on any race other than the Jewish race.
Up to and including WW II, war had been the preferred method for culling large chunks of the population, since it enabled both the acquisition of new territory and new resources, while it also was good for business due to the fact that vast amounts of military equipment and armaments must be constantly replaced.
Yalta_summit_1945_with_Churchill,_Roosevelt,_StalinOnce the war was over, the allies divided up control of the defeated countries as well as the remaining countries that took no direct part in the war.
Taking advantage of the geopolitical disorder at the end of the war, the financier/oligarchs dream of creating a World Government organization, also came to fruition, when the United Nations was formed in 1945.
The United Nations Organization was created as a legitimate looking front that the financier/oligarchs and their lackeys could use to control economic, political and social systems throughout the world. Using economic control and their military power demonstrated during the war, the Allies eventually forced all nations to join the UN and submit to its edicts.
The_World_Bank_logo.svgThe primary method of control was shifted to economic manipulation through banking and the use of economic hitmen that would utilize loans and onerous debt to take over countries. The use of covert operations to acquire resources and capital was preferable to the use of violence, but if covert methods failed to get the results desired in a timely manner, then overt violence was used.
Seal_of_the_Central_Intelligence_Agency.svgThis economic manipulation worked quite well until the population of an indebted country reached the point where grass roots movements gained enough power to negatively impact the puppet government put in place by the economic hitmen and their CIA/MI6/KGB handlers.
An increasing population required the puppet government to focus more resources internally, which meant less available to send to the colonial powers, reducing the flow of wealth out of a country and into the bank accounts of the financier/oligarchs and their lackeys.
So the next important step was to reduce a countries population so that a minimum of resources were utilized by local populations, leaving the lion’s share for the colonial parasites.
“Unbeknown to the masses, governments have used covert methods to limit births in developed
and underdeveloped countries alike and to accelerate deaths in Africa and a few critically poor
and overpopulated areas elsewhere.
181016_10151542331488885_882312798_n-800x445Births have been prevented by interfering with the reproductive system so as to lower human
fertility, while deaths have been promoted by weakening the immune system so as to increase
morbidity and mortality.
The methods used by every country to control population growth have been dictated by the level
of development and the existing infrastructure as much as by political will or lack thereof and
have either been imposed by force and deception from the outside or adopted willingly by the
governing, military and scientific elites of nation states that have relied on the moral, technical
and monetary assistance of the United Nations, its agencies, and the greater international
community.
3-skeletonsRegardless of the methods used to control population and whether they are imposed or self-imposed, strict secrecy and deception have been necessary to prevent the masses from
discovering the bitter truth that for the past 68 years they have been the object of a silent and
global offensive, a campaign of attrition that has turned the basic elements of life into weapons of mass infertility and selective death.
Without our knowledge or consent, governments the world over have subverted our reproductive freedom and ability to procreate to achieve ambitious and necessary demographic objectives and in the process have committed the most odious and wide-sweeping crimes in human history.”(3)
And all this was and is ostensibly to save mankind from even greater evils: nuclear annihilation, mass starvation, and environmental devastation, all claimed to be due to over-population, although a cursory study of history makes it patently clear that the real reason was to enable the financier/oligarchs to increase their wealth and their hegemony of the world’s nations.

Overpopulation is a Myth

Overpopulation is a myth. This myth has caused human rights abuses around the world, forced population control, denied medicines to the poor, and targeted attacks on ethnic minorities and women.

“The concept of overpopulation originated in England in 1798, when the Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus saw that food production increased incrementally, while people reproduced exponentially. Based on his calculations, he predicted that the world would be out of food by the year 1980. Malthus blamed reduced mortality rates and encouraged population reduction.

In his Essay on the Principle of Population, Malthus calls for increased mortality among the poor:

P1.1-SyracuseShantySewer1All the children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to this level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons… To act consistently therefore, we should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality; and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use. Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country, we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations. (Book IV, Chap. V) — Read it online.

Not only that, he believed certain diseases should not sought to be cured for the sake of population control.

“But above all, we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases; and those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders. (Book IV, Chap. V) — Read it online.”

599324_374718182589568_878234514_nIn 1968, Paul Ehrlich of Stanford University adopted and propagated Malthus’ theory of overpopulation. He claimed that excessive human reproduction has overwhelmed the planet and predicted that the world would undergo massive famines, which would kill off hundreds of millions of people by the end of the 70’s.

The_Population_Bomb

 

 

In his 1968 work The Population Bomb, Ehrlich stated:

The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s the world will undergo famines–hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.

A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people…. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.

Because of the fear that such an alarming claims triggered, large sums of money were donated to the UNFPA (the United Nations Population Fund), which was founded the year after Ehrlich published The Population Bomb. This fund thrives on a crisis that – despite being “imminent” – keeps on being rescheduled over and over again for the past 200 years.

Additional Quotes:

Cousteau_en_Calypso“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”

J. Cousteau, 1991 explorer and UNESCO courier

 

 

330px-Международная_Леонардо-премия_10.1“A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine

 

 

255px-TR_Buckskin_Tiffany_Knife

“Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind”

Theodore Roosevelt

 

 

 

 

Reunión_Pinochet_-_Kissinger

Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet shaking hands with Kissinger in 1976

 

 

“Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac,” and “The elderly are useless eaters”

Dr. Henry Kissinger

 

 

 

Georgia_Guidestones-lowres

“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature”

Anonymously commissioned Georgia Guidestones

 

 

Prince_Philip_March_2015

 

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”

Prince Phillip, Queen Elizabeth’s husband, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund

 

 

 

Sierra_Club_logo

Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.

David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club

 

 

 

270px-Seal_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court.svg“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Scarcity Is A MythThe world is abundant of resources and could provide for everyone’s need, yet every year rich countries waste more that 220 million tons of food. Meanwhile, the poor still starve to death – not because resources are scarce, but because they don’t have the money or have rights to enough land.

Overpopulation Does Not Cause Hunger, Unfair Management Does

Sociologists Frederick Buttel and Laura Raynolds published a study of population growth, food consumption, and other variables in ninety-three third world countries. The statistics showed no evidence that fast population growth causes hunger. However, they did find that the populations of poorer countries, and those countries where the poorest 20 % of the population earned a smaller percentage of a nation’s total income, had less to eat.

In other words, poverty and inequality cause hunger, not overpopulation.

We blame poverty on scarcity and overpopulation. But seldom do we look at human behavior itself. Seldom do we look at the laws created by none other than humans preventing starving people from having access to food and arable land, or the obvious misdistribution of resources caused by the greed of the minority.

And let’s not forget the “debt” that poor countries “owe” to the rich.

“The history of third world debt is the history of a massive siphoning-off by international finance of the resources of the most deprived people. This process is designed to perpetuate itself, thanks to a diabolical mechanism whereby debt replicates itself on an even grander scale, a cycle that can only be broken by cancelling the debt. ” – Third World Debt, a Continuing Legacy of Colonialism

consumption-inequality-2005-pie

Many nations can’t realize their full food production potential because of the gross inefficiencies caused by inequitable ownership of land and resources.

Many of the countries in which hunger is rampant export much more in agricultural goods than they import. Northern countries are the main food importers, their purchases representing 71.2 % of the total value of food items imported in the world in 1992. Imports by the 30 lowest-­‐income countries, on the other hand, accounted for only 5.2 % of all international commerce in food and farm commodities.

MediaManipulationNetworksInHeadIt is believed that poverty is the result of overpopulation, poor education, racial inferiority or even laziness. But because most people never think to question our current system and the authorities pulling the strings, few realize how the system itself is geared towards enriching the few and enslaving the masses.

The following passage from “The World’s Wasted Wealth: the political economy of waste” by J.W. Smith describes this reality very well:

Land Rights And Ownership

“The often heard comment (one I once accepted as fact) that “there are too many people in the world, and overpopulation is the cause of hunger”, can be compared to the same myth that expounded sixteenth-century England and revived continuously since.

330px-Palestinian_children_and_Israeli_wall

Palestinian children running towards the barrier, August 2004

Through repeated acts of enclosure the peasants were pushed off the land so that the gentry could make money raising wool for the new and highly productive power looms. They could not do this if the peasants were to retain their historic *entitlement* [emphasis is original] to a share of production from the land. Massive starvation was the inevitable result of this expropriation.

There were serious discussions in learned circles about overpopulation as the cause of this poverty. This was the accepted reason because a social and intellectual elite were doing the rationalizing. It was they who controlled the educational institutions which studied the problem. Naturally the final conclusions (at least those published) absolved the wealthy of any responsibility for the plight of the poor. The absurdity of suggesting that England was then overpopulated is clear when we realize that “the total population of England in the sixteenth century was less than in any one of several present-day English cities.”

Petare_Slums_in_CaracasThe hunger in underdeveloped countries today is equally tragic and absurd. Their European colonizers understood well that ownership of land gave the owner control over what society produced. The most powerful simply redistributed the valuable land titles to themselves, eradicating millennia-old traditions of common use. Since custom is a form of ownership, the shared use of land could not be permitted. If ever reestablished, this ancient practice would reduce the rights of these new owners. For this reason, much of the land went unused or underused until the owners could do so profitably. This is the pattern of land use that characterizes most Third World countries today, and it is this that generates hunger in the world.

These conquered people are kept in a state of relative impoverishment. Permitting them any substantial share of the wealth would negate the historic reason for conquest — namely plunder. The ongoing role of Third World countries is to be the supplier of cheap and plentiful raw materials and agricultural products to the developed world. Nature’s wealth was, and is, being controlled to fulfill the needs of the world’s affluent people.

The U.S. is one of the prime beneficiaries of this well-established system. Our great universities search diligently for “the answer” to the problem of poverty and hunger. They invariably find it in “lack of motivation, inadequate or no education,” or some other self-serving excuse. They look at everything except the cause — the powerful own the world’s social wealth. As a major beneficiary, we have much to gain by perpetuating the myths of overpopulations, cultural and racial inferiority, and so forth. The real causes must be kept from ourselves, as how else can this systematic damaging of others be squared with what we are taught about democracy, rights, freedom, and justice?”(4)

Depopulation in the Developed World

KWN-Stockman-III-462015In the developed nations the primary focus was the use of social engineering, which has had a long effective history, with spectacular success leading into and beyond WW I. Edward Bernays was the mastermind of this public manipulation and was very effective at manufacturing consent from the US public to support entering the war.

Bernays was also the mastermind of the social engineering that got women smoking and manipulated them into equating it with freedom, ‘coincidentally’ also at the time that women had recently gotten the ability to vote. Recognizing that women were still riding high on the suffrage movement, Bernays used the equality angle as the basis for his new campaign. He convinced a number of genteel women, including his own secretary, to march in the 1929 Easter Day parade down Fifth Avenue and light up cigarettes in a defiant show of their liberation.
Since the goal of the Financier/Oligarchs molding society, was to create a compliant androgenous work force, while also taking all control away from the family unit, vast amounts of resources were devoted to the women’s movement to enable women to gain complete equality with men.
05friedan2_184Out of this effort resulted the Women’s Liberation Movement in the 1960s with notable leaders such as Betty Friedan (Betty Naomi Goldstein) and Gloria Steinem. What’s with the name Naomi and feminism anyway?
Betty Friedan was one of the founders of the National Organization for Women (NOW) and a co-signer of the original (1966) Agenda of NOW.
According to Goldstein:
“We do not accept the traditional assumption that a woman has to choose between marriage and motherhood, on the one hand, and serious participation in industry or the professions on the other.”
This all sounds good at first glance, but regardless of what it sounds like, it is but one way by which to attempt to entice women, the majority of whom are found in poll after poll to prefer to be stay-at-home, married moms, to enter the work force. Why would anyone promote an idea that most women don’t like? The answer to that question may be found in the fact that the goal to bring women into the work force is an ancient goal of communism and that Betty Friedan was well into her thirties a devout and active functionary of the Communist Party of the U.S.A.
Even a cursory examination of the goals of the creators of the Communist ideology makes it clear that a primary goal of communism was to break up the family, raise children through state institutions and force men and women to function as equal wage slaves of industry.
Already in the original Communist Manifesto produced by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in 1848/49 it was made clear that no society could be successfully restructured unless all established cultural and moral traditions would be abolished.
So, “how much of the communist ideology that was such large part of Betty Friedan’s life and, indeed, formed her life, made it into the ideology of the oppressive feminism that now covers all aspects of our lives, of society and civilization and threatens to smother us all?”
It’s important to understand that the Communist movement in Russia was financed by Rothchild banking interests in the West.
Karl_Marx_001The growing socialist movement—which was closely allied at that time to the Republican revolutions fomenting all over the world—was seen as a danger to the rich. Marx was trained and sent in to splinter and disorient this movement, which he did. Marx was sent in to control the opposition. At every juncture, Marx manages to create factions rather than alliances. He deftly prevents any real action by always turning the socialists against themselves. He keeps them arguing over philosophical fine-points rather than encouraging direct and immediate action.
What we’re looking at here is the bankrolling and use of similar tactics in the West by the same financier/Oligarchs in order to create a androgenous working proletariat, with the added dose of fascist feminism to prevent men and women joining forces to organize against the wage slavery of a monolithic fascist economic cartel.
‘Divide and conquer’ is a standard operating procedure used by every despot that has ever reigned over an unwilling populace. And once race and class have been utilized, dividing the sexes is the final solution. Utilizing agents to create discord between the sexes was much more difficult when men and women, in order to survive, were required to closely join forces. Once industrialization occurred, with its androgenous workforce, and the same financier/Oligarchs also gained total control of the mass media and mass education system, the use of agents to create discord, became highly advantageous.
bettyfriedan_narrowweb__300x367,0Communist agents such as Betty Friedan (Goldstein) and Gloria Steinem were utilized and enabled to institute the feminist movement in order to rapidly move the agenda forward.
The Oligarchs modus operandi is to finance and promote disgruntled minorities in order to destabilize and undermine the world. Feminism is a prime example. It pretends to be about giving women equal opportunity in the workplace when in fact it is devoted to discouraging women from seeking fulfillment in motherhood while castigating men as being hyper-masculanized, brutish, violent, controlling, unevolved beings.
The push for women to enter the workforce left an increasing number of them with little time or energy to even consider becoming mothers, which also contributed to the depopulation agenda. The additional incessant media focus on consumption of consumer items and experiences, served to force more and more women into the workforce, ultimately creating a situation where women had no option but to work, married or not, leaving very little time to devote to birthing and raising children.
The result…..lower and lower birth rates and as are now commonly seen in the developed nations.
And of course, along with feminism came a push for women’s sexual liberation, quickly followed by birth control and abortion, both of which are a key part of the depopulation agenda.
300px-Jdr-king“John D. Rockefeller and his foundation have been in the forefront of the population “control” and eugenics movement. Ultimately the goal is to reduce the earth’s population for the simple warped reason that the less there is for you and me, the more there will be for J.D. and his cronies.
The financier/oligarchs also push birth control. Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, Ted Turner are among the ultra rich that have donated billions to spreading the gospel of contraception, abortion, and feminism using the United Nations and “US Aid.” Rockefeller funded the invention of the pill, the IUD and owns the rights to the abortion drug RU-486. In the last 50 years, billions of public dollars have been spent on “family planning” designed to limit population by deceit and coercion, including compulsory abortion and infanticide.
In “The War Against Population (1988),” Dr. Jacqueline Kasun writes that in 1981, a directory of population control agencies in Washington DC listed 92 private (but mostly publicly funded) agencies, 12 United Nations and 57 agencies of the US government (p. 198). “The real problem of government family planning is not one of families out of control but of planners out of control,” she wrote (p.211).”(5)
330px-MargaretSanger-Underwood.LOCAnd let’s not forget Margaret Sanger. Margaret Sanger was a popular eugenicist, popularized the term “birth control”, promoted the development of birth control pills, opened the first birth control clinic, the Clinical Research Bureau (CRB). The CRB was the first legal birth control clinic in the United States, staffed entirely by female doctors and social workers. The clinic received extensive funding from John D. Rockefeller Jr. and his family, which continued to make anonymous donations to Sanger’s causes in future decades. She also established organizations that evolved into the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

This is what she had to say:

“While the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors, they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table… They do not do this with white people and if we can train the Negro doctor at the clinic, he can go among them with enthusiasm and…knowledge, which…will have far-reaching results among the colored people…The minister’s work is also important and he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

After World War I, Sanger increasingly appealed to the societal need to limit births by those least able to afford children. The affluent and educated already limited their child-bearing, while the poor and ignorant lacked access to contraception and information about birth-control. Here she found an area of overlap with eugenicists. She believed that they both sought to “assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit.” Sanger was a proponent of negative eugenics, which aims to improve human hereditary traits through social intervention by reducing the reproduction of those who were considered unfit.

Gay_flag.svgWhile actively supporting sexual liberation and its necessitated ‘birth control’, the financier/oligarchs also covertly supported “gay liberation,” with the understanding that the homosexual lifestyle added to the destruction of families and served the depopulation agenda. Through funding and media control, they pushed the public to regard sex as a recreation/physical release rather than as the expression of a spiritual bond (i.e. a loving marriage) resulting in children.

Immediately following the new-found sexual liberation was the increasing incidence of sexually transmitted diseases, which along with scare-mongering, were used to push the idea of abstinence, particularly among young people, which also served the depopulation agenda.

The Fluoridation Strategy

Study after study has confirmed that fluoride is a dangerous, toxic poison that bio-accumulates in your body while being ineffective at preventing dental decay. For instance, there are 25 studies showing that fluoride reduces IQ in children, and approximately 100 animal studies have also linked fluoride to brain damage.

Past research, too, has shown that fluoride has potentially disastrous effects on the male reproductive system, reducing fertility.

DocumentNevertheless, since the 1950s there has been ongoing fluoridation of water supplies in the US with currently around 150 million people receiving fluoridated public drinking water. The other developed countries heavily utilizing fluoridation are Canada, Australia and New Zealand. So on top of the social engineering strategies outlined above, all of these countries are also being deliberately subjected to fertility damaging fluoride in their water, adding to the financier/oligarch depopulation goals.

“Water fluoridation, however, is only possible in places with a modern infrastructure of water treatment plants and therefore even in wealthy nations it is only viable in cities that have at least 10,000 people. Salt fluoridation is the second most popular fluoridation method and is in use throughout Latin America and the Caribbean region as well as in a few European countries that have abandoned water fluoridation. Milk fluoridation is restricted to very few countries and is used as a supplementary method of fluoridation elsewhere. To keep human beings in a constant state of fluoride poisoning, toothpaste and dental health products throughout the world are fluoridated.

The Gender-Bender Strategy

An increasing amount of research information is showing that the ingestion, absorption or inhalation of synthetic particular chemical substances drastically impacts the hormonal balance of male physiology and female physiology as well.

375px-Placenta.svgTo the extent that these substances create an imbalance in the pregnant woman or cross the placental barrier into the fetus, they will also have negative effects on the hormonal balance and sexual development of the male or female. Once the child is born, the exposure to these substances will continue to impact the sexual development until maturity is reached.

According to a recent study, “Falling sperm counts could be caused by traces of the contraceptive pill in drinking water.

 

 

“U.S. scientists say the sex hormone oestradiol – the birth control hormone that passes untreated through sewage plants – has an even larger effect on sperm than Bisphenol A or BPA, as it is widely known.  BPA is found in some plastics used to make food containers, bottles and coatings in tin cans, and is also commonly used in thermal paper in cash register receipts.”(8)

Complete_diagram_of_a_human_spermatozoa_en.svg

Bisphenol A (BPA)

“To close the loophole created by the modern habit of drinking bottled rather than tap water, the depopulation lobby has replaced glass with plastic bottling starting in 1980 and has used a specific fertility-depressing chemical, called bisphenol A (BPA) to manufacture two kinds of plastics: polycarbonates and epoxy resins. BPA is ingested when it leaches into food and beverages for human consumption. Since nearly every plastic bottle on the planet is now made of BPA-based polycarbonates and almost every metal and aluminum can in the world is lined with epoxy resins containing BPA, people are chronically exposed. The lining of metal cans with BPA is aimed at both the urban and rural poor who are more likely to eat canned soups, vegetables and fruit and will thus receive more than their share of fertility depressing agents, as they will ingest it from multiple sources. But as the depopulation lobby has a strong eugenic component to it, reducing the numbers of the poor is a desirable outcome.”(3)

SPF15SunBlock“Make no mistake, BPA isn’t the only method being utilized, there are also a whole host of xenoestrogens found in everything from suntan lotions to the food we eat, all ” clinically significant because they can mimic the effects of endogenous estrogen and thus have been implicated in precocious puberty and other disorders of the reproductive system.”

Via the Women In Balance Institute, we see a partial list of things used every day in America which include the chemicals that are xenoestrogens, including:• Industrial products and Plastics: • Bisphenol A (monomer for polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resin; antioxidant in plasticizers); • Phthalates (plasticizers); • DEHP (plasticizer for PVC); • Polybrominated biphenyl ethers (PBDEs) (flame retardants used in plastics, foams, building materials, electronics, furnishings, motor vehicles); • Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs);

• Food:• Erythrosine / FD&C Red No. 3; • Phenosulfothiazine (a red dye)• Butylated hydroxyanisole / BHA (food preservative); • Building supplies: • Pentachlorophenol (general biocide and wood preservative); • Polychlorinated biphenyls / PCBs (in electrical oils, lubricants, adhesives, paints);

330px-FLIT_Spray_Can_1• Insecticides: • Atrazine (weed killer); • DDT (insecticide, banned); • Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (one of the breakdown products of DDT); • Dieldrin (insecticide); • Endosulfan (insecticide); • Heptachlor (insecticide); • Lindane / hexachlorocyclohexane (insecticide, used to treat lice and scabies); • Methoxychlor (insecticide); • Fenthion; • Nonylphenol and derivatives (industrial surfactants; emulsifiers for emulsion polymerization; laboratory detergents; pesticides);

• Other: • Propyl gallate; • Chlorine and chlorine by-products; • Ethinylestradiol (combined oral contraceptive pill); • Metalloestrogens (a class of inorganic xenoestrogens); • Alkylphenol (surfactant used in cleaning detergents; • 4-Methylbenzylidene camphor (4-MBC) (sunscreen lotions); • Parabens (methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben and butylparaben commonly used as a preservative);  •Benzophenone (sunscreen lotions);

Monsanto_logo.svg“Xenoestrogens, however, come from over 70,000 different chemicals that have a known affect on our hormonal systems. DDT is a big culprit as are numerous fertilizers, herbicides and fungicides used by the non-organic farmers of the world. GMO crops are a huge problem, because they require larger and more pervasive use of these pesticides. Corn, soy, sugar beets, cottonseed oil, zucchini, alfalfa, and Hawaiian papaya are all predominantly grown using genetically modified seed.”(8)
“Phthalates, which are used in everything from vinyl floors to plastic tubing and soaps and lotions, are pervasive in the environment and have increasingly become associated with changes in development of the male brain as well as with genital defects, metabolic abnormalities and reduced testosterone in babies and adults.
Phthalates are one of several groups of chemicals that have the power to disrupt the endocrine system, both in animals and humans. Nicknamed “gender-benders,” these chemicals are causing the males in many species to become feminized.
According to a report issued by ChemTrust last year, HALF of all male fish in British lowland rivers have been found to grow eggs in their testes! And that’s just one eye-opening example of the impact these gender bender chemicals are having on our environment.

EndocrineDisruptors_KailiWillows_Flickr“Their study lists the symptoms found in each of the numerous species tested, which includes testicular cancer, hermaphrodites, genital deformations, low sperm counts, and infertility.

 

Decreased sperm motility and concentration, as well as genital abnormalities in baby boys have been linked to these chemicals.

Common Sources of Phthalates

“Phthalates are found in, among other things:

  • Processed food packaging
  • Hoses
  • Raincoats
  • Shower curtains
  • Vinyl flooring and wall coverings
  • Lubricant and adhesives
  • Detergents
  • Beauty products like nail polish, hair spray, shampoo, deodorants, and fragrances
  • Toys

Other Gender-Bender Chemicals to Watch Out For:

“Endocrine disrupting chemicals are everywhere these days and can be difficult to avoid unless you take decisive steps to limit or eliminate them from your immediate surroundings. This is particularly important if you are pregnant, or planning a pregnancy.

“Reading labels is a necessity these days. PVC plastics, which contain phthalates, will oftentimes carry the plastic recycling symbol # 3.

“Some of the other gender-bender agents to look out for include:

  • 330px-Happy_Pan_PosterPerfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) — found in grease- and water-resistant coatings like Teflon and Gore-Tex, is a likely carcinogen.
  • Methoxychlor and Vinclozin— An insecticide and a fungicide respectively, have been found to cause changes to male mice born for as many as four subsequent generations after the initial exposure.
  • Nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPEs) — Known to be potent endocrine disrupters, these chemicals affect gene expression by turning on or off certain genes, and interfere with the way your glandular system works. They mimic the female hormone estrogen, and have been implicated as one reason behind some marine species switching from male to female.
  • Bovine growth hormones commonly added to commercial dairy have been implicated as a contributor to premature adolescence.
  • Soy products, which are loaded with hormone-like substances.
  • MSG-is-dangerousMSG — A food additive that’s been linked to reduced fertility.
  • Fluoride — This chemical in the U.S. water supply has been linked to lower fertility rates, hormone disruption and low sperm counts.

“Along with the overall health destroying effects of these chemicals is the feminization of males that has become so prevalent at the current time, although these effects have been building over the last 80 years, as more and more anti-testosterone disrupting chemicals have been introduced into the environment, the food supply and various products.”(9)

“These chemicals act to feminize men from the time they are conceived, since the average woman’s body contains close to 250 chemicals from cosmetics, household exposures, pesticides and from environmental pollution.

All of these chemicals end up in women’s bodies since they’re stored in fat and women have more fat tissue than men in their breasts and their hips as well as their butt. When a woman becomes pregnant she begins to expose the male fetus to these chemicals.

NDC 0069-4220-30, Viagra, 100 mg, reverse is Pfizer,

This happens through no fault of the woman, but through the oil, chemical and pharmaceutical companies, which produce and distribute these harmful chemicals throughout the world. Big Pharma has no incentive to reduce this exposure since they make huge profits on the ‘health care’ side of this situation by selling testosterone and Viagra to the millions of men who are emasculated.

By producing and distributing BPA and atrazine, which are found in a variety of foods and products which are used by the public, and which find their way into our drinking water, the chemical companies can make millions of dollars of emasculating men and lowering their testosterone levels in order to make them impotent.

As a result of this onslaught, sperm counts have decreased by 50%, while 85% of sperm cells are defective. Along with this, studies show that almost 30 million men are impotent in the US.

The majority of this damage is done in the womb. Most of these chemicals destroy the cells within the testes that produce testosterone, called the Sertroli cells. So when males are exposed to these chemicals in the womb, they don’t end up with as many Sertroli cells as a normal fetus has, so their testosterone levels go down and they’re less able to produce sperm.

So men today have less sperm produced than their grandfathers did and their testosterone levels are the lowest they’ve ever been in the history of mankind.”(9)

The Poisoned Agriculture Strategy

“A new paper by Rosemary A Mason in the ‘Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry’, indicates there is a growing threat from the release of hormone-disrupting chemicals that could even be shifting the human sex ratio and reducing sperm counts.

Mason cites a good deal of evidence to show how the widespread use on agricultural crops of the systemic neonicotinoid insecticides and the herbicide glyphosate, both of which cause immune suppression, make species vulnerable to emerging infectious pathogens, driving large-scale wildlife extinctions, including essential pollinators.

airplane-465619__340Providing evidence to show how human disease patterns correlate remarkably well with the rate of glyphosate usage on corn, soy and wheat crops, which has increased due to ‘Roundup Ready’ crops, Mason goes on to present more sources to show how our over-reliance on chemicals in agriculture is causing irreparable harm to all beings on this planet. Most of these chemicals are known to cause illness, and they have likely been causing illnesses for many years. But until recently, the herbicides have never been sprayed directly on food crops and never in this massive quantity.(10)

Mason discusses how agriculture and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) fit into a wider agenda for depopulating the planet. She notes that on the initiative of Gates, in May 2009 some of the richest people in the US met at the home of Nurse, a British Nobel prize-winning biochemist and President (2003–10) of Rockefeller University in Manhattan, to discuss ways of tackling a ‘disastrous’ environmental, social and industrial threat of overpopulation. The meeting was hosted by David Rockefeller Jr. These same individuals have met several times since to develop a strategy in which population growth would be tackled.

la-me-c1-assisted-death-20150519-thumbnailThe Rockefeller Foundation (RF) was involved in extensive financing of eugenics research  in league with some of the US’s most respected scientists from such prestigious universities as Stanford, Yale, Harvard and Princeton. The explicit aim of the eugenics lobby funded by wealthy élite families, such as Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman and others since the 1920s, has embodied what they termed ‘negative eugenics’, the systematic killing off of ‘undesired bloodlines’.

RF funded the earliest research on GMOs, which Mason regards as part of the depopulation agenda. The RF funded the earliest research on GMOs in the 1940s and effectively founded the science of molecular biology.

Mason cites Steven Druker to show the fraud behind GMOs and how governments and leading scientific institutions have systematically misrepresented the facts about GMOs and the scientific research that casts doubt on their safety. Druker has shown that GMOs can have severe health impacts, which have been covered up.

RoundupMason then goes on to discuss the impact of glyphosate residues (herbicide-tolerant GM crops are designed to work with glyphosate), which are found in the organs of animals, human urine and human breast milk as well as in the air and rivers. She documents its widespread use and contamination of soil and water and notes that the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer’s assessment of glyphosate being a 2A carcinogen (probably carcinogenic in humans) is unwelcome news for the agrochemical industry.

She claims that plans are under way to depopulate the planet’s seven million plus people to a more manageable level of between 500–2000 million by a combination of means, including the poisoning and contamination of the planet’s food and water supplies via chemical-intensive industrialised agriculture. Mason also notes that health-damaging GMOs are being made available to the masses (under the guise of ‘feeding the poor’), while elites are more prone to eat organic food.

Mason’s concerns about depopulation should not be dismissed, particularly given the record of the likes of the Gates and Rockefeller clans, the various covert sterility programmes that have been instituted by the US over the decades and the way agriculture has and continues to be used as a geopolitical tool to further the agendas of rich interests in the US.

300px-Dow_Chemical_Company_logo.svgTo understand the processes that have led to modern farming and the role of entities like Monsanto, we must appreciate the geopolitics of food and agriculture, which benefits an increasingly integrated global cartel of finance, oil, military and agribusiness concerns. This cartel seeks to gain from war, debt bondage and the control of resources, regardless of any notions relating to food security, good health and nutrition, biodiversity, food democracy, etc.”(10)

Chemtrails Strategy

spray782-450x292“Spraying powdered aluminum oxide at high altitudes by airplane – a phenomenon known as ‘chemtrails’ – is a rather new method of population control that is restricted to NATO countries and is aimed at breaking the back of organic and traditional farmers to make room for corporations and their genetically modified crops. The aluminum sprayed falls to the ground and poisons the soil and the water, which has two intended consequences: first, it makes the growing of traditional or heirloom seeds impossible and forces farmers into bankruptcy thus freeing the land for purchase by agro-giants who stand ready with aluminum-resistant genetically modified seeds; and secondly, aluminum binds with fluoride compounds and greatly increases fluoride toxicity, therefore reducing the human body’s toxicity threshold level previously thought safe.

In other words, you can do far more damage to human health with aluminum fluoride than you can do with just fluoride and you need less of it. That is why, for example, the spraying of aerosolized aluminum is far more prevalent on the Western seaboard of Canada and the US, where tap water fluoridation is scarce and people ingest fluoride from bottled water and soft drinks as well as canned foods, but at lower levels than people whose tap water is fluoridated.”(3)

Take a look at this video by Geoengineering Watch on the Chemtrail strategy:

 

Biological and Bacteriological Methods – Particularly for the Developing World

“Poor countries do not have water treatment plants and therefore cannot fluoridate their water. Salt fluoridation requires the political will and stability necessary to co-opt a select few politicians and bureaucrats, but Africa’s political landscape is volatile and for ever changing. And milk fluoridation is expensive and morally reprehensible as it targets innocent children through free-milk school programs and sickens them when they are young and defenseless. African leaders, moreover, have largely resisted international pressure to poison their people. That is why the depopulation lobby has devised effective methods of population control for Africa specifically and more recently for other poor and reluctant countries whose voluntary cooperation was impossible to gain.”(3)

HIV-AIDS

aids-sufferer-zambia“If the depopulation lobby could not control the number of people born into the world, then they would increase the number of people leaving this world. In other words, if they could not tackle the population problem at the front end of life by controlling fertility, they would and did tackle it at the back end of life by increasing morbidity and mortality. This was deemed necessary for Africa, which resisted any and all attempts at population control.

The HIV/AIDS virus was specifically created for the Sub-Saharan African population by a cooperative effort between Soviet and American scientists in the employ of their nations’ military-industrial establishments. It was designed to do maximum damage by undermining the immune system and to have an affinity for people of color. It gradually achieved its intended goal once it was introduced into the bloodstreams of countless innocents in Africa, Brazil and Haiti by the World Health Organization through its smallpox immunization program that ended in 1980. Infection is as high as 30% in some African nations (5% continent wide) and 70% of all AIDS deaths occur in Africa. More than one million people die in Africa from AIDS annually and nearly two million new infections are registered every year.(3)

Vaccines

66ba7ab1f9cca107eeefc7049453f303“Bioengineered flu strains, such as N1H1, the swine flu and the bird flu viruses, have been used to manufacture mass fear of pandemics and condition the public to the practice of mandatory vaccines or government-mandated vaccinations programs. This will allow the authorities to target specific populations when and if the eugenicists decide that a new deadly strain must be introduced into an unyielding population, as it was done in Africa, Haiti and Brazil until 1980.”(3)

The HPV vaccines have been shown to have serious side effects including causing infertility and spontaneous abortions.

“The World Health Organization (WHO) and its subsidiaries have been actively researching and funding the development of contraceptive / anti-fertility vaccines that prevent full-term pregnancies to take place, for over 20 years. There’s even a Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines of the WHO!(6)

However, no anti-fertility vaccine has ever been placed on the market and promoted as such as of yet.

Instead, as described in a 1993 journal paper published in The British Medical Bulletin, anti-fertility vaccines were being engineered “incorporating tetanus or diphtheria toxoid linked to a variety of hCG-based peptides.”

The authors of this article state:

“The fundamental principle behind this approach to contraceptive vaccine development is to prevent the maternal recognition of pregnancy by inducing a state of immunity against hGC, the hormone that signals the presence of the embryo to the maternal endocrine system.”

nowords1Free tetanus vaccines that were offered to young women of childbearing age for years in countries such as Tanzania, Nigeria, Mexico, and the Philippines, were found to contain human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG), which causes spontaneous abortions if the woman becomes pregnant.

While the woman is not technically sterilized, once injected with hCG, she may never be able to carry a child full term thereafter.

HCG-containing anti-fertility vaccines have also been pursued for more than two decades by the Indian National Institute of Immunology, and The Population Council of the Rockefeller University, among others.

In fact, there are no less than 50 research papers detailing research on “contraceptive vaccines” in the PubMed database.

One disturbing paper published in the FASEB Journal in 1993 states:

“… we initiated studies relating to possible mechanisms of action and potential side effects of this vaccine, which should be relevant to world-wide regulation of population growth.”

So again, why the frantic push for the HPV vaccine, created for young, fertile women, when there’s NO solid, rational basis for its use?”(6)

Massive Brazilian Vaccination Program Raises Suspicions of Covert Sterilization Plans

Flag_of_WHO.svg“A much more recent case of illogical mass vaccinations against a minor health problem is that of the massive, mandatory vaccination program in Brazil, which has raised suspicions among international pro-life activists, who note that the program is similar to other vaccination programs in recent years that have included a hidden sterilizing agent in the vaccines.

The campaign to “annihilate rubella” began in early August this year, mandating rubella vaccinations for all women ages 12 to 49, and 12 to 39 for men; a total of 70 million people, despite the fact that only 17 Brazilian children per year suffer birth defects from the disease.

Adolfo Castañeda of Human Life International notes that just two years ago, researchers found that the rubella vaccine used in a similar campaign in Argentina was laced with human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG).

The suspicion that brought about the investigation [into the rubella vaccine] was caused by the fact that there were very few cases of the disease in Argentina, which didn’t merit a large-scale campaign,” Castañeda said, adding, “The ages for women are the same as those who received the vaccines in Nicaragua, where they included a hormone that sterilizes the woman who receives it, and similar to the age of those who received another sterilizing hormone in the Philippines.”(6)

Polysorbate-80

330px-Gardasil_vaccine_and_box_new“There’s no proof of hCG being present in any of the current HPV vaccines.

But there are definite similarities between these other irrational vaccination programs in other countries for relatively minor public health concerns — that turn out to have far more sinister agendas than mere greed – compared to the fervent, irrational push behind the HPV vaccine here in the U.S.

However, Gardasil does contain Polysorbate-80 – a surfactant used in pharmacology to deliver certain drugs or chemical agents across the blood-brain barrier — which has been linked to infertility in mice.

Researchers Gajdova et.al. found that administration of Polysorbate-80 decreased the weight of the uterus and ovaries, and caused chronic estrogenic stimulation. The ovaries of the mice were also without corpora lutea (a mass of progesterone-secreting endocrine tissue that forms immediately after ovulation) and had degenerative follicles.

So what might the estrogenic effects of Polysorbate-80 be on pre-adolescent girls and pregnant women?”(6)

Agenda 21

The UN has been at the depopulation game from its beginning, since the main reason for its existence is to create and maintain an ideal world environment for the financier/oligarchs.

From the Initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER:

“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.”

The_Hunger_Games_coverOne of the most popular films of 2012 was The Hunger Gameswhich portrayed a post-apocalyptic nation called Panem in which a super-rich, super-pampered, super-callous ‘elite’ lived in high-tech luxury while the rest of the population daily battled to survive in abject poverty, locked away behind prison fences in intensively-populated ‘people zones’. Panem comes from the Latin phrase panem et circenses or ‘bread and circuses’ – a term derived from Rome and meaning to give the people diversions and distractions to hide what is being done to them. Exactly what is happening today.

“Agenda 21 was established at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992, hosted by Maurice Strong, a Canadian oil and business billionaire and long-time front man for the Rothschilds and Rockefellers. Strong has been a leader of their exploit-the-environment-to-scam-the-people program which is now in full flow. Strong is a member of the Club of Rome, the environmental Hidden Hand in the Round Table network that includes the Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations.(7)

Agenda 21 is called ‘the agenda for the 21st century’ and that agenda refers to global fascism/communism. This is a summary of what Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development / Biodiversity is seeking to impose:

• An end to national sovereignty

• State planning and management of all land resources, ecosystems, deserts, forests, mountains, oceans and fresh water; agriculture; rural development; biotechnology; and ensuring ‘equity’ (equal slavery)

• The State to ‘define the role’ of business and financial resources

• Abolition of private property (it’s not ‘sustainable’)

• ‘Restructuring’ the family unit

• Children raised by the State

• People told what their job will be

• Major restrictions on movement

• Creation of ‘human settlement zones’

• Mass resettlement as people are forced to vacate land where they currently live

• Dumbing down education (achieved)

• Mass global depopulation in pursuit of all the above

Iclei_logoThis horrific plan is being coordinated through the United Nations, the stalking horse for world dictatorship, via a non-governmental network once called the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), and now known as Local Governments for Sustainability although still using the shortened name ICLEI. The United Nations is now opening ‘embassies’ around the world called ‘UN Houses’ under the guise of raising awareness of UN activities, but not the activities that people really need to know about.

Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) and other organisations are integrating the plan into every village, town, city and region and it is already becoming widespread across the world. The organisational infrastructure of Agenda 21 is already at fantastic proportions, and involves government agencies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), think-tanks, trusts, foundations, ‘training’ (mind control) operations and ‘initiatives’ which have been building the infrastructure for what they call ‘the post-industrial, post-democratic’ society — all while the public go about their daily business, oblivious of the prison being built all around them by the hour.

Harvey Ruvin, a vice-chairman of ICLEI, was asked how Agenda 21 would affect liberties with regard to the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, private property and freedom of speech. He replied: ‘Individual Rights must take a back-seat to the collective’.

195px-Communist_star.svgA member of the Agenda 21 committees in Santa Cruz, California, in the mid-1990s said that the proposals he heard were so crazy that he laughed at them because they could never happen. These included that ‘Mother Earth’s surface was not to be scratched’; humans should be concentrated in settlement zones; education should focus on the environment as a central organizing principle and all aspects of life covered by Agenda 21. But today, all of these crazy plans are now being introduced. It’s all happy, smiling faces and rhetoric about “how we care”, when the truth is that Agenda 21 is a vicious, brutal, heartless strategy to impose a global Orwellian state and forcibly depopulate humanity.

They want to control every man, woman and child on the planet – everyone and everywhere and every resource, water source and piece of land. To do this they need a global structure of fascist control that goes right down into every local community with the jackboots at local level enforcing the will of the global center. This is why there is so much emphasis on local authorities, and town and city authorities in Agenda 21.

Below is a map of the Reserves and Corridor system being created by Agenda 21:

Agenda-21-Simulated-Reserve-and-Corridor-System-to-Protect-Biodiversity-1024x743

The demand in Agenda 21 for a massive cull of the population can be understood when you see how much of America is designated for no human activity.

The red areas are designated for ‘no human use’ and most of the rest of America is confiscated for little and highly-regulated use. The mass of the population would be concentrated in high-rise, densely-packed ‘human settlement zones’ and denied access to something like 80 percent of present day America. It is without question the world of The Hunger Games with a globally-enforced top-down hierarchy with a world government using its world army and police force to impose its will at regional and local levels (sectors).

The Rockefeller-funded America 2050 has produced a map of the new United States divided into eleven ‘megaregions’ and includes parts of Canada (Figure 2 – above). Seattle, Portland and Vancouver, British Columbia, become the megaregion known as ‘Cascadia’ and this regional system comes under the collective name of ‘megalopolis’ which is Greek for large city or great city. America, Canada and Mexico are slated to merge to form the North American Union in line with the European Union blueprint.

Agenda-21-the-emerging-megaregions-1024x682

As a result of all of these strategies the developed nations are now suffering from deliberate depopulation. The US birthrate has already been cut from 4 to 2 children per woman, the European and Canadian is 1.5. (We need 2.1 just for replacement.) Russia (1.17 children) will see its population plummet from 145 million to 115 million by 2015. In the “Death of the West,” Pat Buchanan argues that population decline is responsible for the inevitable extinction of the West.

The charts below show birthrates in some countries:

Capture3

Virtually all of the developed countries are steadily increasing their depopulation rates.

Capture4And this goes right along with the depopulation plans of the financier/oligarchs.

Cites:

(1) Jewish Eugenics

(2) Wikipedia- Zionism

(3) Killing Us Softly

(4) Overpopulation: Fact Or Myth?

(5) The Devil’s Work: Feminism and the Elite Depopulation Agenda

(6) Prominent Scientist Warns of HPV Vaccine Dangers

(7) Agenda 21: The Plan for a Global Fascist Dictatorship

(8) Wiping Out America….. Study Shows Depopulation Agenda Moving Full Speed Ahead

(9) Can These Household Chemicals Crush Your Son’s Masculinity?

(10) Poisoned Agriculture: Depopulation and Human Extinction

Related Posts:

Vaccines

The Zika Virus Hoax

Emasculation and the Feminization of Society

Chemtrail (Aerosol) Spraying

Contrails vs. Chemtrails (Aerosols)

Geoengineering Weather Warfare

GMO Myths and Truths

Hormones

Just Say No To Fluoride!!!

The Complete History Of Monsanto, “The World’s Most Evil Corporation”

Virus Busters, the Tale of 6 Herbal Superheroes

Disinformation Tactics of Shills & Online Trolls/Zombies

Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist

From Balfour Declatation to Trump: the plight of the Indigenous Arab Population

The Usurpation of Palestine from Balfour to Trump

“Palestinian Arabs might have ended up governing their own country if a Russian Jew living in Manchester had not developed a chemical process for extracting nail-varnish remover from horse-chestnuts.” —Karl Sabbagh [1]

Trump Balfour 685a5

 

In a lackluster speech on December 6, 2017, U.S. president Donald Trump announced the official recognition of Jerusalem al-Quds as the capital of the Israeli entity and directed the U.S. state department to make arrangements to move the U.S. embassy there from Tel Aviv.  [2] While Jerusalem was acknowledged as the Israeli capital by U.S. Senate Concurrent Resolution 106 in 1990 [3] and the embassy move was mandated by the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995, [4] Trump has once again managed to spark worldwide outrage by declaring publicly what most intelligent observers had long since surmised.

The timing of Trump’s address on al-Quds was ironic, for one hundred years earlier British General Edmund Allenby, after having captured the city, which had been under the rule of the Ottoman Turks, spoke of “the establishment of national governments and administrations in those countries deriving authority from the initiative and free will of those people themselves.”  Allenby’s words, however, had previously been neutered by the now notorious Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1917, which declared the British government to “view with favour the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use its best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object,” and indeed “His Majesty’s Government” did. [5]

The Balfour Declaration would never have materialized without the strident efforts of a Jewish chemist named Chaim Weizmann, a Zionist who later became the first president of the Israeli entity.  Originally from southern Russia in the Pale of Settlement, Weizmann left his homeland for Switzerland where he earned a doctorate in chemistry in 1904 from the University of Geneva.  Later he immigrated to Britain where he accepted a position at the University of Manchester until he was tapped by the British government in 1916 to work on munitions. [6] Weizmann developed a new process to make acetone, which is used in nail polish remover and for making cordite, a propellant used in British artillery projectiles, and when Munitions minister David Lloyd George was faced with a shortage of acetone, Weizmann came to his rescue.  Lloyd George later remarked, “Acetone converted me to Zionism,” and after becoming prime minister in December 1916, he rewarded Weizmann by his full support for a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine. [7]

To be understood, the Balfour Declaration must be viewed through the lens of Britain at war against Germany shortly after the Russian Revolution and a mutiny by French troops, events that threatened to leave the British without allies.  Further fueling British fears of fighting the war singlehandedly were rumors that Germany was contemplating a pro-Zionist declaration to entice the Russians to leave the war, which the Bolsheviks did on November 7, 1917 when they entered into peace negotiations with the Germans.  Compounding British anxiety was the reality that most American Jews at the time favored supporting Germany over Britain; those from Germany retained fond memories of their former homeland while those from Russia recalled the Tsar’s pogroms and transferred this antipathy to Britain, Russia’s ally. [8]

Knowing that U.S. president Woodrow Wilson held strong convictions concerning self-determination of peoples, British Prime Minister Lloyd George sought the help of American Jews to convince Wilson of the strategic importance of a British invasion and occupation of Palestine towards victory in the First World War.  The plan conceived with the help of Chaim Weizmann was to portray the Zionist project to Wilson as Jewish self-determination in Palestine, thereby averting any accusations of post-war annexation of conquered lands.   American Jewry had to be enticed to support the British war effort, so in exchange, Britain pledged to support the Zionist objectives in Palestine, but this also required the help of such notables as U.S. Supreme Court justice Louis Brandeis, who headed the Zionist organization in the U.S. and was close to President Wilson.  It was Brandeis who informed Weizmann of the U.S. president’s interest in Zionism. [9]

MORE…

The other side that had to be convinced to join with Britain in the war effort against the Ottoman Empire and Germany was the Arabs, who were also anticipating their own self-determination at the end of the First World War.  To that end, British diplomat Mark Sykes wrote a declaration of assurances to Sharif Hussein bin Ali, the leader of the Arab Revolt, which Hussein declared against the Turks in 1916. Sykes assured that the Palestinian Arabs would be granted political freedom and that the Balfour Declaration announcing British support for a Jewish homeland would be applied only as would be “compatible with the freedom of the existing population, both economic and political.” As a result, Hussein was deliberately duped by Sykes into accepting the idea that Jewish immigration into Palestine would not amount to much.  The British charade became apparent in 1918 when the Bolsheviks published copies of the British and French secret plans to carve up the Middle East at war’s end based on their respective self-interests. [10]

It should be mentioned that the Zionists hedged their political bets in case Britain did not emerge from the First World War victorious by approaching the German and Turkish governments with proposals delivered by the Zionist organization’s representative in Istanbul, Richard Lichtheim.  Pointing out the anticipated gratitude of Jewish Americans, Lichtheim listed the advantages of German support for the Zionist project in Palestine, noting the common German language and emphasizing the business connections of the Jews already there.  To sweeten the deal, Lichtheim even offered to arrange for a Zionist armed force to fight against the British in the Middle East alongside their Turkish and German allies.  As Palestinian author Karl Sabbagh explained, “The unique status of Jews in global politics made this sort of double-dealing possible.” [11]

Britain emerged from the First World War with a mandate for Palestine, which was granted at the San Remo Conference in April 1920.  The Balfour Declaration was also included in the obligations for the mandatory power, enshrining the document in an international agreement and thereby forcing Britain to abide by its terms to facilitate a Zionist colonization project in Palestine. [12] This was while the terms of the mandate also demanded of Britain that it preserve the rights of the existing inhabitants of Palestine.  However, the mandate document itself failed to mention the word “Arab” even once; instead it referred to “non-Jewish” inhabitants as if the overwhelming majority of the population of Palestine at the time were nothing more than a numerically inconsequential minority. [13]

Unsurprisingly, conflict arose almost immediately, as European Jewish immigrants poured into Palestine, the first of which occurred during the Palestinian Muslim festival of Nabi Musa, which took place in April 1920.  Nine people were killed and over 200 wounded in the clashes along with much destruction and looting of property.  The chief Zionist political officer, Richard Meinhertzhagen, even accused the British of having foreknowledge of the riots and allowing them to happen, despite having told the British foreign office four days earlier that he did not anticipate any trouble.  To investigate the causes, the Palin Commission was formed, and after interviewing 152 witnesses, reported that while the violence may have been initiated by Arabs, these were “people who see themselves menaced with deprivation by a race they have hitherto held in dislike and contempt.” [14]

Through the 1920s and 1930s, the conflict created by Balfour’s letter to Lord Rothschild continued to escalate as the native Palestinian Arab majority protested the wholesale colonization of their ancestral land by European Zionists.  Until 1928, the British government attempted to maintain “parity” in its treatment of the indigenous Palestinian Arab population, none of whom had access to British notables, and the incessant demands of the Zionists, who through Weizmann and others enjoyed close relations with British prime ministers and MPs.  While rejecting the concept of parity at first, Palestinian leaders finally agreed to accept the principle only to see their efforts at peaceful compromise summarily rejected by the Zionists.  The result was twofold: first, Palestinians launched a massive uprising in 1929 against the mandatory government, which they rightly saw as favoring the Zionists; and second, a pattern of Palestinian compromise and Zionist intransigency was established, which has held to the present. [15]

Throughout the mandatory period, whenever the British government exhibited tendencies towards acknowledging and correcting the injustices committed against the Palestinians, the Zionists, with their close ties to His Majesty’s Government, managed to force a return to the Balfour colonization track.  This, of course, resulted in additional protests and uprisings by Palestinians, culminating in 1936 with the Arab Revolt, which lasted until 1939 before the British managed to suppress it by sending more troops to Palestine. In the meantime, the Zionists took full advantage of a proposal by the British Peel Commission to divide Palestine into separate Arab and Jewish states, and worked feverishly to establish an autonomous Jewish enclave.  By 1942, Zionist leaders were demanding all of Palestine, and drawing up plans for the ethnic cleansing that would be necessary to rid Palestine of her native Arab population. [16]

Throughout the Second World War Palestinians and Zionists alike sensed that another clash was coming, as foreshadowed by the increasing number of British casualties and the pace of Zionist terrorist attacks such as the July 1946 bombing by the Stern Gang of the British headquarters in the King David Hotel in al-Quds.  The British government, with dire economic woes at home, decided it could no longer afford the expense of maintaining a standing army in Palestine larger than the one it had in India, and handed the entire Palestinian conundrum over to the fledgling United Nations in February 1947, announcing its intension to withdraw by mid-May in 1948.  By July 1947 the U.N. Special Commission on Palestine recommended partition of the country and the proposal was approved in the U.N. General Assembly on November 29. [17] Concurrently, the Hashemite leadership of Transjordan entered into secret talks with the Zionist leadership in hopes of gaining a share of the vacated mandate.  The stage was now set for the Nakbah, the 1948 expulsion of native Palestinians from their country. [18]

In anticipation of the termination of the British mandate on May 15, 1948, the Zionists under the leadership of David Ben-Gurion declared the establishment of the “State of Israel” the day before.  On May 15, U.S. president Harry Truman instructed the U.S. delegation to the U.N. to announce America’s recognition of the newly-created Israeli entity, making the United States the first country to convey diplomatic legitimacy to the Zionists’ usurpation of Palestine.  On the same day, armed forces from Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt and Jordan, with a small number from Saudi Arabia, invaded Palestine in a futile attempt to liberate the land from its Zionist usurpers. [19] Apparently, even then, Saudi Arabia was not greatly concerned about the Zionist threat, and was even viewed as a collaborator given the kingdom’s extensive ties with the United States. [20] In any case, Palestine was not liberated, and some 450,000 Palestinians lost their homes in the ensuing war while hundreds of thousands of Jewish immigrants poured in from abroad. [21]

It is beyond the scope of this article to discuss the ongoing theft of Palestinian lands since 1949 by the regime in Tel Aviv, which has enjoyed ever-increasing economic and political support from Washington.   Suffice it to say that the 1967 war, which by Menachem Begin’s own admission was a “war of choice” for the Zionists, [22] created 275,000 additional displaced Palestinians [23] and gave the Israeli entity de facto control over most of what had been called Mandate Palestine.  By 1973, when Syria and Egypt launched limited military strikes hoping to recoup losses of the Golan and Sinai respectively, “Eretz-Israel” not only had massive conventional armed forces but also had become a nuclear-armed state. [24] Peace treaties with Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994, and the much-vaunted Oslo Accord of 1993 notwithstanding, Palestinian negotiator Haydar Abd al-Shafi correctly predicted that Israel had “no intention of ever allowing a [Palestinian] state.” [25]

How ironic that a former New York real estate developer, who managed to become the U.S. president, has now cut a deal with the Zionists involving a piece of priceless Palestinian real estate, namely al-Quds, which incidentally was not his in the first place.  While the move marks the death knell of any “peace process,” yet Trump continues to pontificate about “building a future of peace and security in the Middle East.” [26] No doubt, Lord Balfour would be pleased.

Endnotes

[1] Karl Sabbagh, Palestine: A Personal History (New York: Grove Press, 2007), 97.

[2] “Statement by President Trump on Jerusalem,” The White House, December 6, 2017, accessed December 13, 2017,  https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/12/06/statement-president-trump-jerusalem.

[3] U.S. Senate Concurrent Resolution 106, 101st Congress, March 26, 1990, accessed December 13, 2017, https://www.congress.gov/bill/101st-congress/senate-concurrent-resolution/106/text.

[4] Public Law 104–45, 104th Congress, November 8, 1995, accessed December 13, 2017, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ45/PLAW-104publ45.pdf.

[5] Charles Smith, Palestine and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 4th ed. (Boston and New York: Bedford/St. Martins, 2001), 75-79.

[6] Charles Smith, ibid., 71.

[7] Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 97-98.

[8] Charles Smith, ibid., 73-75

[9] Charles Smith, ibid., 71-74.

[10] Charles Smith, ibid., 77-78.

[11] Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 106-107.

[12] Charles Smith, ibid., 85

[13] Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 151-152.  For the full text of the Mandate for Palestine, see Smith, ibid., 106-108.

[14] Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 157-159.

[15] Ilan Pappe, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (Oxford: One World Publications, 2006), 14.

[16] Ilan Pappe, ibid., 14-15.

[17] Charles Smith, ibid., 211-212

[18] Ilan Pappe, ibid., 121.

[19] Charles Smith, ibid., 200-201.

[20] Gawdat Bahgat, “Saudi Arabia and the Arab-Israeli Peace Process,” The Middle East Policy Council, 14(2007), accessed December 14, 2017, http://www.mepc.org/journal/saudi-arabia-and-arab-israeli-peace-process.

[21] Charles Smith, ibid., 203-206.

[22] John  J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007), 85.

[23] Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 319.

[24] John  J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, ibid., 85-86.

[25] Charles Smith, ibid., 361, 438, 464, 504.

[26] “Recognizing Jerusalem as the Capital of the State of Israel and Relocating the United States Embassy to Israel to Jerusalem,” The White House, December 6, 2017, accessed December 14, 2017, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-proclamation-recognizing-jerusalem-capital-state-israel-relocating-united-states-embassy-israel-jerusalem/.

In a lackluster speech on December 6, 2017, U.S. president Donald Trump announced the official recognition of Jerusalem al-Quds as the capital of the Israeli entity and directed the U.S. state department to make arrangements to move the U.S. embassy there from Tel Aviv.[1]  While Jerusalem was acknowledged as the Israeli capital by U.S. Senate Concurrent Resolution 106 in 1990[2]and the embassy move was mandated by the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995,[3]Trump has once again managed to spark worldwide outrage by declaring publicly what most intelligent observers had long since surmised.

 

The timing of Trump’s address on al-Quds was ironic, for one hundred years earlier British General Edmund Allenby, after having captured the city, which had been under the rule of the Ottoman Turks, spoke of “the establishment of national governments and administrations in those countries deriving authority from the initiative and free will of those people themselves.”  Allenby’s words, however, had previously been neutered by the now notorious Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1917, which declared the British government to “view with favour the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use its best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object,” and indeed “His Majesty’s Government” did.[4]

 

The Balfour Declaration would never have materialized without the strident efforts of a Jewish chemist named Chaim Weizmann, a Zionist who later became the first president of the Israeli entity.  Originally from southern Russia in the Pale of Settlement, Weizmann left his homeland for Switzerland where he earned a doctorate in chemistry in 1904 from the University of Geneva.  Later he immigrated to Britain where he accepted a position at the University of Manchester until he was tapped by the British government in 1916 to work on munitions.[5]  Weizmann developed a new process to make acetone, which is used in nail polish remover and for making cordite, a propellant used in British artillery projectiles, and when Munitions minister David Lloyd George was faced with a shortage of acetone, Weizmann came to his rescue.  Lloyd George later remarked, “Acetone converted me to Zionism,” and after becoming prime minister in December 1916, he rewarded Weizmann by his full support for a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine.[6]

 

To be understood, the Balfour Declaration must be viewed through the lens of Britain at war against Germany shortly after the Russian Revolution and a mutiny by French troops, events that threatened to leave the British without allies.  Further fueling British fears of fighting the war singlehandedly were rumors that Germany was contemplating a pro-Zionist declaration to entice the Russians to leave the war, which the Bolsheviks did on November 7, 1917 when they entered into peace negotiations with the Germans.  Compounding British anxiety was the reality that most American Jews at the time favored supporting Germany over Britain; those from Germany retained fond memories of their former homeland while those from Russia recalled the Tsar’s pogroms and transferred this antipathy to Britain, Russia’s ally.[7]

 

Knowing that U.S. president Woodrow Wilson held strong convictions concerning self-determination of peoples, British Prime Minister Lloyd George sought the help of American Jews to convince Wilson of the strategic importance of a British invasion and occupation of Palestine towards victory in the First World War.  The plan conceived with the help of Chaim Weizmann was to portray the Zionist project to Wilson as Jewish self-determination in Palestine, thereby averting any accusations of post-war annexation of conquered lands.   American Jewry had to be enticed to support the British war effort, so in exchange, Britain pledged to support the Zionist objectives in Palestine, but this also required the help of such notables as U.S. Supreme Court justice Louis Brandeis, who headed the Zionist organization in the U.S. and was close to President Wilson.  It was Brandeis who informed Weizmann of the U.S. president’s interest in Zionism.[8]

 

The other side that had to be convinced to join with Britain in the war effort against the Ottoman Empire and Germany was the Arabs, who were also anticipating their own self-determination at the end of the First World War.  To that end, British diplomat Mark Sykes wrote a declaration of assurances to Sharif Hussein bin Ali, the leader of the Arab Revolt, which Hussein declared against the Turks in 1916. Sykes assured that the Palestinian Arabs would be granted political freedom and that the Balfour Declaration announcing British support for a Jewish homeland would be applied only as would be “compatible with the freedom of the existing population, both economic and political.” As a result, Hussein was deliberately duped by Sykes into accepting the idea that Jewish immigration into Palestine would not amount to much.  The British charade became apparent in 1918 when the Bolsheviks published copies of the British and French secret plans to carve up the Middle East at war’s end based on their respective self-interests.[9]

 

It should be mentioned that the Zionists hedged their political bets in case Britain did not emerge from the First World War victorious by approaching the German and Turkish governments with proposals delivered by the Zionist organization’s representative in Istanbul, Richard Lichtheim.  Pointing out the anticipated gratitude of Jewish Americans, Lichtheim listed the advantages of German support for the Zionist project in Palestine, noting the common German language and emphasizing the business connections of the Jews already there.  To sweeten the deal, Lichtheim even offered to arrange for a Zionist armed force to fight against the British in the Middle East alongside their Turkish and German allies.  As Palestinian author Karl Sabbagh explained, “The unique status of Jews in global politics made this sort of double-dealing possible.”[10]

 

Britain emerged from the First World War with a mandate for Palestine, which was granted at the San Remo Conference in April 1920.  The Balfour Declaration was also included in the obligations for the mandatory power, enshrining the document in an international agreement and thereby forcing Britain to abide by its terms to facilitate a Zionist colonization project in Palestine.[11]  This was while the terms of the mandate also demanded of Britain that it preserve the rights of the existing inhabitants of Palestine.  However, the mandate document itself failed to mention the word “Arab” even once; instead it referred to “non-Jewish” inhabitants as if the overwhelming majority of the population of Palestine at the time were nothing more than a numerically inconsequential minority.[12]

Unsurprisingly, conflict arose almost immediately, as European Jewish immigrants poured into Palestine, the first of which occurred during the Palestinian Muslim festival of Nabi Musa, which took place in April 1920.  Nine people were killed and over 200 wounded in the clashes along with much destruction and looting of property.  The chief Zionist political officer, Richard Meinhertzhagen, even accused the British of having foreknowledge of the riots and allowing them to happen, despite having told the British foreign office four days earlier that he did not anticipate any trouble.  To investigate the causes, the Palin Commission was formed, and after interviewing 152 witnesses, reported that while the violence may have been initiated by Arabs, these were “people who see themselves menaced with deprivation by a race they have hitherto held in dislike and contempt.”[13]

 

Through the 1920s and 1930s, the conflict created by Balfour’s letter to Lord Rothschild continued to escalate as the native Palestinian Arab majority protested the wholesale colonization of their ancestral land by European Zionists.  Until 1928, the British government attempted to maintain “parity” in its treatment of the indigenous Palestinian Arab population, none of whom had access to British notables, and the incessant demands of the Zionists, who through Weizmann and others enjoyed close relations with British prime ministers and MPs.  While rejecting the concept of parity at first, Palestinian leaders finally agreed to accept the principle only to see their efforts at peaceful compromise summarily rejected by the Zionists.  The result was twofold: first, Palestinians launched a massive uprising in 1929 against the mandatory government, which they rightly saw as favoring the Zionists; and second, a pattern of Palestinian compromise and Zionist intransigency was established, which has held to the present.[14]

 

Throughout the mandatory period, whenever the British government exhibited tendencies towards acknowledging and correcting the injustices committed against the Palestinians, the Zionists, with their close ties to His Majesty’s Government, managed to force a return to the Balfour colonization track.  This, of course, resulted in additional protests and uprisings by Palestinians, culminating in 1936 with the Arab Revolt, which lasted until 1939 before the British managed to suppress it by sending more troops to Palestine. In the meantime, the Zionists took full advantage of a proposal by the British Peel Commission to divide Palestine into separate Arab and Jewish states, and worked feverishly to establish an autonomous Jewish enclave.  By 1942, Zionist leaders were demanding all of Palestine, and drawing up plans for the ethnic cleansing that would be necessary to rid Palestine of her native Arab population.[15]

 

Throughout the Second World War Palestinians and Zionists alike sensed that another clash was coming, as foreshadowed by the increasing number of British casualties and the pace of Zionist terrorist attacks such as the July 1946 bombing by the Stern Gang of the British headquarters in the King David Hotel in al-Quds.  The British government, with dire economic woes at home, decided it could no longer afford the expense of maintaining a standing army in Palestine larger than the one it had in India, and handed the entire Palestinian conundrum over to the fledgling United Nations in February 1947, announcing its intension to withdraw by mid-May in 1948.  By July 1947 the U.N. Special Commission on Palestine recommended partition of the country and the proposal was approved in the U.N. General Assembly on November 29.[16]  Concurrently, the Hashemite leadership of Transjordan entered into secret talks with the Zionist leadership in hopes of gaining a share of the vacated mandate.  The stage was now set for the Nakbah, the 1948 expulsion of native Palestinians from their country.[17]

 

In anticipation of the termination of the British mandate on May 15, 1948, the Zionists under the leadership of David Ben-Gurion declared the establishment of the “State of Israel” the day before.  On May 15, U.S. president Harry Truman instructed the U.S. delegation to the U.N. to announce America’s recognition of the newly-created Israeli entity, making the United States the first country to convey diplomatic legitimacy to the Zionists’ usurpation of Palestine.  On the same day, armed forces from Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt and Jordan, with a small number from Saudi Arabia, invaded Palestine in a futile attempt to liberate the land from its Zionist usurpers.[18]  Apparently, even then, Saudi Arabia was not greatly concerned about the Zionist threat, and was even viewed as a collaborator given the kingdom’s extensive ties with the United States.[19]  In any case, Palestine was not liberated, and some 450,000 Palestinians lost their homes in the ensuing war while hundreds of thousands of Jewish immigrants poured in from abroad.[20]

 

It is beyond the scope of this article to discuss the ongoing theft of Palestinian lands since 1949 by the regime in Tel Aviv, which has enjoyed ever-increasing economic and political support from Washington.   Suffice it to say that the 1967 war, which by Menachem Begin’s own admission was a “war of choice” for the Zionists,[21]created 275,000 additional displaced Palestinians[22]and gave the Israeli entity de facto control over most of what had been called Mandate Palestine.  By 1973, when Syria and Egypt launched limited military strikes hoping to recoup losses of the Golan and Sinai respectively, “Eretz-Israel” not only had massive conventional armed forces but also had become a nuclear-armed state.[23]Peace treaties with Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994, and the much-vaunted Oslo Accord of 1993 notwithstanding, Palestinian negotiator Haydar Abd al-Shafi correctly predicted that Israel had “no intention of ever allowing a [Palestinian] state.”[24]

 

How ironic that a former New York real estate developer, who managed to become the U.S. president, has now cut a deal with the Zionists involving a piece of priceless Palestinian real estate, namely al-Quds, which incidentally was not his in the first place.  While the move marks the death knell of any “peace process,” yet Trump continues to pontificate about “building a future of peace and security in the Middle East.”[25]  No doubt, Lord Balfour would be pleased.

 

Endnotes

[1]“Statement by President Trump on Jerusalem,” The White House, December 6, 2017, accessed December 13, 2017,  https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/12/06/statement-president-trump-jerusalem.

[2]U.S. Senate Concurrent Resolution 106, 101st Congress, March 26, 1990, accessed December 13, 2017, https://www.congress.gov/bill/101st-congress/senate-concurrent-resolution/106/text.

[3]Public Law 104–45, 104th Congress, November 8, 1995, accessed December 13, 2017, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ45/PLAW-104publ45.pdf.

[4]Charles Smith, Palestine and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 4th ed. (Boston and New York: Bedford/St. Martins, 2001), 75-79.

[5]Charles Smith, ibid., 71.

[6]Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 97-98.

[7]Charles Smith, ibid., 73-75

[8]Charles Smith, ibid., 71-74.

[9]Charles Smith, ibid., 77-78.

[10]Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 106-107.

[11]Charles Smith, ibid., 85

[12]Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 151-152.  For the full text of the Mandate for Palestine, see Smith, ibid., 106-108.

[13]Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 157-159.

[14]Ilan Pappe, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine(Oxford: One World Publications, 2006), 14.

[15]Ilan Pappe, ibid., 14-15.

[16]Charles Smith, ibid., 211-212

[17]Ilan Pappe, ibid., 121.

[18]Charles Smith, ibid., 200-201.

[19]Gawdat Bahgat, “Saudi Arabia and the Arab-Israeli Peace Process,” The Middle East Policy Council, 14(2007), accessed December 14, 2017, http://www.mepc.org/journal/saudi-arabia-and-arab-israeli-peace-process.

[20]Charles Smith, ibid., 203-206.

[21]John  J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007), 85.

[22]Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 319.

[23]John  J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, ibid., 85-86.

[24]Charles Smith, ibid., 361, 438, 464, 504.

[25]“Recognizing Jerusalem as the Capital of the State of Israel and Relocating the United States Embassy to Israel to Jerusalem,” The White House, December 6, 2017, accessed December 14, 2017, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-proclamation-recognizing-jerusalem-capital-state-israel-relocating-united-states-embassy-israel-jerusalem/.

 The Balfour Declaration

 

WRITER

YURAM ABDULLAH WEILER

Yuram Abdullah Weiler is a former engineer educated in mathematics turned writer and political critic who has written over 130 articles on Islam, social justice, economics, and politics focusing on the Middle East and U.S. policies.


The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Second Edition

by Ilan Pappe (Author)

Renowned Israeli historian, Ilan Pappe’s groundbreaking book revisits the formation of the State of Israel. Between 1947 and 1949, over 400 Palestinian villages were deliberately destroyed, civilians were massacred and around a million men, women, and children were expelled from their homes at gunpoint.

Denied for almost six decades, had it happened today it could only have been called “ethnic cleansing”. Decisively debunking the myth that the Palestinian population left of their own accord in the course of this war, Ilan Pappe offers impressive archival evidence to demonstrate that, from its very inception, a central plank in Israel’s founding ideology was the forcible removal of the indigenous population. Indispensable for anyone interested in the current crisis in the Middle East.

  
By Jew Ilan Pappé
ISBN-13: 978-1851685554
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Vatican to sign first accord with State of Palestine

AFP , Wednesday 13 May 2015

Vatican

A general view of St. Peter square (Photo:Reuters)
AdTech Ad

The Vatican said Wednesday it was preparing to sign its first accord with Palestine, two years after officially recognising it as a state.”The bilateral commission of the Holy See and the State of Palestine, which is working on a comprehensive agreement” on the life and activity of the Catholic Church in Palestine , is putting the final touches to the treaty, the Vatican said.

“The agreement will be submitted to the respective authorities for approval ahead of setting a debate in the near future for the signing.”

While it will be the first time the Roman Catholic Church signs a treaty with the State of Palestine, the Vatican has recognised the state since February 2013.

“The Holy See has identified the State of Palestine as such since the vote” by the UN general assembly to recognise it in November 2012, Vatican spokesman Federico Lombardi told AFP.

“In its annual directory the Palestinian representative is referred to as the representative of the State of Palestine.


‘Wish you well against Jewish invaders’: Himmler’s letter to Palestinian Arab leader discovered

‘Wish you well against Jewish invaders’: Himmler’s letter to Palestinian Arab leader discovered
An old telegram uncovered by the National Library of Israel shows a letter from Nazi SS chief Heinrich Himmler to Palestinian Grand Mufti Amin al-Husseini, voicing his support for “freedom-seeking Arabs” against “world Jewry.”

The telegram, dating back to autumn 1943, appears to show how in their hatred for Jews, Nazis in Europe have been seeking to support Palestinians against the “Jewish invaders.”

“To Grand Mufti Amin al-Husseini,” the letter read. “From the outset, the National Socialist [Nazi] movement of Greater Germany has been a standard-bearer in the battle against world Jewry. For this reason, it is closely following the battle of freedom-seeking Arabs, particularly in Palestine, against the Jewish invaders.

JerUSAlem Israel@GoldJerusalem18

‘In rediscovered telegram, Hitler’s deputy, Himmler, offers Jerusalem’s Mufti help against ‘Jewish intruders’’http://en.europe-israel.org/2017/03/30/in-rediscovered-telegram-himmler-offers-jerusalems-mufti-help-against-jewish-intruders/ 

The shared recognition of the enemy and the joint fight against it are creating the strong base [uniting] Germany and freedom-seeking Arabs around the world. In this spirit, I am pleased to wish you, on the anniversary of the wretched Balfour Declaration, warm wishes on your continued fight until the great victory.

lemondejuif.info@lemondejuif1fo

Découverte d’un télégramme du nazi Himmler proposant son aide au Mufti de Jérusalem contre les “envahisseurs Juifs” http://www.lemondejuif.info/2017/03/netanyahu-avait-raison-decouverte-dun-telegramme-nazi-himmler-proposant-aide-mufti-de-jerusalem-contre-envahisseurs-juifs/ 

Netanyahu avait raison : découverte d’un télégramme du nazi Himmler proposant son aide au Mufti de…

Un télégramme envoyé par le nazi Heinrich Himmler, l’un des plus hauts dignitaires du Troisième Reich, adressé au Grand Mufti de Jérusalem Hadj Amin al-Husseini, a été retrouvé dans les archives de…

lemondejuif.info

The telegram was sent on 2 November 1943, marking the 26th anniversary of the 1917 Balfour Declaration by the British government, which then controlled the Palestinian territories and expressed support for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

Allen Berman@berman_allen

Himmler & the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem actually agree on Jews?? shocked—shocked—to find that gambling is going on in here!

The document was first confiscated by US Army in Germany, before falling into the hands of a member of the Jewish Haganah paramilitary group (which later went on to form the core of the IDF), who then donated it to the National Library. It was rediscovered after library staff was asked to look for materials about the 1917 declaration.

Amin al-Husseini was considered to be one of the ringleaders of the Jerusalem riots in the 1920’s, which followed tensions between Arab and Jewish communities, and was sentenced to ten years imprisonment by the British. Despite later being granted a pardon, al-Husseini continued with his hardline rhetoric, stopped co-operating with British authorities and took an uncompromising position against the Jews, objecting to any notion of Jewish statehood.

In November 1941, the Grand Mufti visited Nazi Germany where he told Hitler that Arabs and Germans were natural friends as they had common enemies in the Jews and the British. Al-Husseini wanted Hitler’s backing for an Arab revolt against French and British rule in the Middle East but did not get it.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed in 2015 that Hitler didn’t initially want to exterminate the Jews until he was talked into it by al-Husseini.

“Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said to him: ‘If you expel them [the Jews], they will all come here [to Palestine],’”Netanyahu said in a speech before the World Zionist Congress in Jerusalem.

In Netanyahu’s version of events, Hitler then asked, “So what am I supposed to do with them?” and the mufti allegedly replied: “Burn them.”

The statements caused a wave of criticism from Palestinians, German politicians, opposition leaders and Holocaust experts, who accused Netanyahu of twisting historical facts.


synaggue attack jerusalem picture of yosefgenocide web

 

Gandhi’s Despair and the Struggle for Truth and Love

‘When I despair, I remember that all through history the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants, and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of it – always.’ M.K. Gandhi

As we remember Gandhi Jayanti on 2 October, the Mahatma’s 149th birthday and the International Day of Nonviolence, there is plenty of room for despair.

Never before has the Earth and its many inhabitants been under siege as they are now, more than 100 years after Gandhi started warning us of the predicament in which we are embroiled and presenting his strategy for addressing it before it spiraled out of control.

Whether it is the threat of nuclear war, the ongoing wars in many parts of the world and particularly the Middle East, the multiple and synergistic threats to the global environment or the ongoing climate catastrophe, the Earth is under assault on all fronts and its precious lifeforms (human and otherwise) are being killed outright in vast numbers and driven to extinction at the rate of 200 species daily. And the evidence is rapidly accumulating that humans themselves will be extinct by 2026 as well. See ‘Human Extinction by 2026? A Last Ditch Strategy to Fight for Human Survival’.

Moreover, unlike the tyrants to which Gandhi was referring, the current ‘tyrant’ is a global elite that has acquired extraordinary power to kill and destroy as they pursue their insane compulsion to accumulate and control resources at the expense of life. See ‘The Global Elite is Insane Revisited’.

So are we to give up in despair? To quit without a fight? Or even delude ourselves that nothing needs to be done? Obviously, these were not ways that Gandhi would contemplate because, as noted in his words cited above: ‘the ways of truth and love have always won’. Although, as Gandhi did not bother to add: we must struggle, relentlessly, to ensure that truth and love prevail.

And, fortunately, there are many people around the world who agree with him.

Tackling the pervasive violence in our world requires a comprehensive strategy involving many campaigns focused on a wide range of peace, justice and environmental issues, and substantial mobilization. There is no single or simple path. Let me tell you about some of the people engaged in this effort and the nature of their commitment, together with what connects their involvement.

Remarkable activist and progressive journalist Abby Martin, based in the USA, was formerly creator and presenter of the investigative news program ‘Breaking the Set’ and is now creator and presenter of its successor program ‘The Empire Files’. With the support of her fine team, Abby researches and presents reports from ‘inside history’s biggest empire… recording a world shaped by war & inequality’ so that the truth is exposed for all to see. Abby, who is also an artist, interviews a wide range of people from ‘ordinary’ activists to progressive intellectuals to political leaders to penetrate the veil of obscurity cast by the global elite’s corporate media. You can watch Abby’s terrific programs, providing insight into how our incredibly violent world works, on her website ‘The Empire Files’. You can also read about the latest attack on her work and how you can help in the article ‘US Sanctions Shut Down “The Empire Files” with Abby Martin’. Keep fighting Abby! We are with you all the way.

Ina Curic in Romania writes illustrated children’s books designed to teach children a variety of lessons for living an empowered, socially and environmentally conscious life. Her book Queen Rain, King Wind: The Practice of Heart Gardening was published in May and Anagrania’s Challenge: Turning Conflict into Opportunity has just been published. Anagrania’s Challenge is a beautifully created story that offers clear and simple guidance on three subjects vital to our shared future on Earth: what we need to be ourselves, what we need to be healthy, and that acceptance of uniqueness and creatively dealing with conflict are essential if we are to live together and celebrate the benefits and advantages of our differences. If you are looking for children’s books that promote nonviolent living and conflict resolution, you will have trouble finding better books than those by Ina. You can read about Ina, as well as how to obtain her books, on her website Imagine Creatively.

Pakistani Canadian Dr. Mahboob A. Khawaja is a scholar who writes searing critiques of international relations exposing the deep conflicts driving global events. Two of his recent articles are ‘World Affairs and Insanity as Entertainment: Are We at the End of Human Morality?’ and ‘Mankind Must Know: The UNO and Global Leaders are a Menace to Peace and Problem-Solving’.

Moreover, in support of his son Momin, a computer science graduate and IT entrepreneur, who has been unjustly imprisoned since 2004 on terrorism charges (and facing a sentence of life plus 24 years), Mahboob has created a websiteto raise awareness of Momin’s struggle for justice and freedom, and organized a petitionfor those who wish to express their support for him.

Edith Rubinstein in Belgium is definitely an ‘activist senior’. Now 86 and in a center of recuperation following a severe depression and bout of unconsciousness earlier this year, Edith still has her computer and continues her work as an activist. ‘Because I am an activist since a very long time, a feminist, a woman in Black, and I translated free Ecofeminism from Maria Mies and Vandana Shiva…. Since many years, I have translated alternative articles and finally it made me sick.’ In fact, Edith admits, ‘I am completely “abnormal”. Somebody who feels bad to live in a world where hundreds of thousand people are killed or die … because they have nothing to eat anymore and nobody seems to care…. I feel very bad to live in this kind of world. Yes, terrible what is happening in the Congo! But unfortunately it is not the only case. And I am very scandalized by the behavior of the Western World!!!!’

Zakia Haddouch in Morocco continues to report the extraordinarily difficult circumstances of people in that country as she and other activists continue their various struggles to bring some semblance of justice to Moroccan affairs. One prominent issue is the ongoing debate in relation to ‘the forced military service (for both young female and male subjects and I don’t say citizens). It was lately decreed by the king.’ Another struggle is taking place in the wake of the death of Mohcine Fikri on 28 October 2016, who was crushed to death in a rubbish truck trying to recover merchandise confiscated by a policeman. Following this event, Hirak (literally ‘The Movement’) was born and it quickly mobilized widespread support for its vigorous protests. While most of Hirak’s concerns are about local issues, it draws upon a national repertory of nonviolent actions fueled by the experiences of activists around the country. Between October 2016 and May 2017, and faced with social unrest of an unprecedented vitality which increasingly challenged him personally, Mohamed VI remained silent. However, when Hirak leader Nasser Zefzazi – who has never failed to stress nonviolence and advocate self-restraint – interrupted a sermon on 26 May 2017 in which an imam claimed the social movement was tantamount to a ‘fratricidal struggle or even civil war within Islam’, the government took this pretext to clamp down on Hirak. Many activists were jailed – over 200 so far – and demonstrations are now systematically broken up. Zefzazi was among those arrested (on 29 May 2017) and, along with other members of Hirak, subsequently jailed for 20 years. The repression has nipped in the bud any hopes for resolving the crisis quickly. But this doesn’t mean that Zakia and other activists have been intimidated into silence or inaction.

Daniel Dalai reports modestly about his visionary initiative Earthgardens in Guatemala. Earthgardens provides opportunities for girls to realize and practice their inherent leadership potential, particularly as part of Eco-Teams in preserving natural biodiversity. ‘More and more 3rd world governments are proving to be a colossal waste of money as corrupt politicians get rich without addressing local needs. The Sembradores’ model of Girl Power is gaining acceptance as people realize girls are more efficient, more concerned, and less corruptible in solving the simple problems of local needs. Clean water, cheap electricity, food production, and tourist development are urgent needs in many parts of the globe. You may become a volunteer working with children or an Eco-Team assessor in Latin America or Africa.’ Please contact Kate Teggins <earthgardens@outlook.com> The beautiful Earthgardens website has just been updated and the stunning photos alone will tell you much about what these remarkable girls are doing. See Earthgardens.

Young Nigerian Idowu Jawando has been reflecting deeply on the shocking state of our world and his own role in fixing that. ‘Over here in Lagos civilization advances steadily with all its domination and exploitation, squeezing the juice out of all of us. But yet here and there, traces of a smile, the fragrance of love releases its perfume… things seem bearable for a while. The big question on my mind is this: Can civilization be deconstructed? A part of me thinks: Yes of course, it is the actions of individuals that create this world, these same individuals also have the power to take everything down. But how about the police, the armies, the nuclear weapons and what-have you? Things are the way they are because of force. And most especially the threat of starvation too. It forces us into activities and relationships not of our choosing. Civilization uses and discards the people, over and over, squeezing them like lemons.

‘Will the global leaders who are driven to this insane struggle for power and profit suddenly grow a compassionate nature, one that has no doubt been lost a long time ago? You and I know they won’t. With all the disasters that go on, we still see them stripping the earth bare of its life, still forcing people into precarious situations. We find ourselves at a quandary. I personally find myself in a very stifling situation, but I try my best not to let it define, instead I study it as one would study a dangerous toy….

‘Indeed I have found that tenderness impacts strength and courage in others, this is something I have seen in my own existence. But can one be tender to an oppressor? I guess if there was a mass refusal of this world and all its mechanisms, there will be a lot of headway. Such a situation in my own thinking, won’t be one of making demands to any government, but collectively and individually deciding how we want to live our beautiful mortal lives and what we want the world around us to reflect: the ugliness of mindless profit-seeking or co-creative play with earthly life.

‘Many just go through life unquestioningly, accepting the state of things as normal; as well, the walls that prevent us from truly connecting with one another, is one major obstacle. The education, religious systems only encourage people to be followers, never masters of themselves…. I will keep thinking about this. I realize it might take my whole life and then more, to tackle the evils of the world. But it would please me if I am moving inch by inch and encouraging others to do the same. The torch of freedom must never be extinguished. But must pass from generation to generation.’

Each of the inspiring individuals mentioned above is a signatory of The Peoples Charter to Create a Nonviolent World. If you feel inclined to join this worldwide movement to end violence in all of its manifestations, you are welcome to sign the Charter pledge too.

Like those individuals mentioned above, signatories of the Nonviolence Charter come from a diverse range of backgrounds. They live all over the world (in 105 countries). They represent a wide range of genders, races, religions, classes and abilities. And they work on a phenomenal variety of issues with an increasing number recognizing the need to work on ending violence against children. As Gandhi noted:

‘If we are to reach real peace in this world and if we are to carry on a real war against war, we shall have to begin with children.’

This requires us to understand the cause of violence, including violence against children – see Why Violence?’ and Fearless Psychology and Fearful Psychology: Principles and Practice – and to consider making ‘My Promise to Children’. In some cases, it means undertaking the personal healing necessary to nurture children powerfully. See ‘Putting Feelings First’.

Recognizing, as Gandhi put it, that ‘Earth provides enough to satisfy every [person’s] needs, but not every [person’s] greed’, others are tackling the full range of environmental and climate challengesby participating inThe Flame Tree Project to Save Life on Earth.

And given the elite insanity that drives violence in many contexts, still other signatories are engaged in nonviolent struggles – see Nonviolent Campaign Strategy – or national liberation struggles – see Nonviolent Defense/Liberation Strategy – to tackle violence in these contexts.

So if you are inclined to ponder the meaning of Gandhi’s life, you just need to picture a man dressed simply in khadi, walking to the sea to collect salt in defiance of the law of the British occupying power.

The Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. once noted: ‘The enemy is violence.’ But for Gandhi: ‘The enemy is fear.’

This is because it is fear that drives violence but also fear that prevents us responding strategically and nonviolently to the violence in our world. As Gandhi observed: ‘You may never know what results come of your actions, but if you do nothing there will be no results.’

So as humans are beckoned to extinction within the next few years, Gandhi would remind us that ‘The future depends on what we do in the present.’

What will you do?

 Robert J. Burrowes has a lifetime commitment to understanding and ending human violence. He has done extensive research since 1966 in an effort to understand why human beings are violent and has been a nonviolent activist since 1981. He is the author of Why Violence? His email address is flametree@riseup.net and his website is here.

 

Russia Arms Syria with “Unbeatable” Missiles to Ward off Further Jewish Attacks

   

The Russian government has ordered the arming of Syria with new S-300 anti-aircraft missiles—which can shoot down all but the latest US “stealth” planes, and which will be deadly to Israeli F-15 and F-16 jets—in direct response to last week’s atrocity where a Russian aircraft was shot down after being used as a “cover” by the Jewish state’s air force.

In a statement released by Russian Minister of Defense Sergei Shoigu, it was pointed out that the S-300 missile system had in fact been purchased by Syria several years ago, but had never been delivered “upon Israel’s request in 2013.”

Now however, Shoigu said, after the shooting down of the Russian aircraft last week, “things have changed and it isn’t Russia’s fault. This will cool down the hotheads [in Israel] and prevent ill-considered actions threatening Russian soldiers.”

He added that if such a development fails to materialize, the Russian military “would act in accordance to the situation.”

Russia will also supply better control systems to Syrian Air Defense Troops, “which are only supplied to the Russian Armed Forces,” Shoigu added. This will allow integration of Syrian and Russian military assets, allowing the Syrian to have better targeting information.

This will also mean that Israeli aircraft tracked by Russian radar stations will be seen by Syrian missile commanders.

In addition, Russians will also implement a blanket of electronic countermeasures over Syrian coastline, which would “suppress satellite navigation, onboard radar systems and communications of warplanes attacking targets on Syrian territory.”

This will also seriously interfere with further Jewish attacks in Syria, which have consisted by their own admission of over 200 bombing raids, all aimed at weakening the Syrian government in its fight against the US and Israeli-backed “rebels”—who in turn have all turned out to be ISIS and Al-Qaeda affiliates.

In a statement released on the official website of the Russian President, Vladimir Putin said he had told Syrian President Bashar Assad of the developments in person.



“The President of Russia informed about the decision to implement a number of additional measures to ensure the safety of the Russian military in Syria and to strengthen the air defense system of this country, including the transfer of the SAR of the modern S-300 surface-to-air missile system,” the statement said.

The announcement provoked a hysterical reaction in Tel Aviv and in the Jewish Lobby-controlled US government, with Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying that the move would “magnify dangers.”

US National Security Adviser John Bolton saying that the Russian move was a “major mistake” that would cause a “significant escalation” of tensions and urged Moscow to reconsider.

The Russians are however not backing down. When Netanyahu called Putin to complain personally, the Jewish state’s leader was told by the Russian President that the “information provided by the Israeli military about the operation of their aircraft over the Syrian territory is at variance with the conclusions of the Russian Defense Ministry. The Russian side proceeds from the fact that it was the actions of the Israeli Air Force that became the main cause of the tragedy.”

The New Observer’s Russian correspondent reports that the S-300 missiles in effect make Syria “no-go zones” for all aircraft except for the F-22 Raptor and B-2 Spirit “stealth” bombers of the US Air Force.

According to the official specifications, S-300 has a range of 120 miles and can shoot down aircraft flying as high as 100,000ft. and each unit can attack more than half a dozen targets simultaneously.

“The Russian move is by far the most anti-Israel action yet taken by the Russian government,” the New Observer’sMoscow correspondent continued.

“What it in effect means is that the Russians have decided to go toe-to-toe with the Jews, and by implication, the US, over Syria. Be prepared therefore to see increasing anti-Russian hysteria and propaganda in the West’s Jewish lobby-controlled media, and from Washington and Tel Aviv over this move.”


Macron ‘Will Do Everything’ to Assist Democrats Ahead of 2019 EU Vote – Reports

Emmanuel Macron, presidente de Francia

© AFP 2018 / Ludovic Marin

EUROPE

Get short URL

MOSCOW (Sputnik) – French President Emmanuel Macron expressed his intention to be directly involved in the election campaign ahead of the European Parliament election in mid 2019 and pledged in this regard to build a wide list uniting centrists.

“I will be involved [in the election campaign] since I believe in an [election] campaign for the sake of Europe of ambition and future, of Democrats and progressives,” Macron told France’s Le Journal du Dimanche (JDD) newspaper, adding that the upcoming election would be a historical fight.

READ MORE: ‘More Problems Than Benefits’: AfD Official Discusses EU Disintegration, Brexit

He also revealed his plans to draft “the broadest possible” list for the upcoming EU election stressing that he “will do everything” so that the progressives, the Democrats at those whose voices Macron represents — “hopefully, brought together within a single list, the broadest possible in France” — make themselves heard.The next elections to the European Parliament are officially scheduled for May 23-26, 2019.


EU border control

Enhancing the EU’s Frontex Border Agency ‘Won’t Be Possible’ – Journalist

© AFP 2018 / Carsten Rehder

OPINION

Get short URL
101

The EU is looking to secure migration agreements with northern African nations in an attempt to re-use the strategy it developed with Turkey, according to German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Following an EU summit in Salzburg, Merkel said that the EU-Turkey arrangement could serve as a model for working with North Africa.

Sputnik discussed the feasibility of this as a deal with North African states with Paolo Salom, a political observer with the Italian daily newspaper Corriere della Sera.

Sputnik: How workable is the EU-Turkey-like arrangement as a model for a deal with North African states to stem migration?Paolo Salom: Model is a good word, you can have anything you like as a model but when you turn to practical objectives, can we say that a senior arrangement could be used? We have to consider that Turkey is a different country from the North African states in the sense that Turkey has a different history, a different culture and society, and a strong government, a very old story of  good government, it was an Empire for centuries, while the North African states now cannot be seen as stable. Just look at Libya, how it’s turning into a chaotic, anarchic state, so can we do the same in North Africa? I doubt it, but it’s okay to try, but we have to be realistic and considered the situation on the ground.

Sputnik: What’s your thoughts then regarding how likely Brussels is to secure a deal like this from North African nations? What could be expected from the meeting between Donald Tusk and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi?

Paolo Salom: Egypt is probably the only hard state, along with Morocco. A state where the authority of the President is, as we know, without criticism. So yes, it could be reached, a deal with Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, but then we have to consider the overall relations between Europe and other countries. Europe always has set forth a paradigm in which democracy and respect for human rights are paramount when dealing with relations between the two parties. You cannot keep on criticizing a country like Egypt because of the lack of freedom and political rights and human rights, and all those opposition members sent to prison without a fair trial, and then say ‘okay we struck a deal and things are going to be good’. I think it’s a very complicated situation and Europe can, of course, strike a deal but then it has to consider how it will be asked about not criticizing again this regime or other regimes, so it’s a very sharp, pointed issue.

Sputnik: Brussels is also pushing for the enhancement of the EU border agency, which is called Frontex, to which a number of nations most hit by illegal immigration have expressed reluctance due to sovereignty concerns. What are your thoughts on this initiative? Do you agree with it?Paolo Salom: You see this is one of the paradoxes of how Europe is functioning. You have a European Union which is seen as a whole, and it’s asked to be seen as that, and to try find means to solve problems as a unique body, a whole body. But then when they enhance instruments like Frontex and want to push for enhancing to make it stronger and deal with this migration problem, well each country says ‘no, I don’t want to be pushed aside, I want to maintain my sovereignty, I want to maintain my rights to decide what to do in the areas which are under my control.’ So what’s Europe then? Is it something that’s good for everybody or isn’t it? This is the limit and I think it won’t be possible to enhance an agency like this that will, of course, erode the rights of control of each country involved. So the paradox is: we used to say the King is naked, then you see when this happens, the King has no clothes on, so you can see the reality of it and everybody outside of Europe can see it.

 

The views expressed in this article are those of the speaker, and do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.


UK Jews Attack May Government for backing Hungary in EU Parliament Vote

   

The Board of Deputies of British Jews, a Conservative Jewish House of Lords member, Jewish academics, and the Jewish Chronicle (“the world’s oldest and most influential Jewish newspaper”) have all joined forced to attack Britain’s Conservative Party on account its support of Hungary during the recent “article 7” vote in the European Parliament.

In a statement released by the Board of Deputies of British Jews President Marie van der Zyl, that organization said that it had “noted with disappointment that Conservative Party MEPs voted in defence of Hungary’s far-right government of Viktor Orban.

“As we have stated previously, we are very alarmed by the messages at the heart of Orban’s election campaign, including his comments about ‘Muslim invaders’, calling migrants ‘poison’, and the vivid antisemitism in the relentless campaign against Jewish philanthropist George Soros,” Van der Zyl said.

“This whipping up of prejudice by the Hungarian government–alongside restrictions on press freedom and the independence of the judiciary–must be stopped before it undermines Hungary’s democracy irreversibly.

“It is very concerning that the Conservative Party MEPs chose to defend Hungary’s appalling track record, rather than supporting this motion to protect the rule of law.”

The Jerusalem-based Times of Israel commented that the statement was a “rare rebuke to Prime Minister Theresa May’s party, which has built a strong track record of support for the Jewish community in Britain and tackling anti-Semitism.”

The Conservatives were the only governing center-right party in Western Europe to oppose triggering the European Union’s most serious disciplinary action against a member state. In the September 12 vote, 448 MEPs backed the motion, which condemned Hungary’s government as a “systematic threat” to democracy and the rule of law.

The BBC reported that Daniel Finkelstein, “a prominent Jewish Conservative member of the House of Lords and columnist for The Times newspaper,” joined the criticism, saying the vote against censuring Orbán was “a really distressing thing to have happened, and shameful.”

“Lord” Finkelstein called on his colleagues “to rethink their decision, which he said was hypocritical.”

In an editorial, the Jewish Chronicle said that the “decision last week by Conservative MEPs to ally with some of the most unsavoury groups in the European Parliament in backing Viktor Orbán, the Hungarian Prime Minister, was truly shameful and a dark day for the party led by Mrs May.

“Mr Orbán has, repeatedly, used blatant and obvious antisemitic language. Much of his recent election campaign was based on attacks on Jewish Hungarian philanthropist George Soros, in language that was designed to highlight his Judaism and, as such, paint him as the enemy of Hungary.

“This is real antisemitism, in mainland Europe, used as a policy by an EU member.

“The MEPs’ vote was bad enough. But the subsequent refusal of a series of high-profile Conservatives to condemn the vote was, if anything, even worse.”



David Hirsh, senior lecturer in sociology at Goldsmiths, University of London, told the Jewish Chronicle in another article that “The idea that Britain would now cozy up to an anti-Semitic and racist strongman regime… is shameful.”

The Jewish attack upon Hungary and the British government is of course just another example of rampant hypocrisy, which has come to characterize the Jewish lobby all over the Western World.

In the Jews’ own country, Israel, Soros is equally hated by the government for the Soros Foundation’s support of numerous Palestinian organizations, and the government of Benjamin Netanyahu has also cracked down upon the Soros Foundation’s operations.

In addition, the Hungarian government has excellent relations with the Israeli government, with Prime Minister Viktor Orban announcing during an official visit to Jerusalem in July this year that “he has the same views as the Prime Minister of Israel with regard to several 21st-century issues, including security, combatting terrorism, the defence of borders and the problem of modern-day anti-Semitism.”

According to an official press statement released jointly with Netanyahu, Orbán “stressed that they agree that the most important issue is security: every nation has the right to its own security, which it is duty-bound to provide to its citizens. He said today Europe is afflicted by migration and terrorism, against which action must be taken.”

Orban also said that “Hungary will always take action to ensure that international organizations treat Israel in a fair, balanced and unbiased manner,” and that “in the future Hungary will also continue to closely cooperate with Israel in international forums.”

He added that “economic cooperation between the two countries is strong, with two hundred Israeli businesses operating in Hungary, providing jobs for five thousand people – primarily in the field of modern technology.”

Finally, Orban said, the “outstanding bilateral relations between the two countries are due in part to the personal cooperation between the two prime ministers, and the fact that both countries are led by patriotic prime ministers.”

There is therefore no justification for the Jewish lobby in western nations to claim that the Hungarian government is “anti-Semitic” in any way whatsoever.

The Jewish lobby’s hysterical attacks upon Hungary are therefore completely without foundation, and are an obvious and easily disproven lie. There is no evidence at all that the Hungarian government is “anti-Semitic” in any way whatsoever.

Why then the attacks upon Hungary?

This is a question which can only be explained with an understanding of the psychology underpinning the Jewish lobby, which is made up of a combination of extreme schizophrenia, self-serving interest, and an implacable hatred of any form of European nationalism.


Egypt: Israelites moved to a Land called Canaan – Why didn’t God have his son born in Rome?

Why didn’t God have his son born in Rome?

By  Dr. Ashraf Ezzat

“Why was Jesus born in a semi-Arabian land & culture and why he had to deliver his sermons in a semi-Arabian tongue?”

By Dr. Ashraf Ezzat


Not necessarily having to be labelled Muslim, I was raised in a land/region with a Muslim Majority population, namely Egypt. Once again, not necessarily having to be branded as Christian, Egypt has one of the most ancient Christian communities whose members are called Copts and their ancient Church the Coptic Orthodox Church.

Although Christianity had practically first appeared in the East (the ancient Levant) in places like Palestine, Syria and of course Egypt. But the truth of the matter is that if we, right now, want to geographically categorize world religions we will have to concede to the following fact; the East is predominantly Muslim, the Far East Buddhist and Hindu while the West is predominantly Christian.

But I have a nagging problem with this geographical distribution, for Jesus Christ was said to have been born in Palestine (a genuine part of the East or what used to be called, and till this day, The Levant)

IF GOD, THE OMNISCIENT, HAD UNDOUBTEDLY FORESEEN THIS GEOGRAPHICAL DIVIDE WITH ALL THE CONFLICT AND INTOLERANCE THAT IT WOULD SURELY ENTAIL, WHY THEN DIDN’T HE SIMPLY HAVE HIS SON BORN IN ANCIENT GREECE, FRANCE OR ROME FOR THAT MATTER? WHY COMPLICATE THINGS?

Once again, not necessarily having to be classified as atheist, why help politicize religion and turn spiritual affairs into drones carrying so called smart missiles?
After all it was the Roman Empire and church that controlled and canonized the literature of the then newly–fledged Christianity. Hence, Rome, as a birthplace for Jesus, would not only have been more convenient, but also would have saved the world many past and future religious wars/crusades. Not to mention the eagerly awaited mother of all battles, the so-called Armageddon.

Why did Jesus – as the story goes – have to be born in Palestine, a part of the Levant, or in other words the heart of the Ancient Near East? It is so enigmatic, for this is a land with an indigenous culture that runs contrary, if not hostile, to the western/Roman culture and more importantly its concept of Jesus. And do I mean by that that people of the Ancient Near East had another, oriental if you like, concept of Jesus? Yes I do.

In the eastern concept/story, Jesus is called Eas’sa the son of Mar’iam. It is a far older story than that of the Roman version of ‘Jesus”. In short it is one of Ancient Arabia’s religious cults and folk stories (topic of a future essay)

Some will argue that the biblical Lord might have had a sort of long run plan to turn the whole world into accepting Jesus as the Son of God and their savior, no matter where he was born. Even if Jesus’ birthplace was in the heart of a genuinely Eastern land that was indeed influenced by ancient Arabian culture and traditions.

Others will argue that when Jesus was born, Palestine was already part of the Roman Empire. Well, I’m quite familiar with this fact, but being occupied by the Romans doesn’t make the people of Palestine, with their genuine eastern culture/traditions more Roman than the British occupation made India (the land of Buddhism and Hinduism) British.

Let’s admit it, the story of Jesus took place on an Eastern land whose Eastern people spoke Aramaic (a mere dialect of the Arabic tongue).

But then, and after few decades the Bibles of the new Christian faith began to pop up not in Palestine, as one would have logically guessed, but the Bibles had appeared in the Western side of the Roman Empire.

AND GUESS IN WHAT LANGUAGE? NOT IN ARAMAIC, THE LANGUAGE JESUS WAS SAID TO HAVE SPOKEN, BUT STRANGELY ENOUGH IN THE TONGUE OF THE MOTHER OF ALL WESTERN LANGUAGES; GREEK.

The story of the nativity is re-enacted all over the western churches/schools around the time of Christmas with people/actors dressed up in ancient Arabian garments and head covers/pieces (The keffiyeh or kufiya – the symbolic head dress of Palestinians still worn till this very moment).

Westerners, with their Roman culture, keep repeating this Christmas re-enactment (ceremonial tradition) dressed in a completely foreign clothing that is undoubtedly Arabian. But the weird thing is that nobody in the Christian west wonders why Jesus had to be born in a semi-Arabian culture and deliver his sermons in a semi-Arabian tongue.

DID GOD’S PLAN LACK A PRECISE COMPASS, OR WAS JESUS, OR BETTER YET “EAS’SA” AN ARABIAN PROPHET WHOSE STORY HAD SOMEHOW BEEN ROMANIZED AND ROMANTICIZED BY THE THEN WESTERN INTELLECTUALS WITH THEIR GRECO-ROMAN CULTURE?

Some, and rightly so, will bring up the Jewish connection here. They will argue that since Christianity as a theological structure is mainly based on Judaism, Jesus had to be born in the midst of the land of Yehudia/Judaism. In other words, Palestine (according to the mainstream indoctrination).

But is that a correct/valid premise, to begin with? I mean is Palestine really the land of the ancient Israelites and their stories? Did David build his so-called Kingdom and Solomon his so-called temple over the soil of Palestine? Modern Archeologists and historians are in great doubt, if not outright denial, about this hypothesis. Archeologists can’t even validate that what modern-day Jews refer to as the Western Wall is indeed historically related to Herod’s Temple.

Moreover, they can’t even confirm that the foundation of the so-called first Temple lies underneath Al-Aqsa Mosque. Still the Israelis keep on digging under the Muslim Holy shrine, unabashed and undeterred, ever since they had militarily occupied Eastern Jerusalem back in 1967. Over 50 years of their frantic digging has practically yielded zero-evidence that Palestine was indeed the historical land of the Israelites and their stories.

If that what the status quo is, then we are back to the Jewish connection once again. But this time not only are we examining its relation to the geography of Palestine, but to Jesus himself, whom the Jews – quite frankly- till this very moment don’t see/ recognize him as their “Messiah”.

If archeologically and historically Palestine cannot be validated as the land of the Ancient Israelites and their first Temple, and the world Jews don’t accept Jesus as their Messiah, then why was Jesus said to have been born there?

IF THE JEWISH FIRST TEMPLE WAS NEVER BUILT IN PALESTINE, THEN WHAT WAS JESUS, A SUPPOSEDLY PHYSICAL EMBODIMENT OF A JEWISH PROPHECY, DOING IN THE ABSOLUTELY WRONG PLACE AND TEMPLE? WHY DID GOD HAVE HIS SON BORN IN THE WRONG PLACE?

Maybe that explains why Paul, the man who invented (Roman) Christianity, turned his back on Palestine and Arabia and headed to the west and north. Paul did not proselytize in Arabia, which deep in its desert and valleys he had spent three awakening years. And no Arabia in this ancient context doesn’t by any means include the Sinai Peninsula (where Moses is allegedly said to have had his little chat with the God of the Israelites)

Having finished his mysterious sojourn in Arabia, Paul embarked on his mission of spreading the news about a new prophet, a Messiah with a (tailored) message that could very well suit the culture and political agenda of the ancient western world.

Paul, after “burying the dead” of his former theology, began preaching to westerners the story of the Arabian Eas’sa – but with a very, very clever Roman twist.


For more read Dr. Ashraf Ezzat’s book “Egypt Knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites


The Clash of Civilizations for Dummies: Judea’s War Between Christianity and Islam.

clash of cvilization

By Sabba, 16NOV17

INTRODUCTION – In this day and age where the Jews DO control the media and thus maintain 110% control of the discourse, most people have heard the phrase of “clash of civilizations”, a paradigm whereby the world of Islam has always been on the offensive against the Christian world, and many have endorsed it as the only key to understanding history.

It is widely accepted that this concept was born in the mind of the Israeli ‘historian’ Bernard Lewis and then popularized by Samuel Huntington. Given that all discourse these days where ‘Islamic’ issues are discussed, only do so accompanied by extended and completely erroneous statements about Islam, we are forced by those same rules therefore to highlight the jewishness of Bernard Lewis from the start because as a Jew, he sees everything with/through his own Torah lenses which teach one thing and one thing only: how to “utterly destroy everything that breathes” as a fulfillment of the messianic dream described many times within Jewish ‘sacred’ texts.

But contrary to the widely accepted view, this concept did not originate with Bernard Lewis and Samuel Hutington.

The idea featuring a Christian West fighting the Islamic East is all over rabbinical eschatological texts. It is not called ‘clash of civilizations’ per se but is described as the inevitable and apocalyptic fight that will take place in the end times between Edom (Christendom) and Ishmael (Islamic world) whereby each will annihilate the other, leaving Jacob-Israel as the sole survivor. As such, Lewis and Huntington have merely ‘secularized’ a very old Jewish and Torah-based view of the world and gave the Western Gentiles tailor-made Judaic lenses through which to understand our history and actively and willingly take part in what Judaism hopes will be the annihilation of both religions and cultures.

There are many main angles to approach this topic but in this part, we shall argue that in order to understand the Jewish engineered clash of civilizations, one needs to understand Judaism, what it really is, how it works and how it relates to Christianity and Islam from a geopolitical point of view.

PART I – UNDERSTANDING THE TRUE NATURE OF JUDAISM AND HOW IT WORKS

judaism jews synagogue satan

Civilization is defined as the process by which a society reaches an advanced stage of social development, cooperation, and organization. In this manner, one cannot understand civilization without first factoring into it the issue of religion. All civilizations that have emerged on Earth from the beginning of human history have had a spiritual foundation, regardless of what that religion is or was. And all the world’s greatest religions, whether pagan or monotheistic, have led to a civilizing process and to progress.

All of them except for Judaism.

Unlike any other religion, Judaism has been at war against Mankind since it first emerged on the historical scene because, unlike any other religion, Judaism defines itself only in opposition to ‘the other’, whether other people and/or other systems of belief. It can not exist in a vacuum without a nemesis ‘to utterly destroy’.

Unlike any other religion, Judaism does NOT require belief in God and does not believe in Life after Death. It only requires obeisance to ‘the Law’ as laid out within the pages of both the Torah, and its exegesis, the Talmud, as well as allegiance to the Tribe. And although there is no immortality after death for the individual Jew however, the manner by which this is reconciled is by making the Jewish people itself immortal through tradition, the law, and allegiance to Jews as a group.

For the individual Jews, this life is all there is. There is no Judgement Day, no retribution for one’s evil deeds. This is perhaps the Jews’ greatest strength because they are free from the same moral constraints and guilt found within Christianity and Islam which allows them to empty an automatic rifle into the body of a Palestinian infant and go to bed afterwards and sleep like a baby.

But it is also their greatest weakness because their love of this world has carved into their individual and collective psyche an irrational and hyper-intensified fear of death, and it is this fear of death that has made them the world’s greatest cowards and deceivers.

Their disbelief in life after death is quite unique among the ancient religions in the midst of which Judaism emerged.

Ancient pagan religions all believed in an after life, though this was not granted to everyone but only to the most worthy, those who strove for it and deserved it. Rejoining the Gods, to be reunited with them was considered as the greatest reward of all. For the ancient pagan religions, life after death meant achieving immortality, earning Eternity and this is what is meant when we read that some historical characters became ‘gods’. For example, when Julius Caesar was deified, it never meant to the Romans that he became the equal to Jupiter. It only meant he had now become immortal, he was now floating in Eternity, in close vicinity of the ‘real Gods’.

But the Jews never reached any intellectual, spiritual and transcendental sophistication to understand what all other pagan religions understood instinctively and so the Jews rejected the idea of life after death and made the belief in God optional. Their goal is not to be reunited with their ‘God’ after death, their goal is to ‘utterly destroy everything that breathes’ in order to become the masters of this world and its riches.

It is also unique among monotheistic religions to have a ‘religion’ which does not require belief in God. While it is an oxymoron to be an atheist Christian or an atheist Muslim, it is 666% kosher in Judaism. This explains why it is so common to hear about ‘atheist’ or ‘secular’ Jews. For them, these are not contradictory terms at all. This explains why most of the materialist theoreticians were Jews, this is how a Moses Hesse could be a rabbi and a communist, this explains a Karl Marx-Mordechai Levy etc. An atheist Jew is still a Jew whose allegiance is to the Tribe, whether he follows the Law or not and the tribe will always consider him as part of them. And this explains why so many of us are fooled by Judaism because we apply to it our Christian/Islamic understanding of Religion.

Lastly, unlike any other religion, Judaism is always a religion in the making. The verses of the Torah are constantly re-examined, re-interpreted in the light of current events, for one purpose and one purpose only: identify who they must “utterly destroy” to achieve their messianic dreams of world domination.

PART II – THE MAN OF GALILEE

jews-killed-jesus

One event or rather one man forced Judaism to come out of its closet: Jesus, the Son of Man, the Son of the Blessed Virgin Mary (PBUT both). Jesus forced Judaism to reveal itself for what it is: not a religion but a materialistic and satanic ‘philosophy’ which made God completely irrelevant and which was built only on the concepts of choseness and blind obeisance to the Law, in exchange of which they would be rewarded with all the world and its riches.

With the advent of Christianity, Judaism has taken a new shape and has since developed itself exclusively against the Son of Man (Adam?), his name, his legacy and anyone who accepts him as the Christ. With the advent of Christianity, the Torah had to be re-interpreted and a new strategy to achieve their messianic goals was formulated.

Esau is Edom is Christianity is Rome is Europe is the ‘West’ and Christendom has been upgraded to number one enemy to ‘utterly destroy’..

The gloomy fate of Edom which is described in the Book of Obadiah must now be applied to the Christian world in general and the ROMAN Catholic world in particular: “And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the Lord hath spoken it.”

The Book of Daniel has also been re-examined under the Christian Light and the Fourth Beast of Daniel has now become Rome and her daughter, ROMAN Catholic Europe.

PART III – THE EMERGENCE OF ISLAM AND THE BIRTH OF THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS

cross-and-quran-islam-christianity

But in the VIIth century AD, the rabbis had to revise their plans once again because a new comer emerged in Arabia – Islam. This new comer violently rejects the concept of Choseness, confirms Jesus as the Messiah and has elevated the Blessed Virgin Mary into the most exalted place and hailed her as the greatest of all women for all Eternity.

For this reason, Islam has been labelled as yet another enemy ‘to utterly destroy’. The Torah has been re-interpreted to include and adjust to the new geopolitical context and this is how Islam has now become Ishmael.

But Islam, like her older sister Christianity, has given rise to a strong and extremely rich civilization which can not be easily destroyed. The rabbis understood very early on that they would never be able to take on these 2 powerful civilizing religions and, Judaism being a work in constant ‘progress’, the rabbis concocted a new strategy that would ensure the simultaneous destruction of both – welcome to the clash of Civilizations as detailed in the Zohar:

“And in the future, the children of Ishmael are destined to rule over the Holy Land for a long time when it is empty from anything, like their circumcision which is empty and imperfect (…) The children of Ishmael [i.e. the Muslims] will cause great wars in the world and the children of Edom will gather against them and wage war against them, one on the sea, one on the dry land, and one near Jerusalem. And they [the children of Edom] will rule over them[the children of Ishmael], but the Holy Land will not be given over to the children of Edom.[The children of Edom is the Christian West, for Edom is Rome (see Num. 24:19, Rashi) and Rome signifies Greece-Rome and the Roman Catholic Church, the foundations of Western Civilization]. At that time, a nation from the end of the earth will be aroused against evil Rome and wage war against it for three months. Nations will gather there, and [Rome] will fall into their hands (…) There will not remain any power of any people on earth, except the power of Israel alone. This is the meaning of “G-d is your shade upon your right hand”. (Psalms 121:5)”

PART IV – THE REFORMATION AND THE JUDAIFICATION OF EUROPE

REFORMATION LUTHER

Until the XIIIth century, the accepted judaic belief was that one day their Moshiach (our anti-Christ) would emerge in Rome, go to the Vatican, subdue the Pope, abolish Christianity, bring back all the Jews to Palestine and establish the Fifth Kingdom.

The XIIIth century saw a drastic change of plan on the part of the Jewish rabbinate. The very influential kabbalistic rabbi Nahmanides understood that they will never be able to achieve that goal alone, Moshiach or not; he understood that the Jews had to change their strategy and decided to involve Christian Europe: 

Edom/Rome/Christian Europe expelled them from the Holy Land. 

Edom/Rome/Christian Europe had to bring them back.

But medieval Europe was ROMAN Catholic, it was 666% anti-Jewish. How to change the European elites’ mindset and get them to become jew-friendly, and willing beast of burden for the Jews? Unable to do so ‘in the open’, they did by way of deception. As always.

The target back then as it is still now, according to Martin van Creveld, was Italy-Rome because this is where their Moshiach will appear. It started with the Jewish Kabbalah: they spread its teachings to Italy under the pretext that it proved the Trinity and the Divinity of Jesus. The first Gentile to incorporate Jewish Kabbalah into his writings was Pico Della Mirandola. But the Kabbalah failed to take root in Italy or in any Latin country for that matter.

It then moved to the Germanic states and took them by storm. The Reformation came afterwards as the natural consequence of Kabbalah poisoning, with tragic and devastating effects for Christian Europe, the consequences which are only now in full view.

Half of Christian Europe having now succumbed to the siren’s songs of Judaism through the deception of the Reformation, the ‘clash of civilizations’ could now be officially launched and the idea popularized.

It is in the XVIth century that it was ‘secularized’ for the first time and made available to the wider Jewish audience by Joseph Ben Joshua Cohen.

According to Heinrich Grätz, Joseph Cohen “began to search for chronicles in order to write a sort of universal history in the form of annals. He began with the period of the decline of the Roman empire and the formation of the modern states, and represented the course of the world’s history as a struggle between Asia and Europe, between the Crescent and the Cross; the former represented by the then powerful dominion of Turkey; the latter, by France, which had set up Charlemagne, the first emperor of a Christian realm. He connected the whole of European history with these two groups of nations. He included all the events and wars of Christendom, and of the Mahometan countries in ” The Annals of the Kings of France and of the House of Othman,” the title of his historical work.”

Cohen has popularized what was until then known only to the Jewish rabbinical circles and the Jewish elites. Lewis and Hutington have done nothing more than update what Joseph Cohen had written in the XVIth century and adapt it to our modern world

[NOTE – We must pause here and reflect and ask: why, out of all European nations, has Jewish Kabbalah taken the Germanic states by storm? What have they seen in it which all Latin countries failed to see? Or what is it that prevented them to see it and the Reformation for what it was-Jewish onslaught on Christianity – and made them fall into this Jewish trap? Why have the Germanic nations been seduced by the Jewish concept of ‘Choseness – Election’? What have they found in the Torah which ensnared them to the point that they have made it their most important holy book and made them turn their backs on the teachings of Christ? I will leave the reader to answer these questions.]

PART V – CHRISTIAN WEST vs. ISLAMIC EAST: A HISTORICAL REALITY OR A JEWISH LIE?

cross-and-crescent

The fallacy of the theory of the clash of civilizations is that it reads the history of the Muslim world under the light of the Quran, thus inferring that all that comes from there is religion based. It tells us that the world of Islam, by its very religion, is in a state of permanent war against Christendom.

Not only is it fallacious but it is an extremely dishonest historical approach because it would be like analyzing the bloody wars of Charlemagne or the countless wars of the Byzantine Empire before Islam under the light of the New Testament.

But the New Testament is never used to explain the wars of the Christian world, the Torah is never used to explain the 5000 years old Wars of the Jews against Mankind and yet, we are supposed to only understand the wars of the Islamic world through the Quran.

It is all the more baffling that the Old Testament is filled with orders to genocide while there is not one single Quranic verse which calls for an offensive war, let alone a pre-emptive war. Not a single one.

Dying for God is a common trait to all 3 monotheistic religions. However killing for God is entirely Jewish and was passed on to the Christian world through the Old Testament. 

It might come as a surprise to many but the idea of a holy war of aggression for God is Christian, borrowed from Judaism and was developed as early as the IVth century by St Augustine. Until the Crusades, we do not find any Islamic literature advocating a religious war of aggression. The concept of Jihad is something else entirely. With the Crusades and as reaction to them, the very Christian theory of Holy War of aggression for God had been conceptualized and the Muslims incorporated it and mixed it up with the pre-existent concept of Jihad.

It might also come as a surprise to most if not all Western readers, but the term ‘Infidels’ is a Christian terminology found all over European Medieval literature for the Muslims. The Muslims have never ever called the Christians ‘Infidels’, never. It was always the other way round.

The Arabic word Kafir which is always translated as ‘Infidels’ has quite a different meaning. Its primary signification is ‘ungrateful’, ungratefulness to God and not disbelief in God. Satan for example is called a ‘Kafir’, not because he disbelieved in God, but because he disobeyed his Creator. The Children of Adam (mankind) are sometimes called ‘Kafir’ whenever they show their ungratefulness to their Creator. The one thing it does not mean is Christians or Jews. On the other hand, when the Christians used and abused it, it was always in reference to the Muslims, never to those whom Christ himself identified as the Synagogue of Satan.

Lastly, it might also come as a surprise to many but until the world of academia had been taken over by the Jews, no Western Christian Historian ever explained the Islamic expansion or the wars the Muslims waged in the light of the Quran. More often than not, it was Genesis 17:20 which was used to explain the Islamic expansion, never the Quran.

The methodology to analyse the world of Islam by using and misquoting the Quran is entirely new, it is 666% kosher certified and has a 666% Jewish messianic agenda behind it and the West is falling for it, again despite Medieval History being littered with examples proving the exact opposite.

PART VI – CHRISTLAMIC ALLIANCES

Image result for the iv crusade

THE IVth CRUSADE

We shall give here only a few examples to argue our point:

1) The Ashtiname of Muhammad, whereby Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) promises excommunication and eternal damnation to any Muslim who who attacks any Christian and their property.

2) The alliance between Charlemagne and Harun al Rashid. Charlemagne needed an ally in the Levant against the Roman Empire – Byzantium. Harun al Rashid needed an ally in Europe against the newly formed state of Al Andalus in Spain.

3) Pope Gregory VII, one of the most influential pope we ever had, sent a letter to Al Nasir ibn Alennas where he states: “We and you in a special way, more than all pagans among them, we owe this reciprocal charity to one another because we believe and recognize, although in different modes, the only God and praise and venerate Him every day, as Creator of the centuries and Governor of this world”

4) There are countless examples in the history of the Crusader States (not to be confused with the Crusades themselves) where we have one crusader state in alliance with a Muslim principality against another crusader state which had allied itself with another Muslim principality.

The history of the Crusader States provides many examples of the Christlamic mutual and virile respect for one another when they are in close vicinity of each other. All witness accounts of the Second and Third Crusades describe the horror felt by the new Crusaders freshly coming from Europe at the friendly relations the Crusader States had with their Muslim neighbours. And William of Tyre explains to us that it was the new comers who always spoilt it for the Latins of the Levant and who destroyed the equilibrium that had been built.

5) Before, during and after the Crusades, the Byzantine emperors saw the European Christians as their greatest enemies, not the Muslims. And indeed, what the Crusaders did to Constantinople during the IVth Crusade (1204), their level of barbarity against their Christian Brethren had never been seen before and remained unmatched, not even the Ottomans could to surpass it when they took Constantinople in 1453.

It is the European Christian Crusaders who are the real destroyers of Byzantium, not the Ottomans. They weakened it to the point that it could never recover and regain its past glory. In the XIIth century, Constantinople was the greatest city of Christendom with at least 1 million inhabitant. By the end of of the IVth Crusade, its population fell to 400 000 people and by 1453, it did not have more than 50000 inhabitants.

All historians agree that it was the IVth Crusaders who paved the way for the Ottomans: 1453 could have never happened had 1204 not taken place and one might even argue that by 1453, when the Byzantines were triangulated, they deliberately chose to surrender to the Muslims rather than the Europeans whom they saw, and rightly so, as betrayers.

NOTE – Until the XIITh century, the Byzantines consistently refused to lower themselves into marrying European princes and princesses, deemed to low and beneath their Roman dignity. On the other hands, there has been many examples of a Byzantine Princess marrying a Muslim Prince.

PART VII – THE CASE OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE

Image result for joseph nasi and suleiman

JOSEPH NASI

Following the Alhambra Decree of 1492, the Jews started wandering again. Their main destinations were the United Provinces (modern day Netherlands), Morocco, Venice, Rome and the Ottoman Empire. Most of the Jews who had fled to Venice and Rome were soon expelled, yet again, and these then found a safe heaven in Ottoman Empire.

During the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent, the Jews reached an unprecedented level of power, power which they never relinquished and which lead to a man named Atatürk.

According to Heinrich Grätz and Cecil Roth, it was under his rule that the Jews took over and dictated ALL of the Ottoman foreign policy to the point that a man like Joseph Nasi was considered the real ruler of the Ottoman empire.

The Jews ‘foreign policy’ can be summed up with one word: REVENGE against Christian Europe. The conquest of Cyprus, Rhodes, the siege of Vienna, the battle of Lepanto, all the wars against Venice, all the wars against the Habsburgs, were ALL decided by the Jewish advisers to the Ottoman sultans, who used the Ottomans as their attack dog the same the Jews are now using the USA as their attack dog.

Joseph Nasi is credited by Jewish historians as the man responsible for the ‘independence’ of the United Provinces from Catholic Habsburg Spain and for making Amsterdam, the ‘Jerusalem of the North’.

In fact, the power and influence Joseph Nasi had over Suleiman and his son Selim II were so great that Suleiman agreed to allow the very first Jewish immigration back to Palestine (Safed). For the first time since 135AD, the Jews were allowed to return to the Holy Land and settle there. But they did not. Why haven’t they seized the opportunity and repopulated Palestine en masse and even created the embryo of a Jewish State?

The reason is that it did not fit the agenda which must see Christendom ‘utterly destroyed’. Indeed, the only thing that kept the Jews alive as a group for the past 2000 years was not merely a vague dream of returning to the Holy Land some day but rather an insatiable hatred and an unquenchable desire of vengeance against Christ and his followers.

It was not Ishmael/the Muslims who kicked them and destroyed their temple: it was Edom-Rome-the Christians and only they had to undo what Titus and Hadrian had done. They expelled them and banned them form ever returning, only they had to bring them back and establish Eretz Israel for them, paying with their money and the blood of their children.

NOTE – It is interesting to note here that Suleiman is called the Magnificent in the West whereas he is known in the East as ‘Kanuni’, ‘the Law Giver’. We might wonder why the West who has suffered so much under his reign calls him ‘Magnificent’ when his own people do not see anything magnificent about him…

PART VIII – CHRIST: THE REAL TARGET OF THE JEWISH ENGINEERED CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS

jesus money lender banker

The Middle East, where Islam and Christianity have been living side by side for over 1400 years, never witnessed such clash of civilizations, as defined by the Rabbis and popularized by Lewis and Hutington. Indeed, the Middle East is Christlamic at its core: its branches might be Islamic but its roots are entirely Christian.

We saw earlier that during the short time where the Latins had established Crusader States in the Levant, a cordial and respectful entente was soon established between Christians and Muslims. The colonial period never saw the rise of ‘radical’ Islam against the colonial powers and the subsequent independence movements of the XXth were all nationalists in nature, not Religion-based. Why then would the world of Islam all of a sudden decide to destroy Christendom?

Islam, as a religion, has never been on the offensive against Christ, his Blessed Mother, his followers, his legacy. Judaism has. In terms of values, ethos and way of life, Islam has never clashed with Christianity. Judaism does. However Islam does clash with Western values. And so does Christianity.

The ‘West’ is a geopolitical construct while Christian Europe is a historical reality and, in terms of values, ethos and way of life, the West and Christianity are antithetical.

The ‘West’, as a civilization, emerged on the ashes of ROMAN Catholic Europe and it was not Islam which destroyed it: it was the Reformation. Western civilization was born when the Judeo-Protestant nations became the leading nations in Europe and, with Britain at the fore-front, the leading nations in the world.

Western/Judeo-Protestant civilization is built on Torah ‘values’, the most important ones being Choseness/Election and usury and as such, Western civilization has in fact declared war against Christ, his message, his legacy. Protestantism is the new declaration of war against Christ and here lies the real goal of the clash of civilization: Jesus himself.

PART IX – THE JEWS, DESTROYERS OF CIVILIZATIONS

jews judaism anti semitism

Judaism is a declaration of war against Mankind in general and the followers of Christ in particular. Judaism is the most corrosive and destructive force in the world, something all Jews know and boast about:

“The thing that makes Judaism dangerous to everybody, to every race, to every nation, to every idea is that we smash things that aren’t true. We don’t believe in the boundaries of nation-state.
We don’t believe in the ideas of these individual gods that protect individual groups of people. These are all artificial constructions and Judaism really teaches us how to see that.
In a sense our detractors have us right, in that we are a corrosive force. We’re breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people because they’re not real. And that’s very upsetting to people.” Dr. Douglas Rushkoff

Just as Judaism exist only in opposition to other systems of beliefs, likewise the Jews exist only in opposition to the Civilized Man.

The Jews have never built anything, have never contributed anything into the civilizing process of Humanity. They count for nothing and would have never made it into any History book had it not been for their systematic efforts of destruction of everything that is holy, wholesome and pure. They only exist in opposition to Civilization, their raison d’être is to destroy and corrupt everything God has created and destroy every Civilizations the Children of Adam have built.

“We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. NOTHING that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy, because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build.” –“You Gentiles” Maurice Samuel

Civilizations do not clash, they cooperate, they engage in trade, they borrow from each other, the develop and flourish alongside each other, they live in mutual and virile respect of one another, as we witnessed within the Crusader States (again, not to be confused with the Crusades).

It is only the nomadic, parasitic elements who, unable to reach the same level of sophistication as the Civilized Man and who thus suffer from an incurable complex of inferiority, aim at the destruction of Civilizations to bring everyone else to their level. Wandering roots always create weeds within civilized lands.

Judaism and Judaism alone – not Islam – has made it very clear that it is at war against Christ and, by extension, anyone who believes in him and, while it should be clear to all true Christians and Muslims that their only salvation is to unite under the banner of Christ against their common enemy, it baffles the mind to see the Christian West almost looking forward to go to battle against the only other group of people who believes in the Messiahship of Jesus.

Judaism and anyone who accepts it, regardless of their DNA, has declared the Christians and the Muslims enemy because of Christ. It is time we reciprocate and declare Judaism, the Old Testament and anyone who follows it, as our enemy, in the name of Christ.

CONCLUSION 

CHRISTIANITY ISLAM

With the advent of Christianity, Judaism had redefined itself and its goals in opposition to Christ. Not only must they now achieve world domination, but that world domination can not be attained unless and until Christianity/Europe/Rome is destroyed, erased from the face of the earth which they hope will happen by pitting the only civilizing religions which recognize Jesus as the Messiah against one another.

Can it be averted? And if so, how?

The Christians must finally realize that the Jews are not their ‘friends’, never were and never will be. The Christians must finally realize that their only friends and allies are the Muslims. The Christians must finally realize that, while the Jews believe that Christ is a bastard, the Muslims not only believe that he is a Prophet of God but a unique type of Prophet: he is the Messiah, the only Messiah, who came and who will come back at the end of History to rule the world. The Christians must finally realize that what is discussed is a geopolitical alliance and not any kind of syncretism.

Russia and China are strong allies and that does not mean that the Chinese must now adopt Orthodox Christianity. Russia and Iran are allies and that does not mean that the Iranians must now all convert to Orthodox Christianity. Likewise, when a Crescent and Cross or a Christlamic geopolitical alliance is suggested, that does not mean anyone giving up his/her religion. The Muslims understand it; the Orthodox Christians understand it but for some strange reason, the Christian West can not.

The first step to avoid this diabolical Jewish trap is to get the Muslims and the Christians to unite under the Banner of Christ and to finally reject the Jewish Old Testament.

The Christians and the Muslims must give up their arrogance and pedantic claims that they understand the Torah better than the Jews themselves. How we understand it is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is how they understand it and live by it. And for anyone who still fails to understand what it means to live by the Torah, let them look at the Bolshevik Revolution and Palestine. This is the Torah put into practice. This is what Judaism is about.

The Jews commit all the evil which their Torah, not Herzl’s Judenstaat, orders them to do and it is the useful idiots from the Chritlamic world who always come to the rescue and defend their satanic scriptures. 

While we can somehow understand the Christian stance on this (because they made the monstrous mistake to include the Old Testament into their own Holy Scriptures), it is a mystery for me to see the Muslims do the same, despite what the Quran says about them.

All Muslims know that the Jews have re-written their Torah and have thus stop being the Children of Israel and became the Synagogue of Satan. And yet, they still fail to recognize that the Judaism followed by the Jews is NOT the Judaism talked about in the Quran.

Christians and Muslims must understand and accept that the Jews do not want ‘your’ Judaism: they only want the Judaism that was written by the lying pens of scribes in the tongue of their father the devil; they want the Judaism that teaches that it is perfectly kosher to defile, insult, blaspheme and kill the Prophets of God (PBUT all), they want the Judaism that says it is perfectly halal to rape children and kill all non-Jews.

The Muslims claim they love all the Prophets of God, that they believe in all of them and make no difference between any of them. We have seen their outburst of indignation and anger when Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is being blasphemed against. Where is their indignation and anger against Judaism itself which has made all the Prophets whom they claim they love, into the vilest and most disgusting creatures that have walked the earth?

Judaism is THE problem and it has to go and it will go. The Holy Quran tells us so in the most unequivocal manner: when Jesus come back, all the Jews will have to believe in him as the Messiah. In other words, when Jesus comes back, Judaism will be vanquished, Judaism will no longer be, Judaism will disappear from the face of the earth.

The Messiahship of Christ and the sinfulness of the Prophets should be more than enough reason for the Muslims and Christians to unite and jointly de-legitimize the Jewish Torah and thus prevent this Jewish engineered clash of mutual assured destruction between Edom and Ishmael. When John and Jesus departed this world, they had left the ax at the root of the tree. It is now for us to cut off the tree at its roots and it starts with cutting off all ties with the Old Testament.

christian muslim

Saudi Arabia, most infamous sponsor of terrorism in world: Iran

Sat Sep 29, 2018 03:08PM
Saudi Arabia Foreign Minister Adel Ahmed al-Jubeir arrives to address the 73rd annual session of the UN General Assembly in New York on September 28, 2018. (Photo by AFP)
Saudi Arabia Foreign Minister Adel Ahmed al-Jubeir arrives to address the 73rd annual session of the UN General Assembly in New York on September 28, 2018. (Photo by AFP)

Iran has rejected recent unfounded and hackneyed allegations made by Saudi Foreign Minister Adel Ahmed al-Jubeir against Tehran, saying Riyadh is undoubtedly the most infamous sponsor of terrorism in the world.

“The root cause of terrorism that has engulfed the entire world, particularly the Middle East, is nowhere but Saudi Arabia and the radical thoughts and ideologies that are promoted, spread and financed by this regime,” Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman Bahram Qassemi said on Saturday.

Addressing the 73rd annual session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York on Friday, Jubeir once again repeated his anti-Iran rhetoric and claimed that Tehran was continuing its “terrorist activities and hostile behavior” and added that peace and stability in the Middle East requires “deterring Iran’s expansionist and subversive policies.”

He also said Saudi Arabia supports US President Donald Trump’s new strategy “in dealing with Iran.”

In response to Jubeir’s claims, the Iranian spokesperson said it is no surprise that the Saudi foreign minister proudly expresses his country’s support for Trump’s strategy to counter multilateralism and undermine international agreements and accords as Saudi Arabia has been among the most important supporters of a current affiliated with Trump’s thoughts in the US which, along with the Zionist lobby and the United Arab Emirates, is spending billions of dollars to promote Washington’s warmongering and its policy of destabilizing other parts of the world.

Jubeir leveled the accusations against Iran on the same day that the US hosted a meeting of top Arab diplomats in New York to push forward a plan to establish a NATO-like regional alliance to confront Iran.

The US State Department said in a statement that the participants in the meeting had all underlined “the need to confront threats from Iran directed at the region and the United States.”

Read more:

Comments:

khosro
The KSA is a true shame stain for the entire Islam world. Yet it is main source of adversity in between the Muslims’ world. Nowadays the Islam sworn enemy supports it very well, just because of its oil possession. However, this trend will not last very long.
TAXCOLLECTOR2017vor 2 Stunden
Like when House of Bush set up shop in SA and Dubai. Blackwater. Al Qaeda. Maybe they’ll say it was Iran now that did the World Trade Center. Guilliani can say he was working for Iran when he disposed of the evidence.
S.a. Hasanvor 2 Stunden
The greatest terrorists were Abu Sufyan and Hinda and their progeny is the ALE Sauds Al Khalifas ALE Emrites.
RASOUL MPvor 5 Stunden
AXIS OF EVIL:
THE UNITED STATES OF ISRAEL
THE ZIONIST ISRAEL
THE WAHABI ALSAUID
Shia Crescent> RASOUL MPvor 5 Stunden
Well as the, UK.
Majid Sleyimvor 5 Stunden
Evidences are clear for everyone to see the involvement of saud arabia in terrorism. Openly they are attending gathering of notorious cult terrorist wherever they are. They support those terrorists groups and finance them so yes indeed saud arabia is a terrorist entity for everyone to see. You can’t hide a sun with the palms of your hands! al saud terrorists must be brought to account of their crimes if UN means business and do what it suppose to do!
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Neti, King Salman, nukeface

MINT PRESS Brothers in Nukes


Sat Sep 29, 2018 10:51AM
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Iran’s envoy to the UN General Assembly has rejected anti-Iran claims by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and said the Israeli leader – whose actions are reminiscent of those by Daesh and Nazi elements – has lying in his DNA. 

Farhad Mamdouhi touched on Netanyahu’s Thursday speech at the UN, saying by exhibiting some photographs of google street view, “the Israeli showman claimed that he discovered new nuclear facilities in Iran.”

“This is yet another false story. It is not surprising as lying is in his DNA,” the envoy added.

Netanyahu held up the photographs during his address to the annual General Assembly meeting, repeating a mannerism that he has for long adopted as part of his high-profile Iran-bashing.

“This is a dreadfully regressive and undemocratic regime led by a corrupt leader, who pretends to be progressive and democratic. Israeli PM’s ethno-religious fantasies are indeed very close to the other extremists namely Daesh,” Mamdouhi said.

“Israel’s absurd claim of being democratic echoes similar assertions that Nazis used to make before dragging the whole world into destruction.”

The Iranian ambassador called Israel “the warden of the world’s biggest open prison – Gaza,” and denounced the regime for its “mockery of democracy.”

Mamdouhi said Tel Aviv had a long-standing history of opportunism and struggling to deflect the public opinion from its inhumane behavior and barbarity against the Palestinians.

Israel has so far violated 300 United Nations resolutions, including those targeting weapons of mass destruction and settlement activities on the occupied territories. The United States, Israel’s closest ally, has used its veto power on 44 occasions to protect Israel.

“Instead of such fabrications,” Mamdouhi said in reference to the Israeli premier’s address, “he should stop threatening Iran with nuclear annihilation as he did recently.”

The Iranian official was referring to threats Netanyahu issued against the Islamic Republic during an address he delivered close to the regime’s nuclear facilities in the Negev desert late last month.

“Such an inflammatory statement against an NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) party constitutes a serious violation of international law and the UN Charter,” the Iranian envoy asserted.

‘Days of Israel’s immunity over’

Elsewhere in his remarks, the envoy said the Islamic Republic maintained complete awareness of Israel’s criminal measures.

“Let us be outright clear. We watch Israel’s criminal behavior whenever they do it and wherever they do it. The time that Israel hit its neighbors with impunity is past,” he stated.


Image result for herzl quotes maccabees will rise

BY GILAD ATZMON:  The Jewish God is, without doubt, a spectacular invention.