The Planet is Full…..the Depopulation Agenda

The Depopulation Agenda

“Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries”. – Dr. Henry Kissinger

Depopulation has been utilized extensively throughout recorded history wherever it is written that large population groups were deliberately killed through violence or starvation.

PityOfWar071When resources were scarce the preferred option of conquerors was to kill the conquered.

When resources were abundant the conquerors would usually keep the conquered as slaves.

The Old Testament of the Christian bible, also known as the Jewish Torah, describes at great length the Israelites slaughter of every man, woman and child in town after town that they conquer. And this slaughter of every man, woman and child is stated as being commanded by the Jewish god Jehovah.

In essence what this describes is divinely inspired genocide or to use its current politically correct designation, depopulation, which sounds very clinical.

The word depopulate actually comes from the Latin, depopulatus, which means ‘to lay waste’, ‘to ravage, ruin’ a people, to reduce the population of a people, especially by violence, disease, etc.

There was always a eugenics element to this sort of genocide, in that the conquerors normally viewed the conquered as inferior, and so didn’t want to mix their ‘blood’ with ‘blood’ that would weaken their race.

The word eugenics actually comes from the Latin, Eugenius, meaning ‘well-born’, which, in a modern scientific sense, has taken on the meaning of being the movement devoted to improving the human species through the control of hereditary factors in mating.

Photo_Measuring_Babies“Eugenics is a social and scientific movement that seeks to replace natural selection with scientific selection. Eugenics is all about healthy, intelligent children and parental responsibility to future generations. The basic principle is that which has been successfully applied by animal breeders for millennia: like breeds like–at least usually, if not always.(1)
Once the continuity of humankind with the rest of the animal kingdom was established, invigorated attempts to improve the human genome became inevitable. Eugenics is, after all, quite simply, applied human genetics. Five of the first six presidents of the American Society of Human Genetics were also members of the board of directors of the American Eugenics Society. Historically, modern genetics is an offshoot of the eugenics movement, not the reverse.
At its root, eugenics is an interdisciplinary conceptualization of the genetic consequences of social practices for current and future humans. Human ecology does not limit itself to the present population but defines society as the entire human community over time; we should act as nature’s stewards, and simple parental responsibility mandates self-restraint. Thus modern eugenics goes hand in hand with neo-Malthusian thinking, which views the current global population as already exceeding the planet’s long-term carrying capacity.


Intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Positive eugenics refers to approaches intended to raise fertility among the genetically advantaged. These include such genetic techniques as in-vitro fertilization, egg transplants, and cloning ̧ and also ways to encourage use of those techniques, for example, targeted demographic analyses and financial and political stimuli. Pro-natalist countries (that is, those that wish to stimulate their birth rates) already engage in moderate forms of positive eugenics.

Negative eugenics, which is aimed at lowering fertility among the genetically disadvantaged, largely fits under the rubric of family planning and genetic counseling. This includes contraception, abortions, and sterilization. To ensure that such services are available to all on a nondiscriminatory basis, it is advocated that, at a minimum, persons with low income receive such services, free of charge.
Genetic engineering, which was unknown to early eugenicists, consists of active intervention in the germ line without necessarily encouraging or discouraging reproduction of advantaged or disadvantaged individuals. It will allow people to have their own biological children without passing on their most problematic genes.
National family policy provides a good illustration of how a eugenics policy might be implemented. A government can opt either to offer subsidized day care to all women, permitting those wishing to work the opportunity to pursue their careers (according to eugenicists, a praiseworthy approach), or it can subsidize only poor women, many of whom are thus encouraged to view childbearing as a source of income (according to eugenicists, a dysgenic approach).
migrants-continue-arrive-hungaryAnother example is presented by the starkly different positions of the U.S. and Canadian governments on immigration. The United States imports the underclass of other countries to do jobs Americans don’t want to do, while Canada, whose immigrants are easily just as ethnically diverse as are America’s, rates immigration applicants according to educational levels and skills, which correlate highly with intelligence.
Simultaneous with and analogous to China’s Cultural Revolution in the 1960s, an ideological upheaval arrived in America as a denial of Darwinism, declaring eugenics to be the ideology of Holocaust. As the timeline demonstrates, for Jews, who had practiced eugenics for millennia, it was a repudiation of their own history.
The squandering of a group’s genetic patrimony is not by any means an exclusively Jewish affliction. Humankind’s elites are generally disappearing. Economists study human fertility in terms of cost-benefit analysis. Children are no longer the economic advantage they once were when the economy centered around agriculture.
As opposed to its two universalist heresies–Christianity and Islam–traditional Judaism is an explicitly tribalist religion, but as Jews left the ghetto and were subsumed by modern secular culture, they attempted to reconcile tribalism with universalism, creating an internal tension which still rives Jewry today. The resolution of this tension was found in America in the 1960s and 1970s in the form of ‘multiculturalism.’


————Marching from Selma—————- ———Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. (center)——– Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel (2nd from right)

The period witnessed a confluence of three major ideology-forming strivings for Jews: the anti-war movement, the civil rights movement, and the Holocaust Memorial Movement. Jews defended blacks in Selma and Little Rock and battled the police at the Chicago Democratic Convention, but it was the visual images of heaped-up corpses (from cholera and starvation inducing allied bombing) discovered in German concentration camps a quarter century earlier that most keenly triggered their protest. The result was anger, ‘radicalization’, and the pursuit of poorly compatible goals. The Holocaust had been seared into their collective memory, and they were determined at all cost to avoid the role of outsiders confronted with a unified native and hostile ethos. Thus they supported open borders, which would make them one minority group of many, even as they fiercely defended the right of the Zionist state to take precisely the opposite tack.

 No group of people has exemplified this desire for pure, untainted ‘blood’, more the the Jewish people, due to their supposed ‘chosen’ status, as declared by their god, Jehovah.
An important barrier to outsider infiltration into the genome was the establishment of the matriline as the determinator of Jewishness. (While there can always be doubts as to paternity, maternity is tough to simulate.)


Herbert Hill (second from right), labor director of NAACP, with Thurgood Marshall (second from left)

It was the late 1960s that married–in the public mind–eugenics to racial hostility. Outraged over prejudice and hostility, Jews sought out fellow victims for sympathy and support, and Afro-Americans had certainly been victimized, by any standards. ‘Negro’ civil-rights organizations were Jewish-funded and even Jewish-staffed. Over and over the media repeated the word ‘racism’ in conjunction with ‘anti-Semitism.’ Even as their parents fled the cities, young Jewish radicals marched in Alabama and Little Rock. It was really quite idealistic.

But there was an understandable psychological need to understand what motivated the foe.
And that slot was filled when the phraseology was expanded to ‘racism, anti-Semitism, and… eugenics.’ No matter that the majority of eugenicists had publicly decried such hostilities and prejudices.
And since anti-Semitism was mentioned, let’s take a look at this concocted word.
anti-semitismAbsurd terminology is a reliable barometer of muddled and emotional thinking, and any serious reexamination of Jewish eugenics requires a reconstitution of vocabulary. The word ‘anti-Semite,’ for example, still hangs on as an anachronistic coinage of late nineteenth-century racial taxonomy, referring not only to Jews, but also to Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, and Arabs. Semites were supposedly the offspring of Shem, one of Noah‟s three sons. Historical maps printed at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries show the southern shores of the Mediterranean as settled by ‘Semites’ while areas north of the Mediterranean are indicated as inherited by ‘Aryans.’ The mythology is no longer taken seriously, although in all fairness it must be conceded that the Semitic
languages are recognized as a distinct linguistic family.
Thus, even though the concept ‘Semite’ has been debunked as mythology, ‘anti-Semites’ continue to populate the writings of even serious scholars. One could with equal success employ the term ‘anti-unicornism.’ Still more quixotically, the ‘Semite’ component of ‘anti-Semite’ does not refer to ‘Semites,’ but only to Jews. Lastly, at least some Ashkenazi roots reach back, not to Palestine, but to Khazaria, so that calling the Jews ‘Semites’ is nothing less than nonsense all around.
Iran-Cartoon-208x300‘Anti-Semitic’ is now universally used to mean ‘anti-Jewish,’ but its lack of etymological coherence becomes especially evident, not in the adjective, but in the noun. If one substitutes ‘Semite’ with ‘Jew,’ the result is the hilarious neologism =’Anti-Jew.’ And what is the proper terminology when the ‘anti-Semite’ is, say, an Arab, that is, a ‘Semite’? A ‘self-hater’?
The reason the word has persevered for so long is that its vagueness conflates hostility toward Jews with criticism of Jews, presenting a huge barrier to objective analysis. Thus, vocabulary predetermines not only the categories in which we think, but even the range of permitted topics.
Even though the term is a patent absurdity, it has a long history behind it that will allow it to cling to existence for at least a while longer.
Actually, the code word for eugenics has now been chosen. A search that troubled many a scholar has produced a startlingly simple result… ‘genetics.’ Even a brief perusal of Ha’aretz, Forward, or Jewish Week produces glowing recommendations of genetic procedures that are pure eugenics.”(1)


genocidal-ben-gurion“Zionism (Hebrewצִיּוֹנוּת Tsiyyonut IPA: [t͡sijo̞ˈnut]after Zion) is a nationalist political movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel (roughly corresponding to PalestineCanaan or the Holy Land). Zionism emerged in the late 19th century in central and eastern Europe as a national revival movement, in reaction to anti-Semitic (?) and exclusionary nationalist movements in Europe. Soon after this, most leaders of the movement associated the main goal with creating the desired state in Palestine, then an area controlled by the Ottoman Empire.(2)
Until 1948, the primary goals of Zionism were the re-establishment of Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel, ingathering of the exiles, and liberation of Jews from the antisemitic discrimination and persecution that they experienced during their diaspora.
A religious variety of Zionism supports Jews upholding their Jewish identity defined as adherence to religious Judaism, opposes the assimilation of Jews into other societies, and has advocated the return of Jews to Israel as a means for Jews to be a majority nation in their own state.
25s1pwwZionism was established with the political goal of creating a Jewish state in order to create a nation where Jews could be the majority, rather than the minority they were in a variety of nations in the diaspora.”(2)
And this Jewish state was and is being created through the application of racism, eugenics, exclusion, colonialism and genocidal depopulation, which just so happen to be the actions that have been condemned so vociferously by the Zionist Jewish leaders who formulated and executed the plan to create a Jewish State in order to be free of those same actions being perpetrated against the Jewish people.
The actions taken by the Zionist leaders of the Jewish State of Israel provide a perfect example of the application of negative eugenics and negative depopulation applied directly to a large group of people against their will.
Shrinking-Palestine-1024x724At the same time, those same Zionist leaders believe they are taking the best action possible to advance the population and eugenics goals for the Jewish people.
As it happens this is a perfect microcosm of the greater global plan of population and eugenics control that is being carried out now by the same financier/oligarchs who are bankrolling and directing the process in the Jewish State of Israel.

The Popular Image of Eugenics

Capture“In the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum‟s exhibit ‘Deadly Medicine: Creating the Master Race,’ curator Susan Bachrach maintains that eugenics “culminated” in the Holocaust. And even though most people would be unable to provide a definition of eugenics, they nevertheless generally concur with Bachrach, who represents an institution that, according to its official Web site, ‘teaches millions of people each year,’ and there are at least sixty-two other Holocaust museums in addition.(1)
Capture2But even this outreach is dwarfed by mass media that in their totality reach audiences numbering in the billions–and this on a daily basis. A Yahoo search for ‘eugenics’ and ‘anti-Semitism’ produced 311,000 items. A Google search for ‘holocaust+eugenics’ produced a lengthy series of Web sites, the first of which (the most widely read) began with the sentence ‘Probably one of the most hideous aspects of the Third Reich was their notorious fascination and experimentation with Eugenics.’
The first sentence of the second item reads that ‘The eugenics movement… was the forerunner of the Holocaust.’
The third item was a review of the above-mentioned eugenics exhibit at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., making little distinction between German racial hygiene laws and eugenics and characterizing them as ‘diabolical’.
That hereditarian thought was on occasion viciously distorted is not open to dispute, but to present it solely as an instrument of the Holocaust is a grotesque falsification. The following passage from Rabbi George Benedict‟s 1926 Mother‟s Day Sermon at Temple Emanu-El, Roanoke, Virginia, presents a far different image of the eugenics movement than one might expect on the basis of the above:
orthodox-jews-2And what but eugenic development of the race of Israel, whom, according to the conception of Moses, God had chosen to be a pattern to mankind as a nation consecrated to holiness, is the prime intent beneath every one of the laws of Moses? Whether regarded hygienically, morally, or religiously, the whole purport of the Torah, the Law of Moses, is to separate Israel from the rest of mankind as a Chosen People, in order to be a noble people, a well-born race of men for their own superior happiness, as well as, by way of example, to be a blessing to the world.
A current version of Jewish eugenics is to be found on the Web site of the Chicago Center for Jewish Genetic Disorders:
Kapparot-chickenslaughter-YomKippur14Dor Yeshorim [‘Upright Generations’ in Hebrew] is an international, confidential genetic screening system used mainly by Orthodox Jews, which attempts to prevent the transmission of genetic disorders that have an increased frequency among members of the Ashkenazi Jewish community. The system was established to follow Jewish law, under which abortion is not allowed, while acknowledging that testing might prevent the birth of an affected child. Designed in the early 1980s by an Orthodox rabbi, the system tests young adults before they begin to contemplate marriage. Participants can then use the system to learn their genetic compatibility with potential marital partners.
Eugenics–inadvertent and explicit, historical and current–lies at the very core of Jewish identity. Jewish eugenics cannot be understood as standing apart from human eugenics.
By the 1930s a global consensus of support had been achieved for eugenics, especially among
physicians, including German physicians. (If Jews made up 1.2% of the Reich population, in 1925 they constituted 0.9%, and by 1933 the figure had been reduced to a mere 0.76%. But in large cities such as Berlin, Frankfurt, and Hamburg as many as 30% to 40% of the doctors were Jewish.
ADN_animationBut, beginning in the late 1960s, eugenics with its focus on the selectionary consequences of differential fertility was declared beyond the pale, replaced by its own offspring–the natural science of genetics, and also demography with its modern reluctance to probe further than ‘total fertility.’ Indeed, why differentiate if genetic variance in human populations is preordained to be inconsequential? Physical anthropology came to be viewed as a poor second to cultural anthropology, with sociology, criminology, and pedagogy following in lock step, and the arts–as always–bringing up the rear.
Contrary to claims advanced by eugenics foes, Hitler’s position on such topics was not a bone of contention vis-à-vis his American and British World War II foes. His arch-nemisis Winston Churchill, Churchill, was an ardent eugenicist.
25645In 1904, the Conservative government of Arthur Balfour had established a Royal Commission “On the Care and Control of the Feeble-minded,” which reported to the Liberal government and recommended compulsory detention and sterilization of the unfit. In 1912 Balfour had personally addressed the First Eugenics Conference in London, which was attended by then Home Secretary Winston Churchill, who called for ‘a simple surgical operation (sterilization) so the inferior could be permitted freely in the world without causing much inconvenience to others.’ In 1910, Churchill had asked the civil service to investigate implementation of the Indiana law on sterilization.
Even earlier, in 1899, he had written to his cousin Ivor Guest: ‘The improvement of the British breed is my aim in life.’ The poet Wilfrid Scawen Blunt (1840-1922) wrote in his diary:
330px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-14059-0005,_Potsdamer_Konferenz,_Winston_ChurchillWinston is also a strong eugenist. He told us he had himself drafted the [Mental Deficiency] Bill which is to give power of shutting up people of weak intellect and so prevent their breeding. He thought it might be arranged to sterilise them.
In 1937, pressed by William Peel (1867-1937), head of the Palestine Royal Commission, that Britain “might have some compunction if she felt she was downing the Arabs year after year when they wanted to remain in their own country,” Churchill showed himself to be not only a supporter of eugenics, but of the rankest ‘racial hygiene’ as well:
I do not admit that the dog in the manger has the final right to the manger, even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit, for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America, or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to those people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher grade race, or, at any rate, a more worldly-wise race, to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.
The timeline of Jewish eugenics demonstrates beyond doubt that Jews were welcome, active participants in the eugenics movement and that Jews even today are still in the vanguard of a eugenic worldview, a fact entirely unknown to most people.
Eugenics is now viewed by many in the United States largely through the lens of the Holocaust and is to such a degree awash with understandably raw emotion as to quash any cries of protest. The upshot of the situation is that a group of largely Jewish activists have so successfully undermined the very eugenic mechanism that made Jewry what it is as to pose an existential threat to Jewry. But Jewish common sense, plain and old-fashioned as chicken soup, has not only continued to hold sway
in the practice of eugenics, it has even managed to surf the scientific tide of newly found genetic knowledge–all the while paying lip service to the Holocaust-from-eugenics gospel!

Take a look a the following video on Holocaust ‘facts’:

Unlike the U.S. situation, this anti-eugenics view never even got off the ground in Israel. Behavioral scientist Aviad Raz (b. 1968) of Ben Gurion University is quite open in pointing out that both the word ‘eugenics‟’and the actual practice of eugenics enjoy broad approval in that country, and objections to eugenics–at least as far as genetic screening combined with eugenic abortions–are a ‘non-issue’ in Israel:
Eugenic ideologies and practices have persisted in Israel, in a thinly disguised mode, even after the holocaust, because they were an inherent and formative part of Zionism….For many of the above mentioned respondents, prenatal genetic testing was eugenic and was indeed supported precisely for that reason, since ‘eugenic’ for them meant the improvement of the health of progeny and carried positive rather than negative connotations.
Zionist and eugenicist Ludwig Gumplowicz (1838-1909) writes in Racial Struggle that a stronger people enslaves a weaker people and takes over its land:
How does this amalgamation come about? Only in eternal racial struggle, in war and ‘peace’–there is no other way. Man would have to cease being human, he would have to–if it were only possible shuffle off everything that nature had made of him.
Jewish-Austrian journalist Nathan Birnbaum, who coined the words ‘Zionism’ and ‘Zionist,’ maintains that “the secure foundation of nationality is always and everywhere race.”
330px-Flag_of_the_United_Nations_(1945-1947).svgThe driving force behind the Holocaust Memorial Movement is not just grief over the tragedy of the past but also the desire to legitimize the Zionist state. In 1975, by a vote of 72 to 35, with 32 abstentions, the UN General Assembly declared that Zionism was “a form of racism and racial discrimination,” essentially declaring the State of Israel to be illegitimate. As a counterbalance, Jewish groups massively funded the Holocaust Memorial Movement. In its turn, the Holocaust Memorial Movement attacked the eugenics movement with ever increasing fury.
Even though eugenics is as cross-disciplinary a topic as is possible, encompassing anthropology, bioethics, ecology, genetics, history, philosophy, political science, religion, etc., for many it has been reduced to a branch of Jewish studies–’Holocaust.’
A multiplicity of views is obviously preferable to the straitjacket of an artificially imposed group cohesiveness, but history teaches that disproportionate political power inevitably seeks to transform scholarly discourse into a propaganda tool.

Adolf Hitler


How, the reader must inevitably ask, has it come about that the fundamental pro-eugenics thrust–not just of Judaism and Zionism, but of Jewry in its essence and totality–has been so assiduously concealed, but that eugenics has been wed in the public consciousness to an infatuation with the topic on the part of a German political figure?

Maybe there’s a clue in this editorial from the American Hebrew:
Mixed marriages are not only a religious evil. That they are this, is very generally conceded. No one who has studied the question will maintain that the offspring of such marriages is apt to be of much value to Judaism. There will spring up among us a large class which will be neither Jews nor Gentiles,but a hybrid–useless for all purposes of further development. But the question involves ethnological and sociological problems also. The maintenance of the Jewish race purity has caused the preservation of Humanity’s present system of Semitic civilization.
The law of fittest surviving, aided by the breeding of hereditary qualities in a pure race, has given the Jews a physiological and mental superiority which can be perpetuated only by the perpetuation of the race purity.
Despite the urging of German eugenicists, no eugenics laws are passed in Germany during the Wilhelmine period. It is only in the strongly Jewish influenced Weimar Republic that eugenics enters
the popular consciousness and that such legislation begins to be proposed.
The Jewish attitude toward eugenics is truly paradoxical. We are dealing here with a disconnect between practice and theory. For lack of a proper understanding of the nature of eugenics as a world view, the rage has been directed at the word, so that a number of alternative terms have been proposed–’reproductive genetics,’ for example (as if such a beast as ‘non-reproductive genetics’ actually existed). It is like writing an encyclopedia article about horses without using the word ‘horse.'(1)
1013_rabbi-ovadia-yosef-300x300The reason a ‘paradoxical’ disconnect seems to exist is because the actual practice of eugenics is reserved for the ‘chosen’ Jewish population while the theory put forward for the rest of humanity is that eugenics is evil (think Holocaust) and should be avoided at all costs, which has the ultimate effect of degenerating all others races, enabling the ‘chosen’ to dominate and control the rest of humanity.
After all, the Jewish diaspora became painfully aware of the physical and mental (genetic/eugenic) problems that resulted from their tribe’s limited amount of procreation with the many people they lived among during hundreds of years. During this time they also witnessed the physical and mental degradation of those other cultures due to various multiracial mixing.

Population Control

Nathan-Rothschild-and-famed-quoteThe financier/oligarchs that currently control the financial system, became aware sometime before the Malthusian theories came on the scene, that they would lose their control of the geopolitical realms unless they found a way to keep the world population from exploding beyond a certain level. Not to mention the fact that they would also have to experience an increasing incursion of their fox hunting grounds.
What the financier/oligarchs and their lackeys want is to live a very comfortable feudal fiefdom existence with just enough serfs around them to take care of their needs and provide their entertainment, which according to current estimates is around 500 million to 2 billion people.
<<<<The chart above is close, except it skips those above the lackey Central Bankers.
Since the ranks of the financier/oligarchs were heavily populated by the same Zionists that were instrumental in the formation of a Jewish homeland, once they had control of the world economic system and they created a Jewish state, the next focus became decreasing world population, with a particular emphasis on any race other than the Jewish race.
Up to and including WW II, war had been the preferred method for culling large chunks of the population, since it enabled both the acquisition of new territory and new resources, while it also was good for business due to the fact that vast amounts of military equipment and armaments must be constantly replaced.
Yalta_summit_1945_with_Churchill,_Roosevelt,_StalinOnce the war was over, the allies divided up control of the defeated countries as well as the remaining countries that took no direct part in the war.
Taking advantage of the geopolitical disorder at the end of the war, the financier/oligarchs dream of creating a World Government organization, also came to fruition, when the United Nations was formed in 1945.
The United Nations Organization was created as a legitimate looking front that the financier/oligarchs and their lackeys could use to control economic, political and social systems throughout the world. Using economic control and their military power demonstrated during the war, the Allies eventually forced all nations to join the UN and submit to its edicts.
The_World_Bank_logo.svgThe primary method of control was shifted to economic manipulation through banking and the use of economic hitmen that would utilize loans and onerous debt to take over countries. The use of covert operations to acquire resources and capital was preferable to the use of violence, but if covert methods failed to get the results desired in a timely manner, then overt violence was used.
Seal_of_the_Central_Intelligence_Agency.svgThis economic manipulation worked quite well until the population of an indebted country reached the point where grass roots movements gained enough power to negatively impact the puppet government put in place by the economic hitmen and their CIA/MI6/KGB handlers.
An increasing population required the puppet government to focus more resources internally, which meant less available to send to the colonial powers, reducing the flow of wealth out of a country and into the bank accounts of the financier/oligarchs and their lackeys.
So the next important step was to reduce a countries population so that a minimum of resources were utilized by local populations, leaving the lion’s share for the colonial parasites.
“Unbeknown to the masses, governments have used covert methods to limit births in developed
and underdeveloped countries alike and to accelerate deaths in Africa and a few critically poor
and overpopulated areas elsewhere.
181016_10151542331488885_882312798_n-800x445Births have been prevented by interfering with the reproductive system so as to lower human
fertility, while deaths have been promoted by weakening the immune system so as to increase
morbidity and mortality.
The methods used by every country to control population growth have been dictated by the level
of development and the existing infrastructure as much as by political will or lack thereof and
have either been imposed by force and deception from the outside or adopted willingly by the
governing, military and scientific elites of nation states that have relied on the moral, technical
and monetary assistance of the United Nations, its agencies, and the greater international
3-skeletonsRegardless of the methods used to control population and whether they are imposed or self-imposed, strict secrecy and deception have been necessary to prevent the masses from
discovering the bitter truth that for the past 68 years they have been the object of a silent and
global offensive, a campaign of attrition that has turned the basic elements of life into weapons of mass infertility and selective death.
Without our knowledge or consent, governments the world over have subverted our reproductive freedom and ability to procreate to achieve ambitious and necessary demographic objectives and in the process have committed the most odious and wide-sweeping crimes in human history.”(3)
And all this was and is ostensibly to save mankind from even greater evils: nuclear annihilation, mass starvation, and environmental devastation, all claimed to be due to over-population, although a cursory study of history makes it patently clear that the real reason was to enable the financier/oligarchs to increase their wealth and their hegemony of the world’s nations.

Overpopulation is a Myth

Overpopulation is a myth. This myth has caused human rights abuses around the world, forced population control, denied medicines to the poor, and targeted attacks on ethnic minorities and women.

“The concept of overpopulation originated in England in 1798, when the Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus saw that food production increased incrementally, while people reproduced exponentially. Based on his calculations, he predicted that the world would be out of food by the year 1980. Malthus blamed reduced mortality rates and encouraged population reduction.

In his Essay on the Principle of Population, Malthus calls for increased mortality among the poor:

P1.1-SyracuseShantySewer1All the children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to this level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons… To act consistently therefore, we should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality; and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use. Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country, we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations. (Book IV, Chap. V) — Read it online.

Not only that, he believed certain diseases should not sought to be cured for the sake of population control.

“But above all, we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases; and those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders. (Book IV, Chap. V) — Read it online.”

599324_374718182589568_878234514_nIn 1968, Paul Ehrlich of Stanford University adopted and propagated Malthus’ theory of overpopulation. He claimed that excessive human reproduction has overwhelmed the planet and predicted that the world would undergo massive famines, which would kill off hundreds of millions of people by the end of the 70’s.




In his 1968 work The Population Bomb, Ehrlich stated:

The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s the world will undergo famines–hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.

A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people…. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.

Because of the fear that such an alarming claims triggered, large sums of money were donated to the UNFPA (the United Nations Population Fund), which was founded the year after Ehrlich published The Population Bomb. This fund thrives on a crisis that – despite being “imminent” – keeps on being rescheduled over and over again for the past 200 years.

Additional Quotes:

Cousteau_en_Calypso“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”

J. Cousteau, 1991 explorer and UNESCO courier



330px-Международная_Леонардо-премия_10.1“A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine




“Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind”

Theodore Roosevelt






Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet shaking hands with Kissinger in 1976



“Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac,” and “The elderly are useless eaters”

Dr. Henry Kissinger





“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature”

Anonymously commissioned Georgia Guidestones





“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”

Prince Phillip, Queen Elizabeth’s husband, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund





Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.

David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club




270px-Seal_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court.svg“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Scarcity Is A MythThe world is abundant of resources and could provide for everyone’s need, yet every year rich countries waste more that 220 million tons of food. Meanwhile, the poor still starve to death – not because resources are scarce, but because they don’t have the money or have rights to enough land.

Overpopulation Does Not Cause Hunger, Unfair Management Does

Sociologists Frederick Buttel and Laura Raynolds published a study of population growth, food consumption, and other variables in ninety-three third world countries. The statistics showed no evidence that fast population growth causes hunger. However, they did find that the populations of poorer countries, and those countries where the poorest 20 % of the population earned a smaller percentage of a nation’s total income, had less to eat.

In other words, poverty and inequality cause hunger, not overpopulation.

We blame poverty on scarcity and overpopulation. But seldom do we look at human behavior itself. Seldom do we look at the laws created by none other than humans preventing starving people from having access to food and arable land, or the obvious misdistribution of resources caused by the greed of the minority.

And let’s not forget the “debt” that poor countries “owe” to the rich.

“The history of third world debt is the history of a massive siphoning-off by international finance of the resources of the most deprived people. This process is designed to perpetuate itself, thanks to a diabolical mechanism whereby debt replicates itself on an even grander scale, a cycle that can only be broken by cancelling the debt. ” – Third World Debt, a Continuing Legacy of Colonialism


Many nations can’t realize their full food production potential because of the gross inefficiencies caused by inequitable ownership of land and resources.

Many of the countries in which hunger is rampant export much more in agricultural goods than they import. Northern countries are the main food importers, their purchases representing 71.2 % of the total value of food items imported in the world in 1992. Imports by the 30 lowest-­‐income countries, on the other hand, accounted for only 5.2 % of all international commerce in food and farm commodities.

MediaManipulationNetworksInHeadIt is believed that poverty is the result of overpopulation, poor education, racial inferiority or even laziness. But because most people never think to question our current system and the authorities pulling the strings, few realize how the system itself is geared towards enriching the few and enslaving the masses.

The following passage from “The World’s Wasted Wealth: the political economy of waste” by J.W. Smith describes this reality very well:

Land Rights And Ownership

“The often heard comment (one I once accepted as fact) that “there are too many people in the world, and overpopulation is the cause of hunger”, can be compared to the same myth that expounded sixteenth-century England and revived continuously since.


Palestinian children running towards the barrier, August 2004

Through repeated acts of enclosure the peasants were pushed off the land so that the gentry could make money raising wool for the new and highly productive power looms. They could not do this if the peasants were to retain their historic *entitlement* [emphasis is original] to a share of production from the land. Massive starvation was the inevitable result of this expropriation.

There were serious discussions in learned circles about overpopulation as the cause of this poverty. This was the accepted reason because a social and intellectual elite were doing the rationalizing. It was they who controlled the educational institutions which studied the problem. Naturally the final conclusions (at least those published) absolved the wealthy of any responsibility for the plight of the poor. The absurdity of suggesting that England was then overpopulated is clear when we realize that “the total population of England in the sixteenth century was less than in any one of several present-day English cities.”

Petare_Slums_in_CaracasThe hunger in underdeveloped countries today is equally tragic and absurd. Their European colonizers understood well that ownership of land gave the owner control over what society produced. The most powerful simply redistributed the valuable land titles to themselves, eradicating millennia-old traditions of common use. Since custom is a form of ownership, the shared use of land could not be permitted. If ever reestablished, this ancient practice would reduce the rights of these new owners. For this reason, much of the land went unused or underused until the owners could do so profitably. This is the pattern of land use that characterizes most Third World countries today, and it is this that generates hunger in the world.

These conquered people are kept in a state of relative impoverishment. Permitting them any substantial share of the wealth would negate the historic reason for conquest — namely plunder. The ongoing role of Third World countries is to be the supplier of cheap and plentiful raw materials and agricultural products to the developed world. Nature’s wealth was, and is, being controlled to fulfill the needs of the world’s affluent people.

The U.S. is one of the prime beneficiaries of this well-established system. Our great universities search diligently for “the answer” to the problem of poverty and hunger. They invariably find it in “lack of motivation, inadequate or no education,” or some other self-serving excuse. They look at everything except the cause — the powerful own the world’s social wealth. As a major beneficiary, we have much to gain by perpetuating the myths of overpopulations, cultural and racial inferiority, and so forth. The real causes must be kept from ourselves, as how else can this systematic damaging of others be squared with what we are taught about democracy, rights, freedom, and justice?”(4)

Depopulation in the Developed World

KWN-Stockman-III-462015In the developed nations the primary focus was the use of social engineering, which has had a long effective history, with spectacular success leading into and beyond WW I. Edward Bernays was the mastermind of this public manipulation and was very effective at manufacturing consent from the US public to support entering the war.

Bernays was also the mastermind of the social engineering that got women smoking and manipulated them into equating it with freedom, ‘coincidentally’ also at the time that women had recently gotten the ability to vote. Recognizing that women were still riding high on the suffrage movement, Bernays used the equality angle as the basis for his new campaign. He convinced a number of genteel women, including his own secretary, to march in the 1929 Easter Day parade down Fifth Avenue and light up cigarettes in a defiant show of their liberation.
Since the goal of the Financier/Oligarchs molding society, was to create a compliant androgenous work force, while also taking all control away from the family unit, vast amounts of resources were devoted to the women’s movement to enable women to gain complete equality with men.
05friedan2_184Out of this effort resulted the Women’s Liberation Movement in the 1960s with notable leaders such as Betty Friedan (Betty Naomi Goldstein) and Gloria Steinem. What’s with the name Naomi and feminism anyway?
Betty Friedan was one of the founders of the National Organization for Women (NOW) and a co-signer of the original (1966) Agenda of NOW.
According to Goldstein:
“We do not accept the traditional assumption that a woman has to choose between marriage and motherhood, on the one hand, and serious participation in industry or the professions on the other.”
This all sounds good at first glance, but regardless of what it sounds like, it is but one way by which to attempt to entice women, the majority of whom are found in poll after poll to prefer to be stay-at-home, married moms, to enter the work force. Why would anyone promote an idea that most women don’t like? The answer to that question may be found in the fact that the goal to bring women into the work force is an ancient goal of communism and that Betty Friedan was well into her thirties a devout and active functionary of the Communist Party of the U.S.A.
Even a cursory examination of the goals of the creators of the Communist ideology makes it clear that a primary goal of communism was to break up the family, raise children through state institutions and force men and women to function as equal wage slaves of industry.
Already in the original Communist Manifesto produced by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in 1848/49 it was made clear that no society could be successfully restructured unless all established cultural and moral traditions would be abolished.
So, “how much of the communist ideology that was such large part of Betty Friedan’s life and, indeed, formed her life, made it into the ideology of the oppressive feminism that now covers all aspects of our lives, of society and civilization and threatens to smother us all?”
It’s important to understand that the Communist movement in Russia was financed by Rothchild banking interests in the West.
Karl_Marx_001The growing socialist movement—which was closely allied at that time to the Republican revolutions fomenting all over the world—was seen as a danger to the rich. Marx was trained and sent in to splinter and disorient this movement, which he did. Marx was sent in to control the opposition. At every juncture, Marx manages to create factions rather than alliances. He deftly prevents any real action by always turning the socialists against themselves. He keeps them arguing over philosophical fine-points rather than encouraging direct and immediate action.
What we’re looking at here is the bankrolling and use of similar tactics in the West by the same financier/Oligarchs in order to create a androgenous working proletariat, with the added dose of fascist feminism to prevent men and women joining forces to organize against the wage slavery of a monolithic fascist economic cartel.
‘Divide and conquer’ is a standard operating procedure used by every despot that has ever reigned over an unwilling populace. And once race and class have been utilized, dividing the sexes is the final solution. Utilizing agents to create discord between the sexes was much more difficult when men and women, in order to survive, were required to closely join forces. Once industrialization occurred, with its androgenous workforce, and the same financier/Oligarchs also gained total control of the mass media and mass education system, the use of agents to create discord, became highly advantageous.
bettyfriedan_narrowweb__300x367,0Communist agents such as Betty Friedan (Goldstein) and Gloria Steinem were utilized and enabled to institute the feminist movement in order to rapidly move the agenda forward.
The Oligarchs modus operandi is to finance and promote disgruntled minorities in order to destabilize and undermine the world. Feminism is a prime example. It pretends to be about giving women equal opportunity in the workplace when in fact it is devoted to discouraging women from seeking fulfillment in motherhood while castigating men as being hyper-masculanized, brutish, violent, controlling, unevolved beings.
The push for women to enter the workforce left an increasing number of them with little time or energy to even consider becoming mothers, which also contributed to the depopulation agenda. The additional incessant media focus on consumption of consumer items and experiences, served to force more and more women into the workforce, ultimately creating a situation where women had no option but to work, married or not, leaving very little time to devote to birthing and raising children.
The result…..lower and lower birth rates and as are now commonly seen in the developed nations.
And of course, along with feminism came a push for women’s sexual liberation, quickly followed by birth control and abortion, both of which are a key part of the depopulation agenda.
300px-Jdr-king“John D. Rockefeller and his foundation have been in the forefront of the population “control” and eugenics movement. Ultimately the goal is to reduce the earth’s population for the simple warped reason that the less there is for you and me, the more there will be for J.D. and his cronies.
The financier/oligarchs also push birth control. Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, Ted Turner are among the ultra rich that have donated billions to spreading the gospel of contraception, abortion, and feminism using the United Nations and “US Aid.” Rockefeller funded the invention of the pill, the IUD and owns the rights to the abortion drug RU-486. In the last 50 years, billions of public dollars have been spent on “family planning” designed to limit population by deceit and coercion, including compulsory abortion and infanticide.
In “The War Against Population (1988),” Dr. Jacqueline Kasun writes that in 1981, a directory of population control agencies in Washington DC listed 92 private (but mostly publicly funded) agencies, 12 United Nations and 57 agencies of the US government (p. 198). “The real problem of government family planning is not one of families out of control but of planners out of control,” she wrote (p.211).”(5)
330px-MargaretSanger-Underwood.LOCAnd let’s not forget Margaret Sanger. Margaret Sanger was a popular eugenicist, popularized the term “birth control”, promoted the development of birth control pills, opened the first birth control clinic, the Clinical Research Bureau (CRB). The CRB was the first legal birth control clinic in the United States, staffed entirely by female doctors and social workers. The clinic received extensive funding from John D. Rockefeller Jr. and his family, which continued to make anonymous donations to Sanger’s causes in future decades. She also established organizations that evolved into the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

This is what she had to say:

“While the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors, they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table… They do not do this with white people and if we can train the Negro doctor at the clinic, he can go among them with enthusiasm and…knowledge, which…will have far-reaching results among the colored people…The minister’s work is also important and he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

After World War I, Sanger increasingly appealed to the societal need to limit births by those least able to afford children. The affluent and educated already limited their child-bearing, while the poor and ignorant lacked access to contraception and information about birth-control. Here she found an area of overlap with eugenicists. She believed that they both sought to “assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit.” Sanger was a proponent of negative eugenics, which aims to improve human hereditary traits through social intervention by reducing the reproduction of those who were considered unfit.

Gay_flag.svgWhile actively supporting sexual liberation and its necessitated ‘birth control’, the financier/oligarchs also covertly supported “gay liberation,” with the understanding that the homosexual lifestyle added to the destruction of families and served the depopulation agenda. Through funding and media control, they pushed the public to regard sex as a recreation/physical release rather than as the expression of a spiritual bond (i.e. a loving marriage) resulting in children.

Immediately following the new-found sexual liberation was the increasing incidence of sexually transmitted diseases, which along with scare-mongering, were used to push the idea of abstinence, particularly among young people, which also served the depopulation agenda.

The Fluoridation Strategy

Study after study has confirmed that fluoride is a dangerous, toxic poison that bio-accumulates in your body while being ineffective at preventing dental decay. For instance, there are 25 studies showing that fluoride reduces IQ in children, and approximately 100 animal studies have also linked fluoride to brain damage.

Past research, too, has shown that fluoride has potentially disastrous effects on the male reproductive system, reducing fertility.

DocumentNevertheless, since the 1950s there has been ongoing fluoridation of water supplies in the US with currently around 150 million people receiving fluoridated public drinking water. The other developed countries heavily utilizing fluoridation are Canada, Australia and New Zealand. So on top of the social engineering strategies outlined above, all of these countries are also being deliberately subjected to fertility damaging fluoride in their water, adding to the financier/oligarch depopulation goals.

“Water fluoridation, however, is only possible in places with a modern infrastructure of water treatment plants and therefore even in wealthy nations it is only viable in cities that have at least 10,000 people. Salt fluoridation is the second most popular fluoridation method and is in use throughout Latin America and the Caribbean region as well as in a few European countries that have abandoned water fluoridation. Milk fluoridation is restricted to very few countries and is used as a supplementary method of fluoridation elsewhere. To keep human beings in a constant state of fluoride poisoning, toothpaste and dental health products throughout the world are fluoridated.

The Gender-Bender Strategy

An increasing amount of research information is showing that the ingestion, absorption or inhalation of synthetic particular chemical substances drastically impacts the hormonal balance of male physiology and female physiology as well.

375px-Placenta.svgTo the extent that these substances create an imbalance in the pregnant woman or cross the placental barrier into the fetus, they will also have negative effects on the hormonal balance and sexual development of the male or female. Once the child is born, the exposure to these substances will continue to impact the sexual development until maturity is reached.

According to a recent study, “Falling sperm counts could be caused by traces of the contraceptive pill in drinking water.



“U.S. scientists say the sex hormone oestradiol – the birth control hormone that passes untreated through sewage plants – has an even larger effect on sperm than Bisphenol A or BPA, as it is widely known.  BPA is found in some plastics used to make food containers, bottles and coatings in tin cans, and is also commonly used in thermal paper in cash register receipts.”(8)


Bisphenol A (BPA)

“To close the loophole created by the modern habit of drinking bottled rather than tap water, the depopulation lobby has replaced glass with plastic bottling starting in 1980 and has used a specific fertility-depressing chemical, called bisphenol A (BPA) to manufacture two kinds of plastics: polycarbonates and epoxy resins. BPA is ingested when it leaches into food and beverages for human consumption. Since nearly every plastic bottle on the planet is now made of BPA-based polycarbonates and almost every metal and aluminum can in the world is lined with epoxy resins containing BPA, people are chronically exposed. The lining of metal cans with BPA is aimed at both the urban and rural poor who are more likely to eat canned soups, vegetables and fruit and will thus receive more than their share of fertility depressing agents, as they will ingest it from multiple sources. But as the depopulation lobby has a strong eugenic component to it, reducing the numbers of the poor is a desirable outcome.”(3)

SPF15SunBlock“Make no mistake, BPA isn’t the only method being utilized, there are also a whole host of xenoestrogens found in everything from suntan lotions to the food we eat, all ” clinically significant because they can mimic the effects of endogenous estrogen and thus have been implicated in precocious puberty and other disorders of the reproductive system.”

Via the Women In Balance Institute, we see a partial list of things used every day in America which include the chemicals that are xenoestrogens, including:• Industrial products and Plastics: • Bisphenol A (monomer for polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resin; antioxidant in plasticizers); • Phthalates (plasticizers); • DEHP (plasticizer for PVC); • Polybrominated biphenyl ethers (PBDEs) (flame retardants used in plastics, foams, building materials, electronics, furnishings, motor vehicles); • Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs);

• Food:• Erythrosine / FD&C Red No. 3; • Phenosulfothiazine (a red dye)• Butylated hydroxyanisole / BHA (food preservative); • Building supplies: • Pentachlorophenol (general biocide and wood preservative); • Polychlorinated biphenyls / PCBs (in electrical oils, lubricants, adhesives, paints);

330px-FLIT_Spray_Can_1• Insecticides: • Atrazine (weed killer); • DDT (insecticide, banned); • Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (one of the breakdown products of DDT); • Dieldrin (insecticide); • Endosulfan (insecticide); • Heptachlor (insecticide); • Lindane / hexachlorocyclohexane (insecticide, used to treat lice and scabies); • Methoxychlor (insecticide); • Fenthion; • Nonylphenol and derivatives (industrial surfactants; emulsifiers for emulsion polymerization; laboratory detergents; pesticides);

• Other: • Propyl gallate; • Chlorine and chlorine by-products; • Ethinylestradiol (combined oral contraceptive pill); • Metalloestrogens (a class of inorganic xenoestrogens); • Alkylphenol (surfactant used in cleaning detergents; • 4-Methylbenzylidene camphor (4-MBC) (sunscreen lotions); • Parabens (methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben and butylparaben commonly used as a preservative);  •Benzophenone (sunscreen lotions);

Monsanto_logo.svg“Xenoestrogens, however, come from over 70,000 different chemicals that have a known affect on our hormonal systems. DDT is a big culprit as are numerous fertilizers, herbicides and fungicides used by the non-organic farmers of the world. GMO crops are a huge problem, because they require larger and more pervasive use of these pesticides. Corn, soy, sugar beets, cottonseed oil, zucchini, alfalfa, and Hawaiian papaya are all predominantly grown using genetically modified seed.”(8)
“Phthalates, which are used in everything from vinyl floors to plastic tubing and soaps and lotions, are pervasive in the environment and have increasingly become associated with changes in development of the male brain as well as with genital defects, metabolic abnormalities and reduced testosterone in babies and adults.
Phthalates are one of several groups of chemicals that have the power to disrupt the endocrine system, both in animals and humans. Nicknamed “gender-benders,” these chemicals are causing the males in many species to become feminized.
According to a report issued by ChemTrust last year, HALF of all male fish in British lowland rivers have been found to grow eggs in their testes! And that’s just one eye-opening example of the impact these gender bender chemicals are having on our environment.

EndocrineDisruptors_KailiWillows_Flickr“Their study lists the symptoms found in each of the numerous species tested, which includes testicular cancer, hermaphrodites, genital deformations, low sperm counts, and infertility.


Decreased sperm motility and concentration, as well as genital abnormalities in baby boys have been linked to these chemicals.

Common Sources of Phthalates

“Phthalates are found in, among other things:

  • Processed food packaging
  • Hoses
  • Raincoats
  • Shower curtains
  • Vinyl flooring and wall coverings
  • Lubricant and adhesives
  • Detergents
  • Beauty products like nail polish, hair spray, shampoo, deodorants, and fragrances
  • Toys

Other Gender-Bender Chemicals to Watch Out For:

“Endocrine disrupting chemicals are everywhere these days and can be difficult to avoid unless you take decisive steps to limit or eliminate them from your immediate surroundings. This is particularly important if you are pregnant, or planning a pregnancy.

“Reading labels is a necessity these days. PVC plastics, which contain phthalates, will oftentimes carry the plastic recycling symbol # 3.

“Some of the other gender-bender agents to look out for include:

  • 330px-Happy_Pan_PosterPerfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) — found in grease- and water-resistant coatings like Teflon and Gore-Tex, is a likely carcinogen.
  • Methoxychlor and Vinclozin— An insecticide and a fungicide respectively, have been found to cause changes to male mice born for as many as four subsequent generations after the initial exposure.
  • Nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPEs) — Known to be potent endocrine disrupters, these chemicals affect gene expression by turning on or off certain genes, and interfere with the way your glandular system works. They mimic the female hormone estrogen, and have been implicated as one reason behind some marine species switching from male to female.
  • Bovine growth hormones commonly added to commercial dairy have been implicated as a contributor to premature adolescence.
  • Soy products, which are loaded with hormone-like substances.
  • MSG-is-dangerousMSG — A food additive that’s been linked to reduced fertility.
  • Fluoride — This chemical in the U.S. water supply has been linked to lower fertility rates, hormone disruption and low sperm counts.

“Along with the overall health destroying effects of these chemicals is the feminization of males that has become so prevalent at the current time, although these effects have been building over the last 80 years, as more and more anti-testosterone disrupting chemicals have been introduced into the environment, the food supply and various products.”(9)

“These chemicals act to feminize men from the time they are conceived, since the average woman’s body contains close to 250 chemicals from cosmetics, household exposures, pesticides and from environmental pollution.

All of these chemicals end up in women’s bodies since they’re stored in fat and women have more fat tissue than men in their breasts and their hips as well as their butt. When a woman becomes pregnant she begins to expose the male fetus to these chemicals.

NDC 0069-4220-30, Viagra, 100 mg, reverse is Pfizer,

This happens through no fault of the woman, but through the oil, chemical and pharmaceutical companies, which produce and distribute these harmful chemicals throughout the world. Big Pharma has no incentive to reduce this exposure since they make huge profits on the ‘health care’ side of this situation by selling testosterone and Viagra to the millions of men who are emasculated.

By producing and distributing BPA and atrazine, which are found in a variety of foods and products which are used by the public, and which find their way into our drinking water, the chemical companies can make millions of dollars of emasculating men and lowering their testosterone levels in order to make them impotent.

As a result of this onslaught, sperm counts have decreased by 50%, while 85% of sperm cells are defective. Along with this, studies show that almost 30 million men are impotent in the US.

The majority of this damage is done in the womb. Most of these chemicals destroy the cells within the testes that produce testosterone, called the Sertroli cells. So when males are exposed to these chemicals in the womb, they don’t end up with as many Sertroli cells as a normal fetus has, so their testosterone levels go down and they’re less able to produce sperm.

So men today have less sperm produced than their grandfathers did and their testosterone levels are the lowest they’ve ever been in the history of mankind.”(9)

The Poisoned Agriculture Strategy

“A new paper by Rosemary A Mason in the ‘Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry’, indicates there is a growing threat from the release of hormone-disrupting chemicals that could even be shifting the human sex ratio and reducing sperm counts.

Mason cites a good deal of evidence to show how the widespread use on agricultural crops of the systemic neonicotinoid insecticides and the herbicide glyphosate, both of which cause immune suppression, make species vulnerable to emerging infectious pathogens, driving large-scale wildlife extinctions, including essential pollinators.

airplane-465619__340Providing evidence to show how human disease patterns correlate remarkably well with the rate of glyphosate usage on corn, soy and wheat crops, which has increased due to ‘Roundup Ready’ crops, Mason goes on to present more sources to show how our over-reliance on chemicals in agriculture is causing irreparable harm to all beings on this planet. Most of these chemicals are known to cause illness, and they have likely been causing illnesses for many years. But until recently, the herbicides have never been sprayed directly on food crops and never in this massive quantity.(10)

Mason discusses how agriculture and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) fit into a wider agenda for depopulating the planet. She notes that on the initiative of Gates, in May 2009 some of the richest people in the US met at the home of Nurse, a British Nobel prize-winning biochemist and President (2003–10) of Rockefeller University in Manhattan, to discuss ways of tackling a ‘disastrous’ environmental, social and industrial threat of overpopulation. The meeting was hosted by David Rockefeller Jr. These same individuals have met several times since to develop a strategy in which population growth would be tackled.

la-me-c1-assisted-death-20150519-thumbnailThe Rockefeller Foundation (RF) was involved in extensive financing of eugenics research  in league with some of the US’s most respected scientists from such prestigious universities as Stanford, Yale, Harvard and Princeton. The explicit aim of the eugenics lobby funded by wealthy élite families, such as Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman and others since the 1920s, has embodied what they termed ‘negative eugenics’, the systematic killing off of ‘undesired bloodlines’.

RF funded the earliest research on GMOs, which Mason regards as part of the depopulation agenda. The RF funded the earliest research on GMOs in the 1940s and effectively founded the science of molecular biology.

Mason cites Steven Druker to show the fraud behind GMOs and how governments and leading scientific institutions have systematically misrepresented the facts about GMOs and the scientific research that casts doubt on their safety. Druker has shown that GMOs can have severe health impacts, which have been covered up.

RoundupMason then goes on to discuss the impact of glyphosate residues (herbicide-tolerant GM crops are designed to work with glyphosate), which are found in the organs of animals, human urine and human breast milk as well as in the air and rivers. She documents its widespread use and contamination of soil and water and notes that the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer’s assessment of glyphosate being a 2A carcinogen (probably carcinogenic in humans) is unwelcome news for the agrochemical industry.

She claims that plans are under way to depopulate the planet’s seven million plus people to a more manageable level of between 500–2000 million by a combination of means, including the poisoning and contamination of the planet’s food and water supplies via chemical-intensive industrialised agriculture. Mason also notes that health-damaging GMOs are being made available to the masses (under the guise of ‘feeding the poor’), while elites are more prone to eat organic food.

Mason’s concerns about depopulation should not be dismissed, particularly given the record of the likes of the Gates and Rockefeller clans, the various covert sterility programmes that have been instituted by the US over the decades and the way agriculture has and continues to be used as a geopolitical tool to further the agendas of rich interests in the US.

300px-Dow_Chemical_Company_logo.svgTo understand the processes that have led to modern farming and the role of entities like Monsanto, we must appreciate the geopolitics of food and agriculture, which benefits an increasingly integrated global cartel of finance, oil, military and agribusiness concerns. This cartel seeks to gain from war, debt bondage and the control of resources, regardless of any notions relating to food security, good health and nutrition, biodiversity, food democracy, etc.”(10)

Chemtrails Strategy

spray782-450x292“Spraying powdered aluminum oxide at high altitudes by airplane – a phenomenon known as ‘chemtrails’ – is a rather new method of population control that is restricted to NATO countries and is aimed at breaking the back of organic and traditional farmers to make room for corporations and their genetically modified crops. The aluminum sprayed falls to the ground and poisons the soil and the water, which has two intended consequences: first, it makes the growing of traditional or heirloom seeds impossible and forces farmers into bankruptcy thus freeing the land for purchase by agro-giants who stand ready with aluminum-resistant genetically modified seeds; and secondly, aluminum binds with fluoride compounds and greatly increases fluoride toxicity, therefore reducing the human body’s toxicity threshold level previously thought safe.

In other words, you can do far more damage to human health with aluminum fluoride than you can do with just fluoride and you need less of it. That is why, for example, the spraying of aerosolized aluminum is far more prevalent on the Western seaboard of Canada and the US, where tap water fluoridation is scarce and people ingest fluoride from bottled water and soft drinks as well as canned foods, but at lower levels than people whose tap water is fluoridated.”(3)

Take a look at this video by Geoengineering Watch on the Chemtrail strategy:


Biological and Bacteriological Methods – Particularly for the Developing World

“Poor countries do not have water treatment plants and therefore cannot fluoridate their water. Salt fluoridation requires the political will and stability necessary to co-opt a select few politicians and bureaucrats, but Africa’s political landscape is volatile and for ever changing. And milk fluoridation is expensive and morally reprehensible as it targets innocent children through free-milk school programs and sickens them when they are young and defenseless. African leaders, moreover, have largely resisted international pressure to poison their people. That is why the depopulation lobby has devised effective methods of population control for Africa specifically and more recently for other poor and reluctant countries whose voluntary cooperation was impossible to gain.”(3)


aids-sufferer-zambia“If the depopulation lobby could not control the number of people born into the world, then they would increase the number of people leaving this world. In other words, if they could not tackle the population problem at the front end of life by controlling fertility, they would and did tackle it at the back end of life by increasing morbidity and mortality. This was deemed necessary for Africa, which resisted any and all attempts at population control.

The HIV/AIDS virus was specifically created for the Sub-Saharan African population by a cooperative effort between Soviet and American scientists in the employ of their nations’ military-industrial establishments. It was designed to do maximum damage by undermining the immune system and to have an affinity for people of color. It gradually achieved its intended goal once it was introduced into the bloodstreams of countless innocents in Africa, Brazil and Haiti by the World Health Organization through its smallpox immunization program that ended in 1980. Infection is as high as 30% in some African nations (5% continent wide) and 70% of all AIDS deaths occur in Africa. More than one million people die in Africa from AIDS annually and nearly two million new infections are registered every year.(3)


66ba7ab1f9cca107eeefc7049453f303“Bioengineered flu strains, such as N1H1, the swine flu and the bird flu viruses, have been used to manufacture mass fear of pandemics and condition the public to the practice of mandatory vaccines or government-mandated vaccinations programs. This will allow the authorities to target specific populations when and if the eugenicists decide that a new deadly strain must be introduced into an unyielding population, as it was done in Africa, Haiti and Brazil until 1980.”(3)

The HPV vaccines have been shown to have serious side effects including causing infertility and spontaneous abortions.

“The World Health Organization (WHO) and its subsidiaries have been actively researching and funding the development of contraceptive / anti-fertility vaccines that prevent full-term pregnancies to take place, for over 20 years. There’s even a Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines of the WHO!(6)

However, no anti-fertility vaccine has ever been placed on the market and promoted as such as of yet.

Instead, as described in a 1993 journal paper published in The British Medical Bulletin, anti-fertility vaccines were being engineered “incorporating tetanus or diphtheria toxoid linked to a variety of hCG-based peptides.”

The authors of this article state:

“The fundamental principle behind this approach to contraceptive vaccine development is to prevent the maternal recognition of pregnancy by inducing a state of immunity against hGC, the hormone that signals the presence of the embryo to the maternal endocrine system.”

nowords1Free tetanus vaccines that were offered to young women of childbearing age for years in countries such as Tanzania, Nigeria, Mexico, and the Philippines, were found to contain human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG), which causes spontaneous abortions if the woman becomes pregnant.

While the woman is not technically sterilized, once injected with hCG, she may never be able to carry a child full term thereafter.

HCG-containing anti-fertility vaccines have also been pursued for more than two decades by the Indian National Institute of Immunology, and The Population Council of the Rockefeller University, among others.

In fact, there are no less than 50 research papers detailing research on “contraceptive vaccines” in the PubMed database.

One disturbing paper published in the FASEB Journal in 1993 states:

“… we initiated studies relating to possible mechanisms of action and potential side effects of this vaccine, which should be relevant to world-wide regulation of population growth.”

So again, why the frantic push for the HPV vaccine, created for young, fertile women, when there’s NO solid, rational basis for its use?”(6)

Massive Brazilian Vaccination Program Raises Suspicions of Covert Sterilization Plans

Flag_of_WHO.svg“A much more recent case of illogical mass vaccinations against a minor health problem is that of the massive, mandatory vaccination program in Brazil, which has raised suspicions among international pro-life activists, who note that the program is similar to other vaccination programs in recent years that have included a hidden sterilizing agent in the vaccines.

The campaign to “annihilate rubella” began in early August this year, mandating rubella vaccinations for all women ages 12 to 49, and 12 to 39 for men; a total of 70 million people, despite the fact that only 17 Brazilian children per year suffer birth defects from the disease.

Adolfo Castañeda of Human Life International notes that just two years ago, researchers found that the rubella vaccine used in a similar campaign in Argentina was laced with human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG).

The suspicion that brought about the investigation [into the rubella vaccine] was caused by the fact that there were very few cases of the disease in Argentina, which didn’t merit a large-scale campaign,” Castañeda said, adding, “The ages for women are the same as those who received the vaccines in Nicaragua, where they included a hormone that sterilizes the woman who receives it, and similar to the age of those who received another sterilizing hormone in the Philippines.”(6)


330px-Gardasil_vaccine_and_box_new“There’s no proof of hCG being present in any of the current HPV vaccines.

But there are definite similarities between these other irrational vaccination programs in other countries for relatively minor public health concerns — that turn out to have far more sinister agendas than mere greed – compared to the fervent, irrational push behind the HPV vaccine here in the U.S.

However, Gardasil does contain Polysorbate-80 – a surfactant used in pharmacology to deliver certain drugs or chemical agents across the blood-brain barrier — which has been linked to infertility in mice.

Researchers Gajdova found that administration of Polysorbate-80 decreased the weight of the uterus and ovaries, and caused chronic estrogenic stimulation. The ovaries of the mice were also without corpora lutea (a mass of progesterone-secreting endocrine tissue that forms immediately after ovulation) and had degenerative follicles.

So what might the estrogenic effects of Polysorbate-80 be on pre-adolescent girls and pregnant women?”(6)

Agenda 21

The UN has been at the depopulation game from its beginning, since the main reason for its existence is to create and maintain an ideal world environment for the financier/oligarchs.

From the Initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER:

“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.”

The_Hunger_Games_coverOne of the most popular films of 2012 was The Hunger Gameswhich portrayed a post-apocalyptic nation called Panem in which a super-rich, super-pampered, super-callous ‘elite’ lived in high-tech luxury while the rest of the population daily battled to survive in abject poverty, locked away behind prison fences in intensively-populated ‘people zones’. Panem comes from the Latin phrase panem et circenses or ‘bread and circuses’ – a term derived from Rome and meaning to give the people diversions and distractions to hide what is being done to them. Exactly what is happening today.

“Agenda 21 was established at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992, hosted by Maurice Strong, a Canadian oil and business billionaire and long-time front man for the Rothschilds and Rockefellers. Strong has been a leader of their exploit-the-environment-to-scam-the-people program which is now in full flow. Strong is a member of the Club of Rome, the environmental Hidden Hand in the Round Table network that includes the Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations.(7)

Agenda 21 is called ‘the agenda for the 21st century’ and that agenda refers to global fascism/communism. This is a summary of what Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development / Biodiversity is seeking to impose:

• An end to national sovereignty

• State planning and management of all land resources, ecosystems, deserts, forests, mountains, oceans and fresh water; agriculture; rural development; biotechnology; and ensuring ‘equity’ (equal slavery)

• The State to ‘define the role’ of business and financial resources

• Abolition of private property (it’s not ‘sustainable’)

• ‘Restructuring’ the family unit

• Children raised by the State

• People told what their job will be

• Major restrictions on movement

• Creation of ‘human settlement zones’

• Mass resettlement as people are forced to vacate land where they currently live

• Dumbing down education (achieved)

• Mass global depopulation in pursuit of all the above

Iclei_logoThis horrific plan is being coordinated through the United Nations, the stalking horse for world dictatorship, via a non-governmental network once called the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), and now known as Local Governments for Sustainability although still using the shortened name ICLEI. The United Nations is now opening ‘embassies’ around the world called ‘UN Houses’ under the guise of raising awareness of UN activities, but not the activities that people really need to know about.

Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) and other organisations are integrating the plan into every village, town, city and region and it is already becoming widespread across the world. The organisational infrastructure of Agenda 21 is already at fantastic proportions, and involves government agencies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), think-tanks, trusts, foundations, ‘training’ (mind control) operations and ‘initiatives’ which have been building the infrastructure for what they call ‘the post-industrial, post-democratic’ society — all while the public go about their daily business, oblivious of the prison being built all around them by the hour.

Harvey Ruvin, a vice-chairman of ICLEI, was asked how Agenda 21 would affect liberties with regard to the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, private property and freedom of speech. He replied: ‘Individual Rights must take a back-seat to the collective’.

195px-Communist_star.svgA member of the Agenda 21 committees in Santa Cruz, California, in the mid-1990s said that the proposals he heard were so crazy that he laughed at them because they could never happen. These included that ‘Mother Earth’s surface was not to be scratched’; humans should be concentrated in settlement zones; education should focus on the environment as a central organizing principle and all aspects of life covered by Agenda 21. But today, all of these crazy plans are now being introduced. It’s all happy, smiling faces and rhetoric about “how we care”, when the truth is that Agenda 21 is a vicious, brutal, heartless strategy to impose a global Orwellian state and forcibly depopulate humanity.

They want to control every man, woman and child on the planet – everyone and everywhere and every resource, water source and piece of land. To do this they need a global structure of fascist control that goes right down into every local community with the jackboots at local level enforcing the will of the global center. This is why there is so much emphasis on local authorities, and town and city authorities in Agenda 21.

Below is a map of the Reserves and Corridor system being created by Agenda 21:


The demand in Agenda 21 for a massive cull of the population can be understood when you see how much of America is designated for no human activity.

The red areas are designated for ‘no human use’ and most of the rest of America is confiscated for little and highly-regulated use. The mass of the population would be concentrated in high-rise, densely-packed ‘human settlement zones’ and denied access to something like 80 percent of present day America. It is without question the world of The Hunger Games with a globally-enforced top-down hierarchy with a world government using its world army and police force to impose its will at regional and local levels (sectors).

The Rockefeller-funded America 2050 has produced a map of the new United States divided into eleven ‘megaregions’ and includes parts of Canada (Figure 2 – above). Seattle, Portland and Vancouver, British Columbia, become the megaregion known as ‘Cascadia’ and this regional system comes under the collective name of ‘megalopolis’ which is Greek for large city or great city. America, Canada and Mexico are slated to merge to form the North American Union in line with the European Union blueprint.


As a result of all of these strategies the developed nations are now suffering from deliberate depopulation. The US birthrate has already been cut from 4 to 2 children per woman, the European and Canadian is 1.5. (We need 2.1 just for replacement.) Russia (1.17 children) will see its population plummet from 145 million to 115 million by 2015. In the “Death of the West,” Pat Buchanan argues that population decline is responsible for the inevitable extinction of the West.

The charts below show birthrates in some countries:


Virtually all of the developed countries are steadily increasing their depopulation rates.

Capture4And this goes right along with the depopulation plans of the financier/oligarchs.


(1) Jewish Eugenics

(2) Wikipedia- Zionism

(3) Killing Us Softly

(4) Overpopulation: Fact Or Myth?

(5) The Devil’s Work: Feminism and the Elite Depopulation Agenda

(6) Prominent Scientist Warns of HPV Vaccine Dangers

(7) Agenda 21: The Plan for a Global Fascist Dictatorship

(8) Wiping Out America….. Study Shows Depopulation Agenda Moving Full Speed Ahead

(9) Can These Household Chemicals Crush Your Son’s Masculinity?

(10) Poisoned Agriculture: Depopulation and Human Extinction

Related Posts:


The Zika Virus Hoax

Emasculation and the Feminization of Society

Chemtrail (Aerosol) Spraying

Contrails vs. Chemtrails (Aerosols)

Geoengineering Weather Warfare

GMO Myths and Truths


Just Say No To Fluoride!!!

The Complete History Of Monsanto, “The World’s Most Evil Corporation”

Virus Busters, the Tale of 6 Herbal Superheroes

Disinformation Tactics of Shills & Online Trolls/Zombies

Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist

From Balfour Declatation to Trump: the plight of the Indigenous Arab Population

The Usurpation of Palestine from Balfour to Trump

“Palestinian Arabs might have ended up governing their own country if a Russian Jew living in Manchester had not developed a chemical process for extracting nail-varnish remover from horse-chestnuts.” —Karl Sabbagh [1]

Trump Balfour 685a5


In a lackluster speech on December 6, 2017, U.S. president Donald Trump announced the official recognition of Jerusalem al-Quds as the capital of the Israeli entity and directed the U.S. state department to make arrangements to move the U.S. embassy there from Tel Aviv.  [2] While Jerusalem was acknowledged as the Israeli capital by U.S. Senate Concurrent Resolution 106 in 1990 [3] and the embassy move was mandated by the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995, [4] Trump has once again managed to spark worldwide outrage by declaring publicly what most intelligent observers had long since surmised.

The timing of Trump’s address on al-Quds was ironic, for one hundred years earlier British General Edmund Allenby, after having captured the city, which had been under the rule of the Ottoman Turks, spoke of “the establishment of national governments and administrations in those countries deriving authority from the initiative and free will of those people themselves.”  Allenby’s words, however, had previously been neutered by the now notorious Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1917, which declared the British government to “view with favour the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use its best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object,” and indeed “His Majesty’s Government” did. [5]

The Balfour Declaration would never have materialized without the strident efforts of a Jewish chemist named Chaim Weizmann, a Zionist who later became the first president of the Israeli entity.  Originally from southern Russia in the Pale of Settlement, Weizmann left his homeland for Switzerland where he earned a doctorate in chemistry in 1904 from the University of Geneva.  Later he immigrated to Britain where he accepted a position at the University of Manchester until he was tapped by the British government in 1916 to work on munitions. [6] Weizmann developed a new process to make acetone, which is used in nail polish remover and for making cordite, a propellant used in British artillery projectiles, and when Munitions minister David Lloyd George was faced with a shortage of acetone, Weizmann came to his rescue.  Lloyd George later remarked, “Acetone converted me to Zionism,” and after becoming prime minister in December 1916, he rewarded Weizmann by his full support for a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine. [7]

To be understood, the Balfour Declaration must be viewed through the lens of Britain at war against Germany shortly after the Russian Revolution and a mutiny by French troops, events that threatened to leave the British without allies.  Further fueling British fears of fighting the war singlehandedly were rumors that Germany was contemplating a pro-Zionist declaration to entice the Russians to leave the war, which the Bolsheviks did on November 7, 1917 when they entered into peace negotiations with the Germans.  Compounding British anxiety was the reality that most American Jews at the time favored supporting Germany over Britain; those from Germany retained fond memories of their former homeland while those from Russia recalled the Tsar’s pogroms and transferred this antipathy to Britain, Russia’s ally. [8]

Knowing that U.S. president Woodrow Wilson held strong convictions concerning self-determination of peoples, British Prime Minister Lloyd George sought the help of American Jews to convince Wilson of the strategic importance of a British invasion and occupation of Palestine towards victory in the First World War.  The plan conceived with the help of Chaim Weizmann was to portray the Zionist project to Wilson as Jewish self-determination in Palestine, thereby averting any accusations of post-war annexation of conquered lands.   American Jewry had to be enticed to support the British war effort, so in exchange, Britain pledged to support the Zionist objectives in Palestine, but this also required the help of such notables as U.S. Supreme Court justice Louis Brandeis, who headed the Zionist organization in the U.S. and was close to President Wilson.  It was Brandeis who informed Weizmann of the U.S. president’s interest in Zionism. [9]


The other side that had to be convinced to join with Britain in the war effort against the Ottoman Empire and Germany was the Arabs, who were also anticipating their own self-determination at the end of the First World War.  To that end, British diplomat Mark Sykes wrote a declaration of assurances to Sharif Hussein bin Ali, the leader of the Arab Revolt, which Hussein declared against the Turks in 1916. Sykes assured that the Palestinian Arabs would be granted political freedom and that the Balfour Declaration announcing British support for a Jewish homeland would be applied only as would be “compatible with the freedom of the existing population, both economic and political.” As a result, Hussein was deliberately duped by Sykes into accepting the idea that Jewish immigration into Palestine would not amount to much.  The British charade became apparent in 1918 when the Bolsheviks published copies of the British and French secret plans to carve up the Middle East at war’s end based on their respective self-interests. [10]

It should be mentioned that the Zionists hedged their political bets in case Britain did not emerge from the First World War victorious by approaching the German and Turkish governments with proposals delivered by the Zionist organization’s representative in Istanbul, Richard Lichtheim.  Pointing out the anticipated gratitude of Jewish Americans, Lichtheim listed the advantages of German support for the Zionist project in Palestine, noting the common German language and emphasizing the business connections of the Jews already there.  To sweeten the deal, Lichtheim even offered to arrange for a Zionist armed force to fight against the British in the Middle East alongside their Turkish and German allies.  As Palestinian author Karl Sabbagh explained, “The unique status of Jews in global politics made this sort of double-dealing possible.” [11]

Britain emerged from the First World War with a mandate for Palestine, which was granted at the San Remo Conference in April 1920.  The Balfour Declaration was also included in the obligations for the mandatory power, enshrining the document in an international agreement and thereby forcing Britain to abide by its terms to facilitate a Zionist colonization project in Palestine. [12] This was while the terms of the mandate also demanded of Britain that it preserve the rights of the existing inhabitants of Palestine.  However, the mandate document itself failed to mention the word “Arab” even once; instead it referred to “non-Jewish” inhabitants as if the overwhelming majority of the population of Palestine at the time were nothing more than a numerically inconsequential minority. [13]

Unsurprisingly, conflict arose almost immediately, as European Jewish immigrants poured into Palestine, the first of which occurred during the Palestinian Muslim festival of Nabi Musa, which took place in April 1920.  Nine people were killed and over 200 wounded in the clashes along with much destruction and looting of property.  The chief Zionist political officer, Richard Meinhertzhagen, even accused the British of having foreknowledge of the riots and allowing them to happen, despite having told the British foreign office four days earlier that he did not anticipate any trouble.  To investigate the causes, the Palin Commission was formed, and after interviewing 152 witnesses, reported that while the violence may have been initiated by Arabs, these were “people who see themselves menaced with deprivation by a race they have hitherto held in dislike and contempt.” [14]

Through the 1920s and 1930s, the conflict created by Balfour’s letter to Lord Rothschild continued to escalate as the native Palestinian Arab majority protested the wholesale colonization of their ancestral land by European Zionists.  Until 1928, the British government attempted to maintain “parity” in its treatment of the indigenous Palestinian Arab population, none of whom had access to British notables, and the incessant demands of the Zionists, who through Weizmann and others enjoyed close relations with British prime ministers and MPs.  While rejecting the concept of parity at first, Palestinian leaders finally agreed to accept the principle only to see their efforts at peaceful compromise summarily rejected by the Zionists.  The result was twofold: first, Palestinians launched a massive uprising in 1929 against the mandatory government, which they rightly saw as favoring the Zionists; and second, a pattern of Palestinian compromise and Zionist intransigency was established, which has held to the present. [15]

Throughout the mandatory period, whenever the British government exhibited tendencies towards acknowledging and correcting the injustices committed against the Palestinians, the Zionists, with their close ties to His Majesty’s Government, managed to force a return to the Balfour colonization track.  This, of course, resulted in additional protests and uprisings by Palestinians, culminating in 1936 with the Arab Revolt, which lasted until 1939 before the British managed to suppress it by sending more troops to Palestine. In the meantime, the Zionists took full advantage of a proposal by the British Peel Commission to divide Palestine into separate Arab and Jewish states, and worked feverishly to establish an autonomous Jewish enclave.  By 1942, Zionist leaders were demanding all of Palestine, and drawing up plans for the ethnic cleansing that would be necessary to rid Palestine of her native Arab population. [16]

Throughout the Second World War Palestinians and Zionists alike sensed that another clash was coming, as foreshadowed by the increasing number of British casualties and the pace of Zionist terrorist attacks such as the July 1946 bombing by the Stern Gang of the British headquarters in the King David Hotel in al-Quds.  The British government, with dire economic woes at home, decided it could no longer afford the expense of maintaining a standing army in Palestine larger than the one it had in India, and handed the entire Palestinian conundrum over to the fledgling United Nations in February 1947, announcing its intension to withdraw by mid-May in 1948.  By July 1947 the U.N. Special Commission on Palestine recommended partition of the country and the proposal was approved in the U.N. General Assembly on November 29. [17] Concurrently, the Hashemite leadership of Transjordan entered into secret talks with the Zionist leadership in hopes of gaining a share of the vacated mandate.  The stage was now set for the Nakbah, the 1948 expulsion of native Palestinians from their country. [18]

In anticipation of the termination of the British mandate on May 15, 1948, the Zionists under the leadership of David Ben-Gurion declared the establishment of the “State of Israel” the day before.  On May 15, U.S. president Harry Truman instructed the U.S. delegation to the U.N. to announce America’s recognition of the newly-created Israeli entity, making the United States the first country to convey diplomatic legitimacy to the Zionists’ usurpation of Palestine.  On the same day, armed forces from Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt and Jordan, with a small number from Saudi Arabia, invaded Palestine in a futile attempt to liberate the land from its Zionist usurpers. [19] Apparently, even then, Saudi Arabia was not greatly concerned about the Zionist threat, and was even viewed as a collaborator given the kingdom’s extensive ties with the United States. [20] In any case, Palestine was not liberated, and some 450,000 Palestinians lost their homes in the ensuing war while hundreds of thousands of Jewish immigrants poured in from abroad. [21]

It is beyond the scope of this article to discuss the ongoing theft of Palestinian lands since 1949 by the regime in Tel Aviv, which has enjoyed ever-increasing economic and political support from Washington.   Suffice it to say that the 1967 war, which by Menachem Begin’s own admission was a “war of choice” for the Zionists, [22] created 275,000 additional displaced Palestinians [23] and gave the Israeli entity de facto control over most of what had been called Mandate Palestine.  By 1973, when Syria and Egypt launched limited military strikes hoping to recoup losses of the Golan and Sinai respectively, “Eretz-Israel” not only had massive conventional armed forces but also had become a nuclear-armed state. [24] Peace treaties with Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994, and the much-vaunted Oslo Accord of 1993 notwithstanding, Palestinian negotiator Haydar Abd al-Shafi correctly predicted that Israel had “no intention of ever allowing a [Palestinian] state.” [25]

How ironic that a former New York real estate developer, who managed to become the U.S. president, has now cut a deal with the Zionists involving a piece of priceless Palestinian real estate, namely al-Quds, which incidentally was not his in the first place.  While the move marks the death knell of any “peace process,” yet Trump continues to pontificate about “building a future of peace and security in the Middle East.” [26] No doubt, Lord Balfour would be pleased.


[1] Karl Sabbagh, Palestine: A Personal History (New York: Grove Press, 2007), 97.

[2] “Statement by President Trump on Jerusalem,” The White House, December 6, 2017, accessed December 13, 2017,

[3] U.S. Senate Concurrent Resolution 106, 101st Congress, March 26, 1990, accessed December 13, 2017,

[4] Public Law 104–45, 104th Congress, November 8, 1995, accessed December 13, 2017,

[5] Charles Smith, Palestine and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 4th ed. (Boston and New York: Bedford/St. Martins, 2001), 75-79.

[6] Charles Smith, ibid., 71.

[7] Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 97-98.

[8] Charles Smith, ibid., 73-75

[9] Charles Smith, ibid., 71-74.

[10] Charles Smith, ibid., 77-78.

[11] Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 106-107.

[12] Charles Smith, ibid., 85

[13] Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 151-152.  For the full text of the Mandate for Palestine, see Smith, ibid., 106-108.

[14] Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 157-159.

[15] Ilan Pappe, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (Oxford: One World Publications, 2006), 14.

[16] Ilan Pappe, ibid., 14-15.

[17] Charles Smith, ibid., 211-212

[18] Ilan Pappe, ibid., 121.

[19] Charles Smith, ibid., 200-201.

[20] Gawdat Bahgat, “Saudi Arabia and the Arab-Israeli Peace Process,” The Middle East Policy Council, 14(2007), accessed December 14, 2017,

[21] Charles Smith, ibid., 203-206.

[22] John  J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007), 85.

[23] Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 319.

[24] John  J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, ibid., 85-86.

[25] Charles Smith, ibid., 361, 438, 464, 504.

[26] “Recognizing Jerusalem as the Capital of the State of Israel and Relocating the United States Embassy to Israel to Jerusalem,” The White House, December 6, 2017, accessed December 14, 2017,

In a lackluster speech on December 6, 2017, U.S. president Donald Trump announced the official recognition of Jerusalem al-Quds as the capital of the Israeli entity and directed the U.S. state department to make arrangements to move the U.S. embassy there from Tel Aviv.[1]  While Jerusalem was acknowledged as the Israeli capital by U.S. Senate Concurrent Resolution 106 in 1990[2]and the embassy move was mandated by the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995,[3]Trump has once again managed to spark worldwide outrage by declaring publicly what most intelligent observers had long since surmised.


The timing of Trump’s address on al-Quds was ironic, for one hundred years earlier British General Edmund Allenby, after having captured the city, which had been under the rule of the Ottoman Turks, spoke of “the establishment of national governments and administrations in those countries deriving authority from the initiative and free will of those people themselves.”  Allenby’s words, however, had previously been neutered by the now notorious Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1917, which declared the British government to “view with favour the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use its best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object,” and indeed “His Majesty’s Government” did.[4]


The Balfour Declaration would never have materialized without the strident efforts of a Jewish chemist named Chaim Weizmann, a Zionist who later became the first president of the Israeli entity.  Originally from southern Russia in the Pale of Settlement, Weizmann left his homeland for Switzerland where he earned a doctorate in chemistry in 1904 from the University of Geneva.  Later he immigrated to Britain where he accepted a position at the University of Manchester until he was tapped by the British government in 1916 to work on munitions.[5]  Weizmann developed a new process to make acetone, which is used in nail polish remover and for making cordite, a propellant used in British artillery projectiles, and when Munitions minister David Lloyd George was faced with a shortage of acetone, Weizmann came to his rescue.  Lloyd George later remarked, “Acetone converted me to Zionism,” and after becoming prime minister in December 1916, he rewarded Weizmann by his full support for a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine.[6]


To be understood, the Balfour Declaration must be viewed through the lens of Britain at war against Germany shortly after the Russian Revolution and a mutiny by French troops, events that threatened to leave the British without allies.  Further fueling British fears of fighting the war singlehandedly were rumors that Germany was contemplating a pro-Zionist declaration to entice the Russians to leave the war, which the Bolsheviks did on November 7, 1917 when they entered into peace negotiations with the Germans.  Compounding British anxiety was the reality that most American Jews at the time favored supporting Germany over Britain; those from Germany retained fond memories of their former homeland while those from Russia recalled the Tsar’s pogroms and transferred this antipathy to Britain, Russia’s ally.[7]


Knowing that U.S. president Woodrow Wilson held strong convictions concerning self-determination of peoples, British Prime Minister Lloyd George sought the help of American Jews to convince Wilson of the strategic importance of a British invasion and occupation of Palestine towards victory in the First World War.  The plan conceived with the help of Chaim Weizmann was to portray the Zionist project to Wilson as Jewish self-determination in Palestine, thereby averting any accusations of post-war annexation of conquered lands.   American Jewry had to be enticed to support the British war effort, so in exchange, Britain pledged to support the Zionist objectives in Palestine, but this also required the help of such notables as U.S. Supreme Court justice Louis Brandeis, who headed the Zionist organization in the U.S. and was close to President Wilson.  It was Brandeis who informed Weizmann of the U.S. president’s interest in Zionism.[8]


The other side that had to be convinced to join with Britain in the war effort against the Ottoman Empire and Germany was the Arabs, who were also anticipating their own self-determination at the end of the First World War.  To that end, British diplomat Mark Sykes wrote a declaration of assurances to Sharif Hussein bin Ali, the leader of the Arab Revolt, which Hussein declared against the Turks in 1916. Sykes assured that the Palestinian Arabs would be granted political freedom and that the Balfour Declaration announcing British support for a Jewish homeland would be applied only as would be “compatible with the freedom of the existing population, both economic and political.” As a result, Hussein was deliberately duped by Sykes into accepting the idea that Jewish immigration into Palestine would not amount to much.  The British charade became apparent in 1918 when the Bolsheviks published copies of the British and French secret plans to carve up the Middle East at war’s end based on their respective self-interests.[9]


It should be mentioned that the Zionists hedged their political bets in case Britain did not emerge from the First World War victorious by approaching the German and Turkish governments with proposals delivered by the Zionist organization’s representative in Istanbul, Richard Lichtheim.  Pointing out the anticipated gratitude of Jewish Americans, Lichtheim listed the advantages of German support for the Zionist project in Palestine, noting the common German language and emphasizing the business connections of the Jews already there.  To sweeten the deal, Lichtheim even offered to arrange for a Zionist armed force to fight against the British in the Middle East alongside their Turkish and German allies.  As Palestinian author Karl Sabbagh explained, “The unique status of Jews in global politics made this sort of double-dealing possible.”[10]


Britain emerged from the First World War with a mandate for Palestine, which was granted at the San Remo Conference in April 1920.  The Balfour Declaration was also included in the obligations for the mandatory power, enshrining the document in an international agreement and thereby forcing Britain to abide by its terms to facilitate a Zionist colonization project in Palestine.[11]  This was while the terms of the mandate also demanded of Britain that it preserve the rights of the existing inhabitants of Palestine.  However, the mandate document itself failed to mention the word “Arab” even once; instead it referred to “non-Jewish” inhabitants as if the overwhelming majority of the population of Palestine at the time were nothing more than a numerically inconsequential minority.[12]

Unsurprisingly, conflict arose almost immediately, as European Jewish immigrants poured into Palestine, the first of which occurred during the Palestinian Muslim festival of Nabi Musa, which took place in April 1920.  Nine people were killed and over 200 wounded in the clashes along with much destruction and looting of property.  The chief Zionist political officer, Richard Meinhertzhagen, even accused the British of having foreknowledge of the riots and allowing them to happen, despite having told the British foreign office four days earlier that he did not anticipate any trouble.  To investigate the causes, the Palin Commission was formed, and after interviewing 152 witnesses, reported that while the violence may have been initiated by Arabs, these were “people who see themselves menaced with deprivation by a race they have hitherto held in dislike and contempt.”[13]


Through the 1920s and 1930s, the conflict created by Balfour’s letter to Lord Rothschild continued to escalate as the native Palestinian Arab majority protested the wholesale colonization of their ancestral land by European Zionists.  Until 1928, the British government attempted to maintain “parity” in its treatment of the indigenous Palestinian Arab population, none of whom had access to British notables, and the incessant demands of the Zionists, who through Weizmann and others enjoyed close relations with British prime ministers and MPs.  While rejecting the concept of parity at first, Palestinian leaders finally agreed to accept the principle only to see their efforts at peaceful compromise summarily rejected by the Zionists.  The result was twofold: first, Palestinians launched a massive uprising in 1929 against the mandatory government, which they rightly saw as favoring the Zionists; and second, a pattern of Palestinian compromise and Zionist intransigency was established, which has held to the present.[14]


Throughout the mandatory period, whenever the British government exhibited tendencies towards acknowledging and correcting the injustices committed against the Palestinians, the Zionists, with their close ties to His Majesty’s Government, managed to force a return to the Balfour colonization track.  This, of course, resulted in additional protests and uprisings by Palestinians, culminating in 1936 with the Arab Revolt, which lasted until 1939 before the British managed to suppress it by sending more troops to Palestine. In the meantime, the Zionists took full advantage of a proposal by the British Peel Commission to divide Palestine into separate Arab and Jewish states, and worked feverishly to establish an autonomous Jewish enclave.  By 1942, Zionist leaders were demanding all of Palestine, and drawing up plans for the ethnic cleansing that would be necessary to rid Palestine of her native Arab population.[15]


Throughout the Second World War Palestinians and Zionists alike sensed that another clash was coming, as foreshadowed by the increasing number of British casualties and the pace of Zionist terrorist attacks such as the July 1946 bombing by the Stern Gang of the British headquarters in the King David Hotel in al-Quds.  The British government, with dire economic woes at home, decided it could no longer afford the expense of maintaining a standing army in Palestine larger than the one it had in India, and handed the entire Palestinian conundrum over to the fledgling United Nations in February 1947, announcing its intension to withdraw by mid-May in 1948.  By July 1947 the U.N. Special Commission on Palestine recommended partition of the country and the proposal was approved in the U.N. General Assembly on November 29.[16]  Concurrently, the Hashemite leadership of Transjordan entered into secret talks with the Zionist leadership in hopes of gaining a share of the vacated mandate.  The stage was now set for the Nakbah, the 1948 expulsion of native Palestinians from their country.[17]


In anticipation of the termination of the British mandate on May 15, 1948, the Zionists under the leadership of David Ben-Gurion declared the establishment of the “State of Israel” the day before.  On May 15, U.S. president Harry Truman instructed the U.S. delegation to the U.N. to announce America’s recognition of the newly-created Israeli entity, making the United States the first country to convey diplomatic legitimacy to the Zionists’ usurpation of Palestine.  On the same day, armed forces from Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt and Jordan, with a small number from Saudi Arabia, invaded Palestine in a futile attempt to liberate the land from its Zionist usurpers.[18]  Apparently, even then, Saudi Arabia was not greatly concerned about the Zionist threat, and was even viewed as a collaborator given the kingdom’s extensive ties with the United States.[19]  In any case, Palestine was not liberated, and some 450,000 Palestinians lost their homes in the ensuing war while hundreds of thousands of Jewish immigrants poured in from abroad.[20]


It is beyond the scope of this article to discuss the ongoing theft of Palestinian lands since 1949 by the regime in Tel Aviv, which has enjoyed ever-increasing economic and political support from Washington.   Suffice it to say that the 1967 war, which by Menachem Begin’s own admission was a “war of choice” for the Zionists,[21]created 275,000 additional displaced Palestinians[22]and gave the Israeli entity de facto control over most of what had been called Mandate Palestine.  By 1973, when Syria and Egypt launched limited military strikes hoping to recoup losses of the Golan and Sinai respectively, “Eretz-Israel” not only had massive conventional armed forces but also had become a nuclear-armed state.[23]Peace treaties with Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994, and the much-vaunted Oslo Accord of 1993 notwithstanding, Palestinian negotiator Haydar Abd al-Shafi correctly predicted that Israel had “no intention of ever allowing a [Palestinian] state.”[24]


How ironic that a former New York real estate developer, who managed to become the U.S. president, has now cut a deal with the Zionists involving a piece of priceless Palestinian real estate, namely al-Quds, which incidentally was not his in the first place.  While the move marks the death knell of any “peace process,” yet Trump continues to pontificate about “building a future of peace and security in the Middle East.”[25]  No doubt, Lord Balfour would be pleased.



[1]“Statement by President Trump on Jerusalem,” The White House, December 6, 2017, accessed December 13, 2017,

[2]U.S. Senate Concurrent Resolution 106, 101st Congress, March 26, 1990, accessed December 13, 2017,

[3]Public Law 104–45, 104th Congress, November 8, 1995, accessed December 13, 2017,

[4]Charles Smith, Palestine and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 4th ed. (Boston and New York: Bedford/St. Martins, 2001), 75-79.

[5]Charles Smith, ibid., 71.

[6]Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 97-98.

[7]Charles Smith, ibid., 73-75

[8]Charles Smith, ibid., 71-74.

[9]Charles Smith, ibid., 77-78.

[10]Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 106-107.

[11]Charles Smith, ibid., 85

[12]Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 151-152.  For the full text of the Mandate for Palestine, see Smith, ibid., 106-108.

[13]Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 157-159.

[14]Ilan Pappe, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine(Oxford: One World Publications, 2006), 14.

[15]Ilan Pappe, ibid., 14-15.

[16]Charles Smith, ibid., 211-212

[17]Ilan Pappe, ibid., 121.

[18]Charles Smith, ibid., 200-201.

[19]Gawdat Bahgat, “Saudi Arabia and the Arab-Israeli Peace Process,” The Middle East Policy Council, 14(2007), accessed December 14, 2017,

[20]Charles Smith, ibid., 203-206.

[21]John  J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007), 85.

[22]Karl Sabbagh, ibid., 319.

[23]John  J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, ibid., 85-86.

[24]Charles Smith, ibid., 361, 438, 464, 504.

[25]“Recognizing Jerusalem as the Capital of the State of Israel and Relocating the United States Embassy to Israel to Jerusalem,” The White House, December 6, 2017, accessed December 14, 2017,

 The Balfour Declaration




Yuram Abdullah Weiler is a former engineer educated in mathematics turned writer and political critic who has written over 130 articles on Islam, social justice, economics, and politics focusing on the Middle East and U.S. policies.

The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Second Edition

by Ilan Pappe (Author)

Renowned Israeli historian, Ilan Pappe’s groundbreaking book revisits the formation of the State of Israel. Between 1947 and 1949, over 400 Palestinian villages were deliberately destroyed, civilians were massacred and around a million men, women, and children were expelled from their homes at gunpoint.

Denied for almost six decades, had it happened today it could only have been called “ethnic cleansing”. Decisively debunking the myth that the Palestinian population left of their own accord in the course of this war, Ilan Pappe offers impressive archival evidence to demonstrate that, from its very inception, a central plank in Israel’s founding ideology was the forcible removal of the indigenous population. Indispensable for anyone interested in the current crisis in the Middle East.

By Jew Ilan Pappé
ISBN-13: 978-1851685554

Vatican to sign first accord with State of Palestine

AFP , Wednesday 13 May 2015


A general view of St. Peter square (Photo:Reuters)
AdTech Ad

The Vatican said Wednesday it was preparing to sign its first accord with Palestine, two years after officially recognising it as a state.”The bilateral commission of the Holy See and the State of Palestine, which is working on a comprehensive agreement” on the life and activity of the Catholic Church in Palestine , is putting the final touches to the treaty, the Vatican said.

“The agreement will be submitted to the respective authorities for approval ahead of setting a debate in the near future for the signing.”

While it will be the first time the Roman Catholic Church signs a treaty with the State of Palestine, the Vatican has recognised the state since February 2013.

“The Holy See has identified the State of Palestine as such since the vote” by the UN general assembly to recognise it in November 2012, Vatican spokesman Federico Lombardi told AFP.

“In its annual directory the Palestinian representative is referred to as the representative of the State of Palestine.

‘Wish you well against Jewish invaders’: Himmler’s letter to Palestinian Arab leader discovered

‘Wish you well against Jewish invaders’: Himmler’s letter to Palestinian Arab leader discovered
An old telegram uncovered by the National Library of Israel shows a letter from Nazi SS chief Heinrich Himmler to Palestinian Grand Mufti Amin al-Husseini, voicing his support for “freedom-seeking Arabs” against “world Jewry.”

The telegram, dating back to autumn 1943, appears to show how in their hatred for Jews, Nazis in Europe have been seeking to support Palestinians against the “Jewish invaders.”

“To Grand Mufti Amin al-Husseini,” the letter read. “From the outset, the National Socialist [Nazi] movement of Greater Germany has been a standard-bearer in the battle against world Jewry. For this reason, it is closely following the battle of freedom-seeking Arabs, particularly in Palestine, against the Jewish invaders.

JerUSAlem Israel@GoldJerusalem18

‘In rediscovered telegram, Hitler’s deputy, Himmler, offers Jerusalem’s Mufti help against ‘Jewish intruders’’ 

The shared recognition of the enemy and the joint fight against it are creating the strong base [uniting] Germany and freedom-seeking Arabs around the world. In this spirit, I am pleased to wish you, on the anniversary of the wretched Balfour Declaration, warm wishes on your continued fight until the great victory.

Découverte d’un télégramme du nazi Himmler proposant son aide au Mufti de Jérusalem contre les “envahisseurs Juifs” 

Netanyahu avait raison : découverte d’un télégramme du nazi Himmler proposant son aide au Mufti de…

Un télégramme envoyé par le nazi Heinrich Himmler, l’un des plus hauts dignitaires du Troisième Reich, adressé au Grand Mufti de Jérusalem Hadj Amin al-Husseini, a été retrouvé dans les archives de…

The telegram was sent on 2 November 1943, marking the 26th anniversary of the 1917 Balfour Declaration by the British government, which then controlled the Palestinian territories and expressed support for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

Allen Berman@berman_allen

Himmler & the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem actually agree on Jews?? shocked—shocked—to find that gambling is going on in here!

The document was first confiscated by US Army in Germany, before falling into the hands of a member of the Jewish Haganah paramilitary group (which later went on to form the core of the IDF), who then donated it to the National Library. It was rediscovered after library staff was asked to look for materials about the 1917 declaration.

Amin al-Husseini was considered to be one of the ringleaders of the Jerusalem riots in the 1920’s, which followed tensions between Arab and Jewish communities, and was sentenced to ten years imprisonment by the British. Despite later being granted a pardon, al-Husseini continued with his hardline rhetoric, stopped co-operating with British authorities and took an uncompromising position against the Jews, objecting to any notion of Jewish statehood.

In November 1941, the Grand Mufti visited Nazi Germany where he told Hitler that Arabs and Germans were natural friends as they had common enemies in the Jews and the British. Al-Husseini wanted Hitler’s backing for an Arab revolt against French and British rule in the Middle East but did not get it.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed in 2015 that Hitler didn’t initially want to exterminate the Jews until he was talked into it by al-Husseini.

“Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said to him: ‘If you expel them [the Jews], they will all come here [to Palestine],’”Netanyahu said in a speech before the World Zionist Congress in Jerusalem.

In Netanyahu’s version of events, Hitler then asked, “So what am I supposed to do with them?” and the mufti allegedly replied: “Burn them.”

The statements caused a wave of criticism from Palestinians, German politicians, opposition leaders and Holocaust experts, who accused Netanyahu of twisting historical facts.

synaggue attack jerusalem picture of yosefgenocide web


Gandhi’s Despair and the Struggle for Truth and Love

‘When I despair, I remember that all through history the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants, and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of it – always.’ M.K. Gandhi

As we remember Gandhi Jayanti on 2 October, the Mahatma’s 149th birthday and the International Day of Nonviolence, there is plenty of room for despair.

Never before has the Earth and its many inhabitants been under siege as they are now, more than 100 years after Gandhi started warning us of the predicament in which we are embroiled and presenting his strategy for addressing it before it spiraled out of control.

Whether it is the threat of nuclear war, the ongoing wars in many parts of the world and particularly the Middle East, the multiple and synergistic threats to the global environment or the ongoing climate catastrophe, the Earth is under assault on all fronts and its precious lifeforms (human and otherwise) are being killed outright in vast numbers and driven to extinction at the rate of 200 species daily. And the evidence is rapidly accumulating that humans themselves will be extinct by 2026 as well. See ‘Human Extinction by 2026? A Last Ditch Strategy to Fight for Human Survival’.

Moreover, unlike the tyrants to which Gandhi was referring, the current ‘tyrant’ is a global elite that has acquired extraordinary power to kill and destroy as they pursue their insane compulsion to accumulate and control resources at the expense of life. See ‘The Global Elite is Insane Revisited’.

So are we to give up in despair? To quit without a fight? Or even delude ourselves that nothing needs to be done? Obviously, these were not ways that Gandhi would contemplate because, as noted in his words cited above: ‘the ways of truth and love have always won’. Although, as Gandhi did not bother to add: we must struggle, relentlessly, to ensure that truth and love prevail.

And, fortunately, there are many people around the world who agree with him.

Tackling the pervasive violence in our world requires a comprehensive strategy involving many campaigns focused on a wide range of peace, justice and environmental issues, and substantial mobilization. There is no single or simple path. Let me tell you about some of the people engaged in this effort and the nature of their commitment, together with what connects their involvement.

Remarkable activist and progressive journalist Abby Martin, based in the USA, was formerly creator and presenter of the investigative news program ‘Breaking the Set’ and is now creator and presenter of its successor program ‘The Empire Files’. With the support of her fine team, Abby researches and presents reports from ‘inside history’s biggest empire… recording a world shaped by war & inequality’ so that the truth is exposed for all to see. Abby, who is also an artist, interviews a wide range of people from ‘ordinary’ activists to progressive intellectuals to political leaders to penetrate the veil of obscurity cast by the global elite’s corporate media. You can watch Abby’s terrific programs, providing insight into how our incredibly violent world works, on her website ‘The Empire Files’. You can also read about the latest attack on her work and how you can help in the article ‘US Sanctions Shut Down “The Empire Files” with Abby Martin’. Keep fighting Abby! We are with you all the way.

Ina Curic in Romania writes illustrated children’s books designed to teach children a variety of lessons for living an empowered, socially and environmentally conscious life. Her book Queen Rain, King Wind: The Practice of Heart Gardening was published in May and Anagrania’s Challenge: Turning Conflict into Opportunity has just been published. Anagrania’s Challenge is a beautifully created story that offers clear and simple guidance on three subjects vital to our shared future on Earth: what we need to be ourselves, what we need to be healthy, and that acceptance of uniqueness and creatively dealing with conflict are essential if we are to live together and celebrate the benefits and advantages of our differences. If you are looking for children’s books that promote nonviolent living and conflict resolution, you will have trouble finding better books than those by Ina. You can read about Ina, as well as how to obtain her books, on her website Imagine Creatively.

Pakistani Canadian Dr. Mahboob A. Khawaja is a scholar who writes searing critiques of international relations exposing the deep conflicts driving global events. Two of his recent articles are ‘World Affairs and Insanity as Entertainment: Are We at the End of Human Morality?’ and ‘Mankind Must Know: The UNO and Global Leaders are a Menace to Peace and Problem-Solving’.

Moreover, in support of his son Momin, a computer science graduate and IT entrepreneur, who has been unjustly imprisoned since 2004 on terrorism charges (and facing a sentence of life plus 24 years), Mahboob has created a websiteto raise awareness of Momin’s struggle for justice and freedom, and organized a petitionfor those who wish to express their support for him.

Edith Rubinstein in Belgium is definitely an ‘activist senior’. Now 86 and in a center of recuperation following a severe depression and bout of unconsciousness earlier this year, Edith still has her computer and continues her work as an activist. ‘Because I am an activist since a very long time, a feminist, a woman in Black, and I translated free Ecofeminism from Maria Mies and Vandana Shiva…. Since many years, I have translated alternative articles and finally it made me sick.’ In fact, Edith admits, ‘I am completely “abnormal”. Somebody who feels bad to live in a world where hundreds of thousand people are killed or die … because they have nothing to eat anymore and nobody seems to care…. I feel very bad to live in this kind of world. Yes, terrible what is happening in the Congo! But unfortunately it is not the only case. And I am very scandalized by the behavior of the Western World!!!!’

Zakia Haddouch in Morocco continues to report the extraordinarily difficult circumstances of people in that country as she and other activists continue their various struggles to bring some semblance of justice to Moroccan affairs. One prominent issue is the ongoing debate in relation to ‘the forced military service (for both young female and male subjects and I don’t say citizens). It was lately decreed by the king.’ Another struggle is taking place in the wake of the death of Mohcine Fikri on 28 October 2016, who was crushed to death in a rubbish truck trying to recover merchandise confiscated by a policeman. Following this event, Hirak (literally ‘The Movement’) was born and it quickly mobilized widespread support for its vigorous protests. While most of Hirak’s concerns are about local issues, it draws upon a national repertory of nonviolent actions fueled by the experiences of activists around the country. Between October 2016 and May 2017, and faced with social unrest of an unprecedented vitality which increasingly challenged him personally, Mohamed VI remained silent. However, when Hirak leader Nasser Zefzazi – who has never failed to stress nonviolence and advocate self-restraint – interrupted a sermon on 26 May 2017 in which an imam claimed the social movement was tantamount to a ‘fratricidal struggle or even civil war within Islam’, the government took this pretext to clamp down on Hirak. Many activists were jailed – over 200 so far – and demonstrations are now systematically broken up. Zefzazi was among those arrested (on 29 May 2017) and, along with other members of Hirak, subsequently jailed for 20 years. The repression has nipped in the bud any hopes for resolving the crisis quickly. But this doesn’t mean that Zakia and other activists have been intimidated into silence or inaction.

Daniel Dalai reports modestly about his visionary initiative Earthgardens in Guatemala. Earthgardens provides opportunities for girls to realize and practice their inherent leadership potential, particularly as part of Eco-Teams in preserving natural biodiversity. ‘More and more 3rd world governments are proving to be a colossal waste of money as corrupt politicians get rich without addressing local needs. The Sembradores’ model of Girl Power is gaining acceptance as people realize girls are more efficient, more concerned, and less corruptible in solving the simple problems of local needs. Clean water, cheap electricity, food production, and tourist development are urgent needs in many parts of the globe. You may become a volunteer working with children or an Eco-Team assessor in Latin America or Africa.’ Please contact Kate Teggins <> The beautiful Earthgardens website has just been updated and the stunning photos alone will tell you much about what these remarkable girls are doing. See Earthgardens.

Young Nigerian Idowu Jawando has been reflecting deeply on the shocking state of our world and his own role in fixing that. ‘Over here in Lagos civilization advances steadily with all its domination and exploitation, squeezing the juice out of all of us. But yet here and there, traces of a smile, the fragrance of love releases its perfume… things seem bearable for a while. The big question on my mind is this: Can civilization be deconstructed? A part of me thinks: Yes of course, it is the actions of individuals that create this world, these same individuals also have the power to take everything down. But how about the police, the armies, the nuclear weapons and what-have you? Things are the way they are because of force. And most especially the threat of starvation too. It forces us into activities and relationships not of our choosing. Civilization uses and discards the people, over and over, squeezing them like lemons.

‘Will the global leaders who are driven to this insane struggle for power and profit suddenly grow a compassionate nature, one that has no doubt been lost a long time ago? You and I know they won’t. With all the disasters that go on, we still see them stripping the earth bare of its life, still forcing people into precarious situations. We find ourselves at a quandary. I personally find myself in a very stifling situation, but I try my best not to let it define, instead I study it as one would study a dangerous toy….

‘Indeed I have found that tenderness impacts strength and courage in others, this is something I have seen in my own existence. But can one be tender to an oppressor? I guess if there was a mass refusal of this world and all its mechanisms, there will be a lot of headway. Such a situation in my own thinking, won’t be one of making demands to any government, but collectively and individually deciding how we want to live our beautiful mortal lives and what we want the world around us to reflect: the ugliness of mindless profit-seeking or co-creative play with earthly life.

‘Many just go through life unquestioningly, accepting the state of things as normal; as well, the walls that prevent us from truly connecting with one another, is one major obstacle. The education, religious systems only encourage people to be followers, never masters of themselves…. I will keep thinking about this. I realize it might take my whole life and then more, to tackle the evils of the world. But it would please me if I am moving inch by inch and encouraging others to do the same. The torch of freedom must never be extinguished. But must pass from generation to generation.’

Each of the inspiring individuals mentioned above is a signatory of The Peoples Charter to Create a Nonviolent World. If you feel inclined to join this worldwide movement to end violence in all of its manifestations, you are welcome to sign the Charter pledge too.

Like those individuals mentioned above, signatories of the Nonviolence Charter come from a diverse range of backgrounds. They live all over the world (in 105 countries). They represent a wide range of genders, races, religions, classes and abilities. And they work on a phenomenal variety of issues with an increasing number recognizing the need to work on ending violence against children. As Gandhi noted:

‘If we are to reach real peace in this world and if we are to carry on a real war against war, we shall have to begin with children.’

This requires us to understand the cause of violence, including violence against children – see Why Violence?’ and Fearless Psychology and Fearful Psychology: Principles and Practice – and to consider making ‘My Promise to Children’. In some cases, it means undertaking the personal healing necessary to nurture children powerfully. See ‘Putting Feelings First’.

Recognizing, as Gandhi put it, that ‘Earth provides enough to satisfy every [person’s] needs, but not every [person’s] greed’, others are tackling the full range of environmental and climate challengesby participating inThe Flame Tree Project to Save Life on Earth.

And given the elite insanity that drives violence in many contexts, still other signatories are engaged in nonviolent struggles – see Nonviolent Campaign Strategy – or national liberation struggles – see Nonviolent Defense/Liberation Strategy – to tackle violence in these contexts.

So if you are inclined to ponder the meaning of Gandhi’s life, you just need to picture a man dressed simply in khadi, walking to the sea to collect salt in defiance of the law of the British occupying power.

The Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. once noted: ‘The enemy is violence.’ But for Gandhi: ‘The enemy is fear.’

This is because it is fear that drives violence but also fear that prevents us responding strategically and nonviolently to the violence in our world. As Gandhi observed: ‘You may never know what results come of your actions, but if you do nothing there will be no results.’

So as humans are beckoned to extinction within the next few years, Gandhi would remind us that ‘The future depends on what we do in the present.’

What will you do?

 Robert J. Burrowes has a lifetime commitment to understanding and ending human violence. He has done extensive research since 1966 in an effort to understand why human beings are violent and has been a nonviolent activist since 1981. He is the author of Why Violence? His email address is and his website is here.


Russia Arms Syria with “Unbeatable” Missiles to Ward off Further Jewish Attacks


The Russian government has ordered the arming of Syria with new S-300 anti-aircraft missiles—which can shoot down all but the latest US “stealth” planes, and which will be deadly to Israeli F-15 and F-16 jets—in direct response to last week’s atrocity where a Russian aircraft was shot down after being used as a “cover” by the Jewish state’s air force.

In a statement released by Russian Minister of Defense Sergei Shoigu, it was pointed out that the S-300 missile system had in fact been purchased by Syria several years ago, but had never been delivered “upon Israel’s request in 2013.”

Now however, Shoigu said, after the shooting down of the Russian aircraft last week, “things have changed and it isn’t Russia’s fault. This will cool down the hotheads [in Israel] and prevent ill-considered actions threatening Russian soldiers.”

He added that if such a development fails to materialize, the Russian military “would act in accordance to the situation.”

Russia will also supply better control systems to Syrian Air Defense Troops, “which are only supplied to the Russian Armed Forces,” Shoigu added. This will allow integration of Syrian and Russian military assets, allowing the Syrian to have better targeting information.

This will also mean that Israeli aircraft tracked by Russian radar stations will be seen by Syrian missile commanders.

In addition, Russians will also implement a blanket of electronic countermeasures over Syrian coastline, which would “suppress satellite navigation, onboard radar systems and communications of warplanes attacking targets on Syrian territory.”

This will also seriously interfere with further Jewish attacks in Syria, which have consisted by their own admission of over 200 bombing raids, all aimed at weakening the Syrian government in its fight against the US and Israeli-backed “rebels”—who in turn have all turned out to be ISIS and Al-Qaeda affiliates.

In a statement released on the official website of the Russian President, Vladimir Putin said he had told Syrian President Bashar Assad of the developments in person.

“The President of Russia informed about the decision to implement a number of additional measures to ensure the safety of the Russian military in Syria and to strengthen the air defense system of this country, including the transfer of the SAR of the modern S-300 surface-to-air missile system,” the statement said.

The announcement provoked a hysterical reaction in Tel Aviv and in the Jewish Lobby-controlled US government, with Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying that the move would “magnify dangers.”

US National Security Adviser John Bolton saying that the Russian move was a “major mistake” that would cause a “significant escalation” of tensions and urged Moscow to reconsider.

The Russians are however not backing down. When Netanyahu called Putin to complain personally, the Jewish state’s leader was told by the Russian President that the “information provided by the Israeli military about the operation of their aircraft over the Syrian territory is at variance with the conclusions of the Russian Defense Ministry. The Russian side proceeds from the fact that it was the actions of the Israeli Air Force that became the main cause of the tragedy.”

The New Observer’s Russian correspondent reports that the S-300 missiles in effect make Syria “no-go zones” for all aircraft except for the F-22 Raptor and B-2 Spirit “stealth” bombers of the US Air Force.

According to the official specifications, S-300 has a range of 120 miles and can shoot down aircraft flying as high as 100,000ft. and each unit can attack more than half a dozen targets simultaneously.

“The Russian move is by far the most anti-Israel action yet taken by the Russian government,” the New Observer’sMoscow correspondent continued.

“What it in effect means is that the Russians have decided to go toe-to-toe with the Jews, and by implication, the US, over Syria. Be prepared therefore to see increasing anti-Russian hysteria and propaganda in the West’s Jewish lobby-controlled media, and from Washington and Tel Aviv over this move.”

Macron ‘Will Do Everything’ to Assist Democrats Ahead of 2019 EU Vote – Reports

Emmanuel Macron, presidente de Francia

© AFP 2018 / Ludovic Marin


Get short URL

MOSCOW (Sputnik) – French President Emmanuel Macron expressed his intention to be directly involved in the election campaign ahead of the European Parliament election in mid 2019 and pledged in this regard to build a wide list uniting centrists.

“I will be involved [in the election campaign] since I believe in an [election] campaign for the sake of Europe of ambition and future, of Democrats and progressives,” Macron told France’s Le Journal du Dimanche (JDD) newspaper, adding that the upcoming election would be a historical fight.

READ MORE: ‘More Problems Than Benefits’: AfD Official Discusses EU Disintegration, Brexit

He also revealed his plans to draft “the broadest possible” list for the upcoming EU election stressing that he “will do everything” so that the progressives, the Democrats at those whose voices Macron represents — “hopefully, brought together within a single list, the broadest possible in France” — make themselves heard.The next elections to the European Parliament are officially scheduled for May 23-26, 2019.

EU border control

Enhancing the EU’s Frontex Border Agency ‘Won’t Be Possible’ – Journalist

© AFP 2018 / Carsten Rehder


Get short URL

The EU is looking to secure migration agreements with northern African nations in an attempt to re-use the strategy it developed with Turkey, according to German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Following an EU summit in Salzburg, Merkel said that the EU-Turkey arrangement could serve as a model for working with North Africa.

Sputnik discussed the feasibility of this as a deal with North African states with Paolo Salom, a political observer with the Italian daily newspaper Corriere della Sera.

Sputnik: How workable is the EU-Turkey-like arrangement as a model for a deal with North African states to stem migration?Paolo Salom: Model is a good word, you can have anything you like as a model but when you turn to practical objectives, can we say that a senior arrangement could be used? We have to consider that Turkey is a different country from the North African states in the sense that Turkey has a different history, a different culture and society, and a strong government, a very old story of  good government, it was an Empire for centuries, while the North African states now cannot be seen as stable. Just look at Libya, how it’s turning into a chaotic, anarchic state, so can we do the same in North Africa? I doubt it, but it’s okay to try, but we have to be realistic and considered the situation on the ground.

Sputnik: What’s your thoughts then regarding how likely Brussels is to secure a deal like this from North African nations? What could be expected from the meeting between Donald Tusk and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi?

Paolo Salom: Egypt is probably the only hard state, along with Morocco. A state where the authority of the President is, as we know, without criticism. So yes, it could be reached, a deal with Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, but then we have to consider the overall relations between Europe and other countries. Europe always has set forth a paradigm in which democracy and respect for human rights are paramount when dealing with relations between the two parties. You cannot keep on criticizing a country like Egypt because of the lack of freedom and political rights and human rights, and all those opposition members sent to prison without a fair trial, and then say ‘okay we struck a deal and things are going to be good’. I think it’s a very complicated situation and Europe can, of course, strike a deal but then it has to consider how it will be asked about not criticizing again this regime or other regimes, so it’s a very sharp, pointed issue.

Sputnik: Brussels is also pushing for the enhancement of the EU border agency, which is called Frontex, to which a number of nations most hit by illegal immigration have expressed reluctance due to sovereignty concerns. What are your thoughts on this initiative? Do you agree with it?Paolo Salom: You see this is one of the paradoxes of how Europe is functioning. You have a European Union which is seen as a whole, and it’s asked to be seen as that, and to try find means to solve problems as a unique body, a whole body. But then when they enhance instruments like Frontex and want to push for enhancing to make it stronger and deal with this migration problem, well each country says ‘no, I don’t want to be pushed aside, I want to maintain my sovereignty, I want to maintain my rights to decide what to do in the areas which are under my control.’ So what’s Europe then? Is it something that’s good for everybody or isn’t it? This is the limit and I think it won’t be possible to enhance an agency like this that will, of course, erode the rights of control of each country involved. So the paradox is: we used to say the King is naked, then you see when this happens, the King has no clothes on, so you can see the reality of it and everybody outside of Europe can see it.


The views expressed in this article are those of the speaker, and do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.

UK Jews Attack May Government for backing Hungary in EU Parliament Vote


The Board of Deputies of British Jews, a Conservative Jewish House of Lords member, Jewish academics, and the Jewish Chronicle (“the world’s oldest and most influential Jewish newspaper”) have all joined forced to attack Britain’s Conservative Party on account its support of Hungary during the recent “article 7” vote in the European Parliament.

In a statement released by the Board of Deputies of British Jews President Marie van der Zyl, that organization said that it had “noted with disappointment that Conservative Party MEPs voted in defence of Hungary’s far-right government of Viktor Orban.

“As we have stated previously, we are very alarmed by the messages at the heart of Orban’s election campaign, including his comments about ‘Muslim invaders’, calling migrants ‘poison’, and the vivid antisemitism in the relentless campaign against Jewish philanthropist George Soros,” Van der Zyl said.

“This whipping up of prejudice by the Hungarian government–alongside restrictions on press freedom and the independence of the judiciary–must be stopped before it undermines Hungary’s democracy irreversibly.

“It is very concerning that the Conservative Party MEPs chose to defend Hungary’s appalling track record, rather than supporting this motion to protect the rule of law.”

The Jerusalem-based Times of Israel commented that the statement was a “rare rebuke to Prime Minister Theresa May’s party, which has built a strong track record of support for the Jewish community in Britain and tackling anti-Semitism.”

The Conservatives were the only governing center-right party in Western Europe to oppose triggering the European Union’s most serious disciplinary action against a member state. In the September 12 vote, 448 MEPs backed the motion, which condemned Hungary’s government as a “systematic threat” to democracy and the rule of law.

The BBC reported that Daniel Finkelstein, “a prominent Jewish Conservative member of the House of Lords and columnist for The Times newspaper,” joined the criticism, saying the vote against censuring Orbán was “a really distressing thing to have happened, and shameful.”

“Lord” Finkelstein called on his colleagues “to rethink their decision, which he said was hypocritical.”

In an editorial, the Jewish Chronicle said that the “decision last week by Conservative MEPs to ally with some of the most unsavoury groups in the European Parliament in backing Viktor Orbán, the Hungarian Prime Minister, was truly shameful and a dark day for the party led by Mrs May.

“Mr Orbán has, repeatedly, used blatant and obvious antisemitic language. Much of his recent election campaign was based on attacks on Jewish Hungarian philanthropist George Soros, in language that was designed to highlight his Judaism and, as such, paint him as the enemy of Hungary.

“This is real antisemitism, in mainland Europe, used as a policy by an EU member.

“The MEPs’ vote was bad enough. But the subsequent refusal of a series of high-profile Conservatives to condemn the vote was, if anything, even worse.”

David Hirsh, senior lecturer in sociology at Goldsmiths, University of London, told the Jewish Chronicle in another article that “The idea that Britain would now cozy up to an anti-Semitic and racist strongman regime… is shameful.”

The Jewish attack upon Hungary and the British government is of course just another example of rampant hypocrisy, which has come to characterize the Jewish lobby all over the Western World.

In the Jews’ own country, Israel, Soros is equally hated by the government for the Soros Foundation’s support of numerous Palestinian organizations, and the government of Benjamin Netanyahu has also cracked down upon the Soros Foundation’s operations.

In addition, the Hungarian government has excellent relations with the Israeli government, with Prime Minister Viktor Orban announcing during an official visit to Jerusalem in July this year that “he has the same views as the Prime Minister of Israel with regard to several 21st-century issues, including security, combatting terrorism, the defence of borders and the problem of modern-day anti-Semitism.”

According to an official press statement released jointly with Netanyahu, Orbán “stressed that they agree that the most important issue is security: every nation has the right to its own security, which it is duty-bound to provide to its citizens. He said today Europe is afflicted by migration and terrorism, against which action must be taken.”

Orban also said that “Hungary will always take action to ensure that international organizations treat Israel in a fair, balanced and unbiased manner,” and that “in the future Hungary will also continue to closely cooperate with Israel in international forums.”

He added that “economic cooperation between the two countries is strong, with two hundred Israeli businesses operating in Hungary, providing jobs for five thousand people – primarily in the field of modern technology.”

Finally, Orban said, the “outstanding bilateral relations between the two countries are due in part to the personal cooperation between the two prime ministers, and the fact that both countries are led by patriotic prime ministers.”

There is therefore no justification for the Jewish lobby in western nations to claim that the Hungarian government is “anti-Semitic” in any way whatsoever.

The Jewish lobby’s hysterical attacks upon Hungary are therefore completely without foundation, and are an obvious and easily disproven lie. There is no evidence at all that the Hungarian government is “anti-Semitic” in any way whatsoever.

Why then the attacks upon Hungary?

This is a question which can only be explained with an understanding of the psychology underpinning the Jewish lobby, which is made up of a combination of extreme schizophrenia, self-serving interest, and an implacable hatred of any form of European nationalism.

Egypt: Israelites moved to a Land called Canaan – Why didn’t God have his son born in Rome?

Why didn’t God have his son born in Rome?

By  Dr. Ashraf Ezzat

“Why was Jesus born in a semi-Arabian land & culture and why he had to deliver his sermons in a semi-Arabian tongue?”

By Dr. Ashraf Ezzat

Not necessarily having to be labelled Muslim, I was raised in a land/region with a Muslim Majority population, namely Egypt. Once again, not necessarily having to be branded as Christian, Egypt has one of the most ancient Christian communities whose members are called Copts and their ancient Church the Coptic Orthodox Church.

Although Christianity had practically first appeared in the East (the ancient Levant) in places like Palestine, Syria and of course Egypt. But the truth of the matter is that if we, right now, want to geographically categorize world religions we will have to concede to the following fact; the East is predominantly Muslim, the Far East Buddhist and Hindu while the West is predominantly Christian.

But I have a nagging problem with this geographical distribution, for Jesus Christ was said to have been born in Palestine (a genuine part of the East or what used to be called, and till this day, The Levant)


Once again, not necessarily having to be classified as atheist, why help politicize religion and turn spiritual affairs into drones carrying so called smart missiles?
After all it was the Roman Empire and church that controlled and canonized the literature of the then newly–fledged Christianity. Hence, Rome, as a birthplace for Jesus, would not only have been more convenient, but also would have saved the world many past and future religious wars/crusades. Not to mention the eagerly awaited mother of all battles, the so-called Armageddon.

Why did Jesus – as the story goes – have to be born in Palestine, a part of the Levant, or in other words the heart of the Ancient Near East? It is so enigmatic, for this is a land with an indigenous culture that runs contrary, if not hostile, to the western/Roman culture and more importantly its concept of Jesus. And do I mean by that that people of the Ancient Near East had another, oriental if you like, concept of Jesus? Yes I do.

In the eastern concept/story, Jesus is called Eas’sa the son of Mar’iam. It is a far older story than that of the Roman version of ‘Jesus”. In short it is one of Ancient Arabia’s religious cults and folk stories (topic of a future essay)

Some will argue that the biblical Lord might have had a sort of long run plan to turn the whole world into accepting Jesus as the Son of God and their savior, no matter where he was born. Even if Jesus’ birthplace was in the heart of a genuinely Eastern land that was indeed influenced by ancient Arabian culture and traditions.

Others will argue that when Jesus was born, Palestine was already part of the Roman Empire. Well, I’m quite familiar with this fact, but being occupied by the Romans doesn’t make the people of Palestine, with their genuine eastern culture/traditions more Roman than the British occupation made India (the land of Buddhism and Hinduism) British.

Let’s admit it, the story of Jesus took place on an Eastern land whose Eastern people spoke Aramaic (a mere dialect of the Arabic tongue).

But then, and after few decades the Bibles of the new Christian faith began to pop up not in Palestine, as one would have logically guessed, but the Bibles had appeared in the Western side of the Roman Empire.


The story of the nativity is re-enacted all over the western churches/schools around the time of Christmas with people/actors dressed up in ancient Arabian garments and head covers/pieces (The keffiyeh or kufiya – the symbolic head dress of Palestinians still worn till this very moment).

Westerners, with their Roman culture, keep repeating this Christmas re-enactment (ceremonial tradition) dressed in a completely foreign clothing that is undoubtedly Arabian. But the weird thing is that nobody in the Christian west wonders why Jesus had to be born in a semi-Arabian culture and deliver his sermons in a semi-Arabian tongue.


Some, and rightly so, will bring up the Jewish connection here. They will argue that since Christianity as a theological structure is mainly based on Judaism, Jesus had to be born in the midst of the land of Yehudia/Judaism. In other words, Palestine (according to the mainstream indoctrination).

But is that a correct/valid premise, to begin with? I mean is Palestine really the land of the ancient Israelites and their stories? Did David build his so-called Kingdom and Solomon his so-called temple over the soil of Palestine? Modern Archeologists and historians are in great doubt, if not outright denial, about this hypothesis. Archeologists can’t even validate that what modern-day Jews refer to as the Western Wall is indeed historically related to Herod’s Temple.

Moreover, they can’t even confirm that the foundation of the so-called first Temple lies underneath Al-Aqsa Mosque. Still the Israelis keep on digging under the Muslim Holy shrine, unabashed and undeterred, ever since they had militarily occupied Eastern Jerusalem back in 1967. Over 50 years of their frantic digging has practically yielded zero-evidence that Palestine was indeed the historical land of the Israelites and their stories.

If that what the status quo is, then we are back to the Jewish connection once again. But this time not only are we examining its relation to the geography of Palestine, but to Jesus himself, whom the Jews – quite frankly- till this very moment don’t see/ recognize him as their “Messiah”.

If archeologically and historically Palestine cannot be validated as the land of the Ancient Israelites and their first Temple, and the world Jews don’t accept Jesus as their Messiah, then why was Jesus said to have been born there?


Maybe that explains why Paul, the man who invented (Roman) Christianity, turned his back on Palestine and Arabia and headed to the west and north. Paul did not proselytize in Arabia, which deep in its desert and valleys he had spent three awakening years. And no Arabia in this ancient context doesn’t by any means include the Sinai Peninsula (where Moses is allegedly said to have had his little chat with the God of the Israelites)

Having finished his mysterious sojourn in Arabia, Paul embarked on his mission of spreading the news about a new prophet, a Messiah with a (tailored) message that could very well suit the culture and political agenda of the ancient western world.

Paul, after “burying the dead” of his former theology, began preaching to westerners the story of the Arabian Eas’sa – but with a very, very clever Roman twist.

For more read Dr. Ashraf Ezzat’s book “Egypt Knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites

The Clash of Civilizations for Dummies: Judea’s War Between Christianity and Islam.

clash of cvilization

By Sabba, 16NOV17

INTRODUCTION – In this day and age where the Jews DO control the media and thus maintain 110% control of the discourse, most people have heard the phrase of “clash of civilizations”, a paradigm whereby the world of Islam has always been on the offensive against the Christian world, and many have endorsed it as the only key to understanding history.

It is widely accepted that this concept was born in the mind of the Israeli ‘historian’ Bernard Lewis and then popularized by Samuel Huntington. Given that all discourse these days where ‘Islamic’ issues are discussed, only do so accompanied by extended and completely erroneous statements about Islam, we are forced by those same rules therefore to highlight the jewishness of Bernard Lewis from the start because as a Jew, he sees everything with/through his own Torah lenses which teach one thing and one thing only: how to “utterly destroy everything that breathes” as a fulfillment of the messianic dream described many times within Jewish ‘sacred’ texts.

But contrary to the widely accepted view, this concept did not originate with Bernard Lewis and Samuel Hutington.

The idea featuring a Christian West fighting the Islamic East is all over rabbinical eschatological texts. It is not called ‘clash of civilizations’ per se but is described as the inevitable and apocalyptic fight that will take place in the end times between Edom (Christendom) and Ishmael (Islamic world) whereby each will annihilate the other, leaving Jacob-Israel as the sole survivor. As such, Lewis and Huntington have merely ‘secularized’ a very old Jewish and Torah-based view of the world and gave the Western Gentiles tailor-made Judaic lenses through which to understand our history and actively and willingly take part in what Judaism hopes will be the annihilation of both religions and cultures.

There are many main angles to approach this topic but in this part, we shall argue that in order to understand the Jewish engineered clash of civilizations, one needs to understand Judaism, what it really is, how it works and how it relates to Christianity and Islam from a geopolitical point of view.


judaism jews synagogue satan

Civilization is defined as the process by which a society reaches an advanced stage of social development, cooperation, and organization. In this manner, one cannot understand civilization without first factoring into it the issue of religion. All civilizations that have emerged on Earth from the beginning of human history have had a spiritual foundation, regardless of what that religion is or was. And all the world’s greatest religions, whether pagan or monotheistic, have led to a civilizing process and to progress.

All of them except for Judaism.

Unlike any other religion, Judaism has been at war against Mankind since it first emerged on the historical scene because, unlike any other religion, Judaism defines itself only in opposition to ‘the other’, whether other people and/or other systems of belief. It can not exist in a vacuum without a nemesis ‘to utterly destroy’.

Unlike any other religion, Judaism does NOT require belief in God and does not believe in Life after Death. It only requires obeisance to ‘the Law’ as laid out within the pages of both the Torah, and its exegesis, the Talmud, as well as allegiance to the Tribe. And although there is no immortality after death for the individual Jew however, the manner by which this is reconciled is by making the Jewish people itself immortal through tradition, the law, and allegiance to Jews as a group.

For the individual Jews, this life is all there is. There is no Judgement Day, no retribution for one’s evil deeds. This is perhaps the Jews’ greatest strength because they are free from the same moral constraints and guilt found within Christianity and Islam which allows them to empty an automatic rifle into the body of a Palestinian infant and go to bed afterwards and sleep like a baby.

But it is also their greatest weakness because their love of this world has carved into their individual and collective psyche an irrational and hyper-intensified fear of death, and it is this fear of death that has made them the world’s greatest cowards and deceivers.

Their disbelief in life after death is quite unique among the ancient religions in the midst of which Judaism emerged.

Ancient pagan religions all believed in an after life, though this was not granted to everyone but only to the most worthy, those who strove for it and deserved it. Rejoining the Gods, to be reunited with them was considered as the greatest reward of all. For the ancient pagan religions, life after death meant achieving immortality, earning Eternity and this is what is meant when we read that some historical characters became ‘gods’. For example, when Julius Caesar was deified, it never meant to the Romans that he became the equal to Jupiter. It only meant he had now become immortal, he was now floating in Eternity, in close vicinity of the ‘real Gods’.

But the Jews never reached any intellectual, spiritual and transcendental sophistication to understand what all other pagan religions understood instinctively and so the Jews rejected the idea of life after death and made the belief in God optional. Their goal is not to be reunited with their ‘God’ after death, their goal is to ‘utterly destroy everything that breathes’ in order to become the masters of this world and its riches.

It is also unique among monotheistic religions to have a ‘religion’ which does not require belief in God. While it is an oxymoron to be an atheist Christian or an atheist Muslim, it is 666% kosher in Judaism. This explains why it is so common to hear about ‘atheist’ or ‘secular’ Jews. For them, these are not contradictory terms at all. This explains why most of the materialist theoreticians were Jews, this is how a Moses Hesse could be a rabbi and a communist, this explains a Karl Marx-Mordechai Levy etc. An atheist Jew is still a Jew whose allegiance is to the Tribe, whether he follows the Law or not and the tribe will always consider him as part of them. And this explains why so many of us are fooled by Judaism because we apply to it our Christian/Islamic understanding of Religion.

Lastly, unlike any other religion, Judaism is always a religion in the making. The verses of the Torah are constantly re-examined, re-interpreted in the light of current events, for one purpose and one purpose only: identify who they must “utterly destroy” to achieve their messianic dreams of world domination.



One event or rather one man forced Judaism to come out of its closet: Jesus, the Son of Man, the Son of the Blessed Virgin Mary (PBUT both). Jesus forced Judaism to reveal itself for what it is: not a religion but a materialistic and satanic ‘philosophy’ which made God completely irrelevant and which was built only on the concepts of choseness and blind obeisance to the Law, in exchange of which they would be rewarded with all the world and its riches.

With the advent of Christianity, Judaism has taken a new shape and has since developed itself exclusively against the Son of Man (Adam?), his name, his legacy and anyone who accepts him as the Christ. With the advent of Christianity, the Torah had to be re-interpreted and a new strategy to achieve their messianic goals was formulated.

Esau is Edom is Christianity is Rome is Europe is the ‘West’ and Christendom has been upgraded to number one enemy to ‘utterly destroy’..

The gloomy fate of Edom which is described in the Book of Obadiah must now be applied to the Christian world in general and the ROMAN Catholic world in particular: “And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the Lord hath spoken it.”

The Book of Daniel has also been re-examined under the Christian Light and the Fourth Beast of Daniel has now become Rome and her daughter, ROMAN Catholic Europe.



But in the VIIth century AD, the rabbis had to revise their plans once again because a new comer emerged in Arabia – Islam. This new comer violently rejects the concept of Choseness, confirms Jesus as the Messiah and has elevated the Blessed Virgin Mary into the most exalted place and hailed her as the greatest of all women for all Eternity.

For this reason, Islam has been labelled as yet another enemy ‘to utterly destroy’. The Torah has been re-interpreted to include and adjust to the new geopolitical context and this is how Islam has now become Ishmael.

But Islam, like her older sister Christianity, has given rise to a strong and extremely rich civilization which can not be easily destroyed. The rabbis understood very early on that they would never be able to take on these 2 powerful civilizing religions and, Judaism being a work in constant ‘progress’, the rabbis concocted a new strategy that would ensure the simultaneous destruction of both – welcome to the clash of Civilizations as detailed in the Zohar:

“And in the future, the children of Ishmael are destined to rule over the Holy Land for a long time when it is empty from anything, like their circumcision which is empty and imperfect (…) The children of Ishmael [i.e. the Muslims] will cause great wars in the world and the children of Edom will gather against them and wage war against them, one on the sea, one on the dry land, and one near Jerusalem. And they [the children of Edom] will rule over them[the children of Ishmael], but the Holy Land will not be given over to the children of Edom.[The children of Edom is the Christian West, for Edom is Rome (see Num. 24:19, Rashi) and Rome signifies Greece-Rome and the Roman Catholic Church, the foundations of Western Civilization]. At that time, a nation from the end of the earth will be aroused against evil Rome and wage war against it for three months. Nations will gather there, and [Rome] will fall into their hands (…) There will not remain any power of any people on earth, except the power of Israel alone. This is the meaning of “G-d is your shade upon your right hand”. (Psalms 121:5)”



Until the XIIIth century, the accepted judaic belief was that one day their Moshiach (our anti-Christ) would emerge in Rome, go to the Vatican, subdue the Pope, abolish Christianity, bring back all the Jews to Palestine and establish the Fifth Kingdom.

The XIIIth century saw a drastic change of plan on the part of the Jewish rabbinate. The very influential kabbalistic rabbi Nahmanides understood that they will never be able to achieve that goal alone, Moshiach or not; he understood that the Jews had to change their strategy and decided to involve Christian Europe: 

Edom/Rome/Christian Europe expelled them from the Holy Land. 

Edom/Rome/Christian Europe had to bring them back.

But medieval Europe was ROMAN Catholic, it was 666% anti-Jewish. How to change the European elites’ mindset and get them to become jew-friendly, and willing beast of burden for the Jews? Unable to do so ‘in the open’, they did by way of deception. As always.

The target back then as it is still now, according to Martin van Creveld, was Italy-Rome because this is where their Moshiach will appear. It started with the Jewish Kabbalah: they spread its teachings to Italy under the pretext that it proved the Trinity and the Divinity of Jesus. The first Gentile to incorporate Jewish Kabbalah into his writings was Pico Della Mirandola. But the Kabbalah failed to take root in Italy or in any Latin country for that matter.

It then moved to the Germanic states and took them by storm. The Reformation came afterwards as the natural consequence of Kabbalah poisoning, with tragic and devastating effects for Christian Europe, the consequences which are only now in full view.

Half of Christian Europe having now succumbed to the siren’s songs of Judaism through the deception of the Reformation, the ‘clash of civilizations’ could now be officially launched and the idea popularized.

It is in the XVIth century that it was ‘secularized’ for the first time and made available to the wider Jewish audience by Joseph Ben Joshua Cohen.

According to Heinrich Grätz, Joseph Cohen “began to search for chronicles in order to write a sort of universal history in the form of annals. He began with the period of the decline of the Roman empire and the formation of the modern states, and represented the course of the world’s history as a struggle between Asia and Europe, between the Crescent and the Cross; the former represented by the then powerful dominion of Turkey; the latter, by France, which had set up Charlemagne, the first emperor of a Christian realm. He connected the whole of European history with these two groups of nations. He included all the events and wars of Christendom, and of the Mahometan countries in ” The Annals of the Kings of France and of the House of Othman,” the title of his historical work.”

Cohen has popularized what was until then known only to the Jewish rabbinical circles and the Jewish elites. Lewis and Hutington have done nothing more than update what Joseph Cohen had written in the XVIth century and adapt it to our modern world

[NOTE – We must pause here and reflect and ask: why, out of all European nations, has Jewish Kabbalah taken the Germanic states by storm? What have they seen in it which all Latin countries failed to see? Or what is it that prevented them to see it and the Reformation for what it was-Jewish onslaught on Christianity – and made them fall into this Jewish trap? Why have the Germanic nations been seduced by the Jewish concept of ‘Choseness – Election’? What have they found in the Torah which ensnared them to the point that they have made it their most important holy book and made them turn their backs on the teachings of Christ? I will leave the reader to answer these questions.]



The fallacy of the theory of the clash of civilizations is that it reads the history of the Muslim world under the light of the Quran, thus inferring that all that comes from there is religion based. It tells us that the world of Islam, by its very religion, is in a state of permanent war against Christendom.

Not only is it fallacious but it is an extremely dishonest historical approach because it would be like analyzing the bloody wars of Charlemagne or the countless wars of the Byzantine Empire before Islam under the light of the New Testament.

But the New Testament is never used to explain the wars of the Christian world, the Torah is never used to explain the 5000 years old Wars of the Jews against Mankind and yet, we are supposed to only understand the wars of the Islamic world through the Quran.

It is all the more baffling that the Old Testament is filled with orders to genocide while there is not one single Quranic verse which calls for an offensive war, let alone a pre-emptive war. Not a single one.

Dying for God is a common trait to all 3 monotheistic religions. However killing for God is entirely Jewish and was passed on to the Christian world through the Old Testament. 

It might come as a surprise to many but the idea of a holy war of aggression for God is Christian, borrowed from Judaism and was developed as early as the IVth century by St Augustine. Until the Crusades, we do not find any Islamic literature advocating a religious war of aggression. The concept of Jihad is something else entirely. With the Crusades and as reaction to them, the very Christian theory of Holy War of aggression for God had been conceptualized and the Muslims incorporated it and mixed it up with the pre-existent concept of Jihad.

It might also come as a surprise to most if not all Western readers, but the term ‘Infidels’ is a Christian terminology found all over European Medieval literature for the Muslims. The Muslims have never ever called the Christians ‘Infidels’, never. It was always the other way round.

The Arabic word Kafir which is always translated as ‘Infidels’ has quite a different meaning. Its primary signification is ‘ungrateful’, ungratefulness to God and not disbelief in God. Satan for example is called a ‘Kafir’, not because he disbelieved in God, but because he disobeyed his Creator. The Children of Adam (mankind) are sometimes called ‘Kafir’ whenever they show their ungratefulness to their Creator. The one thing it does not mean is Christians or Jews. On the other hand, when the Christians used and abused it, it was always in reference to the Muslims, never to those whom Christ himself identified as the Synagogue of Satan.

Lastly, it might also come as a surprise to many but until the world of academia had been taken over by the Jews, no Western Christian Historian ever explained the Islamic expansion or the wars the Muslims waged in the light of the Quran. More often than not, it was Genesis 17:20 which was used to explain the Islamic expansion, never the Quran.

The methodology to analyse the world of Islam by using and misquoting the Quran is entirely new, it is 666% kosher certified and has a 666% Jewish messianic agenda behind it and the West is falling for it, again despite Medieval History being littered with examples proving the exact opposite.


Image result for the iv crusade


We shall give here only a few examples to argue our point:

1) The Ashtiname of Muhammad, whereby Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) promises excommunication and eternal damnation to any Muslim who who attacks any Christian and their property.

2) The alliance between Charlemagne and Harun al Rashid. Charlemagne needed an ally in the Levant against the Roman Empire – Byzantium. Harun al Rashid needed an ally in Europe against the newly formed state of Al Andalus in Spain.

3) Pope Gregory VII, one of the most influential pope we ever had, sent a letter to Al Nasir ibn Alennas where he states: “We and you in a special way, more than all pagans among them, we owe this reciprocal charity to one another because we believe and recognize, although in different modes, the only God and praise and venerate Him every day, as Creator of the centuries and Governor of this world”

4) There are countless examples in the history of the Crusader States (not to be confused with the Crusades themselves) where we have one crusader state in alliance with a Muslim principality against another crusader state which had allied itself with another Muslim principality.

The history of the Crusader States provides many examples of the Christlamic mutual and virile respect for one another when they are in close vicinity of each other. All witness accounts of the Second and Third Crusades describe the horror felt by the new Crusaders freshly coming from Europe at the friendly relations the Crusader States had with their Muslim neighbours. And William of Tyre explains to us that it was the new comers who always spoilt it for the Latins of the Levant and who destroyed the equilibrium that had been built.

5) Before, during and after the Crusades, the Byzantine emperors saw the European Christians as their greatest enemies, not the Muslims. And indeed, what the Crusaders did to Constantinople during the IVth Crusade (1204), their level of barbarity against their Christian Brethren had never been seen before and remained unmatched, not even the Ottomans could to surpass it when they took Constantinople in 1453.

It is the European Christian Crusaders who are the real destroyers of Byzantium, not the Ottomans. They weakened it to the point that it could never recover and regain its past glory. In the XIIth century, Constantinople was the greatest city of Christendom with at least 1 million inhabitant. By the end of of the IVth Crusade, its population fell to 400 000 people and by 1453, it did not have more than 50000 inhabitants.

All historians agree that it was the IVth Crusaders who paved the way for the Ottomans: 1453 could have never happened had 1204 not taken place and one might even argue that by 1453, when the Byzantines were triangulated, they deliberately chose to surrender to the Muslims rather than the Europeans whom they saw, and rightly so, as betrayers.

NOTE – Until the XIITh century, the Byzantines consistently refused to lower themselves into marrying European princes and princesses, deemed to low and beneath their Roman dignity. On the other hands, there has been many examples of a Byzantine Princess marrying a Muslim Prince.


Image result for joseph nasi and suleiman


Following the Alhambra Decree of 1492, the Jews started wandering again. Their main destinations were the United Provinces (modern day Netherlands), Morocco, Venice, Rome and the Ottoman Empire. Most of the Jews who had fled to Venice and Rome were soon expelled, yet again, and these then found a safe heaven in Ottoman Empire.

During the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent, the Jews reached an unprecedented level of power, power which they never relinquished and which lead to a man named Atatürk.

According to Heinrich Grätz and Cecil Roth, it was under his rule that the Jews took over and dictated ALL of the Ottoman foreign policy to the point that a man like Joseph Nasi was considered the real ruler of the Ottoman empire.

The Jews ‘foreign policy’ can be summed up with one word: REVENGE against Christian Europe. The conquest of Cyprus, Rhodes, the siege of Vienna, the battle of Lepanto, all the wars against Venice, all the wars against the Habsburgs, were ALL decided by the Jewish advisers to the Ottoman sultans, who used the Ottomans as their attack dog the same the Jews are now using the USA as their attack dog.

Joseph Nasi is credited by Jewish historians as the man responsible for the ‘independence’ of the United Provinces from Catholic Habsburg Spain and for making Amsterdam, the ‘Jerusalem of the North’.

In fact, the power and influence Joseph Nasi had over Suleiman and his son Selim II were so great that Suleiman agreed to allow the very first Jewish immigration back to Palestine (Safed). For the first time since 135AD, the Jews were allowed to return to the Holy Land and settle there. But they did not. Why haven’t they seized the opportunity and repopulated Palestine en masse and even created the embryo of a Jewish State?

The reason is that it did not fit the agenda which must see Christendom ‘utterly destroyed’. Indeed, the only thing that kept the Jews alive as a group for the past 2000 years was not merely a vague dream of returning to the Holy Land some day but rather an insatiable hatred and an unquenchable desire of vengeance against Christ and his followers.

It was not Ishmael/the Muslims who kicked them and destroyed their temple: it was Edom-Rome-the Christians and only they had to undo what Titus and Hadrian had done. They expelled them and banned them form ever returning, only they had to bring them back and establish Eretz Israel for them, paying with their money and the blood of their children.

NOTE – It is interesting to note here that Suleiman is called the Magnificent in the West whereas he is known in the East as ‘Kanuni’, ‘the Law Giver’. We might wonder why the West who has suffered so much under his reign calls him ‘Magnificent’ when his own people do not see anything magnificent about him…


jesus money lender banker

The Middle East, where Islam and Christianity have been living side by side for over 1400 years, never witnessed such clash of civilizations, as defined by the Rabbis and popularized by Lewis and Hutington. Indeed, the Middle East is Christlamic at its core: its branches might be Islamic but its roots are entirely Christian.

We saw earlier that during the short time where the Latins had established Crusader States in the Levant, a cordial and respectful entente was soon established between Christians and Muslims. The colonial period never saw the rise of ‘radical’ Islam against the colonial powers and the subsequent independence movements of the XXth were all nationalists in nature, not Religion-based. Why then would the world of Islam all of a sudden decide to destroy Christendom?

Islam, as a religion, has never been on the offensive against Christ, his Blessed Mother, his followers, his legacy. Judaism has. In terms of values, ethos and way of life, Islam has never clashed with Christianity. Judaism does. However Islam does clash with Western values. And so does Christianity.

The ‘West’ is a geopolitical construct while Christian Europe is a historical reality and, in terms of values, ethos and way of life, the West and Christianity are antithetical.

The ‘West’, as a civilization, emerged on the ashes of ROMAN Catholic Europe and it was not Islam which destroyed it: it was the Reformation. Western civilization was born when the Judeo-Protestant nations became the leading nations in Europe and, with Britain at the fore-front, the leading nations in the world.

Western/Judeo-Protestant civilization is built on Torah ‘values’, the most important ones being Choseness/Election and usury and as such, Western civilization has in fact declared war against Christ, his message, his legacy. Protestantism is the new declaration of war against Christ and here lies the real goal of the clash of civilization: Jesus himself.


jews judaism anti semitism

Judaism is a declaration of war against Mankind in general and the followers of Christ in particular. Judaism is the most corrosive and destructive force in the world, something all Jews know and boast about:

“The thing that makes Judaism dangerous to everybody, to every race, to every nation, to every idea is that we smash things that aren’t true. We don’t believe in the boundaries of nation-state.
We don’t believe in the ideas of these individual gods that protect individual groups of people. These are all artificial constructions and Judaism really teaches us how to see that.
In a sense our detractors have us right, in that we are a corrosive force. We’re breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people because they’re not real. And that’s very upsetting to people.” Dr. Douglas Rushkoff

Just as Judaism exist only in opposition to other systems of beliefs, likewise the Jews exist only in opposition to the Civilized Man.

The Jews have never built anything, have never contributed anything into the civilizing process of Humanity. They count for nothing and would have never made it into any History book had it not been for their systematic efforts of destruction of everything that is holy, wholesome and pure. They only exist in opposition to Civilization, their raison d’être is to destroy and corrupt everything God has created and destroy every Civilizations the Children of Adam have built.

“We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. NOTHING that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy, because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build.” –“You Gentiles” Maurice Samuel

Civilizations do not clash, they cooperate, they engage in trade, they borrow from each other, the develop and flourish alongside each other, they live in mutual and virile respect of one another, as we witnessed within the Crusader States (again, not to be confused with the Crusades).

It is only the nomadic, parasitic elements who, unable to reach the same level of sophistication as the Civilized Man and who thus suffer from an incurable complex of inferiority, aim at the destruction of Civilizations to bring everyone else to their level. Wandering roots always create weeds within civilized lands.

Judaism and Judaism alone – not Islam – has made it very clear that it is at war against Christ and, by extension, anyone who believes in him and, while it should be clear to all true Christians and Muslims that their only salvation is to unite under the banner of Christ against their common enemy, it baffles the mind to see the Christian West almost looking forward to go to battle against the only other group of people who believes in the Messiahship of Jesus.

Judaism and anyone who accepts it, regardless of their DNA, has declared the Christians and the Muslims enemy because of Christ. It is time we reciprocate and declare Judaism, the Old Testament and anyone who follows it, as our enemy, in the name of Christ.



With the advent of Christianity, Judaism had redefined itself and its goals in opposition to Christ. Not only must they now achieve world domination, but that world domination can not be attained unless and until Christianity/Europe/Rome is destroyed, erased from the face of the earth which they hope will happen by pitting the only civilizing religions which recognize Jesus as the Messiah against one another.

Can it be averted? And if so, how?

The Christians must finally realize that the Jews are not their ‘friends’, never were and never will be. The Christians must finally realize that their only friends and allies are the Muslims. The Christians must finally realize that, while the Jews believe that Christ is a bastard, the Muslims not only believe that he is a Prophet of God but a unique type of Prophet: he is the Messiah, the only Messiah, who came and who will come back at the end of History to rule the world. The Christians must finally realize that what is discussed is a geopolitical alliance and not any kind of syncretism.

Russia and China are strong allies and that does not mean that the Chinese must now adopt Orthodox Christianity. Russia and Iran are allies and that does not mean that the Iranians must now all convert to Orthodox Christianity. Likewise, when a Crescent and Cross or a Christlamic geopolitical alliance is suggested, that does not mean anyone giving up his/her religion. The Muslims understand it; the Orthodox Christians understand it but for some strange reason, the Christian West can not.

The first step to avoid this diabolical Jewish trap is to get the Muslims and the Christians to unite under the Banner of Christ and to finally reject the Jewish Old Testament.

The Christians and the Muslims must give up their arrogance and pedantic claims that they understand the Torah better than the Jews themselves. How we understand it is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is how they understand it and live by it. And for anyone who still fails to understand what it means to live by the Torah, let them look at the Bolshevik Revolution and Palestine. This is the Torah put into practice. This is what Judaism is about.

The Jews commit all the evil which their Torah, not Herzl’s Judenstaat, orders them to do and it is the useful idiots from the Chritlamic world who always come to the rescue and defend their satanic scriptures. 

While we can somehow understand the Christian stance on this (because they made the monstrous mistake to include the Old Testament into their own Holy Scriptures), it is a mystery for me to see the Muslims do the same, despite what the Quran says about them.

All Muslims know that the Jews have re-written their Torah and have thus stop being the Children of Israel and became the Synagogue of Satan. And yet, they still fail to recognize that the Judaism followed by the Jews is NOT the Judaism talked about in the Quran.

Christians and Muslims must understand and accept that the Jews do not want ‘your’ Judaism: they only want the Judaism that was written by the lying pens of scribes in the tongue of their father the devil; they want the Judaism that teaches that it is perfectly kosher to defile, insult, blaspheme and kill the Prophets of God (PBUT all), they want the Judaism that says it is perfectly halal to rape children and kill all non-Jews.

The Muslims claim they love all the Prophets of God, that they believe in all of them and make no difference between any of them. We have seen their outburst of indignation and anger when Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is being blasphemed against. Where is their indignation and anger against Judaism itself which has made all the Prophets whom they claim they love, into the vilest and most disgusting creatures that have walked the earth?

Judaism is THE problem and it has to go and it will go. The Holy Quran tells us so in the most unequivocal manner: when Jesus come back, all the Jews will have to believe in him as the Messiah. In other words, when Jesus comes back, Judaism will be vanquished, Judaism will no longer be, Judaism will disappear from the face of the earth.

The Messiahship of Christ and the sinfulness of the Prophets should be more than enough reason for the Muslims and Christians to unite and jointly de-legitimize the Jewish Torah and thus prevent this Jewish engineered clash of mutual assured destruction between Edom and Ishmael. When John and Jesus departed this world, they had left the ax at the root of the tree. It is now for us to cut off the tree at its roots and it starts with cutting off all ties with the Old Testament.

christian muslim

Saudi Arabia, most infamous sponsor of terrorism in world: Iran

Sat Sep 29, 2018 03:08PM
Saudi Arabia Foreign Minister Adel Ahmed al-Jubeir arrives to address the 73rd annual session of the UN General Assembly in New York on September 28, 2018. (Photo by AFP)
Saudi Arabia Foreign Minister Adel Ahmed al-Jubeir arrives to address the 73rd annual session of the UN General Assembly in New York on September 28, 2018. (Photo by AFP)

Iran has rejected recent unfounded and hackneyed allegations made by Saudi Foreign Minister Adel Ahmed al-Jubeir against Tehran, saying Riyadh is undoubtedly the most infamous sponsor of terrorism in the world.

“The root cause of terrorism that has engulfed the entire world, particularly the Middle East, is nowhere but Saudi Arabia and the radical thoughts and ideologies that are promoted, spread and financed by this regime,” Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman Bahram Qassemi said on Saturday.

Addressing the 73rd annual session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York on Friday, Jubeir once again repeated his anti-Iran rhetoric and claimed that Tehran was continuing its “terrorist activities and hostile behavior” and added that peace and stability in the Middle East requires “deterring Iran’s expansionist and subversive policies.”

He also said Saudi Arabia supports US President Donald Trump’s new strategy “in dealing with Iran.”

In response to Jubeir’s claims, the Iranian spokesperson said it is no surprise that the Saudi foreign minister proudly expresses his country’s support for Trump’s strategy to counter multilateralism and undermine international agreements and accords as Saudi Arabia has been among the most important supporters of a current affiliated with Trump’s thoughts in the US which, along with the Zionist lobby and the United Arab Emirates, is spending billions of dollars to promote Washington’s warmongering and its policy of destabilizing other parts of the world.

Jubeir leveled the accusations against Iran on the same day that the US hosted a meeting of top Arab diplomats in New York to push forward a plan to establish a NATO-like regional alliance to confront Iran.

The US State Department said in a statement that the participants in the meeting had all underlined “the need to confront threats from Iran directed at the region and the United States.”

Read more:


The KSA is a true shame stain for the entire Islam world. Yet it is main source of adversity in between the Muslims’ world. Nowadays the Islam sworn enemy supports it very well, just because of its oil possession. However, this trend will not last very long.
TAXCOLLECTOR2017vor 2 Stunden
Like when House of Bush set up shop in SA and Dubai. Blackwater. Al Qaeda. Maybe they’ll say it was Iran now that did the World Trade Center. Guilliani can say he was working for Iran when he disposed of the evidence.
S.a. Hasanvor 2 Stunden
The greatest terrorists were Abu Sufyan and Hinda and their progeny is the ALE Sauds Al Khalifas ALE Emrites.
RASOUL MPvor 5 Stunden
Shia Crescent> RASOUL MPvor 5 Stunden
Well as the, UK.
Majid Sleyimvor 5 Stunden
Evidences are clear for everyone to see the involvement of saud arabia in terrorism. Openly they are attending gathering of notorious cult terrorist wherever they are. They support those terrorists groups and finance them so yes indeed saud arabia is a terrorist entity for everyone to see. You can’t hide a sun with the palms of your hands! al saud terrorists must be brought to account of their crimes if UN means business and do what it suppose to do!

Neti, King Salman, nukeface

MINT PRESS Brothers in Nukes

Sat Sep 29, 2018 10:51AM
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Iran’s envoy to the UN General Assembly has rejected anti-Iran claims by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and said the Israeli leader – whose actions are reminiscent of those by Daesh and Nazi elements – has lying in his DNA. 

Farhad Mamdouhi touched on Netanyahu’s Thursday speech at the UN, saying by exhibiting some photographs of google street view, “the Israeli showman claimed that he discovered new nuclear facilities in Iran.”

“This is yet another false story. It is not surprising as lying is in his DNA,” the envoy added.

Netanyahu held up the photographs during his address to the annual General Assembly meeting, repeating a mannerism that he has for long adopted as part of his high-profile Iran-bashing.

“This is a dreadfully regressive and undemocratic regime led by a corrupt leader, who pretends to be progressive and democratic. Israeli PM’s ethno-religious fantasies are indeed very close to the other extremists namely Daesh,” Mamdouhi said.

“Israel’s absurd claim of being democratic echoes similar assertions that Nazis used to make before dragging the whole world into destruction.”

The Iranian ambassador called Israel “the warden of the world’s biggest open prison – Gaza,” and denounced the regime for its “mockery of democracy.”

Mamdouhi said Tel Aviv had a long-standing history of opportunism and struggling to deflect the public opinion from its inhumane behavior and barbarity against the Palestinians.

Israel has so far violated 300 United Nations resolutions, including those targeting weapons of mass destruction and settlement activities on the occupied territories. The United States, Israel’s closest ally, has used its veto power on 44 occasions to protect Israel.

“Instead of such fabrications,” Mamdouhi said in reference to the Israeli premier’s address, “he should stop threatening Iran with nuclear annihilation as he did recently.”

The Iranian official was referring to threats Netanyahu issued against the Islamic Republic during an address he delivered close to the regime’s nuclear facilities in the Negev desert late last month.

“Such an inflammatory statement against an NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) party constitutes a serious violation of international law and the UN Charter,” the Iranian envoy asserted.

‘Days of Israel’s immunity over’

Elsewhere in his remarks, the envoy said the Islamic Republic maintained complete awareness of Israel’s criminal measures.

“Let us be outright clear. We watch Israel’s criminal behavior whenever they do it and wherever they do it. The time that Israel hit its neighbors with impunity is past,” he stated.

Image result for herzl quotes maccabees will rise

BY GILAD ATZMON:  The Jewish God is, without doubt, a spectacular invention.

Syria a victim of wars fought in the name of oil – Austrian Foreign Minister

Syria a victim of wars fought in the name of oil – Austrian Foreign Minister
Oil is the real reason behind all conflicts in the Middle East while Syria is just the latest victim of this struggle, Austrian Foreign Minister Karin Kneissl told the UN General Assembly in a speech she started in Arabic.

The very existence of the modern Middle Eastern states have been “shaped by oil business,” Kneissl told the UNGA. A Middle East expert herself went on to explain that the borders of the states that were established following the breakdown of the Ottoman Empire were “based on pipelines.”

All the wars the region witnessed over the recent decades are just a continuation of this fight for the control over the fossil fuels that still “dominate the energy mix” in the world, the foreign minister said, adding that Syria, which has been engulfed in a bloody seven-years conflict, is “a victim of instability created by all these wars.”

This was the first time an Austrian top official made such statements at the level of the UN General Assembly.

Kneissl also surprised the gathering in New York as she started her speech in Arabic – a move she explained by her respect to the people, who fight for their lives in a region ravaged by wars. She switched to French, Spanish and English as well in the course of her statement.

She also criticized the international community and the UN in particular for losing real effectiveness behind the “flurry of meetings, which some diplomats turned into a comfortable endless game full of litanies and mantras.”

“We settle for these hackneyed arguments when we discuss Syria and Yemen. We get carried away with such words as reconstruction and stabilization while populations – children – are just trying to survive,” Kneissl said. Following these words, the foreign minister announced that Austria would like to “contribute to financing” the mine clearing operations in Syria.

Vienna is also “ready to increase its humanitarian commitment” to help the Yemeni people, Kneissl said as she called the Yemeni crisis, which is often neglected by the western media and officials, “the greatest tragedy of our time.”

In her speech, Kneissl also condemned the use of chemical and biological weapons as well as called for nuclear disarmament and urged the international community to do more to fight for the rights of women.

The foreign minister also criticized the US for its withdrawal from the Iranian nuclear deal, even though she avoided calling Washington by name. While hailing the agreement itself as a “result of multilateral action” and a “subject to independent verification system” that should be preserved, she said that “one country’s” withdrawal from its “weakens the mutual trust” and disrupts measures aimed at “confidence building.”

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shows guided missile sites in Beirut during his address of the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly, at U.N. headquarters, Thursday, Sept. 27, 2018

Iran’s Zarif Shrugs Off Netanyahu’s Secret Nuke Storage Claims as ‘Smokescreen’

© AP Photo / Richard Drew


Get short URL

This week, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu took the most global of stages at a UN gathering in New York to accuse Iran of hiding nuclear equipment and materials. Earlier this year, the US withdrew from the landmark Iran nuclear deal after Netanyahu claimed Tehran was pursuing a nuclear weapons program.

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif has lashed out at Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu over claims that Tehran has been concealing a secret atomic warehouse.

“He’s just trying to find a smokescreen,” Zarif said in an excerpt of an interview set to air on CBS’s public affairs program “Face the Nation” on Sunday.

Iran’s top diplomat went on to brand Netanyahu’s accusations as “nonsense.” “He’s been wrong about the previous [allegations] and he’s wrong about this one,” Zarif added. “The previous allegations that Netanyahu made have been investigated by the IAEA and have been rejected.”

During the UN General Assembly meeting on Thursday, Netanyahu accused Iran of storing “massive amounts” of nuclear equipment and material in a secret nuclear facility in Tehran, disguised as a rug-cleaning factory.

Zarif vehemently denied the claim and went on the offensive, alleging that Israel was the only country in the region to have a concealed nuclear weapons program.

IAEA, the United Nations atomic watchdog, confirmed in its latest report in August that Iran had complied with the requirements for uranium enrichment levels, enriched uranium stocks and other terms.

Netanyahu has been a fierce critic of Iran’s nuclear activity. He has repeatedly claimed that Tehran was pursuing nuclear weapons, sidestepping the 2015 nuclear deal that curbed its nuclear program in exchange for the removal of crippling economic sanctions. In late April, the Israeli PM presentedwhat he said were secret files obtained by Israeli intelligence that demonstrate Iran’s plans to continue working on nuclear weapons.

Following Netanyahu’s accusations, US President Donald Trump pulled the US out of the landmark 2015 agreement. Citing efforts to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, Trump claimed that the “poorly negotiated” deal allowed Iran to reach the brink of a nuclear breakout.

The US president went on to re-impose economic sanctions on Iran and on firms doing business with the country, prompting many investors to leave the local market. Trump’s move was praised by Netanyahu but drew condemnation from the remaining signatories, including the UK, France, Germany, Russia, and China.

Pompeo warns Iran against ‘attacks on US facilities’ after closing Iraq consulate

Pompeo warns Iran against 'attacks on US facilities' after closing Iraq consulate
Iran will be held responsible for any harm to Americans in Iraq caused by ‘associated militias,’ US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said, announcing the US consulate in Basra will temporarily close for safety reasons.

On Friday, Pompeo ordered a “temporary relocation” of US diplomats and the closure of the consulate in the southern Iraqi city, citing “increasing and specific threats” to their safety.

Heather Nauert


.@SecPompeo has placed U.S. Consulate Basrah on ordered departure. @USEmbBaghdad will continue to provide full consular services to for those in and around . We remain strongly committed to supporting Iraqis in the southern provinces and throughout the country.

Pompeo blamed the government of Iran, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force, and “militias facilitated by and under the control and direction of” Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani for “repeated incidents of indirect fire”and threats to the US consulate in Basra and the embassy in Baghdad over the past 24 hours.

The US will hold Iran “directly responsible” for any harm to Americans or US facilities in Iraq and elsewhere, “whether perpetrated by Iranian forces directly or by associated proxy militias,”  Pompeo said in a statement. “I have made clear that Iran should understand that the US will respond promptly and appropriately to any such attacks.”

Kylie Atwood


IRAQ/IRAN/US NEWS: Pompeo statement below says the closure of the US consulate in Basra is due to “increasing and specific threats” to US personnel & facilities in Iraq from Iran, specifically the IRGC, over the last few weeks – including in the last day.

Pompeo has had Iran on his mind all week, promoting a State Department report calling Iran an “outlaw regime” and accusing Tehran of “destructive behavior at home and abroad.” He also spoke at an event on Tuesday hosted by United Against Nuclear Iran, an advocacy group funded mainly by tycoon Sheldon Adelson.

Secretary Pompeo


’s regime violates the basic human rights of its own people. Today, there are over 800 prisoners of conscience. The regime targets journalists and restricts freedom of expression. Watch this video on the injustice of life under Iran’s outlaw regime.

The updated State Department travel advisory for Iraq now says “Do not travel… due to terrorism and armed conflict.”

Basra is located in the south of Iraq, on the Shat-al-Arab, the confluence of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers with the Persian Gulf. Local residents are overwhelmingly adherents of the Shia branch of Islam, as are most Iranians.

In the 1980s, the US-backed government of Iraq fought a long and bloody war against Iran that ended in a stalemate. Iran began to gain influence in Iraq, however, following the 2003 US invasion and overthrow of the government in Baghdad.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!

The Big Lie: “Russian Propaganda.” The Bigger Lie: “The Truth Is What We Say It Is.”

September 24, 2018

Robert David Steele’s blog

I read Oleg Shakirov’s “’Russian Propaganda’: On Social Networks, in Eastern Europe, and Soon Everywhere,”[1] It is a useful perspective but lacking in historical and multi-national context. I wrote the original book, INFORMATION OPERATIONS: All Information, All Languages, All the Time (OSS, 2008)[2] and over the course of forty years have done both sides of the “IO” world – false flag operations and covert media management operations for the CIA,[3] and full spectrum truth operations as the founder of the Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) movement.[4]


I wish to make seven points below, and hope this is helpful to those who might wish to avoid the expensive, negative, and generally not beneficial “interventionist” IO, while optimizing investments – and the return on investment – from “attentive” IO. Interventionist IO promulgates unilateralist lies and seeks to achieve a short-term gain for one party at great expense to other parties. Attentive IO seeks multi-cultural truths that radically reduce costs while creating “a prosperous world at peace, a world that works for all.”[5] Attentive IO is rooted in a “win-win” perspective and an understanding that “the truth at any cost lowers all others costs.”[6]

· Interventionist IO: false flag operations, paid media assets, agents of influence who lie to their own governments (John Bolton working for Israel, John Brennan working for Saudi Arabia, would be two American examples), funded false testimony to Congress (Kuwait Ambassador’s daughter lying about seeing Iraqis throw babies from incubators), outright blackmail (Jeffrey Epstein and pedophilia), outright bribery (Zionist billionaires funding Chuck Schumer, John McCain, Lindsey Graham among many others).

· Attentive IO: strategic communication & public diplomacy; peacekeeping intelligence & information peacekeeping; early warning & stabilization-reconstruction operations; homeland defense & civil support; national education & national research; acquisition & logistics.

Put most simply, Interventionist IO is for traitors who are not being held accountable for results who seek only to spend vast amounts of money to achieve short-term results favoring the Deep State and its Zionist underbelly (in Russia this would be new oligarchs funded by CIA’s Gold War[7] and Russian Jews of convenience with criminal tendencies), while Attentive IO is for patriotic strategic thinkers playing the long game. Put in a way most meaningful to Russia: the Chinese “grand strategy” is about demography including the export of Chinese males; and investment in infrastructure – ports, roads, and high-speed rail.[8] The Chinese now own both Israeli ports and are about to offer Israel a new port and Jewish Autonomous Zone in Manchuria.[9] Such long-term thinking is to be admired and emulated.

The strongest element of Oleg Shakirov’s article was its detailed listing with links of all the reports created by US institutions associated with the Deep State – none of them actually representing the public interest – against Russia. Tens of millions of dollars have been spent fostering the “big lie” of Russian propaganda and the related lie of Russian interference in the US election – the same people spending money to foster this lie are also spending money to conceal the reality that in the US context it is the Deep State and its Zionist underbelly that are responsible for 90% of all social media propaganda operations. It was Zionist Israel working through its undeclared agents of a foreign power, including Haim Saban on the left and Sheldon Adelson on the right, who has done more than any other power to subvert US democracy in favor of the Deep State and its Zionist “front.”

Now here are seven points for consideration by any group that desires peace and prosperity for all.

Point #1: Any discussion of Russian influence on social media that does not mention the decades of structured media influence and active censoring done by Zionist Israel – which now has an advanced “war room” to monitor all social media everywhere for any “anti-Semitic” reference – which is to say, any reference to Zionist genocide, Zionist theft, Zionist pedophilia operations, etcetera – is by definition an exercise in idiocy.[10] Propaganda – and censorship – cannot be understood without placing Zionist Israel squarely at the center of the discussion…along with China, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom.[11]

Point #2: Neither monitoring social media, nor dabbling with social media messaging, comprise election interference. The only “hack” of the US election system was carried out by Hillary Clinton when she stole thirteen primaries from Bernie Sanders.[12]

Point #3: It is now legal for the US Government (USG) to propagandize the US public (the Obama-Biden-Clinton Administration modified the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 1948 in 2012). In the aftermath of the 9/11 lies led by Bush-Cheney, it was clearly felt that some protections were needed to enable the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to carry out a series of blatant domestic false flag operations – under Obama, with an anti-gun agenda, under Trump in pursuit of the ultimate police state with mass surveillance and unlimited search & seizure at the local level.[13]

Point #4: Propaganda has never done well among the educated. The saddest aspect of the USA today is the ignorance of the public, where a third of the so-called college graduates cannot even identify the three branches of the federal government (legislative, executive, judicial), and a frightening twenty-five percent or so think that TV judges are on the Supreme Court. To really understand the weakness of the USA it is necessary to understand the weak mental faculties of the public at large as well as the complete destruction of civics education across the USA in the past quarter century.

Point #5: #GoogleGestapo – the combination of Amazon (which bans books), Facebook, Google, MeetUp, Twitter, YouTube and lesser platforms such as Reddit, Wikipedia, and – is the non-state social media ecology that was funded by the CIA to begin with, and is now in the active service of the Deep State generally and the Zionists particularly. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is the “trusted flagger” for all of these elements, and had led the way in censoring individuals, manipulating information including polls and trends, and digitally assassinating thousands of channels.[14] It is now known that special NSA software has been used and that the current pogrom against conservatives was planned years ago – we are all Palestinian now, we are all black now, if we dare challenge the Deep State and its Zionist bankers and enforcers.

Point #6: The USG will continue to be ineffective against both foreign and domestic threats as long as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), itself founded by a pedophile who accepted small boys from the mafia as gifts, is controlled by hold-overs from Bush-Cheney and Obama-Biden-Clinton. The FBI is not a serious counterintelligence agency – against traitors, against pedophiles, or against high-level bankers looting the public treasury.[15]

Point #7: There is a multi-national solution, one that our President Donald Trump would benefit from, one that would help radically increase prosperity and peace for all: a joint agreement by China, Russia, and the USA – at the Presidential level, the only level that matters right now – to create an Open Source Agency. Such an agency can share the truth about 9/11, about elite pedophilia, about trillion dollar crimes by the Deep State, in a manner that cannot be blocked by the Mainstream Media (MSM) or #GoogleGestapo. Such an agency could create a multi-national “truth channel” and a post-Western Internet that cannot be used by the Deep State and the Zionists to perpetuate lies and keep publics ignorant – the current Syrian false flag issue is an example of where RT and Sputnik are simply not good enough – we need something bigger and better, something that can educate the public on an on-going basis while countering Deep State propaganda. The deal between Alibaba of China and is a very fine start but does not go far enough or fast enough.[16]

#GoogleGestapo — Some Alternatives

Throw in CodeMail instead of the various emails easily surveilled by the NSA, and a distributed serverless cloud with no data centers,[17] and you have the beginning of a post-Western Internet.[18] Hans Morgenthau had it right: the foundation of state power is an educated public and a commitment to realism rooted in truth not lies.[19] Today that must be modified to read educated connected public able to access all information in all languages all the time. This is only possible by fully embracing Open Source Everything Engineering (OSEE), and respecting the rights of the public to anonymity, identity, privacy, and security.[20] Create an OSEE innovation centre at every university – including India, Indonesia, Iran and ideally other nations, and it is game over for the cabal – the Deep State cannot compete with a properly managed open source economy and open source society.

Truth, not lies, are the common enabler of Chinese, Russian, and US progress toward 1,000 years of peace and prosperity for all.[21]


[1] Oleg Shakirov “’Russian Propaganda’: On Social Networks, in Eastern Europe, and Soon Everywhere,” Russian International Affairs Council, 31 July 2018.

[2] Robert Steele, Information Operations: All Information, All Languages, All the Time, Open Source Solutions, Inc., 2006; a free monograph version is Robert Steele, Information Operations: Putting the “I” Back Into DIME, Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, Press, 1 February 2006. Books that expand on the attentive IO aspect include Robert Steele, The New Craft of Intelligence: Personal, Public, & Political–Citizen’s Action Handbook for Fighting Terrorism, Genocide, Disease, Toxic Bombs, & Corruption, Open Source Solutions, Inc., 2002; Robert Steele, Ben de Jong and Wies Platje (eds.) Peacekeeping Intelligence: Emerging Concepts for the Future, Open Source Solutions, Inc., 2003; Robert Steele. The Smart Nation Act: Public Intelligence in the Public Interest, Open Source Solutions, Inc., 2006; Mark Tovey with Robert Steele, eds. Collective Intelligence: Creating A Prosperous World at Peace, Earth Intelligence Network, 2008; and Robert Steele, Intelligence for Earth: Clarity, Diversity, Integrity, & Sustainability, Earth Intelligence Network, 2010.

[3] I am on record as stating that I have managed a false flag operation for the CIA, and am very concerned by the use of false flag operations against our own public. Cf. Robert Steele, “CIA and the Deep State: Mike Pompeo is Totally Wrong – and Politico Totally Worthless,” American Herald Tribune, 2 June 2018; and my three publications, Robert Steele, False Flag Attacks: A Tool of the Deep State (Amazon Kindle, 2017); and free online, Robert Steele, Memoranda for the President, Sandy Hook Truth: To Defend the 2nd Amendment We Must Expose False Flag Operations & Crush #GoogleGestapo Censorship & Fake News,” Earth Intelligence Network, Certified Delivered to the White House on 8 September 2018 and Robert Steele, Memoranda for the President, 9/11 Truth: From Campaign Promise to a Presidential Speech on 9/11 2018?, Earth Intelligence Network, Certified Delivered to the White House on 8 August 2018.

[4] As with IO, there are two forms of OSINT: Passive OSINT limits itself to the monitoring of social media and prohibits overt human intelligence networks from being developed. Active OSINT recognizes that 90% of what is known is not in English, not online, and not known to anyone that the spies talk to. The CIA has fought me on this for 30 years. The Nordics are starting to realize I have had it right all along, I could really use help from China and Russia in showing our President that he can get 100% of what he needs, instead of 4%, if he creates an Open Source Agency responsive to the White House. See especially Robert Steele, For the President of the United States of America Donald Trump: Subject: Eradicating Fake News and False Intelligence with an Open Source Agency That Also Supports Defense, Diplomacy, Development, & Commerce (D3C) Innovation to Stabilize World. Earth Intelligence Network, 2017; and Robert Steele, “Royal Danish Defence College: Lecture by Robert Steele on Open Source Intelligence Done Right,” Copenhagen, Denmark: Royal Danish Defence College, 18 April 2016. OFFICIAL VIDEO 59 Minutes; as well as Robert Steele, “Robert Steele on OSINT – Why and How,” Copenhagen, Denmark: Government of Denmark, April 18-20, 2016, as commissioned and presented to military, police, and national services. BRIEFING.

[5] Buckminster Fuller is generally recognized as the original source of this mission statement.

[6] The author, Robert David Steele, is the originator of this motto as featured on his personal home page

[7] Fred Burks, Memorandum for the President: Evidence 9/11 Used to Launder $240 Billion in Covert Securities in a Covert Economic War (Gold War) Against RussiaPhi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 9 July 2018 and in Steele 9/11 supra note 3. See also multiple references to William Browder at Gold War @ Phi Beta Iota.

[8] No one has done a better job of documenting Chinese grand strategy along these lines than my colleague Parag Khanna, see Parag Khanna, Connectography: Mapping the Future of Global Civilization (Random House, 2016); a free review is online.

[9] Jeff Rense, “China Takes Over Haifa,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 16 September 2018; and Robert Steele, “A New Banking Era & Autonomous Zones – Reconciliation with Japan, Exit Strategy for the Zionists, Solution for the Kurds? UPDATE Mongol Manchuria,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 30 May 2018.

[10] The Zionists began their take-over of US communications and computing in the 1980’s. That story is told in Martin Dillon, Robert Maxwell: Israel’s Superspy(Carroll & Graf, 2002); a free review is online. More recently, as they have started to lose the IO battle (most Jews do not approve of Zionist crimes against humanity including interference in US elections and the genocide of Palestinians), they have started to invest more of the money they receive from the US taxpayer, see for example, this headline and video: @WikiLeaks, AI culture wars: Israeli government launch video of Twitter/Facebook “Command Centre”, which monitors “all posts” for “anti-Semitism” with “artificial intelligence” then lodges complaints e.g. with “intelligence & law enforcement”Twitter, 15 September 2018. The ADL is controlling who gets censored – the American Herald Tribune, for example, has seen its Facebook page closed without notice, no doubt in part because of its many very effective articles against the scourge of Zionism (not to be confused with Judaism – the first is a covert subversive force, the second an open religion). For more on the Zionist Facebook project see Ali Abunimah and Asa Winstanley, “Censored Film Reveals The Israel Project’s Secret Facebook Campaign,” Information Clearinghouse, 13 September 2018.

[11] It is essential to understand that social media has been “weaponized” and that Zionist Israel is the only state power represented within US social media (also known as #GoogleGestapo). The CIA’s rogue elements represent the Deep State, but it is the Zionists, working through both their software companies and the ADL, that have refined the ability to declare any term “hate speech” and any person “anti-Semitic” (or more subtly, a hater or trafficker in pornography). As the “trusted flagger” for each element of #GoogleGestapo, the ADL not only red flags terms such as Sandy Hook (use this term and have your life’s work destroyed) and “illegal alien” (use this term and be shadow-banned), but is the lead manager of both tens of millions of dollars in undeclared illegal campaign contributions to the Democrats and liberals seeking to destroy the USA, and the digital assassination of thousands of conservative voices. The ADL’s relationship with MeetUp is particularly instructive. The ADL has the power to mandate the cancellation of a paid program ($77,000 a year) for #UNRIG as devised by the author and former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, while at the same time mandating a waiver of over $200,000 in MeetUp fees for 1,087 #RESIST elements that are inherently seditious and in violation of the federal hate crime laws. See these two articles for a sense of the degree to which Zionist Israel is the greatest predator and threat to democracy in cyberspace: Ed Jewett, “Conservatives Hunted and Killed Using NSA Social Media Software with Full Complicity of #GoogleGestapo UPDATE,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 24 August 2018; and Robert Steele, “How The Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics: #GoogleGestapo – Censorship & Crowd-Stalking Made Easy,” American Herald Tribune, 7 November 2017.

[12] An educated public, which the USA appears to lack despite the solid common sense among those who support our President Donald Trump, would easily recognize that passive monitoring and even inept social media messaging is not the same as hacking. I was the invited first speaker to Hackers on Planet Earth in New York City in 1994 and wrote the first warning letter to the White House in the same year on how we needed to spend one billion dollars a year (in 1994 dollars) on cyber-security. It deeply offends me that US media can get away with the obvious lies about Russia hacking the US election, which I have addressed in longer articles. This is why I recommend that Russia treat both our President and our public with respect – educating the US public is the center of gravity for a prosperous world at peace. Among other references see Robert David Steele, “Interview“ (PBS,16 July 2001); Robert Stele with James Anderson, William Caelli, and Winn Schwartau, “Correspondence, Sounding the Alarm on Cyber Security,” McLean, VA: Open Source Solutions, Inc., August 23, 1994; Robert Steele, “The Soft Coup Collapses – Blackmail Revealed – What Next? CIA was bluffing, produced no evidence – Russians did not “hack” the election. Is this the beginning of the end of the Deep State in the USA? Can Trump clean house & wage peace? (Trump Revolution 06),” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 9 January 2017; Robert Steele, “US IC Allegations Against Russians Are Crap — Our Own Traitors, Not the Russians, Are the Real Enemy, Fake Evidence & Fake News – UPDATE 22,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 30 December 2016; and most recently, Robert Steele, “Rigging Elections – and Worse! The Americans Rigged Our Election, Bribed Our Government, Stole Our Gold, Killed Our Men, Raped Our Women, and Poisoned our Air, Water, and Earth – and You Want to Blame Something on the Russians?” American Herald Tribune, 10 March 2018.

[13] James Fetzer, “In Solidarity with Alex Jones – Barack Obama paved the way for Sandy Hook by nullifying the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 31 August 2018, and included in Robert Steele (ed.), Sandy Hook Truth: Memoranda for the President (Earth Intelligence Network, 2018, BLOCKED by Amazon, free online.

[14] Supra note 11.

[15] Federal agencies do what they are allowed to do. As long as the USG is “managed” by a two-party tyranny working for the Deep State, with every Member bribed and in many cases also blackmailed, the FBI will be a sideshow. This is one reason why #UNRIG (a twelve-point election reform act) is so essential – until all voters have ballot access and we restore one person one vote, we will not elect a multi-party Congress that makes evidence-based decisions in the public interest. As President Donald Trump has so famously declared, “the system is rigged” and Congress is a “pay to play” process favoring special interests.

[16] Stephen E. Arnold, “China and Russia Create Post-Google Internet,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 13 September 2018.

[17] Cf. Penguin, “Serverless Open Space Projects Against #GoogleGestapo,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 5 September 2018; and Penguin, “Beyond Amazon – Serverless Open Source,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 4 September 2018.
[18] Robert Steele, “Creating a Post-Western Independent Internet: An Open Source Internet Can Create Peace and Prosperity for All,” Russian International Affairs Council, 5 February 2018.

[19] Hans Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations (McGraw-Hill, 2005).

[20] Supra note 4. See also Robert Steele, “Core Works UPDATED with 21st Century University,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 4 March 2018.

[21] Two books that offer a sharp contrast between the politics of truth and the politics of lies are John Caputo, TRUTH: Philosophy in Transit (Penguin Global, 2014), see the free online review; and Gary Fields, ENCLOSURE: Palestinian Landscapes in a Historical Mirror (University of California Press, 2017), see the free online review. The obstacles to truth in any economy, government, and society include Fog Facts, Forbidden Knowledge, Lost History, Manufacturing Consent, Missing Information, Propaganda, Rule by Secrecy, Weapons of Mass Deception, and Weapons of Mass Instruction – each a book title. See Robert Steele, “Itemization of Information Pathologies,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 3 March 2012.

Share this article



EU, Russia and China unite against US over Iran

The UN general assembly in New York, the world’s largest diplomatic event, turned into a show of EU solidarity with Russia and China against the US on Tuesday.




The development, which came about over Iran, symbolised a world-turned-upside-down by US leader Donald Trump’s unilateralism.

It left Mike Pompeo, Trump’s foreign policy chief, “disturbed and indeed deeply disappointed”.

“This is one of the of the most counterproductive measures imaginable for regional and global peace and security,” he told press, after seven decades in which the US and EU had stood together against common adversaries, such as Russia, in the so-called “transatlantic relationship”.

The measures Pompeo referred to were the creation of a “Special Purpose Vehicle [SPV]” to enable the EU and others to buy Iranian oil in a way that skirted Trump’s new sanctions on Iran.

“Everything that Ms Mogherini has said is extremely positive,” Vladimir Yermakov, a senior Russian diplomat, told press, referring to EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini.

He spoke after Mogherini chaired a meeting with the foreign ministers of Russia, China, Iran, France, Germany, and the UK in New York earlier the same day.

“EU member states will set up a legal entity [the SPV] to facilitate legitimate financial transactions with Iran and this will allow European companies to continue to trade with Iran in accordance with European Union law and could be open to other partners in the world,” Mogherini told press alongside Iranian foreign minister Javad Zarif in the margins of the UN assembly.

EU technical experts would shortly meet to flesh out details, she said.

EU refused to be ‘pushed around by the unilateral decisions of our US allies’, France’s Emmanuel Macron said (Photo: Consilium)

“Do you have any better alternative than talks in times of conflict and crisis in the world? Is there a better alternative than diplomacy and dialogue? Is war a better alternative?”, she told US broadcaster CNN in an interview on Tuesday.

The EU, Russia, and China “deeply regret” Trump’s decision, they added in a statement.

His sanctions went against “multilateral diplomacy endorsed unanimously by the UN Security Council,” they added.

The EU-led group, called the “E3+2 and Iran”, had, together with the pre-Trump US administration in 2015, when it used to be called the “E3+3 and Iran”, agreed to lift sanctions on Tehran in return for its freeze of uranium enrichment.

But Trump, in May, tore up the accord on grounds it was not strong enough.

The threat of US sanctions has seen EU firms such as French and German car makers Daimler, Peugeot, and Renault, German engineering company Siemens, and French energy firm Total walk away from new ventures in Iran.

But “we [the EU] cannot accept that the US decided the regions with which European companies can or cannot do business,” Belgian prime minister Charles Michel said after meeting Iranian president Hassan Rouhani in New York.

“We’re working hard on this [the SPV] with our European partners,” German foreign minister Heiko Maas said.

EU-US rift

The EU-US rift on Iran comes after Trump started a trade war with Europe and China, threatened to pull the US out of NATO, and pulled America out of a global deal on climate change – the Paris accord.

It comes after he also threatened to fine Austrian, Dutch, German, and French firms if they co-financed a new Russia-Germany gas pipeline called Nord Stream 2.

The French leader, Emmanuel Macron, attacked Trump for fomenting “nationalism” and “protectionism” in his UN speech on Tuesday.

“We’re being pushed around by the unilateral decisions of our US allies,” in an approach that led to “isolation and conflict … to the detriment of everyone”, Macron said.

“Even those who contest the reality” of climate change “are suffering its consequences like everyone else,” he added.

For his part, Trump, in his UN speech, threatened Iran with military force and redoubled his attack on Nord Stream 2.

“Germany will become totally dependent on Russian energy if it does not immediately change course,” he said.

He also praised Poland for “standing up for their independence, their security, and their sovereignty” one day after the European Commission, on Monday, took Poland to the EU’s highest court for political meddling in its judiciary in violation of EU values and laws.

Laughter at the UN

Trump’s speech prompted laughter in the UN chamber when he claimed he had achieved more in the past two years than any other US president in history.

“I didn’t expect that,” he said.

“Confronting multilateralism is not a sign of strength,” Iran’s Rouhani told the UN in his speech.

“Rather, it’s a symptom of weakness of intellect. It betrays an inability in understanding a complex and interconnected world,” Rohani said.

Via EU Observer



Donald the kike puppet Trump’s UN ambassador Nikki Haley, otherwise known as Nimrata Randhawa, is now urging the UN Security Council to put pressure on Russia to make Moscow stop supporting the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.


“Many of you said we need to put pressure over the Syrian regime. That’s actually not the case, we need to put pressure on Russia because Russia continues to cover for the Syrian regime,” Haley told a Security Council meeting on Thursday.

“I will continue to press the Security Council to act, to do something, regardless of if the Russians continue to veto it because it is our voice that needs to be heard,” she said.

“All eyes and all pressure now need to go to Russia, because they are the ones who could stop this if they wanted to.”

Responding to Haley’s remarks, Deputy Russian UN Ambassador Petr Iliichev told the UN Security Council that Russia, Turkey and Iran were working to uphold a ceasefire in Syria to allow delivery of humanitarian aid.

“Neither you nor your Western colleagues said a single word about what you are doing to improve the situation,” Iliichev said of Haley.

This AFP file photo taken on April 7, 2017 shows US Ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, at the UN headquarters in New York. This disgusting bitch doesn’t represent the interests of America or Americans. Americans don’t want regime change in Syria and could care less about Assad, they are sick of endless zionist wars and want to see resources put back into rebuilding and restoring America’s infrastructure, economy and borders. Nikki is a puppet of the Jews and is only concerned with advancing the jewish world government agenda, which involves war with Syria and Russia. Nikki has sucked jewish cock her whole political career, as governor of South Carolina she made South Carolina the first U.S. state to take action against anti-Israel boycott movement known as BDS.

South Carolina’s Gov. Nikki Haley has signed into law a bill to stop efforts to ‘Boycott, Divest and Sanction’ Israel and while the bill makes no mention of Israel directly, it prevents public entities from contracting with businesses engaging in the “boycott of a person or an entity based in or doing business with a jurisdiction with whom South Carolina can enjoy open trade.” see more here

She also recently attended the AIPAC conference last march in Washington, DC and sucked major jew cock.

“The days of Israel-bashing are over,” US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley vowed on Monday. “For anyone who says you can’t get anything done at the UN, they need to know there is a new sheriff in town.”

Nikki put’s Israel first and America last, that’s why she’s UN ambassador now. She’s been rewarded with a more prestigious political position to do the jews bidding. But fame, fortune and prestige aren’t the only things motivating her to destroy her fellow goyim, oh no. The ambitious bitch is also blackmailed. I did some digging around and found out she is rumored to have been in a open marriageand has had extra marital affairs. So if true, which looks very likely because she hasn’t sued any of the men for libel who have accused her of having an affair with them, then she’s a sex pervert and compromised which is exactly the kind of people the jews love to put in positions of power because they can be totally controlled through blackmail.

The US government is filled with sex perverts. The Jews will not promote any goyim who they do not have dirt on into positions of power, that they can use to make sure they stay in line. As it is, probably a majority of congressmen and other high level government officials are homos, pedos and homo-pedos. Others probably just are on hotel CCTV with prostitutes that the Jews have the phone numbers of, who they can call up at any time and tell to go public with their stories. This is a fundamental means by which the Jews control the mechanisms of power in White society – they find the worst among us, who would otherwise be in prison, killed or at least forced to work low-level jobs due to lack of character, to the highest place in our societies.



Nikki Haley is now US ambassador to the UN, despite being brown and despite allegations that she posted her genitals on some South Carolina blogger guy’s genital site. That guy, Will Folks, will be releasing a book about doing sex things with Haley at some point, but for now, he’s posted an excerpt. (“Sexcerpt”? Is that what they call this sort of thing on the blogs?) Here’s a choice quote: “John Mayer’s “Slow Dancing In a Burning Room” played on her CD changer.” Gubernatorial! Another: “After sliding the front seats of her SUV as far back as they would go, Nikki climbed on top of me – rubbing her crotch back and forth over the growing bulge in my pants while I groped her ass and ran my hands through her hair and up and down her back.” EWW, NIKKI HALEY HAS BACK HAIR? Oh, we misread that.

Anyway, this first excerpt from Folks’ book expands upon information that he previously referenced in his sworn affidavit from last October – a document that was provided in response to a request from a third party.

Please be warned, some of the descriptions contained in this excerpt could be considered NSFW (Not Safe For Work):

We never took our clothes off that first night, but the physical relationship between us progressed much faster than I expected. After sliding the front seats of her SUV as far back as they would go, Nikki climbed on top of me – rubbing her crotch back and forth over the growing bulge in my pants while I groped her ass and ran my hands through her hair and up and down her back.Image result for nikki haley porn

John Mayer’s “Slow Dancing In a Burning Room” played on her CD changer.

Nikki and I kissed even harder and heavier than we had before (away from the lights of the Vista, we weren’t worried about people seeing us here), and at one point I slid my hands under her turtleneck and felt her breasts over the black bra she was wearing.

It was intense. In fact it was one of the most passionate “eighth-grade make out sessions” I’ve ever experienced in my life. Immediately, it was apparent to both Nikki and I that the sexual chemistry between the two of us was very strong.

Nikki told me that night that she had never been unfaithful to her husband – and that up until that evening she had never so much as kissed another man before.

As with everything else she said to me at the time – politically or otherwise – I believed her. Unreservedly, even. I asked her why she let me kiss her earlier that night and she said she didn’t know – a theme that would evolve and expand over the next few months as our affair blossomed.

Around forty-five minutes after we arrived at Emily Douglas Park we left – and Nikki took me back to my car.

By the way, anytime Haley wants to sue us for libel, we’re waiting … in fact, it might be good to get some sworn statements on the record as it relates to this case, don’tcha think?

You know, since Haley has thus far refused to do that …

There’s more. He’s not the only guy saying he’s had an affair with Nikki.


S.C. lobbyist Larry Marchant has signed an affidavit backing up his claim to have had “sexual intercourse” with S.C. Republican gubernatorial nominee Nikki Haley. Marchant’s affidavit – sworn before a notary public in Richland County – reiterates his previous public statement that he and Haley had a one-night stand at a legislative conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.

“After a night together of dinner and drinks with other participants of the conference, Representative Haley and I returned to the hotel together,” Marchant states in the document. “We went back to her room where we had sexual intercourse and I spent the remainder of the evening. I left her room at approximately 6 a.m.”

Marchant’s affidavit was issued in response to a request from S.C. Conservatives for Truth in Politics (TIP), a group of Republican leaders that is challenging Haley on a number of different issues. It comes three days after FITS founding editor Will Folks also submitted an affidavit in response to a request from the group.




Gaza bombing – Al-Anqaa was based in the cultural center and estimates that $40,000 of its equipment was destroyed in the bombing.

The theater where we felt free

Aerial view of music band performing on stage
The Said al-Mishal Cultural Center was one of Gaza’s premier performance venues before it was destroyed by Israel in August. Mohammed Asad

I only ever attended one event at the Said al-Mishal Cultural Center. In March 2017, my husband and I went there to see a play.

The theater on the second floor of this building enchanted me. The seats were a rich shade of red; the lights were turned off, except for those focused on the actors; the audience listened attentively to every word coming from the stage.

I had no idea that we had something so cool in Gaza. Nor could I have known that the next time I would visit this building it would be in ruins.

On 9 August this year, Israel bombed the five-story center.

“When I look at the destroyed building, I can see my laughter, tears, screams and dreams buried under the rubble,” said the theater director Ali Abu Yassin. He had been working at the center since 2004, first overseeing a production of Anton Chekhov’s The Bear.

Abu Yassin’s drama company Ashtar lost approximately $50,000 worth of equipment in the bombing.

He described the facility as a “theater for the poor.” Through it, people with limited means could gain an appreciation of the arts.

“I trained many actors and artists here, it was like our second home,” he said. “It didn’t follow any political party or government. It was an independent institution. We felt free and alive at al-Mishal and it seems Israel didn’t like that.”

Living through shock

Walid Tafesh credits the center and the artists working there with transforming him from “a childhood monster to a young star.”

The 28-year-old is well known in Gaza as a performer of dabke, a traditional Palestinian dance.

Dabke has given him courage. Because of a congenital disorder, he has grown up without a right arm. During his childhood, he was was too shy to play with others.

He has coped better since leaving school, when he began training as a dancer. In 2012, he joined the dabkegroup al-Anqaa, named after the Arabic word for phoenix.

Each week he taught 85 children the skills of dabke at the cultural center. “They are living through the same shock as me,” he said. “It is like Israel has destroyed my left arm.”

Al-Anqaa was based in the cultural center and estimates that $40,000 of its equipment was destroyed in the bombing.

“We lost all that we have done over the last 13 years,” said Mohammed Obaid, al-Anqaa’s coordinator. “We lost our costumes, prizes, official papers, cameras, laptops, everything.”

The cultural center was established with the financial support of entrepreneur Said al-Mishal in 1996. Eight years later, it opened in a Gaza City building, which hosted a gallery, library and conference hall, as well as the theater.

It was that building which Israel bombed last month, claiming that the center was used by Hamas – a claim that the center’s artists have rejected.

Poems under the rubble

Local residents are in no doubt that Israel targeted the center deliberately. Mohammed Khaliefah spoke of how his father received a phone call from an Israeli number shortly before the attack occurred. His father was warned that the family should leave their home as an attack on the center was imminent.

“We didn’t take it seriously because we didn’t imagine that a cultural center would be targeted,” Khaliefah said. “But when the first missile was fired at the building, we knew that it was indeed serious and we started to evacuate the house, leaving everything behind.”

Mona Msaddar recalls fondly when her first book of poetry, I count my steps, was launched at the cultural center in January this year. It was among “the happiest moments of my life,” the 24-year-old said.

Some copies of her book had been kept at the center. “Now they are under the rubble,” she noted.

Boy carrying books walks along rubble of destroyed building
Poet Mona Msaddar’s books now lie under the rubble of the building that housed the Said al-Mishal center.Mohammed Asad

Msaddar is part of a writers’ group called Shaghaf (Passion), which was formed at the center last year. Its 23 members gathered there on a weekly basis, so that they could show their work to each other.

Yousri Alghoul, the group’s founder, is searching for an alternative meeting place. “It’s not easy,” he said. “We don’t have funding and al-Mishal was providing its services for free.”

Ahmed Abu Awad, a poet and photographer, started visiting the center following Operation Cast Lead, a major Israeli attack on Gaza during December 2008 and January 2009.

He went there every day, frequently attending its plays and exhibitions, as well as joining a number of groups that used the facilities.

“In general, I don’t feel that I’m the kind of person who has a loyalty to places, things or people,” he said. “But it was totally different with al-Mishal, it was like my second home. The thing I’ll miss most is the smiles on people’s faces after every event.”

Sarah Algherbawi is a freelance writer and translator from Gaza.

‘Racist state’ or ‘vibrant democracy’? Israel’s nation-state law sparks debate live on RT (VIDEO)

Syria foreign minister tells UN country is ready for refugee return

Syria's Foreign Minister Walid Muallem

Syria’s Foreign Minister Walid Muallem

Syria’s foreign minister, Walid al-Moualem, told the United Nations General Assembly on Saturday that the country was ready for the voluntary return of refugees who fled during the more than seven-year conflict.

“We welcome any assistance with reconstruction from those countries that were not part of the aggression on Syria,” he said. “The countries that offer only conditional assistance or continue to support terrorism, they are neither invited nor welcome to help.”

Syria could face tough sanctions if it blocks political process -US diplomat

Tony Blair confirms receiving millions in donation from Saudi

Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair [file photo]

Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair [file photo]

Tony Blair’s relationship with Saudi Arabia has come under scrutiny following the revelation that the non-government organisation set up under his name has received millions of pounds from Riyadh.

Accounts published yesterday by the Tony Blair Institute confirmed earlier reports that Blair had received donations of up to $12 million from the Kingdom.

The Saudi donation, according to the Financial Times, comes from an organisation called Media Investment Limited (MIL), which is a subsidiary of Saudi Research & Marketing Group, registered in Guernsey.

Publication of the accounts confirmed July reports that Tony Blair Institute had made an agreement with Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, effective ruler of Saudi Arabia, earlier this year to help with a programme of modernisation for the Kingdom.

Read: UK paper joins Saudi media group to launch Middle East news sites

The agreement was said to be the first major deal to have emerged involving the Tony Blair Institute, which Blair established in 2016 after winding down his commercial operations.

The report in the Telegraph prompted the institute to defend its dealing with the Saudi Kingdom saying that the former prime minister did not receive any payment from Riyadh and profits are not generated from its consultancy work. They insisted that their mission was to promote stability and reform in the Middle East – with staff based in the UAE, a key ally of Saudi Arabia.

Following the revelation, questions were raised over some of the institute’s decision, including Blair himself, who supported UK intervention in Syria; a policy that would have primarily benefited the Saudi-backed opposition groups.

Blair’s institute also wrote flattering articles about Bin Salman during the crown prince’s visit to the UK early year. “Britain should learn from Saudi Arabia and how it has demonstrated a clear commitment to tackling the politicisation of Islam to inform policymaking,” one article read.

Read: Legal battle to make UK-Saudi Arabia arms sales unlawful

It also endorsed Bin Salman’s vision. “As part of his broad, sweeping and ambitious plans to revolutionise Saudi Arabia, economically, socially and religiously, the crown prince has demonstrated a level of conviction, clarity and coherence in identifying and understanding the nature of Islamist extremism that Western policymakers should seek to learn from.”

Despite the glowing endorsement, a key plank of Bin Salman’s vision has come off the rail. In August King Salman stepped in and shelved his son’s plans to float a five per cent stake in the country’s national oil company. Furthermore Riyadh has seen some of the worst repression in the country under the current ruler, as progressive imams and female campaigners face capital punishment for their criticism of the ruling monarchy.

White Helmets ‘first witness’ to Syria massacres: Chief

Raed al-Saleh, director of the White Helmets in Ankara, Turkey on September 22, 2018. ( Abdulhamit Topal – Anadolu Agency )

The head of the White Helmets civil defense agency said his organization has been subject to false charges and allegations because of its role as a witness to ongoing massacres in war-torn Syria.

In an exclusive interview with Anadolu Agency, Raed Salah said the White Helmets welcomes financial support from any country or organization provided that the funds were not politically-driven.

“By the end of 2012, some regions in Syria began to fall out of the regime control. As regime forces began to shell civilian settlements and carry out attacks, there was a need for a group to save civilians from these attacks,” he said.

READ: UK to resettle 100 Syria White Helmets rescuers, families 

According to Salah, the name of the civil defense agency was derived from the helmets worn by its members during rescue operations.

He said members of the White Helmets have reached 4,300 volunteers by the end of 2017. Nevertheless, they can only operate in certain areas where they are allowed to.

“As the regime designates us as a terror group, we cannot operate in areas under its control. We have been repeatedly threatened [by the regime],” he said.

“Also, we cannot operate in YPG/PKK-held areas,” he said, adding that White Helmets volunteers were arrested by YPG/PKK in 2015.

“They seized our ambulances and rescue equipment in Afrin,” he said. “Due to similar reasons, we cannot operate in Daesh-held areas.”

The White Helmets hold banners as they stage a protest named “Assad besieges Ghouta” to draw attention the deaths of children due to malnutrition on 26 October 2017 [Fadi al Shami/Anadolu Agency]

Salah said the civil defense agency can only operate in opposition-held areas in northern Syria, the Euphrates Shield zones and Oil Branch Operation zones.

“In addition to rescue operations, the White Helmets also intervene to extinguish fires, solve water and electricity problems and help with rubble cleaning,” he said.

Established in 2013, the White Helmets was nominated for the 2016 Nobel Peace Prize.

In 2013, the civil defense agency members were trained by Turkey’s Search and Rescue Association, AKUT.

READ: White Helmets ‘wiping out the dust of war’ in Syria’s Idlib 

Financial sources

Salah said the White Helmets accepts financial support from any country or organization on the condition that the funds were not politically-driven.

“We welcome help and support from everyone who wants to back the Syrian people,” he said. “We don’t have any objection. Our only condition is no political or military agenda is imposed on us.”

Salah said the organization is supported by countries as Qatar, UK, US, the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany.

“We will ink an agreement with France,” he said. “The Turkish Red Crescent and IHH (Humanitarian Relief Foundation) are also supporting us.”

The White Helmets chief said the civil defense agency has never got any financial support from Israel.

“We would never accept financial support from Israel as we view it as a country of occupation,” he said, going on to deny that his volunteers had been evacuated from western Syria through Israel amid a military operation by regime forces.

The evacuation of our volunteers was not through Israel. The volunteers went to the occupied Golan Heights before moving to Jordan. From there, they left to other countries, he said.


Salah dismissed claims that the White Helmets was carrying out chemical attacks in Syria and heaping the blame on the Syrian regime.

“The party that is conducting chlorine gas and chemical attacks in Syria is obvious,” he said.

“Who has got chlorine gas barrels? The regime does. Who uses Sarin gas? The regime does,” he said. “The Syrian regime is the only one that has Sarin gas. The only party capable of using and carrying such attacks is the regime.”

Salah said such accusations were levelled against his group because the White Helmets was a first witness to ongoing massacres and human rights violations in the war-torn country.

“Russia does its best to whitewash the regime,” he said.

READ: Syria’s White Helmets: We went to Israel for fear of regime reprisals 


Salah said his volunteers were repeatedly targeted by regime forces while rescuing civilians.

“We have been targeted by both regime and Russian warplanes for many times,” he said.

He said some of the White Helmets centers had been hit by regime forces and allies for several times.

“A total of 255 volunteers have been killed so far,” he said.

Salah said a survey conducted last year showed that 85 percent of respondents said that they would seek help from the White Helmets if needed.

“This is a great success for us,” he said. “Our greatest success, however, is that we have saved 115,000 civilian lives.”

“We have also planted the seeds of hope into the hearts and minds of a nation that was about to lose its hope,” he said.

Syria has been locked in a devastating civil war since March 2011, when the Bashar al-Assad regime cracked down on pro-democracy protests with unexpected ferocity.



Netanyahu vows to keep an ‘open mind’ on US peace plan

How They Do It…..

Netanyahu tells CNN he won’t voice support for 2 states, prefers ‘substance’ over ‘labels’; would like to see Palestinians ‘have all the power to govern themselves, but none of the powers to threaten us’

ed note–a few protocols to keep in mind here–

1. The only ‘vow’ that a Jew like Netanyahu can be counted on to keep is to act as a toxic, corrosive force upon any and all Gentile societies and to see Israel raised up as the supreme world power in accordance with Judaism’s messianic prophecies found within the Torah that have been around since a penniless nomad named Abraham began hearing voices in his head telling him to slay his first-born son as a ‘sacrifice’ to the Judaic god, Yahweh.

2. The ‘open mind’ to which Netanyahu is referring is the bullet hole he imagines putting in Trump’s head in the same way that Netanyahu’s associates did to John F. Kennedy for daring attempt to restrain the Jewish state from attaining nuclear weapons by which the Jewish state may terrorize and eventually destroy the world and thus by which Judaism’s messianic prophecies can be realized.

3. All can rest assured that within a New York minute of this interview ending where Netanyahu did an award winning performance in pretending to be reasonable and talked about his desire for a ‘Palestinian state’–that he was on the phone with his Deep State people in the US (including those with very recognizable names such as Frum, Rubin, Kagan , Kristol, Cohen, Boot, etc) telling them to turn up the heat on Trump vis a vis the Mueller probe, Kavanaugh, immeegrayshun, Stormy Daniels, ‘Russian Meddling’ and whatever other screws they happen to have stored away in their tool box of dirty tricks in ‘reasoning’ with Trump to drop any and all plans/pretensions/discussions for the creation of any ‘Palestinian state’, the concept of which is as welcome to Judaic ears as penicillin is to venereal disease.

Please note the following–

‘Israel has to have the overriding security. Not the UN, not Canadian Mounties, not Austrian or Australian forces. Israeli forces have to have the security control, otherwise, that place will be taken over by Islamist terrorists, either [Islamic State] or Hamas or Iran, all of the above…’

In other words, Roman legions returning to Judea to provide peace and quiet, or as it was famously known back then–‘Pax Romana’.

As we have pointed out, this isn’t just about creating a ‘homeland’ for duh po’ lil’ Jooz to lay dey weery heds’.

This is about creating the New World Order where Judaism predominates as THE operating system of all human activity in exactly the manner demanded by the very particular and peculiar protocols laid out in black and white terms within the pages of the Torah.

Times of Israel

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he would consider Washington’s upcoming peace initiative with an “open mind” but would not voice explicit support for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, in an interview with CNN aired Friday night.

“I’m certainly going to look at it and look at it… with a keen and open mind, because I know there’s great friendship to Israel,” the Israeli leader said of the Trump administration’s long-gestating peace plan.

“The question of what happens, you know, precisely, when he puts it out depends on — I’ll look at it,” Netanyahu said. “I always said that I’m willing to look at peace proposals put forward by the United States.”

US President Donald Trump made headlines earlier in the week when he declared for the first time his support for a two-state solution to the conflict.

Following his meeting with Netanyahu on the sidelines of the General Assembly, Trump told reporters that he believes that two states “works best.” He has previously been vague on the topic, suggesting that he would support whatever the parties might agree to, including possibly a one-state resolution, which might see the Palestinian territories become part of Israel.

“I’ve discovered that, if you use labels, you’re not going to get very far because different people mean different things when they say ‘states.’ So rather than talk about labels, I’d like to talk about substance.”

He said he would like to see Palestinians “have all the power to govern themselves but none of the powers to threaten us.”

‘Israel has to have the overriding security. Not the UN, not Canadian Mounties, not Austrian or Australian forces. Israeli forces have to have the security control, otherwise, that place will be taken over by Islamist terrorists, either [Islamic State] or Hamas or Iran, all of the above…’

“And that’s my condition. People say, ‘Is that commensurate with a state?’ I don’t know, you decide… I want the Palestinians to govern themselves, but not to be able to threaten us.”

Israeli ministers on Thursday accused Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas of rejecting peace and embracing terror in his speech to the United Nations, saying it showed he is only interested in revenge and cannot be entrusted with a Palestinian state.

Though the address at the General Assembly in New York was far milder than the angry broadside many had expected, Abbas drew fire for rebuffing the US as a possible peace mediator and hailing terror convicts in Israeli prisons.

During his speech Abbas had declared that “Jerusalem is not for sale” and rejected anything short of all of East Jerusalem, including the Old City with all its holy places, as the capital of a Palestinian state.

Netanyahu also praised the Trump administration’s decision to quit the nuclear accord with Iran and renew painful sanctions against the regime.

“You put growing pressure on Iran to cease its aggression in the region and its secret efforts to achieve a bypass for the nuclear program. I think that very wise,” he said. “Where you’ll end up is a different matter, but the idea is to get Iran back in the box.”

Europe and Iran have pledged their continued commitment to the agreement, which had lifted earlier imposed sanctions in return for curbs in Tehran’s nuclear program. But the promise of renewed sanctions has caused heavy economic damage to Iran, with international companies pulling out and the local currency plunging, leading to civil unrest.

As for whether he hoped the renewed pressure could bring about regime change in the Islamic Republic, Netanyahu said: “I don’t think anyone would shed a tear if it happens, but I think the first thing we want to see is the cessation of this tremendous campaign of terror throughout the world.

“I think that the whole Middle East, Israel, the Arab states — virtually all of them — and the people of Iran are now very happy that the policy of accommodating Iran is over, and the policy of squeezing Iran is very much present and will get stronger.”

On Tuesday, during an unabashedly “America First” speech at the UN, Trump said Iranian leaders “sow chaos, death, and destruction” and “spread mayhem across the Middle East and far beyond.” His national security adviser, John Bolton, later warned that there would be “hell to pay” if Tehran crossed the US, its allies or their partners.

US National National Security Adviser John Bolton promised this week to keep exerting “maximum pressure” on Iran and said new sanctions were in the pipeline while insisting that the US was not seeking the overthrow of Tehran’s clerical regime.

But the European Union said Monday its members would set up a payment system to allow oil companies and businesses to continue trading with Iran in a bid to evade sanctions. The countries said in a statement that they were determined “to protect the freedom of their economic operators to pursue legitimate business with Iran.”

Israel’s Delusion=The World’s Misery

Mark Glenn

Note to those scratching their heads over Israel’s “recent” belligerent behavior viz-a-viz the Obama Administration’s insistence that the Jewish state actually abide by international law and cease construction in the territories pirated by her in 1967–


Neither should anyone be shocked over the fact that–with miniscule exceptions–protests from the Chosenite quarter of humanity over all the bloodshed and chaos caused by the Jewish state in what used to be called the Holy Land are virtually non-existent. For the sake of those who have suffered incalculably, namely the Palestinians, Lebanese, Iraqis and others in the region, let us not pretend we had no way of knowing.

We knew, or at least we should have. As we are always told–“ignorance of the law is no excuse,” the “law” in this case not being just some ordinary, run of the mill law, but rather THE LAW, meaning the word of God Himself, or so they say.

No, we’re not being cheeky here. Indeed, GOD HAS SPOKEN and all anyone need do in figuring this out for him or herself is crack open the playbook being used in mapping all this misery out and see for themselves.

After all, lest we forget, according to the narrative in question, for some indescribable reason the creator of the universe DID decide one day to focus His infinite attention and affection on one tiny, seemingly insignificant percentage of his handiwork, commanding them to then go about the business of invading, stealing, enslaving and genociding those who did not “bless them” in a way deemed acceptable.

That right folks, invasion, theft, enslavement, and genocide, all the things we are told by Jewish interests are part of “Islam”, but which in reality are not, but rather the nuts and bolts of the Jews‘ religion.

And let’s not dabble in the business that this is all a “Netanyahu” thing. Miraculously, Bibi (the same war criminal credited with gloating over the deaths of 3,000 Americans after the 9/11 attacks, characterizing such as “good” because of the “immediate sympathy” the tragedy would generate for Israel) actually spoke the truth in his recent speech to AIPAC when he pointed out that the Judaization of Palestine (termed “redemption by the Jews) through expanded settlement is something that has gone on from the very beginning. Indeed, as inconvenient as it is and as much as it may fly in the face of the fashionable business these days of separating between “good” Jews (leftists who sort-of/kind-of dare to consider Palestinians as human beings) and “bad” Jews (rightists who take literally all that stuff in the Old Testament about the Arabs being “Amalek“ whose eternal destruction is commanded by God) the fact is that they are 2 wings on the same bird. When comparing the two, they differ from each other as much as the Corleones did from the Tattaglias in The Godfather–two crime families engaged in similar “business” but with different names.

As we said earlier, no one should be scratching his or her head over any of this intransigence or belligerence. This was as hard to predict as birds flying south for the winter or 2 dogs sniffing each other’s rear ends upon meeting for the first time. There was, is, and always will be this irrational, magnetic pull towards this kind of business when it comes to Jews and Jewish interests. Remember that old saying we were all taught growing up, meant to make us mind our diet–”You are what you eat”? Well, the Jews have been “eating” all this Old Testament garbage now for 4,000 years and as a result it has gone to their collective head and done almost irreversible internal damage. Having made heroes out of their Hebraic forefathers who invaded, raped, enslaved and stole, why then should anyone be shocked when 4,000 years later we get Ben Gurion, Begin, Rabin, Sharon, Netanyahu, et al?

You see, that’s the problem when certain people claim to hear the voice of God in their heads. Things get lost in translation. Remember Abraham? He starts hearing voices telling him he and his bloodline would be exalted above everyone else, and the next thing you know he’s got a knife to his son’s neck, ready to slit his throat and burn his body as proof of his loyalty to those voices he’s hearing.

No, the problem is not “Islamic extremism”. The problem is what we can call the “Annie Wilkes Syndrome,” a disturbing and dangerous condition wherein a group of nutcases base their entire collective identity on a book, its cast of characters and how these characters behave, to the point the “captive audience” is incapable of living in the real world in a rational, logical and moral way.

If that name–Annie Wilkes–sounds familiar, it should. She was the character in a Stephen King novel entitled Misery later made into a movie of the same name. The reader will recall that her character was that of a lonely, middle-aged woman who rescued her favorite novelist from an otherwise fatal car crash. With both his legs broken she takes him to her home in the mountains so she can “care“ for him in what would later become his stay in Hotel Hell.

What makes the character of Annie Wilkes so interesting is that–like the Jews of today–she has based her entire life and identity on a story, in this case the same series of books written by the very author she rescued from the otherwise fatal car crash. Like the Jews of today with their Old Testament, Annie knows every word by heart. Every twist and turn appearing in the 8 books her beloved novelist wrote she has used as a template in organizing and arranging her life. The fact it is all fiction doesn’t even cross her mind. It is a story she falls so much in love with that reality has no place in her life.

And, as the reader will recall from the movie, all is fine regarding the novelist’s rehabilitation until his “#1 fan” Annie gets a copy of his latest book where the main character in it–her beloved Misery Chastain–dies during childbirth. Annie comes into the author’s bedroom as he lie on a bed with two broken legs and, revealing the true depth of the mad waters raging beneath her otherwise calm and disarming demeanor, lets loose with a tirade that would scare the hell out of the Devil himself.

And then of course, who could forget that infamous scene when Annie–in order to keep her author around a little longer–puts a wooden block between his two angles and then takes a 12-lb sledgehammer to his feet, breaking them and by doing so, leaving him permanently crippled and unable to fend for himself while under her “care”.

Finally, at the end of the movie, the true depth of her madness is apparent as she plans to kill the author and then herself at the same time. The way she sees it, if she can’t have him, no one can, justifying with

“Don’t feel bad Paul…It was bound to happen sooner or later…It’s a sign…You see, I’ve known for some time why I was chosen to save you…You and I were meant to be together forever…Now our time in this world must end…But don’t worry Paul, I’ve prepared for what must be done…I put two bullets in my gun…One for you and one for me…Oh darling, it’ll be so beautiful…”

Behold, life imitating art, as we see Jewish behavior today (and particularly with regards to American foreign policy in the Middle East) dictated by the twists and turns of a certain book. God has spoken and it cannot be undone. Like Misery Chastain, the character at the center of Annie Wilkes’ madness, it MUST be, forever, exactly as described by the black images on the white paper. America, (and indeed the west in general) like the novelist, tied to the bed, her ankles broken and in her crippled state, powerless to stop the mad woman Israel.

Now, certain “mysteries” such as Israel’s intransigence with regards to the settlements becomes clear, as well as all the bloodbaths and the (almost) complete absence of moral reasoning on the part of the international Jewish community.

At the end of the movie, the crippled author must devise a plan–executed from his wheelchair, to boot–for freeing himself from a deranged woman bent upon his demise.

America and the rest of the world must do the same before the final chapter is written, for those who are writing it, claiming to hear voices in their heads, cannot be relied upon to think or act rationally.

© 2010 Mark Glenn

Netanyahu says Russian sale of S-300 missiles to Syria ‘irresponsible’

ed note–again, please consider the Judaic mindset covering all spectra of Judaic thought processes at work here–

‘We are GAAAAWD’S chosen people and we can murder anyone we want in getting what we covet and anyone who f***** with us or tries to impede us in our God-given right to steal and murder whoever we want is an anti-Shemite who deserves all the death and destruction that is coming their way.’

It is this mindset that has been/is/always will be the electrical current driving all Judaic thought processes and behavior, whether in the ‘Jewish state’ as it exists in the Middle East, the ‘Jewish state’ as it exists in the banking systems of the West or the ‘Jewish state’ as it exists in Hollywood and the JMSM. Covet, steal, murder, lie, cover-up, then cry ‘persecution’ and ‘anti-Shemitism’ when the inevitable blowback occurs, and it has been this way ever since the days of a penniless nomad named Abraham selling his wife Sarah into prostitution to Egypt’s Pharaoh so that he himself would be ‘well-treated’.

It is not just a ‘Zionism’ problem and anyone who tells you differently is either a fool, a liar, or both. Everywhere it has gone, through every time period in history and in every geographical location, the reaction to the Judaic paradigm has always been the same–an autonomic, automatic rejection of the hostile, invading virus and the body’s attempt to protect itself from death and destruction. Now, thousands of years too late, the virus has made its way to the central nervous system of the body politic and there seems to be nothing that can be done in stopping it from what it must do according to the program that has been written into its DNA from the beginning–destroy and devour, even as various world leaders try and deal with it in the half-measured way they can at this, the 59th minute of the eleventh hour.

Times of Israel

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has criticized Russia’s decision to provide advanced anti-aircraft systems to Syria as “irresponsible,” but said Israel was committed to continued deconfliction with Moscow in its military operations in the region.

Speaking to CNN in New York after the annual UN General Assembly, Netanyahu said that he spoke to Russian President Vladimir Putin earlier this month after Syrian forces responding to an Israeli airstrike mistakenly shot down a Russian military reconnaissance plane, killing all 15 people on board.

Netanyahu said he told Putin, “Let’s continue this deconfliction, but at the same time, I told him very respectfully and very clearly that Israel will do, will continue to do what it has to do to defend itself.”

He said both sides wanted to avoid a military clash in Syria, noting that the many militaries and other groups operating in the region were making it “very crowded over there in this tiny space.

“Through this mess, we’ve been able for three years to avoid any clash between … between Russian and Israeli forces,” he said. “I think there’s a desire on both our part and Russia’s part to…. avoid a clash.”

On Friday, Russia began supplying the S-300 air-defense system to Syria despite Israeli protests.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announced the deliveries had started during a UN press conference. He said the anti-aircraft system “will be devoted to ensure 100 percent safety and security of our men in Syria.”

Lavrov’s announcement came in the wake of the downing of the Russian plane.

The Russian defense ministry also announced it would begin jamming radars of military planes striking targets in Syria from off the coast of the Mediterranean.

Russian electronic warfare equipment intended to disrupt airstrikes has already arrived in Syria, according to Russian media reports. According to the Moscow-based Izvestia daily newspaper, the electronic warfare equipment arrived at Hmeimim Air Base near Latakia on Monday, aboard Il-76 transport aircraft. Without detailing exactly what was sent, the sources noted that the systems were intended to disrupt airborne radar, aircraft communication and controls and satellite navigation systems used in attack jets, drones and guided munitions.

Both Israel and the United States have protested the decision to supply Syria with the S-300, which could complicate ongoing Israeli efforts to prevent Iran deepening its military presence in Syria and to thwart the transfer of weapons in Syria to Hezbollah.

Israel has vowed to continue its operations. On the sidelines of the UN General Assembly this week, Netanyahu said after meeting US President Donald Trump that the US president gave him various unspecified guarantees regarding Israel’s freedom of operation in Syria. “I received what I asked for. I came with specific points and I got them,” he told reporters.

Israel has carried our hundreds of attacks against Syrian and Iranian targets in Syria over the last several years, with fighter jets going nearly unchallenged by the country’s air defenses — though an F-16 was downed by a Syrian anti-aircraft missile in February in what the IDF later said was the result of a professional error by the pilots.

Jerusalem has vowed to prevent Lebanon-based Hezbollah or Iranian proxy militias in Syria from obtaining advance weapons that could threaten the Jewish state and has worked to keep Iran from gaining a foothold in Syria that can be used to attack Israel.

Russia, which is a main backer of Syrian President Bashar Assad, has maintained a deconfliction hotline with Israel, allowing the Jewish state to carry out the attacks as long as it was informed beforehand.

The future of that program has been under a cloud since the September 17 incident, which occurred as four Israeli fighter jets conducted an airstrike on the weapons warehouse near the coastal city of Latakia, which the IDF said was intended to provide weapons to the Hezbollah terror group and other Iranian proxies.

Moscow has accused Israel of using the IL-20 spy plane as a shield after the attack, rejecting Israel’s claims that poorly trained Syrian air defense operators are to blame for the deaths of 15 Russian servicemen aboard the aircraft.

Israel denies this, and insists it also notified the Russians 12 minutes before the attack — while Moscow has said it was given only a minute’s notice.

Israeli fighter pilots have trained for years to evade S-300 air defense missiles. Earlier this year Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman downplayed Israeli concerns over Russia’s purported plans to install the system in Syria.

“One thing needs to be clear: If someone shoots at our planes, we will destroy them. It doesn’t matter if it’s an S-300 or an S-700,” he said.

Israel’s ‘Operation Protective Edge’–Barbaric human sacrifice taking place in Gaza’s real-life Apocalypto



2014 Mark Glenn

Despite the truly horrifying nature of the theme covered in Mel Gibson’s 2006 blockbuster filmApocalypto–namely the manner by which innocent, defenseless people are hunted down, captured and later used as human sacrifices in appeasing the Mayan god Kukulkan, nevertheless what made the film’s bloody theme and presentation sufferable was the (mistaken) notion that it was a thing of the past and not of the present…

‘Indeed,’ so the prevailing wisdom goes…‘we’re waaaay past that…old hat…yesteryear…passe’…water under the bridge and over the dam…’

The problem with this assessment of course is that it’s as disconnected from reality as the notion that the earth is flat or that babies arrive from heaven via some delivery service known as Stork Express. Despite not being recognized as such per se, nevertheless human sacrifice is alive and well, kicking and screaming in fact–no pun intended–moreso now than at any other time in human history.

And not just the practice itself, but the reasons for doing so as well. Now–as then–it involves primitive peoples–barely-humanoid in many respects–who’ve worked out a business arrangement with some bad-tempered deity whereby ripping to pieces innocent people results in rivers of good fortune flowing in their direction, again, no pun intended…In short time, as the affair becomes ritualistic, ceremonialized and then institutionalized, it gains ‘official’ status when priests, prophets and princes participate, at which point the gory business of Murder, Inc becomes as much a national pastime as feeding people to lions was in ancient Rome.

Indeed, as dramatized in Apocalypto, the ritual was not some ‘private matter’ simply between the victim, victimizer and the god who demanded the blood sacrifice. Rather, it was an open, public event–the beating heart of the metropolis in fact–complete with gawkers, watchers, onlookers and ‘true believers’ who cheered madly as hearts were cut out and heads chopped off.

The only difference between then and now is that today’s human sacrifice is sexier and sanitized, helped along of course with technology making it all seem more like an episode of Star Warsrather than a scene out of Apocalypto. Instead of barely-clad, bone-in-nose, unwashed warriors running barefoot through the jungle chasing some terrified 2-legged creature scheduled to be the main course at a dinner honoring the Mayan god Kukulkan, we have technicians dressed in the respectable clothing of military uniforms, sitting behind computer screens, lattes in one hand while in the other is a joystick attached to a drone that is flown into 3rd-world locales where women and children endure not just having their hearts cut out, but their entire bodies ripped to shreds via high-yield explosive warheads.

And while it is true that many of the ‘enlightened’ countries of the West such as America, Great Britain and others who worship at the altar of money, power and empire and who–in appeasing these dark gods–engage in this modern-day form of human sacrifice known as serial warfare, nevertheless there is one country in particular whose involvement in the grisly, gory business of human sacrifice operates on a very different, personal, primal, and primitive level, and that country of course is Israel.

Whereas the aforementioned countries deal in death not necessarily for death’s sake but rather as an unavoidable consequence of attaining the blessings that the aforementioned gods of money and power bring, when it comes to Israel however, the shedding of blood–innocent, defenseless blood–holds particular ‘sentimental’ significance. More personal than just business, when it comes to the trappings, teachings and traditions of Judaism, blood is as intrinsic to its identity as bread and wine are to certain Christian ceremonies. It is, after all, that ‘old time religion’ that functions as the beating heart of the Jewish state and which sustains and maintains who it is, what it is, what it does, and how it lives.

The notion that Israel, again, THE JEWISH STATE, as her worshippers insist upon her being characterized, would engage in the business of ritualistic human sacrifice should come as no surprise to anyone who understands the ‘beating heart’ of what keeps her alive, meaning the violent, tribalistic and backwards cult known as Judaism. Human sacrifice, i.e. murdering innocent human beings in order to appease the demands of some ‘higher’ power, is a theme introduced within literally the first chapters of the very first book of the Jewish Torah–the book of Genesis to be exact–where a penniless nomad named Abraham–the ‘Founding Father’ of the Jewish state as the world has been told time and again–has got it in his head to slit the throat of his own son Isaac and burn his young son’s body on a pile of stones in pleasing and appeasing the Jewish god Yahweh.

Luckily for Isaac, as the story goes, the voices in Abraham’s head telling him to engage in the very same kind of brutal black Mass depicted in Apocalypto were drowned out by competing voices telling him not to murder his son, but rather to sacrifice a nearby ram whose horns had been caught in a briar and who could not escape to save its life.

The story–whether historically true or not, is immaterial to the fact that in the minds of those whose identity is wrapped up in Israel, Judaism, Zionism, etc, a pattern and a paradigm have been set through this legend–That killing innocent, defenseless creatures who can neither escape nor fight back is the manner by which the Jewish god is appeased and satiated…

Using this–the slaughter and incineration of a ram–as the standard then, from there the Judaic practice of killing docile, defenseless creatures for the purpose of quelling and containing the wrath of the Judaic god Yahweh isn’t just institutionalized, but becomes the institution itself. Whether it is for atonement of sins, giving thanks or whatever the mood of the occasion happens to be at that moment, the slaughter of living creatures becomes THE method and means for connecting with and ‘getting right’ with ‘the god of Israel’ (a term publically used many times by Jewish terrorists ranging from Menachem Begin to Netanyahu) and as explained numerous times in the books of Leviticus, Deuteronomy, Numbers and others found in the Torah. Specifically, as the ritual dictates, by laying hands on the head of the animal to be killed, the sins of the people of Israel are transferred onto the animal, and upon its brutal slaughter, the sins are wiped away and Yahweh is appeased, to wit–

‘The priest is to place his hand on the head of the sin offering and slaughter it…Then the priest is to take some of the blood with his finger and put it on the horns of the altar and pour out the rest of the blood at the base of the altar…They shall remove all the fat and the priest shall then burn the bull, ram, or goat on the altar as an aroma pleasing to the Lord, and in this way the priest will make atonement for the people of Israel, and their sins will be forgiven…’

Paired almost simultaneously with the practice of ritualistic animal slaughter as the centerpiece of Judaic worship come the various decrees from Yahweh’s mouth to Israel’s ear that he–the angry, jealous, vengeful god who has chosen this small, seemingly insignificant tribe of ne’er do wells to someday run the world–is no longer satiated with only the slaughter of defenseless animals. Now, having developed a more ‘sophisticated’ and voracious sacrificial appetite, he demands that defenseless men, women and children must suffer the same fate as well, specifically as laid out within several passages of the Jewish Torah to wit–

‘When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall save nothing alive that breathes…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy…You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…’

And there begins a wedding made in hell, where ritualistic, religiously-driven animal slaughter is paired with war, genocide, invasion and conquest.

Given the inherently supremacist foundation of Judaic thought (‘God’s chosen people’, ‘light unto the world,’ etc) paired with its inherently anti-Gentile disposition, it was just a matter of time then before the two ideas become merged into one–the equating of Gentiles as animals who were fit for nothing but either enslavement or ritual slaughter, the likely catalyst for this merger being the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. by the Romans, resulting in the cessation of the Judaic practice of sacrificial  slaughter of livestock for attaining atonement from the Judaic god and a substitution had to be found therefore if the Judaic community were to maintain any sense of religious/social cohesiveness.

The fact that Gentiles are referred to disparagingly amongst Jews as ‘Goy’ or ‘Goyim’–the Hebrew equivalent of the word ‘livestock’ or ‘cattle’–is one indication that this association between non-Jews and livestock (rams, goats, sheep, etc) used for ritualistic sacrifice has been a fait accompli now for some time. As Israel sinks deeper and deeper into her Judaism and into her ‘Jewishness’, and the more powerful that the Jewish community becomes both in Israel proper and in those countries where ‘her people’ hold unchallenged political and financial power, therefore the more ‘comfortable’ certain political and religious leaders become in voicing ideas that previously had to be kept hidden from the Gentile world for the sake of ‘operational security’. Of the various statements made in recent history, few compare in revealing this mindset than that made by Israel’s former Chief Sephardic Rabbi Ovadiah Yusef who stated to wit–

‘Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world, only to serve the People of Israel…Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat…With gentiles, it will be like any person: They need to die, but God will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money. This is his servant. That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew…’

The reaction on the part of the more ‘cautious’ elements within organized Jewish circles, from the ADL to World Jewish Congress et al was predictable in its utter duplicity, and unfortunately, swallowed whole hog by the Gentile community. One by one, powerful Jewish groups and those who lead them lined up to denounce the Rabbi’s statement despite knowing full well that it reflected the essence of Judaism and forms the foundation of Zionist thinking not only in Israel, but around the world. Sadly, the Gentiles, not yet comprehending the inherently deceptive nature of Judaic linguistics and theatrics, believed it, much to their own detriment.

But more effective in revealing the kinds of genocidal tendencies that have come to plague the Judaic mind than the various statements from Jewish leaders–religious and political alike–are the actions of Israel herself. Whereas those various statements attributed to individuals such as Ovadia Yusef and others can be compared to the distant howling of wolves announcing their impending arrival, it is the ensuing slaughter and carnage that best reveals the nature of the beast within.

That the present Holocaust in Gaza is in effect an exercise in ritualized Jewish mass murder and human sacrifice cannot be disputed by any rational human being. The deliberate targeting of civilians, the murder of women and children as if the entire exercise were nothing more than shooting fish in a barrel cannot be equated with any kind of protective or preventive military operation on the part of a stable, sane nation-state. Operation ‘Defensive Edge’–like all its previous massacres–Jenin, Cast Lead, etc, etc, etc, is the modern day equivalent of the very same ritual sacrifice institutionalized within the pages of the Torah and the same human sacrifice depicted within Apocalypto and for the same reasons–Israel is a nation whose foundation is rooted in religious strains that demand the blood of innocent, defenseless animals who cannot escape, the exact situation as pertains to the people of Gaza today. It is their blood, the Palestinians of Gaza and elsewhere–warm, wet, sticky–that acts as the glue holding together the world’s largest insane asylum peopled with for-the-most-part mentally ill, religious, racist nutcases known as ‘the Jewish state’.

Indeed, as we read the words of the high priest in Apocalypto as he is about to plunge the knife into the chest of his captive victim, they might as well be the words of Benjamin Netanyahu or any of those within his circles–

‘We are a people of destiny…destined to be the masters of all time, destined to be nearest to the gods…’ 

‘Great Kulkulkan, whose fury could scourge the earth to oblivion, let us appease you with this sacrifice…to exalt you in your glory and make our people prosper…’

And, as in Apocalypto, when the citizens of the Mayan superstate roared with approval as the beating heart of the victim was cut out and the head chopped off, so too do we hear the roar of Jewry worldwide as the innocent victims of Gaza are ceremonially murdered on the high altar of Judaic human sacrifice. Israeli citizens gather at the border with food, drinks and other celebratory supplies, snapping pics of the carnage in the celebration of Gentile slaughter and in worshipping the Judaic version of the Mayan god Kukulkan.

Not that anyone should be particularly surprised or shocked at this, since Jews worldwide have gathered together in much the same way to celebrate past instances of Gentile mass murder in religious ‘Holy Days’ such as Passover, Purim, Hannakuh and others.

Where the difference lies however between the Mayan superstate and today’s version of it–Israel–is that the Mayans did not have nuclear weapons with which to burn down the entire world in one giant human sacrifice. Let all hope and pray that the rest of the Gentile world–and particularly those with the military resources to do it–recognize that indeed this is what is in store for mankind if the beast depicted both within the storyline of Apocalypto and within the pages of the final book of the Christian New Testament–The Apocalypse–is not destroyed, for if not, as Jesus Christ Himself predicted, ‘no flesh would survive’.

Ignoring Security Council Resolutions: Israel leads – by Shlomo Shamir

Study: Israel leads in ignoring Security Council resolutions

Shlomo Shamir
October 11, 2002

NEW YORK – Israel holds the record for ignoring United Nations Security Council resolutions, according to a study by San Francisco University political science professor Steven Zunes.

On the eve of a possible U.S.-British assault on Iraq, Zunes decided to examine in depth one of the main arguments used by the Bush administration to justify changing the Baghdad regime – Iraq’s deliberate refusal to implement UN Security Council resolutions. He systematically went through all the states given instructions by the security council to find out how common a phenomenon it was. His results were somewhat surprising: “Some of the countries are considered and are known to be friendly to the U.S.,” he told Ha’aretz yesterday. “In the vast majority of cases I examined, the governments violating UN Security Council resolutions are countries that receive significant military, diplomatic and financial aid from the U.S.”

Israel leads the list. Since 1968, Israel has violated 32 resolutions that included condemnation or criticism of the governments’ policies and actions. Turkey is in second place, with 24 violations since 1974, and Morocco is third with 17 resolutions it ignored.

Newsday newspaper published the ranking yesterday, but Zunes said that he did not rank the states and claimed it was newspaper that came up with the grades. According to Zunes, out of some 1,500 UN Security Resolutions passed since 1947, 90 were openly, blatantly, and continually violated without the governments being held accountable for their actions.

Zunes specifically avoided counting resolutions that are vague or unclear so that governments could claim different interpretations to the meaning of the resolutions. Thus, the famous UN Security Council resolutions 242 and 338 are not included in his study. He also did not count resolutions that only included condemnations. Instead, he focused on those that included specific calls for changes in the subject governments’ policies.

The resolutions Israel violated were either about its annexation of East Jerusalem or settlements in the territories. Israel also ignored UN Security Council resolutions that called for Israel to cease using harsh measures against the Palestinian population and to cease expelling Palestinians.

In response, Israel’s deputy chief of mission at the UN, Aharon Yaakov, said yesterday that there are big differences between the decisions that refer to Israel and those that refer to Iraq. “Israel is the only democracy in the region and is fighting for its existence, while Iraq is a brutal dictatorship that attacked its neighbors and violates human rights, including the use of chemical weapons against its own citizens,” he said.


Mashreq News claims Mossad and “Jewish Mafia” assassinated JFK


© Unknown

The ultra-hardline Mashreq News has a piece on the American Mafia claiming that the image of the criminal organization as one comprising “Italian criminals” from Sicily is at least in part a Hollywood concoction and that “at the apogee of the years of Mafia groups’ activities, the biggest and most mysterious American gangster was a Jewish Zionist.” The article then goes on to provide a “portrait” of famous “mob accountant” Meyer Lansky and the “Jewish Mafia” and make numerous strange and unsubstantiated claims drawing on marginal and dubious anti-Semitic literature.

The article then continues by describing Lansky as a “great defender of the formation of the government of Israel.” It also claims Lansky “performed an important role in the establishment of the country of Israel” and that he “was the Godfather of the modern government of Israel.”

The article even goes as far as to claim that Israel and the Mafia had “the most to gain” from the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and that Israel’s relations with the Kennedy administration had been brought to a “dangerous dead end” over Israel’s “decision to produce a nuclear weapon” and that Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion left his post as prime minister over the impasse.

“Perhaps [Ben Gurion’s] last action as prime minister was to order Mossad to plan the assassination of John F. Kennedy.”

After making this allegation, the article states Lansky was also implicated in the conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy on the basis of a book by Michael Collins Piper, titled Final Judgement: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy.

An online search for the book in question shows it featured on a number of Aryan supremacist and anti-Semitic websites. The book was translated into Persian in 2008, and the article quotes Piper on a number of occasions from the Persian translation. At one point Piper is quoted as claiming, “Some rightly claim, if the Mafia killed John F. Kennedy, it couldn’t have done this without the prior knowledge and leadership of Meyer Lansky.”

Further research yields that Piper was invited to the infamous 2006 “Holocaust conference” at President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s invitation.

Finally the article describes Lansky’s return to Israel in 1970, and his eventual extradition back to the United States to stand trial, though states he was later exonerated as a result of his “magical influence.”

In other news

Hojjat al-Islam Abdol Ali Govahi, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s representative in the Tehran Revolutionary Guards, has claimed that the so-called “deviant current,” which refers to President Ahmadinejad’s inner circle, and sometimes even said to include the president himself, are intent to cause problems for the “regime” in Iran’s upcoming presidential election.

Govahi made his comments in a gathering of Tehran guilds and merchants and added, “We have a duty more than ever to make the people aware of this most dangerous current, so the country goes toward peace and tranquillity.”

Asr-e Iran covers Barack Obama’s swearing in for his second term as president of the United States. It carries the headline quoting Obama as stating, “we will turn sworn enemies into friends” continuing: “An important point that Obama put forward in the field of foreign policy issues was an emphasis on peace, and that America wants to turn its sworn enemies into friends.

“Obama in the swearing in ceremony also referred to himself with his full name, Barack Hossein Obama, while the person overseeing the ceremony referred to him as ‘Barack H. Obama.'”

Judiciary spokesman Hojjat al-Islam Gholam Hossein Mohseni Ezhei, in the course of a news conference has stated that “the allegations against Mehdi Hashemi [the son of former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani] are security and financially [related]”.


Zionism 1990: On this Day in History, Terrorist Jewish Defense League Founder Kahane Assassinated in NYC

Terrorist Kahane Shot dead in New York City sparking a wave of more violence in USA as psychopaths “promised land in Palestine by GOD” continue their march towards infecting US Congress to fleece the American Taxpayers out of billions to colonize the indigenous peoples of the Levant

Terrorist Meir Kahane, an American-born rabbi and founder of the far-right Kach movement, is shot dead in New York City on this November 5th day in 1990. Egyptian El Sayyid Nosair was later charged with the murder but acquitted in a state trial.

The federal government later decided that the killing was part of a larger terrorist conspiracy and thus claimed the right to retry Nosair.

In 1995, he was convicted of killing Kahane during the conspiracy trial of Brooklyn-based Arab militants led by Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman. Nosair was sentenced to life imprisonment.

Kahane, a charismatic Jewish leader who advocated expelling all Arabs from Israel, found followers in Israel and the United States. He formed the Terrorist Jewish Defense League in the United States in the 1960s and in 1971 moved to Israel, where he founded the Kach Party.

Because of its racist platform, Kach was forbidden from participating in Israeli elections after 1988, but it continued to be supported by extremist Jewish settlers in Israel’s occupied territories.

In 1994, after a Jewish settler once affiliated with the Kach movement gunned down more than 30 Arabs worshipping in a mosque in the West Bank town of Hebron, Israel completely outlawed the Terrorist organization.

JDL Logo

What and Who is the Jewish Defense League

The Jewish Defense League (JDL) is a Jewish far-right religious-political TERRORISTorganization in the United States, whose stated goal is to “protect Jews from antisemitism by whatever means necessary“.

While the group asserts that it “unequivocally condemns terrorism” and states that it has a “strict no-tolerance policy against terrorism and other felonious acts”, it was classified as “a right wing extremist group” by the FBI in 2001 and is considered a radical organization by the Southern Poverty Law Center. According to the FBI, the JDL has been involved in plotting and executing acts of terrorism within the United States.

Nov. 2002, Terrorist JDL Leader Irv Rubin was eliminated under mysterious circumstances in jail when awaiting trial on charges of conspiracy to bomb private and government property.

Founded by Rabbi Meir Kahane in New York City in 1968, the JDL’s self-described purpose was to protect Jews from local manifestations of antisemitism. Its criticism of the Soviet Union increased support for the group, transforming it from a “vigilante club” into an organization with a stated membership numbering over 15,000 at one point. The group took to bombing Arab and Soviet properties in the United States, and targeting various alleged “enemies of the Jewish people”, ranging from Arab-American political activists to neo-Nazis, for assassination.

A number of JDL members have been linked to violent, and sometimes deadly, attacks in the United States and in other countries, including the murder of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee regional director and California State University Professor of Arab Studies Alex Odeh in 1985, the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre in 1994, and a plot to assassinate Congressman Darrell Issa in 2001 The National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism’s database of identified terrorist organizations, which is compiled by official contractors and consultants to the United States government and is supported by the Department of Homeland Security, identifies the JDL as a “former terrorist organization”.

The JDL’s website states that it rejects terrorism. Several JDL members and leaders died violent deaths, including Kahane himself, who was assassinated by an Arab-American gunman.

According to the Anti-Defamation League, the JDL consists only of “thugs and hooligans”. The group’s founder, Meir Kahane, “preached a radical form of Jewish nationalism which reflected racism, violence and political extremism,” attitudes that were replicated by Irv Rubin, the successor to Kahane.

RARE- Rabbi Meir Kahane’s assassination reported on Channel 11 news in NY

Netanyahu & Wiesel

BBC Radio: Caller Thanks Jews for Almost Everything

This audio is from earlier this year on BBC radio. A caller takes about 10 minutes of air time to gush over all of the wonderful things jews are doing for Britain, going into great detail about how there are so many great jews in positions of power. It’s top trolling.

Children descended from Palestinians forced to flee their land in the 1948 war surrounding the creation of Israel attend an “apology party”

Banksy holds Balfour ‘apology party’ for Palestinians

Children descended from Palestinians forced to flee their land in the 1948 war surrounding the creation of Israel attend an 'apology party' held by secretive British street artist Banksy in the occupied West Bank

Children descended from Palestinians forced to flee their land in the 1948 war surrounding the creation of Israel attend an ‘apology party’ held by secretive British street artist Banksy in the occupied West Bank

Secretive British street artist Banksy held a special event Wednesday to apologise for the 100th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration outside his hotel in the occupied West Bank.

The typically surreal event involved 50 children hosted by an actor dressed as Queen Elizabeth II for a British-style tea party.

Their party hats were bullet-riddled helmets with British flags on them, while tattered Union Jacks were flown.

The queen revealed a plaque carved in concrete saying “Er, Sorry,” playing on the common initials for Elizabeth Regina.

The apology was etched into Israel’s controversial separation wall, which in many areas cuts through Palestinian territory.

An actor dressed up as Britain's Queen Elizabeth hosts a party organised by secretive British street artist Banksy to apologise for the 1917 Balfour Declaration

An actor dressed up as Britain’s Queen Elizabeth hosts a party organised by secretive British street artist Banksy to apologise for the 1917 Balfour Declaration

The children were descendants of Palestinians forced to flee their land in the 1948 war surrounding the creation of Israel.

Thursday marks the 100th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration, when the British government said it viewed “with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people”.

Palestinians see the document as giving away their homeland, while Israelis see it as helping pave the way to the founding of their country at a time when Jews were facing persecution elsewhere.

“This conflict has brought so much suffering to people on all sides. It didn’t feel appropriate to ‘celebrate’ the British role in it,” Banksy said in a statement.

An actor dressed as Queen Elizabeth revealed a plaque carved in concrete saying "Er, Sorry" at Banksy's 'apology party' in the occupied West Bank

An actor dressed as Queen Elizabeth revealed a plaque carved in concrete saying “Er, Sorry” at Banksy’s ‘apology party’ in the occupied West Bank

“The British didn’t handle things well here — when you organise a wedding, it’s best to make sure the bride isn’t already married.”

Gemma Bell, a British woman among a group who walked part of the way from London to Jerusalem to apologise for their government’s role in Balfour, hailed the work.

“It’s what we should expect from Banksy — brilliant, unpredictable, dramatic and really getting that message home.”

The British government has said it will mark Thursday’s anniversary “with pride”, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to attend a dinner in London with his British counterpart Theresa May.

Banksy opened the Walled-Off Hotel near Bethlehem in March, with all the rooms facing directly onto Israel’s separation wall.

At the time, he said it had the worst view of any hotel in the world.

Dozens of his works are found inside the hotel.

Wissam Salsaa, the hotel’s manager, told AFP they wanted to protest against the British government’s attitude to Balfour.

“This event is a protest or a commemoration of the disastrous Balfour Declaration that caused a catastrophe for the Palestinian people and a catastrophe for the Middle East,” he said.

“The British people and government, represented (here) by the Queen, should apologise to the Palestinian people.”

The wall is one of the most striking symbols of Israel’s 50-year occupation, and has become a major focus for demonstrations and art work.

Banksy closely protects his identity and was not said to be in attendance Wednesday.


Former Jew Benjamin H Freedman on The Balfour Declaration

“Truth” for Jews is ‘whatever serves Israel’s interests’ – Polish priest

I Helped Sell the False Choice of War Once. It’s Happening Again.

Echoes of Colin Powell: Nikki Haley’s recent Yemen push mirrors the Bush Iraq intelligence failures –

Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, recalls his work to invent a case for “pre-emptive” war with Iraq.

Has the ADL Gone Into Hiding?


Jonathan Greenblatt, National Director and CEO of the Anti-Defamation League since 2015. Credit: Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 3.0

Jonathan Greenblatt, National Director and CEO of the Anti-Defamation League since 2015. Credit: Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 3.0

I’ve recently taken a bit of a break after three long months of writing in my American Pravda series, during which I finally got around to publishing many of the very surprising discoveries I had made over the last fifteen-odd years. That total came to more than 90,000 words of text, and required me to read or (mostly) reread some 40-50 books, so I was quite exhausted by the end of the cycle.

However, the results were quite encouraging, with my small series of articles generating nearly half a million pageviews of readership over that short period, while helping to drive our small webzine to record-setting traffic. Even more remarkably, those articles provoked nearly 13,000 comments, totaling an astonishing 1.8 million words of text. Indeed, the three most heavily-commented articles in our webzine’s history came from that group, as did five of our seven most widely-read pieces from the last six months.

Furthermore, several of these articles appear to have very strong “legs” and are still attracting enough readership to remain on the front page many weeks after they were first released, suggesting that they may end up accumulating remarkable aggregate traffic across the coming months and years.

Although all items in my American Pravda series have certainly been controversial, many of this group were especially so, with numerous observers noting that I had leaped four-square onto the deadliest “Third Rail” of journalist topics and some of them predicting that I would quickly be annihilated as a consequences of my foolhardy undertaking. I think the following is a reasonable list of these especially “touchy” pieces:

After the first and most innocuous of these pieces ran, an ultra-right-wing blogger quite unfriendly to me claimed that I had gone completely insane and for some bizarre reason had decided to commit immediate journalistic suicide by writing about such utterly forbidden topics. But that statement was made in early June and those reports of my demise seem rather premature.

Another right-winger bitterly hostile to my views said he was astonished that I had dared to publish the “Jewish Religion” article, and declared that if that piece didn’t immediately kill The Review, then absolutely nothing could. Ten weeks have now gone by, and I see no apparent need for any burial shroud.

Several much friendlier readers commended me for my remarkable bravery, but warned that I should prepare myself for one of the most ferocious onslaughts of attacks and denunciations in recent Internet history. Offhand, that might seem a very plausible prediction. After all, writers with far less visibility and readership have sometimes been fried to a crisp by a blast of vituperation for daring to cautiously mention even just one percent of the controversial claims I had boldly made in my columns. Yet almost no such attacks ensued, except from a couple of rather obscure and marginal quarters.

Surely the ADL ranks as the leading enforcer of silence on these sorts of forbidden issues, with Hollywood stars and powerful politicians trembling at merely a cross word from that fearsome organization. But their own silence over the last three months has been absolutely deafening, and without their apparent willingness to participate in any such attack, what other group or individual of any significance would dare to take the lead?

A very shrewd observation, widely misattributed to Voltaire, states that “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” Or put another way, individuals are reluctant to publicly challenge those whose power they fear. Certainly, this simple standard helps to explain many important aspects of America’s severely malfunctioning political system.

But suppose that same test were applied to the reaction of the ADL and its close allies toward this small series of articles, which have already been read nearly half a million times. What does such total silence indicate about the organization’s opinion on the relative power relationship they would face? I very much doubt that the ADL fears me in the least as an individual, but I do think they may be absolutely terrified of the many facts contained within the series of recent columns that I have now published, and such abject terror is what keeps them far, far away.

The easiest means of testing this hypothesis would for readers to bring these columns to the direct attention of the ADL and any journalists or activists who may be aligned with it. Perhaps the entire leadership of the ADL has merely been on an extended summer vacation, and remains unaware of the existence of this body of highly controversial material, which they normally would attack in such harsh terms. Surely, they would be grateful at an opportunity to begin earning their munificent salaries.

I don’t use Twitter myself, but I believe it’s very good means for passing along such information and links, and the ADL and its top leadership have several public Twitter addresses, as do their friends and allies.


Meanwhile, I’ve recently spent some time reading a couple of the essay collections of Israel Shamir published in the mid-2000s. These had been sitting on my shelf for three or four years, and found the material extremely interesting.

I was very pleased to discover that he had come to so many conclusions quite similar to my own, though his analysis was usually derived from a vastly greater base of historical and personal knowledge rather than my own casual readings here and there. A portion of his articles from such years as 2005 and 2006 are conveniently available here, and provide a flavor of his views.

I first encountered his writings on Counterpunch a few years ago, and I remember the late Alex Cockburn once telling me that no other writer they published received such tremendous support from some of their readers but also such enormous hostility from others. Apparently, the latter group eventually triumphed, and his last column ran there just over three years ago, apparently making him one of the first of their regular contributors to fall in the ongoing purge.

Anyway, I’d strongly recommend his books, which so far at least have not yet been banned from


Update – Here’s a nice example of a Tweet someone sent out

Kevin Barrett@truthjihad

@ADL has attacked me countless times for saying 1% of what Ron Unz says here! 


AIPAC meeting

The allgemeiner

MAY 22, 2017 12:32 PM

ADL Calls on Google to Take Action After Revelations That Deniers Included in ‘Holocaust Historian’ Search Results

avatarby Rachel Frommer

Google image bar results for a search of “Holocaust historian” lists David Irving, among other Holocaust deniers. Photo: Screenshot.

An Anti-Defamation League (ADL) cyber-hate expert has called on Google to take action following revelations that Holocaust deniers are included in the image bar results for a search of “Holocaust historians.”

Jonathan Vick — the ADL’s associate director of investigative technology and cyber-hate — said he was certain that Google would edit the algorithm for the search results to ensure the exclusion of deniers and antisemites.

“[Google has] been confronted with this sort of issue in the past, and there is no real question of how they will respond,” Vick said. “These are unintended and painful consequences of an algorithm that clearly needs human intervention.”

The very first “historian” listed is David Irving, with other results including David Hoggan, author of The Myth of the Six Million, and one-time Columbia University historian Harry Elmer Barnes, who wrote a 1964 article titled “The Zionist Fraud,” in which he claimed Israel manufactured the Holocaust to squeeze reparations from Germany.

All three individuals were discussed in Deborah Lipstadt’s Denying the Holocaust, published in 1993 and considered by many to be a seminal text in the study of Holocaust denial. This was the book that triggered Irving’s failed 1996 libel suit against Lipstadt, a case immortalized last year in the film, “Denial.”

Vick said he was highly concerned by the fact that “we don’t know how long this issue has been up, and it would’ve been nice if someone had noticed earlier.” He noted that having misinformation “like deniers being included in a list of legitimate scholars” readily available across the internet “certainly impacts Holocaust education.”

Google press representatives did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

In 2013, it was exposed that auto-fill suggestions on the search engine for “Jews should” included a host of disturbing antisemitic phrases. Google subsequently edited that algorithm to exclude the most offensive statements from appearing in the auto-fill feature.

UPDATE: The Google search results for “Holocaust historian” have now been updated to exclude the image bar entirely.


Australian Jewish news

Fury over Amazon denial books

AMAZON has come under fire for offering books on Holocaust denial to the public and could be in breach of the Racial Discrimination Act.

The B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission (ADC) has slammed Amazon for offering titles such as Did Six Million Really Die?The Six Million: Fact or Fiction?The Myth of the Extermination of the Jews and The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry.

All these titles are available from the online provider through a simple Google search that takes readers to the Amazon site.

ADC chair Dr Dvir Abramovich told The AJN this week that Amazon Australia could be in breach of Section 18C of the federal Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits material likely to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” on the basis race or ethnicity.

He said Amazon Australia “should not be a hothouse and a cesspool of racism, xenophobia and bigotry and should not act as a gateway for young people to enter a world of hatred”.

“It is inexcusable for Amazon Australia to serve as a vehicle and a platform for bigots to disseminate and propagate their toxic and harmful invective. Literature that promotes and incites hatred against the Jewish people by demonising and defaming them, that denies and trivialises the Holocaust, and which foments racial violence, should not be normalised and mainstreamed,” he stated.

“I am sure that neo-Nazis, racists and radical groups, who cannot offer their heinous materials to traditional publishers, are delighted that this vile content, which glorifies Nazis and white supremacists, and which dehumanises Jews, is available in hard copy and ebook format for mass consumption.

“At a time of a dramatic rise in anti-Semitism, hate speech, and violence against Jews, to have such revolting, poisonous tracts, easily accessible for download, only helps to blow on the embers of prejudice and extremism.”

Abramovich added, “Companies have a moral responsibility and should review and evaluate their practices and guidelines. We urge Amazon Australia to do the right thing, and to withdraw these titles from its virtual shelves immediately.”

Amazon’s head office in the United States had not responded to The AJN at the time of going to press.



Ford-Kavanaugh showdown actually reveals Democrat sickness (Video)

The victim testimony of Dr. Ford served the needs of Democrat senators. And after this scandal ends, Dr Ford will be discarded.

Seraphim Hanisch




Riveting TV.” “Shame of the Nation.” “Hollywood seethes.” The Drudge Report lists these and about thirteen other links at the top of its page as of the time of this writing to describe what was anticipated as a major showdown between the Democrats and Republicans over the fate of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, as his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, got her chance to testify in front of the Senate Committee about her allegations that the Judge sexually assaulted her when she was a teenager at a drinking party back in 1982.

This event was both more – and less – than what either side of supporters probably expected.

In what can likely be seen as a very refreshing display of conservative assertiveness, Judge Kavanaugh was completely unambiguous and forceful in his testimony from beginning to end. Further, and perhaps more significant, Senator Lindsey Graham delivered a scathing lecture to the Democrats who are to a man aligned against Brett Kavanaugh, and to a man, all stating they believe Christine’s story.

Further, the sex-crimes prosecutor who the Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford told the senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, when she talked to them in an overnight meeting where all fifty-one Republican senators were present:

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn’t even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday morning.

It is not necessary for Kavanaugh to secure majority approval of the committee in order to advance to the full Senate, but a favorable recommendation could bode well for his imperiled nomination — and vice-versa…

“It’s a tough one. She offered good testimony, and so did he,” Flake, who sits on the Judiciary Committee, said Thursday night. “If you’re making an allegation, you want there to be some corroboration. Where is the burden? It’s like impeachment. You don’t know.”

In fact, this is true. Dr Ford was as unwavering in her testimony as Judge Kavanaugh was with his own. However, there was a peculiarity in Dr Ford’s testimony that is suspect. Watch here:

Her story is complete, but she is reading it. It must be taken as strong possibility that this is to help her focus as she was already reported to be “terrified” of testifying. She also appears to be either forcing herself to have emotion, for her voice is cracking, but forced and very rehearsed. At other times she does appear to display genuine emotion. However, this testimony, while detailed, seems “vacant” of some real personal connection.

Naturally, people supporting the idea that Dr Ford actually experienced sexual assault at the hands of Brett Kavanaugh would be inclined to take her emotional display as genuine. In contrast, this clip, at the beginning of her testimony, reveals a somewhat different character to her voice:

She starts with a fairly strong tone of speaking, relative to her recounting of her story. But then, there was this rather strange episode concerning her polygraph test:

Here the sex-crimes prosecutor’s questions get blocked by her attorneys (she is flanked by at least two of them), and yet, she reports the polygraph test as “extremely stressful.”

The questions here seemed to run down a rabbit hole, yet the interesting situation remains that she was walked through this part of the questioning very carefully by her counsel.

She said she was “scared of the test itself.”

Again, why?

This makes no sense. A person with a legitimate claim of wrongdoing by someone else should have no problem stating her case. And, Judge Kavanaugh was not in the room during her testimony.

However, the presentation of this story is almost letter-perfect victim testimony, at least for Hollywood. However, again, the story Dr Ford offered is utterly uncorroborated, even by the people she named as witnesses or at least, corroborating people. They all denied this story.

Brett Kavanaugh’s testimony was refreshingly brutal. Even liberal outlet Vox noted that the Judge’s anger “worked.” The man claimed he was set up by Democrats intent on vengeance for various reasons. In this, he spoke as probably anyone who is on the side of President Trump and his nominee would think and feel if confronted with a situation that looks like nothing less than a last-minute lynching. He was furious. One can see so right here:

Again, the way one receives this testimony probably depends on his or her already-made-up-mind. This, of course is a tragedy, because the hearing was not purposed to make each side more set, but to shed light on the allegations and see what the real story actually is. Yet, as Brett Kavanaugh said himself, the attack was a disgrace.

And unlike Dr Ford, Kavanaugh did not think only of himself. He noted that this tactic is dangerous to the future of the nation as a whole.

He then got down to the brass tacks about Dr Ford’s allegation. He broke when he recounted his ten-year old daughter Ashley suggesting that the family pray for Dr Ford. However, unlike Dr Ford’s tears, which appear “forced”, Kavanaugh showed the much harder task of trying to hold them back. He noted, and acknowledged that it is evident that Dr Ford was abused by someone, but emphatically said he never did anything like that.

He never, ever wavered from this.

At the time of this writing the matter of confirming Judge Kavanaugh has been moved to a committee vote. The Democrats continued to grandstand, with several of them refusing to even answer “no” to the voice vote to continue the process. And, apparently, many of them simply left the room. At this time, the vote to move ahead went 11-8 to proceed.

As continuing attacks come from Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA), the shape of the attacks remarkably resembles the attacks against Donald Trump – efforts to decry Judge Kavanaugh’s decorum as unbefitting of a Justice, and so on, just as Trump’s accusers called him “unpresidential.”

There is one glaring issue about this story: Dr Ford’s story was reportedly leaked by Diane Feinstein (a fact she denies). However, the claims of and surrounding Dr Ford are conflicting. She claims to not want to have had her story revealed, but it was. By whom? If she didn’t want to be brought on display, she was anyway. Why? To serve the Democratic Party’s purpose. Christine Blasey Ford is now twice victimized in this issue. By making her story public, she and her family were reportedly receiving death threats. The same is true for Judge Kavanaugh and his family.

Nothing good came out of this for Dr Ford, and she honestly looks unstable. It seems to be that another tragedy is in the making because this frail woman looks like someone in need of help, and not in need of nurturing of victimhood. But this will not come. And it will not come because like so many other people, victims serve a purpose for stronger people. For Dr. Ford, those stronger people were the members of the Senate in the Democrat Party. And after this scandal ends, Dr Ford will be discarded as soon as she is no longer needed.

This is the sickness of Democrat politics in America.

Russia’s HEAVY caliber artillery is back in service



  • Last year, Lieutenant-General Mikhail Matveyevsky,  Commander of Russia’s Army Missile Troops and Artillery, stated that  Russia’s ground forces will  have 50-100% more firepower by 2021. The upgrade of these “old warriors” that have been taken out of storage is underway, along with the addition of new systems. Brand-new equipment is being installed.  Barrels, recoil mechanisms, and other components are being replaced or refitted.

The modernization of Russia’s “big guns” — the 2S4 Tyulpan (Tulip) 240-millimeter mortar and the 2S7 Pion 203-millimeter howitzer — has attracted the attention of US military analysts. The Cold War weapons are being refurbished to adapt them for modern warfare. The program of modernization started about a year ago.   Nothing like it is being done anywhere else in the world.

All in all, more than 400 Tyulpans and the same number of Pions have been produced. The exact number of artillery guns that will be added to the arsenal after the modernization has not been released, but the upgrade is in full swing. Analysis of the Russian military press provides some clues as to why the old big guns are back in the ranks.

Last summer, the Uraltranmash company, a subsidiary of Uralvagonzavod, showcased the modernized version of the 2S4 Tyulpan self-propelled mortar with new onboard systems and communications equipment. The 240mm self-propelled mortar is the largest artillery system in the world. It can fire high-explosivearmor-piercinglaser-guided, and cluster munitions as well as tactical nuclear rounds that can destroy hardened defensive positions. The primary ammunition is a high-explosive 53-F-864 mortar projectile that contains 32 kg of explosive charge.  Its rate of fire: one round per minute. With rocket-assisted projectiles its range is up to twenty kilometers or more. The mortar was also designed to fire the 3B11, a special nuclear munition developed specifically for this artillery system, which yields an explosive force of 2 tons of TNT — enough to wipe out an army brigade.

The thirty-ton artillery piece is installed on a tracked GMZ vehicle chassis. The system is operated by a crew of nine who are protected by up to twenty millimeters of armor.

The 2S7 Pion is a self-propelled system based on a T-80 chassis carrying an externally mounted 2A44 203mm howitzer on the hull rear, which is capable of firing nuclear munitions. Its rate of fire: 2.5 rounds per minute and its range: roughly 35 km. It can be extended up to 55.5 km, if rocket-assisted projectiles are used. For instance, the 110kg ZFO35 high-explosive fragmentation projectile can hit enemy targets at distances of up to 50 km.

With new automated fire-control systems, these weapons have a future. They make it possible to save precision-guided munitions for specific targets, while destroying those that can be knocked out with powerful conventional artillery shells. Some Russian sources mention the possibility of using the systems for launching hypervelocity missiles.    The modernization plans include the ability to fire high-precision munitions with a weight of 133 kg from a distance of 100 km. The accuracy will be improved if drones provide targeting data.

The artillery systems have an important advantage over missiles.  They are immune to the effects of electronic warfare. The weapons need neither GLONASS nor GPS.  An artillery munition with sophisticated devices attached that enable it to guide the artillery with great accuracy is much cheaper than any missile or a smart bomb.  Such a system will be a valuable asset if the mission is to attack targets in the mountains.

Putting heavy caliber artillery back in service is an effective way to substantially increase firepower at a low cost. The big guns have certain advantages compared to contemporary sophisticated systems. With precision-strike capability and the proper equipment installed, they’ll be able to engage in network-centric warfare. The old soldiers are back on duty.

Via Strategic Culture

Radioactive relationship: Iran lashes out at Israeli claims of secret atomic warehouses

Sat Sep 29, 2018 10:51AM – Press TV
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Iran’s envoy to the UN General Assembly has rejected anti-Iran claims by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and said the Israeli leader – whose actions are reminiscent of those by Daesh and Nazi elements – has lying in his DNA. 

Farhad Mamdouhi touched on Netanyahu’s Thursday speech at the UN, saying by exhibiting some photographs of google street view, “the Israeli showman claimed that he discovered new nuclear facilities in Iran.”

“This is yet another false story. It is not surprising as lying is in his DNA,” the envoy added.

Netanyahu held up the photographs during his address to the annual General Assembly meeting, repeating a mannerism that he has for long adopted as part of his high-profile Iran-bashing.

“This is a dreadfully regressive and undemocratic regime led by a corrupt leader, who pretends to be progressive and democratic. Israeli PM’s ethno-religious fantasies are indeed very close to the other extremists namely Daesh,” Mamdouhi said.

“Israel’s absurd claim of being democratic echoes similar assertions that Nazis used to make before dragging the whole world into destruction.”

The Iranian ambassador called Israel “the warden of the world’s biggest open prison – Gaza,” and denounced the regime for its “mockery of democracy.”

Mamdouhi said Tel Aviv had a long-standing history of opportunism and struggling to deflect the public opinion from its inhumane behavior and barbarity against the Palestinians.

Israel has so far violated 300 United Nations resolutions, including those targeting weapons of mass destruction and settlement activities on the occupied territories. The United States, Israel’s closest ally, has used its veto power on 44 occasions to protect Israel.

“Instead of such fabrications,” Mamdouhi said in reference to the Israeli premier’s address, “he should stop threatening Iran with nuclear annihilation as he did recently.”

The Iranian official was referring to threats Netanyahu issued against the Islamic Republic during an address he delivered close to the regime’s nuclear facilities in the Negev desert late last month.

“Such an inflammatory statement against an NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) party constitutes a serious violation of international law and the UN Charter,” the Iranian envoy asserted.

‘Days of Israel’s immunity over’

Elsewhere in his remarks, the envoy said the Islamic Republic maintained complete awareness of Israel’s criminal measures.

“Let us be outright clear. We watch Israel’s criminal behavior whenever they do it and wherever they do it. The time that Israel hit its neighbors with impunity is past,” he stated.

Natanyahood is a criminal whte trash.
Anita Lajoie
Abdul Hanis
good comments

Breaking! Putin in Azerbaijan: Israel will have to leave Moscow’s sphere of influence

Editor’s note:  In 2009, VT discovered two Israeli bases inside Azerbaijan, former Soviet fighter bases, which were to be used to attack Iran.  Supplies to the bases were transferred, including runway denial and bunker-buster bombs, through the Georgian port of Poti via the USS Grapple, an American naval ship leased to Germany but crewed by Israelis.
In 2010, VT found an Israeli drone base at a commercial airport inside Azerbaijan.  Our suspicions were confirmed when two Azeri officers defected to Iran in 2011 outlining the entire Israeli operation.
Below is the momentous announcement in Pravda followed by the detailed VT investigation…  Gordon


Pravda: Russian President Vladimir Putin came to Baku to participate in the Russian-Azerbaijani inter-regional forum. Putin will also attend the final stage of the World Judo Championship. However, behind closed doors, Putin and his Azerbaijani counterpart Ilham Aliyev also discussed  topics of military-technical cooperation, the CSTO, as well as issues of the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict.

The Kremlin watched closely the recent visit of Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman to Azerbaijan. Lieberman promised to supply state-of-the-art air defense systems to Azerbaijan to build an echeloned defense system the border with Armenia.

In addition, Azerbaijan will continue purchasing unmanned aerial vehicles from Israel, after they proved to be highly effective in the course of hostilities in the zone of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict in April 2016.

Naturally, Moscow wants to seize the initiative from Israel, especially after the shutdown of the Ilyushin Il-20 aircraft over Syria. The Kremlin would not want Azerbaijan – a key country in Transcaucasia  – to cooperate closely with Israel.

What can Russia offer in return?

President of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev, paid a visit to Russia in September of 2018. Aliyev then stated publicly that Azerbaijan had acquired weapons from Russia totaling $5 billion, and this number will grow. According to the Azerbaijani leader, Russia is “the world’s most important producer and supplier of military products to international markets.” Therefore, Azerbaijan will continue modernizing its army with Russia’s help.

Is Azerbaijan going to become a full-fledged participant in the Collective Security Treaty Organisation (COST? However, Azerbaijan is a member of the Non-Aligned Movement, which binds the country to maintain neutrality in foreign policy issues and refrain from joining any defense alliances.

Nevertheless, Azerbaijan may join the CSTO, if Putin allows Aliyev to carry out a quick military operation to regain control over five areas adjacent to Nagorno-Karabakh (the five territories are currently occupied by Armenian troops).

Putin’s reaction to this proposal is not known yet. A lot of things in this situation will depend on the policy of new Armenian leader Nikol Pashinyan. If he continues taking Armenia out of the orbit of Moscow’s influence to build closer ties with the EU and NATO instead, Moscow will not be delighted with such a development.

The Armenian administration understands the prospect and tries to maintain friendly relations with Moscow, while making steps towards the European Union and NATO at the same time.

Meanwhile, Armenia is keeping an eye on Putin’s visit to Azerbaijan and wants to know every single detail of the talks in Baku. From Baku, Putin is flying to Dushanbe for the summit of the CIS countries, where he may try to arrange the meeting between the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, taking into consideration the fact that Ilham Aliyev and Nikol Pashinyan have never met before.

In any case, Azerbaijan has not joined the Collective Security Treaty Organization yet. Interestingly, Azerbaijan’s military aviation did not take part in military exercises of air defense forces of the Commonwealth of Independent States that kicked off on September 27. A report from the Russian Defence Ministry said that as many as 100 aircraft from seven CIS countries take part in the exercises: Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Azerbaijan is not among them

See more at


Iran Attack: Azerbaijan Throws Israeli Air Force Out After VT Exposes Plot

Prelude to World War III Outlined

Press TV just announced that Azerbaijan has assured Iran no Israeli attack would occur from their territory.  This is their announcement, from Tehran, moments ago:


Press TV – Azerbaijan’s ambassador to Pakistan says Baku will not allow Israel to use its airspace or land to carry out a military attack on Iran or any other country.






Earlier this week, Reuters confirmed through two Azeri officers that Israeli forces were in place in Azerbaijan and that the president was weighing options of supporting their attack.  That text is now below from Reuters.  Their unedited full text  is at Addendum I:



It doesn’t take a genius to see that Azerbaijan was “caught with their pants down” and is now trying to lie their way out of this.


In an explosive turn of events, Press TV announces Azerbaijan has “turned chicken” after receiving a chastising based on receiving an early distribution of this  Veterans Today document through Russian sources.

Additional VT staff were, while at the Pentagon, responsible for drawing up the war plans, not just for the initial invasion of Iran but the American invasion of Azerbaijan, slated for 2008, as part of a Bush administration military takeover of the entire Caspian Basin.

The map for that attack by US troops from Iran is below:

US Army 2006 “exercise” plans predicated on a 2005 successful invasion of Iran, confirmed by direct Pentagon sources. (the author)

The cover sheet for the War Plans/Exercise Plans is below, a document that contained a full outline for needed capabilities for the successful takeover of all of the former Soviet Republics, beginning with Azerbaijan as seen on the map above.

Today, Azerbaijan announced it would allow Israeli planes to use their air bases to attack Iran.  Reuters published the press release from Baku, one originally released in Veterans Today 27 months ago.  From Reuters:





This attack might have happened sooner without the break in the Turkish relations

An investigation done by independent intelligence organizations made up of former CIA, Army Intelligence and FBI personnel as published on June 18, 2010, discovered a plot between Israel, Georgia, Turkey and Azerbaijan to attack Iran.

At that time, Israeli planes were training in Turkey on terrain meant to simulate Iran.  Israel would send over 8 planes at a time and 6 would return.  Sources report that two would fly to Azerbaijan where Israel now occupies two former Soviet fighter bases.

Israel was building a secret air force in Azerbaijan.  That “secret air force” is now no longer secret, it is public knowledge but few know its history or the threat to world peace this irresponsible act represents.

The bases were supplied through the Georgian port of Poti with cluster and bunker-buster bombs being delivered beginning June 10, 2010.  Units of the Russian Navy observed the deliveries and reported the incident to a world press that suppressed the story.  The ship delivering the illegal arms were flagged American, the USS Grapple.

In consultation with intelligence operatives, it was found that the USS Grapple had been leased to Germany who had then allowed Israel to use it to deliver bombs to the Black Sea port under American naval identity.

USS Grapple – ARS-53




Israel and Turkey have agreed to “Balkanize” Syria.  However, the roots of today’s announcement were known some time ago.

On June 18, 2010, over two years ago, this columnist released the following information:

Would Israel take the gamble, or make the U.S. do it?







Israeli F-15





Israeli F-16








The unknown factor is Azerbaijan’s ability to withstand a massive and immediate ground assault from Iran.  US Army experts on the region indicate that Iran has a “superhighway direct to Baku,” the capitol of Azerbaijan and keystone to the massive Baku/Ceyhan pipeline.

Azerbaijan’s military, 45,000 active duty, a few thousand reserves and an unarmed and untrained inactive reserve of 300,000 veterans is extremely small in comparison to Iran’s military.


If you are not getting a piece of the oil biz, drugs are the only option

Azerbaijan is closely aligned with Turkey.  However, they fought and lost a war in the early 1990’s against Armenia.  Azerbaijan lost 16% of their territory at that time.

During that war, Azerbaijan turned to Al Qaeda and Chechen forces for support, an act that angered Russia.  Azerbaijan is still a “safe haven” for terrorists and is commonly used to transit narcotics from Afghanistan and is a “way station” in human trafficking.

It is believed that an Israeli attack launched from Azerbaijan would unleash an immediate response from Armenia against Azerbaijan.  The two nations have been at the verge of hostilities for nearly two decades.

A recent estimate of regional forces paints a very dark picture for Azerbaijan:






Check out the company names on these oil fields. All would be grabbed in an attack on  Iran as compensation for the pre-emptive strike.

The 1100 mile pipeline is the only outlet for oil from the Caspian basin to outlets on the Mediterranean.  A branch of the pipeline services the massive Kirkuk oil fields of Northern Iraq.

The pipeline is owned by a number of companies with BP having a 30 percent stake.

The 25% stake theoretically held by SOCAR, the state oil company of Azerbaijan is under Israeli control, as collateral to underwrite Israeli weapons sales.

Israel has an agreement to link to the pipeline through Iraq, a deal negotiated between the Elat Ashkian Pipeline Company of Israel and the US backed Chalabi government that assumed control of Iraq after the 2003 invasion.

It is no longer clear as to whether the current government in Baghdad is still interested in this project.

Additional threats to the pipeline are in Armenia, where it may also be intercepted and in Turkey, where the PKK, a Kurdish separatist group, has put the pipeline out of commission many times.

The significance of the pipeline is great in that, even if Iran has no rationale to cut oil supplies through the Straits of Hormuz, it could easily gain control of 5% of the world’s oil output and put all Caspian Basin oil off the market without in any way interfering with free transit of sea-lanes.

Additionally, the transit fees charged for use of the pipeline are a major source of revenue for both Georgia and Turkey, a source that would immediately end.



Israel’s timetable to attack from Azerbaijan is entirely dependent on the risks their long time but highly secretive ally is willing to accept.

Minimally, Azerbaijan might actually disappear.  In a best case scenario, they would lose additional territory to Armenia and suffer total devastation of their oil production and processing facilities and destruction of their armed forces.


Editing:  Jim W. Dean


Addendum I

By Thomas Grove

BAKU | Sun Sep 30, 2012 12:46pm EDT

(Reuters) – Israel’s “go-it-alone” option to attack Iran’s nuclear sites has set the Middle East on edge and unsettled its main ally at the height of a U.S. presidential election campaign.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu exudes impatience, saying Tehran is barely a year from a “red line” for atomic capacity. Many fellow Israelis, however, fear a unilateral strike, lacking U.S. forces, would fail against such a large and distant enemy.

But what if, even without Washington, Israel were not alone?

Azerbaijan, the oil-rich ex-Soviet republic on Iran’s far northern border, has, say local sources with knowledge of its military policy, explored with Israel how Azeri air bases and spy drones might help Israeli jets pull off a long-range attack.

That is a far cry from the massive firepower and diplomatic cover that Netanyahu wants from Washington. But, by addressing key weaknesses in any Israeli war plan – notably on refueling, reconnaissance and rescuing crews – such an alliance might tilt Israeli thinking on the feasibility of acting without U.S. help.

It could also have violent side-effects more widely and many doubt Azeri President Ilham Aliyev would risk harming the energy industry on which his wealth depends, or provoking Islamists who dream of toppling his dynasty, in pursuit of favor from Israel.

Yet despite official denials by Azerbaijan and Israel, two Azeri former military officers with links to serving personnel and two Russian intelligence sources all told Reuters that Azerbaijan and Israel have been looking at how Azeri bases and intelligence could serve in a possible strike on Iran.

“Where planes would fly from – from here, from there, to where? – that’s what’s being planned now,” a security consultant with contacts at Azeri defense headquarters in Baku said. “The Israelis … would like to gain access to bases in Azerbaijan.”


That Aliyev, an autocratic ally of Western governments and oil firms, has become a rare Muslim friend of the Jewish state – and an object of scorn in Tehran – is no secret; a $1.6-billion arms deal involving dozens of Israeli drones, and Israel’s thirst for Azerbaijan’s Caspian Sea crude, are well documented.

Israel’s foreign minister visited Baku in April this year.

But a leaked U.S. diplomatic cable from 2009 quoted Aliyev, who succeeded his father in 2003, describing relations with Israel as “like an iceberg, nine tenths … below the surface”.

That he would risk the wrath of his powerful neighbor by helping wage war on Iran is, however, something his aides flatly deny; wider consequences would also be hard to calculate from military action in a region where Azerbaijan’s “frozen” conflict with Armenia is just one of many elements of volatility and where major powers from Turkey, Iran and Russia to the United States, western Europe and even China all jockey for influence.

Nonetheless, Rasim Musabayov, an independent Azeri lawmaker and a member of parliament’s foreign affairs committee, said that, while he had no definitive information, he understood that Azerbaijan would probably feature in any Israeli plans against Iran, at least as a contingency for refueling its attack force:

“Israel has a problem in that if it is going to bomb Iran, its nuclear sites, it lacks refueling,” Musabayov told Reuters.

“I think their plan includes some use of Azerbaijan access.

“We have (bases) fully equipped with modern navigation, anti-aircraft defenses and personnel trained by Americans and if necessary they can be used without any preparations,” he added.


The administration of U.S. President Barack Obama has made clear it does not welcome Israel’s occasional talk of war and that it prefers diplomacy and economic sanctions to deflect an Iranian nuclear program that Tehran denies has military uses.

Having also invested in Azerbaijan’s defenses and facilities used by U.S. forces in transit to Afghanistan, Washington also seems unlikely to cheer Aliyev joining any action against Iran.

The Azeri president’s team insist that that will not happen.

“No third country can use Azerbaijan to perpetrate an attack on Iran. All this talk is just speculation,” said Reshad Karimov from Aliyev’s staff. He was echoing similar denials issued in Baku and from Israel when the journal Foreign Policy quoted U.S. officials in March voicing alarm that Azeri-Israeli action could thwart U.S. diplomacy toward Iran and across the Caucasus.

Israeli officials dismiss talk of Azeri collaboration in any attack on Iran but decline public comment on specific details.

Even speaking privately, few Israeli officials will discuss the issue. Those who do are skeptical, saying overt use of Azeri bases by Israel would provoke too many hostile reactions. One political source did, however, say flying unmarked tanker aircraft out of Azerbaijan to extend the range and payloads of an Israeli bombing force might play a part in Israeli planning.

Though denying direct knowledge of current military thinking on Iran, the Israeli said one possibility might be “landing a refueling plane there, made to look like a civilian airliner, so it could later take off to rendezvous mid-air with IAF jets”.

A thousand miles separates Tehran and Tel Aviv, putting much of Iran beyond the normal ranges of Israel’s U.S.-made F-16 bombers and their F-15 escorts. So refueling could be critical.


There is far from unanimity among Israeli leaders about the likelihood of any strike on Iran’s nuclear plants, whether in a wider, U.S.-led operation or not. Netanyahu’s “red line” speech to the United Nations last week was seen by many in Israel as making any strike on Iran unlikely – for at least a few months.

Many, however, also assume Israel has long spied on and even sabotaged what the Western powers say are plans for atomic weapons which Israel says would threaten its very existence.

A second Israeli political source called the idea of Azerbaijan being either launch pad or landing ground for Israeli aircraft “ludicrous” – but agreed with the first source that it was fair to assume joint Israeli-Azeri intelligence operations.

The Azeri sources said such cooperation was established.

As part of last year’s arms deal, Azerbaijan is building up to 60 Israeli-designed drones, giving it reconnaissance means far greater than many analysts believe would be needed just to guard oil installations or even to mount any operations against the breakaway, ethnic Armenian enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh.

“With these drones, (Israel) can indirectly watch what’s happening in Iran, while we protect our borders,” legislator Musabayov said – a view shared by Azeri former military sources.

Less reserved than Israeli officials, the sources in Azerbaijan and in Russian intelligence, which keeps a close eye on its former Soviet backyard, said Baku could offer Israel much more, however – though none believed any deal was yet settled.

The country, home to nine million people whose language is close to Turkish and who mostly share the Shi’ite Muslim faith of Iran, has four ex-Soviet air bases that could be suitable for Israeli jets, the Azeri sources said. They named central Kyurdamir, Gyanja in the west and Nasosny and Gala in the east.

The Pentagon says it helped upgrade Nasosny airfield for NATO use. It also uses Azeri commercial facilities in transit to Afghanistan. But U.S. military aid to Azerbaijan is limited by Washington’s role as a mediator in its dispute with Armenia.

One of the sources with links to the Azeri military said: “There is not a single official base of the United States and even less so of Israel on the territory of Azerbaijan. But that is ‘officially’. Unofficially they exist, and they may be used.”

The source said Iran had been a main topic of talks in April with Israel’s Soviet-born foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman.


Azeri tarmac, a shorter flight from key sites in northern Iran including the Fordow underground uranium enrichment plant and missile batteries at Tabriz, might feature in Israeli war planning in less direct ways, the former Azeri officers said.

With Israel wary of its vulnerability to pressure over air crew taken prisoner, plans for extracting downed pilots may be a key feature of any attack plan. Search and rescue helicopters might operate from Azerbaijan, the sources said – or planes that were hit or low on fuel could land at Azeri bases in extremis.

Such engagement carries risks for Azerbaijan and its oil platforms and pipelines operated with international companies.

Defending against Iran is part of public debate in Baku. The United States has provided Azerbaijan with three Coast Guard cutters and has funded seven coastal radar sites as well as giving Baku other help in protecting its oil installations.

Relations have long been strained between the former Soviet state and Iran, which is home to twice as many ethnic Azeris as Azerbaijan itself. Tehran beams an Azeri-language television channel over the border which portrays Aliyev as a puppet of Israel and the West, as well as highlighting corruption in Baku.

Azerbaijan sees Iranian hands behind its Islamist opposition and both countries have arrested alleged spies and agitators.

Faced with an uneven balance of force, Aliyev’s government makes no bones about Israel being an ally. As one presidential aide, speaking on condition of anonymity, explained: “We live in a dangerous neighborhood; that is what is the most powerful driving force for our relationship with Israel.”

However, Israel’s confrontation with Iran may turn out, the arms build-up in Azerbaijan, including recent Israeli upgrades for its Soviet T-72 tanks, may have consequences for the wider region and for the stand-off with Armenia – consequences that would trouble all the powers with stakes in the Caspian region.

“We keep buying arms. On the one hand, it’s a good strategy to frighten Armenia,” one of the former Azeri officers said of the shaky, 18-year-old ceasefire over Nagorno-Karabakh. “But you don’t collect weapons to hang on the wall and gather dust.

“One day, all these could be used.”

(Additional reporting by Dan Williams in Jerusalem and Phil Stewart in Washington; Editing by Alastair Macdonald)

Israel Strikes Syria with Tactical Nuke

This is far from the first time Israel has used nuclear weapons against it’s enemies

by Ian Greenhalgh and Jeff Smith

Late on Saturday night, 28th April, a series of airstrikes hit Syria, local time was 10:30pm, about 2 hours after sunset. Of particular interest is the strike that hit a target hear Hama, supposedly an arms depot. This strike produced an explosion of such massive magnitude that it shook the earth violently enough for the tremors to be picked up by seismic monitoring stations in Europe which recorded a magnitude 2.6 earthquake.

An explosion on the earth’s surface, in order to cause tremors between 2 and 3 on the Richter scale, would be between 1.5 and 3 kilotonnes TNT equivalency. Clearly this was a tactical nuclear weapon and the arms depot story is the usual cover automatically issued when there is a suspiciously big bang.

There is very little video available of the explosion, however at 2 mins 36 seconds into the video below, there is a white flash visible:

Although there has been no official statement from either Tel-Aviv or Damascus, it is clear that this strike was carried out by the Israelis. Most likely they used a GBU-28 carried by an F-15 and ‘toss bombed’ onto the target after approaching over Lebanon at low level then climbing to cross the Anti-Lebanon Mountains, releasing the weapon at the apex of their climb then immediately turning and running for home.As you can see in the photos published by Al-Masdar, the target was totally obliterated, this is the aftermath of a tactical nuclear strike – everything reduced to rubble. Note the shipping containers blown around like toys, the blown back trees and a very large shallow crater. Too big for a standard weapon of 1,000lb size. It appears to be a low altitude air blast causing the 2.6 magnitude quake. Every thing was vapourised no soot / carbon present on the ground. Only steel car parts left intact that were melted at high temp. No aluminium meaning that the heat was over 3,000 deg in order to vapourise it away.

A US Air Force (USAF) F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft from the 492nd Fighter Squadron, Royal Air Force (RAF) Lakenheath, United Kingdom (UK) releases a GBU-28 “Bunker Buster” 5,000-pound Laser-Guided Bomb over the Utah Test and Training Range during a weapons evaluation test hosted by the 86th Fighter Weapons Squadron (FWS) from Eglin AFB, Florida (FL).

A big blast like this is over 20,000 lbs so definitely not conventional explosives. Small arms and artillery rounds go off like pop corn in a microwave oven. Conventional blasts throw up lots of dirt with a small fire ball.

These huge plasma fireball/mushroom cloud explosions are small neutron bombs using lots of lithium 6 with a thin outer shell of fissile material. Very clean burn with minimal fallout; After several hours radiation would be almost undetectable above background.

These tactical neutron bombs are likely uranium-based in order to mask their use. They are either older warheads from surplus SS-21 missiles from Russia/Ukraine or newer Israeli-made stuff using the surplus US stocks transferred under Daddy Bush. This is why both sides are quiet on their use. Much of this black market nuclear proliferation happened under Hilary and Tom Countryman at T-section of the US State Dept. This is why Trump fired Countryman and cleaned out T-section – they let the stuff out the back door.

Soviet-era Short-Range Ballistic Missile OTR – 21 “Tochka”. NATO Designation SS-21 “Scarab”. It could carry a small nuclear warhead with an adjustable yield of 5-150 kilotons.

Thus far there has been no official statement on this strike by Damascus, Moscow or Tehran, most likely there never will be any public acknowledgement that a nuke was used, just as there has never been on any of the many other occasions they have been used.

Reported missile strikes in Syria produced earthquake-like results

A series of powerful explosions that rocked military installations in Syria’s Aleppo and Hama provinces were apparently so powerful they were treated as earthquakes by a European monitoring center.

The tremors, ranked as a Magnitude 2.6 quake by the European-Mediterranean Seismological Center, were apparently detected in the aftermath of “powerful explosions” that occurred at the “the arms depot of the 47th brigade of the Syrian army” near Hama in the aftermath of the alleged attack, though the exact cause of this quake has yet to be determined.

According to Israeli newspaper Haaretz, the missile attacks that apparently hit several Syrian government military bases on Saturday evening might’ve been conducted by Israeli forces, though the country’s representatives have refused to comment on the issue.

Earlier on Sunday, Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman stated that Israel would continue to maintain its freedom to operate in Syria.

“We have no intention to attack Russia or to interfere in domestic Syrian issues. But if somebody thinks that it is possible to launch missiles or to attack Israel or even our aircraft, have no doubt we will respond, and we will respond very forcefully,” he said at an annual Jerusalem Post conference.


Suspected Israeli attack completely destroys Syrian missile base in Hama

A powerful attack was carried out last night against the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) in the Hama countryside that killed more than 30 soldiers.

The attack completely destroyed the Brigade 47 Base, causing a massive explosion that could be heard throughout much of the country.

According to a Syrian military source, the attack was carried out by the Israeli Air Force; however, the latter has yet to comment on the allegations.

The military source added that the attack was believed to have been carried out by an Israeli F-35 fighter jet, as the remnants of glide bombs were found at the site.


Non-semite Khazars, speaking Jiddish and not Hebrew


If US is all for sovereignty, it should stop meddling in other countries’ affairs – Lavrov

If US is all for sovereignty, it should stop meddling in other countries’ affairs – Lavrov
If the US cares as much about the concept of sovereignty as President Donald Trump claims, it should stop interfering in the affairs of other countries, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov says.

Statements by top US officials clearly show which country is actually interfering in the affairs of other nations, Lavrov said during a press conference on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly on Friday.

The foreign minister cited Kurt Volker, the US special representative for Ukraine, as an example.

“It would be fine if Volker talked about reconciliation in Ukraine. All he talks about is how Russia is to blame for everything,”Lavrov said.

“And then he takes the liberty of saying things like ‘Russian people deserve freedom’ – that’s the US special representative for Ukraine speaking – ‘And the Ukrainian experience should inspire Russian people.’”

You can probably figure out from this who is calling for meddling and who isn’t.

If the US actually took seriously its own statements about countries worldwide being sovereign, it would be a very welcome development, the Russian foreign minister stated, reflecting on Trump’s speech at the UN General Assembly.

“Trump, among other things, stated that he firmly backs the sovereignty of each nation in the world; I strongly support this,”Lavrov said.

“If the US is adhering that much to sovereignty as the basic principle, one maybe shouldn’t tamper with the affairs of other countries.”

If you like this story, share it with a friend!


Mote in the eye? What we know about Israel’s murky ‘nukes’ as Bibi points finger at Iran

Mote in the eye? What we know about Israel's murky ‘nukes’ as Bibi points finger at Iran
During his UN General Assembly (UNGA) speech, the Israeli PM was adamant that Tehran has secret nuclear sites. As Israel keeps playing the blame game, let’s see if they have their own radioactive skeletons in the closet.

Using his cherished ‘presentations,’ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu came out with his new revelations on Thursday, showing aerial photographs of Iranian sites allegedly holding nuclear-related material. It did not take long for Tehran to fire back, saying Tel-Aviv is better to look at its own “undeclared nuclear weapons program.”

While Israel has never admitted – notably, not denied as well – to possess military nukes, RT’s Murad Gazdiev looks at whether Tel Aviv may really be not the right country to point its fingers at others.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Unholy alliance: Israel, apartheid South Africa and nukes

“We stand for Christian Nationalism which is an ally of National Socialism [Nazism],” John Vorster said in 1942. But when the South African Prime Minister visited the Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum in Israel on April 9, 1976, he laid a wreath and said a prayer in Afrikaans in memory of Nazi victims. It was an anomalous situation for the state of Israel, founded on socialist and communitarian values, and as refuge for victims of racial oppression, to have welcomed this top-level proponent of apartheid racism.

A rationale became clear earlier this month with the publication on May 25 of Sasha Polakow-Suransky’s book “Unspoken Alliance: Israel’s Secret Relationship with Apartheid South Africa.”

Chris McGreal, reporting for the UK Guardian, surveyed revelations in the book, written by a U.S. scholar and child of anti-apartheid South African exiles. Polakow-Suransky based his conclusions on interviews and on perusal of 700 declassified documents, released by the current South African government.

According to McGreal, the once secret papers provide “the first official documentary evidence of the [Israeli] state’s possession of nuclear weapons.”

The revelations came about just as United Nations discussions were beginning on nuclear non-proliferation, with a special focus on the Middle East. Israeli spokespersons have denied charges of Israeli nuclear cooperation with apartheid South Africa.

In his book’s preface, Polakow-Suransky provides an explanation for rapprochement, coming about after years of Israeli support for liberation struggles in Africa. “Material interests gave birth to an alliance that greatly benefited the Israeli economy and enhanced the security of South Africa’s white minority regime,” he writes. Ideology was operating too, he contends. Both the Israeli and apartheid state projected a racist image of a minority people “under siege.”

Israel was looking primarily for a reliable source of yellow cake uranium and, less crucially, for military weapons buyers. South African military leaders, seeking to develop missile capabilities, specifically with nuclear warheads, needed hardware and technical expertise.

South Africa’s offer to buy nuclear armed missiles from Israel, and Israeli officials’ willingness to sell, never resulted in actual transfer of nuclear material. Polakow-Suransky speculates that the South Africans had hopes of adapting their own nuclear weaponry to missile use, thereby saving money.

The main point, however, is that bilateral approval was secured for the deal, and it could have been consummated.

Interviewed by Amy Goodman on “Democracy Now,” the author discussed key documents. One describes Israeli and South African defense officials agreeing March 31, 1975, on the transfer of nuclear-armed Jericho missiles to South Africa. A document from later that day has one of South African military participants in the talks extolling to superiors the security benefits of nuclear armed missiles headed presumably to South Africa. Polakow-Suransky referred to another document from a few days later, the only one with signatures, demonstrating that the two countries’ defense ministers, Shimon Peres and P.W. Botha, had agreed on secrecy. Lastly, documents are presented showing South Africa interested in Israeli missiles, only if they were nuclear equipped.

Delving below the “tip of the iceberg,” Polakow-Suransky told Goodman,  “Throughout the late ’70s and the mid-1980s, these two countries were cooperating in South Africa on building missile technology that the South Africans intended to use for a second generation of their nuclear weapons.”

Another important revelation had to do with yellow cake uranium, which South African had supplied Israel since 1961. The two nations had agreed that South Africa was providing the material exclusively for domestic use. In 1976, South Africa Prime Minister Vorster instructed Minister of Mines Fanie Botha “to release the safeguards on the uranium,” freeing it up for nuclear weapons use.

Polakow-Suransky read from an interview with the now elderly Botha: “I didn’t sell it to them. I didn’t give it to them. But when I became minister, they had it. They couldn’t use it unless South Africa lifted them, the safeguards, so that’s what I did.”

Israel’s role as arms supplier to apartheid South Africa played out as the nation was becoming, as of three years ago, the world’s fourth largest arms purveyor, accounting for 10 percent of all arms exports.

From the 1960s on, weaponry buyers included notable human rights abusers, including the Pinochet and Somoza regimes in Chile and Nicaragua, along with El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras. Oil – rich Angola and Nigeria are Israel’s top African arms buyers now, with Kenya, worried about Somalia, getting in line this year.



W. T. Whitney Jr.

W. T. Whitney Jr.

W.T. Whitney Jr. grew up on a dairy farm in Vermont and now lives in rural Maine. He practiced and taught pediatrics for 35 years and long ago joined the Cuba solidarity movement, working with Let Cuba Live of Maine, Pastors for Peace, and the Venceremos Brigade. He writes on Latin America and health issues for the People’s World.



By Norman Ball



The Trumanite Network, the fight for Madisonian Restoration, and WW3

By Norman Ball – In the wake of last week’s downing of a Russian Il-20 surveillance plane in Syria, much speculation has ensued over the retaliatory weapon systems Russia plans to deploy: S-300s vs. S-200s, Krasukha-4 mobile electronic warfare systems, etc.

These are tactical determinants to be sure, not sea-change level paradigm shifts in and of themselves.

By now, most people are aware of Russia’s Ministry of Defense (MOD) laying the blame squarely on Israel, when a more diplomatic response might have diluted the culpability to include Syrian incompetence and S-200 operator error. This conclusion is clearly at odds, and not just tonally, with Putin’s rather laconic and diffused assessment: “a chain of tragic, random events”.

There are even more nefarious theories such as one posed here on these very pages that the French frigate Auvergne or even RAF aircraft from the Akrotiri base in Cyprus were responsible for the Tl-20 strike, and that Russia chose to implicate the Israelis instead, one reason being, of course, to avoid inviting a NATO Article 5 response.

Of greater import (than freshly deployed MOD weapon inventories) is the bifurcation evidenced in the Russian response. There’s been a migration from the univocal and measured parsings of Putin, Foreign Minister Lavrov and Press Secretary Peskov to a shared podium populated by a less nuanced, more binary power center consisting of Minister of Defense Shoigu, Deputy Defense Minister Gerasimov, and the so-called Stavka; binary as in, shoot or don’t shoot. How simpler can a march to war get?

In marked contrast to the advisory role of the Security Council of Russia, for example, a Stavka would be operationally focused, tasked with expediting strategic resource allocations in the event of a rapidly evolving, large scale conflict.

In a May 4th Asia Times article, Pepe Escobar predicted such a shift just prior to Putin’s ministerial appointments:

“Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to announce a new government. And a bombshell is in the making. The new cabinet is bound to be a Stavka: that is, a war cabinet.”

In fact the personnel changes were minimal in the new government. And yet Shoigu’s enhanced speaking role, post-Il20, supports the contention that Putin’s range of motion, his up-until-now broad latitude of response, has been curtailed.

Without needing to pass judgment on the long-term efficacy of his absorb-then-counter-strike approach (or whether Russia has simply moved to a good cop/bad cop contrivance), the military-industrial faction at Putin’s back will insist, going forward, on less chess and more hammer.

In short, the Statesman Approach has ceded turf, willingly or otherwise, to the War Cabinet. Many have noted an emergent war cabinet footing in the Trump Administration as well, particularly with the arrival of National Security Adviser John Bolton in April.

Evidence of a converging lethality?

Just as war is a secular trend’s final economic gesture after a series of progressively under-performing business cycles (each successive cycle hobbled by mounting, unassailable debt), the efficacy of statesmanship dissipates in like fashion. Diplomacy becomes an exercise in pushing on rhetorical strings.

Has Putin acceded to a consensual or an imposed power-sharing? We’ll probably never know. Has he been relegated to adjunct status on military affairs? Highly unlikely. Let’s be deferential to the Russian President and call it a more collective response to future incitements. Nonetheless there is an unmistakable whiff of failure. Recourse to war is the ultimate failure of statesmanship.

If the reader will permit a brief philosophical interlude, war’s arrival is as supernatural as it is inevitable. Despite our many retrospective dissections, it routinely exceeds our efforts to fully understand and thus avert; at best, we succeed only in postponing it.

Lincoln said it best in his 1865 Second Inaugural near the conclusion of the American Civil War:

“On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all sought to avert it…Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.”

Human agency flatters itself as being the Prime Mover. Not so. War, of some cryptic accord, governs its own arrival.

And the war came.

In the Syrian theater today, human co-agency finds itself at an all-too-human impasse. Yesterday, Israel’s Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu asserted that the IDF will continue operations to prevent Iran from establishing a Syrian foothold. This was in response to Russian Defense Minister Shoigu’s declaration the day before that the S-300 air defense systems and automated air defense management systems were on their way to Syria. Where is the conceivable walk-back for either side? The fuse is lit at both ends.

We are at an immovable object – irresistible force moment where elaborate pretexts and false flags recede in importance. How will a sickening slide to war be averted now? One senses, in the impasse, war’s hell-bent determination to arrive.

Another pressing casus belli

Straddling the two primordial nemeses –Land Power and Sea Power– there exists a hybridized, destabilizing construct, the Pipeline; call it land as oceanic usurper.

The Nordstream 2 pipeline project is one leading economic indicator that could forever alter the geopolitics beneath its ‘feet’. And it appears, despite President Trump’s most valiant efforts, to be a ‘go’.

The Berlin-to-Moscow pivot, should it proceed from this key connectivity, will extend Eurasian consolidation immeasurably. Here’s Tom Luongo recently with what amounts to a Mackinderite/Great Game interpretation:

“U.S. and British foreign policy has been obsessed for more than a hundred years with stopping the natural alliance between Germany’s industrial base and Russia’s vast tracts of natural resources as well as Russia’s own science and engineering prowess.

These two countries cannot, in any version of a unipolar world dominated by The Davos Crowd, be allowed to form an economic no less political alliance because the level of coordination and economic prosperity works directly against their goals of lowering everyone’s expectations for what humans can accomplish.”

George Friedman (formerly of Stratfor, more recently of Geopolitical Futures) has for years offered much the same rationale for the great wars of the modern era, below:


There is a Left Hand and Right Hand at play in the world, each belonging to the same anatomy despite great efforts to obscure their dark connectivity. Opinions vary on the neural center. Suffice to say both hands are, at the moment, enacting their shadow-play with eerie simultaneity –one globally, the other closer to home.

Speaking of closer to home (for me anyway), let us touch briefly upon the battle currently underway in the US. The American domestic climate has everything to do with what’s transpiring on WW3’s formative fronts.

The Trump Russian Collusion narrative is collapsing at calamitous speed, exposed for the whole-cloth fiction it is.

The fact is the Syrian and NATO war theaters are being brought to a boil at precisely the same time the US flank of the Deep State (really the overarching Five Eyes transnational consortium of surveillance agencies that actively operate as One while maintaining the mirage of discrete and ‘cooperating’ national entities) is under unprecedented attack and potential exposure.

MI6 and GCHQ are all over the backstage shadow-play. Too many of the Collusion key players possess Five Eyes credentials: Stefan Halper (CIA, MI6), Joe Mifsud (MI6), Christopher Steele (MI6), Alexander Downer (ASIS, MI6), Robert Hannigan (GCHQ). That ‘former’ MI6 spy Chris Steele is consistently portrayed as a rogue retiree with a personal grudge against the President is a telling bit of institutional misdirection.




Herein may lie the rationale behind Trump’s uncharacteristic reversal, specifically his September 21st retraction of a September 17th declassification order demanding vast troves of FBI un-redactions. How so? Because the request drew much bigger fish than the usual and expected slate of domestic adversaries known as the American ‘Deep State’.

See more on Double Government here.


Among other things, the redactions almost certainly conceal extensive Five Eyes participation. Trump will seek his pound of flesh wherever the plot-line takes him. And it seems to be leading to the international stage, from the ranks of America’s ‘steadfast allies’ no less.


See Trump’s 9/20/18 interview here (at 2:50):


And his next-day tweet here:


Donald J. Trump


I met with the DOJ concerning the declassification of various UNREDACTED documents. They agreed to release them but stated that so doing may have a perceived negative impact on the Russia probe. Also, key Allies’ called to ask not to release. Therefore, the Inspector General…..

And Fox News’ Judge Napolitano here at 0:16, eighteen months ago on March 14, 2017:

Australia and the UK leaders are likely to have collapsed in a heap at the prospect of the Trump un-redactions. Suddenly Trump has been presented with a transnational cache of fresh leverage. The declassification hook drew a couple of foreign whales. So it’s been retracted pending a more ambitious fishing expedition.

Ponder too (particularly after listening to Napolitano, above) the earth-shaking ramifications of the following headlines:


“UK and Australian Governments Revealed as Central Players in Attempted Coup of US President”


“Seeking to Avoid an NSA Imprimatur, President Obama Directly Sought GCHQ Intervention in an Effort to Subvert His Elected Successor, Trump”


What are the NATO implications alone?

And what countermeasures will pour forth to avoid/displace such a headline? America’s Dept of Justice/FBI participants in this attempted coup are suddenly reduced to mere parochial players in a burgeoning geopolitical tsunami of unprecedented magnitude. Faced with such abject exposure (not to mention cries of treason) Five Eyes has little choice but to unleash a diversionary countermeasure of similar scale.

That would be WW3.

Conclusion? The Russian ‘shift’ is commensurate with the heightened need in the West for a diversionary conflagration. Born in the aftermath of WW2, Five Eyes requires the ‘rejuvenative effects’ (heaven help us) of WW3. No matter that, in FVEY’S relentless pursuit of open-air lockdown, we might all die.

Call it panopticonic nihilism or Kafka’s cage in search of a post-nuclear bird.

The planet’s inexorable slide to war is the elephant in the CNN soundstage. With luck, we’ve seen the last of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s endless parade of fact-devoid assault victims, allowing us, here in the US anyway, to focus anew on that most pressing of national pastimes: Trump-bashing on the edge of the abyss.

Is Vladimir Putin evil? (2/3)

Almost from the very start of his presidency, Vladimir Putin has been relentlessly vilified in the western media. If their portrayal of Mr. Putin reflected the objective truth, we should believe that the man has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. As I noted in the first in this series of excerpts from Grand Deceptionsystematic demonization of a nation’s leader predisposes many people to consent to war or regime change as means to help a stricken nation rid itself of a rotten, tyrannical leader. If we detest Vladimir Putin, we might approve of our intelligence communities orchestrating a coup to throw him out of power, even if the blood of some Russians is spilled in the process. It should be an honorable deed done for a greater good. Indeed, those who are desperate to have a regime change in Russia should be very keen for us to detest Mr. Putin. Hence the nonstop, un-nuanced negative coverage. Here I offer a different perspective: what if Putin isn’t an arch-villain? What if he does in fact have redeeming qualities? Should we not try to get to know the man a bit better before we shrug off another regime change or war to rid the world of tyrants?

putin on holiday

© Kremlin

According to his chief of security, Alexander Korzhakov, Boris Yeltsin worked about two hours per day. The rest he spent eating, drinking, playing tennis, hunting or enjoying some other pastime. Vladimir Putin reportedly works exceptionally long hours and several of his advisers and ministers have testified to working with him until very late into the night and then receiving a call from him early in the morning the next day. Exiled banker and former oligarch Sergei Pugachev described his experience:

we hardly parted company, we met on a daily basis – from early morning to late evening until 3, until 4 AM, every day, every day. We naturally discussed matters of state business development, the state of the economy and so on. Putin needed someone who understood and knew those matters well.” (Harding, Smith and Maynard 2015)

Some of his advisors and ministers reported meeting with him to discuss some matter within their own domain of specialty only to be startled in realizing that Putin commanded a more detailed understanding of that very matter than they themselves had. Being that immersed in and devoted to his occupation enables Vladimir Putin to hold his famous marathon press conferences when he speaks for three or four hours answering journalists’ questions with accurate and detailed information and without teleprompters. His 14th annual call-in marathon in 2016 lasted 3 and a half hours during which he took and answered 80 questions! Most western politicians no longer dare to face any public forums without pre-packaged and rehearsed speeches, which they read off teleprompters, taking only a handful of questions from friendly reporters before their handlers usher them away from any potential embarrassment.

Fight against terrorism

Russia and the United States have had one major thing in common in the 21st century: their respective wars against terrorism. As the United States took its war on terror to Afghanistan and Iraq, Russia had been fighting her own war on terror in Chechnya which went on for nearly ten years, from August 1999 to April 2009. In the Summer of 2015, only six years after the hostilities had ceased Time magazine’s correspondent Simon Shuster visited Chechnya. He reported that:

“Chechnya has undergone a striking transformation. Its cities have been rebuilt with money from Moscow. All traces of its separatist rebellion have been suppressed.” (Shuster and Martinelli 2015)

Indeed, Chechnya under Putin has attained the highest levels of prosperity it’s ever had. The video clip embedded with Shuster’s article related how:

“The kids growing up in Chechnya these days are a lot luckier than their parents and grandparents. At least the youngest ones have only known their homeland to be a peaceful and even quite beautiful place, full of enormous mosques and skyscrapers and shopping districts and fast food joints.”

By contrast, the American war on terror has left chaos and disorder in all nations it has touched, from Afghanistan and Iraq, to Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and Sudan. Kosovo, which has been a de-facto American protectorate since the year 2000, is today the poorest and most corrupt nation in Europe with massive population exodus and unemployment in excess of 35%. The ever sanctimonious West has frequently accused Vladimir Putin of heavy-handedness in his fight against Chechen terrorists (whom they usually call “rebels” or “separatists”), but this is an arbitrary and meaningless reproach. Western analysts may know what distinguishes a gentle war on terror from the ruthless kind, but this is a pointless debate that I would propose to settle by “judging them by their fruits.”

Forgiving Cuba’s debts

When Vladimir Putin visited Cuba in 2014, he wrote off 90 percent of the Cuba’s $32 billion debt owed to Russia from Soviet times. Conceivably, this may have been a calculated gesture made with some ulterior motive favorable to Russia’s interests. Even so, the gesture was remarkable because at that time, Western creditors led by the IMF had been pushing a cruel and inhumane austerity program on Greece for full repayment of her own debts. The same IMF that had raided Russia twenty years prior was now forcing an economic strangulation on Greece with similar effects on that country as it had on Russia in the 1990s.

putin cuba castro

The deranged mindset of Greece’s creditors was on display during the Brussels Group meeting in March of 2015. As Greece was coming dangerously close to defaulting on her debt obligations, the delegation representing her creditors suggested to Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis that his government would be able to service its debts by withholding payment of public employee salaries and pensions for two months. Recommending outright theft of money from ordinary Greeks did not seem to faze or embarrass Greece’s enterprising creditors.

One and a half years later, in November of 2016, the “leader of the free world,” US President Barack Obama, came to Greece on his last official visit. On that occasion, he offered neither help nor debt relief. Instead, he rubbed more salt into the country’s wounds by reiterating that Greece had to continue to press on with austerity, which had already pushed its economy into a crushing depression.

Regardless of motives and national interests, Vladimir Putin’s gesture in Cuba stood in sharp contrast to that of Greece’s creditors and U.S. President Obama. In essence, Vladimir Putin’s gesture toward Cuba was generous and humane. At the same time, West’s treatment of Greece has been inhumane and cruel.

Edward Snowden asylum

In June of 2013, U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden unveiled the massive extent of the NSA’s global surveillance program that illegally collected nearly all electronic and telephone communications of ordinary, law-abiding Americans and foreign nationals. Exposing the secrets of the American (and British) surveillance state turned Edward Snowden into a wanted man overnight and the CIA mounted one of their most massive manhunts ever. To evade capture, on Sunday, 23rd Jun 2013, Snowden boarded an Aeroflot flight from Hong Kong to Moscow. His plan was to fly on to Cuba and from there to another South American country, possibly Venezuela or Ecuador. The U.S. government charged him with espionage and began immediately to pressure various governments around the world to apprehend Snowden and extradite him. By the time his flight from Hong Kong landed at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport, American authorities revoked his passport and he was unable to continue his trip from Moscow, at which point his whereabouts became unclear.

Two days later, on 25th June, Vladimir Putin confirmed that Snowden was still at Sheremetyevo, that he was a free man, that he may choose his own final destination and that Russia would not arrest or extradite him. Through various channels, the U.S. government spent the following days trying to persuade their Russian counter parts to seize Snowden and turn him over. So keen were the Americans on getting Snowden that when they thought that he might attempt to flee Russia on the presidential jet belonging to the Bolivian President Evo Morales, they ordered the French, Spanish, Italian and Portuguese authorities to breach international law and deny Bolivian President’s flight access to their airspace, forcing his aircraft to land in Vienna where President Morales and his crew were detained for 14 hours.

The CIA’s information that Snowden was on the plane turned out to be false so the whole diplomatic incident only succeeded in unmasking the nature of the relationship between the empire and its European vassals as well as their cavalier attitude toward international law. Apparently laws are there to be broken when the hegemon’s expediency obliges. The incident also showed Edward Snowden that it would have been futile for him to seek asylum with any Western nation allied with the U.S. since they would have been likely to violate their own laws to comply with an American extradition request. As a result, Snowden had little choice but to stay put and request asylum in Russia. On July 1st, Putin stated that Edward Snowden might be granted asylum in Russia on condition that he desists in causing further damage to “our American partners.

Watching these events unfold through late June and July of 2013, I wondered if the Russians wouldn’t in the end get Edward Snowden and trade him for some big concession from their “American partners,” who were clearly extremely keen on getting the renegade whistle-blower. I remember thinking that the outcome of that incident would give us an important indication of what Vladimir Putin was made of: would he do the right thing and offer Snowden asylum and protection, or would he end up trading him off? My gut feeling was that Putin would indeed do the right thing, but at the same time I cringed at the thought that I might end up disappointed. After several weeks of legal procedures, on July 31st 2013, Snowden was granted asylum in Russia.

Today (it’s late March 2017), Edward Snowden has been living as a free man in Russia for nearly four years, thanks largely to Vladimir Putin’s principled stand and courage in defying American pressure. If not for his asylum in Russia, Snowden would today most likely be serving a very long prison sentence for doing his patriotic duty.

To be continued

About the author

Alex Krainer is a hedge fund manager and author. His book, twice banned by Amazon in September 2017 and again in August 2018 is now available in pdf, kindle, and epub formats at the following link “Grand Deception: Truth About Bill Browder, the Magnitsky Act and Anti-Russian Sanctions.” Paperback version published by Red Pill Press is now available here. Alex also wrote one book on commodities trading.