Trump’s IQ Under 90: Trump Campaign Says It’s ‘Preparing’ To Sue Cliff Sims Over Tell-All Book

Featured Investigations The Gordon Duff Files

Editor’s note:  So many are trying to represent Trump in a positive light.  Truth is, even Congress, the biggest pack of morons yet, has written him off even though he has widened the feeding trough of the GOP with his climate denialism and massive fake military spending.

What is coming is a book that simply describes a White House of losers that sit around and act tough, grab each others dicks and, just like Trump, brag about women they’ve paid for.

Too many of us are beginning to think this is exactly the government America deserves.  America, all that is left, is a ‘state of mind,’ no longer a nation, that some who love individual freedom and accomplishment, who love human values and sacrifice, still hold dear.

We are the real 1%.

Daily Beast: President Trump’s re-election campaign said Monday that it is preparing to sue former White House staffer Cliff Sims for violating his non-disclosure agreement in his new tell-all book about his experience in the White House.

“The Trump campaign is preparing to file suit against Cliff Sims for violating our NDA,” Michael Glassner, the chief operating officer for the Trump 2020 campaign, tweeted Tuesday morning. President Trump called Sims a “gofer” whom he hardly knew in a tweet, all while the author was live on CNN.

The book, Team of Vipers: My 500 Extraordinary Days in the Trump White House, includes a number of new revelations. Sims responded to Trump’s Twitter attacks on-air: “My identity is not wrapped up in being a Trump staffer… It doesn’t matter to me what Donald Trump or anyone else says I am.”

McCain May Be Dead, but ‘Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran’ Still Resounds

Pompeo and Bolton both stand by McCain’s ‘Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran.’



Authored by Brian Cloughley via The Strategic Culture Foundation:

In 2007, when making a speech during his bid for the presidency of the United States, the late Senator John McCain spoke about Iran’s supposed nuclear weapons’ programme and when questioned as to whether there might be US reaction to such allegations responded by singing “That old Beach Boys song, Bomb Iran… bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb.”

This jovial retort about killing people by bombing them was not surprising to those who remembered that during the US war on Vietnam McCain was shot down on a mission to bomb a power generation plant in Hanoi, the capital of North Vietnam, in the course of the entrancingly-named Operation Rolling Thunder.  If he hadn’t been shot down before he released his bombs there would almost certainly have been civilian casualties and deaths. Power stations in cities are not manned by soldiers, after all, and around the Hanoi plant there were houses that would doubtless be struck by errant bombs.

But who cares about civilians who are killed or maimed in bombing or rocket attacks?

In Syria, for example, in October 2018 “the US-led coalition was responsible for 46% of civilian casualties from all explosive weapon use in Syria.”  And in November Reuters reported that “At least 30 Afghan civilians were killed in US air strikes in the Afghan province of Helmand, officials and residents of the area said on Wednesday, the latest casualties from a surge in air operations aimed at driving the Taliban into talks.”

Forbes records that “the US has never dropped as many bombs on Afghanistan as it did this year. According to U.S. Air Forces Central Command data, manned and unmanned aircraft released 5,213 weapons between January and the end of September 2018. The UN announced that the number of civilian casualties in the first nine months of 2018 is higher than in any year since it started documenting them in 2009.”  On January 25 Defense Post reported that “Afghanistan is investigating reports that at least 16 civilians including women and children were killed in an airstrike in southern Helmand province, the defense ministry said in a statement.” On and on its goes — Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Afghanistan.

There’s nothing new in this, so far as US Secretary of State Pompeo is concerned. As a member of Congress in 2014 he made it clear that he was one of the bombing club. As The Nation reported, “Representative Mike Pompeo (R-KS), participating in the same [Foreign Affairs Committee] roundtable, urged the United States and its allies to strongly consider a pre-emptive bombing campaign of Iran’s nuclear sites. He said ‘In an unclassified setting, it is under 2,000 sorties to destroy the Iranian nuclear capacity. This is not an insurmountable task for the coalition forces’.”

The fact that when Pompeo was asked at a US Senate hearing in April 2018 if he was supportive of a preemptive strike on Iran he declared “I’m not. I’m absolutely not” is indicative only of the fact that he is given to duplicity.

Which brings us to Trump’s National Security Advisor, John Bolton, who has been an advocate of bombing for many years.  He is the man who declared in November 2002 that “We are confident that Saddam Hussein has hidden weapons of mass destruction and production facilities in Iraq” and four weeks before the US invaded Iraq, according to Israel’s Haaretz newspaper in February 2003, “US Undersecretary of State John Bolton said in meetings with Israeli officials on Monday that he has no doubt America will attack Iraq, and that it will be necessary to deal with threats from Syria, Iran and North Korea afterwards.”

Iraq was duly bombed and rocketed and reduced to chaos, and Bolton was totally unrepentant. In an article in the UK’s Daily Telegraph in 2016 he pronounced that “Iraq today suffers not from the 2003 invasion, but from the 2011 withdrawal of all US combat forces. What strengthened Iran’s hand in Iraq was not the absence of Saddam [Hussein], but the absence of coalition troops with a writ to crush efforts by the ayatollahs to support and arm Shi’ite militias. When US forces left, the last possibility of Iraq succeeding as a multi-ethnic, multi-confessional state left with them. Don’t blame Tony Blair and George W Bush for that failure. Blame their successors.”

In November 2016 Bolton was aptly described by MSNBC host Joe Scarborough as “a massive neocon on steroids” but the Financial Times argues that he is not a neocon, because “Neocons believe US values should be universal. Mr Bolton believes in aggressive promotion of the US national interest, which is quite different.”  Be that as it may, there are some things that are certain, such as that Bolton is a rabid warmonger who avoided serving in Vietnam just like Donald Trump and George W Bush and Bill Clinton and Dick Cheney and many others. (And here it has to be said that my feelings are strong about this, having served in Vietnam in the Australian Army in 1970-71.)

As noted by the Daily News of his Alma Mater, Yale, “though Bolton supported the Vietnam War, he declined to enter combat duty, instead enlisting in the National Guard and attending law school after his 1970 graduation. ‘I confess I had no desire to die in a Southeast Asian rice paddy,’ Bolton wrote of his decision in the 25th reunion book. ‘I considered the war in Vietnam already lost’.”  But now that it is obvious that Washington lost its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Bolton is ready for another one.

In July 2018, while tension between the US and Iran was heightening, the Iranian president, Hassan Rouhani, warned Washington about pursuing a hostile policy against his country, saying “Mr Trump, don’t play with the lion’s tail, this would only lead to regret… America should know that peace with Iran is the mother of all peace, and war with Iran is the mother of all wars.”  That was a red rag to a bull, and Trump responded in his normal way by tweeting “To Iranian President Rouhani: NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE. WE ARE NO LONGER A COUNTRY THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH. BE CAUTIOUS!  — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)”

That is frightening.  Any world leader who tweets such things as “North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States. They will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen” is verging on the psychotic. And, in his own words, the demented.

Trump’s former foreign policy officials were not altogether in favour of having Iran and North Korea suffer unspecified by obviously terrifying consequences for having expressed its views on Trump policy, but now, as the BBC notes, “Mr Trump has built a foreign policy team that is largely on the same page — his page.”

That’s the Fire and Fury Page, and it’s being proof-read and expanded by Pompeo and Bolton.  Stand by for Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran.


Satanistic John Bolton Wants Blood In Venezuela

…by Jonas E. Alexis

Neocon hothead and ethnic cleanser John Bolton has his diabolical eyes on Venezuela. Bolton has a history of grabbing his Zionist binoculars and starting to point fingers at countries that he thinks the United States needs to destroy.

Back in 2015, Bolton wrote an article in the New York Times explicitly declaring that in order “to stop Iran’s bomb,” the United States needed to “bomb Iran.”[1]

In order to make his diabolical case, Bolton had to produce categorical lies, such as the following: “Even absent palpable proof, like a nuclear test, Iran’s steady progress toward nuclear weapons has long been evident.”[2]

The simple fact is that even the intelligence community declared that Iran abandoned that plan long ago. In fact, the evidence that Iran was somehow building a nuclear program was non-existent. As scholarly documentation shows, this was clearly the invention of Israel.[3]

If we ought to give credit where credit is due, it was the Obama administration who finally made a reasonable deal with Iran.[4] Bolton tried to overturn that deal by saying that “President Obama’s approach on Iran has brought a bad situation to the brink of catastrophe.”[5]

Bolton wanted blood in Iran. He wanted mothers and fathers to mourn for their young ones. But he didn’t get blood. President Obama let Bolton dry. So Bolton had to move to a different territory. He wanted to attack North Korea, Syria, and now Venezuela.

Bolton has recently showed up a White House briefing with a yellow legal pad with the following inscription: “5,000 troops to Colombia.”[6] Well, who is going to pay for this, Mr. Bolton? You? Your children? You grandchildren? Or the average American and other decent people who are trying to feed their families? Didn’t you support the Iraq war, which sent a six-trillion dollar bill to the average American?[7]

You see, a Satanist is an apt description of who Bolton really is because he is not willing to submit his appetite and passion to reason and the political order. He wants to steal, kill, and destroy.

It has been reported that “1 million veterans injured from the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.”[8] And “Afghanistan and Iraq veterans are ‘the most damaged generation ever.’”[9] There is more:

“More than half of the 2.6 million Americans dispatched to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan struggle with physical or mental health problems stemming from their service, feel disconnected from civilian life and believe the government is failing to meet the needs of this generation’s veterans.”[10]

We should Satanists like Bolton responsible for this. Americans have had enough of these people. Perhaps it is high time for people to rise up and say, “No, we ain’t gonna take it anymore.”

  • [1] John Bolton, “To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran,” NY Times, March 26, 2015.
  • [2] Ibid.
  • [3] See Gareth Porter, Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare (Charlottesville, VA: Just World Books, 2014); Trita Parsi, Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran, and the United States (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007).
  • [4] Trita Parsi, Losing an Enemy: Obama, Iran, and the Triumph of Diplomacy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017).
  • [5] Bolton, “To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran,” NY Times, March 26, 2015.
  • [6] Deirdre Shesgreen, “John Bolton’s notes on ‘5,000 troops to Colombia’ spark speculation about military intervention in Venezuela,” USA Today, January 28, 2019.
  • [7] Ernesto Londono, “Study: Iraq, Afghan war costs to top $4 trillion,” Washington Post, March 28, 2013; Bob Dreyfuss, The $6 Trillion Wars,” The Nation, March 29, 2013; “Iraq War Cost U.S. More Than $2 Trillion, Could Grow to $6 Trillion, Says Watson Institute Study,” Huffington Post, May 14, 2013; Mark Thompson, “The $5 Trillion War on Terror,” Time, June 29, 2011; “Iraq war cost: $6 trillion. What else could have been done?,” LA Times, March 18, 2013.
  • [8] H. A. Goodman, “6,845 Americans Died and 900,000 Were Injured in Iraq and Afghanistan. Say ‘No’ to Obama’s War.,” Huffington Post, April 14, 2015
  • [9] “The shocking cost of war: Afghanistan and Iraq veterans are ‘the most damaged generation ever’ with almost HALF seeking disability benefits,” Daily Mail, May 28, 2012.
  • [10] Rajiv Chandrasekaren, “A legacy of pain and pride,” Washington Post, March 29, 2014.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.