Modern man’s worldview is almost entirely shaped by images of events for which he himself was not present. For example, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the tearing down of the Berlin Wall, and the collapse of the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers on September 11th, 2001. These are events with which everyone is intimately familiar, regardless of whether they were even alive when they took place. The terror of the atom bomb, and its implications during the Cold War, would have been nothing without the iconic images of mushroom clouds rising up from the Earth and parting the clouds.
Epictetus, the Stoic philosopher, said that, “Men are disturbed not by the things which happen, but by their opinions about the things.” This is as true today as it was over two-thousand years ago. What can also be said is that man’s opinions are shaped by the lens through which he views the world.
Take, for example, the existence of starving Africans. In of itself, their existence means nothing. People all over the world go hungry every day, even in the United States of America. Is the problem worse in African countries and other third-world nations? Absolutely. But why do Africans specifically trigger such emotion in the masses? It is because of the photographs.
These two images, the first taken in the 1980s and the second in the 1990s, are world famous. The second won the Pulitzer Prize for Feature Photography in 1994. They were taken by Mike Wells and Kevin Carter, respectively. They aren’t famous because they portray starving Africans; starving Africans are famous because of these photos. There are millions of images of starving children all over the world, what makes these two stick in the public consciousness is that they were expertly framed and shot. They are masterfully composed, respecting both the rule of thirds and the golden ratio, along with a whole host of other artistic techniques. Photography isn’t so much about what you present, but how you present it.
Another example would be how the public perceives political figures. Take for example Donald Trump. What words usually come to mind when one hears his name? Crass, crude, obnoxious, distasteful, buffoonish, lowbrow, lecherous, and so much more, but that last thing one would think of would be dignified. This is also because of the photographs that exist of Donald J. Trump:
Whether this is entirely intentional or not is up for debate, but what is certain is that Trump will never be respected. It’s too late for that; this interpretation has been firmly planted into the public perception.
Now compare Trump’s image with that of Adolf Hitler’s. What words come to mind when one thinks of Hitler? Even to those that hated him, Hitler was never a buffoon. This is thanks to the brilliant photographers of the Third Reich.
Powerful, yet not pretentious, charismatic, yet still kind. The imagery portrayed in these photographs is so good that Jews to this day are still trying to make an ass of Adolf in their Hollywood productions. However, it simply will not work, because we can see the photographs, and the photographs are proof of who he really was. No cartoon or comic portrayal can erase these pictures. That is why good photography is absolutely vital to any propaganda campaign.
Look at how the media portrays White Nationalists:
The perception that one acquires if they have never interacted with White Nationalists in their own lives is that we’re nothing more than a bunch of degenerate drug addicts – crass, crude, and violent. They see men with Hitler Youth haircuts punching women, and sickly looking men and women with Swastika tattoos. If this was an image that helped us, they wouldn’t be broadcasting it to the world, they would be ignoring it.
Now look at how the media portrays Black Nationalists:
Neat, tidy, and organized. In total opposition to the chaotic image of White Nationalists. Complaining about this bias wont change anything, though. Jews of course control the media, so they will portray things as they wish to portray things. That is why we need photographers of our own.
Imagine for a moment if the Third Reich didn’t have people like Leni Riefenstahl on their side. Imagine for a moment if the Third Reich relied on Jewish photographers to present their image to the public. How do you think that would have turned out? Do you think the countless images of Hitler with animals and children would exist? Do you think the images showing off the brilliant order of German speeches and parades would be in the public consciousness?
Of course not. We would be left in the dark about the majesty of the Third Reich. We would have nothing but words to describe it, and who ever really believes words that stand on their own?
What our movement is doing now is akin to that imaginary scenario of a Third Reich without film or photography of their own. We need professional quality images of our people heroically defending their right to exist. Without that, no one will believe we have what it takes to win back our world from the parasites that are sucking it dry. No one will believe that we actually exist.
We are currently living in a world where Jewish pornographers are using better propaganda techniques to sell interracial pornography to the masses then we are using to promote our own future. Compare Greg Aouizerate’s (aka Greg Lansky’s) work, to that of whoever is out there photographing Patrick Little.
What the Jews have realized is that they can sell pornography in public, even the most vile sorts of it, so long as they make it look stylish, and “safe for work” in its advertising materials. Lansky has admitted in interviews with Rolling Stone and Forbes that he bases his marketing off of the tactics of companies like Apple and Versace; he is taking his role as pornographer more seriously than Andrew Anglin has taken his entire life. The advertisement above looks like it could be for a sunscreen company, or any other professionally advertised product, but it’s not, it’s for interracial cuckold pornography. While Patrick Little can’t even find a photographer who can include the Israeli Flag in the image which is supposed to show off him stepping on it. This is pathetic.
If we are to accomplish anything, we need to get serious. Digital cameras are not expensive these days; anyone can get a decent one along with a decent lens for less than a thousand dollars. The materials to learn about composition, color, and everything else there is to know about visual storytelling is free to all, thanks to the internet. We have no excuse to be this bad at what we are doing. A hundred years ago we had people doing a better job in this medium than the Jews ever have and we can do it again if we simply have the will to make it so!
The future of our race is in our hands. If we are to blaze a trail towards a better world, we must first shape our own image into something that commands respect and displays dignity. Until we master our own media, the Jews will continue to cast us as their villains instead of the heroes that we truly are.
Your Enemy and Mine: The Media
Fully complicit in the wars on Iraq and Libya and Syria, the media came baying out of its kennel in support of the missile attack on Syria last Saturday morning. Trump, May and Macron lied to get the attack going and then lied again to justify what they had done. Macron is stripping Bashar al Assad of his Legion d’Honneur whereas, for lying and violating international law, he should be stripped of his job. So should the tweeter-in-chief, Donald Trump, and Theresa May. The sight of British MPs standing up in the House of Commons one after the other to repeat her untruths was a truly repellent sight. The ‘mother of parliaments’ had been turned into a frowsy old tart.
These three had no proof that the Syrian government was behind the chemical weapons attack in Douma. The evidence is now pouring in is that there was no such attack. There was a set-up by the takfiris and the usual pack of terrorist enablers, rushing into the clinic screaming ‘Chemicals! Chemicals!’ and videoing the people there as they hosed them down and pretended to be treating the symptoms of a chemical weapons attack. This is the evidence of doctors and other medical staff. No-one nearby heard of a chemical weapons attack or saw it. All say it was a fake, as it was, sucked up yet again and presented as truth by an ever-accommodating media. The only gas attacks we have had have been verbal, from the White House, 10 Downing St and the Elysee Palace, smelly and disgusting to hear but fortunately not lethal.
As was the case after the alleged chemical weapons attack on the outskirts of Damascus in August, 2013, the fate of the apparently dead children shown in some of the videos shot by the takfiris and/or their supporters in Douma is not even an issue. Were they killed so they could be used for terrorist propaganda? Even the thought is monstrous but then the atrocities committed by these groups have been monstrous.
The media showed no interest in the children who appeared to have been killed by the takfiris in 2013 and it is showing no interest in the children of Douma either, who they were, what actually happened to them and where they were buried if they actually died. The use of children as terrorist props has been a running feature of this war. Has it actually gone as far as the killing of children, possibly Alawis, who are entirely disposable as far as the takfiris are concerned, men, women and children? The issue is real, it is shocking, it is appalling and the images of these children are heartbreaking. We need to know the truth but the media is not interested now that the takfiri-White Helmets propaganda has served the purpose of bringing on a missile strike. Dead children are apparently only relevant only if it can be shown the ‘regime’ killed them.
The real evidence of chemical weapon attacks or pending attacks lay in the workshops where Jaysh al Islam stored and cooked up its material. In one there were dockets for the receipt of material on Jaysh al Islam letterhead. In an underground passage a journalist found more documents, charred but still readable, referring to missile attacks in the centre of Damascus and projects for the use of chemical weapons, including white phosphorus. Enormous quantities of ammunition, especially mortar shells, were stacked in various parts of this underground city.
Virtually none of this was reported in the mainstream media. On the basis of allegations by a terrorist group and its White Helmet enablers, Trump, May and Macron fired more than 100 missiles into Syria. They might have been told lies but they were lies they wanted to hear and wanted the world to believe, in order to push further their attack on Syria and Russia. Trump boasted of destroying Syria’s ‘chemical weapons arsenal.’ In fact, Syria does not have a chemical weapons arsenal. It does not have chemical weapons, period. They were all destroyed under the authority of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in 2013/14. The OPCW has continually monitored Syria and there is no evidence of a revived chemical weapons program. The alleged chemical weapons plant at Barzeh was what the Syrian government and its staff says it was, a scientific research institute, now destroyed as thoroughly as the Al Shifa pharmaceuticals factory in Khartoum, the biggest in Sudan and a central element in its health care system, hit by 14 Cruise missiles in August, 1998, on the orders of President Clinton. The motive for the attack was the same lie, that it was actually producing chemical weapons.
The media is not revealing or exposing but covering up. Through the propaganda it has been running over the past eight years it is fully complicit in the attack on Syria. Douma came so hard on the heels of the Skripal affair that one has to wonder whether they were planned in sequence. Sergei Lavrov has information showing that the agent used against the Skripals was BZ, developed in the US, incapacitating but not deadly, explaining why the Skripals did not die virtually immediately, had the active agent been Novichok as claimed. The Swiss lab which discovered the BZ in the sample it was given is refusing to confirm Lavrov’s claim, while not denying it. If true, the admission would pull down the roof on the American and British governments.
The British delegate to the OPCW has now conceded that his government did not have the evidence it claimed to have had. He said the OPCW had not determined the origin of the agent or the country where it was produced. This seems unlikely and it is not the same as saying the OPCW had not been able to determine origin and source. The scientists would almost certainly have their suspicions if not a short list of countries which could have produced the BZ agent, but unfortunately, they might not include Russia. The issue is so explosive, politically, that no-one should expect anything from the OPCW but waffle and uncertainty, tilted against Russia if the UK and the US can exert enough pressure, whatever it actually knows.
When the British government expelled Russian diplomats, and persuaded other governments to do the same, it did not know which country produced the agent that incapacitated the Skripals (unless of course MI5 set this up, with the full authority of the May government). Even as far as it goes this admission by the British OPCW delegate is damning. Britain launched a missile attack on another country on the basis of supposition, speculation and innuendo. It is truly shocking but the British media is refusing to hold the politicians to account, preferring endless attacks on Jeremy Corbyn.
The evidence coming out of Douma shows that there was no chemical weapons attack. It was yet another fabrication by the takfiris and their White Helmet terrorist enablers, another lie allowing another missile attack on Syria. Film coming out of Douma is showing an extraordinary underground network of tunnels which could not possibly have been built just with pickaxes, as Robert Fisk has suggested, but only with heavy drilling equipment under the supervision of trained engineers. Did Jaysh al Islam just happen to have such specialists on hand, and if not, where did they get them from? These tunnels were big enough in some cases for motorized transport and were used for getting people (including prisoners moved from other areas of the Ghouta) in or out as well as for the movement of weapons.
Apart from the chemical weapon workshops, complete with dockets for the receipt of material on Jaysh al Islam letterhead, there were piles of charred documents found elsewhere referring to missile attacks in the centre of Damascus and projects for the use of chemical weapons, including white phosphorus. There were cells and cages for prisoners and great piles of weaponry, including thousands of mortar shells ready to be filled and fired. Somehow great stretches of the mainstream media have found none of this newsworthy, to the point of ignoring it altogether. Only Tucker Carlson has had the guts to pull the plug on it. For his bravery, he is being called a traitor, a Putin stooge and all the rest of it.
It is the media that has run the war on Syria just as it enabled the wars on Iraq and Libya and almost any other war you can think of. There has been virtually no ‘reporting’ of Syria in the mainstream as the word used to be understood. There has been misinformation and disinformation falsely packaged as news. There has been the enabling of a dishonest government narrative, complicity, in other words, not objectivity and balance. The media is deceiving the people whose interests it should be protecting and protecting the interests of those who are deceiving them. We have seen this so many times before that no-one should be surprised but it is still disgraceful. In and over Syria the media has played up or played down, according to need, playing up anything that might damage the ‘regime’ and playing down to the point of ignoring it altogether anything that might damage the ‘rebels.’ The ‘fourth estate’ has completely lost its way and should not be surprised that it has lost the trust and confidence of its readers and viewers as well.
*(An image grab taken from a video released by the Douma City Coordination Committee shows unidentified volunteers spraying a man with water at a make-shift hospital following an alleged chemical attack on the town of Douma, Syria, April 7, 2018. Image courtesy of AFP)